Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties Improvement of Laser Tailor Welded Blanks of DP600 Steel by Magnetic Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Finite Element Based Physical Chemical Modeling of Corrosion in Magnesium Alloys
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/met7030087
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Erratum to Metals 2017, 7(1), 24.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Liu, Z.; Ji, F.; Wang, M.; Zhu, T. One-Dimensional Constitutive Model for Porous Titanium Alloy at Various Strain Rates and Temperatures. Metals 2017, 7, 24

by
Metals Editorial Office
MDPI AG St. Alban-Anlage 66, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
Metals 2017, 7(3), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/met7030087
Submission received: 7 March 2017 / Accepted: 7 March 2017 / Published: 8 March 2017
Browse Figure
Versions Notes
The Metals Editorial Office wishes to report the following erratum to this paper [1]. In the paper, Figure 4a,b is the same as Figure 4c. The correct version of Figure 4a,b is as follows:
The error was introduced during proofreading by authors. We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by this mistake. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article website.

Reference

  1. Liu, Z.; Ji, F.; Wang, M.; Zhu, T. One-Dimensional Constitutive Model for Porous Titanium Alloy at Various Strain Rates and Temperatures. Metals 2017, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 07 00087 g004 550
Figure 4. Stress–strain curves of the porous titanium alloy specimens (porosity: 26% and 36%) at the same temperatures but different strain rates: (a) εp = 26%, T = 25 °C; (b) εp = 36%, T = 25 °C; (c) εp = 26%, T = 100 °C; (d) εp = 36%, T = 100 °C; (e) εp = 26%, T = 200 °C; (f) εp = 36%, T = 200 °C; (g) εp = 26%, T = 300 °C; and (h) εp = 36%, T = 300 °C.
Figure 4. Stress–strain curves of the porous titanium alloy specimens (porosity: 26% and 36%) at the same temperatures but different strain rates: (a) εp = 26%, T = 25 °C; (b) εp = 36%, T = 25 °C; (c) εp = 26%, T = 100 °C; (d) εp = 36%, T = 100 °C; (e) εp = 26%, T = 200 °C; (f) εp = 36%, T = 200 °C; (g) εp = 26%, T = 300 °C; and (h) εp = 36%, T = 300 °C.
Metals 07 00087 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Editorial Office, M. Erratum: Liu, Z.; Ji, F.; Wang, M.; Zhu, T. One-Dimensional Constitutive Model for Porous Titanium Alloy at Various Strain Rates and Temperatures. Metals 2017, 7, 24. Metals 2017, 7, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7030087

AMA Style

Editorial Office M. Erratum: Liu, Z.; Ji, F.; Wang, M.; Zhu, T. One-Dimensional Constitutive Model for Porous Titanium Alloy at Various Strain Rates and Temperatures. Metals 2017, 7, 24. Metals. 2017; 7(3):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7030087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Editorial Office, Metals. 2017. "Erratum: Liu, Z.; Ji, F.; Wang, M.; Zhu, T. One-Dimensional Constitutive Model for Porous Titanium Alloy at Various Strain Rates and Temperatures. Metals 2017, 7, 24" Metals 7, no. 3: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7030087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop