Next Article in Journal
Multi-Mode Imaging Scale for Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (META)
Previous Article in Journal
Differences in Inhibitory Control and Resting Brain Metabolism between Older Chronic Users of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or Cannabidiol (CBD)—A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Dagan et al. A Lifespan Development Theory of Insecure Attachment and Internalizing Symptoms: Integrating Meta-Analytic Evidence via a Testable Evolutionary Mis/Match Hypothesis. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1226

1
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
2
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
3
Department of Psychology, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(7), 820; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070820
Submission received: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 15 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Developmental Neuroscience)

Error in Table

In the original article [1], there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The confidence interval reported for the comparison between insecure-dismissing and secure attachment adolescence and adulthood classification groups was wrong. The corrected Table 1 appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.

Reference

  1. Dagan, O.; Groh, A.M.; Madigan, S.; Bernard, K. A Lifespan Development Theory of Insecure Attachment and Internalizing Symptoms: Integrating Meta-Analytic Evidence via a Testable Evolutionary Mis/Match Hypothesis. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. List of meta-analyses assessing the magnitude of the links between insecure attachment patterns and internalizing symptoms.
Table 1. List of meta-analyses assessing the magnitude of the links between insecure attachment patterns and internalizing symptoms.
Author (Year)Attachment MeasuresMost Prevalent Symptoms MeasuresAttachment Group Comparison kN Cohen’s d
(95% CI)
Heterogeneity
CHILDHOOD
Groh et al. (2012) [60]SSPCBCLA versus B+C+D2231190.17 (0.03, 0.31)Q(21) = 32.82 *
C versus B+A+D2130780.03 (−0.11, 0.17)Q(20) = 26.05
Madigan et al. (2013) [53]SSPCBCL, TRFA versus B2118520.29 (0.12, 0.45)Q(20) = 33.78 *
C versus B2118230.10 (−0.12, 0.32)Q(20) = 30.11 *
A versus C19664−0.17 (−0.41, 0.06)Q(18) = 48.35 **
ADOLESCENCE AND ADULTHOOD
Dagan et al. (2018) [61]AAIBDI, CES-DDs versus F4328810.09 (−0.03, 0.22)Q(42) = 90.68 ***
E versus F3820790.48 (0.30, 0.65)Q(37) = 71.90 ***
E versus Ds3712850.34 (0.19, 0.50)Q(36) = 47.65
Dagan et al. (2020) [62]AAIBSI, SCL-90-RDs versus F504376−0.02 (−0.10, 0.05)Q(49) = 68.09 *
E versus F4232710.35 (0.19, 0.50)Q(41) = 99.53 ***
E versus Ds4121840.31 (0.15, 0.47)Q(40) = 88.99 ***
Bolded letters represent the attachment classification groups associated with significantly more reported symptoms compared with the other group(s). k = Number of studies; N = Number of participants; AAI = Adult Attachment Interview; SSP = Strange Situation Procedure; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory (self-report); BSI = Brief Symptom Inventory (self-report); CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist (parent report); CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (self-report); SCL-90-R = Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (self-report); TRF = Teacher’s Report Form; A = Insecure-Avoidant; B = Secure; C = Insecure-Resistant; Ds = Insecure-Dismissing; E = Insecure-Preoccupied; F = Secure-Autonomous. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dagan, O.; Groh, A.M.; Madigan, S.; Bernard, K. Correction: Dagan et al. A Lifespan Development Theory of Insecure Attachment and Internalizing Symptoms: Integrating Meta-Analytic Evidence via a Testable Evolutionary Mis/Match Hypothesis. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1226. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070820

AMA Style

Dagan O, Groh AM, Madigan S, Bernard K. Correction: Dagan et al. A Lifespan Development Theory of Insecure Attachment and Internalizing Symptoms: Integrating Meta-Analytic Evidence via a Testable Evolutionary Mis/Match Hypothesis. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1226. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(7):820. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dagan, Or, Ashley M. Groh, Sheri Madigan, and Kristin Bernard. 2022. "Correction: Dagan et al. A Lifespan Development Theory of Insecure Attachment and Internalizing Symptoms: Integrating Meta-Analytic Evidence via a Testable Evolutionary Mis/Match Hypothesis. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1226" Brain Sciences 12, no. 7: 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop