Next Article in Journal
The Value of a Comprehensive Genomic Evaluation in Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Diseases: A Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic and Prognostic Risk Assessment of Heat Shock Protein HSPA1B rs2763979 Gene Variant in Asthma
Previous Article in Journal
A Tet-Inducible CRISPR Platform for High-Fidelity Editing of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Course, Genetic, and Immunohistochemical Characterization of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas (Frantz Tumors) in a Brazilian Cohort
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Whole-Exome Sequencing and Copy Number Analysis in a Patient with Warburg Micro Syndrome

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2364; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122364
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 7 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Genotype-Phenotype Study in Disease)

Abstract

:
Warburg Micro syndrome (WARBM) is an autosomal recessive neuro-ophthalmologic syndrome characterized by microcephaly, microphthalmia, congenital cataracts, cortical dysplasia, corpus callosum hypoplasia, spasticity, and hypogonadism. WARBM is divided into four subtypes according to the causative genes, of which RAB3GAP1 (OMIM# 602536) accounts for the highest proportion. We collected detailed medical records and performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) for a congenital cataract patient. A novel heterozygous frameshift RAB3GAP1 variant was detected in a boy with a rare ocular phenotype of bilateral membranous cataracts accompanied by a persistent papillary membrane. Further copy number variation (CNV) analysis identified a novel deletion on chromosome 2q21.3 that removed 4 of the 24 exons of RAB3GAP1. The patient was diagnosed with WARBM following genetic testing. The present study expands the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of WARBM. It suggests applying whole exome sequencing (WES) and CNV analysis for the early diagnosis of syndromic diseases in children with congenital cataracts.

1. Introduction

Warburg Micro syndrome (WARBM) is a rare autosomal recessive neuro-ophthalmologic syndrome characterized by microcephaly, microphthalmia, congenital cataracts (CCs), cortical dysplasia, corpus callosum hypoplasia, spasticity, and hypogonadism [1]. WARBM presents with many similar clinical disorders as Martsolf syndrome, a milder condition than WARBM. Both diseases genetically overlap and share the same molecular deficit in RAB18. According to a previous report, they were termed the Micro/Martsolf spectrum or RAB18 deficiency disorder [2]
Not only biallelic loss-of-function variants in the RAB3GAP1 (OMIM# 602536), RAB3GAP2 (OMIM# 609275), RAB18 (OMIM# 602207), and TBC1D20 (OMIM# 611663) genes reportedly cause WARBM, but it can also be caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous missense and indels variants [1,2,3,4,5]. RAB3GAP is a heterodimeric protein consisting of a 130-kDa catalytic subunit (encoded by RAB3GAP1) and a 150-kDa noncatalytic subunit (encoded by RAB3GAP2). RAB3GAP functions as a guanine–nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for RAB18 and has a role in regulating calcium-mediated exocytosis of neurotransmitters and hormones [6]. TBC1D20 promotes RAB18 dissociation from the endoplasmic reticulum membrane into the cytosol and shows RAB18 GTPase-activating activity [7]. It is suggested that WARBM is directly caused by a loss of RAB18 or indirectly by a loss of RAB18 regulators (RAB3GAP1, RAB3GAP2, or TBC1D20) [7,8].
Here, we describe a boy with two novel RAB3GAP1 gene variants. One of the variants is a deletion on chromosome 2q21.3, resulting in the removal of four of the twenty-four exons of RAB3GAP1. Our finding broadens the phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of WARBM via detailed clinical examinations and genetic screening.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University and adhered to the Helsinki Declaration. As a part of a series of ongoing studies at the Childhood Cataract Program of the Chinese Ministry of Health (CCPMOH) [9], we enrolled a patient with CCs seen in January 2021 and his parents. The proband and his parents underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES). Informed written consent was obtained from the legal guardian of the patient.

2.2. Clinical Assessments

Clinical data of the patient were collected based on medical history review, clinical examinations of facial dysmorphia, head circumference, height, and thorough ocular examinations including slit-lamp photography (BX900; HAAG-STREIT AG, Bern, Switzerland), Pentacam scheimpflug system (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), Tono-Pen (Reichert, Inc., Depew, NY, USA), and visual evoked potential (RETeval, LKC Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and A-scan ultrasound and B-scan ultrasound (Aviso, Quantel Médical, Clermont-Ferrand, France). The horizontal corneal diameter was measured by caliper.

2.3. Exome Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from participants’ peripheral leukocytes using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We performed WES for the proband via the Agilent v6 targeted sequence capture library process method with Illumina next-generation sequencing systems (NovaSeq 6000, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and bioinformatics analysis was performed as described previously [10,11]. Briefly, raw sequencing reads were matched to the human reference genome assembly (NCBI build 37/hg19) via Burrows-Wheeler Aligner. In addition, local realignment, base quality score recalibration, and variant calling (HaplotypeCaller) were performed on Toolkit (GATK). Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor with custom shell scripts (VEP, https://www.ensembl.org/vep, 6 June 2016) used to assess and annotate the variants. The frequency of variants was from the public database (1000 Genomes, dbSNP, gnomAD, ExAC, and ESP6500) and our private database. All alleles with minor allele frequencies higher than 0.01 were filtered. We then investigated the variants with detailed virtual panels by annotating the genes with PanelApp (Cataract R31, Supplementary File S1). If no candidate causative variant was detected, we further analyzed the variants from the genes included in Structural eye disease v1.3 of PanelApp (Supplementary File S2). The phenotype of the patient was further used to filter the variants. To detect copy number variations (CNVs) and sub-microscopic deletions/duplications, we used the specific software package CNVkit based on the WES data [12]. A reliable CNV reference was trained using an iterative approach, as reported previously [10]. Following the detection of a CNV, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using the BGI MGISEQ-2000 sequencer platform to confirm the existence of the CNV. Briefly, paired-end libraries were constructed using MGIEasy universal DNA library prep. The libraries were then sequenced in 2 × 150 base pair (bp) paired-end reads with at least 30× mean coverage. The Burrows-Wheeler Aligner tool (version 0.7.17) was used for alignment, and a CNVkit was applied for CNV calling. Variants were named using Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature guidelines. A total of 1000 genomes, dbSNP, ClinVar, and HGMD were checked to identify reported pathogenic variants among the candidate variants [13,14,15].

2.4. Pathogenicity Assessments of the Variants

The pathogenicity of the candidate variants was analyzed following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant classification guidelines [16,17].

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Phenotypes

The three-month-old boy presented with nystagmus, and his parents noticed whitish pupils at birth. The proband was born to non-consanguineous unaffected Chinese parents after a full-term pregnancy. No cataract-causing event occurred during pregnancy, including cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, rubella, or toxoplasmosis infection, toxin or X-ray exposure, and relevant medication usage. No facial dysmorphia was detected. Developmental delay was also diagnosed because the boy could not lift his head at three months old. His head circumference was 35.5 cm, which indicated microcephaly, and his height was 56 cm (<97% of boys at the same age) at 3 months old [18]. Ocular examinations revealed bilateral microcornea, microphthalmos, congenital membranous cataracts, and persistent pupillary membranes. The lens was very thin, and the anterior and posterior capsules fused with fibrotic opacities (Figure 1). The corneal diameter of both eyes was 8 mm. The axial lens (AL) was 16.93 mm in the right eye and 16.68 mm in the left eye. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was 16 mmHg in the right eye and 12 mmHg in the left eye. The P2 latency of visual evoked potential was delayed in both eyes. After genetic screening, the patient was referred to a pediatric clinic for further examination and diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed corpus callosum hypoplasia, and a transcranial doppler suggested high blood pressure in the intracranial artery. The patient also had a patent foramen ovale and cryptorchidism. WARBM was then confirmed. The cataracts were removed when the boy was three months old. At the three-month follow-up, severe posterior capsular opacification was noticed in his right eye, and a second surgery was prescribed to remove the opacities. Twice yearly follow-up was scheduled.

3.2. Molecular Findings

As a part of the etiology detection study at the Childhood Cataract Program of the Chinese Ministry of Health (CCPMOH), WES was performed on a patient with CCs (Figure 2A). After annotation with VEP, we performed a filter chain with Excel as follows: gnomAD_exome_ALL lower than 0.1%, gnomAD_genome_ALL lower than 1%, local variant frequency (based on almost 10,000 WES data at our sequence center) lower than 1%, gene list in OMIM morbid (20220115). Thus, we received 142 variants after the first step of filtering. Then, we further investigated the variants with detail the virtual panel by annotating the genes with PanelApp (Cataract R31). We finally obtained six variants and with only one frameshift indel of RAB3GAP1 with VEP impact annotation HIGH. The filtered variants were also listed in Supplementary File S3.
The c.178_182del variant (paternal origin, Figure 2B) results in the premature termination of RAB3GAP1 (p. Glu60IlefsTer3). The variant was classified as Likely Pathogenic, because it showed evidence of PVS1+PM2_support. Since RAB3GAP1 causes autosomal recessive WARBM with the causative mechanism of loss of function (LOF), we searched for another pathogenic variant on that gene. Further CNV analysis investigated a deletion in chromosome 2q21.3 (hg19)2:135890449-135893557del (maternal origin). WGS demonstrated the existence of a deletion around chromosome (hg19)2:135888415-135895985del. The deletion removed exons 14–17 of RAB3GAP1 (Figure 2C), with the HGVS nomenclature NM_012233.3:c.(1236+1_1237-1)_(1923+1_1924-1)del, leading to a loss of 229 amino acids (larger than 10% of the full protein length 982 amino acids). According to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants, we should apply PVS1_strong for this deletion. We did not find any carrier with this in-frame exon 14–17 deletion in the gnomAD SVs v2.1 population database (PM2_support), and we confirmed this exon 14–17 deletion was in-trans of the paternal c.178_182del (p.Glu60IlefsTer3) variant (PM3). According to ClinGen/ACMG/AMP Bayesian classification framework, we classed this maternal exon 14–17 deletion as likely pathogenic (PVS1_strong+PM2_support+PM3) [16,19]. The locations and domain structures (https://pecan.stjude.cloud/proteinpaint/) of the RAB3GAP1 variants are shown in Figure 3.

4. Discussion

We identified a novel frameshift variant and a novel deletion of exons 14–17 in the RAB3GAP1 gene in a proband with CCs. We described the detailed phenotype, including developmental delay, microcephaly, microphthalmia, microcornea, and congenital membranous cataracts with persistent pupillary membranes, corpus callosum hypoplasia, patent foramen ovale, and cryptorchidism. Interestingly, congenital membranous cataracts combined with persistent pupillary membranes were not mentioned in previous WARBM cases. Our findings demonstrate a severe cataract phenotype and expand the genotype spectrum of this disorder.
We identified novel compound heterozygous variants in the RAB3GAP1 gene leading to WARBM. WARBM presents with many similar clinical disorders as Martsolf syndrome, a milder condition than WARBM. From the genotype, Martsolf syndrome is more often associated with a mutation in RAB3GAP2. To date, only three pathogenic variants related to Martsolf syndrome were detected in RAB3GAP1 [20,21]. From the phenotype, Martsolf syndrome has milder clinical manifestations than WARBM. The proband showed severer clinical features including developmental delay, microcephaly, microphthalmia, microcornea, severe CCs, corpus callosum hypoplasia, patent foramen ovale, and cryptorchidism. Combining the above genotypic and phenotypic information, the patient was diagnosed with WARBM. According to previous reports [1,3,22,23,24,25], most WARBM patients originated from consanguineous families (mostly in Egypt, Pakistan, Turkey, India, Iran, and Tunisia). The disease is rare in the Chinese population because of uncommon consanguineous marriages in China. WARBM is classified into four subtypes (WARBM1–4) according to the causative gene (RAB3GAP1, RAB3GAP2, RAB18, and TBC1D20). Among them, RAB3GAP1 accounts for the highest proportion in the population [2]. The pathological mechanisms caused by RAB3GAP1 variants are only partially understood. RAB3GAP1 is the catalytic subunit of the RAB3GAP heterodimeric complex, which acts as a GEF to activate RAB18. To date, more than 65 variants of the RAB3GAP1 gene have been reported, including splice site, nonsense, frameshift mutations, and micro deletion. Most of the above variants were predicted to cause nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and protein LOF with autosomal recessive inheritance [3]. The LOF of the RAB3GAP complex indirectly caused RAB18 deficiency via the loss of its regulators. RAB18 is ubiquitously expressed, has particularly high expression in the brain and epithelia, and regulates the exocytosis of neurotransmitters and hormones [6]. A RAB18 deficiency might impair specific vesicle transport routes, causing WARBM. We suggest the paternal origin c.178_182del variant in the present study caused the disease through the above mechanism. For the in-frame deletion of RAB3GAP1 exons 14–17, it leads to producing a shorter protein, with a loss of 229 amino acids, than wildtype RAB3GAP1, affecting the integrity of the Rab3-GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit. The function of the mutated RAB3GAP1 as the GEF for RAB18 might be impaired. Therefore, WARBM occurred. A congenital membranous cataract is an especially severe type of CC, impairing lens transparency and morphology. The lens material was absorbed, leading to a decrease in lens thickness. The anterior and posterior capsules gradually fused and became cloudy. The severe disorders described above suggest that RAB3GAP1 gene mutations cause significant damage to lens development.
Cataracts can be directly observed through the transparent cornea and pupil, allowing early detection. Additionally, the lens is sensitive to whole-body homeostasis disorders because of its selectively permeable lens capsule, the nuclear degradation of lens fibers, and slow lens protein turnover [26]. Therefore, cataracts could be the first manifestations of many syndromes. Since infants are challenging to examine and many manifestations of WARBM are insidious and uncharacteristic, they are often initially misdiagnosed as simple cataracts. However, genetic testing allows children with syndromic diseases to be diagnosed promptly, and their prognosis might be improved with early rehabilitation. For our patient, genetic screening not only helps the present patient have an earlier diagnosis and treatment but also makes genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis possible.
WES is a convenient and fast method of initial genetic screening for CCs. Most inherited cataracts are caused by small-scale mutations, including substitutions, insertions, and deletions [27]. WES is reliable and efficient in detecting these variants, with a high diagnostic yield up to 85% [28,29,30,31,32], and is therefore used for the initial genetic screening for CCs. Among the patients without causative variants identified during the initial genetic screen, we searched for larger-scale mutations using CNV analysis based on the WES data. Previously, array comparative genomic hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification proved CNV detection means with high accuracy [33]. However, they are not suggested as the first-tier diagnostic test for CCs because small-scale mutations represent a significant proportion of pathogenic variants of CCs. In contrast, WES is particularly designed to identify those variants. Additionally, CNV detection by WES has become increasingly precise due to capture and library progression, coverage and uniformity improvement, and bioinformatics software development. WES can accurately identify CNVs larger than 1 Mb with high specificity and sensitivity [34]. Therefore, we recommend using WES as the first-tier diagnostic test for CCs and including CNV analysis to improve the overall diagnostic rate. In the present case, we performed additional WGS to verify CNVs and explore the deletion breakpoint. The maternal deletion of RAB3GAP1 exons 14–17 could be detected with a CNVkit and read depth signatures by trio WGS. However, the exact breakpoints of the maternal CNV were not detected with split-reads. Using the UCSC genome browser [35], we found tandem repeat and low mappability regions spread across multiple introns of the RAB3GAP1 gene, leading to uncertainty about the precise CNV breakpoint of the short reads sequencing technology.
Limitations also exist in our study, there was no experimental GEF assay for the identified variants since RAB3GAP functions as a GEF for RAB18. A methodologically sound study is needed to further confirm the mechanism.

5. Conclusions

This study expands the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of WARBM. We identified novel compound heterozygous variants (c.178_182del, p. Glu60IlefsTer3 and deletion of exons 14–17) in RAB3GAP1 based on WES data. Genetic screening played a significant role in the early diagnosis of syndromic diseases in children with CCs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13122364/s1, Supplementary File S1: PanelApp (Cataract R31); Supplementary File S2: PanelApp (Structural eye disease v1.3); Supplementary File S3: The list of filtered variants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.C., H.L. and Q.W.; formal analysis, Q.W. and H.L.; funding acquisition, W.C., H.L. and Q.W.; investigation, Q.W. and T.Q.; methodology, Q.W. and T.Q.; project administration, W.C., H.L. and Q.W.; resources, W.C., H.L., Q.W., T.Q., X.W., J.L., X.L. (Xiaoshan Lin), D.W., Z.L., X.Z. and X.L. (Xiaoyan Li); supervision, W.C. and H.L.; validation, Q.W. and T.Q.; writing—original draft, Q.W., T.Q. and X.W.; writing—review and editing, W.C., H.L., Q.W., T.Q., X.W., J.L., X.L. (Xiaoshan Lin), D.W., Z.L., X.Z. and X.L. (Xiaoyan Li). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China, grant number: 2020YFC2008200, the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, grant number 2022A1515012102, and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Regional Collaborative Innovation Special Science and Technology Assistance Plan, grant number: 2022E02052.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (No. 2020KYPJ007 and date of approval: 10 January 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardian of each child.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the patients and their families for their kind participation in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aligianis, I.A.; Johnson, C.A.; Gissen, P.; Chen, D.; Hampshire, D.; Hoffmann, K.; Maina, E.N.; Morgan, N.V.; Tee, L.; Morton, J.; et al. Mutations of the catalytic subunit of RAB3GAP cause Warburg Micro syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 221–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abdel-Hamid, M.S.; Abdel-Ghafar, S.F.; Ismail, S.R.; Desouky, L.M.; Issa, M.Y.; Effat, L.K.; Zaki, M.S. Micro and Martsolf syndromes in 34 new patients: Refining the phenotypic spectrum and further molecular insights. Clin. Genet. 2020, 98, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bem, D.; Yoshimura, S.; Nunes-Bastos, R.; Bond, F.C.; Kurian, M.A.; Rahman, F.; Handley, M.T.; Hadzhiev, Y.; Masood, I.; Straatman-Iwanowska, A.A.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in RAB18 cause Warburg micro syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 88, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Liegel, R.P.; Handley, M.T.; Ronchetti, A.; Brown, S.; Langemeyer, L.; Linford, A.; Chang, B.; Morris-Rosendahl, D.J.; Carpanini, S.; Posmyk, R.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in TBC1D20 cause cataracts and male infertility in blind sterile mice and Warburg micro syndrome in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Aligianis, I.A.; Morgan, N.V.; Mione, M.; Johnson, C.A.; Rosser, E.; Hennekam, R.C.; Adams, G.; Trembath, R.C.; Pilz, D.T.; Stoodley, N.; et al. Mutation in Rab3 GTPase-activating protein (RAB3GAP) noncatalytic subunit in a kindred with Martsolf syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 78, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Stenmark, H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Handley, M.T.; Carpanini, S.M.; Mali, G.R.; Sidjanin, D.J.; Aligianis, I.A.; Jackson, I.J.; FitzPatrick, D.R. Warburg Micro syndrome is caused by RAB18 deficiency or dysregulation. Open. Biol. 2015, 5, 150047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dejgaard, S.Y.; Presley, J.F. Rab18: New insights into the function of an essential protein. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 1935–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, H.; Long, E.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y. Documenting rare disease data in China. Science 2015, 349, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Qin, T.; Wang, D.; Lin, X.; Zhu, Y.; Tan, H.; Zhao, L.; Li, J.; Lin, Z.; et al. Unusual Presentation in WAGR Syndrome: Expanding the Phenotypic and Genotypic Spectrum of the Diseases. Gene 2022, 13, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Q.; Qin, T.; Tan, H.; Ding, X.; Lin, X.; Li, J.; Lin, Z.; Sun, L.; Lin, H.; Chen, W. Broadening the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of MAF in three Chinese Han congenital cataracts families. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2022, 188, 2888–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Talevich, E.; Shain, A.H.; Botton, T.; Bastian, B.C. CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2016, 12, e1004873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. McLaren, W.; Gil, L.; Hunt, S.E.; Riat, H.S.; Ritchie, G.R.; Thormann, A.; Flicek, P.; Cunningham, F. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhou, P.; He, N.; Zhang, J.W.; Lin, Z.J.; Wang, J.; Yan, L.M.; Meng, H.; Tang, B.; Li, B.M.; Liu, X.R.; et al. Novel mutations and phenotypes of epilepsy-associated genes in epileptic encephalopathies. Genes Brain Behav. 2018, 17, e12456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tavtigian, S.V.; Greenblatt, M.S.; Harrison, S.M.; Nussbaum, R.L.; Prabhu, S.A.; Boucher, K.M.; Biesecker, L.G.; ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group (ClinGen SVI). Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework. Genet. Med. 2018, 20, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. WHO. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body Mass Index-for-Age; World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. Brandt, T.; Sack, L.M.; Arjona, D.; Tan, D.; Mei, H.; Cui, H.; Gao, H.; Bean, L.J.H.; Ankala, A.; Del Gaudio, D.; et al. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants. Genet. Med. 2020, 22, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Handley, M.T.; Morris-Rosendahl, D.J.; Brown, S.; Macdonald, F.; Hardy, C.; Bem, D.; Carpanini, S.M.; Borck, G.; Martorell, L.; Izzi, C.; et al. Mutation spectrum in RAB3GAP1, RAB3GAP2, and RAB18 and genotype-phenotype correlations in warburg micro syndrome and Martsolf syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koparir, A.; Karatas, O.F.; Yilmaz, S.S.; Suer, I.; Ozer, B.; Yuceturk, B.; Ozen, M. Revealing the functions of novel mutations in RAB3GAP1 in Martsolf and Warburg micro syndromes. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2019, 179, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hozhabri, H.; Talebi, M.; Mehrjardi, M.Y.V.; De Luca, A.; Dehghani, M. Martsolf syndrome with novel mutation in the TBC1D20 gene in a family from Iran. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2020, 182, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sekhon, P.K.; Premalatha, R.; Sabapathy, S. Warburg micro syndrome in siblings from India. J. Pediatr. Neurosci. 2016, 11, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kerkeni, N.; Kharrat, M.; Maazoul, F.; Boudabous, H.; M’Rad, R.; Trabelsi, M. Novel RAB3GAP1 Mutation in the First Tunisian Family With Warburg Micro Syndrome. J. Clin. Neurol. 2022, 18, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mutlu Albayrak, H.; Elcioglu, N.H.; Yeter, B.; Karaer, K. From cataract to syndrome diagnosis: Revaluation of Warburg-Micro syndrome Type 1 patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2021, 185, 2325–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Haargaard, B.; Wohlfahrt, J.; Fledelius, H.C.; Rosenberg, T.; Melbye, M. Incidence and cumulative risk of childhood cataract in a cohort of 2.6 million Danish children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 1316–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Shiels, A.; Bennett, T.M.; Hejtmancik, J.F. Cat-Map: Putting cataract on the map. Mol. Vis. 2010, 16, 2007–2015. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Gillespie, R.L.; O’Sullivan, J.; Ashworth, J.; Bhaskar, S.; Williams, S.; Biswas, S.; Kehdi, E.; Ramsden, S.C.; Clayton-Smith, J.; Black, G.C.; et al. Personalized diagnosis and management of congenital cataract by next-generation sequencing. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2124–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rechsteiner, D.; Issler, L.; Koller, S.; Lang, E.; Bahr, L.; Feil, S.; Ruegger, C.M.; Kottke, R.; Toelle, S.P.; Zweifel, N.; et al. Genetic Analysis in a Swiss Cohort of Bilateral Congenital Cataract. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021, 139, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bell, S.; Malka, S.; Lloyd, I.C.; Moosajee, M. Clinical Spectrum and Genetic Diagnosis of 54 Consecutive Patients Aged 0-25 with Bilateral Cataracts. Genes 2021, 12, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, W.; Xiao, X.; Li, S.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Q. Exome sequencing of 18 Chinese families with congenital cataracts: A new sight of the NHS gene. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kandaswamy, D.K.; Prakash, M.V.S.; Graw, J.; Koller, S.; Magyar, I.; Tiwari, A.; Berger, W.; Santhiya, S.T. Application of WES Towards Molecular Investigation of Congenital Cataracts: Identification of Novel Alleles and Genes in a Hospital-Based Cohort of South India. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Boone, P.M.; Bacino, C.A.; Shaw, C.A.; Eng, P.A.; Hixson, P.M.; Pursley, A.N.; Kang, S.H.; Yang, Y.; Wiszniewska, J.; Nowakowska, B.A.; et al. Detection of clinically relevant exonic copy-number changes by array CGH. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, 1326–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zhao, L.; Liu, H.; Yuan, X.; Gao, K.; Duan, J. Comparative study of whole exome sequencing-based copy number variation detection tools. BMC Bioinform. 2020, 21, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kent, W.J.; Sugnet, C.W.; Furey, T.S.; Roskin, K.M.; Pringle, T.H.; Zahler, A.M.; Haussler, D. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 996–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Anterior segment photographs of the patient with WARBM. (A) Anterior segment photograph using diffuse illumination of the right eye showing the persistent papillary membrane and lens fibrotic opacities. (B) Anterior segment photograph using diffuse illumination of the left eye, showing the persistent papillary membrane and lens fibrotic opacities. (C) Anterior segment photograph using direct focal illumination of the right eye showing the decreased thickness of the lens. (D) Anterior segment photograph using direct focal illumination of the left eye showing the decreased thickness of the lens. (Red arrow: lens fibrotic opacities).
Figure 1. Anterior segment photographs of the patient with WARBM. (A) Anterior segment photograph using diffuse illumination of the right eye showing the persistent papillary membrane and lens fibrotic opacities. (B) Anterior segment photograph using diffuse illumination of the left eye, showing the persistent papillary membrane and lens fibrotic opacities. (C) Anterior segment photograph using direct focal illumination of the right eye showing the decreased thickness of the lens. (D) Anterior segment photograph using direct focal illumination of the left eye showing the decreased thickness of the lens. (Red arrow: lens fibrotic opacities).
Genes 13 02364 g001
Figure 2. Molecular finding of the Chinese Han families. (A) The boy was born to non-consanguineous unaffected parents. (B) The sanger sequence of the family members showing a novel heterozygous c.178_182del variant in the affected proband and his unaffected father. (C) Chromosome 2q21.3 deletion removing 4 of the 24 exons of RAB3GAP1 in the affected proband and his unaffected mother identified from whole exome sequencing data.
Figure 2. Molecular finding of the Chinese Han families. (A) The boy was born to non-consanguineous unaffected parents. (B) The sanger sequence of the family members showing a novel heterozygous c.178_182del variant in the affected proband and his unaffected father. (C) Chromosome 2q21.3 deletion removing 4 of the 24 exons of RAB3GAP1 in the affected proband and his unaffected mother identified from whole exome sequencing data.
Genes 13 02364 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of RAB3GAP1. Cyan-blue: Rab3-GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit; Red label: c.178_182del, p. Glu60IlefsTer3 variant; Grey label: chromosome 2q21.3 deletion removing 4 of the 24 exons of RAB3GAP1; dotted line: boundary of exons.
Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of RAB3GAP1. Cyan-blue: Rab3-GTPase-activating protein catalytic subunit; Red label: c.178_182del, p. Glu60IlefsTer3 variant; Grey label: chromosome 2q21.3 deletion removing 4 of the 24 exons of RAB3GAP1; dotted line: boundary of exons.
Genes 13 02364 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Qin, T.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Lin, X.; Wang, D.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Lin, H.; et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing and Copy Number Analysis in a Patient with Warburg Micro Syndrome. Genes 2022, 13, 2364. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122364

AMA Style

Wang Q, Qin T, Wang X, Li J, Lin X, Wang D, Lin Z, Zhang X, Li X, Lin H, et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing and Copy Number Analysis in a Patient with Warburg Micro Syndrome. Genes. 2022; 13(12):2364. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122364

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qiwei, Tingfeng Qin, Xun Wang, Jing Li, Xiaoshan Lin, Dongni Wang, Zhuoling Lin, Xulin Zhang, Xiaoyan Li, Haotian Lin, and et al. 2022. "Whole-Exome Sequencing and Copy Number Analysis in a Patient with Warburg Micro Syndrome" Genes 13, no. 12: 2364. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122364

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop