Next Article in Journal
Impact of a Cultivation System upon the Weed Seedbank Size and Composition in a Mediterranean Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Risks of Contaminating Low Erucic Acid Rapeseed with High Erucic Rapeseed and Identification of Mitigation Strategies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/agriculture9090191
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Agriculture 2018, 8(10), 156.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Royo-Esnal, A. and Valencia-Gredilla, F. Camelina as a Rotation Crop for Weed Control in Organic Farming in a Semiarid Mediterranean Climate. Agriculture 2018, 8(10), 156

by
Aritz Royo-Esnal
* and
Francisco Valencia-Gredilla
Department of Hortofruticulture, Botany and Gardening, Agrotecnio, University of Lleida, Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2019, 9(9), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090191
Submission received: 28 August 2019 / Accepted: 30 August 2019 / Published: 4 September 2019
Versions Notes
The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]. Due to an inadvertent error caused by calculation of the models, replace:
In our climatic conditions, up to 83.9%, 46.9%, and 6.9% of A. sterilis, L. rigidum, and P. rhoeas emergences would have been killed by SD1, while these values would go up to 86.2%, 62.4%, and 17.8%, respectively in SD2, and up to 91.9%, 77.7%, and 42.3% in SD3.
with:
In our climatic conditions, up to 83.9%, 46.9%, and 32.3% of A. sterilis, L. rigidum, and P. rhoeas emergences would have been killed by SD1, while these values would go up to 86.2%, 62.4%, and 47.3%, respectively in SD2, and up to 91.9%, 77.7%, and 68.1% in SD3.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.

Reference

  1. Royo-Esnal, A.; Valencia-Gredilla, F. Camelina as a rotation crop for weed control in organic farming in a semiarid Mediterranean climate. Agriculture 2018, 8, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Royo-Esnal, A.; Valencia-Gredilla, F. Correction: Royo-Esnal, A. and Valencia-Gredilla, F. Camelina as a Rotation Crop for Weed Control in Organic Farming in a Semiarid Mediterranean Climate. Agriculture 2018, 8(10), 156. Agriculture 2019, 9, 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090191

AMA Style

Royo-Esnal A, Valencia-Gredilla F. Correction: Royo-Esnal, A. and Valencia-Gredilla, F. Camelina as a Rotation Crop for Weed Control in Organic Farming in a Semiarid Mediterranean Climate. Agriculture 2018, 8(10), 156. Agriculture. 2019; 9(9):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Royo-Esnal, Aritz, and Francisco Valencia-Gredilla. 2019. "Correction: Royo-Esnal, A. and Valencia-Gredilla, F. Camelina as a Rotation Crop for Weed Control in Organic Farming in a Semiarid Mediterranean Climate. Agriculture 2018, 8(10), 156" Agriculture 9, no. 9: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop