Next Article in Journal
DNA Aptamers for the Functionalisation of DNA Origami Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
NeVOmics: An Enrichment Tool for Gene Ontology and Functional Network Analysis and Visualization of Data from OMICs Technologies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/genes9120570
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

UrdA Controls Secondary Metabolite Production and the Balance between Asexual and Sexual Development in Aspergillus nidulans

by
Sandesh S. Pandit
1,
Jessica M. Lohmar
1,
Shawana Ahmed
1,
Oier Etxebeste
2,
Eduardo A. Espeso
3 and
Ana M. Calvo
1,*
1
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, 155 Castle Dr., Dekalb, IL 60115, USA
2
Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Manuel de Lardizabal, 3, 20018 San Sebastian, Spain
3
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (C.S.I.C.), Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(12), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9120570
Submission received: 19 October 2018 / Revised: 15 November 2018 / Accepted: 19 November 2018 / Published: 23 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genus Aspergillus includes important plant pathogens, opportunistic human pathogens and mycotoxigenic fungi. In these organisms, secondary metabolism and morphogenesis are subject to a complex genetic regulation. Here we functionally characterized urdA, a gene encoding a putative helix-loop-helix (HLH)-type regulator in the model fungus Aspergillus nidulans. urdA governs asexual and sexual development in strains with a wild-type veA background; absence of urdA resulted in severe morphological alterations, with a significant reduction of conidial production and an increase in cleistothecial formation, even in the presence of light, a repressor of sex. The positive effect of urdA on conidiation is mediated by the central developmental pathway (CDP). However, brlA overexpression was not sufficient to restore wild-type conidiation in the ΔurdA strain. Heterologous complementation of ΔurdA with the putative Aspergillus flavus urdA homolog also failed to rescue conidiation wild-type levels, indicating that both genes perform different functions, probably reflected by key sequence divergence. UrdA also represses sterigmatocystin (ST) toxin production in the presence of light by affecting the expression of aflR, the activator of the ST gene cluster. Furthermore, UrdA regulates the production of several unknown secondary metabolites, revealing a broader regulatory scope. Interestingly, UrdA affects the abundance and distribution of the VeA protein in hyphae, and our genetics studies indicated that veA appears epistatic to urdA regarding ST production. However, the distinct fluffy phenotype of the ΔurdAΔveA double mutant suggests that both regulators conduct independent developmental roles. Overall, these results suggest that UrdA plays a pivotal role in the coordination of development and secondary metabolism in A. nidulans.

1. Introduction

Numerous fungal species synthesize a variety of natural products, also called secondary metabolites, which are not necessary for the organism to survive but can confer an ecological advantage [1,2,3]. Many fungal secondary metabolites produced are bioactive and have beneficial properties, whereas others are detrimental to plants, animals and human health. Among these harmful compounds are mycotoxins. Some of these mycotoxins are mutagenic, teratogenic and carcinogenic [4,5]. Aspergillus nidulans, a filamentous fungus that has been used as a model organism for more than 60 years [6], is capable of producing a mycotoxin known as sterigmatocystin (ST). Sterigmatocystin is similar to a highly carcinogenic compound known as aflatoxins (AF) [7,8,9,10]. Aflatoxins are produced by species phylogenetically related to A. nidulans such as Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, and Aspergillus nomius. Both, ST and AF, are synthesized through a conserved metabolic pathway, where ST is the penultimate precursor of AF [11]. The genes involved in the production of ST and AF are clustered. The structural genes in these clusters are controlled by an endogenous regulatory gene called aflR, which encodes a transcription factor containing a binuclear zinc cluster domain [12,13,14,15]. Aspergillus nidulans also synthesizes other secondary metabolites, such as the beta-lactam antibiotic penicillin (PN) and the anti-tumoral secondary metabolite terrequinone A [16,17].
The genetic control of secondary metabolism and morphological development are connected [18,19]. Aspergillus nidulans develops sexually by producing fruiting bodies called cleistothecia where ascospores are formed. In addition, air-borne asexual spores are formed on specialized structures called conidiophores. Several genes involved in the regulation of asexual development have been identified and extensively characterized in A. nidulans [20,21,22,23]. Different exogenous and endogenous stimuli induce the expression of signaling genes, resulting in the modification of vegetative hyphae into asexual reproductive structures [24]. The genes involved in conidiophore formation are split into the upstream developmental activators (UDA) flbA-E and the central developmental pathway (CDP). The CDP consists of three genes known as brlA, abaA and wetA. They regulate the spatiotemporal expression of different genes involved in the formation of the conidiophore cell-types [20,23,25]. Absence or inactivation of brlA, the first gene in the CDP pathway, leads to aconidial colonies [26].
Etxebeste et al. [21] showed the importance of a transcription factor known as FlbB in the control of brlA expression. FlbB is detected at the tip of hyphae. Mutations in flbB, as well as other genes in the UDA signaling pathway, result in fluffy colonies (aconidial colonies with abundant aerial mycelium) [21,25]. flbB is not only required to induce asexual development but also to repress sexual development. Transcriptome analysis of the flbB deletion mutant revealed that the gene AN4394, called urdA, is positively regulated by flbB [27]. Oiartzabal-Arano et al. showed that disruption of urdA in A. nidulans reduces conidiation and the expression of brlA, while cleistothecial development was prematurely induced [27]. The same study showed that urdA deletion also resulted in an upregulation of two secondary metabolite genes of the dba gene cluster (AN7895/cipB and AN7898/dbaD), which is required for the synthesis of the antibiotic 2,4-dihydroxy-3-methyl-6-(2-oxopropyl) benzaldehyde or DHMBA [28].
Another well-known genetic link between morphogenesis and synthesis of natural products is VeA. This global regulator forms the VeA/VelB/LaeA heterotrimeric complex in A. nidulans and many other fungi [19]. In addition, VeA also interacts with light sensing proteins FphA and LreA-LreB [29]. The VeA protein is transported in a light-dependent manner to the nucleus by the α-importin KapA, which binds to the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of VeA [30,31] after the formation of a dimeric complex with VelB [32]. Inside the nucleus, VeA forms the heterotrimeric complex with VelB and LaeA, regulating secondary metabolite production and fungal development [19,33]. In light, cytoplasmic FphA negatively affects the transit of VeA to nuclei [29].
The role of UrdA in the control of development and secondary metabolism has only been initially characterized in the veA1 mutant background. The veA1 allele bears a mutation within the NLS of VeA, affecting the efficiency of translocation to the nucleus in the absence of light. This results in strains that conidiate in the absence of light. The goal of the current study is to characterize the role of UrdA in a wild-type veA background (veA+) in A. nidulans, particularly the investigation of its effects on asexual and sexual development as well as its possible role in the regulation of ST toxin production, PN biosynthesis and production of other secondary metabolites. Furthermore, we assessed whether urdA influences the abundance and subcellular localization of VeA, as well as the epistatic relationships between urdA and veA. We also evaluated its uniqueness or possible functional conservation with other fungal homologs by heterologously complementing the urdA deletion in A. nidulans with the homologous gene from the AF-producer and agriculturally important fungus A. flavus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sequence Search, Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses

The deduced amino acid sequence of A. nidulans urdA (ANID_04394) was obtained from the Aspergillus Genome Database (Date accessed: 15 October 2017 [34]. The BLASTp search tool [35] was used to obtain putative orthologous sequences, the corresponding score and expected (e) values, sequence similarities and identities. Amino acid sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega [36] and alignments were visualized using Genedoc software. The phylogenetic tree was generated using Mega (version 4.0) and the Neighbor-joining method with a bootstrap value of 5000 [37]. Finally, UrdA orthologs of those Aspergillus species located in the same branch of the phylogenetic tree were again aligned for domain analysis.

2.2. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions

The A. nidulans strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. All the selected strains used for the characterization of urdA bear a veA wild-type allele. Strains were cultured on glucose minimal medium (GMM) [38], supplemented with the nutrients associated with the corresponding auxotrophic markers unless otherwise stated. For solid medium, agar (15 g/L) was added. Threonine minimal medium (TMM) [39], where threonine replaced glucose as the carbon source, was used to induce the alcA promoter. The strains were stored as 30% glycerol stocks at −80 °C. The experiments were carried out using three replicates.

2.3. Generation of the urdA Deletion Strain (∆urdA)

The A. nidulans ∆urdA strain (TSSP1.1) was generated by transforming a 4.9 kb fusion PCR cassette constructed as previously described [40]. Specifically, first, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of urdA were PCR amplified from A. nidulans FGSC4 genomic DNA with primers urdA-P1 and urdA-P2 (all primers are listed in Table S2), and primers urdA-P3 and urdA-P4 respectively. The pyrG marker gene from A. fumigatus was PCR amplified from plasmid pFNO3 [30,41] using primers urdA-P5-pyrG and urdA-P6-pyrG. The 5′ UTR, 3′ UTR and pyrG fragments were fused using primers urdA-P7 and urdA-P8. Protoplasts of the host strain RJMP1.49 were transformed with the fusion-PCR cassette as previously described [40]. Transformants were confirmed by diagnostic PCR.
Additionally, primers Anidpyro_5UTR_F and Anidpyro_3UTR_R were used to PCR amplify a 3.6 kb DNA fragment containing the A. nidulans pyroA locus. The fragment was then transformed into the selected deletion transformant, TSSP1.1, to generate a prototroph, TSSP25.1.

2.4. Generation of the Aspergillus nidulans urdA Complementation Strain

A complementation strain, TSSP27.1, was obtained by transforming the ∆urdA strain with the A. nidulans urdA wild-type allele. The complementation vector was designed as follows: A DNA fragment containing the entire urdA coding region plus 1.5 kb of 5′ and 1.6 kb of the 3′ UTRs was PCR amplified with primers ANurdA-comF-NotI and ANurdA-comR-SpeI using genomic DNA of a FGSC4 strain as template. The PCR product was digested with NotI and SpeI and ligated into pSM3, previously digested with the same restriction enzymes. The pSM3 vector contains pyroA as transformation marker. The resulting plasmid was denominated as pSSP8.1. Protoplasts of strain TSSP1.1 were then transformed with an aliquot (1 µg) of this vector. Transformants were selected on appropriate selection medium lacking pyridoxine HCl. Complementation was confirmed by a diagnostic PCR.

2.5. Heterologous Complementation

Aspergillus nidulans urdA shows 48% of identity at protein level with its putative ortholog in A. flavus. The entire coding region of A. flavus urdA (AFLA_113110), plus 1 kb 5′ UTR and 0.9 kb 3′ UTR was PCR amplified using primers AflurdA-comF-NotI and AflurdA-comR-SpeI and genomic DNA of an A. flavus CA14 strain as a template. The DNA fragment was digested with NotI and SpeI and cloned into pSM3 previously digested with same enzymes. Protoplasts of strain TSSP1.1 were transformed with the resulting complementation vector, pSSP9.1. Complementation was confirmed by PCR using the same primers. The strain was named TSSP28.1.

2.6. Morphological Studies

To evaluate the effect of urdA on A. nidulans development, the wild-type, ∆urdA and urdA-com strains were point-inoculated on solid GMM and incubated at 37 °C under continuous light and dark conditions for 7 days. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Micrographs were obtained using a Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Ethanol (70%) was sprayed on plates to improve visualization of cleistothecia prior to capturing micrographs. An additional experiment was performed to assess conidial and cleistothecial production. Approximately 5 × 106 spores of wild-type, ∆urdA and urdA-com were top-agar inoculated onto 25 mL of solid GMM. After 36 h and 48 h of incubation, cores were collected for quantification of conidia (7 mm core diameter) and cleistothecia (16 mm core diameter). Cores for conidial counts were homogenized in water and spores were counted using a Hemocytometer (Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA, USA) under a Nikon Eclipse E-400 microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA).

2.7. Overexpression of brlA in a ∆urdA Background

The brlA overexpression plasmid pSSP6.1 [42] containing an inducible alcA promoter, brlA coding region and gpdA terminator was transformed into TSSP1.1 and TRV50 strains; the transformants were designated as TSSP26.1 and TSSP23.1 respectively. Transformants were screened by diagnostic PCR using primers AN_alcA(P)_F & ANbrlA_R., to confirm the presence of the brlA overexpression cassette.
For overexpression analysis using the alcA promoter, approximately 106/mL spores of wild-type, ∆urdA, OEbrlA and OEbrlA-∆urdA were inoculated in 500 mL liquid GMM. The cultures were incubated for 16 h at 250 rpm and 37 °C. Mycelia were then collected and equal amounts (2 g) of biomass were rinsed with liquid TMM and shifted onto solid TMM to induce alcA(p). The TMM cultures were further incubated for 12 days after the shift.

2.8. Toxin Analysis

The wild-type and ∆urdA strains were top-agar inoculated onto 25 mL of solid GMM with 5 × 106 spores/mL. The cultures were incubated for 36 h and 48 h. Three 16-mm diameter cores per plate were collected and extracted with chloroform for each replicate. The overnight dried extracts were resuspended in 200 µL chloroform. Twenty microliters of each sample were separated using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) as previously described [43] and analyzed for ST on silica gel plates using benzene and glacial acetic acid [95:5(v/v)] as solvent system. Aluminum chloride (15% in ethanol) was then sprayed and the plates were baked for 10 min at 80 °C. ST bands were visualized under UV light (375 nm). The ST standard was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.9. Penicillin Analysis

Bacillus calidolactis strain C953 was used as a test organism to perform a penicillin bioassay as previously described [44] with some modifications. Fungal spores (106/mL) were inoculated in 25 mL seed culture medium and incubated at 26 °C for 24 h at 250 rpm. Mycelia were then transferred to PN-inducing medium [44]. Three replicates were used in this experiment. The cultures were filtered using Miracloth (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) and supernatants were collected for analysis.
Three hundred milliliters of Tryptone-Soy Agar was inoculated with 20 mL of B. calidolactis C953 culture and plated on 150-mm diameter Petri plates. Twenty microliters of culture supernatant were added to 7-mm diameter wells perforated on the Trypton-soy agar medium. Bacterial cultures were incubated at 55 °C for 16 h, and inhibition halos were measured. To evaluate whether the antibacterial activity was due to the presence of penicillin or to some other fungal compound present in the supernatant, commercial penicillinase from Bacillus cereus (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) controls were also included in this experiment.

2.10. Fluorescence Microscopy

A ∆urdA strain bearing the construct veA::gfp::pyrGA. fumigatus was generated as follows: primers AnidveA_P7 and ANVeASTagP4 (Table S2) were used to PCR amplify a 6.6 kb DNA fragment, containing a veA::gfp::pyrGA. fumigatus fragment from A. nidulans T-17 strain [30]. The PCR product was then transformed into A. nidulans TSSP7.1 and TSSP4.1 strains (Table S1). Selected transformants were confirmed by PCR using primers VeAFnest and Gfp-mid-R. The resultant transformants were designated as TSSP3.1 and TSSP6.1 respectively. Conidia from these two strains were allowed to germinate on coverslip surfaces immersed in Watch minimal medium [45] in the dark for 6 h and then shifted to light. Samples were washed with 1× PBS after 24 h and stained with DAPI (60 ng/mL) in 0.1% Triton X-100 and 50% glycerol. A Leica DMI-6000b inverted microscope containing Nomarski optics and fluorochromes from Semrock were used to observe for green fluorescent protein (GFP) (excitation, 470; emission, 525). Hamamatsu ORCA-ER (Hamamatsu, Skokie, IL, USA) was used to take micrograph images. The exposure time for DAPI and GFP was 40 ms and 700 ms respectively.

2.11. Construction of a Double ∆urdA∆veA Strain

To study the epistatic relation between veA and urdA, a double deletion mutant strain ∆urdA∆veA (TSSP13.1) was generated by transformation of A. nidulans ∆veA::pyroA (TXF3.1) protoplasts with a urdA deletion cassette containing the pyrG marker (generated as described above). The wild-type, ∆urdA, ∆veA and ∆urdA∆veA strains were point inoculated on GMM and incubated at 37 °C under continuous light and dark for 6 days. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Micrographs were obtained using Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera. Quantification of conidia and cleistothecia was carried out as described above. Sixteen millimeter cores were also collected to analyze ST production as described above.

2.12. Gene Expression Analysis

Mycelia were collected from top-agar inoculated cultures. Total RNA was extracted after lyophilizing the mycelia using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), following manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was used for gene expression analysis. RQ1 DNAse (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used to treat 5 µg of total RNA to remove possible DNA contamination. Approximately 1 µg of DNAse treated RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (Promega). Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed with SYBR green Jumpstart Taq Ready Mix (Sigma) using Mx3000p thermocycler (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Relative expression levels were normalized to the A. nidulans 18S rRNA Ct values following the 2−ΔΔCt method [46].

2.13. Statistical Analysis

All the quantitative data in this study were analyzed using ANOVA (analysis of variance) in combination with Tukey’s post hoc test using the R version 64 3.3.0 statistical software program. The significant difference among the quantitative data was recorded if the p-value was determined to be less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. UrdA Orthologs Are Found Exclusively in the Order Eurotiales

The information retrieved from aspgd.org (confirmed in fungidb.org) predicts that urdA (ANID_04394), located in chromosome III, encodes a 371 amino acid protein product that contains a putative helix-loop-helix (HLH) DNA binding domain (146D-246Q) which corresponds to the 2570–2737 nucleotide region. A BLAST analysis was carried out using the amino acid sequence of A. nidulans UrdA as the query. Putative orthologs of UrdA were found exclusively in species belonging to the order Eurotiales (within the class Eurotiomycetes), indicating a late emergence of this putative transcriptional regulator in evolution. Coverage and expected values of these putative orthologs are shown in Figure S1. The phylogenetic tree shows that orthologs from species of the genera Penicillium, Rasamsonia, Byssochlamys and Talaromyces clustered in one clade, while orthologs from Aspergillus species clustered in four additional clades, with those from A. calidostus, A. nidulans, A. ochraceoroseus, A. rambelli, A. sydowii and A. versicolor being the most divergent ones (Figure S2).
The orthologs of the latter six species were aligned and further analyzed with the aim of identifying conserved domains (Figure 1). Overall, the polypeptide could be divided into three main regions (Figure 1A,B). N- and C-terminal domains (residues 1–91 and 294–371, respectively) were disordered regions (not shown) that contained multiple conserved proline and serine residues (see the hydrophobic cluster analysis, HCA, http://mobyle.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/cgi-bin/portal.py?form=HCA#forms::HCA, in Figure 1B), suggesting that they are prone to interact with other proteins. The central region (amino acids 103–293) is an ordered, globular domain with a predicted coiled-coil region between residues 229 and 276 (Eukaryotic Linear Motif prediction; www.elm.eu.org; not shown). This region contains multiple conserved leucine and isoleucine residues which, according to the HCA analysis, are clustered (Figure 2), purportedly furthering the formation of secondary structures such as α-helices (see below). The central region is predicted to include the HLH-type transcriptional regulatory domain (residues 146-244) and, according to NLStradamus and NLSmapper algorithms (http://www.moseslab.csb.utoronto.ca/NLStradamus/ and http://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp), a monopartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) between residues 133 and 141 (see the positively charged residues of the hypothetic NLS in Figure 1A,B).
Using Swiss-Model server (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/), we modeled a hypothetical 3D structure of a dimer composed of A. flavus (Af) and A. nidulans (An) UrdA homologs (Figure 2). Through multiple target procedures, three models were constructed based on structures of Myc-MAD and MAD-MAX heterodimers. Only the DNA-binding domain of HLH type was possible to model and in all cases predicted three α-helices (α1, α2 and α3, blue color in Figure 2B) linked by lower conserved loops (orange lines in Figure 2B). Residues located in α1 would interact with bases of the DNA. The REKHRVAEADRRKNLS sequence in AnUrdA, conserved in AfUrdA, may as well include those residues, probably arginines and lysines, whose side chains might be maintaining contacts with DNA. α3 predictably participates in the formation of the dimer. Conservation outside the HLH domain is lower among Aspergillus proteins (see below) and almost inexistent when compared to Myc and MAD/MAX proteins.

3.2. urdA Is Required for Normal Conidiation in A. nidulans

To study the role of UrdA in morphogenesis and other cellular processes in the veA+ wild-type background, a deletion strain (ΔurdA) and a complementation (com) strain were constructed. The deletion strain was confirmed by diagnostic PCR (Figure S3). Re-introduction of the A. nidulans urdA wild-type allele in the ΔurdA strain generated the complementation strain, which was verified by PCR (Figure S4) as described in the Materials and Methods section. The complementation strain presented wild-type phenotype (Figure 3A). In our study, ΔurdA produced notably fewer conidia compared to the wild-type; conidial production at 36 h was ~19-fold and 57-fold reduced in the ∆urdA cultures with respect to those of the wild-type strain growing in continuous light and dark, respectively. These differences continued over time, with a ~14-fold decrease in conidial production in the light and 31-fold in the dark after 48 h (Figure 3B). In addition, a reduction of brlA, abaA and wetA expression was observed in the ∆urdA mutant with respect to the control, particularly in 48 h-old light cultures (Figure 3C–E).

3.3. Overexpression of brlA Is Not Sufficient to Induce Conidiation in the Absence of urdA

Based on the finding that urdA affected conidiation, we analyzed whether overexpression of brlA was sufficient to rescue asexual development in the absence of urdA in a strain with an intact veA locus. Diagnostic PCR confirmed the presence of alcA(p)::brlA construct in the transformed ∆urdA strain (Figure 4A). Our results indicated that the overexpressed brlA in an urdA deletion background did not rescue wild-type conidiation (Figure 4B), since only few conidia were observed (Figure 3C). Similar results were obtained in submerged cultures, where the alcA(p)::brlA ∆urdA strain produced few conidia at the tip of some hyphae (Figure 4C).

3.4. Effect of urdA on Sexual Development

The A. nidulans ∆urdA strain presented a precocious and increased sexual development as compared to the wild-type control (Figure 5A). Cleistothecial primordia were already present in ∆urdA cultures after 36 h of incubation, in both light and dark cultures, while they were absent in the wild type. At 48 h, cleistothecia were present in ∆urdA cultures grown in the light and in the dark, some of them already showing pigmentation, while in the wild-type only cleistothecial primordia were observed at that time point, and only in dark cultures. Our gene expression analysis revealed that expression of nsdD, encoding a transcription factor necessary for sexual development [47] increased in the ∆urdA strain at 36 h and under light conditions (Figure 5B). In addition, expression of steA, a gene encoding another transcription factor necessary for cleistothecial formation and ascosporogenesis [48], as well as expression of veA, was more than 2-fold higher in the urdA deletion mutant with respect to the control at 36 h, before the levels decreased over time (Figure 5C). After 7 days ∆urdA cultures showed abundant fully pigmented cleistothecia in both light and dark, whereas the wild type formed few cleistothecia under those conditions (Figure 5A).

3.5. Heterologous Complementation of A. nidulans ∆urdA with the Putative urdA Ortholog of A. flavus Does Not Fully Rescue Wild-Type Morphological Phenotype

To assess possible functional conservation between A. nidulans UrdA and putative homologs from other Aspergillus species, A. nidulans ∆urdA strain was heterologously complemented with the orthologous gene from the AF-producer and agriculturally and medically important fungus A. flavus (AflurdA-com). The A. flavus ortholog presents 48% identity to UrdA however it was located in a different clade in the phylogenetic tree in Figure S2. The heterologous complemented strain presented a reduction in conidiation as in the ∆urdA strain (Figure 6A,B), indicating that the A. flavus ortholog gene was unable to rescue wild-type conidiation in A. nidulans ∆urdA. However, the A. flavus ortholog repressed cleistothecial production as in the wild type control (Figure 6C).

3.6. UrdA Is a Negative Regulator of Sterigmatocystin Biosynthesis and Production of Several Unknown Metabolites in a Light-Dependent Manner

In this study the possible effect of UrdA on the production of ST toxin, a penultimate precursor of aflatoxin B1 in other Aspergillus spp., was also evaluated. The A. nidulans veA+ wild-type strain produces significantly more ST in the dark than in the light when growing on solid GMM [49]. However, the ΔurdA strain produced as much ST, in both light and dark, as the wild-type veA+ dark cultures (Figure 7A,B). This suggests that the role of urdA in regulating ST production in A. nidulans is light-dependent. Interestingly, our chemical analysis also indicated that the absence of urdA affects the synthesis of some additional unknown metabolites (Figure 7A), suggesting a broader effect of UrdA in the control of secondary metabolism. Expression analysis of aflR in the urdA deletion mutant showed an approximate 6-fold increase with respect to that of the wild type at 36 h when the cultures were growing in the light (Figure 7C). Similarly, expression of stcU, a structural gene in the cluster commonly used as an indicator of cluster activation [50], was also notably increased compared to the control at 36 h in the light (Figure 7D).
These results show that UrdA influences the synthesis of ST as well as the production of other fungal metabolites. For this reason, we also examined whether UrdA affects the biosynthesis of penicillin (PN) in A. nidulans. However, our experiment indicated that there is no statistically significant difference in the production of PN between wild-type and ΔurdA cultures (Figure S5).

3.7. UrdA Affects the Level of VeA in Fungal Cells

Figure 5D showed a significant variation in veA expression in the deletion urdA mutant. To study whether UrdA affects the abundance and subcellular localization of VeA, a veA::gfp::pyrGAfum strain was generated in wild-type and urdA deletion genetic backgrounds. A diagnostic PCR, with primers veAF5′UTR and veAGFP, was used to confirm the presence of the veA::gfp::pyrG fragment in the veA locus. Amplification of a 4.0 kb PCR product indicated the correct integration (Figure S6). Microscopic examination of the cultures grown in the dark for 6 h and then shifted to light revealed that the abundance of VeA was greater in the absence of urdA compared to the control strain (Figure 8A). This enhanced VeA accumulation was particularly notable in nuclear compartments as seen by the nucleus to cytoplasmic ratio of the fluorescence intensity (Figure 8B). A parallel set of cultures further grown in the dark did not show any differences with respect to the control (data not shown).

3.8. Epistatic Relationship between urdA and veA

Previous studies revealed that the global regulator veA is required for sexual development and is a negative regulator of conidiation [19], whereas this study showed that urdA is a negative regulator of sexual development and a positive regulator of asexual development. We examined the epistatic relationship between veA and urdA by generating a double deletion mutant ∆veA∆urdA as described in Material and Methods. The resulting ∆veA∆urdA transformant was confirmed by a diagnostic PCR. The wild type TRV50.2 strain, single mutants ∆urdA and ∆veA along with the double mutant ∆veA∆urdA were point-inoculated on GMM plates and grown for 6 days in light and dark (Figure 9A). The double mutant ∆veA∆urdA showed a distinct phenotype, failing to produce either cleistothecia or conidia; instead it produced abundant aerial hyphae (Figure 9B,C).
Sterigmatocystin toxin production was also analyzed in these strains. Unlike the wild type and ∆urdA, the double mutant did not produce ST, which coincides with the expected phenotype of the ∆veA mutant (Figure 9D), as it is known that veA is required for ST production [52].

4. Discussion

Conidiation is the most efficient form of dissemination in Aspergillus species. Regulators of asexual development such as BrlA, AbaA, WetA in the CDP pathway or FlbB and FlbE in the UDA pathway show variable patterns of conservation [53,54], with the presence of BrlA being restricted to the order Eurotiales. In the current study we showed that the flbB-dependent transcription factor gene urdA, controls both production of asexual spores as well as sexual development in the wild type veA+ strain of A. nidulans (Figure 10). Sequence analyses showed that UrdA is conserved exclusively in species of the order Eurotiales. Thus, phylostratigrapy [55] studies strongly suggest that this putative transcription factor emerged late in evolution, developing three domains that are clearly discernible based on our alignments and HCA analyses. The HLH-type transcriptional regulatory domain (also the predicted NLS) shows the highest level of conservation among UrdA orthologs, suggesting that it may be able to bind similar consensus sequences in target promoters. However, the conservation of the disordered N- and C-terminal regions is low, resulting in a group of six orthologs (including UrdA) with the highest sequence divergence. These differences may have caused a modification of the interaction partners or the regulatory mechanisms in which UrdA is required, resulting in a rewiring of the corresponding transcriptional network(s). Absence of urdA resulted in a drastic reduction in conidial production while promoting abundant formation of cleistothecia, even under the light, a condition that inhibits sexual development and promotes conidiation in strains with a veA+ wild type allele [56]. Similarly, deletion of ecdR, the urdA homolog in A. oryzae with 99% identity to that of A. flavus at nucleotide level, produced fewer conidia and higher number of sclerotia compared to the wild-type [27,57,58]. This is relevant since, in addition to serving an important role as survival structures [59,60,61]; sclerotia are stromata for the formation of sexual structures [62,63,64]. UrdA/EcdR appear to have a conserved role in repressing cleistothecia/sclerotia production. However, heterologous complementation with the A. flavus putative ortholog, which presents 48% identity (at protein level) to that in A. nidulans, did not rescue normal conidiation in the A. nidulans deletion mutant, suggesting that urdA/ecdR from A. flavus and likely its ecotype A. oryzae [9], might present certain variations in their mechanisms of action. The sequence divergence and the above-mentioned hypothetic network rewiring events could explain, for example, why the A. flavus ortholog of UrdA is unable to remediate the conidiation defect of the urdA deletion strain of A. nidulans but suppresses the premature induction of sexual development.
To gain insight into UrdA mechanism of action in A. nidulans, we examined its role on the regulation of the CDP controlling conidiation in this fungus, specifically brlA, abaA and wetA [28,65]. Our results revealed that the expression of these three genes is reduced in the ΔurdA mutant compared to the wild type. This reduction was most drastic at 48 h in cultures exposed to light. However, a reduction of asexual spore production is already observed at 36 h, suggesting an additional early mechanism of UrdA, besides controlling the CDP, which also influences asexual development. Overexpression of brlA in the absence of urdA was unable to rescue wild-type conidiation, also suggesting that urdA carries out additional roles in the control of conidiation downstream to brlA. Coinciding with the increase and precocious sexual fruiting bodies production observed in the absence of urdA in the light, we detected an earlier increase in the expression of genes known to be required for sexual development, specifically nsdD, steA and veA [47,48]. The increase in the expression of these genes in light cultures could contribute to the phenotype observed where cleistothecia are abnormally forming early and in abundant numbers under illumination in ΔurdA (Figure 10).
Morphological development and secondary metabolism are genetically linked [18,19,33,66]. A. nidulans produces small levels of ST in the light compared to those in the dark. Interestingly, ∆urdA produced as much ST in light culture as that of wild-type or ∆urdA cultures grown in the dark. These observations suggest that urdA is a light-dependent negative regulator of ST production (Figure 10). Furthermore, our results indicated that such an increase in ST toxin in ∆urdA light cultures was accompanied by high levels of aflR expression that resulted in cluster activation.
In addition to the effect of urdA on ST production, our analysis revealed other unknown metabolites accumulating at higher levels in the absence of urdA compared to the wild-type, indicating a broader regulatory potential. This correlates to the previous study done by Oiartzabal-Arano et al. [27] where urdA was shown to regulate two genes of the dba secondary metabolite gene cluster. For this reason, we also examined the role of urdA in PN biosynthesis and found no effect on the production of this antibiotic in A. nidulans.
A well-known genetic link between morphogenesis and secondary metabolism is the global regulatory gene veA, [18,19,33,51,66]. This global regulator is conserved in numerous fungal species but absent in plant or animal genomes [19,51,67,68,69,70,71,72]. The subcellular localization of the VeA wild-type protein (VeA+) is light dependent [30]. While in the light VeA is abundantly present in the cytoplasm, in the dark this protein mainly accumulates in nuclei, promoting sexual development, biosynthesis of ST and other secondary metabolites, and repressing conidiation. Our study showed that absence of urdA increases VeA protein levels in the cell in light cultures, particularly in nuclei, possibly contributing, at least in part, to the increase in sexual development, decrease in conidiation and greater amount of ST and other compounds in light ΔurdA cultures. These results suggest that the synthesis of VeA and its transport to the nucleus is influenced by UrdA.
Since VeA and UrdA present antagonistic roles in A. nidulans with respect to sexual and asexual development, we investigated the epistatic relationship between these two regulators by the generation of a double mutant ∆veA∆urdA. This double mutant neither produced conidia nor cleistothecia, instead it grew mainly vegetatively forming abundant aerial mycelium. In addition, the medium pigmentation in the double mutant was the same as that of ∆veA. Although veA appears to be epistatic to urdA, the double mutant ∆veA∆urdA failed to hyperconidiate as in the case of the ∆veA mutant. In addition, ∆veA∆urdA did not produce ST, as in the case of ∆veA and unlike ∆urdA and the wild-type strain, which produced ST. Thus, although VeA and UrdA appear functionally related, they also perform independent regulatory roles.
In conclusion, this study provides further insight into the role and mechanism of action of UrdA, a transcription factor with a putative HLH DNA binding domain in the model filamentous fungus A. nidulans. The bioinformatics analysis revealed that urdA is specific to the order Eurotiales. UrdA function in A. nidulans also appears to be distinct, at least from that of A. flavus. In A. nidulans, UrdA has an important role in repressing sexual development and promoting the formation of air-borne conidia, particularly when this organism is exposed to light, a harmful environmental factor for fungal growth. Furthermore, urdA influences secondary metabolism in a light-dependent manner, including the production of the carcinogenic mycotoxin ST. Importantly, UrdA affects the abundance and subcellular localization of VeA, possibly further contributing to the observed broad regulatory spectrum of UrdA in the model filamentous fungus A. nidulans.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/9/12/570/s1,Figure S1: BLASTp results for UrdA. Ortholog sequences of UrdA, ordered according to the expected (e) value (color bar below). The extension of the colored lines indicates the coverage. The black arrow delimits those orthologs analyzed in the phylogenetic tree in Figure S2 and those excluded for analysis, Figure S2: Evolutionary analysis of UrdA orthologs. Phylogenetic tree for the orthologs of UrdA (Mega Software). Sequences belonging to species of the genera Penicillium, Talaromyces, Byssochlamys and Rasamsonia are located in a different clade compared to those from Aspergilli, which are distributed in four different clades. The purple and dotted red squares indicate closest UrdA orthologs and An4394/UrdA, respectively, Figure S3: Generation of A. nidulans ΔurdA strain. (A) Schematic representation showing deletion of urdA by gene replacement using pyrG from Aspergillus fumigatus. The crosses (X) indicate recombination events between the homologous flanking regions. (B) Diagnostic PCR confirming deletion of urdA in the selected transformants using primers urdA-P0 and pyrG_Afum_R denoted by F and R respectively (Table S2). Deletion of ΔurdA is indicated by the presence of the 3.3 kb DNA fragment, Figure S4: Generation of A. nidulans and A. flavus complementation strains. The A. nidulans ΔurdA strain was transformed with plasmids containing urdA from Aspergillus nidulans and its Aspergillus flavus homolog respectively. (A) Linear diagram corresponding to the A. nidulans urdA complementation vector. (B) Diagnostic PCR was used to confirm the reintegration of urdA in the genome using primers ANurdA-comF-NotI and ANurdA-comR-SpeI (Table S2), labeled in this figure as F and R respectively. The expected 4.4 kb PCR product was obtained. (C) Confirmation of the integration of the A.flavus urdA into the genome of the A. nidulans ΔurdA host strain was carried out using a similar strategy with primers AflurdA-comF-NotI and AflurdA-comR-SpeI (Table S2). The expected 3.7 kb PCR product was obtained, Figure S5: urdA does not affect penicillin (PN) production in A. nidulans. Extracts of wild type (WT) and ΔurdA were analyzed for penicillin presence using the bioassay described in Materials and Methods. Diameter of PN growth inhibition halos in mm is shown. Values shown are means of triplicates. Error bars represent standard error, Figure S6: Generation of the veA::gfp and veA::gfp ΔurdA strains. (A) The veA::gfp::pyrGA.fumigatus and veA::gfp::pyrGA.fumigatus ΔurdA strains was generated as follows: primers AnidveA_P7 and ANVeASTagP4 (Table S2) were used to PCR amplify a 6.6 kb fragment containing a veA::gfp::pyrGA. fumigatus fragment from A. nidulans T-17 strain (Stinnett et al., 2007). The PCR product was then transformed into A. nidulans TSSP7.1 and TSSP4.1 strains (Table S1). (B) Diagnostic PCR was used to confirm the integration of veA::gfp in the host strains after transformation, using primers VeAFnest and Gfp-mid-R. The expected 4.0 kb PCR product was obtained. Table S1: Fungal strains used in this study, Table S2: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

A.M.C. designed the experiments. A.M.C. and S.S.P. wrote the manuscript; S.S.P., J.M.L., S.A., E.A.E. and O.E. carried out the experiments and performed the bioinformatic analyses. All authors contributed in making the figures in addition to reading and revising, the manuscript.

Funding

This research and The APC was supported by the Department of Biological Sciences at Northern Illinois University. The research at CIB-CSIC was funded by MINECO/FEDER/EU (grant BFU2015-66806-R). The research at UPV/EHU was funded by grant EHUA15/08.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this research would like to thank Elixabet Perez de Nanclares Arregi (University of the Basque Country) for generating and gifting the BD834 strain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Table
Table A1. Supplementary Strains Table.
Table A1. Supplementary Strains Table.
StrainPertinent GenotypeSource
FGSC4Wild typeFGSC*
BD834∆urdA::pyrGA. fum; pyrG89; pyroA4This study
TRV50.2Wild type[73]
TRV50pyroA4, ∆nkuA::argB; veA+[73]
T-17veA::gfp:: pyrGA.fum; pyrG89; pyroA4[30]
RJMP1.49pyrG89; argB2; ∆nku::argB; pyroA4[74]
TXF3.1pyrG89; argB2; ∆nku::argB; ∆veA::pyro; pyroA4[75]
TXFp2.1 ∆veA::pyrGA.fum; pyrG89; argB2; ∆nku::argB; pyroA4,[75]
TSSP1.1∆urdA::pyrGA.fum; pyrG89; argB2; ∆nku::argB; pyroA4;This study
TSSP3.1veA::gfp::pyrGA.fum; pyrG89, ∆nku::argB; argB2;This study
TSSP4.1 pyrG89, argB2; ∆nku::argB; ∆urdA::pyroA pyroA4This study
TSSP6.1 pyrG89; veA::gfp::pyrGA.fum; ∆nku::argB; argB2; ∆urdA::pyroA; pyroA4;This study
TSSP7.1 pyrG89; argB2; ∆nkuA::argB[75]
TSSP13.1 pyrG89; ∆urdA::pyrGA.fum argB2; ∆nku::argB; ∆veA::pyroA; pyroA4This study
TSSP23.1pyrG89; argB2; ∆nkuA::argB; alcA::brlA::gpdA::pyroA; pyroA4,This study
TSSP25.1∆urdA::pyrG A. fum;pyrG89;argB2; ∆nkuA::argBThis study
TSSP26.1∆urdA::pyrG A. fum; pyrG89; ∆nkuA::argB; argB2;; alcA::brlA::gpdA::pyroA; pyroA4This study
CA14niaD-;pyrG-; Δku70USDA**
TSSP27.1∆urdA::pyrGA.fum; pyrG89; ∆nkuA::argB: argB2; urdA::pyro; pyroA4This Study
TSSP28.1∆urdA::pyrG A. fum; pyrG89; ∆nkuA::argB; argB2; urdAA.flavus::pyroA;pyroA4This Study
*FGSC, Fungal Genetics Stock Center. **USDA, United State Department of Agriculture

References

  1. Adrio, J.L.; Demain, A.L. Fungal biotechnol. Int. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reverberi, M.; Ricelli, A.; Zjalic, S.; Fabbri, A.A.; Fanelli, C. Natural functions of mycotoxin and control of their biosynthesis in fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 899–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brakhage, A.A.; Schroeckh, V. Fungal secondary metabolites-strategies to activate silent gene clusters. Fungal Gen. Biol. 2011, 48, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bennett, J.W.; Klich, M. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Woloshuk, C.P.; Shim, W.B. Aflatoxins, fumonisins, and trichothecenes: A convergence of knowledge. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pontecorvo, G.; Roper, J.A.; Chemmons, L.M.; MacDonald, K.D.; Bufton, A.W.J. The genetics of Aspergillus nidulans. Adv. Genet. 1953, 5, 141–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Payne, G.A.; Nierman, W.C.; Wortman, J.R.; Pritchard, B.L.; Brown, D. Whole genome comparison of Aspergillus flavus and A. Oryzae. Med. Mycol. 2006, 44 (Suppl. 1), S9–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sweeney, M.J.; Dobson, A.D. Molecular biology of mycotoxin biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 175, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Payne, G.A.; Yu, J. Ecology, development and gene regulation in Aspergillus flavus. In Aspergillus: Molecular Biology and Genomics; Machida, M., Gomi, K., Eds.; Caister Academic Press: Norfolk, UK, 2010; pp. 157–171. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kew, M.C. Aflatoxins as a cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2013, 22, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Cole, R.J.; Cox, R.H. Handbook of Toxic Fungal Metabolites; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; ISBN 0121797600. [Google Scholar]
  12. Keller, N.P.; Kantz, N.J.; Adams, T.H. Aspergillus nidulans verA is required for production of the mycotoxin sterigmatocystin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 1444–1450. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, J.H.; Butchko, R.A.; Fernandes, M.; Keller, N.P.; Leonard, T.J.; Adams, T.H. Conservation of structure and function of the aflatoxin regulatory gene aflR from Aspergillus nidulans and A. flavus. Curr. Genet. 1996, 29, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Keller, N.P.; Hohn, T.M. Metabolic pathway gene clusters in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 1997, 21, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fernandes, M.; Keller, N.P.; Adams, T.H. Sequence-specific binding by Aspergillus nidulans AflR, a C-6 zinc cluster protein regulating mycotoxin biosynthesis. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 28, 1355–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Balibar, C.J.; Howard-Jones, A.R.; Walsh, C.T. Terrequinone A biosynthesis through L-tryptophan oxidation, dimerization and bisprenylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Brakhage, A.A.; Thön, M.; Spröte, P.; Scharf, D.H.; Al-Abdallah, Q.; Wolke, S.M.; Hortschansky, P. Aspects on evolution of fungal beta-lactam biosynthesis gene clusters and recruitment of trans-acting factors. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1801–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Calvo, A.M.; Wilson, R.A.; Bok, J.W.; Keller, N.P. Relationship between secondary metabolism and fungal development. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Calvo, A.M.; Lohmar, J.M.; Ibarra, B.; Satterlee, T. Velvet Regulation of Fungal Development. In Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality, 3rd ed.; Wedland, J., Ed.; Mycota Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume I, Chapter 18; pp. 475–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adams, T.H.; Boylan, M.T.; Timberlake, W.E. brlA is necessary and sufficient to direct conidiophore development in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 1988, 54, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Etxebeste, O.; Garzia, A.; Espeso, E.A.; Ugalde, U. Aspergillus nidulans asexual development: Making the most of cellular modules. Trends Microbiol. 2010, 18, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ni, M.; Gao, N.; Kwon, N.J.; Shin, K.S.; Yu, J.H. Regulation of Aspergillus conidiation. In Cellular and Molecular Biology of Filamentous Fungi; Borkovich, K.A., Ebbole, D.J., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 557–576. [Google Scholar]
  23. Park, H.S.; Yu, J.H. Genetic control of asexual sporulation in filamentous fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fischer, R.; Kües, U. Asexual sporulation in mycelial fungi. In Growth, Differentiation, and Sexuality; Kües, U., Fischer, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006; Volume 1, pp. 263–292. [Google Scholar]
  25. Adams, T.H.; Wieser, J.K.; Yu, J.H. Asexual sporulation in Aspergillus nidulans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 35–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Wieser, J.; Lee, B.N.; Fondon, J., III; Adams, T.H. Genetic requirements for initiating asexual development in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr. Genet. 1994, 27, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Oiartzabal-Arano, E.; Garzia, A.; Gorostidi, A.; Ugalde, U.; Espeso, E.A.; Etxebeste, O. Beyond asexual development: Modifications in the gene expression profile caused by the absence of the Aspergillus nidulans transcription factor FlbB. Genetics 2015, 199, 1127–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gerke, J.; Bayram, Ö.; Feussner, K.; Landesfeind, M.; Shelest, E.; Ivo, F.; Braus, G.H. Breaking the silence: Protein stabilization uncovers silenced biosynthetic gene clusters in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 8234–8244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Purschwitz, J.; Müller, S.; Kastner, C.; Schöser, M.; Haas, H.; Espeso, E.A.; Atoui, A.; Calvo, A.M.; Fischer, R. Functional and physical interaction of blue-and red-light sensors in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr. Boil. 2008, 18, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stinnett, S.M.; Espeso, E.A.; Cobeno, L.; Araujo-Bazan, L.; Calvo, A.M. Aspergillus nidulans VeA subcellular localization is dependent on the importin alpha carrier and on light. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 242–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Araujo-Bazan, L.; Dhingra, S.; Chu, J.; Fernandez-Martinez, J.J.; Calvo, A.M.; Espeso, E.A. Importin alpha is an essential nuclear import carrier adaptor required for proper sexual and asexual development and secondary metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bayram, Ö.; Krappmann, S.; Ni, M.; Bok, J.W.; Helmstaedt, K.; Valerius, O.; Braus-Stromeyer, A.; Kwon, N.J.; Keller, N.P.; Yu, J.H.; et al. VelB/VeA/LaeA complex coordinates light signal with fungal development and secondary metabolism. Science 2008, 320, 1504–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Calvo, A.M. The VeA regulatory system and its role in morphological and chemical development in fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 1053–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cerqueira, G.C.; Arnaud, M.B.; Inglis, D.O.; Skrzypek, M.S.; Binkley, G.; Simison, M.; Miyasato, S.R.; Binkley, J.; Orvis, J.; Shah, P.; et al. The Aspergillus Genome Database: multispecies curation and incorporation of RNA-Seq data to improve structural gene annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D705–D710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Goujon, M.; McWilliam, H.; Li, W.; Valentin, F.; Squizzato, S.; Paern, J.; Lopez, R. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL–EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Suppl. 2), W695–W699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J.; et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tamura, K.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Käfer, E. Meiotic and mitotic recombination in Aspergillus and its chromosomal aberrations. Adv. Genet. 1977, 19, 33–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ramamoorthy, V.; Shantappa, S.; Dhingra, S.; Calvo, A.M. veA-dependent RNA-pol II transcription elongation factor-like protein, RtfA, is associated with secondary metabolism and morphological development in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 85, 795–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Szewczyk, E.; Nayak, T.; Oakley, C.E.; Edgerton, H.; Xiong, Y.; Taheri-Talesh, N.; Osmani, S.; Oakley, B.R. Fusion PCR and gene targeting in Aspergillus nidulans. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 1, 3111–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yang, L.; Ukil, L.; Osmani, A.; Nahm, F.; Davies, J.; De Souza, C.P.; Dou, X.; Perez-Balaguer, A.; Osmani, S.A. Rapid production of gene replacement constructs and generation of a green fluorescent protein-tagged centromeric marker in Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryote Cell 2004, 3, 1359–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Etxebeste, O.; Herrero-García, E.; Araújo-Bazán, L.; Rodríguez-Urra, A.B.; Garzia, A.; Ugalde, U.; Espeso, E.A. The bZIP-type transcription factor FlbB regulates distinct morphogenetic stages of colony formation in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 73, 775–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cleveland, T.E.; Bhatnagar, D.; Foell, C.J.; McCormick, S.P. Conversion of a new metabolite to aflatoxin B2 by Aspergillus parasiticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 2804–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Brakhage, A.A.; Browne, P.; Turner, G. Regulation of Aspergillus nidulans penicillin biosynthesis and penicillin biosynthesis genes acvA and ipnA by glucose. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 3789–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Peñalva, M.A. Tracing the endocytic pathway of Aspergillus nidulans with FM4-64. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 963–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Han, K.H.; Han, K.Y.; Yu, J.H.; Chae, K.S.; Jahng, K.Y.; Dong-Min, H. The nsdD gene encodes a putative GATA-type transcription factor necessary for sexual development of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 41, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vallim, M.A.; Miller, K.Y.; Miller, B.L. Aspergillus SteA (Sterile12-like) is a homeodomain-C2/H2-Zn+ 2 finger transcription factor required for sexual reproduction. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 36, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Atoui, A.; Kastner, C.; Larey, C.M.; Thokala, R.; Etxebeste, O.; Espeso, E.A.; Fischer, R.; Calvo, A.M. Cross-talk between light and glucose regulation controls toxin production and morphogenesis in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 962–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hicks, J.K.; Yu, J.H.; Keller, K.P.; Adams, T.H. Aspergillus sporulation and mycotoxin production both require inactivation of the FadA G alpha protein-dependent signaling pathway. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 4916–4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. “NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis”. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kato, N.; Brooks, W.; Calvo, A.M. The expression of sterigmatocystin and penicillin genes in Aspergillus nidulans is controlled by veA, a gene required for sexual development. Eukaryote Cell 2003, 2, 1178–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cortese, M.S.; Etxebeste, O.; Garzia, A.; Espeso, E.A.; Ugalde, U. Elucidation of functional markers from Aspergillus nidulans developmental regulator FlbB and their phylogenetic distribution. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. De Vries, R.P.; Riley, R.; Wiebenga, A.; Aguilar-Osorio, G.; Amillis, S.; Uchima, C.A.; Asadollahi, M.; Askin, M.; Barry, K.; Battaglia, E.; et al. Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Krizsan, K.; Almasi, E.; Merenyi, Z.; Sahu, N.; Viragh, M.; Tamas, K.; Mondo, S.; Kiss, B.; Balint, B.; Kues, U.; et al. Transcriptomic atlas of mushroom development highlights an independent origin of complex multicellularity. bioRxiv 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mooney, J.L.; Yager, L.N. Light is required for conidiation in Aspergillus nidulans. Genes Dev. 1990, 4, 1473–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ogawa, M.; Tokuok, M.; Jin, F.J.; Takahashi, T.; Koyama, Y. Genetic analysis of conidiation regulatory pathways in koji-mold Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jin, F.J.; Nishida, M.; Hara, S.; Koyama, Y. Identification and characterization of a putative basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor involved in the early stage of conidiophore development in Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011, 48, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Coley-Smith, J.R.; Cooke, R.C. Survival and germination of fungal sclerotia. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1971, 9, 65–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Malloch, D.; Cain, R.F. The Trichocomataceae: Ascomycetes with Aspergillus, Paeciloyces and Penicillium imperfect states. Can. J. Bot. 1972, 50, 2613–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wicklow, D.T. Survival of Aspergillus flavus sclerotia in soil. Mycol. Res. 1987, 89, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Horn, B.W.; Sorensen, R.B.; Lamb, M.C.; Sobolev, V.S.; Olarte, R.A.; Worthington, C.J.; Carbone, I. Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus flavus sclerotia naturally produced in corn. Phytopathology 2014, 104, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Horn, B.W.; Moore, G.G.; Carbone, I. Sexual reproduction in aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus nomius. Mycologia 2011, 103, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Horn, B.W.; Moore, G.G.; Carbone, I. Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus flavus. Mycologia 2009, 101, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Adams, T.H.; Timberlake, W.E. Developmental repression of growth and gene expression in Aspergillus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 5405–5409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bayram, O.; Braus, G.H. Coordination of secondary metabolism and development in fungi: The velvet family of regulatory proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Calvo, A.M.; Bok, J.; Brooks, W.; Keller, N.P. veA is required for toxin and sclerotial production in Aspergillus parasiticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4733–4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Duran, R.M.; Cary, J.W.; Calvo, A.M. Production of cyclopiazonic acid, aflatrem, and aflatoxin by Aspergillus flavus is regulated by veA, a gene necessary for sclerotial formation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 73, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Myung, K.; Li, S.; Butchko, R.A.; Busman, M.; Proctor, R.H.; Abbas, H.K.; Calvo, A.M. FvVE1 regulates biosynthesis of the mycotoxins fumonisins and fusarins in Fusarium verticillioides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5089–5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dhingra, S.; Andes, D.; Calvo, A.M. VeA regulates conidiation, gliotoxin production and protease activity in the opportunistic human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryote Cell 2012, 11, 1531–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Laskowski-Peak, M.C.; Calvo, A.M.; Rohrssen, J.; Smulian, A.G. VEA1 is required for cleistothecial formation and virulence in Histoplasma capsulatum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012, 49, 838–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chettri, P.; Calvo, A.M.; Cary, J.W.; Dhingra, S.; Guo, Y.; McDougal, R.L.; Bradshaw, R.E. The veA gene of the pine needle pathogen Dothistroma septosporum regulates sporulation and secondary metabolism. Fung Gen. Biol. 2012, 49, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ramamoorthy, V.; Dhingra, S.; Kincaid, A.; Shantappa, S.; Feng, X.; Calvo, A.M. The putative C2H2 transcription factor MtfA is a novel regulator of secondary metabolism and morphogenesis in Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Shaaban, M.; Palmer, J.; EL-Naggar, W.A.; EL-Sokkary, M.A.; Habib, E.E.; Keller, N.P. Involvement of transposon-like elements in penicillin gene cluster regulation. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Feng, X.; Ramamoorthy, V.; Pandit, S.S.; Prieto, A.; Espeso, E.A.; Calvo, A.M. cpsA regulates mycotoxin production, morphogenesis and cell wall biosynthesis in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 105, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 09 00570 g001 550
Figure 1. Multiple Sequence Alignment of UrdA orthologs from Aspergillus species. Sequences from orthologs of (A) A. nidulans (UrdA), A. Calidoustus (Acal), A. rambellii (Aram), A. ochraceoroseus (Aoch), A. sydowii (Asyd) and A. versicolor (Aver) were aligned using Clustal Omega and visualized using Genedoc (see Materials and Methods). The extension of the predicted N-terminal, central and C-terminal regions, as well as the putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) and helix-loop-helix (HLH) domains are indicated by black lines. (B) Hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA) of UrdA. Residues in green indicate hydrophobic clusters and, thus, possible secondary structures. Residues in blue are positively charged amino acids while those in red are negatively charged. Proline, serine, glycine and threonine are designated by symbols. See Materials and Methods for additional details.
Figure 1. Multiple Sequence Alignment of UrdA orthologs from Aspergillus species. Sequences from orthologs of (A) A. nidulans (UrdA), A. Calidoustus (Acal), A. rambellii (Aram), A. ochraceoroseus (Aoch), A. sydowii (Asyd) and A. versicolor (Aver) were aligned using Clustal Omega and visualized using Genedoc (see Materials and Methods). The extension of the predicted N-terminal, central and C-terminal regions, as well as the putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) and helix-loop-helix (HLH) domains are indicated by black lines. (B) Hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA) of UrdA. Residues in green indicate hydrophobic clusters and, thus, possible secondary structures. Residues in blue are positively charged amino acids while those in red are negatively charged. Proline, serine, glycine and threonine are designated by symbols. See Materials and Methods for additional details.
Genes 09 00570 g001
Genes 09 00570 g002 550
Figure 2. 3D modeling of UrdA sequence. (A) Sequence alignment of AN4394/AnUrdA and its A. flavus ortholog KOC16320/AfUrdA. The position and extension of the three predicted α-helices of the putative HLH transcriptional regulatory domain are indicated by blue lines while orange lines delimit the extension of the loops. (B) Swiss-model images of a hypothetic dimer formed by the HLH domains of AnUrdA and AfUrdA. Helices are shown in blue and loops in orange.
Figure 2. 3D modeling of UrdA sequence. (A) Sequence alignment of AN4394/AnUrdA and its A. flavus ortholog KOC16320/AfUrdA. The position and extension of the three predicted α-helices of the putative HLH transcriptional regulatory domain are indicated by blue lines while orange lines delimit the extension of the loops. (B) Swiss-model images of a hypothetic dimer formed by the HLH domains of AnUrdA and AfUrdA. Helices are shown in blue and loops in orange.
Genes 09 00570 g002
Genes 09 00570 g003 550
Figure 3. urdA promotes asexual development. (A) Wild type (WT), ΔurdA and urdA-complementation (urdA-com) strains were point-inoculated on glucose minimal medium (GMM) plates and incubated for 7 days in light and dark. Micrographs were taken with a Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera at 50× magnification after spraying the plates with 70% ethanol to enhance visualization of cleistothecia. The white arrows indicates the cleistothecia. (B) Quantification of conidiophores in 36 h and 48 h cultures grown on solid GMM in light and dark. Top-agar inoculated cultures were used to analyze the expression of brlA (C) abaA (D) and wetA (E). Values are means of three replicates and Error bars indicate standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. urdA promotes asexual development. (A) Wild type (WT), ΔurdA and urdA-complementation (urdA-com) strains were point-inoculated on glucose minimal medium (GMM) plates and incubated for 7 days in light and dark. Micrographs were taken with a Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera at 50× magnification after spraying the plates with 70% ethanol to enhance visualization of cleistothecia. The white arrows indicates the cleistothecia. (B) Quantification of conidiophores in 36 h and 48 h cultures grown on solid GMM in light and dark. Top-agar inoculated cultures were used to analyze the expression of brlA (C) abaA (D) and wetA (E). Values are means of three replicates and Error bars indicate standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Genes 09 00570 g003
Genes 09 00570 g004 550
Figure 4. Overexpression of brlA is not sufficient to induce conidiation in the absence of urdA. (A) Aspergillus nidulans wild type (TRV50) and ΔurdA strains were transformed with an overexpression plasmid containing A. nidulans brlA coding region driven by the inducible promoter alcA. Diagnostic PCR was used to confirm the incorporation of the overexpression plasmid into the genome of the ΔurdA host strain after transformation, using primers AN_alcA(P)_F & ANbrlA_R (Table S2), labeled in this figure as F and R respectively. The expected 3 kb PCR product was obtained. (B) A. nidulans wild type (WT), ΔurdA, OEbrlA and ΔurdA-OEbrlA strains were inoculated with 106 conidia/mL in liquid GMM at 250 rpm for 18 h and then shifted onto solid GMM or TMM. Micrographs were taken after 12 days with a Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera at 50× magnification. (C) One gram of mycelium was also inoculated in 50 mL of liquid TMM and grown at 37 °C for 18 h after shift to observed possible formation of conidia in submerged cultures. Black arrows show formation of conidia from the tip of hyphae.
Figure 4. Overexpression of brlA is not sufficient to induce conidiation in the absence of urdA. (A) Aspergillus nidulans wild type (TRV50) and ΔurdA strains were transformed with an overexpression plasmid containing A. nidulans brlA coding region driven by the inducible promoter alcA. Diagnostic PCR was used to confirm the incorporation of the overexpression plasmid into the genome of the ΔurdA host strain after transformation, using primers AN_alcA(P)_F & ANbrlA_R (Table S2), labeled in this figure as F and R respectively. The expected 3 kb PCR product was obtained. (B) A. nidulans wild type (WT), ΔurdA, OEbrlA and ΔurdA-OEbrlA strains were inoculated with 106 conidia/mL in liquid GMM at 250 rpm for 18 h and then shifted onto solid GMM or TMM. Micrographs were taken after 12 days with a Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera at 50× magnification. (C) One gram of mycelium was also inoculated in 50 mL of liquid TMM and grown at 37 °C for 18 h after shift to observed possible formation of conidia in submerged cultures. Black arrows show formation of conidia from the tip of hyphae.
Genes 09 00570 g004
Genes 09 00570 g005 550
Figure 5. urdA represses sexual development. (A) Quantification of cleistothecia (both immature and mature) in 36 h and 48 h cultures grown on solid GMM in light and dark. Asterisks indicate not detected. Top-agar inoculated cultures were used to analyze the expression of nsdD (B) steA (C) and veA (D). Values are means of three replicates and error bar indicates standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. urdA represses sexual development. (A) Quantification of cleistothecia (both immature and mature) in 36 h and 48 h cultures grown on solid GMM in light and dark. Asterisks indicate not detected. Top-agar inoculated cultures were used to analyze the expression of nsdD (B) steA (C) and veA (D). Values are means of three replicates and error bar indicates standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Genes 09 00570 g005
Genes 09 00570 g006 550
Figure 6. Heterologous complementation of A. flavus urdA in the A. nidulans ΔurdA strain. (A) A. nidulans and A. flavus urdA complementation strains (urdA-com and AflurdA-com respectively), together with the ΔurdA and wild type (WT) control were point-inoculated on GMM and incubated for 4 days at 37 °C in the light. (B) Quantification of conidia. Cores (7 mm diameter) were collected 1 cm from the colony center, homogenized in water and counted under the microscope. (C) Quantification of cleistothecia. Cores (16 mm diameter) were harvested 1 cm from the colony center and sprayed with 70% ethanol to improve visualization of fruiting bodies. Asterisks indicate not detected. Values are means of three replicates and error bars indicate standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6. Heterologous complementation of A. flavus urdA in the A. nidulans ΔurdA strain. (A) A. nidulans and A. flavus urdA complementation strains (urdA-com and AflurdA-com respectively), together with the ΔurdA and wild type (WT) control were point-inoculated on GMM and incubated for 4 days at 37 °C in the light. (B) Quantification of conidia. Cores (7 mm diameter) were collected 1 cm from the colony center, homogenized in water and counted under the microscope. (C) Quantification of cleistothecia. Cores (16 mm diameter) were harvested 1 cm from the colony center and sprayed with 70% ethanol to improve visualization of fruiting bodies. Asterisks indicate not detected. Values are means of three replicates and error bars indicate standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Genes 09 00570 g006
Genes 09 00570 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of urdA on sterigmatocystin (ST) production in A. nidulans. (A) Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis of ST produced by wild type (WT) and ΔurdA cultures grown on top-agar inoculated solid GMM at 37 °C in light and dark conditions for 36 h, and 48 h. ST, a commercial ST standard from SIGMA. Broken arrows indicate other metabolites whose synthesis is also affected by urdA. (B) Densitometry of the ST bands using ImageJ software [51]. The ST bands were normalized to wild-type levels in the light, considered as 100 percent. (C) Effect of urdA on aflR and stcU expression analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values are means of three replicates and error bar indicates standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 7. Effect of urdA on sterigmatocystin (ST) production in A. nidulans. (A) Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis of ST produced by wild type (WT) and ΔurdA cultures grown on top-agar inoculated solid GMM at 37 °C in light and dark conditions for 36 h, and 48 h. ST, a commercial ST standard from SIGMA. Broken arrows indicate other metabolites whose synthesis is also affected by urdA. (B) Densitometry of the ST bands using ImageJ software [51]. The ST bands were normalized to wild-type levels in the light, considered as 100 percent. (C) Effect of urdA on aflR and stcU expression analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values are means of three replicates and error bar indicates standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Genes 09 00570 g007
Genes 09 00570 g008 550
Figure 8. urdA influences accumulation and location of VeA in fungal cells. A. nidulans wild type (WT) and a ΔurdA strain containing a veA::gfp::pyrG cassette were cultured in the dark for 6 h and then shifted to light. (A) Micrographs showing green fluorescence, DAPI stained nuclei, and merged images. (B) Nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio of the fluorescence in each compartments were calculated using the pixel intensity values. The mean were taken from 40 measurements at different nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 8. urdA influences accumulation and location of VeA in fungal cells. A. nidulans wild type (WT) and a ΔurdA strain containing a veA::gfp::pyrG cassette were cultured in the dark for 6 h and then shifted to light. (A) Micrographs showing green fluorescence, DAPI stained nuclei, and merged images. (B) Nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio of the fluorescence in each compartments were calculated using the pixel intensity values. The mean were taken from 40 measurements at different nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Genes 09 00570 g008
Genes 09 00570 g009 550
Figure 9. Epistatic relation between veA and urdA. (A) Wild type, ΔurdA, ΔveA and ΔveA ΔurdA were point-inoculated and cultivated in dark and light conditions for 6 days. Micrographs were taken with a Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera at 50× magnification. (B) Quantification of conidiospores as described in Material and Methods (C) Quantification of cleistothecia after spraying the plates with 70% ethanol to enhance visualization. (D) TLC analysis of ST. Cores (16 mm) were collected 1.5 cm from the center of the colony after 6 days and ST was extracted as described in Material and Methods. Asterisks indicate not detected. Std., Standard. Values are means of three replicates and error bars indicate standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 9. Epistatic relation between veA and urdA. (A) Wild type, ΔurdA, ΔveA and ΔveA ΔurdA were point-inoculated and cultivated in dark and light conditions for 6 days. Micrographs were taken with a Leica MZ75 dissecting microscope attached to a Leica DC50LP camera at 50× magnification. (B) Quantification of conidiospores as described in Material and Methods (C) Quantification of cleistothecia after spraying the plates with 70% ethanol to enhance visualization. (D) TLC analysis of ST. Cores (16 mm) were collected 1.5 cm from the center of the colony after 6 days and ST was extracted as described in Material and Methods. Asterisks indicate not detected. Std., Standard. Values are means of three replicates and error bars indicate standard errors. Different letters above the bar graphs represent significantly different values (p ≤ 0.05).
Genes 09 00570 g009
Genes 09 00570 g010 550
Figure 10. Model for UrdA activity. The upstream developmental activators (UDA) signaling pathway controls UrdA [27], and UrdA controls the central developmental pathway (CDP) pathway and conidiation (in both veA1 [27] and in veA wild-type background, as shown in the present study). UrdA also negatively affects NsdD, SteA and VeA, inhibiting sexual development. In addition, UrdA represses the production of ST (by negatively influencing AflR) and of other known secondary metabolites. Protein codes are used for simplicity.
Figure 10. Model for UrdA activity. The upstream developmental activators (UDA) signaling pathway controls UrdA [27], and UrdA controls the central developmental pathway (CDP) pathway and conidiation (in both veA1 [27] and in veA wild-type background, as shown in the present study). UrdA also negatively affects NsdD, SteA and VeA, inhibiting sexual development. In addition, UrdA represses the production of ST (by negatively influencing AflR) and of other known secondary metabolites. Protein codes are used for simplicity.
Genes 09 00570 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pandit, S.S.; Lohmar, J.M.; Ahmed, S.; Etxebeste, O.; Espeso, E.A.; Calvo, A.M. UrdA Controls Secondary Metabolite Production and the Balance between Asexual and Sexual Development in Aspergillus nidulans. Genes 2018, 9, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9120570

AMA Style

Pandit SS, Lohmar JM, Ahmed S, Etxebeste O, Espeso EA, Calvo AM. UrdA Controls Secondary Metabolite Production and the Balance between Asexual and Sexual Development in Aspergillus nidulans. Genes. 2018; 9(12):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9120570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pandit, Sandesh S., Jessica M. Lohmar, Shawana Ahmed, Oier Etxebeste, Eduardo A. Espeso, and Ana M. Calvo. 2018. "UrdA Controls Secondary Metabolite Production and the Balance between Asexual and Sexual Development in Aspergillus nidulans" Genes 9, no. 12: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9120570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop