Next Article in Journal
Examining Wear Mechanisms in Railway Wheel Steels: Experimental Insights and Predictive Mapping
Previous Article in Journal
Tribofilm Formation and Friction Reduction Performance on Laser-Textured Surface with Micro-Grooved Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model to Assess Rheological Dynamics of Eco-Friendly Oils as Biolubricants Enriched with SiO2 Nanoparticles

by
Girish Hariharan
1,
Meghana Kundala Navada
2,
Jeevan Brahmavar
1 and
Ganesha Aroor
1,*
1
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India
2
Department of Chemistry, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Lubricants 2024, 12(3), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12030092
Submission received: 7 February 2024 / Revised: 23 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 14 March 2024

Abstract

:
Efficient machinery operation relies on the performance of high-quality lubricants. Currently, mineral oils of different grades are widely employed for lubricating machine components, but their environmental impact is a concern. Biolubricants are potential alternatives to mineral oils due to environmental factors. The present study focuses on assessing the rheological characteristics of SiO2 nanoparticle (NP)-enhanced ecofriendly biolubricants for near zero and high-temperature conditions. Pure neem oil, pure castor oil and a 50:50 blend of both oils were considered as the base oils. Nanobiolubricants with enhanced dispersion stability were prepared for varied concentrations of NPs using an ultrasonification method. Viscosity analysis was conducted using an MCR-92 rheometer, employing the Herschel Bulkley model to precisely characterize the viscosity behavior of bio-oils. Due to the fluid–solid interaction between SiO2 NPs and bio-oils, a crossover trend was observed in the flow curves generated for different base oils enriched with SiO2 NPs. For neem oil, a significant increase in viscosity was noted for 0.2 wt% of NPs. Using the multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithm, an artificial neural network (ANN) model was developed to accurately predict the viscosity variations in nanobiolubricants. The accuracy of the predicted values was affirmed through experimental investigations at the considered nanoSiO2 weight concentrations.

1. Introduction

Currently, there is a growing trend towards the adoption of eco-friendly lubricants designed for total loss applications consisting of biodegradable base oil blended with appropriate additives. A higher fraction of biodegradable components in lubricants makes it more attractive for diverse tribological applications [1,2]. Soybean oil, rapeseed oil, and palm oil are among the bio-oils being investigated for this purpose. Due to their natural biodegradability and lack of toxicity, such bio-oils are particularly enticing for these applications [3,4,5]. Many researchers have used sunflower oil, castor oil, and soybean oil as an alternative fuel for diesel engines; however, these deteriorated engine components [5,6,7]. These studies, still in their early stages, face inherent challenges and limitations that necessitate further research.
The primary performance issues encountered while employing vegetable oils as lubricants stem from their vulnerability to oxidative degradation and limited functionality in low-temperature conditions. The addition of lubricant additives such as organic phosphates, organic sulfides, and organic metallic compounds, exhibits an improvement in the dispersing stability and tribological properties of lubricant. However, certain additives have toxicity and may lead to the release of phosphorus, sulfur, and sulphated ash [8]. The concentration level of nanoparticles (NPs) significantly affects the tribological characteristics of nanolubricants (NL). Incorporating nanoparticles (NPs) into lubricants generally offers benefits by reducing friction and wear. However, identifying the optimal concentration presents significant challenges. Adding NPs below 1 wt% or exceeding 2 wt% does not necessarily result in a proportional reduction in friction and wear. Therefore, an optimal concentration needs to be achieved to attain the maximum reduction in friction and wear [9,10].
Yi and Zhang [11] observed that molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) with a lamellar structure demonstrated notably superior tribological capabilities compared to a petal structure. This highlights the potential for heightened chemical activity and the development of interlayer sliding effects with lamellar MoS2. Hu et al. [12,13] proved that spherical MoS2 nanoparticles exhibited higher antioxidant activity than stacked MoS2 nanoparticles, contributing to increased stability in lubrication. Moreover, Chen et al. [14] found out that ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets exhibited superior performance compared to other metal sulfides, particularly in high-pressure conditions. This superiority was attributed to their enhanced accessibility to friction contact regions. Metal hydroxides, particularly layered double hydroxides (LDHs), have demonstrated remarkable lubricating properties due to their layered structure, small particle size, and robust chemical reactivity. LDH powders have proven to be particularly effective, especially in situations involving boundary lubrication [15,16]. Further, Zhao et al. [17] synthesized La(OH)3 nanoparticles with granular morphologies through the sol-gel process. Multiple base oils blended with La(OH)3 NPs resulted in improved friction reduction and wear resistance qualities.
Over the last few years significant research has been carried out to explore the impact of NP additions on mineral oil-based lubricants and their impact on friction, wear and other tribological parameters. Using a four-ball machine tribometer, Zulkifli et al. [18,19] evaluated the tribological properties of paraffin oil and palm oil biolubricant containing TiO2 NPs as additives. The incorporation of TiO2 NPs into a trimethylolpropane (TMP) ester resulted in a 14% reduction in the friction coefficient and a 10% decrease in the wear scar width compared to the TMP ester without TiO2 NPs. Gulzar et al. [20] examined MoS2 NPs on modified palm oil and found that incorporating a 1 wt% concentration of the NPs enhanced the extreme pressure (EP) properties by 1.5 times. Katpatal et al. [21,22] further investigated the dispersion stability, viscosity, and thermal conductivity variations in a copper oxide (CuO)-blended oil-based nanolubricant. Nanoparticle blended lubricants were prepared by ISO VG46 oil and Jatropha oil in ratios of 90:10 and 80:20. The dispersion process involved introducing surface-modified CuO nanoparticles into the blend in two stages, ranging from concentrations of 0.5–3 wt.%. Notably, the NP blended lubricant at a 90:10 ratio, containing 1.5 wt.% CuO, exhibited increased sensitivity at lower nanoparticle concentrations compared to the NP blended lubricant at a 80:20 ratio. Dispersion of 1 wt% CuO NPs and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in SAE 40 engine oil generated an increase in viscosity of hybrid NLs. Pure oil and hybrid NLs exhibited the Ostwald–de Waele relationship, indicating their non-Newtonian behavior characterized by shear thinning tendencies [23,24].
Dhanola and Garg [25] further analyzed the dispersion stability and behaviour of the size aggregation of TiO2 nanoadditives in canola oil. The dynamic light scattering (DLS) method was utilized to evaluate the impact of different surfactants and various TiO2-to-surfactant mass ratios on dispersion stability. Additionally, rheological assessments were conducted on canola oil with varying quantities of TiO2 nanoadditives at various temperature and shear rate ranges. All nanofluids exhibited Newtonian behavior, indicating an increase in canola oil viscosity with higher concentrations of nanoadditives [26]. Cortes and Ortega [27] investigated the rheological and tribological properties of coconut oil blended with SiO2 and CuO nanoparticles. These nanoparticle additions were found to effectively reduce wear volume loss by 37% and 33% respectively.
Singh et al. [28] investigated the tribological properties of epoxidized Madhuca indica oil with SiO2 nanoparticles as additions. To improve the oil’s acceptability, the unsaturated fatty acid content was chemically enhanced using the epoxidation process. The inclusion of nanoparticles at 100 °C increased the kinematic viscosity of the chemically treated oil by 1.2 wt%. Moreover, the addition of SiO2 nanoparticles led to an elevation in the flash point while causing a reduction in the pour point. Additionally, the incorporation of SiO2 in the epoxidized oil resulted in an increased level of distribution uniformity [29,30]. Further research studies focused on investigating the tribological potential of neem oil and sesame oil as a biolubricant, by integrating hybrid additives such as SiO2 NPs and an imidazolium-based ionic liquid. Improved friction and wear characteristics were noted for an optimal concentration of NP addition [31,32]. Rheological analysis of hazelnut oil blended with 1.5 wt% of zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) NPs and juliflora oil with TiO2 NPs, effectively reduced the COF and pin wear, and improved the flash point and viscosity properties of the base fluid [33,34]. Studies conducted into nanobiolubricants have indicated that the addition of NPs in optimal quantities can enhance the dispersion stability and antiwear characteristics of bio-oils.
In the present study, detailed rheological studies were carried out on a MCR 92 rheometer to evaluate the influence of nanoSiO2 addition on the viscosity of multiple base oils. The rheological properties of biobased nanofluids were studied to further utilize them as an alternate lubricant in journal bearing applications, replacing the conventional mineral oil lubricants. This would help to enhance sustainability due to the eco-friendly nature of biobased oils. The base oils considered for this study included pure neem oil, pure castor oil, and a blend of neem and castor oil in a 50:50 proportion. The volume fractions of nanoSiO2 added in the lubricant mixture varied from 0 wt% to 0.2 wt%. The viscosity variations were experimentally measured for varying operating temperatures from −10 °C to 90 °C. An ANN model was developed to accurately predict the viscosity and shear stress variation for different in input parameter combinations. Use of such predictive models will help to reduce the number of experimental runs to be conducted for generating intermediate data points. By using predictive models, researchers can optimize their experimental design, save time and resources, and still obtain reliable results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. SiO2 Nanoparticles Selection

In this study, SiO2 nanoparticles procured from local vendors in Udupi, Karnataka were utilized to develop multiple nanobiolubricants, effectively enhancing the rheological characteristics of neem and castor oil. SiO2 NPs possess specific physical, chemical, and optical properties, rendering them highly versatile and applicable across various tribological applications [30]. Figure 1a represents the SiO2 NPs utilized at varying concentrations for the rheological experimental studies. Table 1 presents a detailed overview of the physical properties of SiO2 NPs.

2.2. Selection of Biolubricants

Neem oil (NO) and castor oil (CO) were utilized as base oils for developing nano-biolubricants with enhanced properties. The characteristic properties of neem oil and castor oil is detailed in Table 2. Both oils are hydrophobic in nature, having a distinctive odor. Castor oil has high ricinoleic acid content, accounting for approximately 90% of its total fatty acids. Ricinoleic acid contains a hydroxyl group in its structure, imparting exceptional stability to its viscosity at various temperatures, a characteristic not commonly found in other vegetable oils [35].

2.3. Preparation of SiO2-Enriched Nanobiolubricants

Biolubricants blended with nanoSiO2 were prepared using both ultrasonification and magnetic stirring approaches. Ultrasonication employs high-frequency ultrasound waves to disperse and disintegrate nanoparticle agglomerates. The associated shear forces and shock waves play a crucial role in breaking down these agglomerates, facilitating a uniform dispersion of nanoparticles and formulating a stable nanofluid. Further, the nanofluid is subjected to a magnetic stirring technique to attain an enhanced dispersion of nanoparticles in the liquid. The magnetic stirrer bar utilized is coated with a chemically inert material to prevent chemical reactions with the nanofluid. Adjusting the stirring speed allows for control over the level of agitation, with higher speeds potentially aiding in the breakdown of agglomerates and achieving uniform dispersion. As shown in Figure 1c, three distinct base oils were identified: pure neem oil, pure castor oil, and a blend comprising equal proportions of neem and castor oils. For each base oil cases, different weight concentrations of SiO2 NPs were added. The process included dispersing SiO2 NPs in neem and castor oil through an ultrasonication process (Figure 1b). Pure base oil, and base oil blended with 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 wt% of SiO2 NPs were prepared after sonification. The dispersion stability of NPs in the base oil is substantially influenced by the ultrasonication method. Both agglomeration and sedimentation need to be limited as it results in an uneven distribution of NPs in the lubricant, affecting the lubricant performance characteristics.

2.4. Rheological Measurements

The rheological behavior of the nanobiolubricants prepared was assessed using an Anton Par MCR-92 rheometer, as illustrated in Figure 2. Experimental tests were conducted on neem and castor oil blended with different concentrations of nanoSiO2 at various operating temperatures. The temperature range was varied from −10 °C to 90 °C. This study clearly focused on understanding the viscosity-temperature relationship at near-zero and subzero temperatures. This aspect holds substantial importance for potential applications in cold environments, where conventional lubricants may encounter difficulties concerning their flow and effectiveness. The rheological characteristics of nanobiolubricant samples, characterized by their non-Newtonian behavior, were assessed using the Herschel–Bulkley model (Equation (1)) on the MCR-92 rheometer [38,39]. Each test case was performed twice to minimize the errors and generate robust data for analysis and comparison.
τ = τ 0 + k Υ ˙ n

3. ANN Development and Optimization

Prediction Model Using ANN

In the present study, 1575 input data points comprising varying bio-oil types, shear rates, volume fractions and temperatures were considered. Both viscosity and shear stress were defined as the output variables, influencing the rheological behavior of the lubricant. The designed ANN model was developed using a feed-forward multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithm. This algorithm functions by receiving input data, training neurons using a portion of the inputs to determine weights and biases, and subsequently generating outputs through testing and error validation. In case of disparity between the computed error and the user’s predicted error, the weights and biases undergo adjustments, and the training is reiterated until the network achieves the specified error level. Typically, this algorithm comprises three layers: the input layer, a hidden layer, and the output layer. The performance of the neural network is directly impacted by the hidden layer, which is composed of multiple layers, each having varying numbers of neurons. Figure 3 represents the architecture of the ANN model employed in this study. After training, testing and validation, the best ANN model was selected based on the value of R-square and mean square error (MSE). Equations (2) and (3) detail the correlations of these parameters.
M S E = 1 N i = 1 N μ n f e x p t μ n f p r e d 2
R 2 = 1 i = 1 N μ n f e x p t μ n f p r e d i 2 i = 1 N μ n f e x p t i 2
Using the developed ANN model, variation in biolubricant viscosity can be accurately predicted for different operating temperatures and weight concentrations that lie in between the initially considered values. The predicted values can be validated by conducting experimental rheological study on different nanobiolubricants for such in-between weight concentrations. This could help researchers to utilize the developed ANN model to precisely predict the viscosity variations for weight concentrations and temperatures other than those defined in this study. The neural network achieved its optimal and best structure through the method depicted in Figure 4.

4. Results

4.1. Rheological Analysis of Lubricant

The rheological behavior of neem oil (NO) and castor oil (CO) as biolubricants blended with different volume fractions of nano-SiO2 was determined from this study. Three different base oils were considered—pure NO, pure CO, and neem and castor oil blended in a 50:50 ratio (NOCO). The volume fraction of SiO2 NP was varied from 0 wt% to 0.2 wt% with an increment of 0.05 wt%. Figure 5 and Figure 6 represent the flow curves generated by testing the prepared nanobiolubricants in the MCR 92 rheometer for varying temperatures. The operating temperature was varied over a broad range from 90 °C to −10 °C. Rheological behavior of NLs was assessed at higher, near zero, and subzero temperatures in this study.
In Figure 5a–d, the variation in shear stress vs. shear rate for varying operating temperatures and different weight concentration NLs are illustrated in detail. For pure neem oil at a temperature of 10 °C, a reduction in yield stress was observed indicating a fluid -like quality. This trend persisted as the temperature of the neem oil was further raised to 30 °C. With the addition of 0.05 wt% of SiO2 NPs, the nano-neem oil demonstrated non-Newtonian behavior, exhibiting the characteristics of Herschel–Bulkley flow. In this study, the Herschel–Bulkley model was employed to fit the viscosity curve, and the slope of curve generated provides the viscosity value for the lubricant test samples. The model assists in capturing the NP blended bio-oils undergoing shear-thinning or shear-thickening behavior in response to varying conditions. This model was valuable in describing the flow properties of nano-bio fluids that deviate from Newtonian behavior [40]. As the weight concentration of NPs was increased to 0.15 wt% in neem oil, a reduction in viscosity and shear thinning behavior was observed. Nano-neem oil was found to be less resistant to flow under increased shear rate conditions. Such behavior is typical of non-Newtonian fluids, deviating from the linear correlation between shear stress and shear rate that is characteristic of Newtonian fluids [41]. Meanwhile for neem oil infused with 0.2 wt% of SiO2 NPs, a reduction in fluid viscosity was noted at 10 °C, and Newtonian behavior was observed for the 30 °C operating temperature. From the experimental tests, Newtonian flow behavior was observed at the higher temperatures of 70 °C to 90 °C. Elevated temperatures disturb the cohesive forces that bind molecules, facilitating a smoother flow. In non-Newtonian fluids demonstrating shear-thinning behavior, a rise in temperature can result in decreased viscosity due to alterations in the fluid’s internal structure. This phenomenon was especially noteworthy in fluids such as polymer solutions or specific colloidal suspensions [41]. For pure castor oil at 30 °C, the viscosity almost remained constant, with only a negligible variation, reaffirming its Newtonian fluid nature. For 50% blends of base oils, a similar variation in flow curve exhibiting Newtonian behavior was noted for higher temperature conditions. As the temperature was reduced to −10 °C, a significant increase in the yield stress of neem oil and 50% blend oils (NOCO) was observed. By incorporating 0.05 wt% of SiO2 NPs into the neem oil, the yield stress value surpassed that of pure neem oil. An increase in yield stress was noted for the increased weight concentration of NPs in biolubricants. Whereas, for pure castor oil at a volume of 250 mL and temperature of −10 °C, its viscosity remained nearly constant with increasing shear rate, indicating a Newtonian fluid behavior.
By analyzing the viscosity variations recorded in Figure 6, SiO2 NP addition was found to effectively influence the rheological flow behavior of neem oil, castor oil and 50% blend oils. The variations recorded for a temperature of −10 °C was not reported due to the exponential increase in viscosity at subzero temperatures. The variation in viscosity for different nano-biolubricants in the temperature range 10 °C to 90 °C is illustrated in Figure 7 and viscosity variation at −10 °C is represented in detail in Figure 8. For a clear understanding of the flow viscosity, Figure 6a–d represents the flow curves generated from 10 °C to 90 °C. At a near zero temperature of 10 °C, the viscosity of pure neem oil was 171.68 mPa-s, which was 11.45 times and 3.43 times lower than that of base castor oil and the 50% blend mixture. Further at 90 °C, neem oil viscosity was 12.058 mPa-s, which was only 2.47 times lower than pure castor oil. At higher temperatures, the variation in viscosity was found to be minimal for different base oils without NP additives. With the addition of nanoSiO2, an increase in flow viscosity was noted for neem oil. At 0.2 wt% of SiO2 NPs, around 10.37% increase in viscosity was noted in nano-neem oil at 70 °C. A gradual increase in viscosity was observed for different NP concentrations in Neem oil. With the increase in temperature, a reduction in viscosity can be noted for all tested cases of NLs. This phenomenon occurs because, at lower temperatures, the rise in viscosity is primarily attributed to the resistance posed by the nanoparticles against the motion of fluid particles. The lower viscosity is advantageous for reducing friction and decreasing power consumption. This phenomenon primarily occurs because, at higher temperatures, the nanoparticles absorb heat and extend the decay of cohesive forces. Elevated temperatures typically contribute to enhanced fluidity by providing additional energy to the fluid molecules. This increased kinetic energy helps overcome intermolecular forces, resulting in a reduction in viscosity [42].
For castor oil with NP additives, significant variation in viscosity was noted at near zero temperatures. At 10 °C, the viscosity recorded for castor oil with 0.05 wt% nano-SiO2 was 2380.5 mPa-S, which was 21.05% higher than that of pure castor oil. A small variation in the viscosity range was noted for the increased quantity of nano-SiO2 in castor oil lubricant. At 70 °C, a reduction in viscosity was noted with least value (53.31 mPa-S) generated for 0.1 wt% of nano-SiO2. At operating temperature of 10 °C, a maximum viscosity of 636.23 mPa-S was noted for the blend mixture with 0.2 wt% of nano-SiO2. For Neem and castor oil blend, higher viscosities were obtained for increased concentration of nano-SiO2. A crossover trend was noted in the flow curves generated for different base oils with nano-SiO2 additions. With the rise in operating temperature, the crossover point also increases indicating a transition in the rheological behavior of biolubricants. The crossover phenomenon noted was attributed to the interaction between the base oil and the SiO2 nanoparticles, indicating fluid–solid interaction and temperature dependent characteristics. The decrease in adhesive forces between the SiO2 NPs was more significant compared to the reduction in adhesive forces between bio-oils. This has led to the observation of a crossover trend at elevated temperatures. Such crossover variation was mainly influenced by the reduction in adhesive force magnitude observed within SiO2 NPs and base oils. Adhesive forces present between base oil molecules and NPs was proven to affect the rheological behavior of NLs [43].
Figure 7a–c represents the detailed variation in viscosity measured for neem oil, castor oil and blend mixture. Maximum viscosity was found to be generated at near zero temperatures. At lower temperatures, the increase in viscosity was mainly influenced by the resistance offered by the NPs for the fluid motion. Such an increase in viscosity values was further affected by the increase in NP wt%. The highest variation in viscosity was observed at 0.2 wt% of nano-SiO2, showing a significant 260% increase in viscosity. The resistance offered by the addition of NPs was more than the molecular force resistance in the pure Neem oil. However, the addition of SiO2 NPs was found to have minimal impact on viscosity as the temperature increased to room temperature (30 °C) and above (70–90 °C). Such variation at room temperatures indicates that the volume of NPs blended in biolubricant needs to be increased to modify the rheological characteristics. The increase in the NP concentration in biolubricant further increases the contact area thus providing higher resistance. In Figure 7b, a non-uniform variation trend in viscosity was noted for varying concentrations of NPs in castor oil. In comparison with castor oil, around 113.6% increase in viscosity was noted for castor oil mixed with 0.05 wt% SiO2 nanoparticles compared to pure castor oil. The incorporation of 0.05 wt% SiO2 NPs led to an increase in the viscosity of neem oil at 10 °C. However, the effect of NPs on blend mixture of neem and castor oil was minimal.
In this study, the addition of NPs has primarily affected the rheological behavior of lubricant at near zero and even subzero temperatures as indicated in Figure 8. At subzero temperatures (−10 °C), approximately 185% increase in viscosity was noted for Neem oil blended with 0.05 wt% SiO2 NPs than compared with pure Neem oil. With the addition of 0.1 wt% and 0.15 wt% SiO2 NPs, a further increase of 138% and 115% in viscosity was noted at −10 °C. With the addition of 0.1 wt% and 0.2 wt% SiO2 NPs, the viscosity of the castor oil decreases to 74.28% and 94.74% respectively, at −10 °C. At subzero temperatures, higher viscosities were noted for blend mixture of base oils than compared with pure neem oil and castor oil. From Figure 9, for different weight concentrations of NPs, higher viscosity was generated for castor oil. Further studies need to be conducted on castor oil to accurately assess the variation in rheological dynamics of castor oils as compared to neem oil or a 50% blend mixture. Due to the presence of castor oil in equal proportion in the blend mixture, higher viscosities were noted for varying temperatures when compared with neem oil as the base lubricant.
Figure 10 and Figure 11 represent the pair plot and correlation matrix generated for the interaction of multiple input parameters with lubricant viscosity. The effect of varying volume fractions of NPs, temperature, and shear rate during testing on the lubricant viscosity is clearly illustrated for a detailed analysis. Temperature variations were found to exert maximum influence on the fluid viscosity. However, with the addition of nanoSiO2 a nominal improvement in viscosity was noted for different base oils. Higher volume fractions of NPs were found to generate an increase in viscosity when compared with base oil with no additives. At 10 °C, the viscosities of different lubricant compositions reach a point of intersection. This convergence takes place in three different cases of base oils and the blend mixture with 0.05 wt% of nano-SiO2. The viscosity trend exhibits a noticeable change at this specific temperature, suggesting potential interactions or synergistic effects between these parameters. Further study into this viscosity crossover phenomenon could provide valuable insights into the underlying molecular dynamics and formulation behavior of these bio-oil–SiO2 mixtures.

4.2. Performance Prediction Model and Output Analysis

In this study, an objective function considering multiple input parameters influencing the shear stress and viscosity of NLs was built using ANN. Figure 12 represents the neural network training, and performance carried out by defining a set number of neurons to input, output and hidden layers. The training was carried out by allotting major data points to train the ANN model, with the rest utilized for testing and validation purposes. The optimal ANN model with the least MSE and high R-Square value was determined by executing continuous iterations of the ANN model. MSE attained its lower value at 221 epochs. A precise predictive artificial neural network (ANN) model was achieved with a hidden layer comprising 20 neurons. The capacity of the developed ANN model to accurately predict the viscosity variations in nanobiolubricant was assessed by comparing its results with the experimental data as shown in Figure 13.
Using the trained and validated ANN model, viscosity variations obtained for in-between weight concentrations of NPs (0.025 wt%, 0.075 wt%, 0.125 wt% and 0.175 wt%) were predicted and illustrated in Figure 13. The temperatures considered for prediction were 15 °C to 85 °C with an increment of 10 °C. For an increase in operating temperature, a significant variation in lubricant viscosity was noted for a broader range of NP weight concentrations. An optimum nanobiolubricant is such that it experiences minimal variation in viscosity for varied temperature conditions. With the increase in weight concentrations from 0.0125 wt% to 0.0175 wt%, a notable increase in biolubricant viscosity was observed for neem oil, castor oil, and the 50% blend mixture. However, as temperatures increased, the impact of the NP concentration became more pronounced in influencing viscosity variations. The predicted values were further validated through experimental investigations on the NP weight concentrations considered. A near accurate prediction was observed from the results depicted in Figure 13 for different biolubricants enriched with nanoSiO2 of varied concentrations.

5. Conclusions

The current study exploring the rheological characteristics of nanobiolubricants has yielded essential insights into the viscosity patterns observed among different biolubricant formulations across a wide temperature spectrum. The investigation highlights distinctive viscosity trends within neem oil, castor oil, and their combined blend. Notably, the blend exhibited increased viscosity at subzero temperatures (−10 °C to 0 °C), while neem oil showcased reduced viscosity under the same conditions. The minor viscosity fluctuations noticed across all three biolubricant combinations without nanoparticle additives are primarily influenced by the specific molecular structures of each lubricant. At elevated temperatures, there were slight variations in viscosity observed across the three samples owing to their unique molecular compositions. However, as temperatures increased, the impact of nanoparticle concentration became more pronounced in influencing viscosity changes. Particularly striking was the substantial rise in neem oil viscosity—by 185% with the addition of 0.05 wt% SiO2 nanoparticles at subzero temperatures, escalating further to 260% at a 0.2 wt% nanoparticle concentration. Yet, as temperatures approached and exceeded room temperature, the effect of nanoparticles on viscosity diminished due to reduced adhesive and intermolecular forces. Fluid solid interactions significantly affect the viscosity and flow properties of nanobiolubricants, and a cross-over trend influenced by NL volume fractions was notably observed at different operating temperatures. The ANN model developed in this study was able to precisely predict the variation in lubricant viscosities for an intermediate set of NP weight concentrations. Such machine learning models will be effective in predicting the rheological behavior of bio-oils considered for subzero temperatures and for a broader weight concentration spectrum. The nano-biolubricants formulated need to be further tested in a journal bearing with dimpled profiles to further assess the influence of NPs presence in enhancing the pressure distribution and stability of rotor bearing systems. High speed rotors with improved stability and increased load-bearing capacity are primary requirements in various industrial sectors, including power generation and turbomachinery applications. Usage of currently tested NP blended neem oil and castor oil lubricants holds potential to offer advantages over conventional lubricants and even contribute to improved sustainability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.H. and G.A.; Methodology, G.H., G.A. and M.K.N.; Investigation, G.H., J.B. and G.A.; Supervision, G.H., G.A. and M.K.N.; Data curation, G.H. and G.A.; Formal Analysis, G.H. and G.A.; Writing—Original draft, G.H., J.B., G.A. and M.K.N.; and Writing—review and editing, G.H., G.A. and M.K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

No external funding was received to carry out the project work.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Girish Hariharan was employed by the Manipal Institute of Technology, MAHE Manipal. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kreivaitis, R.; Gumbytė, M.; Kazancev, K.; Padgurskas, J.; Makarevičienė, V. A Comparison of Pure and Natural Antioxidant Modified Rapeseed Oil Storage Properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Luo, Y.; Yang, L.; Tian, M. Influence of Bio-Lubricants on the Tribological Properties of Ti6Al4V Alloy. J. Bionic Eng. 2013, 10, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ting, C.-C.; Chen, C.-C. Viscosity and Working Efficiency Analysis of Soybean Oil Based Bio-Lubricants. Measurement 2011, 44, 1337–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Li, Z.; Ren, T.; Zeng, X.; van der Heide, E. Hydrolytic Stability and Tribological Properties of N-Containing Heterocyclic Borate Esters as Lubricant Additives in Rapeseed Oil. Tribol. Int. 2014, 73, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheenkachorn, K.; Fungtammasan, B. Development of Engine Oil Using Palm Oil as a Base Stock for Four-Stroke Engines. Energy 2010, 35, 2552–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dugmore, T.I.J.; Stark, M.S. Effect of Biodiesel on the Autoxidation of Lubricant Base Fluids. Fuel 2014, 124, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Özener, O.; Yüksek, L.; Ergenç, A.T.; Özkan, M. Effects of Soybean Biodiesel on a DI Diesel Engine Performance, Emission and Combustion Characteristics. Fuel 2014, 115, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Quinchia, L.A.; Delgado, M.A.; Franco, J.M.; Spikes, H.A.; Gallegos, C. Low-Temperature Flow Behaviour of Vegetable Oil-Based Lubricants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 37, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Uflyand, I.E.; Zhinzhilo, V.A.; Burlakova, V.E. Metal-Containing Nanomaterials as Lubricant Additives: State-of-the-Art and Future Development. Friction 2019, 7, 93–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Eswaraiah, V.; Sankaranarayanan, V.; Ramaprabhu, S. Graphene-Based Engine Oil Nanofluids for Tribological Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4221–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yi, M.; Zhang, C. The Synthesis of MoS2 Particles with Different Morphologies for Tribological Applications. Tribol. Int. 2017, 116, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hu, K.H.; Hu, X.G.; Xu, Y.F.; Huang, F.; Liu, J.S. The Effect of Morphology on the Tribological Properties of MoS2 in Liquid Paraffin. Tribol. Lett. 2010, 40, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, K.H.; Hu, X.G.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.F.; Han, C.L. Tribological Properties of MoS2 with Different Morphologies in High-Density Polyethylene. Tribol. Lett. 2012, 47, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Z.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Gunsel, S.; Luo, J. Ultrathin MoS2 Nanosheets with Superior Extreme Pressure Property as Boundary Lubricants. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wu, B.; Xu, S.; Luo, J. Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoplatelets with Excellent Tribological Properties under High Contact Pressure as Water-Based Lubricant Additives. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Guo, F.; Sheng, H.; Xia, K.; Liu, W.; Wen, J.; Shi, Y.; Erdemir, A.; Luo, J. Catalytically Active Oil-Based Lubricant Additives Enabled by Calcining Ni–Al Layered Double Hydroxides. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhao, F.; Bai, Z.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, D.; Yan, C. Tribological Properties of Serpentine, La(OH)3 and Their Composite Particles as Lubricant Additives. Wear 2012, 288, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zulkifli, N.W.M.; Kalam, M.A.; Masjuki, H.H.; Shahabuddin, M.; Yunus, R. Wear Prevention Characteristics of a Palm Oil-Based TMP (Trimethylolpropane) Ester as an Engine Lubricant. Energy 2013, 54, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zulkifli, N.W.M.; Kalam, M.A.; Masjuki, H.H.; Yunus, R. Experimental Analysis of Tribological Properties of Biolubricant with Nanoparticle Additive. Procedia Eng. 2013, 68, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gulzar, M.; Masjuki, H.H.; Varman, M.; Kalam, M.A.; Mufti, R.A.; Zulkifli, N.W.M.; Yunus, R.; Zahid, R. Improving the AW/EP Ability of Chemically Modified Palm Oil by Adding CuO and MoS2 Nanoparticles. Tribol. Int. 2015, 88, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Katpatal, D.C.; Andhare, A.B.; Padole, P.M. Viscosity Behaviour and Thermal Conductivity Prediction of CuO-Blend Oil Based Nano-Blended Lubricant. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2018, 233, 1154–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Katpatal, D.C.; Andhare, A.B.; Padole, P.M.; Khedkar, R.S. Study of Dispersion Stability and Thermo-Physical Properties of CuO-Jatropha Oil-Based Nanolubricants. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2017, 39, 3657–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ettefaghi, E.; Ahmadi, H.; Rashidi, A.; Mohtasebi, S.S.; Alaei, M. Experimental Evaluation of Engine Oil Properties Containing Copper Oxide Nanoparticles as a Nanoadditive. Int. J. Ind. Chem. 2013, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moghaddam, M.A.; Motahari, K. Experimental Investigation, Sensitivity Analysis and Modeling of Rheological Behavior of MWCNT-CuO (30–70)/SAE40 Hybrid Nano-Lubricant. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 123, 1419–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dhanola, A.; Garg, H.C. Dispersion Stability and Rheology Study of Canola Oil Containing TiO2 Nanoadditives for Tribological Applications: An Experimental Approach. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2020, 235, 1765–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dhanola, A.; Garg, H.C. Influence of Different Surfactants on the Stability and Varying Concentrations of TiO2 Nanoparticles on the Rheological Properties of Canola Oil-Based Nanolubricants. Appl. Nanosci. 2020, 10, 3617–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cortes, V.; Ortega, J.A. Evaluating the Rheological and Tribological Behaviors of Coconut Oil Modified with Nanoparticles as Lubricant Additives. Lubricants 2019, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singh, Y.; Rahim, E.A.; Singh, N.K.; Sharma, A.; Singla, A.; Palamanit, A. Friction and Wear Characteristics of Chemically Modified Mahua (Madhuca Indica) Oil Based Lubricant with SiO2 Nanoparticles as Additives. Wear 2022, 508–509, 204463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Surana, A.R.; Singh, Y.; Rajubhai, V.H.; Suthar, K.; Sharma, A. Development of Mahua Oil as a Lubricant Additive and Its Tribological Characteristics. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 25, 724–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, D.; Chen, C.; Kang, Y.; Chang, Y.; Chang, S. Size Effects of SiO Nanoparticles as Oil Additives on Tribology of Lubricant. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 2010, 62, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mahara, M.; Singh, Y. Tribological Analysis of the Neem Oil during the Addition of SiO2 Nanoparticles at Different Loads. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 28, 1412–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sabarinath, S.; Rajendrakumar, P.K.; Prabhakaran Nair, K. Evaluation of Tribological Properties of Sesame Oil as Biolubricant with SiO2 Nanoparticles and Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid as Hybrid Additives. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2019, 233, 1306–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shafi, W.K.; Charoo, M.S. Rheological Properties of Hazelnut Oil Mixed with Zirconium-Dioxide Nanoparticles. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 26, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, A.; Chauhan, P.; Mamatha, T.G. A Review on Tribological Performance of Lubricants with Nanoparticles Additives. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 25, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silva, R.V.S.; Casilli, A.; Sampaio, A.L.; Ávila, B.M.F.; Veloso, M.C.C.; Azevedo, D.A.; Romeiro, G.A. The Analytical Characterization of Castor Seed Cake Pyrolysis Bio-Oils by Using Comprehensive GC Coupled to Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 106, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ganesha, A.; Girish, H.; Shilpa, M.P.; Gurumurthy, S.C.; Pai, R.; Kumar, N. Viscosity Analysis of ZnO Enriched Neem Oil Biolubricant at Sub Zero Temperatures. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Maintenance and Intelligent Asset Management (ICMIAM), Ballarat, Australia, 12–15 December 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  37. Patel, V.R.; Dumancas, G.G.; Kasi Viswanath, L.C.; Maples, R.; Subong, B.J.J. Castor Oil: Properties, Uses, and Optimization of Processing Parameters in Commercial Production. Lipid Insights 2016, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sun, X.; Sun, M.; Li, Z. A Novel Prediction Model of the Drag Coefficient of Shale Cuttings in Herschel–Bulkley Fluid. Energies 2022, 15, 4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saasen, A.; Ytrehus, J.D. Viscosity Models for Drilling Fluids—Herschel-Bulkley Parameters and Their Use. Energies 2020, 13, 5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Panaseti, P.; Damianou, Y.; Georgiou, G.C.; Housiadas, K.D. Pressure-Driven Flow of a Herschel-Bulkley Fluid with Pressure-Dependent Rheological Parameters. Phys. Fluids 2018, 30, 030701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bird, R.B. Transport Phenomena. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2002, 55, R1–R4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cengel, Y.A.; Cimbala, J.M. Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: Columbus, OH, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sankarannair, S.; Nair, A.A.; Bijo, B.V.; Das, H.K.; Sureshkumar, H. Biolubricant from Pongamia Oil. In Tribology in Materials and Manufacturing-Wear, Friction and Lubrication; Patnaik, A., Singh, T., Kukshal, V., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2020; Chapter 11; ISBN 978-1-83880-575-3. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Nanoparticle selection and nanobiolubricant preparation: (a) SiO2 nanoparticles, (b) ultrabath sonicator, (c) biolubricants, (d) process flowchart for experimental study.
Figure 1. Nanoparticle selection and nanobiolubricant preparation: (a) SiO2 nanoparticles, (b) ultrabath sonicator, (c) biolubricants, (d) process flowchart for experimental study.
Lubricants 12 00092 g001
Figure 2. MCR 92 rheometer for viscosity measurement.
Figure 2. MCR 92 rheometer for viscosity measurement.
Lubricants 12 00092 g002
Figure 3. Architecture of ANN model.
Figure 3. Architecture of ANN model.
Lubricants 12 00092 g003
Figure 4. Methodology for designing ANN model and optimization.
Figure 4. Methodology for designing ANN model and optimization.
Lubricants 12 00092 g004
Figure 5. Variation in shear stress and shear rate relationship for different operating temperatures: (a) temperature 10 °C, (b) temperature 50 °C, (c) temperature 70 °C, (d) temperature 90 °C.
Figure 5. Variation in shear stress and shear rate relationship for different operating temperatures: (a) temperature 10 °C, (b) temperature 50 °C, (c) temperature 70 °C, (d) temperature 90 °C.
Lubricants 12 00092 g005
Figure 6. Variation in lubricant viscosity and shear rate relationship for different operating temperatures: (a) temperature 10 °C, (b) temperature 50 °C, (c) temperature 70 °C, (d) temperature 90 °C.
Figure 6. Variation in lubricant viscosity and shear rate relationship for different operating temperatures: (a) temperature 10 °C, (b) temperature 50 °C, (c) temperature 70 °C, (d) temperature 90 °C.
Lubricants 12 00092 g006
Figure 7. Variation in viscosity of different nano-biolubricants (a) neem oil (b) castor oil (c) neem and castor Oil blend.
Figure 7. Variation in viscosity of different nano-biolubricants (a) neem oil (b) castor oil (c) neem and castor Oil blend.
Lubricants 12 00092 g007
Figure 8. Variation in viscosity of different nano-biolubricants at −10 °C.
Figure 8. Variation in viscosity of different nano-biolubricants at −10 °C.
Lubricants 12 00092 g008
Figure 9. Variation in viscosity of NLs at different temperatures: (a) temperature 10 °C, (b) Temperature 50 °C, (c) Temperature 70 °C, (d) temperature 90 °C.
Figure 9. Variation in viscosity of NLs at different temperatures: (a) temperature 10 °C, (b) Temperature 50 °C, (c) Temperature 70 °C, (d) temperature 90 °C.
Lubricants 12 00092 g009
Figure 10. Pair plot of various input parameters with lubricant viscosity.
Figure 10. Pair plot of various input parameters with lubricant viscosity.
Lubricants 12 00092 g010
Figure 11. Correlation matrix of various input parameters with lubricant viscosity.
Figure 11. Correlation matrix of various input parameters with lubricant viscosity.
Lubricants 12 00092 g011
Figure 12. Neural network training and validation performance.
Figure 12. Neural network training and validation performance.
Lubricants 12 00092 g012
Figure 13. Comparison of predicted and experimentally measured variation in nanobiolubricant viscosities for varied weight concentrations of SiO2 NPs. (a) Neem Oil (b) Castor Oil (c) Neem and Castor Oil Blend.
Figure 13. Comparison of predicted and experimentally measured variation in nanobiolubricant viscosities for varied weight concentrations of SiO2 NPs. (a) Neem Oil (b) Castor Oil (c) Neem and Castor Oil Blend.
Lubricants 12 00092 g013
Table 1. Properties of SiO2 nanoparticles.
Table 1. Properties of SiO2 nanoparticles.
NanoparticleSiO2
Purity99.5%
Average particle size15 nm
Specific surface area650 m2/g
Molecular weight60.08 g/mol
Shelf life60 months
Table 2. Characteristics of Neem and Castor Oil [35,36,37].
Table 2. Characteristics of Neem and Castor Oil [35,36,37].
CharacteristicsNeem OilCastor Oil
Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C (Cst)51.93292
Viscosity Index (VI)134321
Flash point (°C)284145
Pour point (°C)−92.7
Density (kg/m3)860959
Refractive Index1.4771.480
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hariharan, G.; Navada, M.K.; Brahmavar, J.; Aroor, G. Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model to Assess Rheological Dynamics of Eco-Friendly Oils as Biolubricants Enriched with SiO2 Nanoparticles. Lubricants 2024, 12, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12030092

AMA Style

Hariharan G, Navada MK, Brahmavar J, Aroor G. Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model to Assess Rheological Dynamics of Eco-Friendly Oils as Biolubricants Enriched with SiO2 Nanoparticles. Lubricants. 2024; 12(3):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12030092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hariharan, Girish, Meghana Kundala Navada, Jeevan Brahmavar, and Ganesha Aroor. 2024. "Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model to Assess Rheological Dynamics of Eco-Friendly Oils as Biolubricants Enriched with SiO2 Nanoparticles" Lubricants 12, no. 3: 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12030092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop