Next Article in Journal
High Prevalence and Varied Distribution of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in the Rhizosphere and Rhizoplane of Citrus medica
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Genomic Analysis of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli from South American Camelids in Central Germany
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metabolites and Their Bioactivities from the Genus Cordyceps
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/microorganisms10091707
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of llm1 Affects the Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites of Aspergillus cristatus

by
Yunsheng Wang
,
Yincui Chen
,
Jin Zhang
and
Chuanbo Zhang
*
School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Huaxi University Town, Gui’an New District, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(9), 1707; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091707
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 19 August 2022 / Accepted: 21 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Secondary Metabolism of Microorganisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Putative methyltransferases are thought to be involved in the regulation of secondary metabolites in filamentous fungi. Here, we report the effects of overexpression of a predicted LaeA-like methyltransferase gene llm1 on the synthesis of secondary metabolites in Aspergillus cristatus. Our results revealed that overexpression of the gene llm1 in A. cristatus significantly hindered the production of conidia and enhanced sexual development, and reduced oxidative tolerance to hydrogen peroxide. Compared with the wild-type, the metabolic profile of the overexpression transformant was distinct, and the contents of multiple secondary metabolites were markedly increased, mainly including terpenoids and flavonoids, such as (S)-olEuropeic acid, gibberellin A62, gibberellin A95, ovalitenone, PD 98059, and 1-isomangostin. A total of 600 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified utilizing transcriptome sequencing, and the DEGs were predominantly enriched in transmembrane transport and secondary metabolism-related biological processes. In summary, the strategy of overexpressing global secondary metabolite regulators successfully activated the expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters, and the numerous secondary metabolites were greatly strengthened in A. cristatus. This study provides new insights into the in-depth exploitation and utilization of novel secondary metabolites of A. cristatus.

1. Introduction

Fu-brick tea (FBT) is a traditional post-fermented tea with various health care effects [1,2,3]. Aspergillus cristatus is the dominant microbe during the maturation process of FBT, and has a huge role in the unique taste, color, and pharmacology of the tea; furthermore, the quantity of A. cristatus is critical for evaluating the quality of FBT [4,5]. As a probiotic, A. cristatus is instrumental in the transformation of raw material components and the production of various secondary metabolites during fermentation to improve the quality and efficacy of fermented products [6,7,8], which highlight the significant application value and prospects of A. cristatus. A total of 39 gene clusters for the synthesis of secondary metabolites were predicted to be encoded in the genome of A. cristatus [9], which indicates the great potential of A. cristatus to synthesize secondary metabolites. However, the gene clusters for secondary metabolites encoded in filamentous fungal genomes are not expressed or exhibit very low expression levels under routine laboratory culture [10,11,12], which markedly hinders the utilization of A. cristatus as a source of secondary metabolites.
The method of overexpression or knockout of global secondary metabolite regulators is widely used to fully explore the secondary metabolite potential of fungi. laeA is one of the examples of secondary metabolite regulators with a conserved methyltransferase domain, and was first identified by Bok and colleagues [13]. Overexpression of laeA in Monascus purpureus increased the production of the lipid-lowering secondary metabolite lovastatin [14]. Similarly, overexpression of laeA in other filamentous fungi increased the content of secondary metabolites [15,16].
Further research identified putative methyltransferases in fungal genomes that were similar to laeA, and these were named laeA-like methyltransferases. In Aspergillus nidulans, these genes were named llmA–llmJ [17]. Knockdown of llmF reduced the production of sterigmatocystin, and llmF showed positive regulation of conidiation. Nine genes encoding laeA-like methyltransferases (llm1-9) were also identified in the Cochliobolus heterostrophus genome [18], and knockdown of llm1 resulted in improved T-toxin production, indicating the llm1 negative regulation of the production of this toxin. However, overexpression of a laeA-like gene (llmG) in A. nidulans led to increased production of sterigmatocystin [19]. Overexpression of the laeA-like gene in Daldinia eschscholzii also resulted in the production of two novel metabolites [20]. These indicated that laeA-like methyltransferases are similarly involved in the regulation of secondary metabolites and development in filamentous fungi, and that the regulatory pattern varies among species.
Although laeA-like methyltransferases are well studied in specific species of Aspergillus sp., there are few relevant reports regarding A. cristatus. Consequently, this study aimed to address this gap, and a laeA-like methyltransferase (Llm1 encoded by llm1) was identified in A. cristatus. We further evaluated the activation of silent secondary metabolite pathways via overexpression of llm1 gene of A. cristatus to provide guidance for novel secondary metabolite discovery.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Culture Conditions

A. cristatus strain CM1303 was isolated from FBT (Jingyang, China). The strain was grown on high-concentration sodium chloride MYA solid medium (malt extract 20 g, yeast extract powder 5 g, agar powder 15 g, sucrose 30 g, NaCl 170 g, and water 1000 mL) at 37 °C to induce asexual spore production [9,21]. Potato glucose broth medium (PDB) liquid medium was used for RNA extraction. Induction medium (K2HPO4 2.05 g, KH2PO4 1.45 g, (NH4)2SO4 0.5 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.5 g, NaCl 0.15 g, CaCl2 0.066 g, FeSO4·7H2O 0.00248 g, glucose 1.8 g, glycerol 5 mL, and distilled water to a constant volume of 940 mL) was used for Agrobacterium transformation. Escherichia coli Stbl3 competent cells and Agrobacterium tumefaciens AGL1 competent cells were purchased from Yuanye Boitech Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) and were cultured in LB liquid medium or grown on solid medium.

2.2. Cloning and Overexpression of the llm1 Gene

Total RNA was extracted using an Eastep ® Super Total RNA Extraction Kit (Promega Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and cDNA was prepared with FastKing gDNA Dispelling RT SuperMix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The overexpression vector pCAMBIA1303-TrpC-Hygro-gpdA-GFP (Fenghui Biotech Co., Ltd., Changsha, China), which mainly contains a constitutive promoter gpdA from A. nidulans, resistant kanamycin gene, and resistant hygromycin gene as selection markers, was linearized with restriction endonucleases Bgl II and BstE II. Primers Llm1F and Llm1R (Supplementary Table S1) were designed for amplification of llm1 using the cDNA as a template and the instructions of the seamless cloning kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The gpdA-llm1-Trpc overexpression cassette was then constructed and the plasmid was confirmed by PCR, digestion and sequencing.

2.3. Fungal Transformation

Competent A. tumefaciens AGL1 containing the llm1-overexpression vector were inoculated into LB liquid medium and cultured for 48 h at 28 °C with a shaking speed of 180 rpm. The bacteria were collected by centrifugation, resuspended using IM induction liquid medium, diluted to an OD600 of 0.2, and cultured to an OD600 of 0.7. Next, 100 μL Agrobacterium solution and 100 μL A. cristatus spore solution (1 × 106 conidia/mL) were mixed and spread on IM solid medium containing cellophane. After incubation at 28 °C for 2 d in the dark, the cellophane membrane was transferred to the primary screening medium (PDA containing 50 μg/mL hygromycin B and 200 μg/mL cefotaxime sodium) and suspected transformants were picked onto the rescreening medium (PDA containing 75 μg/mL hygromycin B). After culture for 7 d, RNA was extracted from the transformants and used to obtain cDNA, and the positive clones were verified by PCR amplification using HygroF and HygroR hygromycin fragment primers (Supplementary Table S1).

2.4. Phenotypic Analysis

The conidia (1 × 106 conidia/mL) of A. cristatus wild-type (WT) and overexpression transformant (OE::llm1) were inoculated onto high-concentration NaCl MYA solid medium or MYA solid medium to observe the asexual and sexual development colony morphology, respectively. For further analysis, agar blocks (1 cm in diameter from the same location in the center of the surface of each sample) were collected, homogenized thoroughly by vortexing in a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube containing 1 mL sterile water, and spores or cleistothecia were counted using a hemocytometer. Oxidative stress resistance was determined by measuring the colony diameter after inoculating 15 μL conidia suspension (1 × 106 conidia/mL) of the WT or OE::llm1 transformant on PDA plates containing different concentrations of H2O2, culturing at 28 °C for 10 d. Resistance to oxidative stress was then expressed by the relative diameter size of the colonies.

2.5. LC–MS-Based Metabolite Profiling

A quantity of 3 mL conidia (1 × 106 conidia/mL) of either the WT or OE::llm1 transformant was inoculated into PDB (150 mL) and cultured on a shaker at 180 rpm and 28 °C for 7 d, and mycelium was collected by filtration. A quantity of 50 mg WT or OE::llm1 transformant sample was taken, and 400 μL methanol: water = 4:1 (containing 0.02 mg/mL of internal standard L-2-chloro-phenylalanine) was added. After 6 min of grinding in a frozen tissue grinder and 30 min of low-temperature ultrasonic extraction (5 °C, 40 KHz), the sample was allowed to stand at −20 °C for 30 min. After centrifugation for 15 min (13,000× g, 4 °C), the supernatant was collected for metabolomics analysis.
Untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed using UHPLC-Triple TOF tandem time of flight mass spectrometry (AB SCIE X, Framingham, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation was carried out at 40 °C on an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 mum; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a binary gradient at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Mobile phases A and B were formic acid aqueous solution (0.1%, v/v) and acetonitrile (containing 0.1% formic acid), respectively. The gradient procedure was as follows: 100% A (0–0.5 min), 100–75% A (0.5–2.5 min), 0% A (2.5–13 min), 0–100% A (13.0–13.1 min), and 100% A (13.1–16 min). Full scans and tandem MS acquisitions were performed in both negative and positive modes using the following parameters: full scans were recorded in the mass range m/z 50 to 1000 with a cycle time 510 ms; ion spray voltage, +5.0 kV for the positive ion mode and −4.0 kV for the negative ion mode; curtain gas, 35 PSI; ion source gas 1, 50 PSI; ion source gas 2, 50 PSI; and source temperature, 550 °C.
The metabolomics software, Progenesis QI (version 2.2), was used to process the raw data, and finally a data matrix containing information such as retention time, mass/charge ratio, and peak intensity was obtained. The MS and MS/MS mass spectra were matched with the metabolic database with the MS mass error set to less than 10 ppm, and the metabolites were identified based on the secondary mass spectra matching score. The Human Metabolome Database (HMDB, http://www.hmdb.ca/, accessed on 23 April 2022), METLIN database (https://metlin.scripps.edu/, accessed on 23 April 2022), and self-built databases of the Majorbio I-Sanger Cloud Platform (https://www.i-sanger.com, accessed on 23 April 2022) were used for retrieval. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and supervised partial least squares discrimination analysis (PLS-DA) were performed using the ropls package in R. According to the variable importance projection (VIP) value of the PLS-DA model, VIP > 1, p < 0.05, and fold change (FC) ≥ 1.5 or FC ≤ 0.67 were selected to find the differential metabolites.

2.6. Transcriptome Data Analysis

Conidia (1 × 106 conidia/mL) from either the WT or OE::llm1 transformant were inoculated into PDB liquid medium with 10% volume of inoculum, cultured at 30 °C (180 rpm/min) for 7 d, and mycelium was collected by filtration and rinsed with sterile water, and quickly ground into powder using liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using a TRIzol® Reagent kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the quality and concentration of the extracted RNA were detected using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmingtom, DE, USA). Oligo (dT) primers and polyA of mRNA were used for complementary A-T pairing to isolate total mRNA, and a library was constructed using the Illumina TruseqTM RNA sample prep Kit method, which was used after quality inspection was passed, and the sequencing work was completed using an Illumina platform. Clean reads were obtained by quality control of the raw reads and the resulting reads were then mapped against predicted transcripts from the Aspergillus cristatus (GCA001717485.1) genome. The expression levels of genes and transcripts were analyzed using RSEM (http://deweylab.github.io/RSEM/, accessed on 2 May 2022), and the quantitative index was TPM (number of transcripts per million clean tags). Genes with significantly different expression levels (differentially expressed genes, DEGs) were identified by a significance test with combined thresholds (p-adjust < 0.05 and log2 FC ≥ 1). The raw RNA-Seq reads from WT and OE::llm1 transformant have been deposited in the NCBI SRA database with the accession number PRJNA774889.

2.7. RT-qPCR Detection

After cDNA was obtained from WT and OE::llm1 transformant, RT-qPCR was performed on the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio3 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Biotech Co., Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the instructions of the SYBR Green PCR MasterMix (GeneStar Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), using GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) as the reference gene. Primers used for qPCR are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The relative transcription level of each tested gene was calculated using the 2-ΔΔct method. All real-time PCR assays were performed in triplicate in each culture and repeated three times using RNA isolated from independent cultures.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All data were the results of three repeated experiments and were statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), and then the t-test was used for statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning and Analysis of the Gene llm1 in A. cristatus

The laeA-like gene (llm1) was identified via Local-blast, using the llmF gene (A. nidulans, AN6749) as a query. The llm1 gene was 1286 bp in length and the open reading frame (ORF) consisted of 1116 nucleotides, including three introns, which mapped to 241–296 bp, 736–805 bp, and 950–1000 bp, respectively. The gene encodes 371 amino acids and has a conserved S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase domain at residues 133–221 (Figure 1A). BLASTP analysis revealed that the Llm1 protein sequence (ODM14516) shared 97.84% similarity with a protein from A. chevalieri (XP043139667.1) and 91.89% sequence similarity with a hypothetical protein from A. glaucus (XP_022397524.1). Multiple sequence alignments were performed between Llm1 and other laeA-like protein using DNAMAN and the result revealed that the N-terminus of Llm1 protein was not conserved and exhibited a very conservative methyltransferase domain sequence (Figure 1B).

3.2. Construction and Screening of llm1-Overexpressing Strain

The schematic diagram of llm1 overexpression vector construction is shown in Supplementary Figure S1A. The putative A. cristatus transformants selected on hygromycin B-resistance PDA plates were chosen and grown for three generations. Finally, two transformants were screened out; the resulting two transformants could grow on PDA plates containing a high concentration of hygromycin B, whereas the WT could not (Supplementary Figure S1B). Simultaneously, RNA was extracted from the WT strain and transformants, and after obtaining cDNA, the hygromycin resistance fragment carried by the vector was amplified by PCR using HygroF and HygroR primers. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the resulting PCR products showed no corresponding band in the WT strain, whereas the transformants showed the corresponding fragment (406 bp) had been amplified (Supplementary Figure S1C), and the PCR products were verified by sequencing. QLlm1F and QLlm1R primers were used to validate the relative expression of the llm1 gene (Supplementary Table S1), and the two transformants had significantly higher llm1 expression than the WT strain (Supplementary Figure S1D), indicating the two transformants were desired transformants.

3.3. Effects of Overexpression of llm1 on Sex Development

To investigate the effect of llm1 gene overexpression on sex development of A. cristatus, the WT and OE::llm1 strain were cultured in high-concentration sodium chloride MYA medium at 37 °C for 10 d. As shown in Figure 2A, compared to the WT, the OE::llm1 transformant showed developmental retardation in both light and dark culture conditions. The production of conidia was markedly lower in the OE::llm1 transformant (0.4 ± 0.1 × 105 conidia/cm2) than in WT (1.5 ± 0.2 × 105 conidia/cm2) in dark culture conditions and the same results were observed in light culture conditions (Figure 2C). However, we did not observe any obvious effect on colony morphological development during sexual development of A. cristatus (Figure 2B). Interestingly, the production of cleistothecia was markedly increased in the OE::llm1 transformant (4.41 ± 0.51 × 105 cleistothecia/cm2) compared to the WT (1.33 ± 0.51 × 105 cleistothecia/cm2) in dark culture conditions and the results were very similar in light culture conditions (Figure 2D). These results suggest that overexpression of llm1 appears to inhibit asexual development and enhance sexual development in A. cristatus.

3.4. Overexpression of the Gene llm1 Decreased Oxidative Stress Tolerance of A. cristatus

Putative methyltransferases are involved in the regulation of the tolerance of fungi to oxidative stress. Therefore, WT or the OE::llm1 transformant was inoculated on PDA plates containing different concentrations of H2O2 (Figure 3A). There was no significant difference in strain morphology and growth rate between 5 and 10 mmol/mL H2O2. However, when the concentration of H2O2 was increased to 15 mmol/mL, the colony diameter of the OE::llm1 transformant (28.9 ± 3.8 mm) was significantly lower than that of the WT strain (50.9 ± 6.6 mm) (Figure 3B). This means that the tolerance to oxidative stress was decreased in the overexpression transformant.

3.5. Effects of llm1 Overexpression on Metabolites Production

Studies have demonstrated that the putative methyltransferases represented by laeA are involved in a variety of life activities of filamentous fungi. Consequently, we used non-targeted metabolomics techniques to evaluate the effect of llm1 overexpression on metabolism of A. cristatus. A total of 1238 effective metabolites were identified by searching a self-built database, METLIN database, and HMDB database. Inter-group differences and intra-group sample duplications were evaluated via PCA. As shown in Figure 4A, the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) can clearly separate the two groups of samples, which explains the changes of 49.60% and 18.90%, respectively, indicating significant differences in metabolites between the two groups. The PLS-DA model was used to screen differential compounds between the two groups, as shown in the PLS-DA chart (Figure 4B). WT samples were mainly distributed on the left side of the confidence interval, and the OE:: llm1 groups were mainly distributed on the right side, indicating that the model can effectively distinguish the metabolites of the two groups.
Based on the PLS-DA model, a total of 80 different metabolites (VIP > 1, p < 0.05 and FC ≥ 1.5 or FC ≤ 0.67) were selected (Supplementary Table S2). The HMDB database classification annotation results showed that different metabolites were primarily involved in lipids and lipid-like molecules (28 species, 35%), organic oxygen compounds (9 species, 11.25%), organic acids and derivatives (6 species, 7.5%), organoheterocyclic compounds (4 species, 5%) and phenylpropanoids and polyketides (3 species, 3.75%). The top 25 important compounds with VIP scores and their relative abundances were shown by heat map (Figure 4C). The relative contents of 18 metabolites were significantly increased, including terpenoids ((S)-oleuropeic acid, soyasaponin IV, gibberellin A62, gibberellin A95), steroids ((5-dehydroepisterol), kaempferol 3-[2′-(p-coumaroylglucosyl) rhamnoside]) and two long-chain unsaturated fatty acids (9s-hydroxy-12r,13s-epoxy-10e,15z octadecadienoic acid and (9z,11R,12s,13s,15z)-12,13-epoxy-11-hydroxy-9,15-octadecadienoic acid). A total of 7 metabolites were significantly reduced, including two glycerol phospholipids (PS(14:0/14:1(9Z)) and lysoPE (0:0/20:5(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z))), two kinds of steroid compounds (physagulin D and 6-beta–hydroxymedroxyprogesterone) and a kind of flavonoid compound (schaftoside 6′-O-glucoside). Notably, we found that a variety of typical secondary metabolites were also noted in the 80 important differential compounds, mainly including flavonoids (ovalitenone, PD 98059, 1-isomangostin, tricin 7-[Feruloyl-(->2)-glucuronyl-(1->2)-glucuronide] and kaempferol 3–[2′-(p-coumaroylglucosyl) rhamnoside]), terpenoids (alpha-santalyl acetate, avenestergenin A1, (+/−)-2,4,8-trimethyl-7-nonen-2-ol, 2beta,9xi-dihydroxy-8-oxo-1(10),4,11(13)-germacratrien-12,6alpha-olide), and a variety of organic acids. The results showed that overexpression of llm1 enhanced the production of secondary metabolites represented by terpenoids and flavonoids in A. cristatus.

3.6. Transcriptome Data Analysis

After quality control of raw reads, the number of clean reads obtained was greater than 5 million for each different sample. In addition, the average error rate of sequencing bases corresponding to the quality control data of each sample was below 0.1%, and GC content was around 54%, indicating the quality of the data was excellent (Supplementary Table S3). Gene expression was quantified in each sample, then Pearson correlation analysis was further performed on three repeats of each sample (WT group and OE::llm1 group) to evaluate the reproducibility of the experiment. The correlation between samples was very high (Supplementary Figure S2), indicating that the sequencing results were reliable.
A total of 10,344 genes were identified by transcriptome sequencing, of which 600 genes were significantly differentially expressed with 246 genes being upregulated and 354 genes being downregulated (Supplementary Table S4). The Gene Ontology (GO) database was used for functional enrichment analysis of the DEGs, and the DEGs were enriched in 130 functional pathways. Among them, biological process (BP) accounted for 72/130, cellular component (CC) accounted for 3/130, and molecular function (MF) accounted for 55/130. Our research was mainly focused on biological process (BP), the DEGs were mainly involved in transport and secondary metabolism-related biological processes (Figure 5), and the most significant enrichment pathway was transmembrane transport (GO: 0055085), accounting for 10.58% of the DEGs in BP. Secondary metabolic process (GO: 0019748), phenol-containing compound metabolic process (GO: 0018958), secondary metabolite biosynthetic process (GO: 0044550), phenol-containing compound biosynthetic process (GO: 0046189), isoprenoid biosynthetic process (GO: 0008299), and terpenoid metabolic process (GO: 0006721), accounted for 10.59% of the DEGs in BP, indicating that most of the DEGs were enriched in pathways related to secondary metabolites. Interestingly, consistent with the results obtained from metabonomics, we found that there were significant differences in the expression of numerous genes in the terpenoid biosynthetic process, mainly including farnesyl diphosphate syntheses (SI65_08119 and SI65_09732), acetyltransferase (SI65_03723), and isopentenyl diphosphate delta isomerase (SI65_05138).

3.7. Expression of Secondary Metabolite-Related Gene Clusters

To better understand the regulation of llm1 overexpression on secondary metabolite of A. cristatus, secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were re-predicted by antiSMASH based on genome and transcriptome data [22]. A total of 37 secondary metabolite gene clusters were predicted, comprising a total of 582 related genes. The DEGs were analyzed and 64 genes with significant differences in expression were obtained (Supplementary Table S5), accounting for 11.00% of the predicted secondary metabolite-related genes. The core genes in each gene cluster were annotated, and their expression levels were further analyzed (Table 1). Interestingly, there were 11 significantly upregulated core genes, including non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (SI65_08405, SI65_05234, and SI65_07252), a polyketide (SI65_03722), and two genes annotated as Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (SI65_05770 and SI65_05771). Five core genes were significantly downregulated and belonged to different gene clusters, with three of them predicted to encode polyketide synthase (SI65_09735, SI65_03276, and SI65_06673). These results further indicated that overexpression of llm1 activated the expression of gene clusters of secondary metabolites in A. cristatus.
The accuracy of the transcriptome data was verified by analyzing the expression of seven secondary metabolite genes, including four upregulated genes (SI65_03722, SI65_05768, S165-08405, and SI65_05769) and three downregulated genes (SI65_09735, SI65_01982, and SI65_06672). The transcriptome data and RT-qPCR results were consistent (Supplementary Figure S3).

4. Discussion

The putative methyltransferases represented by laeA are thought to play an important role in the regulation of fungal sex development, secondary metabolism, and oxidative stress [23,24,25]. In A. nidulans, LaeA can form heterotrimers with the velvet family proteins VeA and VelB in the nucleus, thereby activating sex development and regulation of secondary metabolite gene clusters [26]. LlmF, a methyltransferase similar to LaeA, was involved in the regulation of secondary metabolites in A. nidulans, and yeast two-hybrid experiments showed that LlmF and LaeA were similar and could interact with VeA, thus participating in the regulation of secondary metabolites [17,27]. A laeA-like methyltransferase in Penicillium oxalicum also had a regulatory role in sex development and secondary metabolism, but there was no evidence that this protein can interact with the VeA [28]. llmF [17], llm1 [18], and lael 1 [29] were thought to negatively regulate the synthesis of secondary metabolites. However, llmG seemed to exhibit a positive regulatory influence on the regulation of secondary metabolites [19]. These observations illustrate that the regulation of secondary metabolites by putative methyltransferases in filamentous fungi was diverse.
This paper reports the effects of the overexpression of a putative methyltransferase (llm1) on morphological development and secondary metabolism in A. cristatus. The results from the current study indicated that llm1 may be a negative regulator of oxidative tolerance in A. cristatus. However, in C. heterostrophus, a putative methyltransferase gene (llm1) is not considered to be involved in the regulation of oxidative stress processes [18]. This indicates that laeA-like methyltransferases from different sources have different functions in the regulation of fungal oxidative tolerance. Secondary metabolites are instrumental in the defense against oxidative stress [30], so we speculate that the regulation of llm1 on oxidative tolerance may be related to the activation of secondary metabolite gene clusters.
Overexpression of llm1 resulted in a significant decrease in conidia and increase in cleistothecia; this regulation was not affected by light. Similarly, veA was not affected by light in the regulation of sex development of A. cristatus, which is different from other members of Aspergillus spp. [31]. Among a few studies on laeA-like methyltransferases, overexpression of the gene llmF in A. nidulans resulted in the inhibition of sexual development [17], and similar results were reported in C. heterostrophus [18]. This is contrary to the conclusion from the current study and suggested that laeA-like methyltransferases from different sources may also be involved in the regulation of fungal development while their effects may be different.
Interestingly, studies have demonstrated that genetic regulators (e.g., veA and acndtA) controlling the sex development in A. cristatus, also govern the production of secondary metabolites [21,31]. Based on this view, we further used metabolomics and transcriptomics to evaluate the effect of llm1 overexpression on secondary metabolites of A. cristatus. UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS revealed a differential metabolic profile with 80 metabolites that were significantly different. Notably, the contents of several secondary metabolites, including terpenoids, flavonoids, and steroids, increased significantly. The same result was confirmed in transcriptome sequencing, with a total of 600 DEGs in the OE::llm1 transformant compared to WT. There were several terms related to secondary metabolism in GO enrichment analysis of DEGs, mainly including terpenoids and phenol-containing compound biosynthetic process. This further illustrated the regulatory effect of llm1 on secondary metabolites of A. cristatus. These results were consistent with transcriptome data obtained after the laeA gene was knocked out in Valsa mali [32]. Expression analysis was additionally performed for secondary metabolism-related genes, and significant differences were found for 11.00% of the genes. Notably, the expression levels of core enzymes in multiple secondary metabolite gene clusters were significantly upregulated, mainly including non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, polyketide, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, which were thought to play an important role in the synthesis and modification of secondary metabolite [33,34,35,36]. Overexpression of the gene laeA in A. niger also resulted in differential expression of numerous secondary metabolite genes [37], suggesting that llm1 may resemble laeA as a global regulator gene that controls the expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. The strategy of activating secondary metabolic silencing gene clusters in filamentous fungi has shown that the combined editing of multiple genes is often more efficient than knocking out or overexpressing a single gene [19], which provides additional ideas for future in-depth exploration of secondary metabolites of A. cristatus.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we characterized a putative methyltransferase (llm1) from A. cristatus and demonstrated that overexpressing the llm1 gene can effectively activate the silencing gene cluster of secondary metabolites of A. cristatus and increase the production of secondary metabolites. Our study provides new insights and research means for the discovery of new secondary metabolites produced by A. cristatus.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10091707/s1, Figure S1: Construction of overexpression vector and identification of overexpressing llm1 transformants. (A) Construction of the llm1-overexpression vector. (B) Growth of WT and two transformants under high concentrations of hygromycin. (C) Amplification of hygromycin gene resistance fragment in transformants. Lane M: molecular weight standard (DNA Marker 2000), lane 5: positive control, lane 4: negative control, lane 3: wild-type, lanes 1–2: two transformants. (D) Relative expression level of llm1 in two transformants. Experiments were conducted in three replicates. Standard deviations are indicated with error bars. Values that differed significantly from the value for the WT according to the t-test are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). Figure S2: Correlation heat map of samples; Figure S3: RT-qPCR verification of WT and OE::llm1 transformants; Table S1: Primers used in this study; Table S2: Differentially expressed metabolites between OE::llm1 and WT group; Table S3: Mapping statistics of RNA-seq data; Table S4: Differentially expressed genes between OE::llm1 and WT group; Table S5: Significantly differentially expressed secondary metabolite synthesis genes screened based on transcriptome data and antiSMASH annotation.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.W. and C.Z.; software, Y.W., Y.C. and J.Z.; interpretation of the data, Y.W. and Y.C.; writing of the manuscript, Y.W. and C.Z.; funding acquisition, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.31860438 and NO.81760688).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kang, D.; Su, M.; Duan, Y.; Huang, Y. Eurotium cristatum, a potential probiotic fungus from Fuzhuan brick tea, alleviated obesity in mice by modulating gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 5032–5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xiao, Y.; Li, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhong, K.; Gao, H. Eurotium cristatumStructural Characteristics and Hypolipidemic Activity of Theabrownins from Dark Tea Fermented by Single Species PW-1. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Huang, X.; Xu, S.; Yu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Z. Eurotium cristatum Fermented Loose Dark Tea Ameliorates Cigarette Smoke-Induced Lung Injury by MAPK Pathway and Enhances Hepatic Metabolic Detoxification by/Pathway in Mice. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 6635080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, M.; Li, N.; Zhou, F.; Ouyang, J.; Lu, D.; Xu, W.; Li, J.; Lin, H.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, J.; et al. Microbial bioconversion of the chemical components in dark tea. Food Chem. 2020, 312, 126043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. An, T.; Chen, M.; Zu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Lu, H.; Yue, P.; Gao, X. Untargeted and targeted metabolomics reveal changes in the chemical constituents of instant dark tea during liquid-state fermentation by Eurotium cristatum. Food Res. Int. 2021, 148, 110623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chan, L.; Takahashi, M.; Lim, P.; Aoyama, S.; Makino, S.; Ferdinandus, F.; Ng, S.; Arai, S.; Fujita, H.; Tan, H.; et al. Eurotium Cristatum Fermented Okara as a Potential Food Ingredient to Combat Diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, Y.; Wu, X.; Yao, X.; Chen, Y.; Ho, C.; He, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y. Metabolite profiling, antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of buckwheat processed by solid-state fermentation with Eurotium cristatum YL-1. Food Res. Int. 2021, 143, 110262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, S.; Xu, X.; Lin, Y.; Xia, H.; Huang, L.; Dong, M. On-line screening and identification of free radical scavenging compounds in Angelica dahurica fermented with Eurotium cristatum using an HPLC-PDA-Triple-TOF-MS/MS-ABTS system. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ge, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Y.; Ren, X.; Zhang, X.; Hyde, K.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of the Fuzhuan brick tea-fermentation fungus Aspergillus cristatus. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Brakhage, A. Regulation of fungal secondary metabolism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chiang, Y.; Oakley, C.; Ahuja, M.; Entwistle, R.; Schultz, A.; Chang, S.; Sung, C.; Wang, C.; Oakley, B. An efficient system for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite genes in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7720–7731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yaegashi, J.; Oakley, B.; Wang, C. Recent advances in genome mining of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters and the development of heterologous expression systems in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bok, J.; Balajee, S.; Marr, K.; Andes, D.; Nielsen, K.; Frisvad, J.; Keller, N. LaeA, a regulator of morphogenetic fungal virulence factors. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 1574–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, Q.; Hao, S.; Chai, S.; Li, Y.; Jiao, Z.; Shi, J.; Sun, B.; Wang, C. Overexpression of global regulator LaeA increases secondary metabolite production in Monascus purpureus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 3049–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hong, E.; Kim, N.; Lee, D.; Kim, W.; Lee, I. Overexpression of the laeA gene leads to increased production of cyclopiazonic acid in Aspergillus fumisynnematus. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, B.; Li, X.; Tabudravu, J.; Wang, S.; Deng, H.; Pan, L. The chemical profile of activated secondary metabolites by overexpressing LaeA in Aspergillus niger. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 248, 126735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Palmer, J.; Theisen, J.; Duran, R.; Grayburn, W.; Calvo, A.; Keller, N. Secondary metabolism and development is mediated by LlmF control of VeA subcellular localization in Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bi, Q.; Wu, D.; Zhu, X.; Gillian Turgeon, B. Cochliobolus heterostrophus Llm1—A Lae1-like methyltransferase regulates T-toxin production, virulence, and development. Fungal Genet. Biol. FG B 2013, 51, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grau, M.; Entwistle, R.; Oakley, C.; Wang, C.; Oakley, B. Aspergillus nidulans Overexpression of an LaeA-like Methyltransferase Upregulates Secondary Metabolite Production in. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019, 14, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, Z.Z.; Zhu, H.J.; Yang, C.L.; Liu, Y.J.; Jiang, N.; Xiao, Y.S.; Shi, L.Y.; Jiao, R.H.; Ge, H.M.; Tan, R.X. Dalestones A and B, two anti-inflammatory cyclopentenones from Daldinia eschscholzii with an edited strong promoter for the global regulator LaeA-like gene. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2019, 17, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ge, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Shao, L.; Liu, Y.; Ren, X.; Liu, Z. Role of AcndtA in cleistothecium formation, osmotic stress response, pigmentation and carbon metabolism of Aspergillus cristatus. Fungal Biol. 2021, 125, 749–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Kloosterman, A.M.; Charlop-Powers, Z.; van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 6.0: Improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Estiarte, N.; Lawrence, C.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.; Crespo-Sempere, A. LaeA and VeA are involved in growth morphology, asexual development, and mycotoxin production in Alternaria alternata. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 238, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Saha, P.; Ghosh, S.; Roy-Barman, S. MoLAEA Regulates Secondary Metabolism in Magnaporthe oryzae. mSphere 2020, 5, e00936-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maor, U.; Barda, O.; Sadhasivam, S.; Bi, Y.; Levin, E.; Zakin, V.; Prusky, D.; Sionov, E. Functional roles of LaeA, polyketide synthase, and glucose oxidase in the regulation of ochratoxin A biosynthesis and virulence in Aspergillus carbonarius. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 22, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bayram, O.; Krappmann, S.; Ni, M.; Bok, J.; Helmstaedt, K.; Valerius, O.; Braus-Stromeyer, S.; Kwon, N.; Keller, N.; Yu, J.; et al. VelB/VeA/LaeA complex coordinates light signal with fungal development and secondary metabolism. Science 2008, 320, 1504–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sarikaya-Bayram, Ö.; Palmer, J.; Keller, N.; Braus, G.; Bayram, Ö. One Juliet and four Romeos: VeA and its methyltransferases. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Qu, J.; Wang, L.; Zhao, J.; Qu, Y.; Qin, Y. Penicillium oxalicum putative methyltransferase Mtr23B has similarities and differences with LaeA in regulating conidium development and glycoside hydrolase gene expression. Fungal Genet. Biol. FG B 2020, 143, 103445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yao, G.; Yue, Y.; Fu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Ma, G.; Wang, S. Aspergillus flavus Exploration of the Regulatory Mechanism of Secondary Metabolism by Comparative Transcriptomics in. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fréalle, E.; Aliouat-Denis, C.; Delhaes, L.; Hot, D.; Dei-Cas, E. Transcriptomic insights into the oxidative response of stress-exposed Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 3713–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tan, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Ge, Y.; Ren, X.; Ren, C.; Wang, Y.; Ren, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z. The role of the veA gene in adjusting developmental balance and environmental stress response in Aspergillus cristatus. Fungal Biol. 2018, 122, 952–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Feng, Y.; Yin, Z.; Wu, Y.; Xu, L.; Du, H.; Wang, N.; Huang, L. Valsa maliLaeA Controls Virulence and Secondary Metabolism in Apple Canker Pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 581203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kong, W.; Huang, C.; Shi, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, X.; Duan, Q.; Huang, Y.; Duan, Y.; Zhu, X. Recycling of Chinese herb residues by endophytic and probiotic fungus Aspergillus cristatus CB10002 for the production of medicinal valuable anthraquinones. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Khabthani, S.; Rolain, J.M.; Merhej, V. In Silico/In Vitro Strategies Leading to the Discovery of New Nonribosomal Peptide and Polyketide Antibiotics Active against Human Pathogens. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Duban, M.; Cociancich, S.; Leclère, V. Nonribosomal Peptide Synthesis Definitely Working Out of the Rules. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Griffiths, S.; Mesarich, C.; Saccomanno, B.; Vaisberg, A.; De Wit, P.; Cox, R.; Collemare, J. Elucidation of cladofulvin biosynthesis reveals a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase required for anthraquinone dimerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6851–6856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, B.; Lv, Y.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Deng, H.; Pan, L. Profiling of secondary metabolite gene clusters regulated by LaeA in Aspergillus niger FGSC A1279 based on genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis. Res. Microbiol. 2018, 169, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 10 01707 g001 550
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis of llm1. (A) Structure diagram of llm1 gene. (B) Alignment of the amino acid sequence of Llm1 with the sequences of A. nidulans (LlmF); A. candidus (XP_024670304.1); A. saccharolyticus (XP_025434911.1); A. niger (XP_025460546.1); and Trichophyton mentagrophytes (GBF61454.1). The navy boxes represent 100% conservatism and the red boxes indicate the location of the methyltransferase domain.
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis of llm1. (A) Structure diagram of llm1 gene. (B) Alignment of the amino acid sequence of Llm1 with the sequences of A. nidulans (LlmF); A. candidus (XP_024670304.1); A. saccharolyticus (XP_025434911.1); A. niger (XP_025460546.1); and Trichophyton mentagrophytes (GBF61454.1). The navy boxes represent 100% conservatism and the red boxes indicate the location of the methyltransferase domain.
Microorganisms 10 01707 g001
Microorganisms 10 01707 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of overexpression of llm1 on sex development of A. cristatus. (A) Colony morphology of WT and OE::llm1 transformant on MYA plate with high sodium chloride concentration. (B) Colony morphology of WT and OE::llm1 transformant on MYA plate. (C) Statistics of conidia number produced by WT and OE: llm1 transformant. (D) Statistics of cleistothecia number produced by WT and OE: llm1 transformant. Experiments were conducted in three replicates. Standard deviations are indicated with error bars. Values that differed significantly from the value for the WT according to the t-test are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Effect of overexpression of llm1 on sex development of A. cristatus. (A) Colony morphology of WT and OE::llm1 transformant on MYA plate with high sodium chloride concentration. (B) Colony morphology of WT and OE::llm1 transformant on MYA plate. (C) Statistics of conidia number produced by WT and OE: llm1 transformant. (D) Statistics of cleistothecia number produced by WT and OE: llm1 transformant. Experiments were conducted in three replicates. Standard deviations are indicated with error bars. Values that differed significantly from the value for the WT according to the t-test are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Microorganisms 10 01707 g002
Microorganisms 10 01707 g003 550
Figure 3. Phenotypes of WT and OE::llm1 transformant under different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Growth (A) and colony diameter (B) were measured under different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Experiments were conducted in three replicates. Standard deviations are indicated with error bars. Values that differed significantly from the value for the WT according to the t-test are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Phenotypes of WT and OE::llm1 transformant under different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Growth (A) and colony diameter (B) were measured under different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Experiments were conducted in three replicates. Standard deviations are indicated with error bars. Values that differed significantly from the value for the WT according to the t-test are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 10 01707 g003
Microorganisms 10 01707 g004 550
Figure 4. The metabolites in the OE::llm1 group compared to those in the WT group. (A) PCA score plot of metabolite profiles from the OE::llm1 group and WT group. (B) PLS-DA score plot of metabolite profiles from the OE::llm1 group and WT group. (C) Heat map of VIP score calculated by PLS-DA. The color represents the relative abundance of the metabolites in the samples. On the right is the VIP bar graph of metabolites. The length of the bar represents the contribution value of the metabolite to the difference between the groups (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4. The metabolites in the OE::llm1 group compared to those in the WT group. (A) PCA score plot of metabolite profiles from the OE::llm1 group and WT group. (B) PLS-DA score plot of metabolite profiles from the OE::llm1 group and WT group. (C) Heat map of VIP score calculated by PLS-DA. The color represents the relative abundance of the metabolites in the samples. On the right is the VIP bar graph of metabolites. The length of the bar represents the contribution value of the metabolite to the difference between the groups (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Microorganisms 10 01707 g004
Microorganisms 10 01707 g005 550
Figure 5. Enriched biological process Gene Ontology (GO) terms in DEGs.
Figure 5. Enriched biological process Gene Ontology (GO) terms in DEGs.
Microorganisms 10 01707 g005
Table
Table 1. Expression analysis and functional annotation of core genes in secondary metabolic gene clusters.
Table 1. Expression analysis and functional annotation of core genes in secondary metabolic gene clusters.
AccessionDescriptionCluster
Up-regulatedSI65_08318Acyl-CoA ligase8
SI65_08405Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase9
SI65_09733Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase17
SI65_10096Diacylglycerol lipase21
SI65_03722Polyketide synthase24
SI65_05234Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase30
SI65_05768Atrochrysone carboxylic acid synthase32
SI65_05770Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase32
SI65_05771Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase32
SI65_05772Oxidoreductase32
SI65_07252Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase36
Down-regulatedSI65_09735Polyketide synthase17
SI65_03276Polyketide synthase23
SI65_05416Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase31
SI65_06672Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase34
SI65_06673Polyketide synthase34
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C. Overexpression of llm1 Affects the Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites of Aspergillus cristatus. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091707

AMA Style

Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhang C. Overexpression of llm1 Affects the Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites of Aspergillus cristatus. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(9):1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091707

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yunsheng, Yincui Chen, Jin Zhang, and Chuanbo Zhang. 2022. "Overexpression of llm1 Affects the Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites of Aspergillus cristatus" Microorganisms 10, no. 9: 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091707

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop