Next Article in Journal
Epigenetics in the Uterine Environment: How Maternal Diet and ART May Influence the Epigenome in the Offspring with Long-Term Health Consequences
Next Article in Special Issue
SPECC1L Mutations Are Not Common in Sporadic Cases of Opitz G/BBB Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial and Temporal Gene Function Studies in Rodents: Towards Gene-Based Therapies for Autism Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Special Issue
MEK Inhibition in a Newborn with RAF1-Associated Noonan Syndrome Ameliorates Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy but Is Insufficient to Revert Pulmonary Vascular Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/genes13010029
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical and Genetic Findings in a Series of Eight Families with Arthrogryposis

by
Marzia Pollazzon
1,
Stefano Giuseppe Caraffi
1,
Silvia Faccioli
2,3,
Simonetta Rosato
1,
Heidi Fodstad
4,
Belinda Campos-Xavier
4,
Emanuele Soncini
5,
Giuseppina Comitini
6,
Daniele Frattini
7,
Teresa Grimaldi
8,
Maria Marinelli
1,
Davide Martorana
9,
Antonio Percesepe
9,
Silvia Sassi
2,
Carlo Fusco
7,
Giancarlo Gargano
10,
Andrea Superti-Furga
4 and
Livia Garavelli
1,*
1
Medical Genetics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
2
Rehabilitation Pediatric Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
3
PhD Program in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
4
Division of Genetic Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
5
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ospedale di Sassuolo, 41049 Sassuolo, Italy
6
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
7
Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
8
Department of Cardiology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
9
Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
10
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010029
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 15 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Study on Genotypes and Phenotypes of Pediatric Clinical Rare Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The term “arthrogryposis” is used to indicate multiple congenital contractures affecting two or more areas of the body. Arthrogryposis is the consequence of an impairment of embryofetal neuromuscular function and development. The causes of arthrogryposis are multiple, and in newborns, it is difficult to predict the molecular defect as well as the clinical evolution just based on clinical findings. We studied a consecutive series of 13 participants who had amyoplasia, distal arthrogryposis (DA), or syndromic forms of arthrogryposis with normal intellectual development and other motor abilities. The underlying pathogenic variants were identified in 11 out of 13 participants. Correlating the genotype with the clinical features indicated that prenatal findings were specific for DA; this was helpful to identify familial cases, but features were non-specific for the involved gene. Perinatal clinical findings were similar among the participants, except for amyoplasia. Dilatation of the aortic root led to the diagnosis of Loeys–Dietz syndrome (LDS) in one case. The phenotype of DA type 5D (DA5D) and Escobar syndrome became more characteristic at later ages due to more pronounced pterygia. Follow-up indicated that DA type 1 (DA1)/DA type 2B (DA2B) spectrum and LDS had a more favorable course than the other forms. Hand clenching and talipes equinovarus/rocker bottom foot showed an improvement in all participants, and adducted thumb resolved in all forms except in amyoplasia. The combination of clinical evaluation with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis in the newborn may allow for an early diagnosis and, particularly in the DAs, suggests a favorable prognosis.

1. Introduction

Congenital contractures can be divided into two groups: isolated and multiple. Isolated contractures affect only one area of the body, e.g., congenital talipes equinovarus, found in approximately 1 in 500 live births [1,2].
Multiple congenital contractures affecting two or more areas of the body are often indicated with the term arthrogryposis. This is not a specific diagnosis, but rather a clinical finding, reported in over 400 syndromes [3,4]. Overall, the prevalence of arthrogryposis is 1 in 3000 live births [5]. The different characteristics of the various disorders, as well as their differences in mode of inheritance, course, treatment guidelines, and prognosis, underline the importance of making a specific diagnosis in each patient [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Achieving a molecular diagnosis has positive psychological repercussions on the patient’s family, as well as economic consequences for the healthcare system as it prevents the execution of inappropriate investigations and therapies. Since arthrogryposis is a congenital pathology, the clinical diagnosis is generally made at birth or in the neonatal period. Some pregnancies may show a reduction in the amount of amniotic fluid, a reduction in fetal movements, and/or contractures on prenatal ultrasound. Decreased movements can perturb molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in the formation of joints during development [12].
In the wide field of differential diagnosis, it is important to define the neurological functionality of the patient. A heterogeneous group of disorders exists in which multiple congenital contractures are present at birth, but other central neurological functions such as intellectual development and motor abilities are normal. These include: amyoplasia, distal arthrogryposis (DA), metabolic disorders, generalized connective tissue disorder, skeletal dysplasia or other syndromic conditions, intrauterine space limitations (twin pregnancy), vascular uterine impairment, maternal pathology, or therapy in pregnancy. Conversely, an altered neurological examination indicates that movements in the uterus have decreased due to an alteration of the central nervous system (CNS), peripheral nervous system (PNS), neuromuscular junction or muscle [13]. We have focused our attention on participants with normal neurological functions.
Amyoplasia is characterized by a significant congenital reduction in muscle development and has peculiar clinical features: shoulder rotation and adduction, elbow extension, flexion and ulnar deviation of the wrists, rigid fingers, and thumbs positioned in the palm of the hand. The hips can be dislocated, the knees are generally extended, and the feet have severe equinovarus contractures. The etiology of the disease is not yet known, but an epigenetic disease or a vascular origin have been hypothesized [14]. Most of the described cases are sporadic, but there are also rare cases of potentially familial amyoplasia [15].
DA represents a group of conditions that mainly involve the distal parts of the limbs. About 50% of cases are associated with variants in genes coding for contractile proteins of the skeletal muscle: FBN2, MYBPC1, MYH3, MYH8, PIEZO2, TNNI2, TNNT3, and TPM2. Inheritance usually follows an autosomal dominant mode, and clinical expression is highly variable, including incomplete penetrance. At least 19 types of DA have been described [3,4,16,17]. Biallelic variants in the ECEL1 gene have been found in DA type 5D (DA5D), with a characteristic phenotype: severe camptodactyly of the hands, milder camptodactyly in the feet, limited hip flexion, scoliosis, ocular findings (eyelid ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, astigmatism), and distinctive facial features (microretrognathia, grooved tongue) [18,19]. More recently, a new intronic variant and a novel deletion in the gene were described [20,21].
Syndromic forms are widely heterogeneous, with variable course and prognosis depending on the clinical problems associated with arthrogryposis. A noteworthy subgroup is represented by multiple pterygium syndrome (MPS), characterized by multiple pterygium, scoliosis, and congenital contractures of the limbs. Non-lethal (Escobar syndrome) and lethal forms, with both autosomal dominant and recessive modes of inheritance, have been described. Variants in the CHRNG gene are associated with all four forms, while variants in the CHRND and CHRNA1 genes are responsible for lethal forms [22].
Next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, including gene panels, whole exome sequencing (WES), and whole genome sequencing (WGS), allow the identification of new genes associated with arthrogryposis and often clinical diagnosis is only possible once such investigations have been concluded (reverse genetics) [23,24,25]. Currently, there are 402 genes thought to be associated with this condition [25]. In a recent study, WES analysis was extended to a cohort of 89 families, and the diagnosis was reached in 65% of cases, with 19% having potentially pathogenetic variants in more than one locus. In another study, disease gene identification was achieved through WES in 52.7% of index patients [26]. The hypothesis of an oligogenic inheritance for different forms of arthrogryposis has therefore been proposed [27].
In this study, we have re-evaluated the data relating to participants who were offered genetic counseling at our institution, in whom arthrogryposis with otherwise normal neurological development was diagnosed. The contribution of our work is represented by the detailed clinical and instrumental findings with periodic follow-up and extensive photographic documentation provided, paralleled by in-depth genetic investigations. A limitation of our study, in consideration of the small number of cases, concerns the difficulty of carrying out genotype–phenotype correlations, which, however, have been proven complicated even in studies with extended cohorts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Subjects

A group of 13 participants (pts) from 8 unrelated families suffering from arthrogryposis with normal neurological development, all in follow-up at the Medical Genetics Unit of Azienda USL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy, were enrolled in this study. Three participants had a Roma ethnic background, one patient had mixed origins (paternal grandparents from the Dominican Republic, maternal grandparents of Italian origins), and the rest had Italian origins. Each patient had previously undergone genetic and dysmorphological evaluations at different ages, cytogenetic analysis, and molecular genetic testing. In the present study, we re-evaluated these pre-existing participants’ data in order to describe our cohort. Signed informed consent for inclusion in this study was provided by all subjects of at least 18 years of age, or by both parents for participants under the age of 18. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of AVEN (Project identification code 722/2020).

2.2. Genetic Analysis

Prenatal genetic testing reported in 4 cases had already been carried out at the time of the first clinical encounter. Postnatal cytogenetic analyses were performed at the Laboratory of Genetics of Azienda USL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy, in accordance with the approved clinical guidelines at the time of testing. Further molecular testing was performed at the Division of Genetic Medicine of Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. In pts 4 and 12, karyotype analysis on peripheral blood was performed. In pt 13, karyotype on blood and fibroblasts, FISH for 7q11.23 region, FISH for subtelomeric regions, FISH for chromosome 8 on fibroblasts, and whole exome sequencing (WES) were performed. In pt 9, molecular analysis of the FLNB gene was performed before specific analysis for arthrogryposis. In pt 10, CGH-array (60K, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and molecular analysis of the DMPK gene were performed. NGS analysis of a panel of genes responsible for arthrogryposis was performed in seven participants using the TruSight or TruSight One Expanded kit from Illumina with sequencing on the MiSeq or NextSeq system. In pt 11, an NGS panel for genes associated with aortopathies was also performed, due to the suspicion of Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). In pts 9 and 13, WES analysis filtered for specific genes was performed. Variants were classified according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) [28] (Table S1). Bidirectional Sanger sequencing was employed for confirmation of all disease-causing variants detected by NGS and subsequent co-segregation analysis in affected family members.

3. Results

3.1. Participants and Clinical Information

A total of 13 participants with arthrogryposis and otherwise normal neurological functions such as intellectual development and motor abilities, including amyoplasia, DA, and syndromic forms, were recruited for this study (Figure 1).
All individuals showed involvement of all four extremities at birth. The group was composed of 9 females and 4 males. The age ranged from the prenatal period to 49 years. Family pedigrees are shown in Figure 2. None of the families reported consanguineous marriages, although consanguinity was suspected at least in Family 5, since the proband had a rare pathogenic variant in homozygosity.
Table 1 summarizes the clinical features, instrumental findings, genetic analyses and performed treatments in our cohort. These elements are more widely described in Text S1 and Table S2. Clinical features are described in Supplementary Materials according to human phenotype ontology (HPO) terminology [29].

3.2. Clinical and Instrumental Findings in the Cohort

Prenatal ultrasound revealed abnormalities after the 20th week of gestation in 7 out of 12 cases (58%; examination was not performed on pt 3). In 3 familial cases, clinical prenatal findings of arthrogryposis were noticed (joint contractures of hands, ulnar deviation of hands, rocker bottom feet/talipes equinovarus) since the second trimester (Table S2).
In the perinatal period, clinical findings were similar among the participants: most displayed ulnar deviation of the hand, overlapping fingers and/or toes, and camptodactyly. Only pt 12 had a distinct phenotype, with the typical presentation of amyoplasia: internal rotation of the shoulders, extended elbow, flexed wrist, camptodactyly, and equinovarus positioning of feet.
In the postnatal period, 11/13 participants (85%) showed microretrognathia, which is reported as the most striking craniofacial effect of arthrogryposis [30,31]. Trismus was present in 8/13 participants (61%), usually determined by a variable association of microretrognathia and narrow mouth. It was observed not only in DA, as previously reported, but also in syndromic cases. Pterygium, which was previously reported in MPS and DA5D, was also present in three participants with dominant forms of DA, in the participant with amyoplasia and in the patient without a molecular diagnosis, mostly affecting thumbs or other fingers. Participants with a more complex phenotype achieved autonomous walking at the upper limit of physiological age (pt 5, pt 13) or with a delay (pt 7). No intellectual disability was present in our cohort, although speech delay was significant in pt 13, and less severe in pt 5.

3.3. Molecular Diagnosis

Three families (eight participants) displayed a pathogenic variant in one of the genes encoding contractile proteins of the skeletal muscles (TNNT3, TPM2, TNNI2). Alterations in these genes can be responsible for either DA type 1 (DA1) or type 2B (DA2B), which are currently considered a clinical continuum rather than two separate entities. In family 2 bearing a TNNT3 variant and diagnosed with DA2B, all affected individuals presented with trismus, previously described only in DA1. As a result, feeding difficulties were reported for these participants, especially in the neonatal period, and one patient needed speech therapy (pt 5). Trismus was present also in the three participants with a variant in the TPM2 gene (pts 1, 2, 3), with a phenotype more compatible with DA1. They also showed hyperCKemia, serious in the mother, who had a recent history of muscular asthenia and paresthesias to the upper limbs, milder in the grandmother, and transient in the son. Variants in one of the two tropomyosin genes, TPM2 and TPM3, have been associated with a number of different myopathies [32]. Following multidisciplinary care soon after birth, this group of participants in the DA1/DA2B spectrum had the best prognosis [14].
Pt 9 and pt 10 had a more complex phenotype, and their molecular diagnosis was difficult to reach. The evolution of the phenotype through the years was crucial to guide the diagnosis: DA5D in pt 9, with billelic variants in ECEL1 that met the ACMG criteria of pathogenicity, and Escobar syndrome in pt 10, with a known pathogenic homozygous variant in CHRNG [28]. These two cases required three different molecular approaches, the highest number of analyses in the DA group.
Pt 13 also had a complex syndromic phenotype, and despite multiple genetic tests, a molecular diagnosis could not be reached. She showed progressive camptodactyly and scoliosis, congenital cardiopathy, with right pulmonary artery hypoplasia, speech delay, and ocular findings. Her most debilitating aspect was progressive scoliosis, which did not improve despite repeated surgical treatments. Pt 12, who was diagnosed with amyoplasia, also had a complex phenotype and required five surgical interventions in order to improve his quality of life.
An important differential diagnosis was represented by LDS in pt 11. At birth, his clinical features were indistinguishable from those of DA, until a required echocardiography revealed bicuspid aortic valve and mild dilatation of the aortic root. These important elements, together with his family history, led to the correct diagnosis.

4. Discussion

Molecular diagnosis of arthrogryposis remains challenging given the high genetic heterogeneity of conditions with this clinical sign.
Nowadays, improvements in diagnostic sensitivity of sonographic equipment and an increased alertness of gynecologists allow a better identification of elements suggestive of arthrogryposis in the prenatal period, especially in family cases, in which more targeted ultrasound scans are performed. Abnormalities in fetal movements and structural fetal anomalies can be found in some cases. Prenatal findings include polyhydramnios, craniofacial dysmorphisms (retrognathia), lung hypoplasia, pterygium, and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) [33,34]. Hydrops fetalis, nuchal edema, scoliosis, and absent stomach filling (due to lack of ability to swallow) were associated with unfavorable outcomes, implicating a neuromuscular etiology [35]. In our experience, if positioning of the fetus is favorable, careful examination of the ultrasound can also reveal hand clenching, adducted thumb, ulnar deviation of the hand, overlapping fingers, and rocker bottom foot/club foot, signs which are particularly indicative of arthrogryposis.
A limitation of prenatal ultrasound is the inability to highlight anomalies at an early gestational age. It is reported that only about 25% of arthrogryposis cases can be detected within the 24th week, rarely influencing the couple’s decisions [36]. The management of a subsequent pregnancy is easier in the case of molecular diagnosis in a previous child. Molecular diagnosis would be useful in alerting physicians to plan the appropriate follow-up investigations for such cases [37,38]. While, in a previous article, absent stomach filling was associated with unfavorable outcome, implicating a neuromuscular etiology [35], in our cohort pt 5 showed reduced stomach bubble and presented a good prognosis. In our cohort, clinical findings in the perinatal period were similar among participants with different molecular diagnosis, and only post-natal follow-up with instrumental evaluations could help discriminate the most complex cases. In pt 11, LDS was diagnosed only after echocardiography had shown dilatation of the aortic root. The same variant was present in a peripheral blood sample from his mother, whose story was negative for arthrogryposis. This suggests a high degree of intrafamilial variability, but no further evaluations were performed to exclude a mosaicism. In a cohort of 65 LDS patients, finger contractures and talipes equinovarus were reported in 13% and 23% individuals, respectively [39]. Specific limb alterations compatible with arthrogryposis were observed in at least three further LDS patients, two of them bearing a variant in the TGFBR2 gene [40,41,42]. So, we also advise considering this syndrome in the differential diagnosis of arthrogryposis.
Some features present in the perinatal period showed an improvement during time due in particular to physiatric treatment. Early multidisciplinary care soon after birth [14] was successful in improving the arthrogryposis phenotype in all our participants, except the most severely affected, i.e., pt 13. The group of participants in the DA1/DA2B spectrum and the patient with LDS had the best prognosis, and in general, except for pt 4, required less surgical procedures than the case with DA5D (pt 9), one of the two syndromic cases (pt 13) and the case with amyoplasia (pt 12).
Molecular diagnosis allowed us to point out a significant intrafamilial variability among the individuals with DA. In the family with a TPM2 variant described here, involvement of the extremities appeared to be severe in pt 1, moderate in the mother (pt 2), and milder in the grandmother (pt 3). Nevertheless, the generalized neuromuscular involvement was more serious in the mother, with hyperCKemia, muscular asthenia and paresthesias of the upper limbs, milder or transient in the grandmother (a singular elevated level of plasmatic CK) and transient in the son (elevated levels of plasmatic CK only in the past). Variants in the TPM2 gene have been associated with a number of different myopathies. Most are heterozygous changes associated with an autosomal dominant disease [32]. Recently, the second case of recessively inherited TPM2-related Escobar variant of MPS and congenital myopathy in a patient from a consanguineous family was described [43]. In conclusion, we cannot exclude that these familial findings could be related to the role of the TPM2 gene. A degree of intrafamilial variability is also described for the same CHRNG variants. In particular, the homozygous variant in the CHRNG gene we detected in pt 10 has already been reported in association with both the lethal and the non-lethal form of MPS. Although these different forms usually manifest in different families, it has been estimated that there is a 5% chance that a subsequent sibling will have a MPS subtype different than the proband, though concordance decreases for more distant relatives [44]. In addition, CHRNG variants and variants in other components of the embryonal acetylcholine receptor may present with fetal akinesia deformation sequence (FADS) without pterygia. These considerations were important for genetic counselling of the family.
Molecular diagnosis was also important for the follow-up. Due to possible respiratory distress in patients with ECEL1 variants, for pt 9, we recommended not only orthopedic, but also respiratory follow-up [45,46]. In the participant with LDS, we planned not only skeletal investigations, but also vascular, ocular, and cardiological assessments. In pt 10, scoliosis and an already described anomaly of the craniovertebral junction (fusion of cervical vertebrae and clefting of vertebral bodies) were discovered during skeletal survey [4]. Follow-up at later ages was not sufficient to reach a molecular diagnosis in pt 13, despite WES analysis and several cytogenetic investigations. We cannot exclude the possibility of multiple loci contributing to the phenotype with an oligogenic mode of inheritance, as recently described [27].

5. Conclusions

We have described a series of participants affected by arthrogryposis, complete with detailed clinical and molecular information that may help to portray the natural history of this phenotype.
During the prenatal and perinatal periods, clinical features are sometimes similar among different conditions, but over time, specific elements of a particular disease tend to appear. Clinical examination of the parents is helpful to suspect a specific condition and to define the recurrence risk. Since distal arthrogryposis (DA) has a better prognosis than other forms, molecular analysis can help reassure the parents of a newborn. In the same way, a molecular confirmation can prepare parents for conditions with a worse prognosis. Due to a varied differential diagnosis, early genetic testing can also help to avoid unnecessary investigations in children. Molecular diagnosis also helps in the planning of a specific follow-up. Finally, due to a considerable genetic heterogeneity, we confirm the precious contribution of next generation sequencing (NGS) in the molecular diagnosis of arthrogryposis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13010029/s1. Text S1: Medical history, clinical features, instrumental findings, genetic analyses and performed treatments of the described participants. Table S1: Classification of variants associated with arthrogryposis in our cohort, according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) [28]. Table S2: Clinical features, instrumental findings, genetic analyses and performed treatments of the described participants. Each column corresponds to a patient. The feature has to be considered bilateral, if not otherwise specified. Pt = patient. Fy = family. M = male. F = female. − = absent. + = present. N.A. = not avalaible. het = heterozygous. hom = homozygous. comp = compound. NGS = next generation sequencing. NIPT = non-invasive prenatal testing. CGH-array = comparative genomic hybridization array. WES = whole exome sequencing. FISH = fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G., M.P. and A.S.-F.; methodology, M.P. and S.G.C.; investigation, A.S.-F., H.F., B.C.-X., M.M., A.P. and D.M.; data collection and data curation, M.P., S.R., S.G.C., E.S., G.C., D.F., T.G., S.F., S.S., C.F. and G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and S.G.C.; writing—review and editing, L.G. and A.S.-F.; supervision: L.G. and A.S.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.P. and D.M. are partially supported by the “Emma and Ernesto Rulfo Foundation for Medical Research”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Area Vasta Emilia Nord (AVEN) (protocol code 722/2020, date of approval 28 July 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects or from both parents in case of minors involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the participants or from both parents in case of minors to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work has been generated within the European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability (ERN-ITHACA) (EU Framework Partnership Agreement ID: 3HP-HP-FPA ERN-01-2016/739516). The authors also wish to thank the participants and their families for their willingness to contribute to the medical and scientific communities by sharing their stories and photographs necessary for this publication, as well as the photographers Marco Bonazzi and Luca Valcavi. The authors are grateful for the contribution made by the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio Manodori of Reggio Emilia.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that there are no conflict of interest concerning this work.

References

  1. Hall, J.G.; Reed, S.D.; Greene, G. The distal arthrogryposis: Delineation of new entities-review and nosologic discussion. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1982, 11, 185–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hall, J.G. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: Etiology, genetics, classification, diagnostic approach, and general aspects. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B 1997, 6, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hall, J.G. Arthrogryposis (multiple congenital contractures): Diagnostic approach to etiology, classification, genetics, and general principles. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2014, 57, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. OMIM—Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man®. Available online: https://www.omim.org/ (accessed on 16 November 2021).
  5. Fahy, M.J.; Hall, J.G. A retrospective study of pregnancy complications among 828 cases of arthrogryposis. Genet. Couns. 1990, 1, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Vanpaemel, L.; Schoenmakers, M.; van Nesselrooij, B.; Pruijs, H.; Helders, P. Multiple congenital contractures. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B 1997, 6, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bevan, W.P.; Hall, J.G.; Bamshad, M.; Staheli, L.T.; Jaffe, K.M.; Song, K. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (amyoplasia): An orthopaedic perspective. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2007, 27, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bernstein, R.M. Arthrogryposis and amyoplasia. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2002, 10, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hall, J.G. Don’t use the term “amyoplasia” loosely. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 111, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sarwark, J.F.; MacEwen, G.D.; Scott, C.I., Jr. Amyoplasia (a common form of arthrogryposis). J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1990, 72, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sells, J.M.; Jaffe, K.M.; Hall, J.G. Amyoplasia, the most common type of arthrogryposis: The potential for good outcome. Pediatrics 1996, 97, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, H. Embryonic movement stimulates joint formation and development: Implications in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Bioessays 2021, 43, e2000319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bamshad, M.; Van Heest, A.E.; Pleasure, D. Arthrogryposis: A Review and Update. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009, 91, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Griffet, J.; Dieterich, K.; Bourg, V.; Bourgeois, E. Amyoplasia and distal arthrogryposis. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2021, 107, 102781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hall, J.G.; Aldinger, K.A.; Tanaka, K.I. Amyoplasia revisited. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2014, 164, 700–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bamshad, M.; Jorde, L.B.; Carey, J.C. A revised and extended classification of the distal arthrogryposes. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1996, 65, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Beals, R.K. The distal arthrogryposes: A new classification of peripheral contractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 435, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McMillin, M.J.; Below, J.E.; Shively, K.M.; Beck, A.E.; Gildersleeve, H.I.; Pinner, J.; Gogola, G.R.; Hecht, J.T.; Grange, D.K.; Harris, D.J.; et al. Mutations in ECEL1 Cause Distal Arthrogryposis Type 5D. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 92, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Dieterich, K.; Quijano-Roy, S.; Monnier, N.; Zhou, J.; Fauré, J.; Smirnow, D.A.; Carlier, R.; Laroche, C.; Marcorelles, P.; Mercier, S.; et al. The Neuronal Endopeptidase ECEL1 Is Associated With a Distinct Form of Recessive Distal Arthrogryposis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 1483–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Alesi, V.; Sessini, F.; Genovese, S.; Calvieri, G.; Sallicandro, E.; Ciocca, L.; Mingoia, M.; Novelli, A.; Moi, P. A New Intronic Variant in ECEL1 in Two Patients with Distal Arthrogryposis Type 5D. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gowda, M.; Mohan, S.; Ramesh, D.; Chinta, N. Distal arthrogryposis type 5D in a South Indian family caused by novel deletion in ECEL1 gene. Clin. Dysmorphol. 2021, 30, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Michalk, A.; Stricker, S.; Becker, J.; Rupps, R.; Pantzar, T.; Miertus, J.; Botta, G.; Naretto, V.G.; Janetzki, C.; Yaqoob, N.; et al. Acetylcholine Receptor Pathway Mutations Explain Various Fetal Akinesia Deformation Sequence Disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 82, 464–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bayram, Y.; Karaca, E.; Coban Akdemir, Z.; Yilmaz, E.O.; Tayfun, G.A.; Aydin, H.; Torun, D.; Bozdogan, S.T.; Gezdirici, A.; Isikay, S.; et al. Molecular Etiology of Arthrogryposis in Multiple Families of Mostly Turkish Origin. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 762–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Valdès-Flores, M.; Casas-Avila, L.; Hernández-Zamora, E.; Kofman, S.; Hidalgo-Bravo, A. Characterization of a Group Unrelated Patients with Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita. J. Pediatr. 2016, 92, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kiefer, J.; Hall, J.G. Geno ontology analysis of arthrogryposis (multiple congenital contractures). Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2019, 181, 310–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Laquerriere, A.; Jaber, D.; Abiusi, E.; Maluenda, J.; Mejlachowicz, D.; Vivanti, A.; Dieterich, K.; Stoeva, R.; Quevarec, L.; Nolent, F.; et al. Phenotypic spectrum and genomics of undiagnosed arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J. Med. Genet. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pehlivan, D.; Bayram, Y.; Gunes, N.; Coban Akdemir, Z.; Shukla, A.; Bierhals, T.; Tabakci, B.; Sahin, Y.; Gezdirici, A.; Fatih, J.M.; et al. The Genomics of Arthrogryposis, a Complex Trait: Candidate Genes and Further Evidence for Oligogenic Inheritance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 105, 132–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. The Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO). Available online: https://hpo.jax.org/app/tools/phenomizer (accessed on 16 November 2021).
  30. Hall, J.G. Deformations associated with arthrogryposis. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2021, 185, 2676–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bénard, M.; Sesqué, A.; Barthélémy, I.; Depeyre, A. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita and limitation of mouth opening: Presentation of a case and review of the literature. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 122, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marttila, M.; Lehtokari, V.L.; Marston, S.; Nyman, T.A.; Barnerias, C.; Beggs, A.H.; Bertini, E.; Ceyhan-Birsoy, O.; Cintas, P.; Gerard, M.; et al. Mutation update and genotype-phenotype correlations of novel and previously described mutations in TPM2 and TPM3 causing congenital myopathies. Hum. Mutat. 2014, 35, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pena, S.D.J.; Shokeir, M.H.K. Syndrome of camptodactyly, multiple ankyloses, facial anomalies, and pulmonary hypoplasia: A lethal condition. J. Pediatr. 1974, 85, 373–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hellmund, A.; Berg, C.; Geipel, A.; Müller, A.; Gembruch, U. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal akinesia deformation sequence (FADS): A study of 79 consecutive cases. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016, 294, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Busack, B.; Ott, C.E.; Henrich, W.; Verlohren, S. Prognostic significance of prenatal ultrasound in fetal arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 303, 943–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Filges, I.; Tercanli, S.; Hall, J.G. Fetal Arthrogryposis: Challenges and Perspectives for Prenatal Detection and Management. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2019, 181, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, Y.L.; Zhen, L.; Xu, L.L.; Li, D.Z. Fetal akinesia: The need for clinical vigilance in first trimester with decreased fetal movements. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 60, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cao, Q.; Yang, Y.; Pan, M.; Han, J.; Yang, X.; Li, D.Z. Fetal akinesia: The application of clinical exome sequencing in cases with decreased fetal movement. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021, 260, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Erkula, G.; Sponseller, P.D.; Paulsen, L.C.; Oswald, G.L.; Loeys, B.L.; Dietz, H.C. Musculoskeletal findings of Loeys-Dietz syndrome. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010, 92, 1876–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Viassolo, V.; Lituania, M.; Marasini, M.; Dietz, H.; Benelli, F.; Forzano, F.; Faravelli, F. Fetal aortic root dilation: A prenatal feature of the Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 2006, 26, 1081–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chung, B.H.; Bradley, T.; Grosse-Wortmann, L.; Blaser, S.; Dirks, P.; Hinek, A.; Chitayat, D. Hand and fibrillin-1 deposition abnormalities in Loeys-Dietz syndrome—Expanding the clinical spectrum. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2014, 164, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Valenzuela, I.; Fernández-Alvarez, P.; Munell, F.; Sanchez-Montanez, A.; Giralt, G.; Vendrell, T.; Tizzano, E.F. Arthrogryposis as neonatal presentation of Loeys-Dietz syndrome due to a novel TGFBR2 mutation. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2017, 60, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schirwani, S.; Sarkozy, A.; Phadke, R.; Childs, A.M.; Mein, R.; Ismail, A.; Smith, A.; Muntoni, F.; Hobson, E.; Pysden, K. Homozygous intronic variants in TPM2 cause recessively inherited Escobar variant of multiple pterygium syndrome and congenital myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2021, 31, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vogt, J.; Morgan, N.V.; Rehal, P.; Faivre, L.; Brueton, L.A.; Becker, K.; Fryns, J.P.; Holder, S.; Islam, L.; Kivuva, E.; et al. CHRNG genotype-phenotype correlations in the multiple pterygium syndromes. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 49, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shaheen, R.; Al-Owain, M.; Khan, A.O.; Zaki, M.S.; Hossni, H.A.; Al-Tassan, R.; Eyaid, W.; Alkuraya, F.S. Identification of three novel ECEL1 mutations in three families with distal arthrogryposis type 5D. Clin. Genet. 2014, 85, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ullmann, U.; D’Argenzio, L.; Mathur, S.; Whyte, T.; Quinlivan, R.; Longman, C.; Farrugia, M.E.; Manzur, A.; Willis, T.; Jungbluth, H.; et al. ECEL1 gene related contractural syndrome: Long-term follow-up and update on clinical and pathological aspects. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2018, 28, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Genes 13 00029 g001a 550Genes 13 00029 g001b 550Genes 13 00029 g001c 550
Figure 1. Phenotypic characteristics of the participants. Family 1 (Red background: 1A–E pt 1; 2A–E pt 2; 3A–C pt 3). (1A) At birth. (1B–E) At 3 years and 8 months of age. (2A) In the neonatal period. (2B–E) At 24 years of age. (3A–C) At 48 years of age. Family 2 (Blue background: 4A–J pt 4; 5A–D pt 5; 6A–E pt 6). (4A–E) At birth. (4F–I) At 26 years of age. (5A–D) At 1 month of life. (6A–E) At 1 month of life. Family 3 (Yellow background: 7A–C pt 7; 8A–D pt 8). (7A–C) At 1 month of life. (8A–D) At 27 years of age. Family 4 (Green backgorund: 9A–K pt 9). (9A,B) In the neonatal period. (9C–G) At 7 years of age. (9H–K) At 12 years and 1 month. Family 5 (Magenta background: 10A–E pt 10). (10A) At birth. (10B–E) At 4 years and 9 months of age. Family 6 (Violet background: 11A–F pt 11). (11A,B) At birth. (11C–F) At 1 year and 7 months. Family 7 (Orange background: pt 12). (12A): Hands at 25 years of age. Family 8 (Cyan backgroun: 13A–F pt 13). (13A) In childhood. (13B–F) At 35 years of age.
Figure 1. Phenotypic characteristics of the participants. Family 1 (Red background: 1A–E pt 1; 2A–E pt 2; 3A–C pt 3). (1A) At birth. (1B–E) At 3 years and 8 months of age. (2A) In the neonatal period. (2B–E) At 24 years of age. (3A–C) At 48 years of age. Family 2 (Blue background: 4A–J pt 4; 5A–D pt 5; 6A–E pt 6). (4A–E) At birth. (4F–I) At 26 years of age. (5A–D) At 1 month of life. (6A–E) At 1 month of life. Family 3 (Yellow background: 7A–C pt 7; 8A–D pt 8). (7A–C) At 1 month of life. (8A–D) At 27 years of age. Family 4 (Green backgorund: 9A–K pt 9). (9A,B) In the neonatal period. (9C–G) At 7 years of age. (9H–K) At 12 years and 1 month. Family 5 (Magenta background: 10A–E pt 10). (10A) At birth. (10B–E) At 4 years and 9 months of age. Family 6 (Violet background: 11A–F pt 11). (11A,B) At birth. (11C–F) At 1 year and 7 months. Family 7 (Orange background: pt 12). (12A): Hands at 25 years of age. Family 8 (Cyan backgroun: 13A–F pt 13). (13A) In childhood. (13B–F) At 35 years of age.
Genes 13 00029 g001aGenes 13 00029 g001bGenes 13 00029 g001c
Genes 13 00029 g002 550
Figure 2. Pedigrees of the reported families. Pt = participants. V = variant. wt = wild-type. TOP = Termination Of Pregnancy. CK = creatine kinase. The arrow indicates the index case in each family.
Figure 2. Pedigrees of the reported families. Pt = participants. V = variant. wt = wild-type. TOP = Termination Of Pregnancy. CK = creatine kinase. The arrow indicates the index case in each family.
Genes 13 00029 g002
Table
Table 1. Summary of the clinical features, instrumental findings, genetic analyses and performed treatments in our cohort. Each column corresponds to a patient. Pt = patient. Fy = family. M = male. F = female. − = absent. + = present. PP = prenatal period. Y = years. D = days. m = months. N.A. = not avalaible. Het = heterozygous. hom = homozygous. comp = compound. DA = distal arthrogryposis. EVMPS = nonlethal Escobar variant of multiple pterygium syndrome. LDS = Loeys-Dietz syndrome. A = amyoplasia. U = undefined.
Table 1. Summary of the clinical features, instrumental findings, genetic analyses and performed treatments in our cohort. Each column corresponds to a patient. Pt = patient. Fy = family. M = male. F = female. − = absent. + = present. PP = prenatal period. Y = years. D = days. m = months. N.A. = not avalaible. Het = heterozygous. hom = homozygous. comp = compound. DA = distal arthrogryposis. EVMPS = nonlethal Escobar variant of multiple pterygium syndrome. LDS = Loeys-Dietz syndrome. A = amyoplasia. U = undefined.
Pt 1 (Fy1)Pt 2 (Fy1)Pt 3 (Fy1)Pt 4 (Fy2)Pt 5 (Fy2)Pt 6 (Fy2)Pt 7 (Fy3)Pt 8 (Fy3)Pt 9 (Fy4)Pt 10 (Fy5)Pt 11 (Fy6)Pt 12 (Fy7)Pt 13 (Fy8)Total
General information
SexMFFMFFFFMFMFF
Age at first evaluationPP20 y44 y1 dPPPP1 m27 y6 d1 d1 y3 y16 y
Current age (years)42549315422915923137
Prenatal findings
Ultrasound abnormalities+−N.A.++++−−+−+−7/12 = 58%
Postnatal features
Short stature−+−+−+−−++−−+6/13 = 46%
Ptosis−−−−−−−−++−−+3/13 = 23%
Epicanthus−−−−−−−−++−−+3/13 = 23%
Narrow mouth++−+++−−−+−−+7/13 = 54%
Microretrognathia+−−++++++++++11/13 = 85%
Trismus++++++−−−+−−+8/13= 61%
Myopathic facies−−−−−−−−++−−+3/13= 23%
Ulnar deviation of the hand++−++++++++−+11/13 = 85%
Hand clenching+−−++++−+++−−8/13 = 61%
Adducted thumb++−++++++++−+11/13 = 85%
Overlapping fingers+−−+++++−+++−9/13 = 69%
Camptodactyly+−−+++−+++−−+8/13 = 61%
Single transverse palmar crease +−−+++−−+++−+8/13 = 61%
Talipes equinovarus++++−+−−−−+++8/13 = 61%
Rocker bottom foot−−−−+−++++−−−5/13 = 38%
Overlapping toes+++++−+−+−+++10/13 = 77%
Prominent calcaneus+−−++−++++++−9/13 = 69%
Pterygium−+++−−−−++−++7/13 = 54%
Scoliosis−−+−−−−−++−++5/13 = 38%
Hip dysplasia−−−+−−−−++−−−3/13 = 23%
Other clinical findings+++−+++++++++12/13 = 92%
Genetic testing
Molecular diagnosishet NM_003289.4(TPM2):
c.463G>A, p.(A155T)		het NM_006757.3(TNNT3):
c.187C>T, p.(R63C)		het NM_001145829.1(TNNI2):
c.499_501del, p.(E167del)		comp het NM_004826(ECEL1):
c.[1630C>T];[1700C>G], p.[(R544C)];[(P567R)]		hom NM_005199.4(CHRNG):
c.459dup, p.(V154Sfs*24)		het NM_ 001024847.2(TGFBR2):
c.1595dupA, p.(H532Qfs*9)		//11/12 = 92%
DiagnosisDA 1DA 1DA 2BDA 5DEVMPSLDS 2AU
Treatment
Physiotherapy+−−−+++−+++−+8/13 = 61%
Orthopedic devices++−++++++++++12/13 = 92%
Number of surgeries 42151−115225612/13 = 92%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pollazzon, M.; Caraffi, S.G.; Faccioli, S.; Rosato, S.; Fodstad, H.; Campos-Xavier, B.; Soncini, E.; Comitini, G.; Frattini, D.; Grimaldi, T.; et al. Clinical and Genetic Findings in a Series of Eight Families with Arthrogryposis. Genes 2022, 13, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010029

AMA Style

Pollazzon M, Caraffi SG, Faccioli S, Rosato S, Fodstad H, Campos-Xavier B, Soncini E, Comitini G, Frattini D, Grimaldi T, et al. Clinical and Genetic Findings in a Series of Eight Families with Arthrogryposis. Genes. 2022; 13(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pollazzon, Marzia, Stefano Giuseppe Caraffi, Silvia Faccioli, Simonetta Rosato, Heidi Fodstad, Belinda Campos-Xavier, Emanuele Soncini, Giuseppina Comitini, Daniele Frattini, Teresa Grimaldi, and et al. 2022. "Clinical and Genetic Findings in a Series of Eight Families with Arthrogryposis" Genes 13, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010029

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop