Pilot Study of an Online Exercise Therapy Programme for Home Office Workers in Terms of Musculoskeletal and Mental Health
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
- 1
- Usual work
- 2
- Occasional work
- 3
- Non-working area
1.2. Low Back Pain (LBP)
1.3. The Aim of Our Study
2. Materials and Methods
- Thirty patients participated in the study on a voluntary basis. We asked a small local IT company to participate in the online training programme we had developed, which we then confirmed using a validated questionnaire and physical examination.
- Participants signed a consent form in which we informed them about the purpose and ethical background of our programme.
- We divided the participants into two groups. Sixteen people participated in the intervention group and 14 in the control group. The inclusion of the control group was essential for validating the results.
- All participants were examined in their own homes. The assessments were carried out before and after the exercise programme.
- Members of the intervention group participated in a 45 min online exercise programme three times a week for 10 weeks at prearranged times, which took the form of live lectures supervised by a physical therapist.
- Members of the control group did not participate in online therapy sessions. We asked the participants to continue their usual habits and activities and not to start any new activities or other things. This approach was considered important to ensure that the comparison between the control and intervention groups was not influenced by external factors.
- Those who did not meet the above criteria were excluded from the study.
- The data were analysed using statistical methods.
2.1. Target Group
2.2. Study Process
- Working from home.
- Consent required measurements and participation in the exercise programme.
- Attendance at the pre- and post-measurements before and after the 10-week programme.
- Internet access and use of Microsoft Teams application.
- Attendance at all sessions.
- Availability of the necessary equipment (half-litre PET bottles, rubber bands, chair and sofa).
- Sufficient space to carry out the exercise.
- Sufficient physical and health condition to participate in the training programme.
- Registration for our research was completed online.
- Inclusion criteria were completed by 30 participants. The intervention group (n = 16) and control group (n = 14).
- A validated questionnaire and physical examination were carried out in the participants’ homes with the personal assistance of the physiotherapist (n = 30).
- The 10-week online exercise programme took place in the presence of a physiotherapist (n = 16).
- To measure back the results obtained during the study, the previously used validated questionnaires and physical examinations were re-recorded in the personal presence of the physiotherapist (n = 30).
2.3. Questionnaires
2.4. Functional Ability Test
2.5. Mobility Programme
2.5.1. The Warm-Up
2.5.2. The Main Part
- ○
- Squats:
- ○
- Squats → Squats with side steps → Chair-assisted trunk support squats;
- ○
- Burpees:
- ○
- One-sided burpees
- ○
- Pelvic lifts:
- ○
- Pelvic lifts with stable and unstable support
- ○
- Other functional exercises:
- ○
- Kneeling push-ups → Push-ups
- ○
- Abdominal crunches on the floor and on a chair
- ○
- Trunk extension on the floor
- ○
- Plank with knee support → Traditional plank → Side plank with knee support
2.5.3. The Cool Down
2.5.4. The Relaxation Part
2.6. Statistical Methods Used
2.7. Ethics Licence
3. Results
3.1. Results of the Kraus-Weber Test
3.2. Results of the Core Test
3.3. Kempf Test Results
3.4. Beck Questionnaire
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Duchek, D.; McDonough, M.H.; Bridel, W.; McNeely, M.L.; Culos-Reed, S.N. Understanding In-Person and Online Exercise Oncology Programme Delivery: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Participant Perspectives. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 7366–7383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biddle, S.; Mutrie, N. Psychology of Physical Activity, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmon, P. Effects of Physical Exercise on Anxiety. Depression. and Sensitivity to Stress: A Unifying Theory. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 21, 33–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özel, M.; Ciddi, P.K. The effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based structured exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J. Telemed. Telecare 2024, 30, 523–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moretti, A.; Menna, F.; Aulicino, M.; Paoletta, M.; Liguori, S.; Iolascon, G. Characterization of Home Working Population during COVID-19 Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 6284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, A.W.; Jaggi, A.; May, C.R. What is the patient acceptability of real time 1:1 videoconferencing in an orthopaedics setting? A systematic review. Physiotherapy 2018, 104, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, D.; Ward, K.; Kavanagh, R.; O’cOnnor, S. ‘MenoWell’: A pilot 6-week novel, online, multimodal exercise and health education programme for women in all stages of menopause living in Laois, Ireland. J. Phys. Act. Health 2023, 7, 303–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meijer, H.A.; Graafland, M.; Goslings, J.C.; Schijven, M.P. Systematic Review on the Effects of Serious Games and Wearable Technology Used in Rehabilitation of Patients with Traumatic Bone and Soft Tissue Injuries. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018, 99, 1890–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Malińska, M.; Bugajska, J.; Bartuzi, P. Occupational and non-occupational risk factors for neck and lower back pain among computer workers: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2021, 27, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szalay, P. Some Psychological and Somatic Consequences of Alcoholism; Budapest, Hungary, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Shukla, A.; Dogra, D.K.; Bhattacharya, D.; Gulia, S.; Sharma, R. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the mental health in sports: A review. Sport. Sci. Health 2023, 19, 1043–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tavares, A.I. Telework and health effects review. Int. J. Healthc. 2017, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Becerik-Gerber, B.; Lucas, G.; Roll, S.C. Impacts of Working from Home During COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical and Mental Well-Being of Office Workstation Users. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021, 63, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samani, S.A. The Impact of Personal Control over Office Workspace on Environmental Satisfaction and Performance. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2015, 1, 163–175. [Google Scholar]
- DeFilippis, E.; Impink, S.M.; Singell, M.; Polzer, J.T.; Sadun, R. Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Nature of Work. Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumdar, P.; Biswas, A.; Sahu, S. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown: Cause of sleep disruption. depression. somatic pain. and increased screen exposure of office workers and students of India. Chronobiol. Int. 2020, 37, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elst, T.V.; Verhoogen, R.; Sercu, M.; Broeck, A.V.D.; Baillien, E.; Godderis, L. Not Extent of Telecommuting. But Job Characteristics as Proximal Predictors of Work-Related Well-Being. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2017, 59, e180–e186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, K.G.; Kotowski, S.E.; Daniel, D.; Gerding, T.; Naylor, J.; Syck, M. The Home Office: Ergonomic Lessons From the “New Normal”. Ergon. Des. Q. Hum. Factors Appl. 2020, 28, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shariat, A.; Bahri, S.; Tamrin, S.B.M.; Arumugam, M. Musculoskeletal disorders and their relationship with physical activities among office workers: A review. Malaysian J. Public. Health Med. 2016, 16, 62–74. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, S.; He, L.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. Visual display terminal use increases the prevalence and risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Chinese office workers: A cross-sectional study. J. Occup. Health 2012, 54, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- KSH. Teleworking Has Gained in Value in the Shadow of Covid19; KSH: Budapest, Hungary, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Worksafenb. Office Ergonomics Guidelines for Preventing Musculoskeletal Injuries. 2010. Available online: https://docplayer.net/17840851-Office-ergonomics-guidelines-for-preventing-musculoskeletal-injuries.html (accessed on 15 August 2024).
- GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global regional and national burden of low back pain, 1990–2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023, 5, e316–e329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GBD 2019: Global Burden of 369 Diseases and Injuries In 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Available online: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Wang, X.-Q.; Zheng, J.-J.; Yu, Z.-W.; Bi, X.; Lou, S.-J.; Liu, J.; Cai, B.; Hua, Y.-H.; Wu, M.; Wei, M.-L.; et al. A meta-analysis of core stability exercise versus general exercise for chronic low back pain. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coulombe, B.J.; Games, K.E.; Neil, E.R.; Eberman, L.E. Core Stability Exercise Versus General Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain. J. Athl. Train. 2017, 52, 71–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grabovac, B. Organization and Functioning of the Affective Lexicon in Early and Late Serbian Bilinguals. Pécs, Hungary, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Durall, C.J.; Greene, P.F.; Kernozek, T.W. A Comparison of Two Isometric Tests of Trunk Flexor Endurance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2012, 26, 1939–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kovácsné, B.V. Strain Status Assessment and Use of a Strain-Specific Exercise Programme in Dancers. Pécs, Hungary, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kempf, H.-D. No More Back Pain; Novella Publishing: Budapest, Hungary, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Haak, K. Die Neue Rückenschule; Falken-Verlag GmbH: Niedernhausen, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Bartha, É.J. Relaxation and Breathing Exercises. 2019. Available online: https://deac.hu/dokumentumok/EFOP/1.%20Bartha%20%C3%89va%20Judit%20-%20Relax%C3%A1ci%C3%B3s%20%C3%A9s%20l%C3%A9gz%C5%91gyakorlatok_pdf.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Yaghoubitajani, Z.; Gheitasi, M.; Bayattork, M.; Andersen, L.L. Corrective exercises administered online vs at the workplace for pain and function in the office workers with upper crossed syndrome: Randomized controlled trial Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. Arch. Occup. Env. Health 2022, 95, 1703–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haileamlak, A. Physical Inactivity: The Major Risk Factor for Non-Communicable Diseases. Ethiop. J. Health Sci. 1970, 29, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heneghan, N.R.; Baker, G.; Thomas, K.; Falla, D.; Rushton, A. What is the effect of prolonged sitting and physical activity on thoracic spine mobility? An observational study of young adults in a UK university setting. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e019371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özlü, A.; Ünver, G.; Tuna, H.I.; Erdoğan, A. Effects of Interactive Telerehabilitation Practices in Office Workers with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: Randomized Controlled Study. Telemed. J. E Health 2024, 30, 238–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavín-Pérez, A.M.; Collado-Mateo, D.; González, C.H.; Batista, M.; Mayo, X.; Villar, C.R.; Jiménez, A. An online home-based exercise program improves autonomic dysfunction in breast cancer survivors. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1256644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannell, D.J.; France-Ratcliffe, M.; Buckley, B.J.R.; Crozier, A.; Davies, A.P.; Hesketh, K.L.; Jones, H.; Cocks, M.; Sprung, V.S. Motivate team Adherence to unsupervised exercise in sedentary individuals: A randomised feasibility trial of two mobile health interventions. Digit. Health 2023, 9, 20552076231183552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, A.; Knight, E.; Bland, M.; Middleton, J.; Mitchell, E.; McCrum, K.; Conway, J.; Bevan-Smith, E. Feasibility of an online platform delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic respiratory disease. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2021, 8, e000880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barbosa, J.C.; da Luz, B.V.; da Silva, B.F.P.; Marques, A.P.; Saragiotto, B.T.; Comachio, J.; Magalhaes, M.O. Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Exercise Programme on Disability and Pain in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: Randomised Controlled Trial Assessor-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Musculoskelet. Care 2025, 23, e70119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vetrovska, R.; Prochazkova, R.; Havrdova, E.K.; Novotna, K. On-line pilates program as an alternative to conventional rehabilitation therapy for people with multiple sclerosis. pilot study. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2024, 40, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Time (week) | Body Position | Device Used | Exercises |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Supine | Polyfom | Easier spinal mobilisation and isometric stretching |
2–3 | Variable (lying, sitting) | Half litre bottled water, chair, polyfom | Upper and lower abdominal exercises, deep back muscle strengthening |
4–5 | Variable (lying, sitting, standing) | Half litre bottled water, chair, polyfom, rubber band | Shoulder girdle and trunk dynamic exercises |
6 | Variable (lying, sitting, standing, on all fours) | Half litre bottled water, chair, polyfom, rubber band | Shoulder girdle and trunk stabilisation exercises |
7–8 | Variable (lying, sitting, standing, on all fours) | Half litre bottled water, chair, polyfom, rubber band | Heavy back and abdominal muscle strengthening exercises |
9–10 | Variable (lying, sitting, standing, on all fours) | Half litre bottled water, chair, polyfom, rubber band | Difficult strain stabilisation exercises |
Control Group | Intervention Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
male (%) | female (%) | male (%) | female (%) | p-value (control vs. intervention) | |
gender | 69.00 | 31.00 | 43.00 | 57.00 | 0.153 |
Median | IQR | Median | IQR | p-value (control vs. intervention) | |
age | 28.00 | 27.00–30.25 | 27.00 | 26.25–32.00 | 0.461 |
Kraus-Weber Total | 57.00 | 54.75–57.00 | 58.00 | 56.75–60.00 | 0.022 |
Kempf 1 | 15.50 | 13.00–17.25 | 16.50 | 13.75–20.75 | 0.449 |
Kempf 2 | 16.50 | 13.25–17.50 | 17.00 | 13.25–19.25 | 0.583 |
Kempf 3 | 11.50 | 10.00–15.00 | 13.50 | 13.50–17.50 | 0.482 |
Kempf 4 | 13.50 | 10.00–16.00 | 13.50 | 10.00–16.00 | 0.985 |
Core | 49.50 | 38.00–58.00 | 59.00 | 46.75–72.75 | 0.104 |
Beck total | 22.00 | 22.00–23.00 | 22.00 | 20.25–24.00 | 1.000 |
Control Group | Intervention Group | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test | Time (Before/After Intervention) | Median | IQR | p-Value | Median | IQR | p-Value | p-Value (Control vs. Intervention) |
Kraus-Weber Total | Before | 57.00 | 54.75–57.00 | 0.082 | 58.00 | 56.75–60.00 | 0.003 | 0.020 |
After | 57.00 | 54.75–58.00 | 60.00 | 59.00–60.00 | <0.001 | |||
Kraus-Weber 1 | Before | 9.00 | 8.75–10.00 | - | 10.00 | 8.75–10.00 | 0.015 | 0.639 |
After | 9.00 | 8.75–10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.078 | |||
Kraus-Weber 2 | Before | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | - | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.084 | 0.978 |
After | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.279 | |||
Kraus-Weber 3 | Before | 9.50 | 9.00–10.00 | - | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.157 | 0.035 |
After | 9.50 | 9.00–10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.007 | |||
Kraus-Weber 4 | Before | 9.50 | 8.00–10.00 | - | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.083 | 0.052 |
After | 9.50 | 8.00–10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.006 | |||
Kraus-Weber 5 | Before | 10.00 | 10.00–9.00 | 0.082 | 10.00 | 9.75–10.00 | 0.046 | 0.737 |
After | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.551 | |||
Kraus-Weber 6 | Before | 9.00 | 8.75–10.00 | - | 10.00 | 9.00–10.00 | 0.025 | 0.079 |
After | 9.00 | 8.75–10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00–10.00 | 0.001 |
Control Group | Intervention Group | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test | Time (Before/After Intervention) | Median | IQR | p-Value | Median | IQR | p-Value | p-Value (Control vs. Intervention) |
Kempf 1 | Before | 15.50 | 13.00–17.25 | - | 16.50 | 13.75–20.75 | <0.001 | 0.449 |
After | 15.50 | 13.00–17.25 | 23.50 | 18.25–25.50 | 0.001 | |||
Kempf 2 | Before | 16.50 | 13.25–17.50 | - | 17.00 | 13.25–19.25 | <0.001 | 0.583 |
After | 16.50 | 13.25–17.50 | 20.00 | 16.50–26.00 | 0.047 | |||
Kempf 3 | Before | 11.50 | 10.00–15.00 | - | 13.50 | 13.50–17.50 | <0.001 | 0.482 |
After | 11.50 | 10.00–15.00 | 17.00 | 15.00–20.25 | 0.003 | |||
Kempf 4 | Before | 13.50 | 10.00–16.00 | - | 13.50 | 10.00–16.00 | <0.001 | 0.984 |
After | 13.50 | 10.00–16.00 | 15.00 | 12.50–22.00 | 0.205 |
Control Group | Intervention Group | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test | Time (Before/After Intervention) | Median | IQR | p-Value | Median | IQR | p-Value | p-Value (Control vs. Intervention) |
Beck Total | Before | 22.00 | 22.00–23.00 | <0.001 | 22.00 | 20.25–24.00 | <0.001 | 1.000 |
After | 18.00 | 16.50–19.00 | 15.00 | 13.75–17.00 | 0.012 | |||
Beck 1 | Before | 2.00 | 1.25–3.00 | 0.001 | 2.00 | 1.75–3.25 | 0.002 | 0.863 |
After | 1.50 | 1.00–2.00 | 1.50 | 1.00–2.00 | 1.000 | |||
Beck 2 | Before | 2.00 | 1.00–3.00 | 0.003 | 2.00 | 1.00–3.25 | 0.003 | 0.619 |
After | 1.00 | 1.00–2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00–2.25 | 0.616 | |||
Beck 3 | Before | 3.00 | 2.25–3.75 | 0.018 | 3.00 | 2.00–4.00 | 0.001 | 0.878 |
After | 3.00 | 2.00–3.00 | 2.00 | 1.00–2.25 | 0.024 | |||
Beck 4 | Before | 3.00 | 3.00–4.00 | <0.001 | 3.50 | 2.75–4.00 | <0.001 | 0.946 |
After | 2.50 | 2.00–3.00 | 2.00 | 1.00–3.00 | 0.140 | |||
Beck 5 | Before | 3.00 | 2.00–3.75 | 0.018 | 3.00 | 2.00–3.00 | 0.003 | 0.527 |
After | 3.00 | 2.00–3.00 | 2.00 | 1.00–2.00 | 0.042 | |||
Beck 6 | Before | 1.50 | 1.00–2.00 | 0.018 | 1.50 | 1.00–2.00 | 0.014 | 0.982 |
After | 1.00 | 1.00–1.75 | 1.00 | 1.00–1.25 | 0.849 | |||
Beck 7 | Before | 3.00 | 2.00–3.00 | 0.003 | 3.00 | 2.00–3.00 | <0.001 | 0.927 |
After | 2.00 | 2.00–3.00 | 2.00 | 1.00–2.00 | 0.023 | |||
Beck 8 | Before | 2.00 | 2.00–3.00 | 0.027 | 2.00 | 2.00–3.00 | 0.009 | 0.661 |
After | 2.00 | 1.00–2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00–2.00 | 0.980 | |||
Beck 9 | Before | 1.50 | 1.00–2.00 | 0.04 | 2.00 | 1.00–2.00 | 0.015 | 0.528 |
After | 1.00 | 1.00–1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00–1.25 | 0.842 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Szilágyi, T.; Veres-Balajti, I.; Lukács, B.; Király, E.; Laczkó, A.M.; Jenei, Z. Pilot Study of an Online Exercise Therapy Programme for Home Office Workers in Terms of Musculoskeletal and Mental Health. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152010963
Szilágyi T, Veres-Balajti I, Lukács B, Király E, Laczkó AM, Jenei Z. Pilot Study of an Online Exercise Therapy Programme for Home Office Workers in Terms of Musculoskeletal and Mental Health. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(20):10963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152010963
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzilágyi, Tünde, Ilona Veres-Balajti, Balázs Lukács, Enikő Király, Anna Mária Laczkó, and Zoltán Jenei. 2025. "Pilot Study of an Online Exercise Therapy Programme for Home Office Workers in Terms of Musculoskeletal and Mental Health" Applied Sciences 15, no. 20: 10963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152010963
APA StyleSzilágyi, T., Veres-Balajti, I., Lukács, B., Király, E., Laczkó, A. M., & Jenei, Z. (2025). Pilot Study of an Online Exercise Therapy Programme for Home Office Workers in Terms of Musculoskeletal and Mental Health. Applied Sciences, 15(20), 10963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152010963