Next Article in Journal
Deceptive Seduction by Femme Fatale Fireflies and Its Avoidance by Males of a Synchronous Firefly Species (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)
Previous Article in Journal
Bridging the Gap between Field Experiments and Machine Learning: The EC H2020 B-GOOD Project as a Case Study towards Automated Predictive Health Monitoring of Honey Bee Colonies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contact Efficacy of Two Amorphous Silica Powders against the Red Flour Beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combination Insecticide Treatments with Methoprene and Pyrethrin for Control of Khapra Beetle Larvae on Different Commodities

by
Deanna S. Scheff
1,*,
Frank H. Arthur
1,†,
Michael J. Domingue
2 and
Scott W. Myers
2
1
Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 1515 College Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
2
Forest Pest Methods Laboratory, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, USDA, 1398 West Truck Road, Buzzards Bay, MA 02542, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Retired 31 July 2020.
Insects 2024, 15(1), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010077
Submission received: 1 December 2023 / Revised: 18 January 2024 / Accepted: 18 January 2024 / Published: 22 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Integrated Management and Impact of Stored-Product Pests)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The khapra beetle is considered by many to be one of the most destructive stored product pests in the world and it is a quarantine species of significant concern in the United States. This beetle is known to feed on >100 commodities, leaving behind frass, broken and damaged grain kernels, and cast skins, which can make products unsuitable for consumption. Because its immature stage is so problematic, it is critical to identify effective management strategies, which could include fumigation, trapping, and insecticides. In this study, we investigated whether two different grain protectants applied to bulk corn, wheat, and brown rice could be efficacious for inhibiting the development from larvae to adult. Both grain protectants reduced adult emergence on brown rice for 6 months of storage and wheat and corn for up to 12 months of storage. Additional studies are needed to directly measure the amount of frass, feeding damage, and/or insect-damaged kernels (IDK), and larval weight, which would provide further insight on the relationship between commodity type and the efficacy of the insecticide application. Reducing adult emergence inhibits reproduction and population growth during storage. Thus, grain protectants can be a useful preventative tactic for stored commodity managers against the khapra beetle.

Abstract

Trogoderma granarium Everts, the khapra beetle, is a serious pest of stored products throughout the world. Larvae pose a significant threat to stored products because they feed on >100 different commodities, possess the ability to enter facultative diapause, and are difficult to detect. Control methods for T. granarium include fumigation, contact insecticides, trapping, and insecticide-incorporated packaging. The objective of this study was to determine the residual efficacy of two insecticide formulations (methoprene + deltamethrin + piperonyl butoxide synergist Gravista® and methoprene + deltamethrin, DiaconIGR® Plus). These insecticides were evaluated on three stored product commodities, corn, wheat, and brown rice, by exposing T. granarium larvae during a 12-month testing period. Both formulations significantly reduced adult emergence on corn and wheat for 12 months and on brown rice for up to 6 months. Adult emergence was highest at month 12 for corn (8.41%), and brown rice (85.88%), and month 9 for wheat (39.52%), treated with DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista®, respectively. A biological index used to measure the development of exposed larvae on the treated grain from the larval stage (low values) to adult emergence (high values) was lower (fewer adults) on corn and wheat compared to controls. Despite differences in formulations, each of these grain protectants could be utilized by stored commodity managers to protect commodities during storage and transportation for T. granarium when and if this pest is detected at USA ports of entry.

1. Introduction

Trogoderma granarium Everts, the khapra beetle, is a serious pest of stored products worldwide. Trogoderma granarium larvae are known to feed on whole and broken kernels of >100 different commodities and larvae can enter a facultative diapause under less-than-ideal conditions such as low temperature, low humidity, crowded conditions, and lack of food resources [1,2,3,4,5,6]. As a result, diapause can continue for months or years until favorable conditions return. This makes it difficult to detect low-level infestations in stored bulk grain, food processing and storage facilities, and packaged products. The eradication of established populations is also challenging, as T. granarium often resides in cracks and small spaces and can readily move to new food resources or re-infest commodities after control efforts [7,8]. Thus, an integrated pest management (IPM) program that focuses on long-term prevention and control of this species using multiple surveillance and control methods is critical. An efficient IPM program utilizes all available monitoring and control options to manage the stored products, and does not rely on a single control tactic. One type of control tactic is the use of grain protectants on stored commodities to prevent infestation on stored products during extended storage periods.
Grain protectants are insecticides that are applied to raw, uninfested grains that are loaded into storage to provide residual control of the grain during the entire time the grains are stored [9]. Most grain protectants in the United States of America (USA) are applied to the entire grain mass as they are unloaded into a bin or silo with the goal of coating as many kernels as possible prior to long-term storage on farms, agricultural cooperatives, or commercial grain storage facilities. Unlike fumigants, which have no residual efficacy, grain protectants can be effective for weeks to months after application. Additionally, registered grain protectants could be used by exporting countries to protect commodities during storage and transportation to prevent costly re-exportation or destruction of T. granarium, or other stored product insect-infested commodities upon reaching an importing country.
Grain protectants often utilize insect growth regulators (IGRs) to control the juvenile stages of the insect species by inhibiting molting and development to the adult stage [10]. One such grain protectant is methoprene (DiaconIGR®, Central Life Sciences, Schaumberg, IL, USA). This product contains ~300 mg/mL active ingredient (a.i.) methoprene and is applied for labels ranging from 105 to 60 mL (per 1000 bushel) depending on the stored commodity. Methoprene has low mammalian toxicity, and when used at label rates, there is little to no effect on non-target organisms [11]. Previous research has found that wheat and brown rice treated with 1.25 or 2.5 ppm (mg/kg) methoprene inhibited the progeny production of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), lesser grain borer, for up to 24 months [12]. Additionally, methoprene-treated wheat and corn suppressed the progeny production of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), red flour beetle, in the same 24-month study [12].
However, IGRs generally do not affect adult beetles and must be combined with a contact insecticide to target adults in addition to the juvenile stages. Previous research investigating the combined effect of methoprene and deltamethrin on controlling R. dominica, Sitophilus oryzae (L.), rice weevil, and T. castaneum adults on brown rice and maize found that one combined formulation (1.0 ppm deltamethrin and 2.5 ppm methoprene) on brown rice inhibited all progeny production of R. dominica and the total weight loss was <0.01% [13]. The same formulation also resulted in a ~97% reduction in S. oryzae progeny produced from exposed parental adults and a significant reduction in total weight loss, indicating there is a possible additive effect of the deltamethrin and methoprene combination [13].
Recently this combination of methoprene and deltamethrin has been further advanced with the incorporation of the synergist piperonyl butoxide (PBO) into the formulation. As a synergist, PBO aids in preventing the enzymes in the insect body from activating and increasing pyrethrin/pyrethroid effectiveness [14,15]. With the addition of PBO to insecticide formulations, the amount of pyrethrin/pyrethroid added to the insecticide formulations can be reduced and remain effective [14]. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the residual efficacy of the new insecticide formulation (methoprene + deltamethrin + PBO, Gravista®) compared to the standard formulation (methoprene + deltamethrin, DiaconIGR® Plus) applied to three different commodities over 12 months of simulated storage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insecticide Formulations

There were two insecticide formulations used in this study. The first was a commercially available deltamethrin + methoprene combination (DiaconIGR® Plus, Central Life Sciences, Schamburg, IL, USA), and henceforth referred to by the trade name. This formulation contained 4.75% a.i. deltamethrin, 11.40% a.i. s-methoprene, 83.85% other ingredients, alternatively expressed as 49 mg a.i./mL of deltamethrin and 120 mg a.i./mL s-methoprene.
The second insecticide formulation used in this study is a new formulation containing lower amounts of methoprene and deltamethrin but including PBO, with the given trade name of Gravista®, and henceforth referred to by the trade name. The new insecticide formulation was provided by an industry cooperator, Central Life Sciences, as part of a cooperative research program. The formulation contained 1.20% a.i. deltamethrin, 2.85% a.i s-methoprene, and 33.30% a.i PBO or 12.0 mg a.i/mL deltamethrin, 27.4 mg a.i/mL s-methoprene, and 320.0 mg a.i/mL PBO. The insecticide formulation provided by the industry cooperator was a laboratory formulation before full registration with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and thus label rates used in this study were “proposed label rates”. Gravista® has since been registered for use (EPA. Reg. No. 8459-116), and the label rates differ slightly from those used in this study.

2.2. Commodity Treatments

2.2.1. Wheat

According to the insecticide label, DiaconIGR® Plus is to be applied at a rate of 566 mL in 18.9 L of water to treat 1000 bsh of wheat. The weight approximation of wheat is 27.22 kg/bsh, which requires 0.7 mL of insecticide mixed with 25 mL of water; 0.4 mL of the insecticide solution was then applied to 500 g of wheat using an artist spray brush (Model 105, Bader Company, Franklin Park, IL, USA). The proposed label rate for Gravista® was 1138 mL per 18.9 L of water to treat 27.27 kg/bsh of wheat. To treat with this rate, 1.5 mL of Gravista® was mixed with 25 mL of water, and 0.4 mL of insecticide was applied to 500 g of wheat using the artist spray bush described above.

2.2.2. Brown Rice

The label rate for brown rice is 424 mL DiaconIGR® Plus in 18.9 L of water to treat 1000 bsh of brown rice. Using a weight approximation of 20.45 kg/bsh, 0.5 mL of DiaconIGR® Plus was mixed with 25 mL of water; then, 0.5 mL of the solution was applied to 500 g of brown rice using the artist spray brush. Similarly, to treat the brown rice in proportion to the proposed label rate for Gravista®, 1.1 mL of formulated product was mixed with 25 mL of water, and 0.4 mL of insecticide was applied to 500 g of brown rice.

2.2.3. Corn

The label rate for corn is 532 mL of DiaconIGR® Plus in 18.9 L of water to treat 1000 bsh. Using a weight approximation of 25.45 kg/bsh, 0.7 mL of DiaconIGR® Plus was mixed with 25 mL of water and 0.5 mL of solution was applied to 500 g of corn using an artist spray brush. Similarly, the proposed label rate for Gravista® was 1062 mL per 18.9 L of water. To treat the corn, 1.4 mL of Gravista® was mixed with 25 mL of water and 0.4 mL of the insecticide solution was applied to 500 g of corn.

2.3. Insects

This study was conducted at the United States Department of Agriculture–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Forest Pest Methods Laboratory (FPML), in Buzzards Bay, MA, USA. Trogoderma granarium larvae originated from a 2011 collection in Pakistan and were maintained in the FPML insect containment facility. The beetles were reared on a combination diet of 160 g ground dog food (Purina Dog Chow Complete, Nestlé Purina PetCare Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) mixed with 20 g of wheat germ (The Mennel Milling Company, Fostoria, OH, USA), and sprinkled with 20 g of rolled oats (Heartland Mill, Marienthal, KS, USA) on the surface in a 0.95 L glass jar. The colonies were maintained in an environmentally controlled chamber at 30 °C in complete darkness. The larvae used in this study were classified based on their size (mm) because they have an indeterminant number of molts. Thus, the larvae used in all bioassays were standardized to 3.5–5 mm, which are medium-sized larvae for this species.

2.4. Commodity Treatment and Bioassays

Each commodity (wheat, brown rice, and corn) was treated in 15 lots of 500 g samples. Five lots were for DiaconIGR® Plus treatments, five lots were for Gravista® treatments, and five lots were for the controls. The individual lots of each commodity were placed in a single layer on the bottom of a plastic bin, 44.5 × 36.2 × 17.8 cm (Sterilite Corp., Townsend, MA, USA). The insecticides were applied according to label rates, and water was applied to the control group. Five replicate 25 mL vials of insecticide were prepared for each treatment and commodity; one vial was used per lot, and thus represented five replications per insecticide and commodity combination. After each commodity lot was treated, it was mixed by gently shaking the grain in the plastic bin for 30 s, and allowed to dry at ambient conditions for 24 hr. After 24 hr, the grain was placed into a 710 mL plastic container and held at ambient conditions for the duration of testing. The testing periods were at month 0 (1 d after treatment), 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of storage at ambient conditions.
At the start of each testing period, an 80 g sample was taken from each lot and placed inside a 0.18 L plastic vial and fitted with a cap and screened lid. Twenty T. granarium larvae, 3.5–5 mm in size, were added to each vial and placed inside an environmental chamber at 30 °C in complete darkness for 6 wks (same conditions as insect colonies). The vials were immediately frozen, at −18 °C, at the termination date for two weeks before vials were examined either at the USDA-APHIS or USDA-ARS facility due to quarantine regulations. Therefore, the effect on T. granarium was assessed based on the level of development after each testing period. The number of adults, deformed pupae/adult intermediates, normal pupae, and larvae were counted for each treatment.
A development index was created by grading each life stage (adults, deformed pupae/adult intermediates, normal pupae, and larvae) as follows: individuals remaining in the larval stage were classified as 1, normal pupae were scored as 2, pupal–adult intermediates were scored as 3 (Figure 1), and normal adults were scored as 4. Although 20 individual larvae were placed in each vial for the monthly bioassays, not all larvae were recovered from each vial. Therefore, the number of each life stage recovered was converted to a percentage of 20, and thus the value for the developmental index ranged from 20 (all larvae remaining in that stage) to 80 (all larvae emerging as normal adults).

2.5. Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using the Mixed Procedure in the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, version 9.2, Cary, NC, USA) to determine the significance of the main effects of treatment (controls, DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista®), commodity (wheat, brown rice, corn), and the bioassay months (0, 3, 6, 9, and 12), for each of the four life stages, and by using the developmental index values. The data were further analyzed for each of the above by month using the Mixed Procedure to determine the significance of treatment and commodity for each life stage and developmental index, and the means were separated using LS Means with Tukey Adjustment (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Larval Stage

The main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions were significant at p < 0.01 for the percentage of T. granarium larvae remaining in that stage at the end of the 6 wks observation period (Table 1). It should be noted that the vials were frozen after 6 wks and thus live vs. dead larvae could not be determined. There were significantly more larvae in the treated corn and wheat over all the testing periods compared to the controls (Table 2). In contrast, there were few significant differences in the percentage of larvae in the control and treated brown rice vials over the duration of the experiment (Table 2). At month 6, the percentage of individuals remaining in the larval stage on controls was >60%, which was greater than that on any other month of testing. This same trend was observed in both insecticide treatments.
The data in Table 2 were then analyzed by month to determine differences between the treatment and commodity for individuals remaining in the larval stage at the end of the observation period. The percentage of larvae exposed on corn treated with DiaconIGR® Plus and remaining in that stage was >75% throughout the study and was significantly greater than the percentage of larvae exposed on the corn treated with Gravista® throughout the study. The percentage of larvae remaining in that stage on wheat treated with DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® was lower than the corresponding percentages on corn for all months. The percentages of larvae remaining in that stage after exposure on brown rice treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® ranged from 3.1 to 16.7% and was lower than the corresponding percentages on the treated corn, and occasionally lower than the corresponding percentages of individuals remaining in the larval stage on wheat.

3.2. Pupal Stage

The main effects of treatment and month, the treatment × month interaction, and the three-way interaction were all significant at p < 0.012 or less, but neither the main effect of commodity nor any other interactions were significant for exposed larvae that advanced to the pupal stage (Table 3). The percentage of individuals classified as normal pupae was 5.3% or less except for exposures on wheat and brown rice at two months (Table 4), indicating that most of the individuals that advanced beyond the larval stage also advanced beyond the pupal stage during the observation period. There were few significant differences between commodity or between the DiaconIGR® Plus and the Gravista® treatment versus controls (Table 4).

3.3. Pupal-Adult Intermediate Stage

The overall ANOVA for pupal–adult intermediates was significant at p < 0.01 for all main effects and all interactions (Table 5). Pupal-adult intermediates were rare in the controls, <1% (Table 6). However, there were significantly more pupal–adult intermediates in commodities treated with DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista®. In general, the percentages of pupal–adult intermediates were greater in wheat compared to either corn or brown rice, with no differences between the DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® treatments on wheat except for month 12, when the percentages were higher in the DiaconIGR® Plus treatment (Table 6). The lower percentages of pupal–adult intermediates on corn were largely due to the larger percentage of larvae remaining in that stage on corn relative to wheat or brown rice.

3.4. Adult Stage

All main effects and interactions were significant for adult emergence at p < 0.001 (Table 7). Except for month 6 on all commodities, and month 12 on brown rice, the percentage of adults in controls was above 70% (Table 8). The percentage of adults on corn treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® was significantly less than the control with <10% until month 12 when the percentage of those adults on the Gravista® treatment increased to 41% (Table 1). The percentage of adults on the DiaconIGR® Plus treated corn was less than corn treated with Gravista®. The percentage of adults on the two wheat insecticide treatments was <6% for month 0 to 6. There was a sharp increase in the percentage of adults at months 9 and 12, where the percentage of adults ranged from 37 to 52%. However, the increase in the percentage of adults was still significantly lower than the control. The percentage of adults on the two insecticide treatments on brown rice ranged from 43 to 89%, indicating a lack of efficacy on brown rice compared to corn and wheat (Table 8).

3.5. Developmental Index

The final analysis was on the development index, which ranged from 20 (all larvae remaining in that stage) to 80 (all larvae emerging as adults). The overall ANOVA was significant for all main effects and all interactions except for the three-way interaction (Table 9). The development index values were significantly lower on corn treated with DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® compared to the control. The developmental index was generally lower on treated wheat compared to the control, but overall, no significant differences were observed after month 3. There were no differences in developmental index values between the control and treatments for brown rice. Index values were generally lowest on corn compared to wheat and brown rice, with the greatest index values consistently on rice compared to corn and wheat. There were few differences in index values between DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® on any commodity (Table 10).

4. Discussion

Trogoderma granarium is known to feed on multiple commodities; however, the developmental time is commodity-specific [16,17]. In one study [16], newly hatched T. granarium larvae were monitored as they fed on barley, rice (Oryza sativa L.), rye, wheat, and walnuts. Researchers found the longest developmental time of larvae and pupae to be on walnuts and rice, 91 and 82 d, respectively, and the shortest time was wheat and rye at 54 d [16]. Throughout the 12-month study, we observed significantly more larvae on corn compared to wheat or brown rice treated with DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista®. Previous studies on the population growth of T. granarium after 60 d on ten common grains (starting from larvae) were conducted and researchers observed the highest population growth was on wheat and triticale and the lowest on peeled barley and maize [17]. Thus, the high number of larvae found in corn after each exposure period could be partly due to its slower developmental time. No dead larvae were observed in the vials with corn after the conclusion of each month. In previous studies investigating insecticides and T. granarium larvae, dead larvae appeared black and shriveled. In this study, all larvae appeared to be healthy after the testing period. This suggested that the effect on T. granarium larvae development would be a function of the insecticide formulation or slower developmental time. Similarly, the number of larvae in the corn control was also higher than in the other two. Significantly more larvae were observed in treatments of brown rice at month 0 and in wheat up to month 3. As will be discussed below, those larvae continued to develop into pupae or adults, and sometimes in between.
There were few normal pupae observed in the treated or control vials during the study. In the control vials, the larvae developed through the pupal stage to adulthood. However, pupal–adult intermediates or deformities were observed among all commodities and both insecticide treatments (Figure 1). Wheat had a higher percentage of deformed pupae compared with corn and brown rice. The faster development of T. granarium on wheat may account for the higher numbers of deformed pupae. The deformities can be attributed to the IGRs in the formulation, which have been documented in other studies with IGRs applied to grain, surfaces, and packaging. Previous experiments with IGRs applied to different surfaces resulted in deformed adult genitalia, incomplete sclerotization of adult legs and antennae, incomplete hardening of elytra, and incomplete larval–pupae or pupae–adult transformations [18,19,20,21]. The deformities are a direct result of the IGR, whereby the insect is arrested in the larval stage, mortality occurs in the intermediate stage, or the result is deformed adults [10].
Both insecticide treatments were highly effective at inhibiting the larvae from reaching the adult stage on wheat and corn for up to 12 months. However, after 6 months of brown rice storage, there was no significant difference between the control and the treated grain samples. Thus, if larvae are not feeding on the brown rice at the same rate as wheat, the effect of the insecticide on the larvae, because of ingestion, would be limited, and more adult beetles would be observed as is the case for brown rice. What may be more revealing of the effect of each treatment is the developmental index for T. granarium on each treated commodity. Corn treated with DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® had the lowest developmental index compared to the control and other treated commodities. The range in indices was 24–31 for DiaconIGR® Plus and 27–51 for Gravista®, but the ranges were never statistically different between the two treatments. These indices demonstrate that the majority of the larvae exposed to the treated corn remained in the larval stage and began to progress to the pupal and adult stages as the residual time increased. On the other hand, the development index for larvae exposed to DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® treated with brown rice ranged from 52 to 74 and 47 to 75, respectively, and was not statistically different from the control. This range in index values corresponds to deformed pupal–adults and adult beetles making up the majority of the insect life stages present. This result suggests that DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® have little effect on T. granarium development when applied to brown rice.
Deltamethrin, a pyrethroid, and methoprene, an IGR, affect insects through ingestion and/or direct contact with the insect. IGRs affect the growth and development, and pyrethroids affects the insect’s nervous system, and both will cause mortality upon extended exposures. Previous studies on the use of pyrethroids and IGRs applied as contact insecticides to various surfaces have demonstrated immediate and residual efficacy on T. granarium larvae and adults [7,22,23,24,25,26]. In these studies, adult T. granarium are generally more susceptible than larvae to several insecticides applied to grain or concrete surfaces [24,26]. Adult T. granarium are short lived [6,26] and exposure to treated surface or grain protectants would be short compared to the larval stage. Deltamethrin and cyfluthrin pyrethroid insecticide formulations were found to be more effective on T. granarium larvae compared to the IGRs methoprene and pyriproxyfen, with reduced adult emergence and greater larval mortality when exposed to five difference surfaces [7]. It has been stated that T. granarium larvae are affected by direct contact with the insecticide; however, the result may not be death and recovery may occur [22]. The body of T. granarium is covered with long short hairs [27]. It is theorized that the larval hairs on the insect’s body create a semi-barrier to the treated surface, whether that is grain kernel or a surface, and inhibit direct contact with the insecticide.
The effectiveness of the insecticides used in this study relies on two factors: (1) the food substrate being directly treated and consumed (ingestion); and (2) the absorption from movement on the treated grain (contact). Thus, if minimal feeding occurs based on the type of commodity, i.e., rice and corn are less than wheat [16], then it is predicted there will be a reduction in insecticidal efficacy because there is a greater reliance on contact efficacy. In contrast, if there is more feeding, it is likely that either incomplete metamorphosis or death will occur based on the dual insecticide modes of action in the formulations. As observed in this study and prior research, there are many factors contributing to T. granarium growth and development, thus making it difficult to tease out one specific contributing factor. Additional studies are needed to directly measure the amount of frass, feeding damage, and/or insect-damaged kernels (IDK), and larval weight, which would provide further insight into the relationship between commodity type and the efficacy of the insecticide application and primary route of insecticide entry. In addition, future surveillance and monitoring is needed to monitor for potential pesticide resistance to the active ingredients in the formulations studied.
Overall, based on the results of the effect of DiaconIGR® Plus and Gravista® on T. granarium larvae and the resulting development index, these treatments were most effective on corn and wheat and minimally effective on brown rice. The new Gravista® product, with ~75% less a.i. deltamethrin and methoprene in the formulation and the addition of PBO, performed similarly to the standard DiaconIGR® Plus product for stored grain protection. Follow-up studies are needed to evaluate additional commodities, longer storage or exposure periods, and different temperature and humidity conditions. In addition, investigating the effects of grain protectants on diapausing T. granarium is also warranted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, D.S.S., F.H.A. and M.J.D.; data curation, D.S.S. and M.J.D.; formal analysis, D.S.S. and F.H.A.; writing—reviewing and editing, D.S.S., F.H.A., M.J.D. and S.W.M.; funding acquisition, D.S.S. and F.H.A.; project administration, D.S.S. and S.W.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by Central Life Sciences and by the U.S. Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service. The USDA-ARS CRIS project number associated with these funds is 3020-43000-034-000-D, NP 304. Central Life Sciences provided the insecticides used in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Please request any particular data through the corresponding author. Public data will be added to the USDA NAL AG commons and data repository.

Acknowledgments

This paper reports the results of research only. The mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply a recommendation of endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this study received partial funding from Central Life Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication. The funder did provide the insecticides used in this study.

References

  1. Burges, H.D. Studies on the dermestid beetle Trogoderma granarium Everts. IV. Feeding, growth, and respiration with particular reference to diapause larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 1960, 5, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yinon, U.; Shulov, A. The humidity responses of Trogoderma granarium Everts (Col., Dermestidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1967, 57, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nair, K.S.S.; Desai, A.K. Studies on the isolation of diapause and non-diapause strains of T. granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 1973, 9, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bell, C.H. A review of diapause in stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1994, 30, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wilches, D.M.; Laird, R.A.; Floate, K.D.; Fields, P.G. A review of diapause and tolerance to extreme temperatures in dermestids (Coleoptera). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 68, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Athanassiou, C.G.; Phillips, T.W.; Wakil, W. Biology and control of the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium, a major quarantine threat to global food security. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019, 64, 131–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arthur, F.H.; Hartzer, K.L. Susceptibility of selected stored product insects to a combination treatment of pyriproxyfen and novaluron. J. Pest. Sci. 2018, 91, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jian, F. Influences of stored product insect movement on integrated pest management decisions. Insects 2019, 10, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arthur, F.H.; Subramanyam, B. Chemical control in stored products. In Stored Product Protection; Hagstrum, D.W., Phillips, T.W., Cuperus, G., Kan, Eds.; Kansas State University: Manhattan, AR, USA, 2012; pp. 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mondal, K.A.M.S.H.; Parween, S. Insect growth regulators and their potential in the management of stored-product insects. Integr. Pest. Manag. Rev. 2000, 5, 255–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Henrick, C.A. Methoprene. J. Amer Mosq. Control Assoc. 2007, 23, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arthur, F.H. Efficacy of methoprene for multi-year protection of stored wheat, brown rice, rough rice and corn. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 68, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arthur, F.H. Efficacy of combinations of methoprene and deltamethrin as long-term commodity protectants. Insects 2019, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Casida, J.E. Mixed-function oxidase involvement in biochemistry of insecticide synergists. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1970, 18, 753–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hodgson, E.; Levi, P.E. Interactions of piperonyl butoxide with cytochrome P450. In Piperonyl Butoxide-the Insecticide Synergist; Glynne-Jones, D., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998; pp. 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  16. Borzoui, E.; Naseri, B.; Namin, F.R. Different diets affecting biology and digestive physiology of the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2015, 62, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Athanassiou, C.G.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Boukouvala, M.C. Populations growth of the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) on different commodities. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 69, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Klein, J.A.; Burkholder, W.E. Effect of dianex (Methoprene) on growth and reproduction of Trogoderma glabrum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Environ. Entomol. 1984, 13, 1340–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Scheff, D.S.; Subramanyam, B.; Arthur, F.H. Effect of methoprene treated polymer packaging on fecundity, egg hatchability, and egg-to-adult emergence of Tribolium castaneum and Trogoderma variabile. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 69, 27–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scheff, D.S.; Subramanyam, B.; Arthur, F.H.; Dogan, H. Plodia interpunctella and Trogoderma variabile larval penetration and invasion of untreated and methoprene-treated foil packaging. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2018, 78, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Scheff, D.S.; Arthur, F.H.; Myers, S.W. Evaluation of methoprene-treated packaging against Trogoderma granarium Everts and Trogoderma inclusum LeConte larval development and packaging penetration or invasion. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 84, 101530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ghimire, M.N.; Myers, S.W.; Arthur, F.H.; Phillips, T. W Susceptibility of Trogoderma granarium Everts and Trogoderma inclusum LeConte (Coleoptera: Dermetidae) to residual insecticides. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2017, 72, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arthur, F.H.; Domingue, M.J.; Scheff, D.S.; Myers, S.W. Bioassays and methodologies for insecticide tests with larvae of Trogoderma granarium (Everts), the khapra beetle. Insects 2019, 10, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Diamantis, G.C.; Gioukari, H.G.; Boukouvala, M.C. Evaluation of six insecticides against adults and larvae of Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) on wheat, barley, maize and rough rice. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2017, 71, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boukouvala, M.C.; Kavallieratos, N.G. Effect of six insecticides on egg hatching and larval mortality of T. granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermedtidae). Insects 2020, 11, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Athanassiou, C.G.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Boukouvala, M.C.; Mavroforos, M.E.; Kontodimas, D.C. Efficacy of alpha-cypermethrin and thiamethoxam against Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) and Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on concrete. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2015, 62, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hadaway, A.B. The biology of the dermestid beetles, Trogoderma granarium Everts and Trogoderma versicolor (Creutz). Bul. Entomol. Res. 1956, 46, 781–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Deformed pupal–adult intermediate stages for Trogoderma granarium after exposure to either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® applied to corn, wheat, or brown rice and observed after 6 wks of exposure.
Figure 1. Deformed pupal–adult intermediate stages for Trogoderma granarium after exposure to either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® applied to corn, wheat, or brown rice and observed after 6 wks of exposure.
Insects 15 00077 g001
Table 1. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for percentage of larvae Trogoderma granarium remaining in that stage exposure.
Table 1. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for percentage of larvae Trogoderma granarium remaining in that stage exposure.
FactorsF-Valuedfp-Value
Treatment59.72, 178<0.001
Month91.34, 178<0.001
Commodity178.22, 178<0.001
Treatment × Month2.88, 1780.006
Treatment × Commodity58.44, 178<0.001
Month × Commodity9.38, 178<0.001
Month × Treatment × Commodity2.016, 1780.016
Table 2. Percentage of larvae (mean ± SE) of Trogoderma granarium that remained in the larval stage on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® formulation at each specific trial month or untreated grain. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Table 2. Percentage of larvae (mean ± SE) of Trogoderma granarium that remained in the larval stage on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® formulation at each specific trial month or untreated grain. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Trial MonthCommodityControlsDiaconIGR® PlusGravista®
0Corn13.4 ± 5.8aB85.8 ± 6.1aA75.7 ± 2.7aA
Wheat8.3 ± 2.3aB24.0 ± 3.6bA29.0 ± 3.7bA
Brown Rice5.1 ± 1.6aB11.0 ± 0.8cA3.1 ± 1.1cA
3Corn7.3 ± 2.4bB75.1 ± 6.5aA59.8 ± 8.5aA
Wheat25.0 ± 4.4aB52.8 ± 9.2aA43.5 ± 7.4aAB
Brown Rice13.4 ± 4.6abA12.8 ± 3.7bA10.9 ± 5.0bA
6Corn60.7 ± 6.4aB92.9 ± 2.4aA85.1 ± 1.9aA
Wheat66.3 ± 10.6aA83.4 ± 6.4aA79.1 ± 4.1aA
Brown Rice61.2 ± 7.9aA40.9 ± 7.8bA51.7 ± 6.3bA
9Corn24.1 ± 9.4aC89.6 ± 3.6aA63.7 ± 6.8aB
Wheat11.2 ± 4.1aA15.4 ± 3.8bA17.6 ± 4.7bA
Brown Rice25.0 ± 6.4aA7.5 ± 2.7bB16.7 ± 4.9bAB
12Corn14.3 ± 5.4aC77.6 ± 9.4aA46.8 ± 6.2aB
Wheat11.6 ± 1.6aA14.9 ± 2.0bA40.1 ± 6.2aA
Brown Rice31.5 ± 6.4aA6.8 ± 2.2bB7.5 ± 3.3bB
Table 3. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for percentage of normal pupae developing from exposed larvae of Trogoderma granarium.
Table 3. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for percentage of normal pupae developing from exposed larvae of Trogoderma granarium.
FactorF-Valuedfp-Value
Treatment5.92.1780.006
Month24.54.178<0.001
Commodity0.92.1780.396
Treatment × Month5.88.178<0.001
Treatment × Commodity1.34.1780.146
Month × Commodity1.78.1780.293
Month × Treatment × Commodity2.016.1780.012
Table 4. Percentage of normal pupae (mean ± SE) from larvae of Trogoderma granarium exposed on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® formulation or untreated. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Table 4. Percentage of normal pupae (mean ± SE) from larvae of Trogoderma granarium exposed on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® formulation or untreated. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Trial MonthCommodityControlsDiaconIGR® PlusGravista®
0Corn0.0 ± 0.0aA1.2 ± 1.2aA0.0 ± 0.0bA
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aC2.1 ± 3.3aB1.0 ± 1.0aA
Brown Rice0.0 ± 0.0aC2.8 ± 1.9aA0.0 ± 0.0bB
3Corn4.3 ± 1.8bA0.0 ± 0.0aA5.3 ± 2.3aA
Wheat10.1 ± 2.7abA5.1 ± 2.2aA2.1 ± 1.2aA
Brown Rice13.2 ± 4.4aA5.0 ± 3.4aA0.0 ± 5.0aA
6Corn3.3 ± 2.3aA0.0 ± 0.0aB0.0 ± 0.0aB
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA
Brown Rice1.0 ± 1.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA
9Corn0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA
Brown Rice0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA
12Corn0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.04aA
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aA1.3 ± 1.3aA1.0 ± 1.0aA
Brown Rice0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA0.0 ± 0.0aA
Table 5. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions for percentage of pupal–adult intermediates developing from exposed larvae of Trogoderma granarium.
Table 5. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions for percentage of pupal–adult intermediates developing from exposed larvae of Trogoderma granarium.
FactorF-Valuedfp-Value
Treatment164.92.178<0.0001
Month29.14.178<0.0001
Commodity94.82.178<0.0001
Treatment × Month8.48.178<0.0001
Treatment × Commodity28.24.178<0.0001
Month × Commodity6.78.178<0.0001
Month × Treatment × Commodity3.616.178<0.0001
Table 6. Percentage of deformed pupal–adult intermediates (mean ± SE) from larvae of Trogoderma granarium exposed on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista formulation or untreated. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatments within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Table 6. Percentage of deformed pupal–adult intermediates (mean ± SE) from larvae of Trogoderma granarium exposed on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista formulation or untreated. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatments within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Trial MonthCommodityControlsDiaconIGR® PlusGravista®
0Corn0.0 ± 0.0aC11.0 ± 4.9cB22.0 ± 3.6bA
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aC72.8 ± 3.3aA62.8 ± 3.2aB
Brown Rice0.0 ± 0.0aC39.9 ± 5.7bA17.8 ± 5.8bB
3Corn0.0 ± 0.0aB24.8 ± 6.5aA24.4 ± 4.2bA
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aB41.0 ± 9.6bA53.4 ± 6.6aA
Brown Rice0.0 ± 0.0aB27.8 ± 6.2aA11.8 ± 5.0bB
6Corn0.0 ± 0.0aB4.1 ± 1.8aAB9.6 ± 2.6abAB
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aB12.7 ± 6.2bA16.1 ± 4.8aA
Brown Rice0.0 ± 0.0aB16.3 ± 1.1aA5.9 ± 1.8bAB
9Corn1.2 ±1.2aA8.0 ± 3.4bA5.5 ± 3.4bA
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aB46.4 ± 3.3aA30.9 ± 4.6aA
Brown0.0 ± 0.0aB10.3 ± 4.3bA2.0 ± 1.3bAB
12Corn0.0 ± 0.0aB13.9 ± 6.3bA12.1 ± 5.4abA
Wheat0.0 ± 0.0aC47.3 ± 8.6aA22.2 ± 2.7aB
Brown Rice1.2 ± 1.2aB8.7 ± 5.1bA4.2 ± 2.0baAB
Table 7. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for percentage of normal adults developing from exposed larvae of Trogoderma granarium.
Table 7. Three-way ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for percentage of normal adults developing from exposed larvae of Trogoderma granarium.
FactorF-Valuedfp-Value
Treatment268.82.178<0.0001
Month68.84.178<0.0001
Commodity207.92.178<0.0001
Treatment × Month14.08.178<0.0001
Treatment × Commodity67.14.178<0.0001
Month × Commodity5.68.178<0.0001
Month × Treatment × Commodity2.916.178<0.0001
Table 8. Percentage of normal adults (mean ± SE) from larvae of Trogoderma granarium exposed on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista formulation or untreated. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Table 8. Percentage of normal adults (mean ± SE) from larvae of Trogoderma granarium exposed on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista formulation or untreated. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Trail MonthCommodityControlsDiaconIGR® PlusGravista®
0Corn86.6 ± 5.8aA2.4 ± 1.5bB2.5 ± 2.5bB
Wheat91.7 ± 2.2aA1.1 ± 1.1bC6.4 ± 0.9bB
Brown Rice94.9 ± 1.5aA46.2 ± 2.8aC79.1 ± 5.3 aB
3Corn88.4 ± 2.7aA0.0 ± 0.0bC10.4 ± 3.2B
Wheat65.0 ± 4.7bA1.0 ± 1.0bB1.0 ± 1.0B
Brown Rice73.5 ± 3.4bA54.4 ± 8.9aB77.3 ± 3.5A
6Corn33.9 ± 7.1aA3.0 ± 1.2bB5.4 ± 4.1bB
Wheat33.8 ±10.6aA3.9 ± 1.7bB4.1 ± 2.5bB
Brown Rice37.7 ± 8.1aA42.8 ± 12.1aA42.4 ± 6.2aA
9Corn74.8 ±10.2aA1.2 ± 1.2cB2.4 ± 1.5cB
Wheat88.8 ± 4.1aA38.2 ± 4.7bB51.5 ± 6.2bB
Brown Rice76.0 ± 6.4aA82.2 ± 3.9aA81.2 ± 5.2aA
12Corn85.7 ± 5.4aA8.4 ± 4.9cC41.1 ± 3.1bB
Wheat88.3 ± 1.6aA36.8 ± 6.9bB36.7 ± 5.5bB
Brown Rice67.3 ± 6.7bA84.5 ± 5.6aA88.2 ± 5.2aA
Table 9. ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for developmental index (range from 20, all larvae, to 80, all normal emerged adults) of Trogoderma granarium exposed in the larval stage.
Table 9. ANOVA Table (Proc Mixed in SAS) for main effects of treatment, month, commodity, and all associated interactions (p < 0.001 for all) for developmental index (range from 20, all larvae, to 80, all normal emerged adults) of Trogoderma granarium exposed in the larval stage.
FactorF-Valuedfp-Value
Treatment101.32.176<0.001
Month64.04.176<0.001
Commodity146.52.176<0.001
Treatment × Month4.18.176<0.001
Treatment × Commodity47.34.176<0.001
Month × Commodity6.18.176<0.001
Month × Treatment × Commodity1.516.1760.10
Table 10. Index values (mean ± SE) for development of Trogoderma granarium larvae after exposure on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® formulation. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Index values range from 20 (complete arrestation of larvae) to 80 (all exposed larvae reached the adult stage). Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Table 10. Index values (mean ± SE) for development of Trogoderma granarium larvae after exposure on corn, brown rice, and wheat, and each commodity treated with either DiaconIGR® Plus or Gravista® formulation. Bioassays conducted one day after treatment (month 0) and every three months thereafter for one year. Index values range from 20 (complete arrestation of larvae) to 80 (all exposed larvae reached the adult stage). Means for columns within month for each treatment are noted with different lower-case letters indicating significant differences among commodities and means within row for each commodity are noted with different capital letters denoting significant differences among treatment within commodity (p < 0.05, Proc Mixed, LSMeans with Tukey Adjustment).
Trail MonthCommodityControlsDiaconIGR® PlusGravista®
0Corn72.0 ± 3.4aA26.1 ± 2.5cB30.2 ± 1.2cB
Wheat72.0 ± 1.3aA50.2 ± 1.4bAB42.2 ± 1.2bB
Brown Rice76.9 ± 0.9aA64.3 ± 1.9aA74.6 ± 1.0aA
3Corn73.9 ± 1.4aA29.9 ± 2.6bB37.1 ± 3.6bB
Wheat61.0 ± 2.7abA38.2 ± 3.8bB42.4 ± 3.0bB
Brown Rice66.7 ± 1.9abA64.7 ± 1.9aA64.8 ± 3.0aA
6Corn42.2 ± 4.1aA23.5 ± 1.4bB27.0 ± 1.5bB
Wheat40.3 ± 6.3aA27.4 ± 2.7bA29.2 ± 1.7bA
Brown Rice42.8 ± 4.8aA52.2 ± 5.4aA47.8 ± 3.7aA
9Corn65.3 ± 5.8aA24.6 ± 1.6bB40.6 ± 3.8bAB
Wheat61.5 ± 2.3aA63.4 ± 2.9aA63.3 ± 2.8aA
Brown Rice65.0 ± 3.8aA73.3 ± 1.4aA69.6 ± 3.0aA
12Corn71.4 ± 3.2aA30.6 ± 4.5cB49.4 ± 3.9bB
Wheat73.0 ± 1.0aA48.9 ± 12.2bA51.1 ± 3.42bA
Brown Rice60.9 ± 3.9aA74.2 ± 1.7aA74.6 ± 1.9aA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scheff, D.S.; Arthur, F.H.; Domingue, M.J.; Myers, S.W. Combination Insecticide Treatments with Methoprene and Pyrethrin for Control of Khapra Beetle Larvae on Different Commodities. Insects 2024, 15, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010077

AMA Style

Scheff DS, Arthur FH, Domingue MJ, Myers SW. Combination Insecticide Treatments with Methoprene and Pyrethrin for Control of Khapra Beetle Larvae on Different Commodities. Insects. 2024; 15(1):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scheff, Deanna S., Frank H. Arthur, Michael J. Domingue, and Scott W. Myers. 2024. "Combination Insecticide Treatments with Methoprene and Pyrethrin for Control of Khapra Beetle Larvae on Different Commodities" Insects 15, no. 1: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop