Next Article in Journal
A Tough, Water-Resistant, High Bond Strength Adhesive Derived from Soybean Meal and Flexible Hyper-Branched Aminated Starch
Next Article in Special Issue
A Cu(II) Indicator Platform Based on Cu(II) Induced Swelling that Changes the Extent of Fluorescein Self-Quenching
Previous Article in Journal
Raspberry-Like Polysilsesquioxane Particles with Hollow-Spheres-on-Sphere Structure: Rational Design, Controllable Synthesis, and Catalytic Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cationic Fluorescent Nanogel Thermometers based on Thermoresponsive Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and Environment-Sensitive Benzofurazan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Personal Journey across Fluorescent Sensing and Logic Associated with Polymers of Various Kinds

by
Chao-Yi Yao
1,*,
Seiichi Uchiyama
2,* and
A. Prasanna de Silva
1,*
1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen’s University, BT9 5AG Belfast, Northern Ireland
2
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(8), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081351
Submission received: 21 June 2019 / Revised: 10 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 14 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluorescent polymers for sensing and imaging)

Abstract

:
Our experiences concerning fluorescent molecular sensing and logic devices and their intersections with polymer science are the foci of this brief review. Proton-, metal ion- and polarity-responsive cases of these devices are placed in polymeric micro- or nano-environments, some of which involve phase separation. This leads to mapping of chemical species on the nanoscale. These devices also take advantage of thermal properties of some polymers in water in order to reincarnate themselves as thermometers. When the phase separation leads to particles, the latter can be labelled with identification tags based on molecular logic. Such particles also give rise to reusable sensors, although molecular-scale resolution is sacrificed in the process. Polymeric nano-environments also help to organize rather complex molecular logic systems from their simple components. Overall, our little experiences suggest that researchers in sensing and logic would benefit if they assimilate polymer concepts.

1. Introduction

It has been our pleasure to investigate molecular-scale devices which communicate with us at the human-scale. Owing to their subnanometric dimensions, they operate across a range of larger size-scales and provide us with valuable information from these worlds. Fluorescence signals provide output while various chemical species serve as input signals. Excitation light powers these devices wirelessly. In order to carry information, some modulation is required in the fluorescence signal. Chemical responsiveness provides this by chemically biasing a competition [1,2,3,4,5,6] for the deactivation of the fluorophore excited state between fluorescence emission [7,8] and photoinduced electron transfer (PET) [9,10]. Because of the extreme nature of this responsiveness, it is easy to regard these devices as ‘off-on’ switches. This leads to the realization that molecular devices share many attributes with semiconductor logic counterparts [11], while differing in other features [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Chemical responsiveness of fluorescence signals can also be arranged via ionic/dipolar influences on internal charge transfer (ICT) excited states [2,8,39]. Extreme versions of this behavior can be seen in benzofurazan fluorophores which again lead to ‘off-on’ switchability. Having a binary digital basis in electronic engineering does not preclude analog operations for exquisitely fine measurements. Similarly, the Boolean character of molecular switching devices still allows for the accurate measurement of tiny changes in the input signal, whether it be a chemical concentration or a physical property, when substantial populations of molecules exert mass action. Accurate sensing is therefore available from digital molecular devices. A significant fraction of our research involves polymers of some kind, sometimes in crucial ways.
Although each of the authors had their research formation in photoscience of small molecules [40,41,42,43], it is clear to us that macromolecules have uniquely beneficial characteristics barred to small counterparts [44]. For instance, polymer molecules are large enough to possess their own environments at the nanometer-scale. Although objects as varied as proteins [45] and DNA origami [46] could be studied in this way, it would be more immediately productive to pay attention to simple symmetrical systems such as quasi-spherical detergent micelles in water. We can consider detergent micelles in water as supramolecular polymer systems held together by hydrophobic interactions and then examine the region bounded by their surfaces for H+ distribution for instance. These are discussed in Section 2. Especially when cross-linked, polymer molecules are large enough to create their own phase-separated environments at the nanometer- to millimeter-scale. When solid particles are formed in this way, they serve as recyclable matrices to carry functional small molecules such as sensors. Section 3 represents these. Solid polymer particles can also be vehicles for functional small molecules such as drug candidates during their synthesis and their evaluation. These came to the fore during the combinatorial chemistry wave [47] and still have roles to play. It would be important therefore to be able to identify these vehicles individually within large populations. Section 4 presents a solution to this problem by tagging these vehicles with molecular logic gates. Linear macromolecules without cross-links can also create their own phase-separated environments in certain instances. Such a transition of extended linear to globular forms can occur as the temperature is ramped across a threshold value. Such transitions persist in some cross-linked gel versions as well. Fluorescence readout of these transitions is possible from polymer-linked probes. This opens the way to molecular thermometers, which are now throwing light on the foundations of biology (Section 5).
As indicated above, the polymer plays a variety of roles in these systems. These roles will depend on the chemical structures involved. Nano-environments will be set up by long hydrocarbon chain monomers carrying hydrophilic termini which aggregate in water. These micelles or membranes are non-covalent macromolecular (self-assembly) systems which are sisters of synthetic polymers. Some of these nano-environments will also be employed in an organizational role to assemble logic gates. Recyclable matrices will be created with diamondoid Si–O lattices. Vehicles for other molecules will be built from crosslinked polystyrene cores with oligoethyleneglycol shells. Sharp thermoresponsivity will be introduced with polyacrylamides carrying 2-propyl substituents and relatives.

2. Mapping Membrane-Bounded Species

Since compartmentalization is a key to the origin and maintenance of life, it is crucial to study membrane-bounded species, especially those which are key players in biology. H+ is paramount in this capacity because of its vital role in bioenergetics [48]. Since fluorescent PET signalling began with H+ sensing [49], Anthracenemethylamine derivative 1 (Scheme 1) is a straightforward adaptation of a ‘fluorophore-spacer-receptor’ system [50,51] with the addition of an anchoring module in the form of a hydrocarbon chain and a spatial tuning module in the form of amine substituents [52]. When H+ is picked up by 1 from its neighbourhood, the amine receptor is no longer able to perform a PET operation to the anthracene fluorophore, and the fluorescence is switched ‘on’. The neighbourhood being sampled is determined by the height/depth of the amine lone electron pair relative to the micelle-water interface, which in turn is controlled by the hydrophobicity of 1 as it gravitates to the appropriate point along the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity continuum between polar water and the apolar micelle interior. The spatial tuning groups make fine adjustments to the positioning of the amine receptor. The local H+ density relative to the value in bulk water is related to the difference in pKa values determined by fluorescence-pH titrations for 1 in micellar media and for a very hydrophilic version of 1 in neat water [53]. Such ΔpKa values obtained for structural variants of 1 can be correlated with the hydrophobicity of the spatial tuning module. These graphs provide a first glimpse into the spatial distribution of membrane-bounded H+ and how it is controlled by electrostatic and dielectric effects [53].
A more proper mapping of H+ in these micellar neighborhoods, in a cartographic sense, is achievable if the probe position can be determined at the same time as the ΔpKa measurement. This is made possible by employing a variant of 1 outfitted with a fluorophore whose emission wavelength is dependent on environmental polarity. The position occupied by the probe on the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity continuum between polar water and the apolar micelle interior will reflect the local polarity experienced by the probe, and hence its emission wavelength. ICT fluorophores fit the bill [54,55,56,57], and benzofurazans [58,59,60,61,62,63] are the best of all in our hands. 2 (Scheme 1) and its close derivatives produce rather educational maps of H+ density near neutral Triton X-100 micelles [64] in water. In these fluorescent sensors, the effects of protonation at the terminal amino moiety (during H+ sensing) on the fluorophore are dominantly observed in fluorescence efficiency but not in original absorption and emission wavelengths of the fluorophore, which enables accurate monitoring of both H+ density and the environmental polarity simultaneously. As shown in Figure 1, the H+ density near Triton X-100 micelles is hardly affected until we approach neighborhoods of an effective dielectric constant (ε) 40. As sensors go towards the micellar interior from the position of ε = 40 to that of ε = 15, H+ density becomes suppressed to approximately 4% due to the dielectric repulsion (Figure 1). Our probes within the family represented by 2 are unable to get any closer to the micelle.
Further exploration of planet micelle is possible with 3 (Scheme 1) by providing useful mapping data from charged micelles. Although structurally close to 2, 3 has no hydrogen-bond donor N-H group on the fluorophore. This is crucial because the N–H group at the anilino position is free from both protonation and deprotonation in a wide range of pH (e.g., 3 ≤ pH ≤ 12) in water or aqueous micellar solutions and thus can engage in multiple hydrogen bondings with anionic head-groups of micelles (e.g., sulfate groups with considerable hydrogen bonding ability in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles [65]) to pin the probe to a narrow location, meaning that detailed mapping was not possible for anionic micelles via only hydrophobicity tuning. Once N–H is replaced by N–CH3, this pinning effect disappears and a larger spatial distribution of probe positions opens up [66]. 2 does not fare much better with cationic micelles because of cation–pi interactions [67] between the micelle head-groups and the probe pi-system. 4 (Scheme 1) has stronger hydrophobic interactions due to the dioctyl chains so that the cation-pi interaction is relegated to a minor role. Better mapping is the result, though higher-resolution data remains our long-range goal.
Sentient beings depend on Na+ near nerve membranes to convey and process environmental signals [68]. Membrane-bounded Na+ is estimated by 5 (Scheme 2) [69], which takes a leaf out of 1′s book by using a hydrocarbon chain for gross targeting and anchoring of the probe in the micelle. Owing to the relative structural complexity of the benzo-15-crown-5 ether receptor in 5 for Na+ vis-à-vis the H+ receptor amine in 1, no spatial tuning module is available so far. Nevertheless, it is gratifying to find that Na+ is concentrated a 100-fold near the surface of anionic micelles, whereas Na+ is repelled so much from cationic micelles and even neutral micelles as to be immeasurable with 5. The latter finding need not be a surprise because hydrophilic Na+ would indeed be difficult to accommodate in a hydrophobic micelle neighbourhood when bulk water is available within travelling distance.
Though nanometric in size, micelles are great containers which can organize sets of functional molecules. A pair of a fluorophore and a receptor is such an example of a self-assembled fluorescent PET sensor. Here, the role of the spacer in the fluorescent PET system is taken over by the micelle itself [70]. Inspired by this concept, we extend it to self-assembled AND logic systems with, e.g., a fluorophore and two different selective receptors [71]. The fact that various logic gates can be constructed by the step-by-step addition of components allows a ‘plug-and-play’ approach to some of the simpler molecular logic functions. Covalently bound AND logic gates operated within micelles represent computing at the smaller end of the nanoscale [72], which semiconductor devices still struggle to do.
We can cross from mapping and logic to the seemingly unrelated topic of photosynthetic reaction centre (PRC) mimics. In nature, the PRC is a marvel of supramolecular organization within a membrane in terms of structure and function [73]. This is a good thing too, since our origin and survival depend on it. We turn to micelles as a model membrane to contain PRC mimics of a receptor1-spacer1-fluorophore-spacer2-receptor2 format [74]. These have two PET pathways originating from the opposite termini of 6 (Scheme 2), of which one is favoured, somewhat similar to what is seen in the PRC. In its excited state, 6 has an internal electric field [75] to direct PET in one direction rather than the other.

3. Solid-Bound Sensors

Being modular, fluorescent sensors of the ‘fluorophore-spacer-receptor’ format are easily extended to ‘fluorophore-spacer-receptor-spacer-particle’ systems, e.g., 7 (Scheme 2) [76]. Beside the practical aspect of reusability, this SiO2-bound amine receptor system shows the retardation of PET compared to homogeneous solution counterparts. Charge-separating processes of this kind are naturally slowed at solid surfaces because charge-stabilizing orientation polarization of water dipoles is less likely. Fortunately, this PET process, even after retardation, remains competitive with the radiative rate and so adequate H+-sensing capability remains. This situation is maintained when H+-sensing PET systems like 8 (Scheme 3) are embedded in polyvinylchloride, provided the polymer is suitably plasticized [77], and when Na+-sensing PET systems like 9 (Scheme 3) are bonded to various fibres [78]. Solid-bound PET sensors continue to grow in number [79,80,81,82].

4. Molecular Computational Identification (MCID)

In the previous section, the emphasis was on the fluorescent function with the particle being the new environment. Now the particle takes centre stage with the fluorescent function serving as an ID tag. As trailed above, polymer particles can be vehicles for various functional molecules but they can also be models for biological cells showing the way to cell diagnostics.
Whenever we encounter populations of objects, individual object identification is not a problem if they are at fixed locations. If they are not spatially addressable, some kind of tracking feature becomes necessary. Metamorphosing objects would also need tracking if some sense is to be made of their population. Modern information-based society is full of radiofrequency ID (RFID) tags which serve this tracking need [83], but these are limited to sizes above 10 μm because of the necessary antenna. Micrometric objects such as polymer particles and cells are therefore untouched by the RFID revolution and remain at large. Molecules would be capable of rectifying this situation if they possessed some easily detectable parameter which comes in a sufficiently large number of distinguishable values. For example, excitation and emission wavelengths of various fluorophores can encode up to 100 polymer beads, but not much more [84]. However, what about larger populations? It is possible to amplify these 100 codes many-fold by taking each fluorophore and making it conditionally switchable [85]. A given logic type represents this light output driven by chemical input. Many single-, double- and higher-logic types are available [26], e.g., PASS 1 (10, H+-input), YES (11, H+-input), and AND (12, Na+-, H+-inputs) (Scheme 3). Ternary logic types can be included as well [86]. Further amplification of diversity is made by attaching two or more tags to a given particle (Figure 2) [85,87,88]. The fluorescence wavelengths can extend into the near infrared to offer additional bandwidth [88]. MCID has recently been applied to populations, albeit rather small, so that object-to-object variations can be quantified (Figure 2). The method can then be used to unambiguously divide a population into sub-populations of a given logic type [88].
The mechanism of switching in YES gate 11, AND gate 12 and the YES logic-based examples in Figure 2 are PET processes occurring within ‘fluorophore-spacer-receptor-spacer-particle’ and related type systems. Here, PET originates from an electron donor amine or benzocrown ether and terminates in an anthracene or azaBODIPY fluorophore. The PET rate is controlled by its thermodynamics as well as the length of the spacer. As usual, the PET process is arrested by protonation of the amine or by binding Na+ to the benzocrown ether.
It is appropriate to mention some drawbacks, challenges and potential applications of MCID. The need to wash the samples with a chosen reagent can be considered as a drawback from some viewpoints, but chemical stimuli are common in biology. Applications of MCID can be imagined in tracking members of combinatorial chemistry libraries at the level of single polymer beads. The challenge will be to popularize this application. The road to application in cell diagnostics will be rockier, since MCID tags responding to suitably benign chemical stimuli would need to be found and validated.

5. Molecular Thermometers

As mentioned in the introduction section, some linear macromolecules switch between extended and collapsed forms in water as a response to varying temperature. Such cases with hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups which balance their effects display a lower critical solution temperature. The high degree of polymerization of these systems leads to strongly cooperative behaviour so that the transition occurs across a rather narrow temperature range. Outfitting of these polymers with a small amount of an environment (e.g., polarity and hydrogen bonding)-sensitive ICT fluorophore, 4-N,N-dimethylsulfamoyl-7-aminobenzofurazan (DBD), by means of copolymerization produces a fluorescent thermometer, 13 (Scheme 4), with greatly increased sensitivity (Figure 3) [89] over previous versions [90,91]. Other ICT fluorophores such as 7-aminocoumarin [92], BODIPY [93,94,95,96], dansylamine [97,98] and 4-amino-7-nitrobenzofurazan (NBD) [99,100] have also been applied in a similar way. At lower temperatures, 13 takes an open and extended form, and the solvent water molecules access the fluorophores in 13 to cause quenching. In contrast, 13 exists in a globular form at a higher temperature, where the fluorophores are surrounded by the hydrophobic backbone, and therefore emits strong fluorescence. In the similar system 14 (Scheme 4), fluorescence lifetime increases with temperature [101]. In contrast to fluorescence intensity, fluorescence lifetime is not influenced by the fluctuation of various experimental conditions (e.g., excitation light intensity and concentration of a sensor). Accordingly, the fluorescence lifetime can be a more reliable variable than the fluorescence intensity in some applications such as intracellular thermometry where the experimental conditions are relatively changeable. The downside is the need for more elaborate instrumentation for lifetime measurements.
In addition to high sensitivity, the polymeric design brings functional diversity to fluorescent thermometry. The functional temperature range can be easily tuned by using substituted monomers, e.g., 15 (Scheme 4) [89]. Interestingly, the functional temperature range of copolymer 16 (Scheme 4) with a 1:1 blend of the monomer units in 13 and 15 bisects the ranges of 13 and 15 [102]. So, the functional temperature range can be finely tuned by varying co-monomer feed ratios (Figure 3) [102]. The fluorescence wavelength of the polymeric thermometers can also be modified by using a different fluorophore, e.g., 17 (Scheme 4) [103] and 18 (Scheme 5) [104].
Using an additional component in copolymers can improve physical and chemical features of fluorescent thermometers. 19 (Scheme 5) is a highly water-soluble thermometer because the ionic 3-sulfopropyl acrylate units prevent interpolymeric aggregation [105]. Such high solubility enables highly-resolved temperature measurements. In contrast, the incorporation of an H+ receptor amine into a copolymer produces a molecular logic system with temperature and H+ as multiple inputs [106,107,108]. For instance, the polymeric logic gate 20 (Scheme 5) fluoresces strongly only when environmental H+ concentration is ‘low’ and temperature is ‘high’ to behave as an INHIBIT gate. High H+ levels protonate the receptor, causing the copolymer to adopt the extended structure. So the fluorophore is surrounded by water to cause quenching whatever the temperature.
The gelation of solution-based fluorescent polymeric thermometers by adding a crosslinker results in robust nanogel particles [109]. The representative gel 21 (Scheme 5) exists as nanometric beads and shows nearly an order-of-magnitude fluorescence enhancement over a small temperature range when dispersed in water. The switching mechanism is essentially the same as that seen with the soluble version 13 [89]. The thermo-responsive fluorescent polymeric structure based on 13 has also been used as a shell structure of multifunctional magnetite nanoparticles [110]. These particles are expected to be useful in anticancer heat treatment where monitoring the temperature of target tumours is important.
While these fluorescent polymeric thermometers enabled temperature measurements of small objects such as an aqueous fluid in a heater-equipped microdevice [100,111] and turbid aqueous media heated with ultrasound-irradiation [112], the most attractive target is certainly biological cells. Highly water-soluble fluorescent gels (22, Scheme 6) microinjected into monkey’s kidney COS7 cells showed a temperature-dependent fluorescence signal therein [113]. A linear polymeric thermometer (23, Scheme 6) unveiled temperature distribution of a COS7 cell with the aid of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), in which the inside of nuclei and neighbourhoods of mitochondria and centrosomes were remarkably hotter than the other cytoplasmic spaces (Figure 4) [114].
The above breakthrough in intracellular thermometry made biologists imagine the importance of the temperature at the single cell level and subsequently demand chemists to develop more user-friendly fluorescent thermometers. A cationic version of linear polymeric thermometers (24, Scheme 6) [115,116,117] now avoids microinjection procedures due to its ability to spontaneously enter cells. In addition, further labelling of this by a BODIPY structure (25, Scheme 6) enabled ratiometric thermometry, which offered high accuracy even without an expensive fluorescence lifetime imaging microscope [118]. Thermogenesis of brown adipocytes [119,120] and chemical stimulation of brain tissue [121] were successfully monitored with these thermometers.
The future of fluorescent polymeric thermometers looks quite bright. The exemplified application of fluorescent polymeric thermometers in brain tissue will accelerate their use in in-vivo thermometry beyond a single cell level. In such cases, NIR (near infrared) ICT fluorophores will be preferred for the deep penetration of an excitation light and return of an emission signal to a detector. Another challenge of fluorescent polymeric thermometers is targeting to specific organelles of live cells by incorporating target signals into their chemical structures. It is expected that the localization of the fluorescent polymeric thermometer in heat-generating organelles, e.g., mitochondria, improves the detectability towards intracellular thermogenesis [122]. The cytotoxicity of fluorescent polymeric thermometers has also been concerning in biological and medical studies, and normal cell division and even differentiation were observed in a recent progress [123].

6. Conclusions

Whether constructed covalently from monomers or not, whether aqueous soluble or not, whether cross-linked or not, or whether solid or not, polymers offer unique environments and objects as playgrounds for sensors and logic designers. These efforts lead to reusable sensors, insights into the spatial distribution of chemical species near interfaces, membrane-assembled logic systems, temperature maps within living cells, and identification protocols for submillimetric objects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.d.S.; writing―original draft preparation, C.-Y.Y., S.U., A.P.d.S.; writing―review and editing, C.-Y.Y., S.U., A.P.d.S.; funding acquisition, S.U.

Funding

This work was funded by China Scholarship Council and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (17H03075)).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jean-Philippe Soumillion (Universite Louvain-la-Neuve, for collaboration on 7), Otto Wolfbeis (Universitat Regensburg, for collaboration on 8), Jim Tusa (Optimedical Inc, for collaboration on 9), Mark James and Dave Pears (Avecia, for collaboration on 1012), Kaoru Iwai (Nara Women’s University, for collaboration on 13, 15, 16, 20 and 21), Seiji Tobita and Toshitada Yoshihara (Gunma University, for collaboration on 14 and 17), Kohki Okabe and Takashi Funatsu (The University of Tokyo, for collaboration on 22 and 23), Yoshie Harada (Osaka University, for collaboration on 22 and 23), Noriko Inada (Osaka Prefecture University, for collaboration on 23) and Satoshi Yoshida and Aruto Yoshida (KIRIN Company Limited, for collaboration on 24 and 25).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Silva, A.P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; McCoy, C.P.; Maxwell, P.R.S.; Rademacher, J.T.; Rice, T.E. Photoionic devices with receptor-functionalized fluorophores. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 1443–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. De Silva, A.P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A.J.M.; McCoy, C.P.; Rademacher, J.T.; Rice, T.E. Signaling recognition events with fluorescent sensors and switches. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Silva, A.P.; Eilers, J.; Zlokarnik, G. Emerging fluorescence sensing technologies: From photophysical principles to cellular applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 8336–8337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. De Silva, A.P.; Fox, D.B.; Huxley, A.J.M.; Moody, T.S. Combining luminescence, coordination and electron transfer for signalling purposes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Silva, A.P.; Fox, D.B.; Moody, T.S.; Weir, S.M. Luminescent sensors and photonic switches. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Daly, B.; Ling, J.; de Silva, A.P. Current developments in fluorescent PET (photoinduced electron transfer) sensors and switches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4203–4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Lakowicz, J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  8. Valeur, B.; Berberan-Santos, M.N. Molecular Fluorescence: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Weller, A. Electron-transfer and complex formation in the excited state. Pure Appl. Chem. 1968, 16, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Balzani, V. (Ed.) Electron Transfer in Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  11. Malvino, A.P.; Brown, J.A. Digital Computer Electronics, 3rd ed.; Glencoe: Lake Forest, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  12. De Silva, A.P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; McCoy, C.P. A molecular photoionic AND gate based on fluorescent signalling. Nature 1993, 364, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Raymo, F.M. Digital processing and communication with molecular switches. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Katz, E.; Privman, V. Enzyme-based logic systems for information processing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1835–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Amelia, M.; Zou, L.; Credi, A. Signal processing with multicomponent systems based on metal complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 2267–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Silva, A.P.; Uchiyama, S. Molecular logic gates and luminescent sensors based on photoinduced electron transfer. Top. Curr. Chem. 2011, 300, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. De Silva, A.P. Luminescent photoinduced electron transfer (PET) molecules for sensing and logic operations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2865–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feringa, B.L.; Browne, W.R. (Eds.) Molecular Switches, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. De Ruiter, G.; van der Boom, M.E. Surface-confined assemblies and polymers for molecular logic. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. De Silva, A.P. Molecular logic gate arrays. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 750–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Katz, E. (Ed.) Molecular and Supramolecular Information Processing; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Katz, E. (Ed.) Biomolecular Information Processing: From Logic Systems to Smart Sensors and Actuators; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Szaciłowski, K. Infochemistry: Information Processing at the Nanoscale; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  24. Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Venturi, M. Molecular logic circuits. ChemPhysChem 2003, 4, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gust, D.; Andréasson, J.; Pischel, U.; Moore, T.A.; Moore, A.L. Data and signal processing using photochromic molecules. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1947–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. De Silva, A.P. Molecular Logic-Based Computation; Monographs in Supramolecular Chemistry No. 12; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. De Silva, A.P.; Uchiyama, S. Molecular Logic Gates—Functional Molecules with the Ability of Information Processing; Kodansha: Tokyo, Japan, 2014. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Stojanovic, M.N.; Stefanovic, D.; Rudchenko, S. Exercises in molecular computing. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1845–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ling, J.; Daly, B.; Silverson, V.A.D.; de Silva, A.P. Taking baby steps in molecular logic-based computation. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8403–8409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Andréasson, J.; Pischel, U. Molecules with a sense of logic: A progress report. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1053–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andréasson, J.; Pischel, U. Molecules for security measures: From keypad locks to advanced communication protocols. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2266–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. De Silva, A.P.; McClenaghan, N.D. Molecular-scale logic gates. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 574–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. De Silva, A.P.; Leydet, Y.; Lincheneau, C.; McClenaghan, N.D. Chemical approaches to nanometre-scale logic gates. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S1847–S1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Magri, D.C.; Vance, T.P.; de Silva, A.P. From complexation to computation: Recent progress in molecular logic. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. De Silva, A.P.; Uchiyama, S.; Vance, T.P.; Wannalerse, B. A supramolecular chemistry basis for molecular logic and computation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Silva, A.P.; Uchiyama, S. Molecular logic and computing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Venturi, M. Molecular Devices and Machines: Concepts and Perspectives for the Nanoworld, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  38. Andréasson, J.; Pischel, U. Smart molecules at work—Mimicking advanced logic operations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Misra, R.; Bhattacharyya, S.P. Intramolecular Charge Transfer: Theory and Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  40. Grimshaw, J.; de Silva, A.P. Photochemistry and photocyclization of aryl halides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1981, 10, 181–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Silva, A.P.; de Silva, S.A. Fluorescent signalling crown ethers; ‘switching on’ of fluorescence by alkali metal ion recognition and binding in situ. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 1709–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Uchiyama, S.; Santa, T.; Okiyama, N.; Azuma, K.; Imai, K. Semi-empirical PM3 calculations predict the fluorescence quantum yields (Φ) of 4-monosubstituted benzofurazan compounds. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Daly, B.; Moody, T.S.; Huxley, A.J.M.; Yao, C.; Schazmann, B.; Alves-Areias, A.; Malone, J.F.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Nockemann, P.; de Silva, A.P. Molecular memory with downstream logic processing exemplified by switchable and self-indicating guest capture and release. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ringsdorf, H. Hermann Staudinger and the future of polymer research jubilees—Beloved occasions for cultural piety. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1064–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Berg, J.M.; Tymoczko, J.L.; Gatto, G.J., Jr.; Stryer, L. Biochemistry, 9th ed.; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rothemund, P.W.K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 2006, 440, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Lam, K.S.; Salmon, S.E.; Hersh, E.M.; Hruby, V.J.; Kazmierski, W.M.; Knapp, R.J. A new type of synthetic peptide library for identifying ligand-binding activity. Nature 1991, 354, 82–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Harold, F.M. The Vital Force: A Study of Bioenergetics; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  49. De Silva, A.P.; Rupasinghe, R.A.D.D. A new class of fluorescent pH indicators based on photo-induced electron transfer. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1985, 1669–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bissell, R.A.; de Silva, A.P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Lynch, P.L.M.; Maguire, G.E.M.; Sandanayake, K.R.A.S. Molecular fluorescent signalling with ‘fluor–spacer–receptor’ systems: Approaches to sensing and switching devices via supramolecular photophysics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1992, 21, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Silva, A.P.; Vance, T.P.; West, M.E.S.; Wright, G.D. Bright molecules with sense, logic, numeracy and utility. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2468–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bissell, R.A.; Bryan, A.J.; de Silva, A.P.; McCoy, C.P. Fluorescent PET (photoinduced electron transfer) sensors with targeting/anchoring modules as molecular versions of submarine periscopes for mapping membrane-bounded protons. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fernández, M.S.; Fromherz, P. Lipoid pH indicators as probes of electrical potential and polarity in micelles. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 1755–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, Z.; Cao, J.; He, Y.; Yang, J.H.; Kim, T.; Peng, X.; Kim, J.S. Macro-/micro-environment-sensitive chemosensing and biological imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 4563–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Jiang, N.; Fan, J.; Xu, F.; Peng, X.; Mu, H.; Wang, J.; Xiong, X. Ratiometric fluorescence imaging of cellular polarity: Decrease in mitochondrial polarity in cancer cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2510–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yu, C.; Miao, W.; Wang, J.; Hao, E.; Jiao, L. PyrrolyBODIPYs: Syntheses, properties, and application as environment-sensitive fluorescence probes. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3551–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Collot, M.; Bou, S.; Fam, T.K.; Richert, L.; Mély, Y.; Danglot, L.; Klymchenko, A.S. Probing polarity and heterogeneity of lipid droplets in live cells using a push-pull fluorophore. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 1928–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Uchiyama, S.; Santa, T.; Imai, K. Fluorescence characteristics of six 4,7-disubstituted benzofurazan compounds: An experimental and semi-empirical MO study. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 2525–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Numasawa, Y.; Okabe, K.; Uchiyama, S.; Santa, T.; Imai, K. Fluorescence characteristics of ionic benzofurazans, 7-substituted-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole-4-sulfonates. Dyes Pigment. 2005, 67, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Uchiyama, S.; Kimura, K.; Gota, C.; Okabe, K.; Kawamoto, K.; Inada, N.; Yoshihara, T.; Tobita, S. Environment-sensitive fluorophores with benzothiadiazole and benzoselenadiazole structures as candidate components of a fluorescent polymeric thermometer. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 9552–9563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhuang, Y.-D.; Chiang, P.-Y.; Wang, C.-W.; Tan, K.-T. Environment-sensitive fluorescent turn-on probes targeting hydrophobic ligand-binding domains for selective protein detection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8124–8128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Appelqvist, H.; Stranius, K.; Börjesson, K.; Nilsson, K.P.R.; Dyrager, C. Specific imaging of intracellular lipid droplets using a benzothiadiazole derivative with solvatochromic properties. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017, 28, 1363–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Thooft, A.M.; Cassaidy, K.; VanVeller, B. A small push-pull fluorophore for turn-on fluorescence. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 8842–8847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Uchiyama, S.; Iwai, K.; de Silva, A.P. Multiplexing sensory molecules map protons near micellar membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4667–4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Vitha, M.F.; Weckwerth, J.D.; Odland, K.; Dema, V.; Carr, P.W. Study of the polarity and hydrogen bond ability of sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles by the Kamlet-Taft solvatochromic comparison method. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18823–18828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Uchiyama, S.; Yano, K.; Fukatsu, E.; de Silva, A.P. Precise proton mapping near ionic micellar membranes with fluorescent photoinduced-electron-transfer sensors. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 8522–8527. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Dougherty, D.A. Cation-π interactions in chemistry and biology: A new view of benzene, Phe, Tyr, and Trp. Science 1996, 271, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kandel, E.R.; Schwartz, J.H.; Jessell, T.M. Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  69. Uchiyama, S.; Fukatsu, E.; McClean, G.D.; de Silva, A.P. Measurement of local sodium ion levels near micelle surfaces with fluorescent photoinduced-electron-transfer sensors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Diaz-Fernandez, Y.; Foti, F.; Mangano, C.; Pallavicini, P.; Patroni, S.; Perez-Gramatges, A.; Rodriguez-Calvo, S. Micelles for the self-assembly of ʺoff-on-offʺ fluorescent sensors for pH windows. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 921–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. De Silva, A.P.; Dobbin, C.M.; Vance, T.P.; Wannalerse, B. Multiply reconfigurable ‘plug and play’ molecular logic via self-assembly. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1386–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Uchiyama, S.; McClean, G.D.; Iwai, K.; de Silva, A.P. Membrane media create small nanospaces for molecular computation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8920–8921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Deisenhofer, J.; Norris, J.R. The Photosynthetic Reaction Center; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu, J.; de Silva, A.P. Path-selective photoinduced electron transfer (PET) in a membrane-associated system studied by pH-dependent fluorescence. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2012, 381, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. De Silva, A.P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Habib-Jiwan, J.-L.; McCoy, C.P.; Rice, T.E.; Soumillion, J.-P. New fluorescent model compounds for the study of photoinduced electron transfer: The influence of a molecular electric field in the excited state. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1728–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ayadim, M.; Jiwan, J.L.H.; de Silva, A.P.; Soumillion, J.P. Photosensing by a fluorescing probe covalently attached to the silica. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7039–7042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Daffy, L.M.; de Silva, A.P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Huber, C.; Lynch, P.L.M.; Werner, T.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Arenedicarboximide building blocks for fluorescent photoinduced electron transfer pH sensors applicable with different media and communication wavelengths. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 1810–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tusa, J.K.; He, H. Critical care analyzer with fluorescent optical chemosensors for blood analytes. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 2640–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Descalzo, A.B.; Marcos, M.D.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Soto, J.; Beltrán, D.; Amorós, P. Anthrylmethylamine functionalised mesoporous silica-based materials as hybrid fluorescent chemosensors for ATP. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 2721–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Refalo, M.V.; Spiteri, J.C.; Magri, D.C. Covalent attachment of a fluorescent ‘Pourbaix sensor’ onto a polymer bead for sensing in water. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 16474–16477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fernández-Alonso, S.; Corrales, T.; Pablos, J.L.; Catalina, F. A switchable fluorescence solid sensor for Hg2+ detection in aqueous media based on a photocrosslinked membrane functionalized with (benzimidazolyl)methyl-piperazine derivative of 1,8-naphthalimide. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2018, 270, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gui, B.; Meng, Y.; Xie, Y.; Tian, J.; Yu, G.; Zeng, W.; Zhang, G.; Gong, S.; Yang, C.; Zhang, D.; et al. Tuning the photoinduced electron transfer in a Zr-MOF: Toward solid-state fluorescent molecular switch and turn-on sensor. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Shepard, S. RFID: Radio Frequency Identification; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  84. Yamashita, D.S.; Weinstock, J. Method of Encoding a Series of Combinatorial Libraries and Developing Structure Activity Relationships. U.S. Patent 6,210,900 B1, 3 April 2001. [Google Scholar]
  85. De Silva, A.P.; James, M.R.; McKinney, B.O.F.; Pears, D.A.; Weir, S.M. Molecular computational elements encode large populations of small objects. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 787–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Brown, G.J.; de Silva, A.P.; James, M.R.; McKinney, B.O.F.; Pears, D.A.; Weir, S.M. Solid-bound, proton-driven, fluorescent ‘off–on–off’ switches based on PET (photoinduced electron transfer). Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 8301–8306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. McKinney, B.O.F.; Daly, B.; Yao, C.; Schroeder, M.; de Silva, A.P. Consolidating molecular logic with new solid-bound YES and PASS 1 gates and their combinations. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 1760–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yao, C.; Ling, J.; Chen, L.; de Silva, A.P. Population analysis to increase the robustness of molecular computational identification and its extension into the near-infrared for substantial numbers of small objects. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 2272–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Uchiyama, S.; Matsumura, Y.; de Silva, A.P.; Iwai, K. Fluorescent molecular thermometers based on polymers showing temperature-induced phase transitions and labeled with polarity-responsive benzofurazans. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 5926–5935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Chandrasekharan, N.; Kelly, L.A. Progress towards fluorescent molecular thermometers. In Reviews in Fluorescence 2004; Geddes, C.D., Lakowicz, J.R., Eds.; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishes: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 21–40. [Google Scholar]
  91. Uchiyama, S.; de Silva, A.P.; Iwai, K. Luminescent molecular thermometers. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Inal, S.; Kölsch, J.D.; Sellrie, F.; Schenk, J.A.; Wischerhoff, E.; Laschewsky, A.; Neher, D. A water soluble fluorescent polymer as a dual colour sensor for temperature and a specific protein. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 6373–6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Alemdaroglu, F.E.; Alexander, S.C.; Ji, D.; Prusty, D.K.; Börsch, M.; Herrmann, A. Poly(BODIPY)s: A new class of tunable polymeric dyes. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6529–6536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sen, C.P.; Goud, V.D.; Shrestha, R.G.; Shrestha, L.K.; Ariga, K.; Valiyaveettil, S. BODIPY based hyperbranched conjugated polymers for detecting organic vapors. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4213–4225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Squeo, B.M.; Gregoriou, V.G.; Avgeropoulos, A.; Baysec, S.; Allard, S.; Scherf, U.; Chochos, C.L. BODIPY-based polymeric dyes as emerging horizon materials for biological sensing and organic electronic applications. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2017, 71, 26–52. [Google Scholar]
  96. Gong, D.; Cao, T.; Han, S.-C.; Zhu, X.; Iqbal, A.; Liu, W.; Qin, W.; Guo, H. Fluorescence enhancement thermoresponsive polymer luminescent sensors based on BODIPY for intracellular temperature. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2017, 252, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hattori, Y.; Nagase, K.; Kobayashi, J.; Kikuchi, A.; Akiyama, Y.; Kanazawa, H.; Okano, T. Hydration of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) brushes on micro-silica beads measured by a fluorescent probe. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010, 491, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yamada, A.; Hiruta, Y.; Wang, J.; Ayano, E.; Kanazawa, H. Design of environmentally responsive fluorescent polymer probes for cellular imaging. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 2356–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qiao, J.; Chen, C.; Qi, L.; Liu, M.; Dong, P.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, X.; Mu, X.; Mao, L. Intracellular temperature sensing by a ratiometric fluorescent polymer thermometer. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 7544–7550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cellini, F.; Peteron, S.D.; Porfiri, M. Flow velocity and temperature sensing using thermosensitive fluorescent polymer seed particles in water. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2017, 8, 232–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Gota, C.; Uchiyama, S.; Yoshihara, T.; Tobita, S.; Ohwada, T. Temperature-dependent fluorescence lifetime of a fluorescent polymeric thermometer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), labeled by polarity and hydrogen bonding sensitive 4-sulfamoyl-7-aminobenzofurazan. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 2829–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Uchiyama, S.; Matsumura, Y.; de Silva, A.P.; Iwai, K. Modulation of the sensitive temperature range of fluorescent molecular thermometers based on thermoresponsive polymers. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 1793–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Uchiyama, S.; Takehira, K.; Yoshihara, T.; Tobita, S.; Ohwada, T. Environment-sensitive fluorophore emitting in protic environments. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5869–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Shiraishi, Y.; Miyamoto, R.; Hirai, T. A hemicyanine-conjugated copolymer as a highly sensitive fluorescent thermometer. Langmuir 2008, 24, 4273–4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gota, C.; Uchiyama, S.; Ohwada, T. Accurate fluorescent polymeric thermometers containing an ionic component. Analyst 2007, 132, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Uchiyama, S.; Kawai, N.; de Silva, A.P.; Iwai, K. Fluorescent polymeric AND logic gate with temperature and pH as inputs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3032–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Shiraishi, Y.; Miyamoto, R.; Hirai, T. Temperature-driven on/off fluorescent indicator of pH window: An anthracene-conjugated thermoresponsive polymer. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 6660–6664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shiraishi, Y.; Miyamoto, R.; Zhang, X.; Hirai, T. Rhodamine-based fluorescent thermometer exhibiting selective emission enhancement at a specific temperature range. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3921–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Iwai, K.; Matsumura, Y.; Uchiyama, S.; de Silva, A.P. Development of fluorescent microgel thermometers based on thermo-responsive polymers and their modulation of sensitivity range. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 2796–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Herrera, A.P.; Rodríguez, M.; Torres-Lugo, M.; Rinaldi, C. Multifunctional magnetite nanoparticles coated with fluorescent thermo-responsive polymeric shells. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 855–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Graham, E.M.; Iwai, K.; Uchiyama, S.; de Silva, A.P.; Magennis, S.W.; Jones, A.C. Quantitative mapping of aqueous microfluidic temperature with sub-degree resolution using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Lab Chip 2010, 10, 1267–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Yuan, B.; Uchiyama, S.; Liu, Y.; Nguyen, K.T.; Alexandrakis, G. High-resolution imaging in a deep turbid medium based on an ultrasound-switchable fluorescence technique. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 033703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gota, C.; Okabe, K.; Funatsu, T.; Harada, Y.; Uchiyama, S. Hydrophilic fluorescent nanogel thermometer for intracellular thermometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2766–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Okabe, K.; Inada, N.; Gota, C.; Harada, Y.; Funatsu, T.; Uchiyama, S. Intracellular temperature mapping with a fluorescent polymeric thermometer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Tsuji, T.; Yoshida, S.; Yoshida, A.; Uchiyama, S. Cationic fluorescent polymeric thermometers with the ability to enter yeast and mammalian cells for practical intracellular temperature measurements. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9815–9823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Hayashi, T.; Fukuda, N.; Uchiyama, S.; Inada, N. A cell-permeable fluorescent polymeric thermometer for intracellular temperature mapping in mammalian cell lines. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Inada, N.; Fukuda, N.; Hayashi, T.; Uchiyama, S. Temperature imaging using a cationic linear fluorescent polymeric thermometer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 1293–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Uchiyama, S.; Tsuji, T.; Ikado, K.; Yoshida, A.; Kawamoto, K.; Hayashi, T.; Inada, N. A cationic fluorescent polymeric thermometer for the ratiometric sensing of intracellular temperature. Analyst 2015, 140, 4498–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Tsuji, T.; Ikado, K.; Koizumi, H.; Uchiyama, S.; Kajimoto, K. Difference in intracellular temperature rise between matured and precursor brown adipocytes in response to uncoupler and β-adrenergic agonist stimuli. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kimura, H.; Nagoshi, T.; Yoshii, A.; Kashiwagi, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Ito, K.; Yoshino, T.; Tanaka, T.D.; Yoshimura, M. The thermogenic actions of natriuretic peptide in brown adipocytes: The direct measurement of the intracellular temperature using a fluorescent thermoprobe. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Hoshi, Y.; Okabe, K.; Shibasaki, K.; Funatsu, T.; Matsuki, N.; Ikegaya, Y.; Koyama, R. Ischemic brain injury leads to brain edema via hyperthermia-induced TRPV4 activation. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 5700–5709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ano, T.; Kishimoto, F.; Sasaki, R.; Tsubaki, S.; Maitani, M.M.; Suzuki, E.; Wada, Y. In situ temperature measurements of reaction spaces under microwave irradiation using photoluminescent probes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 13173–13179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Uchiyama, S.; Tsuji, T.; Kawamoto, K.; Okano, K.; Fukatsu, E.; Noro, T.; Ikado, K.; Yamada, S.; Shibata, Y.; Hayashi, T.; et al. A cell-targeted non-cytotoxic fluorescent nanogel thermometer created with an imidazolium-containing cationic radical initiator. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5413–5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Chemical structures of 14.
Scheme 1. Chemical structures of 14.
Polymers 11 01351 sch001
Figure 1. Local effective proton density (as measured by the shift of the acidity constant relative to bulk water, ΔpKa) near Triton X-100 micelles as a function of position (as measured by the local dielectric constant, ε). Adapted with permission from reference [64]. Copyright John Wiley and Sons 2018.
Figure 1. Local effective proton density (as measured by the shift of the acidity constant relative to bulk water, ΔpKa) near Triton X-100 micelles as a function of position (as measured by the local dielectric constant, ε). Adapted with permission from reference [64]. Copyright John Wiley and Sons 2018.
Polymers 11 01351 g001
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of 57.
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of 57.
Polymers 11 01351 sch002
Scheme 3. Chemical structures of 812.
Scheme 3. Chemical structures of 812.
Polymers 11 01351 sch003
Figure 2. Histogram for the occurrence of various H+-induced fluorescence enhancement factors (FEH+) in logic-tagged beads for samples of identical copies. Adapted from reference [88] published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 2. Histogram for the occurrence of various H+-induced fluorescence enhancement factors (FEH+) in logic-tagged beads for samples of identical copies. Adapted from reference [88] published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Polymers 11 01351 g002
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of 1317.
Scheme 4. Chemical structures of 1317.
Polymers 11 01351 sch004
Figure 3. Fluorescence intensity (IF) temperature profiles for 13 and 15 and for copolymers including 16 in the feed ratios given. Adapted with permission from reference [102]. Copyright American Chemical Society 2004.
Figure 3. Fluorescence intensity (IF) temperature profiles for 13 and 15 and for copolymers including 16 in the feed ratios given. Adapted with permission from reference [102]. Copyright American Chemical Society 2004.
Polymers 11 01351 g003
Scheme 5. Chemical structures of 1821.
Scheme 5. Chemical structures of 1821.
Polymers 11 01351 sch005
Scheme 6. Chemical structures of 2225.
Scheme 6. Chemical structures of 2225.
Polymers 11 01351 sch006
Figure 4. Intracellular temperature mapping with 23. Confocal fluorescence images of 23 (green) and Mito Tracker Deep Red FM (red) (left and middle) and fluorescence lifetime image of 23 (right) in a live COS7 cell. ‘nuc’ indicate the nucleus. The region of interest shown in the white square in the left panel is enlarged in the middle and right panels. Arrowheads point to local heat production near mitochondria. Adopted from reference [114].
Figure 4. Intracellular temperature mapping with 23. Confocal fluorescence images of 23 (green) and Mito Tracker Deep Red FM (red) (left and middle) and fluorescence lifetime image of 23 (right) in a live COS7 cell. ‘nuc’ indicate the nucleus. The region of interest shown in the white square in the left panel is enlarged in the middle and right panels. Arrowheads point to local heat production near mitochondria. Adopted from reference [114].
Polymers 11 01351 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, C.-Y.; Uchiyama, S.; de Silva, A.P. A Personal Journey across Fluorescent Sensing and Logic Associated with Polymers of Various Kinds. Polymers 2019, 11, 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081351

AMA Style

Yao C-Y, Uchiyama S, de Silva AP. A Personal Journey across Fluorescent Sensing and Logic Associated with Polymers of Various Kinds. Polymers. 2019; 11(8):1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Chao-Yi, Seiichi Uchiyama, and A. Prasanna de Silva. 2019. "A Personal Journey across Fluorescent Sensing and Logic Associated with Polymers of Various Kinds" Polymers 11, no. 8: 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop