Next Article in Journal
Examining the Infractions Causing Higher Rates of Suspensions and Expulsions: Racial and Ethnic Considerations
Next Article in Special Issue
The Structure of European Food Law
Previous Article in Journal
The State of Contracts Scholarship in the United States
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Laws 2013, 2(1), 1-19; doi:10.3390/laws2010001

Public and Private Food Safety Standards: Facilitating or Frustrating Fresh Produce Growers?

Faculty of Agro Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 17100 Jeli, Kelantan, Malaysia
School of Agriculture, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, GL7 6JS, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 September 2012 / Revised: 9 January 2013 / Accepted: 9 January 2013 / Published: 22 January 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Food Safety Law and Policy)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [151 KB, uploaded 22 January 2013]   |  


Global private food safety and quality standards have undergone some major overhauls during the past two decades, and these will continue to evolve with the recent emphasis on harmonization. The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) attempts to ensure that harmonize retail standards are commendable and elegant in principle, but in practice, retailers continue to demand their own standard, whilst supporting GFSI’s benchmarking program. It is difficult to see such retailers giving up their own standards and the control they currently exert as chain captains. There is also the risk that too much harmonization will result in these standards losing their individuality and uniqueness. Amidst the struggle for private standard dominance, alternative approaches to risk management (e.g., self-assessment of risk, independent audits and risk ranking) may be the way forward, similar to how insurance risks are calculated for businesses. Furthermore, this risk-based approach could also lead to the effective implementation of co-regulation, where both public and private sector compliances are addressed together—a win-win situation. This paper considers the implications and future trends of fresh produce farming, and identifies five interventions (i.e., assurance schemes), which include the do-nothing scenario to underpinning one’s brand or label with an existing scheme. View Full-Text
Keywords: farm assurance schemes; food safety risk assessment; GFSI; harmonization farm assurance schemes; food safety risk assessment; GFSI; harmonization

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Soon, J.M.; Baines, R.N. Public and Private Food Safety Standards: Facilitating or Frustrating Fresh Produce Growers? Laws 2013, 2, 1-19.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Laws EISSN 2075-471X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top