Next Article in Journal
Involvement of HPV Infection in the Release of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Why Have Detection, Understanding and Management of Kidney Hypoxic Injury Lagged behind Those for the Heart?
Previous Article in Journal
Deduction of Novel Genes Potentially Involved in Keratinocytes of Type 2 Diabetes Using Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Approaches
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Meta-Analysis: Urinary Calprotectin for Discrimination of Intrinsic and Prerenal Acute Kidney Injury

1
Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
3
Clinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
4
Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
5
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(1), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010074
Submission received: 22 December 2018 / Revised: 6 January 2019 / Accepted: 7 January 2019 / Published: 10 January 2019

Abstract

:
Background: Urinary calprotectin is a novel biomarker that distinguishes between intrinsic or prerenal acute kidney injury (AKI) in different studies. However, these studies were based on different populations and different AKI criteria. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of urinary calprotectin and compared its diagnostic performance in different AKI criteria and study populations. Method: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database up to September 2018. The diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin (sensitivity, specificity, predictive ratio, and cutoff point) was extracted and evaluated. Result: This study included six studies with a total of 502 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 15.15, and the negative LR was 0.11. The symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (symmetric SROC) with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.9667. The relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOC) of the adult to pediatric population and RDOCs of different acute kidney injury criteria showed no significant difference in their diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: Urinary calprotectin is a good diagnostic tool for the discrimination of intrinsic and prerenal AKI under careful inspection after exclusion of urinary tract infection and urogenital malignancies. Its performance is not affected by different AKI criteria and adult or pediatric populations.

1. Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and widespread problem with high mortality and morbidity. Despite understanding the pathogenesis of different etiologies, traditional diagnosis markers (including serum creatinine and urine output) are not a real-time, not a sensitive and specific renal marker for early diagnosis and interventions, not based on acute kidney etiology, and the differentiation of prerenal injury and intrinsic kidney injury is difficult. There are numerous causes of AKI, which are most commonly classified as prerenal, intrinsic (intrarenal), or postrenal kidney injury. To date, many studies have revealed that neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has shown promising results in the early diagnosis of AKI [1,2,3,4], distinguishing between prerenal and intrinsic kidney injury ([5,6,7], and predicting the need for renal replacement therapy and prognosis. [8,9]. Urinary calprotectin is a heterodimer protein involved in the immune system [10] and plays a role in the AKI pathophysiology. Early studies have shown that the release of urinary calprotectin from neutrophil and renal tubular epithelial cells also produces calprotectin in response to injury [10,11,12]. Calprotectin has been demonstrated to be similar to NGAL as a diagnostic marker for early diagnosis and to make a different diagnosis of AKI etiology [5,13,14,15,16,17]. This biomarker, which can early detect acute kidney injury and distinguish between prerenal and intrinsic AKI, can facilitate intervention, reduce the time to initiate therapy, and reduce the number of unnecessary renal biopsies. Nevertheless, these studies used different AKI criteria and were based on different populations. Therefore, we conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis for evaluating the differential diagnostic accuracy of urinary calprotectin between prerenal and intrinsic kidney injury.

2. Methods

2.1. Literature Search

Our two investigators (J.-J.C., C.-H.C.) systematically and independently conducted a review of the published data in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A computerized search of the electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane database was performed to identify all relevant English-language studies up to September 2018 using the keywords and medical subject heading (MeSH) term: AKI, calprotectin, S100A8/A9 complex, and myeloid-related protein complex.

2.2. Study Selection

Two investigators independently determined the study eligibility based on an evaluation of the titles, abstracts, and subsequently, the full texts. Any difference in opinion regarding eligibility was resolved by consensus through discussion. Any article that was deemed potentially relevant was retrieved online for the full-text. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: full-length English original articles published and available, human studies, urinary calprotectin for distinguishing between intrinsic and pre-renal AKI, clear definition of AKI: (the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-Stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE), AKI Network (AKIN), Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), or pediatric RIFLE criteria (pRIFLE)) and reported the definition/clinical criteria of intrinsic or prerenal AKI. Studies were excluded according to the following criteria: (1) focusing on chronic kidney disease, (2) duplicate cohort, (3) non-original studies (such as reviews, commentaries, letters), (4) studies with insufficient information, (5) studies that were not based on urinary calprotectin level, (6) studies with no reported intrinsic or prerenal AKI. Review articles or meta-analysis were not included in the analysis; however, their citations and references were searched for additional relevant studies. Full search strategies are available in Table S1.

2.3. Data Extraction

Two investigators (J.-J.C., C.-H.C.) independently extracted the relevant information from each study. Data elements related to the study level characteristics included first author, year of publication, study location, study design, definition of AKI, sample processing, method of storage, calprotectin measurement method, and test kit, see Table 1. As for patient characteristics, data included gender, age, diabetes, hypertension, urinary tract infection (UTI), creatinine on admission, creatinine prior to admission, C-reactive protein, urinary creatinine, urinary calprotectin, and urinary calprotectin to creatinine ratio and are summarized in Table 2. Items related to the diagnostic test performance were also extracted, including cutoff points based on the Youden index, sensitivity, specificity, and the number of intrinsic and prerenal kidney injuries, see Table 3.

2.4. Outcome Measures

The diagnostic criteria of AKI were different in the six enrolled studies. Four of which (Heller, 2011; Seibert, 2013; Seibert, 2016; Basiratnia, 2017) used AKIN criteria [18]. One (Chang, 2015) used KDIGO AKI criteria [19]. One (Westhoff, 2016) used the pRIFLE criteria modified by Ackan-Arikan et al. [20]. Two of which (Westhoff, 2016; Basiratnia, 2017) were pediatric population studies.
The reference test for differentiating intrinsic or prerenal acute kidney diagnosis was based on clinical criteria as mentioned below (most studies used predefined criteria). The histologic diagnosis of hepato-renal syndrome or cardio-renal syndrome was considered the golden standard. The response to volume repletion (return of creatinine to baseline within 48 to 72 h) was considered an obligatory diagnostic criterion for prerenal kidney injury. Other findings for the diagnosis of prerenal kidney injury included compatible history (dehydration, fluid loss, heart failure, liver cirrhosis), compatible physical examination (low blood pressure, low jugular pulse, tachycardia, orthostatic blood pressure changes, poor skin turgor), and compatible urine analysis (no proteinuria, no hematuria). UTI was classified as an intrinsic kidney injury in three enrolled studies (Heller, 2011; Seibert, 2013; Seibert, 2016).

2.5. Risk of Bias

We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool and Review Manager version 5.3 to assess the quality of the included studies [21]. The QUADAS-2 score is based on four domains (patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing) to judge the risk of bias. Each study was reviewed independently by J.-J.C., C.-H.C., and rated as high, low, or of unclear risk for all four domains. The judgment principle of “applicability” was the same as the bias section, but there were no signaling questions. Disagreements between the two reviewers were solved by consensus through discussion. If the answer to all signaling questions in each domain is “yes”, the domain is considered as low risk. If any signaling question is answered “no”, the domain is considered as having a high risk of bias.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

True positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) rates for each study were calculated according to the reported sensitivity, specificity, and patient number of prerenal and intrinsic AKI. Based on these data, the positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (−LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) could be obtained for each study. The summary measures were calculated using a random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method). To assess the diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin in predicting intrinsic AKI in AKI patients, a symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (symmetric SROC) curve was constructed based on TP and FP rates. The threshold effect was detected using the Spearman correlation coefficient between the logit of sensitivity and logit of ‘1−specificity’, where a non-significant threshold effect was warranted before performing further subgroup analysis or meta-regression [22]. The degree of heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the I2 index, with <25%, 25%–50%, and >50% indicating mild, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. Likelihood ratios indicate that the accuracy of a particular test would be more accurate for patients with a disease than for subjects without disease. Two variables (adult vs. pediatric; AKI criteria) were performed as moderators in the meta-regression analyses to explore possible sources of heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis was done to exclude patients with a UTI. All analyses were conducted by Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) software [23]. A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search

The initial search retrieved 83 records. After excluding duplicated articles and removing irrelevant articles, the remaining 30 articles were screened based on the title and abstract. Ten potentially relevant articles were identified and full-text articles were downloaded and accessed for eligibility. Of these 10 articles, one of which [16] was suspected of using a duplicate cohort to another study [15], two of which reported no data of intrinsic and prerenal AKI, and one of which had no data on urinary calprotectin. Finally, six studies were included in this meta-analytic study, see Figure 1.

3.2. Risk of Bias

With the QUADAS-2 tool, some study characteristics that might increase the risk of bias were identified. Domain 1 of QUADAS-2 focused on patient selection. Four of the included studies were based on an adult population and two on a pediatric population. One of the studies (Seibert, 2016) selected a population that was not a consecutive or random sample of patients but rather focused on post-kidney-transplant adults. Another study (Chang, 2015) selected a narrow spectrum population in the coronary care unit (CCU). Domain three addresses aspects of the reference standard. Inconsistent standard criteria of AKI (KDIGO, AKIN, or pRIFLE) and a lack of pathological evidence of intrinsic kidney injury were found in all studies. In addition, most studies used the clinical observation of a rapid decrease in serum creatinine with convergence to the baseline within 72 h after fluid repletion to diagnose prerenal AKI, except for one study (Basiratnia, 2017) that used 48 h as a time interval. Because there was one study (Seibert, 2016) with an adult kidney transplant population and two others (Basiratnia, 2017, Westhoff 2016) with pediatric populations, the answer regarding the applicability of the patient selection of these three studies was considered to be unclear. We summarized the risk of bias data for all the included studies in Figure 2.

3.3. Study Characteristics

The characteristics of the six included studies are summarized in Table 1. Four of the studies were performed in Germany, one in Taiwan, and one in Iran. Sample sizes ranged from 53 to 152 patients. Two studies were conducted on pediatric populations, one on an adult kidney transplant population, and three on adult populations. Two studies excluded patients with UTI, two provided data for the entire cohort and data of excluded UTI patients, and three provided data of urinary calprotectin and normalization by urine creatinine. The optimal cutoffs were determined by the Youden index in three studies. These six studies adopted clinical diagnostic criteria for prerenal or intrinsic kidney injury, including rapid decreasing serum creatinine (Cr) (<72 h) after fluid repletion as prerenal AKI, physical examination finding, and urine examination. The detailed information of the reference test is described earlier in this article.

3.4. Patient’s Characteristics

A total of 502 patients were included in these six studies. All studies were single-center trials. Study populations included adult and children populations, kidney transplant populations, and CCU patients. The mean age of the four adult AKI studies was 68 years, and there were more males with prerenal acute kidney than males with an intrinsic kidney injury (p < 0.001). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and UTI was higher in the intrinsic kidney group. The level of serum creatinine on admission or AKI diagnosis was not significantly different (p = 0.054). The C-reactive protein level was also not significantly different (p = 0.412). Not surprisingly, the urinary calprotectin and urinary calprotectin to creatinine ration were higher in patients with an intrinsic kidney injury. Two pediatric AKI studies had a mean age of 7.5 and 6.0 years in the prerenal and intrinsic kidney injury groups, respectively. The level of serum creatinine on admission or AKI diagnosis was significantly higher in the pediatric intrinsic kidney injury group (p < 0.001). Detailed information is summarized in Table 2.

3.5. Urinary Calprotectin for Discriminating Prerenal and Intrinsic Acute Kidney Injuries

The diagnostic values, cutoffs, and key results are summarized in Table 3. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88–0.96), respectively. The pooled positive LR was 15.15 (95% CI: 4.45–51.55), and the negative LR was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06–0.20), as shown in Figure 3. The symmetric SROC with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.9667, see Figure 4. The heterogeneity of the aforementioned four pooled indices was moderate to high (I2 ranged from 55% to 68.9%).
By using normalization according to urine creatinine, the data of three studies were pooled. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87–0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88–0.98), respectively. The pooled positive LR was 14.75 (95% CI: 5.54–39.3), and the negative LR was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04–0.18), see Supplementary Information, Figure S1. The SROC with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.9840, see the Supplementary Information, Figure S2.

3.6. Subgroup Analysis

Due to the moderate to high heterogeneity, several study characteristics (population age and criteria of AKI) were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity. The analysis of the diagnosis threshold was performed with Spearman rank correlation (ρ = −0.429; p = 0.397), indicating no threshold effect and allowing for further subgroup analysis. The relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOC) of the adult population relative to the pediatric population was 2.48 (95% CI: 0.01–737.91), indicating no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between adult and pediatric cohorts. The RDOCs of AKIN and KDIGO (both relative to RIFLE) were 25.13 (95% CI: 0.04–15927.64) and 5.38 (95% CI: 0.01–4757.39), respectively, indicating no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy under different criteria of AKI (data not shown).

3.7. Sensitivity Analyses

There were three studies that provided data after excluding patients with a UTI. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of these two studies were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92–1.00), respectively. The pooled positive LR was 31.95 (95% CI: 9.40–108.54), and the negative LR was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.05–0.17), see the Supplementary Information, Figure S3. The symmetric SROC with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.9995, see the Supplementary Information, Figure S4.

4. Discussion

Calprotectin is a heterodimer protein (S100A8/S100A9) that plays a role in the innate immune system, acute kidney pathophysiology, and kidney repair processes as described below. Our findings can be summarized in the following points: (1) Urinary calprotectin is a good marker for differentiation of intrinsic and prerenal AKI; (2) the diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin is not significantly different in different acute kidney diagnostic criteria and in adult or pediatric populations.
The urinary calprotectin is higher in intrinsic kidney injury than prerenal kidney injury. It may be reasonable to conclude that urinary calprotectin is a good diagnostic test in the discrimination of an intrinsic kidney injury with a pooled diagnostic accuracy of symmetric SROC of 0.9667. It has been noted in earlier studies that calprotectin is released from the immune system cells (neutrophils and to lesser degree monocytes) and renal collecting duct epithelial cells [10,11,25,26]. It has also been demonstrated that renal tubular epithelial cells produce calprotectin in response to unilateral ureteral obstruction [11]. Calprotectin also increases expression after ischemia-reperfusion injury and plays a role in M2 macrophage-mediated renal repair [12]. It acts as a danger-associated molecular pattern protein that activates toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). The available immunostainings of the clinical studies suggest that inflammatory infiltration rather than the tubular epithelial cells is the major source of urinary calprotectin in AKI [13,27]. Therefore, different etiologies of an intrinsic kidney injury which involved calprotectin, neutrophils infiltration, and TLR4 are expected to have higher urinary calprotectin. For example, in the leading causes of intrinsic kidney injury, renal epithelial tubular damage and inflammatory renal disease (including glomerulonephritis, tubular-interstitial nephritis and vasculitis, pyelonephritis) can lead to higher levels of urinary calprotectin. In contrast, in prerenal AKI, there is a functional deficit leading to low levels of urinary calprotectin. Elevated urinary calprotectin has been described in different diseases such as urinary bladder malignancies [28]. Gastroenterologists also used fecal calprotectin to distinguish between function disorder (irritable bowel syndrome) and inflammatory bowel diseases [29,30].
Heller (2011) has indicated that a UTI has a higher urinary calprotectin level than other intrinsic kidney injury causes. Pyuria is a potential confounder because it increases the calprotectin level in the urine, independent of renal function. Three above-mentioned studies (Heller, 2011; Seibert, 2013; Seibert, 2016) enrolled a UTI population as having intrinsic kidney injury. Three of the six enrolled studies (Heller, 2011; Chang 2015; Basiratnia, 2017) reported population or subgroup data showing an accuracy after exclusion of UTI and the symmetric SROC of pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.9995. This might suggest that the diagnostic value of calprotectin is better if UTI can be excluded before examination.
Our research also supports the notion that the diagnostic accuracy of urinary calprotectin does not differ from different AKI criteria. The current AKI criteria are based on serum creatinine and urine output. It is widely noted that serum creatinine is not only a delayed but also a functional marker, rather than a damage marker to kidney injury. The novel biomarker was elevated earlier than serum Cr, and in a previous human renal ischemia-reperfusion study [26], calprotectin even increased earlier than NGAL (2 h and 8 h after injury, respectively). This may be an explanation for why we found that the accuracy of urinary calprotectin is not interfered by different AKI criteria.
Calprotectin has several characteristics that make it a promising novel marker and even a troponin for nephrologists [31]. First, as mentioned above, it rises earlier than NGAL. Second, according to Azimi [31], calprotectin combined with serum endocan may further differentiate pure tubular injury from glomerular-tubular injury. In addition, calprotectin has been reported to be associated with mortality and can predict the progression of kidney disease. In an AKI pediatric population, Westhoff et al. concluded that urinary calprotectin can predict the 30-day mortality and the need for renal replacement therapy [16]. Another kidney transplantation adult population study conducted by Tepel et al. revealed that urinary calprotectin levels on day 1 after operation predicted allograft injury and renal function decline after 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery [32].
The first limitation concerns the moderate to high heterogeneity of enrolled studies due to different study populations, even in adult patients (cardiac care unit and kidney transplant populations). As with other similar AKI biomarker systemic studies [33], different acute kidney definitions are also sources of heterogeneity. The second limitation is that our enrolled studies are all published online, the data may represent an optimistic estimate. In addition, few studies have addressed the role of calprotectin so far and only six articles were enrolled in our studies. Furthermore, to date, there is no clinical golden standard for the diagnosis of intrinsic AKI, and current studies are all based on history, clinical, and physical examination criteria. This may result in the misclassification of kidney injury etiology. Urogenital malignancies and UTI may increase urinary calprotectin concentrations independent of acute kidney injury. The careful inspection for urogenital malignancies and UTI is warranted before clinical application.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, early diagnosis of acute kidney injury is of great significance to clinical practice and guides further therapy. Our study demonstrated that urinary calprotectin is a good diagnostic marker for discriminating intrinsic and prerenal AKI in adult or pediatric populations, and its performance was not interfered by different AKI criteria. Further large, multicenter trials may be needed to clarify and identify the possible role of urinary calprotectin in different populations. More efforts on developing biomarkers to guide therapy or treatment protocol and more rapid and accurate etiology diagnosis for AKI are still needed before before the troponin of nephrologist coming true.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/1/74/s1, Table S1: Primary reasons for exclusion of excluded studies, Figure S1. Diagnostic performance of the three studies providing data on urinary calprotectin with normalization to urine creatinine, Figure S2. Symmetric SROC according to the cutoffs of the three studies with urinary calprotectin with normalization to urine creatinine, Figure S3. Diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin with three studies excluding patients with urinary tract infection, Figure S4. Symmetric SROC according to the cutoffs of the three studies excluding patients with urinary tract infection.

Author Contributions

J.-J.C. and C.-H.C. methodology; P.-C.F., G.K., S.-W.C., Y.-T.C., formal analysis; J.-J.C. and C.-H.C., data extraction; J.-J.C., writing—Original draft preparation; G.K., C.-C.L. and P.-C.F., writing—Review and editing; C.-H.C., project administration.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Program (NSC 1 06-2314-B-182A-118 -MY3 and CMRPG3F1651-3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AKIacute kidney injury
Crcreatinine
CCUcoronary care unit
CRPC-reactive protein
ELISAEnzyme linked immunosorbent assay
KDIGOKidney Disease Global outcomes
NGALNeutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
NRNot report
pRIFLEPediatric Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function and End stage kidney disease
PCProspective cohort

References

  1. Haase, M.; Devarajan, P.; Haase-Fielitz, A.; Bellomo, R.; Cruz, D.N.; Wagener, G.; Krawczeski, C.D.; Koyner, J.L.; Murray, P.; Zappitelli, M.; et al. The outcome of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-positive subclinical acute kidney injury: A multicenter pooled analysis of prospective studies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 57, 1752–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siew, E.D.; Ware, L.B.; Gebretsadik, T.; Shintani, A.; Moons, K.G.; Wickersham, N.; Bossert, F.; Ikizler, T.A. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin moderately predicts acute kidney injury in critically ill adults. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 1823–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Koyner, J.L.; Vaidya, V.S.; Bennett, M.R.; Ma, Q.; Worcester, E.; Akhter, S.A.; Raman, J.; Jeevanandam, V.; O’Connor, M.F.; Devarajan, P.; et al. Urinary biomarkers in the clinical prognosis and early detection of acute kidney injury. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 5, 2154–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zelt, J.G.E.; Mielniczuk, L.M.; Liu, P.P.; Dupuis, J.Y.; Chih, S.; Akbari, A.; Sun, L.Y. Utility of Novel Cardiorenal Biomarkers in the Prediction and Early Detection of Congestive Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Seibert, F.S.; Pagonas, N.; Arndt, R.; Heller, F.; Dragun, D.; Persson, P.; Schmidt-Ott, K.; Zidek, W.; Westhoff, T.H. Calprotectin and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in the differentiation of pre-renal and intrinsic acute kidney injury. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2013, 207, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singer, E.; Elger, A.; Elitok, S.; Kettritz, R.; Nickolas, T.L.; Barasch, J.; Luft, F.C.; Schmidt-Ott, K.M. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin distinguishes pre-renal from intrinsic renal failure and predicts outcomes. Kidney Int. 2011, 80, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Au, V.; Feit, J.; Barasch, J.; Sladen, R.N.; Wagener, G. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) distinguishes sustained from transient acute kidney injury after general surgery. Kidney Int. Rep. 2016, 1, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, A.; Cai, Y.; Wang, P.F.; Qu, J.N.; Luo, Z.C.; Chen, X.D.; Huang, B.; Liu, Y.; Huang, W.Q.; Wu, J.; et al. Diagnosis and prognosis of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for acute kidney injury with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wu, V.C.; Shiao, C.C.; Chi, N.H.; Wang, C.H.; Chueh, S.J.; Liou, H.H.; Spapen, H.D.; Honore, P.M.; Chu, T.S. Outcome Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers at Initiation of Dialysis in Critical Units. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Striz, I.; Trebichavsky, I. Calprotectin—A pleiotropic molecule in acute and chronic inflammation. Physiol. Res. 2004, 53, 245–253. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujiu, K.; Manabe, I.; Nagai, R. Renal collecting duct epithelial cells regulate inflammation in tubulointerstitial damage in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 3425–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Dessing, M.C.; Tammaro, A.; Pulskens, W.P.; Teske, G.J.; Butter, L.M.; Claessen, N.; van Eijk, M.; van der Poll, T.; Vogl, T.; Roth, J.; et al. The calcium-binding protein complex S100A8/A9 has a crucial role in controlling macrophage-mediated renal repair following ischemia/reperfusion. Kidney Int. 2015, 87, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Heller, F.; Frischmann, S.; Grunbaum, M.; Zidek, W.; Westhoff, T.H. Urinary calprotectin and the distinction between prerenal and intrinsic acute kidney injury. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 6, 2347–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Seibert, F.S.; Rosenberger, C.; Mathia, S.; Arndt, R.; Arns, W.; Andrea, H.; Pagonas, N.; Bauer, F.; Zidek, W.; Westhoff, T.H. Urinary Calprotectin Differentiates Between Prerenal and Intrinsic Acute Renal Allograft Failure. Transplantation 2017, 101, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Westhoff, J.H.; Fichtner, A.; Waldherr, S.; Pagonas, N.; Seibert, F.S.; Babel, N.; Tonshoff, B.; Bauer, F.; Westhoff, T.H. Urinary biomarkers for the differentiation of prerenal and intrinsic pediatric acute kidney injury. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2016, 31, 2353–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Westhoff, J.H.; Seibert, F.S.; Waldherr, S.; Bauer, F.; Tonshoff, B.; Fichtner, A.; Westhoff, T.H. Urinary calprotectin, kidney injury molecule-1, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for the prediction of adverse outcome in pediatric acute kidney injury. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2017, 176, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chang, C.H.; Yang, C.H.; Yang, H.Y.; Chen, T.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Chang, S.W.; Chen, Y.T.; Hung, C.C.; Fang, J.T.; Yang, C.W.; et al. Urinary Biomarkers Improve the Diagnosis of Intrinsic Acute Kidney Injury in Coronary Care Units. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015, 94, e1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mehta, R.L.; Kellum, J.A.; Shah, S.V.; Molitoris, B.A.; Ronco, C.; Warnock, D.G.; Levin, A.; Acute Kidney Injury, N. Acute Kidney Injury Network: Report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit. Care 2007, 11, R31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2012, 2, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akcan-Arikan, A.; Zappitelli, M.; Loftis, L.L.; Washburn, K.K.; Jefferson, L.S.; Goldstein, S.L. Modified RIFLE criteria in critically ill children with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2007, 71, 1028–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Whiting, P.F.; Rutjes, A.W.; Westwood, M.E.; Mallett, S.; Deeks, J.J.; Reitsma, J.B.; Leeflang, M.M.; Sterne, J.A.; Bossuyt, P.M.; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011, 155, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Arends, L.R.; Hamza, T.H.; van Houwelingen, J.C.; Heijenbrok-Kal, M.H.; Hunink, M.G.; Stijnen, T. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves. Med. Decis. Making 2008, 28, 621–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zamora, J.; Abraira, V.; Muriel, A.; Khan, K.; Coomarasamy, A. Meta-DiSc: A software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2006, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Basiratnia, M.; Kosimov, M.; Farhadi, P.; Azimi, A.; Hooman, N. Urinary calprotectin as marker to distinguish functional and structural acute kidney injury in pediatric population. Iran. J. Pediatr. 2017, 27, e9727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vogl, T.; Tenbrock, K.; Ludwig, S.; Leukert, N.; Ehrhardt, C.; van Zoelen, M.A.; Nacken, W.; Foell, D.; van der Poll, T.; Sorg, C.; et al. Mrp8 and Mrp14 are endogenous activators of Toll-like receptor 4, promoting lethal, endotoxin-induced shock. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ebbing, J.; Seibert, F.S.; Pagonas, N.; Bauer, F.; Miller, K.; Kempkensteffen, C.; Gunzel, K.; Bachmann, A.; Seifert, H.H.; Rentsch, C.A.; et al. Dynamics of Urinary Calprotectin after Renal Ischaemia. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0146395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Schrezenmeier, E.V.; Barasch, J.; Budde, K.; Westhoff, T.; Schmidt-Ott, K.M. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury—pathophysiological basis and clinical performance. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2017, 219, 554–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ebbing, J.; Mathia, S.; Seibert, F.S.; Pagonas, N.; Bauer, F.; Erber, B.; Gunzel, K.; Kilic, E.; Kempkensteffen, C.; Miller, K.; et al. Urinary calprotectin: A new diagnostic marker in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. World J. Urol. 2014, 32, 1485–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Langhorst, J.; Elsenbruch, S.; Koelzer, J.; Rueffer, A.; Michalsen, A.; Dobos, G.J. Noninvasive markers in the assessment of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases: Performance of fecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, and PMN-elastase, CRP, and clinical indices. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 103, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gisbert, J.P.; McNicholl, A.G. Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig. Liver Dis. 2009, 41, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Azimi, A. Could “calprotectin” and “endocan” serve as “Troponin of Nephrologists”? Med. Hypotheses 2017, 99, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tepel, M.; Borst, C.; Bistrup, C.; Marcussen, N.; Pagonas, N.; Seibert, F.S.; Arndt, R.; Zidek, W.; Westhoff, T.H. Urinary calprotectin and posttransplant renal allograft injury. PLoS One 2014, 9, e113006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ho, J.; Tangri, N.; Komenda, P.; Kaushal, A.; Sood, M.; Brar, R.; Gill, K.; Walker, S.; MacDonald, K.; Hiebert, B.M.; et al. Urinary, Plasma, and Serum Biomarkers’ Utility for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Associated With Cardiac Surgery in Adults: A Meta-analysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2015, 66, 993–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart.
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart.
Jcm 08 00074 g001
Figure 2. Summary of risk of bias and applicability concerns.
Figure 2. Summary of risk of bias and applicability concerns.
Jcm 08 00074 g002
Figure 3. Diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin on discriminating between intrinsic acute kidney injuries and prerenal acute kidney injury.
Figure 3. Diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin on discriminating between intrinsic acute kidney injuries and prerenal acute kidney injury.
Jcm 08 00074 g003
Figure 4. Symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (symmetric SROC) according to the cutoffs of the six studies. Abbreviation: SROC, summary receiving operating characteristics; AUC, area under the curve; SE, standard error.
Figure 4. Symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (symmetric SROC) according to the cutoffs of the six studies. Abbreviation: SROC, summary receiving operating characteristics; AUC, area under the curve; SE, standard error.
Jcm 08 00074 g004
Table 1. The characteristics of the six included studies.
Table 1. The characteristics of the six included studies.
Study/yearLocationDesignAKI CriteriaPopulationSample TimeStorageAssayTest Kit
Basiratnia/2017 [24]IranPCAKINPediatricImmediately at diagnosis of AKI−20 °C, no centrifugationELISAPhiCal® Calprotectin, catalogue number K 6928; Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany
Chang/2015 [17]TaiwanPCKDIGOAdult CCUImmediately at admission−80 °C, centrifugationELISAR&D Systems, DLCN20, McKinley Place NE Minneapolis; MPLS, USA and Phi Cal® Calprotectin, K 6935; and Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany
Heller/2011 [13]GermanyPCAKINAdultWithin 3 days−20 °C, no centrifugationELISAPhiCal® Calprotectin, catalog number K 6935; Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany
Seibert/2013 [5]GermanyPCAKINAdultNR−20 °C, no centrifugationELISAPhiCal® Calprotectin, catalog number K 6935; Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany
Seibert/2017 [14]GermanyPCAKINAdult transplantAt admission or on clinics−20 °C, no centrifugationELISAPhiCal® Calprotectin, catalogue number K 6928; Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany
Westhoff/2016 [15]GermanyPCpRIFLEPediatricImmediately at diagnosis or after admission with AKI.−80 °C, centrifugationELISAPhiCal® Calprotectin; Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany
Abbreviation: AKI (acute kidney injury), AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network), CCU (coronary care unit), ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay), KDIGO (Kidney Disease Global Outcomes), NR (not reported), pRIFLE (pediatric Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function and End stage kidney disease), PC (prospective cohort).
Table 2. Patient characteristics based on available data.
Table 2. Patient characteristics based on available data.
VariableAdultPediatric
Prerenal
(n = 116)
Intrinsic
(n = 258)
pPrerenal
(n = 44)
Intrinsic
(n = 84)
p
Male (%)73.349.2<0.00154.640.5<0.001
Age (years)68 (66, 68)68 (58, 71)0.0077.5 (2.6, 7.5)6.0 (0.6, 6.0)<0.001
Hypertension (%)80.282.6<0.001NANANA
Diabetes (%)28.530.6<0.001NANANA
Urinary tract infection (%)041.1<0.001NANANA
Creatinine on admission or diagnosis (mg/dL)3.1 (2.6, 4.4)3.4 (3.1, 4.1)0.0541.1 (0.9, 1.1)1.8 (1.8, 1.9)<0.001
Creatinine at baseline (mg/dL)1.4 (1.4, 1.7)1.4 (1.4, 1.9)0.023NANANA
CRP (mg/dL)5.2 (3.5, 5.3)5.1 (0.7, 6.7)0.412NANANA
Urine creatinine (g/L)0.7 (0.7, 0.8)0.6 (0.5, 0.6)<0.001NANANA
Urinary calprotectin (ng/mL)54 (28, 385)1955 (1955, 2405)<0.00129 (19, 29)1240 (427, 1240)<0.001
Urinary calprotectin (ng/mL)/Cr (g/L) ratio57 (52, 310)2775 (2775, 3698)<0.001NANANA
CRP, C-reactive protein; NA, not applicable; Cr, creatinine; continuous variable was presented as median and interquartile range.
Table 3. Summary of diagnostic performance of the six included studies.
Table 3. Summary of diagnostic performance of the six included studies.
Study/YearSample SizeEvent (Prerenal/Intrinsic)Cufoff (ng/mL)SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
Basiratnia 20177530/4523096.796.797.796.7
Chang 20157431/43314.688.496NRNR
Heller 20118634/5230092.397.19889.2
Seibert 20136224/3860097.495.897.495.8
Seibert 201715227/125134.590.474.1NRNR
Westhoff 20165314/397677939760
PPV, positive predicted value; NPV, negative predicted value; NR, not reported.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.-J.; Fan, P.-C.; Kou, G.; Chang, S.-W.; Chen, Y.-T.; Lee, C.-C.; Chang, C.-H. Meta-Analysis: Urinary Calprotectin for Discrimination of Intrinsic and Prerenal Acute Kidney Injury. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010074

AMA Style

Chen J-J, Fan P-C, Kou G, Chang S-W, Chen Y-T, Lee C-C, Chang C-H. Meta-Analysis: Urinary Calprotectin for Discrimination of Intrinsic and Prerenal Acute Kidney Injury. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(1):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jia-Jin, Pei-Chun Fan, George Kou, Su-Wei Chang, Yi-Ting Chen, Cheng-Chia Lee, and Chih-Hsiang Chang. 2019. "Meta-Analysis: Urinary Calprotectin for Discrimination of Intrinsic and Prerenal Acute Kidney Injury" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 1: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop