Next Article in Journal
Process and Mechanism of Gold Mineralization at the Zhengchong Gold Deposit, Jiangnan Orogenic Belt: Evidence from the Arsenopyrite and Chlorite Mineral Thermometers
Next Article in Special Issue
Pilot-Scale Removal of Arsenic and Heavy Metals from Mining Wastewater Using Adsorption Combined with Constructed Wetland
Previous Article in Journal
Prospectivity Mapping of Mineral Deposits in Northern Norway Using Radial Basis Function Neural Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Release Behaviors of Arsenic and Heavy Metals from Arsenic Sulfide Sludge during Simulated Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accumulation of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Native and Cultivated Plant Species in a Lead Recycling Area in Vietnam

1
Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Ha Noi 10072, Vietnam
2
Institute of Environmental Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Ha Noi 10072, Vietnam
3
VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, 334 Nguyen Trai, Ha Noi 10053, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(2), 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020132
Submission received: 31 December 2018 / Revised: 20 February 2019 / Accepted: 20 February 2019 / Published: 24 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Arsenic Geochemistry and Health)

Abstract

:
This study was conducted to determine the soil contamination and the accumulation of arsenic (As) and heavy metals including chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb) in 15 native and cultivated plant species in a Pb recycling area of Dong Mai village, Hung Yen Province, Vietnam. The analysis of 32 soil samples collected from seven different sites in the study area revealed that the contents of Al, Fe, As, Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in the soils ranged from 6200–32,600, 11,300–55,500, 5.4–26.8, 24.9–290, 66.0–252, 143–455, 0.71–1.67, and 370–47,400 mg/kg, respectively. The contents of As, Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in rice grains and the shoots of 15 plant species ranged from 0.14–10.2, 1.00–10.2, 5.19–23.8, 34.7–165, 0.06–0.99, and 2.83–1160 mg/kg-dry weight (DW), respectively. Hymenachne acutigluma (Steud.) Gilliland, a potential hyperaccumulator of Pb (1160 mg/kg-DW), is considered the best candidate for phytoremediation of Pb-contaminated soil. The cultivation of rice and vegetables, and the use of some native plants for food for humans, pigs, and cattle should be managed with consideration of the accumulation of Pb in their aboveground biomass.

1. Introduction

Contamination by heavy metals and metalloids is one of the most harmful forms of environmental pollution. Being different from many organic pollutants, heavy metals and metalloids are not biodegradable and are more difficult to remediate. The first half-life of heavy metals in soils under lysimetric conditions varies greatly, e.g., that of lead (Pb) being the longest at 740 to 5900 years [1]. The main sources of metal contamination in soil are the mining and smelting of metalliferous ores, landfill leachate, fertilizers, and pesticides [2,3]. Heavy metals mainly enter plants via the soil or atmosphere [4,5]. Chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) are micronutrients essential for plant growth, but they are toxic when present at high contents [6,7]. Arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), and Pb are not essential elements [7,8,9,10] and are toxic to plants at contents of 5–20, 5–30, and 30–300 mg/kg tissue, respectively [11].
Environmental pollution caused by manufacturing activities in industrial zones is of great concern in Vietnam as well as in other developing countries. A parallel still exists for traditional handicraft villages that are interspersed with residential villages. The activities of these traditional villages in Vietnam heavily pollute the surrounding ecosystem and pose a severe health risk to the local people [12]. The operational model of traditional villages interspersed with residents makes pollution control difficult for many reasons. Most notable is the poor planning, management, and handling of hazardous wastes. In the Chi Dao Commune, Van Lam District, Hung Yen Province, Vietnam, the Pb recycling area has existed for more than 4 decades. Activities such as the collection of old batteries and the processing and smelting of Pb have had negative impacts for a long time. Currently, Dong Mai is still assessed as a typical village in which the local activities are causing serious environmental pollution in Hung Yen Province, with many health harmful effects on the local residents [13,14,15,16]. The blood Pb levels in nearly one-fifth of the local children (24 out of 109 children examined) were reported to exceed the allowable limit in 2012 [17]. Therefore, the monitoring and remediation of As and heavy metal contamination in Vietnam are of great interest to many concerned agencies and organizations, but the efficiency of these processes is very limited. Various physical and chemical methods have been developed worldwide for environmental pollution monitoring and remediation with positive results [18,19,20]. However, the disadvantages of these methods are their high cost and the potential for secondary pollution. This fact is hidden in the application of these technologies for environmental remediation in this seriously contaminated area.
Phytoremediation is a plant-based, cost-effective, and environment-friendly technology for cleanup of the contaminated environment [21,22]. Plant species that can take up and store metals in their tissues at high levels that are a multiple of the content found in nearby plants are hyperaccumulators [23]. Hyperaccumulators can be defined as plants accumulating at least 100 mg/kg-DW of Cd; 1000 mg/kg-DW of As, Cr, Cu, or Pb; or 10,000 mg/kg-DW of Zn [24,25,26].
In addition to identification of appropriate plant species for use as hyperaccumulator and phytoremediation, the accumulation of As and heavy metals in cultivated plants (such as vegetables and rice) growing in the contaminated environments is also of great concern for public health. Several studies have reported the high levels of As and metal accumulation in cultivated plants which pose a risk to exposed individuals [27,28,29,30,31].
Previous studies in the Dong Mai Pb recycling area showed very high contents of Pb in soil samples [13,15,32]. However, there have been no studies of the As and heavy metal contents in the plants in this area.
In this study, we assessed the soil contamination with As and heavy metals and the accumulation of these elements in both native and cultivated plants growing in the Dong Mai Pb recycling area in Vietnam and recommend potential plants for use in phytoremediation. We also include recommendations for the cultivation of rice and vegetables in this region, and the use of native plants as animal food.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

The Pb recycling area is located in the Dong Mai Village, Chi Dao Commune, Van Lam District, Hung Yen Province, northern Vietnam. The Chi Dao Commune covers an area of 597 ha with 360 ha of agricultural land. In 2015, its population was 8708, including 1874 children of whom 780 were under 6 years old, 716 were 6–10 years old, and 378 were 11–14 years old [33,34,35,36,37,38]. The study area has a tropical monsoonal climate, and the annual average rainfall is about 1176 mm and the average humidity is 80% [39].
Since the 1970s, the traditional village of Dong Mai in the Chi Dao Commune, Van Lam District, Hung Yen Province, has been developing a professional Pb recycling program, which involves processing old batteries, Pb smelting, and slag sifting. Initially, Pb smelting was performed by individual households within the home and garden areas. Regulation enacted in 1997 improved the recycling management in this village by concentrating the recycling activities at four major Pb smelters located near a paddy field 500 m away from the residential area (old smelters). In 2000, the village started to use a self-contained Pb dust suction system consisting of hundreds of large bags. The suction capacity of this system was 7 tons of Pb dust per one night per one smelter. This groundbreaking technology was very efficient at minimizing the amount of Pb released to the air. Since 2015, Pb smelting has occurred in 2 new smelter systems operated by two companies located approximately 1 km away from the residential area in Dong Mai village because the old smelters were closed.

2.2. Sampling and Analysis

Sampling was carried out in October 2016. Approximately 200 g of soil per sample was collected from the surface layer within 0–20 cm around the sampled plants at the study sites by using a stainless steel shovel. In total, 32 soil samples were collected at 7 sites (Figure 1) (3–8 samples at each site). These samples were air-dried at room temperature for 5–7 days. The large debris, stones, and pebbles were removed, and the soil samples were then sieved through a 1 mm polyethylene sieve and crushed into fine powder.
A total of 57 native and cultivated plant samples belonging to 15 species (Table 1) were collected in the study area (Figure 1). The scientific names of the plant species were determined by a morphological classification method [40,41,42,43,44,45]. The aboveground (aerial) tissues of the selected plant samples were washed thoroughly with tap water to remove dust, rinsed 3 times with deionized distilled water, and dried at 60 °C in an oven (Memmert, Germany) for 72 h. The dried samples were ground and cut into very tiny pieces by using a mortar mill and stainless steel scissors.
The soil pH was measured with a glass electrode in a soil: distilled water slurry (1:2.5, w/v). The total contents of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) were determined with the Vietnam Standard methods [46,47,48]. The soil samples were digested for total N analysis by the addition of 4 mL of a mixed solution of salicylic acid and sulfuric acid (prepared by dissolving 25 g of C7H6O3 in 1 L of concentrated H2SO4) to each 0.5 g soil sample in a specialized glass bottle for >5 h. To this was added 0.5 g of Na2S2O3·5H2O, and the mixture was heated until it stopped bubbling. It was cooled to room temperature, and 1.1 g of the catalysis mixture (200 g K2SO4, 6 g CuSO4·5H2O, 6 g TiO2) was added. The mixture was heated until it became colorless, and then heated gently for a further 5 h. The mixture was cooled and 20 mL of deionized distilled water was added, before N was distilled. The soil samples were digested for the total P analysis by the addition of 10 mL of concentrated H2SO4 and 3 mL of 70% HClO4 to each 1.0 g soil sample in a specialized glass bottle. The mixture was heated gently and then boiled for 20 min, after which five drops of 70% HClO4 were added. The mixture was heated until it became colorless, and was then diluted to 100 mL with deionized distilled water. The content (%) of P2O5 was calculated as: P2O5 (%) = P (%) × 2.31. The soil samples were digested for total K analysis by the addition of 10 mL of HF and 1 mL of 70% HClO4 to each 0.25 g soil sample in a platinum cup. The samples were heated at 200 °C until the fluid had completely evaporated. This procedure was repeated several times until the mixture became colorless. The mixture was cooled, and 5 mL of 6 mol/L HCl and deionized distilled water were added. The mixture was boiled for 5 min, and then diluted to 100 mL with deionized distilled water. The content (%) of K2O was calculated as: K2O (%) = K (%) × 1.205. The available Pb content in each soil sample was extracted with 0.5 M NH4CH3COO and 0.02 M EDTA solution (1:10, w/v) [49].
Soil and plant samples were digested following US EPA method 3052 [50], a weighed amount of dried sample (0.200 ± 0.001 mg) was placed into a digestion vessel. Concentrated 65% HNO3 (9 ± 0.1 mL) and concentrated HF (3 ± 0.1 mL) were added and the mixture was shaken carefully. Small amounts of H2O2 (0.1–2 mL) and deionized distilled water (<5 mL) were also added. For samples containing high contents of iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al), about 2 mL of HCl was added. The vessels were then placed in a microwave-accelerated reaction system (Speedwave 4, Berghof, Germany). The contents of As and heavy metals in the plant and soil samples were measured following SMEWW 3125:2012 [51] using an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP–MS: ELAN 9000, PerkinElmer SCIEX, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples with high Pb contents were analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). All analyses were performed in duplicate. The certified reference materials BAM–U110 (provided by the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing of Germany) and ERM–CD281 (provided by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, European Commission’s Joint Research Centre) were used for quality control of the analytical procedure used for the soil and plant samples, respectively. The average recoveries of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn from BAM-U110 were 104%, 101%, 105%, 106%, 106%, and 105%, respectively; and those from ERM–CD281 were 113%, 103%, 105%, 105%, 106%, and 103%, respectively.

2.3. Contamination Factor, Enrichment Factor, Pollution Index, Bioaccumulation Factor

The contamination factor (CF), which is calculated as the ratio of the metal content in the soil at each site to the regulatory limit, is used to assess of soil contamination [52]. In this study, the thresholds of As (15 mg/kg), Cr (150 mg/kg), Cu (100 mg/kg), Zn (200 mg/kg), Cd (1.5 mg/kg), and Pb (70 mg/kg) regulated by the Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment for agricultural soils [53] were used to calculate the CF.
The enrichment factor (EF) of an element, an indicator of the intensity of anthropogenic contamination of the surface soil, was determined with the following equation [54,55]:
EF = (Ci/Cref)sample/(Ci/Cref)background
where (Ci/Cref)sample is the ratio of the content of interested element and reference element in soil sample, and (Ci/Cref)background is the ratio of the content of interested element and reference element in the background. In this study, Fe was selected as reference element [54]. The contents of Fe, As, Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in shale in the Earth’s crust were used to calculate the background values which were 47,200, 13, 90, 45, 95, 0.3, and 20 mg/kg, respectively [56].
The pollution index (PI) was calculated for each sampling site using Equation (2) [57]:
PI = ( CF aver ) 2 + ( CF max ) 2 2
where CFaver and CFmax represent average value of CF and maximum value of CF at each sampling site, respectively.
The bioaccumulation factor (BAF) is calculated as a ratio of metal in the harvestable part of the plants (aboveground biomass) to that in the soil [58].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses of data were performed using the SPSS 20.0 package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All data were tested for goodness of fit to a normal distribution. Data were log transformed where necessary to achieve homogeneity of variance. Evaluation of significant differences among different treatments was performed using one-way ANOVA (Analysis Of Variance) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients (r) were used to express the associations of quantitative variables.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Contents of N, P, K, As, and Heavy Metals in Soils

The soil sample pH ranged from 4.8 to 7.1 which is in the range of the pH value index of the soils in Vietnam [59] (Table 2). The range of pH values of the soil samples collected from peanut fields (Sites 1 and 2) was 6.3–7.1 and was significantly higher than those of samples collected at all other sites (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The Pb recycling activities, particularly the disposal of old batteries, in Dong Mai have caused the acidification of the soil. The results of this study are consistent with a previous report of the low soil pH in the study area [32].
The total N, P (P2O5), and K (K2O) contents of the soils were 0.19%–0.34%, 0.13%–0.37%, and 1.23%–2.27% (Table 2), respectively, whereas the index values for the total N, P (P2O5), and K (K2O) contents in the soils of Vietnam are 0.095%–0.27%, 0.03%–2.35%, and 0.03%–2.35%, respectively [60,61,62]. Thus, only the soil samples collected from the ditches in front of one old Pb smelter (Site 4) contained total N contents exceeding the index values of total N given in the Vietnam Standard [60].
The contents of Al, Fe, As, Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb were 6200–32,600, 11,300–55,500, 5.4–26.8, 24.9–290, 66.0–252, 143–455, 0.71–1.67, and 370–47,400 mg/kg, respectively (Table 2). The contents of Pb in an extractable form were 3.17–870 mg/kg, which were significantly lower than those of total Pb (p < 0.05). The ratio of the content of extractable Pb to that of total Pb in the present study was lower than that reported by Rodríguez-Seijo et al. [63] and Ngoc et al. [64], but higher than that reported by Zhang et al. [65] and Lenart and Wolny-Koładka [66]. The differences in the proportions of extractable Pb in different studies may be attributable to the total Pb contents in the soils and the different properties of the soils (e.g., soil pH, soil texture, organic carbon content, cation exchange capacity, calcium carbonate equivalents, and nutrient balance) [11,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Extractants also play an important role in the amounts of extractable metals detected [63,64,69]. The effects of the recycling of old batteries on the disturbance of the natural properties of the soil in the study area may have also altered the proportion of extractable Pb.
The results of this study also demonstrate that the contents of Pb (both total and extractable forms) in the soil samples collected at the edges of ditches (Sites 4 and 5) and a paddy field (Site 3) were significantly higher than those at other sites (p < 0.05). The high Pb contents in the paddy field may pose a high risk of Pb accumulation in rice.
The CF for As in approximately 40% of the collected soil samples (three out of seven sites) varied from 1 < CF < 2, indicating moderate contamination according to the classification of Brady et al. [52] (Table 3). The CF values for Cr and Cd were <1, with the exception of Site 1, indicating that the soils in the study area were not contaminated with these metals. The CF values for Cu (0.7–2.5) and Zn (0.7–2.3) indicated uncontaminated to moderately uncontaminated soils (Table 3).
By contrast, the contents of Pb were significantly higher than those of As, Cr, Cu, Zn, and Cd in the soils, except at Site 2 (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The contents of total Pb were 5–677-fold higher than the maximum allowable limit for agricultural soils in Vietnam [53]. The highest contents of Pb were found in the samples collected at the edges of ditches, indicating the release of contaminants into the surrounding environment via the ditch systems and the poor control and management of these hazardous wastes in the study area.
The EFs for As, Cr, Cu, Zn, and Cd were within the range of 1.4–5.3, indicating uncontaminated to moderately uncontaminated soils [52] (Table 3). By contrast, the EFs for Pb varied from 40 to 3850, with an average of 712, indicating extreme contamination of the soils with Pb. The pollution index (PI) ranged from 4 to 492, implying heavily polluted soil according to the classification of Nemerow et al. [57].
The correlations between the contents of each pair of metals (As, Cr, Cu, Zn, and Cd) were moderately to strongly positive (p < 0.01): r(32) was 0.68–0.91 for As, 0.55–0.91 for Cr, 0.55–0.86 for Cu, 0.66–0.88 for Zn, and 0.55–0.69 for Cd. These findings suggest that the As, Cr, Cu, Zn, and Cd were derived from similar sources [70,71]. By contrast, Pb showed no correlation (p > 0.05) with As or other heavy metal, implying that the source of Pb in the soil was the Pb recycling activities in the study area. This result is consistent with the findings of previous studies that Pb occurs naturally in the earth’s crust [72] at levels below 50 mg/kg [73] and that the amounts and types of Pb species in soils are often modified by anthropogenic activities [9]. Iron also correlated (r = 0.45–0.80, p < 0.001) with As and heavy metals, reflecting the role of Fe-compounds in binding these elements in soils [74,75].
Previous studies have also reported high contents of Pb in the soils collected in the study area [13] which were more than 214-fold higher than the maximum allowable limit for agricultural soils in Vietnam [53]. An analysis performed in 2007 showed Pb contamination in the agricultural soils at two sites in Dong Mai village with total Pb contents of 864 and 3352 mg/kg [32]. Recent research reported that the agricultural soil in Dong Mai was heavily contaminated with Pb, with total Pb contents ranged from 250 to 7070 mg/kg [15]. High contents of Pb in the soils have also been reported in other battery recycling areas which were as high as 122,404 mg/kg [76], 140,500 mg/kg [77], 24,600 mg/kg [78], 5657 mg/kg [69], and 640.71 mg/kg [79].

3.2. Bioaccumulation of the Studied Elements in Plant Species

Our survey of the study area in Dong Mai village showed that wild flora was abundant and grew well, displaying no morphological abnormalities in soil contaminated with some heavy metals and heavily contaminated with Pb, indicating the tolerance of these species.
The contents of As and heavy metals in rice grains and in the shoots of 15 native and cultivated plant species are shown in Table 4. The greatest number of plant species belonged to the family Poaceae (six of the 15 species) (Table 1), which is consistent with the dominant distribution of Poaceae in other areas highly contaminated with Pb, Zn, and As in mining regions in northern Vietnam [80].
The contents of As, Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in the rice grains and the shoots of the 15 plant species tested were within the ranges of 0.14–10.2, 1.00–10.2, 5.19–23.8, 34.7–165, 0.06–0.99, and 2.83–1160 mg/kg-DW, respectively. Therefore, the contents of As, Cr, Cu, Zn, and Cd in most of the plant species studied were lower than the toxic levels for plant growth [11] (Table 4), possibly because of the low contents of these metals in the soils. By contrast, the contents of Pb in these plant species were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than those of As and the other heavy metals, reflecting the impact of the high contents of Pb in the soils on its accumulation in these species. Eight of the 15 plant species studied had Pb contents higher than the toxic level for plant growth (Table 4), indicating the capacity of these species to tolerate heavily Pb-contaminated soils and to accumulate Pb in their tissues. In this study, the hyperaccumulation of Pb (1160 mg/kg-DW) was observed in H. acutigluma. In a previous laboratory experiment, Chu [81] reported the hyperaccumulation of Pb in P. hydropiper (4650 mg/kg-DW) and H. acutigluma (3161 mg/kg-DW) after 2 months growth in soils containing 192,185 mg Pb/kg. In the present study, we detected lower contents of Pb in P. hydropiper and H. acutigluma than were reported by Chu [81] (Table 4), possibly resulting from the growing conditions and higher contents of Pb in the soil in the previous study. This was supported by the strong correlation between the contents of Pb in the plant shoots and the contents of total Pb (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and extractable Pb (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). This result also implies the strong effect of the bioavailability of Pb in the soil on the uptake and accumulation of Pb in plant shoots, consistent with previous studies [65,82]. Our results also showed higher contents of Pb in the shoots of I. aquatica (586 mg/kg-DW) than those reported (179 and 232 mg/kg) when the plants were growing in soil containing 864 and 3352 mg Pb/kg, respectively [32], possibly because of the differences in the Pb contents in the soil. At other Pb battery-recycling sites, Pichtel et al. [77] showed that the contents of Pb in the shoots of nine plant species were higher than the toxic level for plant growth [11]. González-Chávez et al. [76] reported that the maximum Pb content in the shoots in Ricinus communis was 293 mg/kg.
Plants considered important components of ecological systems transfer metals from abiotic to biotic environments. Although more than 400 plant species have been identified as hyperaccumulators, most are nickel hyperaccumulators which occur in ultramafic areas throughout the world [83,84,85,86,87], or hyperaccumulators of other elements such as Al, Mn, Cu, Cr, Co, Ni, or Zn [88], whereas only a few hyperaccumulators of Pb have been reported. Jiang et al. [88] reported the hyperaccumulation of Pb in Brassica juncea. Wan et al. [89] found a hyperaccumulation of Pb (2350 mg/kg-DW) in the shoots of Viola principis H. de Boiss. Hyperaccumulation levels (mg/kg-DW) were also reported in Ageratum houstonianum Mill. (1130), and Pteris vittata L. (1020) [90]. Diep and Zarli [91] showed that Lantana camara L. was a hyperaccumulator of Pb.
In general, metal toxicity mechanisms have not been well studied. However, metal toxicity in plants related to an oxidative stress approach has raised much concern in recent years [82,92,93]. It has been reported that a tolerance of metals may be attributable to changes in the content of nonprotein thiols in plants. For example, increased levels of peroxidase activity and higher proline contents in the stems and/or leaves of Vicia faba plants treated with different metals (Pb, Cd, Ni, or Zn) have been established [82]. Heavy metal stress usually promotes the excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species in plant cells, which induce cell damage or death. However, some hyperaccumulator plants develop cellular strategies whereby their endogenous antioxidant enzymes provide them with increased protection against the harmful effects of the oxidative stress induced by heavy metals [92]. It has been reported that the uptake of Pb and Cd is enhanced in the presence of cysteine and glutathione, and that there may be specific transporters for these thiol ligands [94]. The cytoplasmic and intravacuolar sequestration of Pb is predominant in the cells of the root tip, whereas no endocytosis of Pb at the plasma membrane has been observed. Therefore, a membrane transport protein may be involved in the sequestration of Pb. Plants respond to the toxic effects of Pb in various ways [95]. For example, abundant cell-wall thickening could be a common response of plant cells to Pb [96]. The thickening of the plasma membrane almost certainly protects the plant cell from the return of Pb to the protoplast [97].

3.3. Potential Risks Associated with the Consumption of Contaminated Plants

The high contents of Pb in the soil in the study area (370–47,400 mg/kg) could cause high contents of Pb in cultivated vegetables and food. It was reported that total Pb contents from 23.51 to 44.81 mg/kg-DW in agricultural soil caused Pb accumulation in water spinach to levels exceeding the maximum level [98] for Pb in fresh vegetables [99].
Among the cultivated plants analyzed, the contents of As and some other heavy metals in the grains of rice (O. sativa) were lower than those in shoots of wild taro (C. esculenta) and water spinach (I. aquatica) (Table 4). In the study area, these three plant species were cultivated as human food and pig food (wild taro). The contents of Pb in C. esculenta and I. aquatica were approximately twofold higher than the maximum toxic level of Pb in plant species (300 mg/kg-DW) [11], representing a health risk to the local people through the potential biological amplification of Pb accumulation in the upper levels of the food chain, even direct and indirect consumption of these plants. It is noteworthy that although L. chinensis, L. adscendens, and P. hydropiper were not cultivated in the study area, they are sometimes harvested together with C. esculenta as a source of pig food in Vietnam. Brachiaria distachya, C. communis, C. dactylon, H. acutigluma, P. repens, and P. conjugatum are also potential sources of food for cattle. Therefore, the high contents of Pb in these plant species, ranging from 193 to 1160 mg/kg-DW (Table 4) may pose a great risk to human health through the food chain. It is noteworthy that the numbers of pigs and cattle in the Chi Dao Commune were 1300–5200 and 25–250, respectively, during the period 2010–2015 [33,34,35,36,37,38].
The data in Table 4 also show that the content of Pb in grains of rice (O. sativa) was 14-fold higher than the maximum permitted level (0.2 mg/kg) for food and feed [100,101]. Accumulation of Pb in rice to levels higher than 0.2 mg/kg has been reported [102,103], indicating that the uptake of Pb by roots and its accumulation in rice present a considerable risk. The contents of As and Pb in spinach (I. aquatica) were approximately 3- and 293-fold higher, respectively, than the standard allowance for vegetables [101] (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg-DW, respectively). These findings highlight the need to manage the cultivation of rice and vegetables appropriately in these environments and to use native plant species (B. distachya, C. communis, C. dactylon, C. esculenta, H. acutigluma, L. adscendens, L. chinensis, P. conjugatum, P. hydropiper, and P. repens) to reduce the risk of As and heavy metal toxicity in pigs, cattle, and humans via the food chain.

3.4. Phytoremediation Potential of Plant Species

An ideal plant for phytoremediation must meet the following criteria: it must be a hyperaccumulator, have a large, fast-growing biomass, have an AF value >1, be widely distributed, have a highly branched root system, and be easy to cultivate and harvest [21,70,104].
Of the 15 plant species examined in this study, Pb was hyperaccumulated only in H. acutigluma. Although this plant species has a medium biomass, it grows endemically, widely, and very rapidly, and has a highly branched root system. Panicum repens and P. hydropiper also had higher contents of Pb in their shoots than the other species studied, although their biomasses are lower than that of H. acutigluma.
The BAF value for As and the heavy metals tested are shown in Table 4. BAF was >1 in P. hydropiper for As and in H. acutigluma for Pb (extractable Pb in the soil), indicating the capacity of these plants to accumulate these metals in their aboveground biomass. However, the BAF of H. acutigluma for Pb (total Pb in the soil) was only 0.09. Among the species studied, Pb was only hyperaccumulated in H. acutigluma, although high contents of Pb were also found in other species (Table 4). Therefore, this plant species is considered a potential hyperaccumulator of Pb, and warrants further experimental cultivation to confirm a hyperaccumulator [105].
It is notable that very low BAF values for Pb (total Pb contents in soils) were obtained (0.01–0.09), possibly due to the very high contents of Pb in the soils and the ability of Pb to bind strongly to organic and/or colloidal materials. Many other parameters also strongly affect the interactions of trace elements with soils and plants, and therefore influence the efficiency of phytoremediation [11,67,68]. For example, metals are more bioavailable at acidic pH, whereas organic matter and clay with a high cation-exchange capacity reduce metal availability and toxicity [106]. Therefore, only a small amount of the Pb in soil is soluble and available for plant uptake [107,108].
The BAF value of 1.34 (Table 4) calculated from the extractable Pb data may indicate the capacity of H. acutigluma to accumulate Pb in its shoots. Therefore, H. acutigluma is the best candidate species for the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with Pb in the study area. However, considering the very high contents of Pb in the soil, a long period of phytoremediation would be required to achieve the allowable limits of Pb in the soils [53].

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

The total contents of As, Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in soil samples collected in the Dong Mai Pb recycling area in the Chi Dao Commune, Van Lam District, Hung Yen Province, northern Vietnam, exceeded the allowable limits [53] at three, one, five, six, one, and seven of the seven sites tested, respectively. The role of soils for human health, in particular, the effects of soil contamination on human health, is well recognized by some world organizations [108]. The serious contamination of soil with Pb and its contamination with As and other heavy metals endanger the health and livelihoods of local residents. This metal contamination in food and vegetable crops, especially the high Pb contents in rice grains (O. sativa) and the shoots of water spinach (I. aquatica), is higher than the permitted levels [100,101].
Arsenic and heavy metals had accumulated in 15 plant species growing in the study area. Hymenachne acutigluma showed the greatest ability to accumulate Pb from the soil into its shoots (1160 mg/kg-DW), and this species grows rapidly and has a dense root system.
Based on the available evidence, we do not recommend field cultivation of rice or vegetables in the area of Dong Mai village. The local authorities should be informed about the status and risk of food and vegetable contamination by Pb and should take measures to remediate the Pb-contaminated soil in Dong Mai village as soon as possible. In this study, H. acutigluma is recommended as the best candidate for the phytoremediation of soil heavily contaminated with Pb. Detailed laboratory and field experiments are required to assess the feasibility of this plant species in the phytoremediation of Pb-contaminated soils.

Author Contributions

H.T.T.C. designed the research and wrote original draft preparation, T.V.V. analyzed and determined heavy metals in samples, T.K.B.N. collected and processed samples; H.H.T.N. reviewed and edited the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), grant number VAST07.03/16-17.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Iimura, K.; Ito, H.; Chino, M.; Morishita, T.; Hirata, H. Behavior of contaminant heavy metals in soil-plant system. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Soil Environment and Fertility Management in Intensive Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan, 10–17 October 1977; pp. 357–368. [Google Scholar]
  2. Förstner, U. Land Contamination by Metals: Global Scope and Magnitude of Problem. In Metal Speciation and Contamination of Soil; Allen, H.E., Huang, C.P., Bailey, G.W., Bowers, E.R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun, Z.; Xie, X.; Wang, P.; Hu, Y.; Cheng, H. Heavy metal pollution caused by small-scale metal ore mining activities: A case study from a polymetallic mine in South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arshad, M.; Silvestre, J.; Pinelli, E.; Kallerhoff, J.; Kaemmerer, M.; Tarigo, A.; Shahid, M.; Guiresse, M.; Pradere, P.; Dumat, C. A field study of lead phytoextraction by various scented Pelargonium cultivars. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 2187–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Uzu, G.; Sobanska, S.; Sarret, G.; Munoz, M.; Dumat, C. Foliar lead uptake by lettuce exposed to atmospheric fallouts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 427–428, 1036–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kamal, M.; Ghaly, A.E.; Mahmoud, N.; Cote, R. Phytoaccumulation of heavy metals by aquatic plants. J. Environ. Int. 2004, 29, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Selinus, O.; Alloway, B.J.; Centeno, J.A.; Finkelman, R.B.; Fuge, R.; Lindh, U.; Smedley, P. Essentials of Medical Geology: Impacts of the Natural Environment on Public Health; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, NJ, USA, 2005; 812p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pahlsson, A.M.B. Toxicity of heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Cd, Pb) to vascular plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1989, 47, 287–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cecchi, M.; Dumat, C.; Alric, A.; Felix-Faure, B.; Pradere, P.; Guiresse, M. Multi-metal contamination of a calcic cambisol by fallout from a lead-recycling plant. Geoderma 2008, 144, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shahid, M.; Pinelli, E.; Pourrut, B.; Silvestre, J.; Dumat, C. Lead-induced genotoxicity to Vicia faba L. roots in relation with metal cell uptake and initial speciation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. MONRE (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam). National State of Environment 2008: Vietnam Craft Village Environment; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2008; 98p.
  13. Chu, T.T.H. Survey on heavy metals contaminated soils in Thai Nguyen and Hung Yen provinces in Northern Vietnam. J. Viet. Environ. 2011, 1, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  14. MONRE (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam). Available online: http://www.monre.gov.vn/v35/default.aspx?tabid=428&CateID=24&ID=122169&Code=ZD5X122169 (accessed on 15 November 2013). (In Vietnamese)
  15. Pham, T.T.T.; Phan, T.P.; Nguyen, K.L.; Nguyen, T.K.O.; Ha, T.T.T.; Ho, T.O.; Nguyen, K.B.T.; Nguyen, T.M.T.; Do, T.T.T.; Nguyen, T.H.; et al. Status of heavy metal (Pb, Cd) pollution in agricultural soil in Dong Mai lead recycling craft village in Hung Yen, Vietnam. J. Viet. Environ. 2016, 8, 284–288. [Google Scholar]
  16. Phan, T.P.; Pham, T.T.T.; Nguyen, K.L.; Nguyen, T.K.O.; Ha, T.T.T.; Nguyen, K.B.T.; Chu, T.T.H. The impacts of lead recycling activities to human health and environment in Dong Mai craft village, Hung Yen, Vietnam. J. Viet. Environ. 2016, 8, 266–270. [Google Scholar]
  17. DONRE—Department of Natural Resources and Environment. Available online: http://new.hungyen.gov.vn/vi-vn/stnmt/Pages/Article.aspx?ChannelId=18&articleID=590 (accessed on 15 November 2013). (In Vietnamese)
  18. Belluck, D.A.; Benjamin, S.L.; David, S. Why remediate? In Phytoremediation of Metal-Contaminated Soils; Morel, J.L., Echevarria, G., Goncharova, N., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guemiza, K.; Coudert, L.; Metahni, S.; Mercier, G.; Besner, S.; Blais, J.F. Treatment technologies used for the removal of As, Cr, Cu, PCP and/or PCDD/F from contaminated soil: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 333, 194–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yao, Z.; Li, J.; Xie, H.; Yuc, C. Review on remediation technologies of soil contaminated by heavy metals. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 16, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garbisu, C.; Alkorta, I. Phytoextraction: A cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 77, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wan, X.; Lei, M.; Chen, T. Cost–benefit calculation of phytoremediation technology for heavy-metal-contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 563–564, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. US EPA. Introduction to Phytoremediation; EPA/600/R-99/107; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  24. Baker, A.J.M.; Walker, P.L. Physiological responses of plants to heavy metals and the quantification of tolerance and toxicity. Chem. Spec. Bioavailab. 1989, 1, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Malaisse, F.; Grégoire, J.; Brooks, R.R.; Morrison, R.S.; Reeves, R.D. Aeolanthus biformifolius: A hyperaccumulator of copper from Zaïre. Science 1978, 199, 887–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Reeves, R.D.; Brooks, R.R. Hyperaccumulation of lead and zinc by two metallophytes from a mining area in Central Europe. Environ. Pollut. 1983, 31, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kwon, J.C.; Nejad, Z.D.; Jung, M.C. Arsenic and heavy metals in paddy soil and polished rice contaminated by mining activities in Korea. Catena 2016, 148, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Obiora, S.C.; Chukwu, A.; Davies, T.C. Heavy metals and health risk assessment of arable soils and food crops around Pb-Zn mining localities in Enyigba, southeastern Nigeria. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2016, 116, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Souza, E.S.; Texeira, R.A.; Costa, H.S.C.; Oliveira, F.J.; Melo, L.C.A.; Faial, K.C.F.; Fernandes, A.R. Assessment of risk to human health from simultaneous exposure to multiple contaminants in an artisanal gold mine in Serra Pelada, Pará, Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Xiao, R.; Wang, S.; Li, R.; Wang, J.J.; Zhang, Z. Soil heavy metal contamination and health risks associated with artisanal gold mining in Tongguan, Shaanxi, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 141, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhuang, P.; Li, Z.A.; Zou, B.; Xia, H.P.; Wang, G. Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil and Soybean near the Dabaoshan Mine, South China. Pedosphere 2013, 23, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nguyen, H.T.; Tran, T.L.H.; Cao, V.H.; Nguyen, D.H.; Phan, Q.H.; Kurosawa, K.; Egashira, K. Uptake of Pb, Zn and Cu by roots and shoots of fast growing plants grown in contaminated soil in Vietnam. J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manag. 2013, 4, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chi Dao Community People’s Committee. Annual Report 2010; Chi Dao Community People’s Committee: Hung Yen, Vietnam, 2010. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Chi Dao Community People’s Committee. Annual Report 2011; Chi Dao Community People’s Committee: Hung Yen, Vietnam, 2011. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  35. Chi Dao Community People’s Committee. Annual Report 2012; Chi Dao Community People’s Committee: Hung Yen, Vietnam, 2012. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  36. Chi Dao Community People’s Committee. Annual Report 2013; Chi Dao Community People’s Committee: Hung Yen, Vietnam, 2013. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Chi Dao Community People’s Committee. Annual Report 2014; Chi Dao Community People’s Committee: Hung Yen, Vietnam, 2014. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  38. Chi Dao Community People’s Committee. Annual Report 2015; Chi Dao Community People’s Committee: Hung Yen, Vietnam, 2015. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  39. Foreign Affairs of Hung Yen Province. Van Lam District: Natural History. 2018. Available online: http://doingoaihungyen.vn/1016n/van-lam-district.html (accessed on 17 December 2018).
  40. Le, K.B. Flora of Vietnam: Asteraceae Dumort; Science and Technology Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007; Volume 7. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  41. Nguyen, K.K. Flora of Vietnam: Cyperaceae Juss.; Science and Technology Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2002; Volume 3. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  42. Nguyen, T.D. Flora of Vietnam: Polygonaceae Juss.; Science and Technology Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007; Volume 11, pp. 185–186, 363. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Pham, H.H. An Illustrated Flora of Vietnam; TRE Publishing House: Hochiminh City, Vietnam, 1999; Volume I. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  44. Pham, H.H. An Illustrated Flora of Vietnam, 2nd ed.; TRE Publishing House: Hochiminh City, Vietnam, 2000; Volume III. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  45. Pham, H.H. An Illustrated Flora of Vietnam, 2nd ed.; TRE Publishing House: Hochiminh City, Vietnam, 2003; Volume II. (In Vietnamese) [Google Scholar]
  46. TCVN 6498:1999 (ISO 11261:1995)—Soil Quality—Determination of Total Nitrogen—Modified Kjeldahl Method; National Standard of Vietnam; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 1999. (In Vietnamese)
  47. TCVN 8940:2011—Soil Quality—Determination of Total Phosphorus—Colorimetry Method; National Standard of Vietnam; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2011. (In Vietnamese)
  48. TCVN 8660:2011—Soil Quality—Method for Determination of Total Potassium; National Standard of Vietnam; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2011. (In Vietnamese)
  49. Lakanen, E.; Ervio, R. A comparison of eight extractants for determination of plant available micronutrients in soil. Acta Agraria Fennica 1971, 123, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  50. US EPA 3052. Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices. 1996. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/3052.pdf (accessed on 25 December 2017).
  51. SMEWW 3125:2012—Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma/Mass Spectrometry); American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  52. Brady, J.P.; Ayoko, G.A.; Martens, W.N.; Goonetilleke, A. Development of a hybrid pollution index for heavy metals in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. QCVN 03-MT:2015/BTNMT—National Technical Regulation on the Allowable Limits of Heavy Metals in the Soils; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2015. (In Vietnamese)
  54. Barbieri, M. The Importance of Enrichment Factor (EF) and Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo) to Evaluate the Soil Contamination. J. Geol. Geophys. 2016, 5, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yongming, H.; Peixuan, D.; Junji, C.; Posmentier, E.S. Multivariate analysis of heavy metal contamination in urban dusts of Xi’an, Central China. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 355, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Turekian, K.K.; Wedepohl, K.H. Distribution of the elements in some major units of the Earth’s crust. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1961, 72, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nemerow, N.L. Stream, Lake, Estuary, and Ocean Pollution; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1991; 472p. [Google Scholar]
  58. Marrugo-Negrete, J.; Marrugo-Madrid, S.; Pinedo-Hernández, J.; Durango-Hernández, J.; Díez, S. Screening of native plant species for phytoremediation potential at a Hg-contaminated mining site. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 542, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. TCVN 7377:2004—Soils Quality—pH Value Index in the Soils of Vietnam; National Standard of Vietnam; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2004. (In Vietnamese)
  60. TCVN 7373:2004—Sois Quality—Index Values of Total Nitrogen Content in the Soils of Vietnam; National Standard of Vietnam; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2004. (In Vietnamese)
  61. TCVN 7374:2004—Soils Quality—Index Values of Phosphorus Content in the Soils of Vietnam; National Standard of Vietnam; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2004. (In Vietnamese)
  62. TCVN 7375:2004—Soils Quality—Index Values of Total Potassium Content in the Soils of Vietnam; National Standard of Vietnam; Vietnam Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2004. (In Vietnamese)
  63. Rodríguez-Seijo, A.; Lago-Vila, M.; Andrade, M.L.; Vega, F.A. Pb pollution in soils from a trap shooting range and the phytoremediation ability of Agrostis capillaris L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 1312–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ngoc, M.N.; Dultz, S.; Kasbohm, J. Simulation of retention and transport of copper, lead and zinc in a paddy soil of the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, L.; Verweij, R.A.; Van Gestel, C.A.M. Effect of soil properties on Pb bioavailability and toxicity to the soil invertebrate Enchytraeus crypticus. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lenart, A.; Wolny-Koładka, K. The effect of heavy metal concentration and soil pH on the abundance of selected microbial groups within ArcelorMittal Poland Steelworks in Cracow. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013, 90, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Saxena, P.K.; KrishnaRaj, S.; Dan, T.; Perras, M.R.; Vettakkorumakankav, N.N. Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated and polluted soils. In Heavy Metal Stress in Plants: From Molecules to Ecosystems; Prasad, M.N.V., Hagemeyer, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 305–329. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kamnev, A.A.; Van der Lelie, D. Chemical and biological parameters as tools to evaluate and improve heavy metal phytoremediation. Biosci. Rep. 2000, 20, 239–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Palacios, H.; Iribarren, I.; Olalla, M.J.; Cala, V. Lead poisoning of horses in the vicinity of a battery recycling plant. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 290, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ha, N.T.H.; Sakakibara, M.; Sano, S.; Nhuan, M.T. Uptake of metals and metalloids by plants growing in a lead–zinc mine area, Northern Vietnam. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1384–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yoon, J.; Cao, X.; Zhou, Q.; Ma, L.Q. Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Arias, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Ellzey, J.T.; Ren, M.; Viveros, M.N.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Effects of Glomus deserticola inoculation on Prosopis: Enhancing chromium and lead uptake and translocation as confirmed by X-ray mapping, ICP-OES and TEM techniques. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pais, I.; Jones, J.B. The Handbook of Trace Elements; Saint Lucie Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  74. Sigrist, M.E.; Brusa, L.; Beldomenico, H.R.; Dosso, L.; Tsendra, O.M.; González, M.B.; Pieck, C.L.; Verab, C.R. Influence of the iron content on the arsenic adsorption capacity of Fe/GAC adsorbents. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pintor, A.M.A.; Vieira, B.R.C.; Santos, S.C.R.; Boaventura, R.A.R.; Botelho, C.M.S. Arsenate and arsenite adsorption onto iron-coated cork granulates. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 1075–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. González-Chávez, M.C.A.; Carrillo-González, R.; Cuellar-Sánchez, A.; Delgado-Alvarado, A.; Suárez-Espinosa, J.; Ríos-Leal, E.; Solís-Domínguez, F.A.; Maldonado-Mendoza, I.E. Phytoremediation assisted by mycorrhizal fungi of a Mexican defunct lead-acid battery recycling site. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 3134–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pichtel, J.; Kuroiwa, K.; Sawyerr, H.T. Distribution of Pb, Cd and Ba in soils and plants of two contaminated sites. Environ. Poll. 2000, 110, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wasay, S.A.; Parker, W.J.; Van Geel, P.J. Contamination of a calcareous soil by battery industry wastes. I. characterization. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2001, 28, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rodriguez, J.H.; Salazar, M.J.; Steffan, L.; Pignata, M.L.; Franzaring, J.; Klumpp, A.; Fangmeier, A. Assessment of Pb and Zn contents in agricultural soils and soybean crops near to a former battery recycling plant in Córdoba, Argentina. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 145, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dang, T.A.; Chu, T.T.H.; Dao, T.C.T. Some characteristics of Flora of Pb-, Cd-polluted areas in Tan Long, Dong Hy, Thai Nguyen. In Proceedings of the 2nd National Scientific Conference on Ecology and Biological Resources (Sections of Fauna and Flora of Vietnam & Ecology and Environment), Hanoi, Vietnam, 26 October 2007; pp. 297–301. (In Vietnamese). [Google Scholar]
  81. Chu, T.T.H. Study on the growth and tolerance ability of Polygonum hydropiper L. and Hymenachne acutigluma (Steud.) Gilliland on Pb and Cd polluted soil. J. Viet. Environ. 2014, 6, 298–302. [Google Scholar]
  82. Nadgórska-Socha, A.; Kafel, A.; Kandziora-Ciupa, M.; Gospodarek, J.; Zawisza-Raszka, A. Accumulation of heavy metals and antioxidant responses in Vicia faba plants grown on monometallic contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 1124–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Brooks, R.R. Plants that Hyperaccumulate Heavy Metals: Their Role in Phytoremediation, Microbiology, Archaeology, Mineral Exploration and Phytomining; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998; 380p. [Google Scholar]
  84. Reeves, R.D.; Baker, A.J.M. Metal-accumulating Plants. In Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals; Raskin, I., Ensley, B.D., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 193–221. [Google Scholar]
  85. Baker, A.J.M.; McGrath, S.P.; Reeves, R.D.; Smith, J.A.C. Metal Hyperaccumulator Plants: A Review of the Ecology and Physiology of a Biological Resource for Phytoremediation of Metal-polluted Soils. In Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water; Bañuelos, G., Terry, N., Eds.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 85–108. [Google Scholar]
  86. Reeves, R.D. Tropical hyperaccumulators of metals and their potential for phytoextraction. Plant Soil 2003, 249, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Reeves, R.D. Hyperaccumulation of Trace Elements by Plants. In Phytoremediation of Metal-Contaminated Soils; Morel, J.L., Echevarria, G., Goncharova, N., Eds.; NATO Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; p. 68. [Google Scholar]
  88. Van der Ent, A. Plant Diversity and Foliar Elemental Profiles in Relation to Soil Chemistry and Altitude on Ultramafic Edaphic Islands in Kinabalu Park (Malaysia). Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia, 2013; 415p. [Google Scholar]
  89. Jiang, W.; Liu, D.; Hou, W. Hyperaccumulation of lead by roots, hypocotyls, and shoots of Brassica juncea. Biol. Plant. 2000, 43, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wan, X.; Lei, M.; Yang, J. Two potential multi-metal hyperaccumulators found in four mining sites in Hunan Province, China. Catena 2017, 148, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Diep, T.M.H.; Zarli, E.G. Lantana camara L., plant accumulating lead from soils for decontamination. Viet. J. Sci. Technol. Dev. 2007, 10, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  92. Gupta, D.K.; Corpas, F.J.; Palma, J.M. Heavy Meatl Stress in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  93. Fryzova, R.; Pohanka, M.; Martinkova, P.; Cihlarova, H.; Brtnicky, M.; Hladky, J.; Kynicky, J. Oxidative Stress and Heavy Metals in Plants. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2018, 245, 129–156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Krzeslowska, M.; Lenartowska, M.; Mellerowicz, E.J.; Samardakiewicz, S.; Wozny, A. Pectinous cell wall thickenings formation—A response of moss protonemata cells to lead. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Krzesłowska, M.; Lenartowska, M.; Samardakiewicz, S.; Bilski, H.; Wozny, A. Lead deposited in the cell wall of Funaria hygrometrica protonemata is not stable—A remobilization can occur. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Meyers, D.E.R.; Auchterlonie, G.J.; Webb, R.I.; Wood, B. Uptake and localisation of lead in the root system of Brassica juncea. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 153, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Vadas, T.M.; Ahner, B.A. Cysteine- and glutathione-mediated uptake of lead and cadmium into Zea mays and Brassica napus roots. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 2558–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. FAO/WHO. Codex Alimentarius International Food Standards: General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed; CXS193-1995; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  99. Dang, T.A.; Chu, T.T.H. The influence of heavy metal in soil and exposure time on metal accumulation by some leaf vegetables. In Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Life Sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam, 3 November 2005; pp. 361–363. (In Vietnamese). [Google Scholar]
  100. FAO/WHO. In Codex Alimentarius International Food Standards: General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed; CXS193-1995, Adopted in 1995, Revised in 1997, 2006, 2008, 2009, Amended in 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2018.
  101. QCVN8-2:2011/BYT—National Technical Regulation on the Safety Limits of Heavy Metals Contaminants in Food; Vietnam Ministry of Health: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2011. (In Vietnamese)
  102. Fakhri, Y.; Bjørklund, G.; Bandpei, A.M.; Chirumbolo, S.; Keramatie, H.; Pouya, R.H.; Asadi, A.; Amanidaz, N.; Sarafraz AmirSheikhmohammad, M.; Alipour, M.; et al. Concentrations of arsenic and lead in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Iran: A systematic review and carcinogenic risk assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 113, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, H.; Xua, H.; Zhou, S.; Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Zhou, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, G. Distribution and transformation of lead in rice plants grown in contaminated soil amended with biochar and lime. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 165, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Friedland, A.G. The Movement of Metals through Soils and Ecosystems. In Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants: Evolutionary Aspects; Shaw, A.J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; pp. 7–19. [Google Scholar]
  105. Van der Ent, A.; Baker, A.J.M.; Reeves, R.D.; Pollard, A.J.; Schat, H. Hyperaccumulators of metal and metalloid trace elements: Facts and fiction. Plant Soil 2013, 362, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kopittke, P.M.; Asher, C.J.; Kopittke, R.A.; Menzies, N.W. Prediction of Pb speciation in concentrated and dilute nutrient solutions. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 153, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Punamiya, P.; Datta, R.; Sarkar, D.; Barber, S.; Patel, M.; Das, P. Symbiotic role of glomus mosseae in phytoextraction of lead in vetiver grass [Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.)]. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. European Academies. Opportunities for Soil Sustainability in Europe; Schaefer Druck und Verlag GmbH: Teutschenthal, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sampling sites in the Dong Mai Pb recycling area, Hung Yen province, northern Vietnam (Site 1: Peanut field; Site 2: Peanut field; Site 3: Paddy field; Site 4: Path at edge of ditch; Site 5: Path at edge of ditch; Site 6: Path at the edge of the paddy field; Site 7: Paddy field).
Figure 1. Sampling sites in the Dong Mai Pb recycling area, Hung Yen province, northern Vietnam (Site 1: Peanut field; Site 2: Peanut field; Site 3: Paddy field; Site 4: Path at edge of ditch; Site 5: Path at edge of ditch; Site 6: Path at the edge of the paddy field; Site 7: Paddy field).
Minerals 09 00132 g001
Table 1. Plant species collected at the Dong Mai lead recycling area.
Table 1. Plant species collected at the Dong Mai lead recycling area.
N0Latin Name of Plant SpeciesNative or Cultivated PlantFamilyCommon NameNumber of SamplesSampling Sites
1Barleria cristata L.NativeAcanthaceaeBluebell barleria34
2Brachiaria distachya (L.) Stapf.Native *PoaceaeArmgrass millet32, 4
3Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott.CultivatedAraceaeWild taro, dasheen35
4Commelina communis L.Native *CommelinaceaeAsiatic dayflower31, 4
5Cynodon dactylon (L.) Press.Native *PoaceaeBermuda grass34
6Fimbristylis miliacea (L.) VahlNativeCyperaceaeHoorahgrass34
7Hymenachne acutigluma (Steud.) GillilandNative *PoaceaeDhal grass35
8Ipomoea aquatica Forssk.CultivatedConvolvulaceaeWater spinach64, 6
9Limnophila chinensis (Osb.) Merr.Native **ScrophulariaceaeNgo tia64, 5
10Ludwigia adscendens (L.) HaraNative **OnagraceaeWater primrose34
11Oryza sativa L.CultivatedPoaceaeRice63, 7
12Panicum repens L.Native *PoaceaeTorpedo grass34
13Paspalum conjugatum Berg.Native *PoaceaeBuffalo grass34
14Polygonum hydropiper L.Native **PolygonaceaeBite-tounge64, 6
15Sida rhombifolia L.NativeMalvaceaeArrowleaf sida34
* Native plants that are used for cattle food; ** Native plants that are used for pig food.
Table 2. pH values and contents of N, P, K, Al, As, and heavy metals in soils in the Dong Mai lead recycling area.
Table 2. pH values and contents of N, P, K, Al, As, and heavy metals in soils in the Dong Mai lead recycling area.
ParametersSitesAllowable/Index Values *
1234567
pH7.1 ± 0.6 b6.3 ± 0.5 b4.9 ± 0.4 a4.9 ± 0.2 a5.0 ± 0.4 a5.2 ± 0.7 a4.8 ± 0.4 a4.11–7.57 1
Al (mg/kg)6200 ± 1300 b32,600 ± 5600 a21,500 ± 6700 a25,200 ± 6700 a23,300 ± 4400 a14,300 ± 4900 a,b23,400 ± 4200 a-
Fe (mg/kg)22,000 ± 4500 b42,300 ± 11,100 a34,600 ± 15,400 a29,100 ± 3700 a55,500 ± 7800 a32,100 ± 5600 a11,300 ± 1600 b-
As (mg/kg)10.9 ± 0.5 a,b15.3 ± 0.5 a,b10.9 ± 9.0 a,b11.6 ± 4.1 a,b26.8 ± 0.8 a16.0 ± 6.9 a,b5.4 ± 0.3 b15 2
Cr (mg/kg)60.7 ± 22.9 a43.4 ± 11.0 a84.8 ± 49.2 a49.6 ± 32.5 a290 ± 83 a114 ± 79 a24.9 ± 1.4 a150 2
Cu (mg/kg)143 ± 19 a,b101 ± 12 a,b105 ± 58 a,b84.0 ± 4.4 a,b251 ± 56 a104 ± 71 a,b66.0 ± 12.0 b100 2
Zn (mg/kg)455 ± 117 a,b333 ± 97 a,b223 ± 101 a,b228 ± 25 a,b392 ± 75 a223 ± 90 a,b143 ± 48 b200 2
Cd (mg/kg)1.24 ± 0.17 a1.35 ± 0.35 a0.71 ± 0.48 a0.87 ± 0.27 a1.67 ± 0.24 a0.76 ± 0.32 a0.93 ± 0.23 a1.5 2
Pb-Total (mg/kg)370 ± 126 b834 ± 234 b5050 ± 2200 a47,400 ± 43,100 c12,800 ± 4200 a,c977 ± 257 b419 ± 123 b70 2
Pb-Extractable (mg/kg)3.17 ± 0.17 b84.0 ± 5.7 a,c536 ± 252 a869 ± 213 a870 ± 83 a77.7 ± 60.0 c11.9 ± 1.0 b-
Total N (%N)0.19 ± 0.08 a0.19 ± 0.05 a0.23 ± 0.08 a0.34 ± 0.21 a0.27 ± 0.06 a0.23 ± 0.02 a0.29 ± 0.11 a0.095–0.27 3
Total P (%P2O5)0.37 ± 0.11 b0.24 ± 0.06 a0.13 ± 0.02c0.30 ± 0.08 a0.19 ± 0.03 a,c0.17 ± 0.0 5 a,c0.16 ± 0.08 a,c0.03–2.35 4
Total K (%K2O)1.23 ± 0.2 b2.25 ± 0.53 a,c1.90 ± 0.11 a,c1.66 ± 0.18 c1.84 ± 0.13 a2.17 ± 0.17 a,c2.27 ± 0.45 a,c0.03–2.35 5
Note: Figures followed by different letters (a,b,c) in the same row are significantly different at p < 0.05. * Values are for agricultural soil; 1 TCVN 7377: 2004 [59]; 2 QCVN 03-MT:2015/BTNMT [53]; 3 TCVN 7373: 2004 [60]; 4 TCVN 7374: 2004 [61]; 5 TCVN 7375: 2004 [62].
Table 3. Soil quality classification for CF (contamination factor) and EF (enrichment factor).
Table 3. Soil quality classification for CF (contamination factor) and EF (enrichment factor).
Class.QualificationCFEF
0UncontaminatedCF < 1EF < 2
1Uncontaminated to moderately contaminated
2Moderately contaminated1 < CF < 32 < EF < 5
3Moderately-heavily contaminated
4Severely contaminated3 < CF < 65 < EF < 20
5Heavily contaminatedCF > 620 < EF < 40
6Extreme contaminatedEF > 40
Note: Adapted from Brady et al. [51].
Table 4. BAF values, contents of As and heavy metals in the shoots of native and cultivated plants collected at the Dong Mai Pb recycling area.
Table 4. BAF values, contents of As and heavy metals in the shoots of native and cultivated plants collected at the Dong Mai Pb recycling area.
Plant SpeciesContents in the Shoots (mg/kg-DW)BAF Values
AsCrCuZnCdPbAsCrCuZnCdPbPb ***
Native Plant
B. cristata1.411.7213.856.50.202930.170.060.170.250.320.010.33
B. distachya *2.901.8716.989.00.312130.350.070.210.400.490.010.24
C. communis *1.181.8011.096.60.265940.140.060.140.430.410.020.68
C. dactylon *3.491.8015.070.70.321930.420.060.190.320.500.010.22
F. miliacea0.901.005.1934.70.1370.00.110.040.070.160.200.010.08
H. acutigluma *1.9610.214.985.00.9911600.070.040.060.220.590.091.34
L. chinensis **1.202.2010.11650.506000.130.070.120.770.680.010.69
L. adscendens **0.941.3014.563.20.443080.090.040.170.310.550.010.36
P. repens *8.171.8217.990.40.438250.980.060.230.400.680.030.94
P. conjugatum *2.611.7116.183.40.322140.310.060.200.370.500.010.24
P. hydropiper **10.22.2023.892.40.687981.100.070.290.430.920.020.92
S. rhombifolia1.091.0914.144.40.212690.130.040.180.200.330.010.31
Cultivated Plant
C. esculenta1.105.4712.085.40.937260.040.020.050.220.560.060.83
I. aquatica3.182.1423.691.90.495860.340.070.290.430.660.010.68
O. sativa (rice grains)0.141.323.7339.40.062.830.030.060.060.270.110.010.09
Hyperaccumulation 110001000100010,0001001000
Normal range 21.0–1.7-5–3027–1500.05–0.25–10
Toxic range 25–20-20–100100–4005–3030–300
* Native plants that are cattle food; ** Native plants that are harvested for pig’s food; *** Ratio of Pb content in the plant to the extractable Pb content in the soil; 1 Brooks, 1998 [83]; Reeves and Baker, 2000 [84]; 2 Kabata-Pendias, 2011 [11].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chu, H.T.T.; Vu, T.V.; Nguyen, T.K.B.; Nguyen, H.T.H. Accumulation of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Native and Cultivated Plant Species in a Lead Recycling Area in Vietnam. Minerals 2019, 9, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020132

AMA Style

Chu HTT, Vu TV, Nguyen TKB, Nguyen HTH. Accumulation of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Native and Cultivated Plant Species in a Lead Recycling Area in Vietnam. Minerals. 2019; 9(2):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chu, Ha T. T., Tu V. Vu, Tam K. B. Nguyen, and Ha T. H. Nguyen. 2019. "Accumulation of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Native and Cultivated Plant Species in a Lead Recycling Area in Vietnam" Minerals 9, no. 2: 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop