Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Neutral and Non-Neutral Evolution of Duplicated Genes with Gene Conversion
Previous Article in Journal
Meiosis in a Bottle: New Approaches to Overcome Mammalian Meiocyte Study Limitations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gene Duplication and Ectopic Gene Conversion in Drosophila
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 2
Issue 1
10.3390/genes2010169
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Enlightenment of Yeast Mitochondrial Homoplasmy: Diversified Roles of Gene Conversion

by
Feng Ling
1,
Tsutomu Mikawa
2,3,4 and
Takehiko Shibata
3,4,*
1
Chemical Genetics Laboratory, RIKEN Advanced Science Institute/2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
2
Biometal Science Laboratory, RIKEN SPring-8 Center/Mikazuki cho, Hyogo 679-5148 Japan
3
Division of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Supramolecular Biology, Graduate School of Nanobiosciences, Yokohama City University/1-7-29 Suehiro cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
4
Cellular & Molecular Biology Laboratory, RIKEN Advanced Science Institute/2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2011, 2(1), 169-190; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010169
Submission received: 13 January 2011 / Revised: 18 January 2011 / Accepted: 25 January 2011 / Published: 14 February 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene Conversion in Duplicated Genes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

: Mitochondria have their own genomic DNA. Unlike the nuclear genome, each cell contains hundreds to thousands of copies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The copies of mtDNA tend to have heterogeneous sequences, due to the high frequency of mutagenesis, but are quickly homogenized within a cell (“homoplasmy”) during vegetative cell growth or through a few sexual generations. Heteroplasmy is strongly associated with mitochondrial diseases, diabetes and aging. Recent studies revealed that the yeast cell has the machinery to homogenize mtDNA, using a common DNA processing pathway with gene conversion; i.e., both genetic events are initiated by a double-stranded break, which is processed into 3′ single-stranded tails. One of the tails is base-paired with the complementary sequence of the recipient double-stranded DNA to form a D-loop (homologous pairing), in which repair DNA synthesis is initiated to restore the sequence lost by the breakage. Gene conversion generates sequence diversity, depending on the divergence between the donor and recipient sequences, especially when it occurs among a number of copies of a DNA sequence family with some sequence variations, such as in immunoglobulin diversification in chicken. MtDNA can be regarded as a sequence family, in which the members tend to be diversified by a high frequency of spontaneous mutagenesis. Thus, it would be interesting to determine why and how double-stranded breakage and D-loop formation induce sequence homogenization in mitochondria and sequence diversification in nuclear DNA. We will review the mechanisms and roles of mtDNA homoplasmy, in contrast to nuclear gene conversion, which diversifies gene and genome sequences, to provide clues toward understanding how the common DNA processing pathway results in such divergent outcomes.

1. Introduction

In human postmitotic cells, such as muscle and nerve cells, the mtDNA accumulates various mutations during the aging process and becomes heteroplasmic, and the resultant mitochondrial dysfunctions are considered to contribute to age-related degenerative diseases [1,2]. However, heteroplasmy, even that consisting of silent mutations, segregates within a few generations into homoplasmy through a putative genetic bottleneck, for which the genetic or protein-elements have not been identified [3–7]. Maternally inherited heteroplasmic mtDNA mutations are considered to cause some mitochondrial diseases [8] and diabetes [9]. Thus, homoplasmy is very important to health. Heteroplasmic yeast zygotes are readily obtained in the laboratory by mating a cells and α cells containing different mitochondrial genetic markers. The heteroplasmic yeast cells segregate the homoplasmic progeny during zygote outgrowth in the absence of any selective pressure, and after ten to twenty generations, all of the cells in the culture are homoplasmic [10]. A mtDNA gene conversion deficient mutant (mhr1-1) was isolated [11] and characterized, and revealed that Mhr1 is essential for mtDNA partitioning into daughter cells [12], and functions in the homogenization of heteroplasmic mtDNA to generate homoplasmic progeny [13]. The study further showed that Mhr1, like RecA, has an activity to form D-loops from homologous single-stranded DNA and double-stranded DNA, but unlike RecA, it does not require ATP [12]. The mhr1-1 mutation causes a single amino acid replacement that inactivates the D-loop forming activity of Mhr1, and thus Mhr1 plays a role in mtDNA partitioning and homoplasmy, as well as mtDNA gene conversion.

Gene conversion is a type of homologous (DNA) recombination, in which the sequence of the recipient DNA is replaced by copying the homologous sequence of the donor DNA. The other type of homologous recombination is crossing-over, in which parts of a pair of homologous chromosomes are reciprocally exchanged at mutually homologous sequences. The primary role of gene conversion is to repair DNA double-stranded breaks, in which the sequence flanking the damage is replaced by a copy of the homologous DNA sequence. Gene conversion is occasionally associated with crossing-over.

Genes 02 00169f1 1024
Figure 1. Pathways of homologous recombination. Both sides of a double-stranded break (Step 1) are resected to generate 3′ single-stranded tails at Step 2. At Step 3, the single-stranded tail derived from the first end finds a complementary sequence within the homologous DNA and forms a heteroduplex with a D-loop (homologous pairing), followed by repair synthesis to restore the broken sequence from the paired 3′ single-stranded tail at Step 4. DNA synthesis replaces the parental DNA strand to enlarge the D-loop. After Step 5, the double-stranded break-repair pathway is illustrated on the right and the synthesis-dependent strand-annealing (SDSA) pathway is on the left. In the double-stranded break-repair pathway, the second end is captured by annealing with the D-loop at Step 5. The following gap filling and branch migration generate a double-Holliday intermediate. Cleavage of one of the inter-crossed strands leads to the Holliday intermediate at Step 6. At Step 7, the Holliday intermediate can be resolved in two ways, by cutting either the outer strands, to generate the crossing-over product, or the inter-crossed strands, to generate the gene conversion product after mismatch repair. In the SDSA pathway, the synthesized strand is dissociated from the double-stranded DNA and anneals with the second end at Step 5, followed by gap filling (Step 6) and mismatch repair (Step 7) to generate only a gene conversion product. A and a, X and x, and Y and y are alleles at the A, X and Y loci, respectively.
Figure 1. Pathways of homologous recombination. Both sides of a double-stranded break (Step 1) are resected to generate 3′ single-stranded tails at Step 2. At Step 3, the single-stranded tail derived from the first end finds a complementary sequence within the homologous DNA and forms a heteroduplex with a D-loop (homologous pairing), followed by repair synthesis to restore the broken sequence from the paired 3′ single-stranded tail at Step 4. DNA synthesis replaces the parental DNA strand to enlarge the D-loop. After Step 5, the double-stranded break-repair pathway is illustrated on the right and the synthesis-dependent strand-annealing (SDSA) pathway is on the left. In the double-stranded break-repair pathway, the second end is captured by annealing with the D-loop at Step 5. The following gap filling and branch migration generate a double-Holliday intermediate. Cleavage of one of the inter-crossed strands leads to the Holliday intermediate at Step 6. At Step 7, the Holliday intermediate can be resolved in two ways, by cutting either the outer strands, to generate the crossing-over product, or the inter-crossed strands, to generate the gene conversion product after mismatch repair. In the SDSA pathway, the synthesized strand is dissociated from the double-stranded DNA and anneals with the second end at Step 5, followed by gap filling (Step 6) and mismatch repair (Step 7) to generate only a gene conversion product. A and a, X and x, and Y and y are alleles at the A, X and Y loci, respectively.
Genes 02 00169f1 1024

Various DNA lesions and erroneously incorporated bases in double-stranded DNA are repaired by the use of the complementary strand as the template, in nucleotide-or base-excision repair. However, excision repair cannot repair DNA double-stranded breaks and single-stranded gaps that contain damaged bases, since no intramolecular template for repair is available. Thus, these DNA lesions are repaired by homologous recombination using an identical or homologous DNA sequence, such as a sister or homologous chromosome, as the template for repair, or by simple end-joining, in a reaction called non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). NHEJ is associated with mutations, while the repair of double-stranded DNA-breaks by homologous recombination is much more accurate.

In double-strand break-repair by homologous recombination (Figure 1) [14], both ends of a double-stranded break are resected to generate 3′ single-stranded tails. A RecA-family protein (RecA in eubacteria and Rad51 or Dmc1 in eukaryotes) pairs one of the tails (of the first end) with the complementary sequence of a donor double-stranded DNA (homologous pairing), in an ATP-dependent manner, to form a D-loop (displacement loop), in which the parental strand is displaced by the invading, single-stranded tail [15–19]. Once the single-stranded tail is formed in the cells, it is covered by single-strand binding protein, SSB in eubacteria and RPA (replication protein A) in eukaryotes, which is required for efficient homologous pairing, but inhibits the initial binding of RecA-family proteins to the single-stranded tail. Rad52 was first identified as a recombination mediator, which loads a RecA-family protein onto the SSB-or RPA-coated single-stranded tails [20].

Repair DNA synthesis then starts at the 3′ terminus of the single-stranded tail in the D-loop, to copy the complementary sequence of the donor DNA and recover the sequence lost by the double-stranded breakage. The following second end capture and gap filling with branch migration generate a double Holliday intermediate [21], which is processed into a Holliday intermediate. This intermediate is further processed by mismatch repair and junction-resolution into gene conversion products and/or crossing-over products, as R. Holliday postulated [22]. The synthesis-dependent single-strand annealing (SDSA) mechanism is another pathway for gene conversion without associated crossing-over, in which the extended single-stranded tail of the first end is released from the template and anneals with the single-stranded tail of the second end, followed by gap filling and removal of excess sequences (Figure 1) [23].

In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms and roles of mtDNA homoplasmy, in contrast to nuclear gene conversion, which diversifies gene and genome sequences, to clarify how the common DNA processing pathway plays various genetic roles and results in such divergent outcomes.

2. Gene Conversion in Nuclear Genome

2.1. Gene Conversion Generates Diversity in a DNA Sequence Family in the Nuclear Genome

The role of meiotic homologous recombination, either crossing-over or gene conversion, is the acquisition of genetic diversity in each species by reorganizing parental alleles, to facilitate adaptation to environmental changes. In meiosis, the general process to produce haploid cells from diploid mother cells, chromosome duplication is followed by two rounds of cell division without DNA replication. Gene conversion and crossing-over are induced at very high frequencies in the early phase of the first meiotic cell division, by site-and timing-specific double-stranded breakage catalyzed by SPO11. Crossing-over is essential for the precise sorting of each of the homologous chromosome pairs to the opposite poles in the first meiotic cell division, to accomplish the meiotic segregation of homologous chromosomes. This is supported by the observations that most meiotic recombination-deficient mutants cause meiotic nondisjunction, to produce aneuploids. In human, reduced meiotic recombination induces nondisjunction of chromosome 21, which causes Down Syndrome [24].

Meiotic crossing-over is strictly restricted between alleles, and generates various new combinations of alleles derived from both parents to increase genetic diversity. Crossing-over between nonallelic genes necessarily results in chromosomal aberrations, but gene conversion occurs between not only alleles but also non-allelic genes with similar sequences (homologous recombination), and consequently, occasionally produces chimeric genes with additional genetic variations. Both meiotic crossing-over and gene conversion depend on RecA-family proteins, Rad51 and Dmc1, as well as a recombination mediator (Rad52 in S. cerevisiae).

Somatic gene conversion among the members of a DNA sequence family with some sequence variations results in extensive sequence diversification. An example is the production of genes encoding immunoglobulins with various antigen-specificities in a chicken cell line (DT40), derived from bursa B cells [25–27]. This gene conversion allows a 4–20% level of mismatched base-pairs between the donor and recipient DNA sequences [28], which is orders of magnitude higher than the levels tolerated by meiotic gene conversion and double-stranded break-repair observed in somatic cells. The hypervariable region is also a hotspot of somatic hypermutation, and may contribute to immunoglobulin diversification. When DT40 cells were treated with trichostatin A, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, almost all of the cells within the culture recombined at the loci under the optimal conditions, and the induced recombination was suppressed simply by removing the drug. This finding enabled the development of a quick method to generate clones of functional antibodies (ADLib system) [29]. DNA sequence analyses of these established cell lines revealed that the genes encoding the newly obtained, functional antibodies were mostly generated by gene conversion, and the contribution of somatic hypermutation was very limited, even though the trichostatin A-treatment also enhanced somatic hypermutation [29]. Details about the rapid generation of specific antibodies by the ADLib system are described in the review by Kunihiro Ohta, in this issue. The results obtained with the ADLib system suggest that gene conversion between similar sequences of a DNA sequence family has significant power to diversify genes and even to create genes encoding proteins with new functions, as discussed previously for DNA shuffling [30].

Each cell contains a number of mtDNA copies, which suffer from a high frequency of mutagenesis and are recombined to generate either gene conversion products or crossing-over products in yeast and other organisms [10]. Thus, it might be expected that the sequence of mtDNA would be extensively diversified, but as mentioned, mtDNA maintains homoplasmy. This suggests that mitochondria have potent mechanisms to suppress the diversification of mtDNA and to maintain mtDNA homoplasmy.

2.2. Double-Stranded Breaks and Homologous Pairing also Induce DNA Replication

Occasionally, repair synthesis that starts at a D-loop continues without capturing the second end, with associated lagging strand DNA synthesis, as first shown in bacteriophage T4 [31], bacteria [32,33] and yeast [34]. This prolonged DNA synthesis (double-stranded break induced DNA-replication, often abbreviated as BIR) in yeast was shown to cause coconversion to the donor genotype (Figure 2) [35,36]. Double-stranded break-induced DNA replication occurs when the second end is not available, as in the case of a collapsed replication fork, which is recovered by this double-stranded break-induced DNA replication-dependent mechanism [37]. When the second end was available in S. cerevisiae, most of the double-stranded breaks induced in diploid wild-type cells were repaired by Rad51-dependent gene conversion, but when the double-stranded breaks were induced in diploid rad51Δ/ad51Δ cells, one-third of the breaks were repaired by double-stranded break-induced DNA replication, while none was repaired by simple gene conversion. This double-stranded break-induced DNA replication mechanism absolutely depends on Rad52, but does not require Rad51 [34].

Genes 02 00169f2 1024
Figure 2. Double-stranded break-induced DNA replication (BIR) and rolling circle DNA replication. Steps after homologous pairing (D-loop formation; see Figure 1) are indicated. In pathway (1), the crossed strands are cleaved and a replication fork is formed, and then authentic DNA replication occurs. In pathway (2), the D-loop moves along with strand synthesis, followed by lagging strand synthesis. When the donor DNA is circular, the D-loop formation initiates rolling circle replication. Bold lines indicate newly synthesized strands. Red DNA alleles are either lost by double-stranded break-induced DNA replication, or extensively decreased within a multicopy DNA population by rolling circle replication.
Figure 2. Double-stranded break-induced DNA replication (BIR) and rolling circle DNA replication. Steps after homologous pairing (D-loop formation; see Figure 1) are indicated. In pathway (1), the crossed strands are cleaved and a replication fork is formed, and then authentic DNA replication occurs. In pathway (2), the D-loop moves along with strand synthesis, followed by lagging strand synthesis. When the donor DNA is circular, the D-loop formation initiates rolling circle replication. Bold lines indicate newly synthesized strands. Red DNA alleles are either lost by double-stranded break-induced DNA replication, or extensively decreased within a multicopy DNA population by rolling circle replication.
Genes 02 00169f2 1024

3. Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mitochondria Have a Rolling Circle DNA Replication-Dependent Mechanism to Recover and Maintain mtDNA Homoplasmy

3.1. Gene Conversion in Yeast Mitochondria

MtDNA recombination, involving crossing-over and gene conversion, has been intensively studied and well characterized in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [10]. Some sequence-specific endonucleases, such as Endo.SceI [38,39] and I-SceI [40,41], were shown to induce very efficient gene conversion at their cleavage sites in mtDNA, and the cleaved DNA always acted as the recipient, as also observed in nuclear gene conversion. Endo.SceI is a heterodimer of Ens2, encoded by a mitochondrial gene, and a nuclear chromosome-encoded mitochondrial 70 kDa heat shock protein (mtHSP70) [42], and numerous cleavage sites for Endo.SceI exist in the yeast mtDNA [39]. On the other hand, I-SceI and other mitochondrial sequence-specific endonucleases (homing endonucleases) are homodimers encoded within mitochondrial introns, functioning in the transposition of the introns into their intronless alleles (homing) through gene conversion, and each has a rare cleavage site within its intronless allele [40]. The sequence-specific endonuclease-induced gene conversion induced by I-SceI is the most efficient; i.e., all progeny of the mating of I-SceI intron-plus cells and I-SceI intronless cells are I-SceI intron-plus. Note that I-SceI is the name of an intron of the 21S ribosomal RNA gene as well as the name of the sequence-specific endonuclease encoded in the intron [43], and that I-SceI and Endo.SceI [38] are different endonucleases with diverse target specificities.

Until the mid-nineties, the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of homologous mtDNA recombination had been hampered by unsuccessful attempts to isolate mtDNA recombination-deficient mutants, until the identification of the first defective yeast mutant, mhr1-1. By using the efficient mtDNA gene conversion induced by I-SceI or Endo.SceI and developing a “mitochondrial crossing in haploid” screening system, a homologous mtDNA recombination-defective mutant was isolated for the first time [11]. The mutation is a recessive, single base-substitution in a nuclear gene, MHR1, and it generates an amino acid-substitution in the mitochondrial protein, Mhr1 [44].

The mhr1-1 mutation largely suppresses the gene conversion induced by I-SceI and Endo.SceI [11]. Although only a mild reduction in mtDNA crossing-over was observed in mhr1-1 cells [11], this is due to the crossing-over between unlinked mtDNA markers, and subsequent physical tests revealed that mhr1-1 clearly decreased mtDNA crossing-over [45].

Before mhr1-1 was found, two genes or proteins that may be related to mtDNA recombination were known. Pif1 is a DNA helicase [46], and its mutant was isolated by its effect on recombination between a specified type of ρ− DNA (petite; respiration defective mtDNA with a large deletion) and ρ+ (respiration proficient) mtDNA, but this mutation does not affect recombination between ρ+ mtDNAs [47,48]. Pif1 also functions in nuclei at telomere [49] and minisatellite DNA [50]. Cce1 encodes a DNA endonuclease that resolves the Holliday junction in vitro, but a recombination-deficient phenotype was not reported [51,52].

3.2. Rolling Circle DNA Replication as a Mechanism for mtDNA Inheritance and Homoplasmy in Yeast

MHR1 encodes a protein that catalyzes D-loop formation from homologous double-stranded DNA and linear single-stranded DNA in the absence of ATP. The mhr1-1 mutation is a single amino acid-substitution causing the inactivation of the D-loop forming activity of Mhr1 [12]. Thus, the D-loop forming activity of Mhr1 explains the deficiencies of mhr1-1 in homologous mtDNA recombination, either gene conversion or crossing-over. The mhr1-1 mutation generates a pleiotropic phenotype in ρ+ cells. First, it showed defective mtDNA maintenance at a higher temperature, with associated defects in replicated mtDNA transmission into daughter cells (temperature sensitive partitioning) [11,12]. Second, mhr1-1 exhibited slower segregation of heteroplasmic cells to generate homoplasmic cells at a sub-lethal temperature, and the overexpression of Mhr1 in ρ+ cells accelerated the segregation of heteroplasmic cells, indicating that Mhr1 plays an important role in mtDNA homogenization to maintain homoplasmy [13].

The mechanistic roles of Mhr1 in mtDNA partitioning into daughter cells were revealed when the ρ+ mtDNA (ca. 80 kbp) was analyzed in mother cells and growing buds separated from dividing cells, by the use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The major species of mtDNA in the mother cells was multimers, as observed in whole cells, but in the bud, the major mtDNA species was monomers [12]. Detailed information about the forms of mtDNA in the mother and daughter cells was obtained by the analysis of small ρ− mtDNA (ca. 10 kbp) by 1D and 2D agarose gel-electrophoresis. The major species of mtDNA in cells are linear head-to-tail multimers of varying sizes (concatemers) in the mother cells, and circular monomers in daughter cells [12,13]. The amounts of ρ− mtDNA concatemers depend on the activity of Mhr1 within cells, as revealed by the effects of mhr1-1 and the overexpression of Mhr1 in yeast cells [13]. These features are very similar to those observed in the late phase of DNA replication and packaging of E. coli phages lambda and E. coli phage T4 DNA replication; i.e., recombination-dependent formation of concatemers, and selective packing of concatemers into phage capsids by terminase [31,53]. The defective partitioning of mtDNA in mhr1-1 yeast cells indicates that the concatemers formed by Mhr1-dependent mtDNA replication are an essential intermediate for partitioning promoted by the terminase-like enzyme (Figure 3).

Genes 02 00169f3 1024
Figure 3. Mechanism for the efficient segregation of heteroplasmic cells in the yeast, S. cerevisiae. In the heteroplasmic mother cell, a randomly selected template circular DNA molecule (a blue circle in “Mother cell”) is replicated in a rolling circle mode to produce concatemers. The concatemers are selectively transmitted to daughter cells by a mechanism resembling that of terminases, which are ATP-dependent motor proteins that package a single phage genome unit from the phage DNA concatemers into the phage capsid [54]. Upon transmission into the daughter cells, the concatemers are processed into circular monomers (blue circles in “Daughter cell”), as in the case of phage DNA packaging [12] and constitute homoplasmic mtDNA.
Figure 3. Mechanism for the efficient segregation of heteroplasmic cells in the yeast, S. cerevisiae. In the heteroplasmic mother cell, a randomly selected template circular DNA molecule (a blue circle in “Mother cell”) is replicated in a rolling circle mode to produce concatemers. The concatemers are selectively transmitted to daughter cells by a mechanism resembling that of terminases, which are ATP-dependent motor proteins that package a single phage genome unit from the phage DNA concatemers into the phage capsid [54]. Upon transmission into the daughter cells, the concatemers are processed into circular monomers (blue circles in “Daughter cell”), as in the case of phage DNA packaging [12] and constitute homoplasmic mtDNA.
Genes 02 00169f3 1024

Concatemers are formed from circular monomers of DNA, by either crossing-over type homologous recombination or rolling circle DNA replication. A series of pulse labeling and chase experiments of ρ− mtDNA in synchronized cells supported rolling circle DNA replication and excluded crossing-over as the major pathway of concatemer formation in the mother cells, and also showed that the concatemers in the mother cells are the precursors of the circular mtDNA monomers in the growing buds [13]. These results indicated that rolling circle DNA replication is the major pathway to form ρ− mtDNA concatemers, which are selectively transmitted into buds [12,13]. Thus, yeast cells have the Mhr1-dependent mechanism to replicate mtDNA in the rolling circle mode, to form concatemers and to transmit them selectively into daughter cells (mtDNA partitioning). These Mhr1-dependent mechanisms provide an explanation for the homogenization of heteroplasmic ρ+ mtDNA to generate homoplasmic ρ+ cells (Figure 3): Mhr1-dependent rolling circle replication allows the progeny of a template mtDNA molecule to dominate in a multicopy mtDNA population within a cell, and consequently, heteroplasmic mtDNA is rapidly homogenized during mitotic yeast cell growth to generate homoplasmic cells. In addition, the selective transmission of concatemers, the products of rolling circle replication, to daughter cells further enhances mtDNA homogenization [13].

3.3. Initiation of Rolling Circle mtDNA Replication by Site-Specific Double-Stranded Breakage, Catalyzed by a Base-Excision Enzyme for the Repair of Oxidatively Damaged DNA

In S cerevisiae ρ− mitochondria, rolling circle DNA replication is initiated by a double-stranded break introduced at a mtDNA replication origin, such as ori5 [45]. The composition of the yeast mtDNA replication origin resembles that of the human heavy chain replication origin [55,56]; i.e., the sequence overlaps a transcription promoter and is very AT-rich, with three GC-rich clusters. The yeast hypersuppressive ρ− mtDNA has been used as an excellent model system for studying the mechanisms of mtDNA replication and its initiation. Hypersuppressive ρ− mtDNA is a small fragment (1 kbp or less) of ρ+ mtDNA (ca. 80 kbp) that contains an active mtDNA replication origin, and it has an extreme selective advantage over ρ+ mtDNA or neutral ρ− mtDNA. Among the yeast mtDNA replication origins, ori5 is the most active [55,57]. The selective replication and propagation of the hypersuppressive ρ− mtDNA over ρ+ mtDNA or neutral ρ− mtDNA depends on Mhr1 [45], but does not require the transcriptional RNA polymerase (Rpo41) of mitochondria [58]. These observations provide additional support for Mhr1-initiated rolling circle replication, but not for RNA-primed replication, as the major mechanism for yeast mtDNA replication. Rolling circle replication should be associated with lagging strand synthesis, and a primase has not been found in any mitochondria. This observation also suggests that Rpo41 does not act as a primase for lagging strand synthesis.

A series of biochemical and genetic analyses of a hypersuppressive ρ− mtDNA containing ori5 revealed that Ntg1 by itself introduced a double-stranded break in ori5, in mtDNA isolated from oxidatively stressed yeast cells in vitro. In addition, the double-stranded break introduced by Ntg1 in vivo is responsible for the initiation of rolling circle DNA replication, the selective replication and propagation of hypersuppressive ρ− mtDNA, and crossing-over in yeast mitochondria [45]. These findings are somewhat surprising, since Ntg1, a homologue of E. coli endonuclease III, is a well-characterized base-excision repair enzyme that introduces a single-stranded break at nucleotides with an oxidatively damaged base, by its DNA-N-glycosylase- and AP-site-specific DNA-lyase activities [59]. The ability of Ntg1 to cause double-stranded breaks was a novel finding. The Ntg1 treatment of plasmid DNA isolated from heavily oxidatively stressed E. coli cells, under the same conditions, used for the detection of a double-stranded break at ori5, generated only single-stranded breaks, but no double-stranded breaks [45]. These results suggest that mtDNA has a specific structure at the mtDNA replication origin, ori5, for the regulation of mtDNA replication initiation under oxidatively stressful conditions.

3.4. Regulation of the Initiation of Rolling Circle Replication and Somatic Homologous Recombination of mtDNA by ROS in Yeast

MtDNA replication is not coupled with the cell division cycle. The mtDNA copy number changes in response to physiological conditions. Oxidative stress is known to increase the mtDNA copy number in mammals. However, the mechanisms regulating mtDNA replication and copy number are not known [60,61]. The requirement for Ntg1 in the initiation of rolling circle DNA replication suggests that reactive oxygen species (ROS) act directly as signaling mediators to regulate the yeast mtDNA replication. This assumption was confirmed by studies using isolated mitochondria and intact cells with the hypersuppressive ρ− mtDNA. When an appropriate type of oxidative stress was applied to isolated mitochondria, the levels of the ori5-specific double-stranded break and the copy number of the hypersuppressive ρ− mtDNA simultaneously increased [45,62]. Since isolated mitochondria were used in these studies, the effects of nuclear gene expression and metabolic systems could be ignored. Ntg1 is able to recognize an oxidized base on single-stranded DNA and to cleave the DNA at the site, and the mtDNA replication origin (ori5) has a local single-stranded structure in vivo, as shown by the locus-specific sensitivity to the single-stranded DNA- specific S1 nuclease and resistance to double-stranded DNA-specific restriction endonucleases [62].

Genes 02 00169f4 1024
Figure 4. ROS mediated double-stranded breakage at the mtDNA replication origin, ori5.
Figure 4. ROS mediated double-stranded breakage at the mtDNA replication origin, ori5.
Genes 02 00169f4 1024

Since single-stranded DNA is much more sensitive to damaging agents, including ROS, than double-stranded DNA, the local single-stranded nature and the enzymatic specificities of Ntg1 explain the locus-specific oxidation of bases and the double-stranded breakage at ori5 [62] (Figure 4). Thus, ROS act as signal mediators to regulate mtDNA replication and copy number [62].

The activity of the TCA cycle (tricarboxylic acid cycle, citric acid cycle) is regulated at the transcriptional level by nutritional and other environmental conditions [63]. The TCA cycle itself is a source of ROS production at the stage of α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, especially when the NADH/NAD+ ratio is increased [64]. Although the role of the mtDNA copy number in the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression has not been clarified, this, and the function of ROS as a mediator of mtDNA copy number control, suggest an interesting possibility: i.e., the activation of the TCA cycle to produce NADH, enhances ROS production and triggers an increase in the mtDNA copy number, which in turn might increase the expression of genes encoded in the mitochondrial genome.

3.5. Does ρ+ mtDNA, Like ρ− mtDNA, Replicate by the Rolling-Circle Mode in Yeast?

It is well established that yeast ρ+ mtDNA replicates by a Mhr1-mediated recombination-dependent mechanism, and that ρ− mtDNA replicates by a rolling circle mode in S. cerevisiae, as described. Concatemers are the predominant form of ρ+ mtDNA in Saccharomyces yeast [65–67]. However, whether ρ+ mtDNA replicates by the rolling circle mode or not in yeasts is under debate due to a lack of direct evidence. Historically, mtDNA replication is initiated by RNA synthesis by a transcriptional RNA polymerase (Rpo41 in S. cerevisiae). Although the maintenance of ρ+ mtDNA requires Rpo41, Rpo41 is not required for mtDNA replication origin (including ori5) functions, as described above [58].

When concatemers are formed through multiple rounds of crossing-over from circular or linear monomeric DNA, DNA networks are formed during the process. S. cerevisiae has branched mtDNA molecules [67]. Holliday junctions are obligatory intermediates of crossing-over, and a Holliday junction resolvase is required to finish concatemer formation. A typical example is E. coli phage T4 DNA replication, in which branched molecules or networks of DNA are formed from permutated linear DNA molecules, and Endo VII, which resolves the Holliday junctions, is required before packaging by terminase [31]. On the other hand, S. cerevisiae ρ+ mtDNA maintenance does not depend on Cce1, the sole yeast mitochondrial Holliday junction resolvase [51,52,68], and thus, the mtDNA network detected in yeast mitochondria is not an essential intermediate of ρ+ mtDNA replication and partitioning in S. cerevisiae. Since crossing-over and rolling circle replication are the alternative pathways to form concatemers from monomeric mtDNA (the major form of mtDNA in daughter cells), this supports rolling circle replication as the major pathway of ρ+ mtDNA inheritance. The concatemer formation by Cce1-dependent crossing-over appears to act as a minor pathway for the maintenance of ρ− mtDNA, because mhr1-1 cells maintain a very small amount of ρ− mtDNA at the restrictive temperature, and the presence of the cce1 null mutation in the cell is required for the complete removal of mtDNA [12].

The copy number of ρ+ mtDNA is increased in isolated yeast mitochondria by a treatment with limited amounts of hydrogen peroxide, and this increase depends on both Mhr1 and Ntg1, as in the case of hypersuppresive ρ− mtDNA [62]. The copy number of ρ+ mtDNA in yeast cells increased when the cells were cultured under conditions that increased intracellular ROS [62]. These results also support the proposal that ρ+ mtDNA replicates by the recombination-dependent mechanism, including Mhr1 and Ntg1. In addition, in the ROS-induced increase in mtDNA in ρ+ cells, the copy numbers of genetic markers on mtDNA distant from ori5 or other active replication origins changed simultaneously, without a detectable difference from that of ori5 [62]. This observation supports rolling circle replication and is inconsistent with DNA replication initiated at each mtDNA genomic unit (replicon), since, in the latter mode, the copy number of ori5 should increase before those of the genetic markers distant from a replication origin, just after the induction of mtDNA replication by ROS.

4. Two Classes of Homologous Pairing Proteins, and the Choice between Rolling Circle or Double-Stranded Break-Induced DNA Replication and Simple Gene Conversion

In recombination and rolling-circle DNA replication in yeast (S. cerevisiae) mitochondria, D-loop formation is catalyzed by an ATP-independent homologous pairing protein, Mhr1 [12], but does not depend on RecA-family proteins. This is also the case in Escherichia coli bacteriophage λ and its relative, which use ATP-independent pairing proteins, Redβ and RecT, for homologous pairing, respectively [69,70]. In addition, some recombination mediators, including Rad52 [71,72], a BRCA2 homologue [73] and others [74], were found to have an ATP-independent homologous pairing activity. These ATP-independent homologous pairing proteins are structurally and evolutionally unrelated to each other (except for Redβ and RecT) and to the RecA-family proteins.

There was some debate as to whether the RecA-family proteins and the ATP-independent proteins catalyzed homologous pairing through the same or different molecular mechanisms. In all cases, the first intermediate for homologous pairing is the single-stranded DNA-protein complex. NMR analyses of the single-stranded DNA in the complex revealed that the same, uniquely extended structures were induced in the single-stranded DNA upon binding to a homologous pairing protein, independent of its origin and requirement for ATP. This means that the molecular mechanism of homologous pairing is common at the DNA level, and is independent of the requirement for ATP and the origin of the homologous pairing proteins [75].

How are the pathways subsequent to D-loop formation by homologous pairing proteins chosen, between prolonged DNA synthesis for rolling-circle replication or double-stranded break-induced DNA replication and short repair DNA synthesis, to lead to simple gene conversion and/or crossing-over? To address this question, it is important to consider that the nuclear ATP-independent homologous pairing protein, Rad52, and yeast nuclear double-stranded break-induced DNA replication are better understood than mitochondrial rolling circle replication and gene conversion. As described, unlike RAD51 yeast cells, in which induced double-stranded breaks are generally repaired by simple gene conversion, when double-stranded breaks were induced in diploid rad51Δ/rad51Δ cells, one-third of the breaks were repaired by Rad52-dependent double-stranded break-induced DNA replication, while none were repaired by simple gene conversion [34]. It was assumed that Rad51-dependent heteroduplex joint formation at both sides of a double-stranded break forms barriers to DNA replication [76]. However, the formation of a replication barrier can be more simply explained by the nature of the RecA-family protein, without assuming heteroduplex formation on both sides of a break. The RecA spiral filament formed on a single-stranded tail extends onto double-stranded DNA from the site of homologous pairing, leaving the 3′ terminus of the paired single-stranded tail within the spiral filament [77]. In contrast, crystallographic and biochemical studies suggested that human Rad52 catalyzes homologous pairing within a groove that runs around the undecameric ring of the conserved Rad52 N-terminal domain [78,79]. The structure of the N-terminal domain of Rad52 is well conserved between human and yeast. The structural differences between RecA/Rad51 and Rad52 might influence the accessibility of the DNA-replication apparatus to the 3′ termini of the paired single-stranded tails, and explain why Rad52 promotes double-stranded break-induced DNA replication, while Rad51 promotes simple gene conversion and crossing over.

5. Evolutional Conservation of Mitochondrially-Encoded Protein Composition

Mitochondrial DNA suffers from spontaneous mutagenesis at an order of magnitude higher rate than nuclear DNA [80,81]. Hence, it was often said that “mitochondria evolve quickly” [80]. The sizes of the mtDNAs are quite different between human and Saccharomyces yeast (ca. 16 kbp in human [82] and 75-85 kbp in S. cerevisiae [83]). The yeast mtDNA encodes additional genes, but these are mostly non-essential for respiration functions, such as selfish genes, introns and intron-encoded proteins required for mRNA maturation and homing. A comparison of the compositions and amino acid-sequences of the proteins encoded on the mtDNA between S. cerevisiae and human reveals relative evolutional conservation, rather than differences (Table 1) [84], except that the yeast lacks NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (Complex I). Complex I is replaced by cytosolic NADH dehydrogenase in the yeast, while other fungi, including Neurospora crassa, and prokaryotes have Complex I [85]. Although the respiratory chain and ATP synthase complexes consist of a number of subunits and proteins, six of them are encoded by the mtDNA, and the rest are encoded by the nuclear genome in both human and yeast. The exceptions are only two genes, atp9 and var1, encoding a subunit of ATP synthase and a component of the 38S mitochondrial ribosomal subunit, respectively. In addition, the amino acid sequences of the proteins encoded on mtDNA are significantly conserved between yeast and human (Table 1).

Table
Table 1. Proteins encoded by the human and the yeast mitochondrial genomes.
Table 1. Proteins encoded by the human and the yeast mitochondrial genomes.
ProteinHuman Genes
(13 Genes)		Yeast
S. cerevisiae
Genes		% Identities,
[% Conservative Substitutions]
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 6MTND6 or ND6--
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5MTND5 or ND5--
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 4LMTND4L or ND4L--
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 4MTND4 or ND4--
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 3MTND3 or ND3--
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 2MTND2 or ND2--
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 1MTND1 or ND1--
Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IIIMTCO3
or COIII		cox 3
or oxi2		44%
[63%]
Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IIMTCO2
or COII		cox 2
or oxi1		44%
[65%]
Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IMTCO1
or COI		cox1
or oxi3		59%
[77%]
ATPase subunit 9atp9
or oli1		-
ATP synthase protein 8
(ATPase subunit 8)		MTATP8
or ATP8		atp8-
ATP synthase A chain (Protein 6)MTATP6
or ATP6		atp6
or oli2		35%
[55%]
Cytochrome bMTCYB or COB
or CYTB		cob
or cob-box		50%
[70%]
mitoribosomal polypeptidevar1-
ORFs with unknown functions, intron-encoded endo DNases & maturasesORF1, ORF5-ORF12, I-SceII etcSelfish genes

This evolutional conservation in the mitochondrial genome has been generally explained by the mitochondrial-nuclear interaction as the unit of selection [86]. It would be worth considering another, but not alternative, possibility that homoplasmy contributes to the conservation of the mitochondrial genome, since homoplasmy completely neutralizes homologous recombination. Mitochondria have a number of copies of mtDNA, which quickly acquire mutations. Without this neutralization system, in cooperation with spontaneous mutagenesis, homologous gene conversion would cause the rapid diversification of the genome sequence and the acquisition of new genes in mitochondria, as observed in the DT40 cells used in the ADLib system.

6. Sequence Homogenization in Mammals and Human

6.1. Homoplasmy in Human Mitochondria

The heteroplasmy of even neutral mitochondrial genetic markers segregates within a few generations into homoplasmy in mammals [87–89]. In the traditional theory of mammalian or human mtDNA replication, at the heavy chain replication origin, RNA is synthesized by the mitochondrial RNA polymerase for transcription, processed by an endonuclease, and then heavy chain synthesis is initiated at the 3′ end of the RNA, as a primer. The heavy chain synthesis continues to the light chain replication origin associated with D-loop formation (a different D-loop than that formed by homologous pairing in recombination), and then pauses. The light chain is synthesized along the D-loop, and then the entire mtDNA is replicated [90–92]. This traditional theory was challenged by the coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis mechanism [93–96]. Both theories explain how a circular mtDNA monomer replicates into two circular sister monomers. However, if each mtDNA copy is duplicated independently, followed by random 34 upon cell division, then the segregation of heteroplasmic parental calls, containing hundreds to thousands of mtDNA copies, into homoplasmic progeny is difficult to explain. Therefore, extensive reduction of the mtDNA copy number may occur at a critical step for the segregation (genetic bottleneck). The existence of this genetic bottleneck is under debate, and no gene function at the bottleneck step was found in mammals [4–7].

It was once believed that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) does not recombine in mammals, but recently various results supporting homologous mtDNA recombination in human and mammals have been published [97–99]. Although it was only shown in ρ− yeast, rolling circle replication followed by selective transmission of the replication products, concatemers, to the progeny is the sole mechanistic model with genetic and biochemical support.

6.2. Sequence Homogenization within Each Repeated DNA Sequence in Nuclear Genomes

In yeast mitochondria, the mtDNA can be regarded as tandem DNA repeats (i.e., concatemers) of mitochondrial genome units. The nuclear genome also has various tandem DNA repeats (repeated DNA sequences or repetitive elements), including rDNAs, LINEs, SINEs and satellite DNAs. As in mitochondrial DNA, it has been recognized that each of these repeated DNA sequences consists of a homogeneous sequence, and the homogenization of the sequences has been discussed, in terms of concerted evolution [100]. Unequal crossing-over and gene conversion have been considered as mechanisms for concerted evolution. A recent study of hybrid scallops revealed that the very rapid homogenization of rDNA sequences into the maternal genotype is likely to occur by biased mitotic gene conversion [101]. Eukaryotic cells generally contain extrachromosomal circular DNA with heterogeneous sizes, consisting of sequences of repeated chromosomal DNA sequences. The findings in human cells of circular multimers of rDNA and of structures corresponding to intermediates of rolling circle DNA replication suggest a mechanism for the concerted evolution or homogenization of tandem repeats [102]. Telomeres consist of repeated sequences, and in the absence of telomerase, the telomere is maintained by Rad52-dependent and Rad51-independent rolling circle replication in yeast [36]. Therefore, it would be interesting to consider the possibility that cells use rolling circle DNA replication as a mechanism to homogenize (or homoplasmy) repeated DNA sequences, in both the nuclei and mitochondria of various eukaryotes.

7. Conclusion

As observed in the immunoglobulin loci in DT40 cells, gene conversion among a DNA sequence family consisting of similar, but varying, sequences extensively diversifies the sequences and even efficiently generates genes for new functional proteins. Each cell has hundreds to thousands of copies of mtDNA, and thus mtDNA can be regarded as a DNA sequence family. MtDNA acquires mutations ten-times more rapidly than nuclear DNA, and is subjected to homologous gene conversion (gene conversion is observed in yeast mitochondria, and evidence is accumulating for recombination in mammalian mtDNA). Thus, it could be speculated that mitochondria have a heterogeneous mtDNA population and that the mitochondrial genome evolved much more quickly than the nuclear genome. However, the heterogeneous mtDNA population (heteroplasmy) segregates within several cell division cycles in yeast, or a few sexual generations in mammals, into a single genotype within a cell, in a phenomenon called homoplasmy, and the mitochondrial genome is significantly conserved between yeast and human.

The following results were obtained in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae ρ− cells: (1) The major form of mtDNA is concatemers, but growing buds predominantly have monomeric circular mtDNA; (2) rolling circle DNA replication is the major pathway to produce concatemers, which are selectively transmitted to daughter cells; (3) as in gene conversion and crossing-over, rolling circle mtDNA replication is initiated by a double-stranded break and follows homologous pairing (D-loop formation) by Mhr1; (4) a double-stranded break to initiate rolling circle replication is introduced at a replication origin, ori5, by Ntg1; and (5) the mtDNA copy number is very likely to be controlled by Ntg1-mediated double stranded breakage, according to the amounts of ROS (reactive oxygen species), which act as signaling mediators.

These mechanisms readily explain the observed quick segregation of heteroplasmic ρ+ cells to generate homoplasmic ρ+ cells within several cell-division cycles and the responses of ρ+ mitochondria to oxidative stress. Biochemical and genetic data support the functions of these mechanisms in ρ+ yeast cells. Critical support for this mechanism in mammals awaits the finding of a mammalian homologue of Mhr1.

A possible factor for the selection between simple gene conversion (with or without crossing-over) and recombination-dependent DNA replication (rolling circle replication and double-stranded break induced DNA replication), as a consequence of double-stranded cleavage and the subsequent homologous pairing (D-loop formation), is the 3D structures of the proteins that catalyze D-loop formation. RecA-family proteins prefer gene conversion, and ATP-independent homologous pairing proteins select recombination-dependent DNA replication along with gene conversion. These classes of proteins differ in terms of their modes of polymerization along DNA substrates and products.

Finally, rolling circle DNA replication may be a general mechanism for sequence homogenization (homoplasmy) of multiple DNA copy systems and tandem DNA repeats, in both the mitochondria and nuclei of various eukaryotic cells.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), a grant for CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) from JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency), and a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

References

  1. Linnane, A.W.; Marzuki, S.; Ozawa, T.; Tanaka, M. Mitochondrial DNA mutations as an important contributor to ageing and degenerative diseases. Lancet 1989, 333, 642–645. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ozawa, T. Genetic and functional changes in mitochondria associated with aging. Physiol. Rev. 1997, 77, 425–464. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shoubridge, E.A.; Wai, T. Mitochondrial DNA and the mammalian oocyte. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2007, 77, 87–111. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cao, L.; Shitara, H.; Horii, T.; Nagao, Y.; Imai, H.; Abe, K.; Hara, T.; Hayashi, J.I.; Yonekawa, H. The mitochondrial bottleneck occurs without reduction of mtDNA content in female mouse germ cells. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 386–390. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cree, L.M.; Samuels, D.C.; de Sousa Lopes, S.C.; Rajasimha, H.K.; Wonnapinij, P.; Mann, J.R.; Dahl, H.H.; Chinnery, P.F. A reduction of mitochondrial DNA molecules during embryogenesis explains the rapid segregation of genotypes. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 249–254. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khrapko, K. Two ways to make an mtDNA bottleneck. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 134–135. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wai, T.; Teoli, D.; Shoubridge, E.A. The mitochondrial DNA genetic bottleneck results from replication of a subpopulation of genomes. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1484–1488. [Google Scholar]
  8. Goto, Y.; Nonaka, I.; Horai, S. A mutation in the tRNA(Leu)(UUR) gene associated with the MELAS subgroup of mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. Nature 1990, 348, 651–653. [Google Scholar]
  9. van den Ouweland, J.M.; Lemkes, H.H.; Ruitenbeek, W.; Sandkuijl, L.A.; de Vijlder, M.F.; Struyvenberg, P.A.; van de Kamp, J.J.; Maassen, J.A. Mutation in mitochondrial tRNA(Leu)(UUR) gene in a large pedigree with maternally transmitted type II diabetes mellitus and deafness. Nat. Genet. 1992, 1, 368–371. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dujon, B. Mitochondrial genetics and function. In The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Life Cycle and Inheritance; Strathern, J.N., Jones, E.W., Broach, J.R., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 505–635. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ling, F.; Makishima, F.; Morishima, N.; Shibata, T. A nuclear mutation defective in mitochondrial recombination in yeast. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 4090–4101. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ling, F.; Shibata, T. Recombination-dependent mtDNA partitioning. In vivo role of Mhr1p to promote pairing of homologous DNA. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 4730–4740. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ling, F.; Shibata, T. Mhr1p-dependent concatemeric mitochondrial DNA formation for generating yeast mitochondrial homoplasmic cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 310–322. [Google Scholar]
  14. Szostak, J.W.; Orr-Weaver, T.L.; Rothstein, R.J.; Stahl, F.W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 1983, 33, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shibata, T.; DasGupta, C.; Cunningham, R.P.; Radding, C.M. Purified Escherichia coli recA protein catalyzes homologous pairing of superhelical DNA and single-stranded fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 1638–1642. [Google Scholar]
  16. McEntee, K.; Weinstock, G.M.; Lehman, I.R. Initiation of general recombination catalyzed in vitro by the recA protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 2615–2619. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bishop, D.K.; Park, D.; Xu, L.Z.; Kleckner, N. Dmc1: A meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 1992, 69, 439–456. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shinohara, A.; Ogawa, H.; Ogawa, T. RAD51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a recA-like protein. Cell 1992, 69, 457–470. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sung, P. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 1994, 265, 1241–1243. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sung, P. Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 28194–28197. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bzymek, M.; Thayer, N.H.; Oh, S.D.; Kleckner, N.; Hunter, N. Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair. Nature 2010, 464, 937–941. [Google Scholar]
  22. Holliday, R. A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genetic Res., Camb. 1964, 5, 282–304. [Google Scholar]
  23. Allers, T.; Lichten, M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 2001, 106, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sherman, S.L.; Petersen, M.B.; Freeman, S.B.; Hersey, J.; Pettay, D.; Taft, L.; Frantzen, M.; Mikkelsen, M.; Hassold, T.J. Non-disjunction of chromosome 21 in maternal meiosis I: evidence for a maternal age-dependent mechanism involving reduced recombination. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1994, 3, 1529–1535. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reynaud, C.-A.; Anquez, V.; Dahan, A.; Weill, J.-C. A single rearrangement event generates most of the chicken immunoglobulin light chain diversity. Cell 1985, 40, 283–291. [Google Scholar]
  26. Buerstedde, J.M.; Reynaud, C.A.; Humphries, E.H.; Olson, W.; Ewert, D.L.; Weill, J.C. Light chain gene conversion continues at high rate in an ALV-induced cell line. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 921–927. [Google Scholar]
  27. Maizels, N. Diversity achieved by diverse mechanisms: Gene conversion in developing B cells of the chicken. Cell 1987, 48, 359–360. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reynaud, C.-A.; Anquez, V.; Grimal, H.; Weill, J.-C. A hyperconversion mechanism generates the chicken light chain preimmune repertoire. Cell 1987, 48, 379–388. [Google Scholar]
  29. Seo, H.; Masuoka, M.; Murofushi, H.; Takeda, S.; Shibata, T.; Ohta, K. Rapid generation of specific antibodies by enhanced homologous recombination. Nature Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 731–735. [Google Scholar]
  30. Stemmer, W.P.C. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 1994, 370, 389–391. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mosig, G. Recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in bacteriophage T4. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1998, 32, 379–413. [Google Scholar]
  32. Asai, T.; Bates, D.B.; Kogoma, T. DNA replication triggered by double-stranded breaks in E. coli: Dependence on homologous recombination functions. Cell 1994, 78, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kogoma, T. Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1997, 61, 212–238. [Google Scholar]
  34. Malkova, A.; Ivanov, E.L.; Haber, J.E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: A possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 7131–7136. [Google Scholar]
  35. Llorente, B.; Smith, C.E.; Symington, L.S. Break-induced replication: What is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 859–864. [Google Scholar]
  36. McEachern, M.J.; Haber, J.E. Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75, 111–135. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kuzminov, A. Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 16, 373–384. [Google Scholar]
  38. Watabe, H.; Iino, T.; Kaneko, T.; Shibata, T.; Ando, T. A new class of site-specific endo-deoxyribonucleases: Endo.SceI isolated from a eukaryote, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 4663–4665. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nakagawa, K.; Morishima, N.; Shibata, T. An endonuclease with multiple cutting sites, Endo.SceI, initiates genetic recombination at its cutting site in yeast mitochondria. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 2707–2715. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dujon, B. Group I introns as mobile genetic elements: Facts and mechanistic speculations—a review. Gene 1989, 82, 91–114. [Google Scholar]
  41. Monteilhet, C.; Perrin, A.; Thierry, A.; Colleaux, L.; Dujon, B. Purification and characterization of the in vitro activity of I-Sce I, a novel and highly specific endonuclease encoded by a group I intron. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 1407–1413. [Google Scholar]
  42. Morishima, N.; Nakagawa, K.; Yamamoto, E.; Shibata, T. A subunit of yeast site-specific endonuclease SceI is a mitochondrial version of the 70-kDa heat shock protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 15189–15197. [Google Scholar]
  43. Dujon, B.; Belfort, M.; Butow, R.A.; Jacq, C.; Lemieux, C.; Perlman, P.S.; Vogt, V.M. Mobile introns: Definition of terms and recommended nomenclature. Gene 1989, 82, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ling, F.; Morioka, H.; Ohtsuka, E.; Shibata, T. A role for MHR1, a gene required for mitochondrial genetic recombination, in the repair of damage spontaneously introduced in yeast mtDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 4956–4963. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ling, F.; Hori, A.; Shibata, T. DNA recombination-initiation plays a role in the extremely biased inheritance of yeast rho-minus mitochondrial DNA that contains the replication origin, ori5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lahaye, A.; Stahl, H.; Thines-Sempoux, D.; Foury, F. PIF1: A DNA helicase in yeast mitochondria. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 997–1007. [Google Scholar]
  47. Foury, F.; Kolodynski, J. pif mutation blocks recombination between mitochondrial ρ+ and ρ− genomes having tandemly arrayed repeat units in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 5345–5349. [Google Scholar]
  48. Foury, F.; Van Dyck, E. A PIF-dependent recombinogenic signal in the mitochondrial DNA of yeast. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 3525–3530. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schulz, V.P.; Zakian, V.A. The Saccharomyces PIF1 DNA helicase inhibits telomere elongation and de novo telomere formation. Cell 1994, 76, 145–155. [Google Scholar]
  50. Piazza, A.; Boule, J.B.; Lopes, J.; Mingo, K.; Largy, E.; Teulade-Fichou, M.P.; Nicolas, A. Genetic instability triggered by G-quadruplex interacting Phen-DC compounds in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 4337–4348. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kleff, S.; Kemper, B.; Sternberg, R. Identification and characterization of yeast mutants and the gene for a cruciform cutting endonuclease. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 699–704. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lockshon, D.; Zweifel, S.G.; Freeman-Cook, L.L.; Lorimer, H.E.; Brewer, B.J.; Fangman, W.L. A role for recombination junctions in the segregation of mitochondrial DNA in yeast. Cell 1995, 81, 947–955. [Google Scholar]
  53. Enquist, L.W.; Skalka, A. Replication of bacteriophage lambda DNA dependent on the function of host and viral genes. I. Interaction of red, gam and rec. J. Mol. Biol. 1973, 75, 185–212. [Google Scholar]
  54. Catalano, C.E. The terminase enzyme from bacteriophage lambda: A DNA-packaging machine. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2000, 57, 128–148. [Google Scholar]
  55. de Zamaroczy, M.; Marotta, R.; Faugeron-Fonty, G.; Goursot, R.; Mangin, M.; Baldacci, G.; Bernardi, G. The origins of replication of the yeast mitochondrial genome and the phenomenon of suppressivity. Nature 1981, 292, 75–78. [Google Scholar]
  56. Baldacci, G.; Bernardi, G. Replication origins are associated with transcription initiation sequences in the mitochondrial genome of yeast. EMBO J. 1982, 1, 987–994. [Google Scholar]
  57. Blanc, H.; Dujon, B. Replicator regions of the yeast mitochondrial DNA responsible for suppressiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 3942–3946. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lorimer, H.E.; Brewer, B.J.; Fangman, W.L. A test of the transcription model for biased inheritance of yeast mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 4803–4809. [Google Scholar]
  59. Eide, L.; Bjoras, M.; Pirovano, M.; Alseth, I.; Berdal, K.G.; Seeberg, E. Base excision of oxidative purine and pyrimidine DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a DNA glycosylase with sequence similarity to endonuclease III from Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 10735–10740. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lee, H.C.; Wei, Y.H. Mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA maintenance of mammalian cells under oxidative stress. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 822–834. [Google Scholar]
  61. Clay Montier, L.L.; Deng, J.J.; Bai, Y. Number matters: control of mammalian mitochondrial DNA copy number. J. Genet. Genomics 2009, 36, 125–131. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hori, A.; Yoshida, M.; Shibata, T.; Ling, F. Reactive oxygen species regulate DNA copy number in isolated yeast mitochondria by triggering recombination-mediated replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 749–761. [Google Scholar]
  63. Turcotte, B.; Liang, X.B.; Robert, F.; Soontorngun, N. Transcriptional regulation of nonfermentable carbon utilization in budding yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010, 10, 2–13. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tretter, L.; Adam-Vizi, V. Alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase: A target and generator of oxidative stress. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 2005, 360, 2335–2345. [Google Scholar]
  65. Maleszka, R.; Skelly, P.J.; Clark-Walker, G.D. Rolling circle replication of DNA in yeast mitochondria. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 3923–3929. [Google Scholar]
  66. Backert, S.; Dorfel, P.; Lurz, R.; Borner, T. Rolling-circle replication of mitochondrial DNA in the higher plant Chenopodium album (L.). Mol. Cell Biol. 1996, 16, 6285–6294. [Google Scholar]
  67. Bendich, A.J. Structural analysis of mitochondrial DNA molecules from fungi and plants using moving pictures and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 255, 564–588. [Google Scholar]
  68. O'Rourke, T.W.; Doudican, N.A.; Mackereth, M.D.; Doetsch, P.W.; Shadel, G.S. Mitochondrial dysfunction due to oxidative mitochondrial DNA damage is reduced through cooperative actions of diverse proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 22, 4086–4093. [Google Scholar]
  69. Rybalchenko, N.; Golub, E.I.; Bi, B.; Radding, C.M. Strand invasion promoted by recombination protein beta of coliphage lambda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17056–17060. [Google Scholar]
  70. Noirot, P.; Kolodner, R.D. DNA strand invasion promoted by Escherichia coli RecT protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 12274–12280. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kurumizaka, H.; Aihara, H.; Kagawa, W.; Shibata, T.; Yokoyama, S. Human Rad51 amino acid residues required for Rad52 binding. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 291, 537–548. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kagawa, W.; Kurumizaka, H.; Ikawa, S.; Yokoyama, S.; Shibata, T. Homologous pairing promoted by the human Rad52 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 35201–35208. [Google Scholar]
  73. Mazloum, N.; Zhou, Q.; Holloman, W.K. D-loop formation by Brh2 protein of Ustilago maydis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 524–529. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kurumizaka, H.; Ikawa, S.; Nakada, M.; Eda, K.; Kagawa, W.; Takata, M.; Takeda, S.; Yokoyama, S.; Shibata, T. Homologous-pairing activity of the human DNA-repair proteins Xrcc3.Rad51C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 5538–5543. [Google Scholar]
  75. Masuda, T.; Ito, Y.; Terada, T.; Shibata, T.; Mikawa, T. A non-canonical DNA structure enables homologous recombination in various genetic systems. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 30230–30239. [Google Scholar]
  76. Aguilera, A. Double-strand break repair: are Rad51/RecA—DNA joints barriers to DNA replication? Trends Genet. 2001, 17, 318–321. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ohtani, T.; Shibata, T.; Iwabuchi, M.; Watabe, H.; Iino, T.; Ando, T. ATP-dependent unwinding of double helix in closed circular DNA by recA protein of E. coli. Nature 1982, 299, 86–89. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kagawa, W.; Kurumizaka, H.; Ishitani, R.; Fukai, S.; Nureki, O.; Shibata, T.; Yokoyama, S. Crystal structure of the homologous-pairing domain from the human Rad52 recombinase in the undecameric form. Mol. Cell 2002, 10, 359–371. [Google Scholar]
  79. Kagawa, W.; Kagawa, A.; Saito, K.; Ikawa, S.; Shibata, T.; Kurumizaka, H.; Yokoyama, S. Identification of a second DNA binding site in the human Rad52 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 24264–24273. [Google Scholar]
  80. Brown, W.M.; George, M., Jr.; Wilson, A.C. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 1967–1971. [Google Scholar]
  81. Richter, C.; Park, J.-W.; Ames, B.N. Normal oxidative damage to mitochondrial and nuclear DNA is extensive. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 6465–6467. [Google Scholar]
  82. Anderson, S.; Bankier, A.T.; Barrell, B.G.; de Bruijn, M.H.; Coulson, A.R.; Drouin, J.; Eperon, I.C.; Nierlich, D.P.; Roe, B.A.; Sanger, F.; Schreier, P.H.; Smith, A.J.; Staden, R.; Young, I.G. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature 1981, 290, 457–465. [Google Scholar]
  83. Foury, F.; Roganti, T.; Lecrenier, N.; Purnelle, B. The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1998, 440, 325–331. [Google Scholar]
  84. Tzagoloff, A.; Myers, A.M. Genetics of mitochondrial biogenesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1986, 55, 249–285. [Google Scholar]
  85. de Vries, S.; Marres, C.A. The mitochondrial respiratory chain of yeast. Structure and biosynthesis and the role in cellular metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1987, 895, 205–239. [Google Scholar]
  86. Dowling, D.K.; Friberg, U.; Lindell, J. Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 546–554. [Google Scholar]
  87. Laipis, P.J.; Van de Walle, M.J.; Hauswirth, W.W. Unequal partitioning of bovine mitochondrial genotypes among siblings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 8107–8110. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ashley, M.V.; Laipis, P.J.; Hauswirth, W.W. Rapid segregation of heteroplasmic bovine mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 7325–7331. [Google Scholar]
  89. Koehler, C.M.; Lindberg, G.L.; Brown, D.R.; Beitz, D.C.; Freeman, A.E.; Mayfield, J.E.; Myers, A.M. Replacement of bovine mitochondrial DNA by a sequence variant within one generation. Genetics 1991, 129, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  90. Clayton, D.A. Mitochondrial DNA replication: What we know. IUBMB Life 2003, 55, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  91. Bogenhagen, D.F.; Clayton, D.A. The mitochondrial DNA replication bubble has not burst. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28, 357–360. [Google Scholar]
  92. Brown, T.A.; Cecconi, C.; Tkachuk, A.N.; Bustamante, C.; Clayton, D.A. Replication of mitochondrial DNA occurs by strand displacement with alternative light-strand origins, not via a strand-coupled mechanism. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 2466–2476. [Google Scholar]
  93. Holt, I.J.; Lorimer, H.E.; Jacobs, H.T. Coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Cell 2000, 100, 515–524. [Google Scholar]
  94. Yang, M.Y.; Bowmaker, M.; Reyes, A.; Vergani, L.; Angeli, P.; Gringeri, E.; Jacobs, H.T.; Holt, I.J. Biased incorporation of ribonucleotides on the mitochondrial L-strand accounts for apparent strand-asymmetric DNA replication. Cell 2002, 111, 495–505. [Google Scholar]
  95. Yasukawa, T.; Reyes, A.; Cluett, T.J.; Yang, M.Y.; Bowmaker, M.; Jacobs, H.T.; Holt, I.J. Replication of vertebrate mitochondrial DNA entails transient ribonucleotide incorporation throughout the lagging strand. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 5358–5371. [Google Scholar]
  96. Pohjoismaki, J.L.; Holmes, J.B.; Wood, S.R.; Yang, M.Y.; Yasukawa, T.; Reyes, A.; Bailey, L.J.; Cluett, T.J.; Goffart, S.; Willcox, S.; Rigby, R.E.; Jackson, A.P.; Spelbrink, J.N.; Griffith, J.D.; Crouch, R.J.; Jacobs, H.T.; Holt, I.J. Mammalian mitochondrial DNA replication intermediates are essentially duplex but contain extensive tracts of RNA/DNA hybrid. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 397, 1144–1155. [Google Scholar]
  97. Kraytsberg, Y.; Schwartz, M.; Brown, T.A.; Ebralidse, K.; Kunz, W.S.; Clayton, D.A.; Vissing, J.; Khrapko, K. Recombination of human mitochondrial DNA. Science 2004, 304, 981. [Google Scholar]
  98. Zsurka, G.; Kraytsberg, Y.; Kudina, T.; Kornblum, C.; Elger, C.E.; Khrapko, K.; Kunz, W.S. Recombination of mitochondrial DNA in skeletal muscle of individuals with multiple mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 873–877. [Google Scholar]
  99. Pohjoismaki, J.L.; Goffart, S.; Tyynismaa, H.; Willcox, S.; Ide, T.; Kang, D.; Suomalainen, A.; Karhunen, P.J.; Griffith, J.D.; Holt, I.J.; Jacobs, H.T. Human heart mitochondrial DNA is organized in complex catenated networks containing abundant four-way junctions and replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21446–21457. [Google Scholar]
  100. Elder, J.F., Jr.; Turner, B.J. Concerted evolution of repetitive DNA sequences in eukaryotes. Q. Rev. Biol. 1995, 70, 297–320. [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Hu, J.; Bao, Z.; Liu, Z. Molecular and cellular evidence for biased mitotic gene conversion in hybrid scallop. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 6. [Google Scholar]
  102. Cohen, S.; Agmon, N.; Sobol, O.; Segal, D. Extrachromosomal circles of satellite repeats and 5S ribosomal DNA in human cells. Mob. DNA 2010, 1, 11. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ling, F.; Mikawa, T.; Shibata, T. Enlightenment of Yeast Mitochondrial Homoplasmy: Diversified Roles of Gene Conversion. Genes 2011, 2, 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010169

AMA Style

Ling F, Mikawa T, Shibata T. Enlightenment of Yeast Mitochondrial Homoplasmy: Diversified Roles of Gene Conversion. Genes. 2011; 2(1):169-190. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ling, Feng, Tsutomu Mikawa, and Takehiko Shibata. 2011. "Enlightenment of Yeast Mitochondrial Homoplasmy: Diversified Roles of Gene Conversion" Genes 2, no. 1: 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010169

APA Style

Ling, F., Mikawa, T., & Shibata, T. (2011). Enlightenment of Yeast Mitochondrial Homoplasmy: Diversified Roles of Gene Conversion. Genes, 2(1), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010169

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop