Next Article in Journal
An Updated Evaluation of Intrathecal IgG Synthesis Markers in Relation to Oligoclonal Bands
Next Article in Special Issue
Urinary Bladder Hemangioma Successfully Treated by Angioembolization with Long-Term Follow-Up: Case Report and Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of mpMRI in the Assessment of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using the PI-RR System: Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement in Readers with Different Expertise
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Orchialgia—A Literature Review
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Efficacy and Complications

Diagnostics 2023, 13(3), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030388
by Lorenzo Bertolotti 1, Maria Vittoria Bazzocchi 1, Enrico Iemma 1, Francesco Pagnini 1, Francesco Ziglioli 2, Umberto Maestroni 2, Annalisa Patera 2, Matteo Pio Natale 3, Chiara Martini 4,* and Massimo De Filippo 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Diagnostics 2023, 13(3), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030388
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 8 January 2023 / Published: 20 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Urology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Review Report

·      In this article, the authors aimed to compare different ablative modalities of RCC, in terms of effectiveness, efficacy, complication and oncological outcomes

·      The review is very interesting, written in a good fluent language, well-structured, and correctly organized. The authors have worked hard to present their opinion in a good manner.

·      Although the topic is not novel, the article provides a comprehensive review of the different ablative modalities of RCC.

·      I think it will contribute to the current literature.

·      I have a few recommendations:

1.      Add figures.

 

2.      Tabulate some of your data.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
the response to the comment is in the attached file. 

Thank you very much

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In the abstract: it is mentioned that ablation, should be offered to patients with comorbidities. This isn’t completely true nowadays.

Introduction:

What about the guidelines/recommendations of the EAU (admittedly indeed referred to in the ‘current guidelines’ section) ?

Why not performing lesional biopsy in all patients ? How can the ‘oncological outcome of ablation’ can be seriously interpreted when the histology of the treated lesion is unknown. Indeed, many small renal lesions are benign … Lipid-poor angiomyolipoma, oncocytoma; in addition differences in papillary RCC and the classical clear cell RCC …

Patient selection:

Is the lesional growth over time a reliable feature for decision of treatment ?

Study of the lesion:

Is ‘fusion’ of PET-CT images with CT (or US)  during ablation feasible ?

Ablation technique:

RFA: is a needle with retrievable hook-umbrella preferable ?

Anesthesia ?

Outcomes:

See above comment in the introductory section.

Complication rates:

Does perprocedural lesional biopsy interfere with the complication rate ?

Radiologists’ awareness of imaging features after ablation … imaging can be rather tricky.

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
the response to the comment is in the attached file. 

Thank you very much

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop