Next Article in Journal
Is Integrated Management of Gymnandrosoma aurantianum Possible with Trichogramma atopovirilia and Novel Products Used in Citrus Orchards in Brazil?
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy of Pyrethroid–Pyriproxyfen and Pyrethroid–Chlorfenapyr Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) for the Control of Non-Anopheles Mosquitoes: Secondary Analysis from a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (cRCT)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Roles of Insect Carboxyl/Cholinesterases in Chemical Adaptation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/insects14050418
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Leveraging RNA Interference to Impact Insecticide Resistance in the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata

by
Kenan Timani
,
Pierre Bastarache
and
Pier Jr Morin
*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Université de Moncton, 18 Antonine-Maillet Avenue, Moncton, NB E1A 3E9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(5), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050418
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 20 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Evolution of Pesticide Resistance)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The Colorado potato beetle is an insect pest known for the substantial damage it can cause on potato crops worldwide. Various strategies, including insecticides, have been deployed to limit its impact, with different levels of success. Insecticide resistance is often observed in this insect, and understanding the factors responsible for this adaptation is important towards the goal of mitigating this challenge. This review will thus highlight key targets associated with insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle and present the potential of RNAi in modulating the susceptibility of this pest towards diverse compounds.

Abstract

The Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say, is a potato pest that can cause important economic losses to the potato industry worldwide. Diverse strategies have been deployed to target this insect such as biological control, crop rotation, and a variety of insecticides. Regarding the latter, this pest has demonstrated impressive abilities to develop resistance against the compounds used to regulate its spread. Substantial work has been conducted to better characterize the molecular signatures underlying this resistance, with the overarching objective of leveraging this information for the development of novel approaches, including RNAi-based techniques, to limit the damage associated with this insect. This review first describes the various strategies utilized to control L. decemlineata and highlights different examples of reported cases of resistances against insecticides for this insect. The molecular leads identified as potential players modulating insecticide resistance as well as the growing interest towards the use of RNAi aimed at these leads as part of novel means to control the impact of L. decemlineata are described subsequently. Finally, select advantages and limitations of RNAi are addressed to better assess the potential of this technology in the broader context of insecticide resistance for pest management.

1. Introduction

Many insects worldwide are known for the significant threat they pose to the agricultural sector. The Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say, is an excellent example of such an insect pest and is known for the substantial damage that it can cause to potato crops. Various means, including the use of multiple insecticides, have been deployed to regulate its spread and to mitigate its impact on the potato industry, yet its ability to develop resistance against these diverse approaches remains remarkable. Significant efforts have thus been directed towards gathering information that would provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the development of insecticide resistance in this insect in order to better circumvent this challenge. With the goal of presenting key findings associated with insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata, this work reviews studies that have highlighted evidence of its resistance towards different compounds and shows key molecular targets that are emerging as potential players in the development of this resistance. It also presents novel avenues, including the use of RNA interference (RNAi)-based approaches, to consider when devising novel strategies aimed at tackling the observed insecticide resistance in this notorious potato pest.

2. The Colorado Potato Beetle and Its Control

The Colorado potato beetle is an insect that causes damage to potato crops worldwide and is considered a primary pest for potato plants [1,2]. It also poses a significant threat to tomatoes and eggplants [3]. Substantial plant defoliation is observed when this insect invades a potato field, as notably exemplified by the evidence that states that one single L. decemlineata can consume an area equivalent to 40 cm2 of potato leaves while in its larval stage [4]. Up to three L. decemlineata generations can be generated yearly and a female can produce approximately 800 eggs throughout its life, further supporting the extent of harm that this insect could cause in potato fields [4,5]. The defoliation caused by Colorado potato beetles is associated with important damage to potato crops and production on an annual basis, the extent of which can depend on whether the attacks occur prior to tuber initiation or after [6]. While the impacts underlying potato plant defoliation are often attributable to L. decemlineata, it is noteworthy to mention that this insect is not the only culprit responsible for the extensive damage caused to potato crops by insects, as approximately 34% of the losses observed in potatoes on an annual basis result from other insects such as the green peach aphid Myzus persicae or the potato leafhopper Empoasca fabae to name two [7,8]. Nevertheless, L. decemlineata is a key pest for which the damages observed every year in potato fields are attributable. Ultimately, with potatoes being cultivated in approximately 150 countries around the world, considering that the potato is only surpassed by rice and wheat for its global importance [9], strategies to protect this crucial industry from Colorado potato beetles and other threats are essential.
Given its ability to impact potato crops significantly, multiple approaches have been devised over the years to limit the impact of L. decemlineata. Several research groups have, in fact, provided excellent overviews of the diverse options deployed to regulate this potato pest [3,10,11,12,13]. For example, the use of biological approaches, such as leveraging known enemies of the targeted pest, including the predatory ground beetle Pterostichus melanarius [14] or the green lacewing Chrysoplerla carnea [15], has been tested yet with varying levels of efficacy. Sprays consisting of isolates obtained from Bacillus turingiensis (Bt) or Beauveria bassiana are select examples of additional strategies that have been explored for the control of L. decemlineata [16,17]. The use of crop rotation has also been explored and resulted in crop yield increases in select studies [18]. While these options as well as multiple additional alternatives exist to limit the damage caused by this insect pest, the primary strategy for its control remains the use of insecticides. It is estimated that more than hundreds of different compounds have been used to control L. decemlineata since the late 19th century [10,19]. Resistance towards these compounds has often developed rapidly as exemplified by the report of L. decemlineata resistance against DDT, which developed a little over a decade after it was first tested on this insect [20]. Current compounds in use for L. decemlineata control consist of, but are not limited to, diverse chemicals associated with various classes and modes of action, including neonicotinoids or diamides to name two. Unfortunately, as observed with DDT, this insect pest rapidly develops resistance towards these products. It was recently reported that L. decemlineata was one of the fastest insect pests capable of developing a resistance against novel compounds, warranting a better understanding of this adaptation [21].
Resistance towards insecticides has thus been explored in L. decemlineata by multiple research groups. A significant body of work has been directed at highlighting the resistance of this potato pest against specific compounds from the neonicotinoids class of insecticides including imidacloprid and thiamethoxam. For example, pioneering work performed in adults and larvae sampled in a Long Island population of insects revealed increased resistance towards the former of a value 100.8 times greater than the one observed in insects that were susceptible [22]. Insects obtained from this geographical location displayed the highest levels of imidacloprid tolerance when L. decemlineata populations sampled from more than one hundred locations in five countries were evaluated for their response to this compound [23]. A study of L. decemlineata populations sampled from diverse locations in the United States and Canada highlighted variations in the extent of imidacloprid resistance, yet they reported a 37-fold resistance to this compound when compared with susceptible insects used as controls [24]. Work conducted in second-instar larvae from different provinces in Canada showed on a given year that up to 45% of the tested populations could display resistance against imidacloprid [25]. The potential for cross-resistance between the neonicotinoids imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and clothianidin was also raised in this study. It is interesting to note that the temporal assessment of imidacloprid susceptibility during a growing season showed that the response to this compound fluctuates in resistant insects and that increased resistance was observed in the second generation of insects [26]. A study using field populations sampled from various locations in the United States between 1998 and 2010 showed that 80% of the investigated populations had greater LD50 values for the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam by the end of that period when compared with the susceptible controls [27]. Examples of resistance against other insecticides, in addition to neonicotinoids, have also been reported. An increase in resistance ratios pertaining to spinosad, a mixture of spinosyns A and D, was observed in L. decemlineata populations collected in organically managed fields from eastern New York [28]. Work assessing the response against a panel of 14 insecticides in seven L. decemlineata populations collected from China revealed strong resistances in select populations towards different insecticides, including cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, and alpha-cypermethrin to name a few [29]. Finally, it is also worthwhile to point out the recent reports that have explored underlying factors associated with evolution of insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata, including how polygenic resistance can provide insights regarding the genomic patterns tied to this resistance [30] as well as how temporal sampling can reveal evidence for selection in genes associated with resistance in select insecticide resistant L. decemlineata field populations [31]. Overall, these studies all showcase the ongoing interest in understanding the development of resistance against a variety of insecticides in L. decemlineata. Luckily, a clearer picture of the molecular basis underlying such resistances in this potato pest is emerging.

3. Molecular Players Associated with Insecticide Resistance in Colorado Potato Beetle

While various leads have emerged for their potential impact on insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata, multiple reports have highlighted cytochrome P450s as enzymes of particular interest for such resistances in this insect pest as well as in others [32,33]. Pioneering work in L. decemlineata revealed that the expression of select transcripts coding for cytochromes P450s, as determined by RNA-seq and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) approaches, was significantly up-regulated in a population of insects showing imidacloprid resistance when compared with a susceptible one [26]. A study notably showed increased levels of CYP4Q3, CYP4Q7, and CYP6BQ15 transcripts in L. decemlineata displaying imidacloprid resistance. Subsequent RNAi-based knockdown of these targets revealed an impact on imidacloprid response in L. decemlineata, for which CYP4Q3 levels were modulated [34]. In addition to studies showcasing a potential role for cytochrome P450s in imidacloprid response, it is noteworthy to point out that knockdown of CYP350D1 via double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) injection in adult L. decemlineata was associated with a positive impact on chlorantraniliprole response [35]. Another study demonstrated changes in transcripts coding for CYP4C1, CYP4G15, CYP6A13, and CYP9E2 following clothianidin treatment in L. decemlineata, and the injection of dsRNA targeting CYP9E2 was associated with increased susceptibility towards this compound [36]. It is interesting to note that parallel work identified structural variants in CYP4g15 as notably exemplified by the significant number of single nucleotide polymorphism outliers associated with this target and suggested a potential contribution of this candidate cytochrome P450 in insecticide resistance [37]. Work aimed at characterizing the molecular impact of fluazinam showed elevated levels of CYP9Z14v2 transcripts in L. decemlineata larvae exposed to the highest concentration investigated [38]. An overview of studies that investigated the differential expression of cytochrome P450s in L. decemlineata that were treated to insecticides or that were confirmed resistant to a given compound is shown in Table 1. These results all support the importance of cytochrome P450s for insecticide response in L. decemlineata and warrant further assessment of their impact in this potato pest.
In addition to cytochrome P450s, several other enzymes have been identified as potential players in the resistance of L. decemlineata to insecticides and are presented in Table 2. For example, the RNAi-based reduction of Ldace1 expression, a transcript coding for an acetylcholinesterase, was associated with increased susceptibility to chlorpyrifos in L. decemlineata [45]. Interestingly, parallel work has explored the structural and regulatory variations associated with this target, as well as Ldace2, in two L. decemlineata populations [46]. This investigation notably revealed that these populations exhibited differences in susceptibility towards two insecticides and that such a change could be attributable to insecticide target site modifications supporting the ongoing exploration of target site resistance in this potato pest by other groups [47]. A study that leveraged L. decemlineata transcriptome and aimed at the carboxylesterase/cholinesterase superfamily notably identified five carboxylesterases that were induced following fipronil exposure, KM220527, KM220530, KM220541, KM220566, and KM220576, and nine carboxylesterases that responded to cyhalotrin treatments, KM220527, KM220538, KM220541, KM220542, KM220554, KM220561, KM220564, KM220566, and KM220578 [48]. Up-regulation of transcripts coding for a glutathione synthetase was reported in two imidacloprid-resistant populations of L. decemlineata when contrasted with their expression in a susceptible population [49]. Comparison of the transcriptomes from imidacloprid-resistant L. decemlineata with one obtained from susceptible insects demonstrated elevated levels in the former of the transcripts coding for two UDP-glycosyltransferases, UGT1 and UGT2. Subsequent RNAi-based silencing of UGT2 expression significantly increased the susceptibility of the resistant strain to imidacloprid supporting its potential role in imidacloprid resistance [34]. A recent study showed overexpression of transcripts coding for a peroxidase in an imidacloprid-resistant population of L. decemlineata relative to the expression of the same target in a population susceptible to this neonicotinoid [39]. Finally, a significant down-regulation of three transcripts coding for glutathione S-transferases was observed in L. decemlineata treated with spinosad for a short period supporting a potential involvement of this additional family of enzymes for insecticide response in this insect [40].
In addition to families of enzymes identified as likely modulators of insecticide resistance in insects, including L. decemlineata, other non-enzymatic families of proteins have also been linked to this resistance. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, transmembrane pumps that can facilitate the cellular export of diverse compounds such as toxins in an ATP-dependent manner, are examples of such targets. ABC transporters have also been positioned as interesting molecular players to leverage for the monitoring of insecticide resistance in various pests [50]. Considering their overarching functions, it is not surprising to find studies that explored ABC transporters within the context of insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata. Overexpression of transcripts coding for one ABC transporter from the G subfamily was observed by next-generation sequencing and via qRT-PCR in L. decemlineata that displayed imidacloprid resistance when compared with levels measured in a susceptible population [34]. Subsequent RNAi-mediated reduction of its expression in insects using dsRNA-treated potato leaves was not associated with an impact on imidacloprid susceptibility. Reducing the expression of select transcripts coding for ABC transporters in imidacloprid-resistant L. decemlineata was associated with increased mortality in insects treated with this neonicotinoid underlying their potential role in such resistance [51]. Knockdown of genes coding for ABC transporters simultaneously or individually caused an increase in imidacloprid-induced mortality in resistant L. decemlineata, confirming their contribution to insecticide resistance. Characterization of three members from the B subfamily of ABC transporters, termed LedMDR1, LedMDR2, and LedMDR3, was also conducted in multiple tissues isolated from L. decemlineata [52]. Although knockdown of these targets did not lead to an increase in ivermectin susceptibility, assessing the impact of reducing the endogenous levels of these transporters in insects resistant to other compounds, nevertheless, remains of interest to further understand their role, if any, in insecticide response. It is interesting to point out that RNAi-based modulation of LdABCB1 transcript levels was also linked to a reduction in Cry3Aa toxin-mediated toxicity in L. decemlineata larvae [53]. Select studies that have highlighted the importance of ABC transporters for insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata are presented in Table 3. Overall, these findings support a closer investigation of the potential impact of ABC transporters on insecticide resistance in this potato pest.
While a consequential amount of work has been performed to better characterize the function of insecticide resistance in the previously mentioned targets in Colorado potato beetles, it is important to highlight additional molecular leads that have been investigated for a similar role in this potato pest. For example, a proteomics-based approach revealed the elevated expression of a C-type lectin in adult L. decemlineata that exhibited resistance to imidacloprid and treatments of a susceptible laboratory strain with this compound were associated with elevated levels of C-type lectin in the collected midgut samples, warranting a closer attention to the potential role of this family of proteins in imidacloprid resistance [54]. Expression levels of transcripts coding for select heat shock proteins (HSPs) were modulated in L. decemlineata exposed to different stress including temperature and insecticides. Furthermore, changes in HSP60 transcript levels using dsRNA were associated with substantial mortality in adult insects [55]. It is also important to mention work conducted by multiple teams to better delineate the function of cuticular proteins in L. decemlineata within the context of insecticide resistance. A pioneering study showed elevated levels of cuticular protein gene expression levels in L. decemlineata resistant to the compound azinphos-methyl [56]. Additional work reported the identification of 175 genes coding for cuticular proteins in L. decemlineata, setting the stage for a thorough assessment of the impact of these targets in the response against various insecticides for this insect [57]. Interestingly, a recent study using whole-genome sequencing and transcriptomics information highlighted comparable genetic pathways, but different genes, used by L. decemlineata to develop insecticide resistance [58]. Finally, it is noteworthy to mention information stemming from different groups that revealed miRNAs, short non-coding transcripts that can regulate gene expression in a posttranscriptional manner, with potential roles for insecticide resistance and response in L. decemlineata [59,60]. Overall, it is clear from the molecular players presented in this section that many leads with a likely relevance for insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata have emerged over the past decade. Varying the expression of these targets via diverse strategies could be key to influence such resistance in this potato pest.

4. RNAi and Insecticide Resistance

The overarching mechanisms of action associated with RNAi, the use of this technology to silence the expression of molecular targets in insects for various purposes, as well as the challenges associated with such an approach have been reviewed extensively by different research groups [61,62,63,64]. Target silencing via RNAi-based strategies in a given insect can involve the use of dsRNA. The presence of dsRNAs can trigger the modulation of the small interfering RNA (siRNA) pathway and contribute to their subsequent cleavage into siRNA molecules [65]. These fragments can become integral components of the RNA-induced silencing complex, which can facilitate binding to the targeted mRNA, ultimately preventing its translation [66]. This approach thus allows the reduced expression of a given molecular target and holds great promise in the field of insect pest control. In general, much progress has been made towards the optimization of RNAi delivery to make this technology a bona fide tool to control insect pests in an agricultural setting. Significant efforts have been deployed to identify ideal dsRNA packaging systems with dsRNA degradation as well as optimal dsRNA uptake in mind. Such approaches include the use of dsRNA-producing bacterial systems [67], incorporation of dsRNA into nanoparticles [68], as well as the use of plant-based dsRNA delivery systems [69] to name a few. Different RNAi-based products have received approval for commercialization or are in the process of securing it, with the objective of improving crop quality, and have been presented elsewhere [70,71]. Recent examples highlighting the potential of dsRNA specifically for L. decemlineata control notably include the successful use of a dsRNA-based insecticide in field and greenhouse trials [72,73]. This insecticide also displayed similar efficiency to other traditional insecticides used against L. decemlineata, including chlorantraniliprole and spinosad. In general, RNAi technology appears to hold great promise to control insect pests, and it is not surprising to notice multiple reports showcasing its use against L. decemlineata.
Several studies have thus explored the impact of RNAi-mediated knockdown in L. decemlineata, either alone or in the context of insecticide resistance. RNAi-based silencing of STT3b, DAD1, and GCS1, three N-glycosylation related genes involved in the early steps of N-glycosylation, resulted in substantial mortality of fourth-stage L. decemlineata larvae [74]. Feeding trials in a laboratory setting using dsRNA designed against the Mesh gene were proven effective in second- and fourth-stage L. decemlineata larvae [75]. Efficiency in field trials was also shown in this study, notably via evidence of significantly greater insect mortality observed in plants treated with dsMesh versus untreated plants. Furthermore, the efficiency of a dsRNA targeting the proteasome subunit beta type-5 was recently shown in a greenhouse trial and was associated with an efficiency comparable to spinosad [72]. A more extensive list that showcases examples of target genes investigated as part of RNAi-based methods and that are associated with L. decemlineata control can be found elsewhere [76]. In line with this review, RNAi-based approaches also proved successful in impacting insecticide response in L. decemlineata. Pioneering work on the use of RNAi to modulate insecticide susceptibility revealed that the dsRNA-based knockdown of the transcription factor CncC, as well as of four cytochrome P450s with relevance to this transcription factor, played a role in imidacloprid resistance [41]. Subsequent work demonstrated that the reduction of genes coding for targets requiring CncC for their expression was associated with a greater mortality in imidacloprid-resistant insects, further suggesting a role for this transcription factor in regulating the resistance against this neonicotinoid [51]. The DsRNA-mediated knockdown of genes coding for a cuticular protein, a cytochrome P450, and a glutathione synthetase in second-instar larvae exhibiting imidacloprid resistance could enhance the susceptibility against this compound [77]. Examples of targets potentially underlying insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata and explored using dsRNA-based approaches are shown in Table 4. Furthermore, while it is challenging to highlight these studies in the current work, it is relevant to underline that such an approach has seems promising to control a variety of insect pests, including the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda [78], the whitefly Bemisia tabaci [79], and the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis [80].
While several advantages are associated with strategies that rely on RNAi-based approaches to overcome insecticide resistance in insect pests, multiple challenges are, nevertheless, linked with their use in field-based applications and have been reviewed elsewhere [63,81,82,83]. The presence and activity of dsRNases in the digestive system of various insects can negatively impact the RNAi-mediated response in insects fed with dsRNAs [84]. Reports have also shown that RNAi efficiency could vary substantially between different populations of insects that were fed the same dsRNA, showcasing intra-species variation in RNAi response [85]. The possibility that the designed dsRNA may regulate the expression of transcripts against which it was not intentionally directed, leading to off-target effects, is also an important aspect to consider with RNAi-based approaches [86]. Virus-mediated production of viral factors capable of influencing select members of the RNAi pathway and, subsequently, impacting dsRNA efficiency has also been reported [87]. The region targeted by the designed dsRNA has been shown to influence its efficiency as observed via assessing the impact of various dsRNAs on L. decemlineata larvae’s survival rates and weights [88]. A recent report showcased the development of dsRNA resistance in L. decemlineata following dsRNA treatment through non-transgenic foliar delivery, warranting a closer look at the resistance mechanisms underlying the use of dsRNA-based options [89]. Overall, despite inherent challenges associated with dsRNA use as a means to control insect pests, the advantages of this strategy appear to outweigh these hurdles and to support the ongoing efforts deployed at optimizing this approach.

5. Outlook

The potential harm that the Colorado potato beetle causes to the potato industry is evident. Strategies have been deployed over the years to control this pest with different levels of success. This insect can adapt itself to fluctuating temperatures and has demonstrated an inherent ability to resist the many insecticides used to control its spread. As exemplified in this review, significant breakthroughs have been made towards the better characterization of the molecular bases underlying the resistances against insecticides in L. decemlineata. Leveraging these signatures as part of novel avenues to regulate this potato pest is envisioned. RNAi-based methods are notably appealing, considering the strong response this insect has exhibited when targeted by this strategy. On the other hand, hurdles remain to be cleared as well as important aspects must be clarified regarding the use of large-scale approaches relying on RNAi before its broader use in the agricultural world. These challenges notably include the potential off-target effects linked with RNAi, the development of resistances associated with this strategy, as well as the overall cost of dsRNA production at a sizeable scale to name a few. Nevertheless, with the growing number of mechanistic insights regarding insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata that are reported by various groups on an ongoing basis as well as with the increasing understanding of the advantages associated with RNAi, it appears that multiple tools based on this technology are in the development pipeline and could make a tangible difference in the control of this potato pest in the near future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J.M.; Supervision, P.J.M.; Writing—original draft, K.T., P.B. and P.J.M.; Writing—review and editing, K.T., P.B. and P.J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Support from a Research Grant (C1819-0450) under the Canada/New Brunswick Canadian Agricultural Partnership Program, a Canadian Horticultural Council—Agri-Science Cluster for Horticulture 3 grant, as well as from a Discovery Grant (2018-05974) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) is acknowledged.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Colleagues (J.L. Vickruck, P. MacKinley, C. Clark, and others) from the Fredericton Research and Development Centre (New Brunswick) that participated in insect collection and scientific discussions are acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weber, D. Colorado beetle: Pest on the move. Pestic. Outlook 2003, 14, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Radcliffe, E.B.; Lagnaoui, A. Pests and diseases. In Potato Biology and Biotechnology: Advances and Perspectives, 1st ed.; Vreugdenhil, D., Bradshaw, J., Gebhardt, C., Govers, F., Taylor, M.A., MacKerron, D.K., Ross, H.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2007; pp. 545–554. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hare, J.D. Ecology and management of the Colorado potato beetle. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1990, 35, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferro, D.N.; Logan, J.A.; Voss, R.H.; Elkinton, J.S. Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) temperature-dependent growth and feeding rates. Environ. Entomol. 1985, 14, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Harcourt, D.G. Population dynamics of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) in eastern Ontario. III. Major population processes. Can. Entomol. 1971, 103, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alyokhin, A.; Udalov, M.; Benkovskaya, G. The Colorado potato beetle. Insect pests of potato. Glob. Perspect. Biol. Manag. 2013, 2, 11. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oerke, E.C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Radcliffe, E. Insect pests of potato. Ann. Rev. of Entomol. 1982, 27, 173–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Birch, P.R.J.; Bryan, G.; Fenton, B.; Gilroy, M.G.; Hein, I.; Jones, J.T.; Prashar, A.; Taylor, M.A.; Torrance, L.; Toth, I.K. Crops that feed the world 8: Potato: Are the trends of increased global production sustainable? Food Secur. 2012, 4, 477–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Casagrande, R.A. The Colorado potato beetle: 125 years of mismanagement. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1987, 33, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alyokhin, A.; Mota-Sanchez, D.; Baker, M.; Snyder, W.E.; Menasha, S.; Whalon, M.; Dively, G.; Moarsi, W.F. The Red Queen in a potato field: Integrated pest management versus chemical dependency in Colorado potato beetle control. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kadoić Balaško, M.; Mikac, K.M.; Bažok, R.; Lemic, D. Modern techniques in Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) control and resistance management: History review and future perspectives. Insects 2020, 11, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kaleem Ullah, R.M.; Gökçe, A.; Bakhsh, A.; Salim, M.; Wu, H.Y.; Naqqash, M.N. Insights into the use of eco-friendly synergists in resistance management of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Insects 2022, 13, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alvarez, J.M.; Srinivasan, R.; Cervantes, F.A. Occurrence of the carabid beetle, Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger), in potato ecosystems of Idaho and its predatory potential on the Colorado potato beetle and aphids. Am. J. Potato Res. 2013, 90, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sablon, L.; Haubruge, E.; Verheggen, F.J. Consumption of immature stages of Colorado potato beetle by Chrysoperla Carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) larvae in the laboratory. Am. J. Potato Res. 2013, 90, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Whalon, M.E.; Wingerd, B.A. Bt: Mode of action and use. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2003, 54, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wraight, S.P.; Ramos, M.E. Delayed efficacy of Beauveria bassiana foliar spray applications against Colorado potato beetle: Impacts of number and timing of applications on larval and next-generation adult populations. Biol. Control 2015, 83, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Speese, J.; Sterrett, S.B. Crop rotation reduces the cost of Colorado potato beetle control in potatoes. Hort. Technol. 1998, 8, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gauthier, N.L.; Hofmaster, R.N.; Semel, M. History of Colorado potato beetle control. In Advances in Potato Pest Management; Lashomb, J.H., Casagrande, R., Eds.; Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 1981; pp. 13–33. [Google Scholar]
  20. Quinton, R.J. DDT-resistant Colorado potato beetles. Proc. North Cent. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1955, 9, 94–95. [Google Scholar]
  21. Brevik, K.; Schoville, S.D.; Mota-Sanchez, D.; Chen, Y.H. Pesticide durability and the evolution of resistance: A novel application of survival analysis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 1953–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, J.Z.; Bishop, B.A.; Grafius, E.J. Inheritance and synergism of resistance to imidacloprid in the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 1508–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Olson, E.R.; Dively, G.P.; Nelson, J.O. Baseline susceptibility to imidacloprid and cross resistance patterns in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alyokhin, A.; Dively, G.; Patterson, M.; Castaldo, C.; Rogers, D.; Mahoney, M.; Wollam, J. Resistance and cross-resistance to imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Scott, I.M.; Tolman, J.H.; MacArthur, D.C. Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance development in Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations in Canada 2008–2011. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Clements, J.; Schoville, S.; Clements, N.; Chapman, S.; Groves, R.L. Temporal patterns of imidacloprid resistance throughout a growing season in Leptinotarsa decemlineata populations. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Szendrei, Z.; Grafius, E.; Byrne, A.; Ziegler, A. Resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in field populations of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schnaars-Uvino, K.; Baker, M.B. High-level field-evolved resistance to spinosad in Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, in organically managed fields. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 4393–4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, W.H.; Wang, Z.T.; Xiong, M.H.; Lu, W.P.; Liu, P.; Guo, W.C.; Li, G.Q. Insecticide resistance status of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) adults in northern Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Y.H.; Cohen, Z.P.; Bueno, E.M.; Christensen, B.M.; Schoville, S.D. Rapid evolution of insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2023, 55, 101000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cohen, Z.P.; François, O.; Schoville, S.D. Museum genomics of an agricultural super-pest, the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Chrysomelidae), provides evidence of adaptation from standing variation. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2022, 62, 1827–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, N.; Li, M.; Gong, Y.; Liu, F.; Li, T. Cytochrome P450s-Their expression, regulation, and role in insecticide resistance. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 120, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nauen, R.; Bass, C.; Feyereisen, R.; Vontas, J. The role of cytochrome P450s in insect toxicology and resistance. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2022, 67, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kaplanoglu, E.; Chapman, P.; Scott, I.M.; Donly, C. Overexpression of a cytochrome P450 and a UDP-glycosyltransferase is associated with imidacloprid resistance in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dumas, P.; Sambou, M.; Gaudet, J.D.; Morin, M.D.; Moffat, C.E.; Boquel, S.; Morin, P.J. Differential expression of transcripts with potential relevance to chlorantraniliprole response in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 103, e21642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bouafoura, R.; Bastarache, P.; Ouédraogo, B.C.; Dumas, P.; Moffat, C.E.; Vickruck, J.L.; Morin, P.J. Characterization of insecticide response-associated transcripts in the Colorado potato beetle: Relevance of selected cytochrome P450s and clothianidin. Insects 2022, 13, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cohen, Z.P.; Schoville, S.D.; Hawthorne, D.J. The role of structural variants in pest adaptation and genome evolution of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Mol. Ecol. 2023, 32, 1425–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saifullah, S.; Margus, A.; Kankare, M.; Lindström, L. Repeated exposure of fluazinam fungicides affects gene expression profiles yet carries no costs on a nontarget pest. Insect Sci. 2022, 29, 1373–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Clements, J.; Olson, J.M.; Sanchez-Sedillo, B.; Bradford, B.; Groves, R.L. Changes in emergence phenology, fatty acid composition, and xenobiotic-metabolizing enzyme expression is associated with increased insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 103, e21630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bastarache, P.; Bouafoura, R.; Omakele, E.; Moffat, C.E.; Vickruck, J.L.; Morin, P.J. Spinosad-associated modulation of select cytochrome P450s and glutathione S-transferases in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 112, e21993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kalsi, M.; Palli, S.R. Transcription factor cap n collar C regulates multiple cytochrome P450 genes conferring adaptation to potato plant allelochemicals and resistance to imidacloprid in Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 83, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wan, P.J.; Shi, X.Q.; Kong, Y.; Zhou, L.T.; Guo, W.C.; Ahmat, T.; Li, G.Q. Identification of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase genes and their expression profiles in cyhalothrin-treated Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2013, 107, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, F.; Moural, T.W.; Nelson, D.R.; Palli, S.R. A specialist herbivore pest adaptation to xenobiotics through up-regulation of multiple cytochrome P450s. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Clements, J.; Sanchez-Sedillo, B.; Bradfield, C.A.; Groves, R.L. Transcriptomic analysis reveals similarities in genetic activation of detoxification mechanisms resulting from imidacloprid and chlorothalonil exposure. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Revuelta, L.; Ortego, F.; Díaz-Ruíz, J.R.; Castañera, P.; Tenllado, F.; Hernández-Crespo, P. Contribution of Ldace1 gene to acetylcholinesterase activity in Colorado potato beetle. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 41, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Margus, A.; Piiroinen, S.; Lehmann, P.; Grapputo, A.; Gilbert, L.; Chen, Y.H.; Lindström, L. Sequence variation and regulatory variation in acetylcholinesterase genes contribute to insecticide resistance in different populations of Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 15995–16005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Malekmohammadi, M.; Galehdari, H. Target site insensitivity mutations in the AChE enzyme confer resistance to organophosphorous insecticides in Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 126, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lü, F.G.; Fu, K.Y.; Li, Q.; Guo, W.C.; Ahmat, T.; Li, G.Q. Identification of carboxylesterase genes and their expression profiles in the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata treated with fipronil and cyhalothrin. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 122, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Clements, J.; Schoville, S.; Peterson, N.; Lan, Q.; Groves, R.L. Characterizing molecular mechanisms of imidacloprid resistance in select populations of Leptinotarsa decemlineata in the Central Sands region of Wisconsin. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gott, R.C.; Kunkel, G.R.; Zobel, E.S.; Lovett, B.R.; Hawthorne, D.J. Implicating ABC transporters in insecticide resistance: Research strategies and a decision framework. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gaddelapati, S.C.; Kalsi, M.; Roy, A.; Palli, S.R. Cap ‘n’ collar C regulates genes responsible for imidacloprid resistance in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 99, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Favell, G.; McNeil, J.N.; Donly, C. The ABCB multidrug resistance proteins do not contribute to ivermectin detoxification in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Insects 2020, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Güney, G.; Cedden, D.; Hänniger, S.; Heckel, D.G.; Coutu, C.; Hegedus, D.D.; Mutlu, D.A.; Suludere, Z.; Sezen, K.; Güney, E.; et al. Silencing of an ABC transporter, but not a cadherin, decreases the susceptibility of Colorado potato beetle larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. tenebrionis Cry3Aa toxin. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 108, e21834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Scott, I.M.; Hatten, G.; Tuncer, Y.; Clarke, V.C.; Jurcic, K.; Yeung, K.K. Proteomic analyses detect higher expression of C-type lectins in imidacloprid-resistant Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say. Insects 2020, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dumas, P.; Morin, M.D.; Boquel, S.; Moffat, C.E.; Morin, P.J. Expression status of heat shock proteins in response to cold, heat, or insecticide exposure in the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Cell Stress Chaperones 2019, 24, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, J.; Goyer, C.; Pelletier, Y. Environmental stresses induce the expression of putative glycine-rich insect cuticular protein genes in adult Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Insect Mol. Biol. 2008, 17, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.W.; Li, Y.Z.; Li, G.Q.; Wan, P.J.; Li, C. Identification of cuticular protein genes in the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 912–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pélissié, B.; Chen, Y.H.; Cohen, Z.P.; Crossley, M.S.; Hawthorne, D.J.; Izzo, V.; Schoville, S.D. Genome resequencing reveals rapid, repeated evolution in the Colorado potato beetle. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2022, 39, msac016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Morin, M.D.; Lyons, P.J.; Crapoulet, N.; Boquel, S.; Morin, P.J. Identification of differentially expressed miRNAs in Colorado potato beetles (Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)) exposed to imidacloprid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wiebe, K.F.; Elebute, O.O.; LeMoine, C.M.R.; Cassone, B.J. A Day in the Life: Identification of developmentally regulated microRNAs in the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata; Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 1445–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cagliari, D.; Dias, N.P.; Galdeano, D.M.; Dos Santos, E.Á.; Smagghe, G.; Zotti, M.J. Management of pest insects and plant diseases by non-transformative RNAi. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vogel, E.; Santos, D.; Mingels, L.; Verdonckt, T.W.; Broeck, J.V. RNA Interference in insects: Protecting beneficials and controlling pests. Front. Physiol. 2019, 9, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Christiaens, O.; Whyard, S.; Vélez, A.M.; Smagghe, G. Double-stranded RNA technology to control insect pests: Current status and challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhu, K.Y.; Palli, S.R. Mechanisms, applications, and challenges of insect RNA interference. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tomari, Y.; Du, T.; Zamore, P.D. Sorting of Drosophila small silencing RNAs. Cell 2007, 130, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ketting, R.F. The many faces of RNAi. Dev. Cell 2011, 20, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tian, H.; Peng, H.; Yao, Q.; Chen, H.; Xie, Q.; Tang, B.; Zhang, W. Developmental control of a lepidopteran pest Spodoptera exigua by ingestion of bacteria expressing dsRNA of a non-midgut gene. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, K.Y. Chitosan/double-stranded RNA nanoparticle-mediated RNA interference to silence chitin synthase genes through larval feeding in the African malaria mosquito (Anopheles gambiae). Insect Mol. Biol. 2010, 19, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhang, J.; Khan, S.A.; Hasse, C.; Ruf, S.; Heckel, D.G.; Bock, R. Full crop protection from an insect pest by expression of long double-stranded RNAs in plastids. Science 2015, 293, 860–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rank, A.P.; Koch, A. Lab-to-Field transition of RNA spray applications—How far are we? Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 755203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. De Schutter, K.; Taning, C.N.T.; Van Daele, L.; Van Damme, E.J.M.; Dubruel, P.; Smagghe, G. RNAi-based biocontrol products: Market status, regulatory aspects, and risk assessment. Front. Insect Sci. 2022, 1, 818037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rodrigues, T.B.; Mishra, S.K.; Sridharan, K.; Barnes, E.R.; Alyokhin, A.; Tuttle, R.; Kokulapalan, W.; Garby, D.; Skizim, N.J.; Tang, Y.W.; et al. First sprayable double-stranded RNA-based biopesticide product targets Proteasome Subunit Beta Type-5 in Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 728652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pallis, S.; Alyokhin, A.; Manley, B.; Rodrigues, T.B.; Buzza, A.; Barnes, E.; Narva, K. Toxicity of a novel dsRNA-based insecticide to the Colorado potato beetle in laboratory and field trials. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 3836–3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Liu, D.; Schutter, K.D.; Chen, P.; Smagghe, G. The N-glycosylation-related genes as potential targets for RNAi-mediated pest control of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 3815–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Petek, M.; Coll, A.; Ferenc, R.; Razinger, J.; Gruden, K. Validating the potential of double-stranded RNA targeting Colorado potato beetle Mesh gene in laboratory and field trials. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ma, M.Q.; He, W.W.; Xu, S.J.; Xu, L.T.; Zhang, J. RNA interference in Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata): A potential strategy for pest control. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Naqqash, M.N.; Gökçe, A.; Aksoy, E.; Bakhsh, A. Downregulation of imidacloprid resistant genes alters the biological parameters in Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kebede, M.; Fite, T. RNA interference (RNAi) applications to the management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Its current trends and future prospects. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 944774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shelby, E.A.; Moss, J.B.; Andreason, S.A.; Simmons, A.M.; Moore, A.J.; Moore, P.J. Debugging: Strategies and considerations for efficient RNAi-mediated control of the whitefly Bemisia Tabaci. Insects 2020, 11, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Joga, M.R.; Mogilicherla, K.; Smagghe, G.; Roy, A. RNA Interference-based forest protection products (FPPs) against wood-boring Coleopterans: Hope or hype? Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 733608. [Google Scholar]
  81. Cooper, A.M.; Silver, K.; Zhang, J.; Park, Y.; Zhu, K.Y. Molecular mechanisms influencing efficiency of RNA interference in insects. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kunte, N.; McGraw, E.; Bell, S.; Held, D.; Avila, L.A. Prospects, challenges and current status of RNAi through insect feeding. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mehlhorn, S.; Hunnekuhl, V.S.; Geibel, S.; Nauen, R.; Bucher, G. Establishing RNAi for basic research and pest control and identification of the most efficient target genes for pest control: A brief guide. Front. Zool. 2021, 18, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Christiaens, O.; Swevers, L.; Smagghe, G. DsRNA degradation in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) associated with lack of response in RNAi feeding and injection assay. Peptides 2014, 53, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chu, C.-C.; Sun, W.; Spencer, J.L.; Pittendrigh, B.R.; Seufferheld, M.J. Differential effects of RNAi treatments on field populations of the western corn rootworm. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 110, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kulkarni, M.M.; Booker, M.; Silver, S.J.; Friedman, A.; Hong, P.; Perrimon, N.; Mathey-Prevot, B. Evidence of off-target effects associated with long dsRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster cell-based assays. Nat. Methods. 2006, 3, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Swevers, L.; Ioannidis, K.; Kolovou, M.; Zografidis, A.; Labropoulou, V.; Santos, D.; Wynant, N.; Broeck, J.V.; Wang, L.; Capeelle, K.; et al. Persistent RNA virus infection of lepidopteran cell lines: Interactions with the RNAi machinery. J. Insect Physiol. 2016, 93–94, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. He, W.; Xu, W.; Fu, K.; Guo, W.; Kim, D.S.; Zhang, J. Positional effects of double-stranded RNAs targeting β-Actin gene affect RNA interference efficiency in Colorado potato beetle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 184, 105121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mishra, S.; Dee, J.; Moar, W.; Dufner-Beattie, J.; Baum, J.; Dias, N.P.; Alyokhin, A.; Buzza, A.; Rondon, S.I.; Clough, M.; et al. Selection for high levels of resistance to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) using non-transgenic foliar delivery. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Cytochrome P450s with relevance to insecticide response in Colorado potato beetles. Differentially expressed cytochrome P450s identified in L. decemlineata either exposed to different compounds or displaying resistance to select compounds. Methods used to quantify changes in cytochrome P450s are also provided. Abbreviations: Control (C), Resistant (R), Susceptible (S), Treated (T). Symbols: ↓ indicates down-regulation and ↑ indicates up-regulation.
Table 1. Cytochrome P450s with relevance to insecticide response in Colorado potato beetles. Differentially expressed cytochrome P450s identified in L. decemlineata either exposed to different compounds or displaying resistance to select compounds. Methods used to quantify changes in cytochrome P450s are also provided. Abbreviations: Control (C), Resistant (R), Susceptible (S), Treated (T). Symbols: ↓ indicates down-regulation and ↑ indicates up-regulation.
Cytochrome P450sInsecticidesConditionsMethodsReferences
1 CYP4C1↓, CYP4G57↑, CYP6BJ1↑, CYP6BK17↓, CYP6BQ15↑, CYP6EF1↑, CYP6K1↑, CYP9Z12v1↑ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsRNA-seq[34]
CYP4C1↑, CYP4G15↑, CYP6A13↑, CYP9E2↑
CYP4G15↑
CYP6A23↑		Clothianidin
Imidacloprid
Spinosad		T vs. C adultsqRT-PCR[36]
CYP9Z14v2↑FluazinamT vs. C larvaeqRT-PCR[38]
CYP6K1↑ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsqRT-PCR[39]
CYP6A13↓, CYP6A23↑, CYP6D4↓, CYP12A5↓SpinosadT vs. C adultsqRT-PCR[40]
CYP6BJa/b↑, CYP6BJ1v1↑, CYP9Z25↑, CYP9Z29↑ImidaclopridT vs. C cellsqRT-PCR[41]
CYP4BN13v1↑, CYP4BN15↑, CYP6BH2↑, CYP6BJ1↑, CYP6BQ17↑, CYP6BU1↓, CYP6EG1↑, CYP6EH1↑, CYP6EJ1↑, CYP9Z10↓, CYP12H2↑, CYP12J1↓CyhalotrinT vs. C larvaeqRT-PCR[42]
2 CYP6EH1↑, CYP6EZ1↑, CYP6FA1↑, CYP9A↑, CYP9Ya↑, CYP9Yb↑, CYP9Yc↑, CYP9Z14v1↑, CYP9Z25↑, CYP9Z26↑, CYP9Z28↑, CYP9Z29↑, CYP9Zd↑, CYP9Zi↑, CYP9Zj↑, CYP9Zk↑, CYP4BN13v4↑, CYP4Qb↑, CYP4c↑, CYP4e↑ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsqRT-PCR[43]
CYP6K1↑
CYP4D2↑, CYP6K1↑, CYP49A1↑		Chlorothalonil
Imidacloprid		T vs. C adultsRNA-seq[44]
1 Presented are targets that showed absolute log2 fold-changes higher than 5.0. 2 Shown are transcripts that displayed increased transcript levels greater than 5.0-fold in resistant versus susceptible insects.
Table
Table 2. Additional enzymes of interest for insecticide susceptibility in Colorado potato beetles. Differential expression of transcripts coding for enzymes in L. decemlineata treated with or resistant to insecticides. Abbreviations: Control (C), Resistant (R), Susceptible (S), Treated (T). Symbols: ↓ indicates down-regulation and ↑ indicates up-regulation.
Table 2. Additional enzymes of interest for insecticide susceptibility in Colorado potato beetles. Differential expression of transcripts coding for enzymes in L. decemlineata treated with or resistant to insecticides. Abbreviations: Control (C), Resistant (R), Susceptible (S), Treated (T). Symbols: ↓ indicates down-regulation and ↑ indicates up-regulation.
EnzymesInsecticidesConditionsMethodsReferences
1 Acetylcholin EST1↑, alpha EST↓, carboxyl EST1↑, EST4↑, EST5↑, EST11↓, EST Beta↑, EST FE4↑, GST Sigma 1↑, GST Sigma 2↑, GST1↑, GST7↓, UGT2C1↑, UGT1↑ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsRNA-seq[34]
GST↑, GST1-Like↑ClothianidinT vs. C adultsqRT-PCR[36]
Ldace1↑, Glutathione synthetase↓, UGT1↓FluazinamT vs. C larvaeqRT-PCR[38]
Lde_KM220566↑, Lde_KM220530↑, Lde_KM220576↑, Lde_KM220527↑, Lde_KM220541↑
Lde_KM220578↑, Lde_KM220566↑, Lde_KM220542↑, Lde_KM220564↑, Lde_KM220561↑, Lde_KM220554↑, Lde_KM220527↑, Lde_KM220538↑, Lde_KM220541↑		Fipronil
Cyhalotrin		T vs. C larvaeqRT-PCR[48]
Glutathione synthetase↑ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsRNA-seq[49]
Peroxidase↑ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsqRT-PCR[39]
GST↓, GST1↓, GST1-Like↓SpinosadT vs. C adultsqRT-PCR[40]
UDP-glucuronsyltransferase 2b7↑, oxidoreductase↑
UDP-glucuronsyltransferase 2b7↑, venom carboxylesterase-6↑		Chlorothalonil

Imidacloprid		T vs. C adultsRNA-seq[44]
1 Presented are targets that showed absolute log2 fold-changes higher than 5.0.
Table
Table 3. ABC transporters associated with insecticide response in Colorado potato beetles. Studies presenting modulated ABC transporters in L. decemlineata susceptible or resistant to select compounds. Methods leveraged to measure changes in ABC transporters are shown. Abbreviations: Resistant (R), Susceptible (S). Symbols: ↓ indicates down-regulation and ↑ indicates up-regulation.
Table 3. ABC transporters associated with insecticide response in Colorado potato beetles. Studies presenting modulated ABC transporters in L. decemlineata susceptible or resistant to select compounds. Methods leveraged to measure changes in ABC transporters are shown. Abbreviations: Resistant (R), Susceptible (S). Symbols: ↓ indicates down-regulation and ↑ indicates up-regulation.
ABC TransportersInsecticidesConditionsMethodsReferences
1 ABC-B6↑, ABC-G↑, MRP↓, MRP-1↓, MRP 4-1↑, MRP 4-4↓ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsRNA-seq[34]
ABCH278B↑, ABCH278C↑, ABCG1041A↑ImidaclopridR vs. S adultsqRT-PCR[51]
1 Presented are targets that showed absolute log2 fold-changes higher than 3.0.
Table
Table 4. dsRNA-based approaches and insecticide susceptibility in Colorado potato beetles. A list of select targets with relevance to insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata as investigated in studies that used dsRNA. Means utilized to deliver dsRNA are also presented.
Table 4. dsRNA-based approaches and insecticide susceptibility in Colorado potato beetles. A list of select targets with relevance to insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata as investigated in studies that used dsRNA. Means utilized to deliver dsRNA are also presented.
TargetsInsecticidesdsRNA DeliveryReferences
CYP9E2ClothianidindsRNA injection in adults[36]
ABCH278B, ABCH278C, ABCG1041AImidaclopriddsRNA feeding in adults[51]
CncC, CYP6BJa/b, CYP6BJ1v1, CYP9Z25, CYP9Z29ImidaclopriddsRNA feeding in adults[41]
CP18.7, CYP9E2, Glutathione synthetaseImidaclopriddsRNA feeding in larvae[77]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Timani, K.; Bastarache, P.; Morin, P.J. Leveraging RNA Interference to Impact Insecticide Resistance in the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Insects 2023, 14, 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050418

AMA Style

Timani K, Bastarache P, Morin PJ. Leveraging RNA Interference to Impact Insecticide Resistance in the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Insects. 2023; 14(5):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Timani, Kenan, Pierre Bastarache, and Pier Jr Morin. 2023. "Leveraging RNA Interference to Impact Insecticide Resistance in the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata" Insects 14, no. 5: 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop