Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compounds Obtained from Breath and Feces to Detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Doñana National Park, Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Wide Range of the Prevalence and Viral Loads of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 (PCV3) in Different Clinical Materials from 21 Polish Pig Farms
Previous Article in Journal
A Retrospective Assessment of Temperature Trends in Northern Europe Reveals a Deep Impact on the Life Cycle of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Porcine Circovirus 3 in Wildlife Species in Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/pathogens9050344
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Characterization of Porcine Circovirus 3 Strains Circulating in Sardinian Pigs and Wild Boars

by
Silvia Dei Giudici
1,*,
Giulia Franzoni
1,
Piero Bonelli
1,
Pier Paolo Angioi
1,
Susanna Zinellu
1,
Viviana Deriu
2,
Tania Carta
1,
Anna Maria Sechi
1,
Francesco Salis
3,
Francesca Balzano
4 and
Annalisa Oggiano
1
1
Department of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy
3
Freelance Veterinary Practitioner, Via Minerva, Ploaghe, 07017 Sassari, Italy
4
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(5), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050344
Submission received: 9 March 2020 / Revised: 24 April 2020 / Accepted: 29 April 2020 / Published: 2 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Porcine Circovirus Infections)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) is a recently discovered member of the Circoviridae family. So far, its presence has been reported in North America, Asia, South America, and Europe. In this study, blood and tissue samples from 189 Sardinian suids (34 domestic pigs, 115 feral free ranging pigs, and 39 wild boars) were used to genetically characterize the PCV3 strains from Sardinia. PCV3 infection in the animals was confirmed by real time PCR. The detection rate in the three groups analyzed was l7.64% in domestic pigs, 77.39% in free ranging pigs, and 61.54% in wild boars. Moreover, our results showed that co-infection of PCV3 with other viruses is quite a common occurrence. Molecular characterization of Sardinian PCV3 strains was performed by sequencing 6 complete genomes and 12 complete cap genes. Our results revealed that there is a high similarity between our strains and those identified in different countries, confirming the genetic stability of PCV3 regardless of geographical origin. Haplotype network analysis revealed the presence of 6 whole genomes or 12 unique ORF2 haplotypes and a nonsynonymous mutation in ORF2 that leads to an R14K amino acid substitution. Phylogenetic analysis of whole genome and ORF2 was also conducted. The Sardinian strains were allocated in three different clusters of phylogenetic trees of both complete genome and ORF2. With this study, we have provided a snapshot of PCV3 circulation in Sardinia. Our findings might help to achieve a deeper understanding of this emerging porcine virus.

1. Introduction

Porcine circoviruses (PCV) are small, single-stranded, non-enveloped DNA viruses with a circular genome [1]. Three species in the genus Circovirus have been identified: PCV1, PCV2, and PCV3 [2]. Recently, a new circovirus was identified in China and tentatively designated as porcine circovirus type 4 (PCV4) [3]. PCV1 was initially described in the 1970s and it is regarded as non-pathogenic [4], whereas PCV2, first isolated in the early 1990s, has important financial impact on pork production due to increased mortality, reproduction failure, and reduced growth rate in pigs infected with PCV2 [5]. PCV2 infection can be subclinical or associated with several syndromes, commonly known as porcine circovirus–associated diseases (PCVAD) [5,6]. Nowadays, PCV2 is considered endemic in many pork-producing countries.
PCV3 was only recently discovered. In 2016, Palinski et al. reported the detection of PCV3 in North Carolina in sow displaying reproductive problems and clinical signs of porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS) [7]. In the same year, Phan et al. described the presence of PCV3 in North America in pigs affected by cardiac and multi-organ inflammation [8]. Since it was first detected in North America, PCV3 has been subsequently detected in Asia, South America, and Europe [9,10,11,12,13,14]. In addition, retrospective studies suggest that this virus has been circulating in domestic pigs and wild boar for decades, and its first detection was traced back to 1966 [9,12,15]. In a recent study, a phylodynamic approach suggested an ancient origin of PCV3 that was backdated to before the 1900s; however, depending on the dataset analyzed, a far more ancient origin was supported, in the order of several centuries or even millennia [16].
PCV3 has been associated with different clinical syndromes, such as abortion and reproductive disorders [7], PDNS, cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation, and respiratory diseases [7,8,17]; nevertheless, it has also been detected in asymptomatic pigs [12,16]. Elements determining whether PCV3 infection would result in asymptomatic disease or fatal outcome are still unknown.
PCV3 possesses a 1999–2001 nucleotide circular genome, with two open reading frames (ORFs), ORF1 and ORF2, encoding for Rep and Cap proteins respectively, and a putative ORF3, which encodes for a putative 231 amino acid (aa) protein of unknown function [8,18]. Phylogenetic analysis suggests a bat origin of this virus and several studies have recognized the cross-species transmission ability of the virus with its genome being detected not only in pig and wild boar samples, but also in samples of dogs, cattle, mice, and even ticks [2]. Different PCV3 classification schemes have been proposed. A subdivision into three groups called PCV3a, PCV3b, and PCV3c, or into two major groups named “PCV3a” and “PCV3b”, has been proposed [9,19,20,21]. A recent study used the largest datasets available of full genome and ORF2 region to analyze the possibility of defining PCV3 genotypes and found only two clades [22]. One of these contains the majority of the known sequences, the other only two distantly related Chinese sequences collected in 2006. So, the authors formally proposed a definition of one PCV3 genotype (PCV3a) [22].
To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the presence of PCV3 in Sardinia. PCV3 infection in domestic pigs, free ranging pigs, and wild boars was investigated. The co-infection of PCV3 and two other porcine viruses, PCV2 and porcine parvovirus (PPV), was also assessed. The full-length genomes of six PCV3 strains and the cap protein gene of 12 PCV3 strains were sequenced and analyzed phylogenetically to determine the genetic characteristics of this emerging virus in Sardinia.

2. Results

2.1. PCV3 Detection

The presence of PCV3 in Sardinian domestic pigs, free ranging pigs, and wild boars was investigated. As displayed in Table 1, the viral genome was detected in 17.64% (6 out of 34) domestic pigs, 77.39% (89 out of 115) feral free ranging pigs, and 61.54% (24 out of 39) wild boars.
The mean threshold cycle (Ct) values of the positive samples in the three groups that were analyzed were 31.15 ± 7.42, 31.91 ± 4.52, and 29.38 ± 5.43, respectively. Within domestic pigs, the PCV3 genome was detected in three animals (two fattening and one post-weaning pig, Ct 36.49 ± 1.27) and three fetuses (belonging to two different litters, Ct 24.03 ± 5.49). Among the fetal organs of domestic pigs analyzed, the viral genome was detected in three spleens, whereas it was detected in one brain, one blood, and one liver of fattening/post-weaning pigs.
Concerning the type of tissue, the viral genome was detected in the spleen (75%), lung (50%), and blood (66.67%) of PCV3 positive wild boars.
The frequency of PCV3 detection was significantly lower in domestic pigs than in free ranging pigs and wild boars (χ2 = 11.53, p = 0.0007; χ2 = 6.32, p = 0.0019, respectively), whereas the difference in the frequency of PCV3 detection between free ranging pigs and wild boars was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.60, p = 0.43).

2.2. Co-Infection

Co-infection of PCV3 with PCV2 and PPV was investigated using real time PCR. Co-infections were common in both domestic and feral suids: 100% of PCV3+ domestic pig samples (both fetus/placenta and domestic pigs) (6 out of 6), 93.25% of PCV3+ free ranging pigs (83 out of 89), and 95.83% of PCV3+ wild boars (23 out of 24) were co-infected with PCV2 and/or PPV. The frequency of detection of all the three viruses in the different groups analyzed is reported in Table 1.
Within the PCV3 positive samples, the mean Ct values of the PCV2 positive samples were 22.27 ± 6.16 in domestic pigs, 29.42 ± 4.37 in domestic pig aborted fetus/placenta, 26.27 ± 5.94 in free ranging pigs, and 26.26 ± 6.41 in wild boars. Within PCV3 positive samples, the mean Ct values of the PPV positive samples were 37.54 ± 1.85 in domestic pigs, 30.68 ± 5.35 in domestic pig aborted fetus/placenta, 27.21 ± 5.61 in free ranging pigs, and 28.03 ± 5.73 in wild boars.

2.3. Sequencing and Genotyping

The characteristics of Sardinian PCV3 strains (6 full genomes + 12 ORF2 sequences) along with the GenBank accession numbers are presented in Table 2.
Sardinian PCV3 full genome strains have a genome size of 2000 nucleotides (nt.) and there is high similarity among them (98.6–99.8%). Additionally, they exhibited a high similarity (98.6–99.7%) with the international reference strains that were analyzed. They represent six unique haplotypes as determined through DNASp5 and POPART analysis (Figure S1).
Sardinian PCV3 ORF2 sequences (645 nt.) have a 97.6–100% similarity among them and a 97.3–99.8% similarity with the international reference strains that were analyzed, and they constitute 14 different haplotypes. In particular, the analysis of the entire ORF2 dataset revealed that the strains PCV3SAR9, PCV3SAR12, PCV3SAR16, and PCV3SAR17 belong to the same haplotype as the sequence MF805724 4332-7_Denmark_2017. PCV3SAR2 belongs to the same haplotype as the sequence MG595741 HU/Szerencs/2017 from Hungary, whereas the strains PCV3SAR13 and PCV3SAR14 can be assigned to the same unique haplotype. PCV3SAR1, PCV3SAR3, PCV3SAR4, PCV3SAR5, PCV3SAR6, PCV3SAR7, PCV3SAR8, PCV3SAR10, PCV3SAR11, PCV3SAR15, and PCV3SAR18 represent unique haplotypes in the ORF2 dataset. The data were confirmed by network analysis (Figure S2).
The amino acid sequences of the Sardinian PCV3 strains identified in this study were compared with those of the reference strain KX778720 [8]. Our analysis revealed the presence of 10 amino acid substitutions in the cap protein and 4 in the rep protein of the Sardinian PCV3 strains (Figures S3 and S4). Compared to the international strains belonging to the datasets analyzed, some Sardinian sequences revealed unique amino acid substitutions. PCV3SAR1 and PCV3SAR2 contained the amino acid substitutions V252I and P78A, respectively, in ORF1, and PCV3SAR4 and PCV3SAR15 contained the amino acid substitutions R14K and A75S, respectively, in ORF2.
No evidence of recombination was detected by RDP3 analysis between the sequences included in the two datasets analyzed. The phylogenetic signal of the datasets, reported in Figure S5, showed the presence of sufficient phylogenetic information. The phylogenetic trees of the complete genome and ORF2 region are reported in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. Sardinian strains belong to the genotype PCV3a recently defined by Franzo et al. [22]. The phylogenetic tree of the full genome revealed that two Sardinian strains clustered with a strain detected in Colombia, Hungary, and China (PCVSAR2), and another strain detected in the USA and Germany (PCV3SAR4). A cluster containing four Sardinian strains (PCVSAR1, PCVSRA3, PCVSAR5, and PCVSAR6), and strains from Denmark, China, and Germany was also found. These results were confirmed by analysis of the ORF2 phylogenetic tree in which 13 out of 18 strains were grouped in the same cluster. The remaining ORF2 sequences clustered with strains from China, Colombia, Spain, Italy, and the USA, confirming the results obtained with haplotype analysis.

3. Discussion

This study is the first to describe the presence of PCV3 in Sardinian domestic pigs, free ranging pigs, and wild boars. PCV3 was detected in each of these groups but its detection percentage was significantly lower in samples collected from domestic pigs (20% in domestic pigs, 15.7% in domestic pig fetus/placenta) than in wild boars (77.39%) and free ranging pigs (61.54%). We can speculate that the biosecurity measures adopted in pig farms helped to reduce PCV infection, being effective in reducing environmental contamination by pathogens and minimizing contact between pigs and other animals such as dogs, mice, and ticks, in which PCV3 has been detected [23,24,25]. As already reported by several authors [2,26], PCV3 has also been isolated from wild mammals and hematophagous ectoparasites, thus exhibiting a broad host tropism and wide distribution in wildlife. Accordingly, our data suggests that wild boars might be reasonably considered as reservoirs of PCV3 and, at the same time, free ranging pigs might possibly constitute the link between rural and sylvan environments as already suggested by other authors [27].
Other studies, conducted in Spain, Italy, and Germany, analyzed the circulation of PCV3 in wild boars and reported the detection frequency of 42.66%, 33%, and 23–50%, respectively [26,28,29]. Our results would therefore seem to indicate a greater circulation of PCV3 among the Sardinian wilds compared to other studies. However, we must point out that different PCR methods and tissues were used in these studies.
We detected PCV3 genome in three aborted fetuses, at Ct 24.03 ± 5.49, suggesting its potential role in reproductive disorders. These findings are in accordance with previous studies, where PCV3 was associated with abortion and reproductive disorders in the USA [7,30] and China [31].
PCV3 was identified in sick pigs in the absence of other pathogens and results from a recent study suggest that PCV3 can alone induce PDNS [24]. Besides, co-infections of PCV3 with other swine viruses, such as PCV2, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), and PPV, are common in pig herds [2,32,33,34,35,36]. In our study, co-infection of two swine viruses (PCV2 and PPV) was assessed and the results showed a large frequency of both the viruses in domestic and free ranging pigs as well as in wild boars. Although further studies are needed to better characterize the PCV3 impact on the pig immune system, we can hypothesize that, by analogy with PCV2 whose immunosuppressive activity has already been demonstrated [37,38], PCV3 infection might compromise the swine immune system to a certain extent, thus facilitating concomitant infection with other common viruses. Indeed, conversely to what we observed, other authors found that even if co-circulation of PCV2 and PCV3 is a common occurrence in pig farms, co-infections of individual pigs seems to be rare [39]. PCV3 nucleotide sequences of 6 complete genomes and 18 complete cap genes, including the 6 from complete genomes, were analyzed in this study. There was high similarity between the Sardinian strains and between Sardinian strains and strains from different countries, confirming that PCV3 is genetically stable regardless of geographical origin [2,19]. This genetic stability was confirmed by the recent determination of the evolutionary rate that was estimated to be in the range of 10−4 to 10−5 substitutions/site/year using different datasets [16] and all the sequences available at the date of publication.
Six unique haplotypes were found through haplotype analysis of the Sardinian full genome sequences, whereas 12 unique haplotypes out of 14 were recognized through analysis of the ORF2 sequences. The analysis of the ORF2 sequences revealed the presence of unique nonsynonymous mutations in PCV3SAR4, which lead to an R14K amino acid substitution. A recent study provided evidence that the basic amino acid residues at positions 8–32 of ORF2 could direct PCV3 nuclear targeting, and that the highly conserved motif 8RRR-R-RRR16, mutated in PCV3SAR4 and causing replacement of arginine with lysine at position 14, is a key functional nucleolar localization signal that guides PCV3 ORF2 into nucleoli [40]. The function of nucleolar localization signals and that of the amino acid mutation found in PCV3SAR4 needs to be further investigated.
The Sardinian strains were allocated in three different clusters of both complete genome and ORF2 phylogenetic trees (Figure 1; Figure 2). This finding was confirmed by haplotype analysis. All the clusters contained Sardinian strains from the three different pig groups analyzed in the study and from different Sardinian provinces.
Most of the Sardinian strains clustered together, and with strains from Denmark, China, and Germany, as evidenced in both phylogenetic trees and network analysis. These findings suggest that the variability of PCV3 in Sardinia could be due to local viral evolution, and not only due to different epidemic entries. In addition, as we previously speculated in our work on PCV2 [41], we hypothesized that the presence of African swine fever (ASFV) [42], which limits pig trade to imports only, the unique geographical features of Sardinia, and high selective pressure caused by frequent culling of pigs during the ASFV eradication program, together, might have led to generation of new PCV3 variants (not detectable in other countries).
Furthermore, phylogenetic and network analysis (Figure S2) confirmed that our strains clustered with international strains and only two of them clustered with Italian strains. The presence of ASFV in Sardinia prevents the export of live pigs; in the years between 2006 and 2018, pigs were mainly imported from the rest of Italy (30%), and from Spain (24%), France (28%), Germany (9.5%), Belgium (5.8%), and Luxembourg (1.65%) [43]. As opposed to what we already know about PCV2 in Sardinia [41], fewer numbers of Sardinian PCV3 strains clustered with those from other areas of Italy, although in the present study, a lower number of nucleotide sequences were analyzed. To date, only five complete PCV3 sequences are available from the rest of the Italy.
Overall, future studies are needed to better define the characteristics of this recently discovered virus. The reasons behind the broad circulation of PCV3 in the wild are still unknown and comparison between sequences of domestic and wild animals might contribute to a better understanding of the epidemiology of this emerging pathogen and its impact on swine industry.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Samples

In this study, 263 samples were collected between November 2018 and January 2019 and analyzed at the Diagnostic Virology Laboratory of Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale (IZS) of Sardinia:
- 65 samples (aborted fetus, placenta, EDTA blood, spleen, lung, liver, intestine, and brain) from 34 domestic pigs of 16 different farms presenting reproductive failure (8 samples from 6 weaners, 5 samples from 2 post-weaning pigs, 4 from 2 fattening pigs, 5 from 5 sows, and 42 samples from 19 aborted fetus/placenta from 8 litters);
- 83 samples (spleen, lung, EDTA blood) from 39 hunted wild boars in north Sardinia (2018/2019 hunting season);
- 115 spleen samples obtained from feral free ranging pigs culled between 2018 and 2019 in central Sardinia (provinces of Nuoro and Ogliastra) during the depopulation action of the Sardinian ASFV eradication plan.
No clinical data were available for wild boars and free ranging pigs.

4.2. DNA Isolation and Detection of PCV3, PCV2, and PPV

Viral DNA was extracted from tissue or blood samples using MagMax Core kit and MagMax96 extractor (Thermo Fisher) following the manufacturer’s instructions; samples were stored at −20 °C until further analysis. All the samples were screened for the presence of PCV3, PCV2, and PPV by qualitative real-time PCR, as previously described [44,45,46]. Samples with Ct value of less than 40 were considered positive.

4.3. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis of PCV3 DNA

Six PCV3 positive samples with strong RT-PCR results (Ct values < 30) were fully sequenced. The complete genome sequence of PCV3 was obtained via amplification of three overlapping amplicons produced by PCR using primers previously described [7,11] and reported in Table 3.
Furthermore, the complete sequence of cap protein gene was obtained from 12 positive samples using ORF2 primers described in Table 3. Amplicons were separated using 2% agarose gel and subsequently purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified samples were stored at −20°C until further analysis.
Sequencing was performed using the primers mentioned before on an ABI-PRISM 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and a DNA sequencing kit (dRhodamine Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction; Applied Biosystems). The sequences were edited in the BioEdit software version 7.0.0 [47]. ClustalW was utilized for multiple sequence alignment, and BioEdit software and Muscle algorithm of MEGA 7 software were used for editing and sequence translation, respectively [48].
The complete PCV3 genome was assembled and analyzed. Full genome and ORF2 datasets were built using the Sardinian sequences (6 complete strains and 18 ORF2) and all the sequences (n = 100) of international strains retrieved from GenBank in March 2019. Haplotypes were identified using DNASPv5 [49] and POPART software [50]. RDP, GENECONV, MaxChi, and 3Seq methods implemented in the RDP4 software [51] were used to analyze the presence of recombination events. The evolutionary model that best fitted the data of all the datasets was selected using JmodelTest v.2.1.7 [52].
The phylogenetic signal of the datasets was subjected to likelihood mapping analysis with 10,000 random quartets in the TreePuzzle software as already described [41,53]. Phylogenetic trees of the complete PCV3 genome and ORF2 regions were constructed using MEGA 7 software [54] via the maximum likelihood (ML) method and GTR +I +G or TrN +G model of nucleotide substitution, respectively. Statistical support for specific clades was obtained via 1000 bootstrap replicates.

4.4. Data Analysis and Statistics

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software v.21. Chi-squared test (χ2) was used to analyze the differences in the PCV3 detection rate between domestic pigs, free ranging pigs, and wild boars. P values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following materials are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/5/344/s1. Figure S1: PCV3 whole genome haplotype network, Figure S2: PCV3 ORF2 haplotype network, Figure S3: rep protein comparison between Sardinian PCV3 strains and PCV3-USMO2015 reference strain, Figure S4: cap protein comparison between Sardinian PCV3 strains and PCV3-USMO2015 reference strain, and Figure S5: phylogenetic signal of the datasets analyzed in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D.G., P.B., F.S., and F.B.; data curation, S.D.G., P.B., P.P.A., S.Z., V.D., T.C., A.M.S., and F.B.; formal analysis, S.D.G., P.B., P.P.A., S.Z., V.D., T.C., and A.M.S.; funding acquisition, A.O.; methodology, S.D.G., P.B., and F.S.; project administration, S.D.G. and A.O.; writing—original draft, G.F., S.D.G., and P.B.; writing—review and editing, G.F., S.D.G., P.B., F.B., and A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics Statements

Samples used in this study were collected in the context of routine diagnostic activity. Samples of wild boar and free ranging pigs were collected by official veterinarians of the Italian National Health Service during the execution of the extraordinary measures of the eradication program of African Swine Fever in Sardinia. No animals were harmed or killed for this study and thus approval of the ethic committee was not required.

References

  1. Allan, G.M.; Ellis, J.A. Porcine Circoviruses: A review. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2000, 12, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ouyang, T.; Niu, G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, L. Recent progress on porcine circovirus type 3. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 73, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, H.H.; Hu, W.Q.; Li, J.Y.; Liu, T.N.; Zhou, J.Y.; Opriessnig, T.; Xiao, C.T. Novel circovirus species identified in farmed pigs designated as Porcine circovirus 4, Hunan province, China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tischer, I.; Gelderblom, H.; Vettermann, W.; Koch, M.A. A very small porcine virus with circular single-stranded DNA. Nature 1982, 295, 64–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. VanderWaal, K.; Deen, J. Global trends in infectious diseases of swine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 11495–11500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Segalés, J. Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infections: Clinical signs, pathology and laboratory diagnosis. Virus Res. 2012, 164, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palinski, R.; Piñeyro, P.; Shang, P.; Yuan, F.; Guo, R.; Fang, Y.; Byers, E.; Hause, B.M. A novel porcine circovirus distantly related to known circoviruses is associated with porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome and reproductive failure. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01879-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Phan, T.G.; Giannitti, F.; Rossow, S.; Marthaler, D.; Knutson, T.; Li, L.; Deng, X.; Resende, T.; Vannucci, F.; Delwart, E. Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation. Virol. J. 2016, 13, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fu, X.; Fang, B.; Ma, J.; Liu, Y.; Bu, D.; Zhou, P.; Jia, K.; Zhang, G. Insights into the epidemic characteristics and evolutionary history of the novel porcine circovirus type 3 in southern China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 65, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Faccini, S.; Barbieri, I.; Gilioli, A.; Sala, G.; Gibelli, L.R.; Moreno, A.; Sacchi, C.; Rosignoli, C.; Franzini, G.; Nigrelli, A. Detection and genetic characterization of Porcine circovirus type 3 in Italy. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1661–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Franzo, G.; Legnardi, M.; Hjulsager, C.K.; Klaumann, F.; Larsen, L.E.; Segales, J.; Drigo, M. Full-genome sequencing of porcine circovirus 3 field strains from Denmark, Italy and Spain demonstrates a high within-Europe genetic heterogeneity. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 602–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saraiva, G.L.; Vidigal, P.M.P.; Assao, V.S.; Fajardo, M.L.M.; Lorto, J.L.R.; Bressan, G.C.; Lobato, Z.I.P.; Almeida, M.R.; Silva, J.A. Retrospective detection and genetic characterization of porcine circo virus 3 (PCV3) strains identified between 2006 and 2007 in Brasil. Viruses 2019, 11, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Stadejek, T.; Wozniak, A.; Miłek, D.; Biernacka, K. First detection of porcine circovirus type 3 on commercial pig farms in Poland. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1350–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tochetto, C.; Lima, D.A.; Varela, A.P.M.; Loiko, M.R.; Paim, W.P.; Scheffer, C.M.; Herpich, J.I.; Cerva, C.; Schmitd, C.; Cibulski, S.P.; et al. Full-Genome Sequence of Porcine Circovirus type 3 recovered from serum of sows with stillbirths in Brazil. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 65, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saraiva, G.L.; Vidigal, P.M.P.; Fietto, J.L.R.; Bressan, G.C.; Silva, J.A.; de Almeida, M.R. Evolutionary analysis of Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) indicates an ancient origin for its current strains and a worldwide dispersion. Virus Genes 2018, 54, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Franzo, G.; He, W.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Li, G.; Legnardi, M.; Su, S.; Segalés, J. A Shift in Porcine Circovirus 3 (PCV-3) History Paradigm: Phylodynamic Analyses Reveal an Ancient Origin and Prolonged Undetected Circulation in the Worldwide Swine Population. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shen, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, P.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liang, P.; Song, C. Genome characterization of a porcine circovirus type 3 in South China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 65, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, S.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L.; Xin, C.; Liu, Y.; Shi, J.; Peng, Z.; Xu, S.; Fu, F.; Yu, J.; et al. The occurrence of porcine circovirus 3 without clinical infection signs in Shandong Province. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 1337–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Klaumann, F.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Franzo, G.; Sibila, M.; Núñez, J.I.; Segalés, J. Current knowledge on Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV-3): A novel virus with a yet unknown impact on the swine industry. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fux, R.; Söckler, C.; Link, E.K.; Renken, C.; Krejci, R.; Sutter, G.; Ritzmann, M.; Eddicks, M. Full genome characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 isolates reveals the existence of two distinct groups of virus strains. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, G.; He, W.; Zhu, H.; Bi, Y.; Wang, R.; Xing, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, J.; Yuen, K.Y.; Gao, G.F.; et al. Origin, genetic diversity, and evolutionary dynamics of novel porcine circovirus 3. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Franzo, G.; Delwart, E.; Fux, R.; Hause, B.; Su, S.; Zhou, J.; Segalés, J. Genotyping Porcine Circovirus 3 (PCV-3) Nowadays: Does It Make Sense? Viruses 2020, 12, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, N.; Wang, D.; Tu, D.; Yang, L.; Deng, Z.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, P.; et al. First molecular detection of porcine circovirus type 3 in dogs in China. Virus Genes 2018, 54, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiang, H.; Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Zhu, S.; She, R.; Ren, X.; Tian, J.; Quan, R.; Hou, L.; Li, Z.; et al. Induction of Porcine Dermatitis and Nephropathy Syndrome in Piglets by Infection with Porcine Circovirus Type 3. J. Virol. 2019, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Franzo, G.; Grassi, L.; Tucciarone, C.M.; Drigo, M.; Martini, M.; Pasotto, D.; Mondin, A.; Menandro, M.L. A wild circulation: High presence of Porcine circovirus 3 in different mammalian wild hosts and ticks. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 1548–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Klaumann, F.; Dias-Alves, A.; Cabezón, O.; Mentaberre, G.; Castillo-Contreras, R.; López-Béjar, M.; Casas-Díaz, E.; Sibila, M.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Segalés, J. Porcine circovirus 3 is highly prevalent in serum and tissues and may persistently infect wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa). Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 66, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Franzo, G.; Tinello, S.; Grassi, L.; Tucciarone, C.M.; Legnardi, M.; Cecchinato, M.; Dotto, G.; Mondin, A.; Martini, M.; Pasotto, D.; et al. Free to Circulate: An Update on the Epidemiological Dynamics of Porcine Circovirus 2 (PCV-2) in Italy Reveals the Role of Local Spreading, Wild Populations, and Foreign Countries. Pathogens 2020, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Franzo, G.; Tucciarone, C.M.; Drigo, M.; Cecchinato, M.; Martini, M.; Mondin, A.; Menandro, M.L. First report of wild boar susceptibility to Porcine circovirus type 3: High prevalence in the Colli Euganei Regional Park (Italy) in the absence of clinical signs. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prinz, C.; Stillfried, M.; Neubert, L.K.; Denner, J. Detection of PCV3 in German wild boars. Virol. J. 2019, 16, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Arruda, B.; Pineyro, P.; Derscheid, R.; Hause, B.; Byers, E.; Dion, K.; Long, D.; Sievers, C.; Tangen, J.; Williams, T.; et al. PCV3-associated disease in the United States swine herd. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 684–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zou, Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, D.; Tan, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, N. Molecular detection and sequence analysis of porcine circovirus type 3 in sow sera from farms with prolonged histories of reproductive problems in Hunan, China. Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 2841–2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Han, H.Y.; Zheng, H.H.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, R.B.; Xu, P.L.; Hou, H.L.; Chen, H.Y.; Yang, M.F. Development of a SYBR green I-based duplex real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and porcine circovirus 3. Mol. Cell. Probes 2019, 44, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ku, X.; Chen, F.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X.; Fan, S.; Qian, P.; Wu, M.; He, Q. Identification and genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 in China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, S.C.; Nazki, S.; Kwon, S.; Juhng, J.H.; Mun, K.H.; Jeon, D.Y.; Jeong, C.G.; Khatun, A.; Kang, S.J.; Kim, W.I. The prevalence and genetic characteristics of porcine circovirus type 2 and 3 in Korea. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Franzo, G.; Kekarainen, T.; Llorens, A.; Correa-Fiz, F.; Segalés, J. Exploratory metagenomic analyses of periweaning failure-to-thrive syndrome (PFTS) affected pigs. Vet. Rec. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zhao, D.; Wang, X.; Gao, Q.; Huan, C.; Wang, W.; Gao, S.; Liu, X. Retrospective survey and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 3 in Jiangsu province, China, 2008 to 2017. Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 2531–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vincent, I.E.; Balmelli, C.; Meehan, B.; Allan, G.; Summerfield, A.; McCullough, K.C. Silencing of natural interferon producing cell activation by porcine circovirus type 2 DNA. Immunology 2007, 120, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, N.; Li, J.; Yang, Q.; Qiao, J.; Cui, D.; Liu, F.; Li, H.; Zhou, S. Reduced antigen presentation capability and modified inflammatory/immunosuppressive cytokine expression of induced monocyte-derived dendritic cells from peripheral blood of piglets infected with porcine circovirus type 2. Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 1231–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Woźniak, A.; Miłek, D.; Bąska, P.; Stadejek, T. Does porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) interfere with porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccine efficacy? Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 1454–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mou, C.; Wang, M.; Pan, S.; Chen, Z. Identification of Nuclear Localization Signals in the ORF2 Protein of Porcine Circovirus Type 3. Viruses 2019, 22, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dei Giudici, S.; Lo Presti, A.; Bonelli, P.; Angioi, P.P.; Sanna, G.; Zinellu, S.; Balzano, F.; Salis, F.; Ciccozzi, M.; Oggiano, A. Phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 in Sardinia, Italy, shows genotype 2d circulation among domestic pigs and wild boars. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 71, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cappai, S.; Rolesu, S.; Coccollone, A.; Laddomada, A.; Loi, F. Evaluation of biological and socio-economic factors related to persistence of African swine fever in Sardinia. Prev. Vet. Med. 2018, 152, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. National Data Base–BDN. Available online: https://www.vetinfo.it/sso_portale/accesso_home.pl (accessed on 1 February 2019).
  44. Franzo, G.; Legnardi, M.; Centelleghe, C.; Tucciarone, C.M.; Cecchinato, M.; Cortey, M.; Segalés, J.; Drigo, M. Development and validation of direct PCR and quantitative PCR assays for the rapid, sensitive, and economical detection of porcine circovirus 3. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2018, 30, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Opriessing, T.; Yu, S.; Gallup, J.N.; Evans, R.B.; Fenaux, M.; Pallares, F.; Thacker, E.L.; Brockus, C.W.; Ackermann, M.R.; Thomas, P.; et al. Effect of vaccination with selective bacterins on conventional pigs infected with type 2 porcine circovirus. Vet. Pathol. 2003, 40, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Song, C.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, C.; Cui, S. Detection of Porcine Parvovirus using a TaqMan-based real-time PCR with primers and probe designed for the NS1 gene. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Sym. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martin, D.P.; Murrell, B.; Golden, M.; Khoosal, A.; Muhire, B. RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol. 2015, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Posada, D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 7, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zehender, G.; Ebranati, E.; Bernini, F.; Lo Presti, A.; Rezza, G.; Delogu, M.; Galli, M.; Ciccozzi, M. Phylogeography and epidemiological history of West Nile virus genotype 1a in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Pathogens 09 00344 g001 550
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of the PCV3 full genome. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using full genome sequences obtained in this study from different hosts (red: domestic pig; green: free ranging pig; and violet: wild boar) and 100 reference strains retrieved from GenBank. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood algorithm with the TrN+I+G method. Evolutionary analyses were performed in MEGA7 software. Bootstrap values < 70 are not shown. Bar: number of substitutions per site.
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of the PCV3 full genome. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using full genome sequences obtained in this study from different hosts (red: domestic pig; green: free ranging pig; and violet: wild boar) and 100 reference strains retrieved from GenBank. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood algorithm with the TrN+I+G method. Evolutionary analyses were performed in MEGA7 software. Bootstrap values < 70 are not shown. Bar: number of substitutions per site.
Pathogens 09 00344 g001
Pathogens 09 00344 g002 550
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of the ORF2 region of PCV3. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using cap protein gene (ORF2) sequences obtained in this study from different hosts (red: domestic pig; green: free ranging pig; and violet: wild boar) and 100 reference strains retrieved from GenBank. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood algorithm with the TrN + G method. Evolutionary analyses were performed in MEGA7 software. Bootstrap values < 70 are not shown. Bar: number of substitutions per site.
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of the ORF2 region of PCV3. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using cap protein gene (ORF2) sequences obtained in this study from different hosts (red: domestic pig; green: free ranging pig; and violet: wild boar) and 100 reference strains retrieved from GenBank. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood algorithm with the TrN + G method. Evolutionary analyses were performed in MEGA7 software. Bootstrap values < 70 are not shown. Bar: number of substitutions per site.
Pathogens 09 00344 g002
Table
Table 1. Frequency of Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3), Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and Porcine parvo Virus (PPV) detection.
Table 1. Frequency of Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3), Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and Porcine parvo Virus (PPV) detection.
HostPCV3 Infection (%)PCV2 Infection (%)PPV Infection (%)PCV3+PCV2
+PPV (%)		PCV3+PCV2
(%)		PCV3+PPV
(%)
Domestic pigs3/15 (20%)11/15 (57.89%)2/15 (13.33%)1/3 (33.33%)2/3 (33.33%)0/3
Domestic pig fetuses/placenta 3/19 (15.7%)16/19 (84.21%)4/19 (21.05%)2/3 (66.67%)1/3 (33.33%)0/3
Wild boars24/39 (61.54%)35/39 (89.74%)36/39 (92.31%)23/24 (95.83%)0/241/24 (4.17%)
Free ranging pigs89/115 (77.39%)101/115 (87.82%)85/106 (80.19%)61/89 (68.5%)18/89 (20.2%)4/89 (4.5%)
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of Sardinian PCV3 strains. Sequence ID, GenBank accession number, host, year, municipality, and type of sequence obtained are reported.
Table 2. Characteristics of Sardinian PCV3 strains. Sequence ID, GenBank accession number, host, year, municipality, and type of sequence obtained are reported.
IDAccession NumberHostYearMunicipality
(Province)		Sequence
PCV3SAR1MN781187Domestic pig2018Orgosolo (NU)Full genome
PCV3SAR2MN781188Domestic pig2018Bauladu (OR)Full genome
PCV3SAR3MN781189Wild boar2019Osilo (SS)Full genome
PCV3SAR4MN781190Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)Full genome
PCV3SAR5MN781191Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)Full genome
PCV3SAR6MN781192Free ranging pig2019Villagrande (NU)Full genome
PCV3SAR7MN781193Wild boar2019Esporlatu (SS)ORF2
PCV3SAR8MN781194Wild boar2019Bultei (SS)ORF2
PCV3SAR9MN781195Wild boar2019Villagrande (NU)ORF2
PCV3SAR10MN781196Wild boar2019Benetutti (SS)ORF2
PCV3SAR11MN781197Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)ORF2
PCV3SAR12MN781198Free ranging pig2019Villagrande (NU)ORF2
PCV3SAR13MN781199Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)ORF2
PCV3SAR14MN781200Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)ORF2
PCV3SAR15MN781201Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)ORF2
PCV3SAR16MN781202Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)ORF2
PCV3SAR17MN781203Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)ORF2
PCV3SAR18MN781204Free ranging pig2019Urzulei (OG)ORF2
Table
Table 3. The details of primers used for sequencing the PCV3 genome.
Table 3. The details of primers used for sequencing the PCV3 genome.
PrimerSequencePCRLength (bp)Reference
PCV3_1303F
PCV3_8R		5′-ACCGGAGGGGTCAGATTTAT-3′
5′-TGCCGGGTAATACTAGCC-3′		ORF2705[7,11]
PCV3_74F
PCV3_927R		5′-CACCGTGTGAGTGGATATAC-3′
5′-CAAACCCACCCTTAACAG-3′		PCR1853[7,11]
PCV3_1303F
PCV3_541R		5′-ACCGGAGGGGTCAGATTTAT-3′
5′-GAGCTGCTGCTTGAAGATCC-3′		PCR21238[11]
PCV3_817F
PCV3_1647R		5′-GTTATAATGGGGAGGGTGCT-3′
5′-GCCTGGACCACAAACACT-3′		PCR3830[11]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dei Giudici, S.; Franzoni, G.; Bonelli, P.; Angioi, P.P.; Zinellu, S.; Deriu, V.; Carta, T.; Sechi, A.M.; Salis, F.; Balzano, F.; et al. Genetic Characterization of Porcine Circovirus 3 Strains Circulating in Sardinian Pigs and Wild Boars. Pathogens 2020, 9, 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050344

AMA Style

Dei Giudici S, Franzoni G, Bonelli P, Angioi PP, Zinellu S, Deriu V, Carta T, Sechi AM, Salis F, Balzano F, et al. Genetic Characterization of Porcine Circovirus 3 Strains Circulating in Sardinian Pigs and Wild Boars. Pathogens. 2020; 9(5):344. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dei Giudici, Silvia, Giulia Franzoni, Piero Bonelli, Pier Paolo Angioi, Susanna Zinellu, Viviana Deriu, Tania Carta, Anna Maria Sechi, Francesco Salis, Francesca Balzano, and et al. 2020. "Genetic Characterization of Porcine Circovirus 3 Strains Circulating in Sardinian Pigs and Wild Boars" Pathogens 9, no. 5: 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop