Next Article in Journal
Cytochrome P450 CYP2E1 Suppression Ameliorates Cerebral Ischemia Reperfusion Injury
Next Article in Special Issue
The Oxidative Paradox in Low Oxygen Stress in Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Retinopathy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Biosynthesis of Phenolic Compounds Is an Integrated Defence Mechanism to Prevent Ozone Injury in Salvia officinalis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of the Golden SNP-Carrying Orange Gene Enhances Carotenoid Accumulation and Heat Stress Tolerance in Sweetpotato Plants

1
Plant Systems Engineering Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), 125 Gwahak-ro, Daejeon 34141, Korea
2
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, KRIBB School of Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology (UST), 217 Gajeong-ro, Daejeon 34113, Korea
3
College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinjudae-ro, Jinju 52828, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10010051
Submission received: 8 December 2020 / Revised: 29 December 2020 / Accepted: 30 December 2020 / Published: 4 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant Defenses in Plants)

Abstract

:
Carotenoids function as photosynthetic accessory pigments, antioxidants, and vitamin A precursors. We recently showed that transgenic sweetpotato calli overexpressing the mutant sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) Orange gene (IbOr-R96H), which carries a single nucleotide polymorphism responsible for Arg to His substitution at amino acid position 96, exhibited dramatically higher carotenoid content and abiotic stress tolerance than calli overexpressing the wild-type IbOr gene (IbOr-WT). In this study, we generated transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-R96H under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The total carotenoid contents of IbOr-R96H storage roots (light-orange flesh) and IbOr-WT storage roots (light-yellow flesh) were 5.4–19.6 and 3.2-fold higher, respectively, than those of non-transgenic (NT) storage roots (white flesh). The β-carotene content of IbOr-R96H storage roots was up to 186.2-fold higher than that of NT storage roots. In addition, IbOr-R96H plants showed greater tolerance to heat stress (47 °C) than NT and IbOr-WT plants, possibly because of higher DPPH radical scavenging activity and ABA contents. These results indicate that IbOr-R96H is a promising strategy for developing new sweetpotato cultivars with improved carotenoid contents and heat stress tolerance.

1. Introduction

Given their functional importance, carotenoids have been investigated since the beginning of the 19th century, and over 1100 carotenoid compounds have been identified to date [1]. Tetraterpenoids are lipid-soluble carotenoid pigments produced by all photosynthetic organisms, including plants, algae, bacteria, and fungi. In plants, carotenoids are generally categorized into two classes, xanthophylls, and carotenes. These carotenoids are red, orange, and yellow-colored pigments, which are responsible for the coloration of fruits and flowers. These carotenoids also play a vital role in protecting the photosynthetic apparatus from photo-oxidation, which can trigger the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [2,3]. In addition to their functions in photosynthetic organisms, carotenoids also serve as precursors of pro-vitamin A, and exhibit antioxidant properties and the ability to relieve chronic diseases in humans and animals [4,5]. In developing countries, vitamin A deficiency affects approximately 130 million preschool-aged children and 7 million pregnant women and is responsible for the death of 0.6 million children aged under 5 years [6]. To alleviate global health issues caused by the lack of micronutrients, several studies have been carried out to investigate the biofortification of plant-derived foods with carotenoid precursors of pro-vitamin A (mainly β-carotene); for example, Golden Rice, which contains a high level of carotenoids [7,8]. These studies have led to the development of a number of biofortified crops using transgenic approaches by exploiting genes involved in the carotenogenesis pathway [9,10].
Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) is the seventh most important food crop in the world and a rich source of diverse nutrients [11]. It is believed that sweetpotato, especially orange-fleshed cultivars, could combat vitamin A deficiency because of the high level of β-carotene (approximately 90% of all carotenoids) [12]. Sweetpotato has a high nutritional value and is rich in low molecular weight antioxidants (LMWAs) such as carotenoids, ascorbate, tocopherols, and polyphenols [13,14]. Sweetpotato is also considered a valuable source of unique natural products, including some that can be used for the development of medicines effective against various diseases and for the production of industrial products [15,16]. To develop new sweetpotato cultivars with high LMWA content, genetic engineering of the biosynthetic and metabolic genes of LMWAs is currently in progress via molecular breeding. Metabolic engineering of carotenoid biosynthesis genes has been investigated to increase the accumulation of different types of carotenoids. Transgenic sweetpotato plants with enhanced carotenoid content also exhibit environmental stress tolerance [13,14].
The Orange (Or) gene, which encodes the plastid-localized cysteine-rich DnaJ protein, regulates carotenoid accumulation and abiotic stress resistance in various plant species. Ectopic expression of Or promotes carotenoid accumulation in various crop species [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In sweetpotato, the IbOr protein functions as a holdase chaperone, a post-transcriptional regulator of phytoene synthase (PSY), a rate-limiting enzyme in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway [21,26]. Furthermore, IbOr interacts with oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2-1 (PsbP) in the chloroplast, a member of the protein complex in photosystem II (PSII), and protects it from heat-induced denaturation [26,27]. IbOr also interacts with carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (IbCCD4) in the chloroplast, which is consistent with the location of the interaction of IbOr with IbPSY and IbPsbP. The interaction of IbOr and IbCCD4 does not affect the cleavage of β-carotene [28]. Thus, IbOr is a multifunctional protein that exhibits strong holdase chaperone activity and contributes to carotenoid accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance in plants.
Recently, a dominant or allele carrying a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; referred to as the golden SNP) was identified in melon (Cucumis melo); this SNP causes arginine (Arg) to histidine (His) substitution in the CmOr protein and is associated with high β-carotene accumulation in melon [18]. Overexpression of AtOr-His, a variant of the Arabidopsis thaliana or gene carrying the golden SNP, in Arabidopsis calli and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), leads to high-level accumulation of carotenoids [22,29]. In addition, the other SNP was identified between low- and high-carotenoid genotypes in carrot (Daucus carota); this transition of T to C results in a change of the codon TTG to TCG, causing SNP of leucine (Leu) to serine (Ser) and is related to high β-carotene accumulation in carrot [30]. Recently, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of the IbOr gene, leading to Arg to His substitution at position 96 (based on the CmOr protein) in the IbOr protein (IbOr-R96H), and generated IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato calli. Transgenic calli overexpressing IbOr-R96H showed significantly higher carotenoid contents and enhanced salt and heat stress tolerance than those overexpressing the wild-type IbOr (IbOr-WT) gene [31]. In this study, we generated transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-R96H to study its effect at the whole-plant level. Our results showed that overexpression of IbOr-R96H increased the content of total carotenoids, especially β-carotene, in storage roots of transgenic sweetpotato plants. In addition, we investigated abiotic stress tolerance assay using leaf discs and monitored transcript levels of carotenoid biosynthesis and degradation genes. Interestingly, IbOr-R96H transgenic plants exhibited high DPPH radical scavenging activity in both fresh storage roots and leaves compared with non-transgenic (NT) and IbOr-WT plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

A white-fleshed sweetpotato cultivar, Xushu 29, was kindly provided by the Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Xuzhou, China. Plants were grown in a growth chamber under controlled conditions (25 ± 3 °C temperature, under a light intensity of 150 μmol m−2 s−1 and 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod). To analyze carotenoid content, the storage roots of sweetpotato plants were harvested 4 months after planting.

2.2. Plasmid Construction and Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

Site-directed mutagenesis of IbOr was performed as described previously [31]. IbOr-WT (accession no. HQ828087) and IbOr-R96H were cloned into the pGWB5 binary Gateway vector under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter to generate fusions with the GFP gene. The constructs were transformed into sweetpotato embryogenic calli using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 [23].

2.3. Generation of Transgenic Sweetpotato Plants

Transgenic plants were first screened on hygromycin-containing medium and then confirmed by genotyping and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), which were performed using genomic DNA and RNA extracted from fresh leaf samples (0.1 g) of hygromycin-resistant sweetpotato plants. Genomic DNA was amplified using the following primers: 5′-CGCACAATCCCACTATCCTT-3′ and 5′-TTCCCAAGCTCAGCATTCTT-3′. To analyze the expression of IbOr-R96H, qRT-PCR was performed using the following primers: 5′-CTTCATCCGTCGACACCGAA-3′ and 5′-GCTGTATTCTCAGCCTACGA-3′.

2.4. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis of Carotenogenesis-Related Genes

Total RNA was extracted from the leaves and storage roots of 3-week-old and 4-month-old transgenic sweetpotato plants, respectively, using the method reported previously [31]. To analyze the expression of sweetpotato genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis and degradation pathways, qRT-PCR was performed on a CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using EvaGreen fluorescent dye and gene-specific primers (Tables S1 and S2).

2.5. Analysis of Carotenoid Contents

Carotenoids were extracted from storage roots of 4-month-old transgenic sweetpotato plants using acetone (0.01% BHT). The extracted carotenoids were analyzed using the Agilent 1260 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Hewlett-Packard, Waldbronn, Germany), as described previously [32]. All extraction procedures were conducted under dim light to avoid pigment degradation and loss. Carotenoid contents were expressed as μg g−1 dry weight (DW) of storage roots.

2.6. Analysis of Heat Tolerance

To induce heat stress, leaf discs (12 mm in diameter) were excised from the 3rd, 4th, and 5th leaves of 1-month-old transgenic and NT sweetpotato plants, and exposed to high temperature (47 °C) in the dark for 12 h. To visualize the degree of damage caused by heat stress, heat-treated leaf discs were floated on 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution (1 mg mL−1 in water; pH 3.8), as described previously [27]. To measure the extent of cellular damage or membrane disruption, ion leakage was quantified using an ion conductivity meter (MTD, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland).

2.7. Determination of ABA Content

ABA was extracted from the leaf discs of individual plants and its amount was determined with a plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) ELISA Kit (MyBioSource Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) following manufacturer instruction. Absorbance at 450 nm was detected using Bio-Rad i-Mark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad). Three independent experiments were performed.

2.8. Antioxidant Activity Analysis

The analysis of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity is a widely used spectrophotometric methods for the assessment of the antioxidant capacities inhibiting lipid oxidation in complex biological mixtures such as plant or food extracts. The assay was analyzed as described previously [33]. Leaf and storage root extracts of transgenic and NT sweetpotato plants were prepared in methanol, and the absorbance of the extracts was determined at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer. A calibration curve was constructed using L-Ascorbic acid (AsA) as a standard, and the DPPH radical scavenging activity of the extracts was calculated as AsA equivalents per gram of tested samples.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences were identified by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. IbOr-R96H Transgenic Sweetpotato Plants Exhibited a Light-Orange Color

Previously, we reported that overexpression of IbOr-R96H dramatically increased the carotenoid content of transgenic sweetpotato calli compared with WT sweetpotato calli. The total carotenoid and β-carotene contents of IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato calli with dark-orange flesh were 13.3- and 39.3-fold higher, respectively, than those of IbOr-WT calli. Moreover, transgenic calli also showed increased tolerance to salt stress (150 mM NaCl) and heat stress (47 °C) [31]. To examine whether IbOr-R96H is functionally conserved in sweetpotato calli and plants, IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H were overexpressed under the control of the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter in the embryogenic callus of sweetpotato (cv. Xushu 29) using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Figure 1A). Ten independent transgenic lines were generated for each construct and confirmed by genomic DNA-based PCR using construct-specific primers (Figure 1B). Expression levels of IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H were evaluated in each transgenic line using qRT-PCR, and three lines per construct (IbOr-WT [#2, #9, #10] and IbOr-R96H [#1, #9, #10]), showing high IbOr transcript levels, were selected for further characterization (Figure 1C).
To determine whether the overexpression of IbOr-R96H increased carotenoid synthesis in transgenic sweetpotato plants, we first evaluated the morphological phenotypes of NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants. Stem cuttings of NT, IbOr-WT (#2, #9, #10), and IbOr-R96H (#1, #9, #10) plants were grown in plastic pots for 4 months. One-month-old plants of transgenic IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H lines exhibited no significant phenotypic alterations in aerial plant parts compared with NT plants (Figure 2A). However, the skin of IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots exhibited a light-red color compared with that of NT and IbOr-WT storage roots (Figure 2B, left). Interestingly, storage roots of IbOr-R96H plants exhibited a light-orange color overall and a dark-orange color around the cambium rings, whereas storage roots of IbOr-WT plants showed a deeper yellow color around the cambium layers than those of NT plants (Figure 2B, right).

3.2. IbOr-R96H Overexpression Induces Overaccumulation of Carotenoids in Storage Roots

Previously, overexpression of IbOr, AtOr, and SbOr carrying the golden SNP increased the total carotenoid and β-carotene contents of various plant species. Additionally, IbOr-R96H transgenic calli accumulated significantly higher levels of total carotenoids and β-carotene than IbOr-WT transgenic calli, based on the color of the callus [22,31]. To assess whether the color difference correlated with carotenoid accumulation, we analyzed the carotenoid content of storage roots and leaves of NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants by HPLC. The IbOr-R96H transgenic plants exhibited differences in the carotenoid composition and content of storage roots (Figure 3 and Table S3) and leaves (Table S4) compared with NT and IbOr-WT transgenic plants. Depending on the transgenic line, the total carotenoid contents of IbOr-R96H and IbOr-WT transgenic storage roots were 5.4–19.6- and 1.7–3.2-fold higher, respectively, than that of NT storage roots. Among various carotenoids, β-carotene showed a dramatic overaccumulation in IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots; its level was 21.7–186.2-fold higher in IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots than in NT storage roots. The amount of α-carotene varied from 0.09–0.37 μg g−1 DW in storage roots of the three IbOr-R96H transgenic lines; however, α-carotene was undetectable in NT and IbOr-WT transgenic storage roots (Figure 3). Interestingly, β-cryptoxanthin content varied from 0.05 μg g−1 DW (line #9) to 0.13 μg g−1 DW (line #1) in IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots, but was undetectable in NT and IbOr-WT storage roots (Figure 3 and Table S3). Thus, the promotion of β-carotene accumulation in IbOr-R96H transgenic plants was consistent with that observed in IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato calli [31]. In leaves, lutein was the most abundant carotenoid; this result was obtained not only in NT plants but also in transgenic lines (three IbOr-WT and three IbOr-R96H). Unlike storage roots, the total carotenoid and β-carotene contents of IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H plants were slightly lower than those of NT plants (Table S4).

3.3. IbOr-R96H Overexpression Significantly Altered the Expression of Carotenoid Metabolism-Related Genes

Previously, we showed that most carotenoid biosynthetic pathway genes were up-regulated in the transgenic sweetpotato calli and plants overexpressing IbOr [23,31,33]. To determine whether the overaccumulation of carotenoids in storage roots of IbOr-R96H plants is correlated with altered expression of carotenogenesis-related genes, we analyzed the transcript levels of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the Or gene was highly expressed in IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots. In addition, phytoene synthase (PSY), phytoene desaturase (PDS), zeta-carotene desaturase (ZDS), lycopene ε-cyclase (LCY-ε), and beta-carotene hydroxylase (CHY-β) genes were expressed to higher levels in IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots than in NT storage roots (Figure 4).
We previously showed that expression levels of carotenoid cleavage genes were elevated in IbOr-R96H transgenic calli compared with NT calli [31]. Therefore, we investigated the transcript levels of carotenoid degradation pathway genes in IbOr-R96H storage roots. Expression levels of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases 4 (CCD4) and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED), which are involved in carotenoid cleavage, were higher in IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots than in NT storage roots, consistent with our previous results. However, the transcript levels of these genes were lower in IbOr-R96H storage roots than in IbOr-WT storage roots. In addition, the expression levels of carotenoid degradation genes such as CCD1, carotene isomerase (D27), lycopene cleavage dioxygenase (LCD), and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ADH), which are involved in lycopene and β-carotene cleavage, were lower in IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots than in NT and IbOr-WT transgenic storage roots (Figure 5). These results indicate that enhanced accumulation of carotenoids in IbOr-R96H transgenic storage roots might be an effect of the lower expression of carotenoid cleavage genes.

3.4. IbOr-R96H Transgenic Plants Exhibit Increased Antioxidant Activity and Heat Stress Tolerance

Previously, IbOr-WT transgenic sweetpotato calli exhibited increased antioxidant activity and salt stress tolerance. Furthermore, IbOr-R96H transgenic calli also showed enhanced tolerance to salt and heat stresses [31,33]. To investigate the antioxidant activity in transgenic sweetpotato, we analyzed the DPPH radical scavenging activity in fresh storage roots and leaves of NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants (Figure 6). In storage roots, the DPPH radical scavenging activity was 5.5–10.2- and 1.9–3.0-fold higher in IbOr-R96H and IbOr-WT transgenic plants, respectively, than in NT plants (Figure 6A). Additionally, in contrast to the normal (no stress) condition, the DPPH activity in IbOr-R96H leaves was up to 1.85-fold higher than that in NT leaves after 12 h of heat stress treatment (Figure 6B).
Previously, transgenic IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H calli exhibited increased tolerance to heat stress compared with NT calli [31]. To compare the heat stress tolerance of transgenic and NT sweetpotato plants, leaf discs prepared from NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants were incubated at 47 °C for 12 h, and membrane damage was examined by DAB staining and ion leakage analysis. NT plants showed severe membrane damage, as evident from the dark-brown coloration of leaf discs, whereas IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H leaf discs displayed less membrane damage. IbOr-R96H transgenic plants showed greater heat stress tolerance than NT and IbOr-WT plants (Figure 7A). After 12 h of heat stress treatment, leaves of NT and IbOr-WT plants showed 66% and 42.8–43.8% ion leakage, respectively. By contrast, leaves of IbOr-R96H plants exhibited significantly less ion leakage (21.2–23.75%) at the same time point (Figure 7B). In addition, to investigate the relationship between greater heat stress tolerance and the contents of abscisic acid (ABA), we quantified ABA contents in plants under normal growth conditions and after exposure to heat stress. Under normal and after 6 h of heat stress conditions, ABA contents were higher in IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H plants than in NT plants. This result is consistent with the findings that the expression level of NCED, a key enzyme in ABA biosynthesis, was higher in IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H transgenic plants, as shown in Figure 5. After 12 h of heat stress treatment, the highest values of ABA contents were recorded in NT plants compared to IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H plants (Figure 7C). These results suggest that the increases in DPPH radical scavenging activity and ABA contents in IbOr-R96H plants lead to greater tolerance to heat stress.

4. Discussion

Overexpression of the golden SNP-carrying mutant CmOr allele resulted in enhanced carotenoid content and orange-colored melon fruit phenotypes [18]. Overexpression of the IbOr gene carrying the same mutation resulted in high total carotenoid and β-carotene contents and enhanced abiotic stress tolerance in sweetpotato [31]. In this study, we successfully generated transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-R96H. In carrot, the root color depends on the contents of different carotenoids: orange-colored carrot genotypes contain mostly α-carotene and β-carotene; yellow and red carrots contain lutein and lycopene, respectively; and white genotypes contain almost no carotenoid [34]. In storage roots of sweetpotato, the β-carotene content varies greatly with the color of different varieties of sweetpotato, which ranges from white to light yellow, deep yellow, and dark orange [35,36]. Overexpression of IbOr-R96H in sweetpotato changed the color of storage roots from white to orange (Figure 2). These results suggest that overexpression of IbOr-R96H increased the contents of carotenoids, especially β-carotene, in storage roots.
Carotenoids play important roles in the primary and secondary metabolism of plants and accumulate to high levels in tissues of some plants. Xylem and phloem surrounding the cambium layers represent secondary tissues in the plant vascular system. Xylem conducts water, while phloem conducts amino acids and sucrose. Interestingly, overexpression of IbOr-R96H in sweetpotato changed the color of the area surrounding the cambium ring in storage roots (Figure 2B, right). Unlike most crops, the phloem and xylem tissues in carrot roots are visually well separated by the vascular cambium. Previously, some studies showed that the level of carotene was higher in secondary phloem than in secondary xylem of carrot roots. In phloem chromoplasts, carotene is mainly deposited in the crystalline form. Carotenoid metabolites induce structural changes in carotene deposited in chromoplasts, the main organelles of carotenoid accumulation, and crystalline chromoplast development leads to the massive accumulation of carotene pigments [37,38,39,40]. Both carrot and sweetpotato contain high levels of β-carotene and α-carotene. In the carrot root, the proportion of crystalline chromoplasts is the highest compared with other substructures. However, in sweetpotato, chromoplasts exert various substructures such as globular, crystals, and plastoglobuli, together with membrane substructures [41]. Therefore, it is possible that a color change in storage roots of IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato plants, specifically in the area surrounding the cambium ring, is related to the overaccumulation of carotenoids and structural modification of carotenes.
In addition, storage roots of IbOr-R96H plants accumulated carotenoids to higher levels than IbOr-WT and NT plants. Similar to IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato calli, storage roots of IbOr-R96H plants showed a dramatic increase in total carotenoid content (up to 19.6-fold) and β-carotene content (up to 186.2-fold) compared with those of NT plants. Additionally, the total carotenoid and β-carotene contents of IbOr-R96H storage roots were 3.2–6.1- and 11.5–99.3-fold greater than those of IbOr-WT storage roots, respectively (Figure 3). In contrast to the results obtained with storage roots, the leaves of NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants showed no significant differences in carotenoid contents (Table S4). Unlike non-photosynthetic tissues such as fruits and roots, leaves rarely exhibit an overaccumulation of carotenoids. In plant leaves, carotenoids are continuously synthesized and degraded to maintain optimal photosynthesis through carotenoid steady-state regulatory mechanisms [42,43,44,45]. These results indicate that leaves maintain carotenoid homeostasis, however, through unknown mechanisms.
Carotenoid cleavage reactions play a major role in determining the carotenoid content of plants. Lycopene, β-carotene, and zeaxanthin act as precursors of important apocarotenoids. The conversion of carotenoids into apocarotenoids is catalyzed by carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs), which target different double bonds of the carotenoid polyene chain. The 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCEDs) cleave 9-cis-violaxanthin and 9-cis-neoxanthin into xanthoxin, and synthesize abscisic acid (ABA), an important hormone involved in plant stress response and seed maturation. The lycopene cleavage dioxygenase (LCD) enzyme, along with ADH, converts lycopene into bixin, a polyene. Enzymes including CCD1, D27, LCD, and ADH mediate lycopene and β-carotene cleavage [46,47,48]. We showed that overexpression of IbOr-R96H in sweetpotato storage roots increased not only the total carotenoid content but also CCD4 and NCED expression levels (Figure 4). In addition, the expression levels of carotenoid degradation genes such as CCD1, D27, LCD, and ADH were lower in storage roots of IbOr-R96H plants than in those of NT and IbOr-WT plants (Figure 5). These results indicate that the down-regulation of genes encoding carotenoid cleavage enzymes leads to carotenoid overaccumulation in storage roots of IbOr-R96H plants compared with those of NT and IbOr-WT plants. Interestingly, we found various expression patterns among CCDs in IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato plants. Especially, we found that there is an inverse effect between CCD1 and CCD4. While expression levels of CCD1 was lower than in NT storage roots, CCD4 is highly expressed (Figure 5). Similar to CCD1, loss of function in CCD4 induces carotenoid accumulation in plants. However, in sweetpotato, IbCCD4 interacts specifically with IbOr and its interaction did not affect β-carotene degradation [28]. The relation between CCD4 expression and carotenoid accumulation in IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H plants remains to be studied in detail.
IbOr stabilizes IbPSY, a key regulator of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway, via its chaperone activity under heat stress. Overexpression of IbOr in sweetpotato calli and plants improved tolerance to heat stress [26,30]. Here, we showed that leaf discs excised from IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato plants displayed greater heat stress tolerance than IbOr-WT and NT plants. Until 6 h of heat stress conditions, ABA contents were higher in IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H plants than in NT plants (Figure 7). In addition, the DPPH radical scavenging activity, which reflects the antioxidant activity, was higher in IbOr-R96H plants than in IbOr-WT and NT plants (Figure 6). Carotenoids as antioxidants can quench singlet oxygen and scavenge superoxide anion radicals. In addition, DPPH is widely used to evaluate the ability of compounds as a free radical scavenger to enhance antioxidant activity [49,50]. Furthermore, ABA is an important isoprenoid stress-induced phytohormone. The ABA is quickly synthesized and is regulated by the ABA biosynthesis NCED genes under abiotic stresses such as temperature, drought and salinity [51,52]. In this study, DPPH radical activity and ABA contents with enhanced transcript level of NCED in transgenic lines were much higher than those in the NT line. These results suggest that overexpression of IbOr-R96H in sweetpotato not only increases the contents of total carotenoid and β-carotene but also enhances heat stress tolerance via increased ABA level and DPPH radical scavenging activity. The relation between heat stress tolerance and ABA contents in IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H plants remains to be studied in detail.
To further analyze the regulatory mechanisms of IbOr-R96H, we are currently investigating the potential IbOr-R96H-interacting partners associated with carotenoid overaccumulation and abiotic stress tolerance. Furthermore, we anticipate that site-specific mutagenesis of IbOr combined with CRISPR-Cas9-mediated base-editing techniques could be an effective tool for the improvement of carotenoid contents in sweetpotato. Therefore, we are currently under-developing transgenic sweetpotato plants expressing IbOr-R96H. Overall, the IbOr-R96H gene could help us cope with global food and nutrition security problems, and help to establish a sustainable society in the face of climate change.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we showed that overexpression of IbOr-R96H significantly increased carotenoid accumulation and antioxidant activity in sweetpotato storage roots to levels higher than those achieved by the overexpression of IbOr-WT. Storage roots of IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato plants showed up to 19.6- and 186.2-fold higher total carotenoid and β-carotene contents, respectively, compared with those of NT plants. In addition, gene expression analysis indicated that genes encoding carotenoid cleavage enzymes might be involved in the overaccumulation of carotenoids in IbOr-R96H storage roots. Furthermore, at 47 °C, IbOr-R96H transgenic sweetpotato plants displayed greater heat stress tolerance than IbOr-WT plants, which was associated with higher DPPH radical scavenging activity and ABA contents. Taken together, our results demonstrate that overexpression of IbOr-R96H in sweetpotato confers heat stress tolerance by triggering the production of carotenoids and improving free radical scavenging capabilities.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/10/1/51/s1. Table S1: List of primers used for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of sweetpotato genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis; Table S2: List of primers used for qRT-PCR analysis of sweetpotato genes involved in carotenoid degradation; Table S3: Carotenoid contents of storage roots of transgenic and non-transgenic sweetpotato plants; Table S4: Carotenoid contents of leaves of transgenic and non-transgenic sweetpotato plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-E.K., S.-S.K., and H.S.K.; data curation, S.-E.K.; formal analysis, S.-E.K., C.-J.L., S.-U.P., Y.-H.L., W.S.P., H.-J.K., M.-J.A., and H.S.K.; funding acquisition, S.-S.K.; methodology, S.-E.K., C.-J.L., S.-U.P., Y.-H.L., W.S.P., H.-J.K., M.-J.A., S.-S.K., and H.S.K.; resources, S.-E.K. and H.S.K.; validation, S.-E.K.; visualization, S.-E.K.; writing—original draft, S.-E.K., S.-S.K., and H.S.K.; writing—review and editing, S.-E.K., S.-S.K., and H.S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2020R1A2C1004560) and the KRIBB initiative program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yabuzaki, J. Carotenoids database: Structures, chemical fingerprints and distribution among organisms. Database 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Stanley, L.; Yuan, Y.W. Transcriptional regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants: So many regulators, so little consensus. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Watkins, J.L.; Pogson, B.J. Prospects for carotenoid biofortification targeting retention and catabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zheng, X.; Giuliano, G.; Al-Babili, S. Carotenoid biofortification in crop plants: Citius, altius, fortius. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hashimoto, H.; Uragami, C.; Cogdell, R.J. Carotenoids and photosynthesis. Subcell. Biochem. 2016, 79, 111–139. [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, R.E.; Allen, L.H.; A Bhutta, Z.; E Caulfield, L.; De Onis, M.; Ezzati, M.; Mathers, C.; Rivera, J. Maternal and child undernutrition: Global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008, 371, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fraser, P.D.; Bramley, P.M. The biosynthesis and nutritional uses of carotenoids. Prog. Lipid Res. 2004, 43, 228–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Giuliano, G. Provitamin A biofortification of crop plants: A gold rush with many miners. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yuan, H.; Zhang, J.; Nageswaran, D.; Li, L. Carotenoid metabolism and regulation in horticultural crops. Hortic. Res. 2015, 2, 15036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bovell-Benjamin, A.C. Sweetpotato: A review of its past, present, and future role in human nutrition. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2007, 52, 1–59. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kwak, S.S. Biotechnology of sweetpotato: Ensuring the food and nutrition security in the face of climate change. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 1361–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Paine, J.A.; Shipton, A.C.; Chaggar, S.; Howells, R.M.; Kennedy, M.J.; Vernon, G.; Wright, S.Y.; Hinchliffe, E.; Adams, J.L.; Silverstone, A.L.; et al. Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kang, L.; Park, S.C.; Ji, C.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Metabolic engineering of carotenoids in transgenic sweetpotato. Breed. Sci. 2017, 67, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, H.S.; Wang, W.; Kang, L.; Kim, S.E.; Lee, C.J.; Park, S.C.; Park, W.S.; Ahn, M.J.; Kwak, S.S. Metabolic engineering of low molecular weight antioxidants in sweetpotao. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 14, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mohanraj, R.; Sivasankar, S. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)—A valuable medicinal food: A review. J. Med. Food 2014, 17, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Q. Improvement for agronomically important traits by gene engineering in sweetpotato. Breed. Sci. 2017, 67, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lu, S.; Van Eck, J.; Zhou, X. The cauliflower Or gene encodes a DnaJ cysteine-rich domain-containing protein that mediates high levels of β-carotene accumulation. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3594–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tzuri, G.; Zhou, X.; Chayut, N.; Yuan, H.; Portnoy, V.; Meir, A. A ‘golden’ SNP in CmOr governs the fruit flesh color of melon (Cucumis melo). Plant J. 2015, 82, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chayut, N.; Yuan, H.; Ohali, S.; Meir, A.; Sa’Ar, U.; Tzuri, G.; Zheng, Y.; Mazourek, M.; Gepstein, S.; Zhou, X.; et al. Distinct mechanisms of the ORANGE protein in controlling carotenoid flux. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lopez, A.B.; Van Eck, J.; Conlin, B.J.; Paolillo, D.J.; O’Neill, J.; Li, L. Effect of the cauliflower Or transgene on carotenoid accumulation and chromoplast formation in transgenic potato tubers. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, X.; Welsch, R.; Yang, Y.; Álvarez, D.; Riediger, M.; Yuan, H.; Fish, T.; Liu, J.; Thannhauser, T.W.; Li, L. Arabidopsis OR proteins are the major posttranscriptional regulators of phytoene synthase in controlling carotenoid biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3558–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Yuan, H.; Owsiany, K.; Sheeja, T.; Zhou, X.; Rodriguez, C.; Li, Y.; Welsch, R.; Chayut, N.; Yang, Y.; Thannhauser, T.W.; et al. A single amino acid substitution in an ORANGE protein promotes carotenoid overaccumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Park, S.C.; Kim, S.H.; Park, S.; Lee, H.U.; Lee, J.S.; Park, W.S.; Ahn, M.J.; Kim, Y.H.; Jeong, J.C.; Lee, H.S.; et al. Enhanced accumulation of carotenoids in sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-Ins gene in purple-fleshed sweetpotato cultivar. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 86, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Z.; Ke, Q.; Kim, M.D.; Kim, S.H.; Ji, C.Y.; Jeong, J.C.; Lee, H.S.; Park, W.S.; Ahn, M.J.; Li, H.; et al. Transgenic alfalfa plants expressing the sweetpotato Orange gene exhibit enhanced abiotic stress tolerance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kim, H.S.; Ji, C.Y.; Lee, C.J.; Kim, S.E.; Park, S.C.; Kwak, S.S. Orange: A target gene for regulating carotenoid homeostasis and increasing plant tolerance to environmental stress in marginal lands. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3393–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Park, S.; Kim, H.S.; Jung, Y.J.; Kim, S.H.; Ji, C.Y.; Wang, Z.; Jeong, J.C.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Kwak, S.S. Orange protein has a role in phytoene synthase stabilization in sweetpotato. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kang, L.; Kim, H.S.; Kwon, Y.S.; Ke, Q.; Ji, C.Y.; Park, S.C.; Lee, H.S.; Deng, X.; Kwak, S.S. IbOr regulates photosynthesis under heat stress by stabilizing IbPsbP in sweetpotato. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Park, S.C.; Kang, L.; Park, W.S.; Ahn, M.J.; Kwak, S.S.; Kim, H.S. Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (CCD4) cleaves β-carotene and interacts with IbOr in sweetpotato. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 14, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yazdani, M.; Sun, Z.; Yuan, H.; Zeng, S.; Thannhauser, T.W.; Vrebalov, J.; Ma, Q.; Xu, Y.; Fei, Z.; Van Eck, J.; et al. Ectopic expression of ORANGE promotes carotenoid accumulation and fruit development in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 17, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ellison, S.L.; Luby, C.H.; Corak, K.E.; Coe, K.M.; Senalik, D.; Iorizzo, M.; Goldman, I.L.; Simon, P.W.; Dawson, J.C. Carotenoid presence is associated with the or gene in domesticated carrot. Genetics 2018, 210, 1497–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, S.E.; Kim, H.S.; Wang, Z.; Ke, Q.; Lee, C.J.; Park, S.U.; Lim, Y.H.; Park, W.S.; Ahn, M.J.; Kwak, S.S. A single amino acid change at position 96 (Arg to His) of the sweetpotato Orange protein leads to carotenoid overaccumulation. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 1393–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kim, S.H.; Ahn, Y.O.; Ahn, M.J.; Lee, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Down-regulation of β-carotene hydroxylase increases β-carotene and total carotenoids enhancing salt stress tolerance in transgenic cultured cells of sweetpotato. Phytochemistry 2012, 74, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, S.H.; Ahn, Y.O.; Ahn, M.J.; Jeong, J.C.; Lee, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Cloning and characterization of an Orange gene that increases carotenoid accumulation and salt stress tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato cultures. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 70, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nicolle, C.; Simon, G.; Rock, E.; Amouroux, P.; Rémésy, C. Genetic variability influences carotenoid, vitamin, phenolic and mineral content in white, yellow, purple, orange, and dark-orange carrot cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2004, 129, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Takahata, Y.; Noda, T.; Nagata, T. HPLC determination of β-carotene content of sweet-potato cultivars and its relationship with color values. Jpn. J. Breed. 1993, 43, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Teow, C.C.; Truong, V.D.; McFeeters, R.F.; Thompson, R.L.; Pecota, K.V.; Yencho, G.C. Antioxidant activities, phenolic, and β-carotene contents of sweetpotato genotypes with varying flesh colours. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, C.; Craig, J.C.; Petzold, H.E.; Dickerman, A.W.; Beers, E.P. The xylem and phloem transcriptomes from secondary tissues of the Arabidopsis root hypocotyl. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 803–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kim, J.E.; Rensing, K.H.; Douglas, C.J.; Cheng, K.M. Chromoplasts ultrastructure and estimated carotene content in root secondary phloem of different carrot varieties. Planta 2010, 231, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, P.J.; Wang, C.Y.; Yin, T.T.; Zhong, S.L.; Grierson, D.; Chen, K.S.; Xu, C.J. Cytological and molecular characterization of carotenoid accumulation in normal and high-lycopene mutant oranges. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Perrin, F.; Hartmann, L.; Dubois-Laurent, C.; Welsch, R.; Huet, S.; Hamama, L.; Briard, M.; Peltier, D.; Gagné, S.; Geoffriau, E. Carotenoid gene expression explains the difference of carotenoid accumulation in carrot root tissues. Planta 2017, 245, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jeffery, J.; Holzenburg, A.; King, S. Physical barriers to carotenoid bioaccessibility. Ultrastructure survey of chromoplast and cell wall morphology in nine carotenoid-containing fruits and vegetables. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pogson, B.; McDonald, K.A.; Truong, M.; Britton, G.; DellaPenna, D. Arabidopsis carotenoid mutants demonstrate that lutein is not essential for photosynthesis in higher plants. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kim, J.; Smith, J.J.; Tian, L.; Dellapenna, D. The evolution and function of carotenoid hydroxylases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 463–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Beisel, K.G.; Jahnke, S.; Hofmann, D.; Köppchen, S.; Schurr, U.; Matsubara, S. Continuous turnover of carotenes and chlorophyll a in mature leaves of Arabidopsis revealed by 14CO2 pulse-chase labeling. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 2188–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Dhami, N.; Cazzonelli, C.I. Environmental impacts on carotenoid metabolism in leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 7, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Beltran, J.C.; Stange, C. Apocarotenoids: A new carotenoid-derived pathway. Subcell. Biochem. 2016, 79, 239–272. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Sun, T.; Tadmor, Y.; Li, L. Pathways for carotenoid biosynthesis, degradation, and storage. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Rodríguez-Concepción, M., Welsch, R., Eds.; Humana: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Volume 2083, pp. 3–23. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hermanns, A.S.; Zhou, X.; Xu, Q.; Tadmor, Y.; Li, L. Carotenoid pigment accumulation in horticultural plants. Hortic. Plant J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fiedor, J.; Burda, K. Potential role of carotenoids as antioxidants in human health and disease. Nutrients 2014, 6, 466–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Aksoy, L.; Kolay, E.; Ağılönüa, Y.; Aslan, Z.; Kargıoğlu, M. Free radical scavenging activity, total phenolic content, total antioxidant status, and total oxidant status of endemic Thermopsis Turc. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 20, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Xiong, L.M.; Schumaker, K.S.; Zhu, J.K. Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S165–S183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Gouveia, C.S.S.; Ganança, J.F.T.; Slaski, J.J.; Lebot, V.; De Carvalho, M.Â.A.P. Abscisic acid phytohormone estimation in tubers and shoots of Ipomoea batatas subjected to long drought stress using competitive immunological assay. Physiol. Plant. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Generation of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H. (A) Schematic representation of the constructs used for the production of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H. (B) Genotyping transgenic plants using IbOr-specific primers. PC, positive control. (C) Transcript levels of IbOr in transgenic sweetpotato plants. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three technical replicates.
Figure 1. Generation of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H. (A) Schematic representation of the constructs used for the production of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H. (B) Genotyping transgenic plants using IbOr-specific primers. PC, positive control. (C) Transcript levels of IbOr in transgenic sweetpotato plants. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three technical replicates.
Antioxidants 10 00051 g001
Figure 2. Phenotypic analysis of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H. (A) Photographs of aerial plant parts of 1-month-old NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plant lines. (B) Comparison of storage roots of 4-month-old pot-grown NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants. Photographs show whole storage roots (left) and cross-sections of storage roots (right).
Figure 2. Phenotypic analysis of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing IbOr-WT and IbOr-R96H. (A) Photographs of aerial plant parts of 1-month-old NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plant lines. (B) Comparison of storage roots of 4-month-old pot-grown NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants. Photographs show whole storage roots (left) and cross-sections of storage roots (right).
Antioxidants 10 00051 g002
Figure 3. Quantitative HPLC analysis of total carotenoids and individual carotenoid compounds in storage roots of NT and transgenic sweetpotato plants. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks ** p < 0.01; ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Figure 3. Quantitative HPLC analysis of total carotenoids and individual carotenoid compounds in storage roots of NT and transgenic sweetpotato plants. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks ** p < 0.01; ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Antioxidants 10 00051 g003
Figure 4. Expression patterns of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in transgenic and NT sweetpotato plants. GGPS, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase; PSY, phytoene synthase; PDS, phytoene desaturase; ZDS, zeta-carotene desaturase; LCY-β, lycopene β-cyclase; LCY-ε, lycopene epsilon cyclase; CHY-β, beta-carotene hydroxylase; ZEP, zeaxanthin epoxidase. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Figure 4. Expression patterns of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in transgenic and NT sweetpotato plants. GGPS, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase; PSY, phytoene synthase; PDS, phytoene desaturase; ZDS, zeta-carotene desaturase; LCY-β, lycopene β-cyclase; LCY-ε, lycopene epsilon cyclase; CHY-β, beta-carotene hydroxylase; ZEP, zeaxanthin epoxidase. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Antioxidants 10 00051 g004
Figure 5. Expression patterns of carotenoid degradation genes in transgenic and NT sweetpotato plants. CCD, carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase; NCED, 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase; D27, carotene isomerase; LCD, lycopene cleave dioxygenase; ADH, aldehyde dehydrogenase. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Figure 5. Expression patterns of carotenoid degradation genes in transgenic and NT sweetpotato plants. CCD, carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase; NCED, 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase; D27, carotene isomerase; LCD, lycopene cleave dioxygenase; ADH, aldehyde dehydrogenase. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Antioxidants 10 00051 g005
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity in transgenic sweetpotato plants. (A,B) Analysis of DPPH radical scavenging activity in the storage roots (A) and leaves (B) of NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants treated with heat stress for 12 h. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity in transgenic sweetpotato plants. (A,B) Analysis of DPPH radical scavenging activity in the storage roots (A) and leaves (B) of NT, IbOr-WT, and IbOr-R96H plants treated with heat stress for 12 h. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Antioxidants 10 00051 g006
Figure 7. Analysis of heat stress tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato plants using leaf discs. (A) Images of leaf discs and quantification of ROS production in leaves using DAB staining. (B) Ion leakage from detached leaves treated with heat for 0, 6, and 12 h. (C) Quantitative analysis of abscisic acid (ABA) contents in leaves under heat stress. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Figure 7. Analysis of heat stress tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato plants using leaf discs. (A) Images of leaf discs and quantification of ROS production in leaves using DAB staining. (B) Ion leakage from detached leaves treated with heat for 0, 6, and 12 h. (C) Quantitative analysis of abscisic acid (ABA) contents in leaves under heat stress. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Significant differences between IbOr-WT, IbOr-R96H, and NT plants are indicated with asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test).
Antioxidants 10 00051 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.-E.; Lee, C.-J.; Park, S.-U.; Lim, Y.-H.; Park, W.S.; Kim, H.-J.; Ahn, M.-J.; Kwak, S.-S.; Kim, H.S. Overexpression of the Golden SNP-Carrying Orange Gene Enhances Carotenoid Accumulation and Heat Stress Tolerance in Sweetpotato Plants. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10010051

AMA Style

Kim S-E, Lee C-J, Park S-U, Lim Y-H, Park WS, Kim H-J, Ahn M-J, Kwak S-S, Kim HS. Overexpression of the Golden SNP-Carrying Orange Gene Enhances Carotenoid Accumulation and Heat Stress Tolerance in Sweetpotato Plants. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10010051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, So-Eun, Chan-Ju Lee, Sul-U Park, Ye-Hoon Lim, Woo Sung Park, Hye-Jin Kim, Mi-Jeong Ahn, Sang-Soo Kwak, and Ho Soo Kim. 2021. "Overexpression of the Golden SNP-Carrying Orange Gene Enhances Carotenoid Accumulation and Heat Stress Tolerance in Sweetpotato Plants" Antioxidants 10, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10010051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop