Next Article in Journal
Compilation of Genotype and Phenotype Data in GCDH-LOVD for Variant Classification and Further Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of Vascular Plant One-Zinc-Finger Gene Family in Six Cucurbitaceae Species and the Role of CmoVOZ2 in Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiota-Induced Epigenetic Alterations in Depressive Disorders Are Targets for Nutritional and Probiotic Therapies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Euphrates Poplar Responses to Abiotic Stress and Its Unique Traits in Dry Regions of China (Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia): What Should We Know?

by
Boniface Ndayambaza
1,2,
Jianhua Si
1,*,
Yanfang Deng
3,
Bing Jia
1,2,
Xiaohui He
1,2,4,
Dongmeng Zhou
1,2,
Chunlin Wang
1,2,
Xinglin Zhu
1,2,
Zijin Liu
1,2,
Jie Qin
1,2,
Boyang Wang
1,2 and
Xue Bai
1,2
1
Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Qilian Mountain National Park Qinghai Provincial Administration, Xining 810000, China
4
Faculty of Resources and Environment, Baotou Teachers’ College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(12), 2213; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122213
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 27 November 2023 / Accepted: 13 December 2023 / Published: 14 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress in Plants: Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
At the moment, drought, salinity, and low-temperature stress are ubiquitous environmental issues. In arid regions including Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia and other areas worldwide, the area of tree plantations appears to be rising, triggering tree growth. Water is a vital resource in the agricultural systems of countries impacted by aridity and salinity. Worldwide efforts to reduce quantitative yield losses on Populus euphratica by adapting tree plant production to unfavorable environmental conditions have been made in response to the responsiveness of the increasing control of water stress. Although there has been much advancement in identifying the genes that resist abiotic stresses, little is known about how plants such as P. euphratica deal with numerous abiotic stresses. P. euphratica is a varied riparian plant that can tolerate drought, salinity, low temperatures, and climate change, and has a variety of water stress adaptability abilities. To conduct this review, we gathered all available information throughout the Web of Science, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information on the impact of abiotic stress on the molecular mechanism and evolution of gene families at the transcription level. The data demonstrated that P. euphratica might gradually adapt its stomatal aperture, photosynthesis, antioxidant activities, xylem architecture, and hydraulic conductivity to endure extreme drought and salt stress. Our analyses will give readers an understanding of how to manage a gene family in desert trees and the influence of abiotic stresses on the productivity of tree plants. They will also give readers the knowledge necessary to improve biotechnology-based tree plant stress tolerance for sustaining yield and quality trees in China’s arid regions.

1. Introduction

P. euphratica Oliv. (P. euphratica), the Euphrates poplar or desert poplar, is non-halophyte and mesophyte in its morphology, but has a high abiotic stress tolerance [1] and is an important component of riparian ecosystems in arid regions. This poplar tree species is mainly distributed in Southwestern Europe, including Spain [2]; Western Asian countries, including Iran [3], Iraq, Syria, and Turkey [4]; Central Asia, including Kazakhstan [5]; Pakistan [6]; India [7]; and China’s western Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and other arid regions [8,9,10,11,12]. It is also found in many other countries outside of Asia, such as the Middle East and North Africa (Kenya and Morocco [13,14]). P. euphratica is mostly found in the Chinese province Xinjiang, the Tarim Basin area, where it covers 89.1% of its total territory and is dispersed along rivers [15,16]. Although not a halophyte, it can adapt to extreme conditions, from flooding to extremely dry, hot atmospheres, with temperatures ranging from +54 °C to –45 °C, and from normal soil to soil with very high salinity (up to 2~5%) [17]. The adaptation of P. euphratica to high saline concentrations and high pH levels could be due to its physiological capacity [18,19,20]. Deserts have some of the harshest ecosystems because they combine high temperatures and low rainfall. Abiotic stress is an important variable affecting agricultural production and reducing tree yields [21,22]. Globally, these pressures include heavy metals, high pH, salinity, extreme temperatures (hot and cold), and extreme water levels (drought) [23]. The variety of plant evolution within gene regulatory profiles helps to control the water and ion balance, sustain proper photosynthesis, and resist abiotic stress [24,25]. These regulatory genes involve several physiological, metabolic, and cellular activities, including transcription, signal transduction, photosynthesis, energy metabolism, and protein synthesis and breakdown [26,27]. P. euphratica is a deciduous tree that may reach a height of 15 m and belongs to the Salicaceae family. This species is a dioecy, pollinated by the wind, and has different individuals for its male and female flowers [28]. Its fruits are capsules of tiny seeds produced in enormous amounts with cotton-like appendages [29], where these seeds disperse efficiently via wind at great distances. In phreatophytes, vegetative regeneration is very significant. P. euphratica roots spread virtually horizontally within the top 0.6 m of the soil, and the suckers they create can reach a distance of up to 40 m from their parent trees [30]. A phreatophyte found in arid areas is P. euphratica [31] because it can survive salt, which makes it an excellent natural genetic resource for developing plants with salt tolerance. P. euphratica has acquired a variety of morphological characteristics to cope with the salinity of its environment [32], including a unique hydraulic system [33] and succulent leaves [34,35]. Desertification occurs frequently in the riparian forests along the Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia sites, which are suitable for P. euphratica establishment [36,37]. To clarify the adaptation mechanisms that allow this species to live in the seasonal change-prone riparian ecosystem, P. euphratica uses the soil and trunk as water reservoirs to manage water stress during brief drought periods [38,39,40]. The restoration of many species in water-scarce places has a scientific foundation thanks to several studies, which also helps to improve the soil water balance and maintain the stability of the vegetation ecology in arid areas of China [41,42]. Consequently, countless studies confirm that gene families play a decisive role in the effects of drought, salt, and low-temperature stress on physiological and biochemical processes, which impede photosynthesis and destroy cell membranes.
In the last two decades, genomic information from decoded plant genomes, including O. sativa and A. thaliana, has employed DNA microarray technology with a bioinformatics method to evaluate the expression of genome-scale transcripts (mRNA) or transcriptomes. For instance, several miRNAs, including miR395, miR398, and miR399 in P. tremula, were enhanced under salt stress in microarray studies on forestry species. When A. thaliana was exposed to salt stress, miR398 was significantly down-regulated [43]. Under salinity conditions, P. euphratica displayed substantial changes in the expression levels of MiR168, miR1444, and miR1446 [44]. Under low-temperature stress, genes and their functions were analyzed [45]. With the increasing growth of omics data, bioinformatics methods have advanced [46], including those of genome, transcriptome [47], and proteome, alongside the quick development of computer technology [48]. Bioinformatics is also built on the fundamental idea that any biological mechanism comprises many molecular events, and that knowing the interplay within and between distinct levels of genomic architecture is the only way to comprehend phenotypic features [49,50]. Due to their high throughput and genome-wide performance, P. trichocarpa genome draft and poplar DNA microarray methods contribute to the inconclusive identification of gene functions [51,52,53,54,55]. Functional understanding, including metabolic pathways, protein complexes, and stress responses, is predicted through co-expression scrutiny. P. euphratica has also been studied [36,55,56]; the genome sequencing data were uploaded at the NCBI [56,57,58] and co-expressed the functions that respond to biotic stress. P. euphratica shows transcriptional modification in signaling, photoprotection, oxidative stress detoxification, and the suppression of stomatal closure, potentially changing drought stress responses (as illustrated in Figure 1) [47]. The expression of particular gene sets in plants determines their susceptibility to stress and their level of resistance to it. P. euphratica proteins’ functions in plant growth, development, metabolic pathways, and stress responses require advanced study for their regulatory roles and functions. Here, we gathered all information by using the Web of Science, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This review provides a quick summary of recent studies examining the functions of P. euphratica in novel gene families and molecular networks that may control plant tolerance to abiotic stress. These investigation have created the groundwork for improving the stress tolerance of forest breeding.

2. P. euphratica Gene Family Identification and Characterization

Environmental selection is the dynamic force that underscores molecular and biological evolution in P. euphratica [59]. The classification of plant tolerance may be based on its diversification, which includes obvious interspecific phenotypic and genomic changes [60]. As a result, due to the nature of plants, gene quantities, composition, and existence are all factors that are considered during the plant evolution process [61,62,63]. Importantly, this process of the evolutionary mechanism provides more information about the modifications in drought resistance, salt tolerance, and oxygen uptake as an outcome of the plant’s capability for adaptation during its life in the soil, such as the formation of the rooting system, vascular structure, and evolution of metabolites in response to abiotic stresses. Recently, a clear and profound understanding has been gained of P. euphratica’s genome analysis at the transcriptome level, which embodies conditional transcripts. The de novo assembly of P. euphratica reveals the most in-depth analysis of transcriptomic, gene annotation, profiling, gene expression, and transgenic lineages, providing an interesting concept for learning about their gene family. Therefore, the most prevalent TFs corresponding to the bZIP, bHLH, C3H, and NAC TF families were those differentially expressed in the MYB and MYB-related transcription factor families [47]. For example, some genes are crucial in transport, cellular communication, and metabolism. A gene family helps us to identify and characterize the shared origin of proteins with related structures and metabolic activities. Based on the P. euphratica resistance gene family, it is evident that this model plant is tolerant not only to external stress, but also to the multiple environmental pressures during adaption. For example, the transcription factors (TF gene family) function as the regulators of P. euphratica, including plant growth, developmental, and reproductive functions. Studies have established that progress in P. euphratica can be realized based on the different numbers of resistance genes, comprising the PeDREB2 gene family [64]. For example, downstream of the DREB2A transcription cascade system, where PeDREB2, PeCPK10, and HsfA3 are expressed in drought and salt stress [65]; they were also induced by cold, but not by abscisic acid (ABA) treatment [64,65,66]. It is interesting that these gene families play particular roles in tree plants, such as molecular chaperones (heat shock proteins). This large family is a global salvation system in living organisms that prevents protein damage by stopping aggregation, refolding, and restoring cellular homeostasis through proteolysis and lysosomes/proteasomes. Additionally, some extremely hydrophilic proteins, such as the LEA and COR family members, may serve as chaperones to protect proteins and membranes from damage caused by stress [67].
Under abiotic stressors, the gene family contributes significantly more at the transcription level (Figure 1). For example, heat, drought, and salt stresses consequently significantly elevated the expression of PeuHsf genes in P. euphratica [68], as well as bHLH (PebHLH35 from P. euphratica offers drought resistance by controlling the growth, photosynthesis, and stomatal development of A. thaliana) [69]; R2R3-MYB [70]; WRKY [71]; WRKY1 (because PeWRKY1 was able to connect to the W-box in the PeHA1 promoter, salt stress increased the transcription of PeHA1) [72]; PeuSAP [73]; GASA [74]; TCP [75]; and the SPX gene family, which plays a role in the response mechanism to phosphorus stress [76]. It has been witnessed that the transcription factors of the large family play a crucial role in the P. euphratica species [47]. Data from high-throughput sequencing revealed that P. euphratica NAC (PeNAC) genes play a role in osmotic and salt stress responses. One study showed that distinct stress-responsive PeNAC transcription factors differentially control salt tolerance in transgenic plants [77]. For example, the stress response gene PeNAC1 in P. euphratica was subjected to salt stress; despite that, transgenic A. thaliana that overexpressed PeNAC1 had greater salt tolerance. The cloning and functional analysis of PeNAC045 also demonstrated high responses to abiotic stress [78]. The successful identification and isolation of the strongest genes have been experimented with, which suggests the crucial derivative stress tolerance of the gene family in P. euphratica and other model plants. In addition, the cloning gene has evidenced the critical role of P. euphratica tolerance to drought stress, including the PeSCL7 gene [79]; PeSTZ1, a C2H2-type zinc finger enhanced the freezing tolerance throughout the modulation of ROS regulation within the PeAPX2 expression [80]. Increasing the water transport capacity in P. euphratica LAC2 (LACCASE) increases its drought tolerance [81]. Importantly, the overexpression of PeuLAC2 in poplar plants alters the xylem structure, thickening the secondary cell walls and increasing the fiber cell length and stem tensile strength. Arabidopsis CBF gene overexpression induces orthologs and increases stress tolerance. In transgenic poplar leaves, drought, high salt, and cold stressors increase PeCBF4a expression, which enhances the photosynthetic capacity and PSII photosynthetic electron transport activity.
Additionally, most physiological mechanisms depend heavily on the photosynthetic activities of P. euphratica. For example, exogenous plant growth factors are essential for P. euphratica’s ability to withstand drought by controlling photosynthesis and lowering salt stress [82]. Additionally, P. euphratica demonstrates heat tolerance and leaf protein accumulation [83]. What about the modifications made in reaction to salinity in the roots of P. euphratica, then? For instance, to respond to this query, extracellular factors, such as calmodulin, calmodulin-like, and calcineurin B-like proteins, encourage the production of calcium. The Ca2+-mediated CBL-CIPK network, which affects salt tolerance, depends on CIPKs [84,85]. It has been well established that several CIPK genes are implicated in the SOS signaling pathway that mediates salt tolerance [86]. The Na+/H+ antiporter controls Na+ efflux and root salt tolerance in A. thaliana [87,88], while the interaction between AtCBL4 and CIPK24 (SOS3-SOS2 complex) mostly controls NHX activity [87] as opposed to the shoots, where the AtCBL10-AtCIPK24 complex defends against salt stress [86,89]. PeCBL1 interacts with CIPK24, CIPK25, and CIPK26 to improve P. euphratica’s ion homeostasis and salt tolerance. These CDPKs are substrates for ion channel proteins and transporters, and are implicated in abiotic stress-induced Ca2+ signaling [90,91]. For instance, PeCIPK26 expression was found in the roots, stem, leaf, cell membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus, possibly induced by salt stress [92]. By overexpressing the PeCIPK26 gene in A. thaliana cipk24 mutants, the role of PeCIPK26 in salt tolerance was examined. The faster germination rate, lower Na(+) buildup, and greater capacity to release Na(+) when grown with NaCl of transgenic plants compared to mutants demonstrate their superior salt tolerance. These findings point to a role for PeCIPK26 in P. euphratica’s response to salt stress. The model plant regulates genes involved in drought, salt, and freezing stress, indicating resistance to these environmental conditions. For tree-breeding programs, these genes work as abiotic stress markers and aid comparative genomics projects, revealing shared and distinctive transcriptional pathways between tree species [70]. This poplar species revealed its transcriptional pathways that lead to the discovery of the variance in expression of H+-ATPase, rubisco activase, laccases, and expans in P. trichocarpa, but not in P. euphratica [93,94]. A. thaliana’s reactions to drought show clear species-dependent characteristics [95]. This could indicate that angiosperm trees, independent of species or hybrids, will likely have various applications in response to drought stress, and that these processes are extremely varied among species and genotypes. Comparing tree transcriptome investigations’ outcomes is challenging due to varying responses based on plant organs, developmental stages, and stress levels [96]. In P. euphratica, extreme stress triggers quick reactions, while progressive water depletion enables plants to adjust by putting stress defense mechanisms in place. The intricacy of gene expression studies in response to abiotic stress is shown by the fact that various water depletion regimes activate various gene networks (as illustrated in Table 1). Identifying new genes for salt and drought tolerance in plants can advance tree breeding and ecosystem restoration in woody plants.

3. Effect of Salt Stress in P. euphratica

Around 60% of the world’s land surface is exaggerated by salt, which spreads due to ineffective irrigation practices or water contaminated by salt. The total amount of soluble salts in the soil is measured as soil salinity, and high levels can kill or induce plant wilting. Salts, including NaCl, CaCl2, gypsum, magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, and sodium sulfate, are frequently found in saline soils. As a result of salt growth in the cytoplasm, high salinity can harm and even kill leaves. Halophytes are salt-tolerant plants that can survive in environments with salinities higher than 400 mM. Terrestrial vascular plants depend on xylem water transfer and stomatal evaporation to survive in stressful environments. The leaves of P. euphratica are wax-coated, rigid, and thick, preventing oxidation-related damage. They grow more robust xylems with drought-induced cavitation due to their adaptation to hydraulic conductivity and embolism. P. euphratica grows in dry, hot climes; increases its photosynthetic rate and evaporation; accumulates salts; deepens its tape roots; and increases its salt content. The primary root penetrates one meter of soil vertically, while the lower end develops lateral feeder roots. However, salt stress has a major negative impact on plant development, growth, and reproduction. Understanding salt tolerance pathways is essential, as rapid exposure activates genes involved in ribosome activities, photosynthesis, cell development, and transport. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) in excess can harm organisms by degrading chlorophyll and causing membrane leakage. It is necessary to find tree and woody plant species that can withstand salt and improve their resistance. The P. euphratica tree is a good example of a tree with salt tolerance. P. euphratica has lengthy juvenile periods and frequently reproduces across several years. One of the main characteristics that sets P. euphratica apart from other plants is its secondary growth. It has the capacity to produce thickened vascular bundles that accumulate to create secondary xylem (dicots) or wood-like tissue (monocots), which allows them to improve their transport capacity when needed. This species has high outcrossing rates, long-distance pollen distribution, large effective populations, an arborescent stature, longevity, and late successional communities. These characteristics could make P. euphratica less susceptible to genetic bottlenecks and more resilient to habitat fragmentation and climatic changes. Tissue-specific differentially expressed genes (DEG) under salt stress has diverse functions, with membrane transporter activity being the most significant leaf function and the oxidation–reduction process being the most significant root function. Gene families like SOS, NHX, GolS, GPX, APX, RBHF, and CBL are involved in ionic homeostasis in P. euphratica seedling tissues [99]. DEGs, such as antioxidant genes, contribute to ROS scavenging and plant salinity tolerance by maintaining ionic and ROS homeostasis in tissues and improving ion uptake, transport, and compartmentalization [100,101]. The regulation of pathways, including plasma membrane and tonoplast Na+/H+ transporters, is crucial for salt stress tolerance. P. euphratica halophytes maintain a low Na+ influx and prevent Na+ accumulation [102,103]. Ionic homeostasis is accomplished through genes that code for pyrophosphatase, cation/proton antiporters, plasma membrane and vacuolar H+-ATPases, and salt tolerance systems (as illustrated in Figure 2) [104,105]. P. euphratica studies reveal genes controlling the cells’ salt tolerance, ion compartmentalization, xylem loading, and potassium levels [18,106,107]. P. euphratica has intricate and interrelated defense mechanisms that help it avoid or lessen environmental harm. As part of these systems, transcription factors (TFs) bind to cis-elements in the promoters of target genes or other useful modular structures to regulate how genes are expressed in response to abiotic stress. In P. euphratica, 2382 TFs (2382 loci) have been discovered and categorized into 58 families following the family assignment guidelines. The P. euphratica genome has a high content of TFs (http://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/index.php?sp=Peu, accessed on 6 July 2023) and various transcription factors, including DREB, bZIP, AP2/ERF, WRKY, and bHLH, that regulate plant responses to stress (as mentioned in Figure 1), including salt stress [108,109]. In non-woody plants, WRKY genes have just been discovered; nonetheless, the effects of salinity on these transcription factors in woody plants may be pertinent. Interestingly, researchers have revealed that salt stress inhibits the PalWRKY77 gene by reducing the salt tolerance in P alba var. pyramidalis [110]. The PalWRKY77 pathway receives a bad signal from this ABA regulatory mechanism, making poplar trees more vulnerable to salinity. However, the salt-induced transcriptional response of PeWRKY1 in P. euphratica reveals that WRKY1 binds to H+-ATPase promoters, improving gene expression and salt tolerance [72]. However, little is understood about the modifications that the P. euphratica xylem undergoes in response to salinity. Addressing the other transcription factor members is needed to facilitate a molecular revolution for tree breeding in other species.

4. Effect of Drought Stress on the Physiology of P. euphratica

According to different studies, typical abiotic stress, known as drought, impacts cellular homeostasis, gas exchange, seed generation, plant development, and water relations [111,112]. Plants have evolved innate defenses against drought stress to adapt to harsh settings, such as closing stomata, decreasing transpiration, producing abscisic acid (ABA), and storing hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [113]. Although drought can severely restrict a plant’s ability to grow and develop, family genes are thought to have a key role in how the plant reacts to various conditions. Drought impacts the physiological environment of the soil microbiota and plants. Auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins, and abscisic acid, among other phytohormones, are produced by bacteria and have been shown to increase drought resilience in P. euphratica [114,115]. As plant-growth factors, due to their capacity to produce endospores, which enable bacterial survival for lengthy periods under unfavorable environmental conditions, bacterium genera, including Bacillus sp., are frequently discovered in arid land [116]. At the same time, the various metabolisms and strong physical tolerance of Pseudomonas sp. isolates in P.euphratica cultivated in desolate and saline soil may explain their large abundance [117]. Plant rhizobacteria support plant development, biological regulation, and resistance to abiotic stress through direct and indirect processes [118]. The direct mechanisms involve phytohormone regulation, the release of volatile compounds, and an enhanced plant uptake of nutrients [119]. The indirectly beneficial effects include suppressing deleterious microorganisms and pathogens, competition for nutrients, inhibiting enzymes, and triggering host-induced systemic resistance [120,121]. The rhizosphere of both sexes suggests the presence of sex-specific variation in bacterial communities and their relative abundances [122]. In reaction to dryness, males have more drought-tolerant fungus and bacteria in their rhizospheres than females [123]. The altered bacterial and fungal community composition increase soil ammonification in the rhizosphere of female plants. The contribution of Rhizobium in biocontrol activities against pathogens and the alleviation of stresses play a decisive role in the P. euphratica. For instance, recent discoveries discussed the significance of rhizobia, which promote plant growth by reducing salt and osmotic stressors in contaminated soils (see [124] and references therein).
Additionally, rhizobium occurrence and utilities in microbiomes of non-leguminous plants were reviewed to control the growth of various soilborne plant pathogens by focusing on the biological control of the different genera [125]. Rhizobium populi sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium recovered from P. euphratica, was particularly isolated from the storage fluids in the stems of P. euphratica trees, which is an interesting development [126]. The studies conducted on the pathogenic fungus in the pathogenic site of P. euphratica found that it increased its survival rate in arid regions [127]. Microbiome research indicates that planting P. euphratica may influence bacterial communities, possibly resulting in more infections. However, research on the relationship between pathogenic bacteria and a high rate of plant mortality is lacking. Different research revealed that the synergistic actions of the dioecious P. euphratica roots and coexisting microorganisms allow them to respond to and survive drought stress [128,129]. However, research on the identification of genes associated with microorganisms to cope with abiotic stresses remains scarce in this model tree plant. P. euphratica grows in deep water, relying on water table depth, but faces drought-induced cavitation, causing shoot cessation, stomatal closure, and reduced root growth [130,131]. Recent findings have also unveiled that long-term irrigation in P. euphratica plantations affects soil phosphorus fractions and microbial communities [132]. They found positive relationships between inorganic P and various bacteria, while negative associations were observed with Burkholderiaceae and soil phosphorus (soil P) in its inorganic form (Pi). The study suggests that water management techniques focusing on soil microbial recovery could improve soil quality. However, the increased mineralization of organic P in P. euphratica is linked to soil moisture, pH, and microorganism profiles, necessitating future research on foliar P fraction distribution. Based on the research conducted on the impact of cow dung and biochar on phosphorus efficiency in P. euphratica soil, bacterial communities, and functional genes (phoC, phoD, gcd, and pqqC; see [133] and references therein), the authors found that returning cow dung improves soil properties, seedling growth, and phosphorus availability, which are up-taken throughout the roots of P. euphratica. Biochar, a carbonized form of cow manure, has a more definite cumulative phosphorus content and promotion of bacterial diversity in arid regions. However, the study suggests increasing biochar use in plantation management and conducting a long-term analysis to discover the utmost scientific addition technique for P. euphratica seedlings and cow dung. In desert environments, mycorrhizal associations and symbiotic interactions between fungi and plant roots increase plant resilience to drought stress [134,135]. These connections aid in the intake of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, which is necessary for plant growth [136]. These plants survive in arid conditions by developing specialized mycorrhizal associations, which enhance the soil’s surface area for the uptake of nutrients and water, as well as delivering carbon compounds from the host plant [137]. It is interesting to note that P. euphratica may also help us to fully comprehend the intricate mechanisms underpinning P. euphratica’s resilience to drought stress and salt stress, which are mediated via mycorrhizal connections in the desert. The study reveals that not all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can infect and colonize plant roots. In extreme conditions, one species can become predominant. The alkaline P. euphratica rhizosphere soil favored G. mosseae growth, suggesting its selectivity and adaptability. Other AMF species may survive in the rhizosphere soil or colonize P. euphratica roots. There is, however, a small gap in this study that has to be filled [138].
Photosynthesis is one the most significant processes in a plant’s life, but drought stress may affect its mechanisms, which stops plant growth and development under severe ecological conditions. The direct impacts of drought stress on photosynthesis include fluctuations in photosynthetic metabolism and constraints on diffusion via the stomata and mesophyll. Secondary effects include oxidative damage brought on by the superposition of various stresses. Interestingly, a thorough investigation comparing salt and drought stress found that both conditions resulted in the down-regulation of several photosynthetic genes. In P. euphratica, for example, the roots and leaves suggested that during stress, protein concentration can be altered without affecting gene expression [131,139]. Importantly, at the transcriptome level, 27 photosynthesis genes were differentially expressed during drought stress, with the majority being down-regulated and six genes enhancing expression [47]. For examining the processes of abiotic tolerance in woody plants, Populus euphratica is a potential candidate species. For instance, under salt and drought stress conditions, PeGSTU58 overexpression lines showed increased expression of various stress-responsive genes, such as DREB2A, COR47, RD22, CYP8D11, and SOD1. Additionally, PebHLH35 has been demonstrated to be able to directly bind to the promoter region of PeGSTU58 and stimulate its expression in yeast one-hybrid experiments and luciferase studies. These findings suggested that PeGSTU58, whose expression was favorably controlled by PebHLH35, had a role in the tolerance to salt and drought stress by maintaining ROS homeostasis [140].

5. Mechanism of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in P. euphratica

Developing mechanisms that allow plants to regulate their water loss while continuing to fix carbon dioxide (CO2) through photosynthesis has been a critical step in plants’ colonization of terrestrial environments [141,142]. This is an important step, since, in a natural environment, water availability is undoubtedly the primary determinant of plant distribution and survival. Drought tolerance mechanisms are any processes that let plants continue to grow or produce under conditions of an insufficient soil water supply. The first tactic is to prevent a water deficit. Drought resistance entails finishing the life cycle under ideal conditions, limiting transpiration, and maximizing root uptake [143,144,145]. It also involves increasing deciduous plants that hibernate during droughts, as well as species of arid environments with permanent access to the water table, like P. euphratica. By sacrificing biomass production, these strategies enable plant survival. One of the main issues restricting most plants’ survival ability is water. Plants, particularly those found in arid regions, have developed a variety of tactics to stop water loss or adapt to growth in water-scarce environments. At the physiological level, for instance, P. euphratica demonstrates greater antioxidant enzyme activity and stronger root hydrotropic development than other poplar plants [146]. The capacity of stems to carry water (called xylem pressure) and the closure or opening of stomata controlled by phytohormones support water balance in plants (Figure 1). Numerous studies on woody plants have demonstrated that drought tolerance is closely tied to xylem structure, which is connected to the ability of plants to transport water [147,148,149,150]. The experimental evidence, however, is in favor of the associated evolutionary processes, particularly when it comes to the molecular control mechanisms of P. euphratica. It offers a variety of ecological services as a natural check on the spread of deserts, including preventing sandstorms, controlling oasis conditions, and even preserving the ecosystem balance. P. euphratica is therefore frequently used as a model woody plant for the investigation of trees’ abiotic resistance mechanisms. P. euphratica has developed a variety of adaptations in arid environments. Of these, the polymorphisms in its leaves and its hard wood are thought to be two crucial adaptive features that may give P. euphratica an enhanced adaptability to desert conditions. For instance, the xylem of P. euphratica wood can store significant amounts of cellulose and lignin [151]. The xylem’s secondary cell wall (SCW) serves as a route for the long-distance movement of nutrients and water, supporting plants mechanically and as a barrier against disease and insect attacks [152,153,154]. These characteristics and leaf polymorphisms enable the plants to show physiological responses that aid their adaptation to severely dry settings, such as reduced photosynthetic activity, altered cell wall flexibility, and stomatal aperture regulation.
Moreover, the ultimate impact of abiotic stress on plant growth depends not only on the severity of the damage but also on how well the plant can recover from the damage [155]. Photosynthetic electron transport and carbon metabolism rates often decline less in plants that can withstand cold temperatures [156]. Compared to cold-sensitive genotypes, these modifications let these plants recover more quickly from chilling stress [157].

6. P. euphratica, a Naturally Stress-Tolerant Tree, as a Source for Finding Stress-Adapted Genes

P. euphratica is the only arbor species among the toughest plants that can live in the deserts of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in north-central China [158]. Therefore, the Taklamakan Desert in Xinjiang is the second-largest sand desert with moving dunes and is known for its harsh conditions [159]. The Tarim River, the longest inland river in China, flows through the desert, fed by melting snow from Tianshan Mountains [160]. Ejina Banner in Inner Mongolia has had a P. euphratica tree growing there for over 800 years [2,161,162]. The locals refer to it as a “sacred tree.” A new plant species appeared along the ancient Mediterranean Sea some 65 million years ago, following the extinction of the dinosaurs [163,164]. Its scientific name is P. euphratica and its binomial name is P. euphratica Oliv.
The leaves are formed like willow leaves as a sapling to lessen evaporation. Its leaves enlarge and take on a rounded form as it becomes taller and requires more energy to sustain the trunk. In the Gobi Desert, the poplar thrives on water but is drought-resistant. The poplars can flourish happily as long as the groundwater stays at a depth of roughly four meters below the surface. An adult P. euphratica tree can release ten kilograms of salt and alkali annually. Water and soil are well preserved in the desert with a poplar forest. The Taklamakan Desert demonstrated that it has phreatophytic and deciduous character. Despite having a low drought tolerance, the ongoing contact with groundwater allows for significant water usage and transpiration through the mounting season. This method of avoiding drought makes accumulating a lot of biomass possible. Studies have shown that P. euphratica is a fast-growing tree species but is stress-sensitive, and our focus has increased due to its use in environmental protection, agroforestry on marginal soils, and afforestation on damaged soils [18,165]. The study of the endophytic bacteria of P. euphratica in various saline–alkaline regions of Xinjiang revealed that the bacteria in the various tissues of P. euphratica changed with the change in soil salinity [166]. Endogenous bacteria diversity is lower in P. euphratica sap tissue under high salinity. These unique bacteria under various salinities were primarily related to the host’s stress tolerance [20]. Understanding the connections between natural microorganisms and stress-tolerant trees can enhance plant performance and broaden the variety of tree plants. In climate change situations, integrated genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomics data can reveal mechanisms for stress tolerance [167,168]. Creating DNA, RNA, protein, and metabolite separation procedures for woody plant biology and natively tolerant tree biology, including the recalcitrance of seeds, viability, and seed germination and acclimatization. In arid areas, woody species like Populus, Prosopis, Atriplex, and Eucalyptus species effectively use meager rainfall inputs [168,169]. Plants avoid drainage during dry spells by utilizing water surpluses due to their large storage capacity and deep root development systems. Understanding natural adaptation to salinity and drought in woody plants can accelerate gene integration, producing salt-tolerant and drought-tolerant varieties and maintaining commercial woody species’ productivity [170]. Nevertheless, there are arguments against using and regulating genetically modified wood plants and crops in today’s society. Countries have unique regulations on genome-editing technologies, potentially causing delays or prohibitions in their territories. For instance, the Chinese government has a keen eye for using genetically modified plants. The US Department of Agriculture has no regulations, while the EU requires the some regulation for genetically modified plants [171,172]. Therefore, the commercialization of salt-tolerant and drought-tolerant plants depends on individual laws. Studies on woody plants in salinized soils are crucial for sustainable agro-ecosystem management and genetic information, as native stress-tolerant trees offer valuable biological resources.

7. Effect of Water Stress on Hydraulic Traits in P. euphratica

Due to their numerous physiological functions, including photosynthesis, transpiration, photoreception, and respiration, leaves are the most important organs for determining the overall growth of a plant [173,174]. The leaves of plants are highly influenced by their environmental resilience [175]. An important aspect of plant physiology and its functional ecology is shown in the connection between leaves and their environment. The way in which leaves develop and evolve could show how the environment has an array of effects on plants, ranging from gene to population [176]. The distribution of water from leaves along the vertical heights of plants is most likely caused by some factors, one of which is likely to be the hydraulic characteristics. As plants grow taller, the leaf-to-atmosphere vapor pressure deficit increases, causing xylem tension and increased gravitational potential [177]. Drought causes plants to lose moisture, which increases the stress in the hydraulic pathways, which can cause cavitation and the development of embolisms (air bubbles) in the water conductivity xylem [143]. This phenomenon creates a blockage of water transport and, when prolonged, may cause hydraulic failure and plant death. To shrink xylem embolisms, which cause plant hydraulic dysfunction, the plant usually improves its water transport capacity by adjusting its water-related functional traits. The P. euphratica tree, a dominant species of the desert, is one tree species in the terrestrial ecosystem that develops strong leaves in the face of environmental changes, which subjects it to long-term drought and salt stress tolerance. Many researchers have found that P. euphratica has a significant strategy to alleviate the increase in hydraulic constraints along vertical heights [178]. Importantly, poplar saplings exhibit a high degree of phenotypic plasticity in response to water-deficit growing conditions, with reductions in hydraulic stem sensitivity and leaf area being particularly important in postponing the onset of hydraulic failure during an induced drought event. It is interesting to note that PeGSTU30 increases the hydrophobicity of the active cavity while maintaining strong enzymatic activity [179,180]. Leaf functional characteristics are essential for plants to survive and for ecosystems to function. Understanding how these characteristics coordinate under stress is essential since salinity impacts them. According to Li et al. (2023), P. euphratica builds in riparian forests and adjusts and coordinates the functional features of its leaves to survive in saline conditions.

8. Conclusions and Future Research Perspectives

In arid areas of China, the fast-growing deciduous tree P. euphratica is essential for producing timber. It produces wood and stabilizes sand dunes while tolerating salt, alkalinity, and dryness. This review examines gene family analyses, concentrating on salt and drought tolerance in the Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia sites. Research on P. euphratica stress-tolerance genes focuses on its ability to maintain a stable internal water environment under low groundwater levels. New studies are screening functional-coding genes involved in ion transport, antioxidant enzymes, and signal transduction processes. Research suggests that P. euphratica can adapt to severe atmospheres by regulating tolerance genes, particularly in leaves related to photosynthesis. Recent applied research, such as the improved tobacco drought tolerance, highlights the importance of gene applications and techniques in enhancing P. euphratica’s resilience to drought [2]. It has been demonstrated that genes increase stress tolerance by influencing physiological morphology through the study of the molecular control mechanisms of leaf morphology and physiological alterations in P. euphratica. However, the triggers or factors that regulate gene expression in response to stress are controversial among researchers. Some experts believe that chromosomal rearrangements help the tree to adapt, while others argue that environmental stress is the main driver of gene expression. This difference in opinion highlights the need for further investigation and confirmation [181]. Even though various efforts have been made to construct the genome of P. euphratica as a model tree plant, there is still a gap in the complete genome for tree breeding. Future studies should focus on this model plant’s identification and the characterization of genes linked to heavy metal pollution under low pH levels. It is important to gain a thorough understanding of the intricate mechanisms underlying P. euphratica’s resilience to drought stress and salt stress caused by mycorrhizal connections (a symbiotic relationship between the tree and certain fungi) in desert regions. Furthermore, future studies should employ cutting-edge molecular analysis of gene expression patterns and how they govern mycorrhizal-mediated growth, nutrient uptake, and water uptake in stressful conditions. Future studies should also provide a clear investigation into the molecular mechanisms balancing stress tolerance and development in P. euphratica.

Author Contributions

B.N. and J.S. designed the concept of the review; Y.D., B.J., X.H., D.Z., C.W. and X.Z. wrote the draft, and Z.L., J.Q., B.W. and X.B. co-wrote and edited the draft; B.N. prepared the figures. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Major Science and Technology Project in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous region of China (No. Zdzx2018057); the Innovation Cross Team Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS (No. JCTD-2019-19); the Transformation Projects of Scientific and Technological Achievements in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous region of China (No. 2021CG0046); the Science and Technology Research Project of Colleges and Universities in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (No. NJZY21034); the New ecological public welfare projects in Qinghai Province (No. QHHP-2022-032); the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Youth Fund Project (No. 2023QN04014); the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (No. 23JRRA611); and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42001038).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, S.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Hüttermann, A.; Altman, A. Salt, nutrient uptake and transport, and ABA of Populus euphratica; a hybrid in response to increasing soil NaCl. Trees 2001, 15, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, X.; Lv, R.; Zhou, Z.; Fan, M.; Bai, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yang, G. CiteSpace Software Visualization Analyses of the Last Thirty Years of Research on Populus euphratica. Forests 2023, 14, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tavakoli Neko, H.; Shirvani, A.; Assareh, M.H.; Morshedloo, M.R. Physiological Response to Salinity Stress in Various Populus euphratica Oliv. Ecotypes in Iran. Ecopersia 2019, 7, 97–103. Available online: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-25997-en.html1 (accessed on 15 October 2023).
  4. Kansu, Ç.; Kaya, Z. Genetic diversity of marginal populations of Oliv. from highly fragmented river ecosystems. Silvae Genet. 2020, 69, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, T.Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, Z.L.; Niu, G.Y.; Yu, J.J.; Ma, N.; Wu, Z.N.; Pozdniakov, S.P.; Yan, D.H. Drought adaptability of phreatophytes: Insight from vertical root distribution in drylands of China. J. Plant Ecol. 2021, 14, 1128–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qiu, Q.; Ma, T.; Hu, Q.; Liu, B.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Liu, J. Genome-scale transcriptome analysis of the desert poplar, Populus euphratica. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Eusemann, P.; Petzold, A.; Thevs, N.; Schnittler, M. Growth patterns and genetic structure of Populus euphratica Oliv.(Salicaceae) forests in NW China–Implications for conservation and management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 297, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Monda, Y.; Miki, N.; Yoshikawa, K. Stand structure and regeneration of Populus euphratica forest in the lower reaches of the Heihe River, NW China. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2008, 4, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lam, T.Y.; Kleinn, C.; Coenradie, B. Double sampling for stratification for the monitoring of sparse tree populations: The example of Populus euphratica Oliv. forests at the lower reaches of Tarim River, Southern Xinjiang, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 175, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, W.; Liu, P.; Feng, Q.; Wang, T.; Wang, T. The spatiotemporal responses of Populus euphratica to global warming in Chinese oases between 1960 and 2015. J. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 28, 579–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Du, F.K.; Xu, F.; Qu, H.; Feng, S.; Tang, J.; Wu, R. Exploiting the transcriptome of Euphrates Poplar, Populus euphratica (Salicaceae) to develop and characterize new EST-SSR markers and construct an EST-SSR database. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gai, Z.; Zhai, J.; Chen, X.; Jiao, P.; Zhang, S.; Sun, J.; Qin, R.; Liu, H.; Wu, Z.; Li, Z. Phylogeography reveals geographic and environmental factors driving genetic differentiation of Populus sect. Turanga in Northwest China. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 5083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Phan, C.T.; Jörgensen, J.; Jouve, L.; Hausman, J.F.; Polle, A.; Teichmann, T. Micropropagation of Populus euphratica Olivier. Belg. J. Bot. 2004, 137, 175–180. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20794551 (accessed on 15 October 2023).
  14. Ma, T.; Wang, K.; Hu, Q.; Xi, Z.; Wan, D.; Wang, Q.; Feng, J.; Jiang, D.; Ahani, H.; Abbott, R.J.; et al. Ancient polymorphisms and divergence hitchhiking contribute to genomic islands of divergence within a poplar species complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E236–E243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Overdieck, D.; Ziche, D.; Yu, R. Gas exchange of Populus euphratica leaves in a riparian zone. J. Arid Land 2013, 5, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, K.Q.; Qin, F.; Li, Y.; Xie, G.; Li, J.F.; Cui, Y.-M.; Ferguson, D.K.; Yao, Y.F.; Wang, G.H.; Wang, Y.F. A new approach to interpret vegetation and ecosystem changes through time by establishing a correlation between surface pollen and vegetation types in the eastern central Asian desert. Palaeogeography 2020, 551, 109762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, P.; Deng, X.; Long, A.; Xu, H.; Ye, M.; Li, J. Change in spatial distribution patterns and regeneration of Populus euphratica under different surface soil salinity conditions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, S.; Polle, A. Salinity tolerance of Populus. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Junghans, U.; Polle, A.; Düchting, P.; Weiler, E.; Kuhlman, B.; Gruber, F.; Teichmann, T. Adaptation to high salinity in poplar involves changes in xylem anatomy and auxin physiology. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1519–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yue, H.; Zhao, L.; Yang, D.; Zhang, M.; Wu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Xing, X.; Zhang, L.; Qin, Y.; Guo, F. Comparative analysis of the endophytic bacterial diversity of Populus euphratica oliv. in environments of different salinity intensities. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e00500–e00522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tavakoli Neko, H.; Shirvany, A.; Assareh, M.; Naghavi, M.; Pessarakli, M.; Pourmeidani, A. Effects of NaCl on growth, yield and ion concentration of various Populus euphratica Oliv. ecotypes in Iran. Desert 2018, 23, 189–198. Available online: https://jdesert.ut.ac.ir/article_69116_072933987c764fffcebcd5fe41363399.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2023).
  22. Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Yaning, C.; Sushkova, S.; Chapligin, V.A.; Mandzhieva, S. A review on salinity adaptation mechanism and characteristics of Populus euphratica, a boon for arid ecosystems. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Polle, A.; Chen, S.L.; Eckert, C.; Harfouche, A. Engineering Drought Resistance in Forest Trees. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Loredana, F.C.; Pasqualina, W.; Amodio, F.; Giovanni, P.; Petronia, C. Plant Genes for Abiotic Stress; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Crotia, 2011; pp. 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saibo, N.J.; Lourenço, T.; Oliveira, M.M. Transcription factors and regulation of photosynthetic and related metabolism under environmental stresses. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carthew, R.W. Gene Regulation and Cellular Metabolism: An Essential Partnership. Trends Genet. 2021, 37, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dong, X.; Chen, X.; Gai, Z.; Zhai, J.; Guo, X.; Han, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Z.; Li, Z. Phenotypic Diversity and Variation in Natural Populus euphratica Populations Shaped by Environmental Factors. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2023, 16, 230–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Soleimani, A.; Etemad, V.; Calagari, M.; Namiranian, M.; Shirvany, A. Influence of climatic factors on fruit morphological traits in Populus euphratica Oliv. Ann. For. Res. 2014, 57, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wiehle, M.; Eusemann, P.; Thevs, N.; Schnittler, M. Root suckering patterns in Populus euphratica (Euphrates poplar, Salicaceae). Trees 2009, 23, 991–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thomas, F.M. Ecology of Phreatophytes; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 335–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhai, J.; Li, Z.; Si, J.; Zhang, S.; Han, X.; Chen, X. Structural and Functional Responses of the Heteromorphic Leaves of Different Tree Heights on Populus euphratica Oliv. to Different Soil Moisture Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, D.; Si, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, Y.; Wang, C.; Luo, H.; Qin, J.; Gao, G. Hydraulic characteristics of Populus euphratica in an arid environment. Forests 2019, 10, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, L.; Dong, H.; Li, Z.; Han, Z.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Species-specific responses to drought, salinity and their interactions in Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa seedlings. Plant Ecol. 2020, 13, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, H.; Hao, X.; Zhu, C.; Fu, A.; Yang, Y.; Li, W. Research advances in plant physiology and ecology of desert riparian forests under drought stress. Forests 2022, 13, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jia, H.; Liu, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Sun, P.; Zhao, S.; Zhou, X.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Genome resequencing reveals demographic history and genetic architecture of seed salinity tolerance in Populus euphratica. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4308–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Huisingh, D. Combating desertification in China: Monitoring, control, management and revegetation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 182, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, J.X.; Huang, X.; Li, W.H.; Zhu, C.G. Sap flow and trunk maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) measurements for diagnosing water status of Populus euphratica in an inland river basin of Northwest China. Ecohydrology 2013, 6, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Hao, X.; Sun, H.; Hua, D.; Qin, J. How Populus euphratica utilizes dew in an extremely arid region. Plant Soil 2019, 443, 493–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fan, X.; Hao, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y. Populus euphratica counteracts drought stress through the dew coupling and root hydraulic redistribution processes. Ann. Bot. 2023, 131, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shengyue, F.; Lihua, Z. Desertification control in China: Possible solutions. Ambio 2001, 30, 384–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.; Zhu, G.; Lin, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, K.; Sang, L.; Zhang, W.; Qiu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, Z. Water use patterns of dominant species of riparian wetlands in arid areas. Hydrol. Process. 2023, 37, e14835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, J.; Song, Q.; Zuo, Z.-F.; Liu, L. MicroRNA398: A Master Regulator of Plant Development and Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lotfi, A.; Pervaiz, T.; Jiu, S.; Faghihi, F.; Jahanbakhshian, Z.; Khorzoghi, E.G.; Fang, J.; Seyedi, S.M. Role of microRNAs and their target genes in salinity response in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 82, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, J.; Tian, Q.; Pang, T.; Jiang, L.; Wu, R.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. Deep-sequencing transcriptome analysis of low temperature perception in a desert tree, Populus euphratica. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Li, Z.; Jiao, P.; Zhai, J.; Liu, S.; Han, X.; Zhang, S.; Sun, J.; Gai, Z. Multi-omics analysis reveals spatiotemporal regulation and function of heteromorphic leaves in Populus. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 188–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tang, S.; Liang, H.; Yan, D.; Zhao, Y.; Han, X.; Carlson, J.E.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. Populus euphratica: The transcriptomic response to drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 83, 539–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tahmasebi, A.; Niazi, A.; Akrami, S. Integration of meta-analysis, machine learning and systems biology approach for investigating the transcriptomic response to drought stress in Populus species. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cobb, J.N.; Juma, R.U.; Biswas, P.S.; Arbelaez, J.D.; Rutkoski, J.; Atlin, G.; Hagen, T.; Quinn, M.; Ng, E.H. Enhancing the rate of genetic gain in public-sector plant breeding programs: Lessons from the breeder’s equation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Du, J.; Guo, X.; Wen, W.; Gu, S.; Wang, J.; Fan, J. Crop phenomics: Current status and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yan, D.H.; Fenning, T.; Tang, S.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. Genome-wide transcriptional response of Populus euphratica to long-term drought stress. Plant Sci. 2012, 195, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rosso, L.; Cantamessa, S.; Bergante, S.; Biselli, C.; Fricano, A.; Chiarabaglio, P.M.; Gennaro, M.; Nervo, G.; Secchi, F.; Carra, A. Responses to Drought Stress in Poplar: What Do We Know and What Can We Learn? Life 2023, 13, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tuskan, G.A.; Difazio, S.; Jansson, S.; Bohlmann, J.; Grigoriev, I.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; Ralph, S.; Rombauts, S.; Salamov, A. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006, 313, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Evans, L.M.; Slavov, G.T.; Rodgers-Melnick, E.; Martin, J.; Ranjan, P.; Muchero, W.; Brunner, A.M.; Schackwitz, W.; Gunter, L.; Chen, J.-G.; et al. Population genomics of Populus trichocarpa identifies signatures of selection and adaptive trait associations. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1089–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Slavov, G.T.; DiFazio, S.P.; Martin, J.; Schackwitz, W.; Muchero, W.; Rodgers-Melnick, E.; Lipphardt, M.F.; Pennacchio, C.P.; Hellsten, U.; Pennacchio, L.A.; et al. Genome resequencing reveals multiscale geographic structure and extensive linkage disequilibrium in the forest tree Populus trichocarpa. New Phytol. 2012, 196, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ma, T.; Wang, J.; Zhou, G.; Yue, Z.; Hu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Qiu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Genomic insights into salt adaptation in a desert poplar. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, Q.J.; Gao, L.Z. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of desert poplar (Populus euphratica). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2016, 27, 721–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lowe, T.M.; Eddy, S.R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, D.; Kang, M.; Wu, H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Improved genome assembly provides new insights into genome evolution in a desert poplar (Populus euphratica). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zamudio, K.R.; Bell, R.C.; Mason, N.A. Phenotypes in phylogeography: Species’ traits, environmental variation, and vertebrate diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 8041–8048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gregory, T.R. Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions. Evol. Educ. 2009, 2, 156–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sarkar, P.; Bosneaga, E.; Auer, M. Plant cell walls throughout evolution: Towards a molecular understanding of their design principles. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3615–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Meyer, R.S.; Purugganan, M.D. Evolution of crop species: Genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, J.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. Expression profiling and functional characterization of a DREB2-type gene from Populus euphratica. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 378, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, J.; Xue, B.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. A novel calcium-dependent protein kinase gene from Populus euphratica, confers both drought and cold stress tolerance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 441, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rao, S.; Du, C.; Li, A.; Xia, X.; Yin, W.; Chen, J. Salicylic Acid Alleviated Salt Damage of Populus euphratica: A Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis. Forests 2019, 10, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. He, M.; He, C.Q.; Ding, N.Z. Abiotic stresses: General defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhang, J.; Jia, H.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Molecular evolution and expression divergence of the Populus euphratica Hsf genes provide insight into the stress acclimation of desert poplar. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dong, Y.; Wang, C.; Han, X.; Tang, S.; Liu, S.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. A novel bHLH transcription factor PebHLH35 from Populus euphratica confers drought tolerance through regulating stomatal development, photosynthesis and growth in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 450, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sun, J.; Xu, J.; Qu, W.; Han, X.; Qiu, C.; Gai, Z.; Zhai, J.; Qin, R.; Liu, H.; Wu, Z.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of R2R3-MYB transcription factors reveals their differential responses to drought stress and ABA treatment in desert poplar (Populus euphratica). Gene 2023, 855, 147124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ma, J.; Lu, J.; Xu, J.; Duan, B.; He, X.; Liu, J. Genome-wide Identification of WRKY Genes in the Desert Poplar Populus euphratica and Adaptive Evolution of the Genes in Response to Salt Stress. Evol. Bioinform. 2015, 11s1, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yao, J.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, J.; Sa, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Deng, C.; Liu, J.; et al. Populus euphratica WRKY1 binds the promoter of H+-ATPase gene to enhance gene expression and salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 71, 1527–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jia, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Hu, J.; Lu, M. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the stress-associated protein gene family in desert poplar, Populus euphratica. Tree Genet. Genom. 2016, 12, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Han, S.; Jiao, Z.; Niu, M.-X.; Yu, X.; Huang, M.; Liu, C.; Wang, H.-L.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, W.; Wang, X. Genome-wide comprehensive analysis of the GASA gene family in Populus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ma, X.; Ma, J.; Fan, D.; Li, C.; Jiang, Y.; Luo, K. Genome-wide Identification of TCP Family Transcription Factors from Populus euphratica and Their Involvement in Leaf Shape Regulation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, N.; Shang, W.; Li, C.; Jia, L.; Wang, X.; Xing, G.; Zheng, W. Evolution of the SPX gene family in plants and its role in the response mechanism to phosphorus stress. Open Biol. 2018, 8, 170231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lu, X.; Zhang, X.; Duan, H.; Lian, C.; Liu, C.; Yin, W.; Xia, X. Three stress-responsive NAC transcription factors from Populus euphratica differentially regulate salt and drought tolerance in transgenic plants. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 162, 73–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lu, X.; Dun, H.; Lian, C.; Zhang, X.; Yin, W.; Xia, X. The role of peu-miR164 and its target PeNAC genes in response to abiotic stress in Populus euphratica. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 418–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ma, H.S.; Liang, D.; Shuai, P.; Xia, X.L.; Yin, W.L. The salt- and drought-inducible poplar GRAS protein SCL7 confers salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4011–4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. He, F.; Li, H.G.; Wang, J.J.; Su, Y.; Wang, H.L.; Feng, C.H.; Yang, Y.; Niu, M.X.; Liu, C.; Yin, W.; et al. PeSTZ1, a C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor from Populus euphratica, enhances freezing tolerance through modulation of ROS scavenging by directly regulating PeAPX2. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 2169–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Niu, Z.; Li, G.; Hu, H.; Lv, J.; Zheng, Q.; Liu, J.; Wan, D. A gene that underwent adaptive evolution, LAC2 (LACCASE), in Populus euphratica improves drought tolerance by improving water transport capacity. Hort. Res. 2021, 8, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Su, M.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Han, Z. Abscisic Acid, Paclobutrazol, and Salicylic Acid Alleviate Salt Stress in Populus talassica× Populus euphratica by Modulating Plant Root Architecture, Photosynthesis, and the Antioxidant Defense System. Forests 2022, 13, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ferreira, S.; Hjernø, K.; Larsen, M.; Wingsle, G.; Larsen, P.; Fey, S.; Roepstorff, P.; SalomÉ Pais, M. Proteome profiling of Populus euphratica Oliv. upon heat stress. Ann. Bot. 2006, 98, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Thoday-Kennedy, E.L.; Jacobs, A.K.; Roy, S.J. The role of the CBL–CIPK calcium signalling network in regulating ion transport in response to abiotic stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 76, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Reddy, A.S.; Ali, G.S.; Celesnik, H.; Day, I.S. Coping with stresses: Roles of calcium-and calcium/calmodulin-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2010–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mahajan, S.; Pandey, G.K.; Tuteja, N. Calcium-and salt-stress signaling in plants: Shedding light on SOS pathway. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 471, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Tang, R.J.; Xu, H.X.; Lan, W.Z.; Zhao, F.; Luan, S. Calcineurin B-Like proteins CBL4 and CBL10 mediate two independent salt tolerance pathways in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, J.; Ishitani, M.; Halfter, U.; Kim, C.S.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 3730–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ma, X.; Li, Q.H.; Yu, Y.N.; Qiao, Y.M.; Haq, S.u.; Gong, Z.H. The CBL–CIPK pathway in plant response to stress signals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, H.; Lv, F.; Han, X.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. The calcium sensor PeCBL1, interacting with PeCIPK24/25 and PeCIPK26, regulates Na+/K+ homeostasis in Populus euphratica. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Cho, J.H.; Choi, M.N.; Yoon, K.H.; Kim, K.N. Ectopic expression of SjCBL1, calcineurin B-like 1 gene from Sedirea japonica, rescues the salt and osmotic stress hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis cbl1 mutant. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lv, F.; Zhang, H.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. Expression profiling and functional characterization of a CBL-interacting protein kinase gene from Populus euphratica. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Neale, D.B.; Martinez-Garcia, P.J.; De La Torre, A.R.; Montanari, S.; Wei, X.X. Novel insights into tree biology and genome evolution as revealed through genomics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 457–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tang, S.; Dong, Y.; Liang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Ye, C.Y.; Shuai, P.; Han, X.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, W.; Xia, X. Analysis of the drought stress-responsive transcriptome of black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) using deep RNA sequencing. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 33, 424–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cohen, D.; Bogeat-Triboulot, M.B.; Tisserant, E.; Balzergue, S.; Martin-Magniette, M.L.; Lelandais, G.; Ningre, N.; Renou, J.P.; Tamby, J.P.; Le Thiec, D. Comparative transcriptomics of drought responses in Populus: A meta-analysis of genome-wide expression profiling in mature leaves and root apices across two genotypes. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pucholt, P.; Sjödin, P.; Weih, M.; Rönnberg-Wästljung, A.C.; Berlin, S. Genome-wide transcriptional and physiological responses to drought stress in leaves and roots of two willow genotypes. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, C.H.; Ma, T.; Luo, W.C.; Xu, J.M.; Liu, J.Q.; Wan, D.S. Identification of 4CL Genes in Desert Poplars and Their Changes in Expression in Response to Salt Stress. Genes 2015, 6, 901–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chen, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, C.; Xia, X.; Yin, W.; Tian, Q. A putative PP2C-encoding gene negatively regulates ABA signaling in Populus euphratica. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yu, L.; Ma, J.; Niu, Z.; Bai, X.; Lei, W.; Shao, X.; Chen, N.; Zhou, F.; Wan, D. Tissue-specific transcriptome analysis reveals multiple responses to salt stress in Populus euphratica seedlings. Genes 2017, 8, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Brini, F.; Masmoudi, K. Ion Transporters and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. ISRN Mol. Biol. 2012, 2012, 927436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wu, Y.; Ding, N.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, M.; Chang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L. Molecular characterization of PeSOS1: The putative Na+/H+ antiporter of Populus euphratica. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Chen, B.; Qin, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, R.; Liu, H.; Yang, H. Progress in understanding the physiological and molecular responses of Populus to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ye, C.Y.; Zhang, H.C.; Chen, J.H.; Xia, X.L.; Yin, W.L. Molecular characterization of putative vacuolar NHX-type Na+/H+ exchanger genes from the salt-resistant tree Populus euphratica. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 137, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xie, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, X. Structure, Function, and Regulation of the Plasma Membrane Na+/H+ Antiporter Salt Overly Sensitive 1 in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 866265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zeng, F.; Yan, H.; Arndt, S.K. Leaf and whole tree adaptations to mild salinity in field grown Populus euphratica. Tree Physiol. 2009, 29, 1237–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sun, J.; Zhang, X.; Deng, S.; Zhang, C.; Wang, M.; Ding, M.; Zhao, R.; Shen, X.; Zhou, X.; Lu, C. Extracellular ATP signaling is mediated by H2O2 and cytosolic Ca2+ in the salt response of Populus euphratica cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e53136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hoang, X.L.T.; Nhi, D.N.H.; Thu, N.B.A.; Thao, N.P.; Tran, L.P. Transcription Factors and Their Roles in Signal Transduction in Plants under Abiotic Stresses. Curr. Genom. 2017, 18, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Khoso, M.A.; Hussain, A.; Ritonga, F.N.; Ali, Q.; Channa, M.M.; Alshegaihi, R.M.; Meng, Q.; Ali, M.; Zaman, W.; Brohi, R.D.; et al. WRKY transcription factors (TFs): Molecular switches to regulate drought, temperature, and salinity stresses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 39329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jiang, Y.; Tong, S.; Chen, N.; Liu, B.; Bai, Q.; Chen, Y.; Bi, H.; Zhang, Z.; Lou, S.; Tang, H.; et al. The PalWRKY77 transcription factor negatively regulates salt tolerance and abscisic acid signaling in Populus. Plant Cell Biol. 2021, 105, 1258–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Zhu, J.K. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell 2016, 167, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ullah, A.; Manghwar, H.; Shaban, M.; Khan, A.H.; Akbar, A.; Ali, U.; Ali, E.; Fahad, S. Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: A coping strategy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 33103–33118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Iqbal, S.; Wang, X.; Mubeen, I.; Kamran, M.; Kanwal, I.; Díaz, G.A.; Abbas, A.; Parveen, A.; Atiq, M.N.; Alshaya, H. Phytohormones trigger drought tolerance in crop plants: Outlook and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 799318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.J.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A. Phytohormones and Beneficial Microbes: Essential Components for Plants to Balance Stress and Fitness. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, S.; Ouyang, L.; Ju, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y. Survey of plant drought-resistance promoting bacteria from Populus euphratica tree living in arid area. Indian J. Microbiol. 2014, 54, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Mawar, R.; Ranawat, M.; Sharma, S.K.; Sayyed, R. Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms of Arid Region; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dimkpa, C.; Weinand, T.; Asch, F. Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 1682–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Gyaneshwar, P.; Naresh Kumar, G.; Parekh, L.; Poole, P. Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 2002, 245, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Rodriguez, P.A.; Rothballer, M.; Chowdhury, S.P.; Nussbaumer, T.; Gutjahr, C.; Falter-Braun, P. Systems biology of plant-microbiome interactions. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 804–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Boro, M.; Sannyasi, S.; Chettri, D.; Verma, A.K. Microorganisms in biological control strategies to manage microbial plant pathogens: A review. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Xia, Z.; He, Y.; Yu, L.; Li, Z.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Revealing interactions between root phenolic metabolomes and rhizosphere bacterial communities in Populus euphratica plantations. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2021, 57, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hultine, K.R.; Grady, K.C.; Wood, T.E.; Shuster, S.M.; Stella, J.C.; Whitham, T.G. Climate change perils for dioecious plant species. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bellabarba, A.; Fagorzi, C.; diCenzo, G.C.; Pini, F.; Viti, C.; Checcucci, A. Deciphering the symbiotic plant microbiome: Translating the most recent discoveries on rhizobia for the improvement of agricultural practices in metal-contaminated and high saline lands. Agronomy 2019, 9, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Gazolla Volpiano, C.; Lisboa, B.; Granada, C.; São José, J.; Oliveira, A.; Beneduzi, A.; Perevalova, Y.; Passaglia, L.; Vargas, L. Rhizobia for Biological Control of Plant Diseases; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 315–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rozahon, M.; Ismayil, N.; Hamood, B.; Erkin, R.; Abdurahman, M.; Mamtimin, H.; Abdukerim, M.; Lal, R.; Rahman, E. Rhizobium populi sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from Populus euphratica. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 3215–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Tuo, Y.; Dong, Z.; Wang, X.; Gao, B.; Zhu, C.; Tuo, F. Metagenomics reveal correlations between microbial organisms in soils and the health of Populus euphratica. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Xia, Z.; He, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Rhizosphere microbe populations but not root traits induced by drought in Populus euphratica males. Soil Ecol. Lett. 2023, 5, 220152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Juvany, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Sex-related differences in stress tolerance in dioecious plants: A critical appraisal in a physiological context. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6083–6092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hukin, D.; Cochard, H.; Dreyer, E.; Thiec, D.L.; Bogeat-Triboulot, M.B. Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: Does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species? J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2003–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bogeat-Triboulot, M.B.A.; Brosché, M.; Renaut, J.; Jouve, L.; Le Thiec, D.; Fayyaz, P.; Vinocur, B.; Witters, E.; Laukens, K.; Teichmann, T.; et al. Gradual Soil Water Depletion Results in Reversible Changes of Gene Expression, Protein Profiles, Ecophysiology, and Growth Performance in Populus euphratica, a Poplar Growing in Arid Regions. Plant Physiol. 2006, 143, 876–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. He, Y.; Lin, X.; Wang, L.; Ma, X.; Fang, L.; Xia, Z. Effects of long-term irrigation on soil phosphorus fractions and microbial communities in Populus euphratica plantations. For. Res. 2023, 3, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fan, Y.; Lv, G.; Chen, Y.; Chang, Y.; Li, Z. Differential effects of cow dung and its biochar on Populus euphratica soil phosphorus effectiveness, bacterial community diversity and functional genes for phosphorus conversion. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1242469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bahadur, A.; Batool, A.; Nasir, F.; Jiang, S.; Mingsen, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, H. Mechanistic Insights into Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-Mediated Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zou, Y.N.; Qin, Q.Y.; Ma, W.Y.; Zhou, L.J.; Wu, Q.S.; Xu, Y.J.; Kuča, K.; Hashem, A.; Al-Arjani, A.B.F.; Almutairi, K.F.; et al. Metabolomics reveals arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated tolerance of walnut to soil drought. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Cheng, S.; Zou, Y.N.; Kuča, K.; Hashem, A.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.S. Elucidating the Mechanisms Underlying Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Plants Mediated by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 809473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Madouh, T.A.; Quoreshi, A.M. The Function of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Drought Stress Resistance in Native Plants of Arid Desert Ecosystems: A Review. Diversity 2023, 15, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cai, B.; Jie, W.; Lv, D. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiotic status of Populus euphratica, a drought resistant tree species from arid lands. Ecohydrology 2013, 6, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chaves, M.M.; Flexas, J.; Pinheiro, C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot. 2008, 103, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Meng, H.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Diao, K.; Zheng, G.; Li, T.; Dai, X.; Li, J. PeGSTU58, a Glutathione S-Transferase from Populus euphratica, Enhances Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hull, J.C.; Neufeld, H.S.; Gilliam, F.S. Plant Ecology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 528–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Hatfield, J.L.; Dold, C. Water-use efficiency: Advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Pineda-García, F.; Paz, H.; Meinzer, F.C. Drought resistance in early and late secondary successional species from a tropical dry forest: The interplay between xylem resistance to embolism, sapwood water storage and leaf shedding. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Verslues, P.E.; Agarwal, M.; Katiyar-Agarwal, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, J.K. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J. 2006, 45, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Akıncı, Ş.; Lösel, D.M. Plant Water-Stress Response Mechanisms; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Crotia, 2012; pp. 16–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Iqbal, A.; Wang, T.; Wu, G.; Tang, W.; Zhu, C.; Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of heteromorphic leaves and hydrophilic roots in response to soil drying in desert Populus euphratica. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Maherali, H.; Pockman, W.T.; Jackson, R.B. Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 2004, 85, 2184–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Klein, T.; Zeppel, M.J.; Anderegg, W.R.; Bloemen, J.; De Kauwe, M.G.; Hudson, P.; Ruehr, N.K.; Powell, T.L.; von Arx, G.; Nardini, A. Xylem embolism refilling and resilience against drought-induced mortality in woody plants: Processes and trade-offs. Ecol. Res. 2018, 33, 839–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Skelton, R.P.; Anderegg, L.D.; Diaz, J.; Kling, M.M.; Papper, P.; Lamarque, L.J.; Delzon, S.; Dawson, T.E.; Ackerly, D.D. Evolutionary relationships between drought-related traits and climate shape large hydraulic safety margins in western North American oaks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2008987118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Pratt, R.B.; Jacobsen, A.L. Conflicting demands on angiosperm xylem: Tradeoffs among storage, transport and biomechanics. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 897–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Bai, X.; Xu, J.; Shao, X.; Luo, W.; Niu, Z.; Gao, C.; Wan, D. A novel gene coding γ-aminobutyric acid transporter may improve the tolerance of Populus euphratica to adverse environments. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Cesarino, I.; Dello Ioio, R.; Kirschner, G.K.; Ogden, M.S.; Picard, K.L.; Rast-Somssich, M.I.; Somssich, M. Plant science’s next top models. Ann. Bot. 2020, 126, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Jansson, S.; Douglas, C.J. Populus: A model system for plant biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 435–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sorce, C.; Giovannelli, A.; Sebastiani, L.; Anfodillo, T. Hormonal signals involved in the regulation of cambial activity, xylogenesis and vessel patterning in trees. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 885–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Balfagón, D.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Mittler, R.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. High temperatures modify plant responses to abiotic stress conditions. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 170, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zhu, X.; Liu, S.; Sun, L.; Song, F.; Liu, F.; Li, X. Cold tolerance of photosynthetic electron transport system is enhanced in wheat plants grown under elevated CO2. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Munir, N.; Hanif, M.; Abideen, Z.; Sohail, M.; El-Keblawy, A.; Radicetti, E.; Mancinelli, R.; Haider, G. Mechanisms and strategies of plant microbiome interactions to mitigate abiotic stresses. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ling, H.; Zhang, P.; Xu, H.; Zhao, X. How to regenerate and protect desert riparian Populus euphratica forest in arid areas. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Joniak-Lüthi, A. A road, a disappearing river and fragile connectivity in Sino-Inner Asian borderlands. Polit. Geogr. 2020, 78, 102122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wang, T.; Nyamtseren, M. Combating Aeolian Desertification in Northeast Asia; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 17–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zhou, W.-L.; Yang, X.-Q.; Hao, P.; Liu, Q.-W.; Cao, D.-C.; Baribault, T.; Li, J.-W. Plant diversity and its maintenance in Populus euphratica riparian forests in the Ejina Oasis, China. For. Stud. China 2010, 12, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Edmondson, J.R. The flora and fauna of the Euphrates Expedition of 1836. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 64, 224–238. [Google Scholar]
  163. Handley, C. Sacred Species and Sites: Advances in Biocultural Conservation. Arboric. J. 2013, 35, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  164. Safriel, U. Deserts and desertification: Challenges but also opportunities. Land Degrad. Dev. 2009, 20, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Han, Y.; Wang, W.; Sun, J.; Ding, M.; Zhao, R.; Deng, S.; Wang, F.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y. Populus euphratica XTH overexpression enhances salinity tolerance by the development of leaf succulence in transgenic tobacco plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4225–4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Pan, J.; Xue, X.; Huang, C.; Peng, F.; Liao, J.; Ma, S.; You, Q.; Wang, T. Salt Tolerance Strategies of Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. and Elaeagnus angustifolia Linn. Determine the Inoculation Effects of Microorganisms in Saline Soil Conditions. Agronomy 2022, 12, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Clifton-Brown, J.; Harfouche, A.; Casler, M.D.; Dylan Jones, H.; Macalpine, W.J.; Murphy-Bokern, D.; Smart, L.B.; Adler, A.; Ashman, C.; Awty-Carroll, D. Breeding progress and preparedness for mass-scale deployment of perennial lignocellulosic biomass crops switchgrass, miscanthus, willow and poplar. GCB Bioenergy 2019, 11, 118–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Llanes, A.; Palchetti, M.V.; Vilo, C.; Ibañez, C. Molecular control to salt tolerance mechanisms of woody plants: Recent achievements and perspectives. Ann. For. Sci. 2021, 78, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sixto, H.; González-González, B.D.; Molina-Rueda, J.J.; Garrido-Aranda, A.; Sanchez, M.M.; López, G.; Gallardo, F.; Cañellas, I.; Mounet, F.; Grima-Pettenati, J. Eucalyptus spp. and Populus spp. coping with salinity stress: An approach on growth, physiological and molecular features in the context of short rotation coppice (SRC). Trees 2016, 30, 1873–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Harfouche, A.; Meilan, R.; Altman, A. Molecular and physiological responses to abiotic stress in forest trees and their relevance to tree improvement. Tree Physiol. 2014, 34, 1181–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Hundleby, P.A.C.; Harwood, W.A. Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing. Food Energy Secur. 2019, 8, e00161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Mbaya, H.; Lillico, S.; Kemp, S.; Simm, G.; Raybould, A. Regulatory frameworks can facilitate or hinder the potential for genome editing to contribute to sustainable agricultural development. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 959236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Poorter, H.; Niinemets, Ü.; Ntagkas, N.; Siebenkäs, A.; Mäenpää, M.; Matsubara, S.; Pons, T. A meta-analysis of plant responses to light intensity for 70 traits ranging from molecules to whole plant performance. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1073–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, J.K. Thriving under Stress: How Plants Balance Growth and the Stress Response. Dev. Cell 2020, 55, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Abobatta, W.F. Plant Stress Mitigators; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Lüttge, U.; Scarano, F.R. Ecophysiology. Braz. J. Bot. 2004, 27, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Liu, H.; Gleason, S.M.; Hao, G.; Hua, L.; He, P.; Goldstein, G.; Ye, Q. Hydraulic traits are coordinated with maximum plant height at the global scale. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Yang, X.D.; Anwar, E.; Xu, Y.L.; Zhou, J.; Sha, L.B.; Gong, X.W.; Ali, A.; Gao, Y.C.; Liu, Y.; Ge, P. Hydraulic constraints determine the distribution of heteromorphic leaves along plant vertical height. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 941764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Yang, Q.; Han, X.M.; Gu, J.K.; Liu, Y.J.; Yang, M.J.; Zeng, Q.Y. Functional and structural profiles of GST gene family from three Populus species reveal the sequence–function decoupling of orthologous genes. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1060–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Zhuge, X.L.; Xie, T.; Du, X.; Zhang, X.X.; Hu, J.P.; Yang, H.L. Non-synonymous substitution of evolutionarily conserved residue in Tau class glutathione transferases alters structural and catalytic features. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 197, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Brosché, M.; Vinocur, B.; Alatalo, E.R.; Lamminmäki, A.; Teichmann, T.; Ottow, E.A.; Djilianov, D.; Afif, D.; Bogeat-Triboulot, M.B.; Altman, A. Gene expression and metabolite profiling of Populus euphratica growing in the Negev desert. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, R101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Abiotic stresses are perceived by P. euphratica throughout transcription regulation to ensure abiotic stress tolerance and resistance in arid areas.
Figure 1. Abiotic stresses are perceived by P. euphratica throughout transcription regulation to ensure abiotic stress tolerance and resistance in arid areas.
Genes 14 02213 g001
Figure 2. A proposed diagram model of Na+/H+ homeostasis in P. euphratica during NaCl stress tolerance in arid areas.
Figure 2. A proposed diagram model of Na+/H+ homeostasis in P. euphratica during NaCl stress tolerance in arid areas.
Genes 14 02213 g002
Table 1. Genome-wide records of gene family in P. euphratica.
Table 1. Genome-wide records of gene family in P. euphratica.
SpeciesIdentified Genes No.Gene FamilyFunctionsReference
P. euphratica19HSFDrought stress[68]
22HSFSalt stress[68]
2 (PeWRKY45)WRKYSalt stress[71]
(PeWRKY102)
1 (PebHLH35)bHLHDrought and abscisic acid[69]
1 (PeCPK10)CPKDrought and cold stress[65]
1 (PeSTZ1)STZFreezing tolerance[80]
1 (PeuGASA15)GASADrought stress[74]
1 (PeuLAC2)LACCASEDrought stress[81]
34CLSalt stress[97]
1 (PeCBL1; CIPK24,CBL1Salt stress[90]
CIPK25, and cipk26)
AUX-IAA/ARFNot identified yet
1 (PeHAB1)PP2CInduced by drought and ABA as a negative regulator[98]
1 (PeDREB2)DREB2-typeSalt stress[64]
AB13-VP1Not identified yet
C2C2-DofNot identified yet
SBPNot identified yet
MADSNot identified yet
C2C2-GATANot identified yet
FHANot identified yet
GARP-G2 likeNot identified yet
PeGNot identified yet
C2H2Not identified yet
bZIPNot identified yet
HBNot identified yet
C3HNot identified yet
PHDNot identified yet
PeSCL7GRASSalt and drought tolerance[79]
AP2-EREBPNot identified yet
MYB-relatedNot identified yet
SPLNot identified yet
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ndayambaza, B.; Si, J.; Deng, Y.; Jia, B.; He, X.; Zhou, D.; Wang, C.; Zhu, X.; Liu, Z.; Qin, J.; et al. The Euphrates Poplar Responses to Abiotic Stress and Its Unique Traits in Dry Regions of China (Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia): What Should We Know? Genes 2023, 14, 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122213

AMA Style

Ndayambaza B, Si J, Deng Y, Jia B, He X, Zhou D, Wang C, Zhu X, Liu Z, Qin J, et al. The Euphrates Poplar Responses to Abiotic Stress and Its Unique Traits in Dry Regions of China (Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia): What Should We Know? Genes. 2023; 14(12):2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ndayambaza, Boniface, Jianhua Si, Yanfang Deng, Bing Jia, Xiaohui He, Dongmeng Zhou, Chunlin Wang, Xinglin Zhu, Zijin Liu, Jie Qin, and et al. 2023. "The Euphrates Poplar Responses to Abiotic Stress and Its Unique Traits in Dry Regions of China (Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia): What Should We Know?" Genes 14, no. 12: 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop