Next Article in Journal
Using CFD Simulation as a Tool to Identify Optimal Operating Conditions for Regeneration of a Catalytic Diesel Particulate Filter
Previous Article in Journal
Modular Optic Force Sensor for a Surgical Device Using a Fabry–Perot Interferometer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Discrete and Phase Field Methods for Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics: A Comparative Study and State-of-the-Art Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Computational Methods for Fracture”

Institut für Strukturmechanik, Bauhaus University Weimar, Marienstrasse 15, 99423 Weimar, Germany
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(17), 3455; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173455
Submission received: 19 August 2019 / Accepted: 20 August 2019 / Published: 21 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Methods for Fracture)
The prediction of fracture and material failure is of major importance for the safety and reliability of engineering structures and the efficient design of novel materials. Experimental testing is often cumbersome, expensive and, in certain cases, unfeasible, for instance in civil engineering when it is not possible to test the structures in the laboratory. Therefore, computational modeling of fracture and failure of engineering systems and materials has been the focus of research for many years, and there has been tremendous advancements in the past two decades with methods such as the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) developed in 1999, peridynamics (2000), the cracking particles method (2004) and phase field models (2009). There has also been a great deal of effort made in developing multiscale methods for the design of new materials, such as the Extended Bridging Domain Method or the MAD method. The main focus of this book is computational methods for fracture. However, articles concerning issues related to validation, uncertainty quantification, large-scale engineering applications and constitutive modeling are also addressed.
This book offers a collection of 17 scientific papers about computational modeling of fracture [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Some manuscripts propose new computational methods or the improvement of existing cutting-edge methods for fracture. Other manuscripts apply state-of-the-art methods to challenging problems in engineering and materials science.
These contributions can be classified into two categories:
  • Methods which treat the crack as strong discontinuity, such as peridynamics, scaled boundary elements or specific versions of the smoothed finite element methods applied to fracture;
  • Continuous approaches to fracture based on, for instance, phase field models or continuum damage mechanics. On the other hand, this book also offers a wide application range where state-of-the-art techniques are employed to solve challenging engineering problems including fractures in rock, glass, and concrete. Larger systems are also studied, including subway stations due to fire, arch dams and concrete decks.

References

  1. Gou, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhu, H. A Simple High-Order Shear Deformation Triangular Plate Element with Incompatible Polynomial Approximation. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schreter, M.; Neuner, M.; Hofstetter, G. Evaluation of the Implicit Gradient-Enhanced Regularization of a Damage-Plasticity Rock Model. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.; Gao, X.; Fu, X.; Wu, C.; Lin, G. A Nonlinear Crack Model for Concrete Structure Based on an Extended Scaled Boundary Finite Element Method. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Díaz, R.; Wang, H.; Mang, H.; Yuan, Y.; Pichler, B. Numerical Analysis of a Moderate Fire inside a Segment of a Subway Station. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bian, P.; Liu, T.; Qing, H.; Gao, C. 2D Micromechanical Modeling and Simulation of Ta-Particles Reinforced Bulk Metallic Glass Matrix Composite. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Freimanis, A.; Kaewunruen, S. Peridynamic Analysis of Rail Squats. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, X.; Xie, W.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, X. Progressive Collapse Analysis of SRC Frame-RC Core Tube Hybrid Structure. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oucif, C.; Mauludin, L. Continuum Damage-Healing and Super Healing Mechanics in Brittle Materials: A State-of-the-Art Review. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhowmick, S.; Liu, G. Three Dimensional CS-FEM Phase-Field Modeling Technique for Brittle Fracture in Elastic Solids. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, P.; Wei, P.; Wang, W.; Huang, H. Cracking Risk and Overall Stability Analysis of Xulong High Arch Dam: A Case Study. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, H.; Shi, X.; Zhang, Y. Long-Term Behaviour of Precast Concrete Deck Using Longitudinal Prestressed Tendons in Composite I-Girder Bridges. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, Y.; Wang, X.; Deng, S.; Chen, W.; Shi, Z.; Xue, L.; Lv, M. Grouting Process Simulation Based on 3D Fracture Network Considering Fluid–Structure Interaction. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bahmani, B.; Abedi, R.; Clarke, P. A Stochastic Bulk Damage Model Based on Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion for Dynamic Rock Fracture. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cheng, P.; Zhuang, X.; Zhu, H.; Li, Y. The Construction of Equivalent Particle Element Models for Conditioned Sandy Pebble. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Onoda, M. Topological Photonic Media and the Possibility of Toroidal Electromagnetic Wavepackets. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, Y.; Chu, S.; Chen, H. Prediction of Shape Change for Fatigue Crack in a Round Bar Using Three-Parameter Growth Circles. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Egger, A.; Pillai, U.; Agathos, K.; Kakouris, E.; Chatzi, E.; Aschroft, I.; Triantafyllou, S. Discrete and Phase Field Methods for Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics: A Comparative Study and State-of-the-Art Review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rabczuk, T. Special Issue “Computational Methods for Fracture”. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3455. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173455

AMA Style

Rabczuk T. Special Issue “Computational Methods for Fracture”. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(17):3455. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rabczuk, Timon. 2019. "Special Issue “Computational Methods for Fracture”" Applied Sciences 9, no. 17: 3455. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173455

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop