Next Article in Journal
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: From Occupational Health to Emergency Medicine
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of EVAR on International Ruptured AAA Mortality—Sex and Geographic Disparities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/jcm13092465
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biologics and Non-Biologics Immunosuppressive Treatments for IgA Nephropathy in Both Adults and Children

by
Decimo Silvio Chiarenza
,
Enrico Eugenio Verrina
,
Edoardo La Porta
,
Gianluca Caridi
,
Gian Marco Ghiggeri
,
Gabriele Mortari
,
Francesca Lugani
,
Andrea Angeletti
* and
Carolina Bigatti
Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2465; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092465
Submission received: 14 March 2024 / Revised: 14 April 2024 / Accepted: 16 April 2024 / Published: 23 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Immunoglobulin A nephropathy represents the most prevalent cause of glomerulonephritis worldwide and may lead to renal failure in a relevant number of cases in both paediatric and adult subjects. Although their pathogenesis is still largely unclear, evidence of immune abnormalities provides the background for the use of immunosuppressive drugs, such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and antiproliferative and alkylating agents. Unfortunately, these treatments fail to achieve a sustained remission in a significant percentage of affected patients and are burdened by significant toxicities. Recent developments of new biologics, including anti-BAFF/APRIL inhibitors and molecules targeting complement components, offered the opportunity to selectively target immune cell subsets or activation pathways, leading to more effective and safer hypothesis-driven treatments. However, studies testing new biologic agents in IgAN should also consider paediatric populations to address the unique needs of children and close the therapeutic gap between adult and paediatric care.

1. Introduction

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) represents the most prevalent cause of glomerulonephritis worldwide, leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in approximately 20–30% of cases within 25 years after presentation [1,2], and is worsened by the risk of recurrence after kidney transplant in 15–25% of cases [3].
Isolated gross or microhematuria represent the hallmark signs of IgAN. Proteinuria may be present in around half of cases, usually in the non-nephrotic range (<3 g/day), while the development of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN), characterized by the rapid reduction in renal function, is reported to be 2–4% in both adult and paediatric subjects [4,5,6].
The diagnosis of IgAN is based on kidney biopsy, typically showing the expansion and/or proliferation of glomerular mesangium with a dominant or co-dominant mesangial IgA staining [7].
The pathogenesis of IgAN has yet to be completely elucidated and the so-called “4-hit hypothesis” stands as the most widely accepted theory: the cornerstone of the hypothesis is represented by the galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) production (hit-1) that acts as an antigen for the development of autoantibodies (hit-2). As a consequence, circulating immune complexes composed of Gd-IgA1-autoantibodies (hit-3) deposit in the mesangium (hit-4) [8].
In the last decade, the gut-mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), reported to initiate local IgA immune release, was suggested to play a key role in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Several factors, such as the environment, the diet, the microbiome, and genetic predisposition, may affect MALT and contribute to the release of Gd-IgA1 [9]. The type of cells that secrete Gd-IgA1 has yet to be completely clarified, with new data pointing at B cells. Therefore, in last decade, the development of biologic drugs targeting the B-cells’ compartment and components of the complement cascade has been proposed for the treatment of IgAN [10,11].
However, despite a better understanding of the pathogenesis, no specific target therapy has been validated and corticosteroids (CS) still represent the cornerstone of treatment in several adult cases. Of relevance, specific guidelines for the treatment of IgAN recurrence after kidney transplant and IgAN in children are largely missing [12,13].
Therefore, alternative, more selective, and safer therapeutic options are urgently needed. The possible immunosuppressive treatments in IgAN will be the focus of the present review.

2. Non-Biologics Treatments

2.1. Corticosteroids

According to the KDIGO guidelines [2] the administration of CS is suggested when proteinuria persists >1 g/day despite optimal supportive care treatment for a minimum of 3 months: dietary sodium restriction, smoking cessation, weight control, and therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). More recently, new non-immunosuppressive treatments have been proposed as a supportive therapy with the aim of reducing proteinuria and preventing the decrease in renal function that also occurs in IgAN. In more detail, dapaglifozin, a sodium–glucose cotrasporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor in DAPA-CKD RCT, reduced the risk of CKD progression with an optimal safety profile [14]. On the other hand, sparsentan, a dual endothelin-A receptor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist [15], was compared with irbesartan in a multicenter, double-blind RCT (PROTECT study) [16] and was found to be more efficient in reducing proteinuria and preserving kidney function at 110 weeks’ follow-up.
CS administration is mainly based on previous studies supporting the efficacy of CS in IgAN. In 1999, Pozzi et al. [17] presented a multicenter RCT where 86 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN were randomly assigned to supportive care therapy or to CS (intravenous methylprednisolone 1 g/day for 3 consecutive days at 1, 3, and 5 months, plus oral prednisone at 0.5 mg/kg on alternate days for 6 months. The main results showed that steroid treatment reduced the risk of a decline in kidney function at 5 and 10 years of follow-up [17,18].
Manno et al. [19], in an RCT including 97 biopsy-proven IgAN patients, reported that the combination of CS and ramipril versus ramipril significantly reduced proteinuria and the risk of a renal function decrease at 2 years of follow-up.
More recently, the TESTING trial, a multicenter, double-blind RCT investigating 503 patients, compared placebo with daily methylprednisolone at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg for two months, followed by dose tapering by 4 mg per day for a month. The administration of methylprednisolone correlated with a reduced decline in kidney function at 4 years of follow up [20].
On the other hand, STOP IgAN RCT, which enrolled 162 patients, reported a significant reduction in proteinuria in the CS group compared to the supportive care group (ACEi or ARB), but a similar decline in kidney function [21]. These contrasting results may be justified, at least in part, by the different baseline characteristics of patients among different studies and by the different treatment protocols.
Therefore, based on previous studies and on the KDIGO guidelines, CS should be considered in persistent proteinuria despite optimal supportive therapy, but should be administered with great caution in patients with diabetes, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, obesity, latent infections (such as viral hepatitis), or severe osteoporosis; in these patients, CS seems to only offer very short-term benefits.
In childhood, the efficacy of CS is mostly supported by Japanese studies. In a retrospective study, Yata et al. investigated long-term outcomes (interval between disease onset and end-stage renal disease) in Japanese children and young adults with IgAN who were either receiving CS or not. The study cohort was further divided into two groups based on the year of diagnosis: 1976–1989 and1990–2004. Authors reported an increased improvement in renal survival in patients diagnosed in the period 1990–2004. These results may be partly justified by the development of ACEi in the 1990s [22].
In two different RCT studies enrolling 78 and 80 children with IgAN, prednisolone was found to be effective in preventing declines in renal function [23,24].
Overall, the administration of CS in IgAN, both in adults and paediatrics, should be considered in persistent proteinuria despite optimal supportive therapy. On the other hand, CS only demonstrated short-term benefits when administered in patients with the previously mentioned comorbidities, which are more common in adults (Table 1).

2.2. Budesonide

As previously mentioned, the gut mucosal may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Nefecon is a targeted-release formulation of the steroid budesonide that acts only on the gut mucosal. The NEFIGAN trial [32], a multicenter, double-blind RCT on 149 patients, compared placebo versus 16 mg/day or 8 mg/day of budesonide. The administration of 16 mg/day of budesonide correlated with a significant reduction in proteinuria. Following these results, a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested the efficacy of Nefecon 16 mg/day administered for 9 months in adults with persistent proteinuria and eGFR > 35 mL/min/1.73 m2 [25]. At 15 months of follow-up, the treated group reported a decreased reduction in eGFR and persistent reduction in proteinuria, associated with a satisfactory safety profile (Table 1).
Based on these findings, in 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Nefecon for the treatment of patients with IgAN at highrisk of progression to kidney failure with persistent proteinuria despite optimal supportive care and eGFR > 35 mL/min/1.72 m2.
The literature describing the efficacy of budesonide in paediatricIgAN mostly refers to case reports [33,34], and conclusive studies are largely missing.

2.3. Cyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent with chemotherapeutic properties. It forms covalent ligands with DNA, inducing cross-links between DNA strands and subsequent cell death. Cyclophosphamide was largely administrated in several forms of neoplasms and autoimmune diseases [35,36]. According to the KDIGO [2], the administration of cyclophosphamide in IgAN is suggested only in IgAN presenting with RPGN. In line with this, a recent study in 84 patients with IgAN presenting with nephrotic syndrome due to biopsy-proven mesangioproliferative glomerular lesions showed that the combination of cyclophosphamide and CS was more effective in achieving remission than CS alone [PMID: 38046021]. Jia et al. [37], in a retrospective study of 296 patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3 or 4, reported that the administration of CS + cyclophosphamide or CS + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) significantly increased renal survival and attenuated the rate of renal function decline when compared to supportive treatment. Of note, the authors reported a more effective and safety profile for cyclophosphamide compared to MMF (Table 1).

2.4. Mycophenolate Mofetil

MMF is an immunosuppressive agent that inhibits B and T lymphocyte proliferation, potentially reducing the migration of inflammatory cells into glomeruli after antibody deposition. The use of MMF in IgAN remains controversial due to the scarcity of available studies on this topic.
In a recent meta-analysis on nine RCTs (three including paediatric subjects), with a total of 587 patients, the authors reported a similar outcome between MMF and control groups (full-dose steroids and/or supportive treatments) regarding the reduction in proteinuria or decline in renal function [38].
In a recent RCT involving 170 adults with biopsy-proven IgAN in China, MMF correlated with a lower reduction in renal function than the supportive care group [26]. However, in an Italian, two-center, retrospective study, Fontana et al. [39] showed that MMF plus CS and CS alone are similar in inducing complete response (urine protein to creatinine ratio < 0.3 and a less than 20% reduction in eGFR) at 24 months of follow-up (Table 1).
Therefore, based on previous studies, MMF may be considered in cases with persistent proteinuria after a CS cycle, leading to a lower incidence of side effects than CS. The use of MMF as a steroid-sparing agent is mentioned in the KDIGO guidelines, particularly for Chinese patients [2].

2.5. Calcineurin Inhibitors

Tacrolimus and cyclosporine, as calcineurin inhibitors, exert immunosuppression by modulating gene transcription in T cells. In more detail, calcineurin inhibitors limit the dephosphorylation of the nuclear factor of activated T cells, thereby hindering the production of interleukin-2 and its receptors. This leads to the direct suppression of T-cell activity, and potentially macrophage activity, coupled with indirect suppressive effects on B-cells [40]. Studies investigating the efficacy of calcineurin inhibitors in the context of IgAN are limited to case series or retrospective experiences.
In a fully comprehensive review of 10 RCTs, evaluating the efficacy of calcineurin inhibitors combined to CS, involving 472 patients, tacrolimus combined with CS was found to be more effective in reducing proteinuria than CS alone or supportive treatments [27] (Table 1).
In a different meta-analysis considering seven RCTs (five with cyclosporin, not included in previous meta-analyses, and two with tacrolimus, included in previous meta-analyses), involving 374 patients, Song et al. reported similar results [28].
Therefore, the combination of calcineurin inhibitors with steroids seems to induce a marked reduction in proteinuria compared to steroid monotherapy, indicating a synergistic effect.

2.6. Hydroxychloroquine

Hydroxychloroquine is administered as immunomodulator agent in various autoimmune conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Sjögren’s syndrome. Hydroxychloroquine reduces the activation of T cells and B cells and inhibits the presentation of self-antigens by antigen-presenting cells, thereby preventing the activation of autoreactive T cells. Moreover, it blocks signaling through mucosal and renal Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and decreases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, thereby mitigating inflammation and tissue damage [41,42] (Table 1).
Several previous studies, mostly from China, suggested possible efficacy in reducing proteinuria in IgAN [29,43,44,45,46,47]. As the main limitations, all previous studies were characterized by a short follow-up, limiting definitive conclusions on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in counteracting the decline in kidney function.
However, given the safety of hydroxychloroquine and mimicking what already occurs in different immune diseases, the addition of hydroxychloroquine to other therapies in the context of IgAN may be considered a valid supportive strategy.

2.7. Leflunomide

Leflunomide reduces the proliferation of T and B cells through the inhibition of di-hydroorotate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme in pyrimidine synthesis. Additionally, it inhibits the activity of tyrosine kinases and NF-kB in T cells [48].
Two previous, really extensive meta-analyses [30,31] describing the possible role of leflunomide in IgAN, suggested its efficacy in improving renal function and decreasing proteinuria, mostly when combined with CS.
Yi J et al. [30] reviewed 35 RCTs and 9 retrospective studies including 1802 patients. The authors reported that the addition of leflunomide to CS or ACEi/ARB may correlate with a better outcome in terms of proteinuria and renal function.
Lvet al. [31], presented a different meta-analysis of19 RCTs (7 included in previous meta-analyses) including 1153 patients randomly assigned to a treatment group of the combined therapy with leflunomide and CS or CS alone. The combined treatment with leflunomide + CS is more effective than CS alone in reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function.
Furthermore, a more recent retrospective study of 159 patients confirms the efficacy of leflunomide in association with ACEi/ARB in reducing proteinuria and hematuria compared to supportive care alone [46] (Table 1).

3. Biologic Treatments

3.1. BAFF/APRIL Inhibitors

As previously reported, the mesangial deposition of Gd-IgA1 characterizes the final step in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Growing evidence suggests that the B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) and A-proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) each play fundamental roles in the survival and maintenance of B cells and humoral immunity, and are key mediators between mucosal hyper-responsiveness, B-cell activation, and the consequent overproduction of Gd-IgA1 and its corresponding autoantibodies [49]. In line with this, in a murine model, the increased serum levels of BAFF lead to the development of IgAN, which is prevented in IgA-/-mice [50].
Moreover, the serum levels of APRIL are higher in IgAN patients than healthy controls, correlating with the increased levels of circulating Gd-IgA1 and a more severe clinical presentation of the disease [51]. Therefore, BAFF and APRIL emerged as potential and valid therapeutic targets in IgAN.
Atacicept is a human recombinant fusion protein that binds the receptor for both BAFF and APRIL. Atacicept is selective for B-cells, mostly acting on mature B cells and blocking plasma cells and the late stages of B-cell development. Atacicept was recently investigated in the JANUS study [52], a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study, in adult patients with IgAN and persistent proteinuria (UPCR ≥ 1 mg/mg), despite the optimal use of ACEi/ARB. Subjects were randomized into three groups: placebo, and atacicept 25 mg and 75 mg/weekly. Despite the small numbers of patients enrolled (n 16), atacicept was effective in reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function (Table 2). A larger study testing the efficacy of atacicept 150 mg/weekly is in the enrolling phase (ORIGIN phase II study, NCT04716231).
Telitacicept, similar to atacicept, is an APRIL and BAFF inhibitor. In a recent phase II RCT placebo study [53] on 44 adult patients with IgAN and persistent proteinuria (despite the administration of ACEi/ARB), the telitacicept group had a higher reduction in proteinuria than the placebo group (Table 2). A phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is currently recruiting patients.
Povetacicept (ALPN-303), a dual BAFF/APRIL antagonist, showed an increased binding affinity and inhibitor activity compared to the previous agents [54]. An open-label study, is currently recruiting patients to evaluate multiple doses of povetacicept in subjects with IgAN and other autoantibody-associated glomerular diseases (RUBY-3, NCT05732402).
Sibeprenlimab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal antibody that inhibits APRIL. The ENVISION trial [55], a multicenter, double-blind, phase II RCT, evaluated 12 monthly intravenous infusions of sibeprenlimab at doses of 2, 4, or 8 mg/kg versus placebo in 155 patients with IgAN. At 12 months, the sibeprenlimab groups demonstrated a greater reduction in proteinuria compared to placebo (Table 2). A phase III study and an open-label extension study are currently in the recruiting phase (NCT05248646 and NCT05248659).
Zigakibart (BION-1301) is a novel, humanized, monoclonal antibody that blocks APRIL. Preliminary results from a phase 1/2 trial (NCT03945318) suggested that zigakibart is well tolerated, and treatment results in reductions in the serum levels of free APRIL, immunoglobulins, Gd-IgA1, and proteinuria at 52 weeks of follow-up. The global phase 3 BEYOND registrational study (NCT05852938) will evaluate the effect of zigakibart vs. placebo on proteinuria in adults with IgAN.
Table 2. Main studies testing biologics in IgAN.
Table 2. Main studies testing biologics in IgAN.
ReferencesStudy DesignFollow Up
(Months)		Population
(n)		DoseOutcomes
Barratt et al., 2022 [52]RCT1816Atacicept 25/75 mg sc weekly vs. placeboAtacicept was effective in reducing serum levels of Gd-IgA1, with significant improvements in proteinuria and renal function compared to the placebo group.
Lv et al., 2022 [53]RCT 644Telitacicpet 160/240 mg sc weekly vs. placeboTelitacicept group had lower proteinuria than controls
Mathur et al., 2023 [54]RCT12155Sibeprenlimab 2/4/8 mg/kg iv monthly vs. placebo12 months of treatment with sibeprenlimab resulted in a significantly greater decrease in proteinuria than placebo
Zhang et al., 2021 [56]RCT666Iptacopan 10/200 mg twice/daily vs. placeboThere was a significant dose-dependent reduction in proteinuria.
Lafayette et al., 2020 [57]Interventional Study316Narsopliamb 4 mg/kg iv weekly vs. placeboTreatment with narsoplimab resulted in a reduction in proteinuria (ranges from 54% to 95% compared to baseline) and the stability of eGFR in high-risk patients
Barratt et al., 2024 [58]RCT 931Cemdisiran 600 mg every 4 weeks vs. placeboSignificant reduction in proteinuria in treatment group
Bruchfeld et al., 2022 [59]Interventional Study37Avacopan 30 mg twice/dailyThe improvement in proteinuria observed with Avacopan treatment, along with clinically meaningful improvements in three out of seven patients, suggests the potential efficacy of Avacopan.
Lafayette et al., 2017
[60]		RCT 1232Rituximab 1 g twice/monthlyRituximab failed to significantly improve renal function or proteinuria.
Hartono et al., 2018
[61]		Interventional Study568Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 ivBortezomib was found to be effective in reducing proteinuria in selected cases of IgA nephropathy. Subjects who responded to bortezomib had an Oxford classification T score of 0 and normal renal function
Tam et al., 2023
[62]		RCT676Fostamatinib 100/150 mg twice/dailyThe study suggested a dose-dependent reduction in proteinuria
RCT: Randomized Controlled Trial; iv: intravenous; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Ratio; sc: subcutaneous; Gd-IgA1: galactose-deficient IgA1.

3.2. Anti-Complement Treatments

The dysregulation of the complement cascade is crucial in the pathogenesis of IgAN [63]. Previous studies have suggested that both the alternative (AP) and the mannose-binding lectin (MBL) pathways may be involved [64,65,66]. Therefore, targeting the complement pathway may represent an attractive therapeutic strategy.
Iptacopan is an oral selective complement inhibitor that specifically binds Factor B and inhibits the AP. A randomized, double blind, phase II study involving 66 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN compared placebo versus iptacopan at four different doses. The administration of 200 mg twice a day was found to be more effective in reducing proteinuria [56].
Following these results, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, the APPLAUSE trial (NCT 04578834), evaluating the efficacy and safety of iptacopan, is now enrolling. An interim analysis revealed the superiority of iptacopan compared to placebo in reducing proteinuria at 9 months follow up (Table 2).
Other different molecules targeting Factor B are being tested in ongoing trials (NCT04014335, NCT05797610).
Mannan-binding, lectin-associated serine proteinase 2 (MASP-2) is an effector enzyme that is essential for the activation of the MBL. Narsoplimab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits MASP-2, was tested in a phase II study comparing narsoplimab versus CS or ACEi/ARB in 16 patients with IgAN. After 18 weeks of treatment, the narsoplimab group reported a significant reduction in proteinuria compared to controls [57]. However, a subsequent phase III study (ARTEMIS-IgAN, NCT 03608033) failed to demonstrate the efficacy ofnarsoplimab.
Cemdisiran is a subcutaneously administered RNA interference (RNAi) that reduces the transcription of complement component C5. In a phase 2, double-blind, placebo RCT on 31 adults with IgAN, the administration of cemdisiran correlated with a significant reduction in proteinuria [58] (Table 2).
An open-label, phase 2, pilot trial evaluated the efficacy of avacopan, a selective C5a-receptor inhibitor, in seven patients with IgAN: six of the seven patients had an improvement in proteinuria during the treatment period (12 weeks) [59] (Table 2).
An ongoing trial is testing the efficacy of ravulizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits complement protein C5 and is indicated for the treatment of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in patients affected by lupus nephritis and IgAN (NCT04564339).

3.3. Rituximab

The involvement of B cells in IgAN is suggested by the pathological role of anti-Gd-IgA1 antibodies. Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal-depleting antibody targeting the CD20 antigen expressed on B cells [67]. Rituximab depletes naïve and memory B cells through the induction of apoptosis, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, phagocytosis, and complement-mediated cytotoxicity [68]. Rituximab has also been associated with the induction of regulatory T cells (Treg), a cell subset that is crucial for the control of autoreactive conventional T cells [69]. Therefore, given the pathological role of anti-Gd-IgA1 antibodies, rituximab represents a treatment option that may limit the release of autoantibodies, selectively targeting the pathogenic mechanism(s) of the disease.
Previous studies describing the administration of rituximab in In IgAN are mostly limited to case series and retrospective studies [70]. However, in a multicenter RCT, Lafayette and colleagues [60] compared rituximab with standard care in 32 IgAN patients, describing similar outcomes in the two groups after 12 months’ follow-up. In line with this, circulating levels of Gg-IgA1 and anti-Gg-IgA1 antibodies were similar to those of the control and treated group, despite the highly effective depletion of B cells (Table 2).
In contrast to other autoimmune diseases, where rituximab depletes circulating auto-antibodies and improves clinical outcomes [71,72], B cells releasing autoantibodies may mainly derive from the MALT and may be characterized by a limited response to rituximab. Indeed, in patients affected by ulcerative colitis, characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting intestinal epithelial cells, rituximab was not effective [73].
Therefore, rituximab does not represent a treatment of choice in IgAN.

3.4. Bortezomib

The proteasome, an intercellular protein complex, controls many crucial cell functions: cell-cycle progression, the activation of transcriptional factors, such as nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB), and the production of cytokines and chemokines [74]. The interferons (IFN-gamma or -alfa) induce a switch to a new PS form, the so-called immunoproteasome (iPS), leading to improved peptide presentation to reactive T cells [75].
Coppo et al. [76] reported iPS up-regulation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with IgAN.
The proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib was first approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. It exerts its therapeutic effects by inhibiting the activation of transcriptional factor NF-κB, and by inducing apoptosis in myeloma cells. NF-κB is involved in the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis, including IgA nephropathy, causing a pro-inflammatory response [77] (Table 2).
In the VELCADE study [61], Bortezomib was tested in eight adult subjects with biopsy-proven IgAN and proteinuria > 1 g/day. Bortezomib was administered in four infusions at the single dose of 1.3 mg/m2 and complete remission was reached by only three subjects at 1-year follow-up. The non-responding patients could be due to the increased severity of tubular lesions, according to the Oxford classification [78], suggesting that the efficacy of bortezomib may be limited by the chronicity of the disease.
However, given the small sample size and the lack of a control group, more studies are needed to test the efficacy of bortezomib in IgAN. An ongoing interventional study (NCT05383547) is testing bortezomib in glomerular disease (such as IgAN, membranous nephropathy, and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), characterized by proteinuria > 1.5 g/day.

3.5. Fostamatinib

Fostamatinib is a small-molecule inhibitor that targets spleen tyrosine kinase, which plays a crucial role in B-cell receptor signaling. It is used in the treatment of certain autoimmune conditions, such as immune thrombocytopenia and rheumatoid arthritis, by modulating B-cell function and reducing inflammatory responses [79].
The efficacy of fostamatinib in IgAN was recently tested in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial with 76 patients. Although no significant reduction in proteinuria with fostamatinib was detected overall, there was a trend for a dose-dependent reduction in median proteinuria [62] (Table 2). However, further study may be warranted.

4. Conclusions

The limited efficacy and toxicities associated with the use of CS have compelled the search for alternative treatment strategies. Non-biologic agents, such as MMF, hydroxychloroquine, and budesonide, may be used as CS-sparing agents or as an additional therapy in those patients who remain at high risk of progression despite receiving optimal supportive care. Amongst biologics, BAFF/APRIL inhibitors and molecules targeting complement components recently emerged as valid strategies to effectively reduce the rate of the decrease in renal function in patients with IgAN. Further studies proving the effective/safety profile of such treatments are ongoing and largely needed.
On the other hand, there is often a therapeutic gap between the treatments available for adults and those for children. This can result in limited treatment options for paediatric patients, leaving them with suboptimal care or facing the risk of the off-label use of medications. Upcoming studies testing new biologic agents in IgAN should also consider paediatric populations to address the unique needs of children and close the therapeutical gap between adult and paediatric care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.; resources, A.A. and G.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., D.S.C. and C.B.; writing—review and editing, A.A. and G.M.G.; visualization, F.L., E.E.V., E.L.P. and G.M.; supervision, A.A.; funding acquisition, A.A. and G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Angeletti was supported with public funds granted by the Italian Ministry of Health “Ricerca Corrente” and “5 × 1000 funds”. Angeletti and Caridi were supported by the European Union—Next Generation EU—NRRP M6C2—Investment 2.1 Enhancement and strengthening of biomedical research in the NHS.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the Nurses and the Medical Doctors of the Nephrology Operative Unit at IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini Children’s Hospital, who daily perform their job with love and high professionalism, facilitating our clinical and research activity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gharavi, A.G.; Yan, Y.; Scolari, F.; Schena, F.P.; Frasca, G.M.; Ghiggeri, G.M.; Cooper, K.; Amoroso, A.; Viola, B.F.; Battini, G.; et al. IgA nephropathy, the most common cause of glomerulonephritis, is linked to 6q22–23. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rovin, B.H.; Adler, S.G.; Barratt, J.; Bridoux, F.; Burdge, K.A.; Chan, T.M.; Cook, H.T.; Fervenza, F.C.; Gibson, K.L.; Glassock, R.J.; et al. Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int. 2021, 100, 753–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Uffing, A.; Pérez-Saéz, M.J.; Jouve, T.; Bugnazet, M.; Malvezzi, P.; Muhsin, S.A.; Lafargue, M.-C.; Reindl-Schwaighofer, R.; Morlock, A.; Oberbauer, R.; et al. Recurrence of IgA Nephropathy after Kidney Transplantation in Adults. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021, 16, 1247–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, D.; Wang, F.; Ding, J.; Xiao, H.; Zhong, X.; Liu, X. Retrospective study of primary Ig Anephropathy with crescent formation and/or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in children. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2015, 53, 670–675. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yu, B.; Shi, S.; Lv, J.; Liu, L.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, L.; Chen, P.; Yang, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; et al. Rapidly progressive IgA nephropathy: Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes assessed according to the revised definition of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2022, 37, 2429–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Su, B.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhou, J.; Rong, L.; Feng, S.; Zhong, F.; Sun, S.; Zhang, D.; Xia, Z.; et al. Are children with IgA nephropathy different from adult patients? Pediatr. Nephrol. 2024, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pattrapornpisut, P.; Avila-Casado, C.; Reich, H.N. IgA Nephropathy: Core Curriculum 2021. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2021, 78, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Coppo, R. Biomarkers and targeted new therapies for IgA nephropathy. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2017, 32, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gesualdo, L.; Di Leo, V.; Coppo, R. The mucosal immune system and IgA nephropathy. Semin. Immunopathol. 2021, 43, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, J.; Xing, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G. Efficacy and safety of biologic agents for IgA nephropathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0298732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhuang, Y.; Lu, H.; Li, J. Advances in the treatment of IgA nephropathy with biological agents. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 2024, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Infante, B.; Rossini, M.; Di Lorenzo, A.; Coviello, N.; Giuseppe, C.; Gesualdo, L.; Giuseppe, G.; Stallone, G. Recurrence of immunoglobulin A nephropathy after kidney transplantation: A narrative review of the incidence, risk factors, pathophysiology and management of immunosuppressive therapy. Clin. Kidney J. 2020, 13, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Coppo, R. Treatment of IgA nephropathy in children: A land without KDIGO guidance. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2021, 36, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wheeler, D.C.; Toto, R.D.; Stefánsson, B.V.; Jongs, N.; Chertow, G.M.; Greene, T.; Hou, F.F.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Pecoits-Filho, R.; Correa-Rotter, R.; et al. A pre-specified analysis of the DAPA-CKD trial demonstrates the effects of dapagliflozin on major adverse kidney events in patients with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2021, 100, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Syed, Y.Y. Sparsentan: First Approval. Drugs 2023, 83, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rovin, B.H.; Barratt, J.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Alpers, C.E.; Bieler, S.; Chae, D.-W.; Diva, U.A.; Floege, J.; Gesualdo, L.; Inrig, J.K.; et al. Efficacy and safety of sparsentan versus irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy (PROTECT): 2-year results from a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023, 402, 2077–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pozzi, C.; Bolasco, P.G.; Fogazzi, G.B.; Andrulli, S.; Altieri, P.; Ponticelli, C.; Locatelli, F. Corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999, 353, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pozzi, C.; Andrulli, S.; Del Vecchio, L.; Melis, P.; Fogazzi, G.B.; Altieri, P.; Ponticelli, C.; Locatelli, F. Corticosteroid Effectiveness in IgA Nephropathy: Long-term results of a randomized, controlled trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004, 15, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Manno, C.; Torres, D.D.; Rossini, M.; Pesce, F.; Schena, F.P. Randomized controlled clinical trial of corticosteroids plus ACE-inhibitors with long-term follow-up in proteinuric IgA nephropathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2009, 24, 3694–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lv, J.; Wong, M.G.; Hladunewich, M.A.; Jha, V.; Hooi, L.S.; Monaghan, H.; Zhao, M.; Barbour, S.; Jardine, M.J.; Reich, H.N.; et al. Effect of Oral Methylprednisolone on Decline in Kidney Function or Kidney Failure in Patients with IgA Nephropathy: The TESTING Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022, 327, 1888–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rauen, T.; Eitner, F.; Fitzner, C.; Sommerer, C.; Zeier, M.; Otte, B.; Panzer, U.; Peters, H.; Benck, U.; Mertens, P.R.; et al. Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2225–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yata, N.; Nakanishi, K.; Shima, Y.; Togawa, H.; Obana, M.; Sako, M.; Nozu, K.; Tanaka, R.; Iijima, K.; Yoshikawa, N. Improved renal survival in Japanese children with IgA nephropathy. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2008, 23, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yoshikawa, N.; Ito, H.; Sakai, T.; Takekoshi, Y.; Honda, M.; Awazu, M.; Ito, K.; Iitaka, K.; Koitabashi, Y.; Yamaoka, K.; et al. A Controlled Trial of Combined Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Severe Childhood IgA Nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999, 10, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yoshikawa, N.; Honda, M.; Iijima, K.; Awazu, M.; Hattori, S.; Nakanishi, K.; Ito, H.; Japanese Pediatric IgA Nephropathy Treatment Study Group. Steroid Treatment for Severe Childhood IgA Nephropathy: A randomized, controlled trial. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 1, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lafayette, R.; Kristensen, J.; Stone, A.; Floege, J.; Tesař, V.; Trimarchi, H.; Zhang, H.; Eren, N.; Paliege, A.; Reich, H.N.; et al. Efficacy and safety of a targeted-release formulation of budesonide in patients with primary IgA nephropathy (NefIgArd): 2-year results from a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023, 402, 859–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hou, F.F.; Xie, D.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.; Yang, X.; Ai, J.; Nie, S.; Liang, M.; Wang, G.; Jia, N.; et al. Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil Among Patients with Progressive IgA Nephropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2023, 6, e2254054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Luo, J.; Hu, B.; Ma, T. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with glucocorticoid treatment for IgA nephropathy: A meta-analysis. J. Int. Med. Res. 2018, 46, 3236–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, Y.-H.; Cai, G.-Y.; Xiao, Y.-F.; Wang, Y.-P.; Yuan, B.-S.; Xia, Y.-Y.; Wang, S.-Y.; Chen, P.; Liu, S.-W.; Chen, X.-M. Efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitor treatment for IgA nephropathy: A meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2017, 18, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, L.-J.; Yang, Y.-Z.; Shi, S.-F.; Bao, Y.-F.; Yang, C.; Zhu, S.-N.; Sui, G.-L.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Lv, J.-C.; Zhang, H. Effects of Hydroxychloroquine on Proteinuria in IgA Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2019, 74, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yi, J.; He, Z.; Xu, S.; Feng, S. Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in IgA nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2019, 51, 1987–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lv, G.; Ming, C. Efficacy and safety of leflunomide combined with corticosteroids for the treatment of IgA nephropathy: A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ren. Fail. 2022, 44, 1011–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wimbury, D.; Muto, M.; Bhachu, J.S.; Scionti, K.; Brown, J.; Molyneux, K.; Seikrit, C.; Maixnerová, D.; Pérez-Alós, L.; Garred, P.; et al. Targeted-release budesonide modifies key pathogenic biomarkers in immunoglobulin A nephropathy: Insights from the NEFIGAN trial. Kidney Int. 2024, 105, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Venettacci, O.; Larkins, N.; Willis, F. Childhood IgA Nephropathy Successfully Treated with Targeted-Release Budesonide: A Case Report. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2018, 54, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Antonucci, L.; Colucci, M.; Emma, F.; Vivarelli, M. A pediatric case of IgA nephropathy benefitting from targeted release formulation–budesonide. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2023, 38, 3849–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Emadi, A.; Jones, R.J.; Brodsky, R.A. Cyclophosphamide and cancer: Golden anniversary. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 6, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rovin, B.H.; Caster, D.J.; Cattran, D.C.; Gibson, K.L.; Hogan, J.J.; Moeller, M.J.; Roccatello, D.; Cheung, M.; Wheeler, D.C.; Winkelmayer, W.C.; et al. Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 2): Conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2019, 95, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jia, Q.; Ma, F.; Zhao, J.; Yang, X.; Sun, R.; Li, R.; Sun, S. Effect of corticosteroids combined with cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil therapy for IgA nephropathy with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease: A retrospective cohort study. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 946165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peng, X.-J.; Zheng, W.-M.; Fu, R.; Huang, Y.-H.; Deng, M.-H.; Tao, S.-S.; Wang, T.-J.; Zhu, C. Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment for IgA nephropathy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2021, 25, 788–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fontana, F.; Delsante, M.; Vicari, M.; Pala, C.; Alfano, G.; Giovanella, S.; Ligabue, G.; Leonelli, M.; Manenti, L.; Rossi, G.M.; et al. Mycophenolate mofetil plus steroids compared to steroids alone in IgA nephropathy: A retrospective study. J. Nephrol. 2023, 36, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Heidt, S.; Roelen, D.L.; Eijsink, C.; Eikmans, M.; Van Kooten, C.; Claas, F.H.J.; Mulder, A. Calcineurin inhibitors affect B cell antibody responses indirectly by interfering with T cell help. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2010, 159, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sacre, K.; Criswell, L.A.; McCune, J.M. Hydroxychloroquine is associated with impaired interferon-alpha and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012, 14, R155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Willis, R.; Seif, A.M.; McGwin, G., Jr.; Martinez-Martinez, L.A.; González, E.B.; Dang, N.; Papalardo, E.; Liu, J.; Vilá, L.M.; Reveille, J.; et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine treatment on pro-inflammatory cytokines and disease activity in SLE patients: Data from LUMINA (LXXV), a multiethnic US cohort. Lupus 2012, 21, 830–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Han, V.K.; Lauder, J.M.; D’Ercole, A.J. Characterization of somatomedin/insulin-like growth factor receptors and correlation with biologic action in cultured neonatal rat astroglial cells. J. Neurosci. 1987, 7, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Si, F.-L.; Tang, C.; Lv, J.-C.; Shi, S.-F.; Zhou, X.-J.; Liu, L.-J.; Zhang, H. Comparison between hydroxychloroquine and systemic corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: A two-year follow-up study. BMC Nephrol. 2023, 24, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tang, C.; Lv, J.-C.; Shi, S.-F.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Liu, L.-J.; Zhang, H. Effect of hydroxychloroquine in patients with IgA nephropathy with insufficient responses to immunosuppressive therapy: A retrospective case-control study. BMC Nephrol. 2020, 21, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. He, W.-J.; Wang, J.; Liu, N.; Li, G.-Y.; Zhu, X.-W.; Yao, L.; Liu, L.-L. The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine versus leflunomide in patients with IgA nephropathy: A single-center experience. J. Nephrol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, Y.-Z.; Liu, L.-J.; Shi, S.-F.; Wang, J.-W.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Lv, J.-C.; Zhang, H. Effects of Hydroxychloroquine on Proteinuria in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy. Am. J. Nephrol. 2018, 47, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Breedveld, F.C.; Dayer, J.-M. Leflunomide: Mode of action in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2000, 59, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cheung, C.K.; Barratt, J.; Carroll, K.; Lafayette, R.A.; Liew, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Tesař, V.; Trimarchi, H.; Wong, M.G.; Zhang, H.; et al. Targeting APRIL in the Treatment of IgA Nephropathy. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2024, 19, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McCarthy, D.D.; Kujawa, J.; Wilson, C.; Papandile, A.; Poreci, U.; Porfilio, E.A.; Ward, L.; Lawson, M.A.; Macpherson, A.J.; McCoy, K.D.; et al. Mice overexpressing BAFF develop a commensal flora–dependent, IgA-associated nephropathy. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 3991–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhai, Y.-L.; Zhu, L.; Shi, S.-F.; Liu, L.-J.; Lv, J.-C.; Zhang, H. Increased APRIL Expression Induces IgA1 Aberrant Glycosylation in IgA Nephropathy. Medicine 2016, 95, e3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Barratt, J.; Tumlin, J.; Suzuki, Y.; Kao, A.; Aydemir, A.; Pudota, K.; Jin, H.; Gühring, H.; Appel, G.; JANUS study investigators. Randomized Phase II JANUS Study of Atacicept in Patients with IgA Nephropathy and Persistent Proteinuria. Kidney Int. Rep. 2022, 7, 1831–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lv, J.; Liu, L.; Hao, C.; Li, G.; Fu, P.; Xing, G.; Zheng, H.; Chen, N.; Wang, C.; Luo, P.; et al. Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Telitacicept in Patients with IgA Nephropathy with Persistent Proteinuria. Kidney Int. Rep. 2023, 8, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Evans, L.S.; Lewis, K.E.; DeMonte, D.; Bhandari, J.G.; Garrett, L.B.; Kuijper, J.L.; Ardourel, D.; Wolfson, M.F.; Debrot, S.; Mudri, S.; et al. Povetacicept, an Enhanced Dual APRIL/BAFF Antagonist That Modulates B Lymphocytes and Pathogenic Autoantibodies for the Treatment of Lupus and Other B Cell–Related Autoimmune Diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023, 75, 1187–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mathur, M.; Barratt, J.; Chacko, B.; Chan, T.M.; Kooienga, L.; Oh, K.-H.; Sahay, M.; Suzuki, Y.; Wong, M.G.; Yarbrough, J.; et al. A Phase 2 Trial of Sibeprenlimab in Patients with IgA Nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2024, 390, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, H.; Rizk, D.V.; Perkovic, V.; Maes, B.; Kashihara, N.; Rovin, B.; Trimarchi, H.; Sprangers, B.; Meier, M.; Kollins, D.; et al. Results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 2 study propose iptacopan as an alternative complement pathway inhibitor for IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2024, 105, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lafayette, R.A.; Rovin, B.H.; Reich, H.N.; Tumlin, J.A.; Floege, J.; Barratt, J. Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Narsoplimab, a Novel MASP-2 Inhibitor for the Treatment of IgA Nephropathy. Kidney Int. Rep. 2020, 5, 2032–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Barratt, J.; Liew, A.; Yeo, S.C.; Fernström, A.; Barbour, S.J.; Sperati, C.J.; Villanueva, R.; Wu, M.-J.; Wang, D.; Borodovsky, A.; et al. Phase 2 Trial of Cemdisiran in Adult Patients with IgA Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2024, 19, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bruchfeld, A.; Magin, H.; Nachman, P.; Parikh, S.; Lafayette, R.; Potarca, A.; Miao, S.; Bekker, P. C5a receptor inhibitor avacopan in immunoglobulin A nephropathy—An open-label pilot study. Clin. Kidney J. 2022, 15, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lafayette, R.A.; Canetta, P.A.; Rovin, B.H.; Appel, G.B.; Novak, J.; Nath, K.A.; Sethi, S.; Tumlin, J.A.; Mehta, K.; Hogan, M.; et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Rituximab in IgA Nephropathy with Proteinuria and Renal Dysfunction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 28, 1306–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hartono, C.; Chung, M.; Perlman, A.S.; Chevalier, J.M.; Serur, D.; Seshan, S.V.; Muthukumar, T. Bortezomib for Reduction of Proteinuria in IgA Nephropathy. Kidney Int. Rep. 2018, 3, 861–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tam, F.W.K.; Tumlin, J.; Barratt, J.; Rovin, B.H.; Roberts, I.S.D.; Roufosse, C.; Cook, H.T.; Bhangal, G.; Brown, A.L.; Busch, M.; et al. Randomized Trial on the Effect of an Oral Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in the Treatment of IgA Nephropathy. Kidney Int. Rep. 2023, 8, 2546–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Berger, J. Ig Aglomerular deposits in renal disease. Transpl. Proc. 1969, 1, 939–944. [Google Scholar]
  64. Maillard, N.; Wyatt, R.J.; Julian, B.A.; Kiryluk, K.; Gharavi, A.; Fremeaux-Bacchi, V.; Novak, J. Current Understanding of the Role of Complement in IgA Nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26, 1503–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Murphy, B.; Georgiou, T.; Machet, D.; Hill, P.; McRae, J. Factor H-related protein-5: A novel component of human glomerular immune deposits. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002, 39, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Roos, A.; Rastaldi, M.P.; Calvaresi, N.; Oortwijn, B.D.; Schlagwein, N.; van Gijlswijk-Janssen, D.J.; Stahl, G.L.; Matsushita, M.; Fujita, T.; van Kooten, C.; et al. Glomerular Activation of the Lectin Pathway of Complement in IgA Nephropathy Is Associated with More Severe Renal Disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 1724–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cerny, T.; Borisch, B.; Introna, M.; Johnson, P.; Rose, A.L. Mechanism of action of rituximab. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2002, 13 (Suppl. S2), S3–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Datta, S.K. Anti-CD20 antibody is an efficient therapeutic tool for the selective removal of autoreactive T cells. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 2009, 5, 80–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Stasi, R.; Cooper, N.; Del Poeta, G.; Stipa, E.; Evangelista, M.L.; Abruzzese, E.; Amadori, S. Analysis of regulatory T-cell changes in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura receiving B cell–depleting therapy with rituximab. Blood 2008, 112, 1147–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Floege, J. Glomerular disease: Rituximab therapy for IgA nephropathy. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017, 13, 138–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cravedi, P.; Remuzzi, G.; Ruggenenti, P. Rituximab in Primary Membranous Nephropathy: First-Line Therapy, Why Not? Nephron. Clin. Pract. 2014, 128, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Stone, J.H.; Merkel, P.A.; Spiera, R.; Seo, P.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S.; Kallenberg, C.G.; St. Clair, E.W.; Turkiewicz, A.; Tchao, N.K.; et al. Rituximab versus Cyclophosphamide for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Leiper, K.; Martin, K.; Ellis, A.; Subramanian, S.; Watson, A.J.; Christmas, S.E.; Howarth, D.; Campbell, F.; Rhodes, J.M. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of rituximab (anti-CD20) in active ulcerative colitis. Gut 2011, 60, 1520–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ciechanover, A. Intracellular Protein Degradation: From a Vague Idea, through the Lysosome and the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System, and onto Human Diseases and Drug Targeting (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5944–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hendil, K.B.; Khan, S.; Tanaka, K. Simultaneous binding of PA28 and PA700 activators to 20 S proteasomes. Biochem. J. 1998, 332 Pt 3, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Coppo, R.; Camilla, R.; Alfarano, A.; Balegno, S.; Mancuso, D.; Peruzzi, L.; Amore, A.; Dal Canton, A.; Sepe, V.; Tovo, P. Upregulation of the immunoproteasome in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2009, 75, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Humphrey, P.A.; Scroggs, M.W.; Roggli, V.L.; Shelburne, J.D. Pulmonary carcinomas with a sarcomatoid element: An immunocytochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Hum. Pathol. 1988, 19, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Trimarchi, H.; Barratt, J.; Cattran, D.C.; Cook, H.T.; Coppo, R.; Haas, M.; Liu, Z.-H.; Roberts, I.S.; Yuzawa, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: An update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group. Kidney Int. 2017, 91, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ghosh, D.; Tsokos, G.C. Spleen tyrosine kinase: An Src family of non-receptor kinase has multiple functions and represents a valuable therapeutic target in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Autoimmunity 2010, 43, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The main studies testing non-biologic immunosuppressive treatments in IgAN.
Table 1. The main studies testing non-biologic immunosuppressive treatments in IgAN.
ReferencesStudy DesignFollow Up
(Years)		Population
(n)		DoseOutcomes
Pozzi et al., 1999 and 2004 [17,18]RCT5, 1086Methylprednisolone 1 g/day for 3 consecutive days for 1, 3, and 5 months plus oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg on alternate days for 6 months vs. placeboSteroid treatment reduced the risk of a decline in kidney function at 5 and 10 years of follow-up.
Manno et al., 2009 [19]RCT 897Prednisone 1 mg/kg/day for 2 months and then tapered by 0.2 mg/kg/day every month, plus ramipril vs. ramiprilCombination of steroids and ramipril may provide additional benefits compared with ramipril alone in preventing the progression of renal disease.
Lv et al., 2022 [20]RCTMean 4.2503Methylprednisolone 0.4 mg/kg/day for 2 months, and then tapered by 0.4 mg/kg/day every month vs. placeboSteroids significantly reduced the risk of kidney function decline, kidney failure, or death due to kidney disease.
Rauen et al., 2020 [21]RCT3162Methylprednisolone 1 g/day for 3 consecutive days at 1, 3, and 5 months plus oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg on alternate days for 6 months plus RAASi vs. RAASi aloneThe addition of steroids to intensive supportive care in patients with high-risk IgA nephropathy did not significantly improve the outcome
Yoshikawa et al., 1999 [23]RCT278 Paediatric subjectsPrednisolone 2 mg/kg (max. 80) for 2 months, then 1.5 mg/kg for 1 month then 1 mg/kg for 21 months plus azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day, plus heparin and warfarin, plus dipyridamole vs.
heparinandwarfarin, plus dipyridamole		Treatment of children with severe IgAN with prednisolone, azathioprine, heparin-warfarin, and dipyridamole prevents immunologic renal injury and increases in sclerosed glomeruli, and may lead to remission
Lafayette et al., 2023 [25]RCT 2364Nefecon 16 mg/day vs. placeboNefecon provided a clinically relevant reduction in eGFR decline and a durable reduction in proteinuria.
Hou et al., 2023
[26]		RCT 3170Mycophenolate mofetil 1.5 g/day for 12 months, and then tapered to 0.75–1 g/day for at least 6 months plus steroids vs. steroidsThe addition of mycophenolate mofetil to steroids significantly reduced the risk of doubling of serum creatinine, ESKD, or death due to kidney or cardiovascular causes
Kim et al., 2013
[27]		RCT0.340Tacrolimus twice daily (serum levels at 5–10 ng/mL) vs. placeboTacrolimus reduced proteinuria effectively and rapidly in IgA nephropathy with mild to moderate proteinuria
Xu et al., 2014
[28]		RCT196Cyclosporine 3 mg/kg/day per 3 months, then 2 mg/kg/ for 9 months plus prednisolone 0.6–0.8 mg/kg/day for 6–8 weeks vs. prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day for 8–12 weeksThe combination of Cyclosporine and steroids was more effective in reducing proteinuria and elevating plasma albumin
Liu et al., 2019
[29]		RCT0.560 Hydroxychloroquine 0.2/0.1 g twice daily or 0.1 g thrice daily according to eGFR plus RAASi vs. placebo plus RAASiHydroxychloroquine in addition to optimized RAASi significantly reduced proteinuria
Min et al., 2017
[30]		RCT185Leflunomide 40 mg/day for 3 days, then 20 mg/day for 12 months plus prednisone 0.8 mg/kg/day (max. 40) for 4–6 weeks, then tapered vs. prednisone 1 mg/kg/day for 8–12 weeksLeflunomide combined with low-dose CS seems to be at least as effective as full-dose CS for the treatment of progressive IgAN, and is associated with both a greater reduction in proteinuria and fewer severe adverse events
Ni et al., 2021 [31]RCT2108Leflunomide 40 mg/day for 3 days, then 20 mg/day for 12 months plus prednisone 0.5–0.8 mg/kg/day (max. 40) for 8–12 weeks, then tapered vs. prednisone 1 mg/kg/day for 8–12 weeksThe efficacy and safety of leflunomide plus low-dose-prednisone and prednisone alone in the treatment of progressive IgAN are comparable
ESKD: end-stage kidney disease RAASi: renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibition.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiarenza, D.S.; Verrina, E.E.; La Porta, E.; Caridi, G.; Ghiggeri, G.M.; Mortari, G.; Lugani, F.; Angeletti, A.; Bigatti, C. Biologics and Non-Biologics Immunosuppressive Treatments for IgA Nephropathy in Both Adults and Children. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 2465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092465

AMA Style

Chiarenza DS, Verrina EE, La Porta E, Caridi G, Ghiggeri GM, Mortari G, Lugani F, Angeletti A, Bigatti C. Biologics and Non-Biologics Immunosuppressive Treatments for IgA Nephropathy in Both Adults and Children. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(9):2465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiarenza, Decimo Silvio, Enrico Eugenio Verrina, Edoardo La Porta, Gianluca Caridi, Gian Marco Ghiggeri, Gabriele Mortari, Francesca Lugani, Andrea Angeletti, and Carolina Bigatti. 2024. "Biologics and Non-Biologics Immunosuppressive Treatments for IgA Nephropathy in Both Adults and Children" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 9: 2465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop