Next Article in Journal
Design of Linear and Cyclic Mutant Analogues of Dirucotide Peptide (MBP82–98) against Multiple Sclerosis: Conformational and Binding Studies to MHC Class II
Next Article in Special Issue
MyomiRNAs Dysregulation in ALS Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Age-Related Deficits in Memory Encoding and Retrieval in Word List Free Recall
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multidisciplinary Approach Reveals an Age-Dependent Expression of a Novel Bioactive Peptide, Already Involved in Neurodegeneration, in the Postnatal Rat Forebrain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Study Proteomic and Bioinformatic Identification of Molecular Overlap between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

by
Darija Šoltić
1,2,3,
Melissa Bowerman
1,2,3,
Joanne Stock
1,2,3,
Hannah K. Shorrock
4,5,
Thomas H. Gillingwater
4,5 and
Heidi R. Fuller
1,2,3,*
1
School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
2
Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
3
Wolfson Centre for Inherited Neuromuscular Disease, RJAH Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry SY10 7AG, UK
4
Biomedical Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
5
Euan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2018, 8(12), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8120212
Submission received: 24 September 2018 / Revised: 28 November 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018 / Published: 4 December 2018

Abstract

:
Unravelling the complex molecular pathways responsible for motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) remains a persistent challenge. Interest is growing in the potential molecular similarities between these two diseases, with the hope of better understanding disease pathology for the guidance of therapeutic development. The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of published proteomic studies of ALS and SMA, seeking commonly dysregulated molecules to be prioritized as future therapeutic targets. Fifteen proteins were found to be differentially expressed in two or more proteomic studies of both ALS and SMA, and bioinformatics analysis identified over-representation of proteins known to associate in vesicles and molecular pathways, including metabolism of proteins and vesicle-mediated transport—both of which converge on endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi trafficking processes. Calreticulin, a calcium-binding chaperone found in the ER, was associated with both pathways and we independently confirm that its expression was decreased in spinal cords from SMA and increased in spinal cords from ALS mice. Together, these findings offer significant insights into potential common targets that may help to guide the development of new therapies for both diseases.

1. Introduction

The term “motor neuron disease” incorporates several conditions, including the most common adult form, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and the predominantly childhood form, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA); both of which represent a devastating cause of disability, morbidity, and mortality. ALS is clinically characterized by muscular atrophy due to loss of motor neurons in the anterior horn of the spinal cord (“lower motor neurons”) and spasticity due to loss of cortical neurons (“upper motor neurons”) [1]. While approximately 90% of ALS cases occur sporadically (sALS), the remaining 10% of cases are attributable to a familial form of ALS (fALS) that typically follow an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern [2]. Genetic mutations have been identified accounting for half of the fALS cases, including mutations in the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene, the TAR DNA Binding protein-43 (TDP-43) gene, the fused-in-sarcoma (FUS) gene, and a hexonucleotide repeat within the C9orf72 gene [3]. SMA is also primarily characterized by loss of lower motor neurons and subsequent muscular atrophy, but without upper motor neuron involvement [4]. For >95% of SMA patients, the disease is caused by a loss-of-function defect in the SMN1 gene, resulting in reduced levels of the ubiquitously-expressed survival of motor neuron (SMN) protein [5].
Unravelling the genetic basis of SMA and a proportion of ALS cases has been influential in guiding the direction of research, allowing for the development of animal models to further expand the study of motor neuron diseases. There is no cure for either disease, though some progress has been made in recent years towards the development of therapies that may extend survival or alleviate symptoms (reviewed for SMA [6], and for ALS [7]). Despite numerous clinical trials for ALS therapies, the only clinically approved treatments are riluzole, which may prolong survival by a modest 2–3 months, and edaravone, which was recently approved by the FDA to slow disease progression [8]. In 2017, nusinersen received clinical approval as the first antisense oligonucleotide gene therapy for SMA treatment. Clinical trial data suggests that treatment with nusinersen significantly improved disease symptoms for approximately 50% in patients with the most severe form of SMA (SMA Type I) [9,10], with a more modest effect in older patients [9,10,11]. There is a keen interest, therefore, to find alternative approaches to SMA and ALS therapy. For SMA, the need to tailor these treatments to the stage of development, the severity of disease, and to the effects of aging is widely recognized, but development has been hindered by lack of understanding of the mechanisms involved in disease pathogenesis and progression [6]. The disease mechanisms of ALS are likely to be even more complex, especially considering that approximately 90% of cases still have an unexplained etiology.
Despite variation in the genetic basis of fALS and sALS, there is little difference recognized in their clinical presentation (aside from younger age at presentation in fALS) or any phenotypic pattern related to different genes [1,12]. This would suggest that the disease mechanisms of ALS likely converge on common molecular pathways, regardless of the etiology, that ultimately result in similar phenotypes. This then raises the question of whether there are core regulatory pathways involved in motor neuron disease pathology, in general, that may prove useful for guiding research into therapeutic development. Not unsurprisingly, therefore, the potential molecular similarities between ALS and SMA are receiving attention. Several recent reviews have discussed the current knowledge of pathways upon which both diseases appear to converge, including RNA processing pathways [13,14] and the TRAF6-nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway [15]. Whilst these pathways certainly warrant further investigation, the precise molecular overlap between ALS and SMA is yet to be determined.
Quantitative proteomics technology is well equipped to examine the complex molecular biology of both ALS and SMA and has been employed by research groups to study a range of cells and tissues from patients and animal models. Generation of these big datasets, however, has typically been followed by selection of several candidates for further examination, while most of the detected molecular changes have received little or no further attention. As a result, it is quite likely that important molecular changes have been overlooked, particularly at the level of molecular networks and pathways. Indeed, we previously interrogated published SMA proteomic datasets, and identified several proteins that were consistently dysregulated across multiple studies that had not previously been studied in association with SMA [16]. Importantly, this approach also highlighted conserved molecular responses to reduced SMN already proven to be directly relevant to SMA disease pathogenesis [16]. This provides confidence that multi-study comparison of proteomics data is a valid approach to finding disease-relevant targets for therapy design.
Here, we have applied the same approach to interrogate a range of ALS proteomic datasets to gain new insights into mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. By systematically comparing the resulting pooled dataset with the previously published dataset of conserved molecular alterations in SMA [16], we highlight the core molecular overlap between both diseases and use bioinformatics tools to understand the pathways upon which they converge. In addition, we report that calreticulin, a calcium-binding chaperone involved in the regulation of nascent protein folding [17], is associated with several perturbed pathways and we confirm that its expression levels are altered in spinal cords from both SMA and ALS mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of ALS Proteomic Studies

PubMed searches were performed to identify eligible studies for comparison, using combinations of the terms: “amyotrophic lateral sclerosis”, “Lou Gehrig’s disease” or “motor neuron disease” AND “proteomics” or “mass spectrometry”. The search was conducted to include studies published up to 1 July 2018, and published studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they had applied an unbiased proteomics approach to identify disease-specific protein patterns in ALS. Studies that utilized a targeted approach (i.e., seeking specific proteins) for initial protein identification were excluded. Initially 40 studies were eligible for review, but seven studies were further excluded from the list due to inaccessible or incomplete data (i.e., lack of access to complete article, only some results published or accessible), leaving 33 studies in total. Of these, 12 studies examined proteome changes in biofluids from ALS patients and 21 studies examined proteome changes in cells and tissues from ALS models (Table S1).

2.2. Comparison of ALS Proteomic Studies

The studies eligible for review applied a variety of strategies in data analysis and processing, and so it was therefore necessary to establish a method of data selection for the comparison. First, only proteins changed in expression in ALS compared to healthy controls were considered for analysis. Proteins that were differentially expressed between ALS and diseased controls (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease (AD)), protein changes identified between different groups of ALS patients, and/or protein changes identified between different regions of the same tissue were disregarded. Results from studies that used multiple groups in proteomic comparison were filtered so that only proteins that showed differential expression between ALS and healthy controls were included in the comparison. Proteomic datasets were first extracted into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. To facilitate an achievable and accurate method for comparison between the studies the protein identifiers from each study were then converted to official gene symbols using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID 6.8) [18,19]. If protein identifiers were not provided, or if DAVID could not recognize the accession number, identifiers were assigned manually by searching for protein names using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with the appropriate species filter to identify the corresponding accession number. Rarely, proteins had been removed from the NCBI database and so were not included in the final analysis. Most studies presented changes in the protein expression as a fold change (FC) difference between ALS and controls, after having applied a cut-off value to identify proteins that were differentially expressed in ALS. In cases where the cut-off value for fold change was not applied, only proteins that showed at least 20% change in the expression were included in the comparison. (This value was chosen because it has been commonly used in other published proteomic studies to identify differentially expressed proteins e.g., [20,21,22]). The final lists of gene names were then compared using Microsoft Excel’s ‘pivot table’ function to identify proteins that appeared in multiple studies.

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

The DAVID [18,19] platform was used to investigate the likely function of proteins that showed consistent change in expression across ALS studies. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was conducted to include terms that had at least three annotated proteins and a p-value ≤ 0.05. Redundant terms (i.e., those that were describing the same function and had identical matches, e.g., response to oxidative stress and removal of superoxide radicals) were combined into one term. Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) 10 [23] was used to identify statistically significant interactions between proteins that showed consistent change in expression in ALS. Association network analysis was performed with high confidence (0.700) interaction score to exclude false positive results.

2.4. Comparison of SMA and ALS Proteome Changes

Differentially expressed proteins identified in the present ALS comparison (Tables S2–S5) were compared with the differentially expressed proteins identified in our previous multi-study comparison of SMA proteomic datasets [16] to investigate common molecular patterns between the two diseases. Proteins with dysregulated expression in both SMA and ALS datasets were subjected to bioinformatics analysis using DAVID [18,19] and STRING 10 [23] as described above. The Reactome curated database [24] was then used to explore functional relationships between proteins by analyzing which pathways they map to and any known “reactions” within those pathways (i.e., individual steps in pathways that are known to change the state of a biological molecule). Reactome employs a binomial test to calculate the probability for each result, and p-values are corrected for the multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

2.5. Animal Models

For western blotting and immunohistochemistry experiments, the Taiwanese mouse model of severe SMA (Smn−/−; SMN2tg/o) on a congenic FVB background [25] and age-matched phenotypically normal controls (Smn+/−; SMN2tg/o) were obtained from breeding stock at the University of Edinburgh (Home Office license number PPL60/4569) and the ALS mouse model (SOD1G93A) [26] and 20-week-old age/gender-matched wild-type (WT) littermates were obtained from the University of Oxford (Home Office number PDFEDC6F0). The breeding strategy and genotyping using standard PCR protocols, were employed as previously described [27]. For quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis, spinal cords were harvested from Taiwanese SMA (Smn−/−; SMN2tg/o) and control mice (Smn+/−; SMN2tg/o) as well as from 20-week-old SOD1G93A males and age/gender matched WT littermates housed at the University of Oxford (Home Office number PDFEDC6F0). All animal work was carried under the appropriate Project and Personal Licenses from the UK Home Office and following local ethical review.

2.6. Western Blotting

Spinal cords from postnatal day 8 (P8) SMA mice (n = 5) and healthy littermate mice (n = 5), and 20 week-old ALS mice (n = 5) and WT littermate mice (n = 4) were left on ice for 15 min in 2× modified RIPA buffer (2% NP-40, 0.5% Deoxycholic acid, 2 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)), homogenised using pellet pestles and sonicated briefly 2–3 times every 10 min. Samples were centrifugated at 13,000 RPM (MSE, Heathfield, UK; MSB010.CX2.5 Micro Centaur) for 5 min at 4 °C to pellet any insoluble material. Protein extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blotting. Briefly, samples were boiled in 2× SDS sample buffer (4% SDS, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 20% glycerol, 0.125 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) and bromophenol blue) for 3 min at 95 °C and subjected to SDS-PAGE (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) using 4–12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels (Life Technologies, Warrington, UK). A slice of the gel was excised and stained with Coomassie blue as an internal loading control for total protein. The proteins in the remaining part of the gel were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane by western blotting overnight. After blocking with 4% powdered milk in PBS for one hour, the membranes were incubated with rabbit anti-calreticulin antibody (Bio-techne, Abingdon, UK; NB600-103SS; 1:500) in dilution buffer (1% fetal bovine serum, 1% horse serum, 0.1% BSA in PBS with 0.05% Triton X-100) at room temperature for one hour, followed by incubation with HRP-labelled goat anti-rabbit Ig (Agilent, Stockport, UK; P0488) in dilution buffer at 0.25 ng/mL. Between each step membranes were washed three times with PBS for five minutes. Membranes were incubated with West Femto (Thermo Fisher, Paisley, UK) and visualized using a Gel Image Documentation system (Bio-Rad, Deeside, UK). Densitometry measurements of antibody reactive bands were obtained using Fiji software (version 1.51) [28] and were normalized to densitometry measurements of the Coomassie stained gel. For densitometry measurements only, contrast and brightness were adjusted uniformly across the gel and blot to decrease the background and enhance signal detection. After first testing whether the data was normally distributed using a Shapiro–Wilk normality test, independent a two-tail t-test was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between WT and ALS mice, and a Mann–Whitney U test was used to test for significant difference between healthy controls and SMA mice. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 24 (IBM, New York, NY, USA).

2.7. Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemistry, spinal cords from P8 SMA mice and healthy littermates, and 20 week-old ALS mice and WT littermates were fixed in 4% PFA for 24 h, followed by cryopreservation in 30% sucrose for another 24 h. Lumbar spinal cord sections (25 μm) were permeabilised with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for ten minutes and blocked for one hour in 4% BSA/PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 or in 10% goat serum/PBS. After incubation with rabbit anti-calreticulin antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; EPR3924; 1:250) in blocking buffer (4% BSA/PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 or 4% BSA/PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% goat serum) overnight at 4 °C, sections were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 546 (Life Technologies, Warrington, UK; A11010) or goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Life Technologies, Warrington, UK; A11034) for one hour at 5 μg/mL, followed by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK; 0.4 μg/mL) for 10 min and mounted using Hydromount (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). Between each step sections were washed with PBS three times for ten minutes. Images were obtained using Leica SP5 confocal microscope with 63× oil immersion objective. Densitometry measurements of calreticulin staining in motor neurons of the anterior horn were performed using Fiji software (version 1.51) [28]. First, images were calibrated using a calibrated step tablet. A rectangular selection that filled most of the step without overlapping another one was created to measure mean grey value of the first step. The same rectangular selection was then used to measure the mean grey value of all the consecutive steps in the tablet. Measured values were plotted against standard measurements of optical density (OD) to create a calibration curve. Prior to analysis, the mean OD of the negative control was subtracted from the image to correct the background. Calreticulin staining in the anterior horn of lumbar spinal cord sections was assessed in two control and two SMA mice (P8), and in two WT and two ALS mice (20 weeks). A minimum of four sections from each mouse was used in the analysis. Fields of view were selected from each section, and measurements of three distinct regions that contained alpha motor neurons were taken from each field of view using a rectangular selection tool of fixed size. A minimum of 45 measurements was made from each experimental group. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS version 24 (IBM, New York, NY, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the distribution of quantitative data, followed by a Mann-Whitney U test to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in calreticulin staining between control and SMA mice, and between WT and ALS mice.

2.8. Quantitative PCR

Spinal cords were harvested from P7 SMA mice and healthy littermates as well as from 20-week-old SOD1G93A males and age/gender matched WT littermates. RNA was extracted with the RNeasy MiniKit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK). Reverse transcription was performed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Loughborough, UK) for spinal cords from SMA and control mice. For ALS and WT mice, reverse transcription was performed using the qPCRBIO cDNA Synthesis Kit (PCR Biosystems, London, UK). qPCRs were performed using qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Hi-ROX (PCR Biosystems, London, UK). Primers were as follows: PolJ F: ACCACACTCTGGGGAACATC; PolJ R: CTCGCTGATGAGGTCTGTGA; Calreticulin F: AAGACTGGGATGAACGAGCCAAGA; Calreticulin R: AATTTGACGTGGTTTCCACTCGCC. RNA polymerase II polypeptide J (PolJ), was used as a validated housekeeping gene as it has previously been demonstrated as being stably expressed between tissues and in different pharmacological conditions [29]. Relative gene expression was quantified using the Pfaffl method [30] and primer efficiencies were calculated with the LinReg PCR software version 2012.0. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS version 24 (IBM, New York, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test normality, followed by independent two-tail t-tests to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between groups.

3. Results

3.1. Overview of ALS Proteomic Studies

A total of 33 proteomic studies of ALS were eligible for comparison (Table S1) [20,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. As expected, the number of differentially expressed proteins identified in studies correlated with the sensitivity of the method used, with label-free technologies having identified by far the greatest number of protein changes compared to 2D-gel approaches. Both in vivo and in vitro models of ALS were used in analyses, and samples from animal models and ALS patients were equally represented across studies (Table S1). Samples were derived from a range of sources, including ALS patient cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [20,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40], patient serum [41], a range of cell models [42,44,57,59], ALS patient muscle [45,46], ALS patient blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) [48], ALS patient spinal cord [61], ALS patient prefrontal cortex [62], and tissues/cells from various mouse and rat models of ALS including astrocytes [47], skeletal muscle [53], ventral roots [50], embryonic motor neurons [51], spinal cord [43,49,52,54,55,56,58], and hippocampus [60].

3.2. Multi-Study Proteomic Identification of Conserved Molecular Response in ALS Patients and ALS Experimental Models

Protein expression changes in biofluids may not necessarily correlate with protein changes at the cellular level and may in fact be contradictory. It is possible that secretion or leakage of proteins into the CSF or serum may, for example, be accompanied by a concomitant decrease of expression levels in tissues [63]. Thus, studies that utilized cells/tissues were compared separately to those that examined biofluids. Comparison across the 12 proteomic studies that examined biofluids from ALS patients [20,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41] identified 11 proteins that were consistently changed in the same direction across at least two studies (Table S2). Of these, one protein—cystatin C—was decreased in expression across four separate studies [35,37,38,39] and one protein—chitinase 3-like protein 1—was increased in expression across three separate studies [32,34,41]. The remaining eight proteins showed opposing directions of differential expression (Table S3). Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed using the DAVID software [18,19] to investigate the likely function of the 11 proteins that showed a consistent change in expression. “Establishment of localization” was the most enriched biological process term, with seven of the eleven proteins mapping to it (Figure S1A), and complementary to this, 9 of the 11 proteins were associated with the term “vesicles”; eight of which were connected to the term “extracellular vesicles” (Figure S1B). STRING 10 analysis identified association network between four proteins: HBA1, HP, TF and ORM1 (Figure S1D), all of which appear to be plasma-derived proteins.
Comparison of the 21 studies that investigated proteome changes in tissues and cells from ALS patients and animal models identified 80 proteins that were differentially expressed across two or more studies. Of these, 42 proteins showed a consistent direction of differential expression (Table S4), eleven of which were upregulated across three or more studies: aldolase A [47,48,49,53,57], superoxide dismutase 1 [53,54,56] and 2 [44,48,52,58], 14-3-3 protein gamma [44,52,54], calreticulin [44,48,50], glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [49,53,54], heatshock protein 1 [44,54,56], heatshock protein family A member 8 [44,48,54], peroxiredoxin 2 [44,48,51] and 6 [48,49,56] and glial fibrillary acidic protein [47,54,62]. The remaining 38 proteins showed a contradictory direction of expression in different studies (Table S5).
STRING 10 analysis of the 42 proteins that showed a consistent change in expression revealed strong association between mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum proteins that are involved in the control of energy homeostasis, oxidative stress response and protein homeostasis (Figure 1A and Table S6). Within the networks, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was found to have the greatest number of known associations, linking with proteins involved in each of the three main domains. GO analysis of the 42 proteins using the DAVID platform supported these findings and highlighted enrichment of additional terms including programmed cell death, muscle tissue development and synaptic signaling (Figure 1B and Table S6). Cellular component GO analysis returned a range of terms, but similar to the bioinformatics finding from the CSF studies, the greatest number (i.e., 64%) of annotated proteins were associated with the term “extracellular vesicles” (Figure 1C). Enriched terms in the domain “molecular function” were predominantly associated with binding activity (Figure 1D).

3.3. Multi-Study Proteomic Identification of Conserved Molecular Perturbations in both SMA and ALS

To identify conserved protein changes common to SMA and ALS, differentially expressed proteins identified in the ALS multi-study comparison (Tables S2–S5) were compared with the differentially expressed proteins identified in our previous multi-study comparison of SMA proteomic datasets [16]. The following 15 proteins were found to be differentially expressed in both diseases and are summarised in Figure 2: calreticulin [21,44,48,50,64], superoxide dismutase 1 [53,54,56,65,66,67], aldolase fructose-bisphosphate A [22,47,48,49,53,57,65,66], heat shock protein family D, member 1 [22,44,58,65,66], peroxiredoxin 2 [44,48,51,66,67], voltage dependent anion channel 1 [47,52,57,64,66], vimentin [21,44,47,54,64], phosphoglycerate kinase 1 [22,48,49,60,66], annexin A5 [52,54,66,68], heat shock protein 90 beta family member 1 [47,54,64,66], glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [49,53,54,65,66,67], heat shock protein HSP 90 alpha [22,44,54,64,65], ATP synthase subunit alpha mitochondrial [22,47,54,57,60,66], 14-3-3 protein gamma [22,44,52,54,66,68], 2,3-cyclic nucleotide 3-phosphodiesterase [44,52,64].
Programmed cell death was one of the most enriched biological process GO terms (Figure 3A) and is likely describing the downstream consequences of disease pathogenesis. Other highly enriched terms included regulation of immune system, regulation of protein metabolism, cytoskeleton organization, and the metabolism of reactive oxygen species. Strikingly, all 15 proteins identified in the comparison were associated with the cellular component term “extracellular vesicles” (Figure 3B). Transport and establishment of localization were also among enriched biological process GO terms (Figure 3A). Enriched terms in the domain “molecular function” were associated with binding activity (Figure 3C). STRING 10 analyses revealed a strong association network between 14 of the 15 proteins (Figure 3D).
Reactome pathway analysis [24] was performed to further explore which pathways the 15 proteins dysregulated in both ALS and SMA are associated with. At the genome-wide view, pathways that were over-represented were largely complementary to those identified by the GO analysis, above (Figure 4A). Of the over-represented pathways identified, only two—“metabolism of proteins” and “vesicle-mediated transport”—were shown to have a direct connection to each other (Figure 4B) [69]. The molecular highway connecting these two pathways is the “endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi anterograde transport” pathway [69], suggesting this as a core pathway upon which ALS and SMA disease mechanisms converge. Of particular note is that calreticulin (CALR) was associated with both “metabolism of proteins” and “vesicle-mediated transport” pathways (Figure 4B) and was the only protein identified with a consistent direction of differential expression across SMA and ALS proteomic studies (Figure 2B).

3.4. Calreticulin Expression is Dysregulated in Spinal Cord Tissue from ALS and SMA Mice

None of the five proteomic studies that analyzed whole spinal cord extracts from mouse or rat models of ALS reported detection of calreticulin [49,52,54,55,56] (Table S1) (but this is perhaps not surprising since each of these studies utilized a 2D-gel electrophoresis protocol which identifies significantly fewer proteins compared to more recent techniques such as iTRAQ or label-free quantification). Though induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived motor neurons have been studied in the context of SMA [64], there have been no proteomic studies of spinal cord or primary motor neurons isolated from animal models of SMA to date. We therefore performed quantitative western blot analysis of spinal cord extracts from mouse models of ALS (SOD1G93A) and SMA (severe ‘Taiwanese’ model) at late symptomatic time-points to determine the expression levels of calreticulin relative to healthy littermate controls. In spinal cord extracts from ALS mice, calreticulin expression was significantly increased by an average of 43% (p = 0.003) (Figure 5A). In contrast, however, calreticulin expression in SMA spinal cord extracts was significantly reduced by 22% compared to that of controls (p = 0.008) (Figure 5B). Immunohistochemistry analysis of the ventral horn of lumbar spinal cord sections from control and age-matched (P8) SMA mice closely aligned with the quantitative western blotting, showing calreticulin was reduced by an average of 26% in SMA compared to controls (p < 0.001) (Figure 5C). A significant difference in calreticulin expression was not detected by immunohistochemistry analysis of ALS and WT lumbar spinal cord sections (Figure 5C), but RT-PCR analysis of calreticulin gene expression aligned with the trends seen by western blot results, showing a statistically significant increase in ALS vs. WT (Figure 5D) and a slight, but statistically significant, decrease in SMA vs. control spinal cords (Figure 5E).

4. Discussion

Here, we used a comparative approach to identify core molecular perturbations shared between SMA and ALS with the aim of understanding common molecular mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Multi-study comparisons of published proteomic datasets identified 15 proteins that were dysregulated across two of more separate studies in both SMA and ALS. These proteins therefore represent a potential “molecular fingerprint” of disease pathogenesis that is shared between both diseases. Bioinformatics analysis of the 15 differentially expressed proteins identified over-representation of several pathways including cell death, protein metabolism and vesicle-mediated transport pathways; with the latter two being linked via the ER to Golgi anterograde transport pathway. One of the 15 proteins, calreticulin, was strongly associated with this pathway because of its involvement with both protein metabolism and vesicle-mediated transport pathways [69,70]. Using quantitative western blot and immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated for the first time that calreticulin is reduced in expression in spinal cords from late-symptomatic SMA mice, and in agreement with proteomic studies of other ALS cells and tissue [44,48,50], we measured increased levels of calreticulin in spinal cord extracts from symptomatic ALS SOD1G93A mice.
Golgi fragmentation and ER stress were both identified as key pathological features in sALS [71] and transgenic mouse models of fALS [72], and both were evident at a pre-symptomatic stage of disease, directly implicating them in disease pathogenesis [72,73]. It was only recently, however, by studying induced pluripotent derived-motor neurons from SMA patients, that ER stress was implicated in SMA pathogenesis [74]. In line with this, ER stress was also found to be a prominent feature of spinal motor neurons from a mouse model of X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy [75], and alterations of Golgi apparatus were previously reported in anterior horn cells from patients with X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy [76] and in fibroblasts from patients with a rare autosomal dominant form of SMA [77].
ER stress and Golgi alterations can both be triggered by impaired ER-Golgi transport mechanisms, ultimately leading to induction of the cell death-related pathways [78,79]. Dysregulated protein transport between ER and Golgi, identified in the bioinformatics analysis here, therefore highlights the possibility that the same biological mechanism is responsible for aspects of disease pathogenesis in SMA and ALS. Indeed, ALS-associated mutant SOD1, TDP-43 and FUS proteins have been reported to inhibit ER-Golgi trafficking in neuronal cells [78,80]. Importantly, dysregulation of ER-Golgi trafficking preceded protein aggregation, ER stress, Golgi fragmentation and axon degeneration in NSC-34 cells expressing mutant SOD1 [78], and dysregulated ER-Golgi trafficking was observed as an early event in embryonic cortical and motor neurons in a mouse model of ALS [80]. Over-expression of Rab1, a master regulator of ER-Golgi transport, restored ER-Golgi trafficking and prevented induction of ER stress, formation of intracellular aggregations and apoptosis in in vitro model of ALS [80]. Several studies also indicate a role for defective ER-Golgi transport in SMA. SMN interacts with α-COP, a member of COPI vesicles that mediates ER-Golgi transport [81,82,83,84], and knockdown of α-COP caused SMN accumulation in Golgi apparatus of neuron-like NSC34 cells [82] and produced developmental defects in motor neuron-like NSC34 cells and primary cortical murine neurons [84]. Over-expression of human α-COP reversed motor neuron defects in SMN-depleted NSC34 cells [83,84] and in motor neurons from a zebrafish model of SMA [84]. A role for defective ER to Golgi transport in ALS and SMA pathogenesis is further supported by our finding here that all 15 of the differentially expressed proteins, common to SMA and ALS, mapped to “extracellular vesicles” in cellular compartment GO analysis.
Calreticulin is a multifunctional protein involved in a range of processes, including the regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis in the ER, chaperone activity in secretory pathways, folding of nascent proteins, regulation of immune system, and modulation of cell adhesion [17]. Its chaperone activity in the ER is dependent on calcium (Ca2+) levels and perturbations in Ca2+ homeostasis can disrupt the correct functioning of protein folding machinery [85]. It has been suggested that defective Ca2+ handling is responsible for triggering calreticulin depletion in ALS vulnerable motor neurons, leading to ER stress and apoptosis [86]. In addition, defects in Ca2+ handling have been demonstrated in both SMA [87,88,89] and ALS [90,91,92]. Alterations in calcium homeostasis are also known to inhibit ER-Golgi trafficking [93], indicating a possible common mechanism that drives ER and Golgi defects in SMA and ALS. Calreticulin was previously identified from proteomic studies as having increased levels in iPSC-derived motor neurons from type I SMA patients [64] and in SMA mouse muscle [21], and this was verified biochemically in muscles from SMA mice and SMA patients [21]. In contrast, we observed a statistically significant decrease of calreticulin levels in spinal cord extracts from late symptomatic mice. In proteomic studies of ALS, calreticulin was found to be increased in the ventral roots from the spinal cord of ALS SOD1G93A mice [50], blood mononuclear cells from ALS patients [48], and in TDP-43 knockdown SH-SY5Y cells [44], and in agreement with this, we also found increased levels of calreticulin in spinal cord extracts from late-symptomatic ALS SOD1G93A mice. This is, however, in contrast with a biochemical study of lower motor neurons isolated from ALS SOD1G93A mice that reported decreased expression of calreticulin [86].
When taken together, there is certainly evidence to support a role for calreticulin dysregulation in both ALS and SMA, but it is important too, to consider possible explanations for the opposing patterns of calreticulin expression reported in different studies, as this may offer further insights into disease mechanisms. In the case of whole spinal cord from ALS mice, for example, differences in calreticulin expression in different cell populations could, according to a theory proposed by Bernard-Marissal et al. [86], have contributed to the overall calreticulin expression levels, masking changes that were previously reported to be specific to vulnerable lower motor neurons [86]. This could also offer an explanation for why western blotting and RT-PCR analysis of whole spinal cord extracts revealed a statistically significant increase in calreticulin protein and gene expression in ALS, but immunohistochemistry analysis of lumbar spinal cord sections did not. It has been shown that calreticulin levels increase under stress conditions prior to being secreted to the cell surface; a process that is associated with the functional role of calreticulin in apoptosis [94]. It is thus possible that opposing directions of perturbed calreticulin expression reflect ongoing cycles of apoptosis in vulnerable motor neurons. The time-course of disease is another potential variable to consider, since Bernard-Marissal et al. [86] studied ALS mice up to 110 days of age, compared to the later time-point of 140 days in the present study. The obvious limitations of using a late-symptomatic animal model are that it cannot determine whether changes in protein expression levels are causative of disease pathology or are simply reflective of cell death processes. It would be of interest, therefore, to verify the expression of calreticulin throughout different stages of disease development in both SMA and ALS and determine whether other cell populations in proximity of vulnerable motor neurons or unaffected spinal cord regions contribute to alterations in calreticulin levels. Further work is clearly warranted too, to examine the relationship between calreticulin perturbations, defective Ca2+ handling, and ER and Golgi defects in SMA and ALS, and whether targeting these pathways offers a potential therapeutic approach to both diseases.
In this study we demonstrated that calreticulin expression is altered at both the transcript and protein level in ALS and SMA, so we were interested to determine the extent to which the other proteomic changes common to ALS and SMA can be traced back to aberrant gene regulation. None of the SMA and ALS proteomic studies used in this comparison also investigated changes using transcriptomics approaches, but a small number of transcriptomic studies of SMA and ALS have been conducted separately using comparable experimental models. For ALS, two transcriptomic studies investigated gene alterations in patient blood mononuclear cells [95,96], but none of the four proteins found to be differentially expressed in the proteomic study (Table S2) were reported to be differentially expressed at the gene level in either of the two studies. One of the eight proteins that were differentially expressed in spinal cords from ALS SOD1G93A mice [54] (Figure 2), ATP5A1, was also found to be differentially expressed at the gene level in a separate study [97]; with both proteomic and transcriptomic studies having reported an increased expression in ALS. For SMA, two proteins were differentially expressed in mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived motor neurons (Figure 2) [68], and one of these—ANXA5—was also found to be differentially expressed in a separate transcriptomic study [98], but with the opposite direction of change. None of the five proteins differentially expressed in iPSC-derived motor neurons from Type I SMA patients (Figure 2) [64] were found to be differentially expressed in a transcriptomic study of similar cell lines [74]. The altered expression of calreticulin (verified in this study at both transcript and protein level), and the altered expression of ATP5A1 at the protein level (Figure 2) [22,47,54,57,60,66] and at the transcript level [97], suggest that these molecular changes could be due to aberrant gene transcription. The majority of well-characterized molecular changes in SMA and in many fALS cases, however, have been traditionally attributed to dysregulation of RNA metabolism [14], and the apparent lack of overlap between the profile of differentially expressed proteins summarised in this study with differentially expressed genes found in separate studies supports the possibility that at least some changes may be due to post-transcriptional gene regulation defects. Perturbed post-transcriptional gene regulation in both diseases has been associated with several defective RNA processing pathways, including those that regulate RNA splicing [99], RNA stability and translation [100,101]. A growing body of evidence also suggests physical and functional links between SMA and ALS-associated proteins, including SMN, FUS, TDP43 and SOD1, some of which are RNA-binding proteins (summarized in recent reviews [14,15]). This may also offer an explanation of how perturbations in RNA processing pathways extend to fALS cases with mutations in non-RNA binding proteins such as SOD1 [14]. Taken together, it seems that aberrant post-transcriptional gene regulation might contribute to some, but perhaps not all, of the molecular defects in SMA and ALS. Further work is clearly warranted though to establish the precise relationship between ALS and SMA transcriptional and post-transcriptional changes and protein expression changes. When doing so, it will be important to consider these relationships in the same cell/tissue type, matched for both relative age and disease timeline.
The aim of this study was to identify the molecular overlap between SMA and ALS, but it is important not to overlook the results from the comparative analysis of ALS proteomic data sets (Tables S2–S5) as these are likely to provide a useful resource for research aimed at understanding ALS-specific pathways and biomarkers. Whilst several of these proteins have gained significant attention in the context of ALS, including the putative auxiliary biomarker, cystatin C [102] and SOD1 [15], several proteins appear to have been overlooked when these data sets were considered in isolation. One such protein, aldolase A, for example, was increased in expression in five separate studies of ALS cells and tissues [47,48,49,53,57]. Given its importance in glycolysis [103], overexpression of this protein is highly likely to reflect perturbed metabolic activity. Indeed, mitochondrial dysfunction [104] and ER stress [105] are known early pathological features and a major contributing factor of motor neuron death in ALS. Not surprisingly, most of the dysregulated proteins identified in tissues and cells from ALS patients and models were associated with energy homeostasis, oxidative stress response and control of protein stability, confirming the importance of ER and mitochondria in ALS disease pathways. Recently, defective ER-mitochondria crosstalk has received attention in the context of ALS pathogenesis, implying that ER and mitochondria perturbations cannot be perceived separately, but rather as a complex network of changes that together contribute to ALS pathogenesis [106,107]. This therefore presents an opportunity for the development of therapeutic approaches for ALS to simultaneously target functional defects in the ER and mitochondria [106,107].
Another important finding is that most proteins with a consistent direction of differential expression across ALS proteomic studies were associated with extracellular vesicles. Significant attention has been given to extracellular vesicles in the context of neurodegenerative disorders, including ALS, as a potential source of biomarkers and as a possible mechanism of misfolded protein spreading in CNS [108]. Mutant SOD1 and TDP-43 proteins are among molecules whose prion-like properties, facilitated by exosome transport, are thought to contribute to spreading of protein misfolding in ALS [108]. Interestingly, all 15 proteins identified in both ALS and SMA were also associated with extracellular vesicles. A recent study reported increased levels of exosomes in culture media from SMN-depleted cells, SMA patient fibroblasts, and in serum from SMA patients and mouse model of SMA [109], indicating alterations in exosome transport as another shared link between SMA and ALS.
To conclude, we provide evidence that integrating multi-study comparisons of proteomic datasets with bioinformatics analysis can help to unravel complex disease mechanisms. The 15 proteins identified here represent the core molecular overlap between SMA and ALS; many of which, have not until now, been considered in isolation. The identification of over-represented pathways, including two that converge on ER-Golgi trafficking, offers further insights into mechanistic cross-talk between SMA and ALS. Together, these findings offer significant insights into potential common targets that may help to guide the development of new therapies for both diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/8/12/212/s1, Table S1: ALS proteomic studies used in the comparison, Table S2. Proteins differentially expressed in the same direction in biofluids from ALS patients, Table S3. Proteins that showed contradictory direction of differential expression in biofluids from ALS patients across at least two proteomic studies, Figure S1. Bioinformatics analysis of eleven proteins that showed consistent change in expression in biofluids from ALS patients, Table S4. Proteins that showed consistent direction of differential expression in ALS cells and tissues across two or more proteomic studies, Table S5. Proteins that showed contradictory direction of differential expression in cells and tissues across two or more proteomic studies of ALS, Table S6. GO term analysis of proteins that were differentially expressed in tissues and cells in ALS proteomic studies, Table S7. GO term analysis of proteins that were differentially expressed in SMA and ALS proteomic studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.R.F. and D.S.; Validation, H.R.F., M.B., and D.S.; Formal Analysis, D.S., J.S., M.B., and H.R.F.; Investigation, D.S., J.S., M.B., and H.R.F.; Resources, H.R.F., M.B., H.K.S.; and T.H.G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, H.R.F., J.S. and D.S; Writing—Review & Editing, D.S., H.R.F., M.B., T.H.G., J.S. and H.K.S.; Visualization, H.R.F., M.B., and D.S; Supervision, H.R.F.; Project Administration, H.R.F. and D.S.; Funding Acquisition, H.R.F., M.B., and T.H.G.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the Newlife Charity SG/15-16/11] (H.R.F), Keele University ACORN funding (H.R.F and D.S.), UK SMA Research Consortium (SMA Trust) (T.H.G. and M.B.), and the Euan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neuron Disease Research (H.K.S. and T.H.G.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Naganska, E.; Matyja, E. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—Looking for pathogenesis and effective therapy. Folia Neuropathol. 2011, 49, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Valdmanis, P.N.; Rouleau, G.A. Genetics of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2008, 70, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zou, Z.-Y.; Zhou, Z.-R.; Che, C.-H.; Liu, C.-Y.; He, R.-L.; Huang, H.-P. Genetic epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2017, 88, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Groen, E.J.N.; Talbot, K.; Gillingwater, T.H. Advances in therapy for spinal muscular atrophy: Promises and challenges. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lefebvre, S.; Burglen, L.; Reboullet, S.; Clermont, O.; Burlet, P.; Viollet, L.; Benichou, B.; Cruaud, C.; Millasseau, P.; Zeviani, M.; et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 1995, 80, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shorrock, H.K.; Gillingwater, T.H.; Groen, E.J.N. Overview of Current Drugs and Molecules in Development for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Therapy. Drugs 2018, 78, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dorst, J.; Ludolph, A.C.; Huebers, A. Disease-modifying and symptomatic treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2017, 11, 1756285617734734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Miller, R.G.; Appel, S.H. Introduction to supplement: The current status of treatment for ALS. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2017, 18, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Finkel, R.S.; Chiriboga, C.A.; Vajsar, J.; Day, J.W.; Montes, J.; De Vivo, D.C.; Yamashita, M.; Rigo, F.; Hung, G.; Schneider, E.; et al. Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: A phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet 2016, 388, 3017–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chiriboga, C.A.; Swoboda, K.J.; Darras, B.T.; Iannaccone, S.T.; Montes, J.; De Vivo, D.C.; Norris, D.A.; Bennett, C.F.; Bishop, K.M. Results from a phase 1 study of nusinersen (ISIS-SMNRx) in children with spinal muscular atrophy. Neurology 2016, 86, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Finkel, R.S.; Mercuri, E.; Darras, B.T.; Connolly, A.M.; Kuntz, N.L.; Kirschner, J.; Chiriboga, C.A.; Saito, K.; Servais, L.; Tizzano, E.; et al. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1723–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ravits, J.; Appel, S.; Baloh, R.H.; Barohn, R.; Rix Brooks, B.; Elman, L.; Floeter, M.K.; Henderson, C.; Lomen-Hoerth, C.; Macklis, J.D.; et al. Deciphering amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: What phenotype, neuropathology and genetics are telling us about pathogenesis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2013, 14, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gonçalves, I.D.C.G.; Rehorst, W.A.; Kye, M.J. Dysregulation of RNA Mediated Gene Expression in Motor Neuron Diseases. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2016, 15, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gama-Carvalho, M.; Garcia-Vaquero, M.L.; Pinto, F.R.; Besse, F.; Weis, J.; Voigt, A.; Schulz, J.B.; De Las Rivas, J. Linking Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Spinal Muscular Atrophy through RNA-transcriptome homeostasis: A genomics perspective. J. Neurochem. 2017, 141, 12–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bowerman, M.; Murrray, L.M.; Scamps, F.; Schneider, B.L.; Kothary, R.; Raoul, C. Pathogenic commonalities between spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Converging roads to therapeutic development. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2017, 61, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fuller, H.R.; Gillingwater, T.H.; Wishart, T.M. Commonality amid diversity: Multi-study proteomic identification of conserved disease mechanisms in spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2016, 26, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gelebart, P.; Opas, M.; Michalak, M. Calreticulin, a Ca2+-binding chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.; Liu, X.H.; Wu, J.-J.; Ren, H.M.; Wang, J.; Ding, Z.T.; Jiang, V.P. Proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016, 11, 2095–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mutsaers, C.A.; Lamont, D.J.; Hunter, G.; Wishart, T.M.; Gillingwater, T.H. Label-free proteomics identifies Calreticulin and GRP75/Mortalin as peripherally accessible protein biomarkers for spinal muscular atrophy. Genome Med. 2013, 5, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wishart, T.M.; Mutsaers, C.A.; Riessland, M.; Reimer, M.M.; Hunter, G.; Hannam, M.L.; Eaton, S.L.; Fuller, H.R.; Roche, S.L.; Somers, E.; et al. Dysregulation of ubiquitin homeostasis and β-catenin signaling promote spinal muscular atrophy. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 1821–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Szklarczyk, D.; Franceschini, A.; Wyder, S.; Forslund, K.; Heller, D.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Roth, A.; Santos, A.; Tsafou, K.P.; et al. STRING v10: Protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 43, D447–D452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fabregat, A.; Jupe, S.; Matthews, L.; Sidiropoulos, K.; Gillespie, M.; Garapati, P.; Haw, R.; Jassal, B.; Korninger, F.; May, B.; et al. The Reactome pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D649–D655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hsieh-Li, H.M.; Chang, J.-G.; Jong, Y.-J.; Wu, M.-H.; Wang, N.M.; Tsai, C.H.; Li, H. A mouse model for spinal muscular atrophy. Nat. Genet. 2000, 24, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gurney, M.E.; Pu, H.; Chiu, A.Y.; Dal Canto, M.C.; Polchow, C.Y.; Alexander, D.D.; Caliendo, J.; Hentati, A.; Kwon, Y.W.; Deng, H.X. Motor neuron degeneration in mice that express a human Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase mutation. Science 1994, 264, 1772–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Riessland, M.; Ackermann, B.; Forster, A.; Jakubik, M.; Hauke, J.; Garbes, L.; Fritzsche, I.; Mende, Y.; Blumcke, I.; Hahnen, E.; et al. SAHA ameliorates the SMA phenotype in two mouse models for spinal muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 1492–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Radonić, A.; Thulke, S.; Mackay, I.M.; Landt, O.; Siegert, W.; Nitsche, A. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 313, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Collins, M.A.; An, J.; Hood, B.L.; Conrads, T.P.; Bowser, R.P. Label-Free LC−MS/MS Proteomic Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Identifies Protein/Pathway Alterations and Candidate Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 4486–4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Varghese, A.M.; Sharma, A.; Mishra, P.; Vijayalakshmi, K.; Harsha, H.C.; Sathyaprabha, T.N.; Bharath, S.M.; Nalini, A.; Alladi, P.A.; Raju, T.R. Chitotriosidase-a putative biomarker for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin. Proteomics 2013, 10, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mendonça, D.M.F.; Pizzati, L.; Mostacada, K.; de Martins, S.C.; Higashi, R.; Ayres Sá, L.; Moura Neto, V.; Chimelli, L.; Martinez, A.M.B. Neuroproteomics: An insight into ALS. Neurol. Res. 2012, 34, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Von Neuhoff, N.; Oumeraci, T.; Wolf, T.; Kollewe, K.; Bewerunge, P.; Neumann, B.; Brors, B.; Bufler, J.; Wurster, U.; Schlegelberger, B.; et al. Monitoring CSF Proteome Alterations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Obstacles and Perspectives in Translating a Novel Marker Panel to the Clinic. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ryberg, H.; An, J.; Darko, S.; Lustgarten, J.L.; Jaffa, M.; Gopalakrishnan, V.; Lacomis, D.; Cudkowicz, M.; Bowser, R. Discovery and verification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis biomarkers by proteomics. Muscle Nerve 2010, 42, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Brettschneider, J.; Mogel, H.; Lehmensiek, V.; Ahlert, T.; Süssmuth, S.; Ludolph, A.C.; Tumani, H. Proteome analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Neurochem. Res. 2008, 33, 2358–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ranganathan, S.; Williams, E.; Ganchev, P.; Gopalakrishnan, V.; Lacomis, D.; Urbinelli, L.; Newhall, K.; Cudkowicz, M.E.; Brown, R.H., Jr.; Bowser, R. Proteomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid identifies biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem. 2005, 95, 1461–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Ranganathan, S.; Nicholl, G.C.B.; Henry, S.; Lutka, F.; Sathanoori, R.; Lacomis, D.; Bowser, R. Comparative proteomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid between living and post mortem ALS and control subjects. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2007, 8, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Pasinetti, G.M.; Ungar, L.H.; Lange, D.J.; Yemul, S.; Deng, H.; Yuan, X.; Brown, R.H.; Cudkowicz, M.E.; Newhall, K.; Peskind, E.; et al. Identification of potential CSF biomarkers in ALS. Neurology 2006, 66, 1218–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Thompson, A.G.; Gray, E.; Thezenas, M.L.; Charles, D.; Evetts, S.; Hu, M.T.; Talbot, K.; Fischer, R.; Kessler, B.M.; Turner, M.R. Cerebrospinal Fluid Macrophage Biomarkers in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2018, 83, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. De Benedetti, S.; Gianazza, E.; Banfi, C.; Marocchi, A.; Lunetta, C.; Penco, S.; Bonomi, F.; Iametti, S. Serum Proteome in a Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Geographical Cluster. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2017, 11, 1700043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schwenk, B.M.; Hartmann, H.; Serdaroglu, A.; Schludi, M.H.; Hornburg, D.; Meissner, F.; Orozco, D.; Colombo, A.; Tahirovic, S.; Michaelsen, M.; et al. TDP-43 loss of function inhibits endosomal trafficking and alters trophic signaling in neurons. EMBO J. 2016, 35, 2350–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sharma, A.; Varghese, A.M.; Vijaylakshmi, K.; Sumitha, R.; Prasanna, V.K.; Shruthi, S.; Chandrasekhar Sagar, B.K.; Datta, K.K.; Gowda, H.; Nalini, A.; et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid from Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients Induces Mitochondrial and Lysosomal Dysfunction. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 965–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Stalekar, M.; Yin, X.; Rebolj, K.; Darovic, S.; Troakes, C.; Mayr, M.; Shaw, C.E.; Rogelj, B. Proteomic analyses reveal that loss of TDP-43 affects RNA processing and intracellular transport. Neuroscience 2015, 293, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Conti, A.; Riva, N.; Pesca, M.; Iannaccone, S.; Cannistraci, C.V.; Corbo, M.; Previtali, S.C.; Quattrini, A.; Alessio, M. Increased expression of Myosin binding protein H in the skeletal muscle of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Elf, K.; Shevchenko, G.; Nygren, I.; Larsson, L.; Bergquist, J.; Askmark, H.; Artemenko, K. Alterations in muscle proteome of patients diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Proteomics 2014, 108, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Basso, M.; Pozzi, S.; Tortarolo, M.; Fiordaliso, F.; Bisighini, C.; Pasetto, L.; Spaltro, G.; Lidonnici, D.; Gensano, F.; Battaglia, E.; et al. Mutant Copper-Zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1) induces protein secretion pathway alterations and exosome release in astrocytes: Implications for disease spreading and motor neuron pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 15699–15711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nardo, G.; Pozzi, S.; Pignataro, M.; Lauranzano, E.; Spano, G.; Garbelli, S.; Mantovani, S.; Marinou, K.; Papetti, L.; Monteforte, M.; et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis multiprotein biomarkers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bastone, A.; Fumagalli, E.; Bigini, P.; Perini, P.; Bernardinello, D.; Cagnotto, A.; Mereghetti, I.; Curti, D.; Salmona, M.; Mennini, T. Proteomic profiling of cervical and lumbar spinal cord reveals potential protective mechanisms in the wobbler mouse, a model of motor neuron degeneration. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 5229–5240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, J.-Y.; Afjehi-Sadat, L.; Asress, S.; Duong, D.M.; Cudkowicz, M.; Glass, J.D.; Peng, J. Galectin-3 is a candidate biomarker for ALS: Discovery by a proteomics approach. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 5133–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Duplan, L.; Bernard, N.; Casseron, W.; Dudley, K.; Thouvenot, E.; Honnorat, J.; Rogemond, V.; De Bovis, B.; Aebischer, P.; Marin, P.; et al. Collapsin response mediator protein 4a (CRMP4a) is upregulated in motoneurons of mutant SOD1 mice and can trigger motoneuron axonal degeneration and cell death. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bergemalm, D.; Forsberg, K.; Jonsson, P.A.; Graffmo, K.S.; Brännströ, T.; Andersen, P.M.; Antti, H.; Marklund, S.L. Changes in the spinal cord proteome of an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis murine model determined by differential in-gel electrophoresis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2009, 8, 1306–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Staunton, L.; Jockusch, H.; Ohlendieck, K. Proteomic analysis of muscle affected by motor neuron degeneration: The wobbler mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 406, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Basso, M.; Samengo, G.; Nardo, G.; Massignan, T.; D’Alessandro, G.; Tartari, S.; Cantoni, L.; Marino, M.; Cheroni, C.; De Biasi, S.; et al. Characterization of detergent-insoluble proteins in ALS indicates a causal link between nitrative stress and aggregation in pathogenesis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e8130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Massignan, T.; Casoni, F.; Basso, M.; Stefanazzi, P.; Biasini, E.; Tortarolo, M.; Salmona, M.; Gianazza, E.; Bendotti, C.; Bonetto, V. Proteomic analysis of spinal cord of presymptomatic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis G93A SOD1 mouse. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 353, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Strey, C.W.; Spellman, D.; Stieber, A.; Gonatas, J.O.; Wang, X.; Lambris, J.D.; Gonatas, N.K. Dysregulation of stathmin, a microtubule-destabilizing protein, and up-regulation of Hsp25, Hsp27, and the antioxidant peroxiredoxin 6 in a mouse model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 165, 1701–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fukada, K.; Zhang, F.; Vien, A.; Cashman, N.R.; Zhu, H. Mitochondrial Proteomic Analysis of a Cell Line Model of Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2004, 3, 1211–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Li, Q.; Vande Velde, C.; Israelson, A.; Xie, J.; Bailey, A.O.; Dong, M.-Q.; Chun, S.-J.; Roy, T.; Winer, L.; Yates, J.R.; et al. ALS-linked mutant superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) alters mitochondrial protein composition and decreases protein import. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21146–21151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Allen, S.; Heath, P.R.; Kirby, J.; Wharton, S.B.; Cookson, M.R.; Menzies, F.M.; Banks, R.E.; Shaw, P.J. Analysis of the cytosolic proteome in a cell culture model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis reveals alterations to the proteasome, antioxidant defenses, and nitric oxide synthetic pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 6371–6383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shin, J.-H.; London, J.; Le Pecheur, M.; Weitzdoerfer, R.; Hoeger, H.; Lubec, G. Proteome analysis in hippocampus of mice overexpressing human Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase 1. Neurochem. Int. 2005, 46, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Engelen-Lee, J.; Blokhuis, A.M.; Spliet, W.G.M.; Pasterkamp, R.J.; Aronica, E.; Demmers, J.A.A.; Broekhuizen, R.; Nardo, G.; Bovenschen, N.; Van Den Berg, L.H. Proteomic profiling of the spinal cord in ALS: Decreased ATP5D levels suggest synaptic dysfunction in ALS pathogenesis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2017, 18, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Umoh, M.E.; Dammer, E.B.; Dai, J.; Duong, D.M.; Lah, J.J.; Levey, A.I.; Gearing, M.; Glass, J.D.; Seyfried, N.T. A proteomic network approach across the ALS-FTD disease spectrum resolves clinical phenotypes and genetic vulnerability in human brain. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018, 10, 48–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Anderson, N.L.; Anderson, N.G. The human plasma proteome: History, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2002, 1, 845–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Fuller, H.R.; Mandefro, B.; Shirran, S.L.; Gross, A.R.; Kaus, A.S.; Botting, C.H.; Morris, G.E.; Sareen, D. Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patient iPSC-Derived Motor Neurons Have Reduced Expression of Proteins Important in Neuronal Development. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2016, 9, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Wishart, T.M.; Huang, J.P.-W.; Murray, L.M.; Lamont, D.J.; Mutsaers, C.A.; Ross, J.; Geldsetzer, P.; Ansorge, O.; Talbot, K.; Parson, S.H.; et al. SMN deficiency disrupts brain development in a mouse model of severe spinal muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 4216–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Sarvestany, A.A.; Hunter, G.; Tavendale, A.; Lamont, D.J.; Hurtado, M.L.; Graham, L.C.; Wishart, T.M.; Gillingwater, T.H. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomic Profiling Identifies Disruption of Ubiquitin Homeostasis As a Key Driver of Schwann Cell Defects in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 4546–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kobayashi, D.T.; Shi, J.; Stephen, L.; Ballard, K.L.; Dewey, R.; Mapes, J.; Chung, B.; McCarthy, K.; Swoboda, K.J.; Crawford, T.O.; et al. SMA-MAP: A Plasma Protein Panel for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wu, C.-Y.; Whye, D.; Glazewski, L.; Choe, L.; Kerr, D.; Lee, K.H.; Mason, R.W.; Wang, W. Proteomic assessment of a cell model of spinal muscular atrophy. BMC Neurosci. 2011, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sidiropoulos, K.; Viteri, G.; Sevilla, C.; Jupe, S.; Webber, M.; Orlic-Milacic, M.; Jassal, B.; May, B.; Shamovsky, V.; Duenas, C.; et al. Reactome enhanced pathway visualization. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3461–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Schröder, M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 862–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gonatas, N.K.; Stieber, A.; Mourelatos, Z.; Chen, Y.; Gonatas, J.O.; Appel, S.H.; Hays, A.P.; Hickey, W.F.; Hauw, J.-J. Fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus of motor neurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 1992, 140, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Mourelatos, Z.; Gonatas, N.K.; Stieber, A.; Gurney, M.E.; Dal Canto, M.C. The Golgi apparatus of spinal cord motor neurons in transgenic mice expressing mutant Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase becomes fragmented in early, preclinical stages of the disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5472–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Atkin, J.D.; Farg, M.A.; Walker, A.K.; Mclean, C.; Tomas, D.; Horne, M.K. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and induction of the unfolded protein response in human sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 30, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ng, S.-Y.; Soh, B.S.; Rodriguez-Muela, N.; Hendrickson, D.G.; Price, F.; Rinn, J.L.; Rubin, L.L. Genome-Wide RNA-Seq of Human Motor Neurons Implicates Selective ER Stress Activation in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 17, 569–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Montague, K.; Malik, B.; Gray, A.L.; La Spada, A.R.; Hanna, M.G.; Szabadkai, G.; Greensmith, L. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: A potential target for therapy. Brain 2014, 137, 1894–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yaguchi, M.; Hashizume, Y.; Yoshida, M.K.; Gonatas, N.; Okamoto, K. Reduction of the size of the Golgi apparatus of spinal anterior horn cells in patients with X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Other Mot. Neuron Disord. 2003, 4, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Neveling, K.; Martinez-Carrera, L.A.; Hölker, I.; Heister, A.; Verrips, A.; Hosseini-Barkooie, S.M.; Gilissen, C.; Vermeer, S.; Pennings, M.; Meijer, R.; et al. Mutations in BICD2, which encodes a golgin and important motor adaptor, cause congenital autosomal-dominant spinal muscular atrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 92, 946–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Atkin, J.D.; Farg, M.A.; Soo, K.Y.; Walker, A.K.; Halloran, M.; Turner, B.J.; Nagley, P.; Horne, M.K. Mutant SOD1 inhibits ER-Golgi transport in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem. 2014, 129, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Preston, A.M.; Gurisik, E.; Bartley, C.; Laybutt, D.R.; Biden, T.J. Reduced endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi protein trafficking contributes to ER stress in lipotoxic mouse beta cells by promoting protein overload. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 2369–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Soo, K.Y.; Halloran, M.; Sundaramoorthy, V.; Parakh, S.; Toth, R.P.; Southam, K.A.; Mclean, C.A.; Lock, P.; King, A.; Farg, M.A.; et al. Rab1-dependent ER-Golgi transport dysfunction is a common pathogenic mechanism in SOD1, TDP-43 and FUS-associated ALS. Acta Neuropathol. 2015, 130, 679–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Peter, C.J.; Evans, M.; Thayanithy, V.; Taniguchi-Ishigaki, N.; Bach, I.; Kolpak, A.; Bassell, G.J.; Rossoll, W.; Lorson, C.L.; Bao, Z.-Z.; et al. The COPI vesicle complex binds and moves with survival motor neuron within axons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Ting, C.-H.; Wen, H.-L.; Liu, H.-C.; Hsieh-Li, H.-M.; Li, H.; Lin-Chao, S. The spinal muscular atrophy disease protein SMN is linked to the Golgi network. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Custer, S.K.; Todd, A.G.; Singh, N.N.; Androphy, E.J. Dilysine motifs in exon 2b of SMN protein mediate binding to the COPI vesicle protein a-COP and neurite outgrowth in a cell culture model of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 4043–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, H.; Custer, S.K.; Gilson, T.; Hao, L.T.; Beattie, C.E.; Androphy, E.J. α-COP binding to the survival motor neuron protein SMN is required for neuronal process outgrowth. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 7295–7307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Prell, T.; Lautenschläger, J.; Grosskreutz, J. Calcium-dependent protein folding in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Calcium 2013, 54, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Bernard-Marissal, N.; Moumen, A.; Sunyach, C.; Pellegrino, C.; Dudley, K.; Henderson, C.E.; Raoul, C.; Pettmann, B. Reduced calreticulin levels link endoplasmic reticulum stress and Fas-triggered cell death in motoneurons vulnerable to ALS. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 4901–4912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jablonka, S.; Beck, M.; Lechner, B.; Mayer, C.; Sendtner, M. Defective Ca2+ channel clustering in axon terminals disturbs excitability in motoneurons in spinal muscular atrophy. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ruiz, R.; Casanas, J.J.; Torres-Benito, L.; Cano, R.; Tabares, L. Altered intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis in nerve terminals of severe spinal muscular atrophy mice. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. McGivern, J.V.; Patitucci, T.N.; Nord, J.A.; Barabas, M.; Stucky, C.L.; Ebert, A.D. Spinal muscular atrophy astrocytes exhibit abnormal calcium regulation and reduced growth factor production. Glia 2013, 61, 1418–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Siklós, L.; Engelhardt, J.; Harati, Y.; Smith, R.G.; Joó, F.; Appel, S.H. Ultrastructural evidence for altered calcium in motor nerve terminals in amyotrophc lateral sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 1996, 39, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Siklós, L.; Engelhardt, J.I.; Alexianu, M.E.; Gurney, M.E.; Siddique, T.; Appel, S.H. Intracellular calcium parallels motoneuron degeneration in SOD-1 mutant mice. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1998, 57, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kruman, I.I.; Pedersen, W.A.; Springer, J.E.; Mattson, M.P. ALS-linked Cu/Zn-SOD mutation increases vulnerability of motor neurons to excitotoxicity by a mechanism involving increased oxidative stress and perturbed calcium homeostasis. Exp. Neurol. 1999, 160, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ashby, M.C.; Tepikin, A.V. ER calcium and the functions of intracellular organelles. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 12, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Tarr, J.M.; Young, P.J.; Morse, R.; Shaw, D.J.; Haigh, R.; Petrov, P.G.; Johnson, S.J.; Winyard, P.G.; Eggleton, P. A mechanism of release of calreticulin from cells during apoptosis. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 401, 799–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Gagliardi, S.; Zucca, S.; Pandini, C.; Diamanti, L.; Bordoni, M.; Sproviero, D.; Arigoni, M.; Olivero, M.; Pansarasa, O.; Ceroni, M.; et al. Long non-coding and coding RNAs characterization in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Spinal Cord from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis patients. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mougeot, J.-L.C.; Li, Z.; Price, A.E.; Wright, F.A.; Brooks, B.R. Microarray analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes from ALS patients and the SAFE detection of the KEGG ALS pathway. BMC Med. Genom. 2011, 4, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. De Oliveira, G.P.; Alves, C.J.; Chadi, G. Early gene expression changes in spinal cord from SOD1 G93A Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis animal model. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Maeda, M.; Harris, A.W.; Kingham, B.F.; Lumpkin, C.J.; Opdenaker, L.M.; Mccahan, S.M.; Wang, W.; Butchbach, M.E.R. Transcriptome Profiling of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Motor Neurons Derived from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gabanella, F.; Butchbach, M.E.R.; Saieva, L.; Carissimi, C.; Burghes, A.H.M.; Pellizzoni, L. Ribonucleoprotein assembly defects correlate with spinal muscular atrophy severity and preferentially affect a subset of spliceosomal snRNPs. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Saal, L.; Briese, M.; Kneitz, S.; Glinka, M.; Sendtner, M. Subcellular transcriptome alterations in a cell culture model of spinal muscular atrophy point to widespread defects in axonal growth and presynaptic differentiation. RNA 2014, 20, 1789–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Tank, E.M.; Figueroa-Romero, C.; Hinder, L.M.; Bedi, K.; Archbold, H.C.; Li, X.; Weskamp, K.; Safren, N.; Paez-Colasante, X.; Pacut, C.; et al. Abnormal RNA stability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhu, Y.; Yang, M.; Li, F.; Li, M.; Xu, Z.; Yang, F.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, R. Aberrant Levels of Cystatin C in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1041–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Magistretti, P.J.; Allaman, I. A cellular perspective on brain energy metabolism and functional imaging. Neuron 2015, 86, 883–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tan, W.; Pasinelli, P.; Trotti, D. Role of mitochondria in mutant SOD1 linked amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 1295–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Rozas, P.; Bargsted, L.; Martínez, F.; Hetz, C.; Medinas, D.B. The ER proteostasis network in ALS: Determining the differential motoneuron vulnerability. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 636, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Manfredi, G.; Kawamata, H. Mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum crosstalk in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis. 2016, 90, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Bernard-Marissal, N.; Chrast, R.; Schneider, B.L. Endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in diseases of motor and sensory neurons: A broken relationship? Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Quek, C.; Hill, A.F. The role of extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative diseases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 483, 1178–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Nash, L.A.; Mcfall, E.R.; Perozzo, A.M.; Turner, M.; Poulin, K.L.; De Repentigny, Y.; Burns, J.K.; Mcmillan, H.J.; Chardon, J.W.; Burger, D.; et al. Survival Motor Neuron Protein is Released from Cells in Exosomes: A Potential Biomarker for Spinal Muscular Atrophy OPEN. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis of the proteins consistently changed in the same direction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) tissues and cells. (A) Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) 10 association network showing only the proteins that demonstrated association. The type of association between proteins is indicated by the color (pink: experimentally determined interactors; light blue: interactors form curated database; grey: protein homology; black: co-expression; yellow: text-mining; dark blue: gene co-occurrence; green: gene neighborhood). Three functional groups of proteins associated with regulation of oxidative stress, energy homeostasis and protein homeostasis were identified in the network from Figure 1B. Gene ontology (GO) term analysis using the DAVID platform revealed enriched terms connected to (B) biological processes, (C) cellular component and (D) molecular function. The top 10 terms from each domain were presented as bars. White numbers inside the bars indicated the number of annotated proteins. The full list of terms together with annotated proteins is available in Table S6.
Figure 1. Bioinformatics analysis of the proteins consistently changed in the same direction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) tissues and cells. (A) Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) 10 association network showing only the proteins that demonstrated association. The type of association between proteins is indicated by the color (pink: experimentally determined interactors; light blue: interactors form curated database; grey: protein homology; black: co-expression; yellow: text-mining; dark blue: gene co-occurrence; green: gene neighborhood). Three functional groups of proteins associated with regulation of oxidative stress, energy homeostasis and protein homeostasis were identified in the network from Figure 1B. Gene ontology (GO) term analysis using the DAVID platform revealed enriched terms connected to (B) biological processes, (C) cellular component and (D) molecular function. The top 10 terms from each domain were presented as bars. White numbers inside the bars indicated the number of annotated proteins. The full list of terms together with annotated proteins is available in Table S6.
Brainsci 08 00212 g001
Figure 2. Proteins differentially expressed in both spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and ALS proteomic studies. (A) Venn diagram showing the number of proteins differentially expressed in SMA proteomic studies compared to ALS proteomic studies. Fifteen of those proteins were identified in both SMA and ALS comparison. (B) Heat map of proteins that were differentially expressed in both SMA and ALS proteomic studies. Protein names are presented as official gene symbols. The reference for each study is given in the corresponding squares of the heat map. Experimental model and sample type used in each study are indicated above the table. ALDOA—Aldolase, Fructose-Bisphosphate A; ANXA5—Annexin A5; ATP5A1—ATP Synthase Subunit Alpha Mitochondrial; CALR—Calreticulin; CNP—2,3-Cyclic Nucleotide 3-Phosphodiesterase; GAPDH—Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase; HSP90AA1—Heat Shock Protein HSP 90 Alpha; HSP90B1—Heat Shock Protein 90 Beta Family Member 1; HSPD1—Heat Shock Protein Family D, Member 1; PGK1—Phosphoglycerate Kinase 1; PRDX2—Peroxiredoxin 2; SOD1—Superoxide Dismutase 1; VDAC1—Voltage Dependent Anion Channel 1; VIM—Vimentin; YWHAG—14-3-3 Protein Gamma.
Figure 2. Proteins differentially expressed in both spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and ALS proteomic studies. (A) Venn diagram showing the number of proteins differentially expressed in SMA proteomic studies compared to ALS proteomic studies. Fifteen of those proteins were identified in both SMA and ALS comparison. (B) Heat map of proteins that were differentially expressed in both SMA and ALS proteomic studies. Protein names are presented as official gene symbols. The reference for each study is given in the corresponding squares of the heat map. Experimental model and sample type used in each study are indicated above the table. ALDOA—Aldolase, Fructose-Bisphosphate A; ANXA5—Annexin A5; ATP5A1—ATP Synthase Subunit Alpha Mitochondrial; CALR—Calreticulin; CNP—2,3-Cyclic Nucleotide 3-Phosphodiesterase; GAPDH—Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase; HSP90AA1—Heat Shock Protein HSP 90 Alpha; HSP90B1—Heat Shock Protein 90 Beta Family Member 1; HSPD1—Heat Shock Protein Family D, Member 1; PGK1—Phosphoglycerate Kinase 1; PRDX2—Peroxiredoxin 2; SOD1—Superoxide Dismutase 1; VDAC1—Voltage Dependent Anion Channel 1; VIM—Vimentin; YWHAG—14-3-3 Protein Gamma.
Brainsci 08 00212 g002
Figure 3. Bioinformatics analysis of the 15 proteins differentially expressed in both SMA and ALS proteomic studies. Gene ontology analysis revealed enriched terms connected to (A) biological process, (B) cellular component, and (C) molecular function. In the biological process domain, only terms with five or more annotated proteins are presented. Terms are presented as bars, with the white numbers inside the bars indicating number of annotated proteins. The full list of terms together with annotated proteins is available in Table S7. (D) STRING 10 association network of proteins that were differentially expressed in SMA and ALS. Proteins connected to metabolic function, oxidative stress response and protein stability were identified in the network from Figure 3A. The type of the association between proteins is indicated by the color (pink: experimentally determined interactors; light blue: interactors form curated databases; grey: protein homology; black: co-expression; yellow: text-mining; dark blue: gene co-occurrence; green: gene neighborhood).
Figure 3. Bioinformatics analysis of the 15 proteins differentially expressed in both SMA and ALS proteomic studies. Gene ontology analysis revealed enriched terms connected to (A) biological process, (B) cellular component, and (C) molecular function. In the biological process domain, only terms with five or more annotated proteins are presented. Terms are presented as bars, with the white numbers inside the bars indicating number of annotated proteins. The full list of terms together with annotated proteins is available in Table S7. (D) STRING 10 association network of proteins that were differentially expressed in SMA and ALS. Proteins connected to metabolic function, oxidative stress response and protein stability were identified in the network from Figure 3A. The type of the association between proteins is indicated by the color (pink: experimentally determined interactors; light blue: interactors form curated databases; grey: protein homology; black: co-expression; yellow: text-mining; dark blue: gene co-occurrence; green: gene neighborhood).
Brainsci 08 00212 g003
Figure 4. Reactome analysis of the 15 proteins differentially expressed in both SMA and ALS proteomic studies. (A) Genome-wide overview of Reactome pathway analysis identified several over-represented pathways (highlighted using a colored scale on the right-hand side that indicates false discovery rate (FDR)), including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi anterograde transport [69], (B) Zoomed view of “metabolism of proteins” and “vesicle-mediated transport” pathways. Over-represented pathways are indicated by the red line. Proteins annotated to each pathway are shown.
Figure 4. Reactome analysis of the 15 proteins differentially expressed in both SMA and ALS proteomic studies. (A) Genome-wide overview of Reactome pathway analysis identified several over-represented pathways (highlighted using a colored scale on the right-hand side that indicates false discovery rate (FDR)), including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi anterograde transport [69], (B) Zoomed view of “metabolism of proteins” and “vesicle-mediated transport” pathways. Over-represented pathways are indicated by the red line. Proteins annotated to each pathway are shown.
Brainsci 08 00212 g004
Figure 5. Dysregulated expression of calreticulin in spinal cord extracts from late-symptomatic ALS mice (20 week) and late-symptomatic SMA mice (P8). Representative western blots showing (A) a 43% increase in calreticulin (CALR) expression levels in spinal cords of ALS mice (n = 4) compared to wild type (WT) mice (n = 5); (B) a 26% reduction of calreticulin expression in SMA mice (n = 5) compared to control mice (n = 5). Graphs are presented as integrated density of measured protein normalized to total protein (Coomassie stained gel). Densitometry measurements for individual samples and mean of the group are shown, with error bars showing standard error from the mean; (C) Representative immunohistochemistry images showing calreticulin expression in the ventral horn of lumbar spinal cord sections in 20-week-old WT and ALS mice and in control and age-matched (P8) SMA mice. Scale bar = 50 μm. Densitometry measurements of calreticulin levels in alpha motor neurons are presented as mean optical density, with error bars showing standard error from the mean. (D) Calreticulin gene expression levels in WT and ALS mice, and; (E) in control and SMA mice, as determined by RT-PCR. Expression levels of calreticulin were normalized to PolJ. Error bars represent standard error from the mean. CALR—Calreticulin; CTR—Control; WT—Wild Type. ns—Not Significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Dysregulated expression of calreticulin in spinal cord extracts from late-symptomatic ALS mice (20 week) and late-symptomatic SMA mice (P8). Representative western blots showing (A) a 43% increase in calreticulin (CALR) expression levels in spinal cords of ALS mice (n = 4) compared to wild type (WT) mice (n = 5); (B) a 26% reduction of calreticulin expression in SMA mice (n = 5) compared to control mice (n = 5). Graphs are presented as integrated density of measured protein normalized to total protein (Coomassie stained gel). Densitometry measurements for individual samples and mean of the group are shown, with error bars showing standard error from the mean; (C) Representative immunohistochemistry images showing calreticulin expression in the ventral horn of lumbar spinal cord sections in 20-week-old WT and ALS mice and in control and age-matched (P8) SMA mice. Scale bar = 50 μm. Densitometry measurements of calreticulin levels in alpha motor neurons are presented as mean optical density, with error bars showing standard error from the mean. (D) Calreticulin gene expression levels in WT and ALS mice, and; (E) in control and SMA mice, as determined by RT-PCR. Expression levels of calreticulin were normalized to PolJ. Error bars represent standard error from the mean. CALR—Calreticulin; CTR—Control; WT—Wild Type. ns—Not Significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Brainsci 08 00212 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Šoltić, D.; Bowerman, M.; Stock, J.; Shorrock, H.K.; Gillingwater, T.H.; Fuller, H.R. Multi-Study Proteomic and Bioinformatic Identification of Molecular Overlap between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8120212

AMA Style

Šoltić D, Bowerman M, Stock J, Shorrock HK, Gillingwater TH, Fuller HR. Multi-Study Proteomic and Bioinformatic Identification of Molecular Overlap between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Brain Sciences. 2018; 8(12):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8120212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Šoltić, Darija, Melissa Bowerman, Joanne Stock, Hannah K. Shorrock, Thomas H. Gillingwater, and Heidi R. Fuller. 2018. "Multi-Study Proteomic and Bioinformatic Identification of Molecular Overlap between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)" Brain Sciences 8, no. 12: 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8120212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop