Next Article in Journal
Outbreak of Alimentary Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Eastern Slovakia: An Analysis of Affected Patients and Long-Term Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
The History of Live Attenuated Centrin Gene-Deleted Leishmania Vaccine Candidates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pathogenic and Endosymbiotic Bacteria and Their Associated Antibiotic Resistance Biomarkers in Amblyomma and Hyalomma Ticks Infesting Nguni Cattle (Bos spp.)

by
Aubrey Dickson Chigwada
1,
Ntanganedzeni Olivia Mapholi
1,
Henry Joseph Oduor Ogola
1,2,
Sikhumbuzo Mbizeni
1 and
Tracy Madimabi Masebe
1,*
1
Department of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa (UNISA), Florida Campus, Roodepoort 1709, South Africa
2
School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Bondo P.O. Box 210-40601, Kenya
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(4), 432; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040432
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 27 March 2022 / Accepted: 31 March 2022 / Published: 2 April 2022

Abstract

:
Deciphering the interactions between ticks and their microbiome is key to revealing new insights on tick biology and pathogen transmission. However, knowledge on tick-borne microbiome diversity and their contribution to drug resistance is scarce in sub–Saharan Africa (SSA), despite endemism of ticks. In this study, high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and PICRUSt predictive function profiling were used to characterize the bacterial community structure and associated antibiotic resistance markers in Amblyomma variegatum, A. hebraeum, and Hyalomma truncatum ticks infesting Nguni cattle (Bos spp.). Twenty-one (seven families and fourteen genera) potentially pathogenic and endosymbiotic bacterial taxa were differentially enriched in two tick genera. In H. truncatum ticks, a higher abundance of Corynebacterium (35.6%), Porphyromonas (14.4%), Anaerococcus (11.1%), Trueperella (3.7%), and Helcococcus (4.7%) was detected. However, Rickettsia (38.6%), Escherichia (7%), and Coxiellaceae (2%) were the major differentially abundant taxa in A. variegatum and A. hebraeum. Further, an abundance of 50 distinct antibiotic resistance biomarkers relating to multidrug resistance (MDR) efflux pumps, drug detoxification enzymes, ribosomal protection proteins, and secretion systems, were inferred in the microbiome. This study provides theoretical insights on the microbiome and associated antibiotic resistance markers, important for the design of effective therapeutic and control decisions for tick-borne diseases in the SSA region.

1. Introduction

Ticks are important arthropods that act as vectors of various bacterial communities infecting cattle. The enormous annual global loss of about US$22 to US$30 billion has been recorded in livestock production due to tick-borne pathogens; therefore, ticks and tick-borne disease control are very important in animal health and meat production [1,2,3]. Several studies in South Africa have identified ticks of the genera Ixodes, Hyalomma, Amblyomma, and Rhipicephalus infesting Nguni cattle [4]. Hyalomma and Amblyomma tick-associated pathogens include bacterial species in the genus Anaplasma, Borrelia, Coxiella, Ehrlichia, Francisella, and Rickettsia [5,6,7,8,9,10]. The Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia ruminantium, and Rickettsia rickettsia were found most prevalent in Amblyomma ticks, collected from cattle in Cape Town, South Africa [5]. Similarly, ticks collected from dogs in the North West, KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga, and Free State South African provinces were dominated by pathogenic species of Coxiella, Anaplasma, Rickettsia bacterial genera [8].
Diseases associated with tick-borne bacteria include relapsing fever (Borrelia burgdorferi, B. afzelii, and B. garinii) and spotted fever (Rickettsia rickettsia); ovine and bovine anaplasmosis (Anaplasma ovis and A. marginale); Q fever (Coxiella burnetti); ehrlichiosis; and heartwater (Ehrlichia ruminantium) [11,12,13,14]. Antibiotics such as tetracyclines, macrolides, beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones are used for the treatment of infections caused by tick-borne bacteria. On the other hand, bacterial antibiotic resistance can be achieved through mechanisms employing over-expression of efflux pumps, under-expression of porins, iron transport proteins, and enzymes that modify or degrade antibiotics, and chromosomal mutations and mutations in drug target sites have been reported [15,16]. The genes encoding for methylases (erm), drug efflux pumps [mef(A)], and ribosomal mutations in 23S rRNA have been shown to confer macrolide resistance; these have been identified in tick-borne pathogens such as Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia canis [17], Anaplasma phagocytophilum [18], Franscisella tularensis [19], Rickettsia typhi, and Rickettsia prowazekii [20]. Several studies have shown tetracycline resistance in tick-borne bacteria F. tularensis [21,22], and this resistance is attributed to genes coding for active overexpressed efflux pumps [tet(A-H)], ribosomal protection subunits [tet(M-P)], and drug modifying enzymes [tet(X)]. Furthermore, resistance to beta-lactams was reported in Francisella species attributed to genes that coded for blaA, ampG protein, and metallo-β-lactamase [23], while class C β-lactamase enzymes have also been detected in Rickettsia felis and R. conorii strains [24,25]. Despite increasing concerns of drug resistance development in tick-borne pathogens, there is limited information on the tick microbiome ecology and their involvement in drug resistance in local African cattle breeds.
In addition to the pathogens they transmit, several studies have reported that ticks can also harbor several symbiotic and commensal microbes that may be key to vector competency and pathogen transmission dynamics [26,27]. These include Coxiella-like endosymbionts (CLEs), Franscisella-like endosymbionts (FLEs), Rickettsia-endosymbionts, and Wolbachia-like and other commensal tick microbes that are members of the phylum Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria [5,27]. Both the pathogenic and endosymbiotic bacteria coexist within the tick, with increasing evidence that interaction between tick-borne pathogens and tick microbiome is bidirectional [28,29,30]. To the tick host, nonpathogenic endosymbionts and commensals may confer multiple detrimental, neutral, or beneficial effects related to fitness, nutritional adaptation, development, reproduction, defense against environmental stress, and immunity [26,27]. On the other hand, non-pathogenic microorganisms may also play a role in driving the transmission of tick-borne pathogens (TBP) [31]. Despite the accumulating evidence on the link between tick microbiome, tick biology, and tick-borne disease dynamics, the microbiome of many tick species, particularly those that are not common human disease vectors, have yet to be investigated widely in Africa. Few available studies have reported microbial communities in whole intact ticks without consideration of organ-specific community distributions [32]. Salivary glands and mouthparts of ticks serve as routes for efficient pathogen transmission and maintenance of endosymbionts [33,34]. Organ-specific studies are also important in characterizing microbes transmitted, acquired, and maintained within the salivary glands and mouthparts [34]. Studies focusing on antibiotic resistance biomarkers are also limited. We anticipate that comparisons of microbiome compositions and endosymbiont patterns between tick species may offer valuable information for better understanding how tick microbiomes are shaped, how they influence vector competency, and tick-borne pathogenesis [30].
Currently, metagenomics using high-throughput Illumina technology and pyrosequencing enables the routine, comprehensive characterization of microbial communities from diverse environments using culture-independent methods. For example, analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences has become the standard method for culture-independent studies of tick microbial diversity [32,35]. Furthermore, several 16S rRNA gene studies have extended the ability to infer the functional contribution of individual bacterial community members by mapping a subset of abundant 16S rRNA sequences to their nearest sequenced reference genomes. Towards this, predicting microbial functions from 16S rRNA gene sequencing data is currently a common alternative to shotgun metagenomic approaches. Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) constitutes a novel computational algorithm that enables the prediction and establishment of protein and metabolic function profiles based on the frequency of detected 16S rRNA sequences of bacteria corresponding to genomes in regularly updated, functionally annotated genome databases [36]. The ability of PICRUSt to infer metabolic information in genomes included in databases such as the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) based on reference phylogenetic trees of 16S rRNA gene amplicons has made it a popular prediction tool for metagenomic function. Several studies have proven the effectiveness of the PICRUSt algorithm in the characterization of functional and resistance biomarkers of intracellular bacteria under different environments, which is usually impossible when using cultural techniques [37,38]. Bioinformatic approaches including predictive metagenomic profiling using PICRUSt have also been applied in the study of tick microbiomes [29,31,39]. As inferences based on predicted functional traits may suffer from inherent inaccuracies in resolving functional biogeography in certain ecosystems [36], validation of the PICRUSt annotation is always very important. Recently, two studies validated by PCR the functional predictions of PICRUSt annotation on tick microbiomes [40,41], providing support for the use of PICRUSt2 as a suitable tool to accurately predict functional perturbations in the tick microbiome.
In Southern Africa, the indigenous Nguni cattle, an admixture of hump-less zebu (Bos taurus) and humped zebu (Bos indicus), is one of the largest breeds owing to their adaptation to suboptimal environmental conditions, including less susceptibility to tick infestation [42,43]. Despite the higher levels of resistance to tick infestation and tick-borne diseases reported in Nguni cattle than other breeds, the tick challenge is still major [44]. In this study, we explored the composition and structure of the bacterial community associated with Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma truncatum) tick species infesting Nguni cattle in South Africa using high-throughput 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq platform. To gain insight on functional profiles and antibiotic resistance, the prediction tool PICRUSt was used to determine the functional resistance biomarkers of the bacterial communities in the two tick species. We envisaged that comprehensive characterization of both culturable and unculturable bacterial communities, including their antibiotic resistance and disease pathogenesis biomarkers, may provide a deeper understanding of the tick-borne pathogens. This information can be key towards the better elucidation of possible recommendations for strengthening programs to prevent and control the potential infections caused by tick-borne pathogens in the region.

2. Results

2.1. Global Sequencing Data and Tick Microbiome Diversity

A total of 1,065,139 quality sequence reads comprising 1214 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were generated. Among the results, sample (H2) had 0.0003% valid reads and was thus excluded in the downstream analysis. Overall, the average Good’s coverage of the library ranged between 99.34% to 99.90%. In addition, rarefaction curves plots approached plateaus or asymptotes with increasing sample size (Figure A1), suggesting sequencing depth was adequate to reliably describe the bacterial microbiome associated with the tick genera. In this study, exploratory analyses based on alpha and beta diversity, including multivariate analyses did not observe any significant difference between A. variegatum and A. hebraeum community diversity and composition structure (Figure A2). Therefore, for downstream analyses, A. variegatum and A. hebraeum samples were collectively grouped as Amblyomma ticks and compared with H. truncatum samples, herein referred to as Hyalomma ticks.
Comparative analysis of the alpha diversity and species richness indices between Hyalomma and Amblyomma bacterial communities is illustrated in Figure 1. Wilcoxon rank-sum test revealed no significant differences in observed OTUs, Chao1, and ACE indices after multiple testing corrections (Kruskal-Wallis, FDR > 0.05), but alpha diversity indices Shannon, Simpson, Inv Simpson, and Fisher diversity showed a significant difference between Hyalomma and Amblyomma tick microbiome (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.021). This suggested significant differences in species richness and genetic composition of bacterial communities associated with Hyalomma and Amblyomma tick species.
For a glimpse of compositional and structural similarity of tick bacterial communities in samples, we employed beta diversity analysis based on Jaccard indices. The principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed a significant difference in beta-diversity (p < 0.05), with samples showing separation and clustering of samples into two groups according to tick species (Figure 2). The total x-axis variances PCoA 1 was 38.6% and the y-axis PCoA 2 was 13.1%, with prediction ellipses observed having tick species falling in different ellipses, reflecting subtle variances in the associated bacterial communities is dependent on tick species. Further, both analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) showed that bacterial composition patterns differed significantly according to tick species (adonis PERMANOVA, F = 5.21, p = 0.021; ANOSIM, R = 0.321, p = 0.011).

2.2. Microbial Community Structure

At the phylum level, classified sequence reads revealed four major phyla: Actinobacteria (34.65%), Proteobacteria (31.41%), Firmicutes (23.40%), and Bacteroidetes (9.37%), with the remaining phyla accounting for <1.15% of total abundance (Figure 3a). However, members of phylum Proteobacteria were relatively abundant in Amblyomma, while Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were dominant taxa in Hyalomma tick species. To further delineate the differences in bacterial community composition and structure, a two-sided t-test statistical analysis coupled with multiple test correction Storey FDR (false discovery rate) at a 95% confidence interval was performed. An extended error plot (Figure 3b) revealed significant differences (q-value < 0.0001) in mean proportions in Amblyomma and Hyalomma bacterial communities at the phylum level. Members of phylum Proteobacteria were significantly enriched in Amblyomma ticks, whereas Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria were the significant taxa in Hyalomma ticks.
At the genus level, Amblyomma tick species had a comparatively high abundance of Rickettsia (38.6%), Escherichia (7%), Arthrobacter (3.6%), and Coxiella (2%), while Hyalomma tick species had a high abundance of Corynebacterium (35.9%), Porphyromonas (14.4%), Anaerococcus (11.1%), Trueperella (3.7%), and Helcococcus (4.7%) (Supplementary Figure S1). Further, a dendrogram heatmap plot (Figure 4) showing the relatedness of bacterial communities at the genera level revealed clustering together of Amblyomma tick samples in the ordination space. In contrast, Hyalomma tick species clustered with two Amblyomma samples A2 and A11, suggesting shared genera or co-occurrence of some bacterial communities in both tick species. Overall, the top genera identified in this study were Rickettsia, Corynebacterium, Porphyromonas, Trueperella, Coxiellaceae_uc, etc, (Figure 4, Supplementary Figure S1).
In this study, species-level microbiome analysis using EzBioCloud 16S Database (www.ezbiocloud.net, accessed on 28 February 2022) [45] to identify the tick microbiome was also undertaken (Figure A3). The most dominant species in Amblyomma ticks were Rickettsia rickettsia, Escherichia coli, Aerococcus vaginalis, Coxiella_uc group, and Acinetobacter globiformis. In contrast, Corynebacterium group (C. xerosis, C. falsenii, C. resistens, C. striatum, C. epidermidicanis, and C. pseudotuberculosis), Porphyromonas levii, Trueperella pyogenes, JQ480818_s (Coxiella endosymbiont) were identified in H. truncatum.

2.3. Core Microbiome and Metagenomic Biomarker Identification

A Venn diagram was defined as core OTUs at genus level present in at least 50% of the samples of each group at 1% minimum relative abundance and used to evaluate the similarities between Amblyomma and Hyalomma bacteria; the diagram is illustrated in Figure 5a. Overall, 74.4% OTUs of the core microbiome was shared between tick species, while 6.3% and 8.9% OTUs were found to be unique to Amblyomma and Hyalomma ticks, respectively. About 10.6% of non-core microbial bacteria were identified. A summary of the top 30 shared and unique genera representing the core microbiome in the two tick species is presented in Supplementary Table S1. To further investigate the taxonomic apportionment and detect differentially abundant taxa, we compared the abundance of the unique core OTUs at the family and genus levels. The resultant taxonomic profile was then used by LEfSe to detect metagenomic biomarkers. Overall, LEfSe detected 21 differentially abundant biomarkers(LDA > 2.0, q < 0.01) including seven family and fourteen genera level biomarkers across the two tick species (Figure 5b,c). The largest number of taxonomic biomarkers was detected in H. truncatum ticks, with genera ascribed to phylum Actinobacteria (Corynebacterium, Trueperella, and Tessarococcus), Bacteriodetes (Porphyromonas), Firmicutes (Anaerococcus, Helcococcus, Peptoniphilus, Peptococcus, Finegoldia, and unclassified Peptoniphilacae), and Proteobacteria (Coxiella) as the key taxa. In contrast, only proteobacterial genera Rickettsia and Escherichia were identified as biomarkers in A. variegatum and A. hebraeum ticks.

2.4. Distribution of Potentially Pathogenic Taxa in the Tick Samples

As ticks are known to be the most important vectors of pathogens [1,2], this study also examined the distribution of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa associated with two tick species. Potential Pathogenic genera in the top 40 abundant OTUs identified included Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, Coxiella, Porphyromonas, Trueperella, Corynebacterium, and Helcococcus. Interestingly, these taxa, with exception of genus Ehrlichia and Bacillus, constituted the metagenomic biomarkers detected by LEfSe analysis (Figure 5b,c). We then performed the two-sided White’s non-parametric t-test to identify differences in the pathogenic microbiome between Amblyomma and Hyalomma ticks. Consistent with LEfSe results, potentially pathogenic genus Rickettsia was exclusive and highly (q-value < 0.0001) abundant (accounting for 36.7% of sequence reads) in Amblyomma tick samples (Figure 6). Other differentially abundant (White’s non-parametric test, p < 0.05) potentially pathogenic genera in both A. variegatum and A. hebraeum included unclassified Coxiellaceae and Escherichia. In contrast, Porphyromonas, Trueperella, Corynebacterium, Coxiella, and Helcococcus were highly enriched (q-value < 0.0001) in H. truncatum ticks.

2.5. Prediction of the Functional Profiles in the Tick Microbiome

In order to gain insight on the metabolic contribution to antibiotic resistance and disease pathogenesis, the prediction tool PICRUSt2 was used to determine to reveal the functional differences in terms of metabolic, antibiotic resistance, and disease pathogenesis (virulence) biomarkers of the bacterial communities between the two tick species. A total of 28 KEGG pathways showing distinct abundance between Amblyomma and Hyalomma ticks are illustrated in an extended error plot in Figure 7a. The principal pathways such as metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, metabolism, and cellular information processing pathways, including human disease pathways, were common to both Amblyomma and Hyalomma microbiomes. Despite subtle differences in the abundance of functional pathways, no significant differences (R2 = 0.957) were detected in the overall composition of the two tick species (Figure 7b).
One of the key abundant pathways included the genetic information processing related to the biogenesis of ribosomal protection proteins, protein sorting, protein export, and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis. Similarly, metabolic pathways relating to amino acid metabolism, degradation, and biosynthesis of enzymes and secondary metabolites such as streptomycin, penicillin, and cephalosporin were also highly expressed in both tick species. These pathways may account for potential enzyme-derived antibiotic resistance and drug degradation in bacteria communities detected in ticks. Environmental information processing pathways such as membrane transport proteins and efflux pumps, secretion systems, and phosphotransferase enzymes (two-component systems, phosphatidylinositol, MAPK signaling, and bacterial toxins) and the cellular processing pathways (porins regulation and inorganic ion transport) that may be key in bacterial pathogenesis [46] were also enriched.

2.6. Drug Resistance and Disease Pathogenesis Biomarker Analysis

For understanding the drug resistance and disease pathogenesis potential of the tick-borne bacterial community, the predicted functional profiles were subjected to LEfSe analysis to detect differentially expressed drug resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers. In all, LEfSe detected 116 KEGG orthologs (KOs) as differentially (LDA score > 2, p < 0.05) enriched functional biomarkers (Supplementary Table S2). Comparing Amblyomma and Hyalomma tick bacterial communities, LEfSe identified 50 significant drug resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers that were differentially enriched between the tick species (Figure 8).
Overall, Amblyomma and Hyalomma tick bacterial communities had 34 and 16 antibiotic resistance and pathogenesis (virulence) markers, respectively, that were differentially enriched (Figure 8a). Supporting LEfSe results, a scatter plot showed poor correlation (R2 = 0.0001, p < 0.05), indicating significant differences in the compositional diversity of drug resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers in Amblyomma and Hyalomma microbiomes (Figure 8b). The main classes of KO genes associated with drug resistance that were differentially expressed included genes coding for drug efflux pumps, drug degrading and modifying enzymes, secretion system proteins, and ribosomal protection proteins. Specifically, MFS efflux pumps such as MHS family transporter genes encoding alpha-ketoglutarate permeases (K033761) and proline/betaine transporters (K03762), the PAT family gene encoding for beta-lactamase induction signal transducer AmpG (K08218), and the DHA2 family gene encoding for multidrug resistance proteins (K03446) were inferred in both tick microbiomes. Whereas K033761 (p = 0.036), K03762 (p = 0.012), and K08218 (p = 0.008) were significantly enriched in H. truncatum, the DHA2 (K03446) and MATE family multidrug resistance proteins (K03327) including multidrug efflux pumps (K18138, K18139, K03543, and K07799) were differentially (p < 0.05) abundant in both A. variegatum and A. hebraeum microbiomes. Further, drug antiporters in the NhaA family such as Na+:H+ antiporters (K03313) and metal resistance genes involved in ATP-binding protein systems for the iron complex and peptide/nickel transport (K02032, K02031, and K02035) and Cu+-exporting ATPase (K17686) were also highly enriched in both A. variegatum and A. hebraeum microbiomes.
Most importantly, inferred functional KO of bacterial communities from Hyalomma and Amblyomma microbiomes also revealed the presence of drug resistance enzymes. Specifically, penicillin degrading enzymes such as the beta-lactamases class C (K01467) and D (K17838), as well as the penicillin inhibiting and modifying enzymes guanylyltransferase (GTase) (K00971) and 3-demethylubiquinone-9 3-methyltransferase (K00568) were identified. Furthermore, enzymes conferring ribosomal resistance to macrolides such as 23S rRNA (adenine2030-N6)-methyltransferase (K07115) and 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic-acid transferase (K02527), including ribosomal protection protein biosynthesis enzymes such as GTP diphosphokinase and guanosine-3′,5′-bis (diphosphate) 3′-diphosphatase (K01139) were also detected. These enzymes may play an important in ribosome-linked drug resistance in the tick microbiome. A prominent observation was that four of these resistance enzymes (beta-lactamase classes C (K01467) and D (K17838), 3-demethylubiquinone-9,3-methyltransferase (K00568), 23S rRNA (adenine2030-N6)-methyltransferase (K07115), and 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic-acid transferase (K02527)) were more highly enriched in the Amblyomma than the Hyalomma microbiome.
In addition to drug resistance enzymes, drug detoxification enzymes such as the glutathione S-transferases (K00799), known to inhibit the MAP kinase pathway, and the antitoxin YefM proteins (K19159) involved in modulation of toxins as well as environmental stress, were also significantly enriched (p < 0.05) in both Amblyomma microbiomes. Finally, genes coding for enzymes and proteins involved in virulence and pathogenesis such as AraC family transcriptional regulator (K03755) and bacterial transpeptidases (Sortase A) (K07284), as well as versatile type IV secretion system proteins virB4, virB6, virB8, virB9, and virB11 (K03196, K03199, K03201, K03203, and K03204, respectively) were also inferred (Figure 8a, Supplementary Table S3). These are protein complexes normally powered by ATP to secrete protein toxins key to pathogenesis, bacterial survival as well as drug resistance.

3. Discussion

In the current study, host ticks from the genera Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) infesting indigenous Nguni cattle in the Roodaplate ARC research farm were collected between September 2018 and February 2019. Previous studies have confirmed the presence of these tick species, including Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) ticks, in South African cattle [4,6,8,47,48]. However, there is a paucity of information on the microbiome associated with host ticks infesting Nguni cattle. There is accumulating evidence that vector-borne infections in the vertebrate host are shaped by the microbiome of the arthropod vector and its competence to acquire and maintain infections with vector-borne pathogens [26,27,30]. In this study, we described taxonomic and functional characteristics of the microbiome associated with Amblyomma and Hyalomma ticks infesting indigenous Nguni cattle and infer several potential taxonomic, drug resistance, and pathogenesis (virulence) markers that may help in deciphering tick-borne disease dynamics in Nguni livestock.
Ticks are important ectoparasites that are characterized by a complex and dynamic microbial community, ranging from vertically-transmitted pathogenic symbionts to transient commensals acquired from the local environment, that are key to their host interactions, survival, and disease transmission [26]. Hard ticks such as Amblyomma and Hyalomma tick species are known to harbor Coxiella-like endosymbionts (CLEs), Franscisella-like endosymbionts (FLEs), Rickettsia-endosymbionts, and Wolbachia-like and commensal tick microbes that are members of the phylum Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria [5,49]. Consistent with these findings, the most dominant phyla identified in this study were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria with a total of 612 bacterial genera identified in the two tick species. The dominance of bacterial taxa belonging to the genus Rickettsia, Corynebacterium, Porphyromonas, Trueperella, Helcococcus, and Actinomycetospora was observed. Overall, we found that community alpha diversity did not vary among the tick species; however, the species richness (Figure 1) and beta diversity (Figure 2) were lower in Amblyomma. Interestingly, the aggregated mean Shannon diversity index was low (ranging between 1.76 to 5.72) (Figure 1), suggesting shared bacteria genera among the tick species. This is consistent with findings reported elsewhere [32,39,50], where a few core bacteria taxa, likely endosymbionts, dominate the tick microbiome. Our results also showed that A. variegatum and A. hebraeum samples grouped apart from H. truncatum, revealing distinct microbial community structure. This was further supported by multivariate analyses that revealed that bacterial composition patterns differed significantly according to tick species (adonis PERMANOVA, F = 5.21, p = 0.021; ANOSIM, R = 0.321, p = 0.011). These observations are in conformity with previous microbiome ecological studies in tick species [5,6,10] reporting that tick identity, the presence of cattle host blood engorgements, feeding habits, shape and size of mouthparts, and geographical location of the tick samples, as well as a previous tick host, greatly influence microbial community structure [30].
An analysis of community composition showed that A. variegatum and A. hebraeum ticks presented a significantly higher abundance of Proteobacteria mainly ascribed to the genus Rickettsia when compared to H. truncatum samples (Figure 3b). Rickettsia was detected in all the Amblyomma samples and accounted for 36.7% of all sequence reads that were identified to belong to Rickettsia rickettsia, providing proof that A. hebraeum and A. variegatum ticks may be the principal vector of Rickettsia-like symbionts in Nguni cattle. Interestingly, Rickettsia and Escherichia were identified as the key metagenomic biomarkers at the genus level (Figure 5b), indicating their importance in Amblyomma tick interactions with host Nguni cattle, their survival, and disease transmission. Magaia et al. [51] reported that 80% of A. hebraeum ticks in cattle in Mozambique were infected by R. Africae, while Jongejan et al. [52] reported a higher abundance of R. Africae in adult and nymph A. hebraeum ticks in goats in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. In that study, the high relative abundance of Rickettsia species in nymphs also provide clues for their vertical transmission from egg masses. These observations imply that, in addition to tick species, host species and geographical location also play a significant role in modulating the tick microbiome.
Generally, Rickettsia endosymbionts are obligate intracellular gram-negative bacteria that play a major role in tick physiology and survival; for example, several Rickettsia phylotypes have abilities to synthesize folate, which supplements tick nutrition due to lack of this essential vitamin in the blood meal [30,53]. In addition, Rickettsia is associated with zoonotic diseases such as spotted fever and typhus groups [6,53]. Specifically, the findings that high abundance of R. rickettsia group across all Amblyomma tick samples, even from the relatively tick-resistant Nguni cattle breed, confirm their wider presence in South Africa, as has been previously reported in other cattle breeds and tick species [8,9,43,44]. This information is particularly important to tourists and travelers visiting South Africa as it is related to the risk of tick bites and the potential of rocky mountain spotted fever infections.
In this study, we also anticipated a higher percentage of family Anaplasmataceae in the Amblyomma ticks, based on previous studies that have reported co-infection of Ehrlichia ruminantium and R. africae in A. hebraeum ticks [52], and a higher abundance of genus Anaplasma in ticks infesting Nguni cattle [3,43]. The only other Rickettsia-like endosymbionts member of family Anaplasmataceae detected included genus Ehrlichia; however, it was only observed in 22% of Amblyomma samples and constituted 0.2% of total sequence reads. Lack of detection could be attributed to the differences in the methodology used and target tick species, where higher abundance in Rhipicephalus ticks than other species has previously been reported in South Africa [44]. Pathogenic Ehrlichia ruminantium, which are agents of heartwater (ehrlichiosis), were detected in Amblyomma and Hyalomma tick species. However, the low abundance compared to other pathogenic groups may account for the lower seroprevalence and incidence of ehrlichiosis and heartwater that have been previously reported in Nguni cattle [44].
In Hyalomma ticks, members of phyla Firmicutes (Anaerococcus, Helcococcus, Peptoniphilus, Peptococcus, Finegoldia, and unclassified Peptoniphilacae), Actinobacteria (Corynebacterium, Trueperella, and Tessarococcus), Bacteriodetes (Porphyromonas), and Proteobacteria (Coxiella) were highly enriched, with these taxa also identified as the key metagenomic biomarkers (Figure 5b), as well as tick-borne pathogens specific to Hyalomma ticks (Figure 6). Similar to Rickettsia endosymbionts, Coxiella-like symbionts are obligate intracellular gram-negative bacteria vertically transmitted in ticks and are primary endosymbionts with a major role in B vitamin supplementation, nutrients missing from the host’s blood [26]. Their involvement in reproductive fitness in Amblyomma americanum has also been reported [54]. Consistent with our findings, several studies have recorded the presence of pathogenic Coxiella burnetii in all tick species identified in South Africa [5,8,14]. These findings are also in agreement with other reports where high serological indices of Coxiella were detected all over Africa, mainly in tick species of Amblyomma, Hyalomma, and Rhipicephalus [51,55]. In this study, sequence reads of Coxiella identified were mostly of uncultured bacterial strains; therefore, future studies for further isolation, sequencing, and in-depth characterization of these bacteria are warranted.
Other potentially pathogenic commensals identified in Hyalomma ticks were taxa ascribed to genus Corynebacterium, Helcococcus, Arthrobacter, Porphyromonas, Anaerococcus, Aerococcus, Peptoniphilus, Tessarococcus, and Trueperella. Interestingly, all these taxa were also detected in Amblyomma samples, albeit at lower abundance, indicating that they are environmentally acquired. These groups have been reported to be associated with ruminant blood, ticks, and other sources [53,56,57]. Corynebacterium are normal flora of animal skin with some species identified as opportunistic pathogens causing zoonotic diseases. Zoonotic species include C. pseudotuberculosis associated with secondary meningitis, caseous lymphadenitis, and otitis media-interna in cattle and goats [57]. C. xerosis has also been linked to abscesses in the brain, mastitis, osteomyelitis, abortions, and arthritis, while C. falsenii, C. bovis, C. resistans and C. striatum causes the mouth of an eagle, mastitis, bronchial aspirates, and blood culture and abscess, respectively [56,57,58]. In this study, the presence of C. xerosis, C. falsenii, C. resistens, C. striatum, C. epidermidicanis, and C. pseudotuberculosis was detected in both tick species with a higher abundance of these species observed in Hyalomma. It is plausible that these species are innocuous microbiomes of animal skin that are acquired by ticks during feeding. On the other hand, Trueperella pyogenes is an opportunistic pyogenic infectious agent mainly found in the mucus that causes otitis externa, abortions, metritis, infertility, and mastitis in cattle [59,60]. Although data on ticks as vectors of T. pyogenes are scarce, Rzewuska et al. [60] reported tick’s contribution in the transmission of T. pyogenes. Finally, members of the genus Porphyromonas are emerging animal and human pathogens with species such as P. levii implicated in bovine necrotic vulvovaginitis in cattle [61]. In this study, P. levii species were identified in both Hyalomma and Amblyomma, implicating these tick species as reservoirs and potential vectors for the emerging pathogen. The identification of commensals alongside the known Coxiella-like endosymbionts (Coxiella) as key metagenomic biomarkers gives clues on their importance in H. truncatum biology.
Coupled with the microbiota characterization, we used 16S rDNA sequencing data to predict metagenome functions and used the inferences of microbial function to another dimension in characterizing the differences of the microbiota between Amblyomma and Hyalomma. The accuracy of these predictions is measured by the nearest sequenced taxon index (NSTI), which estimates how closely related the microorganism in the studied samples are to microorganisms with already sequenced genomes. In this study, the NSTI values for Amblyomma and Hyalomma samples of 0.14 ± 0.08 and 0.19 ± 0.03, respectively, were comparable to values reported for soil (NSTI = 0.17) and human microbiome samples (NSTI = 0.03) [62]. Overall, the compositional diversity of KEGG level 2 pathways related to metabolism, information processing, environmental information processing, and cellular information processing was similar in both Amblyomma and Hyalomma microbiomes (Figure 7), despite subtle differences observed in the relative abundances.
In this study, we focused on several gene families (KOs) of medical importance relating to antimicrobial resistance and diseases pathogenesis markers such as drug efflux pumps, drug degrading and modifying enzymes, secretion system proteins, and ribosomal protection proteins that were differentially enriched in the two tick microbiomes (Figure 8). These observations support previous in silico findings analyzing resistance genes in tick-borne bacteria [25,63,64]. The most abundant efflux pumps inferred included the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) transporters, ATP-Binding Cassette type 2 (ABC-2), and the Multidrug and Toxic Compounds Extrusion (MATE) family multidrug resistance (MDR) proteins (Figure 8a), whose role in bacterial antibiotic resistance has been widely described [63,65,66]. Comparatively, the Amblyomma microbiome exhibited a significantly higher abundance of ABC-type 2 transporters and MATE family MDR efflux pumps, and a concomitant higher abundance of genus Rickettsia than Hyalomma microbiome (Figure 6). Consistent with our findings, Rolain [67] reported that Rickettsia resistance to macrolides and beta-lactam antibiotics could be linked to the overexpression of ABC-type 2 multiple drug transport systems. Curiously, only MFS efflux pumps ascribed to the Metabolite:H+ Symporter (MHS) family were highly enriched in the Hyalomma microbiome (Figure 8a). Such proteins are integral membrane transporters linked to tetracycline and quinolones resistance mechanisms in Coxiella burnetti [68]. Furthermore, MFS multiple drug antiporters of the NhaA family such as Na+:H+ antiporters were also present in both microbiomes. These genes have previously been identified in the Coxiella genus, and have been implicated to confer resistance to fluoroquinolones [69]. The differential overexpression of the MDR efflux pumps genes inferred in this study provide clues on their importance in drug resistance (tetracycline, quinolone, and fluoroquinolone). Further, they represent novel targets for drug development; specifically, designing a new class of peptidomimetic efflux pump competitive inhibitors for improvement of veterinary and medical treatment for tick-borne bacterial infections is an attractive strategy. However, successful deployment of such treatment will require further pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics studies to determine the efficacy and safety of combined administration of efflux pump inhibitors and antibiotics in the management of tick-borne bacterial pathogens.
An array of metal resistance genes such as ATP-driven iron complex transport and peptide/nickel transport, and Cu+-exporting ATPase, a selection factor that may be critical for the proliferation of co-resistance mechanisms for heavy metals and antibiotics in bacterial pathogens [70], was also identified. These proteins were highly enriched in the Amblyomma microbiome, indicating potential cross-resistance mechanisms for metal and antibiotic resistance in this tick microbiome. Moreover, versatile type IV secretion systems (virB4, virB6, virB8, virB9, and virB11) involved in protein toxin production, including AraC family transcriptional regulator and bacterial transpeptidases that are key to bacterial virulence and pathogenesis [71,72], were enriched in Amblyomma and Hyalomma microbiomes. Another key observation was the abundance of genes encoding drug degrading and modifying enzymes such as the beta-lactamases classes C and D, as well as the penicillin inhibiting and modifying enzymes guanylyltransferase (GTase) and 3-demethylubiquinone-9 3-methyltransferase linked to penicillin resistance in tick-borne Ehrlichia [73], Rickettsia [74], and Corynebacterium [56] in both tick microbiomes. Finally, ribosome and protein synthesis represent one of the major targets in the bacterial cell for clinically-relevant antibiotics such as macrolides (e.g., erythromycin). The macrolide target ribosomal-site-altering enzymes such as 23S rRNA (adenine2030-N6)-methyltransferase (RlmJ) and 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic-acid transferase (kdtA), have been reported to confer macrolide resistance [75] and virulence [76]. Macrolide resistance is attributed to the alteration or mutation of 23S ribosomal RNA and methylation of the domain V of 23S rRNA by methyltransferase enzymes [75]. Additionally, macrolide ribosomal protection proteins and biosynthesis enzymes such as GTP diphosphokinase or guanosine-3′,5′-bis (diphosphate) 3′-diphosphatase were also detected. The current findings of the abundance of these proteins may be linked to the richness of genus Rickettsia and Ehrlichia in Amblyomma microbiomes, which is consistent with the detection of macrolide resistance in Rickettsia, E. chaffeensis, E. canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Francisella tularensis tick-borne pathogens [17,25].
In this study, all antibiotic resistance biomarkers were mainly ascribed to potentially pathogenic genera in the three tick microbiomes. However, there is accumulating evidence that all pathogenic, commensal, as well as environmental bacteria form a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (the resistome) from which pathogenic bacteria can acquire resistance via horizontal gene transfer [77]. Thus, it is plausible that the indiscriminate use and misuse of antibiotics for the management of tick infestation and tick-borne diseases make animal hosts and tick vectors a potential hotspot for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the tick microbiome. Under such scenarios, resistance genes, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and (sub-inhibitory) antibiotic selection pressure from various sources may be introduced to endosymbionts, commensals, and pathogens [78]. Hence, further in-depth studies are needed to help understand the extent of the resistomes and how their mobilization in pathogenic bacteria in cattle breeds may occur under tick infestation endemisms [78].
In conclusion, this study identified the key differences in endosymbiotic community diversity and inferred antibiotic resistance and pathogenesis in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) microbiomes in Nguni cattle. However, whether the endosymbionts and commensals detected in this study are active and their exact involvement in tick physiology and pathogen acquisition, nutrition, and environmental adaptability need to be addressed in the future in order to construct a more holistic view of the tick microbiome. Another limitation of the current study was that all the inferences were based on predicted functional traits by PICRUSt annotation, which may suffer from inherent inaccuracy in resolving functional profiles in certain ecosystems [62]. Therefore, further in-depth validation through functional assays using a large sample size will be important. Nevertheless, our data contribute to the growing knowledge on the link between the key metagenomic/taxonomic taxa associated with A. variegatum, A. hebraeum, and H. truncatum microbiomes and inferred antibiotic resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers that may provide valuable theoretical insights on tick biology, the ever-changing epidemiology of tick-borne diseases and future drug discovery.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Site, Tick Collection, and Identification

Ticks used in this study were collected between September 2018 and February 2019 from the Roodeplaat ARC-research farm, Gauteng, South Africa (29°59″ S, 28°35″ E). To collect the ticks, tweezers were used to remove ticks from cattle, ensuring the mouthparts remained intact. Ticks were then placed into Eppendorf test tubes containing 70% ethanol for preservation. The cattle bite site was carefully cleaned with 70% ethanol. Collected ticks were then transported immediately to the University of South Africa Eureka Life Science Laboratory and stored at −80 °C for subsequent identification and DNA extraction. From the 100 cattle sampled, a total of 110 ticks were collected and identified morphologically to species level using standard taxonomic identification keys as previously described [79,80]. A total of 19 ticks (15 and 4 Amblyomma and Hyalomma samples, respectively) were used for further analysis.

4.2. Sample Preparation for Microbiome Analysis

After microscopic identification and confirmation, ticks were washed with nuclease-free water to remove ethanol, then air-dried. Ticks were then cut under a light microscope from the second leg up to the capitulum to target the salivary glands [10]. The upper sections having salivary glands were cut into pieces and added to 0.5 mL screw-cap tubes. The omega TL® lysis buffer and 25 μL of Proteinase K were added to each tube and lysed for a 24-h incubation at 56 °C. DNA extraction was performed using the E.Z.N.A.® tissue DNA extraction kit, (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.3. Library Preparation and 16S rRNA Metagenomic Sequencing

Library preparation for the 16S rRNA targeted amplicon sequencing was performed according to the protocol described by Ogola et al. [81]. Briefly, the DNA samples were amplified targeting the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA using universal primers 27 F (5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 518 R (5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) primers with overhang adapters (underlined). The PCR reaction mixture (25 μL) comprised of 2.5 μL of DNA, 12.5 μL of 2x KAPA HiFi Hot Start Ready Mix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), and 5 μL of each of the primers. The thermocycling conditions used included: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 36 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for the 30 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 40 s and final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min before infinite cooling at 4 °C. The resulting amplified products were visualized in ethidium bromide-stained 1% agarose gel. The DNA pools that yielded amplified products with fragments of approximately 560 bp were selected. The DNA was quantified with a Qubit® fluorometer (Life Technologies Carlsbad, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using a Qubit dsDNA HS® Assay kit (Thermofisher Scientific Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). Subsequently, the amplified products were cleaned using Ampure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, MA, USA), 80% EtOH, and magnetic beads following manufacturer’s instructions. The resultant purified products were attached to dual indices using the Nextera XT v2 Index Kit [39]. Briefly, a total reaction mixture of 25 μL comprising 5 μL DNA, 2.5 μL each of Nextera index primers, 12.5 μL of 2x KAPA HiFi Hot Start Ready Mix (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA), and 2.5 μL of PCR grade water was prepared. The reaction mixture was amplified under the following thermocycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 8 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 40 s and final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min before holding infinitely at 4 °C. The amplified products were purified using Ampure XP beads, 80% EtOH, and magnetic beads following manufacturer’s instructions. Quantification of the final product was performed using Qubit. The concentrated final library samples were diluted to 4 nM using 10 mM Tris at pH 8.5. A volume of 5 μL of each sample was pooled into a multiplexed library and a negative control sample was included. The 6 pM of the pooled libraries and the PhiX control library were denatured using diluted 0.2 N NaOH to achieve cluster generation during sequencing according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
The final library was sequenced by paired-end (300 bp reads) sequencing v.3 chemistry along with its multiplex sample identifiers on the Illumina MiSeq Platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to standard protocol. The dataset for this study was submitted to NCBI under Bio-project PRJNA753497 with accession numbers SAMN20695925 to SAMN20695943.

4.4. Bioinformatic Processing of 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing Data

Sequence processing was performed using Mothur (version 14) software as per Miseq SOP [82]. The SILVA-based reference sequences (Silva v132) were used to classify unique sequences by executing a Bayesian classifier on the Mothur platform. UCHIME algorithm was used with the Silva SEED database to identify and remove chimeras for downstream analysis, while a rarefaction was used to remove singletons [83]. Using the average-neighbor algorithm, the classified 16S rRNA was assigned operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97.0%. Generated OTU tables were then used for downstream analysis, where R (version 4.0.3) and STAMP (version 2.1.3) software were used for statistical data analysis and visualization as previously described [84].
Briefly, OTU tables were rarefied and normalized to the lowest number of read count of 31,484 reads. In this study, we observed no significant differences in the alpha diversity and bacterial composition structure of A. variegatum and A. hebraeum. Therefore, all samples of A. variegatum and A. hebraeum were collectively grouped as Amblyomma samples, while all H. truncatum samples were here referred to as Hyalomma. Alpha diversity was evaluated based on observed OTUs, Chao1, ACE indices, Shannon, Simpson, Inv Simpson, and Fisher diversity; significant differences were calculated using a Storey false detection rate (FDR)-corrected pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Beta diversity was analyzed by microbial principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on bacterial Jaccard distances. To complement beta diversity analysis, we also used anosim and adonis functions in the vegan package to perform analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with 999 permutations based on Bray-Curtis distances to evaluate the contribution of the tick species to the bacterial composition and structure. These analyses were carried out with the “vegan” package in R. Significances for differences in the abundances of taxa were determined based on the storey FDR-corrected two-sided White’s nonparametric t-test with 1000 permutations implemented in STAMP software. The heatmap of the relative abundances of the top 50 genera and Venn diagram of the core microbiome at the genus level (OTUs present in at least 50% of the samples of each group at 1% minimum relative abundance) were generated using heatmap.2 and ampVis2 packages in R. LEfSe was also used to elucidate the biomarkers in each group.

4.5. Metagenomic Prediction of Functional Resistance biomarkers

Metabolic and resistance biomarkers were predicted by PICRUSt v2 algorithm software using 16S rRNA sequence data and reference databases to infer biomarker gene contents as described by Douglas et al. [36]. Using the PICRUSt v2 algorithm, COG (Cluster of Orthologous Genes), and KEGG databases, resistance biomarkers were identified to Level 2 Orthology. We also calculated the weighted Nearest Sequenced Taxon Index (NSTI), a measure of the availability of nearby genome representatives for the given OTUs, to assess the overall feasibility of the PICRUSt approach. The differential abundance of predicted KO genes was evaluated by LEfSe analysis [85] under the EzBiocloud MTP pipeline [45]. For this analysis, the alpha parameter significance threshold for the Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test implemented among classes in LEfSe was set to 0.01 and the logarithmic LDA score cut-off was set to 2.0.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11040432/s1, Figure S1: Comparative heatmap showing percentage grouped abundance of bacterial community at genus level; Table S1: The core microbiome (unique and shared) associated with Amblyomma and Hyalomma ticks; Table S2: KEGG Orthologs that exhibited differential abundance in tick microbiome based on LEfSe analysis (LDA effect size > 2.0).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.C. and T.M.M.; methodology, A.D.C., S.M. and T.M.M.; software, A.D.C. and H.J.O.O.; validation, A.D.C. and T.M.M.; formal analysis, A.D.C.; investigation, A.D.C. and H.J.O.O.; resources, T.M.M. and N.O.M.; data curation, A.D.C. and H.J.O.O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.C.; writing—review and editing, A.D.C., H.J.O.O., T.M.M. and N.O.M.; visualization, A.D.C. and H.J.O.O.; supervision, T.M.M. and N.O.M.; project administration, T.M.M. and N.O.M.; funding acquisition, T.M.M. and N.O.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by UNISA- Woman in Research Fund, NRF Thuthuka Funding, and NRF Funding for Rated Researchers, grant number PR_CSRP220215660682.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the University of South Africa, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences (protocol code 2019/CAES_AREC/152 of 06/09/2019). Authorization to use animals and collection of ticks was obtained from South Africa DAFF and the Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production Institute.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding of the Woman in Research Fund (UNISA), NRF Thuthuka, NRF Funding for Rated Researchers, and the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) for granting permission to collect samples from their farms.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; and the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Rarefaction curve of bacterial OTUs clustered at 97% sequence identity across Hyalomma and Amblyomma tick samples. The curves represent reads observed against OTUs on the y-axis and reads per sample on the x-axis.
Figure A1. Rarefaction curve of bacterial OTUs clustered at 97% sequence identity across Hyalomma and Amblyomma tick samples. The curves represent reads observed against OTUs on the y-axis and reads per sample on the x-axis.
Pathogens 11 00432 g0a1
Figure A2. Exploratory comparative analysis of alpha and beta diversity of Amblyomma variegatum and A. hebraeum microbiome. (a) Both Chao1 and Shannon indices were not significantly different (p < 0.05) for the tick species microbiome. (b) PCoA showed no obvious clustering of the samples according to A. variegatum and A. hebraeum microbiome for Bray-Curtis distances of the community structure. The visualization was supported by PERMANOVA (F = 0.914, p = 0.523), which found no significant difference between communities in the two tick species when phylogenetic relatedness based on Bray-Curtis distances was accounted for.
Figure A2. Exploratory comparative analysis of alpha and beta diversity of Amblyomma variegatum and A. hebraeum microbiome. (a) Both Chao1 and Shannon indices were not significantly different (p < 0.05) for the tick species microbiome. (b) PCoA showed no obvious clustering of the samples according to A. variegatum and A. hebraeum microbiome for Bray-Curtis distances of the community structure. The visualization was supported by PERMANOVA (F = 0.914, p = 0.523), which found no significant difference between communities in the two tick species when phylogenetic relatedness based on Bray-Curtis distances was accounted for.
Pathogens 11 00432 g0a2
Figure A3. Heatmap showing top 35 bacterial species identified based on using EzBioCloud 16S Database (www.ezbiocloud.net, accessed on 28 February 2022) [45]. Dendrogram heatmap based on similarity and distribution of bacteria communities in Hyalomma and Amblyomma tick species at the species level. Dendrogram linkages and distance of the bacterial genus are not phylogenetic but based upon the relative abundance of species within individual tick samples. The y-axis represents abundance while the x-axis represents the individual tick samples.
Figure A3. Heatmap showing top 35 bacterial species identified based on using EzBioCloud 16S Database (www.ezbiocloud.net, accessed on 28 February 2022) [45]. Dendrogram heatmap based on similarity and distribution of bacteria communities in Hyalomma and Amblyomma tick species at the species level. Dendrogram linkages and distance of the bacterial genus are not phylogenetic but based upon the relative abundance of species within individual tick samples. The y-axis represents abundance while the x-axis represents the individual tick samples.
Pathogens 11 00432 g0a3

References

  1. Falvey, L. Food security: The contribution of livestock. Chiang Mai Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 2015, 14, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lew-Tabor, A.E.; Rodriguez Valle, M. A review of reverse vaccinology approaches for the development of vaccines against ticks and tick borne diseases. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nyangiwe, N.; Yawa, M.; Muchenje, V. Driving forces for changes in geographic range of cattle ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in Africa: A review. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 48, 829–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mapholi, N.O.; Marufu, M.C.; Maiwashe, A.; Banga, C.B.; Muchenje, V.; MacNeil, M.D.; Chimonyo, M.; Dzama, K. Towards a genomics approach to tick (Acari: Ixodidae) control in cattle: A review. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, H.; Adjou Moumouni, P.F.; Thekisoe, O.; Gao, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, J.; Galon, E.M.; Efstratiou, A.; Wang, G.; Jirapattharasate, C.; et al. Genetic characterization of tick-borne pathogens in ticks infesting cattle and sheep from three South African provinces. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Halajian, A.; Palomar, A.M.; Portillo, A.; Heyne, H.; Luus-Powell, W.J.; Oteo, J.A. Investigation of Rickettsia, Coxiella burnetii and Bartonella in ticks from animals in South Africa. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Iweriebor, B.C.; Mmbaga, E.J.; Adegborioye, A.; Igwaran, A.; Obi, L.C.; Okoh, A.I. Genetic profiling for Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species in ticks collected in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mtshali, K.; Nakao, R.; Sugimoto, C.; Thekisoe, O. Occurrence of Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, Rickettsia species and Anaplasma phagocytophilum-like bacterium in ticks collected from dogs and cats in South Africa. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2017, 88, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ringo, A.E.; Adjou Moumouni, P.F.; Taioe, M.; Jirapattharasate, C.; Liu, M.; Wang, G.; Gao, Y.; Guo, H.; Lee, S.-H.; Zheng, W.; et al. Molecular analysis of tick-borne protozoan and rickettsial pathogens in small ruminants from two South African provinces. Parasitol. Int. 2018, 67, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Berggoetz, M.; Schmid, M.; Ston, D.; Wyss, V.; Chevillon, C.; Pretorius, A.M.; Gern, L. Protozoan and bacterial pathogens in tick salivary glands in wild and domestic animal environments in South Africa. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Allsopp, B.A. Trends in the control of heartwater. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2009, 76, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Yabsley, M.J.; Parsons, N.J.; Horne, E.C.; Shock, B.C.; Purdee, M. Novel relapsing fever Borrelia detected in African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) admitted to two rehabilitation centers in South Africa. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 110, 1125–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kuley, R. Characterization of Coxiella Burnetii Outbreak Strains. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Halajian, A.; Palomar, A.M.; Portillo, A.; Heyne, H.; Romero, L.; Oteo, J.A. Detection of zoonotic agents and a new Rickettsia strain in ticks from donkeys from South Africa: Implications for travel medicine. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 26, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Venter, H.; Mowla, R.; Ohene-Agyei, T.; Ma, S. RND-type drug efflux pumps from Gram-negative bacteria: Molecular mechanism and inhibition. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Camp, P.J.; Haslam, D.B.; Porollo, A. Bioinformatics approaches to the understanding of molecular mechanisms in antimicrobial resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Branger, S.; Rolain, J.M.; Raoult, D. Evaluation of Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum by Real-Time PCR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 4822–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chowdhury, M.; Mostafa, M.G.; Biswas, T.K.; Mandal, A.; Saha, A.K. Characterization of the effluents from leather processing industries. Environ. Process. 2015, 2, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gestin, B.; Valade, E.; Thibault, F.; Schneider, D.; Maurin, M. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of macrolide resistance in Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica biovar I. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 2359–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Makarov, G.I.; Makarova, T.M. A noncanonical binding site of chloramphenicol revealed via molecular dynamics simulations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2940–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hedayatianfard, K.; Akhlaghi, M.; Sharifiyazdi, H. Detection of tetracycline resistance genes in bacteria isolated from fish farms using polymerase chain reaction. Fac. Vet. Med. Urmia Univ. Urmia Iran 2014, 5, 269–275. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jurado-Rabadán, S.; de la Fuente, R.; Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria, J.A.; Orden, J.A.; de Vries, L.E.; Agersø, Y. Detection and linkage to mobile genetic elements of tetracycline resistance gene tet(M) in Escherichia coli isolates from pigs. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kassinger, S.J.; van Hoek, M.L. Genetic Determinants of Antibiotic Resistance in Francisella. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 644855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Renesto, P.; Ogata, H.; Audic, S.; Claverie, J.-M.; Raoult, D. Some lessons from Rickettsia genomics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Biswas, S.; Raoult, D.; Rolain, J.-M. A bioinformatic approach to understanding antibiotic resistance in intracellular bacteria through whole genome analysis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 32, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bonnet, S.I.; Pollet, T. Update on the intricate tango between tick microbiomes and tick-borne pathogens. Parasite Immunol. 2021, 43, e12813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Narasimhan, S.; Swei, A.; Abouneameh, S.; Pal, U.; Pedra, J.H.F.; Fikrig, E. Grappling with the tick microbiome. Trends Parasitol. 2021, 37, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gall, C.A.; Reif, K.E.; Scoles, G.A.; Mason, K.L.; Mousel, M.; Noh, S.M.; Brayton, K.A. The bacterial microbiome of Dermacentor andersoni ticks influences pathogen susceptibility. ISME J. 2016, 10, 1846–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Estrada-Peña, A.; Cabezas-Cruz, A.; Obregón, D. Behind Taxonomic Variability: The Functional Redundancy in the Tick Microbiome. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. de la Fuente, J.; Antunes, S.; Bonnet, S.; Cabezas-Cruz, A.; Domingos, A.G.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Johnson, N.; Kocan, K.M.; Mansfield, K.L.; Nijhof, A.M.; et al. Tick-Pathogen Interactions and Vector Competence: Identification of Molecular Drivers for Tick-Borne Diseases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Estrada-Peña, A.; Cabezas-Cruz, A.; Obregón, D. Resistance of Tick Gut Microbiome to Anti-Tick Vaccines, Pathogen Infection and Antimicrobial Peptides. Pathogens 2020, 9, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chicana, B.; Couper, L.I.; Kwan, J.Y.; Tahiraj, E.; Swei, A. Comparative Microbiome Profiles of Sympatric Tick Species from the Far-Western United States. Insects 2019, 10, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rikihisa, Y. Mechanisms of obligatory intracellular infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 469–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Lejal, E.; Moutailler, S.; Šimo, L.; Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Pollet, T. Tick-borne pathogen detection in midgut and salivary glands of adult Ixodes ricinus. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, X.-L.; Deng, Y.-P.; Yang, T.; Li, L.-Y.; Cheng, T.-Y.; Liu, G.-H.; Duan, D.-Y. Metagenomics of the midgut microbiome of Rhipicephalus microplus from China. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Douglas, G.M.; Beiko, R.G.; Langille, M.G.I. Predicting the Functional Potential of the Microbiome from Marker Genes Using PICRUSt. Microbiome Analysis: Methods and Protocols; Beiko, R.G., Hsiao, W., Parkinson, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 169–177. ISBN 978-1-4939-8728-3. [Google Scholar]
  37. Egija, Z.; Brandt, W.B.; Teixeira de Mattos, M.J.; Buijs, J.M.; Caspers, M.P.M.; Rashid, M.U.; Weintraub, A.; Nord, C.E.; Savell, A.; Hu, Y.; et al. Same Exposure but Two Radically Different Responses to Antibiotics: Resilience of the Salivary Microbiome versus Long-Term Microbial Shifts in Feces. MBio 2015, 6, e01693-15. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mukherjee, A.; Chettri, B.; Langpoklakpam, J.S.; Basak, P.; Prasad, A.; Mukherjee, A.K.; Bhattacharyya, M.; Singh, A.K.; Chattopadhyay, D. Bioinformatic Approaches Including Predictive Metagenomic Profiling Reveal Characteristics of Bacterial Response to Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination in Diverse Environments. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Couper, L.I.; Kwan, J.Y.; Ma, J.; Swei, A. Drivers and patterns of microbial community assembly in a Lyme disease vector. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 7768–7779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Mateos-Hernández, L.; Obregón, D.; Wu-Chuang, A.; Maye, J.; Bornères, J.; Versillé, N.; de la Fuente, J.; Díaz-Sánchez, S.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Torres-Maravilla, E.; et al. Anti-Microbiota Vaccines Modulate the Tick Microbiome in a Taxon-Specific Manner. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mateos-Hernández, L.; Obregón, D.; Maye, J.; Borneres, J.; Versille, N.; de la Fuente, J.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Hodžić, A.; Šimo, L.; Cabezas-Cruz, A. Anti-Tick Microbiota Vaccine Impacts Ixodes ricinus Performance during Feeding. Vaccines 2020, 8, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mapholi, N.O.; Maiwashe, A.; Matika, O.; Riggio, V.; Banga, C.; MacNeil, M.D.; Muchenje, V.; Nephawe, K.; Dzama, K. Genetic parameters for tick counts across months for different tick species and anatomical locations in South African Nguni cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2017, 49, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Marufu, M.C. Mechanisms of Resistance to Rhipicephalus Ticks in Nguni Cattle Reared in the Semiarid Areas of South Africa. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, South Africa, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yawa, M.; Nyangiwe, N.; Jaja, I.F.; Kadzere, C.T.; Marufu, M.C. Prevalence of serum antibodies of tick-borne diseases and the presence of Rhipicephalus microplus in communal grazing cattle in the north-eastern region of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pruneau, L.; Lebrigand, K.; Mari, B.; Lefrançois, T.; Meyer, D.F.; Vachiery, N. Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Virulent and Attenuated Ehrlichia ruminantium Strains Highlighted Strong Regulation of map1- and Metabolism Related Genes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fyumagwa, R.D.; Simmler, P.; Meli, M.L.; Hoare, R.; Hofmann-Lehmann, R.; Lutz, H. Molecular Detection of Anaplasma, Babesia and Theileria Species in a Diversity of Tick Species from Ngorongoro Crater, Tanzania. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 2011, 41, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Spickett, A.M.; Heyne, I.H.; Williams, R. Survey of the livestock ticks of the North West province, South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2011, 78, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Fedorina, E.A.; Arkhipova, A.L.; Kosovskiy, G.Y.; Kovalchuk, S.N. Molecular survey and genetic characterization of Anaplasma marginale isolates in cattle from two regions of Russia. Ticks Tick-Borne. Dis. 2019, 10, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mutai, B.; Njaanake, K.; Gathii, K.; Estambale, B.B.; Waitumbi, J.N. Bacteriome in Ticks Collected from Domestic Livestock in Kenya. Adv. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Magaia, V.; Taviani, E.; Cangi, N.; Neves, L. Molecular detection of Rickettsia africae in Amblyomma ticks collected in cattle from Southern and Central Mozambique. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2020, 14, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jongejan, F.; Berger, L.; Busser, S.; Deetman, I.; Jochems, M.; Leenders, T.; de Sitter, B.; van der Steen, F.; Wentzel, J.; Stoltsz, H. Amblyomma hebraeum is the predominant tick species on goats in the Mnisi Community Area of Mpumalanga Province South Africa and is co-infected with Ehrlichia ruminantium and Rickettsia africae. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lim, F.S.; Khoo, J.J.; Tan, K.K.; Zainal, N.; Loong, S.K.; Khor, C.S.; AbuBakar, S. Bacterial communities in Haemaphysalis, Dermacentor and Amblyomma ticks collected from wild boar of an Orang Asli Community in Malaysia. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhong, J.; Jasinskas, A.; Barbour, A.G. Antibiotic Treatment of the Tick Vector Amblyomma americanum Reduced Reproductive Fitness. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. de Aguiar, D.M.; Junior, J.P.A.; Nakazato, L.; Bard, E.; Aguilar-Bultet, L.; Vorimore, F.; Popov, V.L.; Colodel, E.M.; Cabezas-Cruz, A. Isolation and characterization of a novel pathogenic strain of Ehrlichia minasensis. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Lim, F.S.; Loong, S.K.; Khoo, J.J.; Tan, K.K.; Zainal, N.; Abdullah, M.F.; Khor, C.S.; AbuBakar, S. Identification and characterization of Corynebacterium lactis isolated from Amblyomma testudinarium of Sus scrofa in Malaysia. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2018, 23, 1838–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Leask, R.; Blignaut, D.J.C.; Grobler, M.J. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis associated with otitis media-interna in goats. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2013, 84, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Andreotti, R.; de León, A.A.; Dowd, S.E.; Guerrero, F.D.; Bendele, K.G.; Scoles, G.A. Assessment of bacterial diversity in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus through tag-encoded pyrosequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Rezanejad, M.; Karimi, S.; Momtaz, H. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Trueperella pyogenes strains isolated from bovine mastitis and metritis. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rzewuska, M.; Kwiecień, E.; Chrobak-Chmiel, D.; Kizerwetter-Świda, M.; Stefańska, I.; Gieryńska, M. Pathogenicity and virulence of trueperella pyogenes: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Elad, D.; Friedgut, O.; Alpert, N.; Stram, Y.; Lahav, D.; Tiomkin, D.; Avramson, M.; Grinberg, K.; Bernstein, M. Bovine Necrotic Vulvovaginitis Associated with Porphyromonas levii. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 505–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Langille, M.G.I.; Zaneveld, J.; Caporaso, J.G.; Mcdonald, D.; Knights, D.; Reyes, J.A.; Clemente, J.C.; Burkepile, D.E.; Thurber, R.L.V.; Knight, R.; et al. Analysis Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rolain, J.M.; Raoult, D. Prediction of resistance to erythromycin in the genus Rickettsia by mutations in L22 ribosomal protein. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 396–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Martinez, E.; Cantet, F.; Fava, L.; Norville, I.; Bonazzi, M. Identification of OmpA, a Coxiella burnetii Protein Involved in Host Cell Invasion, by Multi-Phenotypic High-Content Screening. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Blanco, P.; Hernando-Amado, S.; Reales-Calderon, J.; Corona, F.; Lira, F.; Alcalde-Rico, M.; Bernardini, A.; Sanchez, M.; Martinez, J. Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Much More Than Antibiotic Resistance Determinants. Microorganisms 2016, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Nikaido, H.; Pagès, J.M. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 340–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Rolain, J.M. Genome Comparison Analysis of Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Antibiotics in the Rickettsia Genus. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1063, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Vranakis, I.; de Bock, P.J.; Papadioti, A.; Tselentis, Y.; Gevaert, K.; Tsiotis, G.; Psaroulaki, A. Quantitative proteome profiling of C. burnetii under tetracycline stress conditions. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Vranakis, I.; Sandalakis, V.; Chochlakis, D.; Tselentis, Y.; Psaroulaki, A. DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV mutations in an in vitro fluoroquinolone-resistant Coxiella burnetii strain. Microb. Drug Resist. 2010, 16, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nguyen, C.C.; Hugie, C.N.; Kile, M.L.; Navab-Daneshmand, T. Association between heavy metals and antibiotic-resistant human pathogens in environmental reservoirs: A review. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2019, 13, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schroeder, M.; Brooks, B.D.; Brooks, A.E. Antibiotic Resistance. J. Infect. Public Health 2017, 10, 369–378. [Google Scholar]
  72. Pan, Y.; Zeng, J.; Li, L.; Yang, J.; Tang, Z.; Xiong, W.; Li, Y. Coexistence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Virulence Factors Deciphered by Large-Scale Complete Genome Analysis. Msystems 2020, 5, e00821-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Brouqui, P.; Raoult, D. In Vitro Antibiotic Susceptibility of the Newly Recognized Agent of Ehrlichiosis in Humans, Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1992, 36, 2799–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Rolain, J.M.; Maurin, M.; Vestris, G.; Raoult, D. In Vitro Susceptibilities of 27 Rickettsiae to 13 Antimicrobials. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 1537–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Fyfe, C.; Grossman, T.H.; Kerstein, K.; Sutcliffe, J. Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics in Public Health Pathogens. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a025395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Daxin, P.; Choudhury, B.P.; Petralia, R.S.; Carlson, R.W.; Gu, X.-X. Roles of 3-Deoxy-d-manno-2-Octulosonic Acid Transferase from Moraxella catarrhalis in Lipooligosaccharide Biosynthesis and Virulence. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 4222–4230. [Google Scholar]
  77. von Wintersdorff, C.J.H.; Penders, J.; van Niekerk, J.M.; Mills, N.D.; Majumder, S.; van Alphen, L.B.; Savelkoul, P.H.M.; Wolffs, P.F.G. Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Economou, V.; Gousia, P. Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Infect. Drug Resist. 2015, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Walker, A. Ticks of Domestic Animals in Africa: A Guide to Identification of Species; Bioscience Reports: Edinburg, Scotland, 2003; ISBN 095451730X. [Google Scholar]
  80. Barker, S.C.; Walker, A.R. Ticks of Australia. The species that infest domestic animals and humans. Zootaxa 2014, 3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ogola, H.J.O.; Selvarajan, R.; Tekere, M. Local Geomorphological Gradients and Land Use Patterns Play Key Role on the Soil Bacterial Community Diversity and Dynamics in the Highly Endemic Indigenous Afrotemperate Coastal Scarp Forest Biome. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kozich, J.J.; Westcott, S.L.; Baxter, N.T.; Highlander, S.K.; Schloss, P.D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the miseq illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5112–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Schloss, P.D.; Westcott, S.L.; Ryabin, T.; Hall, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Hollister, E.B.; Lesniewski, R.A.; Oakley, B.B.; Parks, D.H.; Robinson, C.J.; et al. Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7537–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Selvarajan, R.; Sibanda, T.; Venkatachalam, S.; Ogola, H.J.O.; Obieze, C.C.; Msagati, T.A. Distribution, interaction and Functional Profiles of Epiphytic Bacterial Communities from the Rocky Intertidal Seaweeds, South Africa. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Alpha diversity analysis. Boxplots show Shannon, Simpson, Inv Simpson, Fisher diversity, observed OTUs, Chao1, and ACE indices. The diversity indices Shannon, Simpson, Inv Simpson, Fisher results showed significant differences between Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.021), but the richness indices, observed OTUs, Chao1, and ACE showed no significant differences after multiple testing corrections (Kruskal–Wallis, FDR > 0.05).
Figure 1. Alpha diversity analysis. Boxplots show Shannon, Simpson, Inv Simpson, Fisher diversity, observed OTUs, Chao1, and ACE indices. The diversity indices Shannon, Simpson, Inv Simpson, Fisher results showed significant differences between Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.021), but the richness indices, observed OTUs, Chao1, and ACE showed no significant differences after multiple testing corrections (Kruskal–Wallis, FDR > 0.05).
Pathogens 11 00432 g001
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot showing relatedness between Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) tick bacterial community structures at the genus level. The PCoA was based on multidimensional scaling (MDS) and Jaccard distances and the ellipses represent the 95% confidence based on a multivariate t-distribution.
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot showing relatedness between Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) tick bacterial community structures at the genus level. The PCoA was based on multidimensional scaling (MDS) and Jaccard distances and the ellipses represent the 95% confidence based on a multivariate t-distribution.
Pathogens 11 00432 g002
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial communities at the phylum level. (a) Stacked bar chart representing the taxonomic bacterial composition at the phylum level. Samples A1-15 and H1-3 denote Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) ticks, respectively. (b) Bacterial phyla that were differentially enriched in the Amblyomma and Hyalomma tick species. Each extended error bar plot indicates the p-value along with the effect size and the associated difference in the mean proportion and confidence interval for each phylum. Each bar plot indicates the mean proportion of OTUs assigned to the phylum in each group. q-values represent p-values obtained by White’s nonparametric t-test and Storey FDR correction.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial communities at the phylum level. (a) Stacked bar chart representing the taxonomic bacterial composition at the phylum level. Samples A1-15 and H1-3 denote Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) ticks, respectively. (b) Bacterial phyla that were differentially enriched in the Amblyomma and Hyalomma tick species. Each extended error bar plot indicates the p-value along with the effect size and the associated difference in the mean proportion and confidence interval for each phylum. Each bar plot indicates the mean proportion of OTUs assigned to the phylum in each group. q-values represent p-values obtained by White’s nonparametric t-test and Storey FDR correction.
Pathogens 11 00432 g003
Figure 4. Heatmap of the 35 most abundant genera of bacteria communities in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) tick species. The dendrogram shows complete-linkage agglomerative clustering based on Euclidean distance. The heatmap color (blue to reddish-brown) represents the row z-score of the mean relative abundance from low to high.
Figure 4. Heatmap of the 35 most abundant genera of bacteria communities in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) tick species. The dendrogram shows complete-linkage agglomerative clustering based on Euclidean distance. The heatmap color (blue to reddish-brown) represents the row z-score of the mean relative abundance from low to high.
Pathogens 11 00432 g004
Figure 5. Core microbiome and metagenomic biomarkers in the tick microbiome. (a) Venn diagram showing the shared and unique core microbiome at the genus level (OTUs present in at least 50% of the samples of each group at 1% minimum relative abundance). (b) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) plot depicting the differentially taxonomic/metagenomic biomarkers in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) microbiome at a logarithmic LDA score > 2. (c) LEfSe generated cladogram of the taxonomic/metagenomic biomarker differences in the two tick microbiomes.
Figure 5. Core microbiome and metagenomic biomarkers in the tick microbiome. (a) Venn diagram showing the shared and unique core microbiome at the genus level (OTUs present in at least 50% of the samples of each group at 1% minimum relative abundance). (b) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) plot depicting the differentially taxonomic/metagenomic biomarkers in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) microbiome at a logarithmic LDA score > 2. (c) LEfSe generated cladogram of the taxonomic/metagenomic biomarker differences in the two tick microbiomes.
Pathogens 11 00432 g005
Figure 6. Potentially pathogenic taxa that were differentially enriched in the tick samples. Extended error plot illustrating eleven potentially pathogenic bacteria at the genus level that were differentially abundant between Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) ticks, as tested by a two-sided White’s nonparametric t-test. FDR-adjusted p values are reported at the right of the image.
Figure 6. Potentially pathogenic taxa that were differentially enriched in the tick samples. Extended error plot illustrating eleven potentially pathogenic bacteria at the genus level that were differentially abundant between Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) ticks, as tested by a two-sided White’s nonparametric t-test. FDR-adjusted p values are reported at the right of the image.
Pathogens 11 00432 g006
Figure 7. The major KEGG pathways in the tick microbiome. (a) Differential PICRUSt predicted KEGG pathways between tick microbiomes detected by STAMP software. The p-values (adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg correction to account for false discovery rates), effect size, and 95% confidence interval bootstrap computed by White’s non-parametric t-test (two-sided type) are indicated. (b) Scatter plot showing the correlation of the predicted functional genes in the bacterial community in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) ticks. White’s non-parametric t-test using bootstrap dissimilarity showed that clusters were significant at (R2 = 0.957, p < 0.05).
Figure 7. The major KEGG pathways in the tick microbiome. (a) Differential PICRUSt predicted KEGG pathways between tick microbiomes detected by STAMP software. The p-values (adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg correction to account for false discovery rates), effect size, and 95% confidence interval bootstrap computed by White’s non-parametric t-test (two-sided type) are indicated. (b) Scatter plot showing the correlation of the predicted functional genes in the bacterial community in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) ticks. White’s non-parametric t-test using bootstrap dissimilarity showed that clusters were significant at (R2 = 0.957, p < 0.05).
Pathogens 11 00432 g007
Figure 8. Differentially abundant KEGG orthologs related to drug resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) tick microbiomes. (a) LEfSe histogram of the differential drug resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers at a logarithmic LDA score > 2. The p-values (adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg correction to account for false discovery rates) are shown. (b) Scatter plot showing clustering of the biomarkers of bacteria in the two tick species. The plot used a two-sided, White’s non-parametric t-test at 95% confidence interval with the DP bootstrap method.
Figure 8. Differentially abundant KEGG orthologs related to drug resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers in Amblyomma (A. variegatum and A. hebraeum) and Hyalomma (H. truncatum) tick microbiomes. (a) LEfSe histogram of the differential drug resistance and pathogenesis biomarkers at a logarithmic LDA score > 2. The p-values (adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg correction to account for false discovery rates) are shown. (b) Scatter plot showing clustering of the biomarkers of bacteria in the two tick species. The plot used a two-sided, White’s non-parametric t-test at 95% confidence interval with the DP bootstrap method.
Pathogens 11 00432 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chigwada, A.D.; Mapholi, N.O.; Ogola, H.J.O.; Mbizeni, S.; Masebe, T.M. Pathogenic and Endosymbiotic Bacteria and Their Associated Antibiotic Resistance Biomarkers in Amblyomma and Hyalomma Ticks Infesting Nguni Cattle (Bos spp.). Pathogens 2022, 11, 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040432

AMA Style

Chigwada AD, Mapholi NO, Ogola HJO, Mbizeni S, Masebe TM. Pathogenic and Endosymbiotic Bacteria and Their Associated Antibiotic Resistance Biomarkers in Amblyomma and Hyalomma Ticks Infesting Nguni Cattle (Bos spp.). Pathogens. 2022; 11(4):432. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chigwada, Aubrey Dickson, Ntanganedzeni Olivia Mapholi, Henry Joseph Oduor Ogola, Sikhumbuzo Mbizeni, and Tracy Madimabi Masebe. 2022. "Pathogenic and Endosymbiotic Bacteria and Their Associated Antibiotic Resistance Biomarkers in Amblyomma and Hyalomma Ticks Infesting Nguni Cattle (Bos spp.)" Pathogens 11, no. 4: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop