Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination
Next Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 Prevention Behaviours and Vaccine Acceptability, and Their Association with a Behaviour Change Campaign in Somalia: Analysis of a Longitudinal Cohort
Previous Article in Journal
Neutralizing Antibodies as Predictors of Vaccine Breakthrough Infection in Healthcare Workers Vaccinated with or without a Heterologous Booster Dose: A Cohort Study during the Third COVID-19 Wave in Peru
Previous Article in Special Issue
Global Policy to Reduce the Incidence of Infection Spreading in Non-Vaccinated Healthcare Workers: A Literature Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/vaccines11020449
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in Improving Vaccination Confidence & Addressing Vaccination Disparities to Help Improve Vaccine Uptake: A Systematic Review

by
Uzma Syed
1,
Olivia Kapera
2,3,
Aparajita Chandrasekhar
3,4,
Barbara T. Baylor
5,
Adebola Hassan
6,
Marina Magalhães
7,
Farshid Meidany
8,
Inon Schenker
9,
Sarah E. Messiah
3,4,† and
Alexandra Bhatti
10,*,†
1
South Shore Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine Consultants, Bayshore, NY 11706, USA
2
School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Austin Campus, Austin, TX 78712, USA
3
Center for Pediatric Population Health, UTHealth School of Public Health and Children’s Health System of Texas, Dallas, TX 75027, USA
4
School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas Campus, Dallas, TX 75207, USA
5
Caucus on Public Health and the Faith Community, Atlanta, GA 30331, USA
6
Illinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
7
School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
8
Black Pearl Consulting & Research, Leesburg, VA 20175-3012, USA
9
IMPACT, Jerusalem 9107901, Israel
10
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Senior authors.
Vaccines 2023, 11(2), 449; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020449
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 12 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptance, Trends and Future Prospects for Public Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of vaccination to support individual health across the life-course, with vaccination playing a central strategy role in mitigating transmission and disease. This required unprecedented mobilization and coordination across all sectors to meet people where they are, enable equitable access, and build vaccination confidence. A literature search was conducted with combinations of the keywords and variations of vaccination and faith-based organizations (FBOs). Search inclusion criteria were: (1) FBO programs that supported public health emergency efforts, including vaccination efforts as the primary outcome; and (2) articles written in English language. A total of 37 articles met inclusion criteria (n = 26 focused on general public health campaigns, n = 11 focused on vaccination efforts). The findings related to public health campaigns fell into four themes: FBO’s ability to (1) tailor public health campaigns; (2) mitigate barriers; (3) establish trust; and (4) disseminate and sustain efforts. The findings related to vaccine uptake efforts fell into three themes: (1) pre-pandemic influenza and HPV vaccination efforts, (2) addressing vaccine disparities in minority communities, and (3) enabling COVID-19 vaccination. This review demonstrated that FBOs have a vital role in both public health campaigns and vaccination initiatives to support high vaccine uptake and confidence.

1. Introduction

As of February 2023, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in over 756 million reported cases, over 6.8 million deaths, and has impacted both adults and children around the globe [1]. A silent crisis has emerged as a result of a convergence of factors related to the pandemic; namely the significant decline in routine vaccinations across the life-course, upending decades of progress in achieving and maintaining high vaccination rates. According to World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) data, approximately 25 million children missed some routine vaccinations and close to 17 million children did not receive a single vaccine in 2020 [2]. This results in communities being placed at risk of vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs), outbreaks, and certain cancers associated with VPDs. The US has recently seen the reemergence of VPDs such as measles, 121 cases occurring in 2022, and polio, underscoring the critical need to maintain high vaccination rates to curb further disease [3,4,5]. Furthermore, there is a disparate impact and a slower recovery of VPDs for the most vulnerable and underserved populations, widening pre-pandemic disparities [1,6,7,8,9,10].
Global declines in vaccination coverage rates across the life-course will take years of recovery to return to pre-pandemic levels—and ultimately achieve global and national vaccination targets [10,11]. Projections estimate that for adolescents in the United States, if every provider saw 15% more patients each month, it could take up to seven years to recover certain vaccinations missed during the COVID-19 pandemic [12]. This calls for a comprehensive approach to ensuring vaccination rates not only increase to pre-pandemic levels, but strengthen immunization programs to achieve high vaccine uptake.
As such, the COVID-19 pandemic has compelled communities and immunization programs to generate creative and sustainable solutions to this public health crisis. Often these solutions are deeply embedded in communities, such as faith-based organizations (FBOs). FBOs and faith-based engagement strategies have been the foundation of many previous collective efforts targeting other infectious diseases and public health emergencies [6,7,13]. FBOs are organizations whose philosophies are driven by certain religious beliefs, often including a social or moral component [14]. These entities have been shown to bring people together for positive purposes and can present powerful agents for health and justice [15,16,17,18]. As religion is a social determinant of population health, it functions through the work of social institutions [16]. Therefore, FBOs are key stakeholders in communities; they present a discernible and trusted public face to communities through acts of leadership and capacity for service to others [15,17]. The CDC workbook defines FBOs as “churches, synagogues, mosques, church sponsored service agencies, and all charitable organizations with religious affiliations”—this broad definition can therefore include nonprofit organizations with a religious affiliation or inspiration [18]. FBOs are driven by a desire to provide health care services, combating the growing unmet health care needs in their community [18]. The social capital effects are of importance in communities with minority and low-socioeconomic groups and elsewhere that social and economic resources are limited, such as vaccinations [17].
The public health imperative of going hyperlocal and engaging FBOs and leveraging faith-based engagement is critical as: (1) the pandemic has worsened long-standing vaccination disparities; (2) lower resource regions and countries share a disproportionate burden of low childhood vaccine uptake; (3) public health challenges to global childhood routine vaccination uptake remain. Yet, there is no synthesis of the current literature on this timely topic. Therefore, we present here the latest summary of evidence on the overall role of FBOs in public health efforts and the role of FBOs in vaccination efforts and vaccine disparities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

PRISMA guidelines were used as the search framework (Figure 1). A comprehensive search was completed via PUBMED, Web of Science, Science Direct, and COCHRANE. Combinations of the keywords ‘vaccination’ or ‘immunization’, ‘COVID-19 vaccine’, ‘childhood vaccination’ or ‘routine vaccination’ and ‘faith-based organization’ or ‘faith-based’ were used as search terms. The publication dates of interest were limited to 1 January 2002 through 31 December 2021. The search was run across all databases during January–March 2022. See Supplementary Materials Figure S1 for PRISMA Diagram and additional details regarding the search strategy; Table S1 for sample of quality assessment tool for systematic reviews and meta-analyses by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Table S2 for sample of quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies by the Na-tional Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Table S3 for sample of quality assessment tool for controlled intervention studies by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and Table S4 and sample of quality assessment tool for case series studies by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

2.2. Study Selection

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) FBO programs that supported public health emergency efforts, including vaccination efforts, both routine and COVID-19, as the primary outcome; and (2) articles written in English language.
Literature was excluded: (1) stand-alone abstracts; (2) unpublished articles. Duplicates were manually identified and excluded.
For the context of the study, FBOs were defined as entities associated with or inspired by religion or religious beliefs. Public health campaigns were understood to be an effort to motivate a defined public to participate in behaviors that will improve health or withhold from behaviors that are identified as unhealthy.

2.3. Data Extraction

Studies were selected based on a theoretical framework of FBOs and public health interventions (Figure 2) [15,16,17,18,19]. The theoretical framework proposes FBOs are able to enact public health interventions through four themes: (1) tailor public health campaigns, (2) ability to manage barriers and challenges, (3) dissemination and sustainability, and (4) establishing a community of trust (Table 1). Similarly, we examined the role of FBOs in vaccine uptake specific efforts through three themes: (1) pre-pandemic influenza and HPV vaccination uptake efforts, (2) addressing vaccine disparities in ethnic minority communities, and (3) addressing recent COVID-19 vaccination efforts (Table 2). The themes listed were developed by identifying the overarching goal of each study and subsequently grouping them based on corresponding goals.
Studies were stratified by (1) any FBOs efforts to improve public health interventions (Table 1); (2) FBOs efforts to improve vaccine uptake in general (Table 2); and (3) FBOs efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake (also Table 2).
The papers were also organized according to: origin of data collection, purpose, research design, target population, inclusion criteria, summary points, and key points. This helped to map the overall landscape of the literature.
Data extraction was completed by 2 reviewers (O.K. and A.C.). There were no discrepancies between reviewers in terms of data extracted or choice of articles meriting inclusion.
The study did not collect any primary data. The risk of bias in individual studies was analyzed using the Study Quality Assessment Tools developed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [20]. The strength of studies was evaluated based on criteria published by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) [21].

3. Results

A total of 37 articles were included in the analysis (Figure 1) [6,7,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. Results were categorized as “public health interventions”, where interventions were related to addressing public health needs across various topics including mental health and physical activity, then “vaccination interventions” which are those focused specifically on supporting vaccine uptake. Results are presented below in order of those based on public health interventions first, then further refined to those focused on vaccination interventions.

3.1. Summary of the Role of Faith-Based Organizations in Public Health Interventions

Table 1 summarizes the articles (n = 26) that were deemed relevant or directly related to FBOs and public health interventions. Of the 26 articles, 14 of the studies were conducted in the United States. The findings in context to public health campaigns and efforts in general are summarized in four themes based on the theoretical framework (Figure 2): FBO’s ability to (1) tailor public health campaigns, (2) ability to manage barriers and challenges, (3) dissemination and sustainability, and (4) establishing a community of trust.

3.1.1. Theme 1: Tailored Public Health Campaigns

Leyva et al. [22] concluded that public health campaigns are not one-size-fits-all for FBOs, and there is a need for tailored strategies to enhance community engagement. Due to the involvement in its members’ lives, FBOs can address individual concerns in addition to personalizing the public health campaign, as found in Wasser et al. [23] For utilizing the sense of community within FBOs, Wilson et al. [24] developed a framework for FBOs to create culturally appropriate public health campaigns. Similarly, Blankinship et al. [25] performed a narrative review on faith-based wellness programs in Latino and African American populations and determined FBOs provide culturally appropriate messaging and create community support and self-efficacy, which aid in public health campaigns. Similarly, Sobers et al. [26] showcased FBOs’ use of social support to implement evidence-based self-management intervention for hypertension. Ackerman Gulaid and Kiragu [27] provide ten recommendations for community engagement that highlight the need to actively identify and build on a community’s efforts.

3.1.2. Theme 2: Ability to Manage Barriers and Challenges

The ability to remove barriers that limit access to care for their members is another attribute of the application of FBOs for public health campaigns. In a retrospective chart review of Hispanic farmworker women in Central Florida, Luque et al. [28] found that FBOs aided in the removal of obstacles that prevent uninsured and low-income populations from receiving and accessing care. Tristão Parra et al. [29] reviewed the use of physical activity interventions delivered by FBOs and concluded FBOs create an environment that encourages physical activity and, therefore, can address health disparities. Similarly, in a review of Asian American FBOs in New York City and New Jersey, Kwon et al. [30] determined that FBOs support public health initiatives that give people who have disproportionately poor health outcomes, access to health promotion programs.
Other studies have shown that FBOs provide their members with various coping strategies to address mental health barriers such as prayer, scripture, social support groups, religious services, and aid from religious leaders, showing a potential opportunity for other health-related dialogue such as vaccination. Rayes et al. [31] performed qualitative interviews on Arabic-speaking refugee populations from Muslim majority countries resettling in Europe. The study found that participants with a stronger devotion to faith were more likely to use faith-based coping mechanisms when handling challenges and seeking mental health services. Similarly, Schieffler and Genig [32], after conducting a mini-narrative review on orthodox church members, found that FBOs play a significant role for its people regarding mental health burdens to heal “both soul and body”.

3.1.3. Theme 3: Establishing a Community of Trust

One of the essential aspects of FBOs involvement in public health campaigns is the capability to create a community of trust. Bopp et al. [33] emphasized FBO leaders’ role in distributing health promotion interventions. Members entrust their leaders to shape their spiritual, physical, emotional, and social environments. In a narrative review, Maynard [33] concluded FBOs are a central component in neighborhoods, and participation in a faith community persists in many communities.
FBOs play a crucial role in the daily life of African American faith communities. As explored in Francis and Liverpool [35], the adoption of the public health campaigns by faith community leaders influences the adoption in African American communities. Lancaster et al. [36] performed a systematic review on African American FBOs and concluded FBOs could effectively promote health interventions and behaviors in their communities due to the significance of faith to many African Americans.
By creating a community of trust, FBOs provide an ecosystem of aid. FBOs coordinate and collaborate with health professionals, stakeholders, community members, and social groups. Vitillo et al. [37] concluded from their review of the role and contributions of FBOs, private sectors, and philanthropic partners that joint engagement is required to achieve community success. In a review of the relationship between government and FBOs, Brooks and Koenig [19] found partnerships between government and FBOs may create an environment with the most significant health benefit that could not be accomplished solely. Pfefferbaum et al. [38] found partnerships in public health interventions produce the most significant positive impact.

3.1.4. Theme 4: Dissemination and Sustainability

As explored in a mixed-methods study by Grieve and Oliver [39], FBOs are a recognized, valued stakeholder in society, allowing them to collaborate among those in the public sector and various community members. These partnerships allow for an increase in the public health campaign’s awareness, longevity, and effect. Bopp and Fallon [40] concluded that partnering with FBOs for public health campaigns presents several advantages and prospects for reaching specific populations. Kaczynski et al. [41] performed a group-randomized trial in which they found FBOs can encourage diverse health outcomes. Additionally, Johnston et al. [42] concluded health outcomes could be improved through public health interventions by FBOs.
For a public health campaign to be sustainable, there needs to be buy-in from community members, policymakers, and other relevant decision makers and stakeholders. With FBOs being a trusted source, FBOs can engage members interested in public health campaigns, as seen by Morad et al. [43], which found involvement of FBOs in public health campaigns engages community participation. Sheikhi et al. [7] concluded FBOs provide avenues for partnership with stakeholders and collaboration with healthcare providers, especially mental health professionals. Tadesse Gebremedhin et al. [44] found that committed leadership by policymakers and “buy-in” from crucial stakeholders allows for the involvement of community members at different levels. In a systematic review, DeHaven et al. [45] provided recommendations for FBOs to increase their effectiveness by encouraging partnerships between FBOs and health professionals to evaluate public health interventions, disseminate findings, and focus on fostering relationships with racially and ethnically diverse populations.

3.2. Summary of the Role of Faith-Based Organizations in Vaccination Interventions

Table 2 provides a summary of the role of FBOs in vaccine uptake specific efforts. It must be noted, however, that the literature on vaccination efforts related to COVID-19 vaccines is limited, given that the vaccine has only recently become available for children. In general, the 11 included papers [6,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55] focused on three main themes: (1) pre-pandemic influenza and HPV vaccine uptake efforts, (2) addressing vaccine disparities in ethnic minority communities, and (3) supporting recent COVID-19 vaccination efforts.

3.2.1. Theme 1: Pre-Pandemic Influenza and HPV Vaccine Uptake Efforts

Zimmerman et al. [46] conducted a pre-post study to assess whether interventions tailored to individual practice sites increased influenza vaccination rates among high-risk children at inner-city health centers over two years. The authors found that FBOs saw the highest rates of vaccination compared to other practices and were associated with the highest rates of children obtaining the influenza vaccine. Similarly, Bond et al. [47] showed that FBOs in New York are uniquely equipped with resources to deliver health promotion programs to community members versus academic and governmental organizations, which resulted in high retention rates.
Kiser and Lovelace [48] assessed a national (US) collaboration between the Interhealth Health Program (IPH) at Emory University, the Department of Health and Human Services Partnership Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials to prevent the spread of 2009 H1N1 and seasonal influenza by leveraging community organizations (FBOs being one of them). The authors found that forming national partnerships is critical in mobilizing local community resources and organizations such as FBOs to improve vaccination efforts among underserved populations.
Regarding HPV vaccine uptake efforts, Lahjiani et al. [49] conducted a qualitative case study in the US to understand community perceptions of the HPV vaccination among both leaders and members of an African Methodist Episcopal (AME) church in Atlanta, Georgia. This study made use of a Social and Behavior Change Communication framework in order to increase the promotion of the HPV vaccination in the future. Focusing on findings related to church leaders, this church-based intervention found that leaders were amenable to (1) having more trust in the healthcare system and (2) viewing the HPV vaccine in a less stigmatized manner, instead promoting uptake of the vaccine among church community members. The authors stated that mistrust in the healthcare system by intervention participants was likely due to unethical treatment of study participants in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Conducting this study was important as HPV prevention within this specific church community has never been done before. As a result, this study serves as an important step for leaders of this church community to mobilize and promote the uptake of the HPV vaccine within the AME community. Similarly, Olagoke et al. [50] conducted a cross-sectional study in the US to assess the associations between three domains of religiosity (organizational, non-organizational, and intrinsic) and the intention to obtain HPV information and receive the HPV vaccine. This study found a positive association between the organization domain and the intention to seek HPV information. However, it was also found that information-seeking may not lead to vaccination. This study underscored the importance of engaging FBOs and empowering them to provide parents with accurate information regarding HPV vaccination to increase HPV vaccination rates.

3.2.2. Theme 2: Addressing Vaccine Disparities in Ethnic Minority Communities

Daniels et al. [51] conducted a randomized controlled trial in the US to examine (1) whether church-based vaccine education increased adult utilization of vaccinations in ethnic/minority communities, and (2) if churchgoers who are offered vaccinations in churches have higher vaccination utilization rates compared to non-churchgoers. The target population for this study was African American and Latino adults aged 65 and older living in San Francisco, California. This study showed the value of FBOs in decreasing the disparities in vaccination rates among racial/ethnic communities.
Santibañez et al. [6] discussed how CDC-FBOs collaborations played a key role in the response to pandemic influenza (2009). This vaccination effort focused on ethnic minority communities in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. The Minnesota Immunization Networking Initiative (MINI) conducted vaccination clinics at places of worship (Churches, a Hindu Temple, mosques, a Buddhist monastery) and provided free influenza vaccinations. The collaboration of MINI with different FBOs helped address barriers to influenza vaccinations (access, mistrust, transportation) among underserved groups.

3.2.3. Theme 3: Supporting Recent COVID-19 Vaccination Efforts

Monson et al. [52] conducted a narrative review that showed how medical-religious partnerships are practical and valuable in mitigating the impact of COVID-19-related disparities in the US (e.g., using FBOs as COVID-19 testing sites and as potential COVID-19 vaccine sites). Dascalu et al. [53] conducted a case study in Romania to discuss the contributions of the Romanian Orthodox Church (ROC) in mitigating the impact of COVID-19; vaccination efforts being one. This study found that the ROC advocated against misinformation regarding both COVID-19 in general as well as the national vaccine campaign.
Rachmawati et al. [54] conducted a qualitative case study in Indonesia to assess the strengths of Indonesia’s two largest Islamic FBOs and the challenges faced while conducting activities to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 nationally. The target population for this study were informants (the heads of the special units of both FBOs, government officials, etc.). An important finding of this study was that the Central Board of one of the FBOs provided support for COVID-19 vaccination implementation. Overall, the collaboration of FBOs with the government aid in mobilizing resources to help reduce the impact of COVID-19 in communities across Indonesia.
In contrast to the ten studies summarized above, it is important to note that Rujis et al. [55] conducted a qualitative study (grounded theory) in the Netherlands to determine the role of Protestant religious leaders in promoting acceptance or refusal of vaccination by members of the church. This study showed that the role of Protestant religious leaders in influencing the acceptance or refusal of vaccination was split into three subgroups—(1) those who do not recognize the need to address vaccination as congregation members already accept it, (2) those who focus on giving congregation members the choice, and (3) those who preach against vaccination. All three subgroups believe vaccination in the Netherlands should continue to be voluntary. Additionally, pastors are unwilling to promote vaccination on behalf of the authorities. Thus, this shows that using FBOs to promote vaccination in the Netherlands may not be effective because Protestant religious leaders are unwilling to promote vaccination and there is a low level of religiosity in the general population.

4. Discussion

This timely systematic review summarizes the opportunities for FBOs, built on key themes, to drive public health policy and action to support public health vaccine uptake efforts. Despite the recognized value of FBOs, they remain under-utilized in supporting routine vaccination, resulting in somewhat limited published studies on effectiveness for discreet areas of public health concern, such as vaccination uptake. However, FBOs have played a robust role in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US and globally [56,57]. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical importance of going hyper-local to engage community-based organizations such as FBOs to increase vaccine confidence, allay vaccine concerns, and ultimately drive vaccination uptake. As such we also provide promising strategies that are being leveraged now to support COVID-19 vaccination. For instance, the All Dulles Areas Muslim Society (ADAMS) Compassionate Healthcare Network in Virginia is run by an interfaith team and is committed to providing community members with access to the COVID-19 vaccine [58].
Additionally, Faiths4Vaccines is a highly active group of religious leaders from across the United States which was established during the COVID-19 pandemic to promote vaccine equity. The organization is led by religions and medical leaders and has brought together over 1000 faith leaders across diverse communities in the United States to promote vaccine access and equity. They held 13 bi-weekly roundtables to support a knowledge-exchange for best practices, led by those who have utilized their house of worship as a vaccination site. Faiths4Vaccines had regular engagement with the White House Office on Faith based and Neighborhood Partnerships, the White House COVID-19 Task Force, the Center for Disease Control and Health and Human Services, as part of these bi-weekly calls.
Faiths4Vaccines convened the largest interreligious National Summit in the United States focused on vaccine access and uptake. The Summit connected over 800 registered local and national faith groups, medical professionals, and government officials to identify opportunities for faith leaders and institutions to identify mechanisms and collaboration opportunities to advance equitable vaccine acceptance and uptake. In addition, youth for faith initiative was established in June 2021, which consisted of a roundtable discussion showcasing how youths of faith are leading in their communities within the COVID-19 vaccination efforts. An interfaith clinic vaccination site was established in Washington D.C. The clinic hosted at the mosque was part of Washington, D.C.’s “Faith in the Vaccine Initiative”, which has administered more than 4600 vaccines since February 2021. Lastly, as demonstrated by the evidence and promising findings in this review, partnering with FBOs is particularly critical to engage traditionally underserved, marginalized, and hard-to-reach populations, which can help address health and specifically vaccination disparities that have only widened during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Similarly, the Jerusalem Impact Vaccination Initiative convened leaders of the Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze, and Bahá’í Faiths of the Holy Land in November 2021, to develop an action plan on improving vaccination coverage and community resilience. Through the President of the State of Israel, this initiative widened its scope to similar dialogues in Germany and Switzerland.
This review found that previous public health efforts that partnered with FBOs fell into four general themes. All of these themes are critically important in the context of barriers to vaccine uptake barriers. While there is a strong evidence base to support the benefits of receiving routine vaccinations across the life-course, there is an equally strong literature base documenting disparities in the acceptance and uptake of vaccines among individuals from racial and ethnic minority populations [59,60].
Vaccine hesitancy had steadily increased in the United States prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and has been amplified further during the pandemic [61]. Vaccine hesitancy is described as one’s confidence in the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, complacency towards vaccine uptake/completion, and convenience in accessing the vaccine. The reasons for hesitancy are varied, but many include the following; (1) concerns about perceived safety, (2) skepticism about the trustworthiness of the source(s) of vaccination recommendations, (3) exposure to misinformation and disinformation, (4) immunization considered a low priority, (5) perceived low risk of illness, (6) limited knowledge and health literacy about the disease, (7) difficulty accessing services, (8) clinician bias, (9) cost, or (10) personal, cultural or religious beliefs discouraging vaccination [62,63]. According to a 2019 national survey conducted by the American Academy of Pediatrics, >1 in 4 parents reported hesitancy about influenza vaccinations [11]. Only 1 in 4 parents believed the influenza vaccine was effective and 1 in 8 parents had concerns about the safety of both influenza and other childhood vaccines.
Studies have further documented a pattern of racial and ethnic minority persons being less likely to receive the influenza vaccination, with socioeconomic and clinician/health care system factors as main predictors of poor uptake. Research on HPV vaccine uptake shows a similar pattern of racial and ethnic minority persons being less likely to initiate or complete the series [64]. A survey conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute conducted in March 2021 found that 36% of Black Protestants and 33% of Hispanic Americans who are vaccine hesitant say one or more faith-based approaches would make them more likely to get vaccinated [13].
The COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated global vaccine uptake disparities that require innovative public health strategies. Utilizing a multipronged approach to enhance vaccination rates with both strategic and creative approaches can aid in advancing science. Indeed, effective measures and trusted resources, such as FBOs, are essential to addressing and reducing misinformation, building community trust, and promoting widespread vaccine dissemination, population level uptake, and adherence to vaccination protocols. Upstream factors (e.g., interpersonal, community, health system, policy), relevant cultural and historical factors associated with individual beliefs, risk perceptions, and behavior across multiple levels (e.g., individual, community, etc.) must all be considered. Importantly, policy guidance is needed to address misinformation, distrust, and hesitancy regarding the uptake of vaccines (e.g., COVID-19, pneumococcal, influenza, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus (HPV)), especially in populations at increased risk for morbidity and mortality due to long-standing systemic health and social inequities and chronic medical conditions.
Notably, we also found that the majority of research exploring the role of FBOs and faith-based engagement, occurred in the US (14 of 26), other countries examined came up singularly: Barbados, Israel, Indonesia, Romania, Germany, Ethiopia, Ghana, Southeast Asia, broadly. Given the disproportionate volume of research focused on efforts in the US, comparing findings across countries based on available evidence is challenging. However, consistently, while the value of FBOs and faith-based engagement is identified particularly in supporting underserved and traditionally marginalized populations, most studies underscored the importance of coordination with ongoing vaccination efforts so as to not undermine or duplicated efforts, but rather enhance and build upon them. No discernable differences were identified between how FBOs are engaged across countries included in the studies that were captured in this review, with the exception of Rujis et al. [56] which focused on the role of Protestant religious leaders in the Netherlands, which found that in this case, engaging Protestant religious leaders to support vaccination efforts may be ineffective as leaders were unwilling to promote vaccination, and there was a low level of religiosity in the general population. This provides important insights moving forward in that the potential impact of FBOs and faith-based engagement in supporting vaccination efforts may be determinant on the local level faith-community’s buy-in and willingness to engage on this issue as well as the level of religiosity in the community.
It is important to acknowledge the limitations in this review. First, the intersection between faith-based organizations and vaccination is complex and multifaceted, spanning the breadth of vaccine education, vaccine hesitancy, health equity, vaccine programming for communities of faith, the role of faith-based organizations in supporting vaccine efforts in communities beyond their own, and others. Moreover, improving vaccination rates in and of itself is a complex subject, with limited generalizability across different contexts (ex. emergency response; primary care; domestic vs. global settings) and unique challenges with uptake of specific vaccinations among different target populations (ex. MMR vs. HPV vs. COVID-19 vaccine). Lastly, the focus on FBOs is, at times, in danger of glossing over racial/ethnic inequalities in health, when the intersection of religion and race/ethnicity is important to consider in explicit detail.
This review did identify important gaps in the literature. First, the importance of the role of FBOs in vaccination efforts among pediatric populations has received little attention in the literature. Additionally, there is a lack of evidence and outcome-based research on the role of FBOs in vaccination uptake efforts, particularly in assessing the effectiveness of health programs, community participation, and project continuation. Similarly, the narrow field of literature is dominated by studies of pandemic and non-pandemic influenza vaccination in the US. Therefore, there is a lack of understanding of how FBOs affect the implementation of programs in various settings and policy contexts. Future research should also further examine any differences or commonalities in the role of FBO and faith-based engagement across high income and low- and middle-income countries.
In summary, the global scale of disruptions to routine vaccination due to the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the risk of potential VPDs outbreaks in the future and the urgent need for “catch-up vaccination strategy implementation for vulnerable populations and ensuring vaccine coverage equity and health system resilience” [65]. FBOs can and should be a part of this solution based on their solid track record of previous partnerships that have led to public health successes.

5. Conclusions

This review found that generally FBOs play a vital role in global vaccination efforts, represent significant potential for effective public health and vaccination campaigns, and can help improve vaccination efforts, particularly within traditionally underserved populations. Based on the literature, it is recommended that FBOs be positioned to build trust with communities, activate existing networks, draw on expertise, involve community partners, and resolve conflict. As trusted members of communities, FBOs allow public health interventions to be modified so that individuals are receptive to the messaging. With an established relationship of trust, individuals will be inclined to participate in the vaccination campaigns introduced by their FBOs. Vaccination and policy stakeholders should explore engaging with, enabling, and resourcing FBOs in implementing local vaccination programs and practices to achieve and maintain high vaccination coverage rates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines11020449/s1, Figure S1: PRISMA Diagram Showing Selection of Articles, Table S1: Sample of quality assessment tool for systematic reviews and meta-analyses by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) for Sheikhi et al. Table S2: Sample of quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) for Olagoke et al. Table S3: Sample of quality assessment tool for controlled intervention studies by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) for Daniels et al. Table S4: Sample of quality assessment tool for case series studies by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) for Dascalu et al.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., A.C., A.H., B.T.B., I.S., F.M., M.M., O.K., S.E.M. and U.S.; methodology, A.B., A.C., O.K. and S.E.M.; formal analysis, A.C.; O.K. and S.E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B., A.C., O.K. and S.E.M.; writing—review and editing, A.B., A.C., A.H., B.T.B., I.S., F.M., M.M., O.K. and S.E.M.; supervision, A.B. and S.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Alexandra Bhatti is a current employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and holds equity interest in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Inon Schenker is CEO of Impact Vaccination, a consultancy firm pre-qualified by COVAX for vaccination capacity-building, Jerusalem, Israel.

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2022. Available online: https://covid19.who.int (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  2. World Health Organization. COVID-19 Pandemic Fuels Largest Continued Backslide in Vaccinations in Three Decades. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/15-07-2022-covid-19-pandemic-fuels-largest-continued-backslide-in-vaccinations-in-three-decades (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  3. Link-Gelles, R. Public health response to a case of paralytic poliomyelitis in an unvaccinated person and detection of poliovirus in wastewater—New York, June–August 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles Cases and Outbreaks. 2022. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  5. Maricopa County. Three Measles Cases Confirmed in Maricopa County. 2022. Available online: https://www.maricopa.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=2567 (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  6. Santibañez, S.; Davis, M.; Avchen, R.N. CDC engagement with community and faith-based organizations in public health emergencies. AJPH Am. J. Public Heal. 2019, 109, S274–S276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sheikhi, R.A.; Seyedin, H.; Qanizadeh, G.; Jahangiri, K. Role of religious institutions in disaster risk management: A systematic review. Disaster Med. Public Heal. Prep. 2020, 15, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. Immunization and Conflict. 2022. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/immunization/immunization-and-conflict (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  9. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Global Forced Displacement. 2022. Available online: https://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  10. Shet, A.; Carr, K.; Danovaro-Holliday, M.C.; Sodha, S.V.; Prosperi, C.; Wunderlich, J.; Wonodi, C.; Reynolds, H.W.; Mirza, I.; Gacic-Dobo, M.; et al. Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on routine immunization services: Evidence of disruption and recovery from 170 countries and territories. Lancet Glob. Health 2022, 10, e186–e194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kempe, A.; Saville, A.W.; Albertin, C.; Zimet, G.; Breck, A.; Helmkamp, L.; Vangala, S.; Dickinson, L.M.; Rand, C.; Humiston, S.; et al. Parental hesitancy about routine childhood and influenza vaccinations: A national survey. Pediatrics 2020, 146, e20193852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saxena, K.; Marden, J.R.; Carias, C.; Bhatti, A.; Patterson-Lomba, O.; Gomez-Lievano, A.; Yao, L.; Chen, Y.T. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent vaccinations: Projected time to reverse deficits in routine adolescent vaccination in the United States. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2021, 37, 2077–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Public Religion Research Institute. Faith-Based approaches can positively impact COVID-19 vaccination efforts: Religion Identities and the race against the virus. 2022. Available online: https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/PRRI-IFYC-Apr-2021-Vaccine-D.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  14. Bielefeld, W.; Cleveland, W.S. Defining faith-based organizations and understanding them through research. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2013, 42, 442–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Morabia, A. Faith-based organizations and public health: Another facet of the public health dialogue. Am. J. Public Health 2019, 109, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Idler, E.L. (Ed.) Religion as a Social Determinant of Public Health; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Idler, E.; Levin, J.; VanderWeele, T.J.; Khan, A. Partnerships between public health agencies and faith communities. Am. J. Public Health 2019, 109, 346–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Public Health Workbook to Define, Locate and Reach Special, Vulnerable, and At-Risk Populations in an Emergency; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.
  19. Brooks, R.G.; Koenig, H.G. Crossing the secular divide: Government and faith-based organizations as partners in health. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 2002, 32, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools. 2022. Available online: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  21. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. “The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available online: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  22. Leyva, B.; Allen, J.D.; Ospino, H.; Tom, L.S.; Negrón, R.; Buesa, R.; Torres, M.I. Enhancing capacity among faith-based organizations to implement evidence-based cancer control programs: A community-engaged approach. Transl. Behav. Med. 2017, 7, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wasser, W.G.; Boner, G.; Koslowsky, M.; Lazar, A. Emergence of an Israel faith-based community organization facilitating live donor kidney transplantation. BMC Nephrol. 2018, 19, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wilson, D.S.; Dapic, V.; Sultan, D.H.; August, E.M.; Green, B.L.; Roetzheim, R.; Rivers, B. Establishing the infrastructure to conduct comparative effectiveness research toward the elimination of disparities: A community-based participatory research framework. Heal. Promot. Pr. 2013, 14, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Blankinship, L.A.; Rouse, W.A.; Bernstein, J.; Kruk, J.; Aboul-Enein, B.H. A narrative review of ethnic minority studies for faith-based health promotion interventions with special reference to the contemporary christian nurse. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 1375–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sobers, N.P.; Hambleton, I.R.; Hassan, S.; Anderson, S.G.; Brathwaite-Graham, L.; Lewis, K.; Ferguson, T.S. Assessing the effectiveness and implementation of a chronic disease self-management programme in faith-based organisations in Barbados: Protocol for a cluster randomised parallel trial. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e050548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ackerman Gulaid, L.; Kiragu, K. Lessons learnt from promising practices in community engagement for the elimination of new HIV infections in children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive: Summary of a desk review. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2012, 15 (Suppl. S2), 17390. [Google Scholar]
  28. Luque, J.S.; Tyson, D.M.; Markossian, T.; Lee, J.-H.; Turner, R.; Proctor, S.; Menard, J.; Meade, C.D. Increasing cervical cancer screening in a Hispanic migrant farmworker community through faith-based clinical outreach. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis. 2011, 15, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tristão Parra, M.; Porfírio, G.J.M.; Arredondo, E.M.; Atallah, Á.N. Physical activity interventions in faith-based organizations: A Systematic review. Am. J. Health Promot. 2018, 32, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kwon, S.; Patel, S.; Choy, C.; Zanowiak, J.; Rideout, C.; Yi, S.; Wyatt, L.; Taher, M.D.; Garcia-Dia, M.; Kim, S.; et al. Implementing health promotion activities using community-engaged approaches in Asian American faith-based organizations in New York City and New Jersey. Transl. Behav. Med. 2017, 7, 444–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rayes, D.; Karnouk, C.; Churbaji, D.; Walther, L.; Bajbouj, M. Faith-based coping among arabic-speaking refugees seeking mental health services in Berlin, Germany: An exploratory qualitative study. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 595979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schieffler, D.A., Jr.; Genig, J. The orthodox church and the mental health burden of a pandemic: A narrative mini-review. J. Relig. Heal. 2021, 60, 3209–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bopp, M.; Baruth, M.; Peterson, J.A.; Webb, B.L. Leading their flocks to health? Clergy health and the role of clergy in faith-based health promotion interventions. Fam. Community Heal. 2013, 36, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Maynard, M.J. Faith-based institutions as venues for obesity prevention. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2017, 6, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Francis, S.A.; Liverpool, J. A review of faith-based HIV prevention programs. J. Relig. Heal. 2008, 48, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lancaster, K.J.; Carter-Edwards, L.; Grilo, S.; Shen, C.; Schoenthaler, A.M. Obesity interventions in African American faith-based organizations: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2014, 15 (Suppl. S4), 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vitillo, R.J.; Merico, F.; Levine, A.S.; Buonocore, T. A comprehensive response: The role of nonstate actors in the global plan. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2017, 75 (Suppl. S1), S99–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pfefferbaum, R.L.; Jacobs, A.K.; Noffsinger, M.A.; Pfefferbaum, B.; Sherrieb, K.; Norris, F.H. The burden of disaster: Part II. applying interventions across the child’s social ecology. Int. J. Emerg. Ment. Health 2012, 14, 175–187. [Google Scholar]
  39. Grieve, A.; Olivier, J. Towards universal health coverage: A mixed-method study mapping the development of the faith-based non-profit sector in the Ghanaian health system. Int. J. Equity Health 2018, 17, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bopp, M.; Fallon, E. Community-based interventions to promote increased physical activity: A primer. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 2008, 6, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaczynski, A.T.; Jake-Schoffman, D.E.; Peters, N.A.; Dunn, C.G.; Wilcox, S.; Forthofer, M. Development and testing of the church environment audit tool. Am. J. Health Behav. 2018, 42, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Johnston, J.A.; Konda, K.; Ablah, E. Building capacity among laity: A faith-based health ministry initiative. J. Relig. Health 2018, 57, 1276–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Morad, Z.; Choong, H.L.; Tungsanga, K.; Suhardjono, A. Funding renal replacement therapy in southeast Asia: Building public-private partnerships in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2015, 65, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tadesse Gebremedhin, L.; Giorgis, T.W.; Gerba, H. Policies, delivery models, and lessons learned from integrating mental health and substance abuse services into primary health care in Ethiopia. FASEB Bioadv. 2021, 3, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. DeHaven, M.J.; Hunter, I.B.; Wilder, L.; Walton, J.W.; Berry, J. Health programs in faith-based organizations: Are they effective? Am. J. Public Health 2004, 94, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zimmerman, R.K.; Hoberman, A.; Nowalk, M.P.; Lin, C.J.; Greenberg, D.P.; Weinberg, S.T.; Ko, F.S.; Fox, D.E. Improving influenza vaccination rates of high-risk inner-city children over 2 intervention years. Ann. Fam. Med. 2006, 4, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bond, K.T.; Jones, K.; Ompad, D.C.; Vlahov, D. Resources and interest among faith based organizations for influenza vaccination programs. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2013, 15, 758–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kiser, M.; Lovelace, K. A national network of public health and faith-based organizations to increase influenza prevention among hard-to-reach populations. Am. J. Public Health 2019, 109, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lahijani, A.Y.; King, A.R.; Gullatte, M.M.; Hennink, M.; Bednarczyk, R.A. HPV vaccine promotion: The church as an agent of change. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021, 268, 113375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Olagoke, A.A.; Floyd, B.; Caskey, R.; Hebert-Beirne, J.; Boyd, A.D.; Molina, Y. Disentangling the role of religiosity in human papillomavirus vaccination amidst COVID-19 pandemic. J. Relig. Health 2022, 61, 1734–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Daniels, N.A.; Juarbe, T.; Moreno-John, G.; Pérez-Stable, E.J. Effectiveness of adult vaccination programs in faith-based organizations. Ethn. Dis. 2007, 17, S1. [Google Scholar]
  52. Monson, K.; Oluyinka, M.; Negro, D.; Hughes, N.; Maydan, D.; Iqbal, S.; Golden, S.H.; Teague, P.; Hale, W.D.; Galiatsatos, P. Congregational COVID-19 conversations: Utilization of medical-religious partnerships during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 2353–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dascalu, S.; Flammer, P.G.; Ghafari, M.; Henson, S.C.; Nascimento, R.; Bonsall, M.B. Engaging religious institutions and faith-based communities in public health initiatives: A case study of the Romanian Orthodox Church during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rachmawati, E.; Umniyatun, Y.; Rosyidi, M.; Nurmansyah, M.I. The roles of islamic faith-based organizations on countermeasures against the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ruijs, W.L.M.; Hautvast, J.L.A.; Kerrar, S.; van der Velden, K.; Hulscher, M.E.J.L. The role of religious leaders in promoting acceptance of vaccination within a minority group: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Brunson, E.; Schoch-Spana, M.; Carnes, M.; Hosangadi, D.; Long, R.; Ravi, S. Carrying Equity in COVID-19 Vaccination Forward: Guidance Informed by Communities of Color; Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Baltimore: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wiley, Z.; Khalil, L.; Lewis, K.; Lee, M.; Leary, M.; Cantos, V.D.; Ofotokun, I.; Rouphael, N.; Rebolledo, P.A. A framework for inspiring COVID-19 vaccine confidence in African American and latino communities. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Adams Compassionate Healthcare Network. Adams Compassionate Healthcare Network. 2022. Available online: https://achnhealth.org (accessed on 11 February 2022).
  59. Walsh, B.; Doherty, E.; O’Neill, C. Since the start of the vaccines for children program, uptake has increased, and most disparities have decreased. Health Aff. 2016, 35, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu Disparities among Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups. 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/spotlights/2020-2021/racial-ethnic-disparities-severe-flu-outcomes.htm (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  61. Larson, H.J.; Gakidou, E.; Murray, C.J.L. The vaccine-hesitant moment. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lazarus, J.V.; Wyka, K.; White, T.M.; Picchio, C.A.; Rabin, K.; Ratzan, S.C.; Leigh, J.P.; Hu, J.; El-Mohandes, A. Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Amit, A.M.L.; Pepito, V.C.F.; Sumpaico-Tanchanco, L.; Dayrit, M.M. COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines. PLOS Glob. Public Health 2022, 2, e0000165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Agénor, M.; Pérez, A.E.; Peitzmeier, S.M.; Borrero, S. Racial/ethnic disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination initiation and completion among U.S. women in the post-Affordable Care Act era. Ethn. Health 2020, 25, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Falope, O.; Nyaku, M.K.; O’Rourke, C.; Hermany, L.V.; Plavchak, B.; Mauskopf, J.; Hartley, L.; Kruk, M.E. Resilience learning from the COVID-19 pandemic and its relevance for routine immunization programs. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2022, 21, 1621–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vaccines 11 00449 g001 550
Figure 1. Method flow-chart.
Figure 1. Method flow-chart.
Vaccines 11 00449 g001
Vaccines 11 00449 g002 550
Figure 2. Theoretical Framework of the Role of Faith-Based Organization.
Figure 2. Theoretical Framework of the Role of Faith-Based Organization.
Vaccines 11 00449 g002
Table
Table 1. Summary of Published Studies Focused on the Role of Faith Based Organizations in Public Health Campaigns and Efforts.
Table 1. Summary of Published Studies Focused on the Role of Faith Based Organizations in Public Health Campaigns and Efforts.
AuthorsOriginPurposeResearch DesignTarget PopulationInclusion CriteriaSummary of FindingsKey Points
Theme 1: Tailored Public Health Campaigns
Sobers (2021)BarbadosEvaluate the effect of an online chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP) plus medication adherence tools on systolic blood pressure (SBP) (primary aim) and seek to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementation of this modified CDSMP in faith-based organizations (FBOs) (secondary aim)Unblinded cluster randomized trialAttendees of faith-based organizationsPersons ages 35–70 years; a previous diagnosis of hypertension or currently on antihypertensive therapy and the occurrence of two or more blood pressure readings above 130 mm Hg (systolic) or 80 mm Hg (diastolic) on the day of recruitment; persons not known to have hypertension but who have two or more blood pressure readings at or above 130 mm Hg (systolic) or 80 mm Hg (diastolic) on two recruitment days at least 1 week apartThe study leverages the social support mechanisms existing within faith-based organizations (FBOs) to disseminate an evidence-based self-management intervention for hypertension. Findings on factors impacting implementation should be transferable to other small island developing states/territories with close-knit vibrant FBOs. Engagement of FBOs is likely to under-represent men, as FBO membership in our trial sites consist of more than 70% women.FBOs are able to interact with the community to deliver an evidenced-based intervention that has been modified for cultural relevance and to emphasize medication adherence
Blankinship (2021)USAInvestigates the outcomes of faith-based wellness programs on Latino and African American populations with respect to general health and wellness, obesity management, DM type 2, and hypertensionNarrative reviewFaith-based wellness programs in Latino and African American population Perceived authority of faith community nurses, faith leaders, and accountability and encouragement provided by faith communities are critical. Long-term behavior change is positively affected by elements faith-based organizations can provide cultural appropriateness, community support, and self-efficacyFaith-based organizations can provide cultural appropriateness, community support, and self-efficacy which can aid in health messaging and acquiring healthy behaviors
Wasser (2018)IsraelEvaluate live kidney donations facilitated by the Matnat Chaim organization and referred to Israel transplant centers, since the organization’s inception in 2009, was performed and compared to published data from the Israel Ministry of HealthRetrospective reviewLive donor transplants in IsraelIndividuals referred by Matnat Chaim organization for kidney transplantation after the establishment of the organization in February 2009 until December 2016The success of an Israel community organization in the promotion of kidney transplantation may serve
as a model for other religious and non-religious communities worldwide		Faith-based community organizations help their community members by personalizing processes and addressing individual’s concerns
Leyva (2017)USAExplore the role of faith-based organizations (FBOs) in extending the reach of EBIs to promote cancer control among ethnic minority groups, such as LatinosQualitative interviewsFaith-based organizationsCommunity stakeholders with diverse and complementary expertise in capacity building, FBOs, community partnerships, and leadership within Catholic parishes, and who had affiliations with Latino-serving community organizationsCapacity building intervention may be needed to facilitate adoption and implementation of cancer control EBI in parish settings. Notable barriers exist, including lack of knowledge of existing EBIs as well as limited financial resources and paid outreach personnelThere is a need for tailored strategies rather than a one size fits all approach for capacity enhancement of local parishes
Wilson (2013)USA (FL)A comparative effectiveness trial supporting the IDM process and systematic literature reviews to add to CERED’s goal of providing evidence to eliminate cancer health disparitiesEffectiveness trial and literature reviewBlack men in the Tampa Bay areaSelf-identification as African American, never having been diagnosed with prostate cancer, and being between
the age of 40 and 70 years		The project provides a potential framework for the development of culturally appropriate activities and resources to improve IDM for prostate cancer screening among Black menUtilization of community health workers who are trained to work on multiple levels to enhance knowledge and awareness, increase interpersonal communication, and support organizational involvement and engagement
Ackerman Gulaid (2012) Summarizes the results of a review commissioned by UNAIDS to help inform stakeholders on promising practices in community engagement to accelerate progress towards these ambitious goalsLiterature review and key informant interviews Ten recommendations on community engagement are offered for ending vertical transmission and enhancing the health of mothers and families: (1) expand the frontline health workforce, (2) increase engagement with community- and faith based organizations, (3) engage communities in program monitoring and accountability, (4) promote community-driven social and behavior change communication including grassroots campaigns and dialogues, (5) expand peer support, (6) empower communities to address program barriers, (7) support community activism for political commitment, (8) share tools for community engagement, (9) develop better indicators for community involvement and (10) conduct cost analyses of various community engagement strategiesAs programs expand, care should be taken to support and not to undermine work that communities are already doing, but rather to actively identify and build on such efforts. There should be sustained engagement and unique inputs of various communities, from small informal groups at the grassroots level right up to global coalitions.
Theme 2: Ability to Manage Barriers and Challenges
Rayes (2021)GermanyExplore the manifestation of faith-based coping strategies among Arabic-speaking refugee adults seeking mental healthcare services in Berlin, Germany and explore how favorable faith-based coping strategies can be optimized from a mental health service-delivery and broader integration perspectiveQualitative interviewsArabic-speaking refugee populations from Muslim majority countries resettling in EuropeArabic-speaking refugee adults seeking mental health services at the Charité Universitaetsmedizin in BerlinParticipants’ dynamic relationship with their faith following their arrival to Germany played a direct role in how faith-based coping methods were or were not utilized when experiencing mental health symptomsFaith and faith practices play a significant role in the mental health and integration of people into society
Schieffler (2021)USAIdentify ways in which other faith-based organizations have studied mental health in their own communitiesNarrative mini reviewOrthodox Church membersArticles that addressed aspects of immigrant and minority groups which closely resembles the experience of Orthodox Christians in the USA given the ethnic preferences and insularity of many parishesThere are resources available for Church Leadership if that leadership takes the time to explore those options. Given similarities that exist between minority and immigrant-based faith-based populations and Orthodox communities, a planning framework is suggested to improve an Orthodox response post-pandemicThrough local partnerships and internal organizations, faith-based organizations can play a sizable and dramatic role in the recovery of its people from the mental health burden of recent events
Tristão Parra (2018)USAReview and assess the effectiveness of physical activity interventions delivered in faith-based organizations Members of faith-based organizationsRandomized and nonrandomized controlled trials investigating physical activity interventions for adults delivered in faith-based organizationsInterventions delivered in faith-based organizations increased physical activity and positively influenced measures of health and fitness in participantsFaith-based organizations are promising settings to promote physical activity, consequently addressing health disparities
Kwon (2017)USAPresent baseline results and describes the cultural adaptation and implementation process of the REACH FAR program
across diverse FBOs and religious denominations serving Asian American subgroups		ReviewAsian American faith-based organizations in New York City and New Jersey Most Asian American FBOs lack nutrition policies and present prime opportunities for evidence-based multi-level interventions. REACH FAR presents a promising health promotion implementation program that may result in significant community reachFaith-based health promotion initiatives can provide access to people who disproportionately experience poor health outcomes and are not reached by mainstream
traditional health care channels
Luque (2011)USA (FL)Describe clinical outcomes of an outreach partnership between a cancer center and a faith-based outreach clinic offering gynecologic screening services to increase cervical cancer screening adherence in primarily Hispanic farmworker
women		Retrospective chart reviewHispanic farmworker women in central FloridaWomen who received cervical cancer screening in well-women care at CMMS from January 2003 to October 2006The partnership between academic medical centers and faith-based community was successful in increasing cervical cancer screening adherence in the medically underserved populationFaith-based clinical outreaches aid in the removal of barriers that prevent uninsured and low-income populations from receiving and accessing care
Theme 3: Public Health Intervention Dissemination and Sustainability
Tadesse Gebremedhin (2021)EthiopiaExamine the policies, delivery models, and Lessons learned from Ethiopia’s experience in integrating MH/SA services into primary care through participant observation and literature reviewLiterature review and participant observation Mental Health and Substance Abuse tasks are performed by multiple levels of health providers who receive training and periodic refresher training. These tasks are covered at each level of health sector, local, district, and national. Basic MH/SA services are therefore available to the public at large, no matter where in the country they live and what type of health facility or provider is closest.The importance of committed leadership by policymakers, “buy-in” by critical stakeholders, and calibrated integration of services enable task-sharing across different levels health-care providers, and provision of adequate supervision and mentorship to trainees to ensure proper acquisition of skills for delivery of quality care. Program monitoring and the mobilization
of adequate financial and human resources are essential factors to ensure quality and sustainability of primary health care
Sheikhi (2020) Investigate the role of religious institutions in disasters managementSystematic review The papers from a broad range of disciplines related to keywordsReligious institutions contribute to response and recovery phases of disasters, although these services are valuable, but the great potential of these groups should also be recruited to participate in preparedness and mitigation efforts as part of disasters cycle. Coordination and collaboration of all stakeholders is essential in this wayReligious institution provides avenues for partnership with stakeholders, help collaborate and communicate with mental health professionals, display a unity front for information and messages, deal with disaster in old and new approaches, and assist with barriers and challenges
Johnston (2018)USADescribe the processes utilized to design and implement an initiative to increase capacity for laity-led comprehensive health ministry among Kansas United Methodist Church congregations and to share the key elements of the initiativeReviewLaity-led health ministry teams Health outcomes can be improved though faith-based health interventions
Grieve (2018)GhanaGeospatial mapping of the Ghanian FBNP health sector to provide a visual representation of changes in the spatial footprintMixed-methods studyFBNP in Ghana FBNPs have had a long-standing role in the provision of health services and remain an asset within national health systems in Ghana and sub-Saharan Africa more broadly. Collaboration between the public sector and such non-state providers, drawing on the comparative strengths and resources of FBNPs and focusing on whole system strengthening, is essential for the achievement of UHCResilient health system is more likely to be achieved if a whole systems perspective is taken, that is inclusive of and capitalizes on the strengths and resources that continue to be offered by FBNPs and other NSPs in many LMICs
Kaczynski (2018)USATo describe development and reliability testing of a novel tool to evaluate the physical environment of faith-based settings pertaining to opportunities for physical activity (PA) and healthy eating (HE)Group-randomized trialChurches in a rural and medically underserved community, with a larger population of Black/African American residents relative to the state as a wholeChurches located in the target county, had a membership of at least 20 individuals, and were willing to be randomized to either early or delayed trainingThe tool proved reliable and efficient for assessing church environments and identifying potential intervention points Through faith-based partnerships, the church environments influence diverse health outcomes
Morad (2015)Southeast AsiaReview of the experience of selected countries in Southeast Asia, where such support, especially from philanthropic organizations, has enhanced the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)ReviewPhilanthropic organizations in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia Public-private collaboration in funding of RRT may enable more patients to be treated. Involvement of private organizations in treating ESRD also may engage community participation, promote volunteerism and caring attitudes among the populace, and serve as an avenue for creating awareness of CKD among the communityImplementation of policies that acknowledge and support private contributions, as well as liberal implementation of health care laws, encourages voluntary organizations to participate in the provision of healthcare.
Bopp (2008) Present practical aspects of intervention planning, implementation and evaluation within common community settings There is a need for process evaluation of intervention implementation to provide valuable information for the dissemination and sustainability of successful interventionsPartnering with community settings (schools, worksites, faith-based organizations and healthcare organizations) offers many benefits and the opportunity to reach specific populations
DeHaven (2004)USAExamine published literature on health programs in faith-based organizations to determine the effectiveness of these programsSystematic literature reviewFaith-based organizations Recommendations for FBOs to contribute to community health include increase collaboration between FBOs and health professionals for the purpose of evaluating health activities and disseminating findings, place more emphasis on effectiveness studies as opposed to efficacy studies, devote more attention to building relationships with the racially and ethnically diverse populations that increasingly characterize communities in the United StatesFaith-based programs can improve health outcomes
Theme 4: Establishing a Community of Trust
Maynard (2017) Critique the scope and value of recent studies with a focus on obesity-related health promotion in faith organizationsNarrative reviewFaith-based organizations, particularly those with African American population Faith organizations show promise as settings for obesity prevention among high-risk groups, particularly African AmericansFaith organizations are neighborhood focal points and attendance at places of worship remains important for a range of communities
Vitillo (2017) Highlight the role and contributions of select faith-based organizations and some private sector and philanthropic partners, as well as the work of other organizationsReviewNonstate players and organizations, faith-based organizations, and private sector and philanthropic partners Lessons learned from the Global Plan in harnessing the strengths of nonstate partners are the ones that should be replicated, enhanced, and taken to scaleJoint engagement and action from state and nonstate players, under the leadership of governments is needed to achieve success within the community
Lancaster (2014)USAExamine whether using deep structure concepts to increase the salience of health messages in faith-based interventions facilitated changes in weight and related behaviorsSystematic reviewAfrican American faith-based organizationsStudies in which the intervention was faith based (incorporating faith-related activities and themes) or faith-placed (taking place in a faith setting), where at least 90% of study participants identified as African American/ BlackInterventions in African American FBOs can successfully improve weight and related behaviorsFaith-based organizations are effective venues for delivering health messages and promoting adoption of healthy behaviors due to the importance of faith to many African Americans
Bopp (2013)USAExamine current issues associated with the health, behaviors, and well-being of clergy, highlight the literature on the role clergy play in delivering effective health promotion interventions, and present recommendations for improving clergy health and the involvement of clergy in faith-based initiativesReviewMembers of faith-based organizations Faith-based organizations are led by clergy members who have a strong influence over their institutions and who shape the physical and social environments of their institutions for health-related matters
Pfefferbaum (2012) Describes the application of disaster mental health interventions within the context of the child’s social ecology consisting of the Micro-, Meso-, Exo-, and Macrosystems In designing services and programs to address both disaster-related trauma and the hardships that disasters create for those in their aftermath, practitioners, providers, and policymakersshould consider the means through which families, peers, teachers and other adults, schools, social programs, services, policy, and other communal systems can assist in minimizing
primary and secondary adversities		Individuals, programs, and systems work together through intervention efforts to generate the greatest positive impact. Some of these efforts will emerge naturally within the child’s social ecology. Others may need to be supported by public policies that seek to complement and enrich existing systems
Francis (2009) Review the empirical literature on faith-based HIV prevention programs among African American populationsLiterature reviewAfrican American faith communities Several successful faith-based/public health collaborations are identified, and the limitations and strengths of faith-based prevention programs are discussed. Recommendations are provided for developing effective faith-based/public health collaborationsAfrican Americans have close ties to the church and faith-based organizations
Brooks (2002)USAExplore the relationship between government and faith-based organizations in the opportunities and challenges that are associated with change in this area of health care policyReviewGovernment and faith-based organizations There is a need for further partnering between government and faith-based organizations, within well-defined limits, to maximize the availability of health care education and services throughout this nationPartnership between government and faith-based organizations could synthesize the best of both worlds and result in a greater health benefit for the nation than either could accomplish alone
Table
Table 2. Summary of Published Studies Focused on the Role of Faith Based Organizations (FBOs) in Vaccination Efforts.
Table 2. Summary of Published Studies Focused on the Role of Faith Based Organizations (FBOs) in Vaccination Efforts.
AuthorsOriginPurposeResearch DesignTarget PopulationInclusion CriteriaSummary PointsKey Points
Theme 1: Pre-Pandemic Influenza and HPV Vaccination Uptake Efforts
Kiser &
Lovelace
(2019)		USATo assess a national collaboration between the Interhealth Health Program (IHP) at Emory University, the Department of Health and Human Services Partnership Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials to prevent the spread of 2009 H1N1 and seasonal influenza by leveraging community organizations (FBOs being one of them)N/A—no research design was used to execute this vaccination effort10 sites across the US (was not able to access the table that includes the names of the sites) to serve hard-to-reach vulnerable populations. 5 of the sites were led by faith-based health systemsSee previous column The majority of the faith-based sites conducted vaccination efforts in some capacity—either provided people with vaccinations or conducted immunization education and outreach The formation of national partnerships is critical in mobilizing local, community resources and organizations such as FBOs to increase vaccination efforts among underserved populations
Bond et al.
(2013) 		USATo gauge interest and the capacity of FBOs in medically underserved areas in New York City (NYC) to address health problems among congregation members, focusing on influenza vaccinationsTelephone surveyFBOs in Harlem, the South Bronx, and Central BrooklynSee previous column The majority of FBOs showed interest in being an influenza vaccination site FBOs are equipped with resources that other organizations (academic and government) do not use to deliver health promotion programs to the community. FBO member retention rates are often high because they often have an established connection to the FBO. Thus, making FBOs an effective means of improving community health
Zimmerman et al.
(2006)		USATo assess if interventions tailored to individuals practice sites increased rates of influenza immunization among high-risk children at inner-city health centers of a 2-year period Pre-postChildren aged 2–17 years with high-risk medical conditions
(1)
Child aged 2–17 years
(2)
Have a high-risk medical condition
(3)
Be an active patient of the practice (i.e., within the last year)
Faith-based practices saw the highest rates of vaccination and were also associated with the highest likelihood of getting vaccinated.The use of faith-based health centers was effective in increasing rates of influenza vaccination among high-risk children living in the inner-city
Chebli et al.
(2022)		USAEngage Mexican and Arab communities in Brooklyn to determine various determinants of HPV vaccine uptake Community-based participatory researchMexican and Arab parents in Brooklyn, NYMexican or Arab heritage, living in Brooklyn, NYIncreasing HPV vaccination rates in Mexican and Arab communities in Brooklyn, NY emphasizes the need for a multilevel, culturally and linguistically relevant programImportance of utilizing and leveraging assets in the community—including faith-based leaders
Olagoke et al.
(2022) 		USAAssess the associations between 3 domains of religiosity (organizational, non-organizational, and intrinsic) and the intention to obtain HPV information and receive the HPV vaccineCross-sectionalChristian parents across the USAParents must be:
(1) Over 18 years at recruitment;
(2) Parent/guardian of at least 1 child 11–17 who has never received the HPV vaccine;
(3) Christian;
(4) Live in the USA		Study findings showed a positive association between the organizational domain and the intention to seek HPV information. Information-seeking may not lead to vaccination, however Importance of engaging FBOs and empowering them to provide parents with accurate information regarding HPV vaccination in order to increase HPV vaccination rates
Theme 2: Value of Addressing Vaccine Disparities in Ethnic Minority Communities
Santibañez et al.
(2019) 		USADiscusses how the collaboration of the CDC with FBOs played a key role in the response to pandemic influenza (2009), Ebola (2014), and Zika (2016).
Note: vaccination efforts will be made in reference to pandemic influenza (2009)		N/A—no research design was used to execute this vaccination effortAfrican American, African-born, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic/Latino, and American Indian communities in the Minneapolis-St. Paul areaSee previous columnThe Minnesota Immunization Networking Initiative (MINI) conducted vaccination clinics at various places of worship—churches, a Hindu Temple, mosques, a Buddhist monastery, etc., and provided free influenza vaccinations The collaboration of MINI with various FBOs to provide underserved communities with influenza vaccinations helped address barriers to vaccination (access, mistrust, transportation, etc.)
Daniels et al.
(2007)		USA To examine (1) whether church-based vaccine education increases adult utilization of vaccinations in ethnic/minority communities and (2) if churchgoers who are offered vaccinations in churches have higher vaccination utilization rates compared to non-churchgoersRandomized Controlled TrialAfrican American and Latino adults aged 65 and older in the Bay Area (San Francisco, CA, USA)(1) Previously unvaccinated with pneumococcal vaccine
(2) Not regularly receiving influeza vaccine
(3) 65 years or older or clinical indication for vaccination (various chronic diseases)		The intervention showed that vaccinations provided by FBOs increased vaccination rates among racial/ethnic groups. Additionally, the provision of onsite vaccinations at FBOs increased vaccination rates compared to programs that focus only on educationFBOs may play an important in decreasing the disparities in vaccination rates among racial/ethnic communities.
Theme 3: Addressing Recent COVID-19 Vaccination Efforts
Rachmawati
Umniyatun
Rosyidi
Nurmansyah
(2022)		IndonesiaTo assess the strengths of Indonesia’s two largest Islamic faith-based organizations (FBOs) and the challenges faced while conducting activities to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 in Indonesia Qualitative Case Study Informants—the heads of the special units of both FBOs, government officials, the FBOs’ charity business managers, and community members who benefitted from the FBOs’ effortsHave knowledge and experience to contribute to study objectives
(various informants)		Indonesia’s two largest Islamic FBOs have strengths such as their organizational structure to target the grassroots and are able to support the programs of other organizations that engage in primary and secondary prevention efforts to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. Importantly, the Central Board of one of the FBOs provided support for COVID-19 vaccination implementationThe collaboration of FBOs with the government aids in the mobilization of resources to help reduce the impact of COVID-19.
Monson et al.
(2021) 		USAAn academic hospital to engage FBOs through meetings to communicate information about the COVID-19 pandemic and the role they can play in mitigating the impact of the pandemic on communitiesNarrative reviewFBOs in Baltimore City and the Maryland area
(other states such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and New York also participated)		No specific inclusion criteria—findings were based on participating FBOsThe meetings with FBOs included COVID-19 related themes on how the FBOs can communicate public health messaging, serving as a COVID-19 testing site, and as potential COVID-19 vaccine sitesMedical-religious partnerships are practical and valuable in playing an important role in minimizing the impact of COVID-19 related disparities.
Dascalu et al.
(2021)		Romania To discuss the contributions of the Romanian Orthodox Church (ROC) in mitigating the impact of COVID-19; vaccination efforts being one Case study Followers of the ROC See previous columnThe ROC actively advocated against misinformation regarding COVID-19 in general and the national vaccine campaign FBOs, as a result of partnering with governmental agencies may play a key role in mitigating COVID-19 outcomes by advocating for the national vaccine campaign
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Syed, U.; Kapera, O.; Chandrasekhar, A.; Baylor, B.T.; Hassan, A.; Magalhães, M.; Meidany, F.; Schenker, I.; Messiah, S.E.; Bhatti, A. The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in Improving Vaccination Confidence & Addressing Vaccination Disparities to Help Improve Vaccine Uptake: A Systematic Review. Vaccines 2023, 11, 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020449

AMA Style

Syed U, Kapera O, Chandrasekhar A, Baylor BT, Hassan A, Magalhães M, Meidany F, Schenker I, Messiah SE, Bhatti A. The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in Improving Vaccination Confidence & Addressing Vaccination Disparities to Help Improve Vaccine Uptake: A Systematic Review. Vaccines. 2023; 11(2):449. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020449

Chicago/Turabian Style

Syed, Uzma, Olivia Kapera, Aparajita Chandrasekhar, Barbara T. Baylor, Adebola Hassan, Marina Magalhães, Farshid Meidany, Inon Schenker, Sarah E. Messiah, and Alexandra Bhatti. 2023. "The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in Improving Vaccination Confidence & Addressing Vaccination Disparities to Help Improve Vaccine Uptake: A Systematic Review" Vaccines 11, no. 2: 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020449

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop