Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Standard Assays for the Study of Autophagy in the Ex Vivo Retina
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress-Responsive Apoptosis Inducing Protein (ORAIP) Plays a Critical Role in High Glucose-Induced Apoptosis in Rat Cardiac Myocytes and Murine Pancreatic β-Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Autophagy in Sciatic Nerves of a Rat Model that Develops Inflammatory Autoimmune Peripheral Neuropathies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/cells6040036
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Monitoring Autophagy in the Model Green Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

by
María Esther Pérez-Pérez
,
Inmaculada Couso
,
Luis G. Heredia-Martínez
and
José L. Crespo
*
Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)—Universidad de Sevilla; Avda. Américo Vespucio, 49, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2017, 6(4), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6040036
Submission received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 17 October 2017 / Accepted: 19 October 2017 / Published: 22 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assays to Monitor Autophagy in Model Systems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Autophagy is an intracellular catabolic system that delivers cytoplasmic constituents and organelles in the vacuole. This degradative process is mediated by a group of proteins coded by autophagy-related (ATG) genes that are widely conserved from yeasts to plants and mammals. Homologs of ATG genes have been also identified in algal genomes including the unicellular model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The development of specific tools to monitor autophagy in Chlamydomonas has expanded our current knowledge about the regulation and function of this process in algae. Recent findings indicated that autophagy is regulated by redox signals and the TOR network in Chlamydomonas and revealed that this process may play in important role in the control of lipid metabolism and ribosomal protein turnover in this alga. Here, we will describe the different techniques and approaches that have been reported to study autophagy and autophagic flux in Chlamydomonas.

1. Introduction

Eukaryotic cells are able to degrade intracellular material through a membrane-trafficking process known as autophagy. This catabolic process allows cells to deliver cytosolic contents including proteins, membranes, and even organelles to the vacuole or lysosome. The hallmark of autophagy is the formation of double membrane vesicles, termed autophagosomes, which engulf selectively or non-selectively cytosolic components. The autophagosome then fuses with the vacuole where the cargo is degraded by resident hydrolases (Figure 1). Autophagy usually occurs at a low basal level under optimal growth and is activated upon stress in order to maintain cellular homeostasis [1,2].
Autophagy is mediated by AuTophaGy-related (ATG) proteins, which were initially identified in yeasts [3], and subsequently in metazoans, plants, and algae [4,5,6,7]. Up to now, more than 40 ATG proteins have been described. Among them, the ubiquitin-like protein ATG8 plays an important role in the processes of autophagosome formation, target recognition, and vacuole tethering [8,9]. To develop its functions, ATG8 has to be anchored to the autophagosome membrane through the covalent binding to the membrane lipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE). The lipidation of ATG8 to PE is catalyzed sequentially by the ATG8 conjugation system (Figure 1). First, ATG8 must be cleaved at a strictly conserved Gly at the C-terminus of the protein by the cysteine-protease ATG4. Then, by the consecutive action of the E1- and E2- activating enzymes, ATG7 and ATG3 respectively, and with the contribution of the ATG12–ATG5–ATG16 complex, ATG8 is finally bound to PE. Remarkably, ATG8 can be released from autophagosome outer membrane by the delipidating function of ATG4 [8], which may play an important role in the control of autophagy (Figure 1). The stable binding of ATG8 to the membrane has been widely used to monitor the process of autophagosome formation and a growing number of techniques are available to analyze ATG8 lipidation and autophagic flux in different organisms including algae [10]. Here, we discuss the principles, advantages, and limitations of the different approaches that have been used to study autophagy in the model unicellular green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

2. Chlamydomonas as a Photosynthetic Model System to Study Autophagy

The unicellular green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (referred to here as Chlamydomonas) is a well-developed model organism [11] that has been widely used for the study of important cellular and metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, cell cycle, redox regulation, flagella biogenesis, or nitrogen metabolism, among others [12,13,14]. Chlamydomonas cells are oval-shaped, possess two flagella at their anterior end and about 40% of their volume is occupied by a single cup-shaped chloroplast [15] (Figure 2). The Chlamydomonas genome was published about 10 years ago [16] and the most up-to-date genomic data is currently available at Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov) after extensive assembly and annotation [17]. Chlamydomonas and other microalgae have recently emerged as valuable organisms since they are primary producers of natural and valuable products including vaccines, hydrogen, or nutraceuticals. Most algae produce oils, among them TAGs (triacylglycerols) are of special interest as they are considered a good source for biodiesel production [18]. Chlamydomonas is now considered as a model organism to study the TAG synthesis pathway since this alga can produce and accumulate high amounts of lipids in structures known as lipid bodies or lipid droplets under starvation conditions [19] (Figure 2). Chlamydomonas has also been proposed as a useful system for the study of autophagy in photosynthetic eukaryotes based on the easy handling of cell cultures for physiological and biochemical approaches and the reduced complexity of ATG genes in Chlamydomonas compared to higher plants [20,21]. Furthermore, Chlamydomonas displays a high metabolic plasticity since cells can grow in the presence (by means of photosynthesis) or absence of light (using acetate as carbon source), which provides unique physiological conditions among photosynthetic organisms to investigate the regulation of autophagy by light-derived stress signals. Accordingly, it has been shown that carotenoid depletion triggers autophagy in Chlamydomonas cells in the light but not in the dark [22].
Research on autophagy in Chlamydomonas is currently contributing to elucidating the regulation of this degradative process in photosynthetic organisms and has recently revealed an important role of autophagy in the control of lipid metabolism in algae. Inhibition of autophagy by the Target Of Rapamycin (TOR) kinase has been shown in algae since treatment of Chlamydomonas cells with the macrolide rapamycin results in increased vacuolization [23] and ATG8 lipidation [21]. None of these autophagy features were observed in an FKBP12 mutant strain treated with rapamycin [21,23], suggesting that a rapamycin-sensitive branch of the TOR signaling network inhibits autophagy in Chlamydomonas. Further work on the regulation of autophagy in Chlamydomonas revealed a strong link between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activation of this process in photosynthetic organisms. Mounting evidence showed that autophagy is upregulated in Chlamydomonas in response to a wide range of stress conditions including nutrient limitation, oxidative stress, photo-oxidative damage, high light, endoplasmic reticulum stress, heavy metal toxicity, or salt stress among others [21,22,24,25,26,27,28]. The activation of autophagy in Chlamydomonas cells subjected to these stress conditions is linked to the generation of ROS and redox imbalance. Redox control of autophagy has been reported in other organisms including yeasts, mammals, and plants [29,30,31]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the redox regulation of autophagy are still poorly understood. So far, the ATG4 protease is the only ATG protein whose activity has been shown to be redox regulated. In humans, the activity of ATG4A/B is inhibited by oxidation in a process that involves a cysteine residue close to the catalytic cysteine [30]. The molecular mechanism for the redox regulation of ATG4 has been unraveled in yeasts and Chlamydomonas. It has been shown that ATG4 activity is similarly regulated in these two model systems by the formation of a single disulfide bond controlled by the thioredoxin system [29,32]. Furthermore, stress conditions that generate ROS and activate autophagy in Chlamydomonas promote the oxidation and aggregation of ATG4 in vivo. Specifically, carotenoid depletion induced by norflurazon or mutations in the phytoene synthase gene resulted in the activation of autophagy by photo-oxidative damage and the detection of ATG4 oligomers [32]. Thus, it has been proposed that the fine-tuning of ATG4 by the intracellular redox state may act as a regulatory hub for the redox control of autophagy [29,32]. Whether other ATG proteins are targeted by ROS remains unknown.
A recent study in Chlamydomonas revealed that inhibition of autophagic flux prevents the synthesis of TAGs and the formation of lipid bodies in nitrogen-limited cells [33]. Moreover, this study also showed that autophagic flux is needed for the recycling of some ribosomal proteins under nutrient stress conditions [33]. These findings strongly suggest that autophagy may play an important role in the regulation of lipid metabolism and ribosomal protein turnover in Chlamydomonas. Despite growing progress, autophagy is still poorly understood in Chlamydomonas mainly due to the lack of specific tools to monitor this catabolic process and the current limited knowledge on degradative vacuoles in this organism. How autophagy is initiated or which proteins catalyze the autophagosome-vacuole fusion needs to be investigated in Chlamydomonas. Nevertheless, a number of different approaches have been described to study autophagy in this model alga.

3. Methods for Monitoring Autophagy in Chlamydomonas

3.1. ATG8 Lipidation

As described above, ATG8 stably associates with both inner and outer membranes of the autophagosome through covalent binding to PE in a process known as ATG8 conjugation or lipidation. Consequently, detection of lipidated ATG8 (ATG8-PE) has been widely used to monitor autophagy in multiple organisms [10]. The Chlamydomonas genome contains a single ATG8 gene that encodes a ≈15 kDa protein with a C-terminal extension of 14 amino acids after the highly conserved Glycine residue [5,21]. A specific Chlamydomonas ATG8 antibody that recognizes free and lipidated ATG8 has been generated, and both isoforms can be clearly distinguished by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot analysis since ATG8-PE migrates faster than the unmodified protein [21] (Figure 3A). The ATG8 antibody has been a valuable tool to monitor the lipidation state of this protein in Chlamydomonas. Under optimal growth, unmodified ATG8 is detected as a single band by Western blot that corresponds to the processed and unmodified form of the protein [21]. However, when Chlamydomonas cells are exposed to different stress conditions the abundance of this protein increases and lower apparent molecular mass corresponding to lipidated ATG8 can be also detected (Figure 3A). This approach has been successfully used in Chlamydomonas to investigate ATG8 lipidation under a broad range of stress conditions including nutrient limitation, TOR signaling inhibition, oxidative stress, photo-oxidative damage, or ER stress [21,22,28]. Moreover, a comparative analysis of ATG8 lipidation in wild-type and some mutant strains from Chlamydomonas revealed that cells defective in carotenoid biosynthesis [22] or chloroplast protease activity [34] display high levels of autophagy. Remarkably, the Chlamydomonas ATG8 antibody recognizes ATG8 proteins from other photosynthetic organisms such as the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [21] and it has been used to monitor ATG8 lipidation in plants [35,36]. However, the high complexity of ATG8 proteins in plants (there are nine ATG8 isoforms in A. thaliana) hampers the unambiguous detection of lipidated forms of these proteins.
An important limitation when using ATG8 lipidation to monitor autophagy activity is that the accumulation of lipidated ATG8 does not necessarily reflect the activation of this process. For instance, we have recently reported in Chlamydomonas that inhibition of autophagic flux by concanamycin A, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar ATPase activity [37], results in an accumulation of ATG8-PE due to a blockage of vacuolar degradation and ATG8 recycling [33]. Nevertheless, an increased detection of ATG8 protein abundance and lipidation in response to stress usually indicates an upregulation of autophagy although this should be confirmed by other approaches such as immunolocalization of ATG8 or evaluation of autophagic flux.

3.2. Autophagic Flux

The autophagy process begins with the formation of the phagophore and ends with the degradation of the material sequestered by the autophagosome in the vacuole. The flow of material through the whole pathway is known as autophagic flux and it reflects the autophagic degradation activity within the cell [10]. A number of assays have been developed to determine autophagic flux in yeasts, mammals and plants by using a combination of techniques such as inhibition of vacuolar lytic function, Western blot analysis of specific key proteins, transmission electron microscopy and immunofluorescence microscopy [10]. These approaches have been recently defined for the study of autophagy in Chlamydomonas and provided valuable information about the role of this degradative process in algae [33].
The use of Chlamydomonas as a model system for the study of autophagy in algae has been hampered by the lack of atg mutants. The new released CLiP (Chlamydomonas Library Project) library, a collection of insertional mutants [38], might include some autophagy mutants, although no one has been confirmed yet (unpublished). In order to get around this problem, different approaches have been combined, firstly to inhibit the autophagy process and secondly to visualize it as described below.
Concanamycin A as an inhibitor of autophagic flux: Detection of lipidated ATG8 by itself is an excellent marker for monitoring autophagy, but it only shows a snapshot of the process and needs to be combined with other methodologies. The analysis of ATG8-PE turnover combined with the use of concanamycin to block vacuolar degradation enabled visualization of autophagic flux in Chlamydomonas. It has been shown that both ATG8 and ATG8-PE accumulate in the absence of vacuolar degradation induced by concanamycin treatment, indicating the inhibition of the autophagy process (Figure 3B) [33]. A low concentration of concanamycin (0.1 µM) is sufficient to inhibit autophagy in Chlamydomonas [33]. In contrast, the use of other common inhibitors of autophagic flux like wortmannin [39] or 3-methyladenine [40] did not result in the detection of lipidated ATG8 in Chlamydomonas, which likely suggests that these drugs do not block autophagic flux in this alga [33]. Why wortmannin and 3-methyladenine have no effect on ATG8 lipidation in Chlamydomonas is currently unknown although it might be related to the low conservation of PI3K in this alga [33]. The use of concanamycin in Chlamydomonas combined with the detection of ATG8-PE is a convenient approach to monitor autophagic flux in this organism. This is in contrast to higher plants since detection of lipidated ATG8 forms following concanamycin treatment has not been a good marker for autophagic flux mainly due to the high complexity of ATG8 proteins in these organisms [41,42].
Ultrastructural analysis of Chlamydomonas cells treated with concanamycin by transmission electron microscopy revealed a higher degree of vacuolization and a pronounced increase of vacuole size. Moreover, large vacuoles could be observed in Chlamydomonas cells treated with concanamycin, suggesting that several vacuoles may merge to form a bigger one. At this stage, small vesicles have also been detected within the vacuoles of concanamycin-treated cells [33]. It has been reported that autophagic bodies accumulate in the vacuole of plant cells treated with concanamycin because vacuolar hydrolases cannot act [31,43,44], so the small vesicles detected inside the vacuoles of Chlamydomonas cells treated with concanamycin might also correspond to autophagic bodies.
Monitoring RPS6 and RPL37 as autophagic flux markers: Nitrogen starvation results in decreased abundance of ribosomal proteins [45] and activates autophagy in Chlamydomonas [21]. A recent study revealed that the downregulation of some ribosomal proteins is linked to the activation of autophagy in response to nitrogen or phosphate limitation [33]. The level of two ribosomal proteins, RPS6 and RPL37, largely decreased in nitrogen-starved cells whereas inhibition of autophagic flux by concanamycin prevented their degradation (Figure 3B) [33]. A similar result was obtained in Chlamydomonas cells upon phosphate limitation, which also triggers autophagy in this organism [33]. Based on these results, it has been proposed that RPS6 and RPL37 proteins might be part of the autophagosome cargo in nitrogen- or phosphate-starved cells and their abundance can be used to trace autophagic flux in Chlamydomonas. Whether the turnover of these ribosomal proteins takes place as part of a bulk degradation of cellular components or as a selective ribophagy process needs to be investigated. The downregulation of RPS6 and RPL37 in nitrogen- or phosphate-starved cells might be a good indicator of autophagic flux in Chlamydomonas, as described for NBR1 in plants [46,47], although it is currently unknown if the level of these proteins may also respond to other stress conditions.

3.3. Cellular Localization of ATG8

Cellular distribution of ATG8 by fluorescence microscopy has been analyzed in different organisms using fluorescent tags fused to the N terminus of the protein or specific antibodies raised against ATG8 [10]. In general, ATG8 proteins localize as small dots in the cytoplasm under optimal growth but in response to stress the number and size of spots significantly increase, reflecting the activation of autophagy and the formation of autophagosomes. Fluorescence microscopy studies have also been performed in Chlamydomonas to monitor the progress of autophagy under different stress conditions [21,22,27]. The cellular distribution of ATG8 in Chlamydomonas resembled the localization of this protein in yeasts. In rich medium, the ATG8 signal is usually weak and localized to discrete punctate structures. However, activation of autophagy by stress changed the localization of ATG8 in the cell and several spots with intense fluorescence are easily visible, in close agreement with the higher abundance of ATG8 protein detected by Western blot. So far, all stress conditions that trigger autophagy in Chlamydomonas result in a pronounced detection of ATG8 in punctate structures, indicating that ATG8 cellular distribution can be used to visualize the activation of autophagy in this alga (Figure 3C).
An important disadvantage of ATG8 immunolocalization assays by fluorescence microscopy in Chlamydomonas is the incompatibility of this approach for co-localization experiments with fluorescent-tagged proteins or dyes that require vital staining since cells need to be fixed and permeabilized for immunofluorescence detection. Therefore, it is technically challenging to co-localize ATG8 with other proteins unless monoclonal antibodies are available for the detection of these proteins. In this regard, the absence of reliable markers for different subcellular compartments in Chlamydomonas is a limiting factor when using the ATG8 antibody for cell biology studies in this alga. Nevertheless, a main advantage of immunofluorescence is that, unlike GFP-ATG8 fusion analysis, this approach allows the detection of endogenous ATG8, thus avoiding possible artifacts due to the overexpression of tagged proteins. Indeed, the Chlamydomonas ATG8 antibody has proven to be a convenient tool to analyze the cellular distribution of endogenous ATG8 in some mutant strains from Chlamydomonas [22,34].

3.4. ATG4 Proteolytic Assay

Unlike other ATG8 proteins, Chlamydomonas ATG8 has an extra amino acid sequence of 14 amino acids after the highly conserved glycine (Gly120) at the C-terminus that is recognized by the ATG4 protease (Figure 1 and Figure 3D). Therefore, full-length and mature ATG8 can be resolved by SDS-PAGE [21]. Taking advantage of the C-terminal extension of Chlamydomonas ATG8, the proteolytic activity of ATG4 can be analyzed in vitro using Chlamydomonas ATG8 as substrate. The C terminus of Chlamydomonas ATG8 is recognized and processed not only by Chlamydomonas ATG4 but also by yeast ATG4, which has been very useful to unravel the molecular mechanism underlying the redox regulation of ATG4 from Chlamydomonas and yeasts [29,32]. This assay was established initially to study the activity of purified ATG4 proteins in vitro, but a modified protocol has been also reported to determine the proteolytic activity of ATG4 present in total extracts from Chlamydomonas [21,32]. Briefly, a low amount of His6-tagged Chlamydomonas ATG8 is incubated with total extracts from Chlamydomonas cells and ATG4 activity present in the samples is analyzed by proteolysis of His6-ATG8 followed by SDS-PAGE and detection of ATG8 proteins by Western blot. The different size of endogenous ATG8 and the full-length and cleaved forms of recombinant His6-ATG8 allows the identification of the ATG4 proteolytic product, which can be measured for a quantitative analysis of ATG4 activity (Figure 3D). This assay has been used to demonstrate that ATG4 present in total extracts from Chlamydomonas is inactive in its oxidized form and can be activated by reduction [32]. A potential strength of this cleavage assay relies on its versatility since it might be extended to analyze the ATG4 protease activity present in total extracts from other organisms. However, the set-up of this approach is technically difficult and it may narrow its application to other organisms.

3.5. Transcriptional Activation of ATG Genes

As discussed above, activation of autophagy in Chlamydomonas results in a higher abundance of the ATG8 protein. It has also been shown that the induction of autophagy by different stresses correlates with an enhanced transcription of the ATG8 gene in Chlamydomonas [27,28], strongly suggesting that the high level of the ATG8 protein is due to the upregulation of ATG8 transcription. In response to stress, the autophagy machinery needs to be activated and this is in part accomplished by the transcriptional activation of some ATG genes that in turn leads to higher levels of the corresponding ATG proteins. In Chlamydomonas, it has been reported that ER stress, metal toxicity, oxidative stress, or rapamycin treatment activate the expression of the ATG8 gene [27,28,34]. Moreover, global transcriptomic analysis of Chlamydomonas cells in which autophagy was induced by different stress signals revealed that other ATG genes such as ATG3 and ATG7 are upregulated in addition to ATG8 [26,27,34,45]. Therefore, there seems to be a good correlation between the transcriptional activation of some ATG genes and the induction of autophagy in Chlamydomonas (Figure 3E). However, the quantitative analysis of ATG genes does not provide direct information about the activity of the autophagy process or its degradative capacity, and thus transcriptional studies should be complemented with additional approaches that specifically monitor autophagic flux such as detection of lipidated ATG8 in the presence and absence of vacuolar degradation, as recently shown in nitrogen- or phosphate-starved cells [33].

4. Perspectives

Autophagy research in algae is just taking off, but recent progress made on the regulation of this catabolic process and its possible link to the control of lipid metabolism in these photosynthetic organisms predicts a promising future to this new field. Growing lines of evidence revealed that autophagy is regulated by the intracellular redox potential in Chlamydomonas and that the ATG4 protease may integrate redox signals [21,22,32,48]. Moreover, it has been shown that the inhibition of autophagic flux in Chlamydomonas prevents the synthesis of TAGs and the formation of lipid bodies under nutrient limitation [33]. These results underscore the important role that autophagy may play in Chlamydomonas to maintain cellular homeostasis in response to stress. However, there is still much more to do to unravel the complex regulation of autophagy in photosynthetic organisms. A main disadvantage to studying autophagy in Chlamydomonas compared to other systems is the lack of specific tools. The availability of autophagy defective mutants from Chlamydomonas would certainly help to understand the function of this degradative process in algae, although the generation of stable and reliable knockout or knockdown mutants by RNAi approaches is still challenging in this organism. The absence of specific markers for some cellular compartments such as the vacuole, the ER or the Golgi is also a limiting step for co-localization studies with autophagy proteins. Efforts are currently focused on the generation of fluorescent tags fused to different ATG proteins in order to label and visualize the formation of autophagosomes in Chlamydomonas cells subjected to stress conditions in vivo. Together, these resources will enable a fast progress on our current understanding of the autophagy process and its regulation in Chlamydomonas that may have an impact on related systems such as higher plants.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (grants BFU2015-68216-P to JLC and BIO2015-74432-JIN to MEPP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. He, C.; Klionsky, D.J. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 67–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nakatogawa, H.; Suzuki, K.; Kamada, Y.; Ohsumi, Y. Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: Lessons from yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tsukada, M.; Ohsumi, Y. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1993, 333, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bassham, D.C.; Laporte, M.; Marty, F.; Moriyasu, Y.; Ohsumi, Y.; Olsen, L.J.; Yoshimoto, K. Autophagy in development and stress responses of plants. Autophagy 2006, 2, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Diaz-Troya, S.; Perez-Perez, M.E.; Florencio, F.J.; Crespo, J.L. The role of TOR in autophagy regulation from yeast to plants and mammals. Autophagy 2008, 4, 851–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shemi, A.; Ben-Dor, S.; Vardi, A. Elucidating the composition and conservation of the autophagy pathway in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Autophagy 2015, 11, 701–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Thompson, A.R.; Vierstra, R.D. Autophagic recycling: Lessons from yeast help define the process in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mizushima, N.; Yoshimori, T.; Ohsumi, Y. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27, 107–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xie, Z.; Klionsky, D.J. Autophagosome formation: Core machinery and adaptations. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Klionsky, D.J.; Abdelmohsen, K.; Abe, A.; Abedin, M.J.; Abeliovich, H.; Acevedo Arozena, A.; Adachi, H.; Adams, C.M.; Adams, P.D.; Adeli, K.; et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy 2016, 12, 1–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Harris, E.H. Chlamydomonas as a Model Organism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52, 363–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Goodenough, U.W. Green yeast. Cell 1992, 70, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Grossman, A.R.; Lohr, M.; Im, C.S. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in the landscape of pigments. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004, 38, 119–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rochaix, J.D. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as the photosynthetic yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995, 29, 209–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sager, R.; Palade, G.E. Structure and development of the chloroplast in Chlamydomonas. I. The normal green cell. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1957, 3, 463–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Merchant, S.S.; Prochnik, S.E.; Vallon, O.; Harris, E.H.; Karpowicz, S.J.; Witman, G.B.; Terry, A.; Salamov, A.; Fritz-Laylin, L.K.; Marechal-Drouard, L.; et al. The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science 2007, 318, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Blaby, I.K.; Blaby-Haas, C.E.; Tourasse, N.; Hom, E.F.; Lopez, D.; Aksoy, M.; Grossman, A.; Umen, J.; Dutcher, S.; Porter, M.; et al. The Chlamydomonas genome project: A decade on. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Merchant, S.S.; Kropat, J.; Liu, B.; Shaw, J.; Warakanont, J. TAG, you’re it! Chlamydomonas as a reference organism for understanding algal triacylglycerol accumulation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Goodson, C.; Roth, R.; Wang, Z.T.; Goodenough, U. Structural correlates of cytoplasmic and chloroplast lipid body synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and stimulation of lipid body production with acetate boost. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 1592–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Perez-Perez, M.E.; Crespo, J.L. Autophagy in the model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Autophagy 2010, 6, 562–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Perez-Perez, M.E.; Florencio, F.J.; Crespo, J.L. Inhibition of target of rapamycin signaling and stress activate autophagy in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1874–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Perez-Perez, M.E.; Couso, I.; Crespo, J.L. Carotenoid deficiency triggers autophagy in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Autophagy 2012, 8, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Crespo, J.L.; Diaz-Troya, S.; Florencio, F.J. Inhibition of target of rapamycin signaling by rapamycin in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1736–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, X.; Tian, D.; Kong, X.; Chen, Q.; E, F.A.; Hu, X.; Jia, A. The role of nitric oxide signalling in response to salt stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Planta 2016, 244, 651–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Davey, M.P.; Horst, I.; Duong, G.H.; Tomsett, E.V.; Litvinenko, A.C.; Howe, C.J.; Smith, A.G. Triacylglyceride Production and Autophagous Responses in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Depend on Resource Allocation and Carbon Source. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goodenough, U.; Blaby, I.; Casero, D.; Gallaher, S.D.; Goodson, C.; Johnson, S.; Lee, J.H.; Merchant, S.S.; Pellegrini, M.; Roth, R.; et al. The path to triacylglyceride obesity in the sta6 strain of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 591–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Perez-Martin, M.; Blaby-Haas, C.E.; Perez-Perez, M.E.; Andres-Garrido, A.; Blaby, I.K.; Merchant, S.S.; Crespo, J.L. Activation of Autophagy by Metals in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot. Cell 2015, 14, 964–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Perez-Martin, M.; Perez-Perez, M.E.; Lemaire, S.D.; Crespo, J.L. Oxidative Stress Contributes to Autophagy Induction in Response to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Perez-Perez, M.E.; Zaffagnini, M.; Marchand, C.H.; Crespo, J.L.; Lemaire, S.D. The yeast autophagy protease Atg4 is regulated by thioredoxin. Autophagy 2014, 10, 1953–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Scherz-Shouval, R.; Shvets, E.; Fass, E.; Shorer, H.; Gil, L.; Elazar, Z. Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 1749–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Xiong, Y.; Contento, A.L.; Nguyen, P.Q.; Bassham, D.C. Degradation of oxidized proteins by autophagy during oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Perez-Perez, M.E.; Lemaire, S.D.; Crespo, J.L. Control of Autophagy in Chlamydomonas Is Mediated through Redox-Dependent Inactivation of the ATG4 Protease. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 2219–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Couso, I.; Perez-Perez, M.E.; Martinez-Force, E.; Kim, H.-S.; He, Y.; Umen, J.G.; Crespo, J.L. Autophagic flux is needed for the synthesis of triacylglycerols and ribosomal protein turnover in Chlamydomonas. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ramundo, S.; Casero, D.; Muhlhaus, T.; Hemme, D.; Sommer, F.; Crevecoeur, M.; Rahire, M.; Schroda, M.; Rusch, J.; Goodenough, U.; et al. Conditional Depletion of the Chlamydomonas Chloroplast ClpP Protease Activates Nuclear Genes Involved in Autophagy and Plastid Protein Quality Control. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2201–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alvarez, C.; Garcia, I.; Moreno, I.; Perez-Perez, M.E.; Crespo, J.L.; Romero, L.C.; Gotor, C. Cysteine-generated sulfide in the cytosol negatively regulates autophagy and modulates the transcriptional profile in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4621–4634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Laureano-Marin, A.M.; Moreno, I.; Romero, L.C.; Gotor, C. Negative Regulation of Autophagy by Sulfide Is Independent of Reactive Oxygen Species. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1378–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Drose, S.; Bindseil, K.U.; Bowman, E.J.; Siebers, A.; Zeeck, A.; Altendorf, K. Inhibitory effect of modified bafilomycins and concanamycins on P- and V-type adenosinetriphosphatases. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 3902–3906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, X.; Zhang, R.; Patena, W.; Gang, S.S.; Blum, S.R.; Ivanova, N.; Yue, R.; Robertson, J.M.; Lefebvre, P.A.; Fitz-Gibbon, S.T.; et al. An Indexed, Mapped Mutant Library Enables Reverse Genetics Studies of Biological Processes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 367–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Merkulova, E.A.; Guiboileau, A.; Naya, L.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Yoshimoto, K. Assessment and optimization of autophagy monitoring methods in Arabidopsis roots indicate direct fusion of autophagosomes with vacuoles. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Takatsuka, C.; Inoue, Y.; Matsuoka, K.; Moriyasu, Y. 3-Methyladenine inhibits autophagy in tobacco culture cells under sucrose starvation conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chung, T.; Suttangkakul, A.; Vierstra, R.D. The ATG autophagic conjugation system in maize: ATG transcripts and abundance of the ATG8-lipid adduct are regulated by development and nutrient availability. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 220–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Doelling, J.H.; Walker, J.M.; Friedman, E.M.; Thompson, A.R.; Vierstra, R.D. The APG8/12-activating enzyme APG7 is required for proper nutrient recycling and senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 33105–33114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Thompson, A.R.; Doelling, J.H.; Suttangkakul, A.; Vierstra, R.D. Autophagic nutrient recycling in Arabidopsis directed by the ATG8 and ATG12 conjugation pathways. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2097–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yoshimoto, K.; Hanaoka, H.; Sato, S.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Noda, T.; Ohsumi, Y. Processing of ATG8s, ubiquitin-like proteins, and their deconjugation by ATG4s are essential for plant autophagy. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2967–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schmollinger, S.; Muhlhaus, T.; Boyle, N.R.; Blaby, I.K.; Casero, D.; Mettler, T.; Moseley, J.L.; Kropat, J.; Sommer, F.; Strenkert, D.; et al. Nitrogen-Sparing Mechanisms in Chlamydomonas Affect the Transcriptome, the Proteome, and Photosynthetic Metabolism. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1410–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Svenning, S.; Lamark, T.; Krause, K.; Johansen, T. Plant NBR1 is a selective autophagy substrate and a functional hybrid of the mammalian autophagic adapters NBR1 and p62/SQSTM1. Autophagy 2011, 7, 993–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zientara-Rytter, K.; Lukomska, J.; Moniuszko, G.; Gwozdecki, R.; Surowiecki, P.; Lewandowska, M.; Liszewska, F.; Wawrzynska, A.; Sirko, A. Identification and functional analysis of Joka2, a tobacco member of the family of selective autophagy cargo receptors. Autophagy 2011, 7, 1145–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Perez-Perez, M.E.; Lemaire, S.D.; Crespo, J.L. Reactive oxygen species and autophagy in plants and algae. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 06 00036 g001 550
Figure 1. The autophagy machinery from Chlamydomonas. Most of the ATG proteins that compose the core autophagy machinery and participate in the formation of the autophagosome are conserved in Chlamydomonas. The ATG1 initiation complex, composed by ATG1 and ATG13, catalyzes the initial steps of autophagy. Then, the PI3K nucleation complex—constituted by ATG6, ATG14, VPS15 and VPS 34—participates in the membrane nucleation process and in the recruitment of PI3P binding complex formed by ATG2, ATG9, and ATG18, which is involved in the expansion of the phagophore. Next, the two conjugation systems, ATG8 ubiquitin-like system, composed by ATG8, ATG4, ATG7 and ATG3, and ATG12 ubiquitin-like system—composed by ATG12, ATG7, ATG10, ATG5, and ATG16—act coordinately to accomplish vesicle expansion, autophagosome formation, cargo recognition and autophagosome targeting to the vacuole. The ATG4 protease from Chlamydomonas is activated by the thioredoxin (Trx) system and reversibly inhibited by ROS or irreversibly inactivated by blocking agents such as iodoacetamide (IAM). Cytosolic components including ribosomal proteins such as RPS6 and RPL37 are engulfed by the autophagosome and targeted to the vacuole where they are finally degraded and recycled. Inhibition of vacuolar H+ ATPase with concanamycin A (Conc A) blocks autophagic flux. Accession numbers (from Phytozome https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html) of Chlamydomonas ATG proteins are: ATG1 (Cre09.g391245.t1.1); ATG13 (Cre16.g659000.t1.1); ATG6 (Cre05.g242856.t1.1); VPS15 (Cre06.g290500.t1.1); VPS 34 (Cre01.g035500.t1.2); ATG2 (Cre01.g045600.t1.1); ATG9 (Cre09.g391500.t1.1); ATG18 (Cre10.g457550.t1.2); ATG8 (Cre16.g689650.t1.2); ATG4 (Cre12.g510100.t1.1), ATG7 (Cre03.g165215.t1.1) and ATG3 (Cre02.g102350.t1.2), ATG12 (Cre12.g557000.t1.2), ATG10 (Cre12.g532300), ATG5 (Cre14.g630907.t1.1) and ATG16 (Cre05.g242856.t1.1).
Figure 1. The autophagy machinery from Chlamydomonas. Most of the ATG proteins that compose the core autophagy machinery and participate in the formation of the autophagosome are conserved in Chlamydomonas. The ATG1 initiation complex, composed by ATG1 and ATG13, catalyzes the initial steps of autophagy. Then, the PI3K nucleation complex—constituted by ATG6, ATG14, VPS15 and VPS 34—participates in the membrane nucleation process and in the recruitment of PI3P binding complex formed by ATG2, ATG9, and ATG18, which is involved in the expansion of the phagophore. Next, the two conjugation systems, ATG8 ubiquitin-like system, composed by ATG8, ATG4, ATG7 and ATG3, and ATG12 ubiquitin-like system—composed by ATG12, ATG7, ATG10, ATG5, and ATG16—act coordinately to accomplish vesicle expansion, autophagosome formation, cargo recognition and autophagosome targeting to the vacuole. The ATG4 protease from Chlamydomonas is activated by the thioredoxin (Trx) system and reversibly inhibited by ROS or irreversibly inactivated by blocking agents such as iodoacetamide (IAM). Cytosolic components including ribosomal proteins such as RPS6 and RPL37 are engulfed by the autophagosome and targeted to the vacuole where they are finally degraded and recycled. Inhibition of vacuolar H+ ATPase with concanamycin A (Conc A) blocks autophagic flux. Accession numbers (from Phytozome https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html) of Chlamydomonas ATG proteins are: ATG1 (Cre09.g391245.t1.1); ATG13 (Cre16.g659000.t1.1); ATG6 (Cre05.g242856.t1.1); VPS15 (Cre06.g290500.t1.1); VPS 34 (Cre01.g035500.t1.2); ATG2 (Cre01.g045600.t1.1); ATG9 (Cre09.g391500.t1.1); ATG18 (Cre10.g457550.t1.2); ATG8 (Cre16.g689650.t1.2); ATG4 (Cre12.g510100.t1.1), ATG7 (Cre03.g165215.t1.1) and ATG3 (Cre02.g102350.t1.2), ATG12 (Cre12.g557000.t1.2), ATG10 (Cre12.g532300), ATG5 (Cre14.g630907.t1.1) and ATG16 (Cre05.g242856.t1.1).
Cells 06 00036 g001
Cells 06 00036 g002 550
Figure 2. Microscopy images of Chlamydomonas cells. (A) Nomarski image of a Chlamydomonas cells. (B) Detection of lipid bodies by Nile red staining in Chlamydomonas cells under nitrogen limitation. (C) Ultrastructure of a Chlamydomonas cell. n, nucleus; p, pyrenoid; s, starch; v, vacuole. Scale bars: A and B, 5 µm; C, 500 nm.
Figure 2. Microscopy images of Chlamydomonas cells. (A) Nomarski image of a Chlamydomonas cells. (B) Detection of lipid bodies by Nile red staining in Chlamydomonas cells under nitrogen limitation. (C) Ultrastructure of a Chlamydomonas cell. n, nucleus; p, pyrenoid; s, starch; v, vacuole. Scale bars: A and B, 5 µm; C, 500 nm.
Cells 06 00036 g002
Cells 06 00036 g003 550
Figure 3. Methods for monitoring autophagy in Chlamydomonas. (A) ATG8 lipidation. Western blot analysis of ATG8 in cells growing exponentially in the absence (−) or presence (+) of rapamycin (rap) (adapted from [21]). (B) Inhibition of Autophagic flux by concanamycin A. Western blot analysis of ATG8 in cells treated (+) or not (−) with concanamycin A (ConcA) (upper panel). Monitoring autophagic flux by ribosomal protein degradation. Western blot analysis of RPS6 and RPL37 proteins from Chlamydomonas cells growing in rich medium (TAP: Tris acetate phosphate medium) or nitrogen-depleted medium (TAP-N) in the absence (−) or presence (+) of ConcA (lower panel) (adapted from [33]). (C) ATG8 localization. Immunolocalization of ATG8 in Chlamydomonas cells growing in exponential phase treated with norflurazon (NF). Untreated cells were used as control (adapted from [22]). (D) ATG4 proteolytic assay in cell-free extracts. Recombinant His6-tagged ATG8 protein (His6-ATG8WT) was incubated with Chlamydomonas cell-free soluble extracts (SE) and recombinant and endogenous ATG8 proteins were detected by Western blot. A glycine-to-alanine His6-tagged ATG8 mutant protein (His6-ATG8G120A) that cannot be processed by ATG4 was used as negative control. Unprocessed (His6-ATG8) and processed (pHis6-ATG8) forms of recombinant His6-ATG8 as well as endogenous ATG8 (pATG8) proteins are indicated (adapted from [21]). (E) ATG8 mRNA levels. Expression analysis of ATG8 gene by quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) in cells treated with increasing concentrations of nickel (Ni2+). Western blot analysis of ATG8 in the same conditions (adapted from [27]).
Figure 3. Methods for monitoring autophagy in Chlamydomonas. (A) ATG8 lipidation. Western blot analysis of ATG8 in cells growing exponentially in the absence (−) or presence (+) of rapamycin (rap) (adapted from [21]). (B) Inhibition of Autophagic flux by concanamycin A. Western blot analysis of ATG8 in cells treated (+) or not (−) with concanamycin A (ConcA) (upper panel). Monitoring autophagic flux by ribosomal protein degradation. Western blot analysis of RPS6 and RPL37 proteins from Chlamydomonas cells growing in rich medium (TAP: Tris acetate phosphate medium) or nitrogen-depleted medium (TAP-N) in the absence (−) or presence (+) of ConcA (lower panel) (adapted from [33]). (C) ATG8 localization. Immunolocalization of ATG8 in Chlamydomonas cells growing in exponential phase treated with norflurazon (NF). Untreated cells were used as control (adapted from [22]). (D) ATG4 proteolytic assay in cell-free extracts. Recombinant His6-tagged ATG8 protein (His6-ATG8WT) was incubated with Chlamydomonas cell-free soluble extracts (SE) and recombinant and endogenous ATG8 proteins were detected by Western blot. A glycine-to-alanine His6-tagged ATG8 mutant protein (His6-ATG8G120A) that cannot be processed by ATG4 was used as negative control. Unprocessed (His6-ATG8) and processed (pHis6-ATG8) forms of recombinant His6-ATG8 as well as endogenous ATG8 (pATG8) proteins are indicated (adapted from [21]). (E) ATG8 mRNA levels. Expression analysis of ATG8 gene by quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) in cells treated with increasing concentrations of nickel (Ni2+). Western blot analysis of ATG8 in the same conditions (adapted from [27]).
Cells 06 00036 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Pérez, M.E.; Couso, I.; Heredia-Martínez, L.G.; Crespo, J.L. Monitoring Autophagy in the Model Green Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Cells 2017, 6, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6040036

AMA Style

Pérez-Pérez ME, Couso I, Heredia-Martínez LG, Crespo JL. Monitoring Autophagy in the Model Green Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Cells. 2017; 6(4):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6040036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Pérez, María Esther, Inmaculada Couso, Luis G. Heredia-Martínez, and José L. Crespo. 2017. "Monitoring Autophagy in the Model Green Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii" Cells 6, no. 4: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6040036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop