Next Article in Journal
Formation of Nanospikes on AISI 420 Martensitic Stainless Steel under Gallium Ion Bombardment
Previous Article in Journal
Hyperthermia, Cytotoxicity, and Cellular Uptake Properties of Manganese and Zinc Ferrite Magnetic Nanoparticles Synthesized by a Polyol-Mediated Process
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/nano9101490
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Pd-Doped γ-Graphyne to Detect Dissolved Gases in Transformer Oil: A Density Functional Theory Investigation

by
Xiaoxing Zhang
1,2,3,
Rongxing Fang
1,
Dachang Chen
2,* and
Guozhi Zhang
1
1
Hubei Key Laboratory for High-efficiency Utilization of Solar Energy and Operation Control of Energy Storage System, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
2
School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 400044, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(10), 1490; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101490
Submission received: 24 September 2019 / Revised: 11 October 2019 / Accepted: 12 October 2019 / Published: 19 October 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To realize a high response and high selectivity gas sensor for the detection dissolved gases in transformer oil, in this study, the adsorption of four kinds of gases (H2, CO, C2H2, and CH4) on Pd-graphyne was investigated, and the gas sensing properties were evaluated. The energetically-favorable structure of Pd-Doped γ-graphyne was first studied, including through a comparison of different adsorption sites and a discussion of the electronic properties. Then, the adsorption of these four molecules on Pd-graphyne was explored. The adsorption structure, adsorption energy, electron transfer, electron density distribution, band structure, and density of states were calculated and analyzed. The results show that Pd prefers to be adsorbed on the middle of three C≡C bonds, and that the band gap of γ-graphyne becomes smaller after adsorption. The CO adsorption exhibits the largest adsorption energy and electron transfer, and effects an obvious change to the structure and electronic properties to Pd-graphyne. Because of the conductance decrease after adsorption of CO and the acceptable recovery time at high temperatures, Pd-graphyne is a promising gas sensing material with which to detect CO with high selectivity. This work offers theoretical support for the design of a nanomaterial-based gas sensor using a novel structure for industrial applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

At present, 2D materials are attracting much attention after the successful synthesis of graphene by micromechanical exfoliation in 2004 [1]. Because of the excellent physical and chemical properties of graphene, including high surface area and activity, high thermal conductivity, good heat dissipation, sensitive light response, and gas/ion response, graphene has found broad application value and development space [2,3,4]. Nonetheless, the difficulty of operating the zero value of the band gap restricts its wide use in industrial processes. Based on this, several emerging 2D materials have been exploited, including transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) [5,6], isomers of graphene [7], metal carbides and nitrides [8], 2D metal-organic frameworks [9], etc. Because of their more flexible band structures, these materials could have more promising applications in the field of optical and electronic devices.
Among numerous 2D carbon allotropies, graphyne (GY) remains one of the most popular monolayer materials [10,11,12]. The two most popular structures, γ-graphyne (γ-GY) and graphdiyne (GDY), both have sp2- and sp-hybridized carbon atoms. The difference is that in γ-GY, only one C-C triple bond is present between two hexagonal carbon rings, while two triple bonds occur between the two rings in GDY [10,11,12]. Previous studies using theoretical methods have shown that several structures of graphyne are physically and chemically stable, such as α-graphyne (α-GY), β-graphyne (β-GY), 6,6,12-graphye [11], etc. In contrast to graphene and graphite, C≡C triple bonds appear in all types of graphyne. The ratio of bond type of the acetylenic linkages of α-GY, β-GY, and γ-GY is different. α-GY has 100% acetylenic linkages, while β-GY and γ-GY have 66.67% and 33.33%, respectively [13]. Different types of GY also have different band structures. For α-GY and β-GY, the valence band and conduction band cross to one point, while γ-GY has a direct band gap of about 0.471 eV, as measured using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) approach [14]. But graphdiyne (GDY) was the first one reported to be synthesized in experiment [15]. However, although γ-GY has not been prepared practically, several theoretical studies have shown that it has promising uses in field of catalysis, energy storage, gas/ion sensor, and electronic/optical devices. γ-GY may be a promising catalyst for oxygen reduction reactions (ORRs), nitrogen reduction reactions (NRRs) etc. After the doping of metal or non-metal atoms, graphyne has excellent catalytic performance, and it may be used as a single-atom catalytic material in the future [16,17]. As for the adjustment of the physical properties of γ-GY, e.g., the electronic and magnetic properties, the introduction of impurities and surface defects is an effective method [18,19,20,21]. The doping of metal atom clusters is also a feasible method to adjust the surface activity and electronic properties [22,23,24]. GY is also a promising gas sensing material in many fields. Pristine GY has been shown to interact weakly with most common gas molecules, e.g., CO, CH4, CO2, NH3, and NO, among others [25,26]. Doping with Mn can obviously strengthen the chemical interactions between these molecules and the γ-GY surface [26]. For the gas detection of CO molecules, to improve the weak response, the substitution doping with B and N makes GY more sensitive to CO [27]. For the detection of NH3, doping the main group atom, e.g., Si, can significantly reduce the recovery time [28]. The substitution doping of B can also enhance the gas sensing properties for several inorganic, small molecules such as NO and NO2, as well as organic molecules [29,30]. The doping of noble atoms has also been shown to significantly enhance the chemical interactions between CO and γ-GY [31]. Based on several theoretical studies of GY as a gas sensing material, pristine GY exhibits weak chemical interactions with most small gas molecules. To enhance the gas sensing properties, introducing an adatom onto the surface is advisable. And also, choosing the appropriate doping approach is essential for the selectivity of GY-based sensing materials.
High voltage equipment has been widely used in power stations, transformer substations, and power distribution stations. To guarantee the operational status of equipment such as transformers using oil-paper insulation or gas-insulated switchgears (GISs) using SF6 as an insulating medium, detecting impurity gases using gas sensors has been widely studied. For the detection of SF6 decomposition, several 2D materials have been explored, and surface modification including doping transition metal atoms or metal oxides are feasible to enhance the chemical interactions between the SF6 decompositions and the sensing materials [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Several impurity gases, such as CO, H2, C2H2, CH4, C2H6, and C2H4, will be generated and dissolve in the oil in the transformer after insulation faults occur. So, a dissolved gas analysis (DGA) method is essential for equipment inspection. In view of this, several materials have been studied to detect these kinds of molecules, including metal oxides [42,43,44,45,46,47] and TMDs [46,47,48]. However, the selectivity and the enhancement of the sensitivity should be further considered. In this regard, due to the high surface activity of γ-GY, and the emerge active sites caused by the introduction of Pd [42,44,45], in this study, we propose a DFT study of four typical dissolved gases in transformer oil (H2, CO, C2H2, and CH4) which are adsorbed onto Pd-doped γ-GY. Firstly, the adsorption of one Pd atom on γ-GY was discussed, and the most energetically-favorable structure of Pd-GY was found. Then, the adsorption of gas molecules onto the Pd-GY was investigated and the adsorption energy, electron transfer, and electronic properties were studied in detail. Finally, the different responses to these gases were evaluated. We believe that this study may provide a theoretical basis for graphyne-based nanomaterials to detect dissolved gases in oil, and guidance for the future development of nanomaterial-based gas sensors in many fields.

2. Methods

All the adsorption of Pd and gas molecules on γ-GY are calculated in the Dmol3 module [49]. The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof function (PBE) approach by generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was chosen for correction of the exchange-correlation function [50,51]. The total energy, band structure, and density of states (DOS) were also calculated using the GGA-PBE approximation method. The double numerical plus polarization (DNP) method was considered as the basis set for all the calculations, and the DFT semi-core pseudopotential (DSSP) was selected to handle the electrons, that is, a norm-conserving pseudopotential was applied to calculate the core electrons to improve the calculation efficiency. The long-range interactions derived from the Van der Walls force was calculated using the DFT-D2 method, as proposed by Grimme [52]. A cutoff radius of 4.5 Å was set, and this value remained unchanged in this study. All geometric optimizations between the two steps were carried out using a convergence criterion of 1×10−5 Ha for energy convergence, 0.002 Ha/Å for force convergence, and 0.005 Å for displacement convergence. A k-point sample in the Monkhorst-Pack grid of 4×4×1 was used for geometric optimization, while a more accurate k-point was considered in the electronic properties with a Gaussian smearing of 0.005 Ha [53]. The binding energy (Eads) was calculated using the following equation:
E b i n d = E P d − g r a p h y n e − E g r a p h y n e − E P d   a t o m
where EPd-graphyne, Egraphyne, and EPd atom are the total energy of Pd-graphene, pristine graphyne monolayer, and isolated Pd atom. After the adsorption of one Pd atom, the electron transfer was obtained using the Hirshfeld analysis method [54]:
Q = − ∫ ( ρ 0 ( r ) ∑ ρ 0 ′ ( r ) ) • ( ρ ( r ) − ∑ ρ 0 ′ ( r ) ) d r
where ρ(r) is the total electron density of the selected structure, and ρ0(r) represents the electron density of every atom if separated. ∑ρ0′(r) is the sum of ρ0(r).
The adsorption sites of Pd are shown in Figure 1; considering all the structures of the different adsorption sites, the structure with the largest binding energy was chosen for gas adsorption. The adsorption energy of one gas molecule on Pd-graphyne is defined as:
E a d s = E P d − g r a p h y n e / g a s − E P d − g r a p h y n e − E g a s
where EPd-graphyne/gas, EPd-graphyne, and Egas are the total energy of the structure of the gas molecules adsorbed onto Pd-graphene, Pd-graphyne before the adsorption, and isolation of the gas molecule. All the electron transfers between the gas molecule and Pd-graphyne were also clarified based on the Hirshfeld analysis method. When the electron transfer of QT is negative, it indicates that the gas molecule extracts electrons from the Pd-graphyne, while if QT is positive, it indicates that the gas molecule transfers electrons to Pd-graphyne. To gain a deeper understanding of the electron transfer, the electron density difference between the molecule and the Pd-graphyne can be obtained after calculating the electron density as follows:
Δ ρ = ρ P d − g r a p h y n e / g a s − ( ρ P d − g r a p h y n e + ρ g a s )
where ρPd-graphyne/gas, ρPd-graphyne and ρgas are the total electron density of Pd-graphyne after adsorbing the molecule, that of Pd-graphyne before adsorption, and that of the isolated molecule, respectively. The purple and red regions are the electron accumulation regions, while the green and blue regions represent electron depletion.
The band structure, the total density of states (TDOS), and the partial density of states (PDOS) were also compared before and after gas adsorption

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Structure of Pd-Graphyne and Dissolved Gas in Transformer Oil

The calculated lattice parameter of γ-GY in this study is 6.89 Å × 6.89 Å, which is consistent with the former results [13,29]. We built a 2 × 2 super cell and put one Pd atom on the surface with different adsorption sites. The stoichiometric proportion of Pd and C is 1:48. The adsorption sites of Pd on the γ-GY surface are shown in Figure 1, including two hollow sites (H1, H2) and three bridge sites (B1, B2, and B3). The initial five structures of Pd-graphyne are fully geometrically optimized. The optimized structures are shown in Figure 2, and the summary of the binding energy and electron transfers are listed in Table 1. According to a comparison of the binding energy, adsorption on the H1 site exhibits the largest energy, indicating that one Pd atom on γ-GY has the most energetically-favorable structure. In Figure 2a, the Pd atom is located in the middle of three C≡C bonds. The distance between Pd and one hybridized C atom is about 2.10 Å. It is important to note that the Pd atom is not totally in the plane of the γ-GY, but rather, it extrudes from the surface by about 0.057 Å. The binding energy of the Pd on the H1 site is −2.45 eV, with an electron transfer from Pd to γ-GY of +0.363 e. The adsorbed Pd atom is positively charged. The adsorption on the B3 site exhibits the second largest adsorption energy, while other adsorption energies are smaller. Based on a comparison of the binding energy, we will focus solely on the structure with the largest binding energy for further discussion, i.e., electronic properties and gas adsorption.
The band structures and DOS of pristine γ-GY and Pd-graphyne obtained by the PBE method are shown in Figure 3. Pristine γ-GY has a direct band structure with a 0.42 eV band gap at the Gamma point. This value is very similar to that obtained in other studies (0.43 eV in ref. [23] and 0.435 eV in ref. [55]). The TDOS also shows a gap near 0 eV. It should be noted that the Fermi-level (0 eV) in Dmol3 module is set at the highest occupied state, and thus, the imaginary line is in the middle of the highest occupied peak in Figure 3a. So, the non-zero value at 0 eV is mainly because of the broadening of the peak. After doping the Pd atom, the band structure also shows a direct band gap and the value decreases to 0.33 eV. The Pd atom mainly introduces several impurity states near −2.5 eV to 0 eV. The Pd atom also slightly changes its band distribution near 0 eV, and thus, decreases the band gap. We will only consider the adsorption of gas molecules on the structure in Figure 2a in the next section.
The structure of four kinds of gas molecules are shown in Figure 1b–e. H2 and CO are diatomic molecules, while the C atoms in C2H2 are sp hybridized and the C atom in CH4 is sp3 hybridized. The structures conform to the results obtained in our previous study [46,47,48]. For the initial adsorption structure, we considered two adsorption directions for H2 onto the Pd atom (H2 parallel to the surface and vertical to the surface), two adsorption directions of CO over the Pd atom (C atom downward and O atom downward), one adsorption direction of C2H2 (the C≡C bond right above the Pd atom), and two adsorption directions of CH4 (one H atom downward and three H atoms downward). Only the structures with the largest adsorption energy of each gas molecule were chosen for further study.

3.2. Adsorption of Gas Molecule on Pd-Graphyne

The most energetically-favorable adsorption structures of gas molecules on Pd-graphyne are shown in Figure 4; the adsorption energy and electron transfers are listed in Table 2. The H2 molecule prefers to be adsorbed vertically to the surface right above the Pd atom. The adsorption brings only −0.08 eV adsorption energy and −0.059 e electron transfer. The adsorption distance is 2.58 Å. The Pd atom remains its former position. The adsorption of CO occurs somewhat differentely. The C atom in CO prefers to be right above the Pd atom, which moves from the H1 site to the B3 site (between one C≡C bond). The CO obtains −0.080 e from Pd-graphyne, indicating its role as an electron acceptor. The adsorption energy of CO on Pd-graphyne reaches −1.11 eV, which is the largest among these four molecules. The adsorption of C2H2 exhibits only −0.16 eV adsorption energy, with a very small electron transfer (−0.015 e) compared to other adsorptions. Finally, one sp hybridized C atom is right above the Pd atom. The CH4 adsorption has −0.13 eV adsorption energy and −0.063 e electron transfer. For the adsorption of C2H2 and CH4, the adsorption distance is much larger compared to the adsorption of H2 and CO, and the position of the Pd atom is unchanged. To sum up, only CO adsorption causes a significant change in the structure of Pd-graphyne, with much larger adsorption energy.
To perform a more advanced analysis of the interactions, the electron density difference (EDD) was calculated; the results are shown in Figure 5. For the adsorption of H2, an obvious electron accumulation occurs near the upper H atom and between the H2 and Pd atoms, while the depletion region is between the two H atoms. However, Pd-graphyne does not show any obvious electron density change. The CO adsorption results in an obvious change of the electron distribution. An apparent electron accumulation occurs between the molecule and the Pd atom, while the depletion is around Pd and between C and O atoms. The electrons prefer to move between the molecule and the Pd atom, rather than beneath the Pd. The adsorption of C2H2 causes obvious electron depletion around Pd, and changes the electron distribution of Pd-graphyne to some extent. As for the adsorption of CH4, only a slight depletion region can be found around the Pd atom. Given the different isosurface in Figure 5b, the CO adsorption yields the largest electron redistribution, and the C2H2 adsorption also causes a considerable change in the electron density of the Pd-graphyne; however, the other two adsorptions only result in a smaller effect. The relationship of electron transfer and electronic properties after adsorption will be discussed in the following section.

3.3. Electronic Properties of Pd-Graphyne and Gas Sensing Evaluation

To investigate the effect upon the electronic properties of the Pd-graphyne, the band structure and DOS before and after adsorption were compared. The band structures of Pd-graphyne after adsorbing gas molecules are shown in Figure 6. All the band structures still show a direct band gap, but the gap values have some differences. The H2 and CH4 adsorptions do not exhibit any obvious change of band structure. However, the CO adsorption increases the band gap, while C2H2 decreases it. Considering the electron distribution in Figure 5, only the adsorptions of CO and C2H2 yield obvious changes in electron distribution and change the electronic properties of Pd-graphyne. As a result, the band gap changes only after the adsorption of CO and C2H2.
To further investigate the electronic properties, the TDOS of Pd-graphyne after adsorption and the PDOS of the adsorbed molecule are shown in Figure 7. For the adsorption of H2 and CH4, the states near the Fermi level do not exhibit obvious changes. However, the adsorbed CO or C2H2 molecule introduces several impurity states just below the Fermi level; thus, these states change the electronic properties of the Pd-graphyne near 0 eV. Furthermore, the new band gap has some differences compared to the Pd-graphyne before adsorption. Because the CO adsorption has a much shorter adsorption distance, larger adsorption energy, and significant changes in structure and electron distribution, the chemical interactions between the Pd atom and CO are explored using the PDOS of the atomic orbitals of the Pd and C atoms in CO, as shown in Figure 7e. The states between −7 eV and −6 eV consist of Pd 5s, Pd 4d, and C 2p orbitals. The states between −3 eV and 0 eV are mainly Pd 4d and 5s orbitals. As for the antibonding orbitals above 0 eV, the states are composed of Pd 4d, 5p, and C 2p orbitals. The obvious hybridizations of peaks near −6 eV and +3 eV between the Pd and C atomic orbitals show significant chemical interactions between these two atoms. In summary, the largest adsorption energy (−1.11 eV), largest electron transfer (−0.080 e) of CO compared to other adsorptions, and the significant state hybridization between the Pd and C atoms provide evidence for the strong interactions between CO and Pd-graphyne.
Resistance type gas sensors have attracted much attention for their gas sensing properties. Electrical conductivity is strongly affected by the band structure of the sensing materials, and the change of the resistance can be evaluated by the band gap [56]:
σ ∝ e ( − E g / 2 k B T )
where σ represents the evaluated conductance of the gas sensor, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the working temperature of the gas sensor. It can be seen that in a fixed working temperature, a smaller band gap leads to a larger conductance and vice versa. In this study, the band gap of Pd-graphyne is 0.33 eV, increasing to 0.37 eV when adsorbing CO, while decreasing to 0.31 eV after C2H2 adsorption. As a result, the conductance rises when detecting C2H2 and falls when adsorbing CO. However, another point should be also considered: the recovery time of the sensor is an important aspect relative to its the sensing properties. A very short recovery time can promote the desorption process, but rapid desorption may lead to a higher limit of detection. So, the recovery time should be kept within an acceptable range. The recovery time can be evaluated as follows [57]:
τ = A − 1 e ( − E b a r / k B T )
where A denotes the apparent frequency factor, kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, and T is the working temperature, respectively. Ebar is the energy barrier of the molecule desorption from the surface. For the adsorption of H2, CO, and C2H2, as shown in Figure 4, during the adsorption process, the structure of Pd-graphyne shows nearly no change, and no chemical bonds are broken. As a result, the adsorption does not undergo any endothermic process, and has no energy barrier. Moreover, these three adsorptions mainly show Van der Waals interactions, and no obvious bond formation nor bond breakages have been observed. So, the desorption process of these three gas molecules will not experience a transition state, and the energy barrier of the desorption can be seen as the absolute value of the adsorption energy. The transition state of the adsorption process for CO is shown in Figure 8. It can be seen that the value of the energy barrier of the desorption process is only 1.11−0.04 = 1.07 eV. This value is smaller than the adsorption energy of CO (1.11 eV). As a result, the total energy barrier of desorption is still 1.11 eV, which is the same as that of the adsorption energy. So, for these four adsorptions, the absolute values of Ebar and Eads are the same. The value of A can be evaluated as 1012 s−1, which is consistent with results published in other studies [58]. According to the above precondition, the desorption times of H2, C2H2, and CH4 are 2.25 × 10−11 s, 5.08 × 10−10 s, and 1.58 × 10−10 s, which are much smaller than that of CO, i.e., 5.92 × 10−6 s at 298K. At room temperature, CO is hard to desorb from the surface, but much faster desorption of C2H2 may result in a much higher detection limit. However, if the working temperature reaches 498K, the desorption time of CO decreases to about 0.171 s; this shorter time is suitable for CO sensing. As a result, the Pd-graphyne-based gas sensor may have very good selectivity for CO at higher temperatures.

4. Conclusions

This study discussed the structure and electronic properties of Pd-graphyne, as well as its adsorption properties for four common dissolved gases in transformer oil (H2, CO, C2H2, and CH4). Pd atoms prefer to be adsorbed on the H1 site with the largest binding energy (−2.45 eV) and electron transfer (+0.363 e). The introduction of a Pd atom decreases the band gap and brings in impurity states just below 0 eV. Among the four types of gases, CO adsorption yields the largest adsorption energy and electron transfer. Moreover, the Pd atom moves from the H1 site to B3 site, resulting in obvious changes in the geometric structure and electronic properties of Pd-graphyne. The band gap becomes larger after CO adsorption, but smaller after C2H2 adsorption. The strong chemical interactions between Pd-graphyne and adsorbed CO are mainly attributed to the hybridization of the atomic orbitals of the Pd and C in CO. The recovery properties of the Pd-graphyne-based gas sensor show that the recovery time is about 0.171 s for CO desorption at 498K. This acceptable result indicates that this approach may be applied in the realization of a high selectivity gas sensor for CO detection.

Author Contributions

X.Z. and D.C. proposed the project and organized the manuscript. R.F. and G.Z. contributed to the theoretical simulation and analyzed the simulation results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51777144.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, P.; Wang, K.; Zhu, H. Recent developments in graphene-based membranes: Structure, mass-transport mechanism and potential applications. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2287–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, X.; Yin, Z.; Wu, S.; Qi, X.; He, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, Q.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based materials: Synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Small 2011, 7, 1876–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Singh, V.; Joung, D.; Zhai, L.; Das, S.; Khondaker, S.I.; Seal, S. Graphene based materials: Past, present and future. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2011, 56, 1178–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Han, C.; He, J.; Ni, Z.; Chen, W. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides: Interface and defect engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3100–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tan, C.; Zhang, H. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2713–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rajkamal, A.; Thapa, R. Carbon allotropes as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Naguib, M.; Mochalin, V.N.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. 25th anniversary article: Mxenes: A new family of two-dimensional materials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 992–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, M.; Huang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Huang, Z.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, H. Two-dimensional metal–organic framework nanosheets: Synthesis and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6267–6295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Liu, H.; Li, Y. Graphdiyne and graphyne: From theoretical predictions to practical construction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2572–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, N.; Xue, Y.; Zuo, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, Y. Progress in research into 2d graphdiyne-based materials. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 7744–7803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sakamoto, R.; Fukui, N.; Maeda, H.; Matsuoka, R.; Toyoda, R.; Nishihara, H. The accelerating world of graphdiynes. Adv. Mater. 2019, 1804211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ruiz-Puigdollers, A.; Gamallo, P. DFT study of the role of N- and B-doping on structural, elastic and electronic properties of α-, β- and γ-graphyne. Carbon 2017, 114, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, B.G.; Choi, H.J. Graphyne: Hexagonal network of carbon with versatile Dirac cones. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 115435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, G.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, D. Architecture of graphdiyne nanoscale films. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3256–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, Y.; Liu, S.; Cheng, Z.; Shen, Z. Graphyne doped with transition-metal single atoms as effective bifunctional electrocatalysts for water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 492, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. He, T.; Matta, S.K.; Du, A. Single tungsten atom supported on N-doped graphyne as a high-performance electrocatalyst for nitrogen fixation under ambient conditions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 1546–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, S.; Ruiz Puigdollers, A.; Gamallo, P.; Viñes, F.; Lee, J.Y. Functionalization of γ-graphyne by transition metal adatoms. Carbon 2017, 120, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, J.; Zhou, P.; Jiao, N.; Ma, S.Y.; Zhang, K.W.; Wang, R.Z.; Sun, L.Z. Magnetic exchange coupling and anisotropy of 3d transition metal nanowires on graphyne. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kang, B.; Shi, H.; Wang, F.-F.; Lee, J.Y. Importance of doping site of B, N, and O in tuning electronic structure of graphynes. Carbon 2016, 105, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kang, B.; Ai, H.; Lee, J.Y. Single-atom vacancy induced changes in electronic and magnetic properties of graphyne. Carbon 2017, 116, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Z.W.; Wen, Z.; Jiang, Q. Rational design of Ag38 cluster supported by graphdiyne for catalytic co oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 3463–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J.; Cui, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yang, J. Density functional theory study of small Ag cluster adsorbed on graphyne. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 465, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Seif, A.; López, M.J.; Granja-DelRío, A.; Azizi, K.; Alonso, J.A. Adsorption and growth of palladium clusters on graphdiyne. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 19094–19102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Meng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, H.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Q.; Rao, D.; Liu, Y.; Deng, K.; Lu, R. Graphdiyne as a high-efficiency membrane for separating oxygen from harmful gases: A first-principles study. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28166–28170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, Z.; Lv, P.; Ma, D.; Yang, X.; Li, S.; Yang, Z. Detection of gas molecules on single Mn adatom adsorbed graphyne: A DFT-D study. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 065109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Omidvar, A.; Mohajeri, A. Decorated graphyne and its boron nitride analogue as versatile nanomaterials for CO detection. Mol. Phys. 2015, 113, 3900–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peyghan, A.A.; Rastegar, S.F.; Hadipour, N.L. DFT study of NH3 adsorption on pristine, Ni- and Si-doped graphynes. Phys. Lett. A 2014, 378, 2184–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z. Adsorption of NOx (x = 1, 2) gas molecule on pristine and B atom embedded γ-graphyne based on first-principles study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nagarajan, V.; Srimathi, U.; Chandiramouli, R. First-principles insights on detection of dimethyl amine and trimethyl amine vapors using graphdiyne nanosheets. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2018, 1123, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, D.W.; Li, T.; Wang, Q.; Yang, G.; He, C.; Ma, B.; Lu, Z. Graphyne as a promising substrate for the noble-metal single-atom catalysts. Carbon 2015, 95, 756–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Cui, H.; Tang, J.; Pi, S.; Cui, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y. High selectivity n-type InSe monolayer toward decomposition products of sulfur hexafluoride: A density functional theory study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 479, 852–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, H.; Li, Y.; Tang, J.; Xiao, S.; Zhang, D. A first-principles study of the SF6 decomposed products adsorbed over defective WS2 monolayer as promising gas sensing device. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2019, 19, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J.; Pi, S.; Li, Y.; Cui, Z. High Selective SO2 Gas Sensor Based on Monolayer β-AsSb to Detect SF6 Decompositions. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 19, 1215–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, D.; Tang, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, H. Detecting decompositions of sulfur hexafluoride using MoS2 monolayer as gas sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 19, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J.; Cui, Z.; Cui, H. Pristine and Cu decorated hexagonal Inn monolayer, a promising candidate to detect and scavenge SF6 decompositions based on first-principle study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 363, 346–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J.; Cui, Z.; Cui, H.; Pi, S. Theoretical study of monolayer PtSe2 as outstanding gas sensor to detect SF6 decompositions. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2018, 39, 1405–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, D.; Wu, J.; Li, P.; Cao, Y. Room-temperature SO2 gas-sensing properties based on a metal-doped MoS2 nanoflower: An experimental and density functional theory investigation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 20666–20677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chu, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Yang, A.; Lv, P.; Wu, Y.; Rong, M.; Gao, L. Highly selective detection of sulfur hexafluoride decomposition components H2S and SOF2 employing sensors based on tin oxide modified reduced graphene oxide. Carbon 2018, 135, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cui, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y. First-principles insight into Ni-doped Inn monolayer as a noxious gases scavenger. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 494, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cui, H.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. Ru-InN Monolayer as a Gas Scavenger to Guard the Operation Status of SF6 Insulation Devices: A First-Principles Theory. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 5249–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Lu, Z.; Wei, Z.; Xu, L.; Gui, Y. Recent advances of SnO2-based sensors for detecting fault characteristic gases extracted from power transformer oil. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fan, J.; Wang, F.; Sun, Q.; Ye, H.; Jiang, Q. Application of polycrystalline SnO2 sensor chromatographic system to detect dissolved gases in transformer oil. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2018, 267, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Uddin, A.S.M.I.; Yaqoob, U.; Chung, G.-S. Dissolved hydrogen gas analysis in transformer oil using Pd catalyst decorated on ZnO nanorod array. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2016, 226, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, W.; Zhou, Q.; Gao, T.; Su, X.; Wan, F. Pd-doped SnO2-based sensor detecting characteristic fault hydrocarbon gases in transformer oil. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, H.; Chen, D.; Cheng, H.; Tang, J.; Tian, Y.; Xiao, S. Dissolved Gas Analysis in Transformer Oil Using Pt-Doped WSe2 Monolayer Based on First Principles Method. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 72012–72019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cui, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, G.; Tang, J. Pd-doped MoS2 monolayer: A promising candidate for DGA in transformer oil based on DFT method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 470, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; Tan, S.; Liu, T.; Cui, H. Adsorption characteristic of Rh-doped MoSe2 monolayer towards H2 and C2H2 for DGA in transformer oil based on DFT method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 487, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Delley, B. Dmol3 DFT studies: From molecules and molecular environments to surfaces and solids. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2000, 17, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Perdew, J.P.; Chevary, J.A.; Vosko, S.H.; Jackson, K.A.; Pederson, M.R.; Singh, D.J.; Fiolhais, C. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671–6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA- type density functional constructed with a long- range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hirshfeld, F.L. Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities. Theor. Chem. Acta 1977, 44, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kang, B.; Lee, J.Y. Graphynes as promising cathode material of fuel cell: Improvement of oxygen reduction efficiency. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 12035–12040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, S.S. Semiconductor Physical Electronics; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, Y.H.; Chen, Y.B.; Zhou, K.G.; Liu, C.H.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, H.L.; Peng, Y. Improving gas sensing properties of graphene by introducing dopants and defects: A first-principles study. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 185504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Patel, K.; Roondhe, B.; Dabhi, S.D.; Jha, P.K. A new flatland buddy as toxic gas scavenger: A first principles study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 351, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g001 550
Figure 1. Geometric structures of: (a) pristine graphyne with different adsorption sites; (b) H2; (c) CO; (d) C2H2; (e) CH4.
Figure 1. Geometric structures of: (a) pristine graphyne with different adsorption sites; (b) H2; (c) CO; (d) C2H2; (e) CH4.
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g002 550
Figure 2. Optimized geometric structures of one Pd atom adsorbed on graphyne: (a) H1 site; (b) H2 site; (c) B1 site; (d) B2 site; (e) B3 site.
Figure 2. Optimized geometric structures of one Pd atom adsorbed on graphyne: (a) H1 site; (b) H2 site; (c) B1 site; (d) B2 site; (e) B3 site.
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g002
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Band structure and (b) TDOS of pristine graphyne; (c) Band structure and (d) TDOS of Pd-graphyne and PDOS of adsorbed Pd atom.
Figure 3. (a) Band structure and (b) TDOS of pristine graphyne; (c) Band structure and (d) TDOS of Pd-graphyne and PDOS of adsorbed Pd atom.
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g003
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g004 550
Figure 4. Optimized geometric structures of four kinds of molecule adsorbed on Pd-graphyne: (a) H2 adsorption; (b) CO adsorption; (c) C2H2 adsorption; (d) CH4 adsorption.
Figure 4. Optimized geometric structures of four kinds of molecule adsorbed on Pd-graphyne: (a) H2 adsorption; (b) CO adsorption; (c) C2H2 adsorption; (d) CH4 adsorption.
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g004
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g005 550
Figure 5. Electron density difference (EDD) of four kinds of molecules adsorbed on Pd-graphyne: (a) H2 adsorption; (b) CO adsorption; (c) C2H2 adsorption; (d) CH4 adsorption. The purple region denotes the electron accumulation region, while the green region represents electron depletion (the isosurface of (a), (c), and (d) is 0.005 eÅ−3; the isosurface of (b) is 0.02 eÅ−3).
Figure 5. Electron density difference (EDD) of four kinds of molecules adsorbed on Pd-graphyne: (a) H2 adsorption; (b) CO adsorption; (c) C2H2 adsorption; (d) CH4 adsorption. The purple region denotes the electron accumulation region, while the green region represents electron depletion (the isosurface of (a), (c), and (d) is 0.005 eÅ−3; the isosurface of (b) is 0.02 eÅ−3).
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g005
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g006 550
Figure 6. Band structure of (a) Pd-graphyne/H2; (b) Pd-graphyne/CO; (c) Pd-graphyne/C2H2; and (d) Pd-graphyne/CH4.
Figure 6. Band structure of (a) Pd-graphyne/H2; (b) Pd-graphyne/CO; (c) Pd-graphyne/C2H2; and (d) Pd-graphyne/CH4.
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g006
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g007 550
Figure 7. TDOS and PDOS of (a) Pd-graphyne/H2; (b) Pd-graphyne/CO; (c) Pd-graphyne/C2H2; (d) Pd-graphyne/CH4; and (e) atomic orbitals of CO adsorption.
Figure 7. TDOS and PDOS of (a) Pd-graphyne/H2; (b) Pd-graphyne/CO; (c) Pd-graphyne/C2H2; (d) Pd-graphyne/CH4; and (e) atomic orbitals of CO adsorption.
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g007
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g008 550
Figure 8. Transition state of CO adsorption on Pd-graphyne.
Figure 8. Transition state of CO adsorption on Pd-graphyne.
Nanomaterials 09 01490 g008
Table
Table 1. Binding energy and electron transfer of one Pd atom onto a graphyne monolayer.
Table 1. Binding energy and electron transfer of one Pd atom onto a graphyne monolayer.
Adsorption SiteEbind (eV)QT (e)
H1 site−2.45+0.363
H2 site−1.08+0.323
B1 site−1.59+0.344
B2 site−1.52+0.315
B3 site−1.76+0.273
Table
Table 2. Adsorption energy and electron transfer of H2, CO, C2H2, or CH4 adsorbed on Pd-graphyne.
Table 2. Adsorption energy and electron transfer of H2, CO, C2H2, or CH4 adsorbed on Pd-graphyne.
StructureEads (eV)QT (e)
Pd-graphyne/H2−0.08−0.059
Pd-graphyne/CO−1.11−0.080
Pd-graphyne/C2H2−0.16−0.015
Pd-graphyne/CH4−0.13−0.063

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Fang, R.; Chen, D.; Zhang, G. Using Pd-Doped γ-Graphyne to Detect Dissolved Gases in Transformer Oil: A Density Functional Theory Investigation. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101490

AMA Style

Zhang X, Fang R, Chen D, Zhang G. Using Pd-Doped γ-Graphyne to Detect Dissolved Gases in Transformer Oil: A Density Functional Theory Investigation. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(10):1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaoxing, Rongxing Fang, Dachang Chen, and Guozhi Zhang. 2019. "Using Pd-Doped γ-Graphyne to Detect Dissolved Gases in Transformer Oil: A Density Functional Theory Investigation" Nanomaterials 9, no. 10: 1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop