Pancreatic Cancer with Mutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC Genes: Phenotype Correlation and Detection of a Novel Germline BRCA2 Mutation
by
,
Maria Teresa Vietri
1,2,*, 
Giovanna D’Elia
2,
Gemma Caliendo
2,
Luisa Albanese
2,
Giuseppe Signoriello
3,
Claudio Napoli
4,5 and
Anna Maria Molinari
1,2 1
Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
2
Unity of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
3
Statistical Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
5
Clinical Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistic Units, AOU, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(2), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020321
Submission received: 12 January 2022
/
Revised: 31 January 2022
/
Accepted: 7 February 2022
/
Published: 9 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Genotype-Phenotype Study in Disease)
Abstract
:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide; most of cases are sporadic, however about 5% to 10% report a hereditary predisposition. Several hereditary syndromes have been associated with familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) onset, including hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM), Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and Hereditary pancreatitis (HP).The aim of this study was to determine the mutational status of a cohort of 56 HBOC families, 7 LS families, 3 FAP and FAMMM families, and 1 LFS family with at least one case of PDAC. Mutation analysis of BRCA1/2, ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, NBN, CDH1, TP53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 genes, showedmutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC genes. We founda high mutation rate in patients belong HBOC and LS families, with a percentage of 28.6% in both syndromes and prevalence in HBOC of BRCA2 mutations with one case of double mutation in BRCA2 gene. In FAP family, we found a pathogenic mutation in APC gene in 1/3 families. We observed an early onset of PDAC and a lower survival in PDAC patients belonging to mutated families, while no evidence of possible pancreatic cancer cluster regions was found. Moreover, we identified a novel BRCA2 germline mutation, c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3), not reported in any database, that segregated with disease in HBOC patients. Mutational analysis was extended to family membersof mutated patients, both healthy and cancer affected, which revealed 23 unaffected family members that inherited the proband’s mutation. Although correlative by its nature, the presence of a BRCA mutation in PDAC patients may have benefits in terms of optimized treatment and longer outcome.
1. Introduction
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the twelfthmost common tumor and the seventh main cause of cancer death worldwide [1]. It represents about 5% of all malignancy cases, with the overall survival (OS) 5 years worse than other cancers [2]. Recently, a 2.3-fold increase has been seen in the global number of cases and deaths from PDAC, with a 3 times higher incidence in most developed countries [3]. Most of the PDAC cases are sporadic, but about 5% to 10% report a hereditary predisposition [4].
Pancreatic cancer arises in several hereditary syndromes, including Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch syndrome (LS), Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM), Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and Hereditary pancreatitis (HP) [5,6,7,8]. Most familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is attributable to HBOC syndrome that results from germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes and other genes such as ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, RAD50, and RAD51C [9,10]. In FPC belonging to HBOC, BRCA2 mutations are the most common genetic alteration, observed in about 5–10% of cases [11].
It was shown that about half of the patients with PDAC report pathogenic germline variants, even if they do not have a family history of pancreatic carcinoma. Moreover, the mutation presence could have therapeutic implications [12]. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to date recommend universal germline tests for all patients with PDAC [13] in order to identify germline mutation in patients that may benefit from alternative treatments. Moreover, identification of germline mutations in a patient will allow for testing family members at risk ofthe same or other associated cancers.
Immunetherapies or molecularly targeted agents have been recently introduced into cancer clinical practice [14,15,16], but it is still unclear whether they promote benefits in PDAC patients. For patients with BRCA mutation, positive results data have been shown in clinical trials on poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, as in use of anti-PD-1 antibodies for patients with mismatch repair (MMR) mutation [17]. In a retrospective analysis, patients with PDAC, with a BRCA mutation, after treatment with the combination regimen of leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), had a longer OS than those without the mutations [18]. No differences in survival outcomes were observed in patients treated with Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX, so alternative treatments could be considered in patients with PDAC [19].
The aim of the study was to identify germline mutations in 14 susceptibility genes in HBOC, LS, FAP, FAMMM, and LFS Italian families with at least one case of pancreatic cancer, correlating with phenotypic characteristics of FPC families. Moreover, we describe a novel BRCA2 germline mutation not reported in any database, in a patient and her family. Finally, we carried out a literature analysis to ongoing trials on the treatment of mutated patients.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients
This study was carried out in accordance with the World Medical Association Helsinki Declaration, adopted in 1964 and amended in 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, and 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study was approved and conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” (n.469-23/07/2019).In this study, we enrolled 56 HBOC families, 7 LS families, 3 FAP families, 2 FAMMM families, and 1 LFS family with at least one case of pancreatic cancer. The probands were affected with pancreatic, colorectal, breast or ovarian cancer, pr melanoma and sarcoma (Table 1), with an age interval of 26–85 years.
In 56 HBOC families, 64 cases of PDAC recur (25 females and 39 males) with mean age of onset of 66 years. In the 7 LS families, 8 cases of PDAC occur (3 females and 5 males), the mean age of onset is 58.6 years. In 3 FAP families, 5 cases of PDAC recur (2 females and 3 males), with a mean age of 48.8 years. In 2 FAMMM families, 2 cases of PDAC occur (1 female and 1 male), the mean age of onset is 62 years, while in the LFS family, there was 1 case of male PDAC, at 65 years (Table 1).
All selected patients received genetic counselling. The case and family history were collected, and the pedigree was generated. Mutational analysis was extended to family members of mutated patients.
2.2. Mutational Analysis
Peripheral blood sample were collected from all patients. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
For mutational analysis, we used the TruSight Sequencing Cancer Panel on a MiSeq platform (Illumina) that analyzes 14 genes, BRCA1(NM_007295), BRCA2(NM_000059), ATM (NM_000051.4), CHEK2(NM_007194),PALB2(NM_024675), RAD51C(NM_058216), RAD51D(NM_002878), NBN(NM_002485), CDH1 (NM_004360), TP53 (NM 000546), MLH1 (NM 000249), MSH2 (NM 000251), MSH6 (NM 000179.3), and PMS2 (000535.7).
The presence of the point mutation was confirmed on the other blood sample by Sanger sequencing, as previously described [20]. The results were analyzed using Mutation Surveyor® software, version 3.24 (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA). Molecular analysis in family members of mutated probands was performed by Sanger sequencing, as previously described [21,22].
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were summarized as mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables as absolute and relative frequencies. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-Square test. Significance was assumed for p-values less than 0.05.
3. Results
We found pathogenic mutations in 28.6% (16/56) HBOC proband, 28.6% (2/7) LS, and 33.3% (1/3) FAP, while we did not findmutations in patients belonging to FAMMM and LFS families. Mutations identified occur in BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, and APC genes, while in other investigated genes no mutations were observed. Eighty PDAC cases recur in families with HBOC, LS, FAP, FAMMM, and LFS syndromes (Table 1).
PDAC patients are predominantly male, even if no statistically significant gender differences are observed (Table 2).
Table 2 shows age of onset and death of PDAC patients. We observe a lower survival in mutated patients (1, 2 years) than in non-mutated patients (2, 3 years), although no statistically significant differences are found between two groups.
3.1. HBOC Families
Out of 56 HBOC probands, 16 (28.6%) reported a pathogenic mutation, particularly 6/56 (10.7%) in BRCA1, 9/56 (16.1%) in BRCA2, and 1/56 (1.8%) reported a double mutation (DM), both in BRCA2.
The number and percentage of cancers type that occur in mutated HBOC families are reported in Figure 1A; PDAC is the second recurrent cancer, resulting in 13% of cases. Table 3 shows the frequency of cancer types that occur in mutated and non-mutated HBOC families. A statistically significant difference is observed in OC onset.
One of the BRCA2 mutations, specifically c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3), was a novel germline mutation, not previously reported in any database, previously observedas somatic mutation in tissue of mucoepidermoid carcinoma [23]. This mutation, localized in exon 11, consists of a thymine deletion at nucleotide 5511, which results in the introduction of a premature stop codon at position 1840 (Figure 2A). It was identified in a 46-year-old woman affected with breast cancer diagnosed at the age of 45. Figure 2B reports the pedigree of the proband; her mother was affected with pancreatic cancer. Moreover, the analysis was extended in the sisters of 48 and 43 years, that carried the mutation. Finally, the analysis was conducted to daughters of 23 and 19 years and it revealed the presence of mutation only in the daughter of 19 years.
Figure 3 shows the location through BRCA1/2 genes of the mutations found. The mutations are located throughout the length of gene, in BRCA2 most of them fall in exon 11.
Mutational analysis was extended to 60 family members of 16 mutated patients, both healthy and cancer affected. The results of genetic test were summarized in Table 4. Twenty-sixfamily members resulted wild-type and 34 inherited the proband’s mutation, of these 11 with cancer and 23 unaffected.
3.2. LS Families
Out of sevenprobands, two (28.6%) reported a pathogenic mutation in MLH1 gene. The mean age of pancreatic cancer onset was 62.5 years in mutated patients and 57.3 years in non-mutated patients.
The number and percentage of cancers type that occur in LS mutated families were reported in Figure 1B. PDAC is the third recurrent cancer and happen in 6.9% of cases.
The mutations found were in exon 3 and 5 of MLH1 gene, as shown in Figure 3.
Mutational analysis was extended to three family members of one mutated patient, both healthy and cancer affected; in the second family, no family member was available for genetic testing. The results of genetic test were summarized in Table 4; no family member inherited the mutation.
3.3. FAP Families
Out of three probands, one (33.3%) reported a pathogenic mutation in APC gene. The mean age of pancreatic cancer onset was 47.5 years in mutated patient and 49.6 years in non-mutated patients.
The number and percentage of cancers type that occur in APC mutated family were reported in Figure 1C. PDAC is the second recurrent cancer and occurred in 44.4% of cases.
The mutation found was in exon 15 of APC gene, as showed in Figure 3.
Mutational analysis was extended to six family members, both healthy and cancer affected, of mutated patient; four inherited the proband’s mutation (Table 4).
4. Discussion
The main finding of the present study is that FPC occurs in both males and females at a similar rate, in HBOC LS, FAP, and FAMMM, reporting an earlier onset, with a mean age of 62.8 in mutated patients and 64.5 in non-mutated patients (Table 2); although no statistically significant differences are found between mutated and non-mutated patients, we observe a lower survival in PDAC patients belonging to families with mutation, hypothesizing that the mutation presence could be correlated to a worse phenotype, in terms of OS. FPC incidence is higher in men than in women [1]; moreover, FPC shows a trend toward a younger onset of 58–68 years, compared to 61–74 years in sporadic [24,25]. These data could be supported from a greater number of analyzed cases.
Moreover, the mutation rate in HBOC and LS, was higher (28.6%) than data previously found, showing the frequency of mutation in BRCA1/2 genes be up to 17% in HBOC and in MMR genes up to 12% in LS [26]. The difference in mutation prevalence could be influenced by the selection of the patients included. Studies conducted in FPC patients report a lower mutation rate than a study that included FPC families [27,28].
We observe that the BRCA2 germline mutation is associated with FPC relative risk of 3.5 to 10 as compared to non-carriers; while the relative risk of FPC developing in BRCA1 mutation carriers is approximately 2.26 to 3% [29,30]. As shown in Figure 1A, in HBOC mutated families, PDAC is the second recurrent cancer and happen in 13% of cases, higher than OC. Interestingly, by comparing the prevalence of cancers that recur in mutated and non-mutated HBOC families, statistically significant difference is observed in OC onset (Table 3), confirming that OC patients exhibit a high mutational rate [31]. Patients with BRCA2 mutations are at increased risk for PDAC onset; it has been reported that loss of BRCA2 function predisposes the pancreas to profound DNA damage that determines a major frequency of invasive neoplasia. In addition, multiple cases of PDAC are found in some large BRCA2 mutated families compared to families with mutations in other genes [32]. The BRCA2 gene was the most commonly mutated in FPC; we found BRCA2 mutations in 16.1% of patients, value included in range that reports BRCA2 mutations in 3.7–17.2% of FPC patients [27,33,34]. BRCA1 mutations in FPC have not been reported as well as BRCA2, but with a lower frequency [35]. Here, we found a higher percentage of BRCA1 mutations in 10.7% of patients, not in line with data reported (1.2–2.6%) [26,27,36]. Moreover, in a retrospective study on FPC families, BRCA1 mutations occur in 9.5% [28], this could be due to a different ethnic distribution.
In addition, one patient (1.8%) showed DM in BRCA2. The family with DM does not show a more severe phenotype than families with a single mutation. The BRCA2 DM c.631G>A (p.Val211Ile)/c.7008-2A>T (IVS13-2A>T), was described in unrelated HBOC families [37] and was previously reported in a patient with PDAC [38]. Moreover, it was previously reported in male breast cancer patients [39,40], suggesting high penetrance in PDAC and MBC development in carriers of DM c.631G>A (p.Val211Ile)/c.7008-2A>T (IVS13-2A>T).Remarkably, in the present study, we describe a novel germline mutation in BRCA2 gene, c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3), previously observed in tissue of mucoepidermoid carcinoma [23]. We identified this mutation in a woman affected with breast cancer; her mother was affected with PDAC and died at 78 years old. The mutation is very likely inherited from the maternal side, in which occurs HBOC related tumors (Figure 2B).
In BRCA1/2, an ovarian cluster region (OCCR) was reported; in BRCA1 gene OCCR is located between c.1380–4062, and in BRCA2 between c.3249–5681 and c.5645–7471 [41]. Previously, Toss et al. [42] observed two possible pancreatic cancer cluster regions in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The BRCA1 region is located between c.3239–c.3917 (exon 10) and BRCA2 region within c.7180–c.8248 (exon 14–18). Only one of our identified mutations, BRCA2 c.7857G>A (p.Trp2619Ter), falls in exon 17, in BRCA pancreatic cluster region reported. In our family BRCA1/2 mutations are located throughout the gene, although most of BRCA2 mutations fall between codons 3545–6469, in exon 11 (Figure 3), where many mutations were found in HBOC patients. This suggests no evidence of possible pancreatic cancer cluster regions in BRCA genes, which could influence the PDAC risk, however a larger number of studies is necessary to clarify this association.
We show pathogenic mutation in MLH1 gene in 28.6% of patients among LS families. MMR mutations were reported in a large range, between 1–12.5%, of FPC cases, with major frequency in MSH6 gene, followed by MSH2 and MLH1 genes [4,28,35,43]. Additionally, in this case, the difference could reflect the choice to enroll FPC families in our study. Previous studies that included FPC patients reported a lower mutation rate, such as the study by Yurgelun M et al. which reported mutations in 1–1.3% of cases, while studies that enrolled FPC families showed higher mutation rates (11.1–12.5%) [28,35].
In LS mutated families, PDAC is the third recurrent cancer and occur in 6.9% of cases, together with EC and OC (Figure 1B). The revised Bethesda Guidelines (RBG) indicate PDAC as one of the LS-associated cancers [44]. It was shown that MMR mutations increased PDAC risk by 8.6-fold and cumulative PDAC risk was 3.7% [17]. A recent study found that PDAC risk was 7.8 in MLH1 mutated patients [45]. In our patients, we found mutations in MLH1 but not in other MMR genes. Until now, no pancreatic cancer cluster regions were reported in MLH1 gene or in other MMR genes. The two MLH1 mutations found were in exons 3 and 5 of gene (Figure 3); therefore, an indication of no possible pancreatic cancer cluster regions can also be suggested given the small number of mutations found.
In FAP families, 33.3% of patients showed a pathogenic mutation in APC gene. Pancreatic cancer onset in FAP patients is rare, representing about 1% of extracolonic malignancies [46]; today, few germline APC mutations have been found in FPC patients. In one study, it 1.4% of FPC patients with APC mutations were observed [43]; another study reported the presence of double mutation in APC and BRCA2 genes in a patient with FPC [47]. The high mutation rate found may be due to the small number of families enrolled. Giardiello et al. [48] showed an increased PDAC risk of 4.5-fold in FAP patients, in addition the association between APC mutations, pancreatoblastoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma was found [49,50]. The APC mutation found in our studyis located inexon 15 of gene (Figure 3). Neuman et al. hypothesized that mutations at the 5 ‘end of the gene could be associated with pancreatic cancers [51], however no pancreatic cancer cluster regions were reported in APC genes to date.
The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium indicates the screening for PDAC onset in patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, with presence of STK11 mutation; with presence of a CDKN2A, BRCA1/2, or MMR mutation and with a first-degree relative affected with PDAC [52]. The American College of Gastroenterology recommends screening for individuals with mutationsin STK11 or CDKN2A genes; with a mutation in BRCA1/2, ATM, PALB2, or MMR and a first- or second-degree relative with PDAC; with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome; and in families with at two cases of PDAC, with a first degree relative with pancreatic cancer [53].
We found no LS or FAP unaffected family members inherited the proband’s mutation, while 23 unaffected HBOC family members with mean age of 44.9 years inherited the proband’s mutation. They will undergo surveillance programs for PDAC and other related tumors developing. Currently, there are no specific guidelines on the best screening modality in mutated patients; however, the surveillance should be conducted with endoscopic ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging annually, starting at age 50 [54].
The ASCO and NCCN guidelines suggested the mutational analysis of genes involved in syndromes associated with PDAC onset, not only in order to extend the mutational analysis to healthy family members who will benefit from prevention programs but must also be performed on all patients with PDAC in order to identify the carriers of mutation to direct to alternative therapies [13]. Although correlative events, BRCA1/2 and PALB2 mutation could have impact on treatment decisions. In this regard, Table 5 reported the current ongoing trials on the treatment of mutated patients.
Several clinical trials have shown that patients with BRCA mutations, treated with a platinum regimen, had longer OS than those treated with non-platinum regimen [55]. NCCN Guidelines for PDAC describe the association treatment of gemcitabina (GEM) and cisplatin (CDDP) as a possible treatment in BRCA mutated patients [56]. PARP inhibitors have been clinically investigated for BRCA mutated cases. This agent inhibits participation of PARP in base excision repair; in the presence of BRCA protein deficiency, due to mutation, this pathway is inhibited, inducing cell death [57,58]. A clinically relevant response to PARP inhibitor treatment was observed in PDAC patients reporting a mutation in BRCA, particularly in randomized trials on olaparib alone or veliparib in combination with cytotoxic agents [4]. It is known that immune checkpoint inhibitors have reported clinical benefits in treatment of some malignancies, such as melanoma, neuroendocrine tumors, bone malignancies, or non-small-cell lung cancer. Asthe cancer patients that reported an MMR deficiency showed response to immunotherapy, the Food and Drug Administration has approved pembrolizumab for patients with microsatellite instable tumors, such as those found in LS [59,60,61]. Moreover, a clinical trial of anti-PD-1 antibody reported a positive response in PDAC patients with MMR alterations, although further studies in a larger patient cohort are needed [17]. Of note, many novel therapies have cardiac toxicity that need to be considered [62,63,64,65]
5. Conclusions
Our findings showed that a high incidence of PDAC, which results in the second most recurrent tumor in HBOC and FAP families and the third in LS families, with an earlier onset and a reduced survival, could be notable in all patients with PDAC diagnosis, not only BRCA mutational screening, but also of other genes involved in cancer syndromes understanding PDAC. Mutation diagnosis could be useful for alternative therapeutic treatments and for prevention of related tumors onset in family members of mutated patients that inherited the mutation.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.T.V.; methodology, G.D., G.C. and L.A.; statistical analysis, G.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.V. and G.D.; critical revision, C.N. and A.M.M.; supervision, C.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was carried out in accordance with the World Medical Association Helsinki Declaration, adopted in 1964 and amended in 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996 and 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study was approved and conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” (n.469-23/07/2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We thank Fortunato Ciardiello, Ferdinando De Vita and Michele Orditura, Oncology department of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” of Naples (Italy), for patients following.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Simoes, P.K.; Olson, S.H.; Saldia, A.; Kurtz, R.C. Epidemiology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Chin. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saad, A.M.; Turk, T.; Al-Husseini, M.J.; Abdel-Rahman, O. Trends in pancreatic adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality in the United States in the last four decades; a SEER-based study. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Collaborators GBDPC. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 4, 934–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pilarski, R. The Role of BRCA Testing in Hereditary Pancreatic and Prostate Cancer Families. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2019, 39, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shimmura, H.; Kuramochi, H.; Jibiki, N.; Katagiri, S.; Nishino, T.; Araida, T. Dramatic response of FOLFIRINOX regimen in a collision pancreatic adenocarcinoma patient with a germline BRCA2 mutation: A case report. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 49, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, G.M. Familial pancreatic cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2016, 43, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vietri, M.T.; D’Elia, G.; Caliendo, G.; Casamassimi, A.; Resse, M.; Passariello, L.; Cioffi, M.; Molinari, A.M. Double mutation of APC and BRCA1 in an Italian family. Cancer Genet. 2020, 244, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vietri, M.T.; D’Elia, G.; Caliendo, G.; Casamassimi, A.; Federico, A.; Passariello, L.; Cioffi, M.; Molinari, A.M. Prevalence of mutations in BRCA and MMR genes in patients affected with hereditary endometrial cancer. Med. Oncol. 2021, 38, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vietri, M.T.; Molinari, A.M.; De Paola, M.; Cantile, F.; Fasano, M.; Cioffi, M. Identification of a novel in-frame deletion in BRCA2 and analysis of variants of BRCA1/2 in Italian patients affected with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2012, 50, 2171–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vietri, M.T.; D’Elia, G.; Benincasa, G.; Ferraro, G.; Caliendo, G.; Nicoletti, G.F.; Napoli, C. DNA methylation and breast cancer: A way forward (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2021, 59, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, E.; Ziranu, P.; Spanu, D.; Dubois, M.; Pretta, A.; Tolu, S.; Camera, S.; Liscia, N.; Mariani, S.; Persano, M.; et al. BRCA-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 125, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benzel, J.; Fendrich, V. Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2018, 41, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stoffel, E.M.; McKernin, S.E.; Brand, R.; Canto, M.; Goggins, M.; Moravek, C.; Nagarajan, A.; Petersen, G.M.; Simeone, D.M.; Yurgelun, M.; et al. Evaluating susceptibility to pancreatic cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colao, A.; de Nigris, F.; Modica, R.; Napoli, C. Clinical Epigenetics of Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Road Ahead. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 604341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Nigris, F.; Ruosi, C.; Napoli, C. Clinical efficiency of epigenetic drugs therapy in bone malignancies. Bone 2021, 143, 115605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scognamiglio, G.; De Chiara, A.; Parafioriti, A.; Armiraglio, E.; Fazioli, F.; Gallo, M.; Aversa, L.; Camerlingo, R.; Cacciatore, F.; Colella, G.; et al. Patient-derived organoids as a potential model to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 121, 979–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ohmoto, A.; Yachida, S.; Morizane, C. Genomic Features and Clinical Management of Patients with Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer Syndromes and Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sehdev, A.; Gbolahan, O.; Hancock, B.A.; Stanley, M.; Shahda, S.; Wan, J.; Wu, H.H.; Radovich, M.; O’Neil, B.H. Germline and Somatic DNA Damage Repair Gene Mutations and Overall Survival in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with FOLFIRINOX. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 6204–6211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Williet, N.; Petrillo, A.; Roth, G.; Ghidini, M.; Petrova, M.; Forestier, J.; Lopez, A.; Thoor, A.; Weislinger, L.; De Vita, F.; et al. Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A European Multicenter Study. Cancers 2021, 13, 2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vietri, M.T.; Molinari, A.M.; Caliendo, G.; De Paola, M.L.; D’Elia, G.; Gambardella, A.L.; Petronella, P.; Cioffi, M. Double heterozygosity in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Italian family. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2013, 51, 2319–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vietri, M.T.; Caliendo, G.; Schiano, C.; Casamassimi, A.; Molinari, A.M.; Napoli, C.; Cioffi, M. Analysis of PALB2 in a cohort of Italianbreastcancerpatients: Identification of a novel PALB2 truncatingmutation. Fam. Cancer 2015, 14, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vietri, M.T.; Caliendo, G.; Casamassimi, A.; Cioffi, M.; De Paola, M.L.; Napoli, C.; Molinari, A.M. A novel PALB2 truncatingmutation in an Italian family with male breastcancer. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1243–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, F.; Xi, S.Y.; Hao, W.W.; Yang, X.H.; Deng, L.; Xu, Y.X.; Wu, X.Y.; Zeng, L.; Guo, K.H.; Wang, H.Y. Mutational landscape of primary pulmonary salivary gland-type tumors through targeted next-generation sequencing. Lung Cancer 2021, 160, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peretti, U.; Cavaliere, A.; Niger, M.; Tortora, G.; Di Marco, M.C.; Rodriquenz, M.G.; Centonze, F.; Rapposelli, I.G.; Giordano, G.; De Vita, F.; et al. Germinal BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv) and pancreatic cancer: Epidemiology of an Italian patient cohort. ESMO Open 2021, 6, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsubayashi, H.; Takaori, K.; Morizane, C.; Maguchi, H.; Mizuma, M.; Takahashi, H.; Wada, K.; Hosoi, H.; Yachida, S.; Suzuki, M.; et al. Familial pancreatic cancer: Concept, management and issues. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 935–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosen, M.N.; Goodwin, R.A.; Vickers, M.M. BRCA mutated pancreatic cancer: A change is coming. World J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 27, 1943–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, D.B.; Rabe, K.G.; Gallinger, S.; Syngal, S.; Schwartz, A.G.; Goggins, M.G.; Hruban, R.H.; Cote, M.L.; McWilliams, R.R.; Roberts, N.J.; et al. BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and CDKN2A mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: A PACGENE study. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Catts, Z.A.; Baig, M.K.; Milewski, B.; Keywan, C.; Guarino, M.; Petrelli, N. Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 23, 1729–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, W.; Raufi, A.G.; Safyan, R.A.; Bates, S.E.; Manji, G.A. BRCA Mutations in Pancreas Cancer: Spectrum, Current Management, Challenges and Future Prospects. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 2731–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vietri, M.T.; D’Elia, G.; Caliendo, G.; Resse, M.; Casamassimi, A.; Passariello, L.; Albanese, L.; Cioffi, M.; Molinari, A.M. Hereditary Prostate Cancer: GenesRelated, Target Therapy and Prevention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moscatello, C.; Di Nicola, M.; Veschi, S.; Di Gregorio, P.; Cianchetti, E.; Stuppia, L.; Battista, P.; Cama, A.; Curia, M.C.; Aceto, G.M. Relationshipbetween MUTYH, OGG1 and BRCA1 mutations and mRNAexpression in breast and ovariancancerpredisposition. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Solomon, S.; Das, S.; Brand, R.; Whitcomb, D.C. Inherited pancreatic cancer syndromes. Cancer J. 2012, 18, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Murphy, K.M.; Brune, K.A.; Griffin, C.; Sollenberger, J.E.; Petersen, G.M.; Bansal, R.; Hruban, R.H.; Kern, S.E. Evaluation of candidate genes MAP2K4, MADH4, ACVR1B, and BRCA2 in familial pancreatic cancer: Deleterious BRCA2 mutations in 17%. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 3789–3793. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hahn, S.A.; Greenhalf, B.; Ellis, I.; Sina-Frey, M.; Rieder, H.; Korte, B.; Gerdes, B.; Kress, R.; Ziegler, A.; Raeburn, J.A.; et al. BRCA2 germline mutations in familial pancreatic carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003, 95, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bujanda, L.; Herreros-Villanueva, M. Pancreatic Cancer in Lynch Syndrome Patients. J. Cancer 2017, 8, 3667–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salo-Mullen, E.E.; O’Reilly, E.M.; Kelsen, D.P.; Ashraf, A.M.; Lowery, M.A.; Yu, K.H.; Reidy, D.L.; Epstein, A.S.; Lincoln, A.; Saldia, A.; et al. Identification of germline genetic mutations in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer 2015, 121, 4382–4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vietri, M.T.; Caliendo, G.; D’Elia, G.; Resse, M.; Casamassimi, A.; Minucci, P.B.; Dello Ioio, C.; Cioffi, M.; Molinari, A.M. FiveItalian Families with TwoMutations in BRCA Genes. Genes 2020, 11, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowery, M.A.; Kelsen, D.P.; Stadler, Z.K.; Yu, K.H.; Janjigian, Y.Y.; Ludwig, E.; D’Adamo, D.R.; Salo-Mullen, E.; Robson, M.E.; Allen, P.J.; et al. An emerging entity: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma associated with a known BRCA mutation: Clinical descriptors, treatment implications, and future directions. Oncologist 2011, 16, 1397–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vietri, M.T.; Caliendo, G.; D’Elia, G.; Resse, M.; Casamassimi, A.; Minucci, P.B.; Cioffi, M.; Molinari, A.M. BRCA and PALB2 mutations ina cohort of male breastcancer with onebilateral case. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2020, 63, 103883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarpitta, R.; Zanna, I.; Aretini, P.; Gambino, G.; Scatena, C.; Mei, B.; Ghilli, M.; Rossetti, E.; Roncella, M.; Congregati, C.; et al. Germline investigation in male breast cancer of DNA repairgenes by next-generation sequencing. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 178, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, F.C.; Goncalves, S.; Mele, P.G.; Liria, N.C.; Sganga, L.; Diaz Perez, I.; Podesta, E.J.; Solano, A.R. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and clinical interpretation in 398 ovarian cancer patients: Comparison with breast cancer variants in a similar population. Hum. Genom. 2018, 12, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Toss, A.; Venturelli, M.; Molinaro, E.; Pipitone, S.; Barbieri, E.; Marchi, I.; Tenedini, E.; Artuso, L.; Castellano, S.; Marino, M.; et al. Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 5143 Italian Families with History of BRCA-Related Malignancies. Cancers 2019, 11, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yurgelun, M.B.; Chittenden, A.B.; Morales-Oyarvide, V.; Rubinson, D.A.; Dunne, R.F.; Kozak, M.M.; Qian, Z.R.; Welch, M.W.; Brais, L.K.; Da Silva, A.; et al. Germline cancer susceptibility gene variants, somatic second hits, and survival outcomes inpatients with resected pancreatic cancer. Genet. Med. 2019, 21, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Møller, P.; Seppälä, T.T.; Bernstein, I.; Holinski-Feder, E.; Sala, P.; Gareth Evans, D.; Lindblom, A.; Macrae, F.; Blanco, I.; Sijmons, R.H.; et al. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: A report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut 2018, 67, 1306–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Umar, A.; Boland, C.R.; Terdiman, J.P.; Syngal, S.; de la Chapelle, A.; Rüschoff, J.; Fishel, R.; Lindor, N.M.; Burgart, L.J.; Hamelin, R.; et al. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004, 96, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’Elia, G.; Caliendo, G.; Casamassimi, A.; Cioffi, M.; Molinari, A.M.; Vietri, M.T. APC and MUTYH Analysis in FAP Patients: A Novel Mutation in APC Gene and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation. Genes 2018, 9, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Goehringer, C.; Sutter, C.; Kloor, M.; Gebert, J.; Slater, E.P.; Keller, M.; Treiber, I.; Ganschow, P.; Kadmon, M.; Moog, U. Double germline mutations in APC and BRCA2 in an individual with a pancreatic tumor. Fam. Cancer 2017, 16, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giardiello, F.M.; Offerhaus, G.J.; Lee, D.H.; Krush, A.J.; Tersmette, A.C.; Booker, S.V.; Kelley, N.C.; Hamilton, S.R. Increased risk of thyroid and pancreatic carcinoma in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 1993, 34, 1394–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moussata, D.; Senouci, L.; Berger, F.; Scoazec, J.Y.; Pinson, S.; Walter, T.; Lombard-Bohas, C.; Saurin, J.C. Familial adenomatous polyposis and pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2015, 44, 512–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellastella, G.; Maiorino, M.I.; De Bellis, A.; Vietri, M.T.; Mosca, C.; Scappaticcio, L.; Pasquali, D.; Esposito, K.; Giugliano, D. Serum but not salivary cortisol levels are influenced by daily glycemic oscillations in type 2 diabetes. Endocrine 2016, 53, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinarvand, P.; Davaro, E.P.; Doan, J.V.; Ising, M.E.; Evans, N.R.; Phillips, N.J.; Lai, J.; Guzman, M.A. Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome: An Update and Review of Extraintestinal Manifestations. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2019, 143, 1382–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Canto, M.I.; Harinck, F.; Hruban, R.H.; Offerhaus, G.J.; Poley, J.; Kamel, I.; Nio, Y.; Schulick, R.S.; Bassi, C.; Kluijt, I.; et al. International Cancer of Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Pract. Guidel. Gut 2013, 62, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Syngal, S.; Brand, R.E.; Church, J.M.; Giardiello, F.M.; Hampel, H.L.; Burt, R.W.; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110, 223–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mizrahi, J.D.; Surana, R.; Valle, J.W.; Shroff, R.T. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2020, 395, 2008–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golan, T.; Kanji, Z.S.; Epelbaum, R.; Devaud, N.; Dagan, E.; Holter, S.; Aderka, D.; Paluch-Shimon, S.; Kaufman, B.; Gershoni-Baruch, R.; et al. Overall survival and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NCCN Guidelines Version 2. 2018 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx (accessed on 25 December 2018).
- Farmer, H.; McCabe, N.; Lord, C.J.; Tutt, A.N.; Johnson, D.A.; Richardson, T.B.; Santarosa, M.; Dillon, K.J.; Hickson, I.; Knights, C.; et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 2005, 434, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryant, H.E.; Schultz, N.; Thomas, H.D.; Parker, K.M.; Flower, D.; Lopez, E.; Kyle, S.; Meuth, M.; Curtin, N.J.; Helleday, T. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 2005, 434, 913–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czink, E.; Kloor, M.; Goeppert, B.; Fröhling, S.; Uhrig, S.; Weber, T.F.; Meinel, J.; Sutter, C.; Weiss, K.H.; Schirmacher, P.; et al. Successful immune checkpoint blockade in a patient with advanced stage microsatellite-unstable biliary tract cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2017, 3, a001974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.I.; Shia, J.; Stadler, Z.K.; Varghese, A.M.; Capanu, M.; Salo-Mullen, E.; Lowery, M.A.; Diaz, L.A., Jr.; Mandelker, D.; Yu, K.H.; et al. Evaluating mismatch repair deficiency in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Challenges and recommendations. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 1326–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albanese, L.; Caliendo, G.; D’Elia, G.; Passariello, L.; Molinari, A.M.; Napoli, C.; Vietri, M.T. Diagnostic utility of FGF-23 in mineral bone disorder during chronic kidney disease. J. Circ. Biomark. 2022, 11, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montisci, A.; Vietri, M.T.; Palmieri, V.; Sala, S.; Donatelli, F.; Napoli, C. Cardiac Toxicity Associated with Cancer Immunotherapy and Biological Drugs. Cancers 2021, 13, 4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Montisci, A.; Palmieri, V.; Liu, J.E.; Vietri, M.T.; Cirri, S.; Donatelli, F.; Napoli, C. Severe Cardiac Toxicity Induced by Cancer Therapies Requiring Intensive Care Unit Admission. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 713694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Celešnik, H.; Potocnik, U. Peripheral Blood Transcriptome in Breast Cancer Patients as aSource of Less Invasive Immune Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine, and Implications for Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, J.; Sangwan, N.; Chauhan, A.; Sarma, P.; Prakash, A.; Medhi, B.; Avti, P.K. Screening and identification of phytochemical drug molecules against mutant BRCA1 receptor of breast cancer using computational approaches. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Cancer types that occur in HBOC mutated families (A). Cancer types that occur in LS mutated families (B). Cancer types that occur in FAP mutated family(C). BC: Breast cancer; PDAC: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; OC: Ovarian cancer; LC: Lung cancer; LVC: Liver cancer; GC: Gastric cancer; EC: Endometrial cancer; CC: Colon cancer; BLC: Bladder cancer; PC: Prostate cancer; LEU: Leukemia; bBC: Bilateral Breast cancer; LAC: Laryngeal cancer; MEL: Melanoma; KC: Kidney cancer; ESC: Esophageal cancer; BRC: Brain cancer; and TC: Thyroid cancer.
Figure 1.
Cancer types that occur in HBOC mutated families (A). Cancer types that occur in LS mutated families (B). Cancer types that occur in FAP mutated family(C). BC: Breast cancer; PDAC: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; OC: Ovarian cancer; LC: Lung cancer; LVC: Liver cancer; GC: Gastric cancer; EC: Endometrial cancer; CC: Colon cancer; BLC: Bladder cancer; PC: Prostate cancer; LEU: Leukemia; bBC: Bilateral Breast cancer; LAC: Laryngeal cancer; MEL: Melanoma; KC: Kidney cancer; ESC: Esophageal cancer; BRC: Brain cancer; and TC: Thyroid cancer.
Figure 2.
(A) Partial electropherogram of BRCA2 exon 11. The novel germline mutation c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3) results in chain termination at codon 1840. (B) Pedigree of the proband carrying the BRCA2 novel mutation c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3). The ages at diagnosis are indicated in brackets. Her mother died at 80 years old, was affected with PDAC.
Figure 2.
(A) Partial electropherogram of BRCA2 exon 11. The novel germline mutation c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3) results in chain termination at codon 1840. (B) Pedigree of the proband carrying the BRCA2 novel mutation c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3). The ages at diagnosis are indicated in brackets. Her mother died at 80 years old, was affected with PDAC.
Figure 3.
Mutations found in HBOC, LS, and FAP families with PDAC localized trough BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, and APC genes.
Figure 3.
Mutations found in HBOC, LS, and FAP families with PDAC localized trough BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, and APC genes.
Table 1.
Number, tumor type, and mutations of HBOC, LS, FAP, FAMMM, and LFS probands. Mean age of onset and mutations in PDAC cases belonging to HBOC, LS, FAP, FAMMM, and LFS syndromes.
Table 1.
Number, tumor type, and mutations of HBOC, LS, FAP, FAMMM, and LFS probands. Mean age of onset and mutations in PDAC cases belonging to HBOC, LS, FAP, FAMMM, and LFS syndromes.
| Syndrome | N° of Families (Probands Total 69) | N° and Tumor Type of Probands | Mutation Rate | N° of PDAC Cases (Total 80) | Mean Age of PDAC Onset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBOC | 56 | 13 pancreatic cancers; 34 breast cancers 5 ovarian cancers 3 breast and ovarian cancer 1 breast and colon cancer | (16/56) 28.6% | 64 | 66 years |
| LS | 7 | 2 pancreatic cancer 4 colon cancer 1 ovarian cancer | (2/7) 28.6% | 8 | 58.6 years |
| FAP | 3 | 1 pancreatic cancer 2 colon cancer | (1/3) 33.3% | 5 | 48.8 years |
| FAMMM | 2 | 2 melanoma | - | 2 | 62 years |
| LFS | 1 | 1 sarcoma | - | 1 | 65 years |
HBOC: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, LS: Lynch syndrome, FAP: Familial adenomatous polyposis, FAMMM: Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma, and LFS: Li–Fraumeni syndrome.
Table 2.
Gender, mean age of onset, and death of PDAC patients including in HBOC, LS, and FAP mutated and non-mutated families.
Table 2.
Gender, mean age of onset, and death of PDAC patients including in HBOC, LS, and FAP mutated and non-mutated families.
| Number (77) | PDAC Patients of Non Mutated Families (55) | PDAC Patients of Mutated Families (22) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Females (30) | 22 (40%) | 8 (36%) | 0.77 |
| Males (47) | 33 (60%) | 14 (64%) | ||
| Mean age of PDAC onset (SD) | 64.5 (12.7) | 62.8 (11.7) | 0.59 | |
| Mean age of death (SD) | 66.8 (13.3) | 64.0 (11.7) | 0.41 |
Table 3.
Number and percentage of cancers type that occur in mutated and non-mutated HBOC families.
| Type of Cancer | Cancer Number in Family | Non Mutated PDAC Patients | Mutated PDAC Patients | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 0 | 2 (4%) | 2 (11%) | 0.27 |
| 1 | 15 (33%) | 2 (11%) | ||
| 2 | 13 (28%) | 4 (22%) | ||
| 3 | 10 (22%) | 5 (28%) | ||
| ≥4 | 6 (13%) | 5 (28%) | ||
| PDAC | 1 | 34 (74%) | 14 (78%) | 0.75 |
| 2 | 12 (26%) | 4 (22%) | ||
| OC | 0 | 33 (72%) | 8 (44%) | 0.042 |
| 1 | 11 (24%) | 6 (33%) | ||
| 2 | 2 (4%) | 4 (22%) | ||
| LC | 0 | 23 (50%) | 10 (56%) | 0.30 |
| 1 | 18 (39%) | 4 (22%) | ||
| 2 | 4 (9%) | 3 (17%) | ||
| 3 | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| 4 | 0 (0%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| LVC | 0 | 34 (74%) | 13 (72%) | 0.34 |
| 1 | 10 (22%) | 4 (22%) | ||
| 2 | 2 (4%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| 3 | 0 (0%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| GC | 0 | 27 (59%) | 11 (61%) | 0.93 |
| 1 | 15 (33%) | 6 (33%) | ||
| 2 | 3 (7%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| 4 | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| EC | 0 | 33 (72%) | 15 (83%) | 0.71 |
| 1 | 7 (15%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| 2 | 4 (9%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| 3 | 2 (4%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| CC | 0 | 34 (74%) | 14 (78%) | 0.78 |
| 1 | 6 (13%) | 3 (17%) | ||
| 2 | 4 (9%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| 3 | 2 (4%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| BLC | 0 | 37 (80%) | 15 (83%) | 0.35 |
| 1 | 8 (17%) | 2 (11%) | ||
| 2 | 0 (0%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| 3 | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| PC | 0 | 40 (87%) | 14 (78%) | 0.62 |
| 1 | 5 (11%) | 3 (17%) | ||
| 2 | 1 (2%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| LEU | 0 | 41 (89%) | 15 (83%) | 0.53 |
| 1 | 5 (11%) | 3 (17%) | ||
| bBC | 0 | 44 (96%) | 15 (83%) | 0.099 |
| 1 | 2 (4%) | 3 (17%) | ||
| LAC | 0 | 39 (85%) | 15 (83%) | 0.77 |
| 1 | 6 (13%) | 3 (17%) | ||
| 2 | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| MEL | 0 | 43 (93%) | 16 (89%) | 0.54 |
| 1 | 3 (7%) | 2 (11%) | ||
| KC | 0 | 43 (93%) | 17 (94%) | 0.89 |
| 1 | 3 (7%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| ESC | 0 | 45 (98%) | 16 (89%) | 0.13 |
| 1 | 1 (2%) | 2 (11%) | ||
| BRC | 0 | 43 (93%) | 17 (94%) | 0.81 |
| 1 | 2 (4%) | 1 (6%) | ||
| 2 | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| TC | 0 | 42 (91%) | 18 (100%) | 0.20 |
| 1 | 4 (9%) | 0 (0%) |
BC: Breast cancer; PDAC: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; OC: Ovarian cancer; LC: Lung cancer; LVC: Liver cancer; GC: Gastric cancer; EC: Endometrial cancer; CC: Colon cancer; BLC: Bladder cancer; PC: Prostate cancer; LEU: Leukemia; bBC: Bilateral Breast cancer; LAC: Laryngeal cancer; MEL: Melanoma; KC: Kidney cancer; ESC: Esophageal cancer; BRC: Brain cancer; and TC: Thyroid cancer.
Table 4.
Mutations identified and results of mutational analysis conducted in family members of 16HBOC mutated patients, 2LS mutated patients, and 1 FAP mutated patient. Name of mutation was reported in bold.
Table 4.
Mutations identified and results of mutational analysis conducted in family members of 16HBOC mutated patients, 2LS mutated patients, and 1 FAP mutated patient. Name of mutation was reported in bold.
| Family | Gene | Mutation | Exon | Family Members (Diagnosis) | Age | Mutational Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRCA1 | c.181T>G (p.Cys61Gly) | 5 | Proband (Ovarian Cancer) | 72 | Mutated |
| Sister (Breast Cancer) | 64 | Mutated | ||||
| Daughter (Unaffected) | 48 | Wild Type | ||||
| 2 | BRCA1 | c.917delT (p.Leu306ArgfsTer27) | 11 | Proband (Breast/Ovarian Cancer) | 56 | Mutated |
| Son (Unaffected) | 28 | Mutated | ||||
| Brother (Unaffected) | 61 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 65 | Wild Type | ||||
| 3 | BRCA1 | c.5123C>A (p.Ala1708Glu) | 18 | Proband (Pancreatic cancer) | 67 | Mutated |
| Sister (Ovarian cancer) | 63 | Mutated | ||||
| Nephew (Unaffected) | 38 | Wild Type | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 40 | Mutated | ||||
| 4 | BRCA1 | c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs) | 20 | Proband (Breast and Ovarian cancer) | 64 | Mutated |
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 62 | Wild Type | ||||
| Son (Unaffected) | 38 | Mutated | ||||
| Brother (Unaffected) | 66 | Mutated | ||||
| Niece (Breast cancer) | 32 | Mutated | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 41 | Mutated | ||||
| 5 | BRCA1 | c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs) | 20 | Proband (Pancreatic Cancer) | 73 | Mutated |
| Sister (Breast Cancer) | 72 | Mutated | ||||
| 6 | BRCA1 | c.5397_5398del (p.Leu1800Trpfs*29) | 22 | Proband (Ovarian Cancer) | 63 | Mutated |
| Son (Unaffected) | 33 | Wild Type | ||||
| Daughter (Unaffected) | 41 | Wild Type | ||||
| 7 | BRCA2 | c.3545_3546del (p.Gln1181_Phe1182insTer) | 11 | Proband (Ovarian cancer) | 57 | Mutated |
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 32 | Wild Type | ||||
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 23 | Wild Type | ||||
| Son (Unaffected) | 28 | Wild Type | ||||
| Brother (Unaffected) | 58 | Wild Type | ||||
| Sister (Ovarian cancer) | 62 | Mutated | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 34 | Mutated | ||||
| Nephew (Unaffected) | 30 | Mutated | ||||
| 8 | BRCA2 | c.4284dupT (p.Gln1429Serfs) | 11 | Proband (Breast cancer) | 85 | Mutated |
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 57 | Wild Type | ||||
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 56 | Mutated | ||||
| Son(Unaffected) | 52 | Wild Type | ||||
| Son(Unaffected) | 50 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 83 | Mutated | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 48 | Mutated | ||||
| Nephew (Unaffected) | 42 | Mutated | ||||
| Nephew (Unaffected) | 45 | Mutated | ||||
| Nephew (Unaffected) | 36 | Wild Type | ||||
| 9 | BRCA2 | c.5511delT (p.Phe1837LeufsX3) | 11 | Proband (Breast cancer) | 46 | Mutated |
| Sister (Unaffected) | 48 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 43 | Mutated | ||||
| Daughter (Unaffected) | 23 | Wild Type | ||||
| Daughter (Unaffected) | 19 | Mutated | ||||
| 10 | BRCA2 | c.5722_5723delCT (p.L1908RfsX2) | 11 | Proband (Breast cancer) | 62 | Mutated |
| Brother (Unaffected) | 61 | Wild Type | ||||
| 11 | BRCA2 | c.6037A>T (p.Lys2013Ter) | 11 | Proband (Ovarian cancer) | 52 | Mutated |
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 25 | Mutated | ||||
| Son (Unaffected) | 21 | Wild type | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 58 | Mutated | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 32 | Wild type | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 28 | Wild type | ||||
| 12 | BRCA2 | c.6450dup (p.Val2151fs) | 11 | Proband (Breast cancer) | 54 | Mutated |
| Son (Unaffected) | 24 | Wild Type | ||||
| Daughter (Unaffected) | 21 | Mutated | ||||
| 13 | BRCA2 | c.6468_6469delTC (p.Gln2157Ilefs) | 11 | Proband (Breast Cancer) | 47 | Mutated |
| Father (Unaffected) | 75 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 46 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 41 | Wild type | ||||
| 14 | BRCA2 | c.6468_6469delTC (p.Gln2157Ilefs) | 11 | Proband (Pancreatic Cancer) | 61 | Mutated |
| Sister (Breast and EndometrialCancer) | 62 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Ovarian Cancer) | 54 | Mutated | ||||
| Nephew (Unaffected) | 26 | Wild type | ||||
| 15 | BRCA2 | c.7857G>A (p.Trp2619Ter) | 17 | Proband (Breast Cancer) | 45 | Mutated |
| Sister (Unaffected) | 48 | Wild Type | ||||
| 16 | BRCA2 BRCA2 | c.631G>A (p.Val221Ile) c.7008-2A>T (IVS13-2A>T) | 7 14 | Proband (Breast Cancer) | 62 | Mutated |
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 41 | Wild type | ||||
| Daugheter (Unaffected) | 35 | Mutated | ||||
| Brother (Unaffected) | 59 | Wild Type | ||||
| Sister (Bilateral Breast Cancer) | 56 | Mutated | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 35 | Wild Type | ||||
| Niece (Unaffected) | 30 | Wild Type | ||||
| Niece (Breast cancer) | 33 † | Mutated | ||||
| Cousin (Breast cancer) | 70 | Mutated | ||||
| 1 | MLH1 | c.2181_2182delCA (p.Ile728Serfs) | 5 | Proband (Colon Cancer) | 25 | Mutated |
| Brother (Unaffected) | 29 | Wild Type | ||||
| Aunt (Breast Cancer) | 58 | Wild Type | ||||
| Aunt (Unaffected) | 54 | Wild Type | ||||
| 2 | MLH1 | c.229T>C (p.Cys77Arg) | 3 | Proband (Colon Cancer) | 48 | Mutated |
| No family members | - | |||||
| 1 | APC | c.6709C>T (p.Arg2237Ter) | Proband (Pancreatic Cancer) | 52 † | Mutated | |
| Brother (Cerebral angiomas) | 65 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Pancreatic Cancer) | 48 † | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Colon Cancer) | 55 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Colon Cancer) | 57 | Mutated | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 67 | Wild Type | ||||
| Sister (Unaffected) | 66 | Wild Type |
†: dead.
Table 5.
Ongoing clinical trials investigating the therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
| Study | Disease | Phase | ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niraparib in patients with germline or somatic DDRmutations | Locally advanced metastatic pancreatic cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03601923 |
| Rucaparib maintenance in patients with germline or somaticBRCA or PALB2 mutations | Locally advanced metastaticpancreatic cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03140670 |
| Olaparib in gBRCA Mutated Pancreatic Cancer Whose Disease Has Not Progressed on First Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy | MetastaticPancreaticCancer | Phase 3 | NCT02184195 |
| Chlorambucil in Metastatic PDAC Patients Bearing a Germ Line DNA Defects Repair Mutations (SALE Trial) | MetastaticPancreaticCancer | Phase 2 | NCT04692740 |
| A Study of Maintenance Treatment withFluzoparib in gBRCA/PALB2 MutatedPancreatic Cancer Whose Disease Has Not Progressed on First Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy | MetastaticPancreaticCancer | Phase 3 | NCT04300114 |
| Testing the Addition of Pembrolizumab, an Immunotherapy Cancer Drug to Olaparib Alone as Therapy for Patients WithPancreatic Cancer That Has Spread With Inherited BRCA Mutations | MetastaticPancreaticCancer | Phase 2 | NCT04548752 |
| Niraparib and Dostarlimab for the Treatment of Germline or Somatic BRCA1/2 and PALB2 Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer | PancreaticDuctal Adenocarcinoma | Phase 2 | NCT04493060 |
| A Randomized Study of Olaparib or Placebo in Patients With Surgically Removed Pancreatic Cancer Who Have a BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 Mutation, The APOLLO Trial | P adenocarcinoma | Phase 2 | NCT04858334 |
| Niraparib and TSR-042 for the Treatment of BRCA-Mutated Unresectable or Metastatic Breast, Pancreas, Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer | UnresectablePancreatic Carcinoma, MetastaticPancreaticCancer | Phase1 | NCT04673448 |
| Durvalumab and Olaparib for the treatment of Advanced PDAC, leiomyosarcoma or mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer | Advanced pancreaticcancer | Phase 2 | NCT03851614 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Vietri, M.T.; D’Elia, G.; Caliendo, G.; Albanese, L.; Signoriello, G.; Napoli, C.; Molinari, A.M. Pancreatic Cancer with Mutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC Genes: Phenotype Correlation and Detection of a Novel Germline BRCA2 Mutation. Genes 2022, 13, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020321
AMA Style
Vietri MT, D’Elia G, Caliendo G, Albanese L, Signoriello G, Napoli C, Molinari AM. Pancreatic Cancer with Mutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC Genes: Phenotype Correlation and Detection of a Novel Germline BRCA2 Mutation. Genes. 2022; 13(2):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020321
Chicago/Turabian StyleVietri, Maria Teresa, Giovanna D’Elia, Gemma Caliendo, Luisa Albanese, Giuseppe Signoriello, Claudio Napoli, and Anna Maria Molinari. 2022. "Pancreatic Cancer with Mutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC Genes: Phenotype Correlation and Detection of a Novel Germline BRCA2 Mutation" Genes 13, no. 2: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020321
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
