Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
All We Need Is Brain (and Technology)
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
New Directions in Intelligence Research: Avoiding the Mistakes of the Past
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessComment
J. Intell. 2014, 2(1), 21-25; doi:10.3390/jintelligence2010021

Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Received: 30 November 2013 / Revised: 7 February 2014 / Accepted: 25 February 2014 / Published: 11 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence, Where to Look, Where to Go?)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [283 KB, uploaded 11 March 2014]   |  

Abstract

This comment argues that an important issue in intelligence research is to identify constructs with validity beyond g, and that non-g residuals of tests represent a promising target.
Keywords: general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT. general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Coyle, T.R. Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g. J. Intell. 2014, 2, 21-25.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top