Next Article in Journal
Mixed Rigid and Flexible Component Design for High-Performance Polyimide Films
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Electrospun Nanocomposite Nanofibers of Polyaniline/Poly(methyl methacrylate) with Amino-Functionalized Graphene
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances on Polypyrrole Electroactuators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Imidazolium Ionic Liquid Modified Graphene Oxide: As a Reinforcing Filler and Catalyst in Epoxy Resin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/polym9090437
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Polymer Composites: Mechanisms, Properties, and Applications

by
An Li
,
Cong Zhang
and
Yang-Fei Zhang
*
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2017, 9(9), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090437
Submission received: 5 August 2017 / Revised: 7 September 2017 / Accepted: 7 September 2017 / Published: 15 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graphene-Polymer Composites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the integration and miniaturization of electronic devices, thermal management has become a crucial issue that strongly affects their performance, reliability, and lifetime. One of the current interests in polymer-based composites is thermal conductive composites that dissipate the thermal energy produced by electronic, optoelectronic, and photonic devices and systems. Ultrahigh thermal conductivity makes graphene the most promising filler for thermal conductive composites. This article reviews the mechanisms of thermal conduction, the recent advances, and the influencing factors on graphene-polymer composites (GPC). In the end, we also discuss the applications of GPC in thermal engineering. This article summarizes the research on graphene-polymer thermal conductive composites in recent years and provides guidance on the preparation of composites with high thermal conductivity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Thermal management has become a crucial issue in the modern electronics industry as electronic devices have become more integrated and miniaturized. The power required for some processor modules can reach 250 W in a high-performance computer, leading to heat loads as large as 1 kW in this system [1]. If the heat can-not be dissipated promptly, the lifetime and the efficiency of the system could be reduced, or even breakdown. In this situation, materials with high thermal conductivity are strongly needed to dissipate the heat and solve the problem [2].
Polymers have a lot of advantages, such as being lightweight, low cost, easy to process, and exhibiting good corrosion resistance. However, most polymers are heat insulators and have a thermal conductivity between 0.1 and 0.5 W m−1 K−1 [3], which is due to their amorphous state. There are three kinds of carriers in solids to transport energy: phonons, electrons, and photons [4]. Phonons are quantized modes of vibration in a rigid crystal lattice, which is the fundamental mechanism of heat conduction in most polymers. Polymers in amorphous state are usually considered to have lots of defects that contribute to numerous phonon scatting, leading to a low thermal conductivity [5].
In past years, a lot of works have studied thermal conductive polymer-based composites. Many different materials with high thermal conductivity have been used as fillers to improve the thermal conductivity of composites, such as boron nitride (BN) [6,7,8,9], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [10,11,12,13,14], aluminum oxide [15,16,17], diamond [18,19,20,21], and graphene [22,23].
Graphene has attracted great attention because of its unique two dimensional (2D) structure and novel properties, such as the zero-gap band structure, high electron mobility, and high thermal conductivity [24]. Balandin and his co-workers reported a measurement of the thermal conductivity of suspended single-layer graphene around 5000 W m−1 K−1, which was one of the highest thermal conductivities of currently known materials [25]. Although there are lots of reviews on the thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites, system summaries on thermal conductive graphene-polymer composites are rare [2,3,4]. In this situation, it is necessary to review the advances in the thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites.
In this article, we review the advances in thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites in recent years. Special attention is given to the mechanism, the properties, and the influence factors of graphene-polymer composites. Additionally, we discuss the applications of thermal conductive graphene-polymer composites.

2. Thermal Conductive Mechanisms

2.1. Thermal Conductive Mechanisms in Graphene

In solid materials, heat is carried by phonons and electrons [26]. In metals, thermal conductivity is due to free carriers of electrons. Copper is a good thermal conductor with a thermal conductivity of 400 W m−1 K−1 at room temperature, and the attribution from phonons is limited to 1–2% of the total [27]. The thermal conductivity of graphene is attributed to phonons and electrons because of its metallic property [28]. However, the contribution of electrons to the thermal conductivity of graphene is relatively rare. In general, it is believed that the thermal conductivity of graphene is mainly accomplished by phonons [27]. Figure 1 is a schematic of heat conduction in crystalline materials, which can also be applied to graphene [29]. When one side of the crystal lattice makes contact with the heat source, heat conducts to the first layer atoms in the form of vibrations. Due to the dense packing of atoms in the lattice and the strong chemical bonds between them, the vibrations of the first layer atoms quickly spread to the neighboring atoms, and the neighboring atoms pass the vibrations to the other neighboring atoms, which results in rapid heat transfer in crystalline materials. In graphene, which has the ideal structure, all of the carbon atoms are fixed by a covalent bond to a layer. When some of the atoms in the graphene come into contact with the heat source and begin to vibrate, the vibrations will quickly pass to the surrounding atoms by the strong force of the covalent bond. In other words, the heat transfers from one position to another in graphene. In some studies, the researchers believe that the heat in graphene is transferred by the form of phonon waves, and some researchers have detected and proved this speculation [30,31,32]. In fact, most of the graphene used to manufacture the thermal conductive composites is multilayer graphene, such as graphene nanosheets and graphene nanoplatelets. When one of the layers in multilayer graphene begins to vibrate, due to the weak force of the van der Waals force between each layer, vibrations are difficult to pass on to the adjacent graphene layers. That is, heat is difficult to transfer through the interlayer of graphene. As a result, anisotropic heat conduction exists in the multilayer graphene. This phenomenon has been proved by many researches [25,33,34,35,36].

2.2. Thermal Conductive Mechanisms in Polymers

Thermal conduction through a polymer is a complicated process, which is influenced by many parameters like crystallinity, temperature, orientation of the macromolecules, and so on [37,38,39]. Phonons are usually considered to be thermal carriers in polymers because there is a mere free electron [40]. Burger and her colleagues discussed the mechanism of heat transfer in an amorphous polymer and described it using a schematic diagram, which is presented in Figure 2 [29]. When the surface of the polymer makes contact with the heat source, heat transfers to the first atom of the molecular chain in the form of a vibration, then the nearest atom, and then the next. Heat will not propagate as a wave, like in graphene, but diffuse slower. Heat transfer in a molecular chain will also cause the disordered vibration and rotation of atoms, which significantly reduces the thermal conductivity of the polymer. A good conductor has a complete lattice structure, and atoms accumulate closely. When heat reaches the first atom, it will quickly transfer to the last one. However, heat transfer in a bad conductor causes the vibration and rotation of atoms, which will significantly reduce the thermal conductivity [29].

2.3. Thermal Conductive Mechanisms in Graphene-Polymer Composites

The thermal conductive mechanism of graphene in polymers is more complex. In general, graphene has a very high specific surface area. When being added in a polymer, large numbers of interfaces are produced [41]. These interfaces will lead to phonon scattering and introduce ultrahigh interfacial thermal resistance. Therefore, it is difficult for heat to transfer through the graphene-polymer interface [42]. There is much research discussing the thermal conductive mechanisms in the interface of graphene-polymer composites [2,3,4,29]. Since mismatches between graphene and the polymer exist, the interface will result in phonon scattering and hinder the heat transfer [43]. For example, supposing that during the same time of Δt, the heat transfers from one side of the graphene to the other. But in the polymer, the heat passes over a very short distance attributed to phonon scattering. When the loading of the filler is below the percolation threshold, the fillers cannot connect to each other to form a thermal conduction pathway. In this case, the interfacial thermal resistance of graphene and the polymer will be the main factor determining the thermal conductivity of the composite. Surface modification of the graphene has been proved to be an applicable method to enhance graphene-polymer interface interaction, and an efficient technique to decrease interfacial thermal resistance. In a composite, graphene acts as a highly thermal conductive channel, while the modified surface affords covalent and non-covalent bonding with the molecular chains of the polymer matrix, which will facilitate the phonon transfer from the graphene to the polymer and also promote the phonon transfer from the polymer to the graphene [44]. In many studies, researchers have considered that the molecular chains of polymer and the molecular chains on the surface of graphene can intertwine with each other and form an interlayer. This interlayer will decrease the interfacial phonon scattering and minimize the interface thermal resistance by intertwined molecular chains [45,46]. However, when the loading is above the percolation threshold, the heat in the composite mainly transfers through the thermal conduction pathway, due to the high thermal conductivity of graphene. Figure 3 shows the case of graphene acting as an efficient thermal conduction channel. In the course of time Δt, the heat could transfer over a longer distance in graphene than the polymer matrix. When composites make contact with the heat source, heat transfers though graphene very quickly, which will increase the thermal conductivity. Increasing the number of thermal pathways and reducing the thermal resistance between graphene and the graphene-polymer interface are recommended steps for preparing a composite with high thermal conductivity [3].

3. Recent Advances in Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Polymer Composites

In recent years, more studies have been using graphene and its derived materials to prepare thermal conductive composite materials. The morphology of graphene in the polymer matrix significantly affects the thermal conductivity of the composites [2]. In this section, we review the advances in thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites. To review them more systematically, this section is divided into two parts, according to the different morphology of graphene in the polymer matrix. In the first part, the random dispersion of graphene in yjr polymer matrix is discussed. Random dispersion refers to the addition of graphene to the matrix, which is performed by a simple method, such as agitation, sonication, and blending, etc. Besides, there is no special method employed to control the orientation of graphene in matrix. In the second part, we discuss graphene with a specific orientation in the polymer matrix. This refers to the unusual structures of graphene in the polymer matrix, including the orientation, three-dimension structure (3D), and separate structure, etc. The term “graphene-related materials” is used to refer to the materials associated with graphene, which have different names in different literatures. These include graphene nanosheets, graphene nanoplatelets, graphene sheets, graphene flakes, graphene film, reduced graphene oxides, and graphene foam, etc.

3.1. Graphene with Random Orientation in the Polymer Matrix

Graphene with a random orientation in the polymer matrix can be manufactured by many methods, such as solution mixing, melt mixing, and in-situ polymerization, etc. [47,48,49,50,51,52]. Table 1 lists the thermal conductivity, thermal conductivity enhancement (TCE) per wt %, preparation methods, and surface preparation methods of graphene with a random orientation. The thermal conductivity enhancement is measured by a term of TCE per wt %, which refers to the enhancement of thermal conductivity by per weight content of graphene in composites [53]. In order to find the most effective methods to enhance the thermal conductivity of composites, we compared the TCE per wt % of every composite shown in Table 1. The results are shown in Figure 4. From Figure 4, we can see that graphene is an efficient filler for enhancing the thermal conductivity of the polymer matrix. The TCE per wt % of graphene is around 50%, which means several percent of graphene can significantly increase the thermal conductivity of the composite. But the TCE per wt % of unmodified graphene is difficult to exceed 100%. However, when using graphene modified by covalent or noncovalent bonds, the TCE per wt % can be very close to 100%. When using a titanate coupling agent to modify graphene, the TCE per wt % is as high as 357.8%. The researchers believe the interfacial force between graphene and polymer has been enhanced by surface modification. This enhancement could reduce the interfacial thermal resistance and disperse graphene more uniformly [54].

3.2. Graphene with Specific Orientation in the Polymer Matrix

There are a variety of specific orientations of graphene in the polymer matrix, such as orientation, segregated structure, 3D structure, and so on [53,71,72,73,74,75]. Specific orientations of graphene give special properties to the composites. The thermal properties of recent studies in graphene-polymer composites are listed in Table 2, and the enhancements of each composite are compared in Figure 5. From Figure 5, it seems that the orientation and 3D structure are more efficient structures for improving the thermal conductivity of composites. By comparing Figure 4 and Figure 5, we also find that graphene with a specific orientation is more efficient than that with a random orientation. The researchers believe that this is mainly because that graphene plays the role of the thermal conduction pathway in the polymer matrix, and the heat transfers through the graphene pathway preferentially [76]. The purpose of orientation, a segregated structure, and 3D structure is establishing the thermal pathway in the polymer matrix, which can transfer heat more efficiently [77,78,79,80].

4. Influence Factors on Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Polymer Composites

There are many factors affecting the thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites, such as the defects on graphene, the orientation of graphene in the polymer, the graphene loading, and the surface modification, etc. [3,4,5]. In this section, we mainly review the influence of the characteristics of graphene (such as the defect, morphology, number of layers, and size), the loading of graphene, the orientation of graphene in the polymer matrix, and the interface between graphene and the polymer on the thermal conductivity.

4.1. The Characteristics of Graphene

The characteristics of graphene have a great influence on the thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites [80,91,92,93]. Hoda et al. investigated the thermal conductivity of graphene as a function of the density of defects. Graphene was suspended over ~7.5 μm size square holes and the optothermal Raman technique was employed to measure the thermal conductivity of graphene in air. They found that the thermal conductivity of suspended graphene decreased from ~1.8 × 103 W m−1 K−1 to ~4.0 × 102 W m−1 K−1 near room temperature as the density of defects changed from 2.0 × 1010 cm−2 to 1.8 × 1011 cm−2 [94]. Xin et al. employed a high temperature to obtain defect-free graphene and investigated the thermal conductivities of polymer composites filled with graphene of different defect contents. The graphene annealing at 2200 °C had the least amount of defects, and the composite filled with it had the highest thermal conductivity, reaching 3.55 W m−1 K−1. This is because the high-temperature annealing heals defects and removes oxygen functional groups on graphene, thus reducing the phonon scattering centers [95]. The morphology of graphene also has an influence on the thermal conductivity of composites. Chu et al. pointed out that when using graphene nanoplates with more wrinkles as a filler, the composites will exhibit lower thermal conductivity. The reason for this is that the waviness of GNPs significantly affects the intrinsic characteristics of GNPs (such as thermal conductivity, aspect ratio) and the interfacial phonon coupling behavior between GNPs and polymers [96]. Kim et al. investigated the effects of the graphene layer and size on the thermal conductivity of composites and found that the thermal conductivity across the graphene/epoxy interface increases when increasing the number of graphene layers [97]. Kim et al. prepared composites filled with graphene of varied sizes and thicknesses. A similar result is found that a larger size and thickness of the graphene nanoplatelets results in an effective improvement in the thermal conductivity and heat dissipation ability of the composite [98].

4.2. The Loading of Graphene

The loading of graphene exerts a significant effect on the electrical and thermal conductivity of the composites [22,99,100]. It is found that there is a critical loading (percolation threshold) of graphene when the conductive composite is prepared. When the loading exceeds this value, the electrical conductivity of the composite material is improved significantly. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a percolation threshold phenomenon in thermally conductive composites. Khan et al. researched the thermal conductivity of graphene sheets-epoxy composites. The thermal conductivity increases with increasing graphene loading and there is no percolation threshold [101]. Fazel investigated the thermal conductivity of graphene/1-octadecanol (stearyl alcohol) composites and reported a similar finding [22]. Michael et al. found strong evidence for the existence of a thermal percolation threshold in graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs)-polymer composites. Below the percolation threshold (loading < 0.17), the polymer mediates between adjacent GnPs and the GnP cannot make sufficient contact, resulting in gaps. Above the percolation threshold (loading > 0.17), there is a sharp rise in the thermal conductivity, which means that direct GnP-GnP contacts have been formed [23]. Li et al. also found a similar phenomenon in graphene-epoxy composite [102].

4.3. The Orientation of Graphene in the Polymer Matrix

Many researchers believe that graphene with a specific orientation, like orientation and 3D structure, is much better than graphene with a random orientation when preparing thermal conductive composites [76,77,78,79,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. Zhang et al. poured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) into a vertically aligned graphene film (VAGF) to manufacture a high-orientation graphene-polymer composite. The thermal conductivity of this composite was as high as 614.85 Wm−1 K−1, which is higher than copper at room temperature. It is claimed that this dramatic enhancement is attributed to the rapid and effective heat-transfer path formed by orientated graphene [76]. Zhao et al. prepared a GF/PDMS composite with a thermal conductivity of 0.56 W m−1 K−1, 20% higher than that of GS/PDMS composite at the loading of 0.7 wt %. They believe that the unique interconnected structure of GF acts as an efficient thermal pathway in the polymer matrix [90]. Figure 6. is the schematic of thermal conductance in a polymer, oriented graphene/polymer composite, and 3D graphene/polymer composite.

4.4. The Interface between Graphene and the Polymer

It is considered that the interface between graphene and the polymer plays an important role in thermal conductive composites. Since phonons are the main form of thermal conductance in graphene-polymer composites, bad coupling in vibration modes at the graphene-polymer interface will generate huge interfacial thermal resistance. Chemical bonding between graphene and the polymer can efficiently decrease the phonon scattering at the interface and reduce interfacial thermal resistance [69]. Gao et al. investigated the influence of surface-grafted polymer chains on the thermal conductivity of a graphene-polyamide-6,6 nanocomposite. It was found that the through-plane interfacial thermal conductivity is proportional to the grafting density. Meanwhile, it first rises and then saturates as the grafting length increases. However, the in-plane thermal conductivity of graphene decreases rapidly as the grafting density increases. There is a maximum thermal conductivity of the composite because of these two competing factors [103]. Wang et al. studied the interfacial thermal resistance for polymer composites reinforced by various covalently functionalized graphene using molecular dynamics simulations. Among the various functional groups, like methyl, phenyl, butyl, formyl, carboxyl, amines, and hydroxyl, butyl is found to be the most effective one in reducing the interfacial thermal resistance [104]. Eslami et al. investigated the heat transport between graphene and polyamide-6,6 oligomers. They found that well-organized (chain stretching) polymer layers between the graphene show an interesting anisotropic heat conduction. The heat conduction in the parallel direction to the graphene surface is higher than that in the perpendicular direction [105,106].

5. Applications of Graphene-Polymer Composites in Thermal Engineering

Nowadays, with the improving demand in emerging industries, thermal conductive materials with novel properties are widely required [107,108,109]. Compared with other thermal conductive materials (metal, ceramics, carbon-related materials), polymer matrix composites have many outstanding properties, such as being lightweight and easy to process, and exhibiting good corrosion resistance and vibration damping, etc. In this section, some emerging applications of graphene-polymer composites are listed, such as electronic packaging, batteries, and energy storage.

5.1. Electronic Packaging

In the electronic industry, thermal management has been a serious challenge because of the miniaturization and functionalization of electronic devices. To control the temperature of all components in devices, an effective thermal conductive path must be used [47]. Thermal interface materials (TIM) are used to provide an effective heat conduction path between the two solid surfaces due to their ability to conform to rough surfaces and high thermal conductivity [110]. Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of TIM [101]. The international technology roadmap for high-performance chips at 14 nm is a power density greater than 100 W/cm2 and junction-to-ambient thermal resistance of less than 0.2 °C/W [2]. There is a need for TIM to dissipate heat when the chip is operating. However, the thermal conductivity of commercial TIM is relatively low as most of them are less than 5 W m−1 K−1. Employing graphene to prepare a thermal conductive material as TIM has been attracting a lot of attention.

5.2. Thermal Energy Storage

The effort towards thermal energy storage has been intensified over the past years. Thermal conductivity is an important parameter in thermal energy storage materials, which significantly influences the rate of heat storage and extraction [111]. Therefore, graphene and graphene derivatives are used as thermal conductive carriers to improve the thermal conductivity of thermal energy storage materials. Ji et al. embedded continuous ultrathin-graphite foams (UGFs) in phase change materials to manufacture a composite, and improved the thermal conductivity by 18 times [112]. Mehrali et al. prepared phase change materials by the vacuum impregnation of paraffin within graphene oxide, and the maximum energy storage value was 64.89 kJ/kg [113]. A phase change material consisting of graphene aerogel and octadecanoic acid was produced by Zhong et al. When the loading of GA reached 20 vol %, the thermal conductivity of this composite achieved 2.635 W/m−1 K−1, which is about 14 times that of the OA [114].

5.3. Batteries

As batteries have become more powerful in recent years, thermal management has turned into a special issue in the battery system. When a battery is used at a high charging/discharging rate, the rate of heat generation may exceed the rate of heat dissipation. In this situation, the battery may be inefficient or even catch fire. A thermal management system is needed to maintain the battery pack at an optimum temperature. Khan et al. incorporated 8 wt % graphene nanoflake in polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fiber separators, and the thermal conductivity increased from 3.5 to 8.5 W m−1 K−1. They think Lithium-ion batteries have become the major source of power for portable electronic devices. Separators are one of the major components of these batteries, and the improvement of thermal conductivity in separators is an option for long-lasting Li-ion battery fabrications [115]. Hallaj et al. presented a novel thermal management system and investigated it for electric vehicle applications. They think it is important to manage the heat in a battery under both cold and hot conditions [116].

6. Conclusions

In this paper, we have reviewed the graphene-polymer thermal conductive material in recent years. The thermal conductive mechanisms in graphene, polymers, and their composites have been discussed. The recent advances on thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites have also been reviewed. Furthermore, we have discussed the factors influencing the thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites, such as the characteristics, the loading, the orientation of graphene, and the interface. Finally, the applications of thermal conductive graphene-polymer composites have been demonstrated. This review reveals the relationship between thermal conductive mechanisms and properties and also provides guidance on the preparation of composites with high thermal conductivity.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11202005).

Author Contributions

Yang-Fei Zhang and An Li. conceived and designed the content of the paper. An Li, Cong Zhang and Yang-Fei Zhang wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Py-PGMA-GNS/epoxyPyrene-end poly(glycidyl methacrylate)-graphene nanosheet/epoxy composite
f-GFs/epoxyNon-covalently functionalized graphene flakes/epoxy composite
GnP-C750/epoxyGraphene nanoplatelets (sizes < 1 μm)/epoxy composite
DGEBA-f-GO/epoxyDiglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A functionalized graphene oxide/epoxy composite
GS@Al2O3/PVDFAlumina-coated graphene sheet/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composite
Al2O3@GNP/epoxyAlumina nanoparticles decorated graphene nanoplatelets/epoxy composite
GNP/PBTGraphene nanoplatelet/polybutylene terephthalate composite
GNPs/PPSGraphene nanoplatelets/polyphenylene sulfide composite
PI/SiCNWs-GSsPolyimide/SiC nanowires grown on graphene sheets composite
GP/SRGraphene/silicone rubber
PA6/graphene-GOPolyamide-6/graphene-graphene oxide composite
GNP/epoxyGraphene nanoplatelets/epoxy composite
PVDF/FGS/NDPoly(vinylidene fluoride)/functionalized graphene sheets/nanodiamonds composite
ApPOSS-graphene/epoxyAminopropylisobutyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane grafted graphene/epoxy composite
IL-G/PU1-allyl-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid modified graphene/polyurethane composite
PA/TCA-rGOTitanate coupling agent modified reduced graphene/polyamide composite
BE/grapheneBio-based polyester/graphene composite
GNPs/siliconeGraphene nanoplatelets/silicone composite
VAGF/PDMSVertically aligned graphene film/polydimethylsiloxane
MLG/epoxyMultilayer graphene/epoxy composite
NFC/RGONanofibrillated cellulose/epoxy composite
rLGO/PVDFHighly self-aligned large-area reduced graphene oxide/poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) composite
PVDF/oGNFOriented graphene nanoflake/poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) composite
epoxy/GNS–Fe3O4Epoxy/graphene nanosheets-Fe3O4
GNP/PEGraphene nanoplatelets/polyethylene
GNP/PPGraphene nanoplatelets/polypropylene
GNP/PVAGraphene nanoplatelets/poly(vinyl alcohol)
GNP/PVDFGraphene nanoplatelets/poly(vinylideneuoride)
GNP/PSGraphene nanoplates/polystyrene; RGO/TPU
RGO/TPUReduced graphene oxide/thermoplastic polyurethane
PA6/graphene foamPolyamide-6/graphene foam
GF/epoxyGraphene foams/epoxy
GF/PDMSGraphene foam/polydimethylsiloxane
PEG/HGAPolyethylene glycol/hybrid graphene aerogels

References

  1. Moore, A.L.; Shi, L. Emerging challenges and materials for thermal management of electronics. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, H.; Ginzburg, V.V.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Liu, W.; Huang, Y.; Du, L.; Chen, B. Thermal Conductivity of Polymer-Based Composites: Fundamentals and Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 59, 41–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, X.; Jiang, P.; Tanaka, T. A review of dielectric polymer composites with high thermal conductivity. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2011, 27, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, Z.; Fina, A. Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: A review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 914–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Agari, Y.; Ueda, A.; Omura, Y.; Nagai, S. Thermal diffusivity and conductivity of PMMA/PC blends. Polymer 1997, 38, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, J.; Huang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Pan, G.; Sun, J.; Zeng, X.; Sun, R.; Xu, J.B.; Song, B.; Wong, C.P. A Polymer Composite with Improved Thermal Conductivity by Constructing Hierarchically Ordered Three-Dimensional Interconnected Network of BN. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 13544–13553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lim, H.S.; Jin, W.O.; Kim, S.Y.; Yoo, M.J.; Park, S.D.; Lee, W.S. Anisotropically Alignable Magnetic Boron Nitride Platelets Decorated with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3315–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yao, Y.; Zeng, X.; Wang, F.; Sun, R.; Xu, J.; Wong, C.P. Significant Enhancement of Thermal Conductivity in Bioinspired Freestanding Boron Nitride Papers Filled with Graphene Oxide. Chem. Mater. 2016, 80, 1357–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fang, H.; Bai, S.L.; Wong, C.P. Thermal, mechanical and dielectric properties of flexible BN foam and BN nanosheets reinforced polymer composites for electronic packaging application. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 100, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, A.; Ramesh, P.; Sun, X.; Bekyarova, E.; Itkis, M.E.; Haddon, R.C. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity in a Hybrid Graphite Nanoplatelet—Carbon Nanotube Filler for Epoxy Composites. Adv. Mater. 2010, 20, 4740–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moisala, A.; Li, Q.; Kinloch, I.A.; Windle, A.H. Thermal and electrical conductivity of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotube-epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 1285–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, S.Y.; Ma, C.C.M.; Teng, C.C.; Huang, Y.W.; Liao, S.H.; Huang, Y.L.; Tien, H.W.; Lee, T.M.; Chiou, K.C. Effect of functionalized carbon nanotubes on the thermal conductivity of epoxy composites. Carbon 2010, 48, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Song, Y.S.; Youn, J.R. Evaluation of effective thermal conductivity for carbon nanotube/polymer composites using control volume finite element method. Carbon 2006, 44, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nan, C.W.; Liu, G.; Lin, Y.; Li, M. Interface effect on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 3549–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Choi, S.; Kim, J. Thermal conductivity of epoxy composites with a binary-particle system of aluminum oxide and aluminum nitride fillers. Compos. B Eng. 2013, 51, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, B.; Li, R.; Xie, Y. Properties and effect of preparation method of thermally conductive polypropylene/aluminum oxide composite. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 2524–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Im, H.; Kim, J. Enhancement of the thermal conductivity of aluminum oxide–epoxy terminated poly(dimethyl siloxane) with a metal oxide containing polysiloxane. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 6571–6580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kidalov, S.V.; Shakhov, F.M. Thermal Conductivity of Diamond Composites. Materials 2009, 2, 2467–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cho, H.B.; Konno, A.; Fujihara, T.; Suzuki, T.; Tanaka, S.; Jiang, W.; Suematsu, H.; Niihara, K.; Nakayama, T. Self-assemblies of linearly aligned diamond fillers in polysiloxane/diamond composite films with enhanced thermal conductivity. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, J.; Qian, R.; Jiang, P. Enhanced thermal conductivity for PVDF composites with a hybrid functionalized graphene sheet-nanodiamond filler. Fibers Polym. 2013, 14, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saw, W.P.S.; Mariatti, M. Properties of synthetic diamond and graphene nanoplatelet-filled epoxy thin film composites for electronic applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2012, 23, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shtein, M.; Nadiv, R.; Buzaglo, M.; Kahil, K.; Regev, O. Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2100–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yavari, F.; Fard, H.R.; Pashayi, K.; Rafiee, M.A.; Zamiri, A.; Yu, Z.; Ozisik, R.; Borcatasciuc, T.; Koratkar, N. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity in a Nanostructured Phase Change Composite due to Low Concentration Graphene Additives. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 8753–8758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Geim, A.K. Graphene: status and prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Balandin, A.A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.N. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Maldovan, M. Sound and heat revolutions in phononics. Nature 2013, 503, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Balandin, A.A. Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pu, H.H.; Rhim, S.H.; Hirschmugl, C.J.; Gajdardziska-Josifovska, M.; Weinert, M.; Chen, J.H. Anisotropic thermal conductivity of semiconducting graphene monoxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Burger, N.; Laachachi, A.; Ferriol, M.; Lutz, M.; Toniazzo, V.; Ruch, D. Review of thermal conductivity in composites: Mechanisms, parameters and theory. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 61, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Narula, R.; Bonini, N.; Marzari, N.; Reich, S. Dominant phonon wave vectors and strain-induced splitting of the 2D Raman mode of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 115451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yao, W.; Cao, B. Triggering wave-domain heat conduction in graphene. Phys. Lett. A 2016, 380, 2105–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yao, W.; Cao, B. Thermal wave propagation in graphene studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2014, 59, 3495–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ghosh, S.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Pokatilov, E.P. Extremely high thermal conductivity of graphene: Prospects for thermal management applications in nanoelectronic circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 151911–151913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhixin, G.; Dier, Z.; Xingao, G. Thermal conductivity of graphene nanoribbons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 163103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nika, D.L.; Ghosh, S.; Pokatilov, E.P.; Balandin, A.A. Lattice thermal conductivity of graphene flakes: Comparison with bulk graphite. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 203103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Faugeras, C.; Faugeras, B.; Orlita, M.; Potemski, M.; Nair, R.R.; Geim, A.K. Thermal conductivity of graphene in corbino membrane geometry. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1889–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rossinsky, E.; Müllerplathe, F. Anisotropy of the thermal conductivity in a crystalline polymer: Reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation of the delta phase of syndiotactic polystyrene. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 134905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Choy, C.L.; Greig, D. The low-temperature thermal conductivity of a semi-crystalline polymer, polyethylene terephthalate. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1975, 8, 3121–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choy, C.L.; Chen, F.C.; Luk, W.H. Thermal conductivity of oriented crystalline polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 1980, 18, 1187–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, J.H.; Koh, C.Y.; Singer, J.P.; Jeon, S.J.; Maldovan, M.; Stein, O.; Thomas, E.L. 25th anniversary article: ordered polymer structures for the engineering of photons and phonons. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 532–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Xu, P.; Loomis, J.; Bradshaw, R.D.; Panchapakesan, B. Load transfer and mechanical properties of chemically reduced graphene reinforcements in polymer composites. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 3847–3856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Luo, T.; Lloyd, J.R. Enhancement of Thermal Energy Transport Across Graphene/Graphite and Polymer Interfaces: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2495–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Huang, J.; Yang, B.; Sumpter, B.G.; Qiao, R. Duality of the interfacial thermal conductance in graphene-based nanocomposites. Carbon 2014, 75, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kuila, T.; Bose, S.; Hong, C.E.; Uddin, M.E.; Khanra, P.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Preparation of functionalized graphene/linear low density polyethylene composites by a solution mixing method. Carbon 2011, 49, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garzón, C.; Palza, H. Electrical behavior of polypropylene composites melt mixed with carbon-based particles: Effect of the kind of particle and annealing process. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 99, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hu, Z.; Li, N.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.; Song, Y.; Li, X.; Wu, G.; Xie, F.; Huang, Y. Facile preparation of poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole)/graphene composite films via one-pot in situ polymerization. Polymer 2015, 71, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, A.; Ramesh, P.; Itkis, M.E.; Elena Bekyarova, A.; Haddon, R.C. Graphite Nanoplatelet−Epoxy Composite Thermal Interface Materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 7565–7569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Irwin, P.C.; Cao, P.; Bansal, A.; Schadler, L.S. Thermal and mechanical properties of polyimide nanocomposites. In Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 19–22 October 2003; pp. 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Min, C.; Yu, D.; Cao, J.; Wang, G.; Feng, L. A graphite nanoplatelet/epoxy composite with high dielectric constant and high thermal conductivity. Carbon 2013, 55, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Al-Saygh, A.; Ponnamma, D.; Almaadeed, M.; Poornima, V.P.; Karim, A.; Hassan, M. Flexible Pressure Sensor Based on PVDF Nanocomposites Containing Reduced Graphene Oxide-Titania Hybrid Nanolayers. Polymers 2017, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.; Lian, H.; Hu, Y.; Chang, W.; Cui, X.; Liu, Y. Enhancement in Mechanical and Shape Memory Properties for Liquid Crystalline Polyurethane Strengthened by Graphene Oxide. Polymers 2016, 8, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, D.S.; Dhand, V.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.J. Study on the Effect of Silanization and Improvement in the Tensile Behavior of Graphene-Chitosan-Composite. Polymers 2015, 7, 527–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, H.; Macosko, C.W. Processing-property relationships of polycarbonate/graphene composites. Polymer 2009, 50, 3797–3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tian, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Mei, H.; Shang, Y. The thermal conductivity-dependant drag reduction mechanism of water droplets controlled by graphene/silicone rubber composites. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2017, 85, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Teng, C.C.; Ma, C.C.M.; Lu, C.H.; Yang, S.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Hsiao, M.C.; Yen, M.Y.; Chiou, K.C.; Lee, T.M. Thermal conductivity and structure of non-covalent functionalized graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon 2011, 49, 5107–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Song, S.H.; Park, K.H.; Kim, B.H.; Choi, Y.W.; Jun, G.H.; Lee, D.J.; Kong, B.S.; Paik, K.W.; Jeon, S. Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy-graphene composites by using non-oxidized graphene flakes with non-covalent functionalization. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, F.; Drzal, L.T.; Yan, Q.; Huang, Z. Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 1082–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wan, Y.; Tang, L.; Gong, L.; Yan, D.; Li, Y.; Wu, L.; Jiang, J.; Lai, G. Grafting of epoxy chains onto graphene oxide for epoxy composites with improved mechanical and thermal properties. Carbon 2014, 69, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qian, R.; Yu, J.; Wu, C.; Zhai, X.; Jiang, P. Alumina-coated graphene sheet hybrids for electrically insulating polymer composites with high thermal conductivity. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 17373–17379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, R.; Yao, H.; Zhang, H.B.; Li, Y.; Mai, Y.W.; Yu, Z.Z. Decoration of defect-free graphene nanoplatelets with alumina for thermally conductive and electrically insulating epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 137, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, S.Y.; Ye, J.N.; Yu, J. Thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelets filled composites fabricated by solvent-free processing for the excellent filler dispersion and a theoretical approach for the composites containing the geometrized fillers. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 69, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gu, J.; Xie, C.; Li, H.; Dang, J.; Geng, W.; Zhang, Q. Thermal percolation behavior of graphene nanoplatelets/polyphenylene sulfide thermal conductivity composites. Polym. Compos. 2014, 35, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dai, W.; Yu, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Song, Y.; Lyu, J.; Bai, H.; Nishimura, K.; Jiang, N. Enhanced thermal conductivity and retained electrical insulation for polyimide composites with SiC nanowires grown on graphene hybrid fillers. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 76, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Meng, F.; Li, D.; Tian, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, Z. Super-high thermal conductivity of polyamide-6/graphene-graphene oxide composites through in situ polymerization. High Perform. Polym. 2016, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guo, W.; Chen, G. Fabrication of graphene/epoxy resin composites with much enhanced thermal conductivity via ball milling technique. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zong, P.; Fu, J.; Chen, L.; Yin, J.; Dong, X.; Yuan, S.; Shi, L.Y.; Deng, W. Effect of Aminopropylisobutyl Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Functionalized Graphene on the Thermal Conductivity and Electrical Insulation Properties of Epoxy Composites. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 10498–10506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ma, W.S.; Li, W.; Fang, Y.; Wang, S.F. Non-covalently modified reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposites with good mechanical and thermal properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cho, E.C.; Huang, J.H.; Li, C.P.; Chang-Jian, C.W.; Lee, K.C.; Hsiao, Y.S.; Huang, J.H. Graphene-based thermoplastic composites and their application for LED thermal management. Carbon 2016, 102, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tang, Z.; Kang, H.; Shen, Z.; Guo, B.; Zhang, L.; Jia, D. Grafting of Polyester onto Graphene for Electrically and Thermally Conductive Composites. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 3444–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Varenik, M.; Nadiv, R.; Levy, I.; Vasilyev, G.; Regev, O. Breaking through the Solid/Liquid Processability Barrier: Thermal Conductivity and Rheology in Hybrid Graphene-Graphite Polymer Composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 7556–7564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ling, J.; Zhai, W.; Feng, W.; Shen, B.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, W.G. Facile Preparation of Lightweight Microcellular Polyetherimide/Graphene Composite Foams for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 2677–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, M.; Gao, C.; Hu, H.; Zhao, Z. Electrical conductivity of thermally reduced graphene oxide/polymer composites with a segregated structure. Carbon 2013, 65, 371–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hu, H.; Zhang, G.; Xiao, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Z. Preparation and electrical conductivity of graphene/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites with a segregated structure. Carbon 2012, 50, 4596–4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lin, Y.; Liu, S.; Liu, L. A new approach to construct three dimensional segregated graphene structures in rubber composites for enhanced conductive, mechanical and barrier properties. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 2353–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, M.; Duan, X.; Xu, Y.; Duan, X. Functional Three-Dimensional Graphene/Polymer Composites. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, Y.F.; Han, D.; Zhao, Y.H.; Bai, S.L. High-performance thermal interface materials consisting of vertically aligned graphene film and polymer. Carbon 2016, 109, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, Q.; Guo, Y.; Li, W.; Qiu, S.; Zhu, C.; Wei, X.; Chen, M.; Liu, C.; Liao, S.; Gong, Y. Ultrahigh Thermal Conductivity of Assembled Aligned Multilayer Graphene/Epoxy Composite. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4459–4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, X.; Shao, L.; Song, N.; Shi, L.; Ding, P. Enhanced thermal-conductive and anti-dripping properties of polyamide composites by 3D graphene structures at low filler content. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 88, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, J.; Qi, G.Q.; Liu, Y.; Bao, R.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Yang, W.; Xie, B.H.; Yang, M.B. Hybrid graphene aerogels/phase change material composites: Thermal conductivity, shape-stabilization and light-to-thermal energy storage. Carbon 2016, 100, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, D.; Yang, P.; Yuan, X.; Guo, J.; Liao, N. The defect location effect on thermal conductivity of graphene nanoribbons based on molecular dynamics. Phys. Lett. A 2015, 379, 810–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Song, N.; Jiao, D.; Cui, S.; Hou, X.; Ding, P.; Shi, L. Highly Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity of Layer-by-Layer Assembled Nanofibrillated Cellulose/Graphene Nanosheets Hybrid Films for Thermal Management. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kumar, P.; Yu, S.; Shahzad, F.; Hong, S.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Chong, M.K. Ultrahigh electrically and thermally conductive self-aligned graphene/polymer composites using large-area reduced graphene oxides. Carbon 2016, 101, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jung, H.; Yu, S.; Bae, N.S.; Cho, S.M.; Kim, R.H.; Cho, S.H.; Hwang, I.; Jeong, B.; Ji, S.R.; Hwang, J.Y. High through-plane thermal conduction of graphene nanoflake filled polymer composites melt-processed in an L-shape kinked tube. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yan, H.; Tang, Y.; Long, W.; Li, Y. Enhanced thermal conductivity in polymer composites with aligned graphene nanosheets. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 5256–5264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alam, F.E.; Dai, W.; Yang, M.; Du, S.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Jiang, N.; Lin, C.T. In situ formation of a cellular graphene framework in thermoplastic composites leading to superior thermal conductivity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 6164–6169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wu, K.; Lei, C.; Huang, R.; Yang, W.; Chai, S.; Geng, C.; Chen, F.; Fu, Q. Design and Preparation of a Unique Segregated Double Network with Excellent Thermal Conductive Property. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 7637–7647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Li, A.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.F. RGO/TPU composite with a segregated structure as thermal interface material. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yang, J.; Li, X.; Han, S.; Zhang, Y.; Min, P.; Koratkar, N.; Yu, Z.Z. Air-dried, high-density graphene hybrid aerogels for phase change composites with exceptional thermal conductivity and shape stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 18067–18074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, Z.; Shen, D.; Yu, J.; Dai, W.; Li, C.; Du, S.; Jiang, N.; Li, H.; Lin, C.T. Exceptionally high thermal and electrical conductivity of three-dimensional graphene-foam-based polymer composites. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 22364–22369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhao, Y.H.; Wu, Z.K.; Bai, S.L. Study on thermal properties of graphene foam/graphene sheets filled polymer composites. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 72, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zabihi, Z.; Araghi, H. Effect of functional groups on thermal conductivity of graphene/paraffin nanocomposite. Phys. Lett. A 2016, 380, 3828–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Adamyan, V.; Zavalniuk, V. Lattice thermal conductivity of graphene with conventionally isotopic defects. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2012, 24, 415401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kim, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Grossman, J.C. Thermal transport in functionalized graphene. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9050–9057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Malekpour, H.; Ramnani, P.; Srinivasan, S.; Balasubramanian, G.; Nika, D.L.; Mulchandani, A.; Lake, R.K.; Balandin, A.A. Thermal conductivity of graphene with defects induced by electron beam irradiation. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 14608–14616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Xin, G.; Sun, H.; Scott, S.M.; Yao, T.; Lu, F.; Shao, D.; Hu, T.; Wang, G.; Ran, G.; Lian, J. Advanced Phase Change Composite by Thermally Annealed Defect-Free Graphene for Thermal Energy Storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 15262–15271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chu, K.; Li, W.S.; Dong, H. Role of graphene waviness on the thermal conductivity of graphene composites. Appl. Phys. A 2013, 111, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shen, X.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; He, Y.B.; Kim, J.K. Multilayer Graphene Enables Higher Efficiency in Improving Thermal Conductivities of Graphene/Epoxy Composites. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3585–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kim, H.S.; Bae, H.S.; Yu, J.; Kim, S.Y. Thermal conductivity of polymer composites with the geometrical characteristics of graphene nanoplatelets. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zhan, Y.; Lavorgna, M.; Buonocore, G.; Xia, H. Enhancing electrical conductivity of rubber composites by constructing interconnected network of self-assembled graphene with latex mixing. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 10464–10468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chakraborty, I.; Bodurtha, K.J.; Heeder, N.J.; Godfrin, M.P.; Tripathi, A.; Hurt, R.H.; Shukla, A.; Bose, A. Massive electrical conductivity enhancement of multilayer graphene/polystyrene composites using a nonconductive filler. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16472–16475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Khan, M.F.S.; Alexander, A.B. Graphene–Multilayer Graphene Nanocomposites as Highly Efficient Thermal Interface Materials. Naon Lett. 2012, 12, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, A.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.F. Graphene nanosheets-filled epoxy composites prepared by a fast dispersion method. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gao, Y.; Müllerplathe, F. Increasing the Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Polyamide-6,6 Nanocomposites by Surface-Grafted Polymer Chains: Calculation with Molecular Dynamics and Effective-Medium Approximation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 1336–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, Y.; Zhan, H.F.; Xiang, Y.; Yang, C.; Wang, C.M.; Zhang, Y.Y. Effect of Covalent Functionalization on Thermal Transport across Graphene–Polymer Interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 12731–12738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Eslami, H.; Mohammadzadeh, L.; Mehdipour, N. Anisotropic heat transport in nanoconfined polyamide-6,6 oligomers: Atomistic reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 104901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Eslami, H.; Mohammadzadeh, L.; Mehdipour, N. Reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation of thermal conductivity in nanoconfined polyamide-6,6. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 064703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Prasher, R.S.; Matayabas, J.C. Thermal contact resistance of cured gel polymeric thermal interface material. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 2004, 27, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, J.; Michel, B.; Rencz, M.; Tantolin, C.; Sarno, C.; Miessner, R.; Schuett, K.V.; Tang, X.; Demoustier, S.; Ziaei, A. Recent progress of thermal interface material research—An overview. In Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Thermal Inveatigation of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC 2008), Rome, Italy, 24–26 September 2008; pp. 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. And, M.M.; Winey, K.I. Polymer Nanocomposites Containing Carbon Nanotubes. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 543–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Xu, J.; Munari, A.; Dalton, E.; Mathewson, A. Silver nanowire array-polymer composite as thermal interface material. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 124310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Alkan, C.; Sarı, A.; Karaipekli, A. Preparation, thermal properties and thermal reliability of microencapsulated n-eicosane as novel phase change material for thermal energy storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011, 52, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ji, H.; Sellan, D.P.; Pettes, M.T.; Kong, X.; Ji, J.; Shi, L.; Ruoff, R.S. Enhanced thermal conductivity of phase change materials with ultrathin-graphite foams for thermal energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mehrali, M.; Latibari, S.T.; Mehrali, M.; Metselaar, H.S.M.; Silakhori, M. Shape-stabilized phase change materials with high thermal conductivity based on paraffin/graphene oxide composite. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 67, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhong, Y.; Zhou, M.; Huang, F.; Lin, T.; Wan, D. Effect of graphene aerogel on thermal behavior of phase change materials for thermal management. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 113, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Khan, W.S.; Asmatulu, R.; Rodriguez, V.; Ceylan, M. Enhancing thermal and ionic conductivities of electrospun PAN and PMMA nanofibers by graphene nanoflake additions for battery-separator applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015, 38, 2044–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hallaj, S.A.; Selman, J.R. ChemInform Abstract: A Novel Thermal Management System for Electric Vehicle Batteries Using Phase-Change Material. Cheminform 2001, 32, 3231–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 09 00437 g001 550
Figure 1. The schematic of thermal conductance in a crystalline material [29]. Copyright (2016), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 1. The schematic of thermal conductance in a crystalline material [29]. Copyright (2016), with permission from Elsevier.
Polymers 09 00437 g001
Polymers 09 00437 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of thermal conductive mechanisms in polymer [29]. Copyright (2016), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2. Schematic of thermal conductive mechanisms in polymer [29]. Copyright (2016), with permission from Elsevier.
Polymers 09 00437 g002
Polymers 09 00437 g003 550
Figure 3. Thermal conductivity by graphene in a graphene-polymer composite [29]. Copyright (2016), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3. Thermal conductivity by graphene in a graphene-polymer composite [29]. Copyright (2016), with permission from Elsevier.
Polymers 09 00437 g003
Polymers 09 00437 g004 550
Figure 4. TCE wt % of composites in Table 1.
Figure 4. TCE wt % of composites in Table 1.
Polymers 09 00437 g004
Polymers 09 00437 g005 550
Figure 5. TCE wt % of composites in Table 2.
Figure 5. TCE wt % of composites in Table 2.
Polymers 09 00437 g005
Polymers 09 00437 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic of thermal conductance in a polymer, oriented graphene/polymer composite, and 3D graphene/polymer composite.
Figure 6. Schematic of thermal conductance in a polymer, oriented graphene/polymer composite, and 3D graphene/polymer composite.
Polymers 09 00437 g006
Polymers 09 00437 g007 550
Figure 7. Schematic illustrating the action of thermal interface material, which fills the gaps between two contacting surfaces and conducts the heat produced by electronic drives [101]. (Copyright (2012) the American Chemical Society).
Figure 7. Schematic illustrating the action of thermal interface material, which fills the gaps between two contacting surfaces and conducts the heat produced by electronic drives [101]. (Copyright (2012) the American Chemical Society).
Polymers 09 00437 g007
Table
Table 1. Thermal conductivity of polymer composites filled with graphene and graphene-related materials with a random orientation.
Table 1. Thermal conductivity of polymer composites filled with graphene and graphene-related materials with a random orientation.
SampleGraphene content (wt %)Thermal conductivity (W m−1 k−1)Thermal conductivity enhancement (TCE) per wt %Preparation methodSurface preparation methods
Py-PGMA-GNS/epoxy [55]3.81.91225%In-situ polymerizationNon-covalent modification
f-GFs/epoxy [56]101.5366.5%In-situ polymerizationNon-covalent modification
GnP-C750/epoxy [57]50.4523.8%In-situ polymerizationno
DGEBA-f-GO/epoxy [58]4.64 10.7252.3%In-situ polymerizationno
GS@Al2O3/PVDF [59]400.5864.8%solution mixingCoated by alumina nanoparticals
Al2O3@ GNP/epoxy [60]121.4956.4%solution mixingCoated by alumina
GNP/PBT [61]201.9861%In-situ polymerizationno
GNPs/PPS [62]37.8 14.41449%melt mixingCovalent modification
PI/SiCNWs-GSs [63]70.57721%solution mixingno
GP/SR [54]0.720.369.4%mechanical blendingCovalent modification
PA6/graphene-GO [64]102.1456.9%In-situ polymerization Non-covalent modification
GNP/epoxy [65]252.6749.4%solution mixingno
PVDF/FGS/ND [20]450.663.9%solution mixingno
ApPOSS-graphene/epoxy [66]0.50.348115.8%solution mixingCovalent modification
IL-G/PU [67]0.6080.301255.9%In-situ polymerizationNon-covalent modification
PA/TCA-rGO [68]55.1357.8%melt mixingCovalent modification
BE/graphene [69]2.50.54273.7%solution mixingCovalent modification
GNPs/silicone [70]16~2.649.7%In-situ polymerizationno
1 volume fraction was converted into weight fraction.
Table
Table 2. Thermal conductivity of polymer composites filled with graphene and graphene-related materials with a specific orientation.
Table 2. Thermal conductivity of polymer composites filled with graphene and graphene-related materials with a specific orientation.
SampleGraphene content (wt %)Thermal conductivity (W m−1 k−1)Thermal conductivity enhancement (TCE) per wt %Specific orientation of graphene
VAGF/PDMS [76]92.3614.853329%orientation
MLG/epoxy [77]11.833.541412.7%orientation
NFC/RGO [81]112.6910%orientation
rLGO/PVDF [82]27.219.5~323.5%orientation
PVDF/oGNF [83]~36.8~10~113.2%orientation
epoxy/GNS–Fe3O4 [84]~1.74~0.6~79.9%orientation
GNP/PE [85]101.8445.7%segregated structure
GNP/PP [85]101.5359.5%segregated structure
GNP/PVA [85]101.4358%segregated structure
GNP/PVDF [85]101.4767.3%segregated structure
GNP/PS [86]~9.2~0.943.3%segregated structure
RGO/TPU [87]1.040.8288%segregated structure
PA6/graphene foam [78]20.847150%3D structure
Octadecanl/graphene [88]125.92216%3D structure
GF/epoxy [89]51.52170%3D structure
GF/PDMS [90]0.70.56285%3D structure
PEG/HGA [79]1.81.43200.6%3D structure

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, A.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.-F. Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Polymer Composites: Mechanisms, Properties, and Applications. Polymers 2017, 9, 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090437

AMA Style

Li A, Zhang C, Zhang Y-F. Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Polymer Composites: Mechanisms, Properties, and Applications. Polymers. 2017; 9(9):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, An, Cong Zhang, and Yang-Fei Zhang. 2017. "Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Polymer Composites: Mechanisms, Properties, and Applications" Polymers 9, no. 9: 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop