Next Article in Journal
Negotiating Deaf Bodies and Corporeal Experiences: The Cybernetic Deaf Subject
Next Article in Special Issue
Knowing Apples
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Seeing Green: The Re-discovery of Plants and Nature’s Wisdom
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Societies 2013, 3(2), 158-169; doi:10.3390/soc3020158

A War of Words: Do Conflict Metaphors Affect Beliefs about Managing “Unwanted” Plants?

1
Learning Resources Center, University of Alaska-Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508, USA
2
Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5215, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 February 2013 / Revised: 17 March 2013 / Accepted: 18 March 2013 / Published: 26 March 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rethinking the Vegetal: Emerging Perspectives on Plants and Society)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [280 KB, uploaded 26 March 2013]   |  

Abstract

Woody plants have increased in density and extent in rangelands worldwide since the 1800s, and land managers increasingly remove woodland plants in hopes of restoring pre-settlement conditions and/or improved forage for grazing livestock. Because such efforts can be controversial, especially on publicly owned lands, managers often attempt to frame issues in ways they believe can improve public acceptance of proposed actions. Frequently these framing efforts employ conflict metaphors drawn from military or legal lexicons. We surveyed citizens in the Rocky Mountains region, USA, about their beliefs concerning tree-removal as a management strategy. Plants targeted for removal in the region include such iconic tree species as Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine as well as other less-valued species, such as Rocky Mountain juniper, that are common targets for removal nationwide. To test the influence of issue frame on acceptance, recipients were randomly assigned surveys in which the reason for conifer removal was described using one of three terms often employed by invasive biologists and land managers: “invasion”, “expansion”, and “encroachment”. Framing in this instance had little effect on responses. We conclude the use of single-word frames by scientists and managers use to contextualize an issue may not resonate with the public. View Full-Text
Keywords: conifers; framing; land management; persuasion; public acceptance; woody plant encroachment conifers; framing; land management; persuasion; public acceptance; woody plant encroachment
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nay, C.G.; Brunson, M.W. A War of Words: Do Conflict Metaphors Affect Beliefs about Managing “Unwanted” Plants? Societies 2013, 3, 158-169.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Societies EISSN 2075-4698 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top