Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Challenges of the Pandemic for Different Specialties
2.1. Testing Laboratories
2.2. Emergency Department
2.3. Dermatology
2.4. Orthopedics
2.5. Obstetrics and Gynecology
2.6. Pediatrics
3. Medical Workflow Reorganization
4. Medical Staff Protection
4.1. Psychological Effects of the Pandemic in the Health Care Environment
4.2. Telemedicine
- 1
- The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) enforces the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules–to protect the privacy and security of health information;
- 2
- FDA enforces the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)–regulates the safety of using medical devices, and eliminates the risk when health app does not work properly;
- 3
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act)–prohibits or creates alerts of unfair acts or practices, and monitors apps’ safety or performance.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Combating COVID-19 Pandemic: The Best Management Practices of a Designated Hospital in Southern Philippines. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344468342_Combating_COVID-19_Pandemic_The_Best_Management_Practices_of_A_Designated_Hospital_in_Southern_Philippines (accessed on 31 October 2021).
- Bhatia, R.; Khetrapal, S. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health system & Sustainable Development Goal 3. Indian J. Med. Res. 2020, 151, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molento, M.B. Ivermectin against COVID-19: The unprecedented consequences in Latin America. One Health 2021, 13, 100250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hellwig, M.D.; Maia, A. A COVID-19 prophylaxis? Lower incidence associated with prophylactic administration of ivermectin. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 57, 106248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bader, M.M.K.; Braun, D.A.; Fox, M.C.; Dwinell, L.; Cord, D.J.; Andersen, M.M.; Noakes, B.B.; Ponticiello, D. A California Hospital’s Response to COVID-19: From a Ripple to a Tsunami Warning. Crit. Care Nurse 2020, 40, e1–e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferrinho, P.; Sidat, M.; Leiras, G.; De Barros, F.P.C.; Arruda, H. Principalism in public health decision making in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2020, 35, 997–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hufsky, F.; Lamkiewicz, K.; Almeida, A.; Aouacheria, A.; Arighi, C.; Bateman, A.; Baumbach, J.; Beerenwinkel, N.; Brandt, C.; Cacciabue, M.; et al. Computational strategies to combat COVID-19: Useful tools to accelerate SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus research. Brief. Bioinform. 2021, 22, 642–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cucinotta, D.; Vanelli, M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Sullivan, D.; Rahamathulla, M.; Pawar, M. The Impact and Implications of COVID-19: An Australian Perspective. Int. J. Community Soc. Dev. 2020, 2, 134–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Stability Mechanism (ESM)|European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/financial-assistance-eu/funding-mechanisms-and-facilities/european-stability-mechanism-esm_en (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Clay-Wililams, R.; Rapport, F.; Braithwaite, J. The Australian health system response to COVID-19 from a resilient health care perspective: What have we learned? Public Health Res. Pract. 2020, 30, e3042025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotrin, P.; Moura, W.; Gambardela-Tkacz, C.M.; Pelloso, F.C.; Dos Santos, L.; de Barros Carvalho, M.D.; Pelloso, S.M.; Freitas, K.M.S. Healthcare Workers in Brazil during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. Inquiry 2020, 57, 46958020963711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szylovec, A.; Umbelino-Walker, I.; Cain, B.N.; Ng, H.T.; Flahault, A.; Rozanova, L. Brazil’s Actions and Reactions in the Fight against C19 from January to March 2020. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Shi, T.; Zhong, H.; Guo, Y. COVID-19 Prevention and Control Public Health Strategies in Shanghai, China. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2020, 26, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Rocha, I.C.N.; Shen, X.; Ahmadi, A.; Lucero-Prisno, D.E. Challenges and Strategies in Controlling COVID-19 in Mainland China: Lessons for Future Public Health Emergencies. J. Soc. Health 2021, 4, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
- Gorgenyi-Hegyes, E.; Nathan, R.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Workplace Health Promotion, Employee Wellbeing and Loyalty during COVID-19 Pandemic—Large Scale Empirical Evidence from Hungary. Economies 2021, 9, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagan, A.; Bryndova, L.; Kowalska-Bobko, I.; Smatana, M.; Spranger, A.; Szerencses, V.; Webb, E.; Gaal, P. A reversal of fortune: Comparison of health system responses to COVID-19 in the Visegrad group during the early phases of the pandemic. Health Policy 2021, 126, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigurdsson, E.L.; Blondal, A.B.; Jonsson, J.S.; Tomasdottir, M.O.; Hrafnkelsson, H.; Linnet, K.; Sigurdsson, J.A. How primary healthcare in Iceland swiftly changed its strategy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e043151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, D.; Jóhannsdóttir, L. Impacts, Systemic Risk and National Response Measures Concerning COVID-19—The Island Case Studies of Iceland and Greenland. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grover, S.; Mehra, A.; Sahoo, S.; Avasthi, A.; Tripathi, A.; D’Souza, A.; Saha, G.; Jagadhisha, A.; Gowda, M.; Vaishnav, M.; et al. State of mental health services in various training centers in India during the lockdown and COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J. Psychiatry 2020, 62, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Wang, D.; Abbas, J.; Duan, K.; Mubeen, R. Global Financial Crisis, Smart Lockdown Strategies, and the COVID-19 Spillover Impacts: A Global Perspective Implications from Southeast Asia. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 643783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cepiku, D.; Giordano, F.; Meneguzzo, M. Comparing strategies against COVID-19: Italy and Switzerland. Rev. Adm. Publica 2021, 55, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishitani, K.; Nagao, M.; Matsuda, S. Self-quarantine programme and pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 PCR screening for orthopaedic elective surgery: Experience from Japan. Int. Orthop. 2021, 45, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robert, A. Lessons from New Zealand’s COVID-19 outbreak response. Lancet Public Health 2020, 5, e569–e570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD iLibrary|OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/oecd-policy-responses-to-coronavirus-covid-19_5b0fd8cd-en/datedesc?page=10 (accessed on 4 November 2021).
- Dascalu, S. The Successes and Failures of the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Response in Romania. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitriu, M.; Pantea-Stoian, A.; Smaranda, A.C.; Nica, A.A.; Carap, A.C.; Constantin, V.D.; Davitoiu, A.M.; Cirstoveanu, C.; Bacalbasa, N.; Bratu, O.G.; et al. Burnout syndrome in Romanian medical residents in time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144, 109972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lobiuc, A.; Dimian, M.; Gheorghita, R.; Sturdza, O.A.C.; Covasa, M. Introduction and Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 in North-East of Romania During the First COVID-19 Outbreak. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 654417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Åslund, A. Responses to the COVID-19 crisis in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 2020, 61, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viguria, U.A.; Casamitjana, N. Early Interventions and Impact of COVID-19 in Spain. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diderichsen, F. How did Sweden Fail the Pandemic? Int. J. Health Serv. 2021, 51, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mansfield, K.E.; Mathur, R.; Tazare, J.; Henderson, A.D.; Mulick, A.R.; Carreira, H.; Matthews, A.A.; Bidulka, P.; Gayle, A.; Forbes, H.; et al. Indirect acute effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK: A population-based study. Lancet Digit. Health 2021, 3, e217–e230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lerner, E.B.; Newgard, C.D.; Mann, N.C. Effect of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the U.S. Emergency Medical Services System: A Preliminary Report. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020, 27, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joyce, P.; Maron, F.; Reddy, P.S. IIAS Public Governance Series. In Good Public Governance in a Global Pandemic; The International Institute of Administrative Sciences: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharov, K.S. Trends in adaptation of fifteen European countries population to SARS-CoV-2 in March–May 2020: Can Taiwanese experience be adopted? J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2021, 120 Pt 3, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q.X.; Shan, H.; Zhang, H.L.; Li, G.M.; Yang, R.M.; Chen, J.M. Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 1567–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prather, K.A.; Wang, C.C.; Schooley, R.T. Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Science 2020, 368, 1422–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Mao, Y.; Jones, R.M.; Tan, Q.; Ji, J.S.; Li, N.; Shen, J.; Lv, Y.; Pan, L.; Ding, P.; et al. Aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Evidence, prevention and control. Environ. Int. 2020, 144, 106039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galvin, C.J.; Li, Y.C.; Malwade, S.; Syed-Abdul, S. COVID-19 preventive measures showing an unintended decline in infectious diseases in Taiwan. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 98, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlowski, E.J.W.; Goldsmith, D.J.A. Four months into the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden’s prized herd immunity is nowhere in sight. J. R. Soc. Med. 2020, 113, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.H.T.; Le, H.T.; Le, X.T.T.; Do, T.T.T.; Van Ngo, T.; Phan, H.T.; Vu, G.T.; Nguyen, T.H.; Phung, D.T.; Nghiem, S.H.; et al. Interdisciplinary Assessment of Hygiene Practices in Multiple Locations: Implications for COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness in Vietnam. Front. Public Health 2021, 8, 589183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benham, J.L.; Lang, R.; Kovacs Burns, K.; MacKean, G.; Léveillé, T.; McCormack, B.; Sheikh, H.; Fullerton, M.M.; Tang, T.; Boucher, J.-C.; et al. Attitudes, current behaviours and barriers to public health measures that reduce COVID-19 transmission: A qualitative study to inform public health messaging. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pleyers, G. The Pandemic is a battlefield. Social movements in the COVID-19 lockdown. J. Civ. Soc. 2020, 16, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakhsh, M.A.; Khawandanah, J.; Naaman, R.K.; Alashmali, S. The impact of COVID-19 quarantine on dietary habits and physical activity in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyal, J.W. COVID-19 Among Workers in Meat and Poultry Processing Facilities―19 States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeinalnezhad, M.; Chofreh, A.G.; Goni, F.A.; Klemeš, J.J.; Sari, E. Simulation and Improvement of Patients’ Workflow in Heart Clinics during COVID-19 Pandemic Using Timed Coloured Petri Nets. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swan, D.A.; Bracis, C.; Janes, H.; Moore, M.; Matrajt, L.; Reeves, D.B.; Burns, E.; Donnell, D.; Cohen, M.S.; Schiffer, J.T.; et al. COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Officials, H.; Galea, S. Public Health COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs About the NAM series on Emerging Stronger After. 2021. Available online: https://astho.org/Research/Data-and-Analysis/State-and-Local-Governance- (accessed on 8 November 2021).
- Beste, L.A.; Chen, A.; Geyer, J.; Wilson, M.; Schuttner, L.; Wheat, C.; Rojas, J.; Nelson, K.; Reddy, A. Best Practices for an Equitable COVID-19 Vaccination Program. NEJM Catal. Innov. Care Deliv. 2021, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dascalu, S.; Geambasu, O.; Covaciu, O.; Chereches, R.M.; Diaconu, G.; Dumitra, G.G.; Gheorghita, V.; Popovici, E.D. Prospects of COVID-19 Vaccination in Romania: Challenges and Potential Solutions. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 644538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colson, P.; Lagier, J.C.; Baudoin, J.P.; Bou Khalil, J.; La Scola, B.; Raoult, D. Ultrarapid diagnosis, microscope imaging, genome sequencing, and culture isolation of SARS-CoV-2. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 1601–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubina, R.; Dzedzic, A. Molecular and Serological Tests for COVID-19. A Comparative Review of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Laboratory and Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christie, A.; Brooks, J.T.; Hicks, L.A.; Sauber-Schatz, E.K.; Yoder, J.S.; Honein, M.A. Guidance for Implementing COVID-19 Prevention Strategies in the Context of Varying Community Transmission Levels and Vaccination Coverage. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1044–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network Best Practices for COVID-19. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 2020, 46, 113–118. [CrossRef]
- Shokoohi, M.; Osooli, M.; Stranges, S. COVID-19 Pandemic: What Can the West Learn from the East? Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2020, 9, 436–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandhi, M.; Yokoe, D.S.; Havlir, D.V. Asymptomatic Transmission, the Achilles’ Heel of Current Strategies to Control COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2158–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, L.E.; Heaton, H.A.; Monroe, R.J.; Reichard, R.R.; Kendall, M.; Mullan, A.F.; Goyal, D.G. Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Emergency Department Presentations in an Integrated Health System. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 2395–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baugh, J.J.; White, B.A.; McEvoy, D.; Yun, B.J.; Brown, D.F.; Raja, A.S.; Dutta, S. The cases not seen: Patterns of emergency department visits and procedures in the era of COVID-19. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 46, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matera, L.; Nenna, R.; Rizzo, V.; Ardenti Morini, F.; Banderali, G.; Calvani, M.; Calvi, M.; Cozzi, G.; Fabiani, E.; Falsaperla, R.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Impact on Pediatric Emergency Rooms: A Multicenter Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ministero della Salute. Linee di indirizzo nazionali sul triage intraospedaliero. Direzione generale della programmazione sanitaria. Available online: http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_notizie_3849_listaFile_itemName_1_file.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2022).
- Schmid, B.; Feuerstein, D.; Lang, C.N.; Fink, K.; Steger, R.; Rieder, M.; Duerschmied, D.; Busch, H.-J.; Damjanovic, D. Lung ultrasound in the emergency department—A valuable tool in the management of patients presenting with respiratory symptoms during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. BMC Emerg. Med. 2020, 20, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, A.M.; Baric, R.S.; Saphire, E.O.; Ulmer, J.B. Stopping pandemics before they start: Lessons learned from SARS-CoV-2. Science 2022, 375, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wax, R.S.; Christian, M.D. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Can. J. Anaesth. 2020, 67, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chavez, S.; Long, B.; Koyfman, A.; Liang, S.Y. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A primer for emergency physicians. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 44, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, C.R.; Mudd, P.A.; West, C.P.; Wilber, E.; Wilber, S.T. Diagnosing COVID-19 in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review of Clinical Examinations, Laboratory Tests, Imaging Accuracy, and Biases. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020, 27, 653–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.-W.; Procop, G.W.; Persing, D.H. Molecular diagnostics of infectious diseases. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 2021–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wollina, U. Challenges of COVID-19 pandemic for dermatology. Dermatol. Ther. 2020, 33, e13430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kenanidis, E.; Anagnostis, P.; Arvaniti, K.; Potoupnis, M.E.; Tsiridis, E. Organizing an Orthopaedic Department During COVID-19 Pandemic to Mitigate In-Hospital Transmission: Experience from Greece. Cureus 2020, 12, e8676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Q.; Guan, X.; Wu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Tong, Y.; Ren, R.; Leung, K.S.M.; Lau, E.H.Y.; Wong, J.Y.; et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osanan, G.C.; Vidarte, M.F.E.; Ludmir, J. Do not forget our pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women Health 2020, 60, 959–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Yang, W.; Wu, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Ren, W.; Xia, J. Clinical Manifestation and Laboratory Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pregnant Women. Virol. Sin. 2020, 35, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wong, J.; Goh, Q.Y.; Tan, Z.; Lie, S.A.; Tay, Y.C.; Ng, S.Y.; Soh, C.R. Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: A review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore. Can. J. Anaesth. 2020, 67, 732–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cao, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; Miao, C.; Yang, H.; Chen, Z.; Li, C.; Li, L. Hospital Emergency Management Plan During the COVID-19 Epidemic. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020, 27, 309–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boelig, R.C.; Manuck, T.; Oliver, E.A.; Di Mascio, D.; Saccone, G.; Bellussi, F.; Berghella, V. Labor and delivery guidance for COVID-19. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perl, S.H.; Uzan-Yulzari, A.; Klainer, H.; Asiskovich, L.; Youngster, M.; Rinott, E.; Youngster, I. SARS-CoV-2–Specific Antibodies in Breast Milk After COVID-19 Vaccination of Breastfeeding Women. JAMA 2021, 325, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y.; Chi, X.; Hai, H.; Sun, L.; Zhang, M.; Xie, W.-F.; Chen, W. Antibodies in the breast milk of a maternal woman with COVID-19. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 1467–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vassilopoulou, E.; Feketea, G.; Koumbi, L.; Mesiari, C.; Berghea, E.C.; Konstantinou, G.N. Breastfeeding and COVID-19: From Nutrition to Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 661806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golan, Y.; Prahl, M.; Cassidy, A.G.; Gay, C.; Wu, A.H.B.; Jigmeddagva, U.; Lin, C.Y.; Gonzalez, V.J.; Basilio, E.; Chidboy, M.A.; et al. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Lactation: Assessment of Adverse Events and Vaccine Related Antibodies in Mother-Infant Dyads. medRxiv 2021, 12, 777103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebretsadik, D.; Ahmed, N.; Kebede, E.; Gebremicheal, S.; Belete, M.A.; Adane, M. Knowledge, attitude, practice towards COVID-19 pandemic and its prevalence among hospital visitors at Ataye district hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro-Rodriguez, J.A.; Forno, E. Asthma and COVID-19 in children: A systematic review and call for data. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2020, 55, 2412–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agostoni, C.; Bertolozzi, G.; Cantoni, B.; Colombo, C.; Montini, G.; Marchisio, P. Three months of COVID-19 in a pediatric setting in the center of Milan. Pediatr. Res. 2020, 89, 1572–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulos, N.G.; Custovic, A.; Deschildre, A.; Mathioudakis, A.G.; Phipatanakul, W.; Wong, G.; Xepapadaki, P.; Agache, I.; Bacharier, L.; Bonini, M.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Asthma: Practice Adjustments and Disease Burden. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2020, 8, 2592–2599.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Berger, N.A.; Kaelber, D.C.; Davis, P.B.; Volkow, N.D.; Xu, R. COVID infection severity in children under 5 years old before and after Omicron emergence in the US. medRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leitmeyer, K.; Felton, M.; Chadha, N.K. Strategies for restarting Pediatric Otolaryngology outpatient clinics after a pandemic-related shutdown such as from COVID-19. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 139, 110414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maurrasse, S.; Rastatter, J.C.; Hoff, S.R.; Billings, K.R.; Valika, T.S. Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pediatric Otolaryngology Perspective. Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 2020, 163, 480–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossman, Z.; Chodick, G.; Reingold, S.M.; Chapnick, G.; Ashkenazi, S. The future of telemedicine visits after COVID-19: Perceptions of primary care pediatricians. Isr. J. Health Policy Res. 2020, 9, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakshin, G.; Banek, S.; Keese, D.; Rolle, U.; Schmedding, A. Telemedicine in the pediatric surgery in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2021, 37, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mukerji, S.S.; Liu, Y.-C.; Musso, M.F. Pediatric otolaryngology workflow changes in a community hospital setting to decrease exposure to novel coronavirus. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 136, 110169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Talarico, V.; Pinto, L.; Marseglia, G.L.; Centonze, A.; Cristofaro, C.; Reina, R.; Nocerino, A.; Lubrano, R.; Zampogna, S.; SIMEUP Research Group. Impact of novel coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in Italian pediatric emergency departments: A national survey. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2021, 47, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donà, D.; Masiero, S.; Costenaro, P.; Premuda, M.T.; Rossin, S.; Perilongo, G.; Saieva, A.M.; Giaquinto, C.; Da Dalt, L. Children’s Hospital Management in the COVID-19 Era: The Reorganization of a Tertiary Care Pediatric Emergency Department in Northern Italy. Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 594831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, K.; Yang, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhao, D.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, R.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, B.; Xie, Z.; China National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases; et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children: Experts’ consensus statement. World J. Pediatr. 2020, 16, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dedeilia, A.; Esagian, S.M.; Ziogas, I.A.; Giannis, D.; Katsaros, I.; Tsoulfas, G. Pediatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. World J. Clin. Pediatr. 2020, 9, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogundele, I.O.; Alakaloko, F.M.; Nwokoro, C.C.; Ameh, E.A. Early impact of COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric surgical practice in Nigeria: A national survey of paediatric surgeons. BMJ Paediatr. Open 2020, 4, e000732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buonsenso, D.; Valentini, P.; Moscato, U.; Ricciardi, W.; Roland, D. A Pediatric Strategy for the Next Phase of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 582798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, P.; Nie, H. Challenges and Responses: A Tertiary Hospital in 2019-nCoV Epidemic. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2020, 14, 808–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Walker, P.; Whittaker, C.; Watson, O.; Baguelin, M.; Ainslie, K.; Bhatia, S.; Bhatt, S.; Boonyasiri, A.; Boyd, O.; Cattarino, L.; et al. The Impact of COVID-19 and Strategies for Mitigation and Suppression in Low and Middle -Income Countries. Science 2020, 369, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chew, M.H.; Chau, K.C.; Koh, F.H.; Ng, A.; Ng, S.P.; Tan, M.G.; Ong, S.G.K.; Teo, L.M.; Ong, B.C. Safe operating room protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br. J. Surg. 2020, 107, e292–e293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peros, G.; Gronki, F.; Molitor, N.; Streit, M.; Sugimoto, K.; Karrer, U.; Lunger, F.; Adamina, M.; Breitenstein, S.; Lamdark, T. Organizing a COVID-19 triage unit: A Swiss perspective. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 1506–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pană, B.C.; Lopes, H.; Furtunescu, F.; Franco, D.; Rapcea, A.; Stanca, M.; Tănase, A.; Coliţă, A. Real-World Evidence: The Low Validity of Temperature Screening for COVID-19 Triage. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 672698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Pan, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S. Surgeons’ response to COVID-19: Modified workflow to adapt to the new normal. Br. J. Surg. 2020, 107, e318–e319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skali, H.; Murthy, V.L.; Al-Mallah, M.H.; Bateman, T.M.; Beanlands, R.; Better, N.; Calnon, D.A.; Dilsizian, V.; Gimelli, A.; Pagnanelli, R.; et al. Guidance and best practices for nuclear cardiology laboratories during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: An Information Statement from ASNC and SNMMI. J. Nucl. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phua, J.; Weng, L.; Ling, L.; Egi, M.; Lim, C.-M.; Divatia, J.V.; Shrestha, B.R.; Arabi, Y.M.; Ng, J.; Gomersall, C.D.; et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, S. COVID-19 health facility preparedness for protecting healthcare workers: Designing a tool for rapid self- assessment. Indian J. Med. Sci. 2020, 72, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iyer, S.; Subramaniam, S.; Ravikumar, B.; Pai, R.; Satyapalan, D.; Moni, M.; Thankappan, K.; Subash, P. Recommendations for Safely Performing Major Head and Neck Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience with Implementation of a Workflow. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2020, 19, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roshan, R.; Feroz, A.S.; Rafique, Z.; Virani, N. Rigorous Hand Hygiene Practices Among Health Care Workers Reduce Hospital-Associated Infections During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Prim. Care Community Health 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Israel, S.; Harpaz, K.; Radvogin, E.; Schwartz, C.; Gross, I.; Mazeh, H.; Cohen, M.; Benenson, S. Dramatically improved hand hygiene performance rates at time of coronavirus pandemic. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1566–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, H.; Huang, S.; Xiao, W.; Lin, Y.; Hu, X.; Nie, B.; Lin, K.; Lu, D.; Chen, X.; Song, L.; et al. Practical workflow recommendations for emergency endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients with COVID-19 based on the experience of Wuhan Union Hospital. J. Clin. Anesth. 2020, 66, 109940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Pan, J. Study on Integrated Workflow Development and Presentation of Fangcang Shelter Hospitals in COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Emerg. Manag. Disaster Commun. 2020, 1, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panigrahi, S.K.; Pathak, V.K.; Kumar, M.M.; Raj, U.; Karpaga Prya, P. COVID-19 and mobile phone hygiene in healthcare settings. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, e002505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Brooks, S.K.; Webster, R.K.; Smith, L.E.; Woodland, L.; Wessely, S.; Greenberg, N.; Rubin, G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020, 395, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koontalay, A.; Suksatan, W.; Prabsangob, K.; Sadang, J.M. Healthcare Workers’ Burdens During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Systematic Review. J. Multidiscip. Health 2021, 14, 3015–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandratre, S. Medical Students and COVID-19: Challenges and Supportive Strategies. J. Med. Educ. Curric. Dev. 2020, 7, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baughman, A.W.; Hirschberg, R.E.; Lucas, L.J.; Suarez, E.D.; Stockmann, D.; Johnson, S.H.; Hutter, M.M.; Murphy, D.J.; Marsh, R.H.; Thompson, R.W.; et al. Pandemic Care Through Collaboration: Lessons From a COVID-19 Field Hospital. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 1563–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roy, A.; Singh, A.K.; Mishra, S.; Chinnadurai, A.; Mitra, A.; Bakshi, O. Mental health implications of COVID-19 pandemic and its response in India. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2020, 67, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Chen, J.; Lam, R.W.; Fang, Y.; Xu, Y. Mental Health Service Challenges during the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience and Best Practices from China. Can. J. Psychiatry 2020, 66, 621–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenberg, N.; Docherty, M.; Gnanapragasam, S.; Wessely, S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ 2020, 368, m1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ornell, F.; Schuch, J.B.; Sordi, A.O.; Kessler, F.H.P. “Pandemic fear” and COVID-19: Mental health burden and strategies. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2020, 42, 232–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Walton, M.; Murray, E.; Christian, M.D. Mental health care for medical staff and affiliated healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2020, 9, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega-Galán, Á.M.; Ruiz-Fernández, M.; Lirola, M.-J.; Ramos-Pichardo, J.; Ibáñez-Masero, O.; Cabrera-Troya, J.; Salinas-Pérez, V.; Gómez-Beltrán, P.; Fernández-Martínez, E. Professional Quality of Life and Perceived Stress in Health Professionals before COVID-19 in Spain: Primary and Hospital Care. Healthcare 2020, 8, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spoorthy, M.S.; Pratapa, S.K.; Mahant, S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic–A review. Asian J. Psychiatry 2020, 51, 102119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giusti, E.M.; Pedroli, E.; D’Aniello, G.E.; Badiale, C.S.; Pietrabissa, G.; Manna, C.; Badiale, M.S.; Riva, G.; Castelnuovo, G.; Molinari, E. The Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Health Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giménez-Espert, M.D.C.; Prado-Gascó, V.; Soto-Rubio, A. Psychosocial Risks, Work Engagement, and Job Satisfaction of Nurses During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 566896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mheidly, N.; Fares, J. Leveraging media and health communication strategies to overcome the COVID-19 infodemic. J. Public Health Policy 2020, 41, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asmundson, G.J.G.; Taylor, S. How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know. J. Anxiety Disord. 2020, 71, 102211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Secosan, I.; Virga, D.; Crainiceanu, Z.; Bratu, L.; Bratu, T. Infodemia: Another Enemy for Romanian Frontline Healthcare Workers to Fight during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Medicina 2020, 56, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 2010 Opportunities and Developments Report on the Second Global Survey on eHealth Global Observatory for eHealth Series-Volume 2 TELEMEDICINE in Member States. 2010. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44497 (accessed on 5 March 2022).
- Mahoney, M.F. Telehealth, Telemedicine, and Related Technologic Platforms: Current Practice and Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2020, 47, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratliff, C.R.; Shifflett, R.; Howell, A.; Kennedy, C. Telehealth for Wound Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Studies. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2020, 47, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Malwade, S.; Mallikarjun, M.; Rajendranath, G.; Venkat Santosh Ramana, Y.; Bellamkonda, R.J.; Acharyulu, G.V.R.K.; Itumalla, R.; Syed-Abdul, S. Telemedicine in your pocket: An alternative teleconsultation tool in a pandemic and in resource-poor settings. Telemed. e-Health 2022, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, K. Using social media for telemedicine during the COVID-19 epidemic. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 46, 667–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garattini, L.; Martini, M.B.; Zanetti, M. More room for telemedicine after COVID-19: Lessons for primary care? Eur. J. Health Econ. 2020, 22, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijesooriya, N.R.; Mishra, V.; Brand, P.L.; Rubin, B.K. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2020, 35, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loeb, A.E.; Rao, S.S.; Ficke, J.R.; Morris, C.D.; Riley, L.H.; Levin, A.S. Departmental Experience and Lessons Learned with Accelerated Introduction of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Crisis. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2020, 28, e469–e476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anthony, B., Jr. Use of Telemedicine and Virtual Care for Remote Treatment in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Med. Syst. 2020, 44, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contreras, C.M.; Metzger, G.A.; Beane, J.D.; Dedhia, P.H.; Ejaz, A.; Pawlik, T.M. Telemedicine: Patient-Provider Clinical Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2020, 24, 1692–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, G.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Maurer, L.R.; Witt, E.E.; Perez, N.; Reich, A.; Bates, D.W. Telemedicine, COVID-19, and disparities: Policy implications. Health Policy Technol. 2020, 9, 368–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillman-Wells, C.C.; Sankar, T.K.; Vadodaria, S. COVID-19 Reducing the Risks: Telemedicine is the New Norm for Surgical Consultations and Communications. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2020, 45, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choukou, M.A.; Sanchez-Ramirez, D.C.; Pol, M.; Uddin, M.; Monnin, C.; Syed-Abdul, S. COVID-19 infodemic and digital health literacy in vulnerable populations: A scoping review. Digit. Health 2022, 8, 20552076221076927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pabinger, C.; Lothaller, H.; Lorenz, A.; Dammerer, D. Telemedicine versus on-site treatment at a surgical university clinic: Study of 225 consecutive patients. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2021, 151, 104460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nuttall, C.; Teng, C.-C. Design and Implementation of a Low Cost, Open Access Digital Stethoscope for Social Distanced Medical Care and Tele Auscultation: Stethogram. In Proceedings of the ICMHI 2021: 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics, Kyoto, Japan, 14–16 May 2021; pp. 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamaladin, H.; Van De Belt, T.H.; Luijpers, L.C.; De Graaff, F.R.; Bredie, S.J.; Roeleveld, N.; Van Gelder, M.M. Mobile Apps for Blood Pressure Monitoring: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2018, 6, e187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- The Growing Value of Digital Health. Evidence and Impact on Human Health and the Healthcare System Institute Report. Available online: https://www.iqvia.com/institute/reports/the-growing-value-of-digital-health (accessed on 19 July 2022).
- Rowland, S.P.; Fitzgerald, J.E.; Holme, T.; Powell, J.; McGregor, A. What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients? npj Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, M.; Filieri, R.; Raguseo, E.; Gorton, M. Mobile apps for healthy living: Factors influencing continuance intention for health apps. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 166, 120644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Digital Health Innovation Action Plan. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/106331/download (accessed on 18 July 2022).
- Almaki, M.; Giannicchi, A. Health Apps for Combating COVID-19: Descriptive Review and Taxonomy. JMIR mHealth u-Health 2021, 9, e24322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinbi, A.; Forshaw, M.; Blinkhorn, V. Contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies. Health Inf. Sci. Syst. 2021, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, H.J.L.; Couch, D.; Yap, K. Mobile Health Apps That Help with COVID-19 Management: Scoping Review. JMIR Nurs. 2020, 3, e20596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idrees, S.M.; Nowostawski, M.; Jameel, R. Blockchain-Based Digital Contact Tracing Apps for COVID-19 Pandemic Management: Issues, Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions. JMIR Med. Inform. 2021, 9, e25245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgenstern-Kaplan, D.; Rocha-Haro, A.; Canales-Albarrán, S.J.; Núñez-García, E.; León-Mayorga, Y. An App-Based Telemedicine Program for Primary Care and Specialist Video Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico. Telemed. e-Health 2022, 28, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teladoc. How It Works. Available online: https://www.teladoc.com/how-it-works/ (accessed on 18 July 2022).
- Gordon, W.J.; Landman, A.; Zhang, H.; Bates, D.W. Beyond validation: Getting health apps into clinical practice. NPJ Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Country | Measures | References |
---|---|---|
Australia | Australia’s early physical distancing measures, stable political system, stable wealth, and geographic isolation may have contributed to its relative success in managing the C19 pandemic. Widespread public support for physical distancing measures and the government’s financial support for individuals and businesses afflicted by the pandemic meant that these measures could be quickly put in place. On the other hand, confused and inconsistent communication, especially in the early stages of the pandemic, detracted from government efforts to manage its response. The pandemic exacerbated existing social inequalities, highlighted by racism and dependence on import industries. Measures to reduce social inequality through secure employment are likely to be juxtaposed against measures to contain the costs of employment in forthcoming policy debates. The impact of the withdrawal of job placement schemes while unemployment remains high will likely exacerbate social inequality. The Australian health system’s response to C19 attempted to manage the spread and increase due to its limited number of intensive care unit beds across the continent nation, and the limited supply of ventilators, masks, and personal protective equipment (PPE). New skills and ways of working were required within the health system: these included contact tracing, telehealth, and leveraging resources from the private hospital and health sector. The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration instituted procedures for rapid deployment of a range of medical devices used in the treatment of the disease, including ventilators and point-of-care testing kits, and increasing the availability of PPE. | [9,10,11] |
Belarus | Government authorities initially denied the virus was a public health hazard. Later, they announced that drinking vodka and working in the fields offered protection from C19. Due to its official rejection of the pandemic, Belarus did not impose any quarantine measures, did not restrict cultural activities, events, or the retail industry, and instead operated on a campaign to ignore the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Although geographically isolated and distant from pandemic epicenters in western Europe, C19 finally reached Belarus, forcing measures for self-quarantine, social distancing, mask-wearing, and avoiding shops and public gatherings. | [10] |
Brazil | The C19 pandemic created hardships for developing countries such as Brazil. From January to March 2020, the pandemic reached crisis proportions that exacerbated political, social, and economic problems. However, Brazil also reaffirmed its leadership and coordination capacity, especially in fiscal and economic measures, while the number of healthcare jobs decreased. In large part, healthcare workers were supplied with the necessary PPE following WHO recommendations. However, most healthcare workers did not receive proper training for treating patients suspected of coronavirus infection. Physicians and nurses were overworked and suffered fatigue. Many healthcare workers reported difficulty sleeping as a result of pandemic stress and workplace fatigue. | [12,13] |
California | As a case example of a state in the U.S. where it is difficult to oversee a federal role, following the establishment of Critical Care Services and public health guidelines, C19 patients received better care, and mortality dropped to 0.008%. The public health guidelines involved social distancing, hygiene education, widespread C19 testing, acquiring a substantial inventory of ventilators, PPE for healthcare workers, and ample therapeutic drugs and pharmaceutical supplies. The expansion of resources, including ICU capacity, trained staff (mainly physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and respiratory therapists), and supplies expanded from 20% to 100% in the contingency and upwards of 200% during the peaks of the C19 crisis. | [3] |
China | China responded rapidly and effectively to contain the virus within the Wuhan province where the outbreak began and quickly recovered due to social contact restrictions that were strictly observed. The success was achieved by rapid establishment of lockdowns and construction of modular hospitals, use of state-of-the-art equipment for population-level diagnostics, recruitment of the best health workers, systematic population screening with testing and isolation, prevention of nosocomial transmission, the development of two vaccines, and subsequent administration of an unparalleled vaccine campaign. | [14,15] |
Finland | Finland was the only country to initiate a hybrid strategy to control the C19 spread by shifting from large-scale restrictive measures to more targeted pandemic management measures. Border entry restrictions excluded outside visitors, while Finnish citizens were required to remain in a 2-week quarantine upon re-entry. Non-essential retail operations were closed, while essential retail was allowed (e.g., grocers and pharmacies). Educational institutions suspended on-site activities. The public health institutions and small businesses were financially supported to relieve economic consequences; consulting services that support health care and business were developed. | [10] |
France | Following the well-publicized case explosions in Italy and Spain, and despite it being a foreseeable event, France failed to advance stocks of medical supplies, PPE, and tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection. As cases mounted, the government enacted measures to restrict public gatherings, and the operations of restaurants, shops, schools, and non-essential activities; however, the government funded essential activities, focusing on supporting the healthcare system. | [10] |
Hungary | In March 2020, authorities declared a state of emergency and adopted a law to enact restrictions without the oversight of the parliament. Government communication with citizens was inadequate, and therefore heavily criticized by the population, leading to non-compliance by the citizenry. Financial measures were created to support businesses and entrepreneurships by tax abatements and accelerated VAT refunds as a means to ameliorate the economic impact of restrictions. | [10,16,17] |
Iceland | The primary healthcare in Iceland managed to accomplish its role as a first-line gatekeeper and was able to change its strategy swiftly in an effort to deal with C19. At the same time, traditional maternity and well-child care was preserved. The use of primary healthcare for non-C19-related issues decreased, indicating substantial flexibility in the organization. Iceland has been lauded for its approach to handling the virus, which has led the way in terms of the gathering of scientific evidence and its implementation in policies. Iceland has used the resources of deCODE, a private sector genetics firm located in Reykjavík, in tandem with the public health services to track the health of every individual in Iceland who has tested positive for the virus and, uniquely to this nation, sequenced the genetic material of each viral isolate and screened more than half of the nation’s population for infection. This information has informed the recommendations of the chief epidemiologist in Iceland concerning border controls and domestic restrictions. | [18,19] |
India | An ill-equipped infrastructure and anemic pool of public healthcare professionals led to major failures to slow the C19 spread. Lockdown periods were extended, and measures were taken to equip care centers with C19 facilities, increase the ranks of trained healthcare professionals, and provide the population with PPE. | [20,21] |
Italy | Initially one of the most affected countries in the world in early 2020, Italy altered strategies to focus on reorganizing medical departments and supplementing intensive care beds, closing/blocking activities considered non-essential, financially supporting businesses, and creating isolation areas that reduced risks to healthcare staff. | [22] |
Japan | The Japanese understood the importance of self-quarantine, the telemedicine services worked intensely, being useful to people who could be treated at home, the medical staff understood and respected the rules of protection. | [23] |
New Zealand | New Zealand adopted a set of non-pharmaceutical interventions aiming to bring C19 incidence to zero. The transmission chains were spread out across the country, with the highest incidence in popular tourist areas, and large transmission events such as weddings led to transmission chains containing multiple age groups. The reconstruction of detailed epidemiological links is paramount to improving understanding of the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and keeping close surveillance on settings with a high risk of transmission. | [24] |
Pakistan | The containment measures included self-isolation, social distancing, restricting public gatherings, supplementing public health facilities and staff, concentrating human resources on areas treating patients with C19, providing necessary resources and equipment, and mental and economic support for the population. | [25] |
Romania | A disorganized and under-funded healthcare infrastructure coupled with poor organization by government authorities caused serious failures to address public health and led to a widespread and rapid outbreak. A lack of medical professionals trained in infectious diseases created a massive shortfall in C19 patient care. Once a State-of-Emergency was declared, non-specialist physicians and healthcare workers were deployed to staff C19 sectors. As a result, healthcare workers came in regular contact with a large number of C19 patients, which magnified contamination risks and further strained the healthcare infrastructure. Health-care workers were not provided sufficient Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and worked overtime without adequate rest, which led to declines in performance from illness, stress, and fatigue, which essentially broke the healthcare system. As in other nations, non-C19 patient care needs were reclassified and thereby canceled or postponed, further complicating the public health situation. | [26,27,28] |
Russia | Russia initially denied the severity of SARS-CoV-2. The government sent aid to other areas affected earlier in the pandemic (e.g., Italy and Serbia). Subsequently, as Russia faced its own C19 outbreak, they ran out of necessary supplies to combat contagion spread. Soon thereafter, Russia closed its borders, first to China, and then to all foreigners, but throughout it appeared more concerned with financial stability than the public health crisis. | [29] |
Spain | In the beginning, testing was not provided to health workers that had been exposed to patients with C19, resulting not only in dangerous conditions for workers themselves and the people in close contact with them but also for other patients hospitalized for conditions not related to the C19. Another consequence of the lack of testing was the possible underreporting of cases, resulting in overestimated mortality rates being reported due to the lack of certainty on the real number of positive cases of C19 in Spain. Finally, the lack of surveillance and case detection potentially caused the further spread of the disease, as many of the unidentified cases did not follow recommended isolation measures. Overall, the lack of testing resulted in a symptom-based strategy to control the disease, which was unlikely to succeed at stopping disease transmission due to the characteristics of SARS-CoV2, which had been reported to cause a high proportion of asymptomatic and mild cases. In addition to the consequences seen in the healthcare sector, government interventions also had severe impacts on the public. These impacts included the economic recession generated by confinement measures that caused an unprecedented situation which is predicted to have multiple short and long-term effects on the Spanish economy. Additionally, psychological consequences occurred due to the restricted freedom, decreased social contact, and persistent insecurities caused by the health threat and the control measures; children, adolescents, and young adults are particularly vulnerable to these consequences given the important role of socialization. The outbreak has had a severe social impact; senior citizens, children, and women at risk of violence, families, and individuals at risk of poverty, migrants, socially excluded groups, and people with low-paying or informal jobs are some of the groups that have been severely affected by the psychological, economic, social and health consequences of the pandemic and the measures to control the spread of the outbreak, aggravating the existing inequalities across the population. To be able to meet the needs of the epidemic, health professionals decreased their regular activities at the hospital to focus all their working capacity on tackling the C19 crisis, decreasing the capacity of non-urgent and specialized medical services. | [30] |
Sweden | Based on advice from the national epidemiologist, the government elected few social restrictions except for border controls. Instead, it opted for a herd immunity approach to achieve seroconversion. It is unclear if this approach succeeded, although the mortality rate remains below 1%, while still higher than other Scandinavian nations with Norway the lowest by a factor of 10. | [31] |
Switzerland | Medical resources were strengthened by public-private partnerships that increased isolated treatment areas for C19, separate from other patients; supplementation efforts were extended to aid medical staff and increase availability of medicines that enhanced patient care. | [22] |
Taiwan | The containment of SARS-CoV-2 dissemination was very effective and the population infection rate stopped at the level of hardly more than 0.6 percent. Strict border control and the effectiveness of contamination programs have isolated the pandemic in a few local niduses, mainly in Taipei and Taoyuan. | [21] |
United Kingdom | As the number of cases rose rapidly, government measures focused on patient care and providing medicine, such as PPE, ventilators, and intensive care units. Although a lockdown was enacted in March 2020 and was viewed with some skepticism, the measure came late as cases continued to rise and overwhelm the healthcare system. Researchers and physicians collaborated in drug discovery to develop the Oxford–AstraZeneca C19 vaccine. | [32] |
United States | Although access to information is high, the government lost touch with the population during the pandemic, and disinformation caused mistrust in public health authorities and advocates of protective measures such as vaccination campaigns. Much of the population grew fatigued over mandates and contradictory statements regarding C19, polarizing the people into two fractions, one of which ignored mandates of quarantine or public distancing. The most common systemic problems worsened during the pandemic, as inadequate supplies and an ineffective distribution system led to increased community spread. Perhaps the greatest failure of the U.S. at the onset of the pandemic was the delayed restrictions on international travel, which allowed individuals afflicted with C19 entry into international airports, notably in Seattle and New York. | [33,34] |
Ukraine | The healthcare system was unprepared and therefore overwhelmed. Authorities were forced to adopt a pandemic response and instituted a quarantine on 12 March 2020, eight days after the first case was documented. The government appealed to the private sector entrepreneurs and businesses for monetary assistance in managing the economic and public health crisis. This internal aid provided the necessary equipment and PPE and supported healthcare facilities. After restrictions were lifted, widespread adoption of masks was put in place, public events were restricted, and the over 60 populations were advised to isolate themselves from public exposure. The government facilitated and supported small businesses, cut interest rates, and substantially increased the health sector budget. | [10] |
Vietnam | A number of countries in East and Southeast Asia managed C19 spread quite effectively, notably by promoting hygienic practices to prevent spread, specifically personal hygiene, and food and water hygiene. | [35] |
Country/Region | App | Type of App | Impact | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Australia | COVIDSafe | tracing | epidemiological surveillance, date, time and duration of contact user data privacy concerns, lack of trust, ethical issues, security vulnerabilities, technical constraints | [147,148] |
France | StopCovid | |||
TousAntiCovid | ||||
Germany | Corona-Warn-App | |||
Globally | TraceTogether | |||
COVID Trace | ||||
NOVID Share Trace Safe2 | the user receives a unique ID, and at the time of infection, he is redirected to medical applications | [149] | ||
Italy | Immuni | epidemiological surveillance, date, time, and duration of contact user data privacy concerns, lack of trust, ethical issues, security vulnerabilities, technical constraints | [147,148] | |
Spain | AsistenciaCOVID-19 | |||
Switzerland | SwissCovid | |||
Globally | HowWeFeel | medical | for health care professionals and researchers; a useful tool for patients, quarantine advice, and measures to ensure well-being. The authorized access was ensured by firewalls, antiviruses, and cryptographic algorithms | [149] |
Mexico | Sofia | video consultations: internal medicine and pediatric consultations, prescriptions, follow-up indications; high levels of patient satisfaction, versatile and convenient tool to manage the situation | [150] | |
USA | Teladoc | access to low-cost and high-quality doctors, clinical expertise, virtual care for consumers and clinicians | [151] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Filip, R.; Gheorghita Puscaselu, R.; Anchidin-Norocel, L.; Dimian, M.; Savage, W.K. Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081295
Filip R, Gheorghita Puscaselu R, Anchidin-Norocel L, Dimian M, Savage WK. Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(8):1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081295
Chicago/Turabian StyleFilip, Roxana, Roxana Gheorghita Puscaselu, Liliana Anchidin-Norocel, Mihai Dimian, and Wesley K. Savage. 2022. "Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 8: 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081295