Next Article in Journal
A Review of Antioxidant Peptides Derived from Meat Muscle and By-Products
Previous Article in Journal
Protandim Protects Oligodendrocytes against an Oxidative Insult
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 5
Issue 3
10.3390/antiox5030031
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Phalaenopsis Orchid Hybrids

by
Truong Ngoc Minh
1,
Do Tan Khang
1,
Phung Thi Tuyen
1,
Luong The Minh
1,
La Hoang Anh
1,
Nguyen Van Quan
1,
Pham Thi Thu Ha
1,
Nguyen Thanh Quan
1,
Nguyen Phu Toan
1,
Abdelnaser Abdelghany Elzaawely
2 and
Tran Dang Xuan
1,*
1
Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan
2
Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2016, 5(3), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox5030031
Submission received: 3 July 2016 / Revised: 3 September 2016 / Accepted: 9 September 2016 / Published: 14 September 2016
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phalaenopsis spp. is the most commercially and economically important orchid, but their plant parts are often left unused, which has caused environmental problems. To date, reports on phytochemical analyses were most available on endangered and medicinal orchids. The present study was conducted to determine the total phenolics, total flavonoids, and antioxidant activity of ethanol extracts prepared from leaves and roots of six commercial hybrid Phalaenopsis spp. Leaf extracts of “Chian Xen Queen” contained the highest total phenolics with a value of 11.52 ± 0.43 mg gallic acid equivalent per g dry weight and the highest total flavonoids (4.98 ± 0.27 mg rutin equivalent per g dry weight). The antioxidant activity of root extracts evaluated by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging assay and β-carotene bleaching method was higher than those of the leaf extracts. Eleven phenolic compounds were identified, namely, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, vanillin, ferulic acid, sinapic acid, p-coumaric acid, benzoic acid, and ellagic acid. Ferulic, p-coumaric and sinapic acids were concentrated largely in the roots. The results suggested that the root extracts from hybrid Phalaenopsis spp. could be a potential source of natural antioxidants. This study also helps to reduce the amount of this orchid waste in industrial production, as its roots can be exploited for pharmaceutical purposes.

1. Introduction

Vegetables, spices, and herbs contain important natural substances such as antioxidants. Several studies have dealt with antioxidant activity to find new sources of natural antioxidants to be used in foods, cosmetics, medicine, and other purposes [1,2]. Antioxidants play an important role in health care to prevent and scavenge free radicals; alleviate chronic diseases and degenerative ailments such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, hypertension, atherosclerosis; and delay the ageing process [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Of all the plant secondary metabolites, phenolic compounds have been extensively studied and are commonly used as antioxidants for a wide range of applications [10]. Thus, investigation of new and safe antioxidants from natural sources has become very important for food and medicinal functions [11].
Orchids are the most species-rich of all angiosperm families (estimated > 25,000 species) with a wide diversity of epiphytic and terrestrial growth forms and have successfully colonized most habitats on earth [12]. To date, only very few studies have been conducted on orchids as a potential source of antioxidants. In 2007, Ling and Subramaniam [13] reported the chemical composition, biochemical analyses, and antioxidant activity of the leaves and flowers of Phalaenopsis (Phal.) violacea orchid. On the other hand, the chemical composition and antiradical properties of Dendrobium speciosum have been assessed [14]. It is, therefore, believed that orchids are potential sources of antioxidants. Hence, Phalaenopsis species are considered in this study.
Phalaenopsis species, belonging to family Orchidaceae, also known as the moth orchid, are the most common and commercially important orchids due to its beautiful flowers and long-time blooming. These orchids are fleshy and distichous evergreen leaves that make it both attractive and distinctive in the floriculture industry. They are marketed as potted plants and cut flowers leading to their tremendous production over years. Currently, many countries are developing the production of these orchids because of its benefit. In 2009, Thailand exported 211 genera of orchid plants, among them, the Phal. plant was important with the market share of 25.5% of total quantity [15]. Chien et al. [16] reported that, in 2012, Taiwan is the leading country of exporting Phal., providing the largest share (69%) of total 164.70 million US dollars. Additionally, in 2014, 80 million products of Phal. were manufactured from tissue culture in this country [17]. However, after flowering one or two times, the plant will become very weak and become waste [16]. Therefore, this study aimed to utilize the orchid waste and assess its antioxidant potential. The leaves and roots of six different hybrid Phal. spp. were utilized and investigated in this study.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals

All the analytical-grade chemicals used in this study were purchased from KANTO Chemical, Tokyo, Japan.

2.2. Plant Material

Six different hybrids of Phal. spp. were provided by the Kurousu Orchid Company, Saitama Prefecture, Japan in February 2014. The names and abbreviations of the six commercial Phal. hybrids are presented in Table 1.

2.3. Sample Preparation

Leaves and roots of each orchid species were separately cut into small pieces and dried in an oven at 30 °C. After drying, the samples were powdered using a kitchen grinder.

2.4. Preparation of Ethanol Crude Extracts (Free Phenolics)

The powdered leaves and roots of each hybrid (0.5 g) were separately steeped in 50 mL ethanol for 24 h at room temperature. The extracts were then filtered and concentrated separately under vacuum at 40 °C using a rotary evaporator (SB-350-EYELA, Tokyo Rikakikai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The dried crude ethanol extracts, considered free phenolic extracts, were prepared from leaves or roots. They were separately dissolved in methanol and kept in a refrigerator for the following steps [18].

2.5. Preparation of Ethyl Acetate Conjugate Crude Extracts (Conjugate Phenolics)

The leaf and the root residues after ethanol extraction were mixed separately with 40 mL of 4 M NaOH and constantly stirred at 60 °C for 4 h. The hydrolyzed solution was centrifuged for 10 min at 5000 rpm, and the supernatant was filtered. The resulting solution was acidified to pH 1.5 with 6 M HCl. Subsequently, it was centrifuged for 10 min at 5000 rpm and filtered afterward. The filtrates were extracted with 40 mL of ethyl acetate. The extracts were separately evaporated to dryness by a rotary evaporator at 30 °C and discretely dissolved in methanol and kept at 4 °C for further analyses [19].

2.6. Estimation of Phenolic Contents

Phenolic contents of ethanol crude extracts (free phenolics) or ethyl acetate crude extracts (conjugate phenolics), prepared from leaves and roots were calculated using Folin-Ciocalteu method, described by Elzaawely and Tawata [20]. Two hundred µL of each sample (0.5 mg/L) was mixed with 1.0 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent (10%) and 0.8 mL of sodium carbonate (7.5%), respectively. The solutions were mixed and allowed to stand for 30 min. The mixture was then measured at 765 nm using a HACH DR/4000U spectrophotometer (HACH Company, Loveland, CO, USA). The total phenolic contents were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g dry weight (DW).

2.7. Estimation of Flavonoid Contents

The total flavonoids were determined according to the method described by Djeridane et al. [21]. One mL of extract (0.5 mg/mL) was mixed with 1 mL aluminum chloride (2%). The mixture was stirred and kept at room temperature for 15 min. The absorbance was measured at 430 nm using a HACH DR/4000U spectrophotometer. Total flavonoids were reported as mg rutin equivalents (RE) per g dry weight (DW).

2.8. Antioxidant Activity

2.8.1. DPPH Scavenging Assay

The DPPH free radical scavenging assay described by Elzaawely et al. [19] was used to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of the six orchid hybrids. The mixture consisted of 0.5 mL sample extracts, 0.25 mL of 0.5 mM DPPH, and 0.5 mL of 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 5.5). The mixture was kept in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm. BHT was used as a positive reference while methanol was used as a control. Radical scavenging activity was expressed as the inhibition percentage and was calculated using the formula: % radical scavenging activity = [(Acontrol − Atest)/Acontrol] ×100.
Acontrol corresponds to the absorbance of the control and Atest corresponds to the absorbance of the test extract. The IC50 value was also calculated using % radical scavenging activity. Lower IC50 values indicate higher antioxidant activity.

2.8.2. β-Carotene Bleaching Method

Antioxidant activity was evaluated according to the β-carotene bleaching method described by Siddhuraju and Becker [22]. β-Carotene (2.0 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL chloroform and 1 mL of this solution was mixed with 20 µL linoleic acid and 200 mg Tween-40. The chloroform was evaporated under vacuum at 45 °C, then added by 50 mL oxygenated water. Successively, the mixture was vigorously shaken until an emulsion formed. A volume of 120 mL of the methanolic extract and 120 mL BHT (1000 ppm) were mixed with 1 mL of the emulsion in a test tube, which was then incubated at 50 °C. An equal amount of methanol was used for negative control. The absorbance of the mixture was measured using a HACH DR/4000U spectrophotometer at 492 nm. All samples were measured at zero time and every 15 min up to 180 min. Percentage of lipid peroxidation inhibition (LPI) was calculated using the following equation [23]: % LPI = A1/A0 × 100.
Where A0 is the absorbance value measured at zero time for the test sample, while A1 is the corresponding absorbance value measured after incubation for 180 min.

2.9. Quantification of Phenolic Compounds by HPLC

HPLC was used to determine both free and conjugate phenolics in different samples as described by Xuan et al. [20]. Accordingly, the extracts were separately filtered using 0.2 µm filter (KANTO chemical, Tokyo, Japan), then injected into the HPLC (JASCO PU-2089 Plus, JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, column J-Pak Symphonia C18 110A (4.6 mmØ × 15 mm), solvent system: (A) 0.1% of acetic acid, (B) 100% methanol, gradient program: 5–10 min, 5%–20% (A); 10–30 min, 20%–80% (A); 30–40 min, 80%–100% (A), wavelength: 254 nm and flow rate: 1.0 mL/min). Concentrations of phenolic compounds in the samples were calculated by comparing peak areas with the standards.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using ANOVA with significant difference determined at a confidence level of p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Antioxidant Activity, Phenolic Contents, and Lipid Peroxidation Inhibition of Phal. Hybrid Extracts

Phenolic compounds are one of the major chemical classes of plants’ secondary metabolites. They play an important role in the defense of plants against pathogens, diseases, parasites, and predators [24]. They involve in a number of physiological mechanisms such as antioxidant activity. They also play an important role in stabilizing lipid peroxidation [25]. The amount of phenolics produced by a plant depends on several factors such as temperature, UV-light, nutrition available to the plant, and genetic factors [13].
From Table 2, SYV3 exhibited the highest radical scavenging activity (lowest IC50 values) in both free and conjugate forms. This result is in agreement with its phenolic contents in both extracts. It is also important to note that the roots of SYV3 gave the strongest radical scavenging activity among all samples used. Comparing the roots and the leaves of all samples, the former contain more phenolics than the latter and they showed higher free radical scavenging activity in the order SYV3 > GFSV > FBD > YGL > SH > CXQ.
It has been reported that the phenolics in plants possess strong antioxidant activity and levels of the antioxidant activity are proportional to the concentrations [26]. In the presence of antioxidants, the free radical activity of linoleic acid is hindered, thus preventing it from attacking the polyunsaturated β-carotene [23]. The antioxidant activity and the percentage lipid peroxidation inhibition (% LPI) results of the different extracts are presented in Figure 1. It is clear that the presence of antioxidants in different extracts prepared from Phal. leaves or roots reduced the oxidation of ß-carotene. The LPI values of free phenolic extracts ranged from were 89.4% to 97.0%, while those of conjugate phenolic extracts were 70.1% to 97.0%.

3.2. Total Flavonoids Contents

Flavonoids have the ability to repress free radicals, reduce their levels in the body, and increase antioxidant defense activity [24]. Total flavonoids in six Phal. hybrids ranged from 1.71 ± 0.06 to 4.98 ± 0.27 mg RE/g DW (Figure 2). Among all extracts, a significantly high amount was found in leaf extracts of CXQ and SH with values 4.98 and 4.85 mg RE/g DW, respectively; while root extracts of YGL had the lowest amount (1.71 mg RE/g DW).
The results indicate that phenolic compounds are mostly found in the conjugate form, while most of the flavonoids are in the free form.

3.3. HPLC Quantification

From above results, the free and conjugate phenolics of leaves and roots of Phal. hybrids accounted for high concentration and showed strong antioxidant activity, therefore, they were analyzed by HPLC for identification and quantification of individual phenolics. The HPLC chromatogram of the 15 phenolic standards used in this study is presented in Figure 3.
Of the 15 standard phenolic compounds used, seven compounds including protocatechuic acid (PA), syringic acid (SYA), ferulic acid (FA), sinapic acid (SIA), p-coumaric acid (p-CA), benzoic acid (BA), and ellagic acid (EA) were detected in the free phenolic extracts. PA, SYA, FA, SIA, BA, and EA were found in leaf extracts, while FA, p-CA, and EA were identified in root extracts (Figure 4, Table 3). In all conjugate phenolic extracts, EA was the most common and the leaf extracts of CXQ hybrid contained the highest amount of EA (346.3 µg/g DW).
On the other hand, 11 phenolic compounds including PA, p-HBA, VA, CA, SYA, V, FA, SIA, p-CA, BA, and EA were identified in the conjugate phenolic extracts and they were found mostly in root extracts (Figure 4, Table 4 and Table 5). Among these phenolics, FA, p-CA, and SIA were the predominant in the roots. The highest concentration of FA (432.68 µg/g DW) was detected in the conjugate phenolic leaves extracts of YGL hybrid, while the highest concentration of SIA (2232.81 µg/g DW) and p-CA (767.81 µg/g DW) were detected in the roots extracts of SYV3 and SH hybrids, respectively. It was previously reported that phenolic acids such as ferulic, sinapic, p-coumaric, and ellagic acids possessed strong antioxidant activity [26,27,28]. Ellagic acid has been tested on many biological activities consisting of anti-inflammation, anti-proliferation, anti-angiogenesis, anticarcinogenesis, antimutagenensis, anti-cancer, and antiradical [29].
Phenolic acids are usually found in plants in bound form as esters and glycosides, therefore, alkaline, acidic or enzymatic hydrolysis is needed to release them from its conjugate state [18]. In this study, alkaline hydrolysis with 4 M NaOH at 60 °C was performed to extract conjugated phenolics. The increase of antioxidant activity of the tested extracts after alkaline hydrolysis may be due to the release of bound phenolics from their conjugates [28].

4. Discussion

Orchiaeae is one of the world’s largest families of flowering plants of angiosperms with their diverse shapes, forms, and colors. The potted plants and cut flowers of orchids are marketed and lead to a tremendous production over years [24,30]. Except for important economic value, the search for phytochemicals which may be exploited for herbal drug preparations on commercial orchids has been conducted sporadically [24,31], whilst extensive reports were on medicinal and endangered endemic orchid species [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. The presence of various active compounds including dendrobine, moscatilin, gigantol, denbinobine, nobiline, and dendrophenol in the stems and leaves of the commercial Dendrobium nobile Lind, has greatly increased its medicinal importance [45,46,47]. These compounds were reported to have strong antimutagenic properties, consisting of anti-carcinogenic effects against lung carcinoma, ovary adenocarcinoma, and promyelocytic leukemia [48]. Moin et al., [31] reported the presence of phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, phlobatannins, terpenoids, glycosides, tannins, saponins, and phytosterols in different extracting solvents including petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, methanol, and distilled water of Coelogyne stricta leaf extracts, an ornamentally and medicinally important orchid in Asia. In Dendrobium pandurantum, the presence of steroids, triterpenoids, alkaloids, tannins, phenols, and flavonoids were found [43]. In Cymbidium aloifolium, flavonoids, phenols, quinones, coumarins, saponins, alkaloids, carbonhydrates, tannins, cardiac glycosides, and osalates were found in different parts of the plant (leaves, roots, seeds, and capsule covers) [33]. In other orchid species including Rhynchostylis retusa [41], Eria pseudoclavicaulis [31], Vanda tessellate [39], Monodora tenuifolia [38], Dactylorhiza chuhensis [36], Dendrobium officinale [35], Bauhinia variegate [34], phytochemicals belonging to many chemical classes were identified, including alkaloids, coumarins, tannins, phenols, carbohydrates, terpenoids, steroids, and flavonoids. In Dendrobium ovatum, a threatened medicinal orchid, a bibenzyl compound (stilbene or moscatilin) was identified and quantified [37]. This natural product derived from this orchid species has been known to possess anti-mutagenic and anti-cancer properties [37]. In addition, Maridass et al., [42] screened the phytochemical profile of 61 orchid species in the Tiruneleveli Hills of South India and reported the existence of flavonoids, cyanogenic glycosides, terpenoids, and tannins. Other important phytochemicals were found in orchids such as stilebnoids, anthocyanins, triterpenoids, orchinol, hircinol, cypripedin, bibenzyl derivatives, phenanthrenes, jibantine, ndemin, and loroglossin, in either plant parts or entire plants [49,50,51,52,53,54,55].
The pharmaceutical uses of orchids such as anti-rheumatic, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, anti-carcinogenic, anticonvulsive, diuretic, neutroprotective, relaxation, anti-aging, wound healing, hypoglycemic, antitumor, anti-cancer, antimicrobial, antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-diarrheal, were reported [31,32,36,39,56,57,58]. Number of orchid species have been used as traditional medicines in Asia. Of them, different species of Dendrobium are used in Taiwan, Korea, and Japan for treatments of stomach ache, night sweats, and kidney strengthening. The tuber of Bletilla striata has been used for curing pneumonorrhagia and pneumonophthisis. The medicine prepared from these tubers are useful to treat tuberculosis, hemopysis, gastrisis, and duodenal ulcers, as well as bleeding and cracked skin on the feet and hands. It was reported as medicine for lung consolidation, treatment of pus, boils, abscesses, malignant swellings, ulcers, and breast cancer [54]. The use of orchids as traditional medicine was found in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, America, and Europe [59,60,61]. Other medicinal properties of orchids were reported such as tonic in hysteria, spasm, madness, and epilepsy, treatments of rheumatism, tuberculosis, body ache, eczema, headache and fever, aphrodisiac, and cardiac, respiratory, and nervous disorders [57].
Although many studies on orchids have been conducted so far, and many phytochemicals and pharmaceutical properties were reported, as mentioned above, most of work concentrated on medicinal and endangered orchid species. This study is the initial step to observe those plant parts, especially the roots of the importantly commercial Phal. contained rich antioxidants that should be exploited. This study did not aim to search novel constituents in the Phal. hybrids, but examined the utilization of its plant waste after production of commercial flowers. It was reported in Thailand, where an extensive quantity of orchids is produced, consumed, and exported, the leaf of unused orchid waste has caused environmental concerns [62]. Orchids have played an important role in economy of many countries, but its waste has caused many problems for human health [62,63]. Findings of this study suggest that the quantity of Phal. waste can be reduced when its plant parts can be exploited for medicinal purposes as the roots have been revealed to possess rich antioxidants. Total flavonoids, total phenols, and a number of phenolic acids were detected and quantified in this study, and showed relevance to antioxidant activity which are evidence to examine the potential of using this orchid species as herbal medicines. The next step of searching for novel bioactive compounds in Phal. is required, however it will need further complicated extracting processes and modern analytical instruments to determine the chemical structures of these potent compounds, such as NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance), IR (infrared spectroscopy), LC-MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and GC-MS (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry). It has been estimated that about 400,000 secondary metabolites from plants may exist, but only about 2%–3% of these compounds have been isolated and identified [64]. In higher plants, the bioactive compounds are often in complicated chemical structures, which require laborious isolation and identification and costly in chemical synthesis to develop novel drugs derived from those plants. Therefore, for natural products derived from plants, the synthesis of derivatives from known compounds with simple chemical structures and testing for their novel biological activities is more promising, economic, and efficient for the development of novel pharmaceuticals.

5. Conclusions

This study indicated that the extracts prepared from leaves and roots of six Phal. hybrids contain high amounts of phenolic compounds and exhibit strong antioxidant activities. Ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, and sinapic acid are concentrated largely in the roots in comparison with the leaves. Hence, the root extracts of Phal. orchid hybrids may be used as a potential source of natural antioxidants at a low cost.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Kurousu Orchid Company, Saitama Prefecture, Japan for providing orchid materials.

Author Contributions

Truong Ngoc Minh conceived the idea, conducted the study, wrote the manuscript. Do Tan Khang, Pham Thi Thu Ha, Phung Thi Tuyen, and Luong The Minh assisted review the article after comments. Nguyen Van Quan, Nguyen Phu Toan, La Hoang Anh, and Nguyen Thanh Quan helped in antioxidant activity studies. Tran Dang Xuan and Abdelnaser Abdelghany Elzaawely revised and approved the final submission of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Ao, C.; Li, A.; Elzaawely, A.A.; Xuan, T.D.; Tawata, S. Evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Ficus microcarpa L. fil. extract. Food Control. 2008, 19, 940–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barreira, J.C.M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Pereira, J.A. Antioxidant activities of the extracts from chestnut flower leaf skins and fruit. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Elzaawely, A.A.; Xuan, T.D.; Koyama, H.; Tawata, S. Antioxidant activity and contents of essential oil and phenolic compounds in flowers and seeds of Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.) B.L. Burtt. & R.M. Sm. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1648–1653. [Google Scholar]
  4. Manian, R.; Anusuya, N.; Siddhuraju, P.; Manian, S. The antioxidant activity and free radical scavenging potential of two different solvent extracts of Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntz, Ficus bengalensis L. and Ficus. racemosa L. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Biswas, N.; Balac, P.; Narlakanti, S.K.; Haque, M.D.E.; Mehedi, H.M.D. Identification of phenolic compounds in processed cranberries by HPLC method. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Indrianingsih, A.W.; Tachibana, S.; Dewi, R.T.; Itoh, K. Antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitor activities of natural compounds isolated from Quercus gilva Blume leaves. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Samoticha, J.; Eler, K.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. Traditional elderflower beverages: A rich source of phenolic compounds with high antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1477–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Singh, R.; Kumari, N. Comparative determination of phytochemicals and antioxidant activity from leaf and fruit of Sapindus mukorrossi Gaertn.—A valuable medicinal tree. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2015, 73, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wen, L.; Guo, X.; Liu, R.H.; You, L.; Abbasi, A.M.; Fu, X. Phenolic contents and cellular antioxidant activity of Chinese hawthorn “Crataegus Pinnatifida”. Food Chem. 2015, 186, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Do, Q.D.; Angkawijaya, A.E.; Tran-Nguyen, P.L.; Huynh, L.H.; Soetaredjo, F.E.; Ismadji, S.; Ju, Y.H. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatic. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bursal, E.; Köksal, E. Evaluation of reducing power and radical scavenging activities of water and ethanol extracts from sumac (Rhus coriaria L.). Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 2217–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hsiao, Y.Y.; Pan, Z.J.; Hsu, C.C.; Yang, Y.P.; Hsu, Y.C.; Chuang, Y.C.; Shih, H.H.; Chen, W.H.; Tsai, W.C.; Chen, H.H. Research on orchid biology and biotechnology. Plant. Cell. Phy. 2011, 52, 1467–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ling, L.F.; Subramaniam, S. Biochemical analyses of Phalaenopsis violacea orchid. Asian J. Biochem. 2007, 2, 237–246. [Google Scholar]
  14. Moretti, M.; Cossignani, L.; Messina, F.C.; Dominici, L.; Villarini, M.; Curini, M.; Marcotullio, M.C. Antigenotoxic effect composition and antioxidant activity of Dendrobium speciosum. Food Chem. 2012, 140, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lekawatana, S. Thai Orchid: Current situation. In Proceedings of Taiwan International Orchid Symposium, Tainan, Taiwan, 5 March 2010.
  16. Chien, K.W.; Agrawal, D.C.; Tsay, H.S.; Chang, C.A. Elimination of mixed “Odontoglossum ringspot” and “Cymbidium mosaic” viruses from Phalaenopsis hybrid “V3” through shoot-tip culture and protocorm-like body selection. Crop. Prot. 2015, 67, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C. Application of growth models to evaluate the microenvironmental conditions using tissue culture plantlets of Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian “V3”. Scientia. Hort. 2015, 191, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elzaawely, A.A.; Xuan, T.D.; Tawata, S. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Rumex japonicus HOUTT Aerial parts. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28, 2225–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xuan, T.D.; Tsuzuki, E.; Terao, H.; Matsuo, M.; Khanh, T.D. Correlation between growth inhibitory exhibition and suspected allelochemicals (phenolic compounds) in the extract of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant. Prod. Sci. 2003, 6, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Elzaawely, A.A.; Tawata, S. Antioxidant activity of phenolic rich fraction obtained from Convolvulus arvensis L. leaves grown in Egypt. J. Crop. Sci. 2012, 4, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Djeridane, A.; Yousfi, M.; Nadjemi, B.; Boutassouna, D.; Stocker, P.; Vidal, N. Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Siddhuraju, P.; Becker, K. Studies on antioxidant activities of mucuna seed (Mucuna pruriens var utilis) extract and various non-protein amino/imino acids through in vitro models. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2003, 83, 1517–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Soares, A.A.; Marques de Souza, C.G.; Daniel, F.M.; Ferrari, G.P.; Gomes da Costa, S.M.; Peralta, R.M. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Agaricus brasiliensis (Agaricus blazei Murril) in two stages of maturity. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhattacharyya, P.; Kumaria, S.; Diengdoh, R.; Tandon, P. Genetic stability and phytochemical analysis of the in vitro regenerated plants of Dendrobium nobile Lindl., an endangered medicinal orchid. Meta. Gene. 2014, 2, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wei, Z.; Shiow, Y.W. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5165–5170. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kikuzaki, H.; Hisamoto, M.; Hirose, K.; Akiyama, K.; Taniguchi, H. Antioxidant properties of ferulic acid and its related compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2161–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Han, D.H.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, J.H. Antioxidant and apoptosis-inducing activities of ellagic acid. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 3601–3606. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Siger, A.; Czubinski, J.; Dwiecki, K.; Kachlicki, P.; Nogala-Kalucka, M. Identification and antioxidant activity of sinapic acid derivatives in Brassica napus L. seed meal extracts. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 1130–1138. [Google Scholar]
  29. Khang, D.T.; Dung, T.N.; Elzaawely, A.A.; Xuan, T.D. Phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of germinated legumes. Foods 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tokuhara, K.; Mii, M. Highly-efficient somatic embryogenesis from cell suspension cultures of Phalaenopsis orchids by adjusting carbohydrate sources. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 2003, 39, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moin, S.; Sahaya, B.S.; Servin, P.W.; Chitra, B.D. Bioactive potential of Coelogyne stricta (D.Don) Schltr: An ornamental and medicinally important orchid. J. Phar. Res. 2012, 5, 2191–2196. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rokaya, M.B.; Uprety, Y.; Poudele, R.C.; Timsina, B.; Münzbergová, Z.; Asselind, H.; Tiwari, A.; Shresthac, S.S.; Sigdeli, S.R. Traditional uses of medicinal plants in gastrointestinal disorders in Nepal. J. Ethnophar. 2014, 158, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shubha, J.; Chowdappa, S. Phytochemical analysis and Antibacterial activity of Cymbidium aloifolium L. a medicinal orchid from Western Ghats of Karnataka, India. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Res. Pub. 2016, 2, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  34. Negi, A.; Sharma, N.; Pant, R.; Singh, M.F. Determination of total phenolic content of the stem bark of Bauhinia variegata Linn.; an approach to standardization. Phar. Res. 2013, 7, 16–22. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, B.; Trueman, S.J.; Li, J.; Li, Q.; Fan, H.; Zhang, J. Micropropagation of the endangered medicinal orchid, Dendrobium officinale. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 526–530. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dalara, A.; Guoa, Y.; Esimd, N.; Bengue, A.S.; Konczak, I. Health attributes of an endemic orchid from Eastern Anatolia, Dactylorhiza chuhensis Renz & Taub.—In vitro investigations. J. Herb. Med. 2015, 5, 77–85. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pujari, I.; Shetty, V.; Thomas, A.; Muthusamy, A.; and Babu, V.S. Callus induction and regeneration for moscatilin yield in Dendrobium ovatum, a threatened medicinal orchid. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res. 2015, 3, 6. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ezenwali, M.O.; Njoku, O.U.; Okoli, C.O. Studies on the anti-diarrheal properties of seed extract of Monodora tenuifolia. Int. J. App. Res. Na. Pro. 2010, 2, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bhattacharjee, B.; Islam, T.; Rahman, Z.; Islam, S.M.S. Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical screening of whole plant extracts of Vanda tessellata (Roxb.). W. J. Phar. Phar. Sci. 2014, 4, 72–83. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sahaya, B.S.; Sarmad, M.; Servin, P.W.; Chitra, B.D. Preliminary phytochemical screening, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Eria pseudoclavicaulis Blatt.—An endemic orchid of Western Ghats. Am. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. 2012, 2, 519–525. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bhattacharjee, B.; Islam, S.M.S. Assessment of antibacterial and antifungal activity of the extract of Rhynchostylis retusa blume—A medicinal orchid. W. J. Phar. Phar. Sci. 2015, 4, 74–87. [Google Scholar]
  42. Maridassa, M.; Hussainb, M.I.Z.; Raju, G. Phytochemical survey of orchids in the Tirunelveli hills of South India. Ethnobotanical. Leaflets 2008, 12, 705–712. [Google Scholar]
  43. Johnson, M.; Janakiraman, N. Phytochemical and TLC studies on stem and leaves of the orchid Dendrobium panduratum subsp. villosum Gopalan & AN Henry. Indian J. Nat. Pro. Res. 2013, 4, 250–254. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ramos, P.; Colareda, G.A.; Rosella, M.A.; Debenedetti, S.L.; Spegazzini, E.D.; Consolini, A.E. Phytochemical profile and anti-inflammatory effect of the orchid Catasetum macroglossum. Latin Ame. J. Phar. 2012, 31, 62–67. [Google Scholar]
  45. Miyazawa, M.; Shimamura, H.; Nakamura, S.; Kameoka, H. Antimutagenic activity of gigantol from Dendrobium nobile. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 2849–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Suzuki, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Aoki, K.; Nagase, H.; Nakamura, H.; Yamada, K.; Hirata, Y. Stereochemistry of intermediates in the syntheses of Dendrobium alkaloids. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, W.; Ye, Q.; Tan, X.; Jiang, H.; Li, X.; Chen, K.; Kinghorn, A.D. Three new sesquiterpene glycosides from Dendrobium nobile with immunomodulatory Activity. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 1196–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, K.W.; Wang, H.J.; Murphy, P.A.; Hendrich, S. Soybean isoflavone extract suppresses early but not later promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis by phenobarbital in female rat liver. J. Nut. Can. 1995, 24, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Okamoto, T.; Natsume, M.; Onaka, T.; Uchmaru, F.; Shimizu, M. The structure of dendramine (6-oxydendrobine) and 6-oxydendroxine. The fourth and fifth alkaloid from Dendrobium nobile. Chem. Pha. Bull. 1966, 14, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Williams, C.A. The leaf flavonoids of the orchidaceae. Phytochemistry 1979, 18, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Majumder, P.L.; Sen, R.C. Pendulin, a polyoxygenated phenanthrene derivative from the orchid Cymbidium pendulum. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2432–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Majumder, P.L.; Lahiri, S.; Mukhoti, N. Four stilbenoids from the orchid Agrostophyllum khasiyanum. Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, C.; Liu, Q.; Halaweish, F.; Shao, B.; Ye, Y.; Zhao, W. Copacamphane, picrotoxane, and alloaromadendrane sesquiterpene glycosides and phenolic glycosides from Dendrobium moniliforme. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1140–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhang, J. Dactylorhin B reduces toxic effects of β-amyloid fragment (25–35) on neuron cells and isolated rat brain mitochondria. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs. Arch. Pharmacol. 2006, 374, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Singh, A.; Duggal, S. Medicinal orchids—An overview. Ethnobotanical. Leaflets 2009, 13, 399–412. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ghanaksh, A.; Kaushik, P. Antibacterial effect of Aerides multiflora Roxb: A study in vitro. J. Orchid Soc. India. 1999, 1, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bijaya, P. Medicinal orchids and their uses: Tissue culture a potential alternative for conservation. Afr. J. Plant. Sci. 2013, 7, 448–467. [Google Scholar]
  58. Islam, M.S.; Mehraj, H.; Roni, M.Z.K.; Shimasaki, K.; Uddin, A.F.M.J. Correlation between cane growth and flowering behavior of Dendrobium orchid cultivars. J. Bangladesh Aca. Sci. 2013, 37, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Luo, H.; Lin, S.; Ren, F.; Wu, L.; Chen, L.; Sun, Y. Antioxidant andantimicrobial capacity of Chinese medicinal herb extracts in rawsheep meat. J. Food Protect. 2007, 70, 1440–1445. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bulpitt, C.J. The uses and misuses of orchids in medicine. Q. J. Med. 2005, 98, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wilson, M.F. Medicinal Plant Fact Sheet: Cypripedium: Lady’s Slipper Orchids. Available online: http://www.pollinator.org/Resources/Cypripedium.draft.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2016).
  62. Srivirojana, N.; Theptepa, T.; Punpuing, S.; Guest, P.; Tun, K.; Chankham, O.; Suvansrual, A. Population pressure, utilization of chemicals in agriculture, health outcomes and solid waste management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Solid Waste Management in Southeast Asian Cities, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 5–7 July 2005.
  63. Johnson, M.K.; Alexander, K.E.; Lindquist, N.; Loo, G. A phenolic antioxidant from the freshwater orchid, Habenaria repens. Comp. Biochem. Phys. C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 1998, 122, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Qasem, J.R.; Foy, C.L. Weed allelopathy, its ecological impact and future prospects. J. Crop. Prod. 2001, 4, 43–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 05 00031 g001 1024
Figure 1. Antioxidant activity of the extracts measured by β-carotene bleaching method (a) and their lipid peroxidation inhibition (% LPI) (b). Notes: lf-leaves free phenolics; rf-roots free phenolics; lb-leaves conjugate phenolics; rb-roots conjugate phenolics.
Figure 1. Antioxidant activity of the extracts measured by β-carotene bleaching method (a) and their lipid peroxidation inhibition (% LPI) (b). Notes: lf-leaves free phenolics; rf-roots free phenolics; lb-leaves conjugate phenolics; rb-roots conjugate phenolics.
Antioxidants 05 00031 g001
Antioxidants 05 00031 g002 1024
Figure 2. Total flavonoid contents of Phal. hybrid samples. Notes: l-leaves; r-roots.
Figure 2. Total flavonoid contents of Phal. hybrid samples. Notes: l-leaves; r-roots.
Antioxidants 05 00031 g002
Antioxidants 05 00031 g003 1024
Figure 3. HPLC chromatogram (at 254 nm) of phenolic compounds used as standards. 1 = gallic acid (GA); 2 = protocatechuic acid (PA); 3 = catechol (C); 4 = chlorogenic acid (CHA); 5 = p-hydroxybenzoic acid (p-HBA); 6 = vanillic acid (VA); 7 = caffeic acid (CFA); 8 = syringic acid (SYA); 9 = vanillin (V); 10 = ferulic acid (FA); 11 = sinapic acid (SIA); 12 = p-coumaric acid (p-CA); 13 = benzoic acid (BA); 14 = ellagic acid (EA); 15 = cinnamic acid (CA).
Figure 3. HPLC chromatogram (at 254 nm) of phenolic compounds used as standards. 1 = gallic acid (GA); 2 = protocatechuic acid (PA); 3 = catechol (C); 4 = chlorogenic acid (CHA); 5 = p-hydroxybenzoic acid (p-HBA); 6 = vanillic acid (VA); 7 = caffeic acid (CFA); 8 = syringic acid (SYA); 9 = vanillin (V); 10 = ferulic acid (FA); 11 = sinapic acid (SIA); 12 = p-coumaric acid (p-CA); 13 = benzoic acid (BA); 14 = ellagic acid (EA); 15 = cinnamic acid (CA).
Antioxidants 05 00031 g003
Antioxidants 05 00031 g004 1024
Figure 4. HPLC fingerprints of some samples (at 254 nm).
Figure 4. HPLC fingerprints of some samples (at 254 nm).
Antioxidants 05 00031 g004
Table
Table 1. Names and abbreviations of Phal. hybrids.
Table 1. Names and abbreviations of Phal. hybrids.
NameAbbreviation
Green Field Sweet Valentine “Montclair”GFSV
Sakura HimeSH
Sogo Yukidian “V3”SYV3
Chian Xen QueenCXQ
Fusheng‘s Bridal Dress “Meidarland”FBD
Younghome Golden Leopard “Peachy”YGL
Table
Table 2. DPPH radical scavenging activity in terms of IC50 values and phenolic contents of Phal. hybrid extracts.
Table 2. DPPH radical scavenging activity in terms of IC50 values and phenolic contents of Phal. hybrid extracts.
SampleDPPH IC50 (mg/mL)Phenolics (mg GAE/g DW)
Free FormConjugate FormFree FormConjugate Form
Leaves
GFSV> 40.534 ± 0.004 b1.65 ± 0.06 c,d4.57 ± 0.09 g
SH> 40.494 ± 0.016 c1.98 ± 0.03 b,c6.96 ± 0.10 d
SYV3> 40.430 ± 0.004 d2.29 ± 0.05 b,c5.50 ± 0.12 f
CXQ> 40.435 ± 0.008 d2.97 ± 0.45 b,c8.55 ± 0.02 a
FBD> 40.536 ± 0.000 b1.91 ± 0.12 b,c5.15 ± 0.06 f
YGL> 40.645 ± 0.003 a0.55 ± 0.00 d4.76 ± 0.14 d
Roots
GFSV0.362 ± 0.021 c0.087 ± 0.000 e1.55 ± 0.32 c,d5.87 ± 0.02 e
GFSV0.427 ± 0.008 b0.092 ± 0.000 e2.34 ± 0.08 b,c6.91 ± 0.00 d
SYV30.348 ± 0.001 c0.089 ± 0.000 e3.78 ± 0.44 a7.55 ± 0.10 b
CXQ0.715 ± 0.022 a0.100 ± 0.000 e1.44 ± 0.03 c,d7.14 ± 0.10 c,d
FBD0.364 ± 0.000 c0.098 ± 0.000 e4.01 ± 0.76 a6.91 ± 0.13 d
YGL 0.379 ± 0.010 b,c0.092 ± 0.000 e3.61 ± 0.29 a7.42 ± 0.09 b,c
BHT0.019 ± 0.001-
Values are means of three replications ± SD; Means with the same letter in each column are not significantly different (p < 0.05); -: not detected
Table
Table 3. Phenolic compounds of free form extracts of Phal. hybrids.
Table 3. Phenolic compounds of free form extracts of Phal. hybrids.
SampleContents of Phenolic Compounds (µg/g DW)
PASYAFASIp-CABAEA
Leaves
GFSV133.65 ± 0.08 b-----38.34 ± 1.10 c
SH---274.24 ± 9.85-178.60 ± 2.4940.07 ± 1.89 c
SYV3147.09 ± 0.12 a99.18 ± 0.67----119.21 ± 0.54 b
CXQ------346.30 ± 14.38 a
FBD--216.05 ± 0.19----
YGL------57.16 ± 1.15 c
Roots
GFSV-------
SH------118.20 ± 2.24 b
SYV3----272.00 ± 2.83--
CXQ-------
FBD-------
YGL----236.94 ± 19.62--
ns
Values are means of three replications ± SD (standard deviation); Values with no letter in common in each column are not significantly different (p < 0.05); -: not detected; ns: not significantly different (p < 0.05); PA: protocatechuic acid; SYA: syringic acid; FA: ferulic acid; SIA: sinapic acid; p-CA: p-coumaric acid; BA: benzoic acid; EA: ellagic acid.
Table
Table 4. Phenolic compounds of conjugate extracts of Phal. hybrids base on: PA, p-BHA, VA, CA, SYA, and V.
Table 4. Phenolic compounds of conjugate extracts of Phal. hybrids base on: PA, p-BHA, VA, CA, SYA, and V.
SampleContents of Phenolic Compounds (µg/g DW)
PAp-HBAVACASYAV
Leaves
GFSV-----5.07 ± 1.07 c
SH122.31 ± 0.24 b77.44 ± 0.106.78 ± 1.72 d-93.73 ± 3.47 c-
SYV3------
CXQ--18.93 ± 3.78 d---
FBD------
YGL----104.97 ± 1.04 b,c-
Roots
GFSV-86.50 ± 4.2285.25 ± 19.29 a,b,c-125.54 ± 5.30 a119.15 ± 27.48 b
SH--69.53 ± 0.21 c123.62 ± 23.66--
SYV3------
CXQ--107.24 ± 8.93 a,b-106.18 ± 3.93 b,c113.31 ± 3.13 b
FBD--77.99 ± 1.95 b,c-109.81 ± 2.67 b97.58 ± 7.15 b
YGL184.24 ± 1.24 a-117.84 ± 1.06 a-117.08 ± 1.82 a,b185.23 ± 1.52 a
Values are means of three replications ± SD. Values with no letter in common in each column are not significantly different (p < 0.05); -: not detected; ns: not significantly different (p < 0.05); PA: protocatechuic acid; p-HBA: p-hydroxybenzoic acid; VA: vanillic acid; CA: caffeic acid; SYA: syringic acid; V: vanillin.
Table
Table 5. Phenolic compounds of conjugate extracts of Phal. hybrids base on: FA, SIA, p-CA, BA, and EA.
Table 5. Phenolic compounds of conjugate extracts of Phal. hybrids base on: FA, SIA, p-CA, BA, and EA.
SampleContents of Phenolic Compounds (µg/g DW)
FASIAp-CABAEA
Leaves
GFSV383.63 ± 22.21 a----
SH414.31 ± 17.69 a1141.65 ± 67.00 c--53.80 ± 6.49 a,b
SYV3414.95 ± 12.08 a709.15 ± 15.71 d232.31 ± 9.32 c-31.51 ± 0.21 c
CXQ384.75 ± 6.19 a----
FBD--422.94 ± 70.13 b--
YGL432.68 ± 19.03 a-313.29 ± 28.47 b,c-60.71 ± 7.37 a
Roots
GFSV173.77 ± 4.67 c--340.54 ± 106.00-
SH192.41 ± 3.44b c-767.81 ± 20.67 a-35.01 ± 5.56 b,c
SYV3221.61 ± 3.30b c2232.81 ± 29.71 a288.02 ± 9.31 c242.47 ± 10.6546.99 ± 0.29 a,b,c
CXQ224.14 ± 13.29 b1639.24 ± 42.70 b298.20 ± 11.29 c268.62 ± 41.34-
FBD--289.51 ± 0.64 c139.86 ± 50.6236.23 ± 4.63 b,c
YGL227.80 ± 4.73 b1800.92 ± 39.45 b274.31 ± 2.12 c262.22 ± 13.36-
Values are means of three replications ± SD. Values with no letter in common in each column are not significantly different (p < 0.05); -: not detected; ns: not significantly different (p < 0.05); FA: ferulic acid; SIA: sinapic acid; p-CA: p-coumaric acid; BA: benzoic acid; EA: ellagic acid.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Minh, T.N.; Khang, D.T.; Tuyen, P.T.; Minh, L.T.; Anh, L.H.; Quan, N.V.; Ha, P.T.T.; Quan, N.T.; Toan, N.P.; Elzaawely, A.A.; et al. Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Phalaenopsis Orchid Hybrids. Antioxidants 2016, 5, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox5030031

AMA Style

Minh TN, Khang DT, Tuyen PT, Minh LT, Anh LH, Quan NV, Ha PTT, Quan NT, Toan NP, Elzaawely AA, et al. Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Phalaenopsis Orchid Hybrids. Antioxidants. 2016; 5(3):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox5030031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minh, Truong Ngoc, Do Tan Khang, Phung Thi Tuyen, Luong The Minh, La Hoang Anh, Nguyen Van Quan, Pham Thi Thu Ha, Nguyen Thanh Quan, Nguyen Phu Toan, Abdelnaser Abdelghany Elzaawely, and et al. 2016. "Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Phalaenopsis Orchid Hybrids" Antioxidants 5, no. 3: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox5030031

APA Style

Minh, T. N., Khang, D. T., Tuyen, P. T., Minh, L. T., Anh, L. H., Quan, N. V., Ha, P. T. T., Quan, N. T., Toan, N. P., Elzaawely, A. A., & Xuan, T. D. (2016). Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Phalaenopsis Orchid Hybrids. Antioxidants, 5(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox5030031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop