Next Article in Journal
Cryochemically Obtained Nanoforms of Antimicrobial Drug Substance Dioxidine and Their Physico-chemical and Structural Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Does Thermosalient Effect Have to Concur with a Polymorphic Phase Transition? The Case of Methscopolamine Bromide
Previous Article in Journal
Deposition Technologies of High-Efficiency CIGS Solar Cells: Development of Two-Step and Co-Evaporation Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Skelp Thickness on Precipitate Size and Morphology for X70 Microalloyed Steel Using Rietveld Refinement (Quantitative X-ray Diffraction)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heavily Boron Doped Diamond Powder: Synthesis and Rietveld Refinement

by
Igor P. Zibrov
* and
Vladimir P. Filonenko
Institute for High Pressure Physics RAS, Kaluzhskoe highway, Str. 14, Troitsk, Moscow 108840, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2018, 8(7), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8070297
Submission received: 9 June 2018 / Revised: 16 July 2018 / Accepted: 17 July 2018 / Published: 19 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rietveld Refinement in the Characterization of Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
Boron-doped diamonds were synthesized by the reaction of an amorphous globular carbon powder (80%) with a powder of 1,7-di (oxymethyl)-M-carborane (20%) in a ‘toroid’-type high-pressure chamber at a pressure of 8.0 GPa and temperature of 1700 °C. The structure was refined by the Rietveld method according to the X-ray powder diffraction data. It was shown that the unit cell parameters of these diamonds have two discrete quantities: around 3.570 Å for small concentrations of B (~1–1.5%) and around 3.578 Å for large concentrations of B (~2–3%). The concentration of the vacancies in the diamonds exceeds the concentration of boron atoms by 2–3 fold. This fact can play an important role in the formation of the structure and in determining the physical properties of diamonds.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Diamond is a unique material that is used in various industrial areas, especially in electronics [1,2]. There is active investigation into the possibility of introducing different elements into the diamond lattice. This aims to complement the outstanding properties of diamonds, including high hardness, high thermal conductivity, and high chemical resistance to acids and alkalis, with new optical and electrical characteristics. Most natural and synthetic diamonds contain nitrogen, which makes them yellow. Nitrogen acts as a substitute for carbon in diamond, with a maximum concentration of about one percent (~1020 cm−3). The content of larger atoms (Si, Ti, Ni, Ge, and P) in the diamond lattice is less than 0.01%. They form dopant–vacancy complexes with different luminescent characteristics [3,4]. As a rule, substituting atoms slightly increases the diamond unit cell parameter.
Boron is a neighbor of carbon in the periodic table although it is rarely found in natural diamonds. Several methods have been developed for producing boron-doped diamonds (BDD) with low electrical resistance, high mobility of charge carriers, and p-type conductivity. Large single crystals are synthesized at pressures of about 5 GPa [5]. In this case, the boron is in the molten metal through which the graphite recrystallization takes place. As the concentration of boron increases, the color of diamond changes from blue to black. Various methods of growing diamond films have also made it possible to produce single crystals with a boron content of >1020 cm−3 in the lattice [6]. The electrical conductivity of BDD is most often used for the manufacture of electrodes and sensors. Both CVD films and microcrystals are used for this purpose [7,8,9].
With an increase in the boron concentration, the conductivity of the diamond increases. If the content of boron is more than 1 wt %, the transition of the material to a superconductor can be observed at helium temperatures. The superconductivity of BDD was first discovered in 2004 with a polycrystalline sample synthesized from a mixture of graphite and boron carbide [10].
It is known that the unit cell parameter of the diamond increases with the substitution of carbon by boron. The maximum increase was recorded in [11,12]. As a result of the graphite–diamond phase transition, polycrystals with the unit cell parameters of 3.574–3.577 Å were formed, with the content of boron in these polycrystals being estimated at 3–4 wt %.
Despite the large number of results relating to the production and study of BDD, discussions about the concentration of boron and its role in superconductivity is ongoing. This is partly due to the fact that good-quality single crystals with a high content of boron have not yet been obtained.
The goal of this work was to synthesize microcrystals of diamonds with high boron content, with subsequent refinement of their structure.

2. Materials and Methods

The starting materials for the work were amorphous globular carbon powder with particle sizes of about 25 nm (80%) and powder of 1,7-di (oxymethyl)-M-carborane with the formula HO-H2C-CB10H10C-CH2-OH (20%) (Aviabor, Dzerzhinsk, Russia). M-carborane decomposes at a high temperature to form active atomic boron. The powders were stirred in alcohol with application of ultrasound. The obtained mixture was pressed into pellets with the following dimensions: 3 mm in height and 5 mm in diameter. The thermobaric treatment of pellets was conducted in “toroid”-type high-pressure chambers. The scheme of the high-pressure chamber and the method were previously described in references [13,14]. The temperature in the chamber was calibrated using a W:W-Re thermocouple, with the accuracy of measurements estimated at ±25 °C. The material was treated under the following conditions: P = 8.0 GPa, T = 1700 °C for 20 s (sample N1) and 30 s (sample N2).
Crystal morphology was studied using microscopes SEM JSM-6390 JEOL (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and TEM JEM-2100 JEOL (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
Micro-Raman measurements were obtained at room temperature using the TriVista 555 triple grating spectrometer with a liquid-nitrogen-cooled CCD detector. The 488 nm line of the Ar+ ion laser was used for excitation. To avoid overheating or burning out of the samples, the laser power was kept at a minimum (approximately 0.5 mW) and the 50× objective (NA = 0.5) of Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used for laser focusing and the scattered light collection.
A Huber Imaging Plate Guinier camera G670 (Cu Kα1 radiation, Huber Technology, Tutzing, Germany) was used for the phase analysis and data collection.

3. Results

The chemical interaction of amorphous globular nano-carbon with active boron leads to BDD crystallization with particle sizes of up to 5 µm in a few seconds. Phase analysis showed that both samples consist of three phases: two diamond D1 and D2 with different unit cell parameters and carbide B4C. In this case, the diamond phases had unit cell parameters greater than that of a pure diamond (a = 3.567 Å, ICSD 76766), which is one of the indicators of a heavily BDD. This is well illustrated by the diffraction patterns in the region of the diamond peak (311) (Figure 1). Raman spectra of the obtained diamonds (Figure 2) also showed features that were characteristic of crystals with a high content of boron in the lattice. The characteristics and description of these features can be found in a previous study [15]. The difference in the spectra of Samples 1 and 2 is due to the different content of D1 and D2 (Table 1 and Table 2). M-carborane contains 52.92% of boron and thus, the content of boron is 10.59% in the samples.
Diamond single crystals were formed during the thermobaric treatment of mixtures of nano-carbon with M-carborane, which have dimensions in the range of submicrons to several micrometers. The morphology of the crystals is shown in Figure 3.
Rietveld full-profile refinement was performed with the program GSAS [16,17]. The observed diffractometer data and the difference between the observed and calculated data are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The crystal data and structure refinement are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The unit cell parameters and the weight fraction in the mixture were refined for B4C, while the atomic parameters were taken from [18].
We can calculate the content of boron in diamonds as we know the weight fraction of boron carbide in the sample (Table 1 and Table 2). Boron carbide has a broad homogeneity region. When changing the composition of carbide from B8C to B4C, the parameters of the unit cell are significantly reduced. If we compare the unit cell volumes of boron carbide in Samples 1 and 2 (Table 1 and Table 2) with the results obtained in [19], it can be concluded that the composition is B4C. The boron concentration in the diamonds were calculated to be 1.93% and 1.51% for Samples 1 and 2, respectively. Obviously, the calculations are carried out under the assumption that all boron from M-carborane passes into diamonds and carbide.
The conducted refinement of the occupancy of carbon positions by boron in the Sample 1 gave a boron concentration of 29.8(8)% in D1 and 13.5(8)% in D2, which is higher than the calculated values. Similar values were obtained for Sample 2. This result clearly shows the deficiency of an electron density in the carbon positions. It can only be explained by the presence of vacancies since boron reduces the electron density by only one electron compared to the density on carbon, and a vacancy reduces it by six electrons. Table 3 shows the results of the refinement under the assumption that both boron atoms and vacancies are present in diamonds. In the refinement, the boron concentration was fixed: 3.12% for D1 and 1.56% for D2, which corresponded to the final total of 1.93% (it was assumed that the concentration of boron in D1 is two times higher than that in D2).

4. Discussion

Table 3 shows that the concentration of vacancies in D1 is approximately 6%, while this is 3% in D2. This essentially means that each boron atom is associated with two vacancies in both diamonds. The same refinement for Sample 2 gives around three vacancies per B atom in both diamonds. It should be noted that we have prepared about 10 samples under different P–T conditions and different starting mixtures. The unit cell parameters of the obtained diamonds were either about 3.570 Å or 3.578 Å. Two different concentrations of boron can be associated with the presence of stable electronic states: semiconducting and metallic. In this case, the transition between states can be considered as an electronic Mott transition.
The refinement of the structure does not provide the reason for the discretization of the unit cell parameter of the diamonds although this shows the significant influence of vacancies as their concentration is 2–3 times higher than the boron concentration.

5. Conclusions

For the first time, by using Rietveld full-profile refinement, it is shown that the unit cell parameter of a diamond with boron has two discrete values: around 3.570 Å for small concentrations of B (~1–1.5%) or around 3.578 Å for large concentrations of B (~2–3%). It is also shown that these processes can be influenced by vacancies, the concentration of which is 2–3 times higher than the concentration of boron in diamonds.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1

Author Contributions

V.P.F. finished the HP-HT synthesis, I.P.Z. performed X-ray study. Both authors analyzed and discussed the results.

Funding

This work was financially supported by RFBR grant 17-02-01285 а.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lyapin S.G. for the Raman spectra measurements and Trenikhin M.V. for the electron microscopy studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Scott, D.E. The history and impact of synthetic diamond cutters and diamond enhanced inserts on the oil and gas industry. Ind. Diamond Rev. 2006, 1, 48–58. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vavilov, V.S. Diamond in solid state electronics. Phys. Uspekhi 1997, 1, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nadolinny, V.; Komarovskikh, A.; Palyanov, Y. Incorporation of large impurity atoms into the diamond crystal lattice: EPR of split-vacancy defects in diamond. Crystals 2017, 7, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ekimov, E.A.; Lyapin, S.G.; Boldyrev, K.N.; Kondrin, M.V.; Khmelnitskiy, R.; Gavva, V.A.; Kotereva, T.V.; Popova, M.N. Germanium–vacancy color center in isotopically enriched diamonds synthesized at high pressures. JETP Lett. 2015, 102, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blank, V.D.; Kuznetsov, M.S.; Nosukhin, S.A.; Terentiev, S.A.; Denisov, V.N. The influence of crystallization temperature and boron concentration in growth environment on its distribution in growth sectors of type IIb diamond. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2007, 16, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Issaoui, R.; Achard, J.; Silva, F.; Tallaire, A.; Tardieu, A.; Gicquel, A.; Pinault, M.A.; Jomard, F. Growth of thick heavily boron-doped diamond single crystals: Effect of microwave power density. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 182101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bautze, T.; Mandal, S.; Williams, O.A.; Rodiere, P.; Meunier, T.; Bauerle, C. Superconducting nano-mechanical diamond resonators. Carbon 2014, 72, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tago, S.; Ochiai, T.; Suzuki, S.; Hayashi, M.; Kondo, T.; Fujishima, A. Flexible boron-doped diamond (bdd) electrodes for plant monitoring. Sensors 2017, 17, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ochiai, T.; Tago, S.; Hayashi, M.; Hirota, K.; Kondo, T.; Satomura, K.; Fujishima, A. Boron-doped diamond powder (BDDP)-based polymer composites for dental treatment using flexible pinpoint electrolysis unit. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 68, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ekimov, E.A.; Sidorov, V.A.; Bauer, E.D.; Melnik, N.N.; Curro, N.J.; Thompson, J.D.; Stishov, S.M. Superconductivity in diamond. Nature 2004, 428, 542–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Dubrovinskaia, N.; Eska, G.; Sheshin, G.A.; Braun, H. Superconductivity in polycrystalline boron-doped diamond synthesized at 20 GPa and 2700 K. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99, 033903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ekimov, E.A.; Ralchenko, V.; Popovich, A. Synthesis of superconducting boron-doped diamond compacts with high elastic moduli and thermal stability. Diamond Relat. Mat. 2014, 50, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Filonenko, V.P.; Zibrov, I.P. High-pressure phase transitions of M2O5 (M=V, Nb, Ta) and thermal stability of new polymorphs. Inorg. Mater. 2001, 37, 953–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zibrov, I.P.; Filonenko, V.P.; Werner, P.-E.; Marinder, B.-O.; Sundberg, M. A new high-pressure modification of Nb2O5. J. Solid State Chem. 1998, 141, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Szirmai, P.; Pichler1, T.; Williams, O.A.; Mandal, S.; Bäuerle, C.; Simon, F. A detailed analysis of the Raman spectra in superconducting boron doped nanocrystalline diamond. Phys. Status Solidi B 2012, 249, 2656–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Larson, A.C.; Von Dreele, R.B. General Structure Analysis System (GSAS); Report LA-UR-86-748; Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, USA, 1987.
  17. Toby, B.H. EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kwei, G.H.; Morosin, B. Structures of the boron-rich boron carbides from neutron powder diffraction:  Implications for the nature of the inter-icosahedral chains. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 8031–8039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ponomarev, V.I.; Kovalev, I.D.; Konovalikhin, S.V.; Vershinnikov, V.I. Ordering of Carbon atoms in boron carbide structure. Cryst. Rep. 2013, 58, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diffraction patterns in the region of the diamond peak (311): 1—sample N1, 2—sample N2, 3—diamond ICSD 76766.
Figure 1. Diffraction patterns in the region of the diamond peak (311): 1—sample N1, 2—sample N2, 3—diamond ICSD 76766.
Crystals 08 00297 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectra: 1—Sample N1; 2—Sample N2; 3—ordinary microdiamond.
Figure 2. Raman spectra: 1—Sample N1; 2—Sample N2; 3—ordinary microdiamond.
Crystals 08 00297 g002
Figure 3. Morphology of boron doped diamond crystals. Synthesis from a mixture of globular nano-carbon and M-carborane. (a) SEM; (b) TEM.
Figure 3. Morphology of boron doped diamond crystals. Synthesis from a mixture of globular nano-carbon and M-carborane. (a) SEM; (b) TEM.
Crystals 08 00297 g003
Figure 4. X-ray Rietveld refinement of the sample N1. The observed (+), calculated (solid line) and difference between observed and calculated (bottom curve) powder diffraction profiles. The positions of all allowed Bragg reflections are indicated by the rows of vertical tick marks: B4C upper and diamonds lower marks.
Figure 4. X-ray Rietveld refinement of the sample N1. The observed (+), calculated (solid line) and difference between observed and calculated (bottom curve) powder diffraction profiles. The positions of all allowed Bragg reflections are indicated by the rows of vertical tick marks: B4C upper and diamonds lower marks.
Crystals 08 00297 g004
Figure 5. X-ray Rietveld refinement of the sample N2. The observed (+), calculated (solid line) and difference between observed and calculated (bottom curve) powder diffraction profiles. The positions of all allowed Bragg reflections are indicated by the rows of vertical tick marks: B4C upper and diamonds lower marks.
Figure 5. X-ray Rietveld refinement of the sample N2. The observed (+), calculated (solid line) and difference between observed and calculated (bottom curve) powder diffraction profiles. The positions of all allowed Bragg reflections are indicated by the rows of vertical tick marks: B4C upper and diamonds lower marks.
Crystals 08 00297 g005
Table 1. Experimental details for D1, D2, and B4C (sample N1).
Table 1. Experimental details for D1, D2, and B4C (sample N1).
Chemical FormulaC (D1)C (D2)B4C
Chemical formula weight12.0112.01164.74
Space groupF d −3 mF d −3 mR −3 m
a (Å)3.57831(1)3.57141(1)5.5862(1)
b (Å) 5.5862(1)
c (Å) 12.0484(4)
γ (°) 120.00
V (Å3)45.818(0)45.553(0)325.611(13)
Z883
Dx (Mg m−3)3.2663.3882.506
Weight fraction, %34.44(10)54.51(5)11.05(7)
Radiation typeCu Kα1
Wavelength (Å)1.5405981
Temperature (K)293
Data collection
DiffractometerImaging Plate Guinier camera G670, Huber
RefinementGSAS
RF0.00910.0164
RP0.0184
RWP0.0276
Table 2. Experimental details for D1, D2, and B4C (sample N2).
Table 2. Experimental details for D1, D2, and B4C (sample N2).
Chemical FormulaC (D1)C (D2)B4C
Chemical formula weight12.0112.01164.74
Space groupF d −3 mF d −3 mR −3 m
a (Å)3.57708(1)3.57010(2)5.58783(9)
b (Å) 5.58783(9)
c (Å) 12.0477(3)
γ (°) 120.00
V (Å3)45.770(0)45.503(1)325.78(1)
Z883
Dx (Mg m−3)3.3823.4882.505
Weight fraction, %66.51(4)21.90(11)11.59(7)
Radiation typeCu Kα1
Wavelength (Å)1.5405981
Temperature (K)293
Data collection
DiffractometerImaging Plate Guinier camera G670, Huber
RefinementGSAS
RF0.00980.0138
RP0.0175
RWP0.0250
Table 3. Fractional atomic coordinates, site occupancy, and isotropic displacement parameters Uiso2) for D1 and D2 (Sample 1).
Table 3. Fractional atomic coordinates, site occupancy, and isotropic displacement parameters Uiso2) for D1 and D2 (Sample 1).
PhaseАтомSiteОССxyzUiso
D1C(8a)0.910(3)0.1250.1250.1250.0166(1)
B(8a)0.03120.1250.1250.1250.0166(1)
D2C(8a)0.953(3)0.1250.1250.1250.0141(1)
B(8a)0.01560.1250.1250.1250.0141(1)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zibrov, I.P.; Filonenko, V.P. Heavily Boron Doped Diamond Powder: Synthesis and Rietveld Refinement. Crystals 2018, 8, 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8070297

AMA Style

Zibrov IP, Filonenko VP. Heavily Boron Doped Diamond Powder: Synthesis and Rietveld Refinement. Crystals. 2018; 8(7):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8070297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zibrov, Igor P., and Vladimir P. Filonenko. 2018. "Heavily Boron Doped Diamond Powder: Synthesis and Rietveld Refinement" Crystals 8, no. 7: 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8070297

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop