Next Article in Journal
Plasmonic Photocatalysts Based on Au Nanoparticles and WO3 for Visible Light-Induced Photocatalytic Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Scalability and Investigation of the Geometrical Features and Shapes of a Tandem Photo-Electrolysis Cell Based on Non-Critical Raw Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Prominent COF, g-C3N4, and Their Heterojunction Materials for Selective Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Effect of the Nature of Carbon Nanostructures on the Activity of Bifunctional Catalysts Based on Manganese Oxide Nanowires
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Promoting Bifunctional Oxygen Catalyst Activity of Double-Perovskite-Type Cubic Nanocrystallites for Aqueous and Quasi-Solid-State Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries

1
WA School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering (WASM-MECE), Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
2
School of Energy and Power, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2023, 13(10), 1332; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101332
Submission received: 20 August 2023 / Revised: 22 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 September 2023 / Published: 29 September 2023

Abstract

:
Transition metal oxide materials are promising oxygen catalysts that are alternatives to expensive and precious metal-containing catalysts. Integration of transition metal oxides with high activity for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is an important pathway for good bifunctionality. In contrast to the conventional physical mixing and hybridization strategies, perovskite-type oxide provides an ideal structure for the integration of the transition metal element atoms on an atomic scale. Herein, B-site ordered double-perovskite-type La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites with ultra-small cubic (20–50 nm) morphology and high specific surface areas (25 m2 g−1) were proposed. Rational designs were integrated to promote the ORR-OER catalysis, e.g., introducing oxygen vacancies via A-site cation substitution, further increasing surface oxygen vacancies via integration of a small amount of Pt/C and nanosizing of the material via a facile molten-salt method. The batteries with the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites and an aqueous alkaline electrolyte demonstrate decent discharge−charge voltage gaps of 0.75 and 1.10 V at 1 and 30 mA cm−2, respectively, and good cycling stability of 250 h (1500 cycles). A coin-type battery with a gel−polymer electrolyte also presents a good performance.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aqueous alkaline rechargeable Zn-air batteries represents a promising technique for large-scale electrochemical energy storage [1,2,3,4]. The sluggish kinetics of oxygen redox result in the high overpotential and relatively low energy efficiency of the Zn-air batteries. Catalysts are needed to facilitate the oxygen redox in alkaline electrolytes, i.e., ORR and OER [5,6]. An ideal catalyst for a Zn-air battery should demonstrate good bifunctional ORR-OER catalysis and should be durable for repeatably charging and discharging. Precious metals (e.g., Pt and Pd) and precious metal oxides (e.g., IrO2 and RuO2) have demonstrated very good catalytic activities for ORR and OER, respectively [7]. Good bifunctionality can also be easily achieved by the integration of commercial Pt/C and IrO2. However, most precious metals present poor cycling stability. The high costs of the precious metals also hinder their practical utility in rechargeable Zn-air batteries, especially for large-scale energy storage systems [8].
Transition metal oxide materials are promising alternatives [9,10]. Some transition metal oxides, e.g., MnO2, demonstrated promising catalytic activity for ORR, while some others, e.g., Co3O4, showed good catalysis for OER [11,12]. Integration of transition metal oxides that takes advantage of their catalysis for either ORR or OER is an important pathway for achieving bifunctional oxygen catalysis. Conventionally, the physical mixing of different oxide materials is the simplest strategy [13]. However, this strategy may result in poor interaction between the components. Hybridization of different oxides via a chemical or electrochemical method is another often-studied pathway [12,14,15]. This strategy, however, usually involves complicated synthesis processes or conditions, which may hinder practical utility.
Different from simple oxides, perovskite oxides are a category of cost-effective complex oxide materials that show promising catalysis in aqueous media [16]. A typical single perovskite oxide has a chemical formula of ABO3, where A and B are usually rare earth metal cations and transition metal cations, respectively [17]. One of the most significant advantages of perovskite oxide is its flexibility of cation element and composition. Therefore, perovskite-type oxides provide an ideal structure for the integration of the transition metal element atoms on an atomic scale, which is different from the conventional physical mixing or hybridization strategies. In addition, such integration in perovskite oxides can be easily achieved by facile one-step preparation in an ambient atmosphere, which is promising for practical production. In previous research, different single perovskite oxides (e.g., LaNiO3 [18], La1−xSrxCo1−yMnyO3−δ [19,20], LaMn1−yCoyO3−δ [21], SrxCo1−yFeyO3−δ [22,23], Sr(Co0.8Fe0.2)0.95P0.05O3−δ [24]) and double perovskite oxides (e.g., Sr2TiMnO6 [25], Pr0.5Ba0.5Mn1.8−xNbxCo0.2O6−δ [26], (PrBa0.5Sr0.5)0.95Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ [27,28]) were developed and they showed promising capability for facilitating oxygen redox as catalysts for air cathodes in Zn-air batteries [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].
B-site ordered double perovskite oxide is a sub-catalogue of the perovskite oxide. According to some previous reports, double perovskite demonstrates improved electrochemical stability under catalytic conditions [17,39]. Integrating two different B-site cations (e.g., Mn and Co) into the perovskite structure usually leads to a random and disordered arrangement [21]. Formation of B-site cation ordering may occur when the atomic ratio of the cations is 1:1 [17]. However, achieving the highly ordered cation arrangement is difficult and a slow growth rate is required [40]. At the same time, reducing the particle size of the catalyst can increase the specific area, which is beneficial for improving the activity due to more exposure of active sites. The molten-salt-assisted synthesis method provides an ideal route for achieving the nanosizing of the perovskite material [41,42]. Furthermore, the molten-salt environment may facilitate ionic diffusion during the synthesis process [43], which is expected to shorten the synthesis duration of the B-site ordered double perovskite.
Herein, we proposed a rationally designed B-site ordered double-perovskite-type La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites with an ultra-small cubic morphology and a high specific surface area for Zn-air battery cathodes. Design strategies including nanosizing of the material and introducing oxygen vacancies via A-site cation substitution to effectively improve the oxygen catalysis. A Zn-air battery with the double-perovskite-type La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites demonstrated good discharge−charge voltage gaps and good cycling stability. By increasing surface oxygen vacancies via the integration of a small amount of Pt/C, the bifunctional oxygen catalysis and battery performance were further promoted. This work provides new nanosizing double-perovskite-type nanocrystallites as promising bifunctional oxygen catalysts for Zn-air batteries. The molten-salt-assisted synthesis of the double-perovskite-type La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites will add to the knowledge base of advanced manufacturing techniques for nanosizing oxides and could inspire the development of other functional complex oxide materials.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Perovskite-Type Oxide Nanocrystallites

The double-perovskite-type cubic nanocrystallites (La2MnCoO6, La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6) were prepared via a facile molten-salt process (Figure 1a). Taking La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 as an example, solid solvent salt powders (Na, K nitrates) and target cation salt powders (i.e., La, Sr, Mn, Co nitrates) were dry mixed and then underwent 3 h heat treatment in an air atmosphere at 550 °C. After washing the residual solvent salts with deionized water, the double-perovskite-type cubic La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites were obtained.
The nanocrystallites show a cubic morphology with a side length of approximately 20 to 50 nm, as presented in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Figure S1) and TEM (Figure 1c) images. XRD patterns (Figure 1b) of the La2MnCoO6 and La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 show that their phases are well aligned with a B-site (Mn and Co) ordered double perovskite with a cubic symmetry of Fm-3m and a unit-cell parameter of a ≈ 7.69 Å, which is double that of a cubic single perovskite (The International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database Powder Diffraction File (PDF) card No. 04-010-6383 are provided in Figure 2b as a reference) [44]. An illustration of the B-site ordered double perovskite is presented in the inset image in Figure 1a. The TEM image of a cubic La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallite (Figure 1c) and its corresponding FFT (Figure 1d) pattern with zone axis of [−1 1 0] shows the (002), (220), and (222) planes with lattice distances of 3.88, 2.75, and 2.24 Å, respectively. The pattern confirms the basic cubic structure of the material. The FFT pattern also presents a spot with weaker intensity at the position of half (222) spot. The super-structure spot represents the (111) plane with a lattice distance of 4.48 Å, which doubles that of the (222) plane. This provides evidence that the perovskite sub-cells are doubled, which suggests the existence of the B-site ordered feature of the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 double perovskite, as illustrated in Figure 1e [44]. The high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping images of the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 indicate the homogeneous distribution of the compositional elements (Figure 1f). Analysis of the N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms (Figure S2) indicates that La2MnCoO6 and La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 share a similar pore structure with specific areas of 22.1 and 25.2 m2 g−1 and total pore volumes (micro- and mesopores) of 0.023 and 0.024 cm3 g−1, respectively (Table S1).

2.2. Bifunctional Catalytic Activity for ORR and OER

The catalytic activities of ORR and OER were evaluated using a rotating disk electrode (RDE) in a 0.1 M KOH electrolyte. By integrating both Mn and Co cations into the double-perovskite-type structure, both La2MnCoO6 and La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 demonstrated decent ORR-OER activity (Figure 2a,c). Without the integration of Co cations, LaMnO3 and La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 presented very poor catalysis for OER, though they demonstrated better catalysis for ORR (Figure 2a). The potential difference (ΔE) of major parameters, i.e., half-wave potential (E1/2, V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)) for ORR and potential at the current density of 10 mA cm−2 (Ej=10, V vs. iR-corrected RHE) for OER, is an indicator for evaluating the bifunctional catalysis. As compared in Figure 2e, the E1/2 of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 (0.63 V) was higher than that of La2MnCoO6 (0.61 V). At the same time, the Ej=10 of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 (1.73 V) was lower than that of La2MnCoO6 (1.78 V). As a result, a decent ΔE of 1.10 V was observed for La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6. In addition, La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 presented good selectivity of OH production over the unfavorable HO2, which is indicated by the ~4 electron transfer number (Figure 2b) [45]. La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 also demonstrated a Tafel slope of 72 mV dec−1 (Figure 2d), indicating fast OER kinetics, which is comparable to the benchmark commercial IrO2 (67 mV dec−1).
The improved catalytic activity of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 compared to La2MnCoO6 for both ORR and OER could be associated with the appearance of oxygen vacancies in the double-perovskite-type oxide, which could promote catalysis of ORR and OER according to previous reports [46,47]. Usually, oxygen vacancies are unlikely to occur in LaMnO3 [48]. The oxygen vacancies in La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 could be ascribed to the introduction of Co and the partial substitution of La (III) with Sr (II). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) O 1s spectra presented in Figure 2f show three main surface oxygen species: lattice oxygen (O2−), hydroxide or adsorbed oxygen (–OH/O2), and adsorbed water (H2O) in La2MnCoO6 [49,50]. An additional peak centered at ~530.1 eV can be identified for La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6. The peak could be attributed to highly oxidative oxygen species (O22−/O), which is related to oxygen vacancies [51,52]. The decent catalysis for ORR and OER could also be attributed to the nanosizing of the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6, which results in higher surface exposure for oxygen redox. As presented in Figure S3, the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites prepared via the molten-salt synthesis method demonstrated better ORR-OER activities than those of a La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 sample prepared with a conventional sol−gel method, which usually produces particles with a size of serval micrometers.
Although decent bifunctional catalytic activity, good selectivity of OH generation, and fast kinetics of OER were achieved for La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6, its ΔE (1.10 V) was still not comparable to that of Pt/C + IrO2 (0.89 V) at this stage. Further optimization of the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 to improve its catalytic activity is required and will be demonstrated in the last section of this work.

2.3. Performance of the Zn-Air Batteries

To testify to the validation of the above analysis results, the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites were applied as a catalyst on air cathodes of aqueous and quasi-solid-state Zn-air batteries. An aqueous Zn-air battery with the catalyst demonstrated a decent open-circuit voltage (OCV) of 1.44 V (Figure 3a), close to that with the Pt/C + IrO2 catalyst (1.46 V). A PPD (Figure 3a) of 187 mW cm−2 was achieved at 419 mA cm−2 for La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6, which is comparable to that of the Pt/C + IrO2 (217 mW cm−2 at 408 mA cm−2). The high-rate performance (from 1 to 30 mA cm−2) was evaluated by repeating a recharge process of 5 min galvanostatic charging and 5 min galvanostatic discharging. The median voltage points of each charging and discharging profile are presented in Figure 3b [53]. The La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 cathode presented charging and discharging voltages of 2.01 and 1.26 V, respectively, indicating a decent charge−discharge voltage gap of 0.75 V, corresponding to a round-trip efficiency (i.e., voltage efficiency) of 63% at 1 mA cm−2. As the overpotential increased with the rise in current densities, the voltage gaps increased to 0.82, 0.90, 0.96, 1.04, and 1.10 at 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mA cm−2, respectively. As a comparison, although Pt/C + IrO2 cathode demonstrated better performance at a low current density (e.g., voltage gap of 0.62 V and voltage efficiency of 68% at 1 mA cm−2), the cathode experienced a fast deterioration in working voltage, especially at high current densities. The La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 cathode also showed good voltage retention when the current density was reduced to 1 and 2 mA cm−2, with a voltage gap of 0.73 and 0.81 V, respectively (Figure 3b).
The battery performance of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 was also compared to that of La2MnCoO6 without Sr substitution. Benefiting from the higher ORR and OER activity, as indicated from the RDE tests presented in Figure 2, the OCV, PPD (Figure S4), and rate performance (Figure S5) of the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 cathode were superior to those of the La2MnCoO6 cathode (OCV: 1.40 V, PPD: 167 mW cm−2).
La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 was also evaluated with coin-type batteries with a gel−polymer electrolyte (Figure 4a). As presented in Figure 4b, a single coin-type battery presented a decent OCV of 1.33 V and PPD of 91 mW cm−2. The battery also showed decent cycling stability over 20 h (120 cycles), with a charge−discharge voltage gap of ~0.8 V and a round-trip efficiency of ~55% at 5 mA cm−2 (Figure 4c). A three-series coin-type battery group was also established to verify the practical utility of powering small electronic devices. The battery group presented an OCV of 3.94 V, which dropped to 2.60 V when 21 light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs were lit (Figure 4d). Once the work loading was removed, the voltage quickly recovered to a level (3.79 V) close to the original OCV within 10 s.
As presented in Figure 3c, the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 cathode also demonstrated superior stability (compared to the commercial Pt/C + IrO2 catalyst) in 1500 recharging cycles (250 h) at 5 mA cm−2. During the cycling performance, the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 cathode showed a gradual increase in voltage gap (inset image in Figure 3c) from 0.95 V (1st cycle) to 1.09 V (1500th cycle). The stability was much better than that of the Pt/C + IrO2 cathode, which presented a significant increase of overpotentials after cycling for only a few hours. Prolonged cycling of the Zn-air battery over 333 h (1000 cycles) was conducted to evaluate the stability of the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 material and identify the potential reason for the degradation of battery performance. As presented in Figure S6a, a significant increase in overpotentials for both charging and discharging was observed. The Zn-air battery after cycling for 333 h was disassembled and the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 cathode was characterized by XRD (Figure S6b), where a cathode before cycling and a cathode after cycling for 50 h were also compared. The characteristic perovskite-type crystal structure remains for the cathode after testing for 50 and 333 h This indicates the good stability of the crystal structure of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6, which is beneficial to the stable running of the battery. The fast performance degradation after 250 h could be associated with the precipitation of inert ZnO in the cathode, which could be associated with the over-saturation of zincate ion after prolonged cycling due to the accumulation of product from the irreversible redox of the Zn anode [54,55], which was evidenced by the XRD result presented in Figure S6b. The accumulation of ZnO deposition could result in the deterioration of gas and ionic transfer pathways.

2.4. Integration of a Small Amount of Pt/C for Optimization of Oxygen Catalysis

The decent performance and very good stability presented above suggest that the double-perovskite-type La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 is a promising bifunctional oxygen catalyst for practical Zn-air batteries. As discussed in the last few sections, the oxygen vacancies introduced by the Sr doping were the origin of the enhanced catalytic activity (Figure 5d). Sr doping is a modification of the entire bulk particles, and the oxygen vacancies may disperse on both the particle bulk and surface. Moreover, the substitution amount of Sr has a limitation which is restricted by the perovskite structure itself. It is worth noting that OER and ORR are usually more likely to happen on the catalyst surface. To further increase surface oxygen vacancies, a facile Pt/C decoration strategy was introduced (Figure S7). Commercial Pt/C was physically mixed with the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 using an ultrasonic bath. Even though the mass ratio of Pt/C to the perovskite was controlled at a very low value (2 to 5 wt% of Pt to La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6), the ORR and OER activity was significantly boosted. As presented in Figure 5a, the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6-Pt mixture with a Pt loading of 2% and 5% demonstrated a ΔE (based on RDE test in 0.1 M KOH) of 0.90 and 0.85 V (vs. iR-corrected RHE), which is highly superior to that without Pt decoration (1.10 V). This improvement in the bifunctional catalysis was also reflected by the galvanostatic charging−discharging performance of the Zn-air battery (with 6 M KOH + 0.2 M Zn(Ac)2). As compared in Figure 5b, a decrease in voltage gaps (0.95, 0.88, 0.85 V vs. Zn) and an increase in round-trip efficiency (55%, 58%, 59%) were observed for samples with the introduction of 0%, 2%, and 5% Pt. The XPS O 1s spectra (Figure 5c) indicated the increased amount of O22−/O, which is highly related to surface oxygen vacancy for the samples with Pt decoration (Pt 4f spectra supplemented in Figure S8) [51]. This could be associated with the surface charge transfer from Pt/C to cation elements in the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6, which results in the formation of more oxygen vacancies on the perovskite surface as compensation (Figure 5e) [24].

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Synthesis of Perovskite-Type Oxide Nanocrystallites

A fast and low-temperature synthesis of perovskite-type oxide nanocrystallites was achieved using Na-K nitrate molten salts as a highly oxidized medium, which was adjusted based on the method reported by Tian et al. [42] La, Sr, Mn, and Co nitrate salts were utilized as the source of the cations and the amount of each cation was determined according to the stoichiometric number of the target perovskite products. Taking the synthesis of 0.005 mol La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 as an example, 3.46 g La(NO3)3·6H2O, 0.42 g Sr(NO3)2, 1.26 g Mn(NO3)2·4H2O, and 1.46 g Co(NO3)2·6H2O (weights calculated based on the stoichiometric ratio of cations in La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6) were manually dry-mixed in a mortar for 5 min. The molar ratio of the above cation elements was La:Sr:Mn:Co = 8:2:5:5, and the total molar amount of the cation was 0.02 mol. After that, pre-mixed salts consisting of 5.67 g NaNO3 and 3.37 g of KNO3 (the total molar amount of Na + K was 0.1 mol) were added and further milled for 5 min. The resulting pink-colored powder was then transferred into a crucible and heated at 550 °C for 3 h (heating rate 10 °C min−1). After the crucible was cooled, 80 mL DI water was added into the crucible and put into an ultrasonic bath for 10 min to dissolve the rigid nitrate salts. The resulting dispersion was vacuum filtered, and then repeatedly washed with DI water three additional times. The washed powder was dried at 60 °C.
For comparison, a La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 bulk particle sample was prepared via a conventional sol−gel method. As is typical, 3.46 g La(NO3)3·6H2O, 0.42 g Sr(NO3)2, 1.26 g Mn(NO3)2·4H2O, and 1.46 g Co(NO3)2·6H2O were dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water. Quantities of 5.84 g of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 7.68 g citric acid (CA), and 15.5 mL ammonia solution were added to the solution. The mixture was heated at 180 °C until a transparent gel was formed. Then the gel was heated at 250 °C for 5 h. The obtained precursor was further calcinated at 700 °C for 5 h.

3.2. Material Characterizations

Morphologies of the double-perovskite-type cubic nanocrystallites were observed using microscopic techniques including SEM (Zeiss Neon) and TEM (Titan G2). Crystal structures of the samples were analyzed using XRD (Bruker D8 Advance, Cu Kα radiation) and high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM, Titan G2). Dispersion of the cations was evaluated using the EDS mapping technique via the Titan G2 TEM. The composition ratio of the cations was evaluated by the EDS system (Oxford) equipped with an SEM (Tescan Clara). Porosity information of the materials was analyzed using the 77 K liquid nitrogen adsorption−desorption technique (Micromeritics TriStar). The chemical state of elements on the perovskite surface was analyzed using XPS (Al Kα radiation).

3.3. Evaluation of Oxygen Catalytic Activity

As a common practice for evaluating the catalytic activity of perovskite oxide [16,51], the oxide materials were mixed with conductive carbon (i.e., Super P), which ensures sufficient electrical conductivity on the RDE. A dispersion consisting of 10 mg oxide, 10 mg Super P, 1 mL ethanol, and 100 μL Nafion®117 solution (5 wt%) was made and 5 μL of the dispersion was drop-cast on the glassy carbon area of a RDE (weight loading of the oxide catalyst: ~0.232 mg cm−2). Commercial Pt/C and IrO2 were also evaluated for comparisons. The same electrode dispersion composition as that containing perovskites was adopted for the IrO2 sample (10 mg of IrO2, 10 mg of Super P), while no additional Super P was added for the 20% Pt/C sample (10 mg of 20% Pt/C). For the Pt/C + IrO2 mixture sample, 5 mg 20% Pt/C, 5 mg IrO2, and 10 mg Super P were applied.
Electrochemical measurements for evaluating the oxygen catalytic activity were carried out using the RDE in a three-electrode cell with Pt wire as the counter electrode, Ag/AgCl (4 M KCl) as the reference electrode, and 0.1 M KOH aqueous solution as the electrolyte. The electrolyte was purged with O2 for 30 min before the test and purging continued during the test. The electrochemical evaluation was conducted with a potentiostat (CHI760E). Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) with a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 was performed at 1600 rpm. The voltages from the RDE curves are presented in RHE, converted with the equation: E(RHE) = E(Ag/AgCl) + 0.199 + 0.0591 × pH. Ohmic voltage drop was considered with a resistance (~45 Ω) of the working electrode.
An RRDE (Pine Instruments AFE7R9GCPT) was utilized to evaluate the electron transfer number (n). The ping potential was settled at 0.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). The value of n and percentage of HO2 in the total reduced product (X) was calculated using the equations below:
n = 4 × I d I d + I r / N
X = 200 × I r / N I d + I r / N
Id: disk current, Ir: ring current, N: current efficiency = 37%
For the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 catalyst sample with a small amount (2–5 wt%) of Pt/C, the mass loading of oxide and metallic Pt on the working electrode was the same as that without Pt/C (~0.232 mg cm−2), and the ratio of oxide + Pt to carbon was fixed at 1:1. Taking La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6-Pt (95:5) as an example, the electrode dispersion consists of 9.5 mg oxide, 2.5 mg commercial 20% Pt/C (containing 0.5 mg Pt and 2 mg carbon support), 8 mg Super P, 1 mL ethanol, and 100 μL Nafion solution. To ensure the accuracy of weighing, 10 times the above weighting of the oxide, commercial 20% Pt/C, and Super P were premixed in 10 mL ethanol in an ultrasonic bath and dried at 60 °C. Then, 1/10 of the weighting amount of the mixture (20 mg) was used for preparing the dispersion.

3.4. Evaluation of Aqueous Zn-Air Batteries

Typically, 55 μL of the catalyst dispersion (the same composition as that for the RDE test, which contains 0.5 mg oxide) was drop-cast on 15 × 15 mm hydrophobic carbon paper (AVCarb P75T) within a ϕ8 mm circular coated area (~0.5 cm2, oxide loading of 1 mg cm−2). After drying at 100 °C to evaporate the ethanol, the air cathode film was placed in the positive side of a homemade Zn-air battery model. A Zn plate was placed in the negative side and 2 mL 6 M KOH + 0.2 M Zn(Ac)2 electrolyte was injected into the chamber between the positive and negative electrodes. OCV, I-V, and I-P profiles, and PPD of the aqueous Zn-air batteries were evaluated using a potentiostat (Biologic VSP). Galvanostatic cycling was evaluated using a battery tester (LANHE CT2001A).

3.5. Evaluation of Coin-Type Zn-Air Batteries with Gel−Polymer Electrolyte

SiO2 nanoparticle-modified polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-based gel−polymer electrolyte was prepared using a cast and freeze method. As is typical, 25 g DI water and 2.5 g PVA were mixed at 100 °C, followed by adding 0.83 g SiO2 dispersion (containing 0.25 g nano SiO2) at 100 °C until a high-viscosity mixture with evenly dispersed SiO2 nanoparticles was formed. The mixture was cast in a coin-type CR2016 positive battery case. A freezing (−20 °C, 24 h) and unfreezing (room temperature, 2 h) process was repeated 2 times until the cast mixture eventually formed a flexible and stretchable gel. The gel film was removed from the CR2016 case and soaked in a 1 M KOH + 0.2 M Zn(Ac)2 solution for 24 h. As presented in Figure 4d, a coin-type quasi-solid-state Zn-air battery was assembled according to the following order: (1) a meshed CR2032 negative case, (2) a piece of ϕ19 mm hydrophobic carbon paper as a gas diffusion layer, (3) a ϕ8 mm catalyst film (perovskite:CNT:PTFE = 6:2:2 wt:wt:wt), (4) a gel−polymer electrolyte film, (5) a ϕ8 mm Zn plate as an anode, (6) a ϕ 16 mm stainless steel plate, (7) a stainless steel spring, and (8) a CR2032 negative case.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, rational designs including introducing and increasing oxygen vacancies and nanosizing of the B-site ordered double perovskite were proposed to effectively improve the bifunctional oxygen catalysis. The B-site ordered double-perovskite-type nanocrystallites with ultra-small cubic (20–50 nm length) morphology and high specific surface areas (25 m2 g−1) were prepared via a molten-salt method. Due to the introduction of the oxygen vacancies via partial substitution of La with Sr, the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites demonstrated improved catalytic activity for both ORR and OER. Zn-air batteries with the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 as an oxygen catalyst demonstrated decent discharge−charge voltage gaps of 0.75 and 1.10 V at 1 and 30 mA cm−2, respectively, and good cycling stability for more than 250 h with a fair voltage gap of ~1V in an alkaline electrolyte. The crystal structure of the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites remained stable after hundreds of hours of charge−discharge cycling. A coin-type Zn-air battery with the La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 and an alkaline gel−polymer electrolyte also presented good performance and decent stability. Further enhancement of the ORR-OER catalysis and performance of the Zn-air battery was achieved by increasing surface oxygen vacancies via integrating a small amount of Pt on the surface of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal13101332/s1, Figure S1: SEM images of (a), (b) La2MnCoO6 and (c), (d) La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites; Figure S2: N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the perovskite-type nanocrystallites; Table S1: Physical parameters for the perovskite-type nanocrystallites; Figure S3: Comparison of (a) ORR and (b) OER polarization curves of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallites synthesized via a molten-salt method and La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 particle synthesized via a sol-gel method; Figure S4. Comparison of OCV, I-V and I-P profiles with PPD annotated in the image for aqueous Zn-air batteries with La2MnCoO6 or La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 as the catalyst; Figure S5: Comparison of rate performance for aqueous Zn-air batteries with La2MnCoO6 or La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 as air cathode with 10-minute galvanostatic charging-discharging cycles; Figure S6: (a) A prolonged 2000-cycle (~333 h) test until build-up of overpotential of aqueous Zn-air battery with a La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 as air cathode; (b) XRD profiles of the initial La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 as air cathode and after 50 h and 333 h; Figure S7: SEM images of (a) La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6-Pt (98:2) and (b) La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6-Pt (95:5) and (c) EDS profiles; Figure S8: XPS Pt 4f spectra of Pt/C, La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6-Pt (98:2) and La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6-Pt (95:5); Table S2: Comparison of physical parameters of some representative catalysts and performances of aqueous Zn–air batteries [3,19,24,25,56,57].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and Z.S.; methodology, Y.Z., X.X. and C.S.; validation, Y.Z., M.O.T. and Z.S.; formal analysis, Y.Z. and X.X.; investigation, Y.Z.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., X.X., C.S., M.O.T. and Z.S.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, C.S., M.O.T. and Z.S.; project administration, M.O.T. and Z.S.; funding acquisition, M.O.T. and Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery Projects, Grant Nos. DP200103332, DP200103315 and DP220103669.

Data Availability Statement

All the relevant data are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

Part of this research was undertaken using the SEM, XRD, XPS instrumentation (ARC LE0775553, LE0775551, LE120100026) at the John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University. The authors acknowledge the TEM facilities, and the scientific and technical assistance of the Australian National Fabrication Facility at the Centre for Microscopy, Characterization & Analysis, The University of Western Australia, a facility funded by the University, State and Commonwealth Governments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Lu, J. Metal Air Batteries: Will They Be the Future Electrochemical Energy Storage Device of Choice? ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1370–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fu, J.; Cano, Z.P.; Park, M.G.; Yu, A.; Fowler, M.; Chen, Z. Electrically Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arafat, Y.; Azhar, M.R.; Zhong, Y.; Abid, H.R.; Tadé, M.O.; Shao, Z. Advances in Zeolite Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs) Derived Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysts and Their Application in Zinc–Air Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, Z.; Jiang, T.; Ali, M.; Meng, Y.; Jin, Y.; Cui, Y.; Chen, W. Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 16610–16751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cai, X.; Lai, L.; Lin, J.; Shen, Z. Recent Advances in Air Electrodes for Zn-Air Batteries: Electrocatalysis and Structural Design. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4, 945–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhong, Y.; Xu, X.; Wang, W.; Shao, Z. Recent Advances in Metal-Organic Framework Derivatives as Oxygen Catalysts for Zinc-Air Batteries. Batter. Supercaps 2019, 2, 272–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J. Atomic Modulation and Structure Design of Carbons for Bifunctional Electrocatalysis in Metal-Air Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1803800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, C.; Li, W.; Liu, H.-K.; Dou, S.; Wang, J. Design Strategies for Developing Non-Precious Metal Based Bi-Functional Catalysts for Alkaline Electrolyte Based Zinc–Air Batteries. Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 1812–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hong, W.T.; Risch, M.; Stoerzinger, K.A.; Grimaud, A.; Suntivich, J.; Shao-Horn, Y. Toward the Rational Design of Non-Precious Transition Metal Oxides for Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1404–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, R.; Lee, J.-S.; Liu, M.; Cho, J. Recent Progress in Non-Precious Catalysts for Metal-Air Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 816–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pan, J.; Tian, X.L.; Zaman, S.; Dong, Z.; Liu, H.; Park, H.S.; Xia, B.Y. Recent Progress on Transition Metal Oxides as Bifunctional Catalysts for Lithium-Air and Zinc-Air Batteries. Batter. Supercaps 2019, 2, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Du, G.; Liu, X.; Zong, Y.; Hor, T.S.A.; Yu, A.; Liu, Z. Co3O4 Nanoparticle-Modified MnO2 Nanotube Bifunctional Oxygen Cathode Catalysts for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4657–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ma, H.; Wang, B. A Bifunctional Electrocatalyst α-MnO2-LaNiO3/Carbon Nanotube Composite for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 46084–46092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, N.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Li, A.; Qiao, J.; Zhang, J. Self-Assembly Formation of Bi-Functional Co3O4/MnO2-CNTs Hybrid Catalysts for Achieving Both High Energy/Power Density and Cyclic Ability of Rechargeable Zinc-Air Battery. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, Z.; Irtem, E.; Ibanez, M.; Nafria, R.; Marti-Sanchez, S.; Genc, A.; de la Mata, M.; Liu, Y.; Cadavid, D.; Llorca, J.; et al. Mn3O4@CoMn2O4−CoxOy Nanoparticles: Partial Cation Exchange Synthesis and Electrocatalytic Properties toward the Oxygen Reduction and Evolution Reactions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 17435–17444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xu, X.; Wang, W.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Recent Advances in Novel Nanostructuring Methods of Perovskite Electrocatalysts for Energy-Related Applications. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, X.; Zhong, Y.; Shao, Z. Double Perovskites in Catalysis, Electrocatalysis, and Photo(electro)catalysis. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 410–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Z.; Yu, A.; Higgins, D.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z. Highly Active and Durable Core-Corona Structured Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Metal-Air Battery Application. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1946–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Q.; Xue, Y.; Sun, S.; Li, S.; Miao, H.; Liu, Z. La0.8Sr0.2Co1−xMnxO3 Perovskites as Efficient Bi-Functional Cathode Catalysts for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 254, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dai, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhai, S.; Cheng, C.; Zhao, S.; Tan, P.; Shao, Z.; Ni, M. Regulating the Interfacial Electron Density of La0.8Sr0.2Mn0.5Co0.5O3/RuOx for Efficient and Low-Cost Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysts and Rechargeable Zn-Air Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 61098–61106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bian, J.; Li, Z.; Li, N.; Sun, C. Oxygen Deficient LaMn0.75Co0.25O3−δ Nanofibers as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction and Zinc-Air Batteries. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 8208–8214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Park, H.W.; Lee, D.U.; Zamani, P.; Seo, M.H.; Nazar, L.F.; Chen, Z. Electrospun Porous Nanorod Perovskite Oxide/Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Composite as a Bi-Functional Catalyst for Metal Air Batteries. Nano Energy 2014, 10, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, X.; Pan, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Shi, C.; Guan, D.; Ge, L.; Hu, Z.; Chin, Y.-Y.; Lin, H.-J.; Chen, C.-T.; et al. New Undisputed Evidence and Strategy for Enhanced Lattice-Oxygen Participation of Perovskite Electrocatalyst through Cation Deficiency Manipulation. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2200530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Sunarso, J.; Lu, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Dai, J.; Guan, D.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. High-Performance Platinum-Perovskite Composite Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalyst for Rechargeable Zn-Air Battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bhardwaj, U.; Sharma, A.; Mathur, A.; Halder, A.; Kushwaha, H.S. Synthesis of a Novel Sr2TiMnO6 Double Perovskite Electrocatalyst for Rechargeable Zinc–Air Batteries. Energy Storage 2022, 4, e293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mondal, S.; Majee, R.; Arif Islam, Q.; Bhattacharyya, S. 2D Heterojunction Between Double Perovskite Oxide Nanosheet and Layered Double Hydroxide to Promote Rechargeable Zinc-Air Battery Performance. ChemElectroChem 2020, 7, 5005–5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, C.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, Z.; Luo, X.; Hou, B.; Gholizadeh, M.; Gao, X.; Fan, X.; Tan, Z. Enhancement on PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5 Electrocatalyst Performance in the Application of Zn-Air Battery. Catalysts 2022, 12, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bu, Y.; Gwon, O.; Nam, G.; Jang, H.; Kim, S.; Zhong, Q.; Cho, J.; Kim, G. A Highly Efficient and Robust Cation Ordered Perovskite Oxide as a Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 11594–11601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suntivich, J.; Gasteiger, H.A.; Yabuuchi, N.; Nakanishi, H.; Goodenough, J.B.; Shao-Horn, Y. Design Principles for Oxygen-Reduction Activity on Perovskite Oxide Catalysts for Fuel Cells and Metal-Air Batteries. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, Z.; Song, Q.; Xia, B.; Jiang, L.; Duan, J.; Chen, S. Perovskite Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution and Reduction Reactions in Zinc-Air Batteries. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Majee, R.; Islam, Q.A.; Bhattacharyya, S. Surface Charge Modulation of Perovskite Oxides at the Crystalline Junction with Layered Double Hydroxide for a Durable Rechargeable Zinc-Air Battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 35853–35862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peng, S.; Han, X.; Li, L.; Chou, S.; Ji, D.; Huang, H.; Du, Y.; Liu, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Electronic and Defective Engineering of Electrospun CaMnO3 Nanotubes for Enhanced Oxygen Electrocatalysis in Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ishihara, T.; Guo, L.M.; Miyano, T.; Inoishi, Y.; Kaneko, K.; Ida, S. Mesoporous La0.6Ca0.4CoO3 Perovskites with Large Surface Areas as Stable Air Electrodes for Rechargeable Zn-Air Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 7686–7692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Y.-Q.; Tao, H.-B.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.-F.; Hua, B.; Luo, J.-L. In Situ Grown Cobalt Phosphide (CoP) on Perovskite Nanofibers as an Optimized Trifunctional Electrocatalyst for Zn-Air Batteries and Overall Water Splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 26607–26617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuai, L.; Kan, E.; Cao, W.; Huttula, M.; Ollikkala, S.; Ahopelto, T.; Honkanen, A.-P.; Huotari, S.; Wang, W.; Geng, B. Mesoporous LaMnO3+δ Perovskite from Spray−Pyrolysis with Superior Performance for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Zn−Air Battery. Nano Energy 2018, 43, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yan, Z.; Sun, H.; Chen, X.; Fu, X.; Chen, C.; Cheng, F.; Chen, J. Rapid Low-Temperature Synthesis of Perovskite/Carbon Nanocomposites as Superior Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction in Zn-Air Batteries. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 3282–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arafat, Y.; Azhar, M.R.; Zhong, Y.; Xu, X.; Tadé, M.O.; Shao, Z. A Porous Nano-Micro-Composite as a High-Performance Bi-Functional Air Electrode with Remarkable Stability for Rechargeable Zinc–Air Batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, C.; Hou, B.; Wang, X.; Yu, Z.; Luo, D.; Gholizadeh, M.; Fan, X. High-Performance A-Site Deficient Perovskite Electrocatalyst for Rechargeable Zn–Air Battery. Catalysts 2022, 12, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grimaud, A.; May, K.J.; Carlton, C.E.; Lee, Y.-L.; Risch, M.; Hong, W.T.; Zhou, J.; Shao-Horn, Y. Double Perovskites as a Family of Highly Active Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution in Alkaline Solution. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kleibeuker, J.E.; Choi, E.-M.; Jones, E.D.; Yu, T.-M.; Sala, B.; MacLaren, B.A.; Kepaptsoglou, D.; Hernandez-Maldonado, D.; Ramasse, Q.M.; Jones, L.; et al. Route to Achieving Perfect B-Site Ordering in Double Perovskite Thin Films. NPG Asia Mater. 2017, 9, e406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xue, P.; Wu, H.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, X. Recent Progress in Molten Salt Synthesis of Low-Dimensional Perovskite Oxide Nanostructures, Structural Characterization, Properties, and Functional Applications: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018, 34, 914–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tian, Y.; Chen, D.; Jiao, X. La1−xSrxMnO3 (x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) Nanoparticles Nearly Freestanding in Water:  Preparation and Magnetic Properties. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 6088–6090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, L.H.; Deng, J.X.; Chen, J.; Xing, X.R. Topochemical Molten Salt Synthesis for Functional Perovskite Compounds. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Androulakis, J.; Katsarakis, N.; Giapintzakis, J.; Vouroutzis, N.; Pavlidou, E.; Chrissafis, K.; Polychroniadis, E.K.; Perdikatsis, V. LaSrMnCoO6: A New Cubic Double Perovskite Oxide. J. Solid State Chem. 2003, 173, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tang, T.; Jiang, W.-J.; Liu, X.-Z.; Deng, J.; Niu, S.; Wang, B.; Jin, S.-F.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, L.; Hu, J.-S.; et al. Metastable Rock Salt Oxide-Mediated Synthesis of High-Density Dual-Protected M@NC for Long-Life Rechargeable Zinc–Air Batteries with Record Power Density. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 7116–7127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, C.-F.; King, G.; Dickerson, R.M.; Papin, P.A.; Gupta, S.; Kellogg, W.R.; Wu, G. Oxygen-Deficient BaTiO3−x Perovskite as an Efficient Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalyst. Nano Energy 2015, 13, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bao, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, B.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, M.; Yang, W.; Hu, X.; Wang, H.; Pan, B.; Xie, Y. Ultrathin Spinel-Structured Nanosheets Rich in Oxygen Deficiencies for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7399–7404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ji, Q.; Bi, L.; Zhang, J.; Cao, H.; Zhao, X.S. The Role of Oxygen Vacancies of ABO3 Perovskite Oxides in the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 1408–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. She, S.; Yu, J.; Tang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Sunarso, J.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Systematic Study of Oxygen Evolution Activity and Stability on La1−xSrxFeO3−δ Perovskite Electrocatalysts in Alkaline Media. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 11715–11721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, J.; Sunarso, J.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, X.; Ran, R.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Activity and Stability of Ruddlesden–Popper-Type Lan+1NinO3n+1 (n = 1, 2, 3, and ∞) Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction and Evolution Reactions in Alkaline Media. Chem. Eur. J. Chem. 2016, 22, 2719–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Zhong, Y.; Bu, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhong, Q.; Liu, M.; Shao, Z. A Perovskite Nanorod as Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Merino, N.A.; Barbero, B.P.; Eloy, P.; Cadús, L.E. La1−xCaxCoO3 Perovskite-Type Oxides: Identification of the Surface Oxygen Species by XPS. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 1489–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhong, Y.; Xu, X.; Liu, P.; Ran, R.; Jiang, S.P.; Wu, H.; Shao, Z. A Function-Separated Design of Electrode for Realizing High-Performance Hybrid Zinc Battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2002992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, H.-I.; Kim, E.-J.; Kim, S.-J.; Shin, H.-C. Influence of ZnO Precipitation on the Cycling Stability of Rechargeable Zn–Air Batteries. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2015, 45, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, J.-S.; Kim, S.T.; Cao, R.; Choi, N.-S.; Liu, M.; Lee, K.T.; Cho, J. Metal-Air Batteries with High Energy Density: Li-Air versus Zn-Air. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Miao, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Sun, S.; Xue, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, J. A New Family of Mn-Based Perovskite (La1−xYxMnO3) with Improved Oxygen Electrocatalytic Activity for Metal-Air Batteries. Energy 2018, 154, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Seong, A.; Kim, J.; Kwon, O.; Jeong, H.Y.; Gorte, R.J.; Vohs, J.M.; Kim, G. Self-Reconstructed Interlayer Derived by In-Situ Mn Diffusion from La0.5Sr0.5MnO3 via Atomic Layer Deposition for an Efficient Bi-Functional Electrocatalyst. Nano Energy 2020, 71, 104564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthesis and characterization of the double-perovskite-type cubic nanocrystallites. (a) Illustrative demonstration of synthesis procedure with the inset showing the atomic arrangements of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6; (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns; (c) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image; (d) corresponding fast Fourier transformed (FFT) pattern with zone axis of [−1 1 0]; (e) illustrative demonstration of the atomic arrangements viewed along the [−1 1 0] direction; and (f) elemental mapping of a La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallite.
Figure 1. Synthesis and characterization of the double-perovskite-type cubic nanocrystallites. (a) Illustrative demonstration of synthesis procedure with the inset showing the atomic arrangements of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6; (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns; (c) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image; (d) corresponding fast Fourier transformed (FFT) pattern with zone axis of [−1 1 0]; (e) illustrative demonstration of the atomic arrangements viewed along the [−1 1 0] direction; and (f) elemental mapping of a La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 nanocrystallite.
Catalysts 13 01332 g001
Figure 2. Bifunctional oxygen catalytic activity of the double-perovskite-type cubic nanocrystallites. (a) Comparison of ORR polarization curves for perovskite-type oxide nanocrystallites and three different commercial samples; (b) the electron transfer number (n) and HO2 yield percentage based on the data from rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE). (c) Comparison of OER polarization curves for the perovskite-type materials with commercial samples and (d) corresponding Tafel plots. (e) Comparison of bifunctional oxygen catalysis activities. (f) XPS O 1s profiles of La2MnCoO6 and La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 with peak fitting results.
Figure 2. Bifunctional oxygen catalytic activity of the double-perovskite-type cubic nanocrystallites. (a) Comparison of ORR polarization curves for perovskite-type oxide nanocrystallites and three different commercial samples; (b) the electron transfer number (n) and HO2 yield percentage based on the data from rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE). (c) Comparison of OER polarization curves for the perovskite-type materials with commercial samples and (d) corresponding Tafel plots. (e) Comparison of bifunctional oxygen catalysis activities. (f) XPS O 1s profiles of La2MnCoO6 and La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 with peak fitting results.
Catalysts 13 01332 g002
Figure 3. Performance of aqueous Zn-air batteries with a La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 catalyst in 6 M KOH + 2 M Zn(Ac)2 electrolyte: (a) open-circuit voltage (OCV), current density−voltage (I-V) and current density−power density (I-P) profiles with the peak power densities (PPD) annotated in the image; (b) rate performance evaluated with 5 min galvanostatic charging and 5 min galvanostatic discharging; (c) cycling stability at 5 mA cm−2; inset shows the specific galvanostatic charge−discharge profiles.
Figure 3. Performance of aqueous Zn-air batteries with a La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 catalyst in 6 M KOH + 2 M Zn(Ac)2 electrolyte: (a) open-circuit voltage (OCV), current density−voltage (I-V) and current density−power density (I-P) profiles with the peak power densities (PPD) annotated in the image; (b) rate performance evaluated with 5 min galvanostatic charging and 5 min galvanostatic discharging; (c) cycling stability at 5 mA cm−2; inset shows the specific galvanostatic charge−discharge profiles.
Catalysts 13 01332 g003
Figure 4. Performance of coin-type quasi-solid-state Zn-air battery. (a) Configuration of the coin-type quasi-solid-state Zn-air battery, (b) OCV, I-V, and I-P profiles with the PPD annotated in the image, (c) cycling stability evaluation at 5 mA cm−2, (d) OCV of a three-series coin-type battery group and working voltage for lighting 21 LED bulbs in parallel.
Figure 4. Performance of coin-type quasi-solid-state Zn-air battery. (a) Configuration of the coin-type quasi-solid-state Zn-air battery, (b) OCV, I-V, and I-P profiles with the PPD annotated in the image, (c) cycling stability evaluation at 5 mA cm−2, (d) OCV of a three-series coin-type battery group and working voltage for lighting 21 LED bulbs in parallel.
Catalysts 13 01332 g004
Figure 5. Further optimization of the oxygen catalysis. Comparison of (a) bifunctional oxygen catalysis activities and (b) OCV and first discharge−charge cycle at 5 mA cm−2 of Zn-air battery, and (c) XPS O 1s spectra of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 and Pt/C decorated La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 samples. Illustrative demonstration that the improvement in bifunctional oxygen catalysis activity benefited from (d) generation of oxygen vacancies via partial Sr substitution in the perovskite structure and (e) increased surface oxygen vacancies induced by facile Pt/C decoration.
Figure 5. Further optimization of the oxygen catalysis. Comparison of (a) bifunctional oxygen catalysis activities and (b) OCV and first discharge−charge cycle at 5 mA cm−2 of Zn-air battery, and (c) XPS O 1s spectra of La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 and Pt/C decorated La1.6Sr0.4MnCoO6 samples. Illustrative demonstration that the improvement in bifunctional oxygen catalysis activity benefited from (d) generation of oxygen vacancies via partial Sr substitution in the perovskite structure and (e) increased surface oxygen vacancies induced by facile Pt/C decoration.
Catalysts 13 01332 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhong, Y.; Xu, X.; Su, C.; Tadé, M.O.; Shao, Z. Promoting Bifunctional Oxygen Catalyst Activity of Double-Perovskite-Type Cubic Nanocrystallites for Aqueous and Quasi-Solid-State Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101332

AMA Style

Zhong Y, Xu X, Su C, Tadé MO, Shao Z. Promoting Bifunctional Oxygen Catalyst Activity of Double-Perovskite-Type Cubic Nanocrystallites for Aqueous and Quasi-Solid-State Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. Catalysts. 2023; 13(10):1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhong, Yijun, Xiaomin Xu, Chao Su, Moses Oludayo Tadé, and Zongping Shao. 2023. "Promoting Bifunctional Oxygen Catalyst Activity of Double-Perovskite-Type Cubic Nanocrystallites for Aqueous and Quasi-Solid-State Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries" Catalysts 13, no. 10: 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop