Next Article in Journal
Tradition vs. Eco-Innovation: The Constraining Effect of Protected Designations of Origin (PDO) on the Implementation of Sustainability Measures in the Olive Oil Sector
Next Article in Special Issue
Biocontrol of Stemphylium vesicarium and Pleospora allii on Pear by Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma spp.: Preventative and Curative Effects on Inoculum Production
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Fertilization on the Energy Profit of Tall Wheatgrass and Reed Canary Grass
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Physicochemical Characteristics of Bean Crop Soil in Trichoderma spp. Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Fungicide Application and Vine Age on Trichoderma Diversity as Source of Biological Control Agents

by
Guzmán Carro-Huerga
1,*,
Sara Mayo-Prieto
1,
Álvaro Rodríguez-González
1,
Óscar González-López
2,
Santiago Gutiérrez
3 and
Pedro A. Casquero
1,*
1
Grupo Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería y Agricultura Sostenible (GUIIAS), Instituto de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Biodiversidad, Universidad de León, Avenida Portugal 41, 24071 León, Spain
2
Departamento de Agricultura y Alimentación, Área de Producción Vegetal, Universidad de la Rioja, 24400 Logroño, Spain
3
Grupo Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería y Agricultura Sostenible (GUIIAS), Área de Microbiología, Escuela de Ingeniería Agraria y Forestal, Universidad de León, Campus de Ponferrada, Avenida Astorga s/n, 24400 Ponferrada, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(3), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030446
Submission received: 5 February 2021 / Revised: 23 February 2021 / Accepted: 24 February 2021 / Published: 27 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Using Biological Control Agents in Crop Protection)

Abstract

:
Fungi from the genus Trichoderma have a worldwide distribution and are commonly found in agricultural lands. Further, it has been described as a non-virulent and symbiont microorganism that can contribute to minimize the pernicious effects of pathogens. In the present work we have isolated Trichoderma spp. from bark of grapevine in different orchards in order to determine the influence of fungicide application and vine age on Trichoderma diversity in plant. An opposite correlation between the number of fungicides sprayed per campaign and the diversity of Trichoderma spp. isolates was found. Moreover, the older are grapevine plants the higher is the diversity of Trichoderma spp. isolates. The different Trichoderma strains isolated were tested against Phaeoacremonium minimum, a grapevine trunk pathogen, to evaluate their biocontrol capacity. Three Trichoderma strains shown a significant capacity to control P. minimum and were selected as candidates to be used as biological control agents. In addition, a rapid and easy method for isolating Trichoderma spp. from grapevine plants has been developed, which allowed to determine that the reduction in the amount of pesticide use, together with the preservation of old vineyards, lead to healthier agroecosystems containing higher levels of beneficial microorganisms.

1. Introduction

Some of the most commonly isolated saprotrophic fungi growing in soil, wood, or bark are Trichoderma spp. Rifai, showing a great capability to adapt to different ecological conditions [1]. In addition, some Trichoderma spp. are well known as biological control agents, which exhibit different mechanisms of action against pathogens such as (i) mycoparasitism, (ii) antibiosis, and (iii) competition with pathogens and soil microbial community [2]. Direct confrontation in dual culture assays have been widely used to test in vitro the ability of a particular Trichoderma sp. isolate to control fungal pathogens, concluding that mechanisms that prevail are mycoparasitism and antibiosis [3,4]. As result of these studies the number of commercial products based on Trichoderma spp. has grown exponentially [5].
The availability of Trichoderma products is a great concern due to the reduction of conventional pesticides in European agriculture [6], and the great losses that some diseases such as Grapevine Trunk Diseases (GTDs) could develop due to a lack of efficient measurements of control [7]. So that, many Trichoderma species have been assayed against vine pathogens, such as Botrytis cinerea Pers. [8], Plasmopara viticola (Berk. and M.A. Curtis) Berl. and De Toni [9], and specially against GTDs [10].
Nowadays, one of the most important vine destructive diseases are these GTDs [11,12]. Thus, great efforts are needed to search for alternative control strategies to reduce costs and dependence of chemicals but no curative methods have been obtained yet [7], and Trichoderma can be revealed as an ecological, sustainable, and safe alternative against GTDs.
Some of them such as T. atroviride SC1 has shown an effective biocontrol activity in nursery and field conditions [13]. Further, Remedier® (a mix of T. asperellum and T. gamsii) has shown positive results in terms of reduction of incidence [14]. Another example are T. atroviride isolate UST1 and Eco-77 (T. harzianum) that were tested over grapevine pruning wound surfaces, resulting in a reduction of infection from trunk pathogens [15]. However, not all commercial strains have shown an effective reduction of the disease or ecological adaptation to specific conditions in some vineyards [16,17].
Some examples of successful indigenous strains sprayed can be found, e.g., the selection of indigenous Trichoderma spp. strains from bean plants has shown promising results; these Trichoderma strains were assayed in vitro against Rhizoctonia solani JG Kühn (dual confrontation assay and membrane assay) and some of them were able to biocontrol this pathogen, in addition they could induce plant defense resistance [18]. Further, other indigenous bacteria strains isolated from grapevine rootstocks against GTDs were able to control these diseases [19]. In addition, some other studies suggested that there are no differences between native strains and Trichoderma commercial products in terms of biocontrol [20].
Furthermore, the importance of crop management influencing microbial communities has been described since many years ago [21], including in vineyards and its soils [22,23,24]. There is an important influence of crop management over fungal endophytic communities in grapevines, Vitis vinifera L. cv. Merlot and cv. and cv. Chardonnay, obtaining that fungal endophytic from organically managed farms were different from farms that are cultivated under Integrated Pest Management [25].
However, none of them have related the role of the Trichoderma communities on grapevine plants and their management.
So that, the application of indigenous Trichoderma strains in vineyards with similar agroecological characteristics, could improve the adaptation of this biological control agent (BCA) to each specific agroecosystem [20]. Further, it has been proved that commercial products of fungi and bacteria in comparison to strains that are isolated from vines can be used potentially for controlling crown gall disease in both cases [26].
Our main objective is searching for indigenous strains adapted to the agroecosystem to be applied on the points of disease penetration.
One of the most common and widely distributed species of GTDs is Phaeoacremonium minimum W. Gams, Crous, M.J. Wingf., and L. Mugnai (formerly Phaeoacremonium aleophilum) [27]. It is considered a pioneer in esca disease and can colonize bark, pith, and xylem fibers [28]. It has been described also in Petri and esca diseases, where it is presented as the most prevalent and virulent pathogen [7]. P. minimum can remain not only in spurs and old vascular tissues [29,30] but also it can survive as a soilborne pathogen [31]. This pathogen is also the main cause of wood disease as a vascular pathogen in other crops such as Actinidia deliciosa [32]. Moreover, this specie has been described as a pathogen in human beings who could develop phaeohyphomycosis [27]. Therefore, this pathogen can be considered as a reference for evaluating the efficiency of biological control agents.
The main goal of this article is to evaluate the influence of fungicide application and vine age in Trichoderma diversity in vine as source of biological control agents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Location and Vine Age

We have chosen 4 Spanish winegrowing regions belonging to Castilla y León (Spain) (placed in municipal districts of: 42°35′59″ N 6°43′32″ W (Cacabelos); 41°35′51″ N 4°07′22″ W (Peñafiel); 41°19′59″ N 5°28′09″ W (El Pego); 42°08′03″ N 5°24′10″ W (Gordoncillo); 42°10′45″ N 5°41′22″ W (La Antigua); 42°17′51″ N 5°54′06″ W (La Bañeza). All of them are placed in the inner plateau of Spain (northern subregion) under the same weather conditions. It is a Mediterranean-continental climate that possess long cold winters and short and heat dried summers. Even though, there is a strong contrast of temperature between day and night. We selected 10 plots that have different crop management. All these plots and their characteristics can be identified in Table 1. These plots are involved into a PDO. PDO is a certification to distinguish quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuff of a specific region (EC Reg. n. 1493/1999. 8 August 2009, OJC 187).
There were four plots (1, 2, 3, and 4) that belongs to PDO León; (5) to PDO Toro; (6, 7, and 8) to PDO Bierzo; and (9 and 10) to PDO Ribera del Duero. Woody tissues sampling was undertaken during winter season (between the end of January and the end of February). For bark sampling, fifteen samples of bark were taken from each grapevine plots of 8 different plants (trunk and arm) of V. vinifera (there are 15 samples per plot in 10 plots, obtaining 150 total samples). To collect the samples, a zip-lock bag was used that was kept at 4 °C until use. The bark (rhytidome) from trunk/branch vines was selected as a suitable place for searching for new Trichoderma isolates due to be the most commonly isolated saprotrophic fungi [1].

2.2. Fungicide Treatment and Vine Age

Wineries were surveyed during last five campaigns according to management practices. Number of fungicides spraying was recorded every year and media value of them during this period was annotated. Further, type of fungicide sprayed was recorded, Table 2. Plot (1) is an abandoned vineyard and plot (5) is a vineyard certified as organic production. The other plots (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) are being cultivated under an integrated pest management.

2.3. Sample Processing, Trichoderma Isolation and Quantification

Pruning shears were used for collecting bark samples. They were disinfected using 70% ethanol between different samples in the field. Eight plants were selected in each of the ten plots. Isolation of samples was performed as follows, a square segment of bark that had a dimension of (3 cm × 3 cm) was cut from vine plant, this process was done for extracting bark from trunk and from one of the branches of each vine plant. Plants were selected randomly through each plot in order to obtain a representative sample, in some plants no branches were found so that it was decided to define a total number of samples as 15. They were kept in plastic bags at 4 °C until processing.
These segments were treated in 1.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for one minute, and then washed with abundant sterile distilled water. After that, bark segments were finally dried for 15 min in a laminar flow chamber. These segments were cut using a sterile scalpel in a laminar flow cabinet and seven wood chips (1–2 mm approx. diameter; 0.5–1 cm approximately length) of each segment were placed on a Rose Bengal–Chloramphenicol Agar medium (Conda Laboratory, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain) plate. The wood chips were incubated at 25 °C in darkness until fungi grew to a size at which Trichoderma could be morphologically identified (between 3 and 4 days) [33]. From these data the percentage of presence of Trichoderma spp. was determined as the mean percentage of samples, giving a value =1 in case of finding Trichoderma species in a plate and a value = 0 in case of absence (Trichoderma abundance in grapevine plant = (presence of Trichoderma spp. in each plate/15 plates) × 100). For further analyses, isolates from the same plants that have the same morphological and cultural characteristics were discarded. In total 8 different samples were examined, and each of them had two technical replicates except for one that had just one technical replicate, obtaining 15 subsamples.

2.4. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Genomic DNAs were isolated from 100 mg of mycelia of each fungal isolate. The manufacturer’s protocol for fungi of the Nucleospin Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) was performed. A NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) was used to estimate DNA concentration. PCR amplifications were performed using 50 ng of template DNA in a final volume of 50 μL, containing 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 M dNTP, 400 nM of each primer, and 1.5 U of DreamTaq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The primer pair ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) were used to amplify nuclear rDNA-ITS regions [34]. PCR products were first purified by the Nucleo Spin Extract II kit (Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and were then sequenced using primer ITS5 and the kit BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the automatic capillary sequencer ABI 3130xl (Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA sequences were introduced in databases such as the NCBI Genbank (National Center for Biotechnology Information, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 20 December 2020) using the BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST, accessed on 20 December 2020) to identify the fungi [35].

2.5. Biocontrol Assays

In vitro evaluation of Trichoderma isolates as potential biological control agents was performed by modification of previously described methods by Kotze et al. (2011) [30] and Hermosa et al. (2000) [3]. In this case, it will be tested against a harmful trunk disease pathogen such as P. minimum (formerly P. aleophilum) strain Y038-05-3a that is significantly aggressive to grapevine plants [36]. A mycelial plug of P. minimum from a 14-day-old culture grown on potato dextrose agar medium (PDA, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany), was placed on a fresh PDA plate and incubated in dark conditions at 25 °C for 14 days. After that, a Trichoderma 7-day-old culture from a PDA plate was placed on the opposite side of the plate, 4.5 cm far from the pathogen. Growth parameters were evaluated after 5 days. Percentage Growth Inhibition relative (%GI) was calculated as % GI = { ( G 2 G 1 ) G 1 } × 100 . In total 25 isolates were chosen for biocontrol assays, seven isolates from plot 1, two isolates from plot 2, one isolate from plot 3, two isolates from plot 4, six isolates from plot 5, two isolates from plot 6, three isolates from plot 8, one isolate from plot 9 and one isolate from plot 10. Each Trichoderma isolate had four replicates and the radial mycelial growth (G1), was assessed by calculating the mean diameter from two perpendicular measurements of P. minimum in presence of each Trichoderma strain. (G2) was calculated regarding to the control, mean diameter from two perpendicular measurements in control plates, and it was calculated for the day 5. This value was chosen as the principal criteria for selecting them.
In addition, morphological characteristics of the sporulation on the colony pathogen and production of a yellow pigment on the surface of the medium were recorded by using a 0 to 3 scale in which the values were coded as follows: 0, absence; 1, weak; 2, heavy; and 3, very heavy (Figure 1). However, in order to facilitate the application of the selection, these values were transformed into a scale in which 1 was the maximum rate [3]. Trichoderma strains were selected as potential biological control agents in case that a media value equal or over a 0.67 was achieved for each strain in sporulation.

Statistical Analysis

Values of Percentage Growth Inhibition relative (%GI) were confirmed that had a normal distribution using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Leven Test and ANOVA one-way analyses were done to determine if there were significant differences. A post hoc tests (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05) was performed to establish differences between groups. SPSS software (Statistics for Windows Version 26.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

2.6. Identification of Parameters Involved in Trichoderma spp. Diversity

Data used in this section are media number of fungicide treatments per campaign, age of vines and percentage of Trichoderma abundance in plants. The R software was used for performing an statistical analysis in order to establish a correlation between abundance of Trichoderma in plants and the other variables [37]. First, it was checked that variables had a normal distribution using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. After that, a Pearson’s correlation analysis between data was done.

3. Results

3.1. Trichoderma Isolation, Quantification and Identification

Plates obtained from sample processing were checked and they were examined morphologically for identifying Trichoderma isolates. They were transferred onto a PDA plates and after seven days, Trichoderma spp. isolates were examined morphologically. They were selected preliminary and counted as Trichoderma spp. as [38] suggests. The 10 different plots have a percentage of Trichoderma spp. presence as follows: 73.33% (11/15) in plot 1, 13.33% (2/15) in plot 2, 6.67% (1/15) in plot 3, 26.67% (4/15) in plot 4 from PDO León; 26.67% (4/15) in plot 5 from PDO Toro; 6.67% (1/15) in plot 6, 0.00% (0/15) in plot 7, 20.00% (3/15) in plot 8 from PDO Bierzo; and 13.33% (2/15) in plot 9 and 13.33% (2/15) in plot 10 from PDO Ribera del Duero in Figure 2.
A selection was performed to avoid duplicity of same isolates in same plots due to their morphological and cultural characteristics in case that they belonged to the same plant, and finally they were confirmed using genetic identification by PCR amplification and sequencing. As result, 25 Trichoderma isolates from bark vine (rhytidome) were finally selected in Table 3. T. gamsii was identified at the highest frequency (48%; 12/25). In second place T. koningiopsis was obtained in a (20%; 5/25). After that, they were chosen for biocontrol analysis.

3.2. Biocontrol Assays

Dual confrontation assays were performed with all Trichoderma spp. isolated as indicated above, against P. minimum. %GI values were obtained and were combined with data regarding two additional parameters, i.e., sporulation on the plate, and sporulation on the pathogen colony in PDA plates. In this case, Trichoderma strains that had the maximal values for these three parameters, significant higher values in percentage of GI, a value of sporulation on plate higher than 67%, and a value of over-sporulation on pathogen higher than 67% were selected as effective biological control agents. According to a significant percentage of GI, Trichoderma strains selected are as follows, from DPO León (T72, T74, T75, T77,T78, and T105); from DPO Toro (T79,T80, T82, T84, and T85); none of them from DPO Bierzo and from DPO Ribera del Duero (T154). Among these selected Trichoderma strains, sporulation on plate reached a maximum value (= 1.00) in T79 and T154; and 0.92 in T75. Moreover, T84 exhibited a 0.67 coefficient in sporulation. Sporulation on the pathogen had a value of 0.67 as higher in T75, T79, T84, and T154. In summary, a total of four strains (T75 identified as T. koningiopsis, T79 identified as Trichoderma spp., T84 identified as T. koningiopsis and T154 Trichoderma spp.) were selected as potential biological control agents due to its capacity of antibiosis and/or mycoparasitism. Table 4.

3.3. Identification of Parameters Involved in Trichoderma spp. Diversity

Pearson’s correlation analysis were performed for evaluating the correlation between data of management: age of vines (Age), number of fungicides sprayed per campaign (Fungicides) and Trichoderma abundance in grapevine plants (Trichoderma_plant_abundance) was performed.
Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between Trichoderma plant abundance and Fungicides and also in the combination Trichoderma plant abundance and Age. Regarding Fungicides and age combination, there was no significant differences (Table 5) and they were represented in Figure 3.

4. Discussion

Nowadays, it is well known that GTDs are a major threat for viticulture worldwide and losses associated to these diseases are increasing and having a great impact between grape growers. Furthermore, their etiology, specially of esca disease, is still uncertain due to not all pathogens described as possible causal agents of this disease have been proved following the Koch´s postulates [7]. Some recent studies are unravelling the importance of fungal communities inside grapevine trunks [39,40]. However, none of them have focused on Trichoderma communities over grapevine bark and their relationship to management practices in vineyards.
Using biological control agents reduce the possibilities of develop resistances to chemicals [41], and Trichoderma spp. are well-known fungi [1].
In the present work, for isolating these Trichoderma native strains from vineyards, the period from end January to first February was chosen as ideal of sampling for several reasons: in January the number of different species of isolates was greatest from woody tissues [39], during Winter season rapid growing taxa adapted to extreme weather conditions were more likely to be found [22] and most of farmer´s activities are carried out during growing season (May to October) so that no interference in agricultural activities are possible.
In our case, we have found Trichoderma species in 9 over 10 vineyards. Thus, this procedure, based on the use of Rose-Bengal agar medium [40], was possible for isolating Trichoderma species from grapevine plants bark. In addition, this traditional approach can be also recommended for accurately identify taxa [42].
Trichoderma species are one of the most frequently isolated from endophytic mycota associated with V. vinifera cv. Tempranillo, Moscatel, Grano Menudo, Cabernet-Sauvignon, Malvar, Syrah, Merlot, Garnacha, Albillo, and Airen in Spain [43], and according to [39], Trichoderma was the second most frequent genera identified from this niche. Furthermore, Trichoderma is one of most frequently saprotrophic and ubiquitous fungi [44,45]. Our results have shown a high percentage of Trichoderma isolates on bark.
Inside Trichoderma genus, T. gamsii was previously described as the prevalent species in Trichoderma grapevine plants according to [39], so that, these results agree with our data where T. gamsii represents 48% and it is the predominant specie. T. atroviride was also identified and others strains of this specie have been described as an effective biological control agent against GTDs [13,46].
The method for evaluating the biocontrol potential was performed by modification of previously described methods by Kotze et al. (2011) [30] and Hermosa et al. (2000) [3]. In this case we adapted it to our pathogen, giving to it an advantage of 14 days previous inoculation of Trichoderma according to [47]. Not a high value was obtained in terms of inhibition growth because the low rate of growth of P. minimum. Similar results were obtained using another method of %RGI (Radial Growth Inhibition) by [48], they obtained low rates but it is still useful for selecting isolates as potential biocontrol agents. Some strains were overgrowing the pathogen and sporulating over it and these previous methods did not evaluate these capacities. Further, other strains were able to stop quickly the pathogen, but they did not show a high production of spores or were not able to overgrow it. So that, we added another method for evaluating these abilities that it was described by [3] in order to determine their potential as future commercial product due to its capacity of antibiosis or mycoparasitism.
In dual cultures, all Trichoderma species were able to reduce the growth of the pathogen as shown by [47]. Thus, different behaviors were found according to each Trichoderma strain in terms of sporulation.
According to [3], Trichoderma species showed homogeneous behaviour against different pathogens, as indicates above, in our case a great number of T. gamsii were found, which exhibit remarkable differences in their behaviour, indicating that each isolate requires to be analysed to determine its application as a BCA in a particular environment, i.e., climate conditions, pathogens, crops.
In our case, four strains (T75 T. koningiopsis, T79 Trichoderma spp., T84 T koningiopsis, and T154 Trichoderma spp.) have the property to control P. minimum according to our criteria for being potential biological control agents. We identified two species T. koningiopsis (T75 and T84) as potential biological control agent, also another strain from this specie identified as T. koningiopsis (09/02) was selected as potential biocontrol agent against Lasiodiplodia Theobromae [49]. Strain T154 Trichoderma spp. belongs to green spored clade and it is close related to T. harzianum, being capable to remain as an endophyte in vine plants and mycoparasite P. minimum [50]. Other strains from the same species such as T. harzianum strain AG1 has been proved successfully against Eutypa lata and has performed a good colonization in grapevine canes [51]. Additionally, another strain like T. harzianum AG2 has shown effective results against GTDs [47,52] and it is commercialized as Vinevax®. Another T. harzianum T39 strain favors a defense-related genes response against Plasmopara viticola [9]. Other positive effects have been demonstrated using T. harzianum M10 which improves crop yield, increases total amount of polyphenols and antioxidant activity in the grapes and suppresses the development of Unicnula necator [53]. Thus, T. harzianum strains show a great potential for reducing incidence of diseases in viticulture and improving sanitary status of vine plants.
An interesting possibility could be mixing different strains as cocktail of Trichoderma strains in one commercial product such as Remedier® or TUSAL® that have been tested against GTDs [14,17]. But, these strains need to be evaluated in order to test their intra- and inter-specific compatibility for determining their possible combinations [54].
Another method of evaluation was staining of PDA plates. Some of the strains obtained during this study were able to produce a yellow pigment, a typical characteristic of this genus, that over an agar media are able to produce 6-pentyl α-pyrone (6PP), a secondary metabolite that inhibits fungal growth [55]. So that, T106 strain from this work, could be preselected as a Trichoderma specie that potentially could produce high amount of secondary metabolites that are related to fungal inhibition as other strains of T. atroviride UST1 and UST2 isolated from vineyard [56]. This strain could be evaluated using a membrane assay as it was done in [18]. In order to perform an identification and characterization of its metabolic profile in case that P. minimum was inhibited using that test [56]. In case that positive results were found and identification of chemical compounds were achieved, it could be able to be mixed using those secondary metabolites and the previous selected Trichoderma strains [57].
Furthermore, these strains isolated from grapevine bark in this current work could be useful against insect pests such as Xylotrechus arvicola (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) because both of them share the same ecological niche. Being an important insect pest in the Iberian Peninsula. This insect lays their eggs under the rhytidome of the grapevine plants and the action of the larvae, associated to the spread of wood fungi, causes a direct and indirect damage in this crop [58]. Moreover, biocontrol activity of other Trichoderma strains has been proved in in vitro tests with Trichoderma strains isolated from soil vineyards, a strain from work [59] that is described as T71 T. gamsii reached up to 100% of inhibition in eggs and an 87.5% against adults. Trichoderma is able to produce a range of compounds, such as quitinases, which could destroy the cell wall of the insect [59].
Related to the influence of management and the incidence on Trichoderma communities, this study is in concordance to [60], where they showed that fungal communities were significantly different depending on the age of the grapevines. In addition, numerous potentially plant-beneficial mycoparasites as Trichoderma were isolated from woody tissues of old grapevines, confirming our previous hypothesis indicating that Trichoderma are more likely to be found in old vineyards. In this way, we found that Trichoderma is one of the most common species in 58-year-old plants [60]. Thus, the older are the plants that we sampled the greater number of different Trichoderma strains were isolated. Furthermore, it has been suggested that other factors could affect to the presence of Trichoderma in the fungal communities. In agreement with that, we point out that management and specially a high amount of fungicides have a direct effect in the reduction in the fungal communities, and by the way in the BCAs present on them.
So that, using this method, as a fast method to isolate effective Trichoderma. Sampling a small portion of bark from vineyards, it can be obtained potential biological control agents. This classical microbiological method using our dual culture evaluation has an important advantage, that the species chosen can be obtained in the laboratory in large scale production due to its capacity to sporulate in a high proportion. Being until date, all the products commercialized as spores from Trichoderma isolates [5]. In comparison to other studies where only data of inhibition can be identified. In this case, sporulation on plate and sporulation over pathogen can give us an idea as a real potential in field. Thus, applying this entire protocol can be a useful tool for obtaining Trichoderma native strains as potential biological control agents. Trichoderma strains with biological properties can be also isolated from young vineyards and under a high-pressure environment of fungicides spraying. So, they can have an important impact on biological control. However, in this case the older is the vineyard and a smaller number of fungicides per campaign is sprayed the more probabilities of finding a Trichoderma strain, but it does not mean that a strain has to be a potential biological control agent. This aspect remains unclear. Further studies on taxonomy and microbiome communities are necessary to unravel this hypothesis. Being their effectivity as biocontrol agent more related to biological aspects than to the management [45].
Chemical treatments with herbicides produced great changes in fungal communities according to [22]. The in vitro toxicity of some pesticides such as prochloraz, guazatine, and triticonazole over Trichoderma species such as T. viride, T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum, and T. atroviride have a negative effects over these fungi, causing hyphal disruptions and extrusion of cytoplasmic content [61]. The abuse of fungicides has led not only to a lower number of Trichoderma strains as we have proved in our study but also to a contamination in soils as shown in [62]. So that, searching for new biological control agents, we will be able to reduce pesticide use and implement efficiently an integrated pest management [63].

5. Conclusions

A rapid and easy method for isolating Trichoderma from grapevine plants has been developed. The reduction in the use of fungicide treatments along with the preservation of old vineyards will lead to a healthier agroecosystem with a higher concentration of beneficial microorganisms. The best sources of Trichoderma BCAs are old vineyards with a reduced use of fungicide treatments.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, sampling and data collection were performed by G.C.-H., S.M.-P. and Á.R.-G. Statistical analysis was carried out by G.C.-H., Ó.G.-L., P.A.C., G.C.-H., Ó.G.-L., Á.R.-G., S.M.-P., S.G. and P.A.C. performed the data interpretation and manuscript preparation. Supervision of all study was performed by S.G. and P.A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by project GLOBALVITI ‘Solución global para mejorar la This research was funded by y the Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnolo´gico Industrial–CDTI—(Madrid, Spain) for the project GLOBALVITI project (CIEN Program) IDI-20160746 and the grant awarded to GC-H comes from the MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, CULTURE, AND SPORT (SPAIN), grant number (FPU15/04681).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Enrique Barajas Tola and Juan Antonio Rubio Cano from the Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León (ITACyL) for kindly providing Phaeoacremonium minimum strain Y038-05-03a.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Druzhinina, I.S.; Seidl-Seiboth, V.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Horwitz, B.A.; Kenerley, C.M.; Monte, E.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Zeilinger, S.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Kubicek, C.P. Trichoderma: The genomics of opportunistic success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vinale, F.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Marra, R.; Woo, S.L.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hermosa, M.; Grondona, I.; Iturriaga, E.A.; Díaz-Minguez, J.M.; Castro, C.; Monte, E.; García-Acha, I. Molecular characterization and identification of biocontrol isolates of Trichoderma spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1890–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Anees, M.; Tronsmo, A.; Edel-Hermann, V.; Hjeljord, L.G.; Héraud, C.; Steinberg, C. Characterization of field isolates of Trichoderma antagonistic against Rhizoctonia solani. Fungal Biol. 2010, 114, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Woo, S.L.; Ruocco, M.; Vinale, F.; Nigro, M.; Marra, R.; Lombardi, N.; Pascale, A.; Lanzuise, S.; Manganiello, G.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. Open Mycol. J. 2014, 8, 71–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lamichhane, J.R.; Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S.; Kudsk, P.; Messéan, A. Toward a reduced reliance on conventional pesticides in European agriculture. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 2016, 100, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gramaje, D.; Urbez-Torres, J.R.; Sosnowski, M.R. Managing grapevine trunk diseases with respect to etiology and epidemiology: Current strategies and future prospects. Plant Dis. 2018, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pertot, I.; Giovannini, O.; Benanchi, M.; Caffi, T.; Rossi, V.; Mugnai, L. Combining biocontrol agents with different mechanisms of action in a strategy to control Botrytis cinerea on grapevine. Crop Prot. 2017, 97, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perazzolli, M.; Roatti, B.; Bozza, E.; Pertot, I. Trichoderma harzianum T39 induces resistance against downy mildew by priming for defense without costs for grapevine. Biol. Control 2011, 58, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mondello, V.; Songy, A.; Battiston, E.; Pinto, C.; Coppin, C.; Trotel-Aziz, P.; Clément, C.; Mugnai, L.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine trunk diseases: A review of fifteen years of trials for their control with chemicals and biocontrol agents. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1189–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bertsch, C.; Ramírez-Suero, M.; Magnin-Robert, M.; Larignon, P.; Chong, J.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Spagnolo, A.; Clément, C.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine trunk diseases: Complex and still poorly understood. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Roblin, G.; Luini, E.; Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Larignon, P.; Berjeaud, J.M. Towards a preventive and/or curative treatment of esca in grapevine trunk disease: General basis in the elaboration of treatments to control plant pathogen attacks. Crop Prot. 2019, 116, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Berbegal, M.; Ramón-Albalat, A.; León, M.; Armengol, J. Evaluation of long-term protection from nursery to vineyard provided by Trichoderma atroviride SC1 against fungal grapevine trunk pathogens. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 967–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reggori, F.; Aloi, C.; Baleani, M.; Benanchi, M.; Bigot, G.; Bortolotti, P.; Bossio, D.; Cotromino, M.; Di Marco, S.; Faccini, F.; et al. Remedier(Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma gamsii): A new opportunity to control the esca disease complex. Four-year results of field trials in Italy. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2014, 2, 363–372. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mutawila, C.; Halleen, F.; Mostert, L. Optimisation of time of application of Trichoderma biocontrol agents for protection of grapevine pruning wounds. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2016, 22, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martínez-Diz, M.D.P.; Díaz-Losada, E.; Andrés-Sodupe, M.; Bujanda, R.; Maldonado-González, M.M.; Ojeda, S.; Yacoub, A.; Rey, P.; Gramaje, D. Field evaluation of biocontrol agents against black-foot and Petri diseases of grapevine. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Berlanas, C.; Andrés-Sodupe, M.; López-Manzanares, B.; Maldonado-González, M.M.; Gramaje, D. Effect of white mustard cover crop residue, soil chemical fumigation and Trichoderma spp. root treatment on black-foot disease control in grapevine. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mayo, S.; Gutiérrez, S.; Malmierca, M.G.; Lorenzana, A.; Campelo, M.P.; Hermosa, R.; Casquero, P.A. Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Álvarez-Pérez, J.M.; González-García, S.; Cobos, R.; Olego, M.Á.; Ibañez, A.; Díez-Galán, A.; Garzón-Jimeno, E.; Coque, J.J.R. Use of endophytic and rhizosphere actinobacteria from grapevine plants to reduce nursery fungal graft infections that lead to young grapevine decline. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Karimi, K.; Babai Ahari, A.; Arzanlou, M.; Amini, J.; Pertot, I. Comparison of indigenous Trichoderma spp. strains to a foreign commercial strain in terms of biocontrol efficacy against Colletotrichum nymphaeae and related biological features. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2017, 124, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Donnison, L.M.; Griffith, G.S.; Hedger, J.; Hobbs, P.J.; Bardgett, R.D. Management influences on soil microbial communities and their function in botanically diverse haymeadows of northern England and Wales. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2000, 32, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hernandez, M.M.; Menéndez, C.M. Influence of seasonality and management practices on diversity and composition of fungal communities in vineyard soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 135, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vukicevich, E.; Thomas Lowery, D.; Bennett, J.A.; Hart, M. Influence of groundcover vegetation, soil physicochemical properties, and irrigation practices on soil fungi in semi-arid vineyards. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. López-Piñeiro, A.; Muñoz, A.; Zamora, E.; Ramírez, M. Influence of the management regime and phenological state of the vines on the physicochemical properties and the seasonal fluctuations of the microorganisms in a vineyard soil under semi-arid conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 2013, 126, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pancher, M.; Ceol, M.; Corneo, P.E.; Longa, C.M.O.; Yousaf, S.; Pertot, I.; Campisano, A. Fungal endophytic communities in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) Respond to crop management. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 4308–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ferrigo, D.; Causin, R.; Raiola, A. Effect of potential biocontrol agents selected among grapevine endophytes and commercial products on crown gall disease. BioControl 2017, 62, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gramaje, D.; Mostert, L.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Phaeoacremonium: From esca disease to phaeohyphomycosis. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 759–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pierron, R.; Gorfer, M.; Berger, H.; Jacques, A.; Sessitsch, A.; Strauss, J.; Compant, S. Deciphering the niches of colonisation of Vitis vinifera L. by the Esca-associated fungus Phaeoacremonium aleophilum using a gfp marked strain and cutting systems. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Crous, P.W.; Gams, W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Van Wyk, P.S. Phaeoacremonium gen. nov. associated with with and decline diseases of woody hosts and human infections. Mycologia 1996, 88, 786–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Larignon, P.; Dubos, B. Preliminary studies on the biology of Phaeoacremonium. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Agustí-Brisach, C.; Gramaje, D.; García-Jiménez, J.; Armengol, J. Detection of black-foot and Petri disease pathogens in soils of grapevine nurseries and vineyards using bait plants. Plant Soil 2013, 364, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Roberti, R.; Osti, F.; Innocenti, G.; Rombolà, A.D.; Di Marco, S. An environmentally sustainable approach for the management of Phaeoacremonium minimum, the main agent of wood diseases in Actinidia deliciosa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 148, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rifai, M.A. A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Mycol. Pap. 1969, 116, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  34. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, Z.; Schwartz, S.; Wagner, L.; Miller, W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 2000, 7, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martín, L.; Martín, M.T. Characterization of fungicide resistant isolates of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum infecting grapevines in Spain. Crop Prot. 2013, 52, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Disponible En. Available online: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 3 January 2021).
  38. Pertot, I.; Prodorutti, D.; Colombini, A.; Pasini, L. Trichoderma atroviride SC1 prevents Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum infection of grapevine plants during the grafting process in nurseries. BioControl 2016, 61, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bruez, E.; Vallance, J.; Gerbore, J.; Lecomte, P.; Da Costa, J.P.; Guerin-Dubrana, L.; Rey, P. Analyses of the temporal dynamics of fungal communities colonizing the healthy wood tissues of esca leaf-symptomatic and asymptomatic vines. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bruez, E.; Haidar, R.; Alou, M.T.; Vallance, J.; Bertsch, C.; Mazet, F.; Fermaud, M.; Deschamps, A.; Guerin-Dubrana, L.; Compant, S.; et al. Bacteria in a wood fungal disease: Characterization of bacterial communities in wood tissues of esca-foliar symptomatic and asymptomatic grapevines. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Carvalho, F.P. Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environ. Sci. Policy 2006, 9, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jayawardena, R.S.; Purahong, W.; Zhang, W.; Wubet, T.; Li, X.H.; Liu, M.; Zhao, W.; Hyde, K.D.; Liu, J.H.; Yan, J. Biodiversity of fungi on Vitis vinifera L. revealed by traditional and high-resolution culture-independent approaches. Fungal Divers. 2018, 90, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. González, V.; Tello, M.L. The endophytic mycota associated with Vitis vinifera in central Spain. Fungal Divers. 2011, 47, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hjeljord, L.; Tronsmo, A. Trichoderma and Gliocladium in biological control: An overview. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium; Harman, G.E., Kubicek, C.P., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 1998; Volume 2, pp. 131–151. [Google Scholar]
  45. Mukherjee, P.K.; Horwitz, B.A.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Schmoll, M.; Kenerley, C.M. Trichoderma research in the genome era. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 105–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. van Jaarsveld, W.J.; Halleen, F.; Bester, M.C.; Pierron, R.J.G.; Stempien, E.; Mostert, L. Investigation of Trichoderma species colonization of nursery grapevines for improved management of black foot disease. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kotze, C.; Van Niekerk, J.; Mostert, L.; Halleen, F.; Fourie, P.; Niekerk, J.V.A.N.; Mostert, L.; Halleen, F.; Fourie, P. Evaluation of biocontrol agents for grapevine pruning wound protection against trunk pathogen infection. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, 247–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ruano-Rosa, D.; Del Moral-Navarrete, L.; Lopez-Herrera, C.J. Selection of Trichoderma spp. isolates antagonistic to Rosellinia necatrix. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 8, 1084–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marraschi, R.; Ferreira, A.B.M.; da Silva Bueno, R.N.; Leite, J.A.B.P.; Lucon, C.M.M.; Harakava, R.; Leite, L.G.; Padovani, C.R.; Bueno, C.J. A protocol for selection of Trichoderma spp. to protect grapevine pruning wounds against Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Carro-Huerga, G.; Compant, S.; Gorfer, M.; Cardoza, R.E.; Schmoll, M.; Gutiérrez, S.; Casquero, P.A. Colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by the endophyte Trichoderma sp. strain T154: Biocontrol activity against Phaeoacremonium minimum. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. John, S.; Wicks, T.J.; Hunt, J.S.; Scott, E.S. Colonisation of grapevine wood by Trichoderma harzianum and Eutypa lata. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2008, 14, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Halleen, F.; Fourie, P.H.; Lombard, P.J. Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against Eutypa lata by biological and chemical methods. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 31, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Pascale, A.; Vinale, F.; Manganiello, G.; Nigro, M.; Lanzuise, S.; Ruocco, M.; Marra, R.; Lombardi, N.; Woo, S.L.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma and its secondary metabolites improve yield and quality of grapes. Crop Prot. 2017, 92, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ruano Rosa, D.; López Herrera, C.J. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents against avocado white root rot. Biol. Control 2009, 51, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cardoza, R.; Hermosa, R.; Vizcaíno, J.; Sanz, L.; Monte, E.; Gutiérrez, S. Secondary metabolites produced by Trichoderma and their importance in the biocontrol process. Res. Signpost Indian 2005, 661, 207. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mutawila, C.; Vinale, F.; Halleen, F.; Lorito, M.; Mostert, L. Isolation, production and in vitro effects of the major secondary metabolite produced by Trichoderma species used for the control of grapevine trunk diseases. Plant Pathol. 2015, 65, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Keswani, C.; Singh, H.B.; Hermosa, R.; García-Estrada, C.; Caradus, J.; He, Y.W.; Mezaache-Aichour, S.; Glare, T.R.; Borriss, R.; Vinale, F.; et al. Antimicrobial secondary metabolites from agriculturally important fungi as next biocontrol agents. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 9287–9303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rodríguez-González, Á.; Peláez, H.J.; Mayo, S.; González-López, O.; Casquero, P.A. Biometric traits of Xylotrechus arvicola adults from laboratory and grape fields. Vitis-J. Grapevine Res. 2016, 55, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rodríguez-González, Á.; Carro-Huerga, G.; Mayo-Prieto, S.; Lorenzana, A.; Gutiérrez, S.; Peláez, H.J.; Casquero, P.A. Investigations of Trichoderma spp. and Beauveria bassiana as biological control agent for Xylotrechus arvicola, a major insect pest in Spanish vineyards. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bruez, E.; Baumgartner, K.; Bastien, S.; Travadon, R.; Guérin-Dubrana, L.; Rey, P. Various fungal communities colonise the functional wood tissues of old grapevines externally free from grapevine trunk disease symptoms. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2016, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Roberti, R.; Badiali, F.; Pisi, A.; Veronesi, A.; Pancaldi, D.; Cesari, A. Sensitivity of Clonostachys rosea and Trichoderma spp. as potential biocontrol agents to pesticides. J. Phytopathol. 2006, 154, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rusjan, D.; Strlič, M.; Pucko, D.; Korošec-Koruza, Z. Copper accumulation regarding the soil characteristics in Sub-Mediterranean vineyards of Slovenia. Geoderma 2007, 141, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pertot, I.; Caffi, T.; Rossi, V.; Mugnai, L.; Hoffmann, C.; Grando, M.S.; Gary, C.; Lafond, D.; Duso, C.; Thiery, D.; et al. A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture. Crop Prot. 2017, 97, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dual culture evaluations of Trichoderma spp. (blue arrow) and P. minimum (red arrow) in Petri dishes with potato-dextrose-agar medium (PDA) after 5 days of co-culture. (A) Trichoderma isolate (T79) that produces yellow pigmentation. (B) P. minimum control plate. (C) Degree 0 of sporulation (T106) in dual confrontation (absence). (D) Degree 1 of sporulation in dual confrontation (weak) (T85). (E) Degree 2 of sporulation (T138) in dual confrontation (heavy). (F) Degree 3 of sporulation (T154) in dual confrontation (very heavy).
Figure 1. Dual culture evaluations of Trichoderma spp. (blue arrow) and P. minimum (red arrow) in Petri dishes with potato-dextrose-agar medium (PDA) after 5 days of co-culture. (A) Trichoderma isolate (T79) that produces yellow pigmentation. (B) P. minimum control plate. (C) Degree 0 of sporulation (T106) in dual confrontation (absence). (D) Degree 1 of sporulation in dual confrontation (weak) (T85). (E) Degree 2 of sporulation (T138) in dual confrontation (heavy). (F) Degree 3 of sporulation (T154) in dual confrontation (very heavy).
Agronomy 11 00446 g001
Figure 2. Trichoderma plant abundance. The code of each soil is detailed in Table 1.
Figure 2. Trichoderma plant abundance. The code of each soil is detailed in Table 1.
Agronomy 11 00446 g002
Figure 3. Correlation plot between variables Age, Fungicides, and Trichoderma plant abundance. Values closer to 1 refers a strong positive correlation. Values closer to −1 refers a strong negative correlation.
Figure 3. Correlation plot between variables Age, Fungicides, and Trichoderma plant abundance. Values closer to 1 refers a strong positive correlation. Values closer to −1 refers a strong negative correlation.
Agronomy 11 00446 g003
Table 1. Places and code of the soil sampling used for this study.
Table 1. Places and code of the soil sampling used for this study.
SiteLocationVine VarietiesDates SampledYear Vineyard Stablished
PDO LEÓN
1La Antigua, Castilla y LeónPrieto PicudoJanuary 20171934
2La Bañeza, Castilla y LeónTempranilloJanuary 20172001
3Gordoncillo, Castilla y LeónAlbarín blancoFebruary 20172006
4Gordoncillo, Castilla y LeónPrieto PicudoFebruary 20171997
PDO TORO
5El Pego, Castilla y LeónTempranilloFebruary 20171926
PDO BIERZO
6Cacabelos, Castilla y LeónMencíaJanuary 20171995
7Cacabelos, Castilla y LeónGodelloJanuary 20172011
8Cacabelos, Castilla y LeónGodelloJanuary 20171937
PDO RIBERA DEL DUERO
9Peñafiel, Castilla y LeónTempranilloFebruary 20172001
10Peñafiel, Castilla y LeónCabernet SauvignonFebruary 20172008
Table 2. Characteristics of fungicides treatments.
Table 2. Characteristics of fungicides treatments.
SiteMedia Number of
Fungicides Spraying per Campaign
SulphurCooperSynthetic Fungicides
PDO LEÓN
10nonono
25.2yesyesyes
34yesnoyes
44yesnoyes
PDO TORO
53yesyesno
PDO BIERZO
65.9yesyesyes
75.1yesyesyes
85.9yesyesyes
PDO RIBERA DEL DUERO
95yesyesyes
105yesyesyes
Table 3. Isolates of Trichoderma spp. in each vineyard.
Table 3. Isolates of Trichoderma spp. in each vineyard.
IsolateSpeciesAccesion NumberSite
PDO LEÓN
T72Trichoderma gamsii 1
T73Trichoderma gamsii 1
T74Trichoderma koningiopsis 1
T75Trichoderma koningiopsis 1
T76Trichoderma spp. 1
T77Trichoderma koningiopsis 1
T78Trichoderma gamsii 1
T138Trichoderma spp. 2
T139Trichoderma gamsii 2
T100Trichoderma gamsii 3
T105Trichoderma gamsii 4
T106Trichoderma spp. 4
PDO TORO
T79Trichoderma spp. 5
T80Trichoderma koningiopsis 5
T81Trichoderma harzianum 5
T82Trichoderma gamsii 5
T84Trichoderma koningiopsis 5
T85Trichoderma gamsii 5
PDO BIERZO
T136Trichoderma gamsii 6
T137Trichoderma citrinoviride 6
T135Trichoderma gamsii 8
T170Trichoderma gamsii 8
T171Trichoderma gamsii 8
PDO RIBERA DEL DUERO
T154Trichoderma spp. 9
T151Trichoderma atroviride 10
Table 4. Dual-culture assay of Trichoderma spp. isolates after 5 days at 25 °C with the plant pathogenic fungi P. minimum on PDA. The letters indicate means within which there are no statistically significant differences (p = 0.05), according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) procedure applied to normalized data. An asterisk (*) indicates Trichoderma strain selected as potential biological control agent.
Table 4. Dual-culture assay of Trichoderma spp. isolates after 5 days at 25 °C with the plant pathogenic fungi P. minimum on PDA. The letters indicate means within which there are no statistically significant differences (p = 0.05), according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) procedure applied to normalized data. An asterisk (*) indicates Trichoderma strain selected as potential biological control agent.
IsolateDual Culture (%GI)Sporulation on PlateSporulation on PathogenProduction of Yellow PigmentOrigin
DPO LEÓN
T7220.42 abc0.330.000.001
T7314.62 bcde0.500.000.001
T7420.42 abc0.830.170.001
T75 *19.51 abcd0.92 *0.67 *0.001
T7611.66 cdefg0.330.000.001
T7722.02 ab0.750.170.001
T7822.92 ab0.750.000.001
T1384.04 g0.330.000.002
T1399.25 efg0.330.000.002
T100−5.19 h0.080.000.003
T10523.77 a0.420.000.004
T10617.30 abcde0.250.000.67 *4
DPO TORO
T79 *20.30 abc1.00 *0.67 *0.335
T8022.40 ab0.420.670.005
T8112.36 cdefg0.750.500.085
T8216.14 abcde0.580.000.005
T84 *17.84 abcde0.67 *0.67 *0.005
T8515.33 abcde0.750.000.005
DPO BIERZO
T13613.15 cdef1.000.170.006
T13712.69 cdefg1.000.000.006
T13511.65 cdefg0.330.000.008
T17010.93 defg0.330.000.008
T17112.86 cdefg0.080.000.008
DPO RIBERA DEL DUERO
T154 *20.38 abc1.00 *0.67 *0.009
T1514.57 fg0.580.000.0010
Table 5. Pearson’s product-moment correlation. 95 percent confidence interval (data in bold means significant differences).
Table 5. Pearson’s product-moment correlation. 95 percent confidence interval (data in bold means significant differences).
Combination of ManagementCorrelationp Value
Trichoderma plant abundance and Fungicides−0.883820.00069
Trichoderma plant abundance and Age0.675590.03202
Fungicides and Age−0.522700.1211
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carro-Huerga, G.; Mayo-Prieto, S.; Rodríguez-González, Á.; González-López, Ó.; Gutiérrez, S.; Casquero, P.A. Influence of Fungicide Application and Vine Age on Trichoderma Diversity as Source of Biological Control Agents. Agronomy 2021, 11, 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030446

AMA Style

Carro-Huerga G, Mayo-Prieto S, Rodríguez-González Á, González-López Ó, Gutiérrez S, Casquero PA. Influence of Fungicide Application and Vine Age on Trichoderma Diversity as Source of Biological Control Agents. Agronomy. 2021; 11(3):446. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carro-Huerga, Guzmán, Sara Mayo-Prieto, Álvaro Rodríguez-González, Óscar González-López, Santiago Gutiérrez, and Pedro A. Casquero. 2021. "Influence of Fungicide Application and Vine Age on Trichoderma Diversity as Source of Biological Control Agents" Agronomy 11, no. 3: 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop