Next Article in Journal
Lagging Strand Initiation Processes in DNA Replication of Eukaryotes—Strings of Highly Coordinated Reactions Governed by Multiprotein Complexes
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Genetic Background Effect on Dissecting the Genetic Basis of Kernel Traits in Reciprocal Maize Introgression Lines
Previous Article in Journal
Examining Sporadic Cancer Mutations Uncovers a Set of Genes Involved in Mitochondrial Maintenance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proteome and Ubiquitylome Analyses of Maize Endoplasmic Reticulum under Heat Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/genes14051010
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Association Study Identified Novel SNPs Associated with Chlorophyll Content in Maize

by
Yueting Jin
1,†,
Dan Li
1,†,
Meiling Liu
1,
Zhenhai Cui
1,2,
Daqiu Sun
1,
Cong Li
1,
Ao Zhang
1,
Huiying Cao
1,* and
Yanye Ruan
1,3,*
1
College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
2
Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China
3
Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, Shenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Shenyang 110866, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(5), 1010; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14051010
Submission received: 26 March 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 26 April 2023 / Published: 29 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maize Molecular Genetics and Functional Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chlorophyll is an essential component that captures light energy to drive photosynthesis. Chlorophyll content can affect photosynthetic activity and thus yield. Therefore, mining candidate genes of chlorophyll content will help increase maize production. Here, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on chlorophyll content and its dynamic changes in 378 maize inbred lines with extensive natural variation. Our phenotypic assessment showed that chlorophyll content and its dynamic changes were natural variations with a moderate genetic level of 0.66/0.67. A total of 19 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found associated with 76 candidate genes, of which one SNP, 2376873-7-G, co-localized in chlorophyll content and area under the chlorophyll content curve (AUCCC). Zm00001d026568 and Zm00001d026569 were highly associated with SNP 2376873-7-G and encoded pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein and chloroplastic palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase, respectively. As expected, higher expression levels of these two genes are associated with higher chlorophyll contents. These results provide a certain experimental basis for discovering the candidate genes of chlorophyll content and finally provide new insights for cultivating high-yield and excellent maize suitable for planting environment.

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important source used for animal feed and bioenergy and has become the top crop produced in China, with production estimated up to 272.6 million tons (MT) in 2021 (http://www.stats.gov.cn, accessed on 20 April 2022). High yield based on photosynthesis has always been the focus topic in crop breeding [1]. Chlorophyll is essential for photosynthesis and promotes light energy absorption and assembly with photosynthetic protein complexes [2]. Chlorophyll content is one of the most important physiological traits, which is closely related to leaf photosynthesis and crop yield potential [3]. In a certain range, chlorophyll content is positively correlated with photosynthetic rate, which directly determines the yield of crops [4]. Therefore, maintaining high chlorophyll content in leaves can improve photosynthetic activity and increase yield [5,6]. At present, chlorophyll content has been used to evaluate the photosynthetic capacity and yield potential of leaves in rice [7]. Therefore, a better mining of the genes of chlorophyll content in maize leaves is of great value to speed up maize high-yield breeding.
Chlorophyll content is controlled by nuclear genes [8], and chlorophyll metabolism can be divided into four major steps [9]. The first step is the synthesis of chlorophyll-a via the branched tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway [10,11]. The second step is catalyzing the mutual conversion of chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b [12]. The third step involves the degradation of chlorophyll-a via the pheophorbide a oxygenase (PAO)/phyllobilin pathway [13]. The final step is the chlorophyll cycle pathway [14]. Although significant progress has been made in research on chlorophyll metabolism, the molecular mechanism of chlorophyll metabolism is quite complex, and chlorophyll content is a quantitative trait [15] that can be used for quantitative trait locus analysis and identification. Therefore, it is crucial to deeply study the expression and regulation of genes involved in the regulation of chlorophyll metabolism.
In recent years, researchers have identified some quantitative trait loci (QTLs) of chlorophyll content in leaves of different populations of various crops from different angles and have made considerable progress [7,16,17,18,19], which has laid the foundation for further clarifying the molecular genetic mechanism determining chlorophyll content. However, the method of QTL mapping can only analyze the gene effects of differences between the parent materials of the isolated population and cannot widely excavate the genes regulating chlorophyll content in the whole genome [20,21]. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is an efficient method developed in recent years to study complex traits. It has the advantages of high resolution and throughput, which can associate multiple complex traits and detect multiple alleles at the same time. It was previously reported that GWAS was used to mine candidate genes related to chlorophyll content and tolerance of soybean cyst nematode, and 15 candidate genes related to tolerance of soybean cyst nematode and chlorophyll content were identified [22]. Dhanapal et al. [23] conducted GWAS of soybean chlorophyll traits based on canopy spectral reflectance and leaf extracts and found 15 SNPs loci related to total chlorophyll content. Herritt et al. [24] identified 21 chlorophyll fluorescence phenotypes by GWAS and found relevant genes involved in photosynthesis and electron transport. Therefore, it is important to identify genes associated with chlorophyll content. The chlorophyll content of the first maize leaf was analyzed by GWAS at the seedling stage, and two genes potentially controlling chlorophyll content in maize were identified, a homolog of the Arabidopsis Tic22 and a homolog of rice SAG12 relating to aging [25]. However, no studies have been conducted on chlorophyll content and AUCCC of maize ear leaves within multi-year, multi-location trials.
As a research tool, GWAS have become a common way to study natural variation and inheritance of important agronomic traits in various plants [26]. Maize has rich genetic diversity and rapid linkage disequilibrium decay, which make maize an excellent variety for GWAS. To date, many researchers have contributed to our understanding of maize through GWAS. Wang et al. [27] carried out a study on drought tolerance in maize seedlings that found ZmVPP1, and transgenic maize with enhanced ZmVPP1 expression exhibited improved drought tolerance. Sun et al. [28] identified candidate genes that affect bracing root angle and diameter. Li et al. [29] used GWAS to reveal the candidate gene of maize seed germination traits and found 58 genetic variation sites and 36 candidate genes, which provided important implications for the molecular breeding of maize seed germination. These studies indicate that GWAS is a reliable tool to study the chlorophyll content of maize and to find candidate genes.
In this study, 378 maize inbred lines and 96,726 SNPs were used for the GWAS of the chlorophyll content in two environments. The purpose of this study is to identify candidate genes of chlorophyll content. Our findings provide new insights for mining candidate genes of leaf chlorophyll content.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

An association panel comprising 378 diverse maize inbred lines from the northeast of China, temperate region in the United States and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, were used for GWAS. All materials were kept in the College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University.

2.2. Field Experiments

The 378 inbred lines were grown in Fushun City, Liaoning Province, China (121°74′ E, 42°14′ N) in May 2017 (17FS) and Ledong city, Hainan Province, China (108°39′ E, 18°24′ N) in November 2017 (17LD). The field experiment was designed as random blocks with 2 replicates. Fifteen plants were planted in a 2.5 m long row with 0.6 m row distance, and the planting density was approximately 45,000 plants/ha. The inbred lines were labeled before pollination for standard field management. Chlorophyll content was measured using a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502, plus Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan), which was non-destructive, fast and cheap. SPAD-502 readings were taken from five plants per plot on five dates at a 5 d interval starting 0 d after silking. There were three measurements in the middle of the ear leaf for each plant, and the average value was used for the statistical analysis. AUCCC was calculated based on SPAD-502 readings on all measure dates. Larger AUCCC values represent higher chlorophyll content, and lower AUCCC values represent lower chlorophyll content. The formula used to calculate AUCCC was modified from the AUCCC formula [30]:
AUCCC   =   [ ( γ i + γ i + 1 ) / 2 ]   ( t i + 1 − t i )
in which n is the number of assessment times, γ is the meter reading, i is the ith rating date, and t is time (in days).

2.3. Statistical Analysis of Phenotypes

The “PROC MIXED” program in SAS software was used to analyze the variance heritability of the phenotypic values at the two places. The mixed linear model (MLM) was used for the analysis, and the model yijk = μ+el + rk(l) + fi + (fe)il + εlik, where yijk was the phenotypic value of the attenuation rate ijk in this test, μ denoted the average value of attenuation rate, el was the influence of two environments, rk(l) was the repeated effect in the environment, fl was the genetic effect of the ith family, (fe)il was the interaction between genetic and environmental effects, and εlik was a random error.
The generalized heritability formula is: h2 = σg2/(σg2 + σge2/e + σε2/re) [31], where h2 represents the generalized heritability of the trait, σg2 is the genetic variance of the trait, σge2 represents the variance of the interaction between genetic and environmental effects, σε2 denotes the residual error, and e and r denote the number of environments and the number of repetitions of the trait in each environment. The total phenotype of the two trials was predicted and expressed by the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) value so as to minimize the environmental impact.

2.4. Genome-Wide Association Mapping

The 96,726 SNPs (MAF ≥ 0.05) were used to conduct GWAS by combining the data from two genotyping platforms (RNA-seq and SNP array). The mixed linear model (MLM) calculation method was used to analyze the association of chlorophyll content in R 4.0.3, where population structure and kinship were fitted to control false positives [32,33]. We used the standard Bonferroni correction threshold α= 1 as the significance node. The p value was calculated as 1/n (n = 96,726), and we obtained p < 1.03 × 10−5 as significant nodes.

2.5. Prediction of Candidate Genes

The most significant SNP was selected to represent the locus associated with chlorophyll content in the same LD block (r2 < 0.2). The physical locations of significant SNPs were determined using the B73 RefGen v4 database. The annotated genes were searched within the 100 kb region around (50 kb upstream and 50 kb downstream) the detected significant SNP and were identified based on functional domains. The function of annotation genes referred to the MaizeGDB (https://maizegdb.org/), NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) and the homologous genes of Arabidopsis.

2.6. Heat Map of Candidate Genes Expression

The expression amount of candidate genes in leaves of different days after maize silking was obtained from the Sequence Read Archive database of NCBI, and the mapping method was as described in [34].

2.7. RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR

The SNP allele effect was analyzed using R 4.0.3, and leaves of 6 varieties (Liao7980, A801, 29MIBZ2, PHVA9, LX9311 and Dan330) were selected during maize V4 stage. A leaf segment of 2 cm in length was excised from the middle of the fourth leaf and stored at −80 °C. The RNAprep Pure Plant Kit was used to extract the RNA (TIANGEN). cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA using the FastKing RT Kit (TIANGEN). RT-qPCR reactions were performed using a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA) real-time PCR system using the SuperReal PreMix Plue (SYBR Green) (TIANGEN). Transcript levels were analyzed using the comparative CT (2−△CT) method [29]. ZmTubulin1 (Zm00001d033850) was used as an internal control for data normalization. All data were measured in three independent biological replicates. The primers are listed in Table S6.

3. Results

3.1. Chlorophyll Content Diversity and Heritability at Silking

Chlorophyll content was investigated at silking stage in 17FS and 17LD, and the BLUP values were calculated according to the phenotypic values of two places. The chlorophyll content of 17FS, 17LD and BLUP showed a normal distribution (Figure 1) and a wide range of values, ranging from 36.23 to 68.85 (mean 54.81 ± 4.57), 27.23 to 62.66 (mean 49.63 ± 7.89) and 44.78 to 58.61 (mean 51.96 ± 3.68), respectively (Table S1), indicating that the chlorophyll content conforms to the quantitative trait.
The heritability of chlorophyll content is 0.67, which is medium (Table 1). There were significant and positive correlations between 17FS:17LD, 17FS:BLUP, 17LD:BLUP (p < 0.01; Figure 1). The Genotype × Environment interaction effects were not significant for the chlorophyll content, suggesting that the Genotype × Environment interaction effects were small and had good stability and adaptability of varieties (Table 1). These results suggested that the population’s phenotypic variations of chlorophyll content are largely affected by genetic factors, and therefore, the association panel can be used for further association mapping.

3.2. AUCCC and Heritability after Silking

The chlorophyll content was measured at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 days after silking in 17FS, and at 0, 5, and 10 days after silking in 17LD (Figure 2). We found that the chlorophyll content was the highest at silking (day 0) and gradually decreased and showed the lowest at 20 days after silking during measurement in 17FS and 10 days after silking in 17LD (Figure 2). In general, the chlorophyll content showed a downward trend. After silking, the plant enters the reproductive phase of growth. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other nutrients are rapidly transferred to the kernel [35], and this nutrient redistribution phenomenon is most obvious from the filling stage to the mature stage of maize, which leads to the aging of maize and the decrease in chlorophyll content [36].
The AUCCC showed a normal distribution (Figure 3), and the heritability of AUCCC was 0.66, which is medium (Table 1). These results show that the AUCCC is controlled by genetics and is suitable for further GWAS.

3.3. Correlations of Chlorophyll Content with Other Plant Developmental Processes

The correlation coefficients (Pearson’s) were calculated between chlorophyll content of ear leaf and 10 agronomic traits, including hundred kernel weight (HKW), flowering time (FT), ear rows number (ERN), kernel number per row (KNR), ear length (EL), ear perimeter (EP), kernel length (KL), kernel width (KW), kernel thickness (KT) and kernel area (KA). As shown in Figure 4, chlorophyll content is positively correlated with HKW at the 0.05 level. Previous studies also showed that chlorophyll content was positively correlated with kernel weight in rye and barley, whereas the correlation was significant at the level of 0.01 [37,38].

3.4. Genome-Wide Association Analysis

To ascertain the candidate genes of chlorophyll content, we conducted a GWAS in two environments of 378 lines using each environment and BLUP values at silking as the phenotype (Figure 5). The GWAS was carried out using the MLM method with a threshold of p < 1.03 × 10−5 (Figure 5A–C and Figure S1), and a total of 15 SNPs were identified. Among them, three significant SNPs were located on chromosome 1, 7 and 10, respectively, in 17FS (Figure 5A and Table 2). Ten significant SNPs were found in 17LD, of which three were located on chromosome 1, one was mapped on chromosome 5, and chromosome 2, 4, 10 harbored 2 SNPs respectively (Figure 5B and Table 2). In BLUP, two significant SNPs were located on chromosome 2 and 5 (Figure 5C and Table 2). These results indicate that chlorophyll content in maize was controlled by multiple genetic loci in this cross-combination.
Manhattan plots of GWAS were conducted on AUCCC after silking (Figure 6 and Figure S2). There were four SNPs identified, among which two were for 17FS (Figure 6A) and two were for 17LD (Figure 6B), and there were no significant SNPs in the BLUP (Figure 6C). Notably, we identified the same SNP 2376873-7-G on chromosome 10 by GWAS for chlorophyll content at silking and AUCCC.

3.5. Candidate Genes

A total of 76 candidate genes were identified from 19 SNPs within the 50 kb flanking regions (Table 2 and Table S2), of which 41 genes had functional annotations. The annotations for the candidate genes consisted of transmembrane protein, kinase, phosphatase, signal transduction protein, and transcription factors that may be involved in photosynthesis, redox, chloroplast development, and plant growth. The co-located SNP, 2376873-7-G, harbored Zm00001d026563, Zm00001d026569 and Zm00001d026574 encoding APETALA2/ethylene-responsive element binding protein (AP2/EREBP), chloroplastic palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase and UDP-D-galacturonate, respectively (Table 2). We discovered that the genomic region containing SNP, Marker.247949, includes the gene Zm00001d007012, which encodes chloroplast RNA binding protein and directly participates in chloroplast morphogenesis (Table 2). In addition, ATP synthase encoded by Zm00001d007011 can directly affect photosynthesis. Together, these results further demonstrate that the candidate genes were reliable.

3.6. Expression Pattern of Candidate Gene

To determine the candidate genes’ expression pattern, an in silico profiling was compiled using the published RNA-Seq datasets (Figure 7). The results showed that the expression patterns of different candidate genes varied in seven different tissues (Figure 7A and Table S3). The color scale bar at the top of the heat map represents log10-transformed FPKM value, which represents low and high expression. Zm00001d023314, Zm00001d034534, Zm00001d003404, Zm00001d012982 and Zm00001d014126 had a relatively high level of expression with tissue specificity in the leaf relative to other tissues. Contrarily, Zm00001d039221 had a relatively low level of expression in leaf (Figure 7A). Zm00001d007011 and Zm00001d034528 showed high expression tendencies in all tissues compared to the other candidate genes (Figure 7A). Other genes showed moderate or low expression levels in leaf, such as Zm00001d026563 and Zm00001d007479, which encoded AP2/EREBP transcription factors and BSD-transcription factor, respectively (Figure 7A, Table 2 and Table S2).
To confirm the expression pattern of the candidate genes in leaves, we performed a heat map of the candidate gene expression at 0,6,12,18,24,30 d after pollination (Figure 7B and Table S4). Zm00001d021162 had a low expression level at day 0, moderate on days 6 and 12, and high on days 18 and 24. Zm00001d026563 showed high expression only on day 6. Zm00001d003403 was lowly expressed on days 0 and 6 and moderate on days 12–30. Zm00001d003405 was moderate on day, and low on days 6–30. Zm00001d027601 was lowly expressed on day 0, moderate on day 6, and high on days 12–30. For Zm00001d039221, the expression increased gradually after pollination during measurement.
Expression of Zm00001d003403, encoding AMINO ACID PERMEASE (AAP), gradually increased after pollinating. AAP belongs to the amino acid/auxin permease family, which is involved in transportation of the principal nitrogen assimilates amino acid [39,40]. When the AAP2 gene was mutated in Arabidopsis thaliana, the mutant leaf had more chlorophyll content than the wild-type plant [41]. The leaf chlorophyll decreased (Figure 2) with an increase in Zm00001d003403 expression in maize. These results are in line with previous reports.
The allele variations of SNP 2376873-7-G were identified, and A allele genotypes showed higher chlorophyll content at the population level (Figure 8A and Table S5). Zm00001d026568 and Zm00001d026569 genes were associated with the same SNP 2376873-7-G. The relative expressions of Zm00001d026568 and Zm00001d026569 were higher in the genotypes carrying the SNP A allele (Figure 8B,C). In contrast, the relative expressions of Zm00001d026568 and Zm00001d026569 were lower in lines carrying the G genotype (Figure 8B,C). As expected, higher chlorophyll content in the A genotypes was associated with higher expression of these two candidate genes in the selected lines shown in this study.

4. Discussion

Improvements in maize yield are very important to ensure world food security. Enhancing crop yield potential by enhancing photosynthesis is a major focus of modern crop breeding [42,43]. Chlorophyll content is an indicator of photosynthesis activity, which can directly affect photosynthetic efficiency [44,45,46]. A large number of functional genes related to chlorophyll have been identified by analysis of many mutants in maize, rice, and other species [47,48,49]. However, chlorophyll content is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes, which requires further study on its function. In particular, these genes have more functional variation, and many genomic regions remain largely elusive [50,51]. Therefore, analyzing the candidate genes of chlorophyll content and identifying its important variation sites will contribute to the improvement of maize breeding.
Compared with the traditional linkage analysis, GWAS can directly use the existing natural population as the material that has the advantage of saving time and effort [52]. However, it also has shortcomings in specific research, such as population structure that is prone to lead to false positives, linkage disequilibrium level that is affected by a variety of genetic or non-genetic factors [53,54], and the accuracy of candidate gene determination that is not enough. In order to obtain more accurate research results, we can reduce false positives as much as possible by increasing the population size. We use a mixed linear model (MLM) to take the individual kinship (K) and group structure (Q) as covariates (Q + K) at the same time, which can also effectively reduce the false positive rate [55]. Currently, GWAS approaches based on MLM are widely employed in both plant and animal systems [56]. GWAS is more and more widely used in crop research, for example, the genetic basis of several kernel-related traits and charcoal rot resistance has been reported in maize, and some candidate genes have been predicted by the GWAS [57,58].
The 378 maize inbred lines were used to construct an association population, and the candidate genes of chlorophyll content at silking and AUCCC after silking were mined by using high-density markers and phenotypic data. In this study, the heritability of the two methods was medium, and both of them conformed to normal distribution, indicating that chlorophyll content was contributed to by various types of genetic variation effects. Thee area under the curve to study dynamic processes has been widely used in the medical field; for example, the area under the curve was used to represent the dynamic distribution of the age composition of patients [59]. The AUCCC is a simple tool for breeders to evaluate the chlorophyll content. Although the heritability of AUCCC was similar to chlorophyll content in this study, Yang et al. [30] found that the heritability of the area under the curve could be effectively improved, indicating that the results of this method were reliable. As an indicator, AUCCC not only provides sufficient chlorophyll content information but can also accurately compare genotypes [60]. Furthermore, this simple manipulation method can be used to integrate applied and basic maize research, providing a good foundation for follow-up gene function studies [61].
The chlorophyll content of ear leaves was measured in two different sites, which have significant environmental differences between them; therefore, it could result in that the same SNP was not identified in 17FS and 17LD. Teng et al. [25] revealed the genetic basis of chlorophyll content of the first leaves at the seedling stage by GWAS, which identified nine SNPs. However, no same SNP was found in our study. In addition, positive correlation was detected for chlorophyll content and HKW. This is because the abundance and stability of chlorophyll in leaves significantly affect grain filling, and increasing the chlorophyll content of crop leaves can improve biomass yield and grain yield [62,63,64,65]. In general, a breeding strategy is mainly dependent on phenotypic selection of the best genotype by environmental interactions and the heritability level [66,67]. A total of 19 significant SNPs were associated with chlorophyll content at silking and the AUCCC after silking. To realize good prospects in the improvement of maize, a number of SNPs needs to be selected in order to reduce the overall time and cost.
A total of 76 candidate genes were identified for the chlorophyll content and the dynamic changes of chlorophyll content according to the position of significantly associated SNPs. In addition, Li et al. [6] previously identified gene overlap with these candidate genes, such as cytochrome c reductase. They compared transcriptome related to the physiological changes of yellow-green leaf mutant of maize and found that cytochrome c reductase participates in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. The chlorophyll content of yellow green leaves is different, which results in the difference of cytochrome c reductase. The role of cytochrome c reductase is to catalyze the transfer of electrons from coenzyme Q to cytochrome c [68], which is an important electron transporter in biological oxidation and is related to programmed cell death [69,70]. Programmed cell death leads to leaf senescence, which in turn leads to a decrease in chlorophyll content [71,72]. In addition, the co-located SNPs include Zm00001d026563, Zm00001d026569, Zm00001d026568, etc., which encode AP2/EREBP transcription factor 40, chloroplastic palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase and pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein, respectively. The AP2/EREBP superfamily is one of the largest and specific transcription factor (TF) families in plants that is involved in biotic/abiotic stress, compound storage and plant growth and development [73,74,75,76]. Chlorophyll content is an important physiological index used to measure plant growth and development [77,78]. Palmitoyl acyl carrier protein thioesterase is a key gene for de novo fatty acid synthesis [79]. Fatty acids are one of the main components of the cell membrane, and insufficient fatty acid synthesis triggers programmed cell death [80,81]. Leaf senescence is an organ-level programmed death process during plant growth and development, resulting in a decrease in chlorophyll content. In the inferior allele G, the expression of palmitoyl acyl carrier protein thioesterase is low, and fatty acid metabolism is accelerated, thus leading to a reduction in chlorophyll content. Pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein is one of the largest protein families in plants that affects chloroplast development [82,83]. Therefore, in the dominant allele A, the chlorophyll content is high, and the expression of pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein is high.
To explore the potential roles of candidate genes in regulating chlorophyll content, we performed expression profiling analysis on RNA-seq data from different tissues at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 days after pollination. The expressions of AP2/EREBP transcription factor 40 and chloroplast palmitoyl carrier protein thioesterase in leaves were low, and the expressions were moderately high on the 6th day after pollination. These results indicate that they have direct or indirect effects on chlorophyll content. Thus, selection of Zm00001d026563, Zm00001d026569, Zm00001d026568 or this SNP may help to regulate chlorophyll content in maize breeding. Taken together, the discovery of candidate genes provides help for further analyzing the molecular regulatory network of chlorophyll content on maize ear leaves. The identification of SNP will promote marker-assisted selection in maize molecular breeding.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we discovered candidate genes of natural variation in maize ear chlorophyll content by GWAS. Chlorophyll content appeared to be of moderate heritability and showed extensive variation in the association panel, indicating that chlorophyll content is a quantitative trait suitable for GWAS. GWAS showed that the natural changes regulating chlorophyll content had manymicro effect loci. We found 19 SNPs containing 76 candidate genes that may participate in leaf senescence, photosynthesis, and plant developmental processes. One of the SNPs was co-localized in AUCCC and chlorophyll content that was associated with five genes. Zm00001d026568 and Zm00001d026569 contained significant SNP and encoded pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein and chloroplastic palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase, respectively. They were found to be highly expressed in lines with the A allele as determined by RT-qPCR. These candidate genes provide valuable resources for further study of the molecular network regulating chlorophyll content in maize. In addition, the prediction of SNPs with chlorophyll content may help devise effective breeding plans and selection strategies to improve maize yield.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14051010/s1. All datasets generated in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, and for further inquiries, the corresponding authors can be directly contacted. Table S1: Phenotypic description of chlorophyll content in the maize association population; Table S2: Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosomal positions and candidate genes significantly associated with chlorophyll content and AUCCC identified by genome-wide association study; Table S3: Expression of different candidate genes in seven different tissues; Table S4: Expression of candidate genes in leaves at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 days after pollinating; Table S5: Chlorophyll content in 6 different varieties; Table S6: Primers used in this study; Figure S1. Quantile–quantile plot for chlorophyll content of maize ear leaf; Figure S2: Quantile–quantile plot for AUCCC of maize ear leaf.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, Y.J.; Software, Y.J. and M.L.; Writing—original draft, Y.J.; Writing—review and editing, Y.J., H.C. and D.L.; Visualization, Y.J., A.Z. and D.S.; Data curation, D.L.; Investigation, D.L.; Supervision. Z.C. and C.L.; Conceptualization, Y.R. and H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Bureau of Shenyang Municipality (21-110-3-06), Innovation and Cultivation Project of Shenyang Agricultural University (2022YCXS16).

Data Availability Statement

The original data for this article can be found online at: https://wp.me/p80aHo-L5.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Raines, C.A. Increasing Photosynthetic Carbon Assimilation in C3 Plants to Improve Crop Yield: Current and Future Strategies. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Grossman, A.R.; Bhaya, D.; Apt, K.E.; Kehoe, D.M. Light-Harvesting Complexes in Oxygenic Photosynthesis: Diversity, Control, and Evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995, 29, 231–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Q.; Xie, W.; Xing, H.; Yan, J.; Meng, X.; Li, X.; Fu, X.; Xu, J.; Lian, X.; Yu, S.; et al. Genetic Architecture of Natural Variation in Rice Chlorophyll Content Revealed by a Genome-Wide Association Study. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 946–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Peng, S.; Khush, G.S.; Virk, P.; Tang, Q.; Zou, Y. Progress in Ideotype Breeding to Increase Rice Yield Potential. Field Crops Res. 2008, 108, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Teng, S.; Qian, Q.; Zeng, D.; Kunihiro, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Huang, D.; Zhu, L. QTL Analysis of Leaf Photosynthetic Rate and Related Physiological Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 2004, 135, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, T.; Yang, H.; Lu, Y.; Dong, Q.; Liu, G.; Chen, F.; Zhou, Y. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes Related to the Physiological Changes of Yellow-Green Leaf Mutant of Maize. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Takai, T.; Kondo, M.; Yano, M.; Yamamoto, T. A Quantitative Trait Locus for Chlorophyll Content and Its Association with Leaf Photosynthesis in Rice. Rice 2010, 3, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, L.; Conteh, B.; Fang, L.; Xia, Q.; Nian, H. QTL Mapping for Soybean (Glycine max L.) Leaf Chlorophyll-Content Traits in a Genotyped RIL Population by Using RAD-Seq Based High-Density Linkage Map. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Grimm, B. Connecting Chlorophyll Metabolism with Accumulation of the Photosynthetic Apparatus. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 484–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tanaka, R.; Tanaka, A. Tetrapyrrole Biosynthesis in Higher Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 321–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mochizuki, N.; Tanaka, R.; Grimm, B.; Masuda, T.; Moulin, M.; Smith, A.G.; Tanaka, A.; Terry, M.J. The Cell Biology of Tetrapyrroles: A Life and Death Struggle. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 488–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tanaka, R.; Tanaka, A. Chlorophyll Cycle Regulates the Construction and Destruction of the Light-Harvesting Complexes. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2011, 1807, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Christ, B.; Hörtensteiner, S. Mechanism and Significance of Chlorophyll Breakdown. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, Y.-P.; Wu, M.-C.; Charng, Y. Identification of a Chlorophyll Dephytylase Involved in Chlorophyll Turnover in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 2974–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Z.; Chen, W.; Li, Y. Identification and Fine Mapping of QCTH4, a Quantitative Trait Loci Controlling the Chlorophyll Content from Tillering to Heading in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Hered. 2012, 103, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Suzuki, J.Y.; Bollivar, D.W.; Bauer, C.E. Genetic analysis of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1997, 31, 61–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, G.-H.; Li, S.-Y.; Wang, L.; Ye, W.-J.; Zeng, D.-L.; Rao, Y.-C.; Peng, Y.-L.; Hu, J.; Yang, Y.-L.; Xu, J.; et al. LSCHL4 from Japonica Cultivar, Which Is Allelic to NAL1, Increases Yield of Indica Super Rice 93-11. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1350–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ye, W.; Hu, S.; Wu, L.; Ge, C.; Cui, Y.; Chen, P.; Xu, J.; Dong, G.; Guo, L.; Qian, Q. Fine Mapping a Major QTL QFCC7 L for Chlorophyll Content in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cv. PA64s. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 81, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sakai, T.; Abe, A.; Shimizu, M.; Terauchi, R. RIL-StEp: Epistasis Analysis of Rice Recombinant Inbred Lines Reveals Candidate Interacting Genes That Control Seed Hull Color and Leaf Chlorophyll Content. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2021, 11, jkab130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Salvi, S.; Sponza, G.; Morgante, M.; Tomes, D.; Niu, X.; Fengler, K.A.; Meeley, R.; Ananiev, E.V.; Svitashev, S.; Bruggemann, E.; et al. Conserved Noncoding Genomic Sequences Associated with a Flowering-Time Quantitative Trait Locus in Maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11376–11381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ducrocq, S.; Giauffret, C.; Madur, D.; Combes, V.; Dumas, F.; Jouanne, S.; Coubriche, D.; Jamin, P.; Moreau, L.; Charcosset, A. Fine Mapping and Haplotype Structure Analysis of a Major Flowering Time Quantitative Trait Locus on Maize Chromosome 10. Genetics 2009, 183, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ravelombola, W.S.; Qin, J.; Shi, A.; Nice, L.; Bao, Y.; Lorenz, A.; Orf, J.H.; Young, N.D.; Chen, S. Genome-Wide Association Study and Genomic Selection for Soybean Chlorophyll Content Associated with Soybean Cyst Nematode Tolerance. BMC Genomics 2019, 20, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dhanapal, A.P.; Ray, J.D.; Singh, S.K.; Hoyos-Villegas, V.; Smith, J.R.; Purcell, L.C.; Fritschi, F.B. Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Soybean Chlorophyll Traits Based on Canopy Spectral Reflectance and Leaf Extracts. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Herritt, M.; Dhanapal, A.P.; Purcell, L.C.; Fritschi, F.B. Identification of Genomic Loci Associated with 21chlorophyll Fluorescence Phenotypes by Genome-Wide Association Analysis in Soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Teng, S.; Wang, H.; Liang, H.; Xin, H.; Li, S.; Lang, Z. Genome-wide Association Study of Chlorophyll Content in Maize Leaves. Biotechnol. Bull. 2017, 33, 98–107. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, W.; Guo, Z.; Huang, C.; Duan, L.; Chen, G.; Jiang, N.; Fang, W.; Feng, H.; Xie, W.; Lian, X.; et al. Combining High-Throughput Phenotyping and Genome-Wide Association Studies to Reveal Natural Genetic Variation in Rice. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Ferjani, A.; Li, J.; Yan, J.; Yang, X.; Qin, F. Genetic Variation in ZmVPP1 Contributes to Drought Tolerance in Maize Seedlings. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, D.; Chen, S.; Cui, Z.; Lin, J.; Liu, M.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, A.; Gao, Y.; Cao, H.; Ruan, Y. Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals the Genetic Basis of Brace Root Angle and Diameter in Maize. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 963852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, Y.; Liang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Fan, J.; Ruan, Y.; Zhang, A.; Dong, X.; Yue, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Studies Provide Insights Into the Genetic Architecture of Seed Germination Traits in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 930438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yang, J.; Carena, M.J.; Uphaus, J. Area Under the Dry Down Curve (AUDDC): A Method to Evaluate Rate of Dry Down in Maize. Crop Sci. 2010, 50, 2347–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Knapp, S.J. Confidence Intervals for Heritability for Two-Factor Mating Design Single Environment Linear Models. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 1986, 72, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhou, X.; Stephens, M. Genome-Wide Efficient Mixed-Model Analysis for Association Studies. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 821–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cui, Z.; Luo, J.; Qi, C.; Ruan, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, A.; Yang, X.; He, Y. Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) Reveals the Genetic Architecture of Four Husk Traits in Maize. BMC Genomics 2016, 17, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, S.; Zhang, H.; Ni, P.; Yu, S.; Dong, H.; Zhang, A.; Cao, H.; Zhang, L.; Ruan, Y.; Cui, Z. Genome-Wide Association Study Dissects the Genetic Architecture of Maize Husk Tightness. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nehe, A.S. Nitrogen Partitioning and Remobilization in Relation to Leaf Senescence, Grain Yield and Protein Concentration in Indian Wheat Cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2020, 251, 107778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Das, A.; Guyer, L.; Hörtensteiner, S. Chlorophyll and Chlorophyll Catabolite Analysis by HPLC. In Plant Senescence; Guo, Y., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 1744, pp. 223–235. ISBN 978-1-4939-7670-6. [Google Scholar]
  37. Masojć, P.; Milczarski, P.; Kruszona, P. Comparative Analysis of Genetic Architectures for Nine Developmental Traits of Rye. J. Appl. Genetics 2017, 58, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Borrego-Benjumea, A.; Carter, A.; Zhu, M.; Tucker, J.R.; Zhou, M.; Badea, A. Genome-Wide Association Study of Waterlogging Tolerance in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Under Controlled Field Conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 711654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Young, G.B.; Jack, D.L.; Smith, D.W.; Saier, M.H., Jr. The Amino Acid/Auxin:Proton Symport Permease Family. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta 1999, 1415, 306–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, L.; Garneau, M.G.; Majumdar, R.; Grant, J.; Tegeder, M. Improvement of Pea Biomass and Seed Productivity by Simultaneous Increase of Phloem and Embryo Loading with Amino Acids. Plant J. 2015, 81, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perchlik, M.; Tegeder, M. Leaf Amino Acid Supply Affects Photosynthetic and Plant Nitrogen Use Efficiency under Nitrogen Stress. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Peng, S.; Chen, L.; Ma, L.; Luo, J. Identification of Rubisco RbcL and RbcS in Camellia oleifera and Their Potential as Molecular Markers for Selection of High Tea Oil Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yadav, S.; Mishra, A.; Jha, B. Elevated CO2 Leads to Carbon Sequestration by Modulating C4 Photosynthesis Pathway Enzyme (PPDK) in Suaeda Monoica and S. Fruticosa. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 178, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Azoulay-Shemer, T.; Palomares, A.; Bagheri, A.; Israelsson-Nordstrom, M.; Engineer, C.B.; Bargmann, B.O.R.; Stephan, A.B.; Schroeder, J.I. Guard Cell Photosynthesis Is Critical for Stomatal Turgor Production, yet Does Not Directly Mediate CO 2- and ABA-induced Stomatal Closing. Plant J. 2015, 83, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, D.; Wang, S.; Cao, B.; Cao, D.; Leng, G.; Li, H.; Yin, L.; Shan, L.; Deng, X. Genotypic Variation in Growth and Physiological Response to Drought Stress and Re-Watering Reveals the Critical Role of Recovery in Drought Adaptation in Maize Seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 6, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Singh, R.; Parihar, P.; Prasad, S.M. Sulfur and Calcium Simultaneously Regulate Photosynthetic Performance and Nitrogen Metabolism Status in As-Challenged Brassica juncea L. Seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, Y.; Li, C.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, P.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Di, H. Overexpression of ZmIPT2 Gene Delays Leaf Senescence and Improves Grain Yield in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 963873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xue, Y.; Dong, H.; Huang, H.; Li, S.; Shan, X.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Xia, D.; Su, S.; Yuan, Y. Mutation in Mg-Protoporphyrin IX Monomethyl Ester (Oxidative) Cyclase Gene ZmCRD1 Causes Chlorophyll-Deficiency in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 912215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yamatani, H.; Ito, T.; Nishimura, K.; Yamada, T.; Sakamoto, W.; Kusaba, M. Genetic Analysis of Chlorophyll Synthesis and Degradation Regulated by balance of chlorophyll metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Myles, S.; Peiffer, J.; Brown, P.J.; Ersoz, E.S.; Zhang, Z.; Costich, D.E.; Buckler, E.S. Association Mapping: Critical Considerations Shift from Genotyping to Experimental Design. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2194–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Miculan, M.; Nelissen, H.; Hassen, M.B.; Marroni, F.; Inze, D.; Enrico, M.; Dell’Acqua, M. A Forward Genetics Approach Integrating Genome-Wide Association Study and Expression Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping to Dissect Leaf Development in Maize (Zea mays). Plant J. 2021, 107, 1056–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, C.; Nie, X.; Shen, C.; You, C.; Li, W.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, X.; Lin, Z. Population Structure and Genetic Basis of the Agronomic Traits of Upland Cotton in China Revealed by a Genome-Wide Association Study Using High-Density SNPs. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1374–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ye, J.; Niu, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, Q.; Yuan, X.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Feng, Y.; et al. Divergent Hd1, Ghd7, and DTH7 Alleles Control Heading Date and Yield Potential of Japonica Rice in Northeast China. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jiang, D.; Zhong, S.; McPeek, M.S. Retrospective Binary-Trait Association Test Elucidates Genetic Architecture of Crohn Disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 98, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yu, J.; Pressoir, G.; Briggs, W.H.; Vroh Bi, I.; Yamasaki, M.; Doebley, J.F.; McMullen, M.D.; Gaut, B.S.; Nielsen, D.M.; Holland, J.B.; et al. A Unified Mixed-Model Method for Association Mapping that Accounts for Multiple Levels of Relatedness. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miao, C.; Yang, J.; Schnable, J.C. Optimising the Identification of Causal Variants across Varying Genetic Architectures in Crops. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Hu, D.; Li, T.; Liang, H.; Ye, F.; Xue, J.; Xu, S. Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Candidate Genes Contributing to Kernel-Related Traits in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 872292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rashid, Z.; Kaur, H.; Babu, V.; Singh, P.K.; Harlapur, S.I.; Nair, S.K. Identification and Validation of Genomic Regions Associated with Charcoal Rot Resistance in Tropical Maize by Genome-Wide Association and Linkage Mapping. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 726767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yi, M.; Li, A.; Zhou, L.; Chu, Q.; Song, Y.; Wu, K. The Global Burden and Attributable Risk Factor Analysis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in 195 Countries and Territories from 1990 to 2017: Estimates Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Paraschivu, M.; Cotuna, O.; Paraschivu, M. The use of the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) to assess the epidemics of Septoria tritici in winter wheat. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 45, 193–201. [Google Scholar]
  61. Irfaq, M.; Ajab, M.; Khattak, G.S.S.; Mohammad, T.; Shah, S.J.A. Genetic Behavior of Controlling Area Under Disease Progress Curve for Stripe Rust (Puccinia striiformis f. Sp. Tritici ) in Two Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Crosses. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shao, G.; Li, Z.; Ning, T.; Zheng, Y. Responses of Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, and Grain Yield of Maize to Controlledrelease Urea and Irrigation after Anthesis. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2013, 176, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chang, C.; Lu, J.; Zhang, H.-P.; Ma, C.-X.; Sun, G. Copy Number Variation of Cytokinin Oxidase Gene Tackx4 Associated with Grain Weight and Chlorophyll Content of Flag Leaf in Common Wheat. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ramesh, K.; Chandrasekaran, B.; Balasubramanian, T.N.; Bangarusamy, U.; Sivasamy, R.; Sankaran, N. Chlorophyll Dynamics in Rice (Oryza sativa) Before and After Flowering Based on SPAD (Chlorophyll) Meter Monitoring and Its Relation with Grain Yield. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2002, 188, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, F.; Wang, G.; Li, X.; Huang, J.; Zheng, J. Heredity, Physiology and Mapping of a Chlorophyll Content Gene of Rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.; Bo, C.; Dai, W.; Zhang, X.; Cai, R.; Gu, L.; Ma, Q.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Study of Maize Plant Architecture Using F1 Populations. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 99, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Geshnizjani, N.; Snoek, B.L.; Willems, L.A.J.; Rienstra, J.A.; Nijveen, H.; Hilhorst, H.W.M.; Ligterink, W. Detection of QTLs for Genotype × Environment Interactions in Tomato Seeds and Seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 1973–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brumme, S.; Kruft, V.; Schmitz, U.K.; Braun, H.-P. New Insights into the Co-Evolution of Cytochrome C Reductase and the Mitochondrial Processing Peptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 13143–13149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ow, Y.-L.P.; Green, D.R.; Hao, Z.; Mak, T.W. Cytochrome c: Functions beyond Respiration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Martínez-Fábregas, J.; Díaz-Moreno, I.; González-Arzola, K.; Janocha, S.; Navarro, J.A.; Hervás, M.; Bernhardt, R.; Díaz-Quintana, A.; De la Rosa, M.Á. New Arabidopsis thaliana Cytochrome c Partners: A Look Into the Elusive Role of Cytochrome c in Programmed Cell Death in Plants. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2013, 12, 3666–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Di, C.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Wang, C.; You, Q.; Yan, H.; Dai, S.Y.; Yuan, J.S.; et al. JAZ7 Negatively Regulates Dark-Induced Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, H.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Yang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Wen, X.; Li, W.; Yin, W.; et al. An Alternative Splicing Variant of PtRD26 Delays Leaf Senescence by Regulating Multiple NAC Transcription Factors in Populus. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1594–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cernac, A.; Benning, C. WRINKLED1 Encodes an AP2/EREB Domain Protein Involved in the Control of Storage Compound Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: WRI1 Controls Seed Oil Biosynthesis. Plant J. 2004, 40, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dietz, K.-J.; Vogel, M.O.; Viehhauser, A. AP2/EREBP Transcription Factors Are Part of Gene Regulatory Networks and Integrate Metabolic, Hormonal and Environmental Signals in Stress Acclimation and Retrograde Signalling. Protoplasma 2010, 245, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhou, Y.; Xia, H.; Li, X.-J.; Hu, R.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.-B. Overexpression of a Cotton Gene That Encodes a Putative Transcription Factor of AP2/EREBP Family in Arabidopsis Affects Growth and Development of Transgenic Plants. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, C.; Zhang, T. Expansion and Stress Responses of the AP2/EREBP Superfamily in Cotton. BMC Genomics 2017, 18, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Thornburg, T.E.; Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Xue, H.; Wang, G.; Li, L.; Fontana, J.E.; Davis, K.E.; Liu, W.; Zhang, B.; et al. Potassium Deficiency Significantly Affected Plant Growth and Development as Well as MicroRNA-Mediated Mechanism in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sun, J.; Yang, L.; Yang, X.; Wei, J.; Li, L.; Guo, E.; Kong, Y. Using Spectral Reflectance to Estimate the Leaf Chlorophyll Content of Maize Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Under Water Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 646173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Han, B.; Liu, A.; Xu, W. Integrated Lipidomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Triacylglycerol Accumulation in Castor Bean Seedlings under Heat Stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 180, 114702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Eklund, D.M.; Edqvist, J. Localization of Nonspecific Lipid Transfer Proteins Correlate with Programmed Cell Death Responses during Endosperm Degradation in Euphorbia lagascae Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1249–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wu, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Luo, L.; Li, M.; Wang, J.; Yu, H.; Liu, G.; Yang, L.; et al. Deficient Plastidic Fatty Acid Synthesis Triggers Cell Death by Modulating Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wagoner, J.A.; Sun, T.; Lin, L.; Hanson, M.R. Cytidine Deaminase Motifs within the DYW Domain of Two Pentatricopeptide Repeat-Containing Proteins Are Required for Site-Specific Chloroplast RNA Editing. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 2957–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, J.; Xiao, J.; Li, Y.; Su, B.; Xu, H.; Shan, X.; Song, C.; Xie, J.; Li, R. PDM3, a Pentatricopeptide Repeat-Containing Protein, Affects Chloroplast Development. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5615–5627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 14 01010 g001 550
Figure 1. Scatterplots, frequency distribution histogram and correlation of 17FS, 17LD and BLUP. The histograms on the diagonal represent the phenotypic distribution frequency, the values above the diagonal represent the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between adjacent environments, and the scatterplots below the diagonal represent the degree of data fit. The values in the outer circle represent the range of phenotype values in the corresponding environment. ** indicates statistical significance with p < 0.01 significant.
Figure 1. Scatterplots, frequency distribution histogram and correlation of 17FS, 17LD and BLUP. The histograms on the diagonal represent the phenotypic distribution frequency, the values above the diagonal represent the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between adjacent environments, and the scatterplots below the diagonal represent the degree of data fit. The values in the outer circle represent the range of phenotype values in the corresponding environment. ** indicates statistical significance with p < 0.01 significant.
Genes 14 01010 g001
Genes 14 01010 g002 550
Figure 2. The changes in the chlorophyll content in 17FS and 17LD. The chlorophyll content was measured at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 days in 17FS, and at 0, 5, 10 days in 17LD after silking (data are shown as the average (n = 5)).
Figure 2. The changes in the chlorophyll content in 17FS and 17LD. The chlorophyll content was measured at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 days in 17FS, and at 0, 5, 10 days in 17LD after silking (data are shown as the average (n = 5)).
Genes 14 01010 g002
Genes 14 01010 g003 550
Figure 3. Frequency histogram of AUCCC distribution. (A) 17FS; (B) 17LD.
Figure 3. Frequency histogram of AUCCC distribution. (A) 17FS; (B) 17LD.
Genes 14 01010 g003
Genes 14 01010 g004 550
Figure 4. Correlation coefficients of maize chlorophyll content with 10 agronomic traits based on BLUP values. * indicates statistical significance with p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Correlation coefficients of maize chlorophyll content with 10 agronomic traits based on BLUP values. * indicates statistical significance with p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 14 01010 g004
Genes 14 01010 g005a 550Genes 14 01010 g005b 550
Figure 5. Genome-wide association studies of chlorophyll content. Each point represents an SNP site, and the horizontal black line represents that the effective threshold of Bonferroni correction at 1.03 × 10−5, different colors represent different chromosomes of maize. (A) 17FS; (B) 17LD; (C) BLUP.
Figure 5. Genome-wide association studies of chlorophyll content. Each point represents an SNP site, and the horizontal black line represents that the effective threshold of Bonferroni correction at 1.03 × 10−5, different colors represent different chromosomes of maize. (A) 17FS; (B) 17LD; (C) BLUP.
Genes 14 01010 g005aGenes 14 01010 g005b
Genes 14 01010 g006a 550Genes 14 01010 g006b 550
Figure 6. Genome-wide association studies of AUCCC. Each point represents an SNP site, and the horizontal black line represents that the effective threshold of Bonferroni correction at 1.03 × 10−5, different colors represent different chromosomes of maize. (A) FS; (B) LD; (C) BLUP.
Figure 6. Genome-wide association studies of AUCCC. Each point represents an SNP site, and the horizontal black line represents that the effective threshold of Bonferroni correction at 1.03 × 10−5, different colors represent different chromosomes of maize. (A) FS; (B) LD; (C) BLUP.
Genes 14 01010 g006aGenes 14 01010 g006b
Genes 14 01010 g007a 550Genes 14 01010 g007b 550
Figure 7. Heat map of the expression patterns of candidate genes determined by genome-wide association study. The value used in the figure is the log10 conversion ratio of the counts of standardized PRKM counts of chlorophyll content in (A) seven tissues and (B) in leaves on days 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 of maize silking stage. Columns and rows are sorted according to similarity. Compared with different periods of a specific gene, red, black and green represent higher, moderate and lower expression, respectively.
Figure 7. Heat map of the expression patterns of candidate genes determined by genome-wide association study. The value used in the figure is the log10 conversion ratio of the counts of standardized PRKM counts of chlorophyll content in (A) seven tissues and (B) in leaves on days 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 of maize silking stage. Columns and rows are sorted according to similarity. Compared with different periods of a specific gene, red, black and green represent higher, moderate and lower expression, respectively.
Genes 14 01010 g007aGenes 14 01010 g007b
Genes 14 01010 g008 550
Figure 8. Allele variations of SNP and expression patterns of Zm00001d026568 and Zm00001d026569. (A) Allele effects of SNP 2376873-7-G, 307 and 63, represent the number of G and A genotypes in the population, respectively. The relative expression of Zm00001d026568 (B) and Zm00001d026569 (C) by qRT-PCR in 6 lines, including Liao7980, A801 and 29MIBZ2, containing A allele; PHVA9, LX9311 and Dan330, containing G allele. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation. ** indicates statistical significance with p < 0.01. Bars with different letter superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Allele variations of SNP and expression patterns of Zm00001d026568 and Zm00001d026569. (A) Allele effects of SNP 2376873-7-G, 307 and 63, represent the number of G and A genotypes in the population, respectively. The relative expression of Zm00001d026568 (B) and Zm00001d026569 (C) by qRT-PCR in 6 lines, including Liao7980, A801 and 29MIBZ2, containing A allele; PHVA9, LX9311 and Dan330, containing G allele. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation. ** indicates statistical significance with p < 0.01. Bars with different letter superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Genes 14 01010 g008
Table
Table 1. Variance composition and broad-sense heritability of chlorophyll content and AUCCC in the maize association population in two environments (17FS and 17LD).
Table 1. Variance composition and broad-sense heritability of chlorophyll content and AUCCC in the maize association population in two environments (17FS and 17LD).
Source of Variation aMean SquareSignificance bH2 c
chlorophyll contentEnvironment (E)10058.20165<0.01 **0.67
Genotype (G)190.14580<0.01 **
G × E155.137090.4034
AUCCCEnvironment (E)149.3227937<0.01 **0.66
Genotype (G)1.1585265<0.01 **
G × E0.4053320.0987
a G × E indicates the interaction between G and E. b ** indicates statistical significance with p ≤ 0.01. c Family mean-based broad-sense heritability.
Table
Table 2. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosomal positions and candidate genes significantly associated with chlorophyll content and AUCCC identified by genome-wide association study.
Table 2. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosomal positions and candidate genes significantly associated with chlorophyll content and AUCCC identified by genome-wide association study.
TraitSNPChrPosition (bp)p ValueGeneGene Interval (bp)AnnotationPathway
17BLUP chlorophyll contentMarker.24794922.20 × 1089.10 × 10−6Zm00001d007009Chr2:220125041-220148355DNAJ heat shock N-terminal domain-containing proteinChloroplast targeting, photosystem II repair
Zm00001d007011Chr2:220152033-220155206ATP synthaseEnergy metabolism
Zm00001d007012Chr2:220170458-220175539CHLOROPLAST RNA-BINDING PROTEINChloroplast morphogenesis
Zm00001d007016Chr2:220204271-220219191disease resistance protein RGA2Disease-resistant
Zm00001d007017Chr2:220217348-220221222thioredoxin-like protein AAED1 chloroplasticElectronic circulation and daylighting
17FS chlorophyll content2376873-7-G101.48 × 1087.08 × 10−6Zm00001d026563Chr10:148153479-148157015AP2/EREBP transcription factor 40Plant growth and development
Zm00001d026569Chr10:148185247-148190302chloroplastic palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein thioesteraseDe novo synthesis of fatty acids
Zm00001d026568Chr10:148184610-148195615pentatricopeptide repeat-containing proteinChloroplast development
Zm00001d026573Chr10:148201459-1482078535-methylthioribose kinaseMethylthioadenosine (MTA) cycle
Zm00001d026574Chr10:148208912-148217798UDP-D-galacturonateHomogalacturonan biosynthesis
17LD chlorophyll contentMarker.190636243,281,9076.97 × 10−6Zm00001d003403Chr2:43279990-43285413aaap10—amino acid/auxin permease10Amino acid transportation
Zm00001d003404Chr2:43284025.43288746transmembrane proteinTransmembrane
Zm00001d003405Chr2:43285551-43289511protease inhibitor/seed storage/LTP family proteinSignal transduction
Zm00001d003406Chr2:43298285-43304459actin binding proteinPlant growth and development
Marker.34648748,724,2688.32 × 10−6Zm00001d027598Chr1:8676135-8681000cct101—CO CO-LIKE TIMING OF CAB1 protein domain101)Transcription factors, floral completion
Zm00001d027599Chr1:8699800-8704356alkane hydroxylase MAH1Cuticular wax biosynthesis
Zm00001d027601Chr1:8772748-8777355behenate ω-hydroxylaseSuberin monomers biosynthesis
2504165-22-G52,775,8229.93 × 10−6Zm00001d012982Chr5:2770681-2776100NAD(P)-binding domain containing protein Energy metabolism
17LD AUCCCMarker.57142461.73 × 1087.40 × 10−6Zm00001d039222Chr6:173160699-173165510cct40—CO CO-LIKE TIMING OF CAB1 protein domain40)Transcription factors, floral completion
Zm00001d039221Chr6:173158717-173163744nucleoside diphosphate kinase 4Signal transduction
17FS AUCCC2376873-7-G101.48 × 1085.82 × 10−6Zm00001d026563Chr10:148153479-148157015ereb40—AP2-EREBP-transcription factor 40Plant growth and development
Zm00001d026568Chr10:148184610-148195615pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein, mitochondrial-likeChloroplast development
Zm00001d026569Chr10:148185247-148190302palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase, chloroplasticDe novo synthesis of fatty acids
Zm00001d026573Chr10:148201459-1482078535-methylthioribose kinaseMethylthioadenosine (MTA) cycle
Zm00001d026574Chr10:148208912-148217798UDP-D-galacturonate Homogalacturonan biosynthesis
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, M.; Cui, Z.; Sun, D.; Li, C.; Zhang, A.; Cao, H.; Ruan, Y. Genome-Wide Association Study Identified Novel SNPs Associated with Chlorophyll Content in Maize. Genes 2023, 14, 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14051010

AMA Style

Jin Y, Li D, Liu M, Cui Z, Sun D, Li C, Zhang A, Cao H, Ruan Y. Genome-Wide Association Study Identified Novel SNPs Associated with Chlorophyll Content in Maize. Genes. 2023; 14(5):1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14051010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Yueting, Dan Li, Meiling Liu, Zhenhai Cui, Daqiu Sun, Cong Li, Ao Zhang, Huiying Cao, and Yanye Ruan. 2023. "Genome-Wide Association Study Identified Novel SNPs Associated with Chlorophyll Content in Maize" Genes 14, no. 5: 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14051010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop