Assessment of Agricultural Water Resources Sustainability in Arid Regions Using Virtual Water Concept: Case of South Khorasan Province, Iran
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Virtual Water Content Estimates
2.3. Crop Evapotranspiration
2.4. Virtual Water Trade in Crops
2.5. Water Self-Sufficiency and Water Scarcity
3. Results
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ababaei, B.; Etedali, H.R. Estimation of Water Footprint Components of Iran’s Wheat Production: Comparison of Global and National Scale Estimates. Environ. Process. 2014, 1, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Madani, K.; AghaKouchak, A.; Mirchi, A. Iran’s Socio-economic Drought: Challenges of a Water-Bankrupt Nation. Iran. Stud. 2016, 49, 997–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Konar, M.; Evans, T.P.; Levy, M.; Scott, C.A.; Troy, T.J.; Vörösmarty, C.J.; Sivapalan, M. Water resources sustainability in a globalizing world: who uses the water? Hydrol. Process. 2016, 30, 3330–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rushforth, R.R.; Ruddell, B.L. The vulnerability and resilience of a city’s water footprint: The case of Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 2698–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chapagain, A.K.; Hoekstra, A.Y. Water footprint of nations. Volume 1: Main report. Value Water Res. Rep. Ser. 2004, 1, 1–80. [Google Scholar]
- Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15, 1577–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Godfray, H.C.J.; Beddington, J.R.; Crute, I.R.; Haddad, L.; Lawrence, D.; Muir, J.F.; Pretty, J.; Robinson, S.; Thomas, S.M.; Toulmin, C. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 2010, 327, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hoekstra, A.Y.; Hung, P.Q. A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Water Res. 2002, 49, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Y.; Hubacek, K.; Feng, K.; Guan, D. Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1140–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ussami, K.A.; Martins Guilhoto, J.J. Economic and Water Dependence among Regions; The case of Alto Tiete: Sao Paulo State, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Dalin, C.; Hanasaki, N.; Qiu, H.; Mauzerall, D.L.; Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Water resources transfers through Chinese interprovincial and foreign food trade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014, 111, 9774–9779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mubako, S.T.; Lant, C.L. Agricultural Virtual Water Trade and Water Footprint of U.S. States. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2013, 103, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Karandish, F.; Salari, S.; Darzi-Naftchali, A. Application of Virtual Water Trade to Evaluate Cropping Pattern in Arid Regions. Water Resour. Manag. 2015, 29, 4061–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Karandish, F.; Hoekstra, A.Y. Informing national food and water security policy through water footprint assessment: the case of Iran. Water 2017, 9, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ababaei, B.; Ramezani Etedali, H. Water footprint assessment of main cereals in Iran. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 179, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Agriculture Jihad Organization of South Khorasan. Available online: http://kj-agrijahad.ir (accessed on 25 February 2019).
- Hoekstra, A.Y.; Hung, P.Q. Globalisation of water resources: International virtual water flows in relation to crop trade. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2005, 15, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, X.; Klemeš, J.J.; Varbanov, P.S.; Čuček, L.; Qian, Y. Virtual carbon and water flows embodied in international trade: a review on consumption-based analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 146, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhuo, L.; Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. Consumptive water footprint and virtual water trade scenarios for China - With a focus on crop production, consumption and trade. Environ. Int. 2016, 94, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- FAO. Available online: http://www.fao.org/land-water/en/ (accessed on 25 February 2019).
- South Khorasan Metrological Organization. Available online: http://skhmet.ir/index.php (accessed on 28 December 2018).
- Liu, J.; Sun, S.; Wu, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X. Inter-county virtual water flows of the Hetao irrigation district, China: A new perspective for water scarcity. J. Arid Environ. 2015, 119, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- FAO ETo Calculator | Land & Water | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/cropwat/en/ (accessed on 29 Octobert 2018).
- Hoekstra, A.Y.; Chapagain, A.K.; Aldaya, M.M.; Mekonne, M.M. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual; Routledge: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 9781849712798. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1998; ISBN 9251042195. [Google Scholar]
- Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. Sustainability: Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, 1500323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Boulay, A.M.; Bare, J.; Benini, L.; Berger, M.; Lathuillière, M.J.; Manzardo, A.; Margni, M.; Motoshita, M.; Núñez, M.; Pastor, A.V.; et al. The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Berger, M.; Eisner, S.; Van Der Ent, R.; Flörke, M.; Link, A.; Poligkeit, J.; Bach, V.; Finkbeiner, M. Enhancing the Water Accounting and Vulnerability Evaluation Model: WAVE+. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 10757–10766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pfister, S.; Koehler, A.; Hellweg, S. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4098–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brown, A.; Matlock, M.D. A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies. White Pap. 2011, 106, 19. [Google Scholar]









| Water Scarcity (WS) (%) | Situation |
|---|---|
| WS > 100 | Overexploited |
| 60 ≤ WS < 100 | Heavily exploited |
| 30 ≤ WS < 60 | Moderate exploited |
| WS < 30 | Slightly exploited |
| Group (Number of Crops) | Included Crops |
|---|---|
| Cereals (5) | wheat, barley, maize, alfalfa, millet |
| Legumes (4) | chickpea, mung bean, bean, lentil |
| Roots and fiber crops * (4) | potato, sugar beet, turnip, cotton |
| Vegetables (9) | tomato, onion, cucumber, eggplant, zucchini, sweet melon, water melon, garlic, cantaloupe |
| Fruits (13) | apple, pear, quince, sour cherry, cherry, plum, peach, apricot, table grape, pistachio, almond, walnut, carrot |
| Oil seeds (2) | sesame, sunflower |
| Crops | ETC (mm) | GVW (m3/ton) | BVW (m3/ton) | TVW (m3/ton) | GVW Proportion (%) | Water Productivity (Kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereals | 1213 | 49 | 3454 | 3502 | 1.42 | 0.286 |
| Legumes | 981 | 77 | 11,922 | 11,999 | 0.69 | 0.083 |
| Fiber crops | 1464 | 26 | 3293 | 3319 | 0.83 | 0.301 |
| Vegetables | 1026 | 13 | 923 | 937 | 1.36 | 1.068 |
| Fruits | 1563 | 59 | 4994 | 5052 | 1.21 | 0.198 |
| Oil seeds | 1059 | 60 | 13,110 | 13,171 | 0.50 | 0.076 |
| Crop Type | Difference in Production (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereals | 0.196 | 0.383 | 95.03 | 119 |
| Legumes | 0.049 | 0.152 | 213.32 | 2 |
| Fiber crops | 0.107 | 0.860 | 706.28 | 131 |
| Vegetables | 0.655 | 2.237 | 241.63 | 49 |
| Fruits | 0.161 | 0.269 | 67.34 | 38 |
| Oil seeds | 0.049 | 0.467 | 853.16 | 8 |
| Counties | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
| Birjand | 28.72 | 26.20 | 25.71 | 22.10 | 31.12 | 31.11 | 24.72 | 25.44 |
| Boshrooye | 160.29 | 208.46 | 216.39 | 232.17 | 39.71 | 39.69 | 31.55 | 32.47 |
| Darmian | 32.94 | 31.67 | 31.25 | 44.15 | 47.39 | 47.37 | 37.65 | 38.75 |
| Ferdows | 67.72 | 86.14 | 81.29 | 263.27 | 39.12 | 39.10 | 31.08 | 31.99 |
| Khusf | 56.43 | 64.92 | 51.72 | 63.66 | 134.12 | 134.07 | 106.56 | 109.66 |
| Nehbandan | 84.70 | 101.56 | 126.10 | 109.73 | 168.62 | 168.56 | 133.97 | 137.87 |
| Qaen | 181.09 | 180.53 | 176.13 | 183.98 | 69.92 | 69.89 | 55.55 | 57.17 |
| Sarayan | 102.78 | 158.40 | 160.94 | 159.52 | 46.39 | 46.37 | 36.86 | 37.93 |
| Sarbishe | 80.11 | 106.16 | 104.64 | 115.73 | 64.70 | 64.68 | 51.41 | 52.90 |
| Tabas | 57.84 | 83.03 | 83.47 | 86.12 | 355.02 | 354.89 | 282.06 | 290.29 |
| Zirkuh | 91.18 | 99.29 | 102.47 | 98.42 | 63.65 | 63.62 | 50.57 | 52.04 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Qasemipour, E.; Abbasi, A. Assessment of Agricultural Water Resources Sustainability in Arid Regions Using Virtual Water Concept: Case of South Khorasan Province, Iran. Water 2019, 11, 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030449
Qasemipour E, Abbasi A. Assessment of Agricultural Water Resources Sustainability in Arid Regions Using Virtual Water Concept: Case of South Khorasan Province, Iran. Water. 2019; 11(3):449. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030449
Chicago/Turabian StyleQasemipour, Ehsan, and Ali Abbasi. 2019. "Assessment of Agricultural Water Resources Sustainability in Arid Regions Using Virtual Water Concept: Case of South Khorasan Province, Iran" Water 11, no. 3: 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030449
APA StyleQasemipour, E., & Abbasi, A. (2019). Assessment of Agricultural Water Resources Sustainability in Arid Regions Using Virtual Water Concept: Case of South Khorasan Province, Iran. Water, 11(3), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030449

