Next Article in Journal
Digital Phenotyping and Patient-Generated Health Data for Outcome Measurement in Surgical Care: A Scoping Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Counselling Improves the Molecular Characterisation of Dementing Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Hormonal Contraceptive Treatment May Reduce the Risk of Fibromyalgia in Women with Dysmenorrhea: A Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Portrait of a Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Case in a Large Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 Family
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Wide Spectrum of Genetic Disorders Causing Severe Childhood Epilepsy in Taiwan: A Case Series of Ultrarare Genetic Cause and Novel Mutation Analysis in a Pilot Study

1
Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
2
Genetics Laboratory and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
3
Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
4
Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10(4), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040281
Submission received: 22 November 2020 / Revised: 8 December 2020 / Accepted: 11 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Neurobiology of Neurodegenerative Diseases)

Abstract

:
Background: Pediatric epileptic encephalopathy and severe neurological disorders comprise a group of heterogenous diseases. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify genetic defects in pediatric patients. Methods: Patients with refractory seizures using ≥2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) receiving one AED and having neurodevelopmental regression or having severe neurological or neuromuscular disorders with unidentified causes were enrolled, of which 54 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were enrolled, and underwent WES. Results: Genetic diagnoses were confirmed in 24 patients. In the seizure group, KCNQ2, SCN1A, TBCID 24, GRIN1, IRF2BPL, MECP2, OSGEP, PACS1, PIGA, PPP1CB, SMARCA4, SUOX, SZT2, UBE3A, 16p13.11 microdeletion, [4p16.3p16.1(68,345–7,739,782)X1, 17q25.1q25.3(73,608,322–81,041,938)X3], and LAMA2 were identified. In the nonseizure group, SCN2A, SPTBN2, DMD, and FBN1 were identified. Ten novel mutations were identified. The recurrent genes included SCN1A, KCNQ2, and TBCID24. Male pediatric patients had a significantly higher (57% vs. 29%; p < 0.05, odds ratio = 3.18) yield than their female counterparts. Seventeen genes were identified from the seizure groups, of which 82% were rare genetic etiologies for childhood seizure and did not appear recurrently in the case series. Conclusions: Wide genetic variation was identified for severe childhood seizures by WES. WES had a high yield, particularly in male infantile patients.

1. Introduction

In children, genetic disorders cause severe neurological disease, congenital malformation, inborn errors of metabolism, and developmental epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). DEEs refer to a group of ictal and interictal epileptiform anomalies (clinical and encephalographic) associated with severe cognitive and behavioral impairments according to the classification and terminology criteria of the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE) [1,2]. DEEs are age-specific and of diverse etiologies. Increasing evidence suggests that genetics play a pivotal role in pediatric DEEs and severe neurological disorders [3,4,5]. Although the incidence of each disease is low, the combined incidence is not adequately estimated and unknown. DEEs are highly heterogeneous genetically, but genetic etiologies have been identified in only half of the cases, typically in the form of de novo dominant mutations [6]. Diagnosing severe childhood neurological disorders is important but challenging.
DEEs are characterized by (a) early-onset seizures that are often intractable, (b) electroencephalographic abnormalities, (c) developmental delay or regression, and (d) early death in some patients [2,7,8]. In infants with KCNQ2 or STXBP1 encephalopathy, seizures may be controlled early after onset or may cease spontaneously after a few years. However, the developmental consequences are profound [3].
Despite the recent advances in molecular diagnostics, the genetic causes of only approximately 50% of patients have been identified [3,9]. The identification of the genetic etiology of DEE has greatly improved our understanding of disease pathophysiology at the molecular level. However, understanding the genotype–phenotype correlation remains a challenge. Some epileptic syndromes, such as Dravet syndrome (DS), are attributed to SCN1A mutations in approximately 80% of patients. Otahara syndrome is attributed to mutations in KCNQ2, STXBP1, and ARX. The outcomes are varied and may range from self-limited and drug-responsive to severe debilitating syndromes [9].
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of whole-exome sequencing (WES) for a heterogeneous group of childhood DEEs and to develop a viable protocol for identifying severe neurological disease. We performed WES in 54 pediatric patients with suspected severe neurological or neuromuscular disorders, which remained etiologically undiagnosed despite comprehensive clinical, neuroimaging, and biochemical studies. Patients were enrolled from two medical centers in central Taiwan. The identified genetic etiologies are rare. The case series and diagnostic yield are discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

We enrolled patients from 2017 to 2020 that matched at least 1 of the following criteria: (1) Epileptic encephalopathy defined by ILAE, with the use of ≥2 AEDs, (2) epileptic seizures with the use of 1 AED but with symptoms of neurological regression, (3) nonepileptic patients with symptoms of neurological regression. We collected samples from 54 patients from 2 medical centers in central Taiwan, including the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and the Children’s Hospital of China Medical University from 2017–2020. This study was approved by the institutional research ethics board (CMUH105-REC3-123) and Chung Shan Medical University Hospital’s Internal Review Board (IRB #: CS13036). Informed consent was obtained from the parents.

2.2. Extracting DNA from Peripheral Blood

A genomic DNA purification kit (Gentra Puregene Buccal Cell Kit; Qiagen Taiwan, Taipei City, Taiwan) was used to extract genomic DNA from peripheral blood. Three volumes of RBC lysis buffers were added to blood sample and mixed by inverting 30 times, incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and centrifuged 3000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded. Next, we added 3 volumes of cell lysis buffers (3 mL) to the pellet and vortexed vigorously for 10 s to lyse the cell and centrifuged 3000 rpm for 5 min, followed by transferring the supernatant into a new 15 mL tube. Then, we added 3 mL isopropanol into a 15 mL tube, mixed by inverting 50 times, and centrifuged 3000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was carefully discarded and the pellet was air dried for 10 to 20 min. The dried pellet was resuspended in 300 μL nuclease-free water and frozen at −20 °C or −80 °C for storage. DNA were also extracted from their parents.

2.3. WES

We used the SureSelect XT HS2 DNA reagent kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) protocol for the Illumina Hiseq paired-end sequencing library (catalog# G9611A), and raw reads were mapped to the human genome assembly GRCh37 (also known as hg19) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner software (version 0.6.1; Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, United States). The SureSelectXT Human All Exon Version 6 (51 Mb) probe (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) set was used. For Library Preparation, 50 ng genomic DNA was used. The adapter-ligated DNA sample was purified using Agencourt Ampure Xp Pcr Purification Beads and analyzed using an Agilent DNA Kit. From the purified sample, the hybridization between DNA libraries (750 ng) and baits was carried out and purified using Agencourt Ampure Xp Pcr Purification Beads. The Agilent protocol was used for adding tags by Post-Hybridization Amplification. Finally, the sample was sequenced on Illumina NextSeq500 using the generated reads of 2 × 150 bp. Every analyte passed all the quality control requirements, and 99% of targeted nucleotides were covered at more than 20×.

2.4. Data Analysis and Interpretation

Variant calling was performed using the recommended best practices of GATK version1.0.5506 (Broad Institute). Variant annotation and prioritization were performed using a well-developed pipeline called wANNOVAR [10], which is used for functional annotations, including various gene annotations, alternative allele frequency in the 1000 Genomes Project, conserved element annotation, dbSNP annotation, deleteriousness prediction scores for nonsynonymous variants, ClinVar variant annotation, and genome-wide association study (GWAS) variant annotation [11].
We implemented a variant-reduction pipeline based on commonly used filters and disease models to select nonsynonymous variants and splice variants, rare or novel variants in the 1000 Genomes Project database, and predicted deleterious variants. Thus, synonymous variants, variants with variant frequency <10%, and variants with allele frequency >1% were removed. The remaining variants were annotated with reference to ClinVar, a freely accessible human variation and phenotype database hosted by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [12]. Pathogenicity prediction programs, including PolyPhen2 [13], SIFT [14], and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) [15], were used. All the variants identified were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The corresponding gene contexts were evaluated according to Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man® [16] with the individual phenotypes (clinical, laboratory, and imaging data). Segregation analysis was performed to select de novo or compound heterozygous variants. The identified variants were classified “pathogenic,” “likely pathogenic,” or “of uncertain significance” according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) standards and guidelines [17].

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data of the Enrolled Patients

A total of 54 patients were enrolled, of which 45 had a history of seizure, including 10 patients with seizure onset before 1 month of age, 31 patients with seizure onset between 1 month and 2 years of age, and 4 patients with seizure onset after 2 years of age. Of the patients, 10 received 1 drug and 35 received at least ≥2 AEDs. Nine patients had no history of seizures and were suspected to have severe neurological or neuromuscular disease with regression of symptoms. The demographic data are shown in Table 1. The detailed clinical information including antiepileptic drugs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and outcomes are demonstrated in Table 2.

3.2. Diagnostic Yield

The overall diagnostic rate was 44.4% (24/54). We compared patients with identified and nonidentified genetic etiologies through WES, which indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) in sex between the two groups. In the identified genetic group (N = 24), the sex ratio was 18 males to 6 females. The inheritance patterns were 3 X-linked, 6 autosomal recessive, and 15 autosomal dominant. Male pediatric patients had a significantly higher yield than their female counterparts (57% vs. 29%, odds ratio = 3.18 (95% confidence interval = 1.04 to 9.70)). We found no difference in the number of epileptic drugs taken and the time of seizure onset between the identified genetic and nonidentified genetic groups (Table 1). Among 45 patients with seizures, the yield was 44% (20/45). Considerable genetic variability was found in the seizure group, as recurrent genetic etiologies included KCNQ2, TBCID24, and SCN1A in the cases series, with two patients carrying each gene. Other genes were nonrecurrent for each case in the case series. Seventeen genetic etiologies were identified in the seizure group, of which 82% (14/17) were rare and nonrecurrent.

3.3. Genotype

The clinical genotype and phenotype in genetically positive cases are shown in Table 2. Clinical and molecular data for 24 patients are listed. In 54 patients, 10 novel mutations were identified (Table 3). Among 24 patients with identified genetic etiologies, there were 13 with DEE, 6 patients had seizures with neurodevelopmental regressive symptoms, 2 patients with muscle disease (1 patient with muscle dystrophy carrying DMD gene and 1 patient with congenital muscle dystrophy with seizures), 1 with autism with SCN2A mutation, 1 with spinocerebellar ataxia, and 1 patient with Marfan syndrome. Eleven patients had a single autosomal-dominant disorder and all showed de novo variants. Of these, 10 mutations were novel (Table 3). The diagnosis in four patients was changed after WES, including one with migraine changed to spinocerebellar ataxia, one with Leigh-like syndrome changed to sulfite oxidase deficiency, and two which remained undiagnosed but were suspected of carrying copy number variation after read depth was computed from WES. Thereafter, a final diagnosis was given through multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) or microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) (patients 9 and 17). The 10 novel mutations include 2 missense, 2 splicing, 3 nonsense, 2 indel, and 1 frameshift mutations. They were considered pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations by ACMG guidelines (Table 3).

3.4. Refractory Seizure Cases

Of the 45 patients with seizure, a definitive genetic etiology was identified in 20 (44%). Of the 10 patients with seizure onset before the first month, etiology was confirmed through WES in 5 (50%) patients. These included two patients with KCNQ2 and one patient each with PACS1, OSGEP, and PIGA (Table 2). All patients had poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. One patient with homozygous OSGEP mutations died before 4 months of age due to severe pleural effusions. One patient with PACS1 has survived and is 15 years old.
Of the 31 patients with seizure onset between 1 month and 2 years of age, 13 (42%) received a definitive diagnosis, including 2 patients each with TBCID24 and SCN1A and 1 patient each with PPP1CB, UBE3A, MECP2 duplication syndrome (MECP2:rsa Xq28), SZT2 (Figure 1), SMARCA4 (Figure 2), GRIN1, [4p16.3p16.1(68,345–7,739,782)X1 17q25.1q25.3(73,608,322–81,041,938)X3], SUOX, and LAMA2 SZT2 (Figure 3). Although the 13 patients were initially diagnosed with DEE, their phenotypes are heterogeneous.
A wide range of genetic disorders were identified. The genes involved in seizures included KCNQ2, SCN1A, TBCID 24, GRIN1, IRF2BPL, MECP2, OSGEP, PACS1, PIGA, PPP1CB, SMARCA4, SUOX, SZT2, UBE3A, 16p13.11 microdeletion, [4p16.3p16.1(68,345–7,739,782)X1, 17q25.1q25.3(73,608,322–81,041,938)X3], and LAMA2. Most patients had poor neurological outcomes and refractory seizures controlled by AEDs.

3.5. Recurrent Mutations

The recurrent mutations involved SCN1A, KCNQ2, and TBC1D24. Six cases were attributed to these genes, with seizure onset before 2 years of age. The recurrence of these mutations in the case series indicates that these genes are more commonly involved in childhood DEE, particularly in cases where seizure onset occurs before 2 years of age. Two patients with mutations in KCNQ2 had severe neurological outcomes, and they could not speak at 3 years of age or walk. Two patients with mutations in TBCID24 had persistent refractory seizures with an attention deficit. Two patients with mutations in SCN1A had severe neurological outcomes and refractory seizures.

3.6. Genes Accounting for Epilepsy Demonstrated by the Age of Seizure Onset

The genes accounting for epileptic patients in the study and in a literature review [18,19,20,21,22,23] (Table 4) are demonstrated in the order of age of seizure onset from birth to 1 month old (Figure 4A), 1 month to 24 months old (Figure 4B), and 24 months to adulthood (Figure 4C).

3.7. Nonseizure Group

In the nonseizure group, the yield was 44% (4/9), including one with SCN2A with autism, one FBN1 with Marfan syndrome, one DMD with muscle dystrophy, and one SPTBN2 with spinocerebellar ataxia.

4. Discussion

Of 54 patients with severe neurological disorders, we identified variants corresponding with the disease in 24 patients. In neonatal infants with seizures, genetic etiologies varied. SCN1A, KCNQ2, and TBCID24 had recurrent mutations in the case series. Mutations in other genes were sporadic and not recurrent. Seventeen genetic etiologies were identified in the seizure group. Of those, 82% (14/17) responsible for childhood seizure were rare and nonrecurrent, indicating that the genetic spectrum for neonatal infantile seizures is wide. Thus, the genes selected for the epileptic panel may not represent all etiologies.
The diagnostic yield of WES was 44%, which is not significantly different from that in other studies, which varied from 30% to 70% [19]. However, results vary greatly and depend on the disease groups selected. Studies have reported diagnostic rates of 19% [24], 41% [23], and 49.1% [25]. Neonatal or infantile DEE was the most commonly found syndrome in this study. Studies have used comprehensive epilepsy gene panel analysis, with a success rate ranging from 10% to 40% [20,21] depending on gene selection and number of cases. However, previous studies have not performed gene panel analysis, which explains why WES is more effective in diagnosing genetic etiologies.
The finding that the WES yield was significant in male pediatric patients provides a viable treatment strategy. The finding needs further explanation: One factor is X-linked inheritance. The sex ratio was 18 males to 6 females. However, only 3 were X-linked. The second factor is that the majority (76%) of 54 patients were aged below 2 years old. In the identified genetic group, seizures onset before 1 year old were found in 18 (75%) patients. Demos et al. [18] found that 12 (44.4%) of 27 males and 9 (35%) of 26 females with epileptic diagnosis <6 months had a genetic diagnosis by WES in 360 epileptic cases with an average seizure onset at ≤5 years (Table 4). That indicated a trend of higher yield in male newborn infants with a younger age of seizure onset. Genetic counseling to prevent next offspring was carried out in all patients, even in the autosomal dominant patients with de novo mutation. In our cohort, 12 patients with autosomal dominant inheritance had de novo mutations. The next offspring were explained to prevent unnecessary concern. In addition, we changed antiepileptic drug selection after detecting a causative KCNQ2 variant in patients 4 and 5, which resulted in more effective seizure control. A patient was identified with a mutation in KCNMA1, which encodes the α-subunit of the large conductance calcium-sensitive potassium channel. Mutations in KCNMA1 increase Ca2+ sensitivity of the channel by three- to five-fold, resulting in generalized epilepsy and paroxysmal dyskinesia [24]. We chose to administer levetiracetam (LEV; 20 mg/kg/day) because LEV can limit epileptogenesis by inhibiting Ca2+ elevation following seizures, thus exerting neuroprotective and antiepileptogenic effects [26,27]. The administration of LEV resulted in no episodes of seizure and low frequency of paroxysmal dyskinesia in the patient. Thus, WES data can support precision therapy and provide information for managing pediatric patients with epilepsy.
SCN1A is studied in the context of genotype–phenotype correlations in the GEFS+ spectrum and DS [20,28,29]. Pathological mutations in structural and functional proteins correlate with specific clinical presentations. Modifier genes also contribute to modulating the phenotype. Most phenotypes that cause severe disability are a result of de novo mutations [20,30]. However, the hypothesis does not account for mosaicism [31]. Some studies have proposed that epigenetic factors contribute to determining phenotypes [20,30,31]. In SCN1A channelopathy, DS is the most severe phenotype. Approximately 70–80% of patients with DS [20,30] have SCN1A mutations, which are mostly de novo, as in our patients. Most patients with DS have mutations in the “ion pore” of SCN1A [32,33,34,35]. However, one of our patients with a mutation in the ion pore region had an identical unaffected twin sister. Although studies have reported that patients with pathogenic SCN1A mutations may remain unaffected, the mechanism is unknown. In a large family with familial pathogenic SCN1A missense mutations, clustering of three unaffected carriers was observed in the same generation [35]. Genetic or epigenetic changes were proposed as the causative factors but not established, because the effects of other confounding factors could not be excluded. KCNQ2 encodes a voltage-gated potassium channel that is expressed in the brain and is involved in the etiology of epileptic encephalopathy, early infantile (EIEE7, phenotype MIM# 613720), and benign familial neonatal seizures-1 (BFNS1, phenotype MIM#121200) [36,37]. Two (patients 4 and 5) de novo heterozygous mutations in KCNQ2, namely c.740C > T (p.Ser247Leu) and c.740C > T (p.Pro285Thr), are highly pathogenic and located in the critical pore domain [38]. This finding helps us select suitable AEDs, such as oxcarbazepine, to control seizures.
The diagnostic methods focusing on the genotype–phenotype correlation followed by specialized biochemical tests and Sanger sequencing for suspected genes are time-consuming and costly [39]. Moreover, only “typical” diseases can be diagnosed, and even when the same causative mutations are present, atypical diseases can be overlooked. In summary, we provide a perspective for diagnosing severe neurological disorders in children using WES. The study presents important findings on the genetic causes of severe neurological disorders in childhood, particularly in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.
In the clinical setting, if the clinical course is thought to be benign, including benign epileptic syndromes [40] in childhood, WES is not performed. However, if, after treatment with AEDs, the response is unfavorable and seizures are refractory, to obtain the best time of seizure control and to avoid sacrificing the moment of children’s brain development, as in our case with UBE3A mutation whose seizure was far preceded to her developmental regression, WES should be performed. Therefore, we recommend WES for assessing all childhood seizures with poor response to AEDs without definitive etiology to save time in selecting appropriate AEDs.

5. Conclusions

The findings on the genetic causes of severe childhood neurological disorders are significant. A scientific and efficient WES analysis is particularly important and should be emphasized because the affected gene may not be present in the panel. This findings of this study highlight the diagnostic relevance of WES for childhood patients with epilepsy in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-Y.H. and I.-C.L.; methodology, S.-Y.H. and I.-C.L.; validation, S.-Y.H. and I.-C.L.; formal analysis, S.-Y.H. and I.-C.L.; investigation, S.-Y.H. and I.-C.L.; data curation, I.-C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-Y.H. and I.-C.L.; writing—review and editing, J.-J.Y. and S.-Y.L.; supervision, I.-C.L.; project administration, I.-C.L.; funding acquisition, I.-C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grant MOST 107-2314-B-040-021 from the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology and CSH-2020-C-030 Chung Shan Medical University Hospital.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lee-Jun Wong in Baylor Medical School, USA and everyone who participated in the present project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Engel, J., Jr. A proposed diagnostic scheme for people with epileptic seizures and with epilepsy: Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 2001, 42, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Scheffer, I.E.; Berkovic, S.; Capovilla, G.; Connolly, M.B.; French, J.; Guilhoto, L.; Hirsch, E.; Jain, S.; Mathern, G.W.; Moshé, S.L.; et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 2017, 58, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. El Kosseifi, C.; Cornet, M.C.; Cilio, M.R. Neonatal Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2019, 32, 100770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Howell, K.B.; Harvey, A.S.; Archer, J.S. Epileptic encephalopathy: Use and misuse of a clinically and conceptually important concept. Epilepsia 2016, 57, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. McTague, A.; Howell, K.B.; Cross, J.H.; Kurian, M.A.; Scheffer, I.E. The genetic landscape of the epileptic encephalopathies of infancy and childhood. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nashabat, M.; Al Qahtani, X.S.; Almakdob, S.; Altwaijri, W.; Ba-Armah, D.M.; Hundallah, K.; Al Hashem, A.; Al Tala, S.; Maddirevula, S.; Alkuraya, F.S.; et al. The landscape of early infantile epileptic encephalopathy in a consanguineous population. Seizure 2019, 69, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nieh, S.E.; Sherr, E.H. Epileptic encephalopathies: New genes and new pathways. Neurotherapeutics 2014, 11, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Khan, S.; Al Baradie, R. Epileptic encephalopathies: An overview. Epilepsy Res. Treat. 2012, 2012, 403592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Noh, G.J.; Asher, Y.J.T.; Graham, J.M., Jr. Clinical review of genetic epileptic encephalopathies. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 55, 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chang, X.; Wang, K. wANNOVAR: Annotating genetic variants for personal genomes via the web. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 49, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yang, H.; Wang, K. Genomic variant annotation and prioritization with ANNOVAR and wANNOVAR. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 1556–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Landrum, M.J.; Lee, J.M.; Riley, G.R.; Jang, W.; Rubinstein, W.S.; Church, D.M.; Maglott, D.R. ClinVar: Public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2014, 42 (Database issue), D980–D985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Adzhubei, I.A.; Schmidt, S.; Peshkin, L.; Ramensky, V.E.; Gerasimova, A.; Bork, P.; Kondrashov, A.S.; Sunyaev, S.R. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 248–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sim, N.L.; Kumar, P.; Hu, J.; Henikoff, S.; Schneider, G.; Ng, P.C. SIFT web server: Predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W452–W457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kircher, M.; Witten, D.M.; Jain, P.; O’Roak, B.J.; Cooper, G.M.; Shendure, J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Amberger, J.S.; Bocchini, C.A.; Schiettecatte, F.; Scott, A.F.; Hamosh, A. OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2015, 43 (Database issue), D789–D798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical. Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Demos, M.; Guella, I.; DeGuzman, C.; McKenzie, M.B.; Buerki, S.E.; Evans, D.M.; Toyota, E.B.; Boelman, C.; Huh, L.L.; Datta, A.; et al. Diagnostic Yield and Treatment Impact of Targeted Exome Sequencing in Early-Onset Epilepsy. Front Neurol. 2019, 10, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Snoeijen-Schouwenaars, F.M.; van Ool, J.S.; Verhoeven, J.S.; van Mierlo, P.; Braakman, H.M.; Smeets, E.E.; Nicolai, J.; Schoots, J.; Teunissen, M.W.; Rouhl, R.P.; et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing in 100 consecutive patients with both epilepsy and intellectual disability. Epilepsia 2019, 60, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Butler, K.M.; da Silva, C.; Alexander, J.J.; Hegde, M.; Escayg, A. Diagnostic Yield from 339 Epilepsy Patients Screened on a Clinical Gene Panel. Pediatric Neurol. 2017, 77, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Juanes, M.; Veneruzzo, G.; Loos, M.; Reyes, G.; Araoz, H.V.; Garcia, F.M.; Gomez, G.; Alonso, C.N.; Chertkoff, L.P.; Caraballo, R. Molecular diagnosis of epileptic encephalopathy of the first year of life applying a customized gene panel in a group of Argentinean patients. Epilepsy Behav. 2020, 111, 107322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ostrander, B.E.; Butterfield, R.J.; Pedersen, B.S.; Farrell, A.J.; Layer, R.M.; Ward, A.; Miller, C.; DiSera, T.; Filloux, F.M.; Candee, M.S.; et al. Whole-genome analysis for effective clinical diagnosis and gene discovery in early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. NPJ Genom. Med. 2018, 3, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Srivastava, S.; Cohen, J.S.; Vernon, H.; Barañano, K.; McClellan, R.; Jamal, L.; Naidu, S.; Fatemi, A. Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice. Ann Neurol. 2014, 76, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dixon-Salazar, T.J.; Silhavy, J.L.; Udpa, N.; Schroth, J.; Bielas, S.; Schaffer, A.E.; Olvera, J.; Bafna, V.; Zaki, M.S.; Abdel-Salam, G.H.; et al. Exome sequencing can improve diagnosis and alter patient management. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 138ra178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kuperberg, M.; Lev, D.; Blumkin, L.; Zerem, A.; Ginsberg, M.; Linder, I.; Carmi, N.; Kivity, S.; Lerman-Sagie, T.; Leshinsky-Silver, E. Utility of Whole Exome Sequencing for Genetic Diagnosis of Previously Undiagnosed Pediatric Neurology Patients. J. Child Neurol. 2016, 31, 1534–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, W.; Bautista, J.F.; Yang, H.; Diez-Sampedro, A.; You, S.A.; Wang, L.; Kotagal, P.; Lüders, H.O.; Shi, J.; Cui, J. Calcium-sensitive potassium channelopathy in human epilepsy and paroxysmal movement disorder. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, I.C.; Hong, S.Y. Treatment of intractable seizure in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome with bromide. Brain Dev. 2017, 39, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marini, C.; Scheffer, I.E.; Nabbout, R.; Mei, D.; Cox, K.; Dibbens, L.M.; McMahon, J.M.; Iona, X.; Carpintero, R.S.; Elia, M.; et al. SCN1A duplications and deletions detected in Dravet syndrome: Implications for molecular diagnosis. Epilepsia 2009, 50, 1670–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, W.D.; Chang, K.P.; Wang, C.H.; Chen, S.J.; Fan, P.C.; Weng, W.C.; Lin, W.C.; Tsai, Y.; Tsai, C.H.; Chou, I.C.; et al. Molecular aspects of Dravet syndrome patients in Taiwan. Clin. Chim. Acta 2013, 421, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Claes, L.; Del-Favero, J.; Ceulemans, B.; Lagae, L.; Van Broeckhoven, C.; De Jonghe, P. De novo mutations in the sodium-channel gene SCN1A cause severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 68, 1327–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Vadlamudi, L.; Dibbens, L.M.; Lawrence, K.M.; Iona, X.; McMahon, J.M.; Murrell, W.; Mackay-Sim, A.; Scheffer, I.E.; Berkovic, S.F. Timing of de novo mutagenesis—A twin study of sodium-channel mutations. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1335–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kanai, K.; Hirose, S.; Oguni, H.; Fukuma, G.; Shirasaka, Y.; Miyajima, T.; Wada, K.; Iwasa, H.; Yasumoto, S.; Matsuo, M.; et al. Effect of localization of missense mutations in SCN1A on epilepsy phenotype severity. Neurology 2004, 63, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ceulemans, B.P.; Claes, L.R.; Lagae, L.G. Clinical correlations of mutations in the SCN1A gene: From febrile seizures to severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. Pediatric Neurol. 2004, 30, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lim, B.C.; Hwang, H.; Chae, J.H.; Choi, J.E.; Hwang, Y.S.; Kang, S.H.; Ki, C.S.; Kim, K.J. SCN1A mutational analysis in Korean patients with Dravet syndrome. Seizure 2011, 20, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Goldberg-Stern, H.; Aharoni, S.; Afawi, Z.; Bennett, O.; Appenzeller, S.; Pendziwiat, M.; Kuhlenbäumer, G.; Basel-Vanagaite, L.; Shuper, A.; Korczyn, A.D.; et al. Broad phenotypic heterogeneity due to a novel SCN1A mutation in a family with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus. J. Child Neurol. 2014, 29, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, H.S.; Pan, Z.; Shi, W.; Brown, B.S.; Wymore, R.S.; Cohen, I.S.; Dixon, J.E.; McKinnon, D. KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: Molecular correlates of the M-channel. Science 1998, 282, 1890–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Weckhuysen, S.; Mandelstam, S.; Suls, A.; Audenaert, D.; Deconinck, T.; Claes, L.R.; Deprez, L.; Smets, K.; Hristova, D.; Yordanova, I.; et al. KCNQ2 encephalopathy: Emerging phenotype of a neonatal epileptic encephalopathy. Ann Neurol. 2012, 71, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dedek, K.; Fusco, L.; Teloy, N.; Steinlein, O.K. Neonatal convulsions and epileptic encephalopathy in an Italian family with a missense mutation in the fifth transmembrane region of KCNQ2. Epilepsy Res. 2003, 54, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shashi, V.; McConkie-Rosell, A.; Rosell, B.; Schoch, K.; Vellore, K.; McDonald, M.; Jiang, Y.H.; Xie, P.; Need, A.; Goldstein, D.B. The utility of the traditional medical genetics diagnostic evaluation in the context of next-generation sequencing for undiagnosed genetic disorders. Genet. Med. 2014, 16, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Majumdar, K. Differential operator in seizure detection. Comput. Biol. Med. 2012, 42, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Patient 21 has compound heterozygous mutations of SZT2, (A) c.C9055T (p.Arg3019Ter) (arrows) and (B) c.1496 + 2T > C (arrows), from the asymptomatic father and mother, respectively. Seizure onset occurred at 6 months old. His electroencephalogram shows developmental epileptic encephalopathy with multifocal epileptiform discharges. (C) The MRI shows a short and thick corpus callosum with missing of selenium (arrow). (D) Normal child with the same age demonstrates for comparison with patient. (E) Her examination was notable for macrocephaly, dysmorphic features, frontal bossing, hypertelorism, microphthalmia, depressed nasal bridge, long-tapered fingers, and hyperextensible joints. (F) Long-tapered fingers in the patient (red arrow).
Figure 1. Patient 21 has compound heterozygous mutations of SZT2, (A) c.C9055T (p.Arg3019Ter) (arrows) and (B) c.1496 + 2T > C (arrows), from the asymptomatic father and mother, respectively. Seizure onset occurred at 6 months old. His electroencephalogram shows developmental epileptic encephalopathy with multifocal epileptiform discharges. (C) The MRI shows a short and thick corpus callosum with missing of selenium (arrow). (D) Normal child with the same age demonstrates for comparison with patient. (E) Her examination was notable for macrocephaly, dysmorphic features, frontal bossing, hypertelorism, microphthalmia, depressed nasal bridge, long-tapered fingers, and hyperextensible joints. (F) Long-tapered fingers in the patient (red arrow).
Jpm 10 00281 g001
Figure 2. Patient 3 had facial dysmorphic feature, hypotonia, and orogastric tube dependency after birth. (A) His toenails were hypoplastic (arrow). Seizure onset occurred at 3 months old. (B) Normal toenails in a healthy infant. (C) The image of the head ultrasound was unremarkable. (D) The WES and sequencing results indicated a novel de novo (no mutation in both parents) mutation in the SMARCA4 gene. The arrow indicates a G-to-A substitution at nucleotide 3595 (c.3595G > A, p.Val1199Met) in the patient (arrow), father, and mother. At 2 years, the patient was not able to sit without support.
Figure 2. Patient 3 had facial dysmorphic feature, hypotonia, and orogastric tube dependency after birth. (A) His toenails were hypoplastic (arrow). Seizure onset occurred at 3 months old. (B) Normal toenails in a healthy infant. (C) The image of the head ultrasound was unremarkable. (D) The WES and sequencing results indicated a novel de novo (no mutation in both parents) mutation in the SMARCA4 gene. The arrow indicates a G-to-A substitution at nucleotide 3595 (c.3595G > A, p.Val1199Met) in the patient (arrow), father, and mother. At 2 years, the patient was not able to sit without support.
Jpm 10 00281 g002
Figure 3. Patient 24 has compound heterozygous mutations of LAMA2, (A) c.1583dupA (p.Ser529GlufsTer19), and (B) c.6931A > T (p.Lys2311Ter) from the asymptomatic mother and father, respectively (arrows). (C) His MRI showed basal ganglion, thalamus, white matter and cerebellar vermis signal abnormalities. The finding indicated a dysmyelinating process. A creatine phosphokinase was 548 IU/L (reference values, 40-397 IU/L). The genetic study for spinal muscle atrophy was unremarkable. He had developmental delay, recurrent sepsis, and pneumonia with lung atelectasis, and needed respiratory supportive care at home since birth. He died at 1 year and 2 months old due to respiratory failure.
Figure 3. Patient 24 has compound heterozygous mutations of LAMA2, (A) c.1583dupA (p.Ser529GlufsTer19), and (B) c.6931A > T (p.Lys2311Ter) from the asymptomatic mother and father, respectively (arrows). (C) His MRI showed basal ganglion, thalamus, white matter and cerebellar vermis signal abnormalities. The finding indicated a dysmyelinating process. A creatine phosphokinase was 548 IU/L (reference values, 40-397 IU/L). The genetic study for spinal muscle atrophy was unremarkable. He had developmental delay, recurrent sepsis, and pneumonia with lung atelectasis, and needed respiratory supportive care at home since birth. He died at 1 year and 2 months old due to respiratory failure.
Jpm 10 00281 g003
Figure 4. The genes accounting for epilepsy are demonstrated in the order of age of seizure onset from birth to 1 month old (A), from 1 month to 24 months old (B), and from 24 months to adulthood (C) from the study and from a literature review.
Figure 4. The genes accounting for epilepsy are demonstrated in the order of age of seizure onset from birth to 1 month old (A), from 1 month to 24 months old (B), and from 24 months to adulthood (C) from the study and from a literature review.
Jpm 10 00281 g004
Table 1. The demographic data in identified genetic group and nonidentified genetic group by whole-exome sequencing (WES) are demonstrated.
Table 1. The demographic data in identified genetic group and nonidentified genetic group by whole-exome sequencing (WES) are demonstrated.
Clinical Data (N)Identified
Genetic Group (N = 24)
Nonidentified
Genetic Group (N = 30)
Symptoms NS
Seizures (45)20 (44%)25 (56%)
No seizure (9)4 (44%)5 (56%)
Age at first seizure onset NS
0–1 month (10)5 (50%)5 (50%)
1 month–2 years (31)13 (42%)18 (58%)
>2 years (4)2 (50%)2 (50%)
No seizure (8)4 (44%)5 (56%)
Sex p < 0.05
Male (30)17 (57%)13 (43%)
Female (24)7 (29%)17 (71%)
Number of antiepileptic drugs at the time of study NS
0 (8)4 (44%)5 (56%)
1 (10)2 (20%)8 (80%)
2 (11)5 (49%)6 (51%)
>3 or =3 (25)13 (54%)11 (46%)
NS indicates not significant. Odds ratio = 3.18 (95% confidence interval = 1.04 to 9.70).
Table 2. The genetic and clinical features are summarized in those patients with identified mutations by WES.
Table 2. The genetic and clinical features are summarized in those patients with identified mutations by WES.
Gene NameGenotypeInheritance
Pattern
PhenotypeAge of Diagnosis/
Age of First Seizure
SexNCBI ClinVarSeizure
Types
Neurodevelopmental
Outcomes
P 1PACS1
(NM_018026.4)
c.607C > T
p.(Arg203Trp)
AD,
de novo
DEE, spinal tethered cord12 years/
Newborn
FPathogenicFocal
seizures
Walk by ambulance, cognition delay at 14 years
P 2TBCID 24
(NM_001199 107.1)
c.1499C > T (p.Ala500Val)/c.229_240del (p.77_80del)ARDEE2 years
/10 months
MPathogenic/PathogenicMultiple focal, general, nonconvulsive status epilepticusAttention deficit. cognition delay
P 3FBN1
(NM_000138. 4)
c.794_795insGTAT (p.Val266Tyr fs * 6)ADMarfan syndrome16 years
/-
FPathogenicNo seizureNormal
P 4KCNQ2
(NM_172107.3)
c.740C > T
(p.Ser247Leu)
AD,
de novo
DEE10 months
/Day 3
MPathogenicGeneral tonic, apneaNo language, hypotonia at 3 years
P 5KCNQ2
(NM_172107.3)
c.853C > A
(p.Pro285Thr)
AD,
de novo
DEE2 months
/Day 3
FNovelGeneral tonicNo language, hypotonia at 1 year
P 6OSGEP
(NM_017807.4)
c.740G > A
(p.Arg247Gln)/
c.740G > A
(p.Arg247Gln)
ARLissencephaly,
seizures
3 months
/3 weeks
MPathogenic/PathogenicFocalSevere, died at 6 months
P 7SCN2A
(NM_021007.2)
c.4958delT (p.Leu1653Ter)AD,
de novo
Autism4 years/-MPathogenicNo seizureSevere autism, no language at 4 years
P 816p13.11 microdeletion ADFrequent seizures12 years/10 yearsFPathogenicGeneral tonic Attention deficit
P 9 4p16.3p16.1(68,345–7,739,782)X1, 17q25.1q25.3(73,608,322–81,041,938)X3 AD,
de novo
DEE1 year/
6 months
MPathogenicGeneralGlobal DD
P 10IRF2BPL
(NM_024496.3)
c.562C > T
(p.Arg188Ter)
AD,
de novo
DEE and regressive encephalopathy12 years
/11 years
FPathogenicGeneralProfound ID
P 11PIGA:
(NM.002641)
c.356G > A
(p.Arg119Gln)
X-linkedDEE0.5 month
/Day 3
MPathogenicApnea, cyanosis, absence, atonic, spasmsSevere global DD
P 12PPP1CBc.548A > C
(p.Glu183Ala)
AD,
de novo
DEE, dysmorphism4 months/
2 months
MPathogenicApnea, eye gazed deviation, myoclonicSevere global DD
P 13TBCID 24
(NM_001199 107.1)
c.119G > A
(p.Arg40His)/
c.1499C > T
(p.Ala500Val)
ARDEE8 months
/6 months
MPathogenic
/Pathogenic
Multifocal, myoclonusGlobal DD
P 14UBE3A
(NM_130838)
c.C219A
(p.Thr73Ter)
AD, maternal imprintingRegressive
encephalopathy
14 months
/11 months
MNovelGeneral tonicProfound ID
P 15SCN1A
(NM_001165963)
c.362delC
(p.Ala121fs)
AD,
de novo
DEE5 months
/4 months
MNovelFocal clonic, general tonicProfound ID
P 16SCN1A
(NM_001165963)
c.3918 + 1 G > -AD,
de novo
DEE8 months
/5 months
FNovelFocal clonic, general tonicProfound ID
P 17 $MECP2
(NM_004992.3)
rsa Xq28 MECP2 (exons3-4) x1X-linkedRegressive
encephalopathy
14 months
/8 months
FPathogenicGeneral tonicProfound ID
P 18DMD
(NM_004006.2)
c.C5287T (p.Arg1763Ter)X-linkedMuscle dystrophy3 years
/-
MPathogenicNo seizureMotor delay
P 19SMARCA4 (NM_001128849)c.3595G > A (p.Val1199Met)AD,
de novo
Seizures,
encephalopathy
3 months
/2 months
MNovelGeneral tonicSevere global DD
P 20GRIN1
(NM_007327.3)
c.C2414T
(p.Pro805Leu)
AD,
de novo
DEE4 months
/2 months
MPathogenicInfantile spasmsGlobal DD
P 21SZT2
(NM_015284)
c.1496 + 2T > C/c.9055T > C (p.Arg3019Ter)ARDEE3 years
/6 months
MNovel/NovelFocal motorSevere hypotonia, gastrostomy
P 22SUOX
(NM_001032386.2)
c.650G > A (p.Arg217Gln)/
c.258dupT (p.Lys87Ter)
ARLeigh-like, regression8 months
/4 months
MPathogenic
/novel
Apnea, cyanosis, opisthotonosSevere DD, hypertonia
P 23SPTBN2
(NM_006946. 2)
c.5515C > A
(p.Gln1839Lys)
ADAtaxia, vertigo14 years
/-
MNovelNo seizureFrequent ataxia
P 24LAMA2 NM_000426.3c.1583dupA
(p.Ser529GlufsTer19)
/c.6931A > T (p.Lys2311Ter)
ARHypotonia, seizures2 years
/1.5 months
MNovel/NovelFocalSevere global DD
Diagnosed by WES and 750K microarray chip (Affymetrix CytoScan 750K Array); $ Diagnosed by WES and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). P, patient; DEE, developmental epileptic encephalopathy; F, female; M, male; AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; DEE, developmental epileptic encephalopathy; DD, developmental delay; ID, intelligence disability; NA, not available; NCBI ClinVar, National Center for Biotechnology Information, clinical variability and predictability [12]. The sequence data of each patient were checked against the GenBank reference sequence and version number of genes.
Table 3. Ten novel mutations in the cases-series.
Table 3. Ten novel mutations in the cases-series.
Gene NameGenotype (N) PhenotypeNCBI ClinVarCritical FunctionalGlobalEast AsiaTaiwan Biobank.CADDPolySIFTACMG
DomainMAFMAF PredictPhen2 Score
Patient 15SCN1A
(NM_001165963)
c.362delC
(p.Ala121fs)
FrameshiftDEENovel 000DDDAD, de novo,
(PVS1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 14UBE3A
(NM_130838)
c.C219A
(p.Thr73Ter)
NonsenseEncephalopathy and regressionNovel 000DDDAD from mother
(PVS1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 16SCN1A
NM_001165963)
c.3918 + 1 G > -SplicingDEENovel 000DDDAD, de novo
(PVS1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 19SMARCA4 (NM_001128849)c.3595G > A
(p.Val1199Met)
MissenseSeizure, severe global delayNovelHelicase C-terminal’000DDDAD, de novo
(PS2, PM1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 21SZT2
(NM_015284)
c.1496 + 2T > CSplicingDEENovel 000DDDAR
(PVS1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 21SZT2
(NM_015284)
c.9055T > C
(p.Arg3019Ter)
NonsenseDEENovel 000DDDAR
(PVS1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 22SUOX (NM_001032386.2)c.258dupT
(p.Lys87Ter)
IndelLeigh-like, regressionNovel 000DDDAR
(PVS1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 23SPTBN2
(NM_006946. 2)
c.5515C > A
(p.Gln1839Lys)
MissenseSpinocerebellar ataxia 5NovelAnkyrin binding domain000DDTAD from mother (PM1 + PM2 + PP1 + PP3 + PP4)
Patient 24LAMA2 NM_000426.3c.1583dupA(p.Ser529GlufsTer19)IndelCMD, seizuresNovel 000DDDAR (PVS1, PM2, PP3)
Patient 24LAMA2 NM_000426.3/c.6931A > T (p.Lys2311Ter)NonsenseCMD, seizuresNovel 000DDDAR (PVS1, PM2, PP3)
DEE, developmental epileptic encephalopathy; CMD, Congenital muscular dystrophies; NCBI ClinVar, National Center for Biotechnology Information, clinical variability and predictability [12]; Global MAF, Global mutation allele frequency in EXAC browser; East Asia MAF, East Asia mutation allele frequency in EXAC browser; CADD predict, Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion prediction; D, damage; T, tolerant. ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. The sequence data of each patient were checked against the GenBank reference sequence and version number of genes.
Table 4. Diagnostic yield from different methods to identify genetic causes.
Table 4. Diagnostic yield from different methods to identify genetic causes.
ReferenceThe Study[18][19][20][21][22][23]
MethodWESWESWES110-gene panel47-gene panelWGSWES
Cases (N)54360100339 171478
Ethnicity or regionTaiwanCanadaCaucasian (2 patients had African ethnicity), NetherlandsUnited StatesArgentineanUnited StatesUnited States
Age43.7 ± 62.0 months
41 (76%) seizure onset <2 years
Seizure onset was 18 months (range 0.03–60 months)24.1 ± 16.2 years
(ranged 2.8–67.6 years)
Age ranged
2.5 months
to 74 years
Average age 4 months (range: 0–10 months)Seizure onset
before first month
8.6 ± 5.8 years (ranged 1.6–26.3 years)
Inclusion criteria45 epilepsy (35 with AEDs ≥2; 10 with 1 AED and regression) + 9 nonepileptic with regressive symptomsSeizure onset
at ≤5 years
Unexplained epilepsy and borderline intelligence disability Epileptic patientsEE with age of onset under 12 monthsEIEENeurodevelopmental disabilities
Male/Female30/24154/20655/45About equal8/95/941/37
Yield44%33%25%18%∼50%100%41%
Male/Female in identified
genetic group
17 (57%)/
7 (29%)
23/154 (15%)/
36/206 (19%);
In 53 epilepsy diagnosis < 6 months,
12/27 (44.4%) in males and 9/26 (35%) in females
12 (22%)/
13 (29%)
NA4 (50%)/
4 (44%)
5 (100%)/
9 (100%)
NA
WES, whole-exome sequencing; WGS, whole-genome sequencing; EE, epileptic encephalopathy; AED, antiepileptic drug; NA, not available from the reference.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, S.-Y.; Yang, J.-J.; Li, S.-Y.; Lee, I.-C. A Wide Spectrum of Genetic Disorders Causing Severe Childhood Epilepsy in Taiwan: A Case Series of Ultrarare Genetic Cause and Novel Mutation Analysis in a Pilot Study. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040281

AMA Style

Hong S-Y, Yang J-J, Li S-Y, Lee I-C. A Wide Spectrum of Genetic Disorders Causing Severe Childhood Epilepsy in Taiwan: A Case Series of Ultrarare Genetic Cause and Novel Mutation Analysis in a Pilot Study. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2020; 10(4):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Syuan-Yu, Jiann-Jou Yang, Shuan-Yow Li, and Inn-Chi Lee. 2020. "A Wide Spectrum of Genetic Disorders Causing Severe Childhood Epilepsy in Taiwan: A Case Series of Ultrarare Genetic Cause and Novel Mutation Analysis in a Pilot Study" Journal of Personalized Medicine 10, no. 4: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop