Next Article in Journal
A Risk Assessment for Ozone Regulation Based on Statistical Rollback
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on a Piezoelectric Pump with Flexible Valves
Previous Article in Journal
A Graphene-Assembled Film Based MIMO Antenna Array with High Isolation for 5G Wireless Communication
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Disc-Type High Speed Rotary Ultrasonic Motor with Internal Contact Teeth

1
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing 210016, China
2
Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaicio Str. 58, LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
3
Department of Information Systems, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Avn. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
4
Department of Applied Mechanics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Avn. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2386; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052386
Submission received: 19 January 2021 / Revised: 2 March 2021 / Accepted: 2 March 2021 / Published: 8 March 2021

Abstract

:
This paper presents a disc-type ultrasonic piezoelectric motor, which is designed for micro flying vehicles. It provides a high output rotation speed under low operating voltage, compared with common piezoelectric devices, by employing a “contact teeth” wave transmission structure. The ultrasonic motor (USM) consists of a trimorph disc stator, with triple internal contact teeth, a shaft and two hemispheric hard-wearing rotors. The operating principle of the USM is based on the superposition of the in-plane B03 vibration mode of the trimorph disc, and the first longitudinal vibration of the contact teeth. An optimization method of the stator structure parameters was proposed and validated by numerical modeling. The diameter and thickness of the stator are 20 mm and 1 mm, respectively. A prototype with the weight of 2 g was made for this experimental test. The optimal frequency of the excitation signal and the preload force are 98.5 kHz and 0.5 N, respectively. The minimum operating voltage was tested under 7.5 V and reached the speed of 225 rpm, and the maximum unloaded rotational speed of the USM reached 5172 rpm when 30 V driving voltage was applied. The maximum lifting force generated by this USM was measured as 46.1 mN, which is 2.35 times bigger than its weight.

1. Introduction

Today, the demand for small-sized and high-performance motors [1,2] is increasing greatly in high-end equipment such as microelectronics, micro robots and micro air vehicles (MAVs). Especially, rotary motors are rapidly developing in recent years due to growing interest in MAVs. MAVs are widely used in air surveillance, emergency rescue, target tracking, disaster warning and so on [3,4,5]. The MAV possesses some advantages such as small size, light weight, low noise, strong concealment and agility [6,7]. At present, the DC motor is widely used as the driving motor for MAVs [8,9]. However, as the size of the motor decreases, the Joule heat loss of the motor rapidly increases, and thus, the efficiency of the DC motor is greatly reduced [3], which has become an important limiting factor of the MAV’s endurance time. By contrast, the ultrasonic motor (USM) utilizes the inverse piezoelectric effect and contact friction to convert electrical energy into mechanical energy, which is a more efficient driving method at reduced size. It also possesses many attractive features, such as a compact structure, fast response (microsecond level), high holding torque and high positioning accuracy [10,11].
Some of the existing small-sized rotary USMs have excellent output performance. S. Borodinas et al. designed a compact size coplanar trimorph rotary piezoelectric motor for high-speed applications [12]. The diameter of the trimorph disc is 5 mm, and the total thickness is 0.8 mm. A prototype was manufactured, which can reach 3850 rpm at 80 Vpp. L. Wang et al. introduced a rotary USM, based on the out-of-plane flexural vibration mode. Four different harmonic signals, with a phase shift of π/2, were used to excite the stator. The diameter of the stator is 22 mm, and it can obtain 5000 rpm when the driving voltage is 350 Vpp [13]. T. Mashimo proposed a micro ultrasonic motor with a cubic millimeter stator, and the prototype can obtain 2500 rpm at 98 Vpp [14]. X. Chu et al. used vibration mode B11 to design a disk-pivot structure micro piezoelectric actuator, which can obtain 10,071 rpm when driving voltage is 100 Vpp [15], and the starting voltage can reach 30 Vpp. Apparently, the high-speed rotary USMs mentioned above have potential ability to drive MAVs, but their driving voltage is too high for the micro drive system. High driving voltage acts as a restriction for minimizing the size of the USM. Therefore, a bulkier USM will limit the load capacity and endurance time of an MAV. Hence, reducing the driving voltage of micro-sized USMs should be the priority when considering use of these for driving the motors of MAVs. Compared with single layer piezoelectric ceramics, the multilayer piezoelectric ceramics as energy conversion units is the highly effective way for reducing the driving voltage of USMs, which driving voltage is approximately inversely proportional to the number of layers of the same thickness. However, when it comes to high frequency application, dielectric loss of the piezoelectric stack will significantly enhance, and so does the dissipated heat. After a long period of continuous work, the accumulated heat causes the USM’s performance to plummet. In general, it is difficult to find a proper piezoelectric stack that can be used in a USM specially designed for MAVs. Therefore, new motors with novel principles must be developed to solve the above-mentioned problems.
A high-speed disc-type coplanar ultrasonic piezoelectric motor driven by low voltage is proposed in this paper. The principle of the motor is described, and numerical simulation and optimization were performed. The optimal dimensions of the multi-contact teeth stator have been calculated. An experimental study was performed after manufacturing a prototype. The results of this experimental investigation and numerical analysis are discussed, and they are in good agreement. Motor performance and lifting characteristics after mounting a propeller were tested and analyzed.

2. Design and Operating Principle of the Ultrasonic Motor

The components of the disc-type USM are shown in Figure 1. The USM consists of a rotation shaft, a fastening sleeve, a spring, two hemispherical rotors, a fastening screw, two piezoelectric ceramic rings and a titanium disc with three internal contact teeth. Schematics of the stator and rotor are shown in Figure 2. The stator is a trimorph disc with three internal contact teeth, which are used to excite the rotors to rotate under its B03 vibration mode. The chamfers at the bottom of the contact teeth are designed to reduce stress concentration. Two piezoceramic rings are glued on both sides of the titanium disc. The thickness of the titanium disc is 0.5 mm, while thickness of both the piezoelectric ceramic rings is 0.2 mm. The polarization direction of the piezoelectric ceramic rings is shown in the side view of the stator. The upper and lower surfaces of the stator are in contact with two rotors, and the preload is obtained by the spring. The rotor in contact with the lower surface of the stator is fixed onto the shaft, and the other one can freely slide on the shaft. Both rotors were made of alumina, and their dimensions are shown in Figure 2.
The excitation scheme of the stator is shown in Figure 3. A sine wave electrical signal is applied to the piezoelectric ceramic rings through the electrodes, and the metal part is connected to ground. This configuration is used to excite radial oscillation of the stator.
The actuating principle of the motor is mainly based on a “push–pull” motion [12] of its contact teeth, excited by the B03 vibration mode of the stator (Figure 4). It requires the contact teeth to obtain large longitudinal displacement under resonate mode. The contact teeth and the rotor have different frictional force in the push and pull stage, leading to the difference in the rotating moment. The rotating moment in the push stage is bigger than in the pull stage, and their relationship can be written as follow:
| 0 θ 1 M 1 | > | 0 θ 1 θ 2 M 2 |
where M1, M2, θ1 and θ2 represent the rotating moment in the push stage, the rotating moment in the pull stage, the rotation angle in the push stage, and the rotation angle in the pull stage, respectively. Thus, after accumulating each period of rotation angle, the rotor rotates along the pushing moment direction.

3. Numerical Modeling and Results

The first step of numerical modeling is to obtain the characteristic frequencies and modal shapes of the stator by finite element method (FEM). A numerical simulation of the stator was performed by using FEM software COMSOL Multiphysics. A finite element model of the stator is shown in Figure 5a. The model contains a titanium layer and two piezoelectric ceramic rings. An adhesive layer was neglected in the model. The initial inner and outer diameters of the titanium alloy plate were set to 8 mm and 20 mm, respectively. The length, width and angle of the contact teeth were set to 3.25 mm, 1.2 mm and 18° initially. The stator was meshed by three-dimensional standard tetrahedral finite elements. After several iterations, a complete finite element mesh was defined and it contained 57,905 domain elements, 21,244 boundary elements and 1132 edge elements. The material properties of titanium alloy and piezoelectric ceramics are listed in Table 1. As shown in Figure 5b, the B03 modal shape of the initial dimensions is calculated at the frequency of 98.737 kHz. Figure 5b with color legend represents the value of total displacement, and it can be observed that the total displacement of the contact teeth fits well with the principal design requirement of this modal shape.
After confirming the working mode of the stator, the next step of optimization was to find the optimal dimension parameters of the stator, to allow the contact point “x” (Figure 6) of the stator to gain maximum amplitude in this working mode. Frequency domain analysis method was chosen for use in the process of optimization. Harmonic response analysis was performed to calculate amplitudes of the contact points.
The amplitudes of the contact point depend on the inner and outer diameters of the stator, as well as the length, width and angle of the contact teeth. Because of the scalability of the USM, and considering the limitations of size and complexity of manufacturing, the inner and outer diameters of the stator were chosen to be 8 mm and 20 mm, the same as the ceramic ring. Thus, the length, width and angle of the contact teeth were optimized to find the maximum oscillation amplitude of the contact point. The formulas of this optimizing problem are listed below:
u t o t max = u 2 x ( b , l , α ) + u 2 y ( b , l , α ) ;
Subjected to
b min b b max ;
l min l l max ;
α min α α max ;
f min f f max .
where u t o t is oscillation amplitude of the contact point, b, l and α are the width, length and angle of the contact teeth, respectively, b min / b max , l min / l max and α min / α max are the minimum/maximum limits of the width, length and angle, f is the resonant frequency of the stator and f min / f max are the minimum/maximum limits of the frequency. As is shown in Figure 6, the horizontal distance between the contact point and the central axis x is related to the three variables, i.e., b, l and α. The similar triangle theorem is used to solve this plane analytic geometry problem, and the distance x is described as follows: Equation (7) is used to determine the position of the contact point when different length, width and angle of the contact teeth are applied:
x = ( l sin α b 2 cos α ) [ ( l sin α b 2 cos α ) 2 + ( 4 l cos α b 2 sin α ) 2 b 2 ] ( l sin α b 2 cos α ) 2 + ( 4 l cos α b 2 sin α ) 2
To initiate the FEM analysis, the scan range should be determined, based on the dimension parameters of the contact teeth. The scanning range of each simulation parameter set is shown in Table 2. Scanning interval of frequency was determined by calculating the characteristic frequency of the stator B03 mode, which corresponds to the two groups of critical sizes (lmin = 2.8 mm, bmin = 0.8 mm, αmin = 15; lmax = 3.2 mm, bmax = 1.2 mm, αmax = 30°) in the dimension parameters value range. Characteristic frequencies of B03 mode corresponding to the critical sizes were calculated at 98.5 kHz and 101.5 kHz, respectively. Thus, the scanning interval of frequency was set from 98 kHz to 102 kHz with the scanning step of 100 Hz. Frequency domain simulations were performed for the 375 combinations of the dimension parameter variables, which are listed in Table 2.
Boundary conditions of the model used for the optimization were set. The mechanical boundary of the stator was set to be free. The excitation scheme of the electrodes was used, as shown in Figure 3. The voltage amplitude of 20 Vpp was applied on the electrodes, and the frequency range was set from 98 kHz to 102 kHz with a frequency scan step of 0.1 kHz. 2D plots of the amplitude of contact points in B03 mode vary with length, width, and angle of contact teeth are shown in Figure 7. The color legend of the plot shows the value of the amplitude in the order of micrometers.
It is shown that the largest displacement amplitude is realized when l, b and α have the values of 18 mm, 1.1 mm and 15°, respectively. The B03 mode shape was obtained at 99.5 kHz. Therefore, the aforementioned values of l, b and α were chosen in further numerical investigations. A time domain study has also been performed, to validate the operating principle of the stator. Frequency of the excitation signals was set to 99.1 kHz. Analyzed time range was set to one period of excitation frequency i.e., 10.09 µs with a time step of 1 µs, which is approximately 1/10 of one period. Figure 8 shows the results of the time domain study. Two phases of one period i.e., the contraction phase and the expansion phase of the stator, are presented.

4. Stator Vibration Measurement

A prototype with optimal dimensions was made and assembled. The resonant frequency of the stator was measured by precision impedance analyzer Agilent 4294A. The result of the measurement is shown in Figure 9. In the graph, the orange line is | Z | f curve and the blue one is | θ | f curve, where | Z | is the impedance of the stator and θ is the phase shift. The frequency changes from 80 kHz to 120 kHz. The lowest point of the | Z | f curve means that the stator has the lowest impedance at the corresponding frequency, which is 98.128 kHz. Therefore, the resonant frequency measured by the impedance analyzer is 98.128 kHz. The difference between the measured and simulated frequencies is approximately 0.98%.
The vibration mode of the stator was measured by 2D laser Doppler vibrometer, as Figure 10d is shown. The result of the measurement is shown in Figure 10a. It shows that B03 vibration mode is dominant in the vibration shape of the stator, which meet a good agreement with FEM results. Figure 10c shows the resonant frequency measured by laser vibrometer, which is 98.875 kHz. The difference between the measured and simulated frequencies is 0.76%. The error between resonant frequency obtained by impedance analyzer and vibrometer is caused by differences in clamping during measurements. Amplitudes in axial direction of the three contact teeth were measured separately, using the trimorph stator disc. The tip of each of the contact teeth was taken to be measured, and the results are shown in Figure 10b. The axial vibration amplitudes of the three points are 14.59 nm, 62.62 nm and 27.24 nm, respectively, at a voltage of 40 Vpp, which confirms that the B03 mode was excited under the test condition and no out-of-plane mode interference was found.

5. USM’s Output Performance Test

An experimental investigation was performed, to validate the operating principle and to assess output performance of the motor (Figure 11). A motor prototype was set up into a holder and excited by a single channel of sinusoidal excitation. A laser tachometer was used to record the rotation speed of the motor, when input voltage and frequency changed. Figure 12 shows the relationship between motor driving frequency and rotation speed, under different input voltage. It is apparent that the prototype produces the best output performance under the frequency of 98.5 kHz, which verifies the ideal driving performance of in-plane B03 mode. The maximum unloaded rotational speed of the motor reached 5172 rpm when 30 V was applied.
The ultrasonic motor is generally used in intermittent working situations due to its friction driving principle. Long-term continuous operation of the USM will bring serious friction and wear, which will result in a sudden drop of the performance or even cause it to stop working. The present design is aimed to be used in continuous operation in high rotation speed scenarios, so it is important to reduce the friction and wear, and effectively prolong the working life of the USM. Figure 13a shows the initial surface state of the titanium contact teeth without a protective layer. Figure 13b shows the wear of the contact teeth after six hours of continuous testing, and it is noticed that the teeth surface is seriously worn. To alleviate the performance degradation caused by friction and wear, an alumina ceramic cover was pasted on the contact teeth, to extend the service life of the USM. Figure 13c shows the initial surface state of alumina covered titanium teeth before wear, and Figure 13d shows the surface condition of alumina covered titanium teeth after six hours of continuous testing. By comparing the two experimental results, the stator covered with alumina is more wear-resistant than that with no coatings. Moreover, the alumina–alumina contact interface has superior mechanical transmission efficiency than the alumina–titanium contact interface. Figure 14 shows rotation speed changes of the USM versus the operating time between parts with and without alumina coatings. It is indicated that the USM with alumina coated stator teeth has a larger initial output speed of 3321 RPM and a much lower output speed drop of 13%, while the corresponding values of the compared USM which did not have alumina coated stator teeth are 2240 rpm and 88%, respectively. Therefore, the alumina coating layer plays an important role in improving the output performance and working life of the designed ultrasonic motor.
Figure 15a shows the response of the unloaded rotational speed, with different preload force. It is found that when the preload is 0.5 N, the USM obtains the highest rotational speed. Figure 16 shows the setup of the stalling torque measurement. The shaft of the USM passes through two bearings which are supported by a holder and connects to a pulley. The diameter of the pulley is 6.4 mm, and the relation between input voltage and stalling torque is shown in Figure 15b. Maximum stalling torque is about 0.35 mN·m when driving voltage reaches 30 Vpp. The power efficiency of it can be calculated by the following equation after getting the needed parameters:
η = n M b 9550 u i n i i n
where η, uin, iin, n and Mb refer to power efficiency, input voltage, input current, USM’s rotation speed and stalling torque, respectively. The power efficiency of the prototype can reach 51.5%, which is 2.5 times higher than regular DC motors with a similar size. These properties are a big benefit to the MAV power system. This high power efficiency means an energy saving, which will increase the endurance time of the MAV.

6. Test of the USM’s Lifting Force

The experiment setup for the rotor system lifting force measurement is shown in Figure 17. The lift–weight ratios of six different propellers were tested under the input voltage of 20 Vpp, and the result is shown in Table 3. In this table, total mass refers to the mass of the propeller and the USM. The propeller needs to match the load characteristic of the motor to gain the biggest lift force. Propeller no. 6 provides the biggest lift-weight ratios among them. The lifting force of it under different voltage is shown in Figure 18. The maximum lifting force generated by this USM was measured as 46.1 mN, which is 2.35 times bigger than its weight. It proves this rotor system is capable to carry additional load. Figure 19 shows a hover flight test result of the piezoelectric rotor system when installed into a linear guide rail, which indicates that the piezoelectric rotor system has good attitude stability. When the drive voltage is close to 45 Vpp, the whole device starts to take off, and when the drive voltage reaches 50 Vpp, the whole rotor system can hover stably in the air. Power consumption of the rotor system was 435 mW.

7. Conclusions

A disc-type ultrasonic motor with internal contact teeth was developed. The prototype of the designed ultrasonic motor, with optimal dimensions based on the numerical simulation, has been manufactured and assembled. The results of the numerical simulation and experimental study validated the operating principle of the USM. The optimal frequency of the excitation signal and the preload force are 98.5 kHz and 0.5 N, respectively. The driving voltage of the USM is significantly lower compared to most of the existing high-speed rotary ultrasonic motors. The unloaded rotational speed of the USM reaches to 5172 rpm at 30 Vpp applied driving voltage. The results of this experimental study are in good agreement with the numerical analysis. The lifting force test proves that the USM has good load capacity. The present design of the rotary ultrasonic motor can be used on several different occasions including but not limited to micro air vehicles.

Author Contributions

J.Q. contributed to conceptualization, numerical and experimental investigations and preparation of the paper; Y.Y. contributed to conceptualization, review and editing, supervision, project administration and funding acquisition; X.H. contributed to conceptualization, numerical and experimental studies and preparation of the paper; P.V. contributed to conceptualization and numerical and experimental investigations; D.M. contributed to conceptualization and numerical and experimental investigations; S.B. contributed to conceptualization and numerical and experimental investigations. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number U2037603; The 111 project, grant number B12021; Jiangsu Provincial Science and Technology Project, grant number BZ2020006; The Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morita, T. Miniature piezoelectric motors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2003, 103, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, K.C.; Friend, J. A brief review of actuation at the micro-scale using electrostatics, electromagnetics and piezoelectric ultrasonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. 2010, 31, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Floreano, D.; Wood, R.J. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature 2015, 521, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Pines, D.J.; Bohorquez, F. Challenges Facing Future Micro-Air-Vehicle Development. J. Aircr. 2012, 43, 290–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Numata, T.; Iwatani, Y. Indoor Hovering Flight of a Micro Helicopter by Markerless Visual Servo Control Based on Phase Correlation. J. Control. Syst. Integr. 2014, 7, 291–296. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ward, T.A.; Fearday, C.J. A bibliometric review of progress in micro air vehicle research. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 2017, 9, 175682921667067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hassanalian, M.; Abdelkefi, A. Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2017, 91, 99–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bermes, C.; Bouabdallah, S. Design of the autonomous micro helicopter muFly. Mechatronics 2011, 21, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bohorquez, F.; Samuel, P. Design, Analysis and Hover Performance of a Rotary Wing Micro Air Vehicle. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 2003, 48, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Koc, B.; Uchino, K. Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Motors. Ref. Modul. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng. 2000, 6, 651–661. [Google Scholar]
  11. Aphale, S.S.; Bhikkaji, B. Minimizing Scanning Errors in Piezoelectric Stack-Actuated Nanopositioning Platforms. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2008, 7, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Borodinas, S.; Vasiljev, P. The optimization of a symmetrical coplanar trimorph piezoelectric actuator. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2013, 200, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Lu, X.L. A novel high-speed rotary ultrasonic motor applied to micro air vehicles. Symp. Piezoelectricity IEEE 2017, 17, 176. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mashimo, T. Micro ultrasonic motor using a one cubic millimeter stator. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2014, 213, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chu, X.; Ma, L. A disk-pivot structure micro piezoelectric actuator using vibration mode B11. Ultrasonics 2006, 44, e561–e564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Čeponis, A.; Mažeika, D. Flat Cross-Shaped Piezoelectric Rotary Motor. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Design of the disc-type ultrasonic motor: (1) rotational shaft; (2) fastening sleeve; (3) fastening screw; (4) spring; (5) rotors; (6) piezoelectric ceramic ring; (7) titanium disc.
Figure 1. Design of the disc-type ultrasonic motor: (1) rotational shaft; (2) fastening sleeve; (3) fastening screw; (4) spring; (5) rotors; (6) piezoelectric ceramic ring; (7) titanium disc.
Applsci 11 02386 g001
Figure 2. Schematics of stator and rotor.
Figure 2. Schematics of stator and rotor.
Applsci 11 02386 g002
Figure 3. Excitation scheme of the stator.
Figure 3. Excitation scheme of the stator.
Applsci 11 02386 g003
Figure 4. Actuating principle of the motor.
Figure 4. Actuating principle of the motor.
Applsci 11 02386 g004
Figure 5. (a) Finite element method (FEM) mesh of the stator; (b) B03 mode shape of the stator.
Figure 5. (a) Finite element method (FEM) mesh of the stator; (b) B03 mode shape of the stator.
Applsci 11 02386 g005
Figure 6. Contact point between stator and rotor.
Figure 6. Contact point between stator and rotor.
Applsci 11 02386 g006
Figure 7. 2D plots of the amplitude of contact points in B03 mode vary with length, width, and angle of contact teeth.
Figure 7. 2D plots of the amplitude of contact points in B03 mode vary with length, width, and angle of contact teeth.
Applsci 11 02386 g007
Figure 8. Phases of the stator operation.
Figure 8. Phases of the stator operation.
Applsci 11 02386 g008
Figure 9. Impedance-frequency characteristics of the stator.
Figure 9. Impedance-frequency characteristics of the stator.
Applsci 11 02386 g009
Figure 10. (a) Laser measurement of the stator vibration. (b) Magnitude of the motor contact point. (c) Magnitude–frequency characteristics of the stator. (d) Laser measurement setup.
Figure 10. (a) Laser measurement of the stator vibration. (b) Magnitude of the motor contact point. (c) Magnitude–frequency characteristics of the stator. (d) Laser measurement setup.
Applsci 11 02386 g010
Figure 11. Prototype and experimental setup of the ultrasonic motor (USM).
Figure 11. Prototype and experimental setup of the ultrasonic motor (USM).
Applsci 11 02386 g011
Figure 12. The relationship between driving frequency and rotation speed under different input voltages.
Figure 12. The relationship between driving frequency and rotation speed under different input voltages.
Applsci 11 02386 g012
Figure 13. (a) Surface condition of titanium teeth before wear; (b) surface condition of titanium teeth after wear; (c) surface condition of alumina coated titanium teeth before wear; (d) surface condition of alumina coated titanium teeth after wear.
Figure 13. (a) Surface condition of titanium teeth before wear; (b) surface condition of titanium teeth after wear; (c) surface condition of alumina coated titanium teeth before wear; (d) surface condition of alumina coated titanium teeth after wear.
Applsci 11 02386 g013
Figure 14. Rotation speed of the USM versus operating time under different contact materials.
Figure 14. Rotation speed of the USM versus operating time under different contact materials.
Applsci 11 02386 g014
Figure 15. (a) Rotational speed of the USM versus preload; (b) stalling torque of the USM versus driving voltage.
Figure 15. (a) Rotational speed of the USM versus preload; (b) stalling torque of the USM versus driving voltage.
Applsci 11 02386 g015
Figure 16. Experiment setup for USM’s output measurement.
Figure 16. Experiment setup for USM’s output measurement.
Applsci 11 02386 g016
Figure 17. Experiment setup for the test of rotor’s lifting force.
Figure 17. Experiment setup for the test of rotor’s lifting force.
Applsci 11 02386 g017
Figure 18. Rotor’s lifting force versus driving voltage.
Figure 18. Rotor’s lifting force versus driving voltage.
Applsci 11 02386 g018
Figure 19. Hover flight test of the piezoelectric rotor system. (a) Stationary state. (b) Hovering state.
Figure 19. Hover flight test of the piezoelectric rotor system. (a) Stationary state. (b) Hovering state.
Applsci 11 02386 g019
Table 1. Properties of the materials.
Table 1. Properties of the materials.
Material PropertyTitanium Alloy (Ti6A4V) [12]Piezoelectric Ceramics PIC151 [16]
Density, kg/m344507800
Young’s modulus, N/m2110 × 1097.6 × 1010
Poisson’s coefficient0.34-
Isotropic structural loss factor0.025-
Relative permittivity-ε33T0 = 1200
ε11T0 = 1500
Elastic compliance coefficient (10−12 m2/N)-S11E = 15.00
S33E = 19.00
Elastic stiffness coefficient c33D, N/m2-1.6 × 1010
Piezoelectric constant d33 (10−12 m/V)-225
Piezoelectric constant d31 (10−12 m/V)-−97
Piezoelectric constant d15 (10−12 m/V)-330
Table 2. FEM parameter scan list.
Table 2. FEM parameter scan list.
ParameterValueScanning Step
External diameter, R20 mm-
Internal diameter, r8 mm-
Contact teeth length, l(2.80 mm, 3.20 mm)0.1 mm
Contact teeth width, b(0.8 mm, 1.2 mm)0.1 mm
Contact teeth width, α(15°, 30°)
Frequency of applied voltage(98 kHz, 102 kHz)0.1 kHz
Table 3. The lift–weight ratios of different propellers.
Table 3. The lift–weight ratios of different propellers.
Propeller No.Total Mass/gRotation Speed/rpmLifting Force/mNLift-Weight Ratio
12.3621450.2450.0106
23.1719100.5190.0167
32.8921120.6960.0246
43.0618791.3030.0435
52.420810.3530.0150
62.9517603.9100.1350
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, J.; Yang, Y.; Hong, X.; Vasiljev, P.; Mazeika, D.; Borodinas, S. A Disc-Type High Speed Rotary Ultrasonic Motor with Internal Contact Teeth. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052386

AMA Style

Qiu J, Yang Y, Hong X, Vasiljev P, Mazeika D, Borodinas S. A Disc-Type High Speed Rotary Ultrasonic Motor with Internal Contact Teeth. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(5):2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Jianmin, Ying Yang, Xin Hong, Piotr Vasiljev, Dalius Mazeika, and Sergejus Borodinas. 2021. "A Disc-Type High Speed Rotary Ultrasonic Motor with Internal Contact Teeth" Applied Sciences 11, no. 5: 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop