Next Article in Journal
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for Suspected Mirizzi Syndrome Type IV as Both a Diagnostic and Bridge-to-Surgery Procedure
Previous Article in Journal
Predictors of Early Continence Recovery Following Radical Prostatectomy, Including Transperineal Ultrasound to Evaluate the Membranous Urethra Length (CHECK-MUL Study)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Cost-Effective Model for Predicting Recurrent Gastric Cancer Using Clinical Features
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/diagnostics14080854
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fecal Calprotectin in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Study Based on the History of Bowel Resection and Location of Disease

by
Jeongkuk Seo
1,2,
Subin Song
1,
Seung Hwan Shin
1,
Suhyun Park
1,
Seung Wook Hong
1,
Sang Hyoung Park
1,3,
Dong-Hoon Yang
1,
Byong Duk Ye
1,3,
Jeong-Sik Byeon
1,
Seung-Jae Myung
1,
Suk-Kyun Yang
1,3 and
Sung Wook Hwang
1,3,*
1
Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
3
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(8), 854; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080854
Submission received: 21 March 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 22 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Diseases—Volume 2)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fecal calprotectin (FC) is commonly used to assess Crohn’s disease (CD) activity. However, standardized cut-off values accounting for bowel resection history and disease location are lacking. In this study, we analyzed data from patients with CD who underwent magnetic resonance enterography, ileocolonoscopy, and FC measurements from January 2017 to December 2018. In 267 cases from 254 patients, the FC levels in the ‘operated’ patients were higher when the disease was active compared with those who were in the remission group (178 vs. 54.7 μg/g; p < 0.001), and similar findings were obtained for the ‘non-operated’ patients (449.5 vs. 40.95 μg/g; p < 0.001). The FC levels differed significantly according to the location of inflammation, with lower levels in the small bowel compared to those in the colon. The FC cut-off levels of 70.8 μg/g and 142.0 μg/g were considered optimal for predicting active disease for operated and non-operated patients, respectively. The corresponding FC cut-off levels of 70.8 μg/g and 65.0 μg/g were observed for patients with disease only in the small bowel. In conclusion, different FC cut-off values would be applicable to patients with CD based on their bowel resection history and disease location. Tight control with a lower FC target may benefit those with a history of bowel resection or small-bowel-only disease.

1. Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic and progressive idiopathic inflammatory disorder that affects the gastrointestinal tract. It can lead to complications such as strictures, fistulas, abscesses with loss of intestinal function, and, potentially, intestinal resection [1]. Approximately half the patients with CD require an intestinal resection within 10–20 years of diagnosis, while one-third need a second operation within the next decade [2,3]. The early identification of disease recurrence is crucial for predicting subsequent clinical course, highlighting a need for effective means to monitor disease activity in the postoperative setting [4].
A combination of ileocolonoscopy (IC), cross-sectional imaging such as magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), and clinical and biochemical markers has been adopted as the basis for CD disease monitoring [5,6]. However, repeated ICs and cross-sectional imaging are expensive, invasive, and eventually burdensome for patients with CD. Recently, fecal calprotectin (FC), a biomarker of intestinal inflammation, has demonstrated usefulness in the diagnosis and monitoring of CD, with its advantages being that it is cost-effective, non-invasive, and well tolerated compared to other methods [7,8]. Several studies have shown that FC can reflect endoscopic disease activity in CD, and it is more sensitive than the Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) or C-reactive protein (CRP) [9].
However, the role and precise cut-off values of FC in postoperative patients remain unclear considering the high prevalence of bowel resection among patients with CD [10]. The cut-off values suggested in various studies on patients with CD with a history of bowel resection vary widely (50–270 μg/g) [11,12]. While recent guidelines have suggested cut-off values of FC between 100 μg/g and 150 μg/g based on these studies, their limitation of incorporating only IC data, rather than including cross-sectional imaging to evaluate SB lesions, may have confounded the appropriate cut-off values for FC [13,14]. Moreover, there are conflicting reports on the diagnostic accuracy of FC regarding the influence of disease location in patients with CD [15]. Some studies have shown lower FC levels in small bowel (SB) disease compared to CD involving the large bowel (LB), while others have reported no significant difference according to location [16,17]. Considering the paucity of evidence regarding the precise cut-off values of FC in postoperative patients and those with different disease locations, we compared the performance of FC in patients with a history of bowel resection and those without while considering the disease location.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) registry of the Asan Medical Center, a tertiary university hospital in Korea, has been prospectively maintained since 1997 and has previously been described in detail [18]. We retrospectively reviewed 341 cases from 328 patients with CD who had undergone MRE between January 2017 and December 2018. Patients underwent laboratory examinations and CDAI scoring during each outpatient visit. Patients with clinical and biochemical data within 30 days and IC results within 3 months of MRE were eligible for inclusion. Patients with diseases other than CD, with incomplete IC due to stenosis, or with enterostomy or colostomy were excluded. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center (IRB no. 2021-1515)

2.2. Endoscopic and Radiological Assessments

Ileocolonoscopy and MRE were performed to assess the inflammation statuses of the SBs and colons in patients with CD. For patients without previous bowel resection, SB inflammation proximal to the terminal ileum was evaluated by MRE, while terminal ileum and colonic inflammation were evaluated by both IC and MRE. The same methods were used for patients with previous bowel resection with neoterminal ileum replacing terminal ileum (Figure 1).
The MRE scans were performed as described previously [6]. The examinations were interpreted by board-certified gastrointestinal radiologists with appropriate experience in evaluating MRE images in patients with CD. Ileocolonoscopy was performed using an endoscope (CF-HQ290L/I; Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan). The endoscopic examinations were performed by board-certified gastroenterologists specializing in IBD. Results from IC and MRE were used to assess whether the disease was active or in remission and to determine the location of inflammation in cases of active disease. Disease remission was defined as the combination of both endoscopic and radiologic healing, without visible ulcer or inflammation associated with CD in the colon or SB on IC, and the absence of mural or peri-enteric findings of bowel inflammation on MRE, which is in line with the definition of transmural healing [19,20,21]. All images were stored in the picture archiving and communication system of the Asan Medical Center.

2.3. Clinical and Biochemical Evaluations

We collected data on birth date, sex, date of CD diagnosis, smoking status, location and behavior as defined by Montreal classification, history and extent of bowel surgery, and currently administered medications. All clinical and demographic information was retrieved from the IBD registry and electronic medical records of the Asan Medical Center.
The following serum chemistry biomarkers were checked on the clinic visit day: serum albumin, normal range: >3.5 g/dL (Cobas 8000 modular analyser, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland; AU5800 Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA); serum CRP, normal range: <0.6 mg/dL (Cobas 8000 modular analyser, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland; AU5800 Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA); and ESR, normal range: 0–9 mm/h for men and 0–20 mm/h for women (TEST1, Alifax, Padova, Italy).
Fecal calprotectin measurements were performed within 30 days of MRE date. If multiple samples were collected from one patient within the time interval, the closest result from the MRE date was used. Fecal samples collected by patients were refrigerated (2–8 °C) and sent to the department of laboratory medicine at the Asan Medical Center within one day of collection for analysis. The FC levels were measured using the Quantum Blue Calprotectin rapid test (BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples with FC levels below the assay range (<30 mg/kg) were counted as 29.9 mg/kg in the analyses [19].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are reported as medians and IQR and were analyzed using Student’s t test or Kruskal–Wallis test as appropriate for data normality. Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentages and were analyzed using chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Correlation analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the diagnostic ability of FC in patients grouped according to history of bowel surgery and location of inflammation. Values of area under the ROC curve (AUROCs) and cut-off values, sensitivity, and specificity of each ROC curve were determined. The cut-off point with the best diagnostic value was determined using the Youden method for each ROC curve [22]. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.4.0 (R Development Core Team, Geneva, Switzerland). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

From the enrolled patients, we excluded five patients with diagnoses other than CD, five with enterostomy or colostomy, four with nationalities other than South Korean, and fifty-nine without colonoscopy within 3 months of undergoing MRE. One other patient, despite satisfying the inclusion criteria, experienced severe infection at the time and was excluded. In total, 267 cases from 254 patients were included in the study. The median difference in the time of FC and IC measurement from MRE were 1 (IQR: 0–8.25) day and 2 (IQR: 2–13.0) days, respectively. No significant clinical changes were noted for any patient during that period.
Of the 254 participants, 191 (75.2%) were male and 63 (24.8%) were female, and the median age at the time of evaluation was 27.0 (IQR: 22.0–34.0) years. The median duration of disease prior to evaluation was 5.0 (IQR, 2.0–9.0) years. The median time interval between bowel resection and the FC measurement was 3.2 (IQR: 1.1–7.8) years. Other demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients, grouped according to history of bowel resection and disease status, are summarized in Table 1.

3.2. Correlation of FC with Clinical and Biochemical Markers

The FC levels showed a weak correlation with CRP in patients with and without a history of bowel resection (r = 0.28 and p = 0.024 and r = 0.38 and p < 0.001, respectively). The FC levels correlated moderately with ESR in patients without a history of bowel resection (r = 0.45; p < 0.001) but not in patients with a history of bowel resection (r = 0.24; p = 0.059) (Supplementary Figure S1). The CDAI had a weak correlation with the FC levels in patients with and without a history of bowel resection (r = 0.33 and p = 0.008 and r = 0.32 and p < 0.001, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S2).

3.3. FC and CRP Levels in Patients according to History of Bowel Resection

The median FC levels were significantly different between the active and remission statuses regardless of bowel resection history (all, p < 0.001) (Figure 2A–C). Cases with previous bowel resection had median FC levels of 178 μg/g (n = 56) and 54.7 μg/g (n = 7) for the active status and remission status, respectively, while the FC levels were 449.5 μg/g (n = 154) and 41.0 μg/g (n = 50) in cases without a history of bowel resection, respectively (p < 0.001).
The C-reactive protein level was significantly different between the active status and remission status in all patients and in patients without previous bowel resection, although not for patients with a history of bowel resection (p = 0.37) (Figure 2D–F).
There were 168 cases with positive FC levels according to conventional thresholds (≥100 μg/g) (80% of all 210 cases with active disease; 43 of 56 cases (76.8%) in operated patients; and 125 of 154 cases (81.2%) in non-operated patients) and 78 cases with positive CRP levels according to the threshold of ≥0.5 mg/dL (37.1% of all 210 cases with active disease; 20 of 56 cases (35.7%) in operated patients; and 58 of 154 cases (37.7%) in non-operated patients).

3.4. Comparison of FC Levels According to Disease Location

Patients with an active disease status were further classified by disease location into subgroups labeled SB only, colon, and colon with SB (inflammation in both locations). For all 267 cases, the FC levels were significantly higher in each active disease location subgroup compared with the levels for those in remission (remission: n = 57, 42.6 μg/g; SB: n = 110, 251.5 μg/g; colon: n = 10, 691.5 μg/g; colon + SB: n = 90, 545 μg/g; p < 0.05 for all disease locations in comparison with remission state) (Figure 3A). Similar results were obtained for patients with a history of bowel resection (remission: n = 7, 54.7 μg/g; SB: n = 30, 148.5 μg/g; colon + SB: n = 26, 216 μg/g; p < 0.05 for both disease locations in comparison with remission state) and those without (remission: n = 50, 40.95 μg/g; SB: n = 80, 277 μg/g; colon: n = 10, 691.5 μg/g; colon + SB: n = 64, 786.5 μg/g; p < 0.05 for all disease locations in comparison with remission state) (Figure 3B,C).

3.5. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis of FC according to History of Bowel Resection and Disease Location

For patients in any active state of disease, the AUROCs of FC for all patients, patients with a history of bowel resection, and patients without bowel resection were 0.877 (95% CI, 0.824–0.930), 0.908 (95% CI, 0.860–0.984), and 0.882 (95% CI, 0.819–0.936), respectively. The optimal FC cut-off levels to predict any active disease for all patients, patients with a history of bowel resection, and those without were 89.8 μg/g, 70.8 μg/g, and 142.0 μg/g, respectively (Table 2).
The ROC curve analysis for the subgroup of patients with inflammation located only in the SB showed lower optimal cut-off levels of FC than for any active state of disease (66.4 μg/g for all patients, 70.8 μg/g for operated patients, and 65.0 μg/g for non-operated patients; AUROC values were 0.832 (95% CI, 0.766–0.896), 0.867 (95% CI, 0.736–0.962), and 0.837 (95% CI, 0.759–0.905) for all patients, operated patients, and non-operated patients, respectively).
An additional analysis of various cut-off values for FC, CRP, and CDAI in patients with a history of bowel resection according to the disease location was performed, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity values were calculated (Supplementary Table S1). The AUROC values, sensitivity, and specificity for the optimal cut-off (Youden test) were much higher for FC than for CRP and CDAI. When the ROC curves for FC and CRP were compared in all patients, those with a history of bowel resection, and those without a history of bowel resection, the results of the DeLong’s test for two ROC curves showed significantly higher AUROC values for FC with p values < 0.001 for all groups (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

This study showed that FC performed better than other biomarkers of inflammation in predicting active disease in patients with CD regardless of whether they had a history of bowel resection. When classified according to disease location, the FC levels were lower in patients with SB disease compared with those with colonic or ileocolonic disease regardless of whether they had a history of bowel resection. Optimal FC cut-off levels are suggested according to the ROC curve analysis while considering both the history of bowel resection and disease location. Our results suggest that different FC cut-off values could be applied to patients with CD according to whether they have a history of bowel resection and the disease location. Additionally, tight control with a lower FC cut-off value could be considered in patients with a history of bowel resection or with disease only in the SB, conforming with the current guidelines [23,24].
Since many patients with CD undergo bowel resection at least once in their lifetimes, and recurrence is frequent in the postoperative setting, there have been efforts to validate various biomarkers to predict active disease [4,25]. An acute-phase reactant, CRP, has been known to aid in monitoring disease activity in patients with CD. However, in a postoperative setting, it is known to correlate less well with endoscopic recurrence [26,27]. A composite of eight scored subjective and objective items, the CDAI, has been used as a clinical biomarker since 1979 to support clinical evaluation and decision making [28]. Although CDAI scores <150 have been used in medical trials to indicate remission status, reports of a lack of validity in the postoperative setting suggest against using the CDAI as a primary outcome measure due to its relatively modest sensitivity [29].
Fecal calprotectin is known to be a sensitive surrogate marker of bowel inflammation and is used for diagnosis, to monitor treatment response, and for the early detection of disease aggravation in patients with CD [13,30]. Regarding the history of bowel resection, there have been reports of the capacity of FC to predict postoperative recurrence using IC as a reference test. Supplementary Table S2 summarizes data from previous studies on FC in patients with CD with a history of bowel resection; FC levels ranging from 50 to 270 μg/g have been proposed as the cut-off values [10,11,12,31,32]. In the pivotal prospective, randomized, multicenter Postoperative Crohn’s Endoscopic Recurrence (POCER) trial, the FC levels were measured before surgery and at 6, 12, and 18 months after the resection of all macroscopic CD. The median FC levels were higher in patients with disease recurrence (Rutgeerts score (RS) ≥ i2) than in those in remission (275 vs. 72 μg/g, respectively; p < 0.001). Levels of FC > 100 μg/g indicated endoscopic recurrence with 89% sensitivity and 58% specificity [10]. Based on the above-mentioned studies, FC cut-off values of 100–150 μg/g in postoperative settings have been suggested in the guidelines [13,14]. Notably, previous studies on patients with CD with a history of bowel resection have used IC as the sole method for evaluating disease recurrences by focusing on the Rutgeerts score and endoscopic recurrences in anastomosis/neoterminal ileum (Supplementary Table S2), which is why their cut-off values may be inappropriate for determining mucosal healing in postoperative CD patients. As inflammation in CD can occur in the SB, which is unreachable by IC, such cases might have been overlooked in previous studies. Therefore, from our results using IC and MRE, lower cut-off values for FC compared to previous guidelines could be suggested for tight control and mucosal healing, as emphasized by the CALM study and STRIDE-II guideline [23,24]. There is no study, thus far, that has considered the role of FC with appropriate modalities regarding the concept of mucosal healing in postoperative patients with CD.
The diagnostic accuracy of FC in patients with CD with different disease locations has also been a subject of concern [11]. A study by Zittan et al. enrolled 72 patients with IBD (23 with colonic CD, 14 with isolated small intestinal CD, and 35 with UC) and assessed FC for clinical remission and endoscopic activity [33], reporting a significant correlation between FC and endoscopic activity in patients with CD, although not in cases where only the SB was involved. The optimal cut-off value of FC for discriminating between colonic disease and remission was suggested to be 100 μg/g (sensitivity 100%, specificity 67%, p < 0.001). However, another study regarding the same issue found no significant difference in FC levels between the different disease locations [17]. The limitation of these studies is the small number of enrolled patients, especially those diagnosed with SB CD with and without a history of bowel resection (14 and 13 patients, respectively).
Above all, the strength of this study lies in its large sample size. Compared with previous studies on FC in different disease locations, our data comprise 30 and 80 cases of SB CD among patients with and without a history of bowel resection, respectively. This large number enabled us to compare different patient groups for a more precise estimation of the FC cut-off levels. Furthermore, we utilized MRE in addition to IC for disease evaluation, allowing for the detection of lesions proximal to the neoterminal and terminal ilea. Diagnosis based only on IC may fail to include such cases, thus resulting in false-negative results.
However, our study had some limitations. First, the study design was retrospective. Nevertheless, our IBD registry was maintained prospectively, and all clinical data were recorded immediately during each patient visit; thus, information bias was minimized. Second, most previous studies have used RS ≥ i2, while we considered the presence of disease, which corresponds to RS ≥ i1, and used this factor as the endoscopic evaluation criterion. An analysis by Liu et al. comparing the two approaches demonstrated that when RS ≥ i2 was used, the proposed cut-off value was 276 μg/g, while the cut-off values were lower at 60.2 μg/g when RS ≥ i1 was used [12]. These results are in line with our findings, and considering the mechanism of FC in detecting inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, RS ≥ i1 might better reflect mucosal healing and its influence on FC levels in the real-world setting. Moreover, as FC is known to be correlated with an affected mucosal surface and the depth of ulceration, patients with disease confined to the SB or those with a history of bowel resection would be expected to have lower FC levels [34]. In addition, we incorporated the concept of transmural healing, which would be a more rigorous definition of disease remission. Therefore, setting lower FC cut-off values from this evidence might better aid tight control.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study showed that different FC cut-off values could be applied to patients with CD according to whether they have a history of bowel resection and the disease location. Tight control with lower FC cut-off values could be considered in patients with a history of bowel resection or with SB-only disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics14080854/s1, Figure S1: Scatter plot of (A), (B), (C) CRP against FC, (D), (E), (F) ESR against FC for all, operated patients and non-operated patients, respectivly; Figure S2: Scatter plot of (A), (B), (C) CDAI against FC for all, operated patients and non-operated patients, respectively; Table S1: STROBE statement.

Author Contributions

J.S. and S.W.H. (Sung Wook Hwang) led the conceptualization, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, and reviewing and editing processes of the draft. J.S. led the formal analysis and wrote the original draft of this study. S.S., S.H.S., S.P., S.W.H. (Seung Wook Hongand), S.H.P., D.-H.Y., B.D.Y., J.-S.B. and S.W.H. (Sung Wook Hwang) participated in the analysis of data. S.S., S.H.S., S.P., S.W.H. (Seung Wook Hongand), S.H.P., D.-H.Y., B.D.Y., J.-S.B., S.-J.M., S.-K.Y. and S.W.H. (Sung Wook Hwang) participated in the investigation of data in this study. B.D.Y., S.-J.M. and S.-K.Y. participated as supporting roles in the conceptualization and supervision processes. S.W.H. (Sung Wook Hwang) acquired funds and supervised this study. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Korean Gastroenterology Fund for Future Development and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2021R1A6A1A03040260).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center (IRB no. 2021-1515) (16 September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study and the analysis used anonymous clinical data.

Data Availability Statement

All data, analytical methods, and study materials relevant to this study are included in the article or are available upon request from the corresponding author, S.W.H.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Medical Contents Center of Asan Medical Center for providing assistance with the medical illustration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CD, Crohn’s disease; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FC, fecal calprotectin; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IC, ileocolonoscopy; IQR, interquartile range; LB, large bowel; MRE, magnetic resonance enterography; POCER, Postoperative Crohn’s Endoscopic Recurrence trial; RS, Rutgeerts score; SB, small bowel.

References

  1. Lichtenstein, G.R.; Loftus, E.V.; Isaacs, K.L.; Regueiro, M.D.; Gerson, L.B.; Sands, B.E. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn’s Disease in Adults. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 113, 481–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ye, B.D.; Hong, S.N.; Seo, S.I.; Kim, Y.J.; Cha, J.M.; Rhee, K.H.; Yoon, H.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, K.H.; Park, S.Y.; et al. Changes in the Long-term Prognosis of Crohn’s Disease between 1986 and 2015: The Population-Based Songpa-Kangdong Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study. Gut Liver 2022, 16, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Frolkis, A.D.; Lipton, D.S.; Fiest, K.M.; Negron, M.E.; Dykeman, J.; deBruyn, J.; Jette, N.; Frolkis, T.; Rezaie, A.; Seow, C.H.; et al. Cumulative incidence of second intestinal resection in Crohn’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109, 1739–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rutgeerts, P.; Geboes, K.; Vantrappen, G.; Beyls, J.; Kerremans, R.; Hiele, M. Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 1990, 99, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Crama-Bohbouth, G.; Pena, A.S.; Biemond, I.; Verspaget, H.W.; Blok, D.; Arndt, J.W.; Weterman, I.T.; Pauwels, E.K.; Lamers, C.B. Are activity indices helpful in assessing active intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease? Gut 1989, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Park, S.H.; Ye, B.D.; Lee, T.Y.; Fletcher, J.G. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Small Bowel Enterography: Current Status and Future Trends Focusing on Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 47, 475–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. D’Angelo, F.; Felley, C.; Frossard, J.L. Calprotectin in Daily Practice: Where Do We Stand in 2017? Digestion 2017, 95, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Qiu, Y.; Mao, R.; Chen, B.L.; He, Y.; Zeng, Z.R.; Xue, L.; Song, X.M.; Li, Z.P.; Chen, M.H. Fecal calprotectin for evaluating postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. D’Haens, G.; Ferrante, M.; Vermeire, S.; Baert, F.; Noman, M.; Moortgat, L.; Geens, P.; Iwens, D.; Aerden, I.; Van Assche, G.; et al. Fecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker for endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012, 18, 2218–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wright, E.K.; Kamm, M.A.; De Cruz, P.; Hamilton, A.L.; Ritchie, K.J.; Krejany, E.O.; Leach, S.; Gorelik, A.; Liew, D.; Prideaux, L.; et al. Measurement of fecal calprotectin improves monitoring and detection of recurrence of Crohn’s disease after surgery. Gastroenterology 2015, 148, 938–947.e931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tham, Y.S.; Yung, D.E.; Fay, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Ben-Horin, S.; Eliakim, R.; Koulaouzidis, A.; Kopylov, U. Fecal calprotectin for detection of postoperative endoscopic recurrence in Crohn’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv. Gastroenterol. 2018, 11, 1756284818785571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, R.; Guo, Z.; Cao, L.; Wang, Z.; Gong, J.; Li, Y.; Zhu, W. Profile of Consecutive Fecal Calprotectin Levels in the Perioperative Period and Its Predictive Capacity for Early Endoscopic Recurrence in Crohn’s Disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 2019, 62, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jukic, A.; Bakiri, L.; Wagner, E.F.; Tilg, H.; Adolph, T.E. Calprotectin: From biomarker to biological function. Gut 2021, 70, 1978–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. D’Amico, F.; Nancey, S.; Danese, S.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L. A Practical Guide for Faecal Calprotectin Measurement: Myths and Realities. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2021, 15, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Simon, E.G.; Wardle, R.; Thi, A.A.; Eldridge, J.; Sunil, S.; Moran, G.W. Does fecal calprotectin equally and accurately measure disease activity in small bowel and large bowel Crohn’s disease? A systematic review. Intest. Res. 2019, 17, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gecse, K.B.; Brandse, J.F.; van Wilpe, S.; Lowenberg, M.; Ponsioen, C.; van den Brink, G.; D’Haens, G. Impact of disease location on fecal calprotectin levels in Crohn’s disease. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 50, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jensen, M.D.; Kjeldsen, J.; Nathan, T. Fecal calprotectin is equally sensitive in Crohn’s disease affecting the small bowel and colon. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 46, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Park, S.H.; Yang, S.K.; Park, S.K.; Kim, J.W.; Yang, D.H.; Jung, K.W.; Kim, K.J.; Ye, B.D.; Byeon, J.S.; Myung, S.J.; et al. Long-term prognosis of crohn’s disease and its temporal change between 1981 and 2012: A hospital-based cohort study from Korea. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Noh, S.M.; Oh, E.H.; Park, S.H.; Lee, J.B.; Kim, J.Y.; Park, J.C.; Kim, J.; Ham, N.S.; Hwang, S.W.; Park, S.H.; et al. Association of Faecal Calprotectin Level and Combined Endoscopic and Radiological Healing in Patients with Crohn’s Disease Receiving Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Therapy. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2020, 14, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Oh, K.; Oh, E.H.; Noh, S.M.; Park, S.H.; Kim, N.; Hwang, S.W.; Park, S.H.; Yang, D.H.; Byeon, J.S.; Myung, S.J.; et al. Combined Endoscopic and Radiologic Healing Is Associated with a Better Prognosis Than Endoscopic Healing Only in Patients with Crohn’s Disease Receiving Anti-TNF Therapy. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2022, 13, e00442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernandes, S.R.; Rodrigues, R.V.; Bernardo, S.; Cortez-Pinto, J.; Rosa, I.; da Silva, J.P.; Goncalves, A.R.; Valente, A.; Baldaia, C.; Santos, P.M.; et al. Transmural Healing Is Associated with Improved Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017, 23, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruopp, M.D.; Perkins, N.J.; Whitcomb, B.W.; Schisterman, E.F. Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom. J. 2008, 50, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Turner, D.; Ricciuto, A.; Lewis, A.; D’Amico, F.; Dhaliwal, J.; Griffiths, A.M.; Bettenworth, D.; Sandborn, W.J.; Sands, B.E.; Reinisch, W.; et al. STRIDE-II: An Update on the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) Initiative of the International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD): Determining Therapeutic Goals for Treat-to-Target strategies in IBD. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 1570–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Colombel, J.F.; Panaccione, R.; Bossuyt, P.; Lukas, M.; Baert, F.; Vanasek, T.; Danalioglu, A.; Novacek, G.; Armuzzi, A.; Hebuterne, X.; et al. Effect of tight control management on Crohn’s disease (CALM): A multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017, 390, 2779–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rutgeerts, P.; Geboes, K.; Vantrappen, G.; Kerremans, R.; Coenegrachts, J.L.; Coremans, G. Natural history of recurrent Crohn’s disease at the ileocolonic anastomosis after curative surgery. Gut 1984, 25, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yamamoto, T.; Shimoyama, T. Monitoring and detection of disease recurrence after resection for Crohn’s disease: The role of non-invasive fecal biomarkers. Expert. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 11, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, D.H.; Yang, S.K.; Park, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Boo, S.J.; Park, J.H.; Na, S.Y.; Jung, K.W.; Kim, K.J.; Ye, B.D.; et al. Usefulness of C-reactive protein as a disease activity marker in Crohn’s disease according to the location of disease. Gut Liver 2015, 9, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Winship, D.H.; Summers, R.W.; Singleton, J.W.; Best, W.R.; Becktel, J.M.; Lenk, L.F.; Kern, F., Jr. National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study: Study design and conduct of the study. Gastroenterology 1979, 77, 829–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Walters, T.D.; Steinhart, A.H.; Bernstein, C.N.; Tremaine, W.; McKenzie, M.; Wolff, B.G.; McLeod, R.S. Validating Crohn’s disease activity indices for use in assessing postoperative recurrence. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 1547–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mao, R.; Xiao, Y.L.; Gao, X.; Chen, B.L.; He, Y.; Yang, L.; Hu, P.J.; Chen, M.H. Fecal calprotectin in predicting relapse of inflammatory bowel diseases: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012, 18, 1894–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Verdejo, C.; Hervias, D.; Roncero, O.; Arias, A.; Bouhmidi, A.; Lorente, R.; Saluena, I.; Lucendo, A.J. Fecal calprotectin is not superior to serum C-reactive protein or the Harvey-Bradshaw index in predicting postoperative endoscopic recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 30, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Veyre, F.; Boschetti, G.; Meunier, C.; Cuerq, C.; Gay, C.; Charlois, A.L.; Duclaux-Loras, R.; Danion, P.; Cotte, E.; Kepenekian, V.; et al. Low Levels of Fecal Calprotectin 3 Months After Surgery Predict Subsequent Endoscopic Postoperative Remission in Crohn’s Disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021, 66, 4429–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zittan, E.; Kelly, O.B.; Gralnek, I.M.; Silverberg, M.S.; Hillary Steinhart, A. Fecal calprotectin correlates with active colonic inflammatory bowel disease but not with small intestinal Crohn’s disease activity. JGH Open 2018, 2, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Goutorbe, F.; Goutte, M.; Minet-Quinard, R.; Boucher, A.L.; Pereira, B.; Bommelaer, G.; Buisson, A. Endoscopic Factors Influencing Fecal Calprotectin Value in Crohn’s Disease. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2015, 9, 1113–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Diagnostics 14 00854 g001
Figure 1. A diagram showing the study design. The two inner figures indicate the intestinal statuses among patients without a history of bowel resection involving the ileocecal valve (non-operated patients) and with a history of such surgery (operated patients), respectively. The indicators enveloping the figures show how the disease status was evaluated (left brace) and categorized for each patient (right brace). Abbreviations: MRE, magnetic resonance enterography; IC, ileocolonoscopy.
Figure 1. A diagram showing the study design. The two inner figures indicate the intestinal statuses among patients without a history of bowel resection involving the ileocecal valve (non-operated patients) and with a history of such surgery (operated patients), respectively. The indicators enveloping the figures show how the disease status was evaluated (left brace) and categorized for each patient (right brace). Abbreviations: MRE, magnetic resonance enterography; IC, ileocolonoscopy.
Diagnostics 14 00854 g001
Diagnostics 14 00854 g002
Figure 2. Comparison of FC and CRP levels between patients with active disease and those in remission state (A,D) all patients, (B,E) operated patients, and (C,F) non-operated patients. Abbreviations: FC, fecal calprotectin; CRP, C-reactive protein. *** p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Comparison of FC and CRP levels between patients with active disease and those in remission state (A,D) all patients, (B,E) operated patients, and (C,F) non-operated patients. Abbreviations: FC, fecal calprotectin; CRP, C-reactive protein. *** p < 0.01.
Diagnostics 14 00854 g002
Diagnostics 14 00854 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of FC levels according to disease location for (A) all patients, (B) operated patients, and (C) non-operated patients. Abbreviations: FC, fecal calprotectin; SB, small bowel.
Figure 3. Comparison of FC levels according to disease location for (A) all patients, (B) operated patients, and (C) non-operated patients. Abbreviations: FC, fecal calprotectin; SB, small bowel.
Diagnostics 14 00854 g003
Diagnostics 14 00854 g004
Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristic curve showing predictive accuracy of fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between any active lesion and remission among (A) all patients, (B) patients with history of bowel resection, and (C) patients without history of bowel resection, respectively. Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristic curve showing predictive accuracy of fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between any active lesion and remission among (A) all patients, (B) patients with history of bowel resection, and (C) patients without history of bowel resection, respectively. Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve.
Diagnostics 14 00854 g004
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of study patients during evaluation (267 cases in 254 patients with CD).
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of study patients during evaluation (267 cases in 254 patients with CD).
All PatientsPatients with History of Bowel ResectionPatients without History of Bowel Resection
ActiveRemissionActiveRemission
(N = 254)(N = 53)(N = 7)(N = 144)(N = 50)
Sex, n (%)
 Female63 (24.8)17 (32.1)3 (42.9)30 (20.8)13 (26.0)
 Male191 (75.2) 36 (67.9)4 (57.1)114 (79.2)37 (74.0)
Median age at diagnosis, y [IQR]20.0 [17.0;27.0]20.0 [16.0;29.0]19.0 [17.0;23.0]20.0 [17.0;27.0]19.0 [17.0;22.0] *
Median age at evaluation, y [IQR]27.0 [22.0;34.0]29.0 [24.0;36.0]24.0 [23.0;33.5]27.0 [21.0;33.5]24.0 [22.0;28.0]
Smoking status, n (%)
 N/A1 (0.4) 0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)0 (0.0)
 Current smoker57 (22.4) 12 (22.6)0 (0.0)38 (26.4)7 (14.0)
 Previous smoker13 (5.1) 3 (5.7)0 (0.0)9 (6.2)1 (2.0)
 Never smoked183 (72.0) 38 (71.7)7 (100.0)96 (66.7)42 (84.0)
Duration of disease, y [IQR]5.0 [2.0;9.0] 8.0 [3.0;13.0]8.0 [4.5;10.5]3.5 [1.5;8.0]5.0 [2.0;8.0]
Duration of bowel resection, y [IQR]3.2 [1.1;7.8]3.2 [1.1;7.8]2.8[1.8;6.9]
Montreal behavior, n (%)
 B1143 (53.6) 4 (7.5)0 (0.0)90 (62.5)42 (84.0) *
 B291 (34.1) 8 (15.1)1 (14.3)20 (13.9)3 (6.0)
 B333 (12.4) 41 (77.4)6 (85.7)34 (23.6)5 (10.0)
Concurrent prescription with the below drugs, alone or in combination, n (%)
 5-ASA158 (59.2)36 (64.3)5 (71.4)88 (57.1)29 (58.0)
 Thiopurine179 (67.0) 41 (73.2)5 (71.4)103 (66.9)30 (60.0)
 Methotrexate22 (8.2) 4 (7.1)0 (0.0)15 (9.7)3 (6.0)
 Corticosteroids7 (2.6) 0 (0.0)1 (14.3)5 (3.3)1 (2.0)
 Biologics121 (45.3) 28 (50.0)4 (57.1)61 (39.6)28 (56.0)
CDAI, median [IQR]63.8 [25.9;159.5]82.7 [43.6;193.3]52.0 [46.2;90.1]88.7 [28.7;176.4]23.3 [2.0;52.5] *
FC, μg/g, median [IQR]247.0 [70.2;685.0]178 [108.0;563.5]54.7 [33.7;57.1] *449.5 [164.0;1112.0]41.0 [29.9;78.4] *
ESR, mm/hr, median [IQR]14.0 [5.0;27.0]16.0 [9.5;27.0]7.0 [4.0;14.0]16.0 [6.0;30.0]6.0 [2.0;11.0] *
CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]0.16 [0.10;0.72]0.27 [0.10;0.71]0.1 [0.10;0.10]0.29 [0.10;1.15]0.1 [0.10;0.13] *
Albumin, g/dL, median [IQR]4.1 [3.7;4.3]4.0 [3.6;4.1]4.4 [ 4.3;4.5] *4.0 [3.6;4.3]4.3 [4.1;4.5] *
Resection type, n (%)
 Ileocecal resection20 (7.9)18 (34.0)2 (28.6)
 Subtotal colectomy7 (2.8)4 (7.5)3 (57.1)
 Right hemicolectomy32 (12.6)30 (56.6)2 (28.6)
 Total colectomy1 (0.4)1 (1.9)0 (0.0)
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; N/A, not available; 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; CD, Crohn’s disease; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; FC, fecal calprotectin; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; * p < 0.05.
Table 2. Predictive accuracy of fecal calprotectin when discriminating between active disease and remission in patients with CD.
Table 2. Predictive accuracy of fecal calprotectin when discriminating between active disease and remission in patients with CD.
Extent of DiseaseHistory of Bowel ResectionAUROC95% CICut-Off Level (μg/g)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
Any active state of diseaseAll patients0.8770.824–0.93089.883.384.2
Operated patients0.9080.860–0.98470.883.9100.0
Non-operated patients0.8820.819–0.936142.079.288.0
(Ileo)colonic diseaseAll patients0.9250.874–0.96989.894.084.2
Operated patients0.9560.868–1.00078.492.3100.0
Non-operated patients0.9310.876–0.975142.590.586.0
SB onlyAll patients0.8320.766–0.89666.484.575.4
Operated patients0.8670.736–0.96270.876.7100.0
Non-operated patients0.8370.759–0.90565.087.572.0
Abbreviations: AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CD, Crohn’s disease; CI, confidence interval; SB, small bowel.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seo, J.; Song, S.; Shin, S.H.; Park, S.; Hong, S.W.; Park, S.H.; Yang, D.-H.; Ye, B.D.; Byeon, J.-S.; Myung, S.-J.; et al. Fecal Calprotectin in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Study Based on the History of Bowel Resection and Location of Disease. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080854

AMA Style

Seo J, Song S, Shin SH, Park S, Hong SW, Park SH, Yang D-H, Ye BD, Byeon J-S, Myung S-J, et al. Fecal Calprotectin in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Study Based on the History of Bowel Resection and Location of Disease. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(8):854. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080854

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seo, Jeongkuk, Subin Song, Seung Hwan Shin, Suhyun Park, Seung Wook Hong, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, and et al. 2024. "Fecal Calprotectin in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Study Based on the History of Bowel Resection and Location of Disease" Diagnostics 14, no. 8: 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080854

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop