Next Article in Journal
APC and MUTYH Analysis in FAP Patients: A Novel Mutation in APC Gene and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation
Next Article in Special Issue
Whole Genome Analyses Suggests that Burkholderia sensu lato Contains Two Additional Novel Genera (Mycetohabitans gen. nov., and Trinickia gen. nov.): Implications for the Evolution of Diazotrophy and Nodulation in the Burkholderiaceae
Previous Article in Journal
NF-kappaB Regulates Redox Status in Breast Cancer Subtypes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Rhizobial Symbionts Nodulating Legumes of the Tribe Genisteae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/genes9070321
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Horizontal Transfer of Symbiosis Genes within and Between Rhizobial Genera: Occurrence and Importance

by
Mitchell Andrews
1,*,
Sofie De Meyer
2,3,
Euan K. James
4,
Tomasz Stępkowski
5,
Simon Hodge
1,
Marcelo F. Simon
6 and
J. Peter W. Young
7
1
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
2
Centre for Rhizobium Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia
3
Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
4
James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
5
Autonomous Department of Microbial Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
6
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasilia DF 70770-917, Brazil
7
Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(7), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070321
Submission received: 6 May 2018 / Revised: 21 June 2018 / Accepted: 21 June 2018 / Published: 27 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Genomics of the Rhizobium-Legume Symbiosis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rhizobial symbiosis genes are often carried on symbiotic islands or plasmids that can be transferred (horizontal transfer) between different bacterial species. Symbiosis genes involved in horizontal transfer have different phylogenies with respect to the core genome of their ‘host’. Here, the literature on legume–rhizobium symbioses in field soils was reviewed, and cases of phylogenetic incongruence between rhizobium core and symbiosis genes were collated. The occurrence and importance of horizontal transfer of rhizobial symbiosis genes within and between bacterial genera were assessed. Horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial strains is of common occurrence, is widespread geographically, is not restricted to specific rhizobial genera, and occurs within and between rhizobial genera. The transfer of symbiosis genes to bacteria adapted to local soil conditions can allow these bacteria to become rhizobial symbionts of previously incompatible legumes growing in these soils. This, in turn, will have consequences for the growth, life history, and biogeography of the legume species involved, which provides a critical ecological link connecting the horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial bacteria in the soil to the above-ground floral biodiversity and vegetation community structure.

1. Introduction

Approximately 70% of the ca. 19,300 species in the Fabaceae (Leguminosae, the legume family) can fix atmospheric nitrogen (N2) via symbiotic bacteria (general term ‘rhizobia’) in root nodules [1,2]. Rhizobia reduce atmospheric N2 to ammonia (NH3) through the enzyme nitrogenase, and this NH3, as ammonium (NH4+), is transported to plant cells where it is assimilated into amino acids via the glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase (GS/GOGAT) pathway [3,4]. The ability to fix N2 can give legumes an advantage under low soil nitrogen (N) conditions if other factors are favourable for growth [5,6]. Also, legume N2 fixation can be a major input of N into a wide range of natural and agricultural ecosystems [7,8,9,10].
The most recent classification of the legumes identifies six legume sub-families, namely, the Caesalpinioideae, Cercidoideae, Detarioideae, Dialioideae, Duparquetioideae, and Papilionoideae, but only species within the Caesalpinioideae and Papilionoideae nodulate [1]. In this classification, the sub-family Caesalpinioideae includes all members of the former sub-family Mimosoideae (now referred to as the Mimosoid clade), which contains most of the nodulating legumes within the Caesalpinioideae. For most legumes, the nodulation process is initiated by the legume production of a mix of compounds, mainly flavonoids, which activate nodulation protein D (NodD) in rhizobia by stimulating the binding of NodD to nod gene promoters [11,12]. Different legumes produce different types and mixes of compounds, and this can be a point of legume rhizobium symbiosis specificity [13]. The NodD protein triggers the transcription of a range of genes within the rhizobium, including those required to produce Nod factors, the signal molecules from the rhizobium which induce nodule morphogenesis in the legume [14]. These genes include nodABC which encode the enzymes required for the synthesis of the core Nod factor structure of an N-acetyl glucosamine oligosaccharide backbone with a fatty acyl chain at the non-reducing end [12]. Nod factors differ in their length of the N-acetylglucosamine oligosaccharide backbone and length and saturation of the fatty acid chain. Other nod genes encode species-specific modifications to the Nod factor structure [12], and, related to this, specific nod genes have been shown to be major determinants of legume host specificity [15,16]. Rhizobia enter the roots of most legume species so far studied via root hair infection [2]. Host cell wall material grows around the developing ‘infection’, forming an infection thread which grows through the root cortex, branching repeatedly. Rhizobia are released from the tips of these infection threads into membrane-bound structures within the legume cells, called symbiosomes, where they differentiate into their N2-fixing form known as bacteroids in root nodules. Bacteroids differ in their level of differentiation and viability, and nodules can be indeterminate or determinate in growth, depending on the legume host [2,17,18]. Indeterminate nodules maintain meristematic activity, while determinate nodules have a transient meristem. All genera examined in the Caesalpinioideae and most tribes within the Papilionoideae had indeterminate nodules, but the Dalbergieae, Desmodieae, Phaseoleae, Psoraleeae, and some members of the Loteae had determinate nodules [2].
The nod genes and the nif genes, which encode the subunits of nitrogenase, are often carried on symbiotic islands or plasmids that can be transferred (horizontal—lateral—transfer) between different bacterial species within and across genera [19,20,21,22]. The symbiosis genes involved in horizontal transfer have phylogenies different from those of the core genome of their ‘host’ [17,22]. Here, the literature on legume–rhizobium symbioses in field soils was reviewed, and cases demonstrating incongruence between rhizobium core and symbiosis genes were collated. The occurrence and importance of horizontal transfer of rhizobial symbiosis genes within and between bacterial genera were assessed.

2. Framework and Assumptions of the Study

Rhizobia were aligned with their legume symbionts according to legume sub-family, tribe, genus, and nodule type. Where examined, bacteroids of genera in the Inverted Repeat-Lacking Clade (IRLC, Papilionoideae) were terminally differentiated and could not return to their bacterial form [2,23]. Also, several species in the IRLC were shown to have a high degree of rhizobial specificity related to specific symbiosis genes that have been shown to be transferred between rhizobial species [17], and this clade was considered separately.
The rhizobia genera used in the search were those validated in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. These are the alpha proteobacterial genera in the families Rhizobiaceae (Rhizobium, Ensifer/Sinorhizobium, Allorhizobium, Pararhizobium, Neorhizobium), Bradyrhizobiaceae (Bradyrhizobium), Phyllobacteriaceae (Mesorhizobium, Phyllobacterium), Methylobacteriaceae (Methylobacterium, Microvirga), Brucellaceae (Ochrobactrum), Xanthobacteraceae (Azorhizobium), Hyphomicrobiaceae (Devosia), and the betaproteobacterial genera in the family Burkholderiaceae (Paraburkholderia/Burkholderia, and Cupriavidus) [17].
A comprehensive collation of published cases of phylogenetic incongruence between rhizobium core and symbiosis genes until 30 September 2017 was carried out. Articles were collected by searching the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science, using each legume genus known to nodulate partnered with each of the rhizobia genera, and each of the rhizobia genera partnered with ‘horizontal gene transfer’ and ‘lateral gene transfer’ as key words. Further searches were carried out on the literature quoted in the selected papers and on those papers listed as quoting the selected papers in ISI Web of Science. Only data for plants sampled under field conditions, for plants grown in soils taken from the field, or for plants supplied field soil extracts, were used. Bacteria isolated from legume nodules were accepted as rhizobia on the basis of the criteria described previously [17]. All cases of ‘authenticated’ rhizobia for which core and symbiosis gene sequences were presented were studied further, and the cases for which the authors considered there was incongruence between core and symbiosis gene sequences are discussed. The core and symbiosis genes that showed incongruence are given in Tables. Representative data are presented for Glycine max and Phaseolus vulgaris because of the large number of publications reporting incongruence between core and symbiosis gene sequences for these two species. In some studies, incongruence was tested statistically but, in most cases, this was determined from a visual assessment of phylogenetic trees of the two sets of genes. For example, Mesorhizobium strains isolated from New Zealand endemic Sophora spp. had diverse concatenated (gene sequences aligned head to tail) glnII-recA-rpoB gene sequences but similar concatenated nodA–nodC gene sequences (Figure 1), and, here, the housekeeping and symbiosis genes were considered incongruent [17]. Subsequent statistical analysis of these sequences indicated that the housekeeping and symbiosis genes were incongruent.

3. Lateral Transfer of Symbiosis Genes

3.1. Rhizobia Associated with the Caesalpiniodeae

There are reports of phylogenetic incongruence between core and symbiosis genes for Ensifer, Cupriavidus, Burkholderia, Rhizobium, and Devosia associated with legumes in the Mimosoid clade of the sub-family Caesalpinioideae (Table 1).
Five separate studies indicated that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes had occurred between Ensifer spp. associated with species in the Caesalpinioideae [27,28,34,35,36]. For Ensifer associated with the Mexican native Leucaena leucocephala sampled in Panxi, China, gene sequences indicated that symbiotic genes of strains associated with introduced plants were transferred into indigenous strains in the soil [28]. Ensifer isolates from Vachellia macracantha sampled within the plant’s native range in Peru showed nifH and nodC sequences closely related to other American rhizobial strains, which adds support to the use of symbiotic genes as valuable indicators of geographical origin [35]. Gene sequences indicated diverse origins for the housekeeping genes nifH and nodA for seven Ensifer isolates representative of 73 isolates from Vachellia jacquemontii sampled within its native range in the Thar Desert of India [34]. The authors suggested that the stressful desert conditions, and stressful conditions in general, may favour frequent horizontal gene transfer. Alternatively, rather than promote its occurrence, stressful environments may represent a situation where the positive consequences of horizontal gene transfer in terms of natural selection are more significant, and thus horizontal gene transfer becomes more apparent within the rhizobial population.
Ten Cupriavidus rhizobia strains isolated from five Mimosa spp. in southern Uruguay showed symbiosis and housekeeping gene sequence phylogenies that were not congruent [29]. The strains separated into two groups of five strains on their 16S rRNA sequences, and one strain selected from each of these groups differed substantially in its recA and gyrB sequences. However, both the nodA and nifH sequences for the ten strains grouped together in a cluster. Also, Rhizobium altiplani Br 10423T isolated from Mimosa pudica in Distrito Federal in central Brazil had nifH and nodC sequences closely related (identical for nodC) to those of Rhizobium mesoamericanum CCGE 501T [32].
Mimosa is a genus of ca. 550 species native to the Americas, South Asia, and Africa including Madagascar [1,2]. The evidence indicates that Cupriavidus is the main rhizobial symbiont of endemic Mimosa in southern Uruguay, but Burkholderia and Rhizobium/Ensifer are the main symbionts of Mimosa in central and southern Brazil and central Mexico, respectively [29,37,38,39]. In contrast with findings for Mimosa Cupriavidus symbionts in Uruguay, the symbiosis gene sequences for Burkholderia in Brazil and Rhizobium/Ensifer in Mexico were largely congruent with their respective 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences [37,38]. This indicates that these symbiosis genes diverged over a long period within Burkholderia and Rhizobium/Ensifer without substantial horizontal transfer between species. Similarly, it was concluded that nodC and nifH sequences for Burkholderia isolated from the Piptadenia group (Piptadenia, Parapiptadenia, Pseudopiptadenia, Pityrocarpa, Anadenanthera, and Microlobius) (Mimoseae) have evolved mainly through vertical transfer, with rare occurrence of horizontal transfer [40]. Outside South America, Burkholderia strains isolated from Mimosa diplotricha and M. pudica in Yunan province in subtropical China showed diverse 16S rRNA sequences but grouped together, along with Burkholderia phymatum STM815T, on nodA sequences [31]. Also, Burkholderia caribensis TJ182 isolated from the invasive M. diplotricha in Taiwan and characterized on 16S rRNA sequence, grouped with Cupriavidus strains on nodA sequence, indicating that the nodA gene had been transferred from Cupriavidus to Burkholderia [30]. However, this transfer was not confirmed [41]. In both studies, it was concluded that it was likely that the Burkholderia ‘travelled’ with their invasive hosts from South America to South East Asia [30,31].
A more extreme case of incongruence between core and symbiosis genes was reported from India for Devosia natans isolated from the aquatic ‘water mimosa’ Neptunia natans. Here, the 16S rDNA sequences indicated that two strains isolated from N. natans were Devosia, but the nifH and nodD sequences were most closely related to those of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899T [33]. This finding indicates that the horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes has occurred across genera from Rhizobium to Devosia at some stage.

3.2. Rhizobia Associated with the Papilionoideae

3.2.1. The Inverted Repeat-Lacking Clade (IRLC)

Ensifer, Mesorhizobium, and Rhizobium are the main rhizobial symbionts of legumes in the IRLC, and there are several examples of phylogenetic incongruence between core and symbiosis genes for Mesorhizobium and Rhizobium associated with IRLC species (Table 2).
Incongruence between housekeeping and symbiosis gene sequences indicates that within-genus horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes has occurred between Mesorhizobium strains associated with Cicer arietinum [42,43,44,45,46,47], Cicer canariense [48], Astragalus glycyphyllos [56], Glycyrrhiza uralensis [57], Sphaerophysa salsula [58], Alhagi sparsifolia [59], and five Caragana spp. [60], and between Rhizobium strains associated with Fabeae spp. [49,50,51,52,53,54], and Trifolium spp. [61,62] (Table 2). Considering the crop plants, evidence is strong that indigenous Mesorhizobium muleiense in Northwest China obtained its C. arietinum (chickpea) specific symbiotic genes from Mesorhizobium ciceri or Mesorhizobium mediterraneum associated with imported C. arietinum used as a crop [46]. Similarly, 83 isolates from Trifolium repens (white clover) grown in alkaline soils in subtropical China, identified as Rhizobium anhuiense, Rhizobium leguminosarum, and a novel Rhizobium genospecies on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences, had nifH and nodC sequences similar to R. leguminosarum sv. trifolii introduced with the crop. This indicates that the symbiosis genes had been transferred from the R. leguminosarum sv. trifolii strain to the native soil bacteria [62].
In Xinjiang, China, isolates of Rhizobium multihospitium were obtained from a number of plant species from different tribes: Lathyrus odorata, Vicia hirsuta (Fabeae), Astragalus aksuensis, Astragalus sp., Oxytropis glabra, Oxytropis meinshausenii (Galegeae), Alhagi sp., Caragana jubata, Halimodendron halodendron (Hedysareae) (Table 2); Robinia pseudoacacia (Robineae), Sophora alopecurioides (Sophoreae) (Table 3); Lotus frondosus and Lotus tenuis (Loteae) (Table 4). The nifH and nodD sequences of these isolates were 100% similar to those of Rhizobium lusitanum P1–7T and D. neptuniae J1T [55], and it was suggested that nifH and nodD genes of the three rhizobial species may have the same origin. Also, isolates from S. salsula identified as Rhizobium genotypes on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed similar nifH sequences to those of the Mesorhizobium isolates, while a Bradyrhizobium isolate (16S rRNA) from Caragana intermedia had a similar nodC sequence to the Mesorhizobium isolates [58,60].
Finally, within the IRLC, the pasture legume Biserrula pelecinus was introduced into western Australia from the Mediterranean region in 1994 and, as indigenous rhizobial populations in western Australia do not nodulate this legume, the seed was inoculated with M. ciceri sv biserrulae strain WSM1271 [63,64]. In 2000, Mesorhizobium strains, including WSM2073 and WSM2075 with 16S rRNA, dnaK and GS11 phylogenies different from strain WSM1271, were isolated from nodules of B. pelecinus grown in Western Australia and shown to nodulate the legume, although the bacteria were largely ineffective with regard to N2 fixation [63,64]. Where tested, these strains had identical sequences for the symbiosis insertion regions with WSM1271, indicating that they had obtained their symbiosis genes via horizontal transfer of a symbiosis island from the inoculant within the space of six years. This quick transfer in the field was not a single event, as it was also demonstrated for commercially grown B. pelecinus inoculated with WSM1497 and resulted in three different Mesorhizobium lineages with identical symbiosis genes to the inoculant [64]. The ability of rhizobial strains that do not fix N2 to produce nodules on B. pelecinus could result in decreased yield of the crop.

3.2.2. Papilionoideae with Indeterminate Nodules Excluding the IRLC

Phylogenetic incongruence occurs between core and symbiosis genes for Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Burkholderia, Ensifer, Mesorhizobium, Methylobacterium, Microvirga, Neorhizobium, Ochrobactrum, Rhizobium, and Phyllobacterium associated with Papilionoideae legumes with indeterminate nodules excluding the IRLC (Table 3).
Four studies carried out on species within the Crotalarieae found evidence of horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between different genera of rhizobia. Rhizobium isolated from Aspalathus sp. grown in the Cape Fynbos biome in South Africa and characterized on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences had nifH and nodA,B,C sequences closely related to those of Mesorhizobium [65]. Methylobacterium nodulans ORS2060T isolated from Crotalaria podocarpa in Senegal, grouped with Bradyrhizobium spp. on nodA sequences [66]. Microvirga lotonidis WSM3557T and Microvirga zambiensis WSM3693T isolated from Listia angolensis in Zambia had identical nodA sequences which clustered with strains of Bradyrhizobium, Burkholderia, and Methylobacterium [67]. Burkholderia, isolated from Rafnia triflora in the Core Cape subregion of South Africa and characterized on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences, had a nifH sequence closely related to those of Ensifer spp. [68].
Lemaire and co-workers specifically assessed the degree of horizontal transfer of nodulation genes within rhizobia genera of a range of legumes endemic to the Cape Fynbos biome in South Africa [65]. It was concluded that Mesorhizobium strains isolated from Aspalathus spp., Argyrolobium spp. (Genisteae, Table 3), Otholobium spp., and Psoralea spp. (Psoraleeae, Table 4), and Burkholderia isolated from Podalyria calyptrata (Table 3) show high degrees of horizontal transfer of nodulation genes among closely related species. In associated studies, a Mesorhizobium isolate from Psoralea sp., characterized on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences, aligned closely to Ensifer on nifH sequence, and a Mesorhizobium isolate from Psoralea oligophylla aligned closely to Burkholderia on nodA sequence (Table 4) [68]. Also, for Burkholderia isolated from P. calyptrata, different branching patterns were found among numerous isolates for recA and nodA phylogenies [83]. In a separate study of Burkholderia isolates from Hypocalyptus spp. (Hypocalypteae) and Cyclopia spp., P. calyptrata and Virgilia oroboides (Podalyrieae) sampled in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent and, generally, phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent with those from 16S rRNA and recA sequences [79]. These findings confirm that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes is common in South African Burkholderia, which is in contrast with findings for South American Burkholderia rhizobial symbionts [37,40].
There is also strong evidence that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes has occurred between different Bradyrhizobium spp. associated with Cytisus spp. [69,70,71], Genista versicolor [72] and Lupinus spp. [73,74,75,77,78] in the tribe Genisteae (Table 3). In particular, most Bradyrhizobium isolates from native Lupinus spp. (and native Genisteae species in general [90]) in Europe form a distinct lineage, ‘Clade II’, on the basis of their nodA gene sequences [75,81]. Also, Bradyrhizobium isolates from native Cytisus villosus in Morocco had diverse 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences, but all showed similar nifH and nodC sequences which were closely related to those of Bradyrhizobium japonicum sv. genistearum [71]. These findings indicate that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes has played a role in the development of specific relationships between Genisteae spp. and Bradyrhizobium spp. over wide areas. Bradyrhizobium isolated from invasive Cytisus scoparius in the United States had housekeeping genes similar to indigenous Bradyrhizobium, but their nodC, nifD, and nifH sequences were highly similar or identical to those of a Bradyrhizobium strain from Spain [70]. It appears, therefore, that indigenous North American Bradyrhizobium had acquired symbiosis genes from Bradyrhizobium symbionts of European C. scoparius via horizontal gene transfer.
Microvirga and Ochrobactrum, which are rare as rhizobial symbionts, can nodulate specific Lupinus spp. [17,67,76]. The nifD and nifH sequence for Microvirga lupini Lut6T isolated from Lupinus texensis aligned closely to Rhizobium etli CFN 42T, while its nodA sequence was placed in a clade that contained strains of Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Ensifer [67]. The nifH sequence for Ochrobactrum lupini LUP21T isolated from Lupinus honoratus in Argentina showed 99.6% similarity to two Mesorhizobium strains, while its nodD sequence showed 86.4% similarity to R. etli CFN 42T [76]. Thus, evidence is strong that M. lupini Lut6T and O. lupini LUP21T obtained their symbiosis genes from other, more common rhizobial genera.
Incongruence between housekeeping and symbiosis genes indicate that horizontal gene transfer of symbiosis genes has occurred between Mesorhizobium strains from Coronilla varia (Loteae) grown in Shaanxi province, China [80], Bradyrhizobium isolates from Ornithopus spp. (Loteae) sampled in Europe and western Australia [75,81], and Ensifer strains from Tephrosia spp. (Millettieae) in the Indian Thar Desert [82]. New Zealand endemic Sophora spp. are nodulated by diverse Mesorhizobium spp. with similar symbiosis genes (Figure 1) [85,86,91,92]. Generally, Mesorhizobium isolates from the same field site grouped together on housekeeping gene sequences [85,86]. This apparent link between housekeeping gene sequences and field site in association with almost identical symbiosis genes is consistent with the proposal that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes to Mesorhizobium strains adapted to local soil conditions has occurred, but this requires further testing. The relationship between New Zealand endemic Sophora species and Mesorhizobium with particular symbiosis genes is highly specific and contrasts with findings for Sophora alopecuroides and Sophora. flavescens sampled in China, which are nodulated by Ensifer, Mesorhizobium, Phyllobacterium, and Rhizobium with a wide range of nodC and nifH gene sequences [87,93]. The data indicate that symbiosis genes of rhizobia associated with S. alopecuroides and S. flavescens are primarily maintained by vertical transfer, but there is also evidence for occasional horizontal gene transfer of symbiosis genes within and between rhizobia genera associated with these legume species [87,93].
Horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes has occurred across genera in the case of Agrobacterium sp. strain IRBG74 originally isolated from the aquatic legume Sesbania cannabina and subsequently shown to effectively nodulate Sesbania sesban and seven other Sesbania species [21]. Housekeeping gene sequences identified strain IRBG74 as a close relative of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium radiobacter (=Agrobacterium tumefaciens). However, it did not contain vir genes but harboured a sym-plasmid containing nifH and nodA genes with sequences similar to those of Ensifer spp. which nodulate S. cannabina. In a separate study, Rhizobium/Agrobacterium and Ensifer isolates from S. cannabina with diverse housekeeping gene sequences had similar nifH and nodA sequences, and one Rhizobium/ Agrobacterium strain showed highly similar nifH and nodA sequences to strain IRBG74 [84].
Within the Thermopsideae, Ammopiptanthus nanus and Ammopiptanthus mongolicus sampled across nine sites in three regions of China were nodulated by Ensifer, Neorhizobium, Pararhizobium, and Rhizobium [88]. For strains characterized to species level on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences, Ensifer arboris and Neorhizobium galegeae strains aligned with Ensifer meliloti ATCC9930T on nifH and nodC gene sequences, Phyllobacterium giardinii strains aligned with R. leguminosarum sv. viciae USDA 2370T on nifH and nodC gene sequences, and R./A. radiobacter strains aligned with E. fredii USDA 205T on nifH and nodC gene sequences [88]. For Anagyris latifolia grown in soil samples collected from within natural populations of the legume growing in the Canary Islands, Mesorhizobium isolates with diverse 16S–23S rDNA ITS, 16S rRNA and glnII gene sequences had identical nodC sequences closely related to Mesorhizobium tianshanense USDA 3592T [89].

3.2.3. Papilionoideae with Determinate Nodules

Phylogenetic incongruence between core and symbiosis genes has been described for Bradyrhizobium, Ensifer, Mesorhizobium, Microvirga, Pararhizobium, Phyllobacterium, and Rhizobium associated with Papilionoideae legumes with determinate nodules (Table 4).
Considering crop legumes with determinate nodules, incongruence between housekeeping and symbiosis genes indicates that within-genus horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes has occurred between Bradyrhizobium spp. associated with Arachis hypogaea (peanut) [94,95], Bradyrhizobium, and Ensifer spp. associated with G. max (soybean) [97,98,99,100] and Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) [110,112], Rhizobium spp. associated with P. vulgaris (common bean) [103,105,106] and Mesorhizobium associated with Lotus corniculatus (bird’s-foot trefoil) [19,20]. The data indicate that, in particular cases, symbiosis genes of rhizobia associated with all these species have transferred to indigenous soil bacteria. The transfer of symbiosis genes from Mesorhizobium loti used as inoculum on L. corniculatus in New Zealand to indigenous Mesorhizobium strains has been studied in detail [19,20]. Here, it was shown that the chromosomal symbiotic element of M. loti ICMP 3153 is transferrable between Mesorhizobium strains and can be fully functional in the recipient strain. For G. max in Brazil, an indigenous Bradyrhizobium elkanii strain and an indigenous Ensifer fredii strain had similar nifH, nodC, and nodY-nodA gene sequences to those of B. japonicum used as inoculant. This is strong evidence that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes had occurred between Bradyrhizobium inoculum and indigenous strains of Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer [97]. An Ensifer isolate from G. max in north-eastern Afghanistan had identical nodD1 and nifD sequences to those of Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense [101].
For P. vulgaris, strains of R. leguminosarum sv. phaseoli, R. gallicum, and Pararhizobium giardinii, isolated from plants grown in France, and R. etli, isolated in Mexico and Belize, had highly similar nodC sequences, and a strain characterized as Rhizobium on its 16S rRNA sequence aligned with E. meliloti on its nodC sequence [103]. R. lusitanum P1–7T isolated from P. vulgaris in Portugal had nifH and nodD sequences similar to R. tropici CIAT 899T and D. neptuniae LMG 21357T [104]. In a related study, a Pararhizobium giardinii strain characterized on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences aligned with Ensifer spp. on nodC sequence [107].
Data are presented for three Vigna crop species (Table 4). For Vigna. angularis (adzuki bean), grown in the sub-tropical region of China, Bradyrhizobium, and E. fredii were major, and Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Ochrobactrum were minor rhizobial symbionts [108]. Here, 16S rRNA, housekeeping and nodC gene phylogenies were congruent, except that one Rhizobium strain aligned with E. fredii strains on nodC sequences. In a related study on Bradyrhizobium isolates from V. radiata (mungbean) and V. unguiculata grown in subtropical China, 16S rRNA, housekeeping and nodC gene phylogenies were mainly congruent [116]. Similarly, for V. radiata grown in three agro-ecological regions in Nepal, Bradyrhizobium 16S–23S RNA IGS, 16S rRNA, nodA, nodD1, and nifD sequences were mainly congruent, but five Bradyrhizobium strains aligned with E. meliloti on nodA sequences [109]. In contrast, overall phylogenies for core and nodulation genes for Bradyrhizobium, isolated from V. unguiculata at a range of sites in Botswana and Roodeplaat, South Africa, were incongruent [110]. It was concluded that horizontal gene transfer has significantly influenced the evolution of V. unguiculata root-nodule bacteria in these African countries [110]. Also, for M. vignae BR3299T isolated from V. unguiculata in north-east Brazil, the nifH gene sequence aligned with Mesorhizobium and Rhizobium strains, which supports the proposal that M. vignae BR3299T obtained its nifH gene via horizontal transfer from Rhizobium [111].
Examples of horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes within and between rhizobial genera were also found for non-crop species with determinate nodules. For Desmodium spp. (Desmodieae) growing in Panxi, Sichuan, China, nodC sequences for one Pararhizobium, one Rhizobium/Agrobacterium, and two Rhizobium isolates characterized on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences were identical to those for Ensifer strains isolated from L. leucocephala in China (Panxi) and Brazil [96]. It was concluded that horizontal transfer of nodC genes had occurred between the different genera, but that further work was required to determine the direction of gene transfer [96]. Evidence was also found for lateral transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial genera associated with G. soja (‘wild soybean’). Here, Ensifer and Rhizobium isolates characterized on 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene sequences formed a single Ensifer lineage on nifH and nodA sequences [102].
Across two studies, diverse Mesorhizobium isolated from seven Lotus species in the Canary Islands and characterized on 16S rRNA, atpD, and recA gene sequences clustered together close to M. loti on nodC sequences [113,114]. Similarly, diverse Mesorhizobium (16S rRNA) isolated from L. tenuis grown in three soils of the Salado River Basin Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, clustered together in a large clade on nifH and nodC sequences, again close to M. loti [115]. An Aminobacter (Phyllobacteriaceae) strain was also reported to nodulate L. tenuis and have a nodC sequence similar to the Mesorhizobium strains. This is the first report of an Aminobacter rhizobial strain, however, and requires verification. Similarly, Geobacillus (Phylum Firmicutes), Paenibacillus (Firmicutes), and Rhodococcus (Actinobacteria) were reported as rhizobial symbionts of L. corniculatus [117]. It was stated that these bacterial species had similar nodA gene sequences to Mesorhizobium isolates from the same plants and that they had obtained their nodA gene via horizontal transfer from the Mesorhizobium. This report also needs to be verified using authentification experiments and whole-genome sequencing.

4. Recombination of Symbiotic Islands

Incongruence between rhizobium core and symbiosis genes is strong evidence that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes has occurred between strains, but it tells little about when the transfer took place. However, there are several cases linked to rhizobia associated with invasive species or use of rhizobial inoculum on crop species where the transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial species has been monitored. Here, we briefly consider the recombination of symbiotic islands and focus on two studies in which symbiosis genes were shown to transfer between a Mesorhizobium strain used as a crop inoculant and indigenous soil Mesorhizobium. The structure and physiology of R. leguminosarum symbiotic plasmids is considered in a separate paper in this Special Issue of Genes [118].
Firstly, in an important early study, the chromosomal symbiotic element of M. loti strain ICMP 3153 used as inoculum on L. corniculatus in New Zealand was shown to have transferred to indigenous Mesorhizobium strains and was fully functional in the recipient strains [19,20]. Subsequent work on M. loti strain R7A, a derivative of strain ICMP 3153, has shown that the symbiosis island is a single 502 kb Integrative Conjugative Element (ICEMlSymR7A) which integrates into a phenylalanine transfer RNA (phe-tRNA) gene [119,120,121] (Figure 2). The recombination reaction is driven by the recombination directionality factor S (RdfS) on the attachment sites attLS and attRS, resulting in the excised ICEMISymR7A. The attBS and attPS sites facilitate the reintegration of the ICE into the chromosome, driven by integration factor S (IntS). In a separate study, the full genome sequence was reported for M. ciceri strain CC1192, which is the sole inoculant used on C. arietinum in Australia [122]. The nod, nif, and fix genes appear to be located on a 419 kb symbiosis island integrated within the chromosome of strain CC1192. This symbiosis island shows a similar structure to that of M. loti R7A strain.
The second example is the chromosomal symbiotic element of M. ciceri sv biserrula strain WSM1271, which was used as inoculum on B. pelecinus in western Australia. Again, the symbiotic island was shown to have been transferred from the inoculum to indigenous Mesorhizobium strains, but, here, the recipient strains were ineffective or poorly effective on N2 fixation of the host plant [63,64]. In this case, the symbiosis ICE exists as three separate chromosomal regions when integrated in their host (alpha, beta, and gamma in Figure 3) [121,123]. These regions occupy three different recombinase attachment sites that do not excise independently but recombine in the host chromosome to form a single contiguous region prior to excision and conjugative transfer. Nine additional tripartite ICEs were identified in diverse mesorhizobia, and transfer was demonstrated for three of them [123]. Single-part ICE and tripartite ICEs appear to be widespread in the Mesorhizobium genus [122,123].

5. Occurrence and Importance of Horizontal Transfer of Rhizobial Symbiosis Genes

Andrews and Andrews [17] reviewed the literature on legume–rhizobia symbioses in field soils and related genotypically characterized rhizobia (genus level) to the taxonomy of the legumes (species level) from which they were isolated. Symbioses were described for approximately 450 legume species over 255 separate studies, and phylogenetic incongruence between rhizobium core and symbiosis genes was reported in 73 (~30%) of these studies (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). In the current review, we have listed examples of phylogenetic incongruence between rhizobium core and symbiosis genes for strains of 14 of the currently accepted 15 genera of rhizobia. The exception is Allorhizobium, for which no sequences for symbiosis genes are available for comparison with those in the databases. Thus, horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial strains is of common occurrence and is not restricted to specific rhizobial genera.
Phylogenetic comparisons of gene sequences indicated that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes was more common within than between genera. In several cases such as Bradyrhizobium associated with native Genisteae species in Europe [90] and Mesorhizobium associated with Sophora spp. throughout New Zealand [85,86], within-genus horizontal transfer of nod genes has occurred across many bacterial species and is associated with legume divergence over a wide range of habitats and over long time periods. In 27 studies (~35% of those listed here), gene sequences indicated that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes had occurred between different rhizobia genera. In most cases, this involved gene transfer between the common alphaproteobacterial genera Bradyrhizobium, Ensifer, Mesorhizobium, and Rhizobium. However, evidence is strong that these genera provided the symbiosis genes for the less common rhizobia genera Devosia [33], Methylobacterium [66], Microvirga [67,111], and Ochrobactrum [76], which thrive under particular environmental conditions. It seems certain that within- and between-genera horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes to indigenous soil bacteria has aided the diversification and establishment of legumes in different habitats.
The data indicate that horizontal transfers of symbiosis genes between alpha- and beta-proteobacteria and between the beta-proteobacteria Burkholderia and Cupriavidus are of rare occurrence. Only two cases (in one study) were found for horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between alpha- and beta-proteobacteria. Specifically, in the Core Cape subregion of South Africa, Burkholderia isolated from R. triflora had a nifH sequence closely related to those of Ensifer spp., and a Mesorhizobium isolate from P. oligophylla aligned closely to Burkholderia on nodA sequence [68]. There are no confirmed reports of horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between Burkholderia and Cupriavidus, which may at least in part be related to the genera not overlapping extensively in their biogeographic ranges [17,29,38]. For Burkholderia, findings indicate that within-genus horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes is rare for South American species but common in South African species [37,40,65,79]. The reasons for this regional difference are not clear, but the patterns across different rhizobial genera indicate that ‘lateral transfer of symbiosis traits is an important evolutionary force among rhizobia of the Cape Fynbos biome’ [65]. The potential rapidity of these evolutionary-scale changes in bacterial genomes was illustrated by the example from western Australia, where populations of indigenous Mesorhizobium, originally unable to nodulate the pasture legume B. pelecinus, were isolated from nodules and displayed symbiosis genes obtained from the commercial inoculant within six years [63,64].
In relation to the legume host, horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes to rhizobia and non-rhizobial bacteria that are adapted to local soil conditions is likely to increase the likelihood of establishment of a successful legume–rhizobia symbiosis in these soils as long the recipient bacteria can induce functional N2-fixing nodules on the legume. The ecological success of the transfer is enhanced by the strong selection the plant exerts towards efficient infection and nodulation and the action of error-prone DNA polymerases that accelerate adaptation to symbiosis after gene transfer [22].
By considering all of the examples described here, we can conclude that horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial strains is of common occurrence, is widespread geographically, is not restricted to specific rhizobial genera, and occurs within and between rhizobial genera. The transfer of symbiosis genes to bacteria adapted to local soil conditions can allow these bacteria to become rhizobial symbionts of previously incompatible legumes growing in these soils. This, in turn, will have consequences for the growth, life history, and biogeography of the legume species involved, which provides a critical ecological link connecting the horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial bacteria in the soil to the above-ground floral biodiversity and vegetation community structure.

Author Contributions

M.A. was lead author of the paper and coordinated the contributions from the other authors. S.D.M., E.K.J., T.S., S.H., M.F.S., and J.P.W.Y. contributed to the writing of the paper.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG). A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon 2017, 66, 44–77. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sprent, J.I.; Ardley, J.K.; James, E.K. From North to South: A latitudinal look at legume nodulation processes. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 89, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Betti, M.; Garcia-Calderón, M.; Perez-Delgado, C.M.; Credali, A.; Estivill, G.; Galván, F.; Vega, J.M.; Márquez, A.J. Glutamine synthetase in legumes: Recent advances in enzyme structure and functional genomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 7994–8024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Seabra, A.R.; Pereira, P.A.; Becker, J.D.; Carvalho, H.G. Inhibition of glutamine synthetase by phosphinothricin leads to transcriptome reprogramming in root nodules of Medicago truncatula. Mol. Plant–Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 976–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Raven, J.A.; Andrews, M. Evolution of tree nutrition. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 1050–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Andrews, M.; Raven, J.A.; Lea, P.J. Do plants need nitrate? The mechanisms by which nitrogen form affects plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2013, 163, 174–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Andrews, M.; Scholefield, D.; Abberton, M.T.; McKenzie, B.A.; Hodge, S.; Raven, J.A. Use of white clover as an alternative to nitrogen fertilizer for dairy pastures in nitrate vulnerable zones in the UK: Productivity, environmental impact and economic considerations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 151, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jackson, L.E.; Burger, M.; Cavagnaro, T.R. Roots, nitrogen transformations, and ecosystem services. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 341–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Andrews, M.; James, E.K.; Sprent, J.I.; Boddey, R.M.; Gross, E.; Dos Reis, F.B., Jr. Nitrogen fixation in legumes and actinorhizal plants in natural ecosystems: Values obtained using 15N natural abundance. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2011, 4, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vitousek, P.M.; Menge, D.N.L.; Reed, S.C.; Cleveland, C.C. Biological nitrogen fixation: Rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2013, 368, 20130119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Peck, M.C.; Fischer, R.F.; Long, S.R. Diverse flavonoids stimulate NodD1 binding to nod gene promoters in Simorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5417–5427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, D.; Yang, S.; Tang, F.; Zhu, H. Symbiosis specificity in the legume-rhizobial mutualism. Cell Microbiol. 2012, 14, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, C.-W.; Murray, J.D. The role of flavonoids in nodulation host-range specificity: An update. Plants 2016, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oldroyd, G.E.; Downie, J.A. Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 519–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Roche, P.; Maillet, F.; Plazanet, C.; Debellé, F.; Ferro, M.; Truchet, G.; Promé, J.-C.; Dénarié, J. The common nodABC genes of Rhizobium meliloti are host-range determinants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 15305–15310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Perret, X.; Staehelin, C.; Broughton, W.J. Molecular basis of symbiotic promiscuity. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 180–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Andrews, M.; Andrews, M.E. Specificity in legume rhizobia symbioses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, W.Y.Y.; Ridgway, H.J.; James, T.K.; James, E.K.; Chen, W.-M.; Sprent, J.I.; Young, J.P.W.; Andrews, M. Burkholderia sp. induces functional nodules on the South African invasive legume Dipogon lignosus (Phaseoleae) in New Zealand soils. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 68, 542–555. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Sullivan, J.T.; Patrick, H.N.; Lowther, W.L.; Scott, D.B.; Ronson, C.W. Nodulating strains of Rhizobium loti arise through chromosomal gene transfer in the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 8985–8989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sullivan, J.T.; Ronson, C.W. Evolution of rhizobia by acquisition of a 500-kb symbiosis island that integrates into a phe-tRNA gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5145–5149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Cummings, S.P.; Gyaneshwar, P.; Vinuesa, P.; Farruggia, F.T.; Andrews, M.; Humphry, D.; Elliott, G.N.; Nelson, A.; Orr, C.; Pettitt, D.; et al. Nodulation of Sesbania species by Rhizobium (Agrobacterium) strain IRBG74 and other rhizobia. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 2510–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Remigi, P.; Zhu, J.; Young, J.P.W.; Masson-Boivin, C. Symbiosis within symbiosis: Evolving nitrogen-fixing legume symbionts. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mergaert, P.; Uchiumi, T.; Alunni, B.; Evanno, G.; Cheron, A.; Catrice, O.; Mausset, A.-E.; Barloy-Hubler, F.; Galibert, F.; Kondorosi, A.; et al. Eukaryotic control on bacterial cell cycle and differentiation in the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5230–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA 7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 37, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Swofford, D.L. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony; Version 3.1; Smithsonian Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  26. Farris, J.S.; Källersjö, M.; Kluge, A.G.; Bult, C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 1994, 10, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rincón-Rosales, R.; Lloret, L.; Ponce, E.; Martínez-Romero, E. Rhizobia with different symbiotic efficiencies nodulate Acaciella angustissima in Mexico, including Sinorhizobium chiapanecum sp. nov. which has common symbiotic genes with Sinorhizobium mexicanum. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 67, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xu, K.W.; Penttinen, P.; Chen, Y.X.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, X. Symbiotic efficiency and phylogeny of the rhizobia isolated from Leucaena leucocephala in arid-hot river valley area in Panxi, Sichuan, China. Appl. Microbiol. Biotchnol. 2013, 97, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Platero, R.; James, E.K.; Rios, C.; Iriarte, A.; Sandes, L.; Zabaleta, M.; Battistoni, F.; Fabiano, E. Novel Cupriavidus strains isolated from root nodules of native Uruguayan Mimosa species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 3150–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Elliott, G.N.; Chou, J.-H.; Chen, W.-M.; Bloemberg, G.V.; Bontemps, C.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Velázquez, E.; Young, J.P.W.; Sprent, J.I.; James, E.K. Burkholderia spp. are the most competitive symbionts of Mimosa, particularly under N-limited conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 762–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, X.Y.; Wei, S.; Wang, F.; James, E.K.; Guo, X.Y.; Zagar, C.; Xia, L.G.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y.P. Burkholderia and Cupriavidus spp. are the preferred symbionts of Mimosa spp. in Southern China. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 80, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Baraúna, A.C.; Rouws, L.F.M.; Simoes-Araujo, J.L.; dos Reis, F.B., Jr.; Iannetta, P.P.M.; Maluk, M.; Goi, S.R.; Reis, V.M.; James, E.K.; Zilli, J.E. Rhizobium altiplani sp. nov., isolated from effective nodules on Mimosa pudica growing in untypically alkaline soil in Central Brazil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rivas, R.; Velázquez, E.; Willems, A.; Vizcaíno, N.; Subba-Rao, N.S.; Mateos, P.F.; Gillis, M.; Dazzo, F.B.; Martínez-Molina, E. A new species of Devosia that forms a unique nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbiosis with the aquatic legume Neptunia natans (L.f.) Druce. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5217–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sankhla, I.S.; Tak, N.; Meghwal, R.R.; Choudhary, S.; Tak, A.; Rathi, S.; Sprent, J.I.; James, E.K.; Gehlot, H.S. Molecular characterization of nitrogen fixing microsymbionts from root nodules of Vachellia (Acacia) jacquemontii, a native legume from the Thar Desert of India. Plant Soil 2017, 410, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cordero, I.; Ruiz-Díez, B.; de la Peña, T.C.; Balaguer, L.; Lucas, M.M.; Rincón, A.; Pueyo, J.J. Rhizobial diversity, symbiotic effectiveness and structure of nodules of Vachellia macracantha. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 96, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Degefu, T.; Wolde-meskel, E.; Frostegård, Å. Phylogenetic multilocus sequence analysis identifies seven novel Ensifer genospecies isolated from a less-well-explored biogeographical region in East Africa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 2286–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bontemps, C.; Elliott, G.N.; Simon, M.F.; dos Reis, F.B., Jr.; Gross, E.; Lawton, R.C.; Neto, N.E.; de Fátima Loureiro, M.; de Faria, S.M.; Sprent, J.I.; et al. Burkholderia species are ancient symbionts of legumes. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Bontemps, C.; Rogel, M.A.; Wiechmann, A.; Mussabekova, A.; Moody, S.; Simon, M.F.; Moulin, L.; Elliott, G.N.; Lacercat-Didier, L.; Dasilva, C.; et al. Endemic Mimosa species from Mexico prefer alphaproteobacterial rhizobial symbionts. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. De Castro Pires, R.; dos Reis Júnior, F.B.; Zilli, J.E.; Fisher, D.; Hoffmann, A.; James, E.K.; Simon, M.F. Soil characteristics determine the rhizobia in association with different species of Mimosa in central Brazil. Plant Soil 2018, 423, 411–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bournaud, C.; de Faria, S.M.; dos Santos, J.M.F.; Tisseyre, P.; Silva, M.; Chaintreuil, C.; Gross, E.; James, E.K.; Prin, Y.; Moulin, L. Burkholderia species are the most common and preferred nodulating symbionts of the Piptadenia group (Tribe Mimoseae). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Estrada-de los Santos, P.; Palmer, M.; Chávez-Ramírez, B.; Beukes, C.; Steenkamp, E.T.; Briscoe, L.; Khan, N.; Maluk, M.; Lafos, M.; Humm, E.; et al. Whole genome analyses suggest that Burkholderia sensu lato contains two additional novel genera (Mycetohabitans gen. nov., and Trinickia gen. nov.): Implications for the evolution of diazotrophy and nodulation in the Burkholderiaceae. Genes 2018, 9, 268. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rivas, R.; Laranjo, M.; Mateos, P.F.; Oliveira, S.; Martinez-Molina, E.; Velázquez, E. Strains of Mesorhizobium amorphae and Mesorhizobium tianshanense, carrying symbiotic genes of common chickpea endosymbiotic species, constitute a novel biovar (ciceri) capable of nodulating Cicer arietinum. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Laranjo, M.; Alexandre, A.; Rivas, R.; Velázquez, E.; Young, J.P.W.; Oliveira, S. Chickpea rhizobia symbiosis genes are highly conserved across multiple Mesorhizobium species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 66, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Laranjo, M.; Young, J.P.W.; Oliveira, S. Multilocus sequence analysis reveals multiple symbiovars within Mesorhizobium species. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 35, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, J.J.; Lou, K.; Jin, X.; Mao, P.H.; Wang, E.T.; Tian, C.F.; Sui, X.H.; Chen, W.F.; Chen, W.X. Distinctive Mesorhizobium populations associated with Cicer arietinum L. in alkaline soils of Xinjiang, China. Plant Soil 2012, 353, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, J.; Yang, X.; Guo, C.; de Lajudie, P.; Singh, R.P.; Wang, E.; Chen, W. Mesorhizobium muleiense and Mesorhizobium gsp. nov. are symbionts of Cicer arietinum L. in alkaline soils of Gansu, Northwest China. Plant Soil 2017, 410, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tena, W.; Wolde-Meskel, E.; Degefu, T.; Walley, F. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of rhizobia nodulating chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in soils from southern and central Ethiopia. Can. J. Microbiol. 2017, 63, 690–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Armas-Carpote, N.; Pérez-Yépez, J.; Martínez-Hidalgo, P.; Garzón-Machado, V.; del Arco-Aguilar, M.; Velázquez, E.; Léon-Barrios, M. Core and symbiotic genes reveal nine Mesorhizobium genospecies and three symbiotic lineages among the rhizobia nodulating Cicer canariense in its natural habitat (La Palma, Canary Islands). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 37, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mutch, L.A.; Young, J.P.W. Diversity and specificity of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae on wild and cultivated legumes. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 2435–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tian, C.F.; Wang, E.T.; Wu, L.J.; Han, T.X.; Chen, W.F.; Gu, C.T.; Gu, J.G.; Chen, W.X. Rhizobium fabae sp. nov., a bacterium that nodulates Vicia faba. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 2871–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Santillana, N.; Ramírez-Bahena, M.H.; García-Fraile, P.; Velázquez, E.; Zúñiga, D. Phylogenetic diversity based on rrs, atpD, recA genes and 16S–23S intergenic sequence analyses of rhizobial strains isolated from Vicia faba and Pisum sativum in Peru. Arch. Microbiol. 2008, 189, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Saidi, S.; Ramírez-Bahena, M.H.; Santillana, N.; Zúñiga, D.; Álvarez-Martínez, E.R.; Peix, A.; Mhamdi, R.; Velázquez, E. Rhizobium laguerreae sp. nov. nodulates Vicia faba on several continents. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, Y.J.; Zheng, W.T.; Everall, I.; Young, J.P.W.; Zhang, X.X.; Tian, C.F.; Sui, X.H.; Wang, E.T.; Chen, W.X. Rhizobium anhuiense sp. nov., isolated from effective nodules of Vicia faba and Pisum sativum. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2960–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rashid, M.H.; Young, J.P.W.; Everall, I.; Clercx, P.; Willems, A.; Braun, M.S.; Wink, M. Average nucleotide identity of genome sequences supports the description of Rhizobium lentis sp. nov., Rhizobium bangladeshense sp. nov. and Rhizobium binae sp.nov from lentil (Lens culinaris) nodules. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 3037–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Han, T.X.; Wang, E.T.; Wu, L.J.; Chen, W.F.; Gu, J.G.; Gu, C.T.; Tian, C.F.; Chen, W.X. Rhizobium multihospitium sp. nov., isolated from multiple legume species native of Xinjiang, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1693–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gnat, S.; Malek, W.; Oleńska, E.; Wdowiak-Wróbel, S.; Kalita, M.; Lotocka, B.; Wójcik, M. Phylogeny of symbiotic genes and the symbiotic properties of rhizobia specific to Astragalus glycyphyllos L. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mousavi, S.A.; Li, L.; Wei, G.; Räsänen, L.; Lindström, K. Evolution and taxonomy of native mesorhizobia nodulating medicinal Glycyrrhiza species in China. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Deng, Z.S.; Zhao, L.F.; Kong, Z.Y.; Yang, W.Q.; Lindström, K.; Wang, E.T.; Wei, G.H. Diversity of endophytic bacteria within nodules of the Sphaerophysa salsula in different regions of Loess Plateau in China. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 76, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wei, G.; Chen, W.; Young, J.P.W.; Bontemps, C. A new clade of Mesorhizobium nodulating Alhagi sparsifolia. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 32, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lu, Y.L.; Chen, W.F.; Wang, E.T.; Guan, S.H.; Yan, X.R.; Chen, W.X. Genetic diversity and biogeography of rhizobia associated with Caragana species in three ecological regions of China. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 32, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Marek-Kozaczuk, M.; Leszcz, A.; Wielbo, J.; Wdowiak-Wróbel, S.; Skorupska, A. Rhizobium pisi sv. trifolii K3.22 harboring nod genes of the Rhizobium leguminosarum sv. trifolii cluster. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, J.J.; Jing, X.Y.; de Lajudie, P.; Ma, C.; He, P.X.; Singh, R.P.; Chen, W.F.; Wang, E.T. Association of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) with rhizobia of sv. trifolii belonging to three genomic species in alkaline soils in North and East China. Plant Soil 2016, 407, 417–427. [Google Scholar]
  63. Nandaseena, K.G.; O’Hara, G.W.; Tiwari, R.P.; Howieson, J.G. Rapid in situ evolution of nodulating strains for Biserrula pelecinus L. through lateral transfer of a symbiosis island from the original mesorhizobial inoculant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 7365–7367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nandaseena, K.G.; O’Hara, G.W.; Tiwari, R.P.; Sezmiş, E.; Howieson, J.G. In situ lateral transfer of symbiosis islands results in rapid evolution of diverse competitive strains of mesorhizobia suboptimal in symbiotic nitrogen fixation on the pasture legume Biserrula pelecinus L. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2496–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lemaire, B.; Van Cauwenberghe, J.; Chimphango, S.; Stirton, C.; Honnay, O.; Smets, E.; Muasya, A.M. Recombination and horizontal transfer of nodulation and ACC deaminase (acdS) genes within Alpha- and Betaproreobacteria nodulating legumes of the Cape Fynbos biome. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015, 91, fiv118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sy, A.; Giraud, E.; Jourand, P.; Garcia, N.; Willems, A.; de Lajudie, P.; Prin, Y.; Neyra, M.; Gillis, M.; Boivin-Masson, C.; et al. Methylotrophic Methylobacterium bacteria nodulate and fix nitrogen in symbiosis with legumes. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ardley, J.K.; Parker, M.A.; De Meyer, S.E.; Trengove, R.D.; O’Hara, G.W.; Reeve, W.G.; Yates, R.J.; Dilworth, M.J.; Willems, A.; Howieson, J.G. Microvirga lupini sp. nov., Microvirga lotononidis sp. nov. and Microvirga zambiensis sp. nov. are alphaproteobacterial root-nodule bacteria that specifically nodulate and fix nitrogen with geographically and taxonomically separate legume hosts. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 2579–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lemaire, B.; Dlodlo, O.; Chimphango, S.; Stirton, C.; Schrire, B.; Boatwright, J.S.; Honnay, O.; Smets, E.; Sprent, J.; James, E.K.; et al. Symbiotic diversity, specificity and distribution of rhizobia in native legumes of the Core Cape Subregion (South Africa). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015, 91, fiv118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Vinuesa, P.; Léon-Barrios, M.; Silva, C.; Willems, A.; Jarabo-Lorenzo, A.; Pérez-Galdona, R.; Werner, D.; Martínez-Romero, E. Bradyrhizobium canariense sp. nov., an acid-tolerant endosymbiont that nodulates endemic genistoid legumes (Papilionoideae: Genisteae) from the Canary Islands, along with Bradyrhizobium japonicum bv. genistearum, Bradyrhizobium genospecies alpha and Bradyrhizobium genospecies beta. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Horn, K.; Parker, I.M.; Malek, W.; Rodríguez-Echeverria, S.; Matthew, A.P. Disparate origins of Bradyrhizobium symbionts for invasive populations of Cytisus scoparius (Leguminosae) in North America. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014, 89, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chahboune, R.; Barrijal, S.; Moreno, S.; Bedmar, E.J. Characterization of Bradyrhizobium species isolated from root nodules of Cytisus villosus grown in Morocco. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 34, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cobo-Díaz, J.F.; Martínez-Hidalgo, P.; Fernández-González, A.J.; Martínez-Molina, E.; Toro, N.; Velázquez, E.; Fernández-López, M. The endemic Genista versicolor from Sierra Nevada National Park in Spain is nodulated by putative new Bradyrhizobium species and a novel symbiovar (sierranevadense). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 37, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Velázquez, E.; Valverde, A.; Rivas, R.; Gomis, V.; Peix, A.; Gantois, I.; Igual, J.M.; León-Barrios, M.; Willems, A.; Mateos, P.F.; et al. Strains nodulating Lupinus albus on different continents belong to several new chromosomal and symbiotic lineages within Bradyrhizobium. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2010, 97, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Jarabo-Lorenzo, A.; Pérez-Galdona, R.; Donate-Correa, J.; Rivas, R.; Velázquez, E.; Hernández, M.; Temprano, F.; Martínez-Molina, E.; Ruiz-Argüeso, T.; Léon-Barrios, M. Genetic diversity of Bradyrhizobial populations from diverse geographic origins that nodulate Lupinus spp. and Ornithopus spp. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 26, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Stępkowski, T.; Żak, M.; Moulin, L.; Króliczak, J.; Golińska, B.; Narożna, D.; Safronova, V.I.; Mądrzak, C.J. Bradyrhizobium canariense and Bradyrhizobium japonicum are the two dominant rhizobium species in root nodules of lupin and serradella plants growing in Europe. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 34, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Trujillo, M.E.; Willems, A.; Abril, A.; Planchuelo, A.-M.; Rivas, R.; Ludeña, D.; Mateos, P.F.; Martínez-Molina, E.; Velázquez, E. Nodulation of Lupinus albus by strains of Ochrobactrum lupini sp. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 1318–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Durán, D.; Rey, L.; Sánchez-Cañizares, C.; Navarro, A.; Imperial, J.; Ruiz-Argueso, T. Genetic diversity of indigenous rhizobial symbionts of the Lupinus mariae-josephae endemism form alkaline-limed soils within its area of distribution in Eastern Spain. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Bourebaba, Y.; Durán, D.; Boulila, F.; Ahnia, H.; Boulila, A.; Temprano, F.; Palacios, J.M.; Imperial, J.; Ruiz-Argüeso, T.; Rey, L. Diversity of Bradyrhizobium strains nodulating Lupinus micranthus on both sides of the Western Mediterranean: Algeria and Spain. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Beukes, C.W.; Venter, S.N.; Law, I.J.; Phalane, F.L.; Steenkamp, E.T. South African papilionoid legumes are nodulated by diverse Burkholderia with unique nodulation and nitrogen-fixation loci. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yang, W.; Kong, Z.; Chen, W.; Wei, G. Genetic diversity and symbiotic evolution of rhizobia from root nodules of Coronilla varia. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Stępkowski, T.; Moulin, L.; Krzyżańska, A.; McInnes, A.; Law, I.J.; Howieson, J. European origin of Bradyrhizobium populations infecting lupins and serradella in soils of Western Australia and South Africa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 7041–7052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Tak, N.; Awasthi, E.; Bissa, G.; Meghwal, R.R.; James, E.K.; Sprent, J.S.; Gehlot, H.S. Multi locus sequence analysis and symbiotic characterization of novel Ensifer strains nodulating Tephrosia spp. in the Indian Thar Desert. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lemaire, B.; Van Cauwenberghe, J.; Verstraete, B.; Chimphango, S.; Stirton, C.; Honnay, O.; Smets, E.; Sprent, J.; James, E.K.; Muasya, A.M. Characterization of the papilionoid-Burkholderia interaction in the Fynbos biome: The diversity and distribution of beta-rhizobia nodulating Podalyria calyptrata (Fabaceae, Podalyrieae). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, E.T.; Ren, C.; Liu, W.; Xu, H.; Wu, H.; Jiang, N.; Li, Y.; et al. Genetic diversity and community structure of rhizobia nodulating Sesbania cannabina in saline-alkaline soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Tan, H.W.; Heenan, P.B.; De Meyer, S.E.; Willems, A.; Andrews, M. Diverse novel mesorhizobia nodulate New Zealand native Sophora species. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 38, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Nguyen, T.D.; Heenan, P.B.; De Meyer, S.E.; James, T.K.; Chen, W.-M.; Morton, J.D.; Andrews, M. Genetic diversity and nitrogen fixation of mesorhizobia symbionts of New Zealand endemic Sophora species. N. Z. J. Bot. 2017, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jiao, Y.S.; Liu, Y.H.; Yan, H.; Wang, E.T.; Tian, C.F.; Chen, W.X.; Guo, B.L.; Chen, W.F. Rhizobial diversity and nodulation characteristics of the extremely promiscuous legume Sophora flavescens. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 1338–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhao, L.; Wang, X.; Huo, H.; Yuan, G.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, D.; Cao, Y.; Xu, L.; Wei, G. Phylogenetic diversity of Ammopiptanthus rhizobia and distribution of rhizobia associated with Ammopiptanthus mongolicus in diverse regions of Northwest China. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Donate-Correa, J.; Léon-Barrios, M.; Hernández, M.; Pérez-Galdona, R.; del Arco-Aguilar, M. Different Mesorhizobium species sharing the same symbiotic genes nodulate the shrub legume Anagyris latifolia. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 30, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Stepkowski, T.; Banasiewicz, J.; Granada, C.E.; Andrews, M.; Passaglia, L.M.P. Phylogeny and phylogeography of rhizobial symbionts nodulating legumes of the tribe Genisteae. Genes 2018, 9, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. De Meyer, S.E.; Tan, H.W.; Andrews, M.; Heenan, P.B.; Willems, A. Mesorhizobium calcicola sp. nov., Msorhizobium waitakense sp. nov., Mesorhizobium sophorae sp. nov., Mesorhizobium newzealandense sp. nov. and Mesorhizobium kowhaii sp. nov. isolated from Sophora root nodules in New Zealand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. De Meyer, S.E.; Tan, H.W.; Heenan, P.B.; Andrews, M.; Willems, A. Mesorhizobium waimense sp. nov. isolated from Sophora longicarinata root nodules and Mesorhizobium cantuariense sp. nov. isolated from Sophora microphylla root nodules in New Zealand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 3419–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhao, L.; Deng, Z.; Yang, W.; Cao, Y.; Wang, E.; Wei, G. Diverse rhizobia associated with Sophora alopecuroides grown in different regions of Loess Plateau in China. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Li, Y.H.; Wang, R.; Zhang, X.X.; Young, J.P.W.; Wang, E.T.; Sui, X.H.; Chen, W.X. Bradyrhizobium guangdongense sp. nov. and Bradyrhizobium guangxiense sp. nov., isolated from effective nodules of peanut. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 4655–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Chen, J.; Hu, M.; Ma, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, E.T.; Zhou, Z.; Gu, J. Genetic diversity and distribution of bradyrhizobia nodulating peanut in acid-neutral soils in Guangdong Province. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Xu, K.W.; Zou, L.; Penttinen, P.; Zeng, X.; Liu, M.; Zhao, K.; Chen, C.; Chen, Y.X.; Zhang, X. Diversity and phylogeny of rhizobia associated with Desmodium spp. in Panxi, Sichuan, China. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Barcellos, F.G.; Menna, P.; da Silva Batista, J.S.; Hungria, M. Evidence of horizontal transfer of symbiotic genes from a Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculant strain to indigenous diazotrophs Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii and Bradyrhizobium elkanii in a Brazilian savannah soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 2635–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Zhang, Y.M.; Li, Y., Jr.; Chen, W.F.; Wang, E.T.; Tian, C.F.; Li, Q.Q.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Sui, X.H.; Chen, W.X. Biodiversity and biogeography of rhizobia associated with soybean plants grown in the North China Plain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 6331–6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Li, Q.Q.; Wang, E.T.; Chang, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Zhang, Y.M.; Sui, X.H.; Chen, W.F.; Chen, W.X. Ensifer sojae sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of Glycine max grown in saline-alkaline soils. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1981–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Wang, J.Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.M.; Liu, H.C.; Chen, W.F.; Wang, E.T.; Sui, X.H.; Chen, W.X. Bradyrhizobium daqingense sp. nov., isolated from soybean nodules. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Habibi, S.; Ayubi, A.G.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Sekimoto, H.; Yokoyama, T. Genetic characterization of soybean rhizobia isolated from different ecological zones in north-eastern Afghanistan. Microbes Environ. 2017, 32, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhao, L.; Fan, M.; Zhang, D.; Yang, R.; Zhang, F.; Xu, L.; Wei, X.; Shen, Y.; Wei, G. Distribution and diversity of rhizobia associated with wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc.) in Northwest China. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 37, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Laguerre, G.; Nour, S.M.; Macheret, V.; Sanjuan, J.; Drouin, P.; Amarger, N. Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts. Microbiology 2001, 147, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Valverde, A.; Igual, J.M.; Peix, A.; Cervantes, E.; Velázquez, E. Rhizobium lusitanum sp. nov. a bacterium that nodulates Phaseolus vulgaris. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 2631–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Wang, H.; Man, C.X.; Wang, E.T.; Chen, W.X. Diversity of rhizobia and interactions among the host legumes and rhizobial genotypes in an agricultural-forestry ecosystem. Plant Soil 2009, 314, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Cao, Y.; Wang, E.-T.; Zhao, L.; Chen, W.-M.; Wei, G.-H. Diversity and distribution of rhizobia nodulated with Phaseolus vulgaris in two ecoregions of China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, L.; Cao, Y.; Wang, E.T.; Qiao, Y.J.; Jiao, S.; Liu, Z.S.; Zhao, L.; Wei, G.H. Biodiversity and biogeography of rhizobia associated with common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Shaanxi Province. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Han, L.L.; Wang, E.T.; Lu, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.F.; Sui, X.H.; Chen, W.F.; Chen, W.X. Bradyrhizobium spp. and Sinorhizobium fredii are predominant in root nodules of Vigna angularis, a native legume crop in the subtropical region of China. J. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Risal, C.P.; Djedidi, S.; Dhakal, D.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Sekimoto, H.; Yokoyama, T. Phylogenetic diversity and symbiotic functioning in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) bradyrhizobia from contrast agro-ecological regions of Nepal. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 35, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Steenkamp, E.T.; Stępkowski, T.; Przymusiak, A.; Botha, W.J.; Law, I.J. Cowpea and peanut in southern Africa are nodulated by diverse Bradyrhizobium strains harboring nodulation genes that belong to the large pantropical clade common in Africa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 48, 1131–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Radl, V.; Simões-Araújo, J.L.; Leite, J.; Passos, S.R.; Martins, L.M.V.; Xavier, G.R.; Rumjanek, N.G.; Baldani, J.I.; Zilli, J.E. Microvirga vignae sp. nov., a root nodule symbiotic bacterium isolated from cowpea grown in semi-arid Brazil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Tampakaki, A.P.; Fotiadis, C.T.; Ntatsi, G.; Savvas, D. A novel symbiovar (aegeanense) of the genus Ensifer nodulates Vigna unguiculata. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 4314–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lorite, M.J.; Donate-Correa, J.; del Arco-Aguilar, M.; Galdona, R.P.; Sanjuán, J.; Léon-Barrios, M. Lotus endemic to the Canary Islands are nodulated by diverse and novel rhizobial species and symbiotypes. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Lorite, M.J.; Muñoz, S.; Olivares, J.; Soto, M.J.; Sanjuán, J. Characterization of strains unlike Mesorhizobium loti that nodulate Lotus spp. in saline soils of Granada, Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 4019–4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Estrella, M.J.; Muñoz, S.; Soto, M.J.; Ruiz, O.; Sanjuán, J. Genetic diversity and host range of rhizobia nodulating Lotus tenuis in typical soils of the Salado River basin (Argentina). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1088–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zhang, Y.F.; Wang, E.T.; Tian, C.F.; Wang, F.Q.; Han, L.L.; Chen, W.F.; Chen, W.X. Bradyrhizobium elkanii, Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense and Bradyrhizobium japonicum are the main rhizobia associated with Vigna unguiculata and Vigna radiata in the subtropical region of China. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 285, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ampomah, O.Y.; Huss-Danell, K. Genetic diversity of root nodule bacteria nodulating Lotus corniculatus and Anthyllis vulneraria in Sweden. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 34, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sánchez-Cañizares, C.; Jorrín, B.; Durán, D.; Nadendla, S.; Albareda, M.; Rubio-Sanz, L.; Lanza, M.; González-Guerrero, M.; Prieto, R.I.; Brito, B.; et al. Genomic diversity in the endosymbiotic bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum. Genes 2018, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Ramsay, J.P.; Sullivan, J.T.; Stuart, G.S.; Lamont, I.L.; Ronson, C.W. Excision and transfer of the Mesorhizobium loti R7A symbiosis island requires an integrase IntS, a novel recombination directionality factor RdfS, and a putative relaxase RlxS. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Kelly, S.; Sullivan, J.; Ronson, C.; Tian, R.; Brau, L.; Munk, C.; Goodwin, L.; Han, C.; Woyke, T.; Reddy, T.; et al. Genome sequence of the Lotus spp. microsymbiont Mesorhizobium loti strain R7A. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2014, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Haskett, T.L.; Ramsay, J.P.; Bekuma, A.A.; Sullivan, J.T.; O’Hara, G.W.; Terpolilli, J.J. Evolutionary persistence of tripartite integrative and conjugative elements. Plasmid 2017, 92, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Haskett, T.; Wang, P.; Ramsay, J.; O’Hara, G.; Reeve, W.; Howieson, J.; Terpolilli, J. Complete genome sequence of Mesorhizobium ciceri strain CC1192, an efficient nitrogen-fixing microsymbiont of Cicer arietinum. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00516-16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  123. Haskett, T.L.; Terpolilli, J.J.; Bekuma, A.; O’Hara, G.W.; Sullivan, J.T.; Wang, P.; Ronson, C.W.; Ramsay, J.P. Assembly and transfer of tripartite integrative and conjugative genetic elements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12268–12273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryotic genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 09 00321 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparative maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using housekeeping and symbiotic gene clusters from Mesorhizobium strains isolated from New Zealand endemic Sophora spp. Sequence alignment, alignment editing, and phylogenetic analysis were performed using MEGA7 [24]. The phylogenetic trees were built using the GTR model with G + I substitutions for the housekeeping genes (1083 bp) and Tamura 3-parameter model with G + I substitutions for the symbiosis genes (869 bp). The possibility of concatenation was investigated using the partition-homogeneity test with PAUP [25,26]. Each concatenation was investigated for 1000 replicates. All housekeeping genes were congruent with each other (p = 0.015), and both symbiosis genes were congruent with each other (p = 0.02). The housekeeping genes were shown not to be congruent with the symbiosis genes (p = 0.001). Bootstrap values after 500 replicates are expressed as percentages; values less than 50% are not shown. The scale bar indicates the fraction of substitutions per site. M: Mesorhizobium, S: Sophora, FS: Field Site.
Figure 1. Comparative maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using housekeeping and symbiotic gene clusters from Mesorhizobium strains isolated from New Zealand endemic Sophora spp. Sequence alignment, alignment editing, and phylogenetic analysis were performed using MEGA7 [24]. The phylogenetic trees were built using the GTR model with G + I substitutions for the housekeeping genes (1083 bp) and Tamura 3-parameter model with G + I substitutions for the symbiosis genes (869 bp). The possibility of concatenation was investigated using the partition-homogeneity test with PAUP [25,26]. Each concatenation was investigated for 1000 replicates. All housekeeping genes were congruent with each other (p = 0.015), and both symbiosis genes were congruent with each other (p = 0.02). The housekeeping genes were shown not to be congruent with the symbiosis genes (p = 0.001). Bootstrap values after 500 replicates are expressed as percentages; values less than 50% are not shown. The scale bar indicates the fraction of substitutions per site. M: Mesorhizobium, S: Sophora, FS: Field Site.
Genes 09 00321 g001
Genes 09 00321 g002 550
Figure 2. Recombination and circularization of Mesorhizobium loti R7A integrative and conjugative elements (ICEMlSymR7A) [20,119,120,121]. The recombination is initiated by IntS (integration factor S) at the attachment sites attB and attP to integrate the ICEMlSymR7A in the chromosome and produce the attachment sites attL and attR. The recombination directionality factor S (RdfS) together with IntS stimulates excision of the ICE and forms the attachment sites attP and attB. phe-tRNA = phenylalanine transfer RNA. The ICEMlSymR7A is coloured blue, and the remaining chromosome is coloured grey. The schematic diagram is not drawn to scale.
Figure 2. Recombination and circularization of Mesorhizobium loti R7A integrative and conjugative elements (ICEMlSymR7A) [20,119,120,121]. The recombination is initiated by IntS (integration factor S) at the attachment sites attB and attP to integrate the ICEMlSymR7A in the chromosome and produce the attachment sites attL and attR. The recombination directionality factor S (RdfS) together with IntS stimulates excision of the ICE and forms the attachment sites attP and attB. phe-tRNA = phenylalanine transfer RNA. The ICEMlSymR7A is coloured blue, and the remaining chromosome is coloured grey. The schematic diagram is not drawn to scale.
Genes 09 00321 g002
Genes 09 00321 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparative genome analysis using the circular BLASTN alignment in BRIG (BLAST Ring Image Generator, [124] of WSM2073 and WSM2075 against WSM1271. The three ICEMcSym1271 regions are indicated and summarised from Haskett et al. [123]. It highlights the transfer of the symbiosis island from the Biserrula pelecinus inoculant strain WSM1271 to non-symbiotic recipient strains that turn into poorly effective symbionts. ICEMcSym1271 consists of three separate regions (alpha, beta, and gamma) when integrated in the chromosome but excises as one circular plasmid and re-integrates in the recipient chromosome [123].
Figure 3. Comparative genome analysis using the circular BLASTN alignment in BRIG (BLAST Ring Image Generator, [124] of WSM2073 and WSM2075 against WSM1271. The three ICEMcSym1271 regions are indicated and summarised from Haskett et al. [123]. It highlights the transfer of the symbiosis island from the Biserrula pelecinus inoculant strain WSM1271 to non-symbiotic recipient strains that turn into poorly effective symbionts. ICEMcSym1271 consists of three separate regions (alpha, beta, and gamma) when integrated in the chromosome but excises as one circular plasmid and re-integrates in the recipient chromosome [123].
Genes 09 00321 g003
Table
Table 1. Reported cases of phylogenetic incongruence between core and symbiosis genes for rhizobia associated with legumes in the sub-family Caesalpinioideae. All species have indeterminate nodules.
Table 1. Reported cases of phylogenetic incongruence between core and symbiosis genes for rhizobia associated with legumes in the sub-family Caesalpinioideae. All species have indeterminate nodules.
Caesalpinioideae Mimosoid CladeRhizobia
Acaciella angustissimaEnsifer chiapanecum ITTG S70T and Ensifer mexicanum ITTG R7T had different gyrA, nolR, recA. rpoB, and rrs gene sequences but similar nifH and nodA sequences [27]
Leucaena leucocephalaEnsifer isolates formed three clades in both 16S rRNA and recA phylogenetic trees but only one clade in both nifH and nodC trees [28]
Mimosa cruenta, Mimosa magentea, Mimosa ramulosa, Mimosa reptans, Mimosa schleideniiCupriavidus isolates separated into two groups on 16S rRNA, recA and gyrB sequences but grouped together on nifH and nodA sequences [29]
Mimosa diplotrichaBurkholderia caribensis TS182 characterized on 16S rRNA sequence grouped with Cupriavidus strains on nodA sequence [30]
M. diplotricha, Mimosa pudicaBurkholderia strains with diverse 16S rRNA gene sequences grouped together along with B. phymatum STM815T on nodA sequence [31]
M. pudicaRhizobium altiplani BR 10423T had nifH and nodC sequences closely related (identical for nodC) to those of Rhizobium mesoamericanum CCGE 501T [32]
Neptunia natansDevosia isolates characterized on 16S rRNA sequences had nifH and nodD sequences closely related to those of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899T [33]
Vachellia jacquemontiiEnsifer showed incongruence across all three of concatenated rrs-glnII-atpD-recA-dnaK, nifH, and nodA gene sequences [34]
Vachellia macracanthaEnsifer sequences for nifH and nodC were incongruent with those for 16S rRNA [35]
Vachellia seyal, Vachellia tortilisEnsifer isolates separated into seven groups on the basis of 16S rRNA, recA, gyrB, rpoB, atpD, gap and pnp gene sequences but were closely related with respect to their nifH and nodC gene sequences [36].
Table
Table 2. Reported cases of phylogenetic incongruence between core and symbiosis genes for rhizobia associated with legumes in the inverted repeat-lacking clade (IRLC) of the legume sub-family Papilionoideae. All species have indeterminate nodules.
Table 2. Reported cases of phylogenetic incongruence between core and symbiosis genes for rhizobia associated with legumes in the inverted repeat-lacking clade (IRLC) of the legume sub-family Papilionoideae. All species have indeterminate nodules.
Papilionoideae
Tribes and Genera		Rhizobia
Cicereae
Cicer arietinumMesorhizobium ciceri, Mesorhizobium mediterraneum, Mesorhizobium muluense and Mesorhizobium spp. with diverse 16S rDNA, recA, atpD, glnII and gyrB sequences had similar nifH, nodA and nodC sequences [42,43,44,45,46,47]
Cicer canarienseMesorhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA, recA and glnII sequences had similar nodC gene sequences [48]
Fabeae
Lathyrus spp., Lens culinaris, Pisum sativum and Vicia spp.Rhizobium fabeae, Rhizobium pisi, Rhizobium laguerreae, Rhizobium anhuiense, Rhizobium bangladeshense, Rhizobium binae, Rhizobium lentis and Rhizobium spp. with diverse 16S rRNA and recA, atpD and glnII sequences had similar nifH, nodA and nodC sequences [49,50,51,52,53,54]
Lathyrus odoratus, Vicia hirsutaRhizobium multihospitium isolates had nifH and nodD sequences 100% similar to those of Rhizobium lusitanum P1–7T and Devosia neptuniae J1T [55]
Galegeae
Astragalus aksuensis, Astragalus sp., Oxytropis glabra, Oxytropis meinshauseniiR. multihospitium isolates had nifH and nodD sequences 100% similar to those of R. lusitanum P1–7T and D. neptuniae J1T [55]
Astragalus glycyphyllosMesorhizobium isolates showing 16S rRNA sequences similar to M. ciceri, Mesorhizobium amorphae or Mesorhizobium septentrionale formed one clearly separated, closely related cluster for nodA, nodC, nodH and nifH sequences [56]
Glycyrrhiza uralensisMesorhizobium concatenated rrs-recA-rpoB, nifH, nodA and nodC sequences were not congruent [57]
Sphaerophysa salsulaMesorhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA sequences showed similar nifH sequences [58]Mesorhizobium and Rhizobium identified on 16S rRNA sequences showed similar nifH sequences [58]
Hedysareae
Alhagi sparsifoliaMesorhizobium isolates separated into three groups on the basis of their rrs, dnaK and dnaJ sequences but their nodA and nodC sequences were closely related [59]
Alhagi sp., Caragana jubata, Halimodendron halodendron, R. multihospitium isolates had nifH and nodD sequences 100% similar to those of R. lusitanum P1-7T and D. neptuniae J1T [55]
Caragana bicolor, Caragana erinacea, Caragana franchetiana, Caragana intermediaMesorhizobium isolates with diverse 16S–23S IGS 16S rRNA sequences and one Bradyrhizobium isolate (16S rRNA) from C. intermedia had similar nodC sequences [60]
Trifolium
Trifolium repensR. pisi sv. trifolii K3.22 characterised on the basis of 16S rRNA, atpD, dnaK, glnA, gyrB, recA and rpoB sequences had nodA, nodB, nodC and nodD sequences with high similarity to those of Rhizobium leguminosarum sv. trifolii [61].Rhizobium spp. with diverse 16S rRNA and concatenated atpD-recA-glnII sequences had similar nifH and nodC sequences [62]
Table
Table 3. Legume–rhizobia symbioses of species in the sub-family Papilionoideae with indeterminate nodules excluding the IRLC.
Table 3. Legume–rhizobia symbioses of species in the sub-family Papilionoideae with indeterminate nodules excluding the IRLC.
Papilionoideae
Tribes (Genera)		Rhizobia
Crotalarieae
Aspalathus sp.Rhizobium isolate characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-gyrB-glnA sequences had nifH and concatenated nodA-B-C sequences closely related to those of Mesorhizobium [65]
Aspalathus astroites, Aspalathus aurantiaca, Aspalathus bracteata, Aspalathus ciliaris, Aspalathus cordata, Aspalathus ericifolia, Aspalathus spicataMesorhizobium phylogenetic relationships between concatenated recA-atpD-gyrB-glnA and nodA-B-C sequences were incongruent [65]
Crotalaria podocarpaMethylobacterium nodulans ORS2060T nodA sequence groups with nodA sequences for Bradyrhizobium spp. [66]
Listia angolensisMicrovirga lotonidis WSM3557T and Microvirga zambiensis WSM3693T nodA sequences were identical and clustered with Bradyrhizobium, Burkholderia and Methylobacterium nodA sequences [67]
Rafnia trifloraBurkholderia isolate characterized on concatenated 16S rRNA-recA-atpD sequences had a nifH sequence closely related to those of Ensifer spp. [68]
Genisteae
Argyrolobium lunare, Argyrolobium velutinumMesorhizobium phylogenetic relationships between concatenated recA-atpD-gyrB-glnA and nodA-nodB-nodC sequences were incongruent [65]
Cytisus proliferusBradyrhizobium with diverse 16S–23S rRNA, atpD, glnII and recA sequences showed similar nifH and nodC sequences [69]
Cytisus scopariusBradyrhizobium 16S rRNA, 23S rRNA, dnaK, gyrB, rplC, rpoB, nifD, nifH and nodC sequences indicated a highly heterogeneous ancestry [70]
Cytisus villosusBradyrhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA and concatenated glnII-recA sequences showed similar nifH and nodC sequences [71]
Genista versicolorBradyrhizobium with diverse 16S–23S ITS and atpD sequences showed similar nifH and nodC sequences for almost all strains [72]
Lupinus albusBradyrhizobium with diverse 16S–23S ITS and rrs and atpD sequences clustered together on nodC sequences [73]
L. albus, Lupinus angustifolius, Lupinus luteus, Lupinus sp.Bradyrhizobium with diverse 16S–23S ITS and 16S rRNA sequences clustered together on nodC sequences [74]
L. albus, L. angustifolius, L. luteusBradyrhizobium with diverse concatenated atpD-glnII-recA sequences clustered together on nodA sequences [75]
Lupinus honoratusOchrobactrum lupini LUP21T nifH sequence showed 99.6% similarity to M. ciceri strains; its nodD sequence showed 86.4% similarity to Rhizobium etli CFN42T [76]
Lupinus mariae-josephaeBradyrhizobium with diverse concatenated atpD-glnII-recA sequences separated into two distinct clusters on nodA and nodC sequences [77]
Lupinus micranthusBradyrhizobium with diverse concatenated 16S rRNA and concatenated atpD-gln11-recA sequences showed similar nodC gene sequences [78]
Lupinus texensisMicrovirga lupini Lut6T concatenated nifD-nifH sequence aligned close to R. etli CFN42T; its nodA sequence was placed in a clade that contained strains of Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium and Ensifer [67]
Hypocalypteae
Hypocalyptus sophoroides, Hypocalyptus oxalidifolius, Hypocalyptus colutoidesBurkholderia phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent; Burkholderia phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent with those from 16S rRNA and recA sequences [79]
Loteae
Coronilla variaMesorhizobium phylogenies for 16S rRNA, nifH and nodC sequences were incongruent [80]
Ornithopus compressus, Ornithopus sativusBradyrhizobium with diverse 16S–23S rRNA ITS and dnaK, atpD, glnII and recA sequences clustered together on nodA, nodZ and nolL sequences [75,81]
Millettieae
Tephrosia falciformis, Tephrosia leptostachya, Tephrosia purpurea, Tephrosia villosa, Tephrosia wallichiiEnsifer 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-glnII-dnaK sequences grouped with Ensifer saheli LMG 7837T and Ensifer kotiensis LMG 19225T but nifH, nodA and nodC sequences clustered with Ensifer fredii USDA 205T [82]
Podalyrieae
Cyclopia buxifolia, Cyclopia genistoides, Cyclopia glabra, Cyclopia intemedia, Cyclopia longifolia, Cyclopia maculata, Cyclopia meyeriana, Cyclopia pubescens, Cyclopia sessiflora, Cyclopia subternataBurkholderia phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent; phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent with those from 16S rRNA and recA sequences [79]
Podalyria calyptrataBurkholderia phylogenetic relationships between concatenated recA-atpD-gyrB-glnA and nodA-B-C sequences were largely incongruent [65]Burkholderia phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent; phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent with those from 16S rRNA and recA sequences [79]Burkholderia phylogenetic relationships between recA and nodA sequences were largely congruent but different branching patterns were observed among numerous isolates [83]
Virgilia oroboidesBurkholderia phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent; phylogenies inferred from nifH and nodA sequences were incongruent with those from 16S rRNA and recA sequences [79]
Robineae
R. pseudoacaciaR. multihospitium isolates had nifH and nodD sequences 100% similar to those of R. lusitanum P1–7T and D. neptuniae J1T [55]
Sesbanieae
Sesbania cannabinaRhizobium strain IRBG74 characterised on concatenated 16S rRNA–rpoB-fusA sequence harboured a sym-plasmid containing nifH and nodA genes similar to those of Ensifer strains that nodulate this legume [21]Rhizobium/Agrobacterium and Ensifer characterized on concatenated recA-atpD-glnII sequences had similar Ensifer nifH and nodA sequences [84]
Sesbania sesbanEnsifer isolates separated into three groups on the basis of concatenated 16S rRNA-recA-gyrB-rpoB-atpD-gap-pnp sequences but were closely related with respect to their nifH and nodC sequences [36]
Sophoreae
Sophora alopecuroidesR. multihospitium isolates had nifH and nodD sequences 100% similar to those of R. lusitanum P1–7T and D. neptuniae J1T [55]
Sophora chathamica, Sophora fulvida, Sophora godleyi, Sophora longicarinata, Sophora microphylla, Sophora prostrata, Sophora tetrapteraMesorhizobium with diverse concatenated recA-glnII-rpoB sequences had similar nifH, nodA and nodC sequences [85,86]
Sophora flavescensRhizobium mongolense isolate characterized on concatenated atpD-glnII-recA sequences had nodC sequence similar to isolates characterized as M. septentrionale [87]. E. fredii isolate characterized on concatenated atpD-glnII-recA sequences had nodC sequence identical to Mesorhizobium temperatumT [87]. Phyllobacterium sophoraeT isolate characterized on concatenated atpD-glnII-recA sequences had nodC sequence closely related to M. septentrionaleT [87]. Mesorhizobium and Rhizobium phylogenetic relationships between concatenated atpD-glnII-recA and nodC sequences were incongruent [87]
Thermopsideae
Ammopiptanthus nanus, Ammopiptanthus mongolicusEnsifer arboris and Neorhizobium galegeae characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-rpoB-thrC sequences aligned with Ensifer meliloti ATCC9930T on nifH and nodC sequences [88]. Phyllobacterium giardinii characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-rpoB-thrC sequences aligned with R. leguminosarum sv. viciae USDA 2370T on nifH and nodC sequences [88]. Rhizobium/Agrobacterium radiobacter characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-rpoB-thrC sequences aligned with E. fredii USDA205T on nifH and nodC sequences [88]
Anagyris latifoliaMesorhizobium isolates with diverse 16S–23S rDNA ITS, 16S rRNA and glnII sequences had identical nodC sequences closely related to Mesorhizobium tianshanense USDA 3592T [89]
Table
Table 4. Legume–rhizobia symbioses of species in the sub-family Papilionoideae with determinate nodules.
Table 4. Legume–rhizobia symbioses of species in the sub-family Papilionoideae with determinate nodules.
Papilionoideae
Tribes and Genera		Rhizobia
Dalbergieae
Arachis hypogaeaBradyrhizobium guangdongense CCBAU 51649T, Bradyrhizobium guangxiense CCBAU 53363T, Bradyrhizobium sp. P1237 and Bradyrhizobium sp. CH81 had identical nodA sequences [94]; Bradyrhizobium with diverse 16S–23S rRNA ITS and concatenated atpD-recA sequences showed similar nodA sequences [95]
Desmodieae
Desmodium oldhamiRhizobium characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-glnII sequences aligned with Ensifer sp. on nodC sequences [96]
Desmodium sequaxRhizobium and Pararhizobium characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-glnII sequences aligned with Ensifer sp. on nodC sequences [96]
Phaseoleae
Glycine maxBradyrhizobium strains with clearly separated 16S rRNA sequences showed identical or similar nifH, nodC and nodY-nodA sequences [97]; Ensifer strain characterized on 16S rRNA sequence showed similar nifH, nodC and nodY-nodA sequences to B. japonicumT [97]; Bradyrhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-glnII-atpD sequences showed identical nifH and nodC sequences [98]; Ensifer with diverse 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-glnII-atpD sequences showed identical nifH and nodC sequences [98]; Ensifer sojae CCBAU 05684T and E. fredii USDA 205T showed identical nodC sequences [99]; Bradyrhizobium daqingense CCBAU 15774T, Bradyrhizobium liaonginenese USDA 3622T and B. japonicum USDA 6T showed identical nifH and nodC sequences [100]; Ensifer isolate classified on 16S rRNA sequence showed 99% similarity to Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense in nodD1 and nifD sequences [101]
Glycine sojaEnsifer and Rhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-atpD-glnII sequences formed a single Ensifer lineage on nifH and nodA sequences [102]
Phaseolus vulgarisR. etli, Rhizobium gallicum, R. leguminosarum sv. phaseoli and Pararhizobium giardinii characterized on 16S rRNA sequences had similar nodC sequences and a strain characterized as Rhizobium aligned with E. meliloti on nodC sequence [103]; R. lusitanum P1–7T had nifH and nodC sequences similar to D. neptuniae LMG 21357T and R. tropici CIAT 899T [104]; R. etli and R. leguminosarum characterized on 16S rRNA sequences showed similar nifH and nodC sequences to R. etli CFN 42T [105]; Rhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA and concatenated atpD-glnII-recA sequences clustered together on nifH and nodC sequences [106]; Pararhizobium giardinii characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated recA-glnII-atpD sequences aligned with Ensifer on nodC sequence [107]
Vigna angularisRhizobium characterized on 16S rRNA and concatenated atpD-recA sequences had a nodC sequence similar to Ensifer strains [108]
Vigna radiataBradyrhizobium characterized on sequences of the 16S rRNA, nodD1 and nifD genes and the ITS region aligned with Ensifer on nodA sequences [109]
Vigna unguiculataBradyrhizobium with diverse concatenated rrs-recA-glnII sequences showed similar nodA sequences [110]; Microvirga vignae BR3299T aligned with Mesorhizobium and Rhizobium on nifH sequence and Microvirga lotononidis, M. zambiensis, Bradyrhizobium, Burkholderia and Methylobacterium on nodA sequences [111]; E. fredii characterized on sequences of 16S rRNA, concatenated recA-glnII-gyrB-truA-thrA-SMc00019 and IGS were substantially diverged from E. fredii on nifH, nodC and rhcRST-1 sequences [112]
Psoraleae
Otholobium bracteolatum, Otholobium hirtum, Otholobium virgatum, Otholobium zeyheriMesorhizobium phylogenetic relationships between concatenated recA-atpD-gyrB-glnA and nodA-B-C sequences were incongruent [65]
Psoralea asarina, Psoralea congesta, Psoralea laxa, Psoralea rigidulaMesorhizobium phylogenetic relationships between concatenated recA-atpD-gyrB-glnA and nodA-B-C sequences were incongruent [65]
P. oligophyllaMesorhizobium isolate characterized on concatenated 16S rRNA-recA-atpD sequence aligned closely to Burkholderia on nodA sequence [68]
Psoralea sp.Mesorhizobium isolate characterized on concatenated 16S rRNA-recA-atpD sequence aligned closely to Ensifer on nifH sequence [68]
Loteae
Lotus bertheloti, Lotus callis-viridis, Lotus corniculatus, Lotus campylocladus, Lotus pyranthus, Lotus sessifolius, L. tenuisMesorhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA, atpD and recA sequences clustered together on nodC gene sequences [113,114]
L. corniculatusTransfer of symbiotic island between Mesorhizobium loti inoculum and indigenous Mesorhizobium strains [19,20]
L. frondosus, L. tenuisR. multihospitium isolates had nifH and nodD sequences 100% similar to those of R. lusitanum P1–7T and D. neptuniae J1T [55]
L. tenuisMesorhizobium with diverse 16S rRNA sequences clustered together on nifH and nodC sequences [115]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andrews, M.; De Meyer, S.; James, E.K.; Stępkowski, T.; Hodge, S.; Simon, M.F.; Young, J.P.W. Horizontal Transfer of Symbiosis Genes within and Between Rhizobial Genera: Occurrence and Importance. Genes 2018, 9, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070321

AMA Style

Andrews M, De Meyer S, James EK, Stępkowski T, Hodge S, Simon MF, Young JPW. Horizontal Transfer of Symbiosis Genes within and Between Rhizobial Genera: Occurrence and Importance. Genes. 2018; 9(7):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andrews, Mitchell, Sofie De Meyer, Euan K. James, Tomasz Stępkowski, Simon Hodge, Marcelo F. Simon, and J. Peter W. Young. 2018. "Horizontal Transfer of Symbiosis Genes within and Between Rhizobial Genera: Occurrence and Importance" Genes 9, no. 7: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop