Next Article in Journal
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Abdominal-A and Ultrabithorax in the Asian Corn Borer, Ostrinia furnacalis
Next Article in Special Issue
Two New Fossil Sawflies of Pamphiliidae (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) from the Mesozoic of Northeastern China
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Variability of Polypedilum (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Southwest Ecuador
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Diversity of Aphidlion-like Larvae over the Last 130 Million Years
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/insects13040383
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Fossil Xyelidae (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) from the Mesozoic of Northeastern China †

by
Liyang Dai
1,2,
Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn
3,4,
Chungkun Shih
1,5,
Mei Wang
2,* and
Dong Ren
1,*
1
College of Life Sciences and Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies, Capital Normal University, 105 Xisanhuanbeilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100048, China
2
Key Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Nature Conservation, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
3
Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 123 Profsoyuznaya ul., 117647 Moscow, Russia
4
Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
5
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature). The LSID (Life Science Identifier) for this publication are: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EB337A73-7193-4F06-BEE1-5C763455AD8C; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BA52B5AB-2CEE-49FB-801F-FD10FBBCBB93; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:210F14DD-AFBB-4DD5-9E1C-61237067649E; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7AF6A939-7C5C-44A7-86D5-E3B30AAA9C41.
Insects 2022, 13(4), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040383
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 7 April 2022 / Accepted: 8 April 2022 / Published: 13 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fossil Insects: From Carboniferous to Quaternary)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

One new genus and two new species, described from new fossil specimens of northeastern China, enhance our knowledge of the Xyelidae in the mid-Mesozoic. A key to the genera of Angaridyelini and a table of known fossil species of Macroxyelinae are provided. After investigating various angles between Rs+M and 1-Rs for known fossil species of Macroxyelinae, we report that the angle and the length of 1-Rs are correlated. In addition, we believe that the tribe Ceroxyelini may have only one genus of Ceroxyela, and suggest that Isoxyela and Sinoxyela should be transferred to Gigantoxyelini.

Abstract

One new genus and species, Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov., and one new species, Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov., are described and illustrated based on two well-preserved compression fossils from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation and the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation of China, respectively. Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov. is placed in the tribe Angaridyelini, 1966 and Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov. in the tribe Xyeleciini Benson, 1945; while both tribes are in the subfamily Macroxyelinae Ashmead, 1898 of Xyelidae. A key to the genera of Angaridyelini is provided. In addition, we investigated various angles between Rs+M and 1-Rs for known fossil species of Macroxyelinae, and we found the angle and the length of 1-Rs are correlated; however, we could not see any correlation between the angles and the fossil ages even within a tribe. Furthermore, based on Sc2 connected to R before Rs, the angle between Rs+M and 1-Rs, and the length of the first flagellomere, we believe that the tribe Ceroxyelini may have only one genus of Ceroxyela, and suggest that Isoxyela and Sinoxyela should be transferred to Gigantoxyelini.

1. Introduction

Hymenoptera, one of four mega-diverse insect orders, comprises more than 155,000 described species [1,2] and plays a fundamental role in almost all terrestrial ecosystems [3,4]. Hymenoptera consists of the suborders of Apocrita and Symphyta [5]. Symphyta include about 9000 species in the world [6]. The most important diagnosis trait of Symphyta is the presence of broad waists, contrary to the Apocrita. As the most basal group of Symphyta, the small family Xyelidae has a special status in the evolutionary history of the Symphyta and Hymenoptera [7,8,9].
The earliest appearances of xyelids have been reported from the Middle or Upper Triassic of Kyrgyzstan [10], and the Upper Triassic of Australia [11,12], South Africa [13], Argentina [14] and Japan [15]. The family reached its maximal of diversity between the Middle Jurassic and the Early Cretaceous, and its past distribution was much broader than today [16]. There are four subfamilies in the Xyelidae: Archexyelinae Rasnitsyn, 1964; Macroxyelinae Ashmead, 1898; Madygellinae Rasnitsyn, 1969 and Xyelinae Newman, 1834 [17], with numerous fossil records. Hitherto, more than 85 species within 50 genera belonging to four subfamilies of Xyelidae have been reported in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic [18,19,20,21].
Macroxyelinae are a common subfamily of Xyelidae in the Mesozoic and can easily be differentiated from all other subfamilies because of the following combination of characters: the sclerotized apical bridge between C and R1 next to pterostigma, short and wide ovipositor and at least partially sclerotized pterostigma [10]. Macroxyelinae encompass five tribes: Angaridyelini Rasnitsyn, 1967; Ceroxyelini Rasnitsyn, 1969; Gigantoxyelini Rasnitsyn, 1969; Macroxyelini Ashmead, 1898 and Xyeleciini Benson, 1954 [22]. Up to date, 28 genera containing 44 fossil species have been reported in Macroxyelinae (Table 1).
In this report, we describe a new genus and species as well as a new species of a previously erected genus Scleroxyela, which enhance our knowledge of the Xyelidae in the Mesozoic of northeastern China.

2. Materials and Methods

The holotype specimen of Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov. (Figure 1) was collected from the Lower Cretaceous, Yixian Formation; Huangbanjigou, Chaomidian Village, Shangyuan Township, Beipiao City, Liaoning Province, China. The holotype specimen of Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov. (Figure 2) was collected from the latest Middle Jurassic, Jiulongshan Formation; Daohugou Village, Shantou Township, Ningcheng City, Inner Mongolia, China. All specimens are housed at the fossil collection of the Key Lab of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes, at the College of Life Sciences and Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies, Capital Normal University (CNUB; Dong Ren, curator), in Beijing, China.
The photographs were taken with a Nikon SMZ 25 and an attached Nikon DS-Ri 2 digital camera system. Line drawings were prepared using Adobe Illustrator CC and Adobe Photoshop CC. Statistical analyses were performed using R v.4.0.3 (R Core Team, Auckland, New Zealand) The wing venation nomenclature used in this paper follows Huber and Sharkey (1993) [23]. Antennal thread means flagellar segments behind the enlarged first flagellar segment. For wing venation, 1-Rs and 2-Rs refers to the 1st and 2nd segments of Rs; 1-M means the 1st segment of M and 1-Cu, 2-Cu and 3-Cu mean 1st, 2nd and 3rd segments of Cu.

3. Results

Systematic palaeontology.
Order: Hymenoptera, Linnaeus, 1758.
Suborder: Symphyta, Gerstaecker, 1867.
Superfamily: Xyeloidea, Newman, 1834
Family: Xyelidae, Newman, 1834
Subfamily: Macroxyelinae, Ashmead, 1898
Tribe: Angaridyelini, Rasnitsyn, 1966
Genus: Leptoxyela, Dai, Rasnitsyn, and Wang gen. nov.
Type species: Leptoxyela eximia, Dai, Rasnitsyn, and Wang sp. nov.
Etymology: the generic name is a combination of Greek “Lepto-”, meaning thin and referring to the long and thin terminal part of flagellum, and the generic name Xyela.
Diagnosis: Antenna with thread, longer than first flagellomere. Pterostigma sclerotized basally; 1-Rs slightly longer than half 1-M, shorter than half 2-Rs; Sc1 connected to C beyond level of Rs and Sc2 connected to R just before origin of Rs; Rs1 closer to pterostigma than to 1-Rs2 along wing margin; 1m-cu apparently longer than 2-Cu; ovipositor sheaths short and moderately wide.
Species included: type only.
Remarks: Leptoxyela gen. nov. is attributed to Macroxyelinae, based on the sclerotisation connecting C and R before pterostigma; short and moderately wide ovipositor sheaths, and further to Angaridyelini based on pterostigma sclerotized only basally. Within Angaridyelini, the new genus is similar to Nigrimonticola in having long antennal thread; Sc1 connected to C beyond level of Rs and Sc2 connected to R just before origin of Rs. It can be differentiated from Nigrimonticola by its longer 1m-cu (see Key below for details).
Key to the genera of Angaridyelini
1. 1-Rs longer than 2-Rs ..................................................................................................................Ophthalmoxyela Rasnitsyn, 1966.
1-Rs shorter than 2-Rs (Figure 3A) ............................................................................................2
2. Cell 1mcu twice as long as pterostigma. Sc lost ......................................................................Baissoxyela Rasnitsyn, 1969.
Cell 1mcu at most 1.5 × as long as pterostigma (Figure 3F). Sc distinct ...............................3
3. Sc2 connected to R just at Rs base .............................................................................................4
Sc2 connected to R before Rs base (Figure 3A,C,F) .................................................................5
4. Pterostigma sclerotised only basally (Figure 3C) ...................................................................Lethoxyela Zhang and Zhang, 2000.
Pterostigma sclerotised basally and far along fore margin ...................................................Liaoxyela Zhang and Zhang, 2000.
5. Sc1 connected to C before level of Rs (Figure 3A). Gena with distinct lateral horn ...........Ceratoxyela Zhang and Zhang, 2000.
Sc1 connected to C at or beyond level of Rs. Gena with no lateral horn ...................................6
6. Antennal thread shorter than the length of segments 1–3 combined ......................................Angaridyela Rasnitsyn, 1966.
Antennal thread longer than the length of segments 1–3 combined (Figure 4D,E) ..........7
7. 1m-cu half as long as 3-Cu ......................................................................................................Nigrimonticola Rasnitsyn, 1966.
1m-cu almost as long as 3-Cu (Figure 1D) ............................................................................Leptoxyela gen. nov.
Leptoxyela eximia Dai, Rasnitsyn, and Wang gen. et sp. nov.
Material: CNU-HYM-LB-2021002, housed at the College of Life Sciences and Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies, Capital Normal University.
Etymology: the specific name is from Latin “eximius”, meaning exceptional and referring to the well-preserved fossil specimen.
Locality and horizon: Lower Cretaceous, Yixian Formation; Huangbanjigou, Chaomidian Village, Shangyuan Township, Beipiao City, Liaoning Province, China.
Diagnosis: as for the genus.
Description (Figure 1): Female sawfly in latero-ventral view with incomplete head and wings. Body length 10 mm (excluding antennae), forewing (as preserved) 8 mm long and antenna 5.7 mm long. Head and thorax brown, legs pale, antenna and abdomen of coloration intermediate between that of the head and that of the legs, legs and antenna with some darker spots.
Head distorted. Antenna very long, scape ca. 5× as long as wide, almost half as long as first flagellomere, pedicel somewhat longer than wide, first flagellomere very thin, as long as cell 1mcu, antennal thread about 1.7× as long as first flagellomere, 1.1× as long as segments 1–3 combined, with 20 segments visible, each three times as long as wide.
Thorax distorted, with no important characters available.
Forewing with pterostigma sclerotized basally; costal area broad, Sc closer to R than to C, sub-parallel to R, with two branches, Sc1 connected to C beyond level of Rs and Sc2 connected to R just before origin of Rs; R only slightly curved; 1-Rs slightly longer than half the length of 1-M, at most half the length of 2-Rs; 1r-rs slightly longer than 2r-rs, inclined toward wing base, 3-Rs arched posteriorly; Rs1 closer to Rs2 than to pterostigma along wing margin; 1m-cu almost as long as 3-Cu and about 1.2× as long as 2-Cu; 1-Cu curved in middle. Cell 1rm long and narrow, significantly longer than 1r; cell 1r about 1.6 times as long as wide and longer than cell 2r; cell 2r trapezoidal; length ratio of cells 1r:2r = 5:3; cell 1mcu nearly as long as cell 1r; cell 2mcu longer and wider than 1mcu, about 2.2× as long as wide and 1.1× as long as cell 2rm; 2rm as long as cell 3rm; cell 1cua and cell 1a incomplete. Hind wing only fragmentarily preserved.
Foreleg and middle leg partly preserved, but structure of each part of hind leg well-preserved; foreleg with coxa thin as preserved; mesopleuron and metapleuron partly preserved; hind leg with coxa elongate, about 2.1× as long as wide; trochanter small and trapezoidal, trochantellus clearly visible; femur thick and slightly wider medially, about 3.3× as long as wide; hind tibia long, about 1.4× as long as femur, and with long and sharp terminal spur; tarsus incomplete (many segments of tarsi preserved).
Abdomen with nine segments visible, ovipositor sheath broad and short; first valvifers roughly triangular; second valvifers large, longer than first valvifers; ovipositor well preserved, first valvula as wide as second valvula.
Tribe: Xyeleciini, Benson, 1945
Genus: Scleroxyela, Zheng, Hu, D. Chen, J. Chen, Zhang, and Rasnitsyn, 2021
Type species: Scleroxyela daohugouensis, Zheng, Hu, D. Chen, J. Chen, Zhang, and Rasnitsyn, 2021.
Species included: type species and Scleroxyela cephalota, Dai, Rasnitsyn, Shih, and Wang sp. nov.
Scleroxyela cephalota, Dai, Rasnitsyn, Shih, and Wang sp. nov.
Material: CNU-HYM-NN-2021004, housed at the College of Life Sciences and Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies, Capital Normal University.
Etymology: the specific name is from Greek “kephalon”, meaning head and referring to the large head.
Locality and horizon@ latest Middle Jurassic (late Callovian), Jiulongshan Formation; Daohugou Village, Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China.
Description (Figure 2): Male (body length 5.47 mm) sawfly in ventral view with nearly complete forewings. Body and antenna dark, legs pale with some darker spots. Head (width 1.45 mm, length 0.9 mm) massive, eye large, about a quarter of head width. Antenna incomplete, with first flagellomere slightly longer than thread.
Thorax and head nearly equal in width. Medial mesoscutal line short, not extending behind notauli; notauli V-like; mesoscutellum wider than prescutum, about 1.4× as wide as mesoscutum; cenchri slightly shorter than wide; metascutum triangular-shaped; metapostnotum slender and remaining part of the thorax not discernable.
Forewing (6.42 mm long) with pterostigma completely sclerotised, costal area obviously widened proximad base of Rs; Sc with two branches, posterior branch of Sc (Sc2) short, subvertical to R, shorter than 1-Rs and connected to R well before origin of Rs; anterior branch (Sc1) long, reaching C beyond origin of Rs; R distinctly bent before origin of Rs and greatly thickened before pterostigma; 1-Rs half the length of 1-M; 2r-rs ca. 1.5× as long as 1r-rs; 3-Rs arched posteriorly; 1m-cu half the length of 3-CuA, roughly equal to 1cu-a; 3r-m about 1.3× as long as 2r-m; M+Cu slightly curved in its basal third; CuP straight, extended to the top of cell 2a. Cell 1r about twice as long as 2r and 2.6× as long as wide; cell 2r trapezoidal, length ratio of cells 1r:2r = 2:1; cell 1cua narrow and long, distinctly broader at M base, about 7.5 times as long as wide, and twice as long as cell 1mcu; cell 2mcu long and narrow, longer than 2rm and about 3.6 times as long as wide; cell 1a 1.75 times as long as 2a.
Hind wing with 1-Rs vanishing short (1r-m meeting Rs close to Rs base); limit between 1-M and 1r-m obscure; M+Cu nearly straight.
Foreleg and middle leg incomplete, hind leg with coxa elongate, about 1.5× as long as wide; trochanter small and trapezoidal; femur oval, slightly wider medially, about 4.6× as long as wide; hind tibia long, about 1.1× as long as femur; tarsi not preserved.
Abdomen with nine segments visible, genitalia visible, hypopygium large, diamond-shaped; gonocoxa wide, subtriangular (narrowed basally), apparently wider than gonostylus; gonostylus long, with distinct gonomacula.
Remarks. Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov. can be assigned to the subfamily Macroxyelinae based on the pterostigma slerotised and with sclerotisation connecting C and R near pterostigma, to the tribe Xyeleciini based on Sc2 connected to R before Rs and 1-Rs at most half the length of 1-M, and to the genus Scleroxyela based on pterostigma completely sclerotized and Sc1 reaching C distinctly behind Rs. Within the genus, the new species differs from S. daohugouensis in having the head wider, pterostigma wider than 1r-rs length, Sc2 connected to R more distant from Rs base, and forewing shorter (6.42 mm long vs. 11.1 mm in S. daohugouensis). These differences are unlikely to be sexually dependent.

4. Discussion

We describe one new genus and two new fossil species, from Huangbanjigou and Daohugou of China, respectively. Both Daohugou and Huangbanjigou are important insect deposits containing abundant, well-preserved insect fossils [24]. The Daohugou area, an important locality for the Middle Jurassic insects, located in northeast of China, is assumed to be located in a humid and warm–temperate climate area by the paleoenvironment reconstruction analysis. The Huangbanjigou area, as an important section of the Yixian Formation, also has a large number of rare animal, insect and plant fossils [25]. However, different experts have different views on the age of the Yixian Formation. Three opinions have been offered: Late Jurassic [26], transition from Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous [27,28], and Early Cretaceous [29,30,31]. Nowadays, the academic community generally supports the results of radioactive geochronological dating method, considering the Yixian Formation as the Early Cretaceous, Barremian–Aptian age [32,33]. The position of biota of the Yixian Formation within the Jehol Biota, which it belongs to, is discussed by Rasnitsyn (2020) [34]. Up to date, there are 5 species of Macroxyelinae reported from Daohugou, and 14 species from Huangbanjigou [35].
The angle between Rs+M and 1-Rs is usually obtuse in Macroxyelinae, but the angle varies among the tribes. The formation of angle between Rs+M and 1-Rs is discussed (red in Figure 3) using a series of Macroxyelinae fossils. Our observations, including the angle of all fossil species of the subfamily Macroxyelinae, are summarized in Table 1. The angle varies from 108° to 145° in the tribe Xyeleciini, from 113° to 154° in the tribe Angaridyelini, 120° in the tribe of Ceroxyelini (only Ceroxyela Rasnitsyn, 1966), from 150° to 170° in the tribe of Macroxyelini, and from 145° to 180° in the tribe Gigantoxyelini.
We try to compare and investigate the angle changes between Rs+M and 1-Rs for the tribes in the subfamily Macroxyelinae. We found that there are two trends in the degree of the angle allowing the creation of two informal groups of Macroxyeline tribes (Angaridyelini + Ceroxyelini + Xyeleciini, angle = 108–155°) and (Gigantoxyelini + Macroxyelini, angle = 145–180°). Note that some overlappings of the morphospaces of some tribes are recorded (Figure 4). Interestingly, we found that the first group is also characterized by a short 1-Rs, unlike the second one with generally longer 1-Rs, again with some overlapping. However, we cannot see any correlation between the angle and the fossil age, which is also an interesting observation. Additionally, these fossils show a transition from an obtuse angle toward a perfectly linear alignment of Rs+M and 1-Rs. The angles between Rs+M and 1-Rs became broadened from the tribes Xyeleciini, Angaridyelini and Ceroxyelini to the tribe Macroxyelini, and then to the tribe Gigantoxyelini, while nearly reaching a linear alignment in some species of Macroxyelinae.
The tribe Ceroxyelini was established by Rasnitsyn (1969) initially consisting of only one genus of Ceroxyela. Subsequently, Zhang and Zhang (2000) reported two genera, Sinoxyela and Isoxyela, which were also placed in tribe Ceroxyelini based on their pterostigma of the forewing being sclerotized and basally membranous. In this report, we believe that Isoxyela and Sinoxyela cannot be attributed to Ceroxyelini primarily based on these different characters: Sc2 meeting R before Rs for Isoxyela and Sinoxyela; the pterostigmal desclerotisation is less extensive than in Ceroxyela; the angle between Rs+M and 1-Rs is 120° in Ceroxyela, strongly different from those of Sinoxyela (155°) and Isoxyela (157°); and the length of 1-Rs and the first flagellomere of Isoxyela and Sinoxyela are obviously different from those of Ceroxyela.
The first flagellomere, an important diagnosis trait in Xyelidae [36], is also diversified among the subfamily Macroxyelinae (Figure 5): first flagellomere varies from being three times longer than thread (Isoxyela and Gigantoxyela), to as long as it (Scleroxyela), to 0.6 times shorter than thread (Leptoxyela), and up to 0.4 times so (Ceroxyela). Based on the above study on the veins and antennae, we believe that the tribe Ceroxyelini may only consist of one genus of Ceroxyela, and that the genera Isoxyela and Sinoxyela should not be included in Ceroxyelini. We would suggest to transfer these two genera to Gigantoxyelini tentatively, based on the sclerotized pterostigma and basal Sc2 until more information is available. We also hope that there will be better phylogenetic results in the future to reveal the relationship within Ceroxyelini.

5. Conclusions

As the most basal group of Symphyta in Hymenoptera, the family Xyelidae has a special status in the evolutionary history of the Symphyta [7,8,9]. The earliest appearances of xyelids have been reported from the Middle or Upper Triassic of Kyrgyzstan [10], and the Upper Triassic of Australia [11,12], South Africa [13], Argentina [14] and Japan [15]. Xyelidae reached its maximum diversity between the Middle Jurassic and the Early Cretaceous, and its past distribution was much broader than today [6]. Macroxyelinae is a common subfamily of Xyelidae in the Mesozoic [10]. Macroxyelinae encompasses five tribes: Angaridyelini Rasnitsyn, 1967; Ceroxyelini Rasnitsyn, 1969; Gigantoxyelini Rasnitsyn, 1969; Macroxyelini Ashmead, 1898 and Xyeleciini Benson, 1954 [22]. Until now, 28 genera containing 44 fossil species have been reported in Macroxyelinae
We described Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov. and Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov., based on two well-preserved compression fossils from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation and the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation of China, respectively. Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov. is placed in the tribe Angaridyelini and S. cephalota sp. nov. in the tribe Xyeleciini; while both tribes are in Macroxyelinae of Xyelidae. After investigating various angles between Rs+M and 1-Rs for known fossil species of Macroxyelinae, we reported that the angle and the length of 1-Rs are correlated, however, we could not see any correlation between the angles and the fossil ages even within a tribe. In addition, we suggested that Isoxyela and Sinoxyela should be transferred to Gigantoxyelini and the tribe Ceroxyelini may have only one genus of Ceroxyela.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.D. and M.W.; resources, D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D. and M.W.; writing—review and editing, M.W., A.P.R. and C.S.; validation, C.S., M.W. and D.R.; visualization, L.D. and C.S.; supervision, M.W. and A.P.R.; project administration, D.R.; funding acquisition, M.W., D.R. and A.P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

In this work, D.R. was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31730087 and 41688103). M.W. was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Forestry (Grant No. CAFYBB2019QB004) and the Youth Talent Support Program for Science & Technology Innovation of National Forestry and Grassland (2020132602). For A.P.R., this work was partially supported by the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences Program ‘Origin of the Biosphere and Evolution of Geobiological Systems’.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data from this study are available in this paper and the associated papers.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Taiping Gao, Xiangbo Guo, Jia Gao, Liang Chen and Jialiang Zhuang (Capital Normal University, Beijing, China) for their helpful advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguiar, A.P.; Deans, A.R.; Engel, M.S.; Forshage, M.; Huber, J.T.; Jennings, J.T.; Johnson, N.F.; Lelej, A.S.; Longino, J.T.; Lohrmann, V.; et al. Order Hymenoptera. Zootaxa 2013, 3703, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huber, J.T. Biodiversity of Hymenoptera. In Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, Secon; Foottit, R.G., Adler, P.H., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 303–323. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grimaldi, D.; Engel, M.S. Evolution of the Insects; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 407–755. [Google Scholar]
  4. Quicke, D.L.J. Parasitic Wasps; Chapman & Hall: London, UK; Weinheim, Germany; New York, NY, USA; Tokyo, Japan; Melbourne, Australia; Madras, India, 1997; p. xviii + 470. [Google Scholar]
  5. Heraty, J.; Ronquist, F.; Carpenter, M.J.; Hawks, D.; Schulmeister, S.; Dowling, P.A.; Murray, D.; Munro, J.; Wheeler, C.W.; Schiff, N.; et al. Evolution of the hymenopteran megaradiation. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2011, 60, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Taeger, A.; Liston, A.D.; Prous, M.; Groll, E.K.; Gehroldt, T.; Blank, S.M. ECatSym—Electronic World Catalog of Symphyta (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Program Version 5.0 (19 December 2018). Data Version 40 (23 September 2018); Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut (SDEI): Müncheberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schulmeister, S. Simultaneous analysis of basal Hymenoptera (Insecta): Introducing robust-choice sensitivity analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 79, 245–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schulmeister, S.; Wheeler, W.C.; Carpenter, J.M. Simultaneous analysis of the basal lineages of Hymenoptera (Insecta) using sensitivity analysis. Cladistics 2002, 18, 455–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vilhelmsen, L. Phylogeny and classification of the extant basal lineages of the Hymenoptera (Insecta). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2001, 131, 393–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rasnitsyn, A.P. Origin and Evolution of Lower Hymenoptera; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1969; Volume 123, pp. 1–196. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Engel, M.S. A new sawfly from the Triassic of Queensland (Hymenoptera: Xyelidae). Mem. Qld. Mus. 2005, 51, 558. [Google Scholar]
  12. Riek, E.F. Fossil insects from the Triassic beds at Mt. Crosby, Queensland. Aust. J. Zool. 1995, 3, 654–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schlüter, T. Moltenia rieki n. gen., n. sp. (Hymenoptera: Xyelidae?), a tentative sawfly from the Molteno Formation (Upper Triassic), South Africa. Paläontologische Z. 2000, 74, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lara, M.B.; Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Zavattieri, A.M. Potrerilloxyela menendezi gen. et sp. nov. from the Late Triassic of Argentina: The oldest representative of Xyelidae (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) for Americas. Paleontol. J. 2014, 48, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oyama, N.; Maedo, H. Madygella humioi sp. nov. from the Upper Triassic Mine Group, southwest Japan: The oldest record of a sawfly (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) in East Asia. Paleontol. Res. 2020, 24, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, T.P.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Ren, D. New fossil Xyelidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) from the Yixian Formation of western Liaoning, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2011, 85, 528–532. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abe, M.; Smith, D.R. The Genus-Group Names of Symphyta (Hymenoptera) and Their Type Species. Esakia 1991, 31, 1–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jouault, C.; Aase, A.; Nel, A. Past ecosystems drive the evolution of the early diverged Symphyta (Hymenoptera: Xyelidae) since the earliest Eocene. Foss. Rec. 2021, 24, 379–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kopylov, D.S. New sawflies of the subfamily Madygellinae (Hymenoptera, Xyelidae) from the Middle-Upper Triassic of Kyrgyzstan. Paleontol. J. 2014, 48, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, H.C.; Zhang, J.F. Xyelid Sawflies (Insecta, Hymenoptera) from the Upper Jurassic Yixian Formation of Western Liaoning, China. Acta Palaeontol. Sin. 2000, 39, 476–492. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.Q.; Zhang, H.C. New fossil sawflies (Hymenoptera, Xyelidae) from the Middle Jurassic of northeastern China. Alcheringa Australas. J. Palaeontol. 2019, 44, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, M.; Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Ren, D. Two new fossil sawflies (Hymenoptera, Xyelidae, Xyelinae) from the Middle Jurassic of China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2014, 88, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huber, T.H.; Sharkey, M.J. Structure. In Hymenoptera of the World: An Identification Guide to Families; Goulet, H., Huber, T.H., Eds.; Research Ottawa: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1993; pp. 13–59. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gao, T.P.; Shih, C.K.; Ren, D. Behaviors and interactions of insects in ecosystems of mid-mesozoic northeastern china. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2021, 66, 337–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiang, J.; Ji, S.A. On discovery of the earliest bird fossil in China and the origin of birds. Chin. Geol. 1996, 233, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zheng, S.L.; Zheng, Y.J.; Xing, D.H. Characteristics, age and climate of Late Jurassic Yixian flora from western Liaoning. J. Stratigr. 2003, 27, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, P.J.; Wang, Q.F.; Zhang, H.C.; Cao, M.Z.; Li, W.B.; Wu, S.Q.; Shen, Y.B. Discussion on the stratotype of Jianshangou of Yixian Formation. Sci. China Ser. D 2004, 34, 883–895. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, W.L.; Zhang, L.J.; Zheng, S.L.; Zheng, Y.J.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.T.; Yang, F.L. A new study on the stratotype and biostratigraphy of the Yixian stage in Yixian-Beipiao region, Liaoning-establishment and study of stratotypes of the Yixian stage. Acta Geol. Sin. 2004, 78, 433–447. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, P.X.; Cheng, Z.W.; Pang, Q.Q. The horizon and age of the Confuciusornis in Beipiao, western Liaoning. Acta Geol. Sin. 2001, 75, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pang, Q.Q.; Li, P.X.; Tian, S.G.; Liu, Y.Q. Discovery of ostracods in the Dabeigou and Dadianzi Formations at Zhangjiagou, Luanping County, northern Hebei province of China and new progress in the biostratigraphic boundary study. Geol. Bull. China 2002, 21, 329–336. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou, Z.H.; Barrett, P.M.; Hilton, J. An exceptionally preserved lower Cretaceous ecosystem. Nature 2003, 421, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, S.H.; He, H.Y.; Jin, F.; Zhang, F.C.; Wu, Y.B.; Yu, Z.Q.; Li, Q.L.; Wang, M.; O’Connor, J.K.; Deng, C.L.; et al. The appearance and duration of the Jehol Biota: Constraint from SIMS U-Pb zircon dating for the Huajiying Formation in northern China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 14299–14305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.J. Beipiao Huangbanjigou area, Yixian Formation and the era of Xiang overview. World Nonferrous Met. 2017, 13, 260–262. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kopylov, D.S.; Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Aristov, D.S.; Bashkuev, A.S.; Bazhenova, N.V.; Dmitriev, V.Y.; Gorochov, A.V.; Ignatov, M.S.; Ivanov, V.D.; Khramov, A.V.; et al. The Khasurty fossil insect Lagerstätte. Paleontol. J. 2020, 54, 1235–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, Y.; Hu, H.; Chen, D.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.C.; Rasnitsyn, A.P. New fossil records of Xyelidae (Hymenoptera) from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China. Eur. J. Taxon. 2021, 733, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Engle, M.S.; Huang, D.Y.; Alqarni, A.S.; Cai, C.Y. An unusual new lineage of sawflies (Hymenoptera) in upper Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar. Cretac. Res. 2016, 60, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Insects 13 00383 g001 550
Figure 1. Photographs of Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov., holotype (specimen CNU-HYM-LB-2021002) female. (A,B), latero-ventral view as preserved. (C), line drawing of latero-ventral view. (D), line drawing of forewing. (E), line drawing of antenna. (F), ovipositor under alcohol. (G), line drawing of ovipositor. (H), middle leg under alcohol. (I), middle leg under alcohol, showing leg tibial spurs (white wireframe). (J), middle leg under alcohol, showing planter lobes (white wireframe). Scale bars: 1 mm in (A–D); 0.5 mm in (E–J). Abbreviations: cx1—coxa1; cx3—coxa3; fla1–fla21—flagellomeres I-XXI; nt—notaulus; pe—pedicel; pl2—mesopleuron; pl3—metapleuron; pn—pronotum; sc—scape; scl—mesoscutellum; smm—medial mesoscutal suture; t8–t9—tergum 8–9; v1—first valvula; v2—second valvula (vI + v2—ovipositor); v3—third valvula (ovipositor sheath); vr1—first valvifer; vr2—second valvifer.
Figure 1. Photographs of Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov., holotype (specimen CNU-HYM-LB-2021002) female. (A,B), latero-ventral view as preserved. (C), line drawing of latero-ventral view. (D), line drawing of forewing. (E), line drawing of antenna. (F), ovipositor under alcohol. (G), line drawing of ovipositor. (H), middle leg under alcohol. (I), middle leg under alcohol, showing leg tibial spurs (white wireframe). (J), middle leg under alcohol, showing planter lobes (white wireframe). Scale bars: 1 mm in (A–D); 0.5 mm in (E–J). Abbreviations: cx1—coxa1; cx3—coxa3; fla1–fla21—flagellomeres I-XXI; nt—notaulus; pe—pedicel; pl2—mesopleuron; pl3—metapleuron; pn—pronotum; sc—scape; scl—mesoscutellum; smm—medial mesoscutal suture; t8–t9—tergum 8–9; v1—first valvula; v2—second valvula (vI + v2—ovipositor); v3—third valvula (ovipositor sheath); vr1—first valvifer; vr2—second valvifer.
Insects 13 00383 g001
Insects 13 00383 g002 550
Figure 2. Photographs of Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov., holotype (specimen CNU-HYM-NN-2021004) male. (A), dorsal view as preserved. (B), ventral view as preserved. (C), line drawing of dorsal view with forewings and hind wings. (D), line drawing of forewing. (E), line drawing of hind wing. (F), Photo of body under alcohol. (G), Photo of genitalia under alcohol. (H), line drawing of genitalia. (I). Photo of head under alcohol. Scale bars: 1 mm in (A–E); 0.25 mm in (F–I). Abbreviations: t7–t9, tergum 7–9.
Figure 2. Photographs of Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov., holotype (specimen CNU-HYM-NN-2021004) male. (A), dorsal view as preserved. (B), ventral view as preserved. (C), line drawing of dorsal view with forewings and hind wings. (D), line drawing of forewing. (E), line drawing of hind wing. (F), Photo of body under alcohol. (G), Photo of genitalia under alcohol. (H), line drawing of genitalia. (I). Photo of head under alcohol. Scale bars: 1 mm in (A–E); 0.25 mm in (F–I). Abbreviations: t7–t9, tergum 7–9.
Insects 13 00383 g002
Insects 13 00383 g003 550
Figure 3. Angle of Rs+M and the section of Rs in the subfamily Macroxyelinae. (A), Uroxyela sicicauda, Rasnitsyn, 1966 (Xyeleciini). (B), Ceroxyela dolichocera, Rasnitsyn, 1966 (Ceroxyelini). (C), Leptoxyela eximia, gen. et sp. nov (Angaridyelini). (D), Megaxyela yaoshanica, Zhang, 1989 (Macroxyelini). (E), Sinoxyela viriosa, Zhang and Zhang, 2000 (tribe to be determined). (F), Abrotoxyela multiciliata, Gao, Ren and Shih, 2009 (Gigantoxyelini).
Figure 3. Angle of Rs+M and the section of Rs in the subfamily Macroxyelinae. (A), Uroxyela sicicauda, Rasnitsyn, 1966 (Xyeleciini). (B), Ceroxyela dolichocera, Rasnitsyn, 1966 (Ceroxyelini). (C), Leptoxyela eximia, gen. et sp. nov (Angaridyelini). (D), Megaxyela yaoshanica, Zhang, 1989 (Macroxyelini). (E), Sinoxyela viriosa, Zhang and Zhang, 2000 (tribe to be determined). (F), Abrotoxyela multiciliata, Gao, Ren and Shih, 2009 (Gigantoxyelini).
Insects 13 00383 g003
Insects 13 00383 g004 550
Figure 4. Different types of antennae in the subfamily Macroxyelinae. (A), Isoxyela rudis Zhang and Zhang, 2000. (B), Gigantoxyela quadrifurcata Rasnitsyn, 1966. (C), Scleroxyela daohugouensis Zheng et al., 2021. (D), Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov. (E), Ceratoxyela decorosa Zhang and Zhang, 2000.
Figure 4. Different types of antennae in the subfamily Macroxyelinae. (A), Isoxyela rudis Zhang and Zhang, 2000. (B), Gigantoxyela quadrifurcata Rasnitsyn, 1966. (C), Scleroxyela daohugouensis Zheng et al., 2021. (D), Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov. (E), Ceratoxyela decorosa Zhang and Zhang, 2000.
Insects 13 00383 g004
Insects 13 00383 g005 550
Figure 5. The changes of angle between 1-Rs and Rs+M of forewing for known fossil species of five tribes in Macroxyelinae and the relationship between the angle and fossil age. Angaridyelini in black; Ceroxyelini in yellow; Gigantoxyelini in purple; Macroxyelini in blue; Xyeleciini in red. J2—Middle Jurassic; J3—Late Jurassic; K1—Early Cretaceous; Eo—Eocene; M—Miocene.
Figure 5. The changes of angle between 1-Rs and Rs+M of forewing for known fossil species of five tribes in Macroxyelinae and the relationship between the angle and fossil age. Angaridyelini in black; Ceroxyelini in yellow; Gigantoxyelini in purple; Macroxyelini in blue; Xyeleciini in red. J2—Middle Jurassic; J3—Late Jurassic; K1—Early Cretaceous; Eo—Eocene; M—Miocene.
Insects 13 00383 g005
Table
Table 1. Known fossil species of Macroxyelinae.
Table 1. Known fossil species of Macroxyelinae.
TribeTaxonLocality and HorizonAngle between 1-Rs and Rs+M of ForewingReference
XyeleciiniBolboxyella bolboicaE. Siberia, K1-Rasnitsyn, 1990
Microxyelecia brachyceraKazakhstan; J3108°Rasnitsyn, 1969
Proxyelia pankowskiiUSA; P145°Jouault, Aase and Nel, 2021
Scleroxyela cephalota sp. nov.China; J2128°This paper
Scleroxyela daohugouensisChina; J2130°Zheng et al., 2021
Xyelecia xiejiaheensisChina; N130°Hong, 1983
Xyelites lingyuanensisChina; K1125°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Xyelites trigeminusE. Siberia, K1115°Rasnitsyn, 1966
Uroxyela sicicaudaE. Siberia, K1118°Rasnitsyn, 1966
AngaridyeliniAngaridyela chengdeensisChina; K1143°Ren, 1995
Angaridyela endemicaChina; K1154°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Angaridyela exculptaChina; K1139°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Angaridyela minorE. Siberia, K1124°Rasnitsyn, 1966
Angaridyela pallipesE. Siberia, K1152°Rasnitsyn, 1966
Angridyela robustaChina; K1132°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Angridyela suspectaChina; K1125°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Angaridyela vitimicaE. Siberia, K1125°Rasnitsyn, 1966
Baissoxyela tarsalisE. Siberia, K1×Rasnitsyn, 1969
Ceratoxyela decorosaChina; K1145°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Leptoxyela eximia gen. et sp. nov.China; K1130°This paper
Lethoxyela excurvaChina; K1140°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Lethoxyela vulgataChina; K1137°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Liaoxyela antiqueChina; K1150°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Nigrimonticola longicornisKazakhstan; J3113°Rasnitsyn, 1966
Ophthalmoxyela brachyuaKazakhstan; J3×Rasnitsyn, 1966
CeroxyeliniCeroxyela dolichoceraE. Siberia, K1120°Rasnitsyn, 1966
To be determinedSinoxyela viriosaChina; K1155°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Isoxyela rudisChina; K1157°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
MacroxyeliniAnthoxyela anthophagaRussia; K1150°Rasnitsyn, 1982
Anthoxyela baissensisRussia; K1170°Rasnitsyn, 1977
Anthoxyela orientalisChina; K1167°Gao and Ren, 2008
Anthoxyela turgensisRussia; K1165°Rasnitsyn, 1990
Brachyoxyela brevinodiaChina; K1159°Gao, Zhao and Ren, 2011
Brachyoxyela gracilentaChina; K1158°Gao, Zhao and Ren, 2011
Chionoxyela niveaE. Siberia, K2-Rasnitsyn, 1993
Megaxyela petrefactaUSA; N155°Brues, 1908
Megaxyela yaoshanicaChina; N155°Zhang, 1989
Paleoxyela nearcticaUSA; P160°Jouault, Aase and Nel, 2021
GigantoxyeliniAbrotoxyela curvaChina; J2180°Zheng et al., 2020
Abrotoxyela lepidaChina; J2165°Gao, Ren and Shih, 2009
Abrotoxyela multiciliataChina; J2172°Gao, Ren and Shih, 2009
Chaetoxyela hirsutaE. Siberia, K1145°Rasnitsyn, 1966
Gigantoxyela quadrifurcataE. Siberia, K1158°Rasnitsyn, 1966
Heteroxyela ignotaChina; K1180°Zhang and Zhang, 2000
Magnaxyela raraChina; J2170°Zheng et al., 2020
Shartexyela mongolicaMongolia; J3165°Rasnitsyn, 2008
Note. The systematic position of fossil Symphyta in the table was based on the description in original papers, and it does not reflect certain different opinions. J—Jurassic, K—Cretaceous, P—Paleogene, N—Neogene, J2—Middle Jurassic, J3—Late Jurassic, K1—Early Cretaceous.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dai, L.; Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Shih, C.; Wang, M.; Ren, D. New Fossil Xyelidae (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) from the Mesozoic of Northeastern China. Insects 2022, 13, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040383

AMA Style

Dai L, Rasnitsyn AP, Shih C, Wang M, Ren D. New Fossil Xyelidae (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) from the Mesozoic of Northeastern China. Insects. 2022; 13(4):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dai, Liyang, Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn, Chungkun Shih, Mei Wang, and Dong Ren. 2022. "New Fossil Xyelidae (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) from the Mesozoic of Northeastern China" Insects 13, no. 4: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop