Next Article in Journal
Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis Impact on Pyrolyzed Cellulose to Produce Bio-Oil
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Biodiesel Synthesis from Honne-Rubber-Neem Oil Blend with a Novel Mesoporous Base Catalyst Synthesized from a Mixture of Three Agrowastes
Previous Article in Journal
PdI2 as a Simple and Efficient Catalyst for the Hydroamination of Arylacetylenes with Anilines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Palm Biochar-Based Sulphated Zirconium (Zr-AC-HSO3) Catalyst for Methyl Ester Production from Palm Fatty Acid Distillate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrothermally Carbonized Waste Biomass as Electrocatalyst Support for α-MnO2 in Oxygen Reduction Reaction

by
Harold O. Panganoron
1,2,3,
Jethro Daniel A. Pascasio
1,
Eugene A. Esparcia, Jr.
1,
Julie Anne D. del Rosario
1 and
Joey D. Ocon
1,2,*
1
Laboratory of Electrochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
2
Energy Engineering Program, National Graduate School of Engineering, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
3
Samar State University–Mercedes Campus, Catbalogan City 6700, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2020, 10(2), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020177
Submission received: 19 December 2019 / Revised: 21 January 2020 / Accepted: 27 January 2020 / Published: 3 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation of Catalysts from Renewable and Waste Materials)

Abstract

:
Sluggish kinetics in oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) requires low-cost and highly durable electrocatalysts ideally produced from facile methods. In this work, we explored the conversion and utilization of waste biomass as potential carbon support for α-MnO2 catalyst in enhancing its ORR performance. Carbon supports were derived from different waste biomass via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) at different temperature and duration, followed by KOH activation and subsequent heat treatment. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-Ray diffraction (XRD) were used for morphological, chemical, and structural characterization, which revealed porous and amorphous carbon supports for α-MnO2. Electrochemical studies on ORR activity suggest that carbon-supported α-MnO2 derived from HTC of corncobs at 250 °C for 12 h (CCAC + MnO2 250-12) gives the highest limiting current density and lowest overpotential among the synthesized carbon-supported catalysts. Moreover, CCAC + MnO2 250-12 facilitates ORR through a 4-e pathway, and exhibits higher stability compared to VC + MnO2 (Vulcan XC-72) and 20% Pt/C. The synthesis conditions preserve oxygen functional groups and form porous structures in corncobs, which resulted in a highly stable catalyst. Thus, this work provides a new and cost-effective method of deriving carbon support from biomass that can enhance the activity of α-MnO2 towards ORR.

1. Introduction

The use of electrochemical energy technologies, such as batteries and fuel cells, are effective and practical ways of dealing with stability issues brought by intermittent renewable energy sources. At present, lithium-ion chemistries dominate among energy storage technologies and cover a wide array of applications. However, metal-air batteries (MABs) are also seen to address the challenges for renewable energy applications and other niche applications [1,2].
The utilization of ambient air in energy storage applications is constrained by the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) [3]. As such, previous studies have focused on the development of electrocatalysts to enhance ORR performance [4,5,6]. ORR electrocatalysts should provide low ORR overpotential, high durability, and selectivity towards the ideal 4-electron (e) pathway. Moreover, the material should be abundantly available and can be easily synthesized [7]. Electrocatalysts that were previously investigated include precious metals and their alloys, transition metals, metal oxides, and carbon-based materials [1]. Transition metal oxides have also been formed into a matrix with carbon-based structures to improve ORR activity [8,9,10]. Among the transition metal oxides, manganese oxides (MnO2) are widely recognized as suitable ORR catalysts due to their high catalytic activity, low cost, and environmental friendliness [11,12,13].
MnO2 comes in various polymorphs. Two of which, α-MnO2 and δ-MnO2, are reported to have the relatively high ORR catalytic activities [12,13]. The former is considered to have better performance due to higher Mn3+ surface concentration, which allows for more electroactive sites for catalysis [14]. The drawbacks of α-MnO2, however, include poor conductivity and low stability. Thus, catalyst supports such as carbon black, graphene, and carbon nanotubes are typically used to improve MnO2‘s catalytic performance [10,15].
Catalyst supports assist in metal dispersion and morphological formation of the electrocatalyst. As a result, heat and mass transfer properties are enhanced, thereby improving catalyst efficiency [16]. Moreover, interactions of the carbon support and the metal species result in a faster electron transfer and improved absorption/desorption characteristics for oxygen intermediates [17]. Conversion of low-cost carbon-based materials to catalyst supports, however, involves complex methods [18]. Therefore, facile methods for carbon-based support synthesis are investigated in several studies [19,20,21,22,23,24].
For an efficient, low-cost production, carbon can be derived from different sources, including waste biomass [19]. Natural structures in biomass such as periodic patterns, hierarchical organization, and nanoarchitectures allow for special properties such as super hydrophobicity, structural coloration, and biological self-assembly. These structures can also provide networks for electrochemically active sites, which are beneficial for catalysis [20,21]. Mass producible biomass such as jackfruit seeds [19], eggplant [23], and silk [24] have been explored for electrocatalyst materials and showed promising results as carbon-based supports and air electrodes.
Among the different methods used to carbonize biomass, hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is considered as the most cost-effective since it allows for the conversion of high moisture materials [25,26]. HTC requires no prior drying, utilizes water as media, and produces a lignite-like product [27]. This process is carried out at 180–250 °C under autogenous pressure. Carbon and hydrogen in the feedstock undergo decomposition by dehydration and decarboxylation [28]. The properties of the HTC product (called hydrochar) can be controlled by varying the synthesis conditions such as temperature, pH, and residence time [28,29,30,31,32]. Activation using potassium hydroxide (KOH) can also be employed to further enhance the porosity, surface area, and total pore volume of the hydrochar [33].
In this work, we investigate the derivation of carbon supports from different waste biomass materials including corncobs, coffee waste grounds, rice hulls, and coconut lumber sawdust. Their potential viability as carbon supports are then evaluated based on their morphology, and their ORR activity when used as support for α-MnO2. Carbon supports were prepared via HTC at different temperatures and durations, followed by KOH activation. Treatment of waste biomass at 250 °C for 12 h produced carbon-supported MnO2 with the highest ORR catalytic activity. This work provides a new and cost-effective method of deriving carbon supports from biomass through HTC for effective and durable ORR electrocatalysts.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Hydrothermal Carbonization

The presence of oxygen functional groups from cellulose and aromatic carbon bonds in lignin were investigated using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Figure 1). The summary of peaks and the corresponding functional groups are summarized in Table 1.
The HTC process reduced the volatile oxygen functional groups from cellulose (1655, 1310, 1270 and 1050 cm−1). The high thermal stability of lignin [39], however, resulted in the preservation of functional groups in aromatic rings (1600, 1500 and 1450 cm−1). Increasing the temperature from 200 to 250 °C resulted to a higher degree of degradation compared to increasing the HTC duration from 6 to 12 h.
The changes in the morphological structures were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM images of raw and hydrothermally carbonized samples are shown in Figure 2. After HTC, the porous structures are preserved with lignin serving as the backbone [39]. Increasing the HTC temperature resulted in size reduction of globular masses found in the hydrochars. This is due to nucleation and polymerization reactions, which led to the breakage of the fibrous structure and the creation of micrometric cellulose fragments [40]. Similarly, an increase in the residence time resulted in the formation of a different hydrochar with polyaromatic structure, which consists of the polymerized fragments [41]. From the SEM images, rice hull (RH) was observed to have the least surface variation before and after treatment compared to the other samples. Similar observations were made for the HTC of RH in other studies, which were attributed to partial carbonization at the given HTC conditions. Therefore, the hydrochar from RH is expected to have low surface area and pore volumes [42].

2.2. Activation

The hydrochars from the different biomass samples were then subjected to KOH activation followed by heat treatment at 600 °C in an N2 environment. The effect of activation on the functional groups of hydrochars was then examined using FTIR, as shown in Figure 3. Results showed reduction of peak strength of the functional groups in all waste biomass samples due to volatilization and degradation [30,43]. Coffee waste grounds (CWG) and RH showed a relatively higher degree of functional group degradation compared to corncobs (CC) and coconut sawdust (SD). Among the samples subjected to HTC at 250 °C for 12 h prior to activation, activated CWG (CWGAC) and activated RH (RHAC) exhibited the lowest peaks while activated CC (CCAC) and activated SD (SDAC) retained aromatic groups at peaks located at 1655, 1310, 1270 and 1050 cm−1.
The morphological examination of hydrochars after KOH activation and heat treatment are shown in Figure 4. Under the same activation conditions, samples that were pre-carbonized through HTC at 250 °C and 12 h showed higher degrees of formation of porous structures compared to those at lower temperature and residence time. Activation allowed for the opening of more pores, which were not achieved through HTC alone. Increased pore formation translates to formation of networks that can provide active sites for ORR [44]. Further, pre-carbonization reduces the formation of carbonaceous intermediate defects while it increases the micropore formation [45]. The pre-carbonization step (HTC) before activation was therefore essential in achieving stable and effective carbon support structures.
The elemental composition of the raw biomass and activated carbons that were analyzed using energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy are summarized in Table 2. The results show an increase in the carbon concentrations and the reduction of other elements after HTC and KOH activation. Of the samples that were synthesized, CCAC 250-12 showed the highest carbon concentration. Analysis of RHAC 250-12 showed that silicon (Si) was still present after carbonization. EDX data also indicate that there were no metals or other impurities in the synthesized carbon supports other than silicon (in the form of silica), which is inherently present in rice hulls [42]. This result also supports the FTIR results of the samples that were subjected to HTC at 250 °C for 12 h since no peaks were found at 1342–1260 cm−1 and 710–570 cm−1. Such peaks are used to gauge the presence of C–N and C–S bonds respectively [36,37,38].
The crystal phase of activated carbon was determined using XRD (Figure 5). In the analysis, a broad peak was identified at 15–30 degrees, which indicates the presence of amorphous carbon [46,47]. The broad diffraction peaks in 20.8 and 21.6 in XRD pattern refers to the (002) facet [46]. Among the samples, higher intensities were observed for CCAC 250-12 and SDAC 250-12. Sharp peaks that were generated were attributed to the gold (Au) metal holder used in the XRD analysis.

2.3. Incorporation of MnO2

The hydrochars and activated carbons from the different biomass were embedded with an MnO2 catalyst via the hydrothermal method. Figure 6 shows SEM images of activated samples after MnO2 embedding. Based on the images, the change in the surface roughness of the samples indicate that MnO2 was successfully embedded into the carbon supports. In Figure 7, the presence of the α-MnO2 was confirmed by the XRD peaks.

2.4. ORR Activity

In Figure 8, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of activated carbon (AC) derived from hydrochars with embedded α-MnO2 were obtained after three cycles from 0.035 to −0.096 V vs. Ag/AgCl at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte saturated with N2 or O2. The CV curves in the N2-saturated solutions showed capacitive behavior in all cases. The appearance of peaks in the O2-saturated solution is thus attributed to ORR. Well-defined cathodic peaks corresponding to ORR were obtained from CCAC + MnO2 and CWGAC + MnO2 in contrast with RHAC + MnO2 and SDAC + MnO2. In the same figure, CCAC + MnO2 250-12 shows the highest area enclosed in the CV curve, which is indicative of the power per active surface area of the electrocatalyst (W cm−2) resulting to a better ORR performance.
The ORR performance of pure AC were then compared using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) along with hydrochars and AC embedded with α-MnO2 (Figure 9). LSV was carried out at 1600 rpm in 0.1 M KOH solution. The results show that the activation process consistently improved the ORR performance of their unactivated counterparts. The activation process could have potentially increased the open edge sites and curvatures, which assisted oxygen molecules to reach active sites for ORR catalysis [42]. Furthermore, the figures also suggest that the incorporation of α-MnO2 in the activated carbon improved the ORR performance. This is observed also when doped carbon materials were added to the active electrocatalyst in other studies [10,15,18]. Among the samples that were analyzed, hydrochar and activated carbon produced from HTC at 250 °C for 12 h showed the highest performance, which is consistent with the CV results. Increasing the temperature and duration of HTC leads to the formation of micrometric structures [29,35], thereby improving ORR catalytic activity.
The activity of α-MnO2 supported by biomass-derived carbons were also compared with Vulcan XC-72 (VC) supported α-MnO2, and 20% Pt/C (Figure 10). Comparison of the limiting current density (jL), onset potential (Eons), and overpotential of samples are shown in Table 3. Results indicate that among the biomass derived samples, CCAC + MnO2 250-12 exhibited the highest limiting current density (2.85 mA cm-2) and lowest overpotential (0.50 V) at the onset of ORR. However, the values were still lower compared to VC + MnO2 and 20% Pt/C. The large difference between the limiting current density of 20% Pt/C with the different carbon-supported α-MnO2 could be attributed to the loading ratio of α-MnO2 to the carbon support. In the study, α-MnO2 was estimated to constitute 33% of the catalyst loading. The synthesis method, however, involved the direct incorporation of the carbon during α-MnO2 synthesis, which may have resulted in a lower catalyst loading. Investigation of an appropriate α-MnO2 to carbon ratio should be pursued in future works to optimize the performance of the developed carbon-supported electrocatalyst. Onset potentials of hydrothermally-prepared catalysts follow the behavior of biomass derived carbon for ORR since carbonaceous compounds have inherently low ORR activity in alkaline media [48,49,50]. However, if carbon is used as a support for the metal oxide, rather than as a pure electrocatalyst, the conductivity of the composite enhances and facilitates the electron transfer to the electroactive sites of the metal oxide. [51]. The support also provides a conducting network that enables charge transfer on the metal oxide surface during electrochemical reactions such as ORR [52].
The higher performance of the support from corncobs compared to the other biomass can be attributed to the structures left after HTC and KOH activation as discussed in the FTIR results. The regions 1600–1000 cm−1 wherein peaks still remain for CCAC 250-12 while others have been greatly reduced, are regions with oxygen-containing functional groups. These functional groups include C=O [34], aryl–O, and C–O [36]. The presence of oxygen-containing groups were found to improve ORR activity in an alkaline environment [53]. It was postulated that the oxygen adsorbed to the active carbon site has a synergistic effect on the oxygen of the carboxyl group. As a result, the carbon to oxygen bond cleaves more easily which benefits the ORR performance [53]. The FTIR results for SDAC 250-12 from Table 2 also indicated the presence of the said functional groups. However, its low activity can be attributed to insufficient development of a porous structure, which hindered the progress of electrochemical reactions on the catalyst surface. In addition, CCAC showed the highest carbon concentration in the EDX analysis which can allow for a greater area for the electrocatalyst. Therefore, it is important to consider both the functional groups and the pore structure resulting from HTC and activation to produce the most suitable carbon support.
To further elucidate the electrochemical properties of activated-carbon-supported MnO2 samples, the electron transfer number was determined through LSV at different rotation speeds (Figure 11). Koutecky–Levich (KL) plots were then generated from −0.96 to −0.75 V vs. Ag/AgCl (Figure 12). The results showed that carbon supported MnO2 generally follow a 4-e pathway for CCAC + MnO2 250-12 and CWGAC + MnO2 250-12. On the other hand, RHAC + MnO2 and SDAC + MnO2 250-12 showed a combination of a 2-e and 4-e pathway. The number of electrons transferred is greatest in CCAC + MnO2 250-12 (Figure 12a) among tested samples, which further supports that carbon support derived from CC has also better ORR performance.
The ORR mechanism for the electron pathway that an electrocatalyst follows depends on the interaction of oxygen molecules with the catalyst surface. Adsorption of O2 through a horizontal mode on α-MnO2 proceeds via a bridge-type connection, which is consistent with the 4-e pathway [54,55]. While, a vertical mode adsorption follows a two electron 2-e- reduction pathway [55,56]. Most carbonaceous materials follow a 2-e pathway [57] while MnO2 follows a 4-e in an alkaline environment [12,51]. Although the synthesized supports are essentially carbonaceous in nature, differences in the structure of each biomass potentially resulted in different adsorption mechanisms. This implies that CCAC and CWGAC have structures, which supports the electrocatalytic activity of α-MnO2 towards a horizontal mode of O2 adsorption and thus favoring the 4-e pathway. On the other hand, it can be concluded that RHAC- and SDAC-supported α-MnO2 exhibits ORR that proceeds both in 2-e and 4-e pathways, which resulted in an electron transfer number approaching three (3). In other studies [10,19,58], the electron pathway is influenced both by the individual ORR mechanism of the carbon support and the electrocatalyst. For such materials, ORR proceeds both in the composites, hence a mixed behavior can be expected. In this work, the α-MnO2-mediated pathway for ORR provided a greater contribution compared to the carbon-mediated pathway for CCAC + MnO2 250-12 and CWGAC + MnO2 250-12. Whereas, ORR in RHAC + MnO2 250-12 and SDAC + MnO2 250-12 proceeded to undergo ORR equally in the carbon support and in α-MnO2. Therefore, the carbon from CC and CWG were more effective supports for enhancing ORR acitivity of α-MnO2 compared to those derived from RH and SD since the former group were able to retain the activity of the electrocatalyst.
Material stability is also a concern for carbonaceous compounds and noble metals in ORR electrocatalysis. Accelerated durability tests (ADT) were conducted for CCAC + MnO2 250-12, VC + MnO2 and 20% Pt/C in 0.1 M KOH at 50 mV s−1 for 5000 cycles. A comparison of limiting current density (jL) and half wave potential (E1/2) is summarized in Table 4 while the voltammetric curves are illustrated in Figure 13. Figure 13e,f show significant reduction of performance for 20% Pt/C. On the other hand, CCAC-MnO2 250-12 showed less reduction in activity compared to VC + MnO2. The E1/2 for 20% Pt/C showed no changes while significant reduction was observed for VC + MnO2. A reduction of the limiting current density value was significant for both 20% Pt/C and VC + MnO2 which amounts to 140% and 98% reduction, respectively. The activity decrease implies the degradation of surface-active sites over time. Meanwhile, CCAC + MnO2 250-12 showed minor changes in activity compared to the 20% Pt/C and VC + MnO2, which suggests higher durability.
In this work, we developed a new facile method for the conversion of waste biomass to carbon-based supports for ORR electrocatalysts. The MnO2-embedded carbon-based catalysts were also successfully synthesized, and their ORR performance analyzed. The use of the carbon-supported MnO2 catalysts developed in this study could be further tested for metal-air battery systems, which have promising applications as compact power sources and energy storage devices [59]. Successful commercialization has already been reported for primary MABs particularly in zinc-air battery systems [60]. Still, different studies have been made and are still ongoing to address constraints arising from high material costs, low catalytic efficiencies, and poor durability of materials [4,5,6,18,19,20]. The catalysts developed in this work are cheap and active alternative cathode materials that can potentially improve the performance of primary MABs. As such, future works are intended to explore the characteristics of the developed electrocatalysts for metal-air battery applications.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Hydrothermal Carbonization

Coffee waste grounds (CWG) were prepared by boiling at 100 °C using deionized water for three hours to remove volatile organic compounds. Corncobs (CC) were first milled into 1 mm product while rice hull (RH) and coconut sawdust (SD) were directly subjected to hydrothermal carbonization (HTC). A ratio of 32 g biomass to 100 mL deionized water was placed in a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-lined stainless-steel autoclave and was treated in a furnace. Residence time was varied at 6 and 12 h while temperatures were varied at 200 and 250 °C. The hydrochar produced was recovered using filtration and dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 8 h. Samples were then cooled down to room temperature.

3.2. Activation

Hydrochar samples were mixed at a 1:3 ratio with KOH solution (RCI Labscan Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand) and heated to 90 °C for 30 minutes with constant stirring. KOH treated samples were then filtered and dried in a vacuum oven at 90 °C for 4 h. Dried samples were then heat treated in a tube furnace (LTF 12, Lenton Furnaces & Ovens, Hope Valley, United Kingdom) at 600 °C for one hour under N2 atmosphere (200–300 mL min−1) with a ramp rate of 5 °C min−1. After cooling, the samples were washed with 1 M HCl (RCI Labscan Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand) followed by copious amounts of deionized water. Finally, the activated samples were dried at 90 °C for 4 h in a vacuum oven.

3.3. Incorporation of MnO2

Equal amounts of 2 M manganese sulfate (MnSO4; Loba Chemie Pvte. Ltd., Mumbai, India) and 2 M ammonium persulfate (NH4)2S2O8 (Loba Chemie Pvte. Ltd., Mumbai, India) were added to activated and hydrochar samples corresponding to the 1:2 w/w ratio of MnO2 to carbon. The solution was then transferred to a PTFE lined stainless steel autoclave and hydrothermally treated for 3 h at 120 °C [13]. Samples were then taken out of the autoclave and allowed to cool to room temperature. Finally, the MnO2 samples were filtered and dried for 6 h in a vacuum oven at 90 °C.

3.4. Material Characterization

Morphological analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; ZEISS Gemini SEM 500, Jena, Germany), determination of crystalline structures using X-ray diffraction (XRD; Maxima XRD-7000 Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), identification of functional groups on the samples surface using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Nicolet 6700, Wisconsin, USA) and elemental analysis using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX; Phenom XL SEM-EDX, Phenom-World B.V., Eindhoven, Netherlands).

3.5. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrocatalytic activity was measured against a platinum on carbon standard using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). Samples from hydrochar, and unactivated and activated hydrochar embedded with MnO2 were analyzed for the difference in electrocatalytic activities. The catalyst ink was prepared by dispersing 6 mg of samples in 950 μL ethanol (RCI Labscan Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand), which was then subjected to ultrasonication for 30 minutes. Then, 50 μL of Nafion solution (5 wt%) (Fuel Cell Store, Texas, USA) was added into the dispersion and ultrasonicated for 20 minutes. Vulcan XC-72 (Fuel Cell Store, Texas, USA) and 20% Pt/C (HiSPEC 3000, John Matthey Fuel Cells, Fuel Cell Store, Texas, USA) catalyst ink were also prepared to serve as standards for ORR performance. Finally, 0.244 mg cm−2 loading of the catalysts was dropped in a glassy carbon electron then onto a rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE). Electrochemical measurements were performed using a potentiostat (PGSTAT204, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). The set-up used for voltammetry consisted of RRDE working electrode, Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and a platinum sheet counter electrode. Cyclic voltammetry was performed under N2- and O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solutions at 50 mV s−1. Linear sweep voltammetry was performed at 5 mV s−1 scan rate from 0.035 to −0.96 V vs. Ag/AgCl at 1600 rpm.
The number of electrons transferred (n) was estimated according to the Koutecky–Levich equation [60].
1 j = 1 B ω 1 2 + 1 j k
B = 0.62 n F C o D o 2 3 v 1 6
where j is the recorded current density, jK is the kinetic current density, w is the electrode rotating rates (rad s−1), n means the transferred electron number, and F is the Faraday constant (96,485 C mol−1). C0 (1.2 × 10−3 mol L−1) is the bulk concentration, and D0 (1.9 × 10−5 cm2 s−1) corresponds to the diffusion coefficient of O2 in 0.1 mol L−1. The v represents the kinematic viscosity of the electrolyte (0.01 cm2 s−1) [61,62,63].
Accelerated degradation test was then performed from −0.36 to 0.035 V vs. Ag/AgCl at 0.1 M KOH for 5000 cycles. Changes in LSV and CV data were obtained from 0.035 to −0.96 V vs. Ag/AgCl for 1000, 3000 and 5000 cycles.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we successfully synthesized and evaluated carbon support for α-MnO2 through hydrothermal carbonization followed by KOH activation and heat treatment. High temperature (250 °C) and longer duration (12 h) provided biomass-derived carbon support with better ORR performance due to the formation of pores and micrometric fragments, and the preservation of the lignin backbone structure, which enhances the contact of oxygen to active sites of MnO2. Further, it was found that activation is a necessary step in the conversion of biomass to carbon support as it functions as the main factor for cellulosic structure degradation and pore formation. Finally, CCAC + MnO2 250-12 showed the greatest ORR catalytic performance among prepared samples since the conditions were favorable in the formation of porous structures and the preservation of oxygen containing functional group, which facilitated ORR performance. The CCAC + MnO2 250-12 also showed higher stability compared to VC + MnO2 and 20% Pt/C. This work provides a new and cost-effective method of deriving carbon support from biomass for enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards ORR. In addition, this synthesized carbon-supported electrocatalyst is seen as a potential cathode for fuel cells and metal-air battery application.

Author Contributions

H.O.P., J.D.A.P. and E.A.E.J. conceived, designed, and performed the synthesis experiments. H.O.P. and J.D.A.P. performed the electroanalytical experiments; J.D.A.P. and E.A.E.J. assisted in project administration; J.A.D.d.R. performed validation of results; H.O.P. prepared the draft manuscript; E.A.E.J., J.A.D.d.R. and J.D.O. reviewed and edited the draft manuscript; J.D.O. provided the overall supervision of the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by the University of the Philippines Emerging Interdisciplinary Research Program through the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs (UP EIDR C08-003). Panganoron would like to thank the Engineering Research and Development for Technology (ERDT) Program of the Department of Science and Technology—Science Education Institute (DOST-SEI) of the Philippines for the graduate scholarship and financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Davari, E.; Ivey, D.G. Bifunctional electrocatalysts for Zn–air batteries. Sustain. Energ. Fuels 2018, 2, 39–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pan, H.; Shao, Y.; Yan, P.; Cheng, Y.; Han, K.S.; Nie, Z.; Wang, C.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; Bhattacharya, P.; et al. Reversible aqueous zinc/manganese oxide energy storage from conversion reactions. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 2058–7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, S.; Han, W.; Cui, B.; Liu, X.; Sun, H.; Zhang, J.; Lefler, M.; Licht, S. Rechargeable zinc air batteries and highly improved performance through potassium hydroxide addition to the molten carbonate eutectic electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A149–A154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Greeley, J.; Stephens, I.E.L.; Bondarenko, A.S.; Johansson, T.P.; Hansen, H.A.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Rossmeisl, J.; Chorkendorff, I.; Nørskov, J.K. Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 552–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Osgood, H.; Devaguptapu, S.V.; Xu, H.; Cho, J.P.; Wu, G. Transition metal (Fe, Co, Ni and Mn) oxides for oxygen reduction and evolution bifunctional catalysts in alkaline media. Nano. Today 2016, 11, 601–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, C.; Dai, L. Carbon-based metal-free catalysts for electrocatalysis beyond the ORR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11736–11758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.; Xu, D.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X. Oxygen electrocatalysts in metal–air batteries: From aqueous to nonaqueous electrolytes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7746–7786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, L. Anchoring Mn3O4 nanoparticles on oxygen functionalized carbon nanotubes as bifunctional catalyst for rechargeable zinc-Air battery. Acs Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, Q.; Li, Q.; Khene, S.; Ren, X.; Lopez-Suarez, F.E.; Lozano-Castello, D.; Bueno-Lopez, A. high-loading cobalt oxide coupled with nitrogen-doped graphene for oxygen reduction in anion-exchange-membrane alkaline fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 8697–8707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, M.; Chen, K.; Liu, J.; He, Q.; Li, G.; Li, F. Efficiently enhancing electrocatalytic activity of α-MnO2 nanorods/N-doped ketjenblack carbon for oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reaction using facile regulated hydrothermal treatment. Catalysts 2018, 8, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cheng, F.; Su, Y.; Liang, J.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. MnO2-based nanostructures as catalysts for electrochemical oxygen reduction in alkaline media. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 898–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lima, F.H.B.; Calegaro, M.L.; Ticianelli, E.A. Electrocatalytic activity of manganese oxides prepared by thermal decomposition for oxygen reduction. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 3732–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moon, J.; Munakata, H.; Kajihara, K.; Nakamura, K. Hydrothermal synthesis of manganese dioxide nanoparticles as cathode material for rechargeable batteries. Electrochemistry 2013, 81, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Valim, R.B.; Santos, C.M.; Lanza, M.; Machado, S.A.; Lima, F.H.B.; Calegaro, M. Oxygen reduction reaction catalyzed by ε-MnO2: Influence of the crystalline structure on the reaction mechanism. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 85, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, N.; Nie, Q.; Luo, L.; Yao, C.Z.; Gong, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Qiao, J. Controllable hortensia-like MnO2 synergized with carbon nanotubes as an efficient electrocatalyst for long-term metal–air batteries. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 11, 578–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Smith, M.W.; Shekhawat, D. Fuel Cells: Technologies for Fuel Processing. In Chapter 5—Catalytic Partial Oxidation; Shekhawat, D., Spivey, J.J., Berry, D.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 73–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, Q.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Sun, S. Rational design of carbon-based oxygen electrocatalysts for zinc–air batteries. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 4, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fu, G.; Tang, Y.; Lee, J.M. Recent advances in carbon-based bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for Zn−air batteries. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 1424–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kasturi, P.R.; Araunchander, A.; Kalpana, D.; Selvan, R.K. Bio-derived carbon as an efficient supporting electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 124, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Song, N.; Li, X. Biomass-derived renewable carbon materials for electrochemical energy storage. Mater. Res. Lett 2017, 5, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ioannidou, O.; Zabaniotou, A. Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production – A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1966–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, H.; Geng, J.; Ge, H.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, G. Egg-derived mesoporous carbon microspheres as bifunctional oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, B.; Geng, D.; Lee, S.; Ge, X.; Chai, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Hor, T.; Zong, Y. Eggplant-derived microporous carbon sheets: Towards mass production of efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst at low cost for rechargeable Zn-Air Batteries. ChemComm 2015, 51, 8841–8844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wan, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liang, H.W.; Chen, P.; Yu, S.H. N-, P-and Fe-tridoped nanoporous carbon derived from plant biomass: An excellent oxygen reduction electrocatalyst for zinc–air batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 8602–8609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, T.; Zhai, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Zeng, G. A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, P.; Shen, Y.; Ge, S.; Yoshikawa, K. Energy recycling from sewage sludge by producing solid biofuel with hydrothermal carbonization. Energy Convers Manag 2014, 78, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Knez, Ž.; Markočič, E.; Hrnčič, M.K.; Ravber, M.; Škerget, M. High pressure water reforming of biomass for energy and chemicals: A short review. J. Supercrit Fluids 2015, 96, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Funke, A.; Ziegler, F. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: A summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels. Bioprod. Bioref. 2010, 4, 160–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, Q.; Qian, Q.; Quek, A.; Ai, N.; Zeng, G.; Wang, J. Hydrothermal carbonization of macroalgae and the effects of experimental parameters on the properties of hydrochars. Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Wang, B.; Wang, Q.; Yang, G.; Chen, J. Effect of residence time on hydrothermal carbonization of corn cob residual. BioResources 2015, 10, 3979–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sumtong, P.; Chollacoop, N.; Eiad-ua, A. Effect of temperature and times by hydrothermal carbonization process from sawdust and bagasse for carbon materials supporter. J. Appl. Sci. 2017, 16, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hoffmann, V.; Jung, D.; Zimmermann, J.; Rodriguez Correa, C.; Elleuch, A.; Halouani, K.; Kruse, A. Conductive carbon materials from the hydrothermal carbonization of vineyard residues for the application in electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) and direct carbon fuel cells (DCFCs). Materials 2019, 12, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Song, M.; Jin, B.; Xiao, R.; Yang, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Huang, Y. The comparison of two activation techniques to prepare activated carbon from corn cob. Biomass Bioenerg 2013, 48, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, A. Hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge with pinewood sawdust for nutrient-rich hydrochar production: Synergistic effects and products characterization. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 201, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zbair, M.; Bottlinger, M.; Ainassaari, K.; Ojala, S.; Stein, O.; Keiski, R.; Bensitel, M.; Brahmi, R. Hydrothermal carbonization of argan nut shell: Functional mesoporous carbon with excellent performance in the adsorption of Bisphenol A and Diuron. Waste Biomass Valori 2018, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Reza, M.T.; Wirth, B.; Lüder, U.; Werner, M. Behavior of selected hydrolyzed products during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 169, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khataee, A.; Kayan, B.; Kalderis, D.; Karimi, A.; Akay, S.; Konsolakis, M. Ultrasound-assisted removal of Acid Red 17 using nanosized Fe3O4-loaded coffee waste hydrochar. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 35, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Strezov, V.; Kan, T. Energy recovery potential analysis of spent coffee grounds pyrolysis products. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 110, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, C.; Huang, X.; Kong, L. Efficient low temperature hydrothermal carbonization of Chinese reed for biochar with high energy density. Energies 2017, 10, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Titirici, M.M. Porous Hydrothermal Carbons. In Sustainable Carbon Materials from Hydrothermal Processes; Wiley Editors: School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary, University of London, UK, 2013; pp. 37–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kang, S.; Li, X.; Fan, J.; Chang, J. Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of lignin, cellulose, D-xylose, and wood meal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 9023–9031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kalderis, D.; Kotti, M.; Méndez, A.; Gascó, G. Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of rice husk. Solid Earth 2014, 6, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kim, D.; Lee, K.; Bae, D.; Park, K.Y. Characterizations of biochar from hydrothermal carbonization of exhausted coffee residue. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2017, 19, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lin, G.; Ma, R.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Q.; Dong, X. KOH activation of biomass-derived nitrogen-doped carbons for supercapacitor and electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 261, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yun, C.; Park, Y.; Park, C. Effects of pre-carbonization on porosity development of activated carbons from rice straw. Carbon 2001, 39, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, K.; Li, Y.; Xiong, J.; Ou, X.; Su, W.; Zhong, G.; Yang, C. Activated amorphous carbon with high-porosity derived from camellia pollen grains as anode materials for lithium/sodium ion batteries. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saad, M.J.; Chia, C.; Zakaria, S.; Sajab, M.S.; Misran, S.; Bin Abdul Rahman, M.H.; Chin, S.X. Physical and chemical properties of the rice straw activated carbon produced from carbonization and KOH activation processes. Sains Malays. 2019, 48, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sidik, R.; Anderson, A.; Subramanian, N.; Kumaraguru, S.; Popov, B. O2 Reduction on graphite and nitrogen-doped graphite: Experiment and theory. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 1787–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Maldonado, S.; Stevenson, K. Influence of nitrogen doping on oxygen reduction electrocatalysis at carbon nanofiber electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 4707–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Y.; Dai, H. Recent advances in Zinc-air batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5257–5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Xu, N.; Qiao, J.; Zhang, X.; Ma, C.; Jian, S.; Liu, Y.; Pei, P. Morphology controlled La2O3/Co3O4/MnO2–CNTs hybrid nanocomposites with durable bi-functional air electrode in high-performance zinc–air energy storage. Appl. Energy 2016, 175, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Basirun, W.J.; Sookhakian, M.; Baradaran, S.; Endut, Z.; Mahmoudian, M.R.; Ebadi, M.; Yousefi, R.; Ghadimi, H.; Ahmad, S. Graphene oxide electrocatalyst on MnO2 air cathode as an efficient electron pump for enhanced oxygen reduction in alkaline solution. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhong, R.S.; Qin, Y.H.; Niu, D.F.; Tian, J.W.; Zhang, X.S.; Zhou, X.G.; Sun, S.G.; Yuan, W.K. Effect of carbon nanofiber surface functional groups on oxygen reduction in alkaline solution. J. Power Sources 2013, 225, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Roche, I.; Chaînet, E.; Chatenet, M.; Vondrák, J. Durability of carbon-supported manganese oxide nanoparticles for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline medium. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2008, 38, 1195–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Woon, C.; Islam, A.; Tharan, B.; Ong, H.R.; Cheng, C.K.; Chong, K.F.; Hedge, G.; Khan, M. Carbon nanotube-modified MnO2: An efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 7637–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karuppiah, S.; Senthil Kumar, S.M.; Rangasamy, T.; Ganesan, K.; Murugan, P.; Rajput, P.; Jha, S.; Bhattacharyya, D. Physiochemical investigation of shape designed MnO2 nanostructures and their influence on oxygen reduction reaction activity in alkaline solution. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6604–6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gu, P.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, Q.; Xiao, X.; Xue, H.; Pang, H. Rechargeable zinc–air batteries: A promising way to green energy. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 7651–7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Molina-García, M.; Rees, N. Effect of catalyst carbon supports on the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media: A comparative study. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 94669–94681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Yu, Y.; Hu, A. Recent progress of metal-air batteries—a mini review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Clark, S.; Latz, A.; Horstmann, B. A review of model-based design tools for metal-air batteries. Batteries 2018, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhou, R.; Zheng, Y.; Jaroniec, M.S.; Qiao, Z. Determination of the electron transfer number for the oxygen reduction reaction: From theory to experiment. ACS Catal 2016, 6, 4720–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, G.; Peng, H.; Qiao, X.; Du, L.; Li, X.; Shu, T.; Liao, S. Biomass-derived porous heteroatom-doped carbon spheres as a high-performance catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 14101–14110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, X.; Xu, N.; Li, H.; Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Qiao, J. 3D hollow sphere Co3O4/MnO2-CNTs: Its high-performance bi-functional cathode catalysis and application in rechargeable zinc-air battery. Green Energy Environ. 2017, 2, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of raw and hydrochars of (a) corncobs (CC), (b) coffee waste grounds (CWG), (c) rice hull (RH) and (d) coconut sawdust (SD) at different temperatures (200 and 250 °C) and residence time (6 and 12 h).
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of raw and hydrochars of (a) corncobs (CC), (b) coffee waste grounds (CWG), (c) rice hull (RH) and (d) coconut sawdust (SD) at different temperatures (200 and 250 °C) and residence time (6 and 12 h).
Catalysts 10 00177 g001
Figure 2. SEM images at 2500× magnification of the (a–d) corncobs (CC), (e–h) coffee waste grounds (CWGs), (i–l) rice hull (RH) and (m–p) coconut sawdust (SD) at varying HTC temperatures (200 and 250 °C) and duration (6 and 12 h). A measurement scale is located at the lower-right of the figure.
Figure 2. SEM images at 2500× magnification of the (a–d) corncobs (CC), (e–h) coffee waste grounds (CWGs), (i–l) rice hull (RH) and (m–p) coconut sawdust (SD) at varying HTC temperatures (200 and 250 °C) and duration (6 and 12 h). A measurement scale is located at the lower-right of the figure.
Catalysts 10 00177 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of activated carbon from (a) corncobs (CCAC), (b) coffee waste grounds (CWGAC), (c) rice hull (RHAC) and (d) coconut sawdust (SDAC).
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of activated carbon from (a) corncobs (CCAC), (b) coffee waste grounds (CWGAC), (c) rice hull (RHAC) and (d) coconut sawdust (SDAC).
Catalysts 10 00177 g003
Figure 4. SEM images at 2500× magnification after activation of (a–d) corncobs (CCAC), (e–h) coffee waste grounds (CWGAC), (i–l) rice hull (RHAC) and (m–p) coconut sawdust (SDAC) that were pre-carbonized in HTC temperatures (200 and 250 °C) and residence times (6 and 12 h).
Figure 4. SEM images at 2500× magnification after activation of (a–d) corncobs (CCAC), (e–h) coffee waste grounds (CWGAC), (i–l) rice hull (RHAC) and (m–p) coconut sawdust (SDAC) that were pre-carbonized in HTC temperatures (200 and 250 °C) and residence times (6 and 12 h).
Catalysts 10 00177 g004
Figure 5. XRD data for (a) CCAC 250-12, (b) CWGAC 250-12, (c) RHAC 250-12 and (d) SDAC 250-12.
Figure 5. XRD data for (a) CCAC 250-12, (b) CWGAC 250-12, (c) RHAC 250-12 and (d) SDAC 250-12.
Catalysts 10 00177 g005
Figure 6. SEM images at 2500× magnification for (a) α–MnO2 and after embedding MnO2 to activated hydrochar (b) CCAC + MnO2, (c) CWGAC + MnO2, (d) RHAC + MnO2 and (e) SDAC + MnO2 from HTC at 250 °C at 12 h.
Figure 6. SEM images at 2500× magnification for (a) α–MnO2 and after embedding MnO2 to activated hydrochar (b) CCAC + MnO2, (c) CWGAC + MnO2, (d) RHAC + MnO2 and (e) SDAC + MnO2 from HTC at 250 °C at 12 h.
Catalysts 10 00177 g006
Figure 7. XRD pattern of the synthesized MnO2.
Figure 7. XRD pattern of the synthesized MnO2.
Catalysts 10 00177 g007
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) results for (a) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (b) CWGAC + MnO2 250-12, (c) RHAC + MnO2 250-12 and (d) SDAC + MnO2 250-12 in N2 and O2 saturated 0.1 M KOH electrolyte.
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) results for (a) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (b) CWGAC + MnO2 250-12, (c) RHAC + MnO2 250-12 and (d) SDAC + MnO2 250-12 in N2 and O2 saturated 0.1 M KOH electrolyte.
Catalysts 10 00177 g008
Figure 9. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves for hydrochar with MnO2, pure activated carbon (AC) and AC embedded with MnO2 derived from (a–c) corncobs, (d–f) coffee waste grounds, (g–i) rice hull and (j–l) coconut sawdust in 0.1 M KOH at 0.244 mg cm−2 loading, scan rate of 5 mV s−1 and rotation speed of 1600 rpm.
Figure 9. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves for hydrochar with MnO2, pure activated carbon (AC) and AC embedded with MnO2 derived from (a–c) corncobs, (d–f) coffee waste grounds, (g–i) rice hull and (j–l) coconut sawdust in 0.1 M KOH at 0.244 mg cm−2 loading, scan rate of 5 mV s−1 and rotation speed of 1600 rpm.
Catalysts 10 00177 g009
Figure 10. LSV curves for carbon supported MnO2 of different activated HTC-treated biomass, (Vulcan) supported MnO2 and 20% Pt/C in 0.1 M KOH at 0.244 mg cm−2 loading, scan rate of 5 mV s−1 and at 1600 rpm rotation speed.
Figure 10. LSV curves for carbon supported MnO2 of different activated HTC-treated biomass, (Vulcan) supported MnO2 and 20% Pt/C in 0.1 M KOH at 0.244 mg cm−2 loading, scan rate of 5 mV s−1 and at 1600 rpm rotation speed.
Catalysts 10 00177 g010
Figure 11. LSV curves for different rotation speeds for (a) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (b) CWGAC + MnO2 250-12, (c) RHAC + MnO2 250-12 and (d) SDAC + MnO2 250-12.
Figure 11. LSV curves for different rotation speeds for (a) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (b) CWGAC + MnO2 250-12, (c) RHAC + MnO2 250-12 and (d) SDAC + MnO2 250-12.
Catalysts 10 00177 g011
Figure 12. Koutecky–Levich (KL) plots at different potential for (a) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (b) CWGAC + MnO2 250-12, (c) RHAC + MnO2 250-12 and (d) SDAC + MnO2 250-12.
Figure 12. Koutecky–Levich (KL) plots at different potential for (a) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (b) CWGAC + MnO2 250-12, (c) RHAC + MnO2 250-12 and (d) SDAC + MnO2 250-12.
Catalysts 10 00177 g012
Figure 13. LSV and CV curves for (a,b) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (c,d) VC + MnO2 and (e,f) 20% Pt/C at 0.244 mg cm−2 in 0.1 M KOH.
Figure 13. LSV and CV curves for (a,b) CCAC + MnO2 250-12, (c,d) VC + MnO2 and (e,f) 20% Pt/C at 0.244 mg cm−2 in 0.1 M KOH.
Catalysts 10 00177 g013
Table 1. Peaks and associated functional groups of produced hydrochars.
Table 1. Peaks and associated functional groups of produced hydrochars.
Peaks (cm−1)Functional GroupReference
1655–1700C=O and C=C vibration from ketones and aromatic ring structures [34]
1450–1510C=C–C bonds vibration in an aromatic ring[35]
1310–1410O–H bends and aliphatic CH3 and CH2 deformation[35]
1050–1270Aryl–O and C–O stretch from ether compounds[36]
1000–1055C–O bonds in glucose[36]
900C–H groups with aromatic out-of-plane bends[37,38]
Table 2. Elemental composition of raw biomass and activated carbons.
Table 2. Elemental composition of raw biomass and activated carbons.
Sample%Weight Concentration
CONKSiTotal
CC Raw42.3652.663.951.02 100.00
CCAC 250-1283.4016.60 100.00
CWG Raw39.0147.9012.021.08 100.00
CWGAC 250-1276.7923.21 100.00
RH Raw46.0622.703.560.0027.68100.00
RHAC 250-1261.9231.71 6.38100.00
SD Raw41.3349.388.410.890.00100.00
SDAC 250-1273.6626.34 100.00
Table 3. Electrocatalytic activity of carbon supported electrocatalysts and 20% Pt/C.
Table 3. Electrocatalytic activity of carbon supported electrocatalysts and 20% Pt/C.
SamplejL (mA cm−2)Eons (V vs. Ag/AgCl)Overpotential (V)
CCAC + MnO2 250-12−2.85−0.23 (0.73) 10.50
CWGAC + MnO2 250-12−2.62−0.25 (0.71) 10.52
RHAC + MnO2 250-12−2.72−0.35 (0.61) 10.62
SDAC + MnO2 250-12−2.58−0.36 (0.6) 10.63
VC + MnO2−2.67−0.17 (0.79) 10.44
20% Pt/C−4.63−0.098 (0.87) 10.36
1 () V vs. RHE.
Table 4. Electrocatalytic properties of catalysts during accelerated durability tests (ADT).
Table 4. Electrocatalytic properties of catalysts during accelerated durability tests (ADT).
SampleE1/2 (V vs. Ag/AgCl)jL (mA cm−2)
InitialFinalInitialFinal
CCAC + MnO2 250-12−0.32−0.392.852.62
VC + MnO2−0.29−0.382.671.84
20% Pt/C−0.11−0.114.633.79

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Panganoron, H.O.; Pascasio, J.D.A.; Esparcia, E.A., Jr.; del Rosario, J.A.D.; Ocon, J.D. Hydrothermally Carbonized Waste Biomass as Electrocatalyst Support for α-MnO2 in Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Catalysts 2020, 10, 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020177

AMA Style

Panganoron HO, Pascasio JDA, Esparcia EA Jr., del Rosario JAD, Ocon JD. Hydrothermally Carbonized Waste Biomass as Electrocatalyst Support for α-MnO2 in Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Catalysts. 2020; 10(2):177. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Panganoron, Harold O., Jethro Daniel A. Pascasio, Eugene A. Esparcia, Jr., Julie Anne D. del Rosario, and Joey D. Ocon. 2020. "Hydrothermally Carbonized Waste Biomass as Electrocatalyst Support for α-MnO2 in Oxygen Reduction Reaction" Catalysts 10, no. 2: 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020177

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop