Next Article in Journal
Effects of Graphene Oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) on Green-Emitting Conjugated Copolymer’s Optical and Laser Properties Using Simulation and Experimental Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Modeling of Poly(L-lactic acid) via Polycondensation of L-Lactic Acid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Incorporation in Polyurethane Foams: A Solution for Future Antimicrobial Materials?

by
Radu Claudiu Fierascu
1,
Eduard-Marius Lungulescu
2,*,
Irina Fierascu
1,3,
Miruna S. Stan
4,
Ionela C. Voinea
4 and
Silviu Ionel Dumitrescu
5,6
1
National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry ICECHIM, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
National Institute for Research and Development in Electrical Engineering ICPE-CA, 313 Splaiul Unirii, 030138 Bucharest, Romania
3
Faculty of Horticulture, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59 Marasti Bvd., 011464 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 91-95 Splaiul Independentei, 050095 Bucharest, Romania
5
Central Emergency University Military Hospital, 013058 Bucharest, Romania
6
Medical-Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(23), 4570; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15234570
Submission received: 19 October 2023 / Revised: 18 November 2023 / Accepted: 27 November 2023 / Published: 29 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Functional Polyurethane and Composites)

Abstract

:
With the technological developments witnessed in recent decades, nanotechnology and nanomaterials have found uses in several common applications and products we encounter daily. On the other hand, polyurethane (PU) foams represent an extremely versatile material, being widely recognized for their extensive application possibilities and possessing a multitude of fundamental attributes that enhance their broad usability across various application fields. By combining the versatility of PU with the antimicrobial properties of nanoparticles, this emerging field holds promise for addressing the urgent need for effective antimicrobial materials in various applications. In this comprehensive review, we explore the synthesis methods, properties and applications of these nanocomposite materials, shedding light on their potential role in safeguarding public health and environmental sustainability. The main focus is on PU foams containing metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, but a brief presentation of the progress documented in the last few years regarding other antimicrobial nanomaterials incorporated into such foams is also given within this review in order to obtain a larger image of the possibilities to develop improved PU foams.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In addition to the common applications of polyurethane foams, such as insulation for walls and roofs, coatings, elastomers, adhesives and sound insulation materials in the construction and automotive sectors, efforts have been directed towards utilizing these materials in various biomedical applications, like stents, vascular prostheses, breast implants, dressings, antibacterial surfaces, catheters, controlled drug release for cancer treatment, tissue engineering, nerve regeneration, etc. [1].
Polyurethanes constitute a class of polymeric materials primarily synthesized through a polyaddition reaction involving a diisocyanate (such as methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) or toluene diisocyanate (TDI)) and a mixture of polyols (either polyether or polyester diols), conducted with the aid of catalysts (typically tertiary amines), chain extenders and blowing agents (including CO2 generated from the reaction of water with an NCO group, as well as pentane, among others). The final characteristics of the resulting polyurethane foam (density, mechanical strength, gelation time, pore structure) can be finely tuned by manipulating factors such as the molecular weight of the polyols, hydroxyl (OH) and isocyanate (NCO) indices, the quantity of the blowing agent, the type and amount of catalyst, the surfactant and so on [2,3].
Obtaining antimicrobial polyurethane foam involves incorporating antimicrobial agents or additives into the polyurethane foam during the manufacturing process. These agents can include metal nanoparticles, quaternary ammonium compounds or other substances known for their ability to inhibit the growth of microorganisms [4,5]. Antimicrobial additives are typically mixed with the polyurethane polymer before it is foamed and cured. This ensures that the resulting foam possesses antimicrobial properties, making it suitable for various applications, including medical devices, upholstery and filtration systems, where preventing the growth of harmful microorganisms is essential for safety and hygiene [6,7].
When it comes to the creation of polyurethane foams modified with nanometal particles, the existing literature is relatively limited. This scarcity can be attributed to the use of conventional methods for producing metal nanoparticles, which rely on aqueous solutions. It is widely acknowledged that the precise control of water is crucial in the process of synthesizing polyurethanes with the specific properties for their intended applications. Additionally, achieving an adequate dispersion of these nanoparticle systems presents certain challenges. In specific cases, PUF nanocomposite materials have been generated through different methods, including immersing PU in solutions containing metal ion precursors followed by a chemical reduction [8], immersing PU in solutions with dispersed nanoparticles [9], in situ polymerization [10] or electrospinning [11].
Conversely, an equally significant factor in shaping the characteristics of nanocomposites comprising polyurethane foam and metal nanoparticles is the management of their particle dimensions, arrangement and morphology, alongside the method of their incorporation into the polyurethane foam matrix [12,13,14].
The growing concern over antimicrobial resistance has fueled intense research into novel materials capable of combatting infectious agents. This review article delves into an intriguing prospect for the future: the incorporation of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles into polyurethane foams. By combining the versatility of polyurethane with the antimicrobial properties of nanoparticles, this emerging field holds promise for addressing the urgent need for effective antimicrobial materials in various applications. In this comprehensive review, we explore the synthesis methods, properties and applications of these nanocomposite materials, shedding light on their potential role in safeguarding public health and in environmental sustainability.

2. PU Foams—A Versatile and Widely Encountered Material

Polyurethane (PU) foams, widely recognized for their extensive application possibilities, possess a multitude of fundamental attributes that enhance their broad usability across various application fields.
As outlined in the Polyurethane Foam Market report [15], the worldwide polyurethane foam market had a valuation of USD 44.02 billion in 2022, with a forecasted trajectory of ascending to USD 64.44 billion by 2028, manifesting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% within the forecast period spanning 2023 to 2028. The pronounced growth in this market is predominantly driven by the increasing demand for polyurethane foam in various industries, including the construction, automotive, furniture and packaging industries. Figure 1 provides a comprehensive visual representation of the primary applications of polyurethane foams, delineating their respective market shares within various sectors [15,16,17]. This graphical depiction highlights the distribution of polyurethane foam usage across sectors such as construction, automotive, furniture and packaging and also summarizes its application in biomedical contexts.
A notable feature of PU foams is their exceptional versatility [5,18]. They can be tailored through different formulations to acquire specific properties, be that the flexibility needed for cushioning or the stiffness essential for insulations. This inherent adaptability enables PU foams to serve in a diverse range of applications, spanning from lightweight, thermally insulating construction materials to the comforting support of mattresses [19,20,21].
This versatility allows for the incorporation of diverse fillers, a practice that extends the foams’ utility by enhancing their intrinsic properties. Among the arsenal of modifiers, flame retardants stand as a vital component, imparting increased fire resistance to these foams [22,23,24]. Different synthetic fibers (e.g., polymers, glass fibers) or natural fillers (e.g., cellulose, chitin, hazelnut and eggshell), on the other hand, reinforce the polyurethane foam’s structural integrity [25]. Incorporating antimicrobial agents into polyurethane foams provides them with the ability to combat microbial growth, a feature highly coveted in the medical and hygiene industries [26,27,28]. Furthermore, the infusion of metal nanoparticles and inorganic oxides (including nano forms) bestows advanced functionalities, e.g., enhanced thermal conductivities, superior electrical properties, improved mechanical strengths, reductions in noise pollution, and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities [20,21,22,29,30,31].
In addition to their versatility, PU foams are well known for their lightweight nature. Their exceptional thermal insulating properties are highly regarded in the construction and refrigeration industries, where energy efficiency is a key concern [32]. The foams’ ability to dampen sound and reduce noise further broadens their appeal, with applications in automotive interiors and architectural acoustics [29,30,33].
Durability is another key facet of PU foams. They are designed to withstand wear and tear, ensuring long-lasting performance. Additionally, some formulations can exhibit resistance to various chemicals [34,35].
As sustainability and environmental concerns become increasingly important, efforts have been made to develop more eco-friendly alternatives within the area of PU foams [35,36]. This ongoing evolution seeks to reduce the environmental footprint of PU foam production and application.

3. Methodology

For the selection of the published works to be included in the review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA) recommendations were followed [37]. The research strategy was formulated according to the PICO (Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) approach (Table 1).
The research was conducted based on the PICO question: “Can metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles provide appropriate antimicrobial properties to PU foams?” As such, the following inclusion/exclusion criteria were defined.

3.1. Inclusion Criteria:

-
Research articles published in the time interval 2012–present, full text;
-
Articles published or available in English;
-
Incorporation of nanomaterials—for automatic screening, only the term “nano*” was used;
-
Development of materials with antimicrobial properties—for automatic screening, the automatic search “antimicrob* OR antibact* OR antifung*” was used;
-
Relevance of the review topic (new information provided).

3.2. Exclusion Criteria:

-
Articles published before 2012;
-
Book chapters or books;
-
Review or systematic review articles;
-
Conference papers, notes, letters, short surveys, errata, editorial or conference reviews;
-
Retracted papers;
-
Articles published in languages other than English;
-
Articles not presenting the incorporation of metal/metal oxides nanoparticles.
The literature search was conducted using the SCOPUS (as a more exhaustive database) database, using “polyurethane foams” as the primary search term. Further selection of the articles was performed automatically using the inclusion/exclusion criteria defined above, while inclusion in the present review was decided after a full review of the manuscripts.

4. Results

After applying the above-stated exclusion and inclusion criteria, as well as reading the title, abstract, and full text, a total of 69 articles were selected for inclusion in the present review (Figure 2), covering the modification of polyurethane foams with metallic and metalloid nanoparticles. To the selected articles, other works were added to provide the necessary context. These articles were retrieved by a “search and find”/manual selection approach using the SCOPUS database (by searching using specific keywords) or were suggested by reviewers during the peer review process.

5. Incorporation of Metal-Based Nanomaterials into PU Foams

When speaking of antimicrobial foams, as the main focus of the present review, one of the main materials that comes to mind is silver. A well-known and widely used antimicrobial material, silver (in very different formulations) represents the subject of a multitude of patents [38] or products already on the market [39]. It is no wonder that most of the modifications presented (Table 2—presenting the incorporation of ex situ-formed nanoparticles; Table 3—presenting the in situ formation of nanoparticles in a PU matrix) are based on silver in different forms. Other known antimicrobial metals (such as copper or zinc) are also represented by a significant number of papers. However, several other types of PU foam modifications were also encountered, with, e.g., reinforcement or increasing PU foams’ fire resistance or their application in environmental protection, as their main goals. The reason for their inclusion in the present review is the intrinsic antimicrobial properties of the used nanoparticles.
According to the literature data surveyed, three main methods to develop PU foams containing different types of nanoparticles can be identified: mixing the metal salts or nanoparticle solutions in a polyol precursor, the in situ formation of nanoparticles in already constructed PU foams and, finally, physical deposition (i.e., by dipping, spraying, etc.) of NPs on PU foams. All methods have their advantages and shortcomings, which, in our opinion, should be carefully considered when selecting the composite synthesis route, together with the envisaged application. For example, physical deposition of NPs, as an advantage, preserves their morphological and physical properties, although its main disadvantage is represented by insufficient depth penetration into PU foams. The presence of the NPs mostly on the surface also represents a disadvantage of in situ formation, together with supplementary variables that influence the NP’s size and shape. The in situ formation of NPs by mixing in a polyol structure usually has, as a main advantage, a homogenous distribution in PU foams, although this, on the other hand, could affect both the properties of the PU foam and the developed NPs.
Considering these aspects, examples regarding the incorporation of NPs into PU foams will be presented considering their synthesis route (ex situ—Table 2, schematically presented in Figure 3; in situ—Table 3, schematically presented in Figure 4).
Among the studies regarding ex situ-synthesized NPs, several present the use of commercially available nanoparticle dispersions [9,10,27,40,41,42,43]. The main advantage of this approach is a thorough control of the morphology of the nanoparticles, as well as the very good stability of NP solutions, which allows them to be used over long periods of time. Usually, this approach leads to a good dispersion of the nanoparticles in PU foams.
Regarding the NPs, Ag seems to be the primary choice for research in this area, either as metallic nanoparticles or as metal oxide NPs. The literature data present several examples of PU foams containing silver nanoparticles synthesized ex situ [9,10,13,21,27,28,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Besides antimicrobial applications (including water disinfection), the developed PU foam composites were tested for use as sensors, in electromagnetic shielding [49] and in pollutant removal [50,53]. Cu (either as a metal or as metal oxide nanoparticles), Zn (in its oxidized form) or silver ions or salts are also widely presented as PU foam reinforcements [12,14,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68], either for antimicrobial applications [54,55,56,57,61,62,63,64], environmental protection applications [14,54,56,60,64,66,68], as flame retardants [57,65], in electromagnetic shielding [58] or other miscellaneous applications [59,67]. Other forms of ex situ-synthesized NPs, such as MgO, Au, W, TiO2, Pd, Fe3O4, Al2O3, SiO2 or Ni, have been explored in the literature for incorporation in PU foams [26,31,65,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]. Their application is usually connected with the NP’s individual properties, such as antimicrobial potential [31], and can be linked to catalytic or photocatalytic systems [26,71,77], pollutant adsorption [74,75], flame retardancy [65], shielding [72,73,78] or other industrial applications [76]. For example, multi-branched AuNPs, synthesized via ultrasound and chemical reduction (using hydroquinone), were evaluated by Huynh et al. [31] for incorporation in a classical PU foam to develop an antibacterial dressing. A minor influence of the NPs on the PU structure was exhibited in the developed material, with the foam retaining a relatively small average pore size (smallest dimensions: 98 nm). The intrinsic properties of more exotic NPs, such as W, can be applied for specific uses (such as a radiopaque agent), as demonstrated by Hasan et al. [69]. Their results demonstrated an increase in density with an increase in W incorporation (up to a maximum value of 0.060 g cm−3), as well as an increased viscosity, Young’s modulus and tensile strength (up to 4%W). At the same time, the foam maintained a constant overall porosity and demonstrated longer actuation times with an increase in W. Iron-oxide-NP-reinforced PU foams can find applications in environmental protection [74,75] or shielding [72,73].
Considering all these potential applications, reinforcement of PU foams with metal or metal oxide NPs can definitively be viewed as a viable approach, making use of their specific properties. However, a particular question arises when modifying an already established material: how are its properties influenced? Fortunately, several studies can provide satisfactory answers.
Several studies (see Table 2) suggest that the incorporation of NPs does not alter the open cell structure of the foam but provides a higher surface area and a smaller pore size (important elements for several applications), preserving or enhancing the foam’s mechanical properties. The only significant exception is represented by the study of Khan et al. [76], that revealed, for Al2O3 concentrations above 2%, significant alterations of the PU’s structure and properties. This is not, however, a surprise, as most authors define an optimal NP concentration (dependent on the NPs and incorporation route) above which the properties start to decline. Generally speaking, at concentrations under 2% NPs, the foams exhibited pore sizes in the range of 100–500 µm (which reduced with the addition of NPs compared to pure PU foams) and an increase in the compression strength and stability.
Sportelli et al. [12] evaluated the incorporation of CuNPs (obtained by the sacrificial-anode electrochemical method) into different types of PU foams (for mattresses and for the automotive industry) by the dipping method in order to develop antimicrobial foams. Their results suggested that the NPs do not affect the pore characteristics, while NP release is favored at a higher initial copper concentration and by the characteristics of the foams (foams with larger pores lead to higher and faster NP release).
Namviriyachote et al. [9] presented the incorporation of different concentrations of AgNPs, together with a herbal compound from Centella asiatica active in wound healing (asiaticoside), in PU foams based on natural polyols (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, chitosan and sodium alginate) to develop a foam dressing for wound healing. The composite’s properties were more related to the type and content of natural polyols than to the NP content; the authors determined an optimal composition for both NP and herbal compound release. The study is important considering the alternative to classical chemical polyols, which opens another important research area. Another alternative for conventional organic-solvent-based polyurethane is represented by waterborne polyurethane. Zhao et al. [40] presented the incorporation of commercial AgNPs (15–40 nm) into waterborne PU foams via mechanical foaming for use as a bacteriostatic agent. Their results revealed the preservation of the open cell structure, with uniformly dispersed NPs. The optimal NP concentration identified by the authors was 2%, at which increases in the pore size, air permeability, water vapor transmission, and thermal and mechanical properties were recorded. Above this concentration, most of the mechanical and physical properties started to decline.
Phytosynthesized AgNP incorporation in PU foams was presented by Morena et al. [13]. The phytosynthesis process was applied using phenolated lignin under ultrasound irradiation, leading to nanoparticles with an average diameter of 13.29 nm. Impregnation was performed by dispersing the NPs in a polyol mixture at different concentrations. The addition of NPs preserved the open cell structure and led to a decrease in cell diameter. The optimal NP concentration that led to the highest compression modulus and swelling ratio increase was 0.12%NPs.
A very interesting study is represented by the work of Cheng et al. [21]. Although it is more focused on the antibacterial effect of the TiO2/Ag/chitosan embedded in the PU foams (an aspect that will be detailed in the next section) than on the NP’s characteristics and their influence on the final PU properties, the authors conducted a patient feedback study on a pain-reducing mattress constructed using the composites, with >85% of the responses evaluating it as “excellent”. This study offers a glimpse into the possible future applications of the solutions offered at the laboratory level by other works.
Another important application of PU foams is in electromagnetic interference shielding. Selvaraj et al. [78] presented the incorporation of a mixture of commercial NPs (MgO 40–60 nm, Ni 30–50 nm) in a bio-based PU foam via the dipping method. NP incorporation led to a potentially biodegradable, inexpensive, lightweight and flexible shielding material (maximum shielding: 27.56 dB).
Another metal nanoparticle which was evaluated for incorporation in PU foams not commonly encountered in the literature is Pd. Sahoo et al. [71] presented the incorporation of PdNPs obtained via hydrothermal synthesis using PVP as a coating material in commercially available PU foams via dipping. The authors evaluated the efficiency of the developed material as a recyclable catalyst for Suzuki−Miyaura cross-coupling reactions; their findings supported their potential application (the catalysts were viable after 50 catalytic cycles). More importantly, considering the goal of the present review, the authors also evaluated the penetration depth of the NPs (0.1 cm) and the morphology of the evaluated foam, revealing a structure comprising 3D interconnected 100−500 μm pores. The incorporation of SiO2 nanoparticles could also increase the mechanical durability and stability of the foams by providing water and oil repellency characteristics, as demonstrated by Cho et al. [77].
Table 2. Incorporation of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles formed ex situ into PU foams and the main non-antimicrobial findings; references are grouped considering the NP type 1.
Table 2. Incorporation of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles formed ex situ into PU foams and the main non-antimicrobial findings; references are grouped considering the NP type 1.
NP TypeNP Synthesis Method and CharacteristicsPU FoamsSynthesis ProcessApplicationMain FindingsRef.
AgCommercial NPsPU foams containing natural polyols (hydroxypropyl
methylcellulose, chitosan and sodium alginate)
Active ingredients (AgNPs at 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mg/cm2 and asiaticoside powder at 5%) adsorbedDermal wound dressingAverage pore size: 228–262 μm, viscosity slightly increased; higher concentration of polyols led to higher AgNP-releasing profiles. Optimal formulation: 6% natural polyols and 1 mg/cm2 AgNPs[9]
AgCommercial AgNPs, PVP-coated,
100 nm diameter, surface area 5.0 m2/g.
Commercial flexible foamIncorporation via mechanical stirring at different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1%)Antimicrobial applicationsHomogeneous dispersion of AgNPs in a polymeric matrix at low concentrations, cluster formation at higher loadings. Optimum concentration by step compression stress relaxation was 0.1% AgNP; resilience, hardness and compression unaltered by NPs. No change in thermal stability induced by NPs[10]
AgPhytosynthesis using phenolated lignin and sonication, 13.29 nm (TEM)PU formulation: PEG, DC 5179 additive, MDI, DABCOImpregnation via NP dispersion in a polyol mixture at 0.12, 0.2, 0.25% relative to final compositionChronic wound treatmentOpen cell structure, cell diameter decreased with an NP concentration increase, 40% increase in compression modulus, swelling ratios varied from 585% (0.25% NPs) to 1145% (0.12% NPs), density increased with NP content[13]
AgCommercial, 100 nmPolypropylene glycol-based PU foamIncorporation of NPs into a polyol mixture, foams converted to negative Poisson’s ratio or auxetic polyurethaneMedical cushioningFoams made using a higher compression ratio exhibited an increase in compression strength at higher strains and a higher density compared to PU foam.[27]
Ag/Ag2OMixture of NPs obtained by chitosan treatment, spherical, 44–75 nm (SEM)Commercial PU foamsImpregnated with nanochitosan and nanosilver/silver oxideColiform removal from water sourcesIncreased surface area (2.17 m2/g)[28]
AgNPs obtained by the borohydride technique—average diameter 19 nmPolyether type polyurethane foam (commercial)Immersion in NP solutionPotential applications in analytical chemistryMaterials stable for at least four days; uniform color, indicating satisfactory dispersion of NPs.[44]
AgNPs obtained by reduction with chitosan, spherical shape and a size range of~50 nmCommercially availableDipping in AgNP solutionIn vivo antibacterial studyCoating thickness 3–5 µm; PU coating average pore size 400–600 µm[45]
AgNPs obtained by reduction with sodium citrate, 25 nm crystallite (XRD),Obtained from commercial polyisocyanate and polyol reactantsDipping in AgNPs for 2, 4, 6, 8 hAntimicrobial applications (water disinfection)No detectable agglomeration of AgNPs; total size and porosity of foam unaltered; AgNPs unwashed after repeated cycles[46]
AgSynthesis
by electric explosion of wire in liquid, 90 nm diameter (SEM)
Obtained from commercial polyisocyanate and polyol (ethylene oxide/propylene oxide random copolymer (polyethylene glycol)) reactantsIncorporation of AgNP and recombinant human epidermal growth factor in foamsDressing material for biomedical applicationsNo influence of incorporation on PU foam surface pore size (200–400 µm), AgNPs embedded inside the pores[47]
AgFungi extracellular synthesis of NPs, 4.24–23.2 nm diameter for Scopulaiopsos brumptii Salvanet-Duval particles, 6–26 nm for Peniciillium Citreonigum Dierck particles, spherical morphology (TEM)Commercially availableIncorporated by soaking over nightRemoval of pathogenic bacteria from wastewaterNo evaluation of the material’s characteristics[48]
AgCommercial NPs, 15–40 nmWaterborne PU foams (commercially available emulsion)Incorporation by mechanical foaming, AgNPs—0–4%Bacteriostatic agentOpen cell structure; NPs uniformly dispersed; aggregation at higher NP concentration a rougher surface; up to 25.8 nm (AFM), pore size increased up to 34.24 µm; improved thermal properties; increase in air permeability, water vapor transmission, tensile strength (up to 1.26 Mpa, 412.39% increase at 2% NPs); elongation at break decreased with AgNP addition[40]
AgPolymer-template-assisted assembly using glucose, PVP and NaCl, 180 °C for 18 hObtained from commercial isocyanate and polyethylene polyol reactantsImpregnation with graphene oxide (7 mg/mL), carbon nanotubes
(7 mg/mL), AgNPs (15 mg/mL) and dopamine (0.1 mg/mL)
Industrial applications (such as sensors and electromagnetic shielding)Final composites reached 12.28 N/mm (tensile strength), improved thermal stability, electric conductivity properties (2 × 10−4 S/cm−1)[49]
AgPhytosynthesized using hibiscus leaf extract, spherical, 50–70 nm (TEM), compared with commercial NPsCommercially available (modified by chemical treatment—hydrophilic)Surface-coated on polyurethane foam, or fused on polyurethane foamPesticide adsorption in
column studies
Highest pesticide removal (96% at 20 mL/h) for fused polyurethane foam with commercial NPs, surface-coated polyurethane foam
(CPU) and fused polyurethane foam
[50]
AgCommercialCommercial formulationsIncorporation in PU foams, comparison with other biocidal additivesBiocidal applicationsAgNPs had the least effect on the technological parameters[41]
AgCommercial nanowires, 70 nm diameter, 100–200 µm lengthCommercially availableNW solution sprayed over PU foamsClinical wound healingComposites revealed excellent elasticity without plastic deformation, hydrophobic character[42]
AgReduction with ethanol on the surface of natural zeolite, diameter 4.61 nm (TEM)Open-cell soft polyurethane foamNPs/zeolite mixed during PU productionBiocidal applicationOpen cell foam structure, mean cell size distribution 121.68 μm[51]
AgCommercial NPs, 30 nmDisocyanate and polyol PU foamAgNP and AgNP/GO nanocomposites prepared by pepsin reduction mixed in the polyol solutionAntibacterial applicationsCompared with AgNP loading, the use of AgNPs/GO led to a more homogenous dispersion, 1.85% resilience improvement, 7.9% tensile strength improvement, 6.52% tensile elongation at break improvement[43]
AgPhytosynthesized using a
Verbena officinalis leaf extract, 42.57 nm (SEM)
Obtained from commercial polyisocyanate and polyol reactantsIncorporation by mixing in polyol solutionAntimicrobial nano-biofilterThe number of foam cavities increased with addition of NPs[52]
Ag/Ag2OMixture of NPs obtained by chitosan treatment, spherical, 44–75 nm (SEM)Commercially availableImpregnation by dipping with nanochitosan, nanosilver/silver oxide and nanochitosan-nanosilver/silver oxidePhosphate removal from water sourcesIncrease in surface area, superior sorption capacity compared to individual nano-components[74]
Ag/TiO2Produced by sintering at 600 °C, particle size 958.3 nm, by adding Ag to TiO2 NPs produced by sol–gelProduced by the group, no recipe disclosedAg/TiO2/chitosan powder coated on bendable double mattress with added HAP powderBending mattress for
bedridden
patients
Bed mattress tested using a patient survey with good feedback[21]
CuSacrificial-anode electrochemical synthesis and TOAC stabilization, 2.6 nm diameter (TEM)Commercially available. Two types of industrial foams, a filling material for mattresses (large and irregular pores, density: 25 kg/m3) and an automotive industry foam (small and regular pores, density: 21 kg/m3)Dipping in diluted CuNP solutions (1:100, 1:1000)Antimicrobial applicationsPore characteristics are not affected by NP uptake; higher and faster Cu release for higher initial CuNP solution and PU foams with larger pores[12]
CuNanosheets obtained via a CBD processCommercially availableDippingAdsorption and antimicrobial propertiesPore size 150–500 μm, adsorption capacity 76.5 mg/g for Cr (VI), 714 mg/g for Congo Red dye[54]
CuODirect thermal decomposition method, spherical shaped, 47.5 nm diameter (TEM)Foams obtained via the one-shot method using a toluene diisocyanate and polyol systemCuONPs, starch and silicone surfactant mixed with polyol componentsAntiseptic polyurethane foam
dressings
Optimal NP synthesis at 600 °C, with optimal open cells of the corresponding foams[55]
Ag3PO4PrecipitationObtained from commercial toluene diisocyanate, polyols and polyvinyl alcoholDispersed in a flexible open-cell polyurethane mixture, followed by graphene oxide coatingAntimicrobial properties and acid red 87 dye adsorptionOpen cell structure, adsorption efficiency of 97% for 0.05 g of nanocomposite[56]
AgIons from AgNO3Commercially available (30 kg/m3 density)Successively dipping in poly(acrylic) acid, chitosan, Ti3C2 and metal solutionFlame retardancy and antibacterial applicationsNo visible damage; reduced thermal degradation rate, burning rate (156 mm/min, control 237 mm/min), PHRR, heat production speed; smoke suppression ability. Increased compression strength by 79.6%[57]
CuIons from CuSO4Discontinuous coating: micro-cracking; no influence on thermal stability; reduced burning rate (208 mm/min, control 237 mm/min), PHRR, heat production speed; smoke suppression ability; increased compression strength by 38.4%[57]
CuElectroless depositionThermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) granules, commercially availableDeposition on TPU/ANF/Ti3C2Tx MxeneDetection of human motion and electromagnetic interference shieldingBoard compressive
interval (0–344.5 kPa, 50% strain), good sensitivity at 0.46 kPa−1, rapid response/recovery time (100 ms), electromagnetic interference shielding at 79.09 dB in X band
[58]
CuOArc discharge in a controlled atmosphere synthesis, spherical, average size 34 nm (TEM)Rigid polyurethane foams obtained using high-molecular-weight tannins (from
Pinus radiata bark), polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate, dimethyl sulfoxide, SoudaFoam FR, polyol
Mixing in polyol solution, final concentration 2%Miscellaneous applicationsDecreased pore size, strengthened cell walls, improved mechanical properties, elastic modulus (3.7 MPa) and stress (max. 1.13 MPa), apparent density[59]
ZnChemical precipitation from commercial ZnO NPsCommercially availableDippingOil–water separationSuperhydrophilic/superoleophobic features (oil contact angle 158°, water contact angle 0°), oil separation efficiency up to 99.5%[60]
ZnOSol–gel method, spherical, 40 nm diameter (XRD, TEM)Obtained from commercial isocyanate and polyol reactantsIncorporation by mixing in polyol solutionPhotocatalytic
degradation of textile dye methylene blue
Increased density with NP content, reduction in cell diameter, increased exposed surface area, open cell structure, superior MB degradation under solar irradiation[14]
ZnONPs obtained by the sonochemical method in a biopolymer (starch, gelatin, chitosan, and agar) matrix; crystallite sizes: 15, 26, 19, and 12 nm (XRD), average diameter 80, 41, 38, and 60 nm (TEM); morphology: microspherical/rice-like/nanospherical/egg-shapedFurniture-grade polyurethane foam, commercially availableCoating with ZnO—biopolymerAntifungal pillow materials for automobile and hospital industriesZnO starch and ZnO chitosan—homogeneous adhesion spread through the foam walls, maintaining the softness of the foam;
ZnO gelatin and ZnO agar—continuous film-like growth; all samples revealed UV photoactivity
[61]
ZnOPrecipitation method, spherical, 50 nmObtained from commercial isocyanate and polyol reactantsZnO added in the polyol, followed by mechanical stirring, foams obtained by a two-step methodAntibacterial applicationsFoams presented polygon closed-cell structures with energetically stable hexagonal and pentagonal faces, cell size comparable to unloaded foams, maximum tensile strength (193.5 kPa) and suitable compressive strength at 1.5% ZnONPs[62]
ZnOCommercial NPs, 50–250 nmObtained from diisocyanate and bio-based polyester polyol reactantsIncorporation of NPs by thermally induced phase separation at 1, 2, 5, 10%Potential wound dressingFlexible membranes,
thickness 150–230 μm, similar porous structures, pore size 10–60 μm, small negative influence on thermal properties, increased hydrophobicity with NP content, lower
absorptivity and acceptable WVTR (up to 8.9 mg/cm2·h)
[63]
ZnOChemical reduction, calcination, spherical, crystallite size 18.4 nmCommercially availablePU foams refluxed with ZnO NPs for 6 h.Antibacterial activity, detection and removal of basic dyes from wastewaterDetection limits of 2.5 and 2.9 μg/L for brilliant green and toluidine blue dyes, removal percentages of 92.4–98.2%, increased surface area, average pore radius of 3.4 nm[64]
ZnOChemical synthesis using KOH, 20–80 nm (TEM), crystal size 27 nm (XRD)Rigid polyurethane foam obtained from commercial isocyanate and polyolNPs added to the foam mixture at 5% relative to polyol contentFlame-retardant rigid PU foamIncreased cell size, decreased density, pore diameter of 481 µm, lower burning velocity (346 mm/min, compared with blank—275 mm/min)[65]
ZnOLow-temperature
chemical synthesis method, nanorods, 0.3 µm thickness, 1.2 µm length (SEM)
Commercially availableMulti-step dip-coating and seed-growth procedurePhotocatalytic treatment of aqueous acid red 88 dyeHighly porous, maximum color removal of 97% reached in 180 min under UVA[66]
ZnOCommercial NPsObtained from commercial isocyanate and polyol (castor oil derivative) reactantsNPs (6%) and sheath palm residues added during the polyol and
isocyanate mixture
Miscellaneous applicationsZnO acted as a cell nucleation agent—homogeneous and isotropic cell structures. Increased resistance to heat absorption, thermal stability, foam crystallinity and stiffness[67]
ZnOCo-precipitation, crystallite size 15 nm (XRD), semi-regular spherical and rod-shaped structure.Commercially available, apparent density 12–15 kg/m3 (97%)Deposition on foam containing reduced GO by two successive impregnation and hydrothermal processesPhotocatalysts for methylene blue degradationGood dispersion and embedment of NPs into the foam structure, ZnO NPs reduced the photodegradation capacity of PU foams containing reduced GO[68]
MgOChemical synthesis using NaOH, 10–75 nm (TEM), crystal size 12 nm (XRD)Rigid polyurethane foam obtained from commercial isocyanate and polyolNPs added to the foam mixture at 5% relative to polyol contentFlame-retardant rigid PU foamIncreased cell size, decreased density, pore diameter of 514 µm, lower burning velocity (333 mm/min, compared with blank—275 mm/min)[65]
AuMulti-branched AuNPs, synthesized using hydroquinone as a reducing agent and chitosan as a stabilizer under ultrasound, 45 nm branches, 40 nm average size of core (TEM)Obtained from commercial isocyanate and polyolDipping for 24 hAntibacterial dressingHigh water absorption, small average pore size (smallest dimensions 98 nm), 500% absorptivity[31]
WCommercial, 40–60 nmShape memory polymer foam obtained from isocyanate (NCO) pre-polymer and alcoholsWNPs dispersed in the
NCO pre-polymer, prior to foam blowing at 4% to 11%.
Radiopaque agent for neurovascular occlusion applicationsDensity increased with W incorporation (up to 0.060 g cm−3); pore density and volume changed with loading, constant overall porosity; increased viscosity (with W addition), Young modulus and tensile strength (up to 4%W); longer actuation times with W increase[69]
TiO2Atanase form, hydrothermal treatment from tetrabutyl titanate and fluoric acid, 20–30 nm × 3 nm (TEM)Commercially availableDippingPhotocatalytic inactivation of airborne bacteriaPhotoluminescence intensity decreases after loading with Mxene compared with pure TiO2[26]
TiO2Commercial spherical TiO2 (anatase),
density 3.9 g/cm3,
average diameter 25 nm
Commercially available flexible PU foamsInjection of NPs into the polyol followed by ultrasonic treatmentIndustrial applications (sandwich panels)Good dispersion of NPs in the matrix, decrease in cell size with NP content (up to 1%).
1% TiO2NPs foams—best thermal stability. Increased decomposition temperature, storage modulus, loss modulus and glass transition with NP addition
[70]
PdHydrothermal synthesis using PVP, 2−6.5 nm (TEM)Commercially availableDippingRecyclable catalyst for Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactionsNPs penetrated the foam up to 0.1 cm; foams contained 3D interconnected 100−500 μm pores; catalysts can be reused for 50 catalytic cycles[71]
Fe3O4Vacuum coprecipitationObtained from Sapiumse biferum kernel oil polyol and diphenylmethane diisocyanateIncorporation in foam mixtureLightweight renewable microwave-absorbing materialPorous structure; at 9% Fe3O4 content, foam exhibited microwave absorbency (effective bandwidth of 4.62/4.72 GHz at 1.789 mm/2.0 mm thickness in paraffin/bio-based polyurethane matrix). Effective absorbing frequency of 13.84 GHz at 5 mm thickness; saturation magnetization of 15.18 emu/g (superparamagnetism)[72]
Fe3O4Coprecipitation, 74 nm (TEM)Obtained from commercial isocyanate and polyolIncorporation of NPs and reduced GO by mixing in polyol solutionElectro-magnetic interference shielding materialCylindrical cells with spherical shapes; average cell size of the composite decreases with filler concentration; cell density increased with the filler concentration; addition of the filler enhanced the compressive modulus and strength; maximum shielding efficiency 33 dB at 35% Fe3O4/rGO[73]
Fe3O4Commercial, 50–100 nmObtained from commercial isocyanate and polyolIncorporation of Fe3O4@APTES (developed via sol–gel) by mixing in the polyol solutionArsenic and heavy metal removal from waterHomogenous cell structure; higher surface area and lower pore size compared to PU (9.225 m2/g, 8.4 nm); removal efficiency of 95%, 86%, 79% for As/Cd/Zn.[74]
Fe3O4Phytosynthesis using Simmondsia chinensis (jojoba) defatted meal extract, rectangular shape 51.48 nm (XRD)Commercially availableImpregnation through the dip adsorption method.Drinking water defluorinationIncreased thermal stability, superior adsorption capacity for Al2O3-modified foams (43.47 mg/g) compared to Fe3O4 (34.48 mg/g)[75]
Al2O3Phytosynthesis using Simmondsia chinensis (jojoba) defatted meal extract, irregular shapes 11.64 nm (XRD)Commercially availableImpregnation through the dip adsorption method.Drinking water defluorination[75]
Al2O3Commercial NPs, 40 nm (SEM)Obtained from commercial isocyanate and polyolIncorporation of Al2O3 at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10% by mixing in the polyolSandwich composites for industrial applicationsDamage to cellular structure increased with NP content, lower glass transition temperature with NP increase, highest damping ratio and buckling peak for 2% NPs, decrease in stiffness and strength with addition of NPs[76]
SiO2Commercial, 20 nmCommercially available (density of 30.3 kg/m2, tensile strength of 1.25 kg/m2, elongation of 130%)Dip-coatingBacterial anti-adhesion and antifouling applicationsThe foam demonstrated mechanical
durability and stability; a high repellency to liquids such as water and oil; a high antifouling effect against polar and nonpolar liquid
pollutants
[77]
MgO/NiCommercial nanoparticles, 40–60 nm/30–50 nmObtained from commercial isocyanate and bio-based polyolDippingElectromagnetic interference shieldingOpen cellular porous honeycomb morphology, average pore size: 300 μm, pore wall thickness: 15 μm, composites with 10% MgO and 1% Ni presented maximum shielding of 27.56 dB.[78]
1 Abbreviations: NPs—nanoparticles, PEG—polyethylene glycol, MDI—4,4′-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate), DABCO—1,4-diazabicyclo(2.2.2)octane, SEM—scanning electron microscopy, XRD—X-ray diffraction, TEM—transmission electron microscopy, NCO—isocyanate, TOAC—tetraoctylammonium chloride, AFM—atomic force microscopy, PVP—polyvinylpyrrolidone, WVTR—water vapor transmission rate, HAP—hydroxyapatite, MB—methylene blue, NW—nanowire, CBD—chemical bath deposition, GO—graphene oxide, PHRR—peak heat release rates, TPU—thermoplastic polyurethane, APTES—(3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane.
The second major alternative for the development of NPs containing PU foams is represented by the in situ formation of the nanoparticles in the PU matrix (Figure 4).
Although not as common as the ex situ formation, the literature data provide several examples regarding the development of PU foams containing in situ-synthesized NPs, including Ag [7,8,44,79,80,81], Cu [82], ZnO [83], SiO2 [84], FeOOH [85], MnO2 [86] or mono- and bi-metallic noble metal NPs [87].
Silver nanoparticles are commonly obtained in the PU matrix either by chemical methods or by photoreduction. Their potential applications vary from wound healing and antimicrobial applications [7,8,80,81] to analytical applications [44] or air filtration systems [79]. An interesting study is represented by the work of Apyari et al. [44], who comparatively evaluated both methods for incorporation of AgNPs. The reduction of sorbed silver nitrate was achieved by the use of ascorbic acid, and the authors established the optimal conditions as a reaction medium of 0.05 M sulfuric acid and a reaction time of 40 min. Besides these results, the authors concluded that the material obtained was more promising for applications in analytical chemistry for the determination of oxidants and reductants compared with the composite obtained using ex situ-synthesized NPs.
Li et al. [82] evaluated the antimicrobial applications of CuNP/PU foams, as well as the morphology and mechanical characteristics of the developed materials. The authors determined that the cell structure was not significantly influenced by the development of NPs, while the open cell content decreased from 97.42 to 96.64%, accompanied by tensile and compressive strength improvements, thus recommending the materials for antimicrobial and water treatment applications.
An important issue related to the widespread use of PU foams is their highly combustible nature. A study by Meng et al. [85] could provide an alternative solution to this issue. The authors incorporated FeOOH NPs obtained via chemical precipitation on PU foams through in situ surface growth in order to develop an antimicrobial flame-retardant coating. The multifunctional PU foam composite exhibited a limiting oxygen index of 25.5%, a reduction in the peak heat release rate of 45.0% and in the smoke density of 69.1% and a good underwater superoleophobicity.
A more complex study was recently published by Gazil et al. [87], evaluating the in situ development of mono- (Au, Ag, Pd) and bi-metallic (AuPd) nanoparticles in PU foams via microwave irradiation and hydrothermal synthesis for their application as catalytic sponges in semiautomated synthesis. Their conclusions were that the mono-metallic NPs obtained an open cell structure, with smooth surfaces of the cell walls and a homogeneous distribution of nanoparticles on cell walls. Regarding their potential applications, the reaction rate obtained using the materials was comparable to state-of-the-art catalysts. At the same time, for the bimetallic nanoparticles, the open cell structure was preserved; however, the NPs had an inhomogeneous distribution and morphology, while the obtained reaction rates for 4-nitrophenol reduction were inconsistent.
Table 3. Incorporation of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles formed in situ into PU foams and main non-antimicrobial findings; references are grouped considering the NP type 1.
Table 3. Incorporation of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles formed in situ into PU foams and main non-antimicrobial findings; references are grouped considering the NP type 1.
NP TypeNP Synthesis Method and CharacteristicsPU FoamsSynthesis ProcessApplicationMain FindingsRef.
AgIn situ formation, quasispheric, 20–30 nm (TEM)PU constructed using lignin-based polyolsDipping in metal salt solutionWound healing applicationsPorous morphology, average pore diameter: 100 μm, pore size decreased with NP concentration increase, improved residual ash content, initial degradation temperature and mechanical strength, best results obtained for the highest Ag concentration[7]
AgSpherical nanoparticles, 6–10 nm (TEM), smaller dimensions for inner particlesCommercial open-cell PU foam (average density 18.5 g dm−3)Intermatrix synthesis
inside foam via the NaBH4 method
Catalytic and bactericidal water treatmentUp to ten times higher metal content uptake compared with ex situ formation; stable final composites (<1% Ag leaching); significant catalytic activity, not diminished after 3 cycles[8]
AgAverage diameter 52 nm (SEM)Polyether-type polyurethane foam (commercial)In situ reduction of silver to NPs using ascorbic acidPotential applications in analytical chemistryIn situ optimal synthesis—0.05 M sulfuric acid, 40 min.[44]
AgPhotoreduction (UV) synthesis of NPs, spheroidal NPs, grouped in 150–200 nm clustersIndustrial PU foamsDirect synthesis on the foamFilters for air filtrationAgNPs penetrated the foam up to 5 mm with good homogeneity, no altering of the porous structure or polymeric surface chemical composition, fast release of antibacterial ions in physiological solution[79]
AgChemical synthesis (using NaBH4 method) and phytosynthesis using neem leaf extractObtained from commercial isocyanate and polyols (castor oil) reactantsInter matrix synthesis approach, reduction performed directly on silver impregnated PU foamsBiomedical applicationsNPs enhanced PU thermoxidative degradation (lower degradation temperature)[80]
AgIn situ reductionCommercially available (76 par per inch, density 30.4 kg/m3)Reduction of Ag+ ions to form AgNPs with glycerol in calcium alginate (CA)/PU foam compositeAntibacterial agent for point-of-use
water disinfection
CA/PUF@Ag composites prepared with 0.25% w/v CA present a higher swelling ratio (8.0 g/g), larger initial AgNP loading (8.48 mg/g), a lower Ag release concentration (44.35 μg/L) and a lower Ag release rate (0.27%) after 14 days[81]
CuIn situ generated, at different copper concentrationsNeat flexible PU foams obtained by a one-step processDipping in CuSO4, maintained at 80 °CAntimicrobial applicationsCell structure not significantly influenced; open cell content decreased from 97.42 to 96.64%; tensile and compressive strength improved, respectively, from 78.1 to 94.2 kPa and from 3.80 to 5.63 kPa[82]
ZnOHydrothermal synthesis by seeding on the surface of PU foamsCommercially availableDippingPhotodegradation of acid black 1 dye under UV and solar light85%/65% dye degradation achieved under UV/solar light irradiation.[83]
SiO2Sol–gel synthesis in PU matrix, 5–60 nmObtained from commercial isocyanate and polyols reactantsDirect synthesis of the hybrid foamsBiomedical applications (dressing foams)Low structural integrity of foams at >10% Si; increased stiffness with the silica contents; significant increase in durability, strength and elongation; no significant change in water vapor transmission rate[84]
FeOOHChemical precipitationCommercially available (polyether-based polyurethane foam, density, 30.00 kg/m3)In situ growth on the surface of PU foam containing oxidized sodium alginate and dopamineFlame-retardant coating, antimicrobial applicationsLOI reached 25.5%,
peak heat release rate reduced by 45.0%, smoke density decreased by 69.1%; good underwater superoleophobicity (oil contact angle under water 155.2°)
[85]
MnO2In situ formationWhite and color industrial polyurethane foam waste from various sources: scrap from households, upholstery stores, furniture factoriesRefluxed with KMnO4 in acidic mediumAntibacterial applications and removal of anionic and cationic dyesMnO2 randomly distributed inside the spaces of the matrix, paramagnetic behavior (2.5 × 10−5 erg/G2 g), superior surface area (14.3 m2/g), 97.5–100% removal of methylene blue dye, 85–87% removal of Trypan blue[86]
AuMicrowave irradiation, hydrothermal synthesis, 30 nm, seeds of 3 nm (TEM)Commercial PU foamIn situ synthesis, foam inserted into the reaction mediumCatalytic sponge for semiautomated synthesisOpen cell structure, smooth surfaces of the cell walls, nanosized particles homogeneously distributed on cell walls, reaction rate comparable with state-of-the-art catalysts[87]
AgMicrowave irradiation, hydrothermal synthesis, 16 nm (TEM)
PdMicrowave irradiation, hydrothermal synthesis, 5 nm (TEM)
AuPdMicrowave irradiation, hydrothermal synthesis, Au—130 nm, Pd—6 nm (TEM)Open cell structure, smooth surfaces of the cell walls, nanosized inhomogeneous particles, inconsistent reaction rates for 4-nitrophenol reduction
1 Abbreviations: NPs—nanoparticles, SEM—scanning electron microscopy, TEM—transmission electron microscopy, LOI—limiting oxygen index.
All these examples, alongside the other studies presented in Table 2 and Table 3, reveal the possibilities of NP incorporation in PU foams, as well as the many different areas in which the developed composites can find applications.

6. Antimicrobial Properties and Biocompatibility of Metal-Nanoparticle-Modified PU Foams

As presented in the previous section, most works have highlighted the antimicrobial properties of the developed materials. Therefore, the present section provides the main findings regarding the antimicrobial efficiency reported within these studies, summarized in Table 4.
Among all metals, silver-based antibacterial agents are the most widely studied and applied. Although their mechanism of action on microorganisms has not been entirely elucidated, various hypotheses have been proposed. The main antibacterial actions include the continuous release of silver ions, their adherence to the bacterial cell wall and membrane (permeabilization or disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane), oxidative stress induction and modification of signal transduction pathways [95]. The accumulation of Ag NPs on the cell surface was observed especially in the case of Gram-negative bacteria. The absence of a thick cell wall and the presence of negatively charged lipopolysaccharides make them much more sensitive to the action of Ag NPs than Gram-positive bacteria [96]. Once inside the cell, metal ions can interfere with the signaling pathways of bacterial metabolism and growth by inhibiting ATP production and the synthesis of proteins involved in cell viability and division [46]. However, along with their antibacterial properties, metal and metal nanoparticles also have a series of adverse effects on the environment and human health. For example, silver exhibits some potential toxic effects in aquatic ecosystems and against human-friendly soil microbial communities (such as nitrogen-fixing and ammonifying bacteria) [97].
Metal nanoparticles can enter ecosystems through various pathways, such as industrial runoff or the disposal of products containing these nanoparticles. Once released into the environment, they can accumulate in the soil and water, leading to bioaccumulation in plants and animals, potentially causing adverse effects to ecosystem health [98,99,100]. Furthermore, these nanoparticles may undergo transformations in the environment, altering their chemical and physical properties and potentially enhancing their toxicity. Their small size and increased surface area can also facilitate their transport over long distances, increasing the risk of widespread environmental contamination [101].
To address these concerns, in addition, there are several reports that describe the biocompatibility of these metal-nanoparticle-modified PU foams with animal cells, exhibiting an efficient wound healing activity. In this way, silver nanoparticles were included in CuraVAC Ag, a device that administers negative pressure wound therapy through a polyurethane foam dressing and discharges ions onto a wound surface where they are saturated with water, providing high efficiency scores of wound healings on rats [45]. Also, lignin-based PU foams with silver nanoparticles were applied to full-thickness skin wounds on mice, demonstrating higher wound healing abilities than Tegaderm film, as demonstrated by well-proliferated granulation tissue formation, re-epithelialization, angiogenesis and dense collagen deposition [7].
Besides animal studies, there are also several reports on in vitro cytotoxicity assessments of PU foams in order to confirm their benefits for the management of burns, limiting the number of suffering animals. Boonkaew et al. showed that their own developed hydrogel dressing based on a 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid sodium salt and silver nanoparticles had lower toxicity to human keratinocytes (immortal cell line HaCaT and primary cells HEK) and fibroblasts (NHF) compared to commercially available silver products (ActicoatTM and FlamazineTM) after 24 h of incubation in NuncTM polycarbonate inserts [102]. No cytotoxicity to HaCaT cells and BJ5ta fibroblasts was also observed for PU foams with incorporated lignin-capped silver nanoparticles, which had radical-scavenging activity and an ability to reduce the ex vivo myeloperoxidase activity in wound exudate [13]. Another cell line used to confirm the cytocompatibility is the 3T3 murine fibroblast line, as reported by Picca et al. for Ag-modified PU foams [79]. Further, human-adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) were cultivated in direct contact with TPU/ZnO nanocomposite foams, displaying the highest cell proliferation for 2 and 5 wt% ZnO [63]. This type of cell was also used by Norozi et al. to demonstrate the ability of PU foams with ZnO to help cellular adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation [103]. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts are another type of cell used to test the biocompatibility of PU foams, as in the case of those incorporated with nanosized copper-benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate [90].
Novel synergistic dressings, comprising silver nanoparticles and recombinant human epidermal growth factor in PU foams, provided a good cytocompatibility with mice fibroblasts L929 and significantly accelerated the healing of diabetic wounds, with complete re-epithelialization in a diabetic BALB/c mice model [47]. Full-thickness wounds treated with PU foams with 5–60 nm silica nanoparticles (with a content of up to 10 wt%) demonstrated accelerated wound closure rates in Sprague-Dawley rats and collagen and elastin fiber regeneration in a newly formed dermis covered by a new epithelial layer [84]. In addition, these PU-Si hybrid foams promoted L929 cell proliferation to a greater extent than pure PU (p < 0.05) [84].
A PU foam dressing containing 6% alginate, 1 mg/cm2 silver and 5% asiaticoside proved its lack of cytotoxicity on human skin fibroblasts (BJ cell line), lack of skin irritation in rabbits and improved wound healing in pigs without any dermatologic reactions [9].
A silver-nanowire-based 3D porous foam dressing developed by Chen et al. [42] showed high levels of live cells after 48 h of incubation with 3T3 cells and promoted wound healing in Bama pigs in combination with exogenous electric fields. This combined therapeutic system facilitated necrotic tissue drainage, downregulated the expression of E-cadherin to weaken intercellular adhesion and promoted angiogenesis, cell migration and proliferation.

7. Other Types of Modified PU Foams with Antimicrobial Properties

As previously mentioned, the main goal of the presented review is a review of the current state of the art regarding incorporation of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles into PU foams (especially for biomedical and related applications). In order to provide an image of the possibilities in the development of antimicrobial PU foams, the following section will provide a brief presentation of the progress in the last few years regarding other antimicrobial nanomaterials incorporated into PU (summarized in Table 5). Besides the efficiency of inhibiting bacterial growth, several PU foams have been designed for skin applications, exhibiting a good biocompatibility and cell adherence in in vitro studies [104,105,106] and improved wound healing in in vivo murine models [104,107]. These types of materials are important to briefly present, as they can be considered as a starting point for future research.
As can be seen from the examples provided in Table 5, PU foams can be easily modified with a large variety of other types of materials, although the impregnation/reinforcement routes are similar to those described in previous sections. Also, if, for simpler fillers, the addition can be performed via incorporation into the polyol mixture (without a negative effect on the foam structure and characteristics), for more complex fillers, a deposition strategy should be adopted. The latter case (especially when the reinforcement material forms a second layer and does not diffuse through the foam) raises some issues regarding the different properties of the layers. The issue can be overcome by carefully selecting the most appropriate coating for the PU foam.
All the above examples underline the great potential of modified PU foams, especially regarding antimicrobial applications.

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

As emerging from the literature review, several synthesis methods for NPs were evaluated for reinforcing PU foams. Among those, green synthesis methods were relatively poorly studied, with biosynthesis (using fungi) and phytosynthesis (using natural extracts) being the only evaluated routes. The production processes for metal nanoparticles often involve energy-intensive methods and the use of hazardous chemicals [110], contributing to environmental pollution. The use of alternative nanomaterials, such as nanolignin, nanoclay, chitosan or montmorillonite (as presented in Section 7), could provide increased biocompatibility for skin applications, without posing an environmental threat. Further, the use of green synthesis methods for the development of nanoparticles can constitute a viable approach (some scarce literature data have already been presented on this topic for both ex situ [48,50,52,75] and in situ [80] routes); this leads to the proposal of other green synthesis routes, such as the use of ionizing-radiation-assisted synthesis, a method that our group previously used to provide small-dimension nanoparticles with good antimicrobial properties [111].
Regarding the characterization of PU foams, the existence of dedicated standards represents a tremendous advantage [112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128], although not all the studies presented followed their recommendations. In our opinion, these standards should be applied when evaluating the appropriateness of PU foams in order, on the one hand, to provide reproducible and comparable results, and, on the other hand, to demonstrate the market potential of the formulations.
Another very important aspect that can be considered in future research is represented by the replacement of conventional organic-solvent-based polyurethane by either waterborne polyurethane or bio-based polyurethane, as several authors have pointed out. Together with the adoption of green synthesis routes for NPs, this would lead not only to PU foams with superior mechanical and physical properties, adapted to the envisaged application, but also to more eco-friendly solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.-M.L., R.C.F. and M.S.S.; methodology, R.C.F. and E.-M.L.; investigation, E.-M.L., R.C.F., I.F., M.S.S., I.C.V. and S.I.D.; data curation, R.C.F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.-M.L., R.C.F., I.F., M.S.S. and I.C.V.; writing—review and editing, E.-M.L., R.C.F. and M.S.S.; supervision, E.-M.L., R.C.F. and M.S.S.; project administration, E.-M.L., R.C.F. and M.S.S.; funding acquisition, E.-M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2021-0423 (contract 612PED/2022) and project number 25PFE/30.12.2021—Increasing R-D-I capacity for electrical engineering-specific materials and equipment regarding electromobility and “green” technologies within PNCDI III, Programme 1. R.C.F. and I.F. also acknowledge the support provided by the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization through Program 1—Development of the national research and development system, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance—Projects to finance excellence in RDI, Contract no. 15PFE/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Joseph, J.; Patel, R.M.; Wenham, A.; Smith, J.R. Biomedical applications of polyurethane materials and coatings. Trans. IMF 2018, 96, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dutta, A.S. 2-Polyurethane Foam Chemistry. In Recycling of Polyurethane Foams; Thomas, S., Rane, A.V., Kanny, K., Abita, V.K., Thomas, M.G., Eds.; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gama, N.; Ferreira, A.; Barros-Timmons, A. Polyurethane Foams: Past, Present, and Future. Materials 2018, 11, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Udabe, E.; Isik, M.; Sardon, H.; Irusta, L.; Salsamendi, M.; Sun, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Yan, F.; Mecerreyes, D. Antimicrobial polyurethane foams having cationic ammonium groups. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dixit, A.; Sabnis, A.; Balgude, D.; Kale, S.; Gada, A.; Kudu, B.; Mehta, K.; Kasar, S.; Handa, D.; Mehta, R.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of citric acid and itaconic acid-based two-pack polyurethane antimicrobial coatings. Polymer Bull. 2023, 80, 2187–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paladini, F.; Cooper, I.R.; Pollini, M. Development of antibacterial and antifungal silver-coated polyurethane foams as air filtration units for the prevention of respiratory diseases. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X.; Qiu, S.; Chen, J.; Lu, G.; Jia, Z.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Q.; Chen, J.; et al. Antimicrobial Lignin-Based Polyurethane/Ag Composite Foams for Improving Wound Healing. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 1622–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Domènech, B.; Ziegler, K.; Vigués, N.; Olszewski, W.; Marini, C.; Mas, J.; Muñoz, M.; Muraviev, D.N.; Macanás, J. Polyurethane foams doped with stable silver nanoparticles as bactericidal and catalytic materials for the effective treatment of water. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 3716–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Namviriyachote, N.; Lipipun, V.; Akkhawattanangkul, Y.; Charoonrut, P.; Ritthidej, G.C. Development of polyurethane foam dressing containing silver and asiaticoside for healing of dermal wound. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 14, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Madkour, T.M.; Abdelazeem, E.A.; Tayel, A.; Mustafa, G.; Siam, R. In situ polymerization of polyurethane-silver nanocomposite foams with intact thermal stability, improved mechanical performance, and induced antimicrobial properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saleemi, M.A.; Lim, V. Overview of antimicrobial polyurethane-based nanocomposite materials and associated signalling pathways. Europ. Polym. J. 2022, 167, 111087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sportelli, M.C.; Picca, R.A.; Ronco, R.; Bonerba, E.; Tantillo, G.; Pollini, M.; Sannino, A.; Valentini, A.; Cataldi, T.R.I.; Cioffi, N. Investigation of Industrial Polyurethane Foams Modified with Antimicrobial Copper Nanoparticles. Materials 2016, 9, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morena, A.G.; Stefanov, I.; Ivanova, K.; Pérez-Rafael, S.; Sánchez-Soto, M.; Tzanov, T. Antibacterial Polyurethane Foams with Incorporated Lignin-Capped Silver Nanoparticles for Chronic Wound Treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 4504–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chandan, M.R.; Radhakrishnan, K.; Bal, D.K.; Rizwan, M.; Shaik, A.H. Flexible Polyurethane Foam-ZnO Nanocomposite for Photocatalytic Degradation of Textile Dye. Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 2314–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mordor Intelligence—Mordor Intelligence, Polyurethane Market Size & Share Analysis—Growth Trends & Forecasts (2023–2028). Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/polyurethane-market (accessed on 12 November 2023).
  16. Cui, M.; Chai, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Chen, J. Developments of polyurethane in biomedical applications: A review. Res. Chem. Mater. 2023, 2, 262–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miri, Z.; Farè, S.; Ma, Q.; Haugen, H.J. Updates on polyurethane and its multifunctional applications in biomedical engineering. Progr. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 5, 04200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Imran, M.; Kanti Bandyopadhyay, A.; Karan Singh Gandhi, T.; Rahaman, A.; Rehaan Chandan, M. Mechanical property enhancement of flexible polyurethane foam using alumina particles. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 4040–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, J.; Kim, J.H. Performance evaluations of flexible polyurethane foams manufactured with castor oil-based bio-polyol. Polym. Test. 2023, 124, 108069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dupuis, R.; Duboeuf, O.; Kirtz, B.; Aubry, E. Characterization of vibrational mechanical properties of polyurethane foam. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng, C.W.; Yang, C.I.; Ou, S.L.; Chi, H.W.; Lui, P.W.; Chen, W.Y.; Ao, W.; Lai, F.M. Bending Mattress and Antibacterial Effect of TiO2/nAg/Chitosan-nanoparticle-applied Intelligent Patient Bed. Sens. Mater. 2020, 32, 1757–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nguyen-Ha, T.M.; Nguyen, T.B.; Nguyen, T.A.; Pham, L.H.; Nguyen, D.H.; Nguyen, D.M.; Hoang, D.; Oh, E.; Suhr, J. Novel high-performance sustainable polyurethane nanocomposite foams: Fire resistance, thermal stability, thermal conductivity, and mechanical properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 474, 145585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yin, S.; Du, Y.; Liang, X.; Xie, Y.; Xie, D.; Mei, Y. Surface coating of biomass-modified black phosphorus enhances flame retardancy of rigid polyurethane foam and its synergistic mechanism. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 637, 157961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zeng, F.; Men, X.; Chen, M.; Liu, B.; Han, Q.; Huang, S.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y. Molecular-micron multiscale toughening and flame retarding for polyurethane foams. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, R.; Wang, R.; Lou, C.W.; Lin, J.H. Comparison of tensile and compressive characteristics of intra/interply hybrid laminates reinforced high-density flexible foam composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 41438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, S.Y.; Meng, G.; Wang, C.; Chen, H. Photocatalytic inactivation of airborne bacteria in a polyurethane foam reactor loaded with a hybrid of MXene and anatase TiO2 exposing {001} facets. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vinay, V.C.; Varma, D.S.M.; Chandan, M.R.; Sivabalan, P.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Swetha, S.; Kaczmarek, B.; Sionkowska, A. Study of silver nanoparticle-loaded auxetic polyurethane foams for medical cushioning applications. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 4233–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sasidharan, A.P.; Meera, V.; Raphael, V.P. Coliform removal efficacy of polyurethane foam impregnated with chitosan nanoparticles and silver/silver oxide nanoparticles. Water Supply 2022, 22, 5675–5687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Binxia, Y.; Weiguang, H.; Jianben, L.; Bing, Z.; Rui, Z.; Lan, C. Theoretical and experimental study on sound absorption performance of Al2O3-polyurethane foam and microperforated plate composite structure. J. Low. Freq. Noise Vibr. Active Control 2023, 42, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, B.; Fang, X.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, R. Improved Sound Absorption Properties in Polyurethane Foams by the Inclusion of Al2O3 Nanoparticles. Shock. Vib. 2021, 2021, 8010391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huynh, P.T.; Nguyen, G.D.; Tran, K.T.L.; Ho, T.M.; Lam, V.Q.; Bown, M.; Ngo, T.V.K. Study on green preparation of multi-branched gold nanoparticles loaded flexible polyurethane foam for antibacterial dressing. Nanocomposites 2022, 8, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nandy, A.; Houl, Y.; Zhao, W.; D’Souza, N.A. Thermal heat transfer and energy modeling through incorporation of phase change materials (PCMs) into polyurethane foam. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 182, 113410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kiddell, S.; Kazemi, Y.; Sorken, J.; Naguib, H. Influence of Flash Graphene on the acoustic, thermal, and mechanical performance of flexible polyurethane foam. Polym. Test. 2023, 119, 107919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kausar, A. Polyurethane Composite Foams in High-Performance Applications: A Review. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2018, 57, 346–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hasan, S.M.; Fletcher, G.K.; Monroe, M.B.B.; Wierzbicki, M.A.; Nash, L.D.; Maitland, D.J. Shape memory polymer foams synthesized using glycerol and hexanetriol for enhanced degradation resistance. Polymers 2020, 12, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gurgel, D.; Bresolin, D.; Sayer, C.; Cardozo Filho, L.; Hermes de Araújo, P.H. Flexible polyurethane foams produced from industrial residues and castor oil. Ind. Crop Prod. 2021, 164, 113377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The Prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sim, W.; Barnard, R.T.; Blaskovich, M.A.T.; Ziora, Z.M. Antimicrobial Silver in Medicinal and Consumer Applications: A Patent Review of the Past Decade (2007–2017). Antibiotics 2018, 7, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paladini, F.; Pollini, M. Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles for Wound Healing Application: Progress and Future Trends. Materials 2019, 12, 2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, B.; Qian, Y.; Qian, X.; Fan, J.; Feng, Y. Fabrication and characterization of waterborne polyurethane/silver nanocomposite foams. Polymer Compos. 2019, 40, 1492–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kraev, I.D.; Pykhtin, A.A.; Lonskii, S.L.; Kurshev, E.V.; Terekhov, I.V. Effect of Biocidal Additives on Technological Parameters in the Manufacture of Polyurethane Foams. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2021, 12, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Y.; Liang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, J.; Jia, N.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, J. Optimizing microenvironment by integrating negative pressure and exogenous electric fields via a flexible porous conductive dressing to accelerate wound healing. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, Z.; Li, K.R.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Hu, J.L.; Li, T.Y.; Weng, Z.X.; Wu, L.X. Antibiotic Silver Particles Coated Graphene Oxide/polyurethane Nanocomposites Foams and Its Mechanical Properties. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2022, 41, 2203125–2203131. [Google Scholar]
  44. Apyari, V.V.; Volkov, P.A.; Dmitrienkoet, S.G. Synthesis and optical properties of polyurethane foam modified with silver nanoparticles. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 015001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Park, J.K.; Lee, J.H.; Kwak, J.J.; Shin, H.B.; Jung, H.W.; Bae, S.W.; Yeo, E.D.; Lee, Y.K.; Yang, S.S. Evaluation of an antimicrobial silver foam dressing. Wounds 2013, 25, 153–191. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Nadafan, M.; Malekfar, R.; Izadi-Darbandi, A.; Dehghani, Z. Microstructural and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticle-decorated porous polyurethane surface for water purification. Desal. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 21286–21293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Choi, H.J.; Thambi, T.; Yang, Y.H.; Bang, S.I.; Kim, B.S.; Pyun, D.G.; Lee, D.S. AgNP and rhEGF-incorporating synergistic polyurethane foam as a dressing material for scar-free healing of diabetic wounds. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 13714–13725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moustafa, M.T. Removal of pathogenic bacteria from wastewater using silver nanoparticles synthesized by two fungal species. Water Sci. 2017, 31, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gedam, S.S.; Chaudhary, A.K.; Vijayakumar, R.P.; Goswami, A.K.; Bajad, G.S.; Pal, D. Thermal, mechanical and morphological study of carbon nanotubes-graphene oxide and silver nanoparticles based polyurethane composites. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 085308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Varghese, J.; Chandan, M.R.; Shanthakumar, S. Fixed bed column study for pesticide removal using silver nanoparticles-embedded polyurethane foam and glass beads. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2020, 207, 1337–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Czél, G.; Vanyorek, L.; Sycheva, A.; Kerekes, F.; Szőri-Dorogházi, E.; Janovszky, D. Antimicrobial effect of silver nanoparticles plated natural zeolite in polyurethane foam. Express Polym. Lett. 2021, 15, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sanchooli, N.; Sanchooli, E.; Khandan Barani, H. Investigating the effect of water filter made using polyurethane foam containing silver nanoparticles on controlling Yersinia ruckeri in Oncorhynchus mykiss water tanks. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2022, 21, 500–515. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sasidharan, A.P.; Meera, V.; Raphael, V.P. Novel polyurethane foams loaded with nanoparticles—Synthesis, characterisation, and evaluation of phosphate removal efficacies. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 7483–7502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sasidharan, V.; Sachan, D.; Chauhan, D.; Talreja, N.; Ashfaq, M. Three-dimensional (3D) polymer—Metal–carbon framework for efficient removal of chemical and biological contaminants. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ashjari, H.R.; Dorraji, M.S.S.; Fakhrzadeh, V.; Eslami, H.; Rasoulifard, M.H.; Rastgouy-Houjaghan, M.; Gholizadeh, P.; Kafil, H.S. Starch-based polyurethane/CuO nanocomposite foam: Antibacterial effects for infection control. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 111, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gheydari, M.; Seyed Dorraji, M.S.; Fazli, M.; Rasoulifard, M.H.; Almaie, S.; Daneshvar, H.; Ashjari, H.R. Preparation of open-cell polyurethane nanocomposite foam with Ag3PO4 and GO: Antibacterial and adsorption characteristics. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lin, B.; Yin Yuen, A.C.; Oliver, S.; Liu, J.; Yu, B.; Yang, W.; Wu, S.; Yeoh, G.H.; Wang, C.H. Dual functionalisation of polyurethane foam for unprecedented flame retardancy and antibacterial properties using layer-by-layer assembly of MXene chitosan with antibacterial metal particles. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 244, 110147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qian, K.; Zhou, J.; Miao, M.; Wu, H.; Thaiboonrod, S.; Fang, J.; Feng, X. Highly Ordered Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Aramid Nanofiber Conductive Foams Modulated by Kevlar Polyanion for Piezoresistive Sensing and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Díaz-Gomez, A.; Godoy, M.; Berrio, M.E.; Ramirez, J.; Jaramillo, A.F.; Medina, C.; Montaño, M.; Meléndrez, M.F. Evaluation of the Mechanical and Fire Resistance Properties of Rigid Tannin Polyurethane Foams with Copper Oxide Nanoparticles. Fibers Polym. 2022, 23, 1797–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Satria, M.; Saleh, T.A. Facile approach of eco-friendly superhydrophilic/underwater superoleophobic zinc-functionalized polyurethane foams for continuous oil-water separation. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 367, 120341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sanoop, P.K.; Mahesh, K.V.; Nampoothiri, K.M.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Ananthakumar, S. Multifunctional ZnO-biopolymer nanocomposite coatings for health-care polymer foams and fabrics. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 126, E233–E244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dorraji, S.M.; Rasoulifard, M.H.; Shajeri, M.; Ashjari, H.R.; Azizi, M.; Rastgouy-Houjaghan, M. The role of prepared ZnO nanoparticles on improvement of mechanical and antibacterial properties of flexible polyurethane foams: Experimental modeling. Polym. Bull. 2018, 75, 1519–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bužarovska, A.; Dinescu, S.; Lazar, A.D.; Serban, M.; Pircalabioru, G.G.; Costache, M.; Gualandi, C.; Averous, L. Nanocomposite foams based on flexible biobased thermoplastic polyurethane and ZnO nanoparticles as potential wound dressing materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Moawed, E.A.; Eissa, M.S.; Al-Tantawy, S.A. Application of polyurethane foam/zinc oxide nanocomposite for antibacterial activity, detection, and removal of basic dyes from wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 7767–7774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vo, D.K.; Do, T.D.; Nguyen, B.T.; Tran, C.K.; Nguyen, T.A.; Nguyen, D.M.; Pham, L.H.; Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, T.-D.; Hoang, D. Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles and aluminum hydroxide on the physicochemical properties and flame-retardant behavior of rigid polyurethane foam. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 356, 129268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kardeş, M.; Yatmaz, H.C.; Öztürk, K. ZnO Nanorods Grown on Flexible Polyurethane Foam Surfaces for Photocatalytic Azo Dye Treatment. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 6605–6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zanini, N.C.; de Souza, A.G.; Barbosa, R.F.S.; Rosa, D.S.; Mulinari, D.R. A novel hybrid polyurethane composites with ZnO particles and sheath palm residues: Synergistic effect. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Morsy, M.; Abdel-Salam, A.I.; Gomaa, I.; Moustafa, H.; Kalil, H.; Helal, A. Highly Efficient Photocatalysts for Methylene Blue Degradation Based on a Platform of Deposited GO-ZnO Nanoparticles on Polyurethane Foam. Molecules 2023, 28, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hasan, S.M.; Harmon, G.; Zhou, F.; Raymond, J.E.; Gustafson, T.P.; Wilson, T.S.; Maitland, D.J. Tungsten-loaded SMP foam nanocomposites with inherent radiopacity and tunable thermo-mechanical properties. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Keshavarz, M.; Zebarjad, S.M.; Daneshmanesh, H.; Moghim, M.H. On the role of TiO2 nanoparticles on thermal behavior of flexible polyurethane foam sandwich panels. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127, 2037–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sahoo, L.; Mondal, S.; Beena, N.C.; Gloskovskii, A.; Manju, U.; Topwal, D.; Gautam, U.K. 3D Porous Polymeric-Foam-Supported Pd Nanocrystal as a Highly Efficient and Recyclable Catalyst for Organic Transformations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 10120–10130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, X.; Tian, X.; Bo, G.; Su, X.; Yan, J.; Yan, Y. Synthesis of Lightweight Renewable Microwave-Absorbing Bio-Polyurethane/Fe3O4 Composite Foam: Structure Analysis and Absorption Mechanism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Oraby, H.; Tantawy, H.R.; Correa-Duarte, M.A.; Darwish, M.; Elsaidy, A.; Naeem, I.; Senna, M.H. Tuning Electro-Magnetic Interference Shielding Efficiency of Customized Polyurethane Composite Foams Taking Advantage of rGO/Fe3O4 Hybrid Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Moghaddam, S.T.; Ghasemi, T.; Hussein, F.B. Effect of reaction parameters on Arsenic removal capacity from aqueous solutions using modified magnetic PU foam nanocomposite. Results Mater. 2023, 17, 100373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kumari, S.; Khan, S. Defluoridation technology for drinking water and tea by green synthesized Fe3O4/Al2O3 nanoparticles coated polyurethane foams for rural communities. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Khan, T.; Aydın, O.A.; Acar, V.; Aydın, M.R.; Hülagü, B.; Bayrakçeken, H.; Seydibeyoğlu, M.Ö.; Akbulut, H. Experimental Investigation of Mechanical and Modal Properties of Al2O3 Nanoparticle Reinforced Polyurethane Core Sandwich Structures. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 24, 101233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cho, D.; Oh, J.K. Silica Nanoparticle-Infused Omniphobic Polyurethane Foam with Bacterial Anti-Adhesion and Antifouling Properties for Hygiene Purposes. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Selvaraj, V.K.; Subramanian, J.; Jeyamani, E.; Azeez, A.; Keerthivasan, R. A study to determine electromagnetic interference-shielding effectiveness on bio-based polyurethane foam reinforced with PVDF/MgO/Ni for emerging applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 140, e53386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Picca, R.A.; Paladini, F.; Sportelli, M.C.; Pollini, M.; Giannossa, L.C.; Di Franco, C.; Panico, A.; Mangone, A.; Valentini, A.; Cioffi, N. Combined approach for the development of efficient and safe nanoantimicrobials: The case of nanosilver-modified polyurethane foams. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 1417–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Subramanian, K.; Somachandran, R. Synthesis of Castor Oil based Pristine and Silver Nanoparticle Embedded Polyurethanes and their Characterization by Thermal and Antibacterial Activity Analysis for Biomedical Applications. Asian J. Chem. 2022, 34, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xu, M.Q.; Luo, H.Y.; Rong, H.W.; Wu, S.H.; Zheng, Z.X.; Chen, B.Y. Calcium alginate gels-functionalized polyurethane foam decorated with silver nanoparticles as an antibacterial agent for point-of-use water disinfection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, C.; Ye, H.; Ge, S.; Yao, Y.; Ashok, B.; Hariram, N.; Liu, H.; Tian, H.; He, Y.; Guo, G. Fabrication and properties of antimicrobial flexible nanocomposite polyurethane foams with in situ generated copper nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 19, 3603–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Inderyas, A.; Bhatti, I.A.; Ashar, A.; Ashraf, M.; Ghani, A.; Yousaf, M.; Mohsin, M.; Ahmad, M.; Rafique, S.; Masood, N.; et al. Synthesis of immobilized ZnO over polyurethane and photocatalytic activity evaluation for the degradation of azo dye under UV and solar light irardiation. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 025033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Song, E.H.; Jeong, S.H.; Park, J.U.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.E.; Song, J. Polyurethane-silica hybrid foams from a one-step foaming reaction, coupled with a sol-gel process, for enhanced wound healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 79, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Meng, D.; Wang, K.; Wang, W.; Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Gu, X.; Zhang, S. A biomimetic structured bio-based flame retardant coating on flexible polyurethane foam with low smoke release and antibacterial ability. Chemosphere 2023, 312, 137060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Moawed, E.A.; Kiwaan, H.A.; El-Zakzouk, S.K.; El-Sonbati, M.A.; El-Zahed, M.M. Chemical Recycling of Polyurethane Foam Waste and Application for Antibacterial and Removal of Anionic and Cationic Dyes. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 40, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gazil, O.; Bernardi, J.; Lassus, A.; Virgilio, N.; Unterlass, M.M. Urethane functions can reduce metal salts under hydrothermal conditions: Synthesis of noble metal nanoparticles on flexible sponges applied in semi-automated organic reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 12703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sachsenmaier, S.; Peschel, A.; Ipach, I.; Kluba, T. Antibacterial potency of V.A.C. GranuFoam Silver(®) dressing. Injury 2013, 44, 1363–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rembe, J.D.; Fromm-Dornieden, C.; Böhm, J.; Stuermer, E.K. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis. Wound Repair. Regen. 2018, 26, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lee, D.N.; Gwon, K.; Nam, Y.; Lee, S.J.; Tran, N.M.; Yoo, H. Polyurethane Foam Incorporated with Nanosized Copper-Based Metal-Organic Framework: Its Antibacterial Properties and Biocompatibility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rawson, K.B.; Neuberger, T.; Smith, T.; Reddy, H.R.K.; Haussener, T.J.; Sebahar, P.R.; Looper, R.E.; Isaacson, B.M.; Shero, J.; Pasquina, P.F.; et al. Antibiofilm potential of a negative pressure wound therapy foam loaded with a first-in-class tri-alkyl norspermidine-biaryl antibiotic. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2022, 110, 1780–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Regulski, M.; Myntti, M.F.; James, G.A. Anti-biofilm efficacy of commonly used wound care products in in vitro settings. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ozkan, E.; Garren, M.; Manuel, J.; Douglass, M.; Devine, R.; Mondal, A.; Kumar, A.; Ashcraft, M.; Pandey, R.; Handa, H. Superhydrophobic and conductive foams with antifouling and oil-water separation properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 7610–7626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. El-Zahed, M.; Kiwaan, H.; Farhat, A.; Moawed, E.; El-Sonbati, M. Application of thiourea polyurethane@copper sulfide composite for antibacterial potential. Egypt. J. Chem. 2023, 66, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mikhailova, E.O. Silver nanoparticles: Mechanism of action and probable bio-application. J. Funct. Biomater. 2020, 11, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yin, I.X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, I.S.; Mei, M.L.; Li, Q.; Chu, C.H. The antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles and its application in dentistry. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Panyala, N.D.; Peña-Méndez, E.M.; Havel, J. Silver or silver nanoparticles: A hazardous threat to the environment and human health? J. Appl. Biomed. 2008, 6, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wiemann, M.; Vennemann, A.; Blaske, F.; Sperling, M.; Karst, U. Silver Nanoparticles in the Lung: Toxic Effects and Focal Accumulation of Silver in Remote Organs. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Velicogna, J.R.; Schwertfeger, D.M.; Jesmer, A.H.; Scroggins, R.P.; Princz, J.I. The bioaccumulation of silver in Eisenia andrei exposed to silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate in soil. NanoImpact 2017, 6, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rastogi, A.; Zivcak, M.; Sytar, O.; Kalaji, H.M.; He, X.; Mbarki, S.; Brestic, M. Impact of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Plant: A Critical Review. Front. Chem. 2017, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Zhang, W.; Xiao, B.; Fang, T. Chemical transformation of silver nanoparticles in aquatic environments: Mechanism, morphology and toxicity. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Boonkaew, B.; Kempf, M.; Kimble, R.; Cuttle, L. Cytotoxicity testing of silver-containing burn treatments using primary and immortal skin cells. Burns 2014, 40, 1562–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Norozi, S.; Ghollasi, M.; Salimi, A.; Halabian, R.; Shahrousvad, M. Mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation by ZnO nanoparticles and polyurethane bimodal foam nanocomposites. Cell Tissue Bank. 2023, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pahlevanneshan, Z.; Deypour, M.; Kefayat, A.; Rafienia, M.; Sajkiewicz, P.; Esmaeely Neisiany, R.; Enayati, M.S. Polyurethane-Nanolignin Composite Foam Coated with Propolis as a Platform for Wound Dressing: Synthesis and Characterization. Polymers 2021, 13, 3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yoon, S.; Chen, B. Modulating the Properties of Poly(glycerol sebacate)-Based Polyurethane Hydrogels Using an Organoclay. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 786–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. McFerran, A.; McIvor, M.J.; Lemoine, P.; Meenan, B.J.; Acheson, J.G. Biocompatible Nanocomposite Coatings Deposited via Layer-by-Layer Assembly for the Mechanical Reinforcement of Highly Porous Interconnected Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Karizmenh, M.S.; Poursamar, S.A.; Kefayat, A.; Farahbakhsh, Z.; Rafienia, M. An in vitro and in vivo study of PCL/chitosan electrospun mat on polyurethane/propolis foam as a bilayer wound dressing. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 135, 112667. [Google Scholar]
  108. Sasidharan, A.P.; Meera, V.; Raphael, V.P. Nanochitosan impregnated polyurethane foam in the removal of phosphate and coliforms from greywater. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, G.; Sun, X.; Gong, Q.; Xie, Y.; Fei, F.; Fan, L. Preparation and modification of antibacterial polyurethane foam for oil–water separation. J. Mater. Res. 2023, 38, 2701–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yaqoob, A.A.; Umar, K.; Ibrahim, M.N.M. Silver nanoparticles: Various methods of synthesis, size affecting factors and their potential applications–A review. Appl. Nanosci. 2020, 10, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.; Lungulescu, E.M.; Nicula, N.; Somoghi, R.; Ditu, L.M.; Ungureanu, C.; Sutan, A.N.; Draghiceanu, O.A.; Paunescu, A.; et al. Phytosynthesis and radiation-assisted methods for obtaining metal nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 1915–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. ISO 5999:2013; International Organization for Standardization, Flexible Cellular Polymeric Materials—Polyurethane Foam for Load-Bearing Applications Excluding Carpet Underlay—Specification. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/59740.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  113. ISO 6915:2019; International Organization for Standardization, Flexible Cellular Polymeric Materials—Polyurethane Foam for Laminate Use—Specification. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/77358.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  114. ISO 8873-3:2007; International Organization for Standardization. Rigid Cellular Plastics—Spray-Applied Polyurethane Foam for Thermal Insulation—Part 3: Test methods. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/39407.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  115. ISO 8873-2:2007; International Organization for Standardization. Rigid Cellular Plastics—Spray-Applied Polyurethane Foam for Thermal Insulation—Part 2: Application. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/39406.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  116. ISO 8873-1:2006; International Organization for Standardization. Rigid Cellular Plastics—Spray-Applied Polyurethane Foam for Thermal Insulation—Part 1: Material specifications. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/39378.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  117. ISO 1856:2018; International Organization for Standardization. Flexible Cellular Polymeric Materials—Determination of Compression Set. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/70213.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  118. ISO 2440:2019; International Organization for Standardization. Flexible and Rigid Cellular Polymeric Materials—Accelerated Ageing Tests. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/77359.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  119. D3574-17(2017); ASTM International. Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d3574-17.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  120. ASTM C1620-16(2023); ASTM International. Standard Specification for Aerosol Polyurethane and Aerosol Latex Foam Sealants. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d1620-16.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  121. ASTM D7487-18; ASTM International. Standard Practice for Polyurethane Raw Materials: Polyurethane Foam Cup Test. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d7487-18.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  122. ASTM F1839-08(2021); ASTM International. Standard Specification for Rigid Polyurethane Foam for Use as a Standard Material for Testing Orthopaedic Devices and Instruments. Available online: https://www.astm.org/f1839-08r21.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  123. ASTM C1806-21(2021); ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Flow Rate of Aerosol Foam Sealants. Available online: https://www.astm.org/c1806-21.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  124. ASTM C1536-19 (2019); ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Yield for Aerosol Foam Sealants. Available online: https://www.astm.org/c1536-19.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  125. ASTM E1730-19 (2019); ASTM International. Standard Specification for Rigid Foam for Use in Structural Sandwich Panel Cores. Available online: https://www.astm.org/e1730-19.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  126. ASTM C1303/C1303M-22 (2022); ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Predicting Long-Term Thermal Resistance of Closed-Cell Foam Insulation. Available online: https://www.astm.org/c1303_c1303m-22.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  127. ASTM D4273-23 (2023); ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Polyurethane Raw Materials: Determination of Primary Hydroxyl Content of Polyether Polyols. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d4273-23.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
  128. ASTM D4274-23 (2023); ASTM International. Standard Test Methods for Testing Polyurethane Raw Materials: Determination of Hydroxyl Numbers of Polyols. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d4274-23.html (accessed on 24 September 2023).
Figure 1. Polyurethane foam market share in 2022 and its biomedical applications (source of raw data: [15]).
Figure 1. Polyurethane foam market share in 2022 and its biomedical applications (source of raw data: [15]).
Polymers 15 04570 g001
Figure 2. Article selection process flowchart.
Figure 2. Article selection process flowchart.
Polymers 15 04570 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of NP/PU foam composite development using ex situ-synthesized NPs and its applications.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of NP/PU foam composite development using ex situ-synthesized NPs and its applications.
Polymers 15 04570 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of NP/PU foam composite development using in situ-synthesized NPs and its applications.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of NP/PU foam composite development using in situ-synthesized NPs and its applications.
Polymers 15 04570 g004
Table 1. Definition of the PICO strategy applied in the present work.
Table 1. Definition of the PICO strategy applied in the present work.
P (Problem)Insufficient Antimicrobial Properties of PU Foams
I (Intervention)Development of nanomaterial-containing PU foams for biomedical applications
C (Comparison)PU foams, other antimicrobial materials
O (Outcome)Development of antimicrobial PU foams containing metallic nanoparticles
Table 4. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties of metal-nanoparticle-modified PU foams; references are presented in chronological order 1.
Table 4. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties of metal-nanoparticle-modified PU foams; references are presented in chronological order 1.
NP TypeMetal Content, as Described by Each StudyPU MatrixMicroorganismsMain Findings on Antibacterial ActivityRef.
ZnO0.2% biopolymer-ZnO (ZnO final concentration—40 mg/g)Commercial PU foams coated with ZnO—functional biopolymers: starch, gelatin, chitosan, and agar (1:20 solid to liquid ratio)Aspergillus nigerOptical microscopic images showed that ZnO containing agar coatings has no significant fungus growth[45]
Ag1.0% w/wMedical-grade PU foam dipped in AgNPsS. aureus
E. coli
99.9% reduction in viable cell numbers after 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h of exposure[52]
Ag-Commercial V.A.C. GranuFoam Silver DressingS. aureus
S. epidermidis
ZOI: 4.4 mm after 24 h and 4.7 mm after 39 h
ZOI: 7.5 mm after 24 h and 8.1 mm after 39 h
[88]
Ag1.04 × 10−3 M (colloidal suspension)PU foam soaked in a AgNP solution for 8 hE. coliBacterial growth inhibition after 20 min exposure to polyurethane coated with AgNPs[46]
Ag0.1, 0.5 and 1%PU foam incorporating AgNPs by mechanical stirringKlebsiella sp.
Staphylococcus sp.
E. coli
Bacterial growth inhibition by 0.1% AgNP foam[10]
Ag11 to 21 mg Ag per g matrixCommercial open-cell PU foams loaded with AgNPs obtained via intermatrix synthesisE. coli100% of bacteria killed in less than 6.5 h; the bacterial mortality rate was ca. 1000 CFU mL−1 s −1[8]
Cu0.3–1.3%Two types of industrial PU foams dipped in diluted CuNP solutions (1:100, 1:1000)S. aureus
E. coli
K. marxianus
A higher CuNP loading was generally correlated to a higher concentration of released ions and an
increased inhibition of colony growth after 24 h
[12]
Ag-PU foams incorporating AgNPs and recombinant human epidermal growth factorS. aureus
E. coli
ZOIs for AgNP-PUFs and AgNP/rhEGF-PUFs were significantly larger than that of the PUFs and at the same time higher against S. aureus after 24 h[48]
Ag1118.6 mg/LPU foams soaked in AgNP solution overnightFecal coliforms
Fecal streptococci
S. aureus
Effective removal of total coliforms (97.3%), fecal coliforms (99.9%), fecal streptococci (99.9%) and S. aureus (99.9%) from wastewater after 24 h[46]
Ag100 g/m2Direct synthesis of AgNPs on an industrial PU foam surfaceS. aureus
E. coli
96% and
97% bacterial reduction after 24 h;
no bacterial growth was observed in the 24 h following the recultivation of surviving bacteria
[47]
Ag0.95 mg/cm2
1.20 mg/cm2
0.50 mg/cm2
0.90 mg/cm2
1.34 mg/cm2
1.30 mg/cm2
Commercial PU foam dressings: Biatain Ag, Mepilex Ag, UrgoCell Silver, Allevyn Ag, Acticoat Moisture Control Ag, PolyMem SilverE. coli
S. aureus
P. aeruginosa
Biatain Ag, Mepilex Ag, and Allevyn Ag showed the highest antibacterial activity under challenging conditions with human acute wound fluid[89]
CuO-Foams obtained via the one-shot method incorporating CuO NPs, starch and silicone surfactant mixed with polyol componentsE. coli
S. aureus
P. aeruginosa
E. faecalis
C. albicans
The highest antimicrobial activity against hospital infections was obtained for CuO NPs obtained at 600 °C after only 120 min of exposure[55]
ZnO1.5 wt%ZnO added to the polyol, followed by mechanical stirring, foams obtained by a two-step methodE. coli
S. aureus
Bacterial growth reduction after 24 h with a more pronounced effect against E. coli[62]
Ag0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mg/cm2AgNPs and asiaticoside powder at 5% adsorbed on PU foams containing natural polyols (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, chitosan and sodium alginate)P. aeruginosa
S. aureus
E. coli
B. subtilis
Great antibacterial activity for PU formulations with 1 mg/cm2 silver (ZOI: ~ 2.5–3.5 mm)[9]
Ag0–4 wt%Waterborne PU foams incorporating AgNPs via mechanical foamingE. coli
S. aureus
PU matrix filled with 2 wt% AgNPs proved its antibacterial activity (bacteriostatic rates were 98.23% and 97.38%, respectively)[40]
ZnO1, 2, 5, 10%Thermoplastic PU foam incorporating ZnO NPs via the thermally induced phase separation methodS. aureus
E. faecalis
E. coli
P. aeruginosa
The highest ZnO concentration (10%) led to a 103 fold reduction in CFUs;
55% reduction in biofilm formation on the surface of the composites with no significant differences between ZnO concentrations
[63]
Ag0.12, 0.2, 0.25% relative to final compositionImpregnation of NP dispersion in polyol mixtureS. aureu
P. aeruginosa
An increase in the Ag NP content in the foams led to a higher antibacterial activity. PUF-0.25%NP showed over 4 and 5 logs bacterial growth reduction [13]
Ag/TiO2-Ag/TiO2/chitosan powder coated on a bendable double mattress with added HAP powderS. aureus99% antibacterial efficiency[21]
Ag1 wt%PU foam incorporating Ag NP/zeolite during productionE. coli
M. luteus
More pronounced antibacterial effect against Gram-positive bacteria (M. luteus)[51]
Ag1 wt%Foams converted to negative Poisson’s ratio or auxetic PU foam incorporating AgNPsS. aureus
S. epidermidis
P. aeruginosa
E. coli
A higher compression factor greatly enhanced the antibacterial activity[27]
Ag3PO4-Ag3PO4 NPs dispersed in a flexible open-cell polyurethane mixture, followed by graphene oxide coatingS. aureus
E. coli
0.1 g of GO/Ag3PO4 PU foam inhibited the colonies’ growth after 24 h[56]
Cu-PU foam incorporated with Cu-BTC NPsP. aeruginosa
K. pneumoniae
methicillin-resistant S. aureus
Selective and significant bactericidal effect; efficiency rates:
66.3%
99.3%
30.8%
[90]
Cu0.2 M (colloidal suspension)PU foam dip coated with Cu NPsE. coli
S. aureus
0.2 g of Cu PU foam effectively removed bacteria from wastewater in 3 h[54]
TiO2-PU foams coated with {001}TiO2/Ti3C2Tx (MXene) nanosheetsE. coliSuperior inactivation efficiency of airborne E. coli under UV photocatalysis;
Different inactivation mechanisms between UV irradiation and UV photocatalysis (bacteria are not able to reactivate after photocatalytic oxidation)
[26]
Ag0.002, 0.021, and 0.088 wt%PU foam obtained using lignin-based polyols dipped in metal salt solutionE. coli
S. aureus
>99% antibacterial rate against E. coli within 1 h and S. aureus within 4 h[7]
Ag10% w/wCommercial (GF Silver)methicillin-resistant S. aureus
A. baumannii
ZOI: 1.52 mm
ZOI: 2.04 mm
[91]
Ag50 and 100 mgPU foams obtained by mixing “green” Ag NPs in polyol solutionY. ruckeriZOI: 15.33 ± 1.6 for 50 mg Ag and 14.83 ±0.76 mm for 100 mg Ag[52]
Ag0.002 M (silver nitrate solution)PU foams impregnated with AgNPs incorporated by intermatrix synthesisE. coli
B. subtilis
AgNP increased the ZOI diameter, showing antibacterial
action against both bacterial strains
[80]
Ag0.4%AgNPs and AgNP/GO nanocomposites prepared by pepsin reduction mixed in the polyol solutionS. aureusThe foam containing AgNP/GO induced a larger ZOI, as it is a more effective antibacterial agent[43]
Ag and Cu1 wt%PU foams successively dipped in poly(acrylic) acid, chitosan, Ti3C2 and metal solutionP. aeruginosa
S. aureus
Significant reduction in bacterial growth (Ag-coated PU: 99.97% for P. aeruginosa and 88.9% for S. aureus; Cu-coated PU: 58.7% for P. aeruginosa and 72.4% for S. aureus)[57]
Ag/AgO-PU foams impregnated with nanochitosan and Ag/AgO NPsE. coli100% removal efficiency[28]
Cu1 mM, 5 mM, 25 mM, 125 mM, 250 mM (copper salt solution)PU dipped in CuSO4 solutionE. coli
P. aeroginosa
B. licheniformis
S. aureus
Good antibacterial activities were obtained even with low concentrations of CuSO4 (ZOI varied between 28 and 40 mm)[82]
Au5–15 μg/mLAu multi-branched NPs incorporated into PU foam by dipping for 24 hS. aureus
E. coli
>95% and
~ 85% removal efficiency
[31]
Ag0.5 mM, 2 mM, 5 mM (silver salt concentration)Calcium alginate (CA)/PU foam composite decorated with Ag NPsE. coliZOI: 1.8–4.5 mm;
OD600 value of the bacterial suspension filtered through CA/PUF@Ag decreased to a very low level (<0.05)
[81]
Ag-Commercial PU Foam–Ag SaltP. aeruginosa
S. aureus
Unable to inhibit bacterial biofilm[92]
Cu-Nanosized Cu and graphene were incorporated into PU mixE. coliViability of planktonic and adhered E. coli reduced to 99.66% and 96%[93]
CuS50, 100 and 150 μg/mLImmobilization of CuS NPs on PU foam via the seeding methodB. cereus
P. aeruginosa
Significant difference between bacterial strains (no antibacterial effect of the 50 μg/mL PU composite on P. aeruginosa growth);
Excellent antibacterial activity for the highest content of CuS NPs (ZOI: 15 mm for B. cereus and 12 mm for P. aeruginosa)
[94]
FeOOH-In situ growth on the surface of a flexible PU foam containing oxidized sodium alginate and dopamineE. coli
S. aureus
Colonies of both bacteria did not grow on modified PU surfaces, and the number of both bacteria decreased significantly after 12 h [85]
ZnO1 wt%PU foams refluxed with ZnO NPs for 6 hE. coli
S. aureus
S. typhimurium
A decrease in bacterial growth was observed after 4 h; the antibacterial effect was more pronounced for S. aureus and S. typhimurium[64]
SiO2-Fluorinated silica NP suspension deposited on PU foams via dip-coatingE. coli
S. epidermidis
Reduction by >90% per unit area (1–2 log units) in bacterial adhesion[77]
MnO2-PU foam wastes refluxed with KMnO4 in acidic mediumB. cereus
S. aureus
E. coli
ZOI: 8.8 mm
ZOI: 7.5 mm
ZOI: 7.1 mm
[86]
1 Abbreviations: NP—nanoparticle, ZOI—zone of inhibition, Cu-BTC—copper(II)-benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate; CFUs—colony forming units; OD—optical density.
Table 5. Antimicrobial properties of other types of nanomaterial-modified PU foams; references are presented in chronological order 1.
Table 5. Antimicrobial properties of other types of nanomaterial-modified PU foams; references are presented in chronological order 1.
NMPU Foam
Composition
AssaysMain Morphological
Findings
Main Findings on Biological ActivityRef.
NL, 45–80 nmPolyethylene glycol, glycerol, NL, 1, 6-diisocyanato-hexane (NCO/OH
ratio: 1.2) and water as a blowing agent, coated with propolis
Morphological investigations
Antimicrobial—ZOI test against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922)
Biocompatibility (L929 fibroblasts)
In vivo wound
healing
Increased tensile strength, and elongation at break; average pore diameter 110 µm, apparent porosity 87.9%, density 0.28 g/cm3, water absorption 242%, contact angle 50.1 ± 2.1°
ZOI: E. coli 7.2 mm, S. aureus 11.2 mm
Cell viability > 90%, good fibroblast adhesion
Significantly (p < 0.05) higher wound closure rate (~90% after 10 days) compared with the control (<60%)
Antibacterial activity
(ZOI: E. coli 7.2 mm, S. aureus 11.2 mm);
Good biocompatibility on L929 fibroblasts (cell viability > 90%, good cell adhesion);
Significantly (p < 0.05) higher wound closure rate (~90% after 10 days) compared to control (<60%) in in vivo rat studies
[104]
NCl, Cloisite 30BHexamethylene diisocyanate, poly(ethylene glycol) reacted
in tetrahydrofuran with tin(II) and added to a mixture of poly(glycerol sebacate) and Cloisite 30B; the resulting
mixture was casted into polytetrafluoroethylene molds
Morphological
drug loading and release tests.
Biodegradation (lipase enzyme)
Biocompatibility (L929 cell line)
Excellent transparency, pore size 94.3 µm, Young’s moduli 0.10 MPa, compressive
stress at 75% strain values 0.29 MPa, contact angle 86.0°, water swelling ratio 212.3%;
dye loading MB 41.8 mg/g, MO 15.6 mg/g, SG 6 mg/g, dye release 11.1/12.6/3.4 mg/g
Mass loss with lipase 35.6%
No evidence of cytotoxicity, increasing cell metabolic activity and good cell morphology
No evidence of cytotoxicity on L929 fibroblasts, increased cell metabolic activity and good cell morphology[105]
Composite: poly(ethylenimine), poly(acrylic acid), Na+ montmorillonite, poly(diallydimethylammonium chloride), chitosan and sodium alginateComposite deposited via the layer-by-layer technique on commercial PU foamsMorphological and mechanical assays
Cell viability
Open cell structure, elastic modulus increased up to 6.01 MPa, similar porosity
Significantly lower cytotoxicity for the chitosan and poly(diallydimethylammonium chloride) coatings
Significantly lower cytotoxicity for the chitosan and poly(diallydimethylammonium chloride) coatings on U-2 OS bone cells[106]
poly-ε-caprolactone/chitosan
nanofibres
Nanofiber mat as the sublayer, PU foam coated with ethanolic extract of propolisMorphological and physico-mechanical properties
Antibacterial activity (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli)
Cytotoxicity assays (L929 Fibroblast)
In vivo study
Bead-free, randomly oriented, continuous
nanofibers, 207 nm;
the layer composite porosity reduced to 68%, tensile strength to 6.21 MPa, elongation at break to 371%, contact angle to 58.6°; significant increase in swelling ratio; 17.7% degradation in 28 days
ZOI 0.53 mm (S. aureus)/1.54 mm (E coli)
Significantly enhances the cell viability
Significantly and effectively accelerated the healing process
Antibacterial activity (ZOI: 0.53 mm for S. aureus, and 1.54 mm for E. coli);
Significantly enhanced the viability of L292 fibroblasts;
Significantly and effectively accelerated the healing process in in vivo murine models
[107]
Chitosan, 56–112 nmNanochitosan soaked in commercial PU foamsMorphological evaluation
Phosphate removal
Antimicrobial properties and coliform removal
Nanoparticles not agglomerated, no influence on morphological features
Adsorption capacity ~ 17 mg/g
Inhibition of coliform growth (>99%)
Bacterial growth inhibition efficiency = 77.53%
Removed >99% of coliforms from the synthetic graywater
Bacterial growth inhibition efficiency = 77.53%
[108]
MWCNTsPU modified with amino acid (mixed in the polyol solution), soaked in dopamine solution, finally MWCNT solution addedMorphological evaluation
Hydrophobicity and lipophilicity evaluation
Oil sorption and oil water separation Antibacterial activity (S. aureus, E. coli)
MWCNT aggregates observed on surface, porous structure intact,
water contact angle: 153°, lipophilic nature,
over 97% efficiency in oil/water or organic solvent/water mixture separation,
high antibacterial activity E. coli (>80%) and S. aureus (>75%); activity against Gram-negative bacteria was maintained at a high level after repeated use
High antibacterial activity against E. coli (>80%) and S. aureus (>75%); activity maintained at a high level against Gram-negative bacteria after repeated use[109]
1 Abbreviations: NM—nanomaterial, NL—nanolignin, ZOI—zone of inhibition, NCl—nanoclay, MB—methylene blue, MO—methyl orange, SG—solvent green 3, MWCNTs—multi wall carbon nanotubes.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fierascu, R.C.; Lungulescu, E.-M.; Fierascu, I.; Stan, M.S.; Voinea, I.C.; Dumitrescu, S.I. Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Incorporation in Polyurethane Foams: A Solution for Future Antimicrobial Materials? Polymers 2023, 15, 4570. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15234570

AMA Style

Fierascu RC, Lungulescu E-M, Fierascu I, Stan MS, Voinea IC, Dumitrescu SI. Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Incorporation in Polyurethane Foams: A Solution for Future Antimicrobial Materials? Polymers. 2023; 15(23):4570. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15234570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fierascu, Radu Claudiu, Eduard-Marius Lungulescu, Irina Fierascu, Miruna S. Stan, Ionela C. Voinea, and Silviu Ionel Dumitrescu. 2023. "Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Incorporation in Polyurethane Foams: A Solution for Future Antimicrobial Materials?" Polymers 15, no. 23: 4570. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15234570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop