Next Article in Journal
Antiproliferative and Antimicrobial Activity of Anthocyanins from Berry Fruits after Their Isolation and Freeze-Drying
Previous Article in Journal
Antidiabetic, Anticholesterol, and Antioxidant Activity of Gryllusbimaculatus Fermented by Bacillus and Lactobacillus Strains
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Shear Wave Velocity Estimation Using the Real-Time Curve Tracing Method in Ultrasound Elastography

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2095; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052095
by Yu Li, Qian Lv *, Jiayue Dai, Ye Tian and Jianzhong Guo *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2095; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052095
Submission received: 6 February 2021 / Revised: 20 February 2021 / Accepted: 23 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Acoustics and Vibrations)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study is proposing a new approach in evaluating/using SWE in evaluating the tissue displacement induced by SWE. I was surpised that the data presented in the introduction and also in the discussions are combined Single wave procedure, such as ARFI (POint Share wave) and Supersonic data (multiple biplane shear wave). In the general practice, when describing the medical use of SWE the two methods can not be compared. SO, if you are reffering to Supersonic devices, please do use correct references when describing the practical use of SWE in the diagnostic of both diffuse (thyroid, renal, parathyroid) or nodular disease (breast, thyroid, prostate)

Your references are mixed up. Please do correct them. The same is valid for discussion the two elastographyc techniques are combined and mixed.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. All shortenings should be explained by the full name using for the first time, even when commonly used in the research field (ROI, SSI, …)
  2. 10, Fig. 11 – x- and y-axis should be described with the appropriate units. Fig. 11b and Fig. 11c – blue line is invisible, please change the order, blue line at the top
  3. Table 4 please define the formula for the relative error
  4. Conclusions, please extend this, the most important part of the paper (discussion with other, recent (last 5 years) research)
  5. In this part of the paper, in my opinion, it is better to use full names of methods used or both in brackets full name, than only shortenings.
  6. The literature review is poor and incomplete. Please add the newest research (last 5 years)

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

All the recommended changes were made...

Back to TopTop