Next Article in Journal
Current Insight of Printability Quality Improvement Strategies in Natural-Based Bioinks for Skin Regeneration and Wound Healing
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential of Mean Force between Bare or Grafted Silica/Polystyrene Surfaces from Self-Consistent Field Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Biocompatibility and Pharmacological Effects of Innovative Systems for Prolonged Drug Release Containing Dexketoprofen in Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heterogeneity Effects in Highly Cross-Linked Polymer Networks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/polym13071013
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Hybrid Polymer Composites with Graphene and MXene Nano-Reinforcements: Computational Analysis

by
Sigitas Kilikevičius
1,*,
Saulė Kvietkaitė
1,
Leon Mishnaevsky, Jr.
2,
Mária Omastová
3,
Andrey Aniskevich
4 and
Daiva Zeleniakienė
1
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentų st. 56, 51424 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 2000 Roskilde, Denmark
3
Polymer Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41 Bratislava 45, Slovakia
4
Institute for Mechanics of Materials, University of Latvia, Jelgavas st. 3, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(7), 1013; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071013
Submission received: 15 February 2021 / Revised: 19 March 2021 / Accepted: 24 March 2021 / Published: 25 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling and Simulation of Polymer Nanocomposites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper presents a computational analysis on the mechanical and damage behavior of novel hybrid polymer composites with graphene and MXene nano-reinforcements targeted for flexible electronics and advanced high-strength structural applications with additional functions, such as real-time monitoring of structural integrity. Geometrical models of three-dimensional representative volume elements of various configurations were generated, and a computational model based on the micromechanical finite element method was developed and solved using an explicit dynamic solver. The influence of the geometrical orientation, aspect ratio, and volume fractions of the inclusions, as well as the interface properties between the nano-reinforcements and the matrix on the mechanical behavior, was determined. The results of the presented research give initial insights about the mechanical and damage behavior of the proposed composites and provide insight for future design iterations of similar multifunctional materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

After the discovery of graphene, focus shifted to two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials. These nanofillers drew attention due to their flexible properties, allowing us to create multi-functional composite materials that can be used for a range of applications such as aerospace, energy storage, and electromagnetic interference shielding [1,2,3]. Two-dimensional nanomaterials such as graphene, due to their high aspect ratio (AR), offer increased fatigue resistance and fracture toughness through deflection of crack propagation and bridging mechanics [4,5,6]. However, such fillers are hydrophobic and do not form bonds with polymers. Such a pursuit led to the discovery of a new class of 2D materials in 2011. MXenes are ternary layered compounds, produced by selectively etching A-group layers from the MAX phases. They exhibit unique properties such as hydrophilic nature combined with high electrical and thermal conductivity, capability to intercalate ions, high electrical capacity, excellent electrochemical activity, and great mechanical properties [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. These properties make them of great interest for many applications, and they can be utilized in developments of composite materials with polymer matrixes for flexible electronics and advanced high-strength structural applications with additional functions such as real-time monitoring of structural integrity. There are more than 30 different types reported, and hundreds computationally studied in silico [7,16]. Titanium carbide Ti3C2Tz is the most widely researched MXene exhibiting hydrophilic properties, which makes it dispersible in a range of polar solvents [17,18]. Ti3C2Tz of high aspect ratios obtained by using several different methods showed increased conductivity [19,20,21], as well as improved thermal [22] and mechanical properties [23] of polymer composites. Moreover, these materials showed great promise for developing materials with long-term thermo-oxidative resistance [24]. Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate high adhesion between MXene and epoxy resin [25].
The mechanical properties of the hierarchical composite greatly depend on 2D nanofiller geometry (shape, length, and thickness). Depending on the synthesis method of the MXene, varying thickness and number of layers can be obtained [19,26]. The average thickness of a single Ti3C2Tz flake is 0.8 nm, while a thickness of 1 nm is characteristic for the flake with surface functional groups, and the mean lateral size is usually around 500 nm [26,27]. As multi-layered MXenes are more common, their thickness can range from 5 to 30 nm with AR 17-100 [28,29,30,31].
Recently, the electrical properties of polymer composites have gained great interest. The conductivity properties of hybrid composites with carbon nanotubes and carbon black can by utilized for energy storage [32]. Carbon nanotubes and carbon fiber were studied to implement electro-activated polymeric shape-memory nanocomposites [33,34,35]. Moreover, nano-reinforcements in polymer-based composites can be utilized for strain sensing [36,37,38,39]. All this shows a huge potential to expand the scope of applications of polymer composites. With this in mind, MXenes electrical properties can be utilized in polymer composites with additional functions such as real-time monitoring of structural integrity.
The finite element-based approach was proven to be a very valuable tool for studying the mechanical and damage behavior of various composite materials. In the field of finite element-based analysis on nanocomposites, the majority of published works are focused on graphene for improving the mechanical characteristics of nanocomposites [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Recently, the finite element-based methods gained attention in studying the damage behavior of various composites. The finite element method along with the molecular dynamics model were used for modelling the fracture and strength of single layer graphene platelets reinforced reacted epoxy [53]. The mechanical properties of epoxy and interfaces between graphene and epoxy were obtained by modelling crosslinking reactions with the molecular dynamics model. These properties were used in the finite element model to investigate the effects of graphene morphology on the composites. Computational micromechanics in conjunction with the augmented finite element method were applied for an investigation on damage mechanisms in thin-ply composite laminates [54]. The finite element method was applied for analyzing the progressive failure of open-hole composite laminates for aeronautical applications and demonstrated a good agreement with the experiments [55]. A numerical model of tensile response and damage evolution in flax/epoxy and carbon/epoxy composites was developed within a thermodynamics framework, and the predictions made by this model corelated well in terms of mechanical response, stiffness degradation, and inelasticity [56]. The damage and fracture mechanisms of graphene/epoxy composites were researched in another work [57]. The influence of the shape, aspect ratio, orientation, clustering, and volume fraction of graphene reinforcements was demonstrated by computational experiments based on the finite element method. The finite element-based micromechanics study of epoxy composite reinforced with pristine graphene and reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets [58] demonstrated that the rivalry between the brittle matrix cracking and interface debonding damage mechanisms is influenced by the orientation of nanoplatelets, volume fractions, nanoplatelets/matrix modulus-mismatch, and interface strength. The same approach was used for an analysis on the damage behavior of a nacre-inspired graphene oxide/polyvinylidene fluoride nanocomposite [59]. Crack deflection and excessive plastic deformation was observed when fractions of graphene were lower, while brittle fracture was observed when fractions of graphene were higher due to the coalescence of cracks. Finite element-based micromechanical models were applied to study the influence of functionally graded voids and graphene nanoplatelets on the damage behavior of polyurethane foam core [60]. The study revealed that the air pores significantly increased the ductility of brittle thermoplastic polyurethane resin when the pores were distributed non-linearly in a functionally graded circular shape, and graphene nano-reinforcements compensated the decrease in the Young’s modulus occurring due to linearly distributed air-voids.
The tensile response and the damage mechanism of MXene/epoxy composites MXene/polyvinyl alcohol composites were investigated [61] by developing a micromechanical finite element model, which was calibrated taking into account experimental results. The predictions based on this model demonstrated that MXene shows great promise for polymer matrix-based composites by significantly improving their mechanical properties, as well as high-strength multifunctional MXene-polymer film materials with high mechanical properties, which can be applied for real time monitoring of structural integrity by utilizing the electrical conductivity of MXene. Bioinspired MXene/polymer nanocomposites with nacre mimetic brick and mortar structures were modelled using classical analytical methods and numerical methods based on the finite element approach [62]. It was demonstrated that such structures result in an interlocking mechanism between MXene inclusions, leading to a significant increase in stiffness and strength. Orthotropic elastic properties of epoxy composites with MXene and graphene 2D nano-reinforcements were studied [63] by applying numerical methods. Recent works demonstrated that the mechanical and damage behavior of composites can be significantly improved by proper selection of reinforcements.
The aim of this research is to study the mechanical and damage behavior of hybrid polymer composites with MXene and graphene nano-reinforcements by developing a computational model based on the micromechanical finite element method, which would allow initial insights on the mechanical and damage behavior of such hybrid composites to be presented and estimations to be made about the influence of the geometrical orientation, aspect ratio and volume fractions of the inclusions as well as the interface properties between the nano-reinforcements and the matrix.

2. Materials and Methods

The investigated composite materials are composed of an epoxy matrix and 2D nanosheets of graphene and MXenes. The mechanical properties of the materials are presented in Table 1. The graphene-matrix interphase properties used in the presented computational analysis were based on the previous research [25,57], which studied these properties using an inverse modelling approach.
To investigate the mechanical behavior of such hybrid polymer composites reinforced with graphene and MXene nanosheets, a computational model was developed on the basis of the micromechanical finite element method. Geometrical models of three-dimensional representative volume elements (RVEs) with various volume fractions (denoted as fG and fMX, respectively) of graphene and MXene inclusions, various aspect ratios (ρG and ρMX), and different alignment configurations were created using Digimat-FE (Extreme Engineering, MSC.Software GmbH, Munich, Germany). In practice, the alignment of nano-reinforcements can be achieved through electrical methods [68,69]. A volume fraction for graphene inclusions was set to 0.1%. The MXene volume fractions were set in a range from 0.8% to 1.6% for the RVEs with randomly placed inclusions and in a range from 0.8% to 6.4% for the RVEs with aligned inclusions. An aspect ratio value of 500 was used for the graphene inclusions, while aspect ratio values of 200 and 400 were used for the MXene inclusions.
The RVEs with randomly placed inclusions were built as cubes with a size of 595 nm, while the RVEs with aligned inclusions were built as rectangular cuboids with dimensions of 595 × 290 × 595 nm, aligning the inclusions in the x–z plane. The graphene and MXene inclusions were generated as discs with a thickness of 0.335 nm and 1 nm [1,70,71,72], respectively. As inclusions/polymer matrix interfaces make a significant influence on the mechanical behavior of composite materials reinforced with nanosheets, the approach of effective interface models was adopted where the thin layer, surrounding the inclusions, is generated with specific properties. Based on the experimental observations presented in the article [73], the thickness of the effective interface layers was set to 1 nm. Typical RVEs used in this research are presented in Figure 1.
The created RVEs were imported to the commercial finite element software Abaqus FEA (Dassault Systemes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France), which was used to develop computational model and carry out the simulation tasks. The periodic boundary conditions [74] were opted in Digimat-FE (Extreme Engineering, MSC.Software GmbH, Munich, Germany) and were imported along with the geometrical models to Abaqus FEA (Dassault Systemes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France). The RVEs were subjected to uniaxial tensile loading along the x-axis direction [61,63] The RVEs were meshed using the three-dimensional 4-node linear tetrahedron element (C3D4) type. A minimum size of 8 nm was applied for the mesh, resulting in a total number of 1–2 million, depending on the RVE’s configuration. The experimental stress–strain curve of epoxy [67] was inserted in the program and the multilinear hardening plasticity model was considered to define the response to the mechanical loading. To investigate the influence of the MXene/epoxy interface properties on the strength of the proposed composite, several values of the Young modulus EMX and strength of the interface was used (multiplying by 0.5, 0.75 and 1.5 to those of the matrix Em). These values were in the range determined in the previous research [61]. The maximum principal stress criterion was applied for the simulation of matrix and interfaces cracking using the values provided in Table 1 as it was demonstrated that these are reasonable value for the maximum principal strength [75,76]. The MXene and graphene inclusions were not damaged during the simulation as the obtained maximum principal stress did not exceed the strength limit of these materials. The developed computational model was solved using Abaqus explicit and converged, delivering reliable and stable results.

3. Results and Discussion

Stress distributions in RVEs subjected to tension along the x-axis direction are shown in Figure 2 and damage evolution is shown in Figure 3.
At the beginning, the MXene/epoxy interfaces start to fail (Figure 3e). High-stress concentrations at the edges of the nano-reinforcements were observed (Figure 2a,e) resulting in the formation of localized cracking at the edges of the nano-reinforcements in both RVEs (Figure 3a,e). In the RVE with randomly placed inclusions, matrix damage was observed at a strain value of 0.016 (Figure 3a). As the strain increases, the main crack starts to form (Figure 2b and Figure 3b) and propagate (Figure 2c and Figure 3c). A complete fracture of the RVE with randomly placed inclusions was observed at a strain of 0.038 (Figure 2d). In contrast, in the case of the RVE with aligned inclusions, it was observed at a strain of 0.045 (Figure 2h). After a complete fracture (Figure 3d,h), the stress dropped, and crack pinning and deflection of the epoxy matrix were observed in the fractured RVEs (Figure 2d,h).
The influence of geometrical orientation of the inclusions is shown in Figure 4a. Both the effective Young’s modulus and the tensile strength were higher in the case of aligned MXene and graphene inclusions. In the composites containing ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 1.6%, and EMX = 0.5Em, the effective Young’s modulus was 3.4 GPa, and the tensile strength was 40.1 MPa with randomly placed inclusions, while the effective Young’s modulus along the alignment (x-axis) direction was 4.6 GPa and the tensile strength was 58.4 MPa with aligned inclusions. The influence of the aspect ratio of aligned inclusions is shown in Figure 4b, at ρG = 500, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 3.2%, and EMX = 0.5Em. At MXene aspect ratio values of 60, 125, and 250, the effective Young’s moduli were 4.7 GPa, 6.17 GPa, and 8.1 GPa, respectively. Additionally, higher values of elongation at break were observed at higher values of aspect ratio.
The MXene/epoxy interface did not have a significant influence on the effective Young’s modulus of the composite; however, higher properties of the interface result in significantly higher values of the tensile strength (Figure 5). In the RVEs with randomly placed MXenes having ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 1.6%, the tensile strength was 40.1 MPa, 48.6 MPa, and 63.5 MPa, at EMX = 0.5Em, EMX = 0.75Em, and EMX = 1.5Em, respectively (Figure 5a). In RVEs with ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 6.4%, where MXenes aligned, the tensile strength was 69.2 MPa, 82.6 MPa, and 116.1 MPa, at EMX = 0.5Em, EMX = 0.75Em, and EMX = 1.5Em, respectively (Figure 5b). Moreover, elongation at break was almost two times higher when EMX = 1.5Em compared to the case when EMX = 0.5Em.
These results confirm the previous findings [63] that the elastic properties of this composite are not highly influenced by the MXene/epoxy interface properties. However, this research shows that the interface has an influence on the fracture response.
The influence of the MXene volume fraction is shown in Figure 6. An increase in the volume fracture resulted in a significant increase in the effective Young’s modulus of the composite. With randomly placed inclusions as ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and EMX = 0.5Em, the obtained effective Young’s moduli were 2.8 GPa and 3.4 GPa at fMX = 0.8% and fMX = 1.6%, respectively. For the composites with aligned MXenes, containing ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and EMX = 0.5Em, effective Young’s modulus values of 3.5 GPa, 4.6 GPa, 6.1 GPa, and 10.1 GPa were obtained at fMX = 0.8%, fMX = 1.6%, fMX = 3.2%, and fMX = 6.4%, respectively.
Summarizing the results in Figure 5 and Figure 6, it should be noted that a stronger interface is able to improve both the maximum stress and the maximum strain, while the volume fraction of MXene is able to improve the maximum stress but the maximum strain is then decreased as the composite becomes more brittle. When developing compositions of new hybrid polymer composites with graphene and MXene nano-reinforcements, it is important to take these insights into account and control the manufacturing procedures in order to ensure a proper interface as well as optimize the MXene volume fraction in such cases where the degradation of structures occurs at small deformations.
Besides load carrying capabilities, the proposed composite can utilize the electrical properties of MXene. For example, when a structure made of such composite loses its structural integrity, the electrical conductivity is also deteriorated. This can be easily measured in real-time and give a reference about the structural integrity state.

4. Conclusions

Novel hybrid polymer composites with graphene and MXene nano-reinforcements were proposed, and a computational model based on the micromechanical finite element method was developed for studying the mechanical and damage behavior of hybrid polymer composites with MXene and graphene nano-reinforcements.
The influence of the geometrical orientation, aspect ratio and volume fractions of the inclusions, as well as the interface properties between the nano-reinforcements and the matrix, on the mechanical behavior was studied. The modelling demonstrated that both the effective Young’s modulus and the tensile strength were higher in the composites with aligned MXene and graphene inclusions in comparison to the composites with randomly placed inclusions. An increase in the volume fracture of the nano-reinforcements results in a significant increase in the effective Young’s modulus of the analyzed composites. The effective Young’s modulus of the composite with aligned nano-reinforcements containing 0.1% and 6.4% volume fractions of graphene and MXene, respectively, was 3.65 times higher compared to the Young’s modulus of the matrix. Moreover, the tensile strength increased as the volume fraction of MXene increased in the composites with aligned nano-reinforcements. However, in the composites with randomly placed nano-reinforcements, an increase in the volume fraction resulted in only an increase in the effective Young’s modulus. The MXene/epoxy interface did not have a significant influence on the effective Young’s modulus of the composite; however, higher properties of the interface resulted in significantly higher values of the tensile strength. Further, higher mechanical properties were observed at higher aspect ratios of nano-reinforcements. Crack pinning and deflection of the epoxy matrix were observed in the fractured RVEs.
Graphene nano-reinforcements may be used for additional strengthening of multifunctional composites with MXenes and further expand the scope of application of such materials by utilizing the great mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of MXene. The proposed novel hybrid polymer composites with graphene and MXene nano-reinforcements can be applied for flexible electronics and advanced high-strength structural applications with additional functions as real-time monitoring of structural integrity.
The results of the computational analysis revealed that MXene and graphene nano-reinforcements demonstrate considerable promise in the development of novel multifunctional composites, exhibiting excellent mechanical properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, software, data curation, and writing—original draft, S.K. (Sigitas Kilikevičius); software, formal analysis, and data curation, S.K. (Saulė Kvietkaitė); formal analysis and writing—review and editing, L.M.J.; formal analysis, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing, M.O.; formal analysis, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing, A.A.; conceptualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing, D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

This research has received funding from the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT) grant number S-M-ERA.NET-18-1; the State Education Development Agency Republic of Latvia grant number 1.1.1.5/ERANET/18/02, and the Slovak Academy of Sciences grant number M-ERANET-18-414-Nano2Com.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was developed under the M-era.Net research project titled NANO2COM—Advanced Polymer Composites Filled with Novel 2D Nanoparticles.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, M.-Q.; Ren, C.E.; Ling, Z.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Zhang, C.; Van Aken, K.L.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. Flexible MXene/Carbon Nanotube Composite Paper with High Volumetric Capacitance. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shahzad, F.; Alhabeb, M.; Hatter, C.B.; Anasori, B.; Hong, S.M.; Koo, C.M.; Gogotsi, Y. Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science 2016, 353, 1137–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zhang, C.; Anasori, B.; Seral-Ascaso, A.; Park, S.-H.; McEvoy, N.; Shmeliov, A.; Duesberg, G.S.; Coleman, J.N.; Gogotsi, Y.; Nicolosi, V. Transparent, Flexible, and Conductive 2D Titanium Carbide (MXene) Films with High Volumetric Capacitance. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bhasin, M.; Wu, S.; Ladani, R.B.; Kinloch, A.J.; Wang, C.H.; Mouritz, A.P. Increasing the fatigue resistance of epoxy nanocomposites by aligning graphene nanoplatelets. Int. J. Fatigue 2018, 113, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mishnaevsky, L.; Dai, G. Hybrid and hierarchical nanoreinforced polymer composites: Computational modelling of structure–properties relationships. Compos. Struct. 2014, 117, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dai, G.; Mishnaevsky, J.L. Fatigue of multiscale composites with secondary nanoplatelet reinforcement: 3D computational analysis. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 91, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, X.; Kuklin, A.V.; Baev, A.; Ge, Y.; Ågren, H.; Zhang, H.; Prasad, P.N. Two-dimensional MXenes: From morphological to optical, electric, and magnetic properties and applications. Phys. Rep. 2020, 848, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, J.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, L.; Dai, X.; Yu, F. Free-standing Ti3C2Tx MXene film as binder-free electrode in capacitive deionization with an ultrahigh desalination capacity. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fatima, M.; Fatheema, J.; Monir, N.B.; Siddique, A.H.; Khan, B.; Islam, A.; Akinwande, D.; Rizwan, S. Nb-Doped MXene With Enhanced Energy Storage Capacity and Stability. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Xu, L.-C.; Zhao, W.; Li, R.; Yang, Z.; Liu, R.; Li, X. Achieving superior high-capacity batteries with the lightest Ti2C MXene anode by first-principles calculations: Overarching role of S-functionate (Ti 2CS2) and multivalent cations carrier. J. Power Sources 2020, 451, 227791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Kong, N.; Uzun, S.; Levitt, A.; Seyedin, S.; Lynch, P.A.; Qin, S.; Han, M.; Yang, W.; Liu, J.; et al. Scalable Manufacturing of Free-Standing, Strong Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene Films with Outstanding Conductivity. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2001093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lipton, J.; Röhr, J.A.; Dang, V.; Goad, A.; Maleski, K.; Lavini, F.; Han, M.; Tsai, E.H.; Weng, G.-M.; Kong, J.; et al. Scalable, Highly Conductive, and Micropatternable MXene Films for Enhanced Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. Matter 2020, 3, 546–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xia, M.; Chen, B.; Gu, F.; Zu, L.; Xu, M.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J. Ti3C2Tx MXene Nanosheets as a Robust and Conductive Tight on Si Anodes Significantly Enhance Electrochemical Lithium Storage Performance. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 5111–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bao, Z.; Bing, N.; Zhu, X.; Xie, H.; Yu, W. Ti3C2Tx MXene contained nanofluids with high thermal conductivity, super colloidal stability and low viscosity. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cygan, T.; Wozniak, J.; Petrus, M.; Lachowski, A.; Pawlak, W.; Adamczyk-Cieślak, B.; Jastrzębska, A.; Rozmysłowska-Wojciechowska, A.; Wojciechowski, T.; Ziemkowska, W.; et al. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Alumina Composites with Addition of Structurally Modified 2D Ti3C2 (MXene) Phase. Materials 2021, 14, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soundiraraju, B.; George, B.K. Two-Dimensional Titanium Nitride (Ti2N) MXene: Synthesis, Characterization, and Potential Application as Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 8892–8900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maleski, K.; Mochalin, V.N.; Gogotsi, Y. Dispersions of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide MXene in Organic Solvents. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 1632–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hope, M.A.; Forse, A.C.; Griffith, K.J.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Ghidiu, M.; Gogotsi, Y.; Grey, C.P. NMR reveals the surface functionalisation of Ti3C2MXene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 5099–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lipatov, A.; Alhabeb, M.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Boson, A.; Gogotsi, Y.; Sinitskii, A. Effect of Synthesis on Quality, Electronic Properties and Environmental Stability of Individual Monolayer Ti3C2MXene Flakes. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1600255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Alhabeb, M.; Maleski, K.; Anasori, B.; Lelyukh, P.; Clark, L.; Sin, S.; Gogotsi, Y. Guidelines for Synthesis and Processing of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx MXene). Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7633–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, S.; Zou, X.; Xiong, X.; Zheng, K.; Lu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Xie, X.; Xu, Q. Electrosynthesis of Ti3AlC2 from oxides/carbon precursor in molten calcium chloride. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 735, 1901–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, S.; Kim, J. Incorporating MXene into Boron Nitride/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Composite Films to Enhance Thermal and Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2021, 13, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Borysiuk, V.N.; Mochalin, V.N.; Gogotsi, Y. Bending rigidity of two-dimensional titanium carbide (MXene) nanoribbons: A molecular dynamics study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 143, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, G.-X.; Yang, Y.-D.; Zhu, D.; Wei, Y.-C.; Liao, S.; Luo, M. MXene Enabling the Long-Term Superior Thermo-Oxidative Resistance for Elastomers. Polymers 2021, 13, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zukiene, K.; Monastyreckis, G.; Kilikevicius, S.; Procházka, M.; Micusik, M.; Omastová, M.; Aniskevich, A.; Zeleniakiene, D. Wettability of MXene and its interfacial adhesion with epoxy resin. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 257, 123820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maleski, K.; Ren, C.E.; Zhao, M.-Q.; Anasori, B.; Gogotsi, Y. Size-Dependent Physical and Electrochemical Properties of Two-Dimensional MXene Flakes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 24491–24498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, T.; Pan, L.; Tang, H.; Du, F.; Guo, Y.; Qiu, T.; Yang, J. Synthesis of two-dimensional Ti3C2Tx MXene using HCl+LiF etchant: Enhanced exfoliation and delamination. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cao, Y.; Deng, Q.; Liu, Z.; Shen, D.; Wang, T.; Huang, Q.; Du, S.; Jiang, N.; Lin, C.-T.; Yu, J. Enhanced thermal properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites with ultrathin nanosheets of MXene. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 20494–20501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jastrzębska, A.M.; Karwowska, E.; Wojciechowski, T.; Ziemkowska, W.; Rozmysłowska, A.; Chlubny, L.; Olszyna, A. The Atomic Structure of Ti2C and Ti3C2 MXenes is Responsible for Their Antibacterial Activity Toward, E. coli Bacteria. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2019, 28, 1272–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, W.; Luo, H.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, S.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Peng, S. Ultrasonic assisted etching and delaminating of Ti3C2 Mxene. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 7084–7087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, L.; Shi, X.; Yu, N.; Zhang, X.; Du, X.; Lin, J. Measurement and Analysis of Thermal Conductivity of Ti3C2Tx MXene Films. Materials 2018, 11, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Krause, B.; Kunz, K.; Kretzschmar, B.; Kühnert, I.; Pötschke, P. Effect of Filler Synergy and Cast Film Extrusion Parameters on Extrudability and Direction-Dependent Conductivity of PVDF/Carbon Nanotube/Carbon Black Composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, H.; Huang, W.M. Synergistic effect of self-assembled carboxylic acid-functionalized carbon nanotubes and carbon fiber for improved electro-activated polymeric shape-memory nanocomposite. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 231910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, H.; Yao, Y.; Huang, W.M.; Hui, D. Noncovalently functionalized carbon fiber by grafted self-assembled graphene oxide and the synergistic effect on polymeric shape memory nanocomposites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 67, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kulakov, V.; Aniskevich, A.; Ivanov, S.; Poltimae, T.; Starkova, O. Effective electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube–epoxy nanocomposites. J. Compos. Mater. 2016, 51, 2979–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Georgousis, G.; Pandis, C.; Kalamiotis, A.; Georgiopoulos, P.; Kyritsis, A.; Kontou, E.; Pissis, P.; Micusik, M.; Czanikova, K.; Kulicek, J.; et al. Strain sensing in polymer/carbon nanotube composites by electrical resistance measurement. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 68, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carraro, P.A.; Zappalorto, M.; Quaresimin, M. Health monitoring of cross-ply laminates: Modelling the correlation between damage evolution and electrical resistance change. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 82, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zappalorto, M.; Panozzo, F.; Carraro, P.A.; Quaresimin, M. Electrical response of a laminate with a delamination: Modelling and experiments. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 143, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sánchez-Romate, X.F.; Sans, A.; Jiménez-Suárez, A.; Campo, M.; Ureña, A.; Prolongo, S.G. Highly Multifunctional GNP/Epoxy Nanocomposites: From Strain-Sensing to Joule Heating Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hussein, A.; Kim, B. Graphene/polymer nanocomposites: The active role of the matrix in stiffening mechanics. Compos. Struct. 2018, 202, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Elmarakbi, A.; Azoti, W.; Serry, M. Multiscale modelling of hybrid glass fibres reinforced graphene platelets polyamide PA6 matrix composites for crashworthiness applications. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Liu, M.; Kinloch, I.A.; Young, R.J.; Papageorgiou, D.G. Modelling mechanical percolation in graphene-reinforced elastomer nanocomposites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 178, 107506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Yang, S.; Shin, H.; Cho, M. Molecular dynamics simulation and finite element analysis on mechanical behavior of oxygen functionalized graphene/polymer nanocomposites. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Parizi, M.J.G.; Shahverdi, H.; Mondali, M. FEM study on mechanical properties of nanocomposites reinforced by defective graphene sheets. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, E1084–E1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wan, H.; Fan, L.; Jia, J.; Han, Q.; Jamalabadi, M.Y.A. Micromechanical modeling over two length-scales for elastic properties of graphene nanoplatelet/graphite fiber/polyimide composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 262, 124255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jaroniek, M.; Czechowski, L.; Kaczmarek, Ł.; Warga, T.; Kubiak, T. A New Approach of Mathematical Analysis of Structure of Graphene as a Potential Material for Composites. Materials 2019, 12, 3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Chavan, S.; Gumtapure, V.; Perumal D, A.P. Numerical and experimental analysis on thermal energy storage of polyethylene/functionalized graphene composite phase change materials. J. Energy Storage 2020, 27, 101045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, G.; Su, Y.; Jiang, D.; Pan, L.; Li, S. An experimental and numerical investigation on a paraffin wax/graphene oxide/carbon nanotubes composite material for solar thermal storage applications. Appl. Energy 2020, 264, 114786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, B.; Xiao, G.; Yi, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, T.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, C. Effect of the Characteristic Size and Content of Graphene on the Crack Propagation Path of Alumina/Graphene Composite Ceramics. Materials 2021, 14, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shingare, K.; Naskar, S. Probing the prediction of effective properties for composite materials. Eur. J. Mech. Solids 2021, 87, 104228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, Y.; Hu, Y.; Liu, M. Elasto-plastic behavior of graphene reinforced nanocomposites with hard/soft interface effects. Mater. Des. 2021, 199, 109421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Drozdov, A.; Christiansen, J. Micromechanical modeling of barrier properties of polymer nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 189, 108002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bian, P.; Verestek, W.; Yan, S.; Xu, X.; Qing, H.; Schmauder, S. A multiscale modeling on fracture and strength of graphene platelets reinforced epoxy. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2020, 235, 107197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Naderi, M.; Iyyer, N. Micromechanical analysis of damage mechanisms under tension of 0°–90° thin-ply composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 2020, 234, 111659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shi, J.; Tong, M.; Zhou, C.; Ye, C.; Wang, X. Progressive Failure Analysis in Open-Hole Tensile Composite Laminates of Airplane Stringers Based on Tests and Simulations. Appl. Sci. 2020, 11, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mahboob, Z.; Chemisky, Y.; Meraghni, F.; Bougherara, H. Mesoscale modelling of tensile response and damage evolution in natural fibre reinforced laminates. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 119, 168–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Dai, G.; Mishnaevsky, L. Graphene reinforced nanocomposites: 3D simulation of damage and fracture. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 95, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hussein, A.; Kim, B. Micromechanics based FEM study on the mechanical properties and damage of epoxy reinforced with graphene based nanoplatelets. Compos. Struct. 2019, 215, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hussein, A.; Ramasundaram, S.; Kim, B. A novel method for fabricating bioinspired layered nanocomposites using aligned graphene oxide/PVDF and their micromechanical modeling. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 24, 101050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Al-Maharma, A.Y.; Sendur, P.; Patil, S.P.; Markert, B. The Effect of Functionally-Graded Voids and GNPs on the Damage Tolerance of Polyurethane Foam Core. PAMM 2021, 20, e202000082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Monastyreckis, G.; Mishnaevsky, L.; Hatter, C.; Aniskevich, A.; Gogotsi, Y.; Zeleniakiene, D. Micromechanical modeling of MXene-polymer composites. Carbon 2020, 162, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aghamohammadi, H.; Amousa, N.; Eslami-Farsani, R. Recent advances in developing the MXene/polymer nanocomposites with multiple properties: A review study. Synth. Met. 2021, 273, 116695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kilikevičius, S.; Kvietkaitė, S.; Žukienė, K.; Omastová, M.; Aniskevich, A.; Zeleniakienė, D. Numerical investigation of the mechanical properties of a novel hybrid polymer composite reinforced with graphene and MXene nanosheets. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2020, 174, 109497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lipatov, A.; Lu, H.; Alhabeb, M.; Anasori, B.; Gruverman, A.; Gogotsi, Y.; Sinitskii, A. Elastic properties of 2D Ti3C2TxMXene monolayers and bilayers. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat0491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Zeleniakiene, D.; Monastyreckis, G.; Aniskevich, A.; Griskevicius, P. Deformation and Failure of MXene Nanosheets. Materials 2020, 13, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lee, C.; Wei, X.; Kysar, J.W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, Y.-K.; Yu, L.-J.; Peng, R.-G.; Huang, Y.-L.; He, C.-E.; Liu, H.-Y.; Wang, X.-B.; Xie, X.-L.; Mai, Y.-W. Incorporation of liquid-like multiwalled carbon nanotubes into an epoxy matrix by solvent-free processing. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 225701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lu, H.; Liang, F.; Gou, J. Nanopaper enabled shape-memory nanocomposite with vertically aligned nickel nanostrand: Controlled synthesis and electrical actuation. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 7416–7423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pothnis, J.R.; Kalyanasundaram, D.; Gururaja, S. Enhancement of open hole tensile strength via alignment of carbon nanotubes infused in glass fiber-epoxy-CNT multi-scale composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2021, 140, 106155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Naguib, M.; Kurtoglu, M.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Niu, J.; Heon, M.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-Dimensional Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4248–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Ling, Z.; Ren, C.E.; Zhao, M.-Q.; Yang, J.; Giammarco, J.M.; Qiu, J.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. Flexible and conductive MXene films and nanocomposites with high capacitance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 16676–16681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Naguib, M.; Mochalin, V.N.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. 25th Anniversary Article: MXenes: A New Family of Two-Dimensional Materials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 992–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gong, L.; Young, R.J.; Kinloch, I.A.; Riaz, I.; Jalil, R.; Novoselov, K.S. Optimizing the Reinforcement of Polymer-Based Nanocomposites by Graphene. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2086–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bahmani, A.; Li, G.; Willett, T.L.; Montesano, J. Three-dimensional micromechanical assessment of bio-inspired composites with non-uniformly dispersed inclusions. Compos. Struct. 2019, 212, 484–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zappalorto, M.; Salviato, M.; Pontefisso, A.; Quaresimin, M. Notch effect in clay-modified epoxy: A new perspective on nanocomposite properties. Compos. Interfaces 2013, 20, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pontefisso, A.; Mishnaevsky, L. Nanomorphology of graphene and CNT reinforced polymer and its effect on damage: Micromechanical numerical study. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 96, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 01013 g001 550
Figure 1. Typical representative volume elements (RVEs) with random placed inclusions (ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 1.6%) and aligned inclusions (ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 6.4%): (1), graphene/matrix interface; (2), graphene; (3), MXene/matrix interface; (4), MXene; (5), matrix.
Figure 1. Typical representative volume elements (RVEs) with random placed inclusions (ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 1.6%) and aligned inclusions (ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 6.4%): (1), graphene/matrix interface; (2), graphene; (3), MXene/matrix interface; (4), MXene; (5), matrix.
Polymers 13 01013 g001
Polymers 13 01013 g002 550
Figure 2. Stress distribution inside RVEs demonstrating crack formation and propagation (cut views): (a) RVE with randomly placed inclusions at a strain of 0.026, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 1.6%, and EMX = 0.5Em (localized cracking is indicated by the black arrows); (b) at a strain of 0.029; (c) at a strain of 0.031; (d) completely fractured at a strain of 0.038; (e) the RVE with aligned inclusions at a strain of 0.032, ρG = 500, ρMX = 250, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 3.2%, and EMX = 0.5Em (localized cracking is indicated by the black arrows) at a strain of 0.036; (f) at a strain of 0.039; (g) at a strain of 0.041; (h) completely fractured at a strain of 0.045.
Figure 2. Stress distribution inside RVEs demonstrating crack formation and propagation (cut views): (a) RVE with randomly placed inclusions at a strain of 0.026, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 1.6%, and EMX = 0.5Em (localized cracking is indicated by the black arrows); (b) at a strain of 0.029; (c) at a strain of 0.031; (d) completely fractured at a strain of 0.038; (e) the RVE with aligned inclusions at a strain of 0.032, ρG = 500, ρMX = 250, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 3.2%, and EMX = 0.5Em (localized cracking is indicated by the black arrows) at a strain of 0.036; (f) at a strain of 0.039; (g) at a strain of 0.041; (h) completely fractured at a strain of 0.045.
Polymers 13 01013 g002
Polymers 13 01013 g003 550
Figure 3. Damage evolution in the RVEs (damage is highlighted in red): (a–d) the RVE with randomly placed inclusions (the interface layers are hidden for better crack visualization, the MXenes are shown in transparent green, while the graphene inclusions are shown in transparent blue), ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 1.6%, and EMX = 0.5Em: (a) at a strain of 0.016; (b) at a strain of 0.026; (c) at a strain of 0.029; (d) at a strain of 0.038; (e–h) the RVE with aligned inclusions (the MXenes are shown in green, while the graphene inclusions are shown in blue), ρG = 500, ρMX = 250, fG = 0.1% fMX = 3.2%, and EMX = 0.5Em: (a) at a strain of 0.011; (b) at a strain of 0.036; (a) at a strain of 0.039; (a) at a strain of 0.045.
Figure 3. Damage evolution in the RVEs (damage is highlighted in red): (a–d) the RVE with randomly placed inclusions (the interface layers are hidden for better crack visualization, the MXenes are shown in transparent green, while the graphene inclusions are shown in transparent blue), ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 1.6%, and EMX = 0.5Em: (a) at a strain of 0.016; (b) at a strain of 0.026; (c) at a strain of 0.029; (d) at a strain of 0.038; (e–h) the RVE with aligned inclusions (the MXenes are shown in green, while the graphene inclusions are shown in blue), ρG = 500, ρMX = 250, fG = 0.1% fMX = 3.2%, and EMX = 0.5Em: (a) at a strain of 0.011; (b) at a strain of 0.036; (a) at a strain of 0.039; (a) at a strain of 0.045.
Polymers 13 01013 g003
Polymers 13 01013 g004 550
Figure 4. The influence of: (a) geometrical orientation of the inclusions at ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 1.6%, and EMX = 0.5Em; (b) the aspect ratio of aligned MXene inclusions at ρG = 500, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 3.2%, and EMX = 0.5Em.
Figure 4. The influence of: (a) geometrical orientation of the inclusions at ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 1.6%, and EMX = 0.5Em; (b) the aspect ratio of aligned MXene inclusions at ρG = 500, fG = 0.1%, fMX = 3.2%, and EMX = 0.5Em.
Polymers 13 01013 g004
Polymers 13 01013 g005 550
Figure 5. The influence of the MXene/epoxy interface: (a) randomly placed MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 1.6%; (b) aligned MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 6.4%.
Figure 5. The influence of the MXene/epoxy interface: (a) randomly placed MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 1.6%; (b) aligned MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and fMX = 6.4%.
Polymers 13 01013 g005
Polymers 13 01013 g006 550
Figure 6. The influence of volume fractions of MXenes: (a) randomly placed MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and EMX = 0.5Em; (b) aligned MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and EMX = 0.5Em.
Figure 6. The influence of volume fractions of MXenes: (a) randomly placed MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and EMX = 0.5Em; (b) aligned MXenes, ρG = 500, ρMX = 125, fG = 0.1%, and EMX = 0.5Em.
Polymers 13 01013 g006
Table
Table 1. The mechanical properties of the materials.
Table 1. The mechanical properties of the materials.
Materials
Material PropertyMXene (Ti3C2) [64,65]Graphene [66]Graphene/Epoxy Effective Interface [25,57]Epoxy [67]
Young’s modulus (GPa)33010003.742.74
Poisson’s ratio0.230.1650.350.35
Strength (MPa)22,000130,00012080.3
Elongation at break (%)5.520 5.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kilikevičius, S.; Kvietkaitė, S.; Mishnaevsky, L., Jr.; Omastová, M.; Aniskevich, A.; Zeleniakienė, D. Novel Hybrid Polymer Composites with Graphene and MXene Nano-Reinforcements: Computational Analysis. Polymers 2021, 13, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071013

AMA Style

Kilikevičius S, Kvietkaitė S, Mishnaevsky L Jr., Omastová M, Aniskevich A, Zeleniakienė D. Novel Hybrid Polymer Composites with Graphene and MXene Nano-Reinforcements: Computational Analysis. Polymers. 2021; 13(7):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kilikevičius, Sigitas, Saulė Kvietkaitė, Leon Mishnaevsky, Jr., Mária Omastová, Andrey Aniskevich, and Daiva Zeleniakienė. 2021. "Novel Hybrid Polymer Composites with Graphene and MXene Nano-Reinforcements: Computational Analysis" Polymers 13, no. 7: 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop