Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Histones Activate Plasma Membrane Toll-Like Receptor 9 to Trigger Calcium Oscillations in Rat Pancreatic Acinar Tumor Cell AR4-2J
Next Article in Special Issue
The Autophagy-Lysosomal Pathways and Their Emerging Roles in Modulating Proteostasis in Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Can We Design a Nogo Receptor-Dependent Cellular Therapy to Target MS?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Autophagy in Proteostasis: Friend and Foe in Cardiac Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 8
Issue 1
10.3390/cells8010002
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of ATG16 in Autophagy and The Ubiquitin Proteasome System

by
Qiuhong Xiong
1,
Wenjing Li
1,
Ping Li
1,
Min Yang
1,
Changxin Wu
1,* and
Ludwig Eichinger
2,*
1
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, No.92 Wucheng Road, Taiyuan 030006, China
2
Center for Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2019, 8(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8010002
Submission received: 9 November 2018 / Revised: 17 December 2018 / Accepted: 18 December 2018 / Published: 20 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proteostasis and Autophagy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Autophagy and the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) are the two major cellular degradation pathways, which are critical for the maintenance of cell homeostasis. The two pathways differ in their mechanisms and clients. The evolutionary conserved ATG16 plays a key role in autophagy and appears to link autophagy with the UPS. Here, we review the role of ATG16 in different species. We summarize the current knowledge of its functions in autophagosome membrane expansion and autophagosome formation, in Crohn’s disease, and in bacterial sequestration. In addition, we provide information on its autophagy-independent functions and its role in the crosstalk between autophagy and the UPS.

1. Introduction

Cell homeostasis is maintained by a precisely regulated balance between synthesis and degradation of cellular components. Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy for simplicity), chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), and the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) are the major routes for protein and organelle clearance in eukaryotic cells. In CMA, an important pathway in cell proteostasis, cytosolic proteins bearing a pentapeptide motif are directly delivered to the lysosome for degradation [1]. The UPS is responsible for the degradation of many regulated, short-lived, abnormal, denatured, or, in general, damaged proteins [2]. However, the proteasome does not have the ability to degrade aggregated proteins. It has been found that protein aggregates are cleared by autophagy and this process is called aggrephagy. Furthermore, cellular organelles, invading microorganisms as well as most of the long-lived proteins are degraded via autophagy [3].
In the 1990s, genetic studies in yeast identified a series of autophagy-related (ATG) genes. Now the number of ATG genes has increased to more than 37 [4]. Among them, 15 ATG genes have been referred to as “core” ATG genes, as they are required for autophagosome formation [5]. They can be subdivided in four subgroups [5,6]: (1) the ATG1/ULK1 complex, composed of ATG1/ULK1, ATG13, ATG101 and FIP200 (focal adhesion kinase family interacting protein of 200 kDa). FIP200 increases the ATG1/ULK1 kinase activity and stability [7]; (2) the class III PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase) complex composed of Vps34, Vps15, ATG6/Beclin1 and ATG14. Both complexes regulate the initiation phase of autophagy; (3) the two Ubl (ubiquitin-like) protein conjugation systems which consist of ATG12, ATG5, ATG16, ATG8/LC3, ATG7, ATG10, ATG3, and ATG4 and are important for autophagosome formation and membrane elongation; and (4) two transmembrane proteins, ATG9 (and associated proteins ATG2 and ATG18) and VMP1 which are important for autophagosome formation and maturation [8]. ATG16 is one of the core autophagy proteins, it associates non-covalently with the ATG12~5 conjugate and forms a hetero-tetrameric complex [9,10]. In this complex, the ATG12~5 conjugate holds the E3-ligase activity to promote the covalent linkage of ATG8/LC3 to the lipid phosphatidyl-ethanolamine (PE). For this activity ATG16 is not strictly required [11]. ATG16 is present in all eukaryotic species and its function is well-studied. ATG16 is required for the correct localization of the ATG12~5 conjugate to the pre-autophagosomal structure [12] in yeast and to the isolation membrane in higher eukaryotes [13,14]. In ATG16L1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEFs), the ATG12~5 conjugate could not be recruited to the isolation membrane, which resulted in a loss of ATG8/LC3 lipidation [15]. It is thought that the ATG16 complex may deliver ATG8/LC3 to the forming autophagosome and subsequently ATG8/LC3 functions in the closing of the autophagosome [16]. In this review, we will describe ATG16 in different models and focus on the functions of ATG16 and its role in connecting autophagy and the UPS.

2. ATG16 is Ubiquitous in Eukaryotes and Highly Conserved

All eukaryotic species that were analyzed harbor a gene for ATG16 and the encoded protein shows high structural and sequence similarity across species (Figure 1). Most lower eukaryotes only have a single gene for ATG16 while most higher eukaryotes encode two ATG16 paralogs. The two paralogs seem to have independent functions, although they share similar structures and even form a complex with the ATG12~5 conjugate [17].

2.1. ATG16 in Yeast

ATG16 (Apg16p) was first identified in yeast in 1999 by the group of Ohsumi [10]. Yeast ATG16 is a 150 amino acid protein that contains an N-terminal AFIM (ATG5-interacting motif) and a C-terminal CCD (coiled-coil domain) but lacks the tryptophan-aspartic acid (WD40) repeat domain that constitutes the C-terminal domain in ATG16 proteins of most species. It association via the AFIM with ATG5 and its CCD, which mediates the formation of the ATG12~5/16 heterotetrameric complex, is important for autophagy in yeast [9,10,20].

2.2. ATG16 in Mouse and Human

Mouse and human ATG16L1 and L2 are highly conserved and share 94 and 83% sequence identity, respectively. Mouse ATG16 was identified in 2003 by the same group as yeast ATG16 [21]. Mouse and human ATG16 shows homology to yeast ATG16 in its N-terminal region, but harbor in addition a large C-terminal domain with seven WD40 repeats, which is missing in the yeast protein. Therefore, they named the protein ATG16L (ATG16-like protein) or ATG16L1. Because the function of ATG16L1 is similar to yeast ATG16, it was concluded that mouse ATG16L1 and yeast ATG16 are orthologs [21]. In 2011, Ishibashi et al. identified a new isoform of ATG16L in mouse and named it ATG16L2. Similar to ATG16L1, ATG16L2 can interact with ATG5 through the AFIM and also self-oligomerizes via the CCD, but it is unable to mediate canonical autophagy [17].
Human ATG16L1 was identified by large-scale sequencing analysis of a human fetal brain cDNA library [22]. Database searching revealed that there exist at least four splice variants [22] and Jiang et al. suggested the presence of seven splice variants of ATG16L1 in H. sapiens [23]. Functional analysis of three isoforms revealed different autophagic properties because of the absence of some regions of ATG16L1 which impaired their localization on autophagosomes [23]. For ATG16L2 it was shown that mRNA and protein levels decreased in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. The authors suggested that ATG16L2 may play an important role in autophagy of T cells and may serve as a potential biomarker for the prediction of relapse rates of MS patients [24].

2.3. ATG16 in C. Elegans

C. elegans ATG16 was identified by genetic screens in 2010 [25]. C. elegans has two ATG16 paralogs, ATG16.1 and ATG16.2 and both proteins have the same domain structure including the seven WD40 repeats at the C-terminus as human ATG16 (Figure 1A). Depletion of either atg16.1 or atg16.2 caused defects in autophagy, growth, and development. Interestingly, the phenotype was much more severe in the double mutants, suggesting that ATG16.1 and ATG16.2 have partially overlapping functions [18]. Furthermore, protein sequence alignment showed that four of the five critical amino acids of the AFIM of ATG16.2 were conserved, while only two of them were conserved in ATG16.1 (Figure 1B). Functional analysis, however, showed that the N-terminus of ATG16.1 still interacted with ATG5 [18]. In contrast to mammalian and yeast ATG16, neither ATG16.1 nor ATG16.2 appear to be required for LGG-1/ATG8 (LC3 in mammals) lipidation, but ATG16.2 is required for lipidated LGG-1/ATG8 to form punctate structures [18].

2.4. ATG16 in D. Discoideum

Dictyostelium ATG16 was identified in a screen for developmental mutants and the gene was originally named tipD because the encoded protein was required for tip formation during multicellular development [26]. The tipD gene encodes an ATG16 ortholog and later it turned out that the developmental phenotype observed in the tipD− mutant is typical for many D. discoideum autophagy mutants and similar developmental phenotypes were described for knockout mutants of different autophagy genes, such as e.g., atg5, atg7 and atg9 [8,27,28,29] Furthermore, we found that ATG16 knockout cells display a pleiotropic phenotype [30,31]. In contrast to yeast ATG16, D. discoideum ATG16 contains, as is the case for the orthologs of higher eukaryotes, seven WD40 repeats in the C-terminal half of the protein (Figure 1A).

3. Functions of ATG16

ATG16 is composed of three distinct regions—the N-terminal portion containing the AFIM, followed by the CCD and seven WD40 repeats in the C-terminal half. Each domain has its distinct binding partners which mediate specific functions. In particular, the WD40 domain, which folds into a β-propeller structure is known as a hub for protein-protein interactions [12,32,33]. Consequently, many proteins that interact with ATG16 have been identified so far in different screens (Table 1). These interactions appear to be crucial for autophagy-dependent or -independent functions of ATG16 and will be dealt with below.

3.1. ATG16 in Autophagosome Formation

Formation of the ATG12~5/16 complex is promoted by phosphorylation on Ser139 [57] and inhibited by methylation on Lys151 in cardiomyoctyes [58]. Binding of the complex to the phagophore or omegasome appears to be mediated by different binding partners. The class III PI3K VPS34 is essential for autophagosome formation and it was shown that the yeast ATG16 complex binds to PI3P-containing liposomes [59]. Thus, the local production of PI3P on autophagosome precursors may contribute to the localization of the ATG16 complex on the phagophore assembly site (PAS) or isolation membrane [60]. However, the mechanism how the ATG16 complex is recruited to the PAS or isolation membrane is still not completely solved, because neither ATG5 nor ATG12 nor ATG16 show any typical membrane-binding motifs [61]. Recently, two independent studies identified FIP200 as a direct binding partner of ATG16L1 [34,35]. The FIP200-binding domain (FBD) of mammalian ATG16L1 has been mapped to the region between its CCD and WD40 repeat domain. It is thought that FIP200 is responsible for the specific recruitment of ATG16L1 complex to the isolation membrane [34]. In another study, WIPI2b, the mammalian homolog of S. cerevisiae ATG18, was also shown to bind to ATG16L1. Interestingly, in ATG16L1-deficient MEFs, the expression of an ATG16L1 mutant that was able to bind FIP200, but defective for binding WIPI2b, LC3 lipidation was not rescued. This suggests that WIPI2b rather than FIP200 binding to ATG16L1 is responsible for its recruitment to the isolation membrane and its function in autophagy [36]. In addition, the transmembrane protein 166 (TMEM166/EVA1A) was also shown to promote the recruitment of ATG12~5/16L1 complex to the autophagosome membrane and enhance the formation of the autophagosome (Figure 2) [37].
Rab33B is a Rab-type small GTPase which is ubiquitously expressed, localizes to the cis-Golgi and functions in intra-Golgi trafficking and retrograde Golgi-ER trafficking [62,63]. Itoh et al. showed that Rab33B can interact with the CCD of ATG16L1 in a GTP-dependent manner [38]. A GTPase-deficient mutant of Rab33B enhanced LC3 lipidation, even under nutrient-rich conditions. In addition, expression of the Rab33B-binding domain of ATG16L1 or silencing of Rab33B decreased ATG12- and ATG8/LC3-positive puncta, which suggested the inhibition of autophagosome formation [38,39]. It is, therefore, likely that ATG16L1 functions as a specific effector molecule for Rab33B in autophagosome formation (Figure 2) [40].
Clathrin is a major component of coated vesicles that mediate sorting and selective transport of membrane-bound proteins for several pathways of intracellular membrane traffic. Clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) are responsible for receptor-mediated endocytosis (RME) at the plasma membrane and sorting of proteins at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) during the biogenesis of lysosomes and secretory granules [64]. Ravikumar et al. showed that the heavy chain of clathrin interacts with the N-terminal region of ATG16L1 and is involved in the formation of ATG16L1-positive early autophagosome precursors [42]. Knock down of the clathrin heavy chain resulted in an inhibition of both autophagosome formation and maturation [41,42,43]. Furthermore, annexin A2 was also demonstrated to promote phagophore assembly by enhancing ATG16L1-positive vesicle formation and homotypic fusion [44,65,66]. In contrast, connexin 43 (Cx43), a main component of plasma membrane gap junctions, inhibited autophagosome formation through interaction with the WD40 repeat domain of ATG16L1 (Figure 2) [45,46].

3.2. ATG16 in Crohn’s Disease

Crohn’s disease [67] is a type of inflammatory bowel disease that causes diarrhea, malabsorption, fistulation, and intestinal obstruction [68]. The pathophysiology of CD is poorly understood. Recently, a coding polymorphism in the atg16L1 gene that codes for a threonine to alanine switch (T300A) was identified as a risk factor for the development of CD in Caucasian people [69,70]. In contrast, a genome-wide association study of Crohn’s disease in the Korean population identified an association with atg16L2 [71,72].
Paneth cells are specialized intestinal epithelial cells that secrete granules containing antimicrobial peptides such as α-defensins, secretory PLA2, and lysozyme [73]. In Drosophila, ATG16 is essential for the differentiation of intestinal stem cells into entero-endocrine (EE) cells. Expression of ATG16 lacking the WD40 repeat domain resulted in morphological changes in the intestine that resembled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [74]. Furthermore, ATG16L1 hypomorphic mice that expressed the ATG16L1T300A mutation showed defects in the granule exocytosis pathway of the Paneth cell and revealed abnormal Paneth cell morphology [75]. It was also demonstrated that the expression level of the ATG16L1T300A variant decreased and that it had an increased sensitivity to caspase-3 mediated cleavage [76,77]. Interestingly, the most common Crohn’s-associated NOD2 variant was defective in recruitment of ATG16L1 to the bacterial entry site and in bacterial autophagy [50,51]. The lower levels of ATG16L1 may lead to lower ATG16L1-NOD2 complex formation. This could shift the balance of NOD2 functional effects towards increased receptor-interacting protein 2 (RIP2) kinase activation, which would subsequently cause an up-regulation of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-18 mRNA expression [15,77,78]. ATG16L1 may therefore modulate the balance between NOD2-induced xenophagy versus cytokine production. This may explain the effects of this polymorphism on the inflammatory process in CD [78].

3.3. ATG16 in Bacterial Sequestration

ATG16 comprises seven C-terminal WD40 repeats that are dispensable for canonical autophagy [79,80] but are important in xenophagy. One recent study showed that the human transmembrane protein TMEM59 which localizes to the endosomal compartment can directly bind the WD40 repeat domain of ATG16L1 via a minimal 19 amino acids subdomain in its cytoplasmic domain [47,48]. The same motif has also been found in the cytoplasmic region of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), which promotes ATG8/LC3 labeling of conventional phagosomes [81], in the N-terminal caspase recruitment domain of NOD2 and in two additional proteins, (T3JAM and DEDD2), not previously linked to autophagy [47]. Surprisingly, NOD1 lacks the motif but can also bind directly to the WD40 repeats of ATG16L1 [49]. NOD1 and NOD2 are involved in bacterial sensing through recognition of peptidoglycan and provide a link to autophagy by recruiting ATG16L1 to the entry site of Shigella flexneri at the plasma membrane [50]. Along this line ATG16L1 is required for the defense of intestinal epithelial cells against Salmonella typhimurium [82]. During infection with S. typhimurium, endosomal proteins, which are exposed through damage of the endosomal membrane by bacteria residing in the endosome, are ubiquitinated and autophagy is triggered. In this process, ATG16L1 is recruited to the Salmonella-containing endosomes by a direct interaction between the WD40 repeat domain and ubiquitin [52]. The T300A mutation had no effect on ATG16L1 binding to ATG5 or on basal autophagy. However, the T300A variant showed impaired xenophagy against S. typhimurium [83] and enhanced replication of adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) (Figure 3) [84]. ATG16L1 is also required for LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) as murine bone marrow-derived macrophages deficient in ATG16L1 failed to undergo both, canonical autophagy or LAP [85,86].
Autophagy is generally considered to be antipathogenic. However, there are also reports that autophagy is exploited by the pathogens. One recent study demonstrated that the ATG16L1T300A variant conferred protection from cellular invasion by S. typhimuriunm in HCT116 cells [87]. Wang et al. also demonstrated that Atg16L1 deficiency resulted in protection of these mice against both acute and latent uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) infection [75,88,89]. Furthermore, for HeLa cells and MEFs infected with Staphylococcus aureus autophagy was important for the survival and replication of the pathogen [90]. In HeLa cells infected with S. aureus, TMEM59 promoted ATG8/LC3 conjugation to the single-membrane bacterial phagosome by directly engaging ATG16L1. TMEM59 depletion blocked ATG8/LC3 lipidation and resulted in reduced bacterial recovery from infected cells [47]. Thus, the role of ATG16L1 in microbial infection apparently depends on the type of invading microbe and the cell type [87].

3.4. ATG16 and the UPS

WD40 repeats are present in a wide range of proteins involved in distinct biological activities [32,33]. A large subfamily of WD40 repeats has been identified as distinct ubiquitin-binding domains that interact with ubiquitin in a similar fashion [12]. The WD40 repeat domain of ATG16 can bind to ubiquitin in vitro and in vivo [49,52]. ATG16 is also involved in Cullin-3-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of p62/SQSTM1 by the proteasome. p62/SQSTM1 acts as a selective autophagy adaptor for autophagic degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates. It also interacts with the proteasome and thus shuttles proteins for proteasomal degradation [91]. Here, ATG16 determined the neddylation of Cullin-3, which is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for p62/SQSTM1. In the absence of ATG16, endogenous Cullin-3 was not neddylated, which resulted in accumulation of p62/SQSTM1 (Figure 4) [92]. Furthermore, ATG16 itself is possibly a client of the UPS. The ATG16L1 protein level increased in Atg5 knockout MEFs after treatment with proteasome inhibitors [80]. In addition, ATG16 is also crucial for optimal UPS function, since the Dictyostelium atg16 knockout mutant displayed strongly reduced proteasomal activity [30].

3.5. Autophagy-Independent Roles of ATG16

The WD40 repeat domain is dispensable for canonical autophagy but is required for other processes [93]. Its deletion inhibited MHC class II antigen presentation in mouse dendritic cells during influenza A virus infection [79]. Recent studies further demonstrated that the interaction of ATG16L1 and the microtubule-organizing center-associated protein pericentriolar material 1 (PCM1) is required for B-cell receptor (BCR) polarization which is crucial for antigen presentation in the human B-cell line BJAB [53]. In addition, the coiled-coil domain of ATG16L1 also functions in hormone secretion in PC12 cells by binding to Rab33A. This interaction is required for the hormone-containing dense-core vesicle localization of ATG16L1, which is independent of its autophagic activity [54]. The Drosophila neuropeptide Corazonin is thought to be the homolog of mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone, the production of which may promote the sedation response during ethanol exposure. ATG16 expression in Corazonin-producing neurosecretory cells promoted ethanol sedation. In contrast, Drosophila deficient for ATG16 showed not only a defect in autophagy but also decreased expression of Corazonin and an increased resistance to the sedative effects of ethanol. This effect was not seen in flies deficient for ATG7 or ATG3, suggesting that ATG16 has an autophagy-independent function in the alcohol-induced sedation response in Drosophila [94]. Very recently, a study showed that ATG16 is required in MEFs for autophagy-independent plasma membrane repair [67] (Figure 5).

4. Crosstalk between Autophagy and the UPS

Autophagy and the UPS were thought to act independently for a long time, but evidence is accumulating that these two major intracellular pathways for protein and organelle clearance in eukaryotic cells are interrelated. It is well established that there is compensatory up-regulation of autophagy upon inhibition of proteasomal activity [95,96,97,98]. However, the effect of autophagy inhibition on the UPS is less clear. Wang et al. reported an up-regulation of proteasomal subunits and an increase in proteasomal activity in response to pharmacological inhibition of autophagy as well as downregulation of autophagy genes by RNAi in colon cancer cells [99]. In contrast, autophagy inhibition in HeLa cells resulted in impaired clearance of UPS clients although proteasomal activity was unchanged [100]. The authors suggest that autophagy inhibition leads to p62/SQSTM1 accumulation, which, in turn, impairs flux through the UPS. Of note, reduced proteasomal activity and an accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins have also been observed in case of autophagy inhibition in neuroblastoma cells and in autophagy-deficient D. discoideum cells [30,101,102]. Furthermore, proteasomal activity was also significantly reduced in mice deficient for the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D [103].
Ubiquitination has been deciphered as the hallmark for proteins to be degraded by the 26S proteasome. Several recent studies have shown that ubiquitin also plays an essential role in selective autophagy by acting as a sorting tag for incorporation of autophagy substrates [104]. Thus, both systems, selective autophagy and the UPS, use ubiquitin as an important substrate recognition signal, and different ubiquitin codes appear to distinguish between selective autophagy and the UPS [105]. Lys48 (K48) polyubiquitin chains are the most common signal for proteasomal degradation, while monoubiquitination and/or oligomeric Lys63 (K63)-linked ubiquitin chains mark substrate proteins for degradation via autophagy [105,106]. However, the code is not unambiguous: the autophagic machinery can also target ubiquitin linkages besides K63- and linear-ubiquitin chains [52] and the K63-polyubiquitinated tau can be delivered by p62/SQSTM1 to the proteasome for degradation [107]. In addition, several proteins, as e.g., α-synuclein and other aggregate-prone proteins, are known to be substrates of both degradative pathways [108,109].
It was shown that ULK1/ATG1 and ATG8/LC3 can be degraded by the proteasome in an ubiquitin-dependent and -independent way [110,111]. Vice versa, proteasomal subunits were found to be degraded by lysosomes [112]. In contrast to proteasomal degradation, selective autophagy needs cargo adaptors, such as p62/SQSTM1, NBR1, ALFY, HDAC6, Parkin and NDP52, to mediate the interaction between ubiquitin and the autophagic machinery [3,113]. Recently, Marshall et al. demonstrated in Arabidopsis thaliana that inactive 26S proteasomes were ubiquitinated and then degraded via autophagy, a process the authors termed proteaphagy. In A. thaliana it is mediated by the proteasomal subunit RPN10/PSMD4 and ATG8/LC3. However, the interaction of RPN10/PSMD4 and ATG8/LC3 was not found in yeast and mammals, suggesting that in these organisms other adaptors or receptors mediate proteaphagy [114]. Recent studies showed that in HeLa cells proteaphagy was mediated by p62/SQSTM1 [115] and in yeast by the ubiquitin receptor Cue5 and sorting nexin 4 (Snx4) [116]. Furthermore, Waite et al. reported that degradation of the yeast proteasomal core (20S) and regulatory particle (19S) subunits were different upon nitrogen starvation. It appears that the 20S core particles are degraded by autophagy in an Ubp3-dependent and the 19S regulatory particles in an Ubp3-independent way, respectively [117].

5. ATG16 Mediates the Crosstalk between Autophagy and UPS in Dictyostelium

ATG16 contains three distinct domains, and each of them can bind to different partners and has specific functions. As a common protein interaction domain, the WD40 repeat domain binds to ubiquitin and several other proteins independent of ubiquitin. This likely extends the functions of ATG16 to also serve as an adaptor as p62/SQSTM1 does. It is also feasible that ATG16 directly recognizes autophagy substrates as a receptor to mediate degradation by autophagy. Kimura et al. showed that tripartite motif 20 (TRIM20) mediates the autophagic degradation of inflammasome components by interacting with the WD40 repeat domain of ATG16L1 (Figure 4) [55]. Recent studies in D. discoideum showed that the N-terminal half of ATG16 interacted with the 19S proteasomal subunit PSMD1 and the C-terminal half containing the WD40 repeat domain interacted with PSMD1 and PSMD2. Further analysis showed that RFP-PSMD1 and RFP-PSMD2 colocalized with the autophagosome marker GFP-ATG8/LC3 and with ATG16-GFP. In addition, RFP-PSMD1 and RFP-PSMD2 were delivered to lysosomes for degradation. These results indicated that ATG16 mediates the autophagic degradation of PSMD1 and PSMD2 in D. discoideum (Figure 4) [56]. Further work will unravel whether the 19S regulatory particle or the 26S proteasome are degraded via autophagy and whether ATG16 indeed acts as an adaptor or receptor for proteaphagy.

6. Final Remarks

Autophagy and UPS are crucial for protein and cell homeostasis. As a core autophagy protein, ATG16 plays a pivotal role in canonical autophagy processes, such as autophagosome formation. ATG16 is composed of three distinct domains—the N-terminal region which includes the AFIM, the CCD which mediates dimerization and the C-terminal WD40 repeat domain which is crucial for many protein-protein interactions. The N-terminal region and the CCD of ATG16 are indispensable for canonical autophagy. The C-terminal WD40 repeat domain seems to have additional functions, such as in bacterial sequestration and Crohn’s disease. Furthermore, ATG16 also has functions besides its role in canonical autophagy. It plays a role in macropinocytosis, in the uptake of the human pathogen Legionella pneumophila and in phagocytosis [30]. ATG16 also links autophagy and the UPS, as proteasomal activity is strongly decreased in ATG16 deficient cells and as it mediates the autophagic degradation of the proteasomal subunits PSMD1 and PSMD2 in D. discoideum [30,56]. It is expected that in the years to come more and more of the fascinating roles and interactions of ATG16 in canonical and non-canonical autophagy and in autophagy-independent processes will be unraveled.

Author Contributions

Q.X. reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript; W.L., P.L. and M.Y. reviewed the literature and prepared the table and figures; L.E. and C.W. reviewed the literature and finalized the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant number 31801972. L.E. acknowledges support by the German Research Foundation (CRC670, TP01) and by Köln Fortune.

Acknowledgments

Qiuhong Xiong acknowledge support of this work by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant number 31801972 and China Scholarship Council.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Catarino, S.; Pereira, P.; Girao, H. Molecular control of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Essays. Biochem. 2017, 61, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Collins, G.A.; Goldberg, A.L. The logic of the 26s proteasome. Cell 2017, 169, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schreiber, A.; Peter, M. Substrate recognition in selective autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 163–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ohsumi, Y. Historical landmarks of autophagy research. Cell. Res. 2014, 24, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xie, Z.; Klionsky, D.J. Autophagosome formation: Core machinery and adaptations. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2007, 9, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Z.; Klionsky, D.J. Mammalian autophagy: Core molecular machinery and signaling regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2010, 22, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zachari, M.; Ganley, I.G. The mammalian ulk1 complex and autophagy initiation. Essays. Biochem. 2017, 61, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mesquita, A.; Cardenal-Munoz, E.; Dominguez, E.; Munoz-Braceras, S.; Nunez-Corcuera, B.; Phillips, B.A.; Tabara, L.C.; Xiong, Q.; Coria, R.; Eichinger, L.; et al. Autophagy in dictyostelium: Mechanisms, regulation and disease in a simple biomedical model. Autophagy 2017, 13, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kuma, A.; Mizushima, N.; Ishihara, N.; Ohsumi, Y. Formation of the approximately 350-kda apg12-apg5.Apg16 multimeric complex, mediated by apg16 oligomerization, is essential for autophagy in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 18619–18625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mizushima, N.; Noda, T.; Ohsumi, Y. Apg16p is required for the function of the apg12p-apg5p conjugate in the yeast autophagy pathway. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 3888–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hanada, T.; Noda, N.N.; Satomi, Y.; Ichimura, Y.; Fujioka, Y.; Takao, T.; Inagaki, F.; Ohsumi, Y. The atg12-atg5 conjugate has a novel e3-like activity for protein lipidation in autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 37298–37302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pashkova, N.; Gakhar, L.; Winistorfer, S.C.; Yu, L.; Ramaswamy, S.; Piper, R.C. Wd40 repeat propellers define a ubiquitin-binding domain that regulates turnover of box proteins. Mol. Cell. 2010, 40, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Suzuki, K.; Kirisako, T.; Kamada, Y.; Mizushima, N.; Noda, T.; Ohsumi, Y. The pre-autophagosomal structure organized by concerted functions of apg genes is essential for autophagosome formation. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 5971–5981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fujita, N.; Itoh, T.; Omori, H.; Fukuda, M.; Noda, T.; Yoshimori, T. The atg16l complex specifies the site of lc3 lipidation for membrane biogenesis in autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19, 2092–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saitoh, T.; Fujita, N.; Jang, M.H.; Uematsu, S.; Yang, B.G.; Satoh, T.; Omori, H.; Noda, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Komatsu, M.; et al. Loss of the autophagy protein atg16l1 enhances endotoxin-induced il-1beta production. Nature 2008, 456, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Noda, T.; Yoshimori, T. Molecular basis of canonical and bactericidal autophagy. Int. Immunol. 2009, 21, 1199–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ishibashi, K.; Fujita, N.; Kanno, E.; Omori, H.; Yoshimori, T.; Itoh, T.; Fukuda, M. Atg16l2, a novel isoform of mammalian atg16l that is not essential for canonical autophagy despite forming an atg12-5-16l2 complex. Autophagy 2011, 7, 1500–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, H.; Wu, F.; Wang, X.; Du, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H. The two c. Elegans atg-16 homologs have partially redundant functions in the basal autophagy pathway. Autophagy 2013, 9, 1965–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, J.H.; Hong, S.B.; Lee, J.K.; Han, S.; Roh, K.H.; Lee, K.E.; Kim, Y.K.; Choi, E.J.; Song, H.K. Insights into autophagosome maturation revealed by the structures of atg5 with its interacting partners. Autophagy 2015, 11, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fujioka, Y.; Noda, N.N.; Nakatogawa, H.; Ohsumi, Y.; Inagaki, F. Dimeric coiled-coil structure of saccharomyces cerevisiae atg16 and its functional significance in autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 1508–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mizushima, N.; Kuma, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Matsubae, M.; Takao, T.; Natsume, T.; Ohsumi, Y.; Yoshimori, T. Mouse apg16l, a novel wd-repeat protein, targets to the autophagic isolation membrane with the apg12-apg5 conjugate. J. Cell. Sci. 2003, 116, 1679–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zheng, H.; Ji, C.; Li, J.; Jiang, H.; Ren, M.; Lu, Q.; Gu, S.; Mao, Y.; Xie, Y. Cloning and analysis of human apg16l. DNA Seq. 2004, 15, 303–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jiang, T.; Qin, B.; He, J.; Lin, S.; Ding, S. Three isoforms of the atg16l1 protein contribute different autophagic properties. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 378, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yin, L.; Liu, J.; Dong, H.; Xu, E.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Jia, J.; Li, L.; Geng, X. Autophagy-related gene16l2, a potential serum biomarker of multiple sclerosis evaluated by bead-based proteomic technology. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 562, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tian, Y.; Li, Z.; Hu, W.; Ren, H.; Tian, E.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, Q.; Huang, X.; Yang, P.; Li, X.; et al. C. Elegans screen identifies autophagy genes specific to multicellular organisms. Cell. 2010, 141, 1042–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stege, J.T.; Laub, M.T.; Loomis, W.F. Tip genes act in parallel pathways of early dictyostelium development. Dev. Genet. 1999, 25, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Otto, G.P.; Wu, M.Y.; Kazgan, N.; Anderson, O.R.; Kessin, R.H. Macroautophagy is required for multicellular development of the social amoeba dictyostelium discoideum. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 17636–17645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Otto, G.P.; Wu, M.Y.; Kazgan, N.; Anderson, O.R.; Kessin, R.H. Dictyostelium macroautophagy mutants vary in the severity of their developmental defects. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 15621–15629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tung, S.M.; Unal, C.; Ley, A.; Pena, C.; Tunggal, B.; Noegel, A.A.; Krut, O.; Steinert, M.; Eichinger, L. Loss of dictyostelium atg9 results in a pleiotropic phenotype affecting growth, development, phagocytosis and clearance and replication of legionella pneumophila. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 765–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiong, Q.; Unal, C.; Matthias, J.; Steinert, M.; Eichinger, L. The phenotypes of atg9, atg16 and atg9/16 knock-out mutants imply autophagy-dependent and -independent functions. Open Biol. 2015, 5, 150008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Munoz-Braceras, S.; Calvo, R.; Escalante, R. Tipc and the chorea-acanthocytosis protein vps13a regulate autophagy in dictyostelium and human hela cells. Autophagy 2015, 11, 918–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Neer, E.J.; Schmidt, C.J.; Nambudripad, R.; Smith, T.F. The ancient regulatory-protein family of wd-repeat proteins. Nature 1994, 371, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Smith, T.F.; Gaitatzes, C.; Saxena, K.; Neer, E.J. The wd repeat: A common architecture for diverse functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, 24, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nishimura, T.; Kaizuka, T.; Cadwell, K.; Sahani, M.H.; Saitoh, T.; Akira, S.; Virgin, H.W.; Mizushima, N. Fip200 regulates targeting of atg16l1 to the isolation membrane. EMBO Rep. 2013, 14, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gammoh, N.; Florey, O.; Overholtzer, M.; Jiang, X. Interaction between fip200 and atg16l1 distinguishes ulk1 complex-dependent and -independent autophagy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dooley, H.C.; Razi, M.; Polson, H.E.; Girardin, S.E.; Wilson, M.I.; Tooze, S.A. Wipi2 links lc3 conjugation with pi3p, autophagosome formation, and pathogen clearance by recruiting atg12-5-16l1. Mol. Cell. 2014, 55, 238–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hu, J.; Li, G.; Qu, L.; Li, N.; Liu, W.; Xia, D.; Hongdu, B.; Lin, X.; Xu, C.; Lou, Y.; et al. Tmem166/eva1a interacts with atg16l1 and induces autophagosome formation and cell death. Cell. Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Itoh, T.; Fujita, N.; Kanno, E.; Yamamoto, A.; Yoshimori, T.; Fukuda, M. Golgi-resident small gtpase rab33b interacts with atg16l and modulates autophagosome formation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19, 2916–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chua, C.E.; Gan, B.Q.; Tang, B.L. Involvement of members of the rab family and related small gtpases in autophagosome formation and maturation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 3349–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fukuda, M.; Itoh, T. Direct link between atg protein and small gtpase rab: Atg16l functions as a potential rab33 effector in mammals. Autophagy 2008, 4, 824–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cuervo, A.M. The plasma membrane brings autophagosomes to life. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2010, 12, 735–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ravikumar, B.; Moreau, K.; Jahreiss, L.; Puri, C.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Plasma membrane contributes to the formation of pre-autophagosomal structures. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2010, 12, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ravikumar, B.; Moreau, K.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Plasma membrane helps autophagosomes grow. Autophagy 2010, 6, 1184–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Morozova, K.; Sridhar, S.; Zolla, V.; Clement, C.C.; Scharf, B.; Verzani, Z.; Diaz, A.; Larocca, J.N.; Hajjar, K.A.; Cuervo, A.M.; et al. Annexin a2 promotes phagophore assembly by enhancing atg16l(+) vesicle biogenesis and homotypic fusion. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bejarano, E.; Yuste, A.; Patel, B.; Stout, R.F., Jr.; Spray, D.C.; Cuervo, A.M. Connexins modulate autophagosome biogenesis. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2014, 16, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Iyyathurai, J.; Decuypere, J.P.; Leybaert, L.; D’Hondt, C.; Bultynck, G. Connexins: Substrates and regulators of autophagy. BMC Cell. Biol. 2016, 17, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Boada-Romero, E.; Letek, M.; Fleischer, A.; Pallauf, K.; Ramon-Barros, C.; Pimentel-Muinos, F.X. Tmem59 defines a novel atg16l1-binding motif that promotes local activation of lc3. EMBO J. 2013, 32, 566–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Boada-Romero, E.; Serramito-Gomez, I.; Sacristan, M.P.; Boone, D.L.; Xavier, R.J.; Pimentel-Muinos, F.X. The t300a crohn’s disease risk polymorphism impairs function of the wd40 domain of atg16l1. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ver Heul, A.M.; Fowler, C.A.; Ramaswamy, S.; Piper, R.C. Ubiquitin regulates caspase recruitment domain-mediated signaling by nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing proteins nod1 and nod2. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 6890–6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Travassos, L.H.; Carneiro, L.A.; Ramjeet, M.; Hussey, S.; Kim, Y.G.; Magalhaes, J.G.; Yuan, L.; Soares, F.; Chea, E.; Le Bourhis, L.; et al. Nod1 and nod2 direct autophagy by recruiting atg16l1 to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hugot, J.P.; Chamaillard, M.; Zouali, H.; Lesage, S.; Cezard, J.P.; Belaiche, J.; Almer, S.; Tysk, C.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gassull, M.; et al. Association of nod2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to crohn’s disease. Nature 2001, 411, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fujita, N.; Morita, E.; Itoh, T.; Tanaka, A.; Nakaoka, M.; Osada, Y.; Umemoto, T.; Saitoh, T.; Nakatogawa, H.; Kobayashi, S.; et al. Recruitment of the autophagic machinery to endosomes during infection is mediated by ubiquitin. J. Cell. Biol. 2013, 203, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Arbogast, F.; Arnold, J.; Hammann, P.; Kuhn, L.; Chicher, J.; Murera, D.; Weishaar, J.; Muller, S.; Fauny, J.D.; Gros, F. Atg5 is required for b cell polarization and presentation of particulate antigens. Autophagy 2018. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ishibashi, K.; Uemura, T.; Waguri, S.; Fukuda, M. Atg16l1, an essential factor for canonical autophagy, participates in hormone secretion from pc12 cells independently of autophagic activity. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2012, 23, 3193–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kimura, T.; Jain, A.; Choi, S.W.; Mandell, M.A.; Schroder, K.; Johansen, T.; Deretic, V. Trim-mediated precision autophagy targets cytoplasmic regulators of innate immunity. J. Cell. Biol. 2015, 210, 973–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xiong, Q.; Fischer, S.; Karow, M.; Muller, R.; Messling, S.; Eichinger, L. Atg16 mediates the autophagic degradation of the 19s proteasomal subunits psmd1 and psmd2. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 2018, 97, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Song, H.; Pu, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, L.; Xiao, J.; Liu, Q.; Chen, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Ni, M.; et al. Atg16l1 phosphorylation is oppositely regulated by csnk2/casein kinase 2 and ppp1/protein phosphatase 1 which determines the fate of cardiomyocytes during hypoxia/reoxygenation. Autophagy 2015, 11, 1308–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Song, H.; Feng, X.; Zhang, M.; Jin, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, L.; Ding, X.; Luo, Y.; Lin, F.; Wu, Q.; et al. Crosstalk between lysine methylation and phosphorylation of atg16l1 dictates the apoptosis of hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced cardiomyocytes. Autophagy 2018, 14, 825–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Romanov, J.; Walczak, M.; Ibiricu, I.; Schuchner, S.; Ogris, E.; Kraft, C.; Martens, S. Mechanism and functions of membrane binding by the atg5-atg12/atg16 complex during autophagosome formation. EMBO J. 2012, 31, 4304–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kihara, A.; Noda, T.; Ishihara, N.; Ohsumi, Y. Two distinct vps34 phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes function in autophagy and carboxypeptidase y sorting in saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell. Biol. 2001, 152, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zavodszky, E.; Vicinanza, M.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Biology and trafficking of atg9 and atg16l1, two proteins that regulate autophagosome formation. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 1988–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Valsdottir, R.; Hashimoto, H.; Ashman, K.; Koda, T.; Storrie, B.; Nilsson, T. Identification of rabaptin-5, rabex-5, and gm130 as putative effectors of rab33b, a regulator of retrograde traffic between the golgi apparatus and er. FEBS Lett. 2001, 508, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Starr, T.; Sun, Y.; Wilkins, N.; Storrie, B. Rab33b and rab6 are functionally overlapping regulators of golgi homeostasis and trafficking. Traffic 2010, 11, 626–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Brodsky, F.M.; Chen, C.Y.; Knuehl, C.; Towler, M.C.; Wakeham, D.E. Biological basket weaving: Formation and function of clathrin-coated vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2001, 17, 517–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Puri, C.; Renna, M.; Bento, C.F.; Moreau, K.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Diverse autophagosome membrane sources coalesce in recycling endosomes. Cell 2013, 154, 1285–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Puri, C.; Renna, M.; Bento, C.F.; Moreau, K.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Atg16l1 meets atg9 in recycling endosomes: Additional roles for the plasma membrane and endocytosis in autophagosome biogenesis. Autophagy 2014, 10, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tan, J.M.J.; Mellouk, N.; Osborne, S.E.; Ammendolia, D.A.; Dyer, D.N.; Li, R.; Brunen, D.; van Rijn, J.M.; Huang, J.; Czuczman, M.A.; et al. An atg16l1-dependent pathway promotes plasma membrane repair and limits listeria monocytogenes cell-to-cell spread. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 1472–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ravikumar, B.; Sarkar, S.; Davies, J.E.; Futter, M.; Garcia-Arencibia, M.; Green-Thompson, Z.W.; Jimenez-Sanchez, M.; Korolchuk, V.I.; Lichtenberg, M.; Luo, S.; et al. Regulation of mammalian autophagy in physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 1383–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hampe, J.; Franke, A.; Rosenstiel, P.; Till, A.; Teuber, M.; Huse, K.; Albrecht, M.; Mayr, G.; De La Vega, F.M.; Briggs, J.; et al. A genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous snps identifies a susceptibility variant for crohn disease in atg16l1. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rioux, J.D.; Xavier, R.J.; Taylor, K.D.; Silverberg, M.S.; Goyette, P.; Huett, A.; Green, T.; Kuballa, P.; Barmada, M.M.; Datta, L.W.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 596–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, S.K.; Hong, M.; Zhao, W.; Jung, Y.; Baek, J.; Tayebi, N.; Kim, K.M.; Ye, B.D.; Kim, K.J.; Park, S.H.; et al. Genome-wide association study of crohn’s disease in koreans revealed three new susceptibility loci and common attributes of genetic susceptibility across ethnic populations. Gut 2014, 63, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, S.K.; Ye, B.D.; Song, K. Atg16l1 contributes to crohn’s disease susceptibility in koreans: Overmuch concern for ethnic difference? Gut 2015, 64, 687–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Porter, E.M.; Bevins, C.L.; Ghosh, D.; Ganz, T. The multifaceted paneth cell. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002, 59, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nagy, P.; Szatmari, Z.; Sandor, G.O.; Lippai, M.; Hegedus, K.; Juhasz, G. Drosophila atg16 promotes enteroendocrine cell differentiation via regulation of intestinal slit/robo signaling. Development 2017, 144, 3990–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cadwell, K.; Liu, J.Y.; Brown, S.L.; Miyoshi, H.; Loh, J.; Lennerz, J.K.; Kishi, C.; Kc, W.; Carrero, J.A.; Hunt, S.; et al. A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal paneth cells. Nature 2008, 456, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Murthy, A.; Li, Y.; Peng, I.; Reichelt, M.; Katakam, A.K.; Noubade, R.; Roose-Girma, M.; DeVoss, J.; Diehl, L.; Graham, R.R.; et al. A crohn’s disease variant in atg16l1 enhances its degradation by caspase 3. Nature 2014, 506, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Plantinga, T.S.; Crisan, T.O.; Oosting, M.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; de Jong, D.J.; Philpott, D.J.; van der Meer, J.W.; Girardin, S.E.; Joosten, L.A.; Netea, M.G. Crohn’s disease-associated atg16l1 polymorphism modulates pro-inflammatory cytokine responses selectively upon activation of nod2. Gut 2011, 60, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Plantinga, T.S.; Joosten, L.A.; Netea, M.G. Atg16l1 polymorphisms are associated with nod2-induced hyperinflammation. Autophagy 2011, 7, 1074–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fletcher, K.; Ulferts, R.; Jacquin, E.; Veith, T.; Gammoh, N.; Arasteh, J.M.; Mayer, U.; Carding, S.R.; Wileman, T.; Beale, R.; et al. The wd40 domain of atg16l1 is required for its non-canonical role in lipidation of lc3 at single membranes. EMBO J. 2018, 37, e97840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fujita, N.; Saitoh, T.; Kageyama, S.; Akira, S.; Noda, T.; Yoshimori, T. Differential involvement of atg16l1 in crohn disease and canonical autophagy: Analysis of the organization of the atg16l1 complex in fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 32602–32609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sanjuan, M.A.; Dillon, C.P.; Tait, S.W.; Moshiach, S.; Dorsey, F.; Connell, S.; Komatsu, M.; Tanaka, K.; Cleveland, J.L.; Withoff, S.; et al. Toll-like receptor signalling in macrophages links the autophagy pathway to phagocytosis. Nature 2007, 450, 1253–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Conway, K.L.; Kuballa, P.; Song, J.H.; Patel, K.K.; Castoreno, A.B.; Yilmaz, O.H.; Jijon, H.B.; Zhang, M.; Aldrich, L.N.; Villablanca, E.J.; et al. Atg16l1 is required for autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells and protection of mice from salmonella infection. Gastroenterology 2013, 145, 1347–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kuballa, P.; Huett, A.; Rioux, J.D.; Daly, M.J.; Xavier, R.J. Impaired autophagy of an intracellular pathogen induced by a crohn’s disease associated atg16l1 variant. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lapaquette, P.; Glasser, A.L.; Huett, A.; Xavier, R.J.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A. Crohn’s disease-associated adherent-invasive e. Coli are selectively favoured by impaired autophagy to replicate intracellularly. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Martinez, J.; Malireddi, R.K.; Lu, Q.; Cunha, L.D.; Pelletier, S.; Gingras, S.; Orchard, R.; Guan, J.L.; Tan, H.; Peng, J.; et al. Molecular characterization of lc3-associated phagocytosis reveals distinct roles for rubicon, nox2 and autophagy proteins. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2015, 17, 893–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rai, S.; Arasteh, M.; Jefferson, M.; Pearson, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Bicsak, B.; Divekar, D.; Powell, P.P.; Nauman, R.; et al. The atg5-binding and coiled coil domains of atg16l1 maintain autophagy and tissue homeostasis in mice independently of the wd domain required for lc3-associated phagocytosis. Autophagy 2018, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Messer, J.S.; Murphy, S.F.; Logsdon, M.F.; Lodolce, J.P.; Grimm, W.A.; Bartulis, S.J.; Vogel, T.P.; Burn, M.; Boone, D.L. The crohn’s disease: Associated atg16l1 variant and salmonella invasion. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e002790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, C.; Mendonsa, G.R.; Symington, J.W.; Zhang, Q.; Cadwell, K.; Virgin, H.W.; Mysorekar, I.U. Atg16l1 deficiency confers protection from uropathogenic escherichia coli infection in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11008–11013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, C.; Symington, J.W.; Mysorekar, I.U. Atg16l1 and pathogenesis of urinary tract infections. Autophagy 2012, 8, 1693–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Schnaith, A.; Kashkar, H.; Leggio, S.A.; Addicks, K.; Kronke, M.; Krut, O. Staphylococcus aureus subvert autophagy for induction of caspase-independent host cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 2695–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liebl, M.P.; Hoppe, T. It’s all about talking: Two-way communication between proteasomal and lysosomal degradation pathways via ubiquitin. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 311, C166–C178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lee, J.; Kim, H.R.; Quinley, C.; Kim, J.; Gonzalez-Navajas, J.; Xavier, R.; Raz, E. Autophagy suppresses interleukin-1beta (il-1beta) signaling by activation of p62 degradation via lysosomal and proteasomal pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 4033–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Lamprinaki, D.; Beasy, G.; Zhekova, A.; Wittmann, A.; James, S.; Dicks, J.; Iwakura, Y.; Saijo, S.; Wang, X.; Chow, C.W.; et al. Lc3-associated phagocytosis is required for dendritic cell inflammatory cytokine response to gut commensal yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Varga, K.; Nagy, P.; Arsikin Csordas, K.; Kovacs, A.L.; Hegedus, K.; Juhasz, G. Loss of atg16 delays the alcohol-induced sedation response via regulation of corazonin neuropeptide production in drosophila. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ding, W.X.; Ni, H.M.; Gao, W.; Yoshimori, T.; Stolz, D.B.; Ron, D.; Yin, X.M. Linking of autophagy to ubiquitin-proteasome system is important for the regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and cell viability. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Korolchuk, V.I.; Menzies, F.M.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Mechanisms of cross-talk between the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome systems. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 1393–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pandey, U.B.; Nie, Z.; Batlevi, Y.; McCray, B.A.; Ritson, G.P.; Nedelsky, N.B.; Schwartz, S.L.; DiProspero, N.A.; Knight, M.A.; Schuldiner, O.; et al. Hdac6 rescues neurodegeneration and provides an essential link between autophagy and the ups. Nature 2007, 447, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rideout, H.J.; Lang-Rollin, I.; Stefanis, L. Involvement of macroautophagy in the dissolution of neuronal inclusions. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2004, 36, 2551–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, X.J.; Yu, J.; Wong, S.H.; Cheng, A.S.; Chan, F.K.; Ng, S.S.; Cho, C.H.; Sung, J.J.; Wu, W.K. A novel crosstalk between two major protein degradation systems: Regulation of proteasomal activity by autophagy. Autophagy 2013, 9, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Korolchuk, V.I.; Mansilla, A.; Menzies, F.M.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Autophagy inhibition compromises degradation of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway substrates. Mol. Cell. 2009, 33, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Qiao, L.; Zhang, J. Inhibition of lysosomal functions reduces proteasomal activity. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 456, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Arhzaouy, K.; Strucksberg, K.H.; Tung, S.M.; Tangavelou, K.; Stumpf, M.; Faix, J.; Schroder, R.; Clemen, C.S.; Eichinger, L. Heteromeric p97/p97r155c complexes induce dominant negative changes in wild-type and autophagy 9-deficient dictyostelium strains. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Qiao, L.; Hamamichi, S.; Caldwell, K.A.; Caldwell, G.A.; Yacoubian, T.A.; Wilson, S.; Xie, Z.L.; Speake, L.D.; Parks, R.; Crabtree, D.; et al. Lysosomal enzyme cathepsin d protects against alpha-synuclein aggregation and toxicity. Mol. Brain 2008, 1, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, X.; Terpstra, E.J. Ubiquitin receptors and protein quality control. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2013, 55, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Kirkin, V.; McEwan, D.G.; Novak, I.; Dikic, I. A role for ubiquitin in selective autophagy. Mol. Cell. 2009, 34, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Welchman, R.L.; Gordon, C.; Mayer, R.J. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 6, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Babu, J.R.; Geetha, T.; Wooten, M.W. Sequestosome 1/p62 shuttles polyubiquitinated tau for proteasomal degradation. J. Neurochem. 2005, 94, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Ravikumar, B.; Duden, R.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Aggregate-prone proteins with polyglutamine and polyalanine expansions are degraded by autophagy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 1107–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Webb, J.L.; Ravikumar, B.; Atkins, J.; Skepper, J.N.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Alpha-synuclein is degraded by both autophagy and the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 25009–25013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Gao, Z.; Gammoh, N.; Wong, P.M.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Tempst, P.; Jiang, X. Processing of autophagic protein lc3 by the 20s proteasome. Autophagy 2010, 6, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nazio, F.; Carinci, M.; Valacca, C.; Bielli, P.; Strappazzon, F.; Antonioli, M.; Ciccosanti, F.; Rodolfo, C.; Campello, S.; Fimia, G.M.; et al. Fine-tuning of ulk1 mrna and protein levels is required for autophagy oscillation. J. Cell. Biol. 2016, 215, 841–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Cuervo, A.M.; Palmer, A.; Rivett, A.J.; Knecht, E. Degradation of proteasomes by lysosomes in rat liver. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 227, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Johansen, T.; Lamark, T. Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins. Autophagy 2011, 7, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Marshall, R.S.; Li, F.; Gemperline, D.C.; Book, A.J.; Vierstra, R.D. Autophagic degradation of the 26s proteasome is mediated by the dual atg8/ubiquitin receptor rpn10 in arabidopsis. Mol. Cell. 2015, 58, 1053–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Cohen-Kaplan, V.; Livneh, I.; Avni, N.; Fabre, B.; Ziv, T.; Kwon, Y.T.; Ciechanover, A. P62- and ubiquitin-dependent stress-induced autophagy of the mammalian 26s proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7490–E7499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Nemec, A.A.; Howell, L.A.; Peterson, A.K.; Murray, M.A.; Tomko, R.J., Jr. Autophagic clearance of proteasomes in yeast requires the conserved sorting nexin snx4. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 21466–21480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Waite, K.A.; De-La Mota-Peynado, A.; Vontz, G.; Roelofs, J. Starvation induces proteasome autophagy with different pathways for core and regulatory particles. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 3239–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 08 00002 g001 550
Figure 1. ATG16 shares high structural similarity in different species. (A) Domain structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATG16 (NP_013882.1), Homo sapiens ATG16L1 (NP_001350671.1) and ATG16L2 (NP_203746.1), Mus musculus ATG16L1 (NP_001192320.1) and ATG16L2 (NP_001104581.1), Caenorhabditis elegans ATG16.1 (NP_508768.1) and ATG16.2 (NP_495299.2), Drosophila melanogaster ATG16 (NP_001138124.2) and Dictyostelium discoideum ATG16 (XP_643673.1). Conserved domains were predicted using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). AFIM (ATG5-interacting motif), red; CCD (coiled-coil domain), green; WD40 (tryptophan-aspartic acid, WD40, repeat domain), violet. * the sequence used here lacks the N-terminal 51 amino acids because it was shown that the C. elegans atg-16.1 gene encodes 527 amino acids and not, as originally predicted 578 amino acids [18]. (B) Sequence alignment of the AFIM regions of different ATG16 proteins using the Multiple Sequence Alignment program at the NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The highly conserved AFIM residues are denoted on the top [19]. Red letters highlight conserved key residues of the AFIM and yellow shading indicates the highly conserved AFIM region between species.
Figure 1. ATG16 shares high structural similarity in different species. (A) Domain structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATG16 (NP_013882.1), Homo sapiens ATG16L1 (NP_001350671.1) and ATG16L2 (NP_203746.1), Mus musculus ATG16L1 (NP_001192320.1) and ATG16L2 (NP_001104581.1), Caenorhabditis elegans ATG16.1 (NP_508768.1) and ATG16.2 (NP_495299.2), Drosophila melanogaster ATG16 (NP_001138124.2) and Dictyostelium discoideum ATG16 (XP_643673.1). Conserved domains were predicted using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). AFIM (ATG5-interacting motif), red; CCD (coiled-coil domain), green; WD40 (tryptophan-aspartic acid, WD40, repeat domain), violet. * the sequence used here lacks the N-terminal 51 amino acids because it was shown that the C. elegans atg-16.1 gene encodes 527 amino acids and not, as originally predicted 578 amino acids [18]. (B) Sequence alignment of the AFIM regions of different ATG16 proteins using the Multiple Sequence Alignment program at the NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The highly conserved AFIM residues are denoted on the top [19]. Red letters highlight conserved key residues of the AFIM and yellow shading indicates the highly conserved AFIM region between species.
Cells 08 00002 g001
Cells 08 00002 g002 550
Figure 2. ATG16 in the initiation phase of autophagosome formation. The ATG12~5/16 complex is required for ATG8/LC3 lipidation and is recruited to the phagophore or isolation membrane by interacting with FIP200, WIPI2b and TMEM166. ATG16 also interacts with Rab33B, clathrin, annexin A2 and connexin 43. The former three promote autophagosome membrane expansion while the latter is inhibitory.
Figure 2. ATG16 in the initiation phase of autophagosome formation. The ATG12~5/16 complex is required for ATG8/LC3 lipidation and is recruited to the phagophore or isolation membrane by interacting with FIP200, WIPI2b and TMEM166. ATG16 also interacts with Rab33B, clathrin, annexin A2 and connexin 43. The former three promote autophagosome membrane expansion while the latter is inhibitory.
Cells 08 00002 g002
Cells 08 00002 g003 550
Figure 3. ATG16 in xenophagy and LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP). Through interaction with ubiquitin, NOD1, and NOD2, ATG16 is important for xenophagy. The ATG16T300A variant has a decreased stability and is impaired in this process. ATG16 is also required for LAP, which promotes LC3 lipidation of the phagosomal membrane.
Figure 3. ATG16 in xenophagy and LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP). Through interaction with ubiquitin, NOD1, and NOD2, ATG16 is important for xenophagy. The ATG16T300A variant has a decreased stability and is impaired in this process. ATG16 is also required for LAP, which promotes LC3 lipidation of the phagosomal membrane.
Cells 08 00002 g003
Cells 08 00002 g004 550
Figure 4. ATG16 links autophagy and the UPS. ATG16 facilitates the proteasomal degradation of p62/SQSTM1 and the autophagic degradation of the inflammasome via TRIM20. Furthermore, ATG16 mediates the autophagic degradation of the proteasomal subunits PSMD1 and PSMD2 in D. discoideum and might also mediate the autophagic degradation of the proteasome. Vice versa, ATG16 itself maybe a substrate of the UPS.
Figure 4. ATG16 links autophagy and the UPS. ATG16 facilitates the proteasomal degradation of p62/SQSTM1 and the autophagic degradation of the inflammasome via TRIM20. Furthermore, ATG16 mediates the autophagic degradation of the proteasomal subunits PSMD1 and PSMD2 in D. discoideum and might also mediate the autophagic degradation of the proteasome. Vice versa, ATG16 itself maybe a substrate of the UPS.
Cells 08 00002 g004
Cells 08 00002 g005 550
Figure 5. Autophagy-independent roles of ATG16. ATG16 is required for plasma membrane repair in MEFs and regulates antigen presentation in human B cells, hormone secretion in PC12 cells and the alcohol-induced sedation response in Drosophila through interaction with PCM1, Rab33A and activation of the expression of Corazonin, respectively.
Figure 5. Autophagy-independent roles of ATG16. ATG16 is required for plasma membrane repair in MEFs and regulates antigen presentation in human B cells, hormone secretion in PC12 cells and the alcohol-induced sedation response in Drosophila through interaction with PCM1, Rab33A and activation of the expression of Corazonin, respectively.
Cells 08 00002 g005
Table
Table 1. ATG16 interacting proteins, the binding regions, and the functions of this interactions.
Table 1. ATG16 interacting proteins, the binding regions, and the functions of this interactions.
Interacting ProteinBinding Region of ATG16FunctionReferences
ATG5N-terminal AFIMEssential for ATG16 complex localization to PAS and ATG8/LC3 lipidation [9,11,14,15]
FIP200Between CCD and WD40 repeat domainPromotes the specific targeting of ATG16L1 to the isolation membrane[34,35]
WIPI2bCCDPromotes the recruitment of ATG16 to the isolation membrane[36]
TMEM166WD40 repeat domainPromotes the recruitment of ATG16L1 complex to the autophagosome membrane[37]
Rab33BCCDTransport of Golgi-derived membrane to autophagosome[38,39,40]
ClathrinN-terminal regionTransport of plasma membrane to autophagosome[41,42,43]
Annexin A2NDPromotes the formation of phagophore structures[44]
Connexin 43WD40 repeat domainInhibits autophagosome formation[45,46]
TMEM59WD40 repeat domainXenophagy[47,48]
NOD1WD40 repeat domainXenophagy[49,50]
NOD2WD40 repeat domainXenophagy[47,50,51]
T3JAMWD40 repeat domainND[47]
DEDD2WD40 repeat domainND[47]
UbiquitinWD40 repeat domainXenophagy[49,52]
PCM1NDAntigen presentation[53]
Rab33ACCDHormone secretion[38,54]
TRIM20WD40 repeat domainAutophagic degradation of inflammasome components[55]
PSMD1N-terminal half;
WD40 repeat domain		Autophagic degradation of PSMD1[56]
PSMD2WD40 repeat domainAutophagic degradation of PSMD2[56]
The proteins were listed according the order of appearance in this paper. ND: not determined.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiong, Q.; Li, W.; Li, P.; Yang, M.; Wu, C.; Eichinger, L. The Role of ATG16 in Autophagy and The Ubiquitin Proteasome System. Cells 2019, 8, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8010002

AMA Style

Xiong Q, Li W, Li P, Yang M, Wu C, Eichinger L. The Role of ATG16 in Autophagy and The Ubiquitin Proteasome System. Cells. 2019; 8(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiong, Qiuhong, Wenjing Li, Ping Li, Min Yang, Changxin Wu, and Ludwig Eichinger. 2019. "The Role of ATG16 in Autophagy and The Ubiquitin Proteasome System" Cells 8, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop