Next Article in Journal
Role of Water Molecules to the Electronic States of M-DNA
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Crystal Structure of a 1D Chained Coordination Polymer Constructed from Ca2+ and 2-[(E)-(2-Furoylhydrazono)methyl]benzenesulfonate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Molecular Structures of (E)-non-2-enoic Acid and (E)-dec-2-enoic Acid

Leibniz Institute for Catalysis at the University of Rostock (LIKAT), Albert-Einstein-Str. 29a, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2015, 5(4), 466-474; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5040466
Submission received: 25 September 2015 / Revised: 9 October 2015 / Accepted: 10 October 2015 / Published: 16 October 2015

Abstract

:
The molecular structures of (E)-non-2-enoic acid (C9) and (E)-dec-2-enoic acid (C10) are reported. The title compounds were crystallized by slow evaporation of ethanolic solutions at −30 °C. C9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c and C10 in the triclinic space group P-1, each with 4 molecules in the unit cell. The unit cell parameters for C9 are: a = 10.6473(4) Å, b = 5.2855(2) Å, c = 17.0313(7) Å; β = 106.0985(10)° and V = 920.87(6) Å3. The unit cell parameters for C10 are: a = 4.1405(2) Å, b = 15.2839(6) Å, c = 17.7089(7) Å; α = 68.3291(11)°, β = 83.3850(13)°, γ = 85.0779(12)° and V = 1033.39(8) Å3.

1. Introduction

Unsaturated fatty acids and particularly essential fatty acids are compounds with great interest in food, nutrition and health sciences due to their role in biological processes especially for humans [1,2,3,4]. They can be classified as monounsaturated and polyunsaturated, or trans-unsaturated and cis-unsaturated fatty acids, which exhibit long nonpolar unsaturated alkyl chains and polar carboxylic head groups. For example, oleic acid (Z)-octadec-9-enoic acid, or linoleic acid (9Z,12Z)-9,12-octadecadienoic acid, respectively, can be found in natural foods, like meat, milk products, nuts, olives and oils. By increasing the number of double bonds within the alkyl chain the melting point decreases, yielding liquids, especially in case of polyunsaturated fatty acids at ambient conditions [5]. A certain number of derivatives of the title compounds (E)-non-2-enoic acid (C9) and (E)-dec-2-enoic acid (C10) exhibit interesting properties, e.g., 10-Hydroxy-2-decenoic acid isolated from royal jelly shows good antibiotic activity against many bacteria and fungi [6,7]. 4-hydroxy-trans-2-nonenoic acid as a derivate of C9 acts as a receptor ligand in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus and elevated concentrations can be found in patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease [8].
Crystal structure determinations of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids are still scarce in the literature. The crystal structures of acrylic acid (C3) [9,10,11,12], and crotonic acid (C4) [13] have been known for more than 40 years, while recently the crystal structures of four more members of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids, (E)-pent-2-enoic acid (C5) [14], (E)-hex-2-enoic acid (C6) [15], (E)-undec-2-enoic acid (C11) [16], and (E)-dodec-2-enoic acid (C12) [17], respectively, have been reported. In addition, two crystal structure determinations of co-crystals containing C6 are also known [18,19]. In comparison a complete set of crystal structures of the corresponding saturated carboxylic acids (propionic acid to pentadecanoic acid) is available from the literature [20,21,22,23,24]. In this contribution, we report on the synthesis, characterization and crystal structure determinations of two members of the series of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids: (E)-non-2-enoic acid (C9) and (E)-dec-2-enoic acid (C10), respectively, which are linked into centrosymmetric dimers via pairs of O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds in the crystals.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

One-hundred and thirty years ago, Schneegans reported on the synthesis of nonenoic acid via reaction of heptanal, sodium acetate and acetic anhydride without knowledge of the correct constitution of this α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid [25]. Later, Harding and Weizmann reported on the correct molecular formula of the received (E)-non-2-enoic acid [26]. However, until now there has been no X-ray determination of the crystal structure of C9 or its homologue C10. The syntheses of the two unsaturated α,β-carboxylic acids C9 and C10 are conducted by a convenient adapted condensation reaction of malonic acid and the appropriate aldehydes at room temperature in high yields and purities as depicted in Scheme 1 [27,28,29,30].
Scheme 1. Reaction sequences for the synthesis of the two title compounds C9 and C10.
Scheme 1. Reaction sequences for the synthesis of the two title compounds C9 and C10.
Crystals 05 00466 g005

2.2. Crystal Structures

Molecular structures of linked acid dimers of the title compounds with pairs of O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively, with atom-labeling scheme and displacement thermal ellipsoids at the 50% probability level. Crystal and instrumental parameters of the crystal structure determinations of C9 and C10 can be found in Table 1.
Selected bond lengths and angles are summarized in Table 2. C9 crystallizes in monoclinic space group P21/c with 4 molecules in the unit cell, whereas C10 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P-1 with two symmetry independent molecules in the asymmetric unit and Z = 4.
Figure 1. View of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C9 showing atom labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Figure 1. View of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C9 showing atom labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Crystals 05 00466 g001
Figure 2. View of acid dimers of the two symmetry independent molecules in the crystal of C10 showing atom labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Figure 2. View of acid dimers of the two symmetry independent molecules in the crystal of C10 showing atom labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Crystals 05 00466 g002
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for compounds C9 and C10.
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for compounds C9 and C10.
CompoundC9C10
Chemical formulaC9H16O2C10H18O2
Formula weight156.22170.24
Crystal systemmonoclinictriclinic
Unit cell dimensionsa10.6473(4) Å4.1405(2) Å
b5.2855(2) Å15.2839(6) Å
c17.0313(7) Å17.7089(7) Å
α90°68.3291(11)°
β106.0985(10)°83.3850(13)°
γ90°85.0779(12)°
Unit cell volume920.87(6) Å31033.39(8) Å3
Temperature150(2) K150(2) K
Space groupP21/cP 1 ¯
Z (Z)4 (1)4 (2)
μ0.078 mm−10.074 mm−1
No. of reflections measured820920,844
No. of independent reflections22164999
Rint0.01480.0236
Final R1 values (I > 2σ(I))0.03650.0443
Final wR(F2) values (I > 2σ(I))0.09920.1108
Final R1 values (all data)0.04200.0619
Final wR(F2) values (all data)0.10460.1226
Goodness of fit on F21.0541.057
Density1.127 g/cm³1.094 g/cm³
Table 2. Selected atom distances (Å) and angles (°) for compounds C9 and C10.
Table 2. Selected atom distances (Å) and angles (°) for compounds C9 and C10.
--C9C10----
AtomsDistanceDistanceAtomsDistance
C1–O11.2902(11)1.2860(15)C11–O31.2757(15)
C1–O21.2468(11)1.2547(15)C11–O41.2575(14)
C1–C21.4711(12)1.4714(17)C11–C121.4697(16)
C2–C31.3242(13)1.3199(18)C12–C131.3197(17)
C3–C41.5010(11)1.4965(16)C13–C141.4927(16)
average C–C (alkyl chain)1.5231.523average C–C (alkyl chain)1.523
H-bonds in:D–H∙∙∙AD–HH∙∙∙AD∙∙∙A
C9O1–H1∙∙∙O2i0.960(15)1.676(15)2.6319(9)
C10O1–H1∙∙∙O2ii0.967(19)1.679(19)2.6400(13)
--O3–H3A∙∙∙O4iii0.841.792.6209(12)
--O4–H4A∙∙∙O3iii0.841.812.6209(12)
AtomsAngleAngleAtomsAngle
O1–C1–O2123.35(8)123.32(11)O3–C11–O4123.55(11)
O1–C1–C2117.78(8)117.88(11)O3–C11–C12118.30(10)
O2–C1–C2118.88(8)118.80(11)O4–C11–C12118.14(11)
C1–C2–C3123.29(8)123.74(12)C11–C12–C13124.19(12)
C2–C3–C4125.11(8)124.69(12)C12–C13–C14124.11(12)
H-bonds in:D–H∙∙∙AAngleSymmetry codes--
C9O1–H1∙∙∙O2i173.9(14)(i) – x + 2, – y, – z + 2--
C10O1–H1∙∙∙O2ii172.4(17)(ii) – x + 1, – y, – z + 2--
--O3–H3A∙∙∙O4iii170(iii) – x + 2, –y + 1, –z--
--O4–H4A∙∙∙O3iii162----
Interestingly, all corresponding saturated carboxylic acids crystallize exclusively in monoclinic space groups at low temperatures, either in C2/m (No. 12) [22], P21/c (No. 14) [20,23,24], or C2/c (No. 15) [24], respectively, whereas only the high-pressure form of propionic acid crystallizes in the triclinic space group P-1 (No. 2) [21]. In contrast to this findings, the analogous α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids crystallize either in orthorhombic (C3: Ibam) [9,10,11,12], monoclinic (C4: C2/c) [13], or triclinic (C5, C6, C11, C12: P-1) [14,15,16,17] space groups. The high-pressure form of acrylic acid crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c (No. 14) [12]. Bond lengths and angles in C9 and C10 resemble closely values found in other α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The crystal structures of C9 and C10 are characterized by carboxylic acid inversion dimers linked by pairs of O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds. Views of the packing of acid dimer layers in C9 and C10 are depicted in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. All non-hydrogen atoms of C9 lie almost in one plane with a torsion angle between the carboxylic group and the alkyl chain of 8.1° (C2–C3–C4–C5). In contrast, C10 features two symmetry-independent molecules, which adopt a conformation where the carboxylic group and the following three carbon atoms of the chain of the molecules lie almost in one plane and the remaining carbon atoms of the hydrocarbon chain adopt a nearly fully staggered conformation with torsion angles C2–C3–C4–C5: 127.7° and C12–C13–C14–C15: 122.8°, respectively.
Figure 3. View of the packing of acid dimer layers in the crystal of C9 along the crystallographic b axis.
Figure 3. View of the packing of acid dimer layers in the crystal of C9 along the crystallographic b axis.
Crystals 05 00466 g003
Figure 4. View of the packing of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C10 along the crystallographic a axis.
Figure 4. View of the packing of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C10 along the crystallographic a axis.
Crystals 05 00466 g004

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Considerations

NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV300 or Bruker AV400 and chemical shifts of the 1H, and 13C spectra were reported in parts per million (ppm) using the solvent shifts for 1H and 13C as internal standard (CDCl3: 1H δ = 7.26, 13C δ = 77.0). Elemental analysis for C, and H was performed on a Leco Microanalysator TruSpec CHNS device. MS spectra were determined by electron spray ionization using a Thermo Electron Finnigan MAT 95-XP mass spectrometer. Melting points were determined by cyclic differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) using a Mettler Toledo DSC823e in the range of −50 to 50 °C with a heating rate of 10 K/min (2 cycles, N2 atmosphere, Al crucible). All melting points are peak temperatures.

3.2. Materials

All chemicals were used as received without further drying or purification unless otherwise noted. n-heptanal, n-octanal, and malonic acid were purchased from ABCR (purity > 98%).

3.3. General Synthesis of α,β-unsaturated Carboxylic acids

Malonic acid (25.0 g, 240.2 mmol, 1.0 eq) was dissolved in dry pyridine (38.0 g, 480.5 mmol, 2.0 eq) at room temperature in a three-necked flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar and a reflux condenser under a mild flow of argon. The appropriate aldehyde (240.2 mmol, 1.0 eq) was then added in one portion and the resulting clear solution was further stirred for 72 h at room temperature under argon. Afterwards, the resulting light yellow to orange solution was brought to an acidic pH value by adding phosphoric acid at 0 °C (42.5 wt. %, 138.5 g, 600.6 mmol, 2.5 eq). The resulting two layers were extracted three times with 150 mL portions of ethyl acetate and reduced to a volume of ca. 150 mL in vacuo. To remove impurities from aldol condensation the raw acid was converted into the corresponding sodium salt by addition of an aqueous solution of sodium carbonate (20.4 g, 192.2 mmol, 0.8 eq in 200 mL). After stirring for 30 min the water phase was separated and extracted three times with 150 mL portions of ethyl acetate. The water phase was then acidified with concentrated hydrochloric acid (37.0 wt. %, 35.5 g, 360.4 mmol, 1.5 eq), the organic phase was separated and the water phase was again extracted three times with 150 mL portions of ethyl acetate. The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness in vacuo. The resulting raw product was further purified by distillation in vacuo yielding the product in purity > 99% (GC).
(E)-non-2-enoic acid (C9). M. p. 7 °C (lit. 1 °C) [31]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.05 (br s, 1H, OH); 7.09 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 5.82 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 4J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 2.26–2.19 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.50–1.432(m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.35–1.25 (m, 6H, 3x –CH2–); 0.91–0.85 (m, 3H, –CH3–). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.56 (CO); 152.57 (CH); 120.78 (CH); 32.46 (CH2); 31.71 (CH2); 28.95 (CH2); 27.98 (CH2); 22.67 (CH2); 14.17 (CH3). MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 156 (M+, 0), 99 (17), 97 (11), 96 (25), 95 (10), 86 (26), 84 (23), 81 (24), 73 (49), 71 (11), 70 (12), 69 (23), 68 (27), 67 (19), 57 (14), 56 (28), 55 (53), 54 (16), 53 (31), 45 (37), 43 (83), 42 (33), 41 (100), 40 (20), 39 (89), 38 (11), 29 (75). HRMS (ESI-TOF/MS): calculated for C9H16O2 (M+) 155.10759, found 155.10759. Elemental analysis for C9H16O2% (calc.): C 69.27 (69.19); H 10.28 (10.32).
(E)-dec-2-enoic acid (C10): M. p. 12 °C (lit. 9–12 °C) [32,33]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.13 (br s, 1H, OH); 7.09 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 5.82 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 4J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 2.26–2.19 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.50–1.43 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.34–1.25 (m, 8H, 4x–CH2–); 0.90–0.85 (m, 3H, –CH3–). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.56 (CO); 152.67 (CH); 120.78 (CH); 32.46 (CH2); 31.87 (CH2); 29.22 (CH2); 29.18 (CH2); 28.02 (CH2); 22.76 (CH2); 14.20 (CH3). MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 170 (M+, 0), 110 (14), 99 (15), 98 (12), 86 (19), 84 (17), 82 (10), 81 (21), 73 (43), 70 (16), 69 (25), 68 (26), 67 (19), 57 (20), 56 (28), 55 (48), 54 (14), 53 (27), 45 (29), 43 (78), 42 (23), 41 (100), 40 (16), 39 (74), 29 (75). HRMS (ESI-TOF/MS): calculated for C10H18O2 (M+) 169.123340, found 169.12335. Elemental analysis for C10H18O2% (calc.): C 70.62 (70.55); H 10.57 (10.66).

3.4. Crystal Structure Determinations

Data were collected on a Bruker Kappa APEX II Duo diffractometer [34]. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures on F2 with the SHELXTL software package [35]. Data were corrected for absorption effects using the multi-scan method (SADABS) [36]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. H1 could be found from the difference Fourier map and was refined with Uiso(H) fixed at 1.5 Ueq(O) for both compounds. For compound C10 the carboxyl group of the second molecule is disordered, therefore H3A and H4A were placed using AFIX 83 instruction with site occupancy factors of 0.6 for H3A and 0.4 for H4A (d(O–H) = 0.84 Å, Uiso(H) fixed at 1.5 Ueq(O)). The disorder concerning O3 and O4 was not resolved. All other H atoms were placed in idealized positions with d(C–H) = 0.95 Å (CH), 0.99 Å (CH2), 0.98 Å (CH3) and refined using a riding model with Uiso(H) fixed at 1.2 Ueq(C) for CH and CH2 and 1.5 Ueq(C) for CH3. Crystal data, data collection, and refinement parameters are collected in Table 1. DIAMOND program package was used for graphical representations [37]. Crystallographic data for the structural analyses have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC-1408770 for (E)-non-2-enoic acid (C9), and CCDC-1408769 for (E)-dec-2-enoic acid (C10). These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK; Fax: (+44)-1223-336-033; or E-Mail: [email protected].

4. Conclusions

The crystal and molecular structures of two homologues in the series of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids, namely (E)-non-2-enoic acid (C9) and (E)-dec-2-enoic acid (C10), are reported. In analogy to other known crystal structures of this class of substances C9 and C10 are characterized by carboxylic acid inversion dimers linked by pairs of O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds. However, in contrast to previously reported structures, C10 features two symmetry-independent molecules.

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Philipp Thiele (University of Rostock) for DSC measurements and Johannes Gerardus de Vries (LIKAT) for helpful support.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Burr, G.O.; Burr, M.M.; Miller, E.S. On the fatty acids essential in nutrition. III. J. Biol. Chem. 1932, 97, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Damude, H.G.; Kinney, A.J. Enhancing plant seed oils for human nutrition. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lands, B. Consequences of essential fatty acids. Nutrients 2012, 4, 1338–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Spector, A.A.; Kim, H.-Y. Discovery of essential fatty acids. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Beare-Rogers, J.; Dieffenbacher, A.; Holm, J.V. Lexicon of lipid nutrition (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 685–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Blum, M.S.; Novak, A.F.; Tabler, S. 10-Hydroxy-Δ2-decenoic acid, an antibiotic found in royal jelly. Science 1959, 130, 452–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Townsend, G.F.; Morgan, J.F.; Tolnai, S.; Hazlett, B.; Morton, H.J.; Shuel, R.W. Studies on the in vitro antitumor activity of fatty acids. I. 10-Hydroxy-2-decenoic acid from royal jelly. Cancer Res. 1960, 20, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Murphy, T.C.; Poppe, C.; Porter, J.E.; Montine, T.J.; Picklo, M.J., Sr. 4-Hydroxy-trans-2-nonenoic acid is a γ-hydroxybutyrate receptor ligand in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. J. Neurochem. 2004, 89, 1462–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chatani, Y.; Sakata, Y.; Nitta, I. Crystal structure of monomers polymerizable in their solid states. Part I. Acrylic acid. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Lett. 1963, 1, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Higgs, M.A.; Sass, R.L. The crystal structure of acrylic acid. Acta Cryst. 1963, 16, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boese, R.; Bläser, D.; Steller, I.; Latz, R.; Bäumen, A. Redetermination of 2-propenoic acid at 125K. Acta Cryst. 1999, C55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oswald, I.D.H.; Urquhart, A.J. Polymorphism and polymerization of acrylic and methacrylic acid at high pressure. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 4503–4507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Shimizu, S.; Kekka, S.; Kashino, S.; Haisa, M. Topochemical Studies. III. The Crystal and Molecular Structures of Crotonic Acid, CH3CH=CHCOOH, and Crotonamide, CH3CH=CHCONH2. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1974, 47, 1627–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peppel, T.; Sonneck, M.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of (E)-pent-2-enoic acid. Acta Cryst. 2015, E71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peppel, T.; Sonneck, M.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of (E)-hex-2-enoic acid. Acta Cryst. 2015, E71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sonneck, M.; Peppel, T.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of (E)-undec-2-enoic acid. Acta Cryst. 2015, E71, o426–o427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sonneck, M.; Peppel, T.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of (E)-dodec-2-enoic acid. Acta Cryst. 2015, E71, o528–o529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aakeröy, C.B.; Beatty, A.M.; Helfrich, B.A.; Nieuwenhuyzen, M. Do polymorphic compounds make good cocrystallizing agents? A structural case study that demonstrates the importance of synthon flexibility. Cryst. Growth Des. 2003, 3, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stanton, M.K.; Bak, A. Physicochemical properties of pharmaceutical co-crystals: A case study of ten AMG 517 co-crystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 3856–3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strieter, F.J.; Templeton, D.H.; Scheuerman, R.F.; Sass, R.L. The crystal structure of propionic acid. Acta Cryst. 1962, 15, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Allan, D.R.; Clark, S.J.; Parsons, S.; Ruf, M. A high-pressure structural study of propionic acid and the application of CCD detectors in high-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2000, 12, L613–L618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Strieter, F.J.; Templeton, D.H. Crystal structure of butyric acid. Acta Cryst. 1962, 15, 1240–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Scheuerman, R.F.; Sass, R.L. The crystal structure of valeric acid. Acta Cryst. 1962, 15, 1244–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bond, A.D. On the crystal structures and melting point alternation of the n-alkyl carboxylic acids. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schneegans, A. Die Perkin’sche Reaction in der Fettkörperreihe. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1885, 227, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Harding, V.J.; Weizmann, C. XXXII.—Δ1-Nonylenic acid. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1910, 97, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Knoevenagel, E. Condensation von Malonsäure mit aromatischen Aldehyden durch Ammoniak und Amine. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1898, 31, 2596–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Doebner, O. Ueber die der Sorbinsäure homologen, ungesättigten Säuren mit zwei Doppelbindungen. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1902, 35, 1136–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bennani, Y.L.; Sharpless, K.B. Asymmetric Synthesis of γ-Hydroxy α,β-Unsaturated Amides via an AD-elimination Process; Synthesis of (+)-Coriolic Acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2083–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Böhme, R.; Jung, G.; Breitmaier, E. Synthesis of the Antibiotic (R)-Reutericyclin via Dieckmann Condensation. Helv. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 2837–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scanlan, J.T.; Swern, D. Action of lead tetraacetate upon hydroxylated fat acids and related compounds. II. hydroxylated ricinoleic acid and castor oil. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 2309–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Van Romburgh, P. On the essential oil of achasma walang val. Rec. Travaux Chim. Pays-Bas 1938, 57, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gouge, M. γ-Ethylenic glycols. Ann. Chim. Appl. 1951, 6, 648–704. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bruker, APEX II; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2007.
  35. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst. 2008, A64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bruker, SADABS; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2001.
  37. Brandenburg, K. DIAMOND, version 2.1 c; Crystal Impact GbR: Bonn, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sonneck, M.; Peppel, T.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Synthesis and Molecular Structures of (E)-non-2-enoic Acid and (E)-dec-2-enoic Acid. Crystals 2015, 5, 466-474. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5040466

AMA Style

Sonneck M, Peppel T, Spannenberg A, Wohlrab S. Synthesis and Molecular Structures of (E)-non-2-enoic Acid and (E)-dec-2-enoic Acid. Crystals. 2015; 5(4):466-474. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5040466

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sonneck, Marcel, Tim Peppel, Anke Spannenberg, and Sebastian Wohlrab. 2015. "Synthesis and Molecular Structures of (E)-non-2-enoic Acid and (E)-dec-2-enoic Acid" Crystals 5, no. 4: 466-474. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5040466

APA Style

Sonneck, M., Peppel, T., Spannenberg, A., & Wohlrab, S. (2015). Synthesis and Molecular Structures of (E)-non-2-enoic Acid and (E)-dec-2-enoic Acid. Crystals, 5(4), 466-474. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst5040466

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop