Genetic Diversity of Candida spp. Isolates Colonizing Twins and Their Family Members
by
, , ,
Iwona Wojciechowska-Koszko
1,
Paweł Kwiatkowski
1
,
Paulina Roszkowska
1,
Barbara Krasnodębksa-Szponder
2,
Michał Sławiński
3,
Artur Gabrych
4,
Stefania Giedrys-Kalemba
5,
Barbara Dołęgowska
6,
Edward Kowalczyk
7 and
Monika Sienkiewicz
8,* 1
Department of Diagnostic Immunology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
2
Immunology Laboratory Independent, Public Clinical Hospital No. 2 in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
3
Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Public Clinical Hospital No. 2 in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
4
Hospital Pharmacy, Public Clinical Hospital No. 2 in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
5
Department of Medical Microbiology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
6
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
7
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-752 Lodz, Poland
8
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Microbiological Diagnostic, Medical University of Lodz, 90-151 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(12), 1532; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121532
Submission received: 9 October 2022
/
Revised: 30 November 2022
/
Accepted: 10 December 2022
/
Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Candida Commensalism and Infections in Mucosae–Interactions with Other Human Diseases)
Abstract
:A wide range of options for studying Candida species are available through genetic methods. Twins, particularly monozygotic ones and their families may be fitting subjects for studying those microorganisms. The question is: How specific can yeast flora be in an individual? The study aimed to analyze the strain relatedness among commensal yeasts isolated from various parts of the bodies of healthy people and to compare correlations between the genotypes of the isolates. Yeasts were isolated from 63 twins and their family members (n = 25) from the oral cavity, anus, interdigital space and navel. After species identification, Candida albicans (n = 139), C. parapsilosis (n = 39), C. guilliermondii (n = 25), C. dubliniensis (n = 11) and C. krusei (n = 9) isolates were analyzed using the random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) optimization method. The similarities between the strains were calculated based on the Dice (Sab) coefficient and are displayed graphically as dendrograms. Using cluster analysis, the following relatedness was distinguished: 13 genotypes and three unique (Un) patterns among C. albicans; 10 genotypes and four Un patterns among C. parapsilosis; three genotypes and one Un pattern among C. guilliermondii and C. dubliniensis; and three genotypes among C. krusei isolates. The presence of identical, similar or both genotypes among the strains isolated from family members shows the transmission of yeasts between ontocenoses in the same person and between individuals. The similarity between the genotypes of C. albicans, C. guilliermondii, C. dubliniensis and C. krusei was more remarkable than between the genotypes of C. parapsilosis in the strains isolated from ontocenoses of the same individual and their family members. The degrees of genetic similarity between Candida spp. strains isolated from monozygotic twins and those obtained from their relatives did not differ.
1. Introduction
The fungal microbiome in a healthy person undergoes continuous quantitative and qualitative changes during the various periods of life. The changes depend on the genetic factors of a host as well as environmental factors. Of all the fungi occurring in a healthy individual, the yeasts of the Candida genus and the yeast-like fungi of the Malassezia genus appear the most often. The main reservoir of yeasts in healthy people is the digestive tract, particularly the oral cavity. Fungi may also occur on the skin and colonize the urogenital system. It is worth noting that some species of Malassezia are also a natural part of the human skin microflora. Nevertheless, they can sometimes cause skin diseases, making them count among the opportunistic mycopathogens that cause dermatoses [1,2,3,4].
Fungi enter the human body through different pathways, such as the digestive tract, inhalation (aero-droplet and aero-powder), sexual contact, through damaged mucous membranes, cornea, or the skin [3]. They are transmitted directly from human to human and indirectly from the environment to human through contact with everyday objects [5].
Unique transmission occurs between a mother and a newborn during natural childbirth. The fungi are transmitted directly from the vagina to the oral cavity and the infant’s digestive tract and colonize the skin [6]. Phenotypic testing, which consists of assaying a biotype using Williamson’s classification and API ZYM tests, showed that the strains isolated from the mothers and their children included C. albicans, C. kefyr, C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii and C. krusei with identical hydrolase profiles.
Changes that occur in the original fungal flora, transmitted from mother to child at birth, during an individual’s life have not been explained [7]. Horizontal transmission of Candida strains among children and their parents and occasionally their grandparents, as well as the colonization of different body sites of the same person, have been seen. The transmission of yeasts among different body sites of the same individual was also noticed. In both cases, the transmission may have involved the oral cavity, anus, vagina, between the toes and interdigital spaces [6,8,9,10].
Molecular biology methods are now widely used to assess Candida spp. relatedness. They can be used not only for species identification but also for verifying intraspecies diversity. The random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) method was used in the current study. This method amplifies genomic DNA with primers of arbitrary nucleotide sequences. The method does not require pledging the details of the target DNA sequence [11]. The PCR is conducted at low annealing temperatures of 36 °C. During this reaction, each primer gives a different pattern of PCR products, and thus detecting polymorphisms among strains is possible. Statistically, the differences among strains depend on the number of analyzed bands [11].
The transmission of yeasts between twins, particularly monozygotic ones, is little studied. There are minimal data on the transmission of fungi within twins or among relatives. It is not known how twins’ zygosity affects the relatedness of the Candida strains, particularly in monozygotic twins with identical genetic material. Twins—particularly monozygotic ones—and their families may be fitting subjects to study these yeasts. Hence, this study aimed to analyze the strain relatedness among commensal yeasts isolated from various parts of the body of dizygotic and monozygotic twins and their family members. To compare correlations between the genotypes of the isolates, the RAPD-PCR method was used.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Characteristics of the Study Group
A total of 88 people (twins [n = 63], mothers [n = 15], fathers [n = 7] and siblings [n = 3]) from 33 families (F1–F33) were examined in the current study. In the case of 30 families, pairs of monozygotic (n = 12) and dizygotic (n = 18) twins were analyzed, while, in the remaining families (F2, F3 and F24), the other twin was not present or did not consent to the study. Individual family members were conventionally labeled according to the following criteria: T1—twin 1, T2—twin 2, M—mother, F—father and SIB—siblings. The average ages of T1 (n = 33), T2 (n = 30), M (n = 15), F (n = 7) and SIB (n = 3) were 16, 16, 37, 35 and 9 years, respectively. Details of the study group, including the distribution of family members, their age and twin type, are shown in Table 1.
2.2. Mycological Study
Yeasts were isolated from four body sites: oral cavity, anus, navel and interdigital space. Overall, 472 Candida spp. isolates were collected and analyzed for species identification using the germ tube test and biochemical ATB ID32C test (bioMérieux, Warsaw, Poland). Only strains present in at least two family members, including at least one twin, were chosen for genetic analysis. Altogether 223 isolates, including C. albicans (n = 139), C. parapsilosis (n = 39), C. guilliermondii (n = 25), C. dubliniensis (n = 11) and C. krusei (n = 9), were analyzed.
The relationships among the Candida spp. isolates and the twin zygosity were based on the analysis of 60 strains isolated from 12 pairs of monozygotic twins. Using the short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex PCR, twin zygosity was assayed at the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University. Three tests with different numbers of assayed loci were used: AmpFI Cofiler, AmpFI Profiler and AmpFI SGM Plus [12,13].
2.3. RAPD-PCR Method
Yeast chromosomal DNA was extracted using the Graham method [14]. During the analysis, the amplification conditions followed the parameters used in the studies by Tavanti et al. [15] except for the concentrations of the PCR mixture with a final volume of 25 µL (10× PCR buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM dNTP, 30 pm of each primer, 30 ng/L DNA and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase). All reagents were bought from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany).
Then, using the optimized RAPD-PCR method, isolates of all Candida species were subjected to intraspecific analysis. The optimization of the RAPD-PCR and the choices of primers were selected individually for each Candida sp. isolate following the protocol suggested by Cobb and Clarkson [16]. The PCR mixture had the best constant number of reagents for each Candida sp. strain: 10x PCR buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM KCl and pH 8.3), 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany) and remaining components, such as MgCl2, dNTP and primers (Table S1).
Additionally, to verify the species differentiation—C. orthopsilosis, C. metapsislosis and C. parapsilosis, in the case of 39 strains identified in biochemical tests as C. parapsilosis, additional genetic analysis was performed using the RAPD method using the RP02 primer with the following sequence 5’-GCGATCCCCA-3’ [15,17,18].
The amplification reactions were conducted on the GeneAmp PCR System 9600 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The RAPD-PCR conditions for all the primers used included 42 cycles. The following temperatures and times for each profile were chosen: denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 36 °C for 1 min and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min. The final elongation ran at 72 °C for 7 min. The amplification products, negative control and DNA molecular mass marker were analyzed using horizontal electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel stained with 0.5 mg/L ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, Poznan, Poland) in 1× TBE running buffer at 120 V for one hour.
DNA bands were visualized under UV light and photographed. The results were assessed using BioGenProfil software (BioProfil-BioGen Windows Application Version 99.04, Glostrup, Denmark). The similarity was clustered using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) and computed based on band positions using the Dice coefficient (Equation (1)):
where: a—number of similar bands, b and c—numbers of different bands in two compared lanes. The SAB value can range from 0 (no similar bands in two compared profiles) to 1 (all bands identical).
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The degree of similarity among the strains isolated from twins and the strains isolated from their relatives were compared using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test (Statistica 5.0 software version Edition, Szczecin, Poland). All values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.
3. Results
3.1. Source of Isolation
Candida spp. strains were isolated from various sources, most from the oral cavity—139 (62.3%). Strains of C. albicans, C. dubliniensis and C. krusei were mainly isolated from the oral cavity (55.6–73.4%), while C. parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii were isolated from interdigital space (44.0–46.2%). The frequency of isolated Candida spp. strains from each source is shown in Figure 1.
3.2. Genotypes of Candida spp.
The amounts of genotypes that adopted adequate SAB level were ≥80% for C. albicans and ≥70% for the four other Candida species strains. The value of the SAB level determined the average sum of all the SAB values obtained for individual dendrograms. The genotypes obtained for each Candida sp. are shown in Table 2.
Thirteen genotypes (A–M) and three unique (Un) patterns were found in 139 strains of C. albicans isolated from 26 families (Figure 2a). Most C. albicans strains, isolated from different ontocenoses of the same person, belonged to the same genotype, i.e., they had identical or similar patterns, e.g., family no. 4—genotype C4; family 7—genotype D1. Only in single cases different genotypes or Un patterns were found within a family, e.g., family no. 6: T1—oral cavity: genotype D2, anus: genotype C1; family no. 9, T1—oral cavity: genotype J4, interdigital space: Un2. In a few cases, C. albicans strains with different genotypes were present in the same ontocenosis, e.g., family no. 6, T2—oral cavity: genotypes C1 and D2; family no. 16, T1—oral cavity: genotypes J2, F1 and F2.
After the first analysis of species diversity, 36 bands profiles characteristic of C. parapsilosis, two bands profiles characteristic of C. orthopsislosis (F12_T1_OC2_CP, F31_IS_T2_CP) and one band profile characteristic of C. metapsilosis (F17_T1_OC_CP) were obtained. On the other hand, the analysis of intra-species differentiation allowed for the identification of 10 genotypes (A–J), and four Un patterns were found in 39 strains of C. parapsilosis isolated from 10 families (Figure 2b). C. parapsilosis isolates from different ontocenoses of the same person or their family members showed significantly greater genetic diversity when compared with C. albicans strains.
In individual cases, identical genotypes were found in different ontocenoses of the same person (family no. 26, T1—oral cavity, anus and interdigital space: genotype F1; family no. 9, T2—oral cavity and anus: genotype A2) as well as in different ontocenoses of their family members (family no. 2, T2 and M: genotype E, family no. 31, T1, T2, M, F: genotype J). Identical genotypes occurred within ontocenoses of the same person (family no. 8, T2—oral cavity: four strains belonged to genotype H1). Furthermore, diverse genotypes within Un patterns (family no. 12, T1—oral cavity: genotype B1 and Un2, family no. 15, T1—interdigital space: genotype C and Un3; M—interdigital space: genotypes C and D2) were detected.
Three genotypes (A–C) and one Un pattern were found in the 25 strains of C. guilliermondii isolated from seven families (Figure 2c). C. guilliermondii strains, such as C. albicans strains, showed a small genetic diversity both among and within ontocenoses of the same person and in ontocenoses of their family members. In most cases, isolates of identical or similar patterns were found. Only in family no. 19, a Un pattern—Un1 was found, in addition to similar genotypes C1 and C3, in the T1 oral cavity ontocenosis.
Three genotypes (A–C) and one Un pattern were found in 11 isolates of C. dubliniensis isolated from three twin pairs (Figure 2d). Identical or similar genotypes were detected in families no. 18, 19 and 20, and only one person T1 from family no. 20 was found with genotype C and the Un pattern—Un1. Three genotypes (A–C) were found in the nine C. krusei species isolated from three families (Figure 2d). In family no. 1 in T1, an identical genotype was found in the ontocenoses A1; in families no. 9 and 17, similar genotypes were found: B1 and B2, as well as C1, C2 and C3.
3.3. Genetic Analysis of Candida Isolates from Monozygotic Twins
To determine a possible correlation between twin zygosity and the degree of relationship between Candida strains, the genotype distribution within 60 strains was isolated from 12 pairs of monozygotic twins. The strains belonged to three species: C. albicans—46 strains, C. guilliermondii—six strains and C. parapsilosis—eight strains. The most remarkable genetic similarity of the strains isolated from monozygotic twins was found among C. albicans and C. guilliermondii isolates.
Identical and similar patterns in both twins were found most often. C. parapsilosis strains were detected only in two pairs of monozygotic twins. One pair had similar patterns (family no. 12) and the other Un pattern (family no. 10), and the second had different patterns (family no. 17). The most monozygotic twin pair—11 (78.6%), were living together. However, the other three pairs from families no. 21, 22 and 32 did not live together.
The correlation between the genetic relatedness of strains isolated from monozygotic twins and the test results obtained from other twins and their parents were analyzed using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. In these two groups, C. albicans and C. guilliermondii showed more remarkable similarity compared with C. parapsilosis; however, those differences were not statistically significant. The yeast genetic similarity coefficients among relatives, as defined by the average and standard deviations, are listed in Table 3.
4. Discussion
The acquisition and adaption of physiological flora is the effect of various relationships among various microorganisms and the interactions between microorganisms and the host. Genetic factors of macro-organisms play a significant role here, being responsible, among others, for the chemical composition of secretions, expression of surface receptors on mucous membranes and skin, which affect the adequate adhesion and colonization by microorganisms, including fungi. The studies based on phenotypic methods indicate the transmission of Candida strains between family members, in particular those who cohabit [5].
Yeast transmission among different ontocenoses of the same person and the ontocenoses of close relatives have been confirmed by fingerprinting methods. Genetically identical strains were found in the oral cavity and the anus in 65.2% of 23 examined preschoolers [19]. Another study on the same pairs three times within six-month intervals also showed interpersonal transmission among relatives in a mother—newborn relationship.
The results suggest that colonization with fungal flora, which follows birth, continues through the individual’s life. This flora is derived mainly from the mother and the surroundings. Another group of children was colonized by strains different from their mothers’ [20]. This confirms the possibility of colonization of human ontocenoses with strains originating from exogenous sources. Similarly, molecular studies by Abdeljelil et al. [21] conducted in hospital conditions confirm the transmission of C. albicans strains between medical staff and newborns in the intensive care unit.
Our research analyzed the degree of diversity/relatedness of Candida strains isolated from twins and their family members. High genetic similarities were found among Candida strains isolated from various ontocenoses of twins and their parents. In most families, identical and similar genetic patterns were found. This shows that the transmission of the same yeast clones among ontocenoses of a given person and the transmission of the same strains among family members, are likely to occur.
The occurrence of genetically similar isolates in different ontocenoses of the same person or different ontocenoses of their family members may be caused by allelism and chromosome reassortments occurring during the parasexual reproductive cycle of yeasts [22]. These changes may also be associated with different environmental factors or caused by other genetic or immunological determinants. A slight change in the genetic profile of the strain (similar type) may be related to the adaptation of the strain to different conditions in a new ontocenosis, such as a transmission from the oral cavity to the anus or the vagina.
Genetic tests that analyzed C. albicans strains isolated from the oral cavity and the anus of people suffering from Crohn’s disease and members of their families using the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) method seem to confirm the theory of the inter-ontocenosis and interfamilial transmission of fungi [22]. These results also showed identical or closely related strains within the examined ontocenoses in the studied group of patients and their relatives.
The occurrence of strains with different genotype patterns, or unique patterns within families, might affect the acquisition of a new strain from the environment, showing a periodic exchange of yeast strains colonizing various human ontocenoses. It is worth noting that, in the current study, the most remarkable genetic diversity was found in the strains of C. parapsilosis, which, during the analysis, showed the most substantial number of unique bands—four.
In the case of these isolates, preliminary molecular analysis regarding species diversity showed that two of them belong to C. orthopsilosis species (F12_T1_OC2_CP, F31_IS_T2_CP) and the rest—one to C. parapsilosis (F15_T1_IS2_CP) and the other to C. metapsilosis (strain 1-F17_T1_OC_CP). The genetic diversity among C. parapsilosis isolates was also confirmed by Delfino et al. [23], who showed that C. parapsilosis strains isolated from the hands of medical personnel were significantly more heterogeneous than clinical strains.
Monozygotic twins seem particularly fitting subjects for studying factors mediating yeast colonization. In our studies, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii strains isolated from 24 monozygotic twins (12 pairs) were tested for genetic relatedness and then compared to the isolates from the group consisting of dizygotic twins and their parents. In both groups, the similarity ratios were high. The similarity between the group of C. albicans and C. guilliermondii isolates from monozygotic twins and the isolates from the remaining group of twins and their parents was higher than between C. parapsilosis strains.
A higher diversity of genetic types predominating similar and unique patterns was found within the C. parapsilosis isolates from family members. However, there was no distinct correlation between the fungi isolates from monozygotic twins and other members of their families. It is thus possible that, in people that are genetically closely related—for example, monozygotic twins—there is no greater predisposition for colonization with genetically identical Candida strains, irrespective of their cohabitation. On the other hand, since the group of the studied subjects was too small to stand for the general population, these conclusions should be treated as preliminary results.
Another observation in our study was that Candida strains isolated from and within a particular family belonged, in general, to various genotypes. Only in a few families were the same or similar genotypes found. In addition, the genetic variability of Candida strains isolated from inhabitants of geographically different regions was observed [24]. This confirms a significant diversity of Candida strains circulating in the environment and shows their adaptability to labile/variable environmental conditions when shifting from one ontocenosis to another.
We found that the degree of relatedness of Candida strains in the group of monozygotic twins and their family members was the same as in other related people. A higher genetic similarity was found among C. albicans and C. guilliermondii than was found among C. parapsilosis strains.
5. Conclusions
We concluded that higher genetic similarity of strains was found within C. albicans and C. guilliermondii compared with within C. parapsilosis isolates. The degrees of relatedness among Candida spp. isolates from the monozygotic twins were similar and were statistically similar to other related people. The convergence of the results obtained with RAPD and MLST confirms (despite certain limitations and reservations) the usefulness of the first method in epidemiological examinations, and there is also an economic advantage.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11121532/s1, Figure S1. The representative examples of dendrograms for: (a) Candida albicans, (b) C. parapsilosis, (c) C. guilliermondii, (d) C. dubliniensis and (e) C. krusei. M—marker.; Table S1. The names and sequences of the primers used for random amplified polymorphic DNA—polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) analysis for each Candida sp.; Table S2. A detailed summary of the study group and results obtained in this study.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, I.W.-K.; methodology, I.W.-K.; validation, I.W.-K.; formal analysis, I.W.-K., P.K., B.K.-S., P.R., M.S. (Michał Sławiński), A.G., S.G.-K., B.D., E.K. and M.S. (Monika Sienkiewicz); investigation, I.W.-K.; data curation, I.W.-K., P.K., B.K.-S., P.R., M.S. (Michał Sławiński) and A.G.; writing—original draft, I.W.-K.; writing—review and editing, I.W.-K., P.K. and M.S. (Monika Sienkiewicz); visualization, I.W.-K. and P.K.; supervision, I.W.-K.; funding acquisition, E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pomeranian Medical University of Szczecin (approval number: KB-0012/33/19, approved on 14 January 2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Kimsa, Ł.; Tokarska-Rodak, M. Occurrence of Candida spp. in healthy oral microbiota. Health Probl. Civiliz. 2020, 14, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.L.; Leaw, S.N.; Wang, A.H.; Chen, H.T.; Cheng, W.T.; Lo, H.J. Characterization of yeasts colonizing in healthy individuals. Med. Mycol. 2011, 49, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gerós-Mesquita, Â.; Carvalho-Pereira, J.; Franco-Duarte, R.; Alves, A.; Gerós, H.; Pais, C.; Sampaio, P. Oral Candida albicans colonization in healthy individuals: Prevalence, genotypic diversity, stability along time and transmissibility. J. Oral Microbiol. 2020, 12, 1820292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velegraki, A.; Cafarchia, C.; Gaitanis, G.; Iatta, R.; Boekhout, T. Malassezia infections in humans and animals: Pathophysiology, detection, and treatment. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Patel, M. Oral cavity and Candida albicans: Colonisation to the development of infection. Pathogens 2022, 11, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waggoner-Fountain, L.A.; Walker, M.W.; Hollis, R.J.; Pfaller, M.A.; Ferguson, J.E., 2nd; Wenzel, R.P.; Donowitz, L.G. Vertical and horizontal transmission of unique Candida species to premature newborns. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1996, 22, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khatib, R.; Riederer, K.M.; Ramanathan, J.; Baran, J.J. Faecal fungal flora in healthy volunteers and inpatients. Mycoses 2001, 44, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kam, A.P.; Xu, J. Diversity of commensal yeasts within and among healthy hosts. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2002, 43, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trojanowska, D.; Zwolinska-Wcislo, M.; Tokarczyk, M.; Kosowski, K.; Mach, T.; Budak, A. The role of Candida in inflammatory bowel disease. Estimation of transmission of C. albicans fungi in gastrointestinal tract based on genetic affinity between strains. Med. Sci. Monit. 2010, 16, CR451–CR457. [Google Scholar]
- Da Silva Dantas, A.; Lee, K.K.; Raziunaite, I.; Schaefer, K.; Wagener, J.; Yadav, B.; Gow, N.A. Cell biology of Candida albicans-host interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2016, 34, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dabrowski, W.; Czekajlo-Kolodziej, U.; Medrala, D.; Giedrys-Kalemba, S. Optimisation of AP-PCR fingerprinting discriminatory power for clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 218, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komorowska, B.; Walczak, A.; Piątek, J.; Parafiniuk, M.; Żołędziewska, M.; Dobosz, T. Comparison of two genetic methods of determination the twin’s zygosity. Gemellol. Rev. 2002, 4, 121–124. [Google Scholar]
- Żołędziowska, M.; Kowalczyk, E.; Jonkisz, A.; Dmochowska, G.; Bartnik, B.; Sawicki, K.; Świątek, B.; Dobosz, T. The multiplex as a tool for zygosity determining. Gemellol. Rev. 2002, 4, 133–135. [Google Scholar]
- Graham, G.C.; Mayers, P.; Henry, R.J. A simplified method for the preparation of fungal genomic DNA for PCR and RAPD analysis. Biotechniques 1994, 16, 48–50. [Google Scholar]
- Tavanti, A.; Davidson, A.D.; Gow, N.A.R.; Maiden, M.C.J.; Odds, F.C. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J. Cinical Microbiol. 2005, 43, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cobb, B.D.; Clarkson, J.M. A simple procedure for optimising the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using modified Taguchi methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 3801–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kocsubé, S.; Tóth, M.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Dóczi, I.; Pesti, M.; Pócsi, I.; Szabó, J.; Varga, J. Occurrence and genetic variability of Candida parapsilosis sensu lato in Hungary. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Del Pilar Vercher, M.; García Martínez, J.M.; Cantón, E.; Pemán, J.; Gómez García, M.M.; Gómez, E.V.; del Castillo Agudo, L. Differentiation of Candida parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis by specific PCR amplification of the RPS0 intron. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 301, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, H.; Ansari, F.; Schulz-Weidner, N.; Wetzel, W.-E.; Chakraborty, T.; Domann, E. Clonal identity of Candida albicans in the oral cavity and the gastrointestinal tract of pre-school children. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 18, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannula, J.; Saarela, M.; Jousimies-Somer, H.; Takala, A.; Syrjänen, R.; Könönen, E.; Asikainen, S. Age-related acquisition of oral and nasopharyngeal yeast species and stability of colonization in young children. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1999, 14, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Abdeljelil, J.; Saghrouni, F.; Emira, N.; Valentin-Gomez, E.; Chatti, N.; Boukadida, J.; Ben Saïd, M.; Del Castillo Agudo, L. Molecular typing of Candida albicans isolates from patients and health care workers in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 111, 1235–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bougnoux, M.-E.; Diogo, D.; François, N.; Sendid, B.; Veirmeire, S.; Colombel, J.F.; Bouchier, C.; Van Kruiningen, H.; D’Enfert, C.; Poulain, D. Multilocus sequence typing reveals intrafamilial transmission and microevolutions of Candida albicans isolates from the human digestive tract. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 1810–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Delfino, D.; Scordino, F.; Pernice, I.; Lo Passo, C.; Galbo, R.; David, A.; Barberi, I.; Criseo, G.; Cascio, A.; Romeo, O. Potential association of specific Candida parapsilosis genotypes, bloodstream infections and colonization of health workers’ hands. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O946–O951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Clemons, K.V.; Feroze, F.; Holmberg, K.; Stevens, D.A. Comparative analysis of genetic variability among Candida albicans isolates from different geographic locales by three genotypic methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 1332–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
The frequencies of the isolated Candida spp. strains.
Figure 2.
Dendrograms of: (a) Candida albicans, (b) C. parapsilosis, (c) C. guilliermondii, (d) C. dubliniensis and (e) C. krusei isolates. Strains described according to the following pattern: number of family_member of family_source of isolation_species.
Figure 2.
Dendrograms of: (a) Candida albicans, (b) C. parapsilosis, (c) C. guilliermondii, (d) C. dubliniensis and (e) C. krusei isolates. Strains described according to the following pattern: number of family_member of family_source of isolation_species.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study group by a distribution of family members, age and twin type.
| No. | No. of Family (F) | Twin Type | Family Member (Age in Years) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin 1 | Twin 2 | Mother | Father | Siblings | |||
| 1. | F1 | Dizygotic | + (12) | + (12) | + (42) | - | - |
| 2. | F2 | - | + (6) | - | - | + (32) | - |
| 3. | F3 | - | + (11) | - | + (46) | - | - |
| 4. | F4 | Monozygotic | + (14) | + (14) | + (43) | + (45) | - |
| 5. | F5 | Monozygotic | + (14) | + (14) | + (40) | - | - |
| 6. | F6 | Monozygotic | + (2) | + (2) | + (29) | + (29) | - |
| 7. | F7 | Dizygotic | + (12) | + (12) | + (36) | - | + (10) |
| 8. | F8 | Monozygotic | + (9) | + (9) | - | - | + (11) |
| 9. | F9 | Dizygotic | + (1) | + (1) | + (34) | - | - |
| 10. | F10 | Monozygotic | + (13) | + (13) | + (41) | - | - |
| 11. | F11 | Dizygotic | + (21) | + (21) | - | - | - |
| 12. | F12 | Monozygotic | + (15) | + (15) | - | - | - |
| 13. | F13 | Monozygotic | + (17) | + (17) | - | - | - |
| 14. | F14 | Dizygotic | + (2) | + (2) | - | - | + (6) |
| 15. | F15 | Dizygotic | + (9) | + (9) | + (39) | - | - |
| 16. | F16 | Monozygotic | + (11) | + (11) | + (34) | + (39) | - |
| 17. | F17 | Dizygotic | + (13) | + (13) | - | + (35) | - |
| 18. | F18 | Dizygotic | + (27) | + (27) | - | - | - |
| 19. | F19 | Dizygotic | + (11) | + (11) | + (47) | - | - |
| 20. | F20 | Dizygotic | + (50) | + (50) | - | - | - |
| 21. | F21 | Monozygotic | + (67) | + (67) | - | - | - |
| 22. | F22 | Monozygotic | + (34) | + (34) | - | - | - |
| 23. | F23 | Dizygotic | + (8) | + (8) | + (36) | - | - |
| 24. | F24 | - | + (26) | - | - | - | - |
| 25. | F25 | Monozygotic | + (2) | + (2) | - | + (34) | - |
| 26. | F26 | Dizygotic | + (24) | + (24) | - | - | - |
| 27. | F27 | Dizygotic | + (1) | + (1) | + (27) | - | - |
| 28. | F28 | Dizygotic | + (17) | + (17) | + (40) | - | - |
| 29. | F29 | Dizygotic | + (15) | + (15) | - | - | - |
| 30. | F30 | Dizygotic | + (13) | + (13) | - | - | - |
| 31. | F31 | Dizygotic | + (2) | + (2) | + (27) | + (29) | - |
| 32. | F32 | Monozygotic | + (44) | + (44) | - | - | - |
| 33. | F33 | Dizygotic | + (9) | + (9) | - | - | - |
Table 2.
Genotypes of Candida spp. obtained from twins and their relatives.
| No. of Family | Genotypes of Candida spp. No. of Isolates | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin 1 | Twin 2 | Mother | Father | Siblings | ||||||||||||||||
| OC | AN | IS | NA | OC | AN | IS | NA | OC | AN | IS | NA | OC | AN | IS | NA | OC | AN | IS | NA | |
| F1 | A31 | A11 | - | - | A41 | A41 | - | - | A42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| A11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| F2 | - | - | - | - | B1 | B1 | B21 | - | B2 | B1 | E1 | - | A21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| E1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| B21 | B21 | |||||||||||||||||||
| F3 | - | A22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | A23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F4 * | C42 | - | - | - | C41 | - | - | - | C42 | C42 | - | - | C42 | - | - | - | C41 | - | - | - |
| F5 * | C22 C31 | - | - | - | C21 | C21 C31 | - | - | C21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F6 * | D21 | C12 | - | - | C11 D21 | - | - | - | D24 | - | - | - | D24 | D21 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F7 | D11 | - | - | - | D11 | - | - | - | D11 | - | - | D11 | - | - | - | - | D11 | - | - | - |
| F8 * | I1 | - | - | - | I2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Un31 | - | H21 | - |
| H14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| F9 | J41 | J51 | Un21 | - | J41 | J41 | C31 | - | J51 | J31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| A21 | A21 | A11 | ||||||||||||||||||
| C21 | C21 | C11 | ||||||||||||||||||
| F10 * | M32 | - | - | - | M32 | M31 | - | - | M31 | M31 | M41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| F11 | M31 | - | - | - | - | M31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F12 * | M21 | - | B21 | - | M11 M21 | - | B31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| B11 Un21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| F13 * | J12 | J12 | - | - | J11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F14 | A11 | - | - | - | - | - | A12 F11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Un11 | - | - | - |
| F15 | M31 | - | C1 Un31 | - | M32 | - | D13 | - | C1 | - | C1 D21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F16 * | J21 F22 F11 | - | - | - | J21 | - | - | - | F22 | F21 | - | - | J21 | - | J21 | - | - | - | - | - |
| F17 | Un11 | - | - | - | B11 | - | A12 | - | - | - | - | - | B21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| B11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| F18 | A11 A21 | - | A11 A21 | - | A12 | - | A11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F19 | C31 | C11 Un11 | C11 | C11 | B22 | - | - | - | C31 | C31 | C31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| B11 | B21 | |||||||||||||||||||
| F20 | - | C11 Un11 | - | - | C21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F21 * | H1 | H1 | - | - | H1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| C11 | C31 | |||||||||||||||||||
| F22 * | F31 | - | - | - | F31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F23 | - | - | C21 | - | G11 | - | C21 | - | G12 G21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F24 | K42 | K43 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F25 * | K21 | - | - | K21 | K21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | K22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| B13 | B11 | |||||||||||||||||||
| F26 | F11 | F11 | F11 | - | K21 | K22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F27 | - | - | I11 | - | K12 | - | - | - | K11 | - | I21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| F28 | K31 | - | - | - | K21 | - | - | - | K21 K32 | K31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F29 | E24 E11 | E21 | - | - | E21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F30 | G11 | - | F21 | - | G11 G21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F31 | J1 | - | - | - | J1 | - | Un41 | - | - | J1 | - | - | - | J1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F32 * | L21 L31 | - | - | - | L11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F33 | - | - | C21 | - | - | - | C22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
OC—oral cavity; AN—anus; IS—interdigital space; and NA—navel. The genotypes of the different Candida strains are marked with the following colors: yellow—Candida albicans, blue—Candida parapsilosis, green—Candida guilliermondii, red—Candida dubliniensis and gray—Candida krusei; and *—family in which affirmed occurrence monozygotic twins.
Table 3.
Statistical analysis of Candida species relatedness—the arithmetical average of coefficient SAB ± standard deviation.
Table 3.
Statistical analysis of Candida species relatedness—the arithmetical average of coefficient SAB ± standard deviation.
| Candida spp. | Twins | Combination | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1–T2 | T1–M | T1–F | T2–M | T2–F | M–F | ||
| C. albicans | M | 0.892 ± 0.056 | 0.926 ± 0.121 | 0.769 ± 0.298 | 0.874 ± 0.173 | 0.927 ± 0.000 | 0.870 ± 0.298 |
| C. parapsilosis | 0.568 ± 0.226 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| C. guilliermondii | 0.958 ± 0.176 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| C. albicans | D | 0.867 ± 0.211 | 0.921 ± 0.128 | 0.789 ± 0.301 | 0.883 ± 0.188 | 0.898 ± 0.133 | 0.870 ± 0.298 |
| C. parapsilosis | 0.66 ± 0.148 | 0.796 ± 0.000 | 1 * | 0.715 ± 0.141 | 0.790 ± 0.296 | 1 * | |
| C. guilliermondii | 0.931 ± 0.114 | 0.782 ± 0.176 | - | - | - | - | |
M—monozygotic twins; D—dizygotic twins; T1—twin 1; T2—twin 2; M—mother; and F—father; * in these cases, only one pair of isolates was present among comparing ontocenoses; thus, there is no standard deviation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Wojciechowska-Koszko, I.; Kwiatkowski, P.; Roszkowska, P.; Krasnodębksa-Szponder, B.; Sławiński, M.; Gabrych, A.; Giedrys-Kalemba, S.; Dołęgowska, B.; Kowalczyk, E.; Sienkiewicz, M. Genetic Diversity of Candida spp. Isolates Colonizing Twins and Their Family Members. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121532
AMA Style
Wojciechowska-Koszko I, Kwiatkowski P, Roszkowska P, Krasnodębksa-Szponder B, Sławiński M, Gabrych A, Giedrys-Kalemba S, Dołęgowska B, Kowalczyk E, Sienkiewicz M. Genetic Diversity of Candida spp. Isolates Colonizing Twins and Their Family Members. Pathogens. 2022; 11(12):1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121532
Chicago/Turabian StyleWojciechowska-Koszko, Iwona, Paweł Kwiatkowski, Paulina Roszkowska, Barbara Krasnodębksa-Szponder, Michał Sławiński, Artur Gabrych, Stefania Giedrys-Kalemba, Barbara Dołęgowska, Edward Kowalczyk, and Monika Sienkiewicz. 2022. "Genetic Diversity of Candida spp. Isolates Colonizing Twins and Their Family Members" Pathogens 11, no. 12: 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121532
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
